Loading...
2021 Dec 07 - CC PACKETAGENDA EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2021 4:00 PM CLOSED SESSION 6:00 PM OPEN SESSION MEETING ID: 964 5963 7962 PIN: 730770 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 350 MAIN STREET, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 PUBLIC ADVISORY. THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AND/OR LOBBY WILL ONLY BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARING. (Face masks/coverings are required to be worn inside City facilities) Drew Boyles, Mayor Chris Pimentel, Mayor Pro Tern Carol Pirsztuk, Councilmember Scot Nicol, Councilmember Lance Giroux, Councilmember Tracy Weaver, City Clerk Matthew Robinson, City Treasurer Executive Team Scott Mitnick, City Manager Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager Jaime Bermudez, Interim Police Chief Michael Allen, Dev. Services Director Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director Melissa McCollum, Com. Services Dir. Mark Hensley, City Attorney Joe Lillio, Chief Financial Officer Deena Lee, Fire Chief Rebecca Redyk, HR Director Charles Mallory, IT Director MISSION STATEMENT: "Provide a great place to live, work, and visit." VISION STATEMENT: "Be a global innovation leader where big ideas take off while maintaining our unique small town character." 1 Page 1 of 500 How Can Members of the Public Observe and Provide Public Comments? • Residents can watch the meeting live via Spectrum Channel 3, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 and/or El Segundo TV at YouTube.com. Access remotely via Zoom from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device or by phone. Use URL https:Hzoom.us/j/96459637962 and enter PIN: 730770 or visit www.zoom.us on device of choice, click on "Join a Meeting" and enter meeting ID and PIN. • Join by phone at 1-669-900-9128 and enter meeting ID and PIN. Your phone number is captured by the Zoom software and is subject to the Public Records Act. Dial *67 BEFORE dialing in to remain anonymous. • For Public Communications, members of the public may provide comments in the Lobby and/or Council Chamber or via Zoom. For in person comments, please fill out a Speaker Card located in the Chamber Lobby and for Zoom comments, notify meeting host by raising your virtual hand (see hand icon at bottom of screen) and you will be invited to speak. (If you do not wish for your name to appear on the screen, then use the drop -down menu and click on "rename" to rename yourself "anonymous") Please note that you will be placed in a "listen only" mode and your video feed will not be shared with City Council or members of the public. • For written communication, submit to ALLELECTEDOFFICIALS(a)-elsegundo.org by 3:00 PM to be uploaded to the Website. Emails received after 3:00 PM will be posted the next day. • For Public Hearings, members of the public may provide comments in the Lobby and/or Council Chamber or via Zoom. • Speaker cards and attendee's information captured by Zoom software will be considered public documents subject to possible posting on the City's Website and are subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. Additional Information: The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. Any writings or documents given to a majority of City Council regarding any matter on this agenda that the City received after issuing the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's Office during normal business hours. Such documents may also be posted on the City's website at www.elsegundo.org and additional copies will be available at the City Council meeting. Unless otherwise noted in the agenda, the public can only comment on City -related business that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the agenda during the Public Communications portions of the Meeting. Additionally, members of the public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the agenda during the Public Hearing portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person. Before speaking to the City Council, please state: your name, residence, and organization/group you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. 2 Page 2 of 500 4:00 PM CLOSED SESSION — CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (RELATED TO CITY BUSINESS ONLY — 5-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON, 30-MINUTE LIMIT TOTAL) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow City Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. City Council and/or City Manager will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed. SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS RECESS INTO CLOSED SESSION: City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for purposes of conferring with City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with City's Labor Negotiators. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (GOV'T CODE §54956.9(D)(1): -2- MATTER(S) 1. Eric Moore (retired Fire Department Battalion Chief) v. City of El Segundo, Workers Compensation Appeals Board, Case No. ADJ12509749 2. Michael Ward (retired Maintenance Worker) v. City of El Segundo, Workers Compensation Appeals Board, Case No. ADJ11677036 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d) (2) and (3): -1- matter. Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter. 6:00 PM — CONVENE OPEN SESSION — CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL INVOCATION — Pastor Scott Tannehill, The Bridge Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Councilmember Pirsztuk SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 1. Ainsley Gulden - Eagle Scout Holiday Project Commendation 2. Candy Cane Lane Event 3. Annual Holiday Parade 4. Los Angeles Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant Spill Update 3 Page 3 of 500 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (RELATED TO CITY BUSINESS ONLY — 5 MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON, 30 MINUTE LIMIT TOTAL) Individuals who have received value of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after Public Communications is closed. CITY MANAGER FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS — (Related to Public Communications) A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS Read all Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda by Title Only Recommendation - Approval B. CONSENT 5. City Council Meeting Minutes Recommendation - Approve Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2021. 6. Warrant Demand Register for November 17, 2021 through December 07, 2021 Recommendation - Ratify payroll and employee benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and, wire transfers. 2. Approve Warrant Demand Register numbers 10A, 10B and 10C: warrant numbers 3038131 through 3038426, and 9002280 through 9002283. 7. Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project Recommendation — Authorize the City Manager to execute a Standard Public Works Contract with Corral Construction & Development, Inc. in the amount of $144,044.00 for the Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project, Project No. PW 22-02, and authorize an additional $21,956.00 as contingency funds for potential unforeseen conditions. 0 Page 4 of 500 8. Notice of Completion of the Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project Recommendation - Accept the Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project No. PW 20-16 by T2 UES, Inc. as complete. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office. 9. Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project Recommendation - Adopt resolution to approve plans and specifications for the Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project No. PW 22-03. 2. Authorize staff to advertise the project for construction. 10. City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project Recommendation - 1. Adopt resolution approving the plans and specifications of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project (CDBG Project 602294-20), Project No. PW 21-08. 2. Authorize staff to advertise the City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project 602294-20, Project No. PW 21-08 for construction. 11. Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements Project Recommendation - Adopt resolution to approve engineering plans and construction specifications for the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements, Project No. PW 21-09. 2. Authorize staff to advertise the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements, Project No. PW 21-09 for construction. 3. Approve an additional appropriation of $300,000 from the unassigned General Fund Balance. 5 Page 5 of 500 12. Adoption of Ordinance Adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of the El Segundo Municipal Code Regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Recommendation — Waive the second reading and adopt an ordinance adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of El Segundo Municipal Code regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction. 13. Government Finance Officers Association Award for Financial Reporting Recommendation — Receive and file the Government Finance Officers Association award for excellence in financial reporting for the City's Fiscal Year 2019-20 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. 14. Resolution Allowing Public Meetings to Continue to be Conducted via Teleconferencing Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 Recommendation — Approve a resolution to allow public meetings to continue to be conducted via teleconferencing pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 361. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 15. Preferential Parking Zone 2 for Portions of California Street, Holly Avenue, and Kansas Street Recommendation — Continue the public hearing until the January 18, 2022 City Council Meeting. A Page 6 of 500 16. Proposed Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and Training Facility Development, and Raytheon Storage Facility Relocation (2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard) Recommendation - Adopt resolution adopting an Addendum to the certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR); 2. Waive first reading and introduce an ordinance approving a second amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02 (Agreement No. 4972A), and minor modifications to Specific Plan No. 11-01 Revision A; 3. Adopt resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 (SUB21-03) and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01 for development of a new corporate headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers on a 13.7-acre site, in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7" and "8"); and, 4. Adopt resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 21-02 for a storage facility located in the southeast portion of lot 18 in Phase IV. D. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 17. Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements Recommendation — Adopt resolution approving the City's participation in two national opioid litigation settlements and authorizing the City Manager to execute related participation and related implementation agreements. 18. Citywide Salary Schedule Update Recommendation — Adopt resolution to approve the Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4, 2011, with revisions through December 7, 2021. 19. Amendment to City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums Recommendation — Adopt resolutions amending the City Contributions for CalPERS medical premiums for the Executive Management and Mid-Management/Confidential groups covered under the City of El Segundo Administrative Code, Title 1A Salaries and Conditions of Employment, Chapter 1A2 Management -Confidential Series. E. COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS PRESENTATIONS F. REPORTS - CITY CLERK 7 Page 7 of 500 G. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER 20. Investment Portfolio Report for September 2021 Recommendation — Receive and file. H. REPORTS - COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBER GIROUX COUNCILMEMBER NICOL COUNCILMEMBER PIRSZTUK MAYOR PRO TEM PIMENTEL MAYOR BOYLES I. REPORTS - CITY ATTORNEY J. REPORTS/FOLLOW-UP - CITY MANAGER CLOSED SESSION The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor Negotiators. REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required) MEMORIALS ADJOURNMENT POSTED: DATE: December 3, 2021 TIME: 5:00 PM BY: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk Page 8 of 500 ommellbatt"On City of (91 *eguubo, California WHEREAS, Ainsley Gulden, Eagle Scout Candidate, and model El Segundo youth was inspired to bring holiday cheer to her community for all ages to enjoy; and WHEREAS, Ainsley's ability to use her woodworking talents to plan and implement her vision, while showcasing exceptional organizational and leadership skills as she guided her team of Scouts and volunteers through the process of designing, building, and transforming Library Park's Gazebo into a whimsical gingerbread house; and WHEREAS, Ainsley's desire for her gingerbread decorations to bring years of holiday cheer and smiles shines through in her thoughtful designs, quality control and professional product; and WHEREAS, Ainsley's diligence and perseverance is evident in her commitment to achieving the highest level rank as an Eagle Scout, and continued focus on seeing through her Eagle Scout Service Project will be a benefit for the whole community to enjoy. NOW, THEREFORE, on this 7t" day of December, 2021, the Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby take great honor in commending Ainsley Gulden on completing her Eagle Scout Service Project and adding to El Segundo's hometown charm in Library Park where children play and residents of all ages gather to enjoy the outdoors. Mayor Drew Boy(es �dayor Pro 2'em Chris Pimentel Council9dember Caro(Birsztuk Counci(,TemberScot Xico( Councif9demberLance Giroux Page 9 of 500 tortamatt"On Citp of (EC *egunbo, California WHEREAS, Great and wonderful events are many times the inspiration of one person, like Ken Bailey, whose simple idea that a decorated tree be placed at the end of the cul-de-sac on the 1200 Block of East Acacia Avenue in celebration of a neighborhood Christmas in 1949, is 72 years later an annual holiday tradition in El Segundo, worthy of national media coverage, and known as Candy Cane Lane; and WHEREAS, Candy Cane Lane features Santa Claus arriving on top of a horn -blowing El Segundo Fire Engine to light the beautifully decorated homes on Candy Cane Lane. Unfortunately, this year Santa will immediately be returning to the North Pole after he lights up the lane due to COVID 19 safety protocols; and WHEREAS, Homes, yards and magnolia trees are brightly decorated while property owners dress up their homes for all the oohs and aahs and the tradition of Candy Cane Lane. A few good merry men of Candy Cane Lane, have given their merry Ho, Ho, Ho's, year after year, in the Santa suit donated by Chevron. A big thanks to Spring Cleaners for generously making sure Santa's suit is sparkling for the season. The El Segundo Police Department, the El Segundo Volunteer Program and the El Segundo Recreational Park Department Heads who make sure the crowds maneuver down the Lane in a safe and orderly fashion; and WHEREAS, Least we forget, we herein list the names of the folks that are synonymous with Candy Cane Lane: Eyres, Klingamans, Stocks, Esdins, Salehs, McEwan, Lees, Moores, Turnbulls, McCulloughs, de Lambertyes, Guidone, Laughlin & Barre Mitchells, Gans, Hudspeths, Harts, Doukakis's, Brunnenkants, Phillips, Stosser & Szeto, Leachs, Kehls, Wongs, Schlendering, Wisiniakowski, Armacost & Hoggs. NOW, THEREFORE, on this 7`' day of December, 2021, the Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, proclaim the 1200 Block of East Acacia Avenue as CANDY CANE LANE from December 11, 2021 at 7:00 p.m., through December 23, 2021 and invite the young and young at heart to experience the wonders of this El Segundo holiday tradition. .Mayor Drew Boyfes �44ayor Pro Tem Chris lnimentel CounciCWember CaroC(irsztuk CounclOdember Scot Rico( CouncdWemberLance Giroux Page 10 of 500 rortamatt"011 CCitp of CCC *eguubo, California WHEREAS, The E1 Segundo Chamber of Commerce has given E1 Segundo the Annual Holiday Parade for the past 57 years, a tradition which both celebrates El Segundo and calls forth the Holiday Season; and WHEREAS, The parade, to be held Sunday, December 12, 2021 from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., with a theme of Merry on Main, will assemble on the corner of Imperial Avenue and Main, and continue down Main Street, disbanding at E1 Segundo Boulevard; and WHEREAS, The parade will start with the Grand Marshall, end with the traditional Grand Finale - the Chevron Fire Truck, bringing Santa Claus through downtown E1 Segundo, and in between, the crowds will be treated to a few surprises. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby proclaim Sunday, December 12, 2021, as the 57th Annual E1 Segundo Holiday Parade, and invite the community to all the traditional E1 Segundo holiday events and wish the Chamber of Commerce many more years of marching down Main Street. �I1ayor Drew Boyles W ayor Pro rIem Chris lnimentel Council Member Carol Birsztuk CounciOlember Scot Nicol CouncilWemberLance Giroux Page 11 of 500 MEETING MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2021 CLOSED SESSION — Due to lack of quorum at 4:00 PM, Mayor Boyles called to order at 5:00 PM ROLL CALL Mayor Boyles - Present Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel - Present Council Member Pirsztuk - Present Council Member Nicol - Present Council Member Giroux - Present PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (Related to City Business Only — 5-minute limit per person, 30-minute limit total) None SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Mayor Boyles announced that Council would be meeting in closed session pursuant to the items listed on the Agenda. CLOSED SESSION: City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for purposes of conferring with City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with City's Labor Negotiators as follows. - CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNCIL —ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d) (2) and (3): -1- matter(s) Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter(s) Adjourned Closed Session at 5:50 PM OPEN SESSION — Mayor Boyles called to order at 6:01 PM ROLL CALL Mayor Boyles - Present Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel - Present Council Member Pirsztuk - Present Council Member Nicol - Present Council Member Giroux - Present EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 1 Page 12 of 500 INVOCATION — Pastor Rob McKenna, The Bridge Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: 1. Holiday Events update given by Ryan Delgado, Recreation and Parks Supervisor and Kristina Kora-Beckman, Community Services Education and Outreach. Few dates to remember; Menorah Lighting is December 1 st in the City Hall Plaza from 5:30 -6:00 PM, Annual Tree Lighting event is December 2nd on Main Street in front of the Plaza from 3:00 -7.00 PM, new event, Festival of Holidays is December 3rd in the Plaza from 4:00 — 8:00 PM and the annual Christmas dinner will be held on Christmas Eve, December 241", to RSVP call 310.524.2705 and if you wish to have your dinner delivered call 310.524.2706. 2. Los Angeles Hyperion Treatment Plant Wastewater Spill and Recovery Update, report given by Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5-minute limit per person, 30-minute limit total) In Chamber - Marianne Bjorklund, resident, commented on the increased coyote sightings in town. Sheena Parks, resident, and El Segundo Little League (ESLL) Board Member, commented on the need for a new working scoreboard at Brett Field. Matthew Robinson, resident, requested Council to declare El Segundo a Constitutional Republic City to protect the rights of citizens and those who work in El Segundo. Geoff Gerny, resident, firefighter and FFA President, commented on the Council's decision to brown out Engine 32. Steve Dunlop, resident, commented on the City's coyote management plan and the increased coyote sightings in town. Via Zoom - Julie Holop, resident, commented on the Teen Girl Space Coalition, which is mentioned in the Recreation Park Master Plan on pages 24 and 29. Asked Council to consider allocating space and funding for this project. Carisma De Anda, resident, in favor, along with other youth, of the Aviation Greenway Project. CITY MANAGER FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS: Interim Police Chief Bermudez commented on the increased coyote sightings and what is being done. Mentioned there will be a meeting with the Department of Fish and Wildlife on December 9t" at 5:30 PM at Joslyn Center, encouraged all to attend. Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director, commented on the ESLL scoreboard and what the next steps are to replace the current scoreboard. Scott Mitnick, City Manager commented on browning out Engine 32. EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 2 Page 13 of 500 A. Read all Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda by Title Only. MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk to read all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 B. CONSENT: 3. Approve Regular City Council Minutes of November 2, 2021. (Fiscal Impact: None) 4. Approve warrants demand register for October 25, 2021 through November 16, 2021, numbers 98A and 9B and warrant numbers 3037945 through 30381304, and 9002243 through 9002279. Ratify Payroll and employee benefit Checks; Checks released early due to contracts or agreement; Emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and, Wire transfers. (Fiscal Impact: $1,240,449.10 ($805,421.58 in check warrants and $435,027.52 in wire warrants)) 5. Authorize City Manager to execute standard Public Works Construction Contract No. 6212 with Union Construction Company for $662,525 for the Civic Center Maintenance and Repairs project and authorize an additional $132,000 as contingency funds for potential unforeseen conditions. (Project No. PW 21-11) (Fiscal Impact: $850,000.00) 6. PULLED BY MAYOR BOYLES 8. Authorize the City Manager to execute Professional Services Agreement No. 6214 with Bureau Veritas to prepare an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Policy for the City in the amount of $150,000. (Fiscal Impact: $150,000.00) 9. PULLED BY MAYOR PRO TEM PIMENTEL 10. Adopt Resolution No. 5284 adopting a Citywide Records Retention schedule for City documents. (Fiscal Impact: Savings in reduced storage expenses and improved operational efficiency) 11. PULLED BY MAYOR PRO TEM PIMENTEL EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 3 Page 14 of 500 12. Waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1629 for Environmental Assessment No. 1240 and Zone Text Amendment No. ZTA 18-07, amending Municipal Code Title 15 (Zoning Regulations), Chapter 14: Historic Preservation, Chapter 15: Off-street Parking and Loading Spaces, Chapter 22: Administrative Determinations, Administrative Use Permits, and Adjustments, Chapter 23: Director Discretionary Decisions, Chapter 24: Variances and Conditional Use Permits, Chapter 25: Site Plan Review, Chapter 26: Coastal Zone Development Permits, Chapter 27: Amendments, Chapter 28: Public Hearings, and Chapter 29: Appeals, and streamline the review and approval processes for discretionary applications. (Fiscal Impact: None) MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Nicol, approving Consent Agenda items 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 12 . MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 PULLED ITEMS: 6. 2022 City Council Meeting Calendar Mayor Boyles requested the July 19, 2022 meeting date be added to the calendar as part of the summer recess. (Fiscal Impact: None) Council discussion MOTION by Mayor Boyles, SECONDED by Council Member Nicol approving the 2022 City Council calendar and adding the July 19, 2022 meeting date as part of the summer recess. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/1 YES: Boyles Pimentel, Nicol Giroux NO: Pirsztuk 7. Purchase of One New Ford F-550 Dump Truck (Fiscal Impact: $66,383.00) Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director answered Councils questions regarding the need to purchase the dump truck. Council discussion MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles pursuant to El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") § 1-7-9 (C), waive the bidding process and purchase one (1) new Ford F-550 dump truck for use by the Public Works Department and authorize the City Manager to execute a Agreement No. 6213 to purchase one (1) new Ford F-550 Dump Truck. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 9. Resolution Approving Application for Per Capita Grant Funds (Fiscal Impact: $188,087.00) EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 4 Page 15 of 500 Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel pulled the item to explain to the residents the process of updating the Acacia Park and congratulate staff on a job well done. Council discussion MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles adopting Resolution No. 5283 allowing an application to Per Capita Grant Funds to receive funding from the Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018 ( Proposition 68). MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 11. Resolution to Rescind Intent to Withdraw Membership from Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) for FY 22/23 and Provide Written Notice of Intent to Withdraw in FY 23/24 (Fiscal Impact: None) Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel pulled the item to clarify the item to residents. MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel, SECONDED by Council Member Giroux adopting Resolution No. 5285 authorizing the City Manager to rescind the written notice of intent to withdraw membership from the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) for FY 22/23 and adopt Resolution No. 5286 authorizing the City Manager to provide written notice of intent to withdraw membership from the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) for FY 23/24. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 C. PUBLIC HEARING: 13. Resolution Adopting Preferential Parking Zone 2 for Portions of California Street, Holly Avenue, and Kansas Street. (Fiscal Impact: None) Mayor Boyles stated the Public Hearing is continued to the December 7, 2021 City Council Meeting. D. STAFF PRESENTATIONS: 14. Candy Cane Lane Update and Safety Plan (Fiscal Impact: $46,955.00) Melissa McCollum, Community Services Director presented and reported on the item. Jaime Bermudez, Interim Police Chief answered Councils questions. Council discussion EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 5 Page 16 of 500 MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk approving the traffic and pedestrian safety plan and related expenditures for the Candy Cane Lane annual holiday lights event in the 1200 block of East Acacia Avenue and surrounding neighborhood. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 MOTION by Council Member Pirsztuk, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles approving an appropriation from the General Fund Balance Reserve (001-299-0000-2990) in the amount of $46,955 to Recreation Special Events (001-400-5210-4101 for $36,000 and 001-400-5210-6214 for $10,955). MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0 Recessed at 7:45 PM Reconvened at 7:58 PM 15. Recreation Park Needs Assessment and Master Plan Recommendations (Fiscal Impact: See staff report for fiscal impact narrative ) Melissa McCollum, Community Services Director and Zachary Mueting, Consultant with RJM Design Group gave a presentation and answered Council's questions. Council discussion Council consensus to receive and file review of proposed Recreation Park Needs Assessment and Master Plan, continue the item, no action this evening, schedule 2-2-1 meetings (individual meetings with staff and consultant) and schedule a work study session meeting that possibly includes the Recreation and Parks Commission. 16. LA Metro Funding for Law Enforcement Services (Fiscal Impact: None) Jaime Bermudez, Interim Police Chief reported on the item. Council discussion MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Nicol to support funding for LA Metro to maintain law enforcement services. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0 (Mayor Pro Tern left dais) 17. Conversion of Hillcrest Street and West Pine Avenue Intersection from Two -Way Stop Signs to Four Way Stop Signs. (Fiscal Impact: $500.00 estimation) Scott Mitnick, City Manager reported on the item. Council discussion EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 6 Page 17 of 500 MOTION by Council Member Nicol, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk directing staff to install four-way stop signs at the intersection of Hillcrest Street and West Pine Avenue. (Reference Resolution No. 5287) MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. 4/0 (Mayor Pro Tern left dais) 18. Resolution to Support the Brand -Huang -Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative, Providing the City Land Use and Zoning Laws Override Conflicting State Laws (Fiscal Impact: None) Portland Bates, Senior Management Analyst reported on the item. Council discussion Mark Hensley, City Attorney read the resolution by title only; RESOLUTION NO. 5288 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO SUPPORTING THE "BRAN D-HUANG-MENDOZA TRIPARTISAN LAND USE INITIATIVE ENSURING LOCAL ZONING AND LAND USE AUTHORITY MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk adopting Resolution No. 5288. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. 4/0 (Mayor Pro Tern left dais) 19. Fiscal Year 2021-2022 First Quarter Financial Review (Fiscal Impact: None) Joe Lillio, Chief Financial Officer gave a presentation and answered Council's questions. Council discussion Council consensus to receive and file the first quarter financial review. MOTION by Council Member Nicol, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles authorizing staff to form a City Council Finance Committee appointing Council Member Pirsztuk and Council Member Giroux to serve on the committee. The bylaws will be brought back to a future Council meeting for Council approval. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. 4/0 (Mayor Pro Tern left dais) 20. Ordinance Adding Chapter 8 to Title 5 of the El Segundo Municipal Code Regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction (SB 1383) (Fiscal Impact: None) Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director reported on the item and answered Council's questions. EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 7 Page 18 of 500 Council discussion Mark Hensley, City Attorney read the Ordinance by title only; ORDINANCE NO. 1630 AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 5 OF THE EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION Council Member Pirsztuk introduced Ordinance No. 1630. Second reading and possible adoption scheduled for the regular City Council meeting on December 7, 2021. E. COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS PRESENTATIONS: None F. REPORTS — CITY CLERK — Mentioned the December 21, 2021 City Council meeting has been reinstated. G. REPORTS — CITY TREASURER — Not Present H. REPORTS — COUNCIL MEMBERS Council Member Giroux — No report Council Member Nicol — Mentioned he would like Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager to look into a marketing push with local hotels in our city for the upcoming Superbowl at SoFi Stadium in February 2022 and asked all who are interested in the Christmas Eve Dinner to please reach out and RSVP at 310.2705 or request a meal delivery at 310.524.2706. Council Member Pirsztuk — Thanked staff for their time and effort with the Recreation Park Assessment Needs survey and thanked the Recreation and Parks Commission for their time and input as well. Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel — No report Mayor Boyles — Will attend the South Bay Council of Governments (SBCOG) Board of Directors meeting on Thursday, November 18, 2021 and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY — No report J. REPORTS/FOLLOW-UP — CITY MANAGER — Will follow-up with Council regarding the Recreation Park Assessment Survey, stated the next City Council meeting will be held December 7, 2021 and reminded everyone City Hall will be closed on November 25t" and 26t" next week for the Thanksgiving Holiday. EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 8 Page 19 of 500 MEMORIALS — Calvin Smith Adjournment at 9.39 PM Tracy Weaver, City Clerk EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2021 PAGE 9 Page 20 of 500 {:ICVoy ELEUND TITLE: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.6 Warrant Demand Register for November 17, 2021 through December 07, 2021 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify payroll and employee benefit checks; checks released early due to contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and, wire transfers. 2. Approve Warrant Demand Register numbers 10A, 10B and 10C: warrant numbers 3038131 through 3038426, and 9002280 through 9002283. FISCAL IMPACT: The warrants presented were drawn in payment of demands included within the FY 2021-2022 Adopted Budget. The total of $5,805,474.96 ($1,302,191.04 in check warrants and $4,503,283.92 in wire warrants) are for demands drawn on the FY 2021- 2022 Budget. BACKGROUND: California Government Code Section 37208 provides General Law cities flexibility in how budgeted warrants, demands, and payroll are audited and ratified by their legislative body. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the California Government Code, warrants drawn in payments of demands are certified by the City's Chief Financial Officer and City Manager as conforming to the authorized expenditures set forth in the City Council adopted budget need not be audited by the City Council prior to payment, but may be presented to the City Council at the first meeting after delivery. In government finance, a warrant is a written order to pay that instructs a federal, state, county, or city government treasurer to pay the warrant holder on demand or after a specific date. Such warrants look like checks and clear through the banking system like checks. Warrants are issued for payroll to individual employees, accounts payable to vendors, to local governments, and to companies or individual taxpayers receiving a Page 21 of 500 Warrant Demand Register December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 2 refund. DISCUSSION: The attached Warrants Listing delineates the warrants that have been paid for the period identified above. The Chief Financial Officer certifies that the listed warrants were drawn in payment of demands conforming to the adopted budget and that these demands are being presented to the City Council at its first meeting after the delivery of the warrants. CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability Objective 5B: El Segundo approaches its work in a financially strategic and responsible way. PREPARED BY: Wei Cao, CPA, CPFO, Management Analyst REVIEWED BY: Joseph Lillio, Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Register 10a summary pages 2. Register 10b summary pages 3. Register 10c summary pages Page 22 of 500 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO WARRANTS TOTALS BY FUND 3038131 - 3038238 DATE OF APPROVAL: AS OF 12r7121 9002280 - 9002282 Oct GENERAL FUND 352.123.26 104 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND - 106 STATE GAS TAX FUND 105 ASSOCIATED RECREATION ACTIVITIES FUND 109 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 110 MEAURE"R" - ill COMM_DEVEL BLOCK GRANT - 112 PROP'A"TRANSPORTATION - 114 PROP U' TRANSPORTATION 16.140.18 115 AIR QUALITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM - 116 HOME SOUND INSTALLATION FUND - 117 HYPERION MITIGATION FUND I la TOA ARTICLE 3 - SB 621 BIKEWAY FUND 57,466,07 119 MTA GRANT - 120 C.O.P.S. FUND 121 FEMA 122 L AW A FUND 123 PSAF PROPERTY TAX PUBLIC SAFETY - 124 FEDERAL GRANTS - 125 STATE GRANT 3,093.75 126 PIP CUPA PROGRAM OVERSIGHT SURCHARGE - 128 SB-1 129 CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM - 130 AFFORDABLE HOUSING - 131 COUNTY STORM WATER PROGRAM 5,000.00 202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT%73 - 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND - 302 INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUND - 4C5 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE - 501 WATER UTILITY FUND 3,621.20 502 WASTEWATER FUND 1,57752 503 GOLF COURSE FUND 2,000.00 505 SOLID WASTE FUND - 601 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 25,000.00 602 LIABILITY INSURANCE 192.00 603 WORKERS COMP. RESERVEANSURANCE - 701 RETIRED EMP. INSURANCE - 702 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND -DEVELOPER FEES - 703 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND -OTHER 1,500.00 704 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT 706 OUTSIDE SERVICES TRUST TOTALWARRANTS 3 468,144.08 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Information on actual expenditures is available in the Director of Finance's office in the City of El Segundo. I certify as to the accuracy of the Demands and the availability of fund for payment thereof. For Approval: Regular checks held for City council authorization to release. CODES: VOID CHECKS DUE TO ALIGNMENT: NIA R = Computer generated checks for all non-emergencyfurgency payments for materials, supplies and services in support of City Operations VOID CHECKS DUE TO INCORRECT CHECK DATE: For Ratification: A = Payroll and Employee Benefit checks VOID CHECKS DUE TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE ERROR: AP - U = Computer generated Early Release disbursements and/or adjustments approved by the City Manager. Such as: payments for utility services, petty cash and employee travel expense NOTES reimbursements, various refunds, contract employee services consistent with current contractual agreements, instances where prompt payment discounts can be obtained or late payment penalties can be avoided or when a situation arises that the City Manager approves. H = Handwritten Early Release tlisburserrf7!}j�ts and/or dl stmenls approved by the City Manager. CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER � � j CITY MANAGER DATE: �Y\ (' DATE: REGISTER R 10A Page 23 of 500 D 0 r r D � O = > m O D D n r O D z N n m O m m z K 0 rn z � C -i U) CO Cn cnO AAAA4h. A p M O) W N O O O O O O O O O C)aJ Dmcnm m m 7 n nn - = 3 C. N m (Q C (emu 3 CD o 0 3 cn m CD m i7 0 v � O 41 �. m z 3 m v w m m 0 v m m m C n m (D r O m z A W W W O O cn v 0) �1 CU A U1 W fV W W W s N Ul cn N N W j p N N .... N N N — 0 A A N CO V p Un A A N —— W N —+ m 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 A W O O O O O --+ p N s N --+ O --� -nao -,m rZOG)DmmOOOOOO G) � O O O O cl 0 ——— m —0- 0' v Q3 < 3 c� 3���� z 00 3' m m 3 �' ?. o D 3 c� n m (a -O c v 3 3� 3. 0 3 m c Cn CD A m cn :3 O D D (D �m`m �`� o_rn m m cD W m Qm o v' D 0 0 M. 0 (a c�-i' 3 r 0 Z m cn �`n y m3_ O m D _OU)i00 O m D v"ccm m cn0Dm o' m a -I mr r fn z m m C/) m z � < Z y a 0 C r D mz m DO X >O m —i m � z m z c m (n o -i O N W W N (J7 j D -4 W A A �1 W W r —1 O N O W IV j O —I N W A N s A �1 CO W �I v IV co N A j O W W O W W W A 07 O O W (O 0 W cn N O N m m m M (.n V N O O N O A W N W O A O N M M --i m O O Page 24 of 500 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 11/08/21 THROUGH 11/14/21 Date Payee Description 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 14,013.21 EFT Retirement Safety-Fire-PEPRA New 25020 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 27,235.42 EFT Retirement Safety-Police-PEPRA New 25021 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 42,604.04 EFT Retirement Misc - PEPRA New 26013 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 41,761.09 EFT Retirement Misc - Classic 27 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 65,544.00 EFT Retirement Safety Police Classic - 1 st Tier 28 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 58,283.98 EFT Retirement Safety Fire- Classic 30168 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 3,296.92 EFT Retirement Sfty Police Classic-2nd Tier 30169 11/9/2021 Cal Pers 577,422.68 EFT Health Insurance Payment 11/10/2021 West Basin 2,455,802.99 H2O payment 11/12/2021 Mission Square 62,516.64 457 payment Vantagepoint 11/12/2021 Mission Square 1,279.09 401(a) payment Vantagepoint 11/12/2021 Mission Square 550.00 IRA payment Vantagepoint 11/12/2021 ExpertPay 1,763A2 EFT Child support payment 11/01/21-11107/21 Workers Comp Activity 51,252.89 SCRMA checks issued 11/01/21-11/07/21 Liability Trust - Claims 2,132.00 Claim checks issued/(voided) 11/01/21-11/07/21 Retiree Health Insurance 11,697.57 Health Reimbursment checks issued 3,417,155.94 DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/15/21 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: 3,417,155.94 Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by: Treasury & Customer Services Manager Daffi Chief FA anci I Officer Date Date nformation on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo. PACity TreasurerlWire Transfers\Wire Transfers 07-01-21 to 6-30-22 1 1/15/2021 1 /1 Page 25 of 500 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO WARRANTS TOTALS BY FUND 3038239 - 3038313 DATE OF APPROVAL: AS OF 12f7121 9002283 - Lot GENERAL FUND 273,115.01 104 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND - 106 STATE GAS TAX FUND 38,491.70 108 ASSOCIATED RECREATION ACTIVITIES FUND - 109 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND - 11D MEAURE"R' - ill COMM. DEVEL BLOCK GRANT - 112 PROP"N'TRANSPORTATION - 114 PROP"C'TRANSFORTATION - 115 AIR QUALITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM - 116 HOME SOUND INSTALLATION FUND - 117 HYPERION MITIGATION FUND - 118 TDA ARTICLE 3- SS 821 BIKEWAY FUND - 119 MTAGRANF - 120 C.O.P.S. FUND - 121 FEMA 122 LA.W.A FUND - 123 PSAF PROPERTY TAX PUBLIC SAFETY - 124 FEDERAL GRANTS - 125 STATE GRANT 7,800.00 126 AM CUPA PROGRAM OVERSIGHT SURCHARGE 2,352.00 128 se-1 9,062.50 129 CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM - 130 AFFORDABLE HOUSING - 131 COUNTY STORM WATER PROGRAM - 202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTC73 - 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 171,737.20 302 INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUND - 4C5 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE - 501 WATER UTILITY FUND 15,144.96 502 WASTEWATER FUND 16,010,07 503 GOLF COURSE FUND - 505 SOLID WASTE FUND - 601 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT - 602 LIABILITY INSURANCE - 603 WORKERS COMP, RESERVEIINSURANCE - 701 RETIREDEMP. INSURANCE - 702 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND - DEVELOPER FEES 438.05 703 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND - OTHER 2,500.00 704 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT - 708 OUTSIDE SERVICES TRUST - TOTAL WARRANTS $ 538.371_89 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Information an actual expenditures is available in the Director of Finance's once in the City of El Segundo. I certify as to the accuracy of the Demands and the availability of fund for payment thereof. For Approval Regular checks held for City council authorization to release, CODES'. VOID CHECKS DUE TO ALIGNMENT: N/A R = Computer generated checks for all non-emergencylurgency payments for materials, supplies and services in support of City Operations VOID CHECKS DUE TO INCORRECT CHECK DATE: For Ratification, A = Payroll and Employee Benefit checks VOID CHECKS DUE TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE ERROR: AP - U = Computer generated Early Release disbursements andfor adjustments approved by the City Manager. Such as: payments for utility services, petty cash and employee travel expense NOTES reimbursements, various refunds, contract employee services consistent with current contractual agreements, instances where prompt payment discounts can be obtained or late payment penalties (�] can be avoided or when a situation arises that the City Manager approves. H = y Handwritten Early Releas cisbur enls tUor adjustments approved by the City Manager. CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CITY MANAGER �• DATE: y `�'� b—�11 DATE: I \"L REGISTERS JOB Page 26 of 500 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 11/15/21 THROUGH 11/21/21 Date Payee 11/15/2021 IRS 11/15/2021 Employment Development 11/15/2021 Employment Development 11 /17/2021 ExpertPay 11/1712021 Unum 11/18/2021 Pitney Bowes 11/08/21-11/14/21 Workers Comp Activity 11108/21-11/14/21 Liability Trust - Claims 11/08/21-11/14121 Retiree Health Insurance DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/22121 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by: Treasury & Customer Services Manager _T Chief RVAncial Officer City Manager Description 281,834.81 Federal941 Deposit 4,680.47 State SDI payment 67,964.97 State PIT Withholding 1,763.42 EFT Child support payment 266.10 Long Term Care Premium - October 10,000.00 Postage for City Hall 1T311.65 SCRMA checks issued 0.00 Claim checks issued/(voided) 0.00 Health Reimbursment checks issued 383,821.42 Date Date I ZCl' Z !, Date Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo. 383,821.42 PACity TreasurerlWire Transfers\Wire Transfers 07-01-21 to 6-30-22 1 1 /22/2021 1 /1 Page 27 of 500 O 000 r- CD N O O M O O O O O" LO r M LO O M 0 mr--OuiMmIg0 rl- T M O O rT M CO CO N aD l(] In `ct O O In MM M L17 J < Ln T O CD r N 'i V T N O cq 0 CO w z w n z w �- a x oa w z w m Z) p 0 J Q H Z N w m - W [n N a' cd Z C Jew �0U > 10 w Q C N a Q w []' Z w p Ci J U H U p a Q .� N o a) a Q) Z Q Z p w .0 > m 0 m OfJ w is m C <n Y ca .0 C a) .w tf w O 0 N M M 0 C_ .y C 7 O.. U c c U�Q LU .� ' o.� o t.- 0�a o' 0-0 (� UUUUUUwa.< 0Z_r _ _ _ r O r r N CD a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w r N M T r N d' V' LO O r� 0 r p r r r N N N N N N N N (N CO H LL a N c) J m M a O CO � N rn C) Cl) r 00 f-CO N co T1�2 u E a T < m U) CO cn u _m U N a CD O i C a 1L In a O O m Nr O Cl O O r N It M M N N N CD N 00) 1 0 of ao (0 �r Sri CO rl- qT O T 0 N �; V' V' ti 1 c0 N ti T z lu 2 a 0 Y O W C U w m C _ f4 o in to c a Z m t`a a ca y C C O a N O 0 3 N 0 c 2 E c W Q) Q U cu a) aD .- ED Q) S E U C W W Q �U 0 C� O O O O O O O N O O r N M CO CO OO �t It t LO 7 CO O O O 0) co M T ` V' CQ O LO w Z cr p Z o w Z a Z w D 0 aw 0 a w IL Q 0 ~ w J !— 0 a J U Q Page 28 of 500 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO WARRANTS TOTALS BY FUND 3038314 - 3038426 DATE OF APPROVAL: AS OF 1217121 not GENERALFUND 195,249.76 104 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND - 105 STATE GAS TAX FUND 5,002.30 ins ASSOCIATED RECREATION ACTIVITIES FUND - 109 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 242.58 110 MEAURE"R" 111 COMM DEVEL BLOCK GRANT - 112 PROP"A"TRANSPORTATION - 114 PROP'C"TRANSPORTATION - 115 AIR QUALITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM - 116 HOME SOUND INSTALLATION FUND - 117 HYPERION MITIGATION FUND 216.38 116 TOA ARTICLE 3 - SB 821 BIKEWAY FUND - 119 MTA GRANT 14,710.89 120 COPS FUND 13,183.00 121 FEMA - 122 L.AW.A. FUND 123 PSAF PROPERTY TAX PUBLIC SAFETY - 124 FEDERAL GRANTS - 125 STATE GRANT - 126 AlP CUPA PROGRAM OVERSIGHT SURCHARGE 6.27 128 SB�l 17,623.96 129 CERTIFIEDACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM - 130 AFFORDABLE HOUSING - 131 COUNTY STORM WATER PROGRAM 7.14325 202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT*73 - 301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND - 302 INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUND - 405 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE - 501 WATER UTILITY FUND 16,325. 17 502 WASTEWATER FUND 4,936,98 503 GOLF COURSE FUND - 505 SOLID WASTE FUND 601 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT - 602 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1.18 603 WORKERS COMP. RESERVOINSURANCE 51.46 701 RETIRED EMP. INSURANCE - 702 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND -DEVELOPER FEES 5.695.37 703 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND - OTHER 7,494.00 704 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT 7792.80 708 OUTSIDE SERVICES TRUST TOTAL WARRANTS $ 295,674.35 Lf_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Information on actual expenditures is available in the Director of Finance's ofce in the City of El Segundo. I certify as to the accuracy of the Demands and the availability of fund for payment thereof. For Approval: Regular checks held for City council authorization to release. CODES: VOID CHECKS DUE TO ALIGNMENT: WA R = Computer generated checks for all non-emergency7urgency payments for matedafs, supplies and services in support of City Operations VOID CHECKS DUE TO INCORRECT CHECK DATE: For Ratification: A= Payroll and Employee Benefit checks VOID CHECKS DUE TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE ERROR: AP- U = Computer generated Early Release disbursements and/or adjustments approved by the City Manager. Such as: payments for utility services, petty cash and employee travel expense NOTES reimbursements, various refunds, contract employee services consistent with current contractual agreements, instances where prompt payment discounts can be obtained or late payment penalties y can be avoided or when a situation arises that the City Manager approves. 1 H = 34 Handwritten Early �disbumis and/ r adjustments gIppmved by the City Manages CHIEF PI NCIAL OFFICER CITY MANAGER .[ DATE: DATE: REGISTER 14 10C Page 29 of 500 C+ cn 0 4 O 00 CA W N — oC, 00000 O N i 0 0 O O F- D (D(D CL c m 3 (n m CD CD •-a �` D 0 m` 3 m CD m Za CD --1 D m _ 0 0 X N Z 3 v [) O m m m N 3. C Z ,< m m mCO z a m CD U r O N .Q m z D fD w 71 -4 N O 0-0 00 D (D _A _? � 1 cn cn w — It Cn CO Cb 90 O O N (wD W 0 Cn N N . co cn (D C) O N n ()) — (D N W W —1 A N N W W fA 1V N N N N N N N N— 0 A N CD -I O C" � -� Jh- N — W N 1 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •P Cl) OO 00CD—ON it moon-v rzOODmmOOOOOO O O a 0' a3<310`3 Z m 3 3 3'—o D3 �0-40 m CL a) w�3'c033o?w�coo � ru t c c0i m r D m CD < O m C D Q- W CD Q CD O N D 0 3 n • 3 0�r N m m D -I CD -m � W O Z 6)co00 m °: n m '[� m �-n D m o m m CD r r cn ' z NCom G) Z D o C r u0 m >0 X m m z m z � c m m 0 N N -� N W N D N 00 N (n �I v CA V C) CD r m Cn s CD N A CA W 1 0 [n W i" Cn O 1 Cr CO W 3 O Cn 00 W O N co W C.O O W CA W CD W N 00 — O -1I N N Cn Ul V N W CA — M W O m N (D W" V m CA cn — O W 00 O CO N N 00 m D) Page 30 of 500 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER 11/22/21 THROUGH 11/28/21 Date Payee 11/22/2021 Unum 11/23/2021 Cal Pers 11/23/2021 Cal Pers 11/23/2021 Cal Pers 11/23/2021 Cal Pers 11/23/2021 Cal Pers 11123/2021 Cal Pers 11/23/2021 Cal Pers 11/24/2021 Mission Square 11/24/2021 Mission Square 11/24/2021 Mission Square 11/26/2021 IRS 11/26/2021 Employment Development 11/26/2021 Employment Development 11/15/21-11/21/21 Workers Comp Activity 11/15121-11/21/21 Liability Trust - Claims 11/15/21-11/21/21 Retiree Health Insurance DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/29121 TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: Description 266.10 Long Term Care Premium - November 13,343.99 EFT Retirement Safety- Fi re-PEPRA New 25020 27,193.73 EFT Retirement Safety-Police-PEPRA New 25021 42,899.67 EFT Retirement Misc - PEPRA New 26013 41,153.23 EFT Retirement Misc - Classic 27 63,155.96 EFT Retirement Safety Police Classic - 1st Tier 28 57235.22 EFT Retirement Safety Fire- Classic 30168 3,296.92 EFT Retirement Sfty Police Classic-2nd Tier 30169 56,090.58 457 payment Vantagepoint 1,198.62 401(a) payment Vantagepoint 550.00 IRA payment Vantagepoint 285,472.96 Federal 941 Deposit 4,354.23 State SDI payment 69,836.66 State PIT Withholding 36,258.69 SCRMA checks issued 0.00 Claim checks issuedl(voided) 0.00 Health Reimbursment checks issued 702, 306.56 Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by: Treasury & Customer Services Manager &I� 9/�l Date Date Date Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo. PACity TreasurerlWire Transfers\Wire Transfers 07-01-21 to 6-30-22 702,306.56 11 /29/2021 111 Page 31 of 500 {:ICVoy ELEUND TITLE: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.7 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute a Standard Public Works Contract with Corral Construction & Development, Inc. in the amount of $144,044.00 for the Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project, Project No. PW 22-02, and authorize an additional $21,956.00 as contingency funds for potential unforeseen conditions. FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget Amount Budgeted: $250,000 Additional Appropriation: None Account Number(s): 109-400-3109-8708 (Asset Forfeiture Fund), $166,000 BACKGROUND: At the September 7, 2021 City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to advertise this project for construction and solicit bids to demolish and renovate the existing women's bathroom facility at the Police Department located at 348 Main Street. The scope of this remodel project includes removing the existing smaller locker room and utilizing the space to add one more shower stall, maintaining the two existing toilet stalls, and upgrading the facility to current American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California Building Code (CBC) requirements. DISCUSSION: Page 32 of 500 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 3 On October 19, 2021, the City Clerk received and opened 8 bids: 1. Corral Construction & Development, Inc. (Commerce, $144,044.00 CA) 2. Urban Professional Builders, Inc. (Pasadena, CA) $174,000.00 3. Sanz Construction, Inc. (Alhambra, CA) $189,000.00 4. G2K Construction, Inc. (Agoura Hills, CA) $198,000.00 5. Golden Sun Enterprise (Van Nuys, CA) $208,777.00 6. Sas Constructions (Santa Ana, CA) $223,000.00 7. Meyers Construction Co (Long Beach, CA) $233,000.00 8 Union Construction Co (Glendale, CA) $228,290.00 A protest against Corral Construction & Development, Inc. (Corral) was received on October 20, 2021. After reviewing the protest in cooperation with the City Attorney's Office, staff concluded that Corral remains the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The protest and response letters are attached. Staff checked references and the contractor's license status and found the performance of their work to be satisfactory. Corral has successfully completed similar projects for other public agencies. With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for the bathroom remodel is as follows: December 2021 Contract Award February 2022 Begin Construction May 2022 Project Completion CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Page 33 of 500 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external customers. Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and effective community. PREPARED BY: Arianne Bola, Sr. Engineer Associate REVIEWED BY: Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Location Map 3. Bid Log Sheet 4. Bid Protest and Response Letters 5. Contract Page 34 of 500 ELSEGUNDO PW 22-02 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project Vicinity Map �,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�••—••—••� Imperi it Awe—••— •�..—• •.——••�•f=FAirF,tiF1 E VVal nut Ave ; I �Oway 1 I E Sycamore Ave i! A s ' I' E Maple Aveel -,AQUAdD 1 +n Hqh SsYrtfoa z MariposaAvk, �. eguildo garb � E and Ave c Grand u 2 io�l4nq�ieS 14V Grand Ave Air Foma Ic EFranklinAve _ dc a • E E I Sequnbo Nvd <"hw on E -E El Segy Parl = .UAAlfbofne f 91RiA 6 A O � � U T Fw Wau E I •^ S�utrHa " O k ' a l W 1111h St Lenny rVi ddl-E Sc hors W. Awe N�e w9 Y C {J ir cl Q - W R o=_ 6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. Page 35 of 500 ELSEGUNDO PW 22-02 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project Location Map --Ay Hall Cb Police I � Station ,Jv�_.,, E Holly Ave -41 I I Snack Bar Fire Station 1 Public Parking Public - Q;JV Parking 199 Grand Ave W Grand Ave r t�l 0 376.2 0 188.08 376.2 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO BID LOG BID NO. PW 22-02 City of El Segundo — Public Works Department Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project Date of BID Opening: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 Time of BID Opening: 11 AM Place of BID Opening: City Clerk's Office COMPANY NAME/ADDRESS Total BID Amount d N) 1. Sanz Construction, Inc. 2724 W. Main Street 1 .I D (D Q Alhambra, CA 91801 Received: 1011412021 aD 11:40 AM 2. SAS Constructions 505 N. Tustin Ave., #128 223 I �(�� e p Santa Ana, CA 92705 1 Received: 1011912021 10:07 AM 3. Urban Professional Builders, Inc. 157 El Nido Ave. `__7 LA C)0 CD V Pasadena, CA 91107 Received:10/1912021 @ 10:22 AM 4. Corral Construction & Development 5211 E. Washington Blvd. 2-122 �' L-Li Commerce, CA 90040 Received. 10/1912021 @ 10:30 AM 5. G2K Construction, Inc. 28348 Roadside Dr., Ste. 205 o (Do1� Agoura Hills, CA 91301 V Received: 1011912021 @ 10:34 AM 6. Meyers Construction Co. 0 C7O Received: 1011912021 @D 10:41 AM 7. Ij0,Oh Wvj%qum/on Co (� Received:10 l°1I21 W'MAM 8. G&AW �uv\ fnteypvi i-ee Received: t0 1a 12,1 9. Received: 10. Received: Staff Present: City Clerk's Office 4y_Qe[k's Office PW Representative FORMS\BIMOPENLOG1 Page 37 of 500 Bola, Arianne From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Good morning Ms. Bola: Urban Builders Estimator <estimator@urbanbuilders.com> Wednesday, October 20, 2021 11:47 AM Bola, Arianne Naji Khalil Bid Protest PW 22-02 Police Department Womens Bathroom Remodel Project - Corral Construction and Development Inc..pdf; PW 22-02 Bid Tally.xlsx We have examined the apparent lowest bidder's proposal. We noticed the following deficiencies with "Corral Construction and Development Inc." bid proposal which might render their bid proposal non responsive: 1- Their Non -Collusion affidavit was not notarized. 2- They failed to list subcontractors for the plumbing and electrical trades. Their bid proposal clearly states that they hold "B" and "C33" licenses only. As such, they cannot perform those two trades with their own crew. We believe that "Corral Construction" proposal is non -responsive. We look forward to hearing the City of El Segundo's final decision with respect to this our bid protest. Thanks and regards, Eyad Khalil Urban Professional Builders 310 801 8302 i Page 38 of 500 November 9, 2021 j EL S City of El Segundo 350 Main Street • �. G.II! �.. T!. , p l• El Segundo, CA 90245 310-524-2200 Urban Professional Builders, Inc. Attn: Naji Haj-Khalil, Owner 157 El Nido Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107 Via Email to najikhalil@urbanbuilders.com Elected Officials: Subject: Response to Letter of Protest by Urban Professional Builders, Inc. for Dren'Rny'/es, Alnyor PW 22-02 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project Chris Pirumfel, Alayor No Tent Lance Giroux Connell Alenrber Carol Pimr"A, Dear Mr. Haj-Khalil, Cauncil Alenrber Scot Nicol, Council Alemher Tracy Weever, Please refer to Corral Construction & Development, Inc.'s response to Urban Professional Cig'Clerk nrinhe,e Rnbinsan, Builders, I g By nc.'s bid protest attached with this letter. After reviewing the relevant information Cig'Treasnrer concerning your bid protest with our City Attorney's Office, the City of El Segundo staff will recommend that the City Council award the contract to the lowest bidder Corral Construction Appointed officials: & Development, Inc. Scort Alitnick, Ciry'Mnsley. Afnrk D. Hcrtslcy', We thank you for our interest in the project and hope that you will continue to monitor the Ci 's Y Y p j p y ty Cig'Artorrtey website for future contracting opportunities. Department Directors: Sincerely, Barbara Voss, - Depnry Cite Manage'60 Joseph Lillio, Finance Ar nne Bola Beene Lee, Fire Chief Senior Associate Engineer Rebecca Reelyk, Human Resornes Charles Afalrory, information Systems CC: Arelissn muff )-s COINIIInlnlly'.SCrvnCes Elias Sassoon Public Works Director , AficD Allen• De,•eluplrlenl Lifan Xu City Engineer Services Jaime Rerlmrrle.. � Joaquin Vazquez, Assistant City Attorney Interim Pot c Chief Elias Sassoon, Arblic jfl kv 350 Main Street, El Segundo, California 90245-3613 Phone (310) 524-2300 Page 39 of 500 Corral Construction#92H.5 5211 E. Washington Boulevard #2-122 Commerce, CA 90040 562 762-6632 11 /4/2021 Arianne Bola Senior Associate Engineer City of El Segundo Public Works Department 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Re: PW22-02 Bid Protest Response Police Department — Women's Locker Room Project Hello Ms. Bola: Our response to the bid protest that was submitted for the above project is as follows. Non -Collusion Affidavit Not Notarized 1) The non -collusion affidavit form in the bid package did not need to be individually notarized. Neither the form itself or any instructions state that this form must be individually notarized. Plumbing & Electrical Subcontractors Were Not Listed 2) As long as the project is in connection to a structure and it requires 2 or more unrelated trades besides framing or carpentry than a B licensed contractor can self -perform the unrelated trades, including electrical and plumbing work. (Business & Professions Code, Division 3, Chapter 9, Article 4, Section 7057(b). Given the above response you can see that our bid was in fact responsive. We look forward to working with you on this project. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Renee Soto President Page 40 of 500 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND CORRAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC. POLICE DEPARTMENT WOMEN'S BATHROOM REMODEL PROJECT NO.: PW 22-02 This CONTRACT is entered into this 7' day of December, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal corporation ("the City") and CORRAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC. ("the Contractor"). 1. WORK. A. The Contractor will provide all work required by the Contract Documents (the "Work"). The Contractor agrees to do additional work arising from changes ordered by the City in accordance with the Contract Documents. B. The Contractor and the City agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in the Contract Documents; C. The Contractor will furnish all of the labor; supplies and materials; equipment; printing; vehicles; transportation; office space and facilities; all tests, testing and analyses; and all matters whatsoever (except as otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by the City) needed to perform and complete the Work and provide the services required of the Contractor by the Contract Documents. D. "Contract Documents" means the Notice Inviting Bids; Instructions to Bidders; Supplementary Instructions to Bidders; Proposal; this Contract; Standard Specifications; Supplementary Conditions; Exhibits; Technical Specifications; List of Drawings; Drawings; Addenda; Notice to Proceed; Change Orders; Notice of Completion; and all other documents identified in the Contract Documents which together form the contract between the City and the Contractor for the Work. The Contract Documents constitute the complete agreement between the City and the Contractor and supersede any previous agreements or understandings. 2. CONTRACT SUM. The City agrees to pay the Contractor a sum not to exceed a total of One Hundred Forty Four Thousand, Forty Four Dollars ($144,044.00) for the Work in the manner set forth in the Contract Documents. 3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE. A. The Contractor will fully complete the Work within one hundred twenty (120� calendar days (the "Contract Time.") B. The Contract Time will commence when the City issues a Notice to Proceed. Page 41 of 500 The Contract Documents will supersede any conflicting provisions included on the notice to proceed issued pursuant to this Contract. C. The Contractor may not perform any Work until: The Contractor furnishes proof of insurance as required by the Contract Documents; and ii. The City gives the Contractor a written, signed, and numbered purchase order and notice to proceed. D. By signing this Contract, the Contractor represents to the City that the Contract Time is reasonable for completion of the Work and that the Contractor will complete the Work within the Contract Time. E. Should the Contractor begin the Work before receiving written authorization to proceed, any such Work is at the Contractor's own cost and risk. 4. DISPUTES. Disputes arising from this contract will be determined in accordance with the Contract Documents and Public Contracts Code §§ 10240-10240.13. 5. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. In accordance with Public Contracts Code § 9201, the City will promptly inform the Contractor regarding third -party claims against the Contractor, but in no event later than ten (10) business days after the City receives such claims. Such notification will be in writing and forwarded in accordance with the "Notice" section of the Contract Documents. As more specifically detailed in the Contract Documents, the Contractor agrees to indemnify and defend the City against any third -party claim. 6. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. The Contractor will provide the City with a Taxpayer Identification Number. 7. PERMITS AND LICENSES. Unless otherwise provided, the Contractor, at its sole expense, will obtain and maintain during the Contract Time, all necessary permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the Work. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Contractor under the Contract Documents are the City's property. The Contractor may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired, but will deliver all original materials to the City upon the City's written notice. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless as set forth in the Contract Documents. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by the Contractor as required by the Contract Documents, and any approval of such insurance by the City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Page 42 of 500 Contractor pursuant to the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City and the Contractor agree that the Contractor will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. The Contractor will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with the City. The Contractor is not an agent or employee of the City and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits the City provides for its employees. Any provision in this Contract that may appear to give the City the right to direct the Contractor as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that the Contractor will follow the direction of the City as to end results of the work only. 11. AUDIT OF RECORDS. The Contractor will maintain full and accurate records with respect to all services and matters covered under this Contract. The City will have free access at all reasonable times to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same and to make transcript therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings and activities. The Contractor will retain such financial and program service records for at least three (3) years after termination or final payment under the Contract Documents. 12. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows: The City City of El Segundo -Public Works 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Attention: Arianne Bola abola@elsegundo.org (310) 524-2364 The Contractor Corral Construction & Development, Inc. 5211 E. Washington Boulevard #2-122 Commerce, CA 90040 Attention: Renee Soto coffal.construction@yahoo.com (562) 762-6632 Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee three (3) days after deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. 13. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. This Contract and every provision herein is for the exclusive benefit of the Contractor and the City and not for the benefit of any other parry. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of the Contractor's or the City's obligations under this Contract. 14. INTERPRETATION. This Contract was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this Contract will be in Los Angeles County. Page 43 of 500 15. EFFECT OF CONFLICT. In the event of any conflict, inconsistency, or incongruity between any provision of the Contract Documents, precedence will be as follows: A. This Contract; B. The Standard Specifications; and C. Precedence of documents as determined in the Standard Specifications. 16. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of the Contract Documents are declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Contract will continue in full force and effect. 17. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Contract and to engage in the actions described herein. This Contract may be modified by written amendment. The City's city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on the City's behalf. 18. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract, agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. 19. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. The parties agree that all of the provisions hereof will be construed as both covenants and conditions, the same as if the words importing such covenants and conditions had been used in each separate paragraph. 20. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Contract are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Contract. 21. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of the Contract Documents. Page 44 of 500 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Contract the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO CORRAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC. Scott Mitnick Name: City Manager Title: ATTEST: Taxpayer ID No. Tracy Weaver, City Clerk Contractor State License No.: Contractor City Business License No.: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney Insurance Reviewed by: Page 45 of 500 {:ICVoy ELEUND TITLE: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.8 Notice of Completion of the Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project RECOMMENDATION: 1. Accept the Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project No. PW 20-16 by T2 UES, Inc. as complete. 2. Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: The final cost of the project is $62,200. Amount Budgeted: $100,000 Additional Appropriation: None Account Number(s): $20,000 from #501-400-7103-8206 (Water Fund) $20,000 from #502-400-4301-6215 (Wastewater Fund) $60,000 from #106-400-4202-6214 (Gas Tax Fund) BACKGROUND: On June 15, 2021, City Council awarded a standard Public Works Contract to T2 UES, Inc. (T2) in the amount of $92,700 and approved a construction contingency amount of $7,300 to perform underground utility investigation, field survey and mapping services for the City's underground fiber optic system. DISCUSSION: The underground utility investigation began on August 9, 2021 and was completed by T2 on October 8, 2021. The contractor was able to use a less intrusive investigation method with minimal excavation to complete the task, and the project cost was reduced Page 46 of 500 Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 2 from the contract amount of $92,700 to $62,200, resulting in $30,500 savings for the City. The inspection work was performed by city staff and it was determined that the project was completed in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Staff. Staff recommends that City Council approve the recommended actions as noted. CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external customers. Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and effective community. PREPARED BY: Arianne Bola, Sr. Engineer Associate REVIEWED BY: Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Location Map 3. Notice of Completion Page 47 of 500 ELSEGUNDO PW 20-16 Utilities Investigation and Verification Services Project Vicinity Map �,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�•--••—••� Imperi it Awe—•-- •�..-- •.——••�-f=FAirF,tiF1 E VVal nut Ave ; I �Oway 1 I E Sycamore Ave i! A s ' I' E Maple Aveel -,AQUAdD 1 +n Huh SsYrtfoa z MariposaAvk, �. eguildo garb � E and Ave c Grand u 2 io�l4nq�ieS 14V Grand Ave Air Foma Ic EFranklinAve _ dc a • E E I Sequnbo Nvd <"hw on E -E El Segy Parl = .UAAlfbofne f 91RiA 6 A O � � U T Fw Z Wau E I •^ S�utrHa " O k ' a l W 1111h St Lenny rVi ddl-E Sc hors W. Awe N�e w9 Y C {J ir cl Q - W R o=_ 6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. Page 48 of 500 ELSEGUNDO PW 20-16 Utilities Investigation and Verification Services Project Location Map �,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�•--••—••� Imperi it Awe—•-- •�..-- •.——••�-f=FAirF,tiF1 E VVal nut Ave ; I �Oway 1 I E Sycamore Ave i! A s ' I' E Maple Aveel -,AQUAdD 1 +n Huh SsYrtfoa z MariposaAvk, �. eguildo garb � E and Ave c Grand u 2 io�l4nq�ieS 14V Grand Ave Air Foma Ic EFranklinAve _ dc a • E E I Sequnbo Nvd <"hw on E -E El Segy Parl = .UAAlfbofne f 91RiA 6 A O � � U T Fw Z •^ S�utrHa " O k ' a l W 1111h St Lenny rVi ddl-E Sc hors W. Awe N�e w9 Y C {J ir cl Q - W R o=_ 6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. Page 49 of 500 Recording Requested by and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk, City Hall 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Project Name: Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project Project No.: PW 20-16 Contract No. 6105 Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 et seq that: The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is: City of El Segundo 3. The full address of the owner is: City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245 4. The nature of the interest of the owner is: Public Facilities 5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the City Engineer on October 8, 2021. The work done was: underground utility investigation 6. On December 7, 2021, City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder. 7. The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: T2 UES, Inc. 8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows: city - owned underground utility investigation services 9. The street address of said property is: El Segundo, CA 90245 Dated: Elias Sassoon Public Works Director VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Works/City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on , 2021 at El Segundo, California. 90245 Elias Sassoon Public Works Director Page 50 of 500 {:ICVoy EL E UND TITLE: Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project RECOMMENDATION: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.9 1. Adopt resolution to approve plans and specifications for the Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project No. PW 22-03. 2. Authorize staff to advertise the project for construction. FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget Amount Budgeted: $85,000 Additional Appropriation: None Account Number(s): 301-400-8201-8103 (Capital Improvement Program Fund) 7_[81:(r]:A1l1►113 The City of El Segundo Fire Department has two Fire Stations. Fire Station # 1 is located at 314 Main Street and the Fire Station # 2 is located at 2261 East Mariposa Avenue. These two Fire Stations are being utilized 24/7, 365 days per year and the flooring of these facilities is subject to a tremendous amount of foot traffic. Due to the age of the existing carpet, the normal tear and wear, and the daily foot traffic, the replacement of the carpet has become a priority for the Fire Department. This project was included and has been approved as part of this year's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). DISCUSSION: The scope of this project is to remove the existing carpet flooring and replace it with an approved durable laminate or tile type flooring system. This proposed flooring system Page 51 of 500 Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 2 looks nice and is much more durable. This proposed flooring is also easier to clean, and consequently, it provides a more sanitary environment. With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for this project is as follows: December 2021: Advertising and Bid Process February 2022: Contract Award March 2022: Begin Construction June 2022: Project Completion CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external customers. Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and effective community. PREPARED BY: Arianne Bola, Sr. Engineer Associate REVIEWED BY: Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Location Map 3. Resolution Page 52 of 500 ELSEGUNDO PW 22-03 Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project Vicinity Map �,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�•--••—••� Imperi it Awe—•-- •�..-- •.——••�-f=FAirF,tiF1 E VVal nut Ave ; I �Oway 1 I E Sycamore Ave i! A s E Maple ' I Ir el -,AQUAdD 1 +n Hqh SsYrtfoa z MariposaAvk, �. eguildo garb � E and Ave c Grand u 2 iorfl4nq�ieS 14V Grand Ave Air Foma Ic EFranklinAve _ dc a • E E I Sequnbo Nvd <"hw on -E El Segy Pare UA Airborne IWM6 M A O � � � U T Fw Wau E I •^ S�utrtla " O k ' t t W 1111h St Lenny rVi ddl-E Sc hay W. Awe N�e w9 Y C {J ir cl Q - W R o=_ 6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. Page 53 of 500 ELSEGUNDO PW 22-03 Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project Location Map Cb I � rt Hall Police Station F Hs-)lly Ave I t I ' -41 I I I Snack Bar Fire Station 1 Public Parking Public - ;JV Parking 1f } 199Grand Ave Ave W Grand Ave f t�l 0 376.2 0 188.08 376.2 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. ELSEGUNDO PW 22-03 Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project Location Map s4s osa Ave r � - Fire Sta do n 2 2399 .�j7[. E Mariposa Avr v ui sv N 188.1 0 94.04 188.1 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE STATIONS 1 & 2 FLOOR REPLACEMENT, PROJECT NO. PW 22- 03, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 830.6 AND ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT. The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. The City Engineer prepared plans and specifications for PW 22-03, Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement ("Project") to replace existing carpet flooring to new resilient flooring. These plans and specifications are complete. Services related to the Project may begin; B. The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6 with regard to the plans and construction of the Project. SECTION 2: Design Immunity, Authorization. A. The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with the City's standards and are approved. B. The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual work on the Project construction commenced. C. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms with the City's General Plan. D. The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City's behalf in approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans approved by this Resolution. E. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6. SECTION 3: Project Payment Account. For purposes of the Contract Documents administering the Project, the City Council directs the City Manager, or designee, to establish a fund containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay for the Project ("Project Payment Account"). The Project Payment Account is the sole source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined in the Contract Document administering the Project. SECTION 4: The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution. SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. Page 1 of 2 Page 56 of 500 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021. ATTEST: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: for Mark D. Hensley City Attorney Drew Boyles, Mayor Page 2 of 2 Page 57 of 500 {:ICVoy EL E UND TITLE: City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project RECOMMENDATION: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.10 1. Adopt resolution approving the plans and specifications of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project (CDBG Project 602294-20), Project No. PW 21-08. 2. Authorize staff to advertise the City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project 602294-20, Project No. PW 21-08 for construction. FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget Amount Budgeted: $299,600 Additional Appropriation: No Account Number(s): $199,600 from 111-400-2781-8499 (CDBG fund Capital Improvement Project) $100,000 from 301-400-8201-8209 (General Fund Capital Improvement Project) BACKGROUND: Each year, the City of El Segundo applies for Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding from the County of Los Angeles Community Development Authority (LACDA). This funding is available for community development projects that meet national objectives, including the American Disability Act (ADA) requirements. The City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project meets the CDBG funding criteria and proposes remodeling of the existing City Hall East Lobby (at main entrance) as well as the City Council Chamber's Lobby restrooms to remove accessibility barriers and Page 58 of 500 CDBG City Hall Public Restroom Improvements December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 3 provide ADA-compliant facilities. The ADA compliance related improvements include removing interior doors and walls as necessary, removing and relocating stall partitions, providing clear turning spaces, reducing equipment protrusions, providing clear approach areas, and removing or relocating fixtures and accessories to meet ADA requirements. While items related to ADA compliance are eligible for CDBG funds, there are other necessary improvements needed to be included in the project for efficiency and betterment that are not eligible for CDBG funds. These improvements include new floor tiles, replacing existing plumbing features with water efficiency plumbing, upgrading electrical fixtures, and replacing the floor drains. The estimated cost for these non-ADA related improvements is $100,000, with the source of funding from the General Fund. As indicated earlier, all these improvements are proposed to take place in both the women's and men's restrooms in the Civic Center by the main entrance to City Hall and by the City Council Chamber. The funding for this project is included in the FY2021-22 adopted budget. DISCUSSION: The final engineering plans and specifications for this project are now ready for adoption and advertisement for construction. The project will be coordinated with other city hall projects to minimize the impact on staff and the public. Staff respectfully recommends that City Council approve the adoption of the attached resolution approving the final engineering plans and specifications for the project and authorizing staff to advertise the project for construction. It is proposed to construct this project in two phases to minimize the adverse impact on public restroom availability. With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for this project is as follows: December 2021: Advertising and Bid Process January 2022: Contract Award February 2022: Begin Construction December 2022: Project Completion CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external customers. Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and Page 59 of 500 CDBG City Hall Public Restroom Improvements December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 3 effective community. PREPARED BY: Floriza Rivera, Principal Civil Engineer REVIEWED BY: Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Location Map 3. Resolution Page 60 of 500 Vicinity Map ELEGUNDO CDBG Project Number 602294-20: City Hall Public Restroom Improvements < Lennc W 111th St Middl Sc hcc EalnutAve-- I E Sy cant ore Ave Aa°dYway L+ EMaple Ave I 43 El Segundo I 1Z I t.9 High 0 41 Sc hoo I 4! j E MariposaAVe -0En ;5 Y d ---ti j EI Sep creation t] x D Park I Tx � z J E Grand Ave r - — LosAngeles 1W Grand e " ej Air Force Y Base L�elAirs E Franklin Ave H HP t.._.._.._..�_. r E El Segundo Blvd Chevron - — E Ei $egnrd4$trK Raytheon Space E+ Employee M and Air borne .� Systems ak1 Lakes b L --JIF Coui r- :n ! U ` j r e 1 Plaza EI I �' ,nor` ir, Segundo WO 15th St I - 27th St q, Marine - Avenue ryPoe Marine Ave Park 6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. Page 61 of 500 Location Map ELF�EGUNDO CDBG Project Number 602294-20: City Hall Public Restroom Improvements r 2 Police Station E Holly Ave V3 M 4 ra M c Lin-nn � I � 4 RI S&gUndo 1. r... r:. v --- ------- 1V R Legend — City Boundary 253 Project Location Phase 1 - Council Chambers Lobby Restrooms Phase 2 - Main (East) Lobby Restrooms 0 188.1 0 94.04 188.1 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIs sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_AuxiIiary_Sphere from the use of this map. Notes RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN AND PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CHECKOUT BUILDING RESTROOM IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 830.6 AND ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT. The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. The City retained Omnis Consulting, Inc. ("Consultant") as the engineer to design and prepare plans for the Checkout Building Restroom Improvements; B. The Consultant informed the City Engineer that these plans are complete and that construction of the Project may begin; C. The City Engineer reviewed the completed design and plans for the Project and agrees with the Consultant that the plans are complete and the Project may be constructed; D. The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6 with regard to the plans and construction of the Project. SECTION 2: Design Immunity, Authorization. A. The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with the City's standards and are approved. B. The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual work on the Project construction commenced. C. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms to the City's General Plan. D. The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City's behalf in approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans approved by this Resolution. E. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6. SECTION 3: Project Payment Account. For purposes of the Contract Documents administering the Project, the City Council directs the City Manager, or designee, to establish a fund containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay for the Project ("Project Payment Account"). The Project Payment Account is the sole Page 1 of 2 Page 63 of 500 source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined in the Contract Document administering the Project. SECTION 4: The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution. SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021. Drew Boyles, Mayor /_�11111111*15 Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARK D. HENSLEY, City Attorney Joaquin Vazquez, Deputy City Attorney Page 2of2 Page 64 of 500 {:ICVoy EL E UND TITLE: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.11 Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements Project RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution to approve engineering plans and construction specifications for the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements, Project No. PW 21-09. 2. Authorize staff to advertise the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements, Project No. PW 21-09 for construction. 3. Approve an additional appropriation of $300,000 from the unassigned General Fund Balance. FISCAL IMPACT: Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget Amount Budgeted: $200,000 (301-400-8202-8224: CIP fund, Rec. Park Restroom) Additional Appropriation: Yes - $300,0000 from unassigned General Fund Balance (001-200-0000-2989). Appropriate $300,000 to General Fund Transfers Out (001-400- 0000-9301) and $300,000 to the CIP Fund Park Restrooms (301-400-8202-8224) Account Number for Project: $500,000 from 301-400-8202-8224 (CIP fund, Rec. Park Restroom) BACKGROUND: Constructed in the late 1950's and expanded in the early 1980's, the Checkout Building is one of the most active buildings in Recreation Park, serving the park's various visitors. Its public restrooms serve almost the entire park and are used frequently. This facility needs to be rehabilitated and brought into compliance with current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. On June 15, 2021, the City Council adopted Page 65 of 500 Checkout Building Restroom Improvements December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 3 the FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program Budget, which included $200,000 for the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Rehabilitation Project. On September 7, 2021, City Council directed staff to expand the project scope to include converting the inactive northern portion of the building, formerly shower rooms, into additional restrooms for general public use. Currently, there are no family restrooms in the existing facility. This project adds two family restrooms and almost doubles the available restroom facilities as shown in the following tables: Existing Women's Men's Restroom No Existing Total Facilities Restroom Family Restroom Toilets 3 3 6 Sinks 2 2 0 4 Urinals N/A 2 0 2 Proposed Women's Men's Restroom Proposed Family Total Facilities Restroom Restroom Toilets 5 3 2 10 Sinks 2 2 2 6 Urinals N/A 2 0 2 DISCUSSION: The final engineering plans and construction specifications for the expanded Checkout Building Restroom Improvements project has been completed, and based on these documents, it is proposed to remove the accessibility barriers in the existing men's and women's restrooms and convert them into ADA-compliant facilities. In general, the proposed improvements include the removal and relocation of stall partitions, providing clear turning spaces, providing clear approach areas, and the removal and relocation of facilities to adhere to the ADA requirements and new plumbing, as necessary. Further, this project proposes to expand the restroom facilities by converting the northern area of the building into general public restrooms. The estimated cost of this project is $500,000. A total of $200,000 is available from the Adopted FY 2021-2022 General Fund Capital Improvement Program Budget. Additional required funding of $300,000 is available from the unassigned General Fund Balance. There are sufficient funds available in the General Fund Balance after meeting the City's policy reserve requirement of 20%. Staff respectfully recommends that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the engineering plans and construction specifications for the project and authorizing staff to advertise the project for construction. Page 66 of 500 Checkout Building Restroom Improvements December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 3 With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for this project is as follows: December 2021: Advertising and Bid Process January 2022: Contract Award February 2022: Begin Construction July 2022: Project Completion CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external customers. Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and effective community. PREPARED BY: Floriza Rivera, Principal Civil Engineer REVIEWED BY: Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Location Map 3. Restroom Locations Map 4. Resolution Page 67 of 500 Vicinity Map ELEGUNDO Checkout Building Restroom Improvements Y } J. 4 W 1111h S1 E Walnut Awe it I E SyramcreAv�, At++'°° YHaY E Maple Ave � i _ l i 5egunda ;2, I v' sari 4 1 srrcoa x ' - i a Madposa Ave - ._..i Hfcrtollon yr *' _ � a_ j EI egut�da Par+ r7i , z �•_1 `�+ Grand Avo c 2 Lc) AngNi-% Grand Ave U An Forte Ic j EFranklin Ave = dc gage 1r4v° r E 1=1 taequTtido Blvd q"hwTvn I E El Segwtdt Paarrel andAwbofnq + S r *Moms A � P t U T he `r 1 e ke = Q 1 V II r[,Ur38 'L Pla z4 E-1 560 u rltlb 1 i Lenno Tk4Iddi= Sc han rp W► 6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. Page 68 of 500 ELSEGUNDO Location Map Checkout Building Restroom Improvements Tot Are Recreation 0Pa rk a -- �r►3c Bar Ca nopyArea s ■ Roller Hockey R O❑ 188.1 0 94.04 188.1 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map. Legend -•• City Boundary ❑ Project Location Notes ELFSEGUNDO Restroom Locations Checkout Building Restroom Improvements NO SCALE Legend ■ Existing restrooms to decrease in size and be remodeled Mechanical/equipment room to be enlarged and remodeled ■ Former restrooms/current storage area to be remodeled as general -public restrooms RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN AND PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CHECKOUT BUILDING RESTROOM IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 830.6 AND ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT. The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. The City retained Omnis Consulting, Inc. ("Consultant") as the engineer to design and prepare plans for the Checkout Building Restroom Improvements; B. The Consultant informed the City Engineer that these plans are complete and that construction of the Project may begin; C. The City Engineer reviewed the completed design and plans for the Project and agrees with the Consultant that the plans are complete and the Project may be constructed; D. The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6 with regard to the plans and construction of the Project. SECTION 2: Design Immunity, Authorization. A. The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with the City's standards and are approved. B. The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual work on the Project construction commenced. C. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms to the City's General Plan. D. The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City's behalf in approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans approved by this Resolution. E. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6. SECTION 3: Project Payment Account. For purposes of the Contract Documents administering the Project, the City Council directs the City Manager, or designee, to establish a fund containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay for the Project ("Project Payment Account"). The Project Payment Account is the sole Page 1 of 2 Page 71 of 500 source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined in the Contract Document administering the Project. SECTION 4: The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution. SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021. Drew Boyles, Mayor /_�11111111*15 Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARK D. HENSLEY, City Attorney Joaquin Vazquez, Deputy City Attorney Page 2of2 Page 72 of 500 {:ICVoy ELEUND TITLE: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.12 Adoption of Ordinance Adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of the El Segundo Municipal Code Regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction RECOMMENDATION: Waive the second reading and adopt an ordinance adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of El Segundo Municipal Code regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adding this ordinance to the Municipal Code. Indirect cost of staff time will be absorbed via the City's adopted FY 2021-2022 Annual Budget. BACKGROUND: In 2016, Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 1383, establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of Short -Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCP) in various sectors of California's economy. SB 1383 is the state's most ambitious waste reduction law in the last 30 years and enacts the following targets to reduce organic waste in landfills: • Achieve a 50% reduction in the level of the statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75% reduction by 2025 • Recover at least 20% of currently disposed surplus food by 2025 SLCPs, including methane, adversely affect indoor and outdoor air quality. Methane emissions are more potent than carbon dioxide but live a short time in the atmosphere. The decomposition of organic waste in landfills is a significant source of methane emissions. Actions to reduce SLCPs are essential to address the many impacts of climate change on human health and the environment. Page 73 of 500 Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 3 On November 16, 2021, the City Council introduced the proposed ordinance for first reading. Q 1*9111*4Is] ►F Since landfills are the third largest producer of methane, the state's SLCP strategy includes managing organic waste. Food scraps, green waste, paper, and cardboard are organic materials that account for a significant portion of California's overall waste stream. Increasing food waste prevention, encouraging edible food rescue, and expanding the composting and in -vessel digestion of organic waste will reduce methane from landfill operations. In addition to setting specific emissions reduction goals, SIB 1383 mandates cities and counties to: • Provide organic waste collection services for all residents and businesses • Develop and adopt an enforcement mechanism or ordinance by January 2022 • Establish an edible food recovery program • Update the City's procurement policy to purchase recycled paper content and recycled organic waste products (e.g., compost, mulch, and renewable natural gas) at a volume of 0.08 tons/resident • Provide outreach and education for generators, haulers, facilities, edible food recovery organizations, and municipal departments • Plan and secure access for recycling and edible food recovery capacity • Monitor compliance and conduct enforcement • Maintain accurate compliance records To meet the SIB 1383 regulations, jurisdictions throughout the State are required to adopt an ordinance or other similarly enforceable mechanism by January 1, 2022. The proposed ordinance will mandate that organic waste generators, haulers, and other entities subject to the requirements of SIB 1383 regulations and subject to the jurisdiction's authority, comply with SIB 1383 regulatory requirements. It will also help reduce food insecurity by requiring commercial edible food generators to arrange to have the maximum amount of their edible food, that would otherwise be disposed of, be recovered for human consumption. Page 74 of 500 Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 3 The proposed ordinance addresses the SB 1383 regulatory requirements the City needs to enforce on other entities, including requirements for generators to participate in organic waste collection programs; multi -family and business owners and property managers to support organic waste disposal reduction; commercial edible food generators to recover edible food through contracts or written agreements with food recovery organizations and services; and more. CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 2: Support Community Safety and Preparedness Objective: El Segundo is a safe and prepared city. Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and effective community. Objective 4B: El Segundo's technology supports effective, efficient, and proactive operations. PREPARED BY: Lifan Xu, City Engineer REVIEWED BY: Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Organic Waste Ordinance (SB 1383) Page 75 of 500 CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 5 OF THE EL SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A new Chapter 9 entitled "Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction" is added to Title 5 (Health and Sanitation) of the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") to read as follows: "Chapter 9 MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION 5-9-1 Purpose. This chapter is adopted in accordance with Article XI, § 7 of the California Constitution and Public Resources Code § 40059 to protect public health, safety and well-being, to control the spread of vectors, and to limit sources of air pollution, noise and traffic within the City. This chapter is adopted to supplement and implement the legal requirements of AB 939 and, in particular, the SB 1383 Regulations. 5-9-2 Definitions. Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this chapter. Words and phrases not given a meaning by this Chapter have the meaning set forth in the Act and the regulations promulgated to implement the Act, if defined therein, and if not, to the definitions found in RCRA and the regulations promulgated to implement RCRA, as amended, or in this code (see Chapter 5-2). References to an undesignated regulation are to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. "AB 939" or "Act" means the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 codified in part at Public Resources Code, §§ 40000 et seq., as amended. "City Enforcement Official" means the city manager, or designee. "Commercial Business" or "Commercial" means a firm, partnership, Page 1 of 15 Page 76 of 500 City of Ell Segundo Ordinance No. Page 2 of 15 proprietorship, joint-stock company, corporation, or association, whether for -profit or nonprofit, strip mall, industrial facility, or a multifamily residential dwelling, or as otherwise defined in § 18982(a)(6). A Multi - Family Residential Dwelling that consists of fewer than five units is not a Commercial Business for purposes of implementing this chapter. "Commercial Edible Food Generator" includes a Tier One or a Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator as defined in this chapter or as otherwise defined in 18982(a)(73) and (a)(74). For the purposes of this definition, Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services are not Commercial Edible Food Generators pursuant to § 18982(a)(7). "Compliance Review" means a review of records by the city to determine compliance with this chapter. "Community Composting" means any activity that composts green material, agricultural material, food material, and vegetative food material, alone or in combination, and the total amount of feedstock and Compost on -site at any one time does not exceed 100 cubic yards and 750 square feet, as specified in § 17855(a)(4) or as otherwise defined by § 18982. "Compost" has the same meaning as in § 17896.2(a)(4), which stated, as of the effective date of this chapter, that "Compost" means the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic Solid Wastes that are Source Separated from the municipal Solid Waste stream, or which are separated at a centralized facility. "Compostable Plastics" or "Compostable Plastic" means plastic materials that meet the ASTM D6400 standard for compostability, or as otherwise described in § 18984.1 or § 18984.2. "Edible Food" means food intended for human consumption, or as otherwise defined in § 18982(a)(18). For purposes of this chapter or as otherwise defined in § 18982(a)(18), "Edible Food" is not Solid Waste if it is recovered and not discarded. Nothing in this chapter requires or authorizes the Recovery of Edible Food that does not meet the food safety requirements of the California Retail Food Code. "Designee" means the person designated by the city manager pursuant to § 18981.2(b). "Food Recovery" means actions to collect and distribute food for human consumption that otherwise would be disposed, or as otherwise defined in § 18982(a)(24). Page 77 of 500 City of Ell Segundo Ordinance No. Page 3 of 15 "Food Waste" means Food Scraps, Food -Soiled Paper, and Compostable Plastics. "Gray Container" has the same meaning as in § 18982(28). "Gray Container Waste" means Solid Waste that is collected in a Gray Container that is part of a three -container Organic Waste collection service that prohibits the placement of Organic Waste in the Gray Container as specified in § 18984.1(a) and (b), or as otherwise defined in § 17402(a)(6.5). "Green Container" has the same meaning as in § 18982(a)(29) and will be used for the purpose of storage and collection of Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste. "Multi -Family Residential Dwelling" or "Multi -Family" means of, from, or pertaining to residential premises with five or more dwelling units. Multi - Family premises do not include hotels, motels, or other transient occupancy facilities, which are considered Commercial Businesses. "RCRA" means the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act as set forth at 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901, et seq., as amended. "SB 1383" means Senate Bill 1383 of 2016 approved by the Governor on September 19, 2016, which added Health and Safety Code §§ 39730.5, 39730.6, 39730.7, and 39730.8 and added Public Resources Code Chapter 13.1 (commencing with § 42652), establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a Statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants as amended, supplemented, superseded, and replaced from time to time. "SB 1383 Regulations" or "SB 1383 Regulatory" means or refers to, for the purposes of this chapter, the Short -Lived Climate Pollutants: Organic Waste Reduction regulations found at Titles 14 (Chapter 12) and 27 of the California Code of Regulations. "Single -Family" means of, from, or pertaining to any residential premises with fewer than five units. "Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste" means Source Separated Organic Waste that can be placed in a Green Container that is specifically intended for the separate collection of Organic Waste by the generator, excluding Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste, carpets, Non-Compostable Paper, and textiles. Page 78 of 500 City of El Segundo Ordinance No. Page 4 of 15 "Source Separated Recyclable Materials" means Source Separated Non - Organic Recyclables and Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste. 5-9-3 Requirements for Single -Family Generators. Except as otherwise provided for Self -Haulers, Single -Family Organic Waste Generators must: A. Subscribe to Organic Waste collection services for all generated Organic Waste. City may review the number and size of a generator's containers to evaluate adequacy of capacity provided for each type of collection service for proper separation of materials and containment of materials. Single - Family generators must adjust their collection service level as directed by the City to maintain a level of service that is consistent with the purpose of this chapter. Generators must manage their Organic Waste by preventing or reducing their Organic Waste, managing Organic Waste on site, and/or using a Community Composting site pursuant to § 18984.9(c). B. Participate in the Organic Waste collection service by placing designated materials in designated containers as described below. It is unlawful to place Prohibited Container Contaminants in collection containers. C. Generators must Place Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, including Food Waste, in the Green Container; 2. Place Source Separated Recyclable Materials in the Blue Container; and 3. Place Gray Container Waste in the Gray Container. D. It is unlawful for Generators to place materials designated for the Gray Container into the Green Container or Blue Container. 5-9-4 Requirements for Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings. A. Except as provided for Self -Haulers, all generators that are Commercial Businesses or Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must subscribe to City's three container collection services and comply with requirements of those services as described below. Page 79 of 500 City of El Segundo Ordinance No. Page 5 of 15 B. City may review the number and size of a generator's containers and frequency of collection to evaluate adequacy of capacity provided for each type of collection service for proper separation of materials and containment of materials. C. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must adjust their collection service level as directed by the City to maintain a level of service that is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and to avoid adverse impacts to public health, safety or welfare. D. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must participate in the City's Organic Waste collection service by placing designated materials in designated containers as follows: Place Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, including Food Waste, in the Green Container; 2. Place Source Separated Recyclable Materials in the Blue Container; and 3. Place Gray Container Waste in the Gray Container. Generator must not place materials designated for the Gray Container into the Green Container or Blue Container. E. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must supply, and allow, employees, contractors, tenants, and customers unfettered access to collection containers of adequate number and size, consistent with City's Blue Container, Green Container, and Gray Container collection service or, if self -hauling, per the Commercial Businesses' instructions to support its compliance with its self -haul program. All collection containers must be labeled or colored as set forth below. F. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must provide containers for the collection of Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials in all indoor and outdoor areas where disposal containers are provided for customers to deposit materials generated by that business. Such containers do not need to be provided in restrooms. If a Commercial Business does not generate any of the materials that would be collected in one type of container, then the business does not have to provide that particular container in all areas where disposal containers are provided for customers. G. Pursuant to § 18984.9(b), the containers provided by the business must have either: Page 80 of 500 City of Ell Segundo Ordinance No. Page 6 of 15 A body or lid that conforms with the container colors provided through the collection service provided by City, with either lids conforming to the color requirements or bodies conforming to the color requirements or both lids and bodies conforming to color requirements. A Commercial Business is not required to replace functional containers, including containers purchased before January 1, 2022, that do not comply with the requirements of this subsection before the end of the useful life of those containers, or before January 1, 2036, whichever comes first. 2. Container labels that include language or graphic images, or both, indicating the primary material accepted and the primary materials prohibited in that container, or containers with imprinted text or graphic images that indicate the primary materials accepted and primary materials prohibited in the container. Pursuant § 18984.8, the container labeling requirements are required on new containers commencing January 1, 2022. H. Multi -Family Residential Dwellings are not required to comply with container placement requirements or labeling requirements pursuant to § 18984.9(b). Commercial Businesses must, to the extent practicable, prohibit employees from placing materials in a container not designated for those materials per the City's Blue Container, Green Container, and Gray Container collection service or, if self -hauling, per the Commercial Businesses' instructions to support its compliance with its self -haul program. Commercial Businesses must periodically inspect Blue Containers, Green Containers, and Gray Containers for contamination and inform employees if containers are contaminated and of the requirements to keep contaminants out of those containers pursuant to § 18984.9(b)(3). K. Commercial Businesses must annually provide information to employees, contractors, tenants, and customers about Organic Waste Recovery requirements and about proper sorting of Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials. L. Commercial Businesses must provide education information before or within 14 days of occupation of the premises to new tenants that describes requirements to keep Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials separate from Gray Container Waste (when applicable) and the location of containers and the rules governing their use at each property. M. Commercial Businesses must provide or arrange access for City or Page 81 of 500 City of Ell Segundo Ordinance No. Page 7 of 15 Designee to their properties during all Inspections conducted in accordance with this chapter to confirm compliance with the requirements of this chapter. N. If a Commercial Business wants to self -haul, it must meet the Self -Hauler requirements in this chapter. O. Nothing in this Section prohibits a generator from preventing or reducing waste generation, managing Organic Waste on site, or using a Community Composting site pursuant to § 18984.9(c). P. Commercial Businesses that are Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply with Food Recovery requirements. 5-9-5 De Minimis Waivers for Generators. A. The City may waive a Commercial Business's obligation (including Multi - Family Residential Dwellings) to comply with some or all of the Organic Waste requirements of this chapter if the Commercial Business provides documentation that the business generates below a certain amount of Organic Waste material as described below. B. Commercial Businesses requesting a de minimis waiver must submit an application specifying the services that they are requesting a de minimis waiver for and provide the following documentation: The Commercial Business's total Solid Waste collection service is two cubic yards or more per week and Organic Waste subject to collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less than 20 gallons per week per applicable container of the business' total waste; or 2. The Commercial Business' total Solid Waste collection service is less than two cubic yards per week and Organic Waste subject to collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less than 10 gallons per week per applicable container of the business's total waste. C. Notify City if circumstances change such that Commercial Business's Organic Waste exceeds the threshold required for de minimis waiver, in which case the waiver will be rescinded. D. Acknowledge that if the City obtains information at any time that the Commercial Business is exceeding the organic waste thresholds for the de minimis waiver, that the City will rescind waiver. Page 82 of 500 City of El Segundo Ordinance No. Page 8 of 15 E. At least every five years after receiving a de minimis waiver, allow the City to conduct an inspection for the purpose of verifying continued eligibility for the de minimis waiver. 5-9-6 Physical Space Waivers. A. City may waive a Commercial Business's or property owner's obligations (including Multi -Family Residential Dwellings) to comply with some or all of the Organic Waste collection service requirements of this code if the Commercial Business or property owner provides documentation, or the City obtains evidence, from a hauler, California licensed architect, or California licensed engineer demonstrating that the premises lacks adequate space for the collection containers required for compliance with this chapter. B. A Commercial Business or property owner must request a physical space waiver through the following process: Submit an application form specifying the type(s) of collection services for which a waiver is requested. 2. Provide documentation that the premises lacks adequate space. 3. If City grants a waiver, allow access by a Designee to verify the ongoing need for a waiver. 5-9-7 Requirements for Commercial Edible Food Generators. A. Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply with the requirements of this section commencing January 1, 2022, and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply commencing January 1, 2024. B. Large Venue or Large Event operators not providing food services, but allowing for food to be provided by others, must require Food Facilities operating at the Large Venue or Large Event to comply with the requirements of this section commencing January 1, 2024. C. Commercial Edible Food Generators must: Arrange to recover the maximum amount of Edible Food that would otherwise be disposed. 2. Contract with, or enter into a written agreement with, Food Recovery Organizations or Food Recovery Services for: (i) the collection of Edible Food for Food Recovery; or (ii) acceptance of Page 83 of 500 City of Ell Segundo Ordinance No. Page 9 of 15 the Edible Food that the Commercial Edible Food Generator self - hauls to the Food Recovery Organization for Food Recovery. 3. Allow City Enforcement Officials, upon reasonable notice, to access the premises and review records pursuant to § 18991.4. D. Additionally, Commercial Edible Food Generators must keep, for a minimum period of five years, records that includes the documentation, contacts, and such additional information needed to comply with § 18991.3(b) on forms provided by the City or Designee. E. Not later than March 31 st of each year commencing no later than February 1, 2023 for Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators and February 1, 2025 for Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator, provide an annual Food Recovery report to the City that includes the following information: A copy of all contracts or written agreements established under § 18991.3(b). 2. The quantity of food, measured in annual pounds recovered, collected or self -hauled to a Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization for Food Recovery. 3. The name, address and contact information of the Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization. F. Nothing in this chapter will be construed to limit or conflict with the protections provided by the California Good Samaritan Food Donation Act of 2017, the Federal Good Samaritan Act, or share table and school food donation guidance pursuant to Senate Bill 557 of 2017. 5-9-8 Requirements for Food Recovery Organizations and Services. A. A Food Recovery Service that has established a contract or written agreement to collect or receive Edible Food directly from Commercial Edible Food Generators must keep, for a minimum period of five years, records that includes the documentation, contacts, and such additional information needed to comply with § 18991.5 on forms provided by the City or Designee. B. No later than March 31 st of each year, commencing March 31, 2023 Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services that have their primary address physically located in the City and contract with or have written agreements with one or more Commercial Edible Food Generators pursuant to § 18991.3(b) must report to the City the total pounds of Edible Food recovered in the previous calendar year from the Tier One and Tier Page 84 of 500 City of El Segundo Ordinance No. Page 10 of 15 Two Commercial Edible Food Generators they have established a contract or written agreement with pursuant to § 18991.3(b). C. In order to support Edible Food Recovery capacity planning assessments or other studies conducted by the City Food Recovery Services and Food Recovery Organizations operating in the City must provide information and consultation to the City, upon request, regarding existing, or proposed new or expanded, Food Recovery capacity that could be accessed by the City and its Commercial Edible Food Generators. A Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization contacted by the City must respond to such request for information within 60 days unless a shorter timeframe is otherwise specified by the City. 5-9-9 Requirements for Haulers and Facility Operators. A. An exclusive franchised hauler or permitted hauler providing residential, Commercial, or industrial Organic Waste collection services to generators within the City's boundaries must meet the following requirements and standards as a condition of approval of a contract, agreement, or other authorization with the City to collect Organic Waste: Through written notice to the City annually on or before March 15tn identify the facilities to which they will transport Organic Waste including facilities for Source Separated Recyclable Materials and Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste. 2. Transport Source Separated Recyclable Materials, Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste to a facility, operation, activity, or property that recovers Organic Waste. 3. Obtain approval from the City to haul Organic Waste, unless it is transporting Source Separated Organic Waste to a Community Composting site or lawfully transporting C&D in a manner that complies with § 18989.1 or other applicable law including this code. B. Owners of facilities, operations, and activities that recover Organic Waste, including, without limitation, Compost facilities, in -vessel digestion facilities, and publicly -owned treatment works must, upon City request, provide information regarding available and potential new or expanded capacity at their facilities, operations, and activities, including information about throughput and permitted capacity necessary for planning purposes. Entities contacted by the City must respond within 60 days after a request is sent by the City. C. Community Composting operators, upon City request, will provide Page 85 of 500 City of El Segundo Ordinance No. Page 11 of 15 information to the City to support Organic Waste capacity planning, including, without limitation, an estimate of the amount of Organic Waste anticipated to be handled at the Community Composting operation. Entities contacted by the City must respond within 60 days after a request is sent by the City. 5-9-10 Requirements for Self -Haulers of Organic Waste. A. Self -Haulers must source separate all recyclable materials and Organic Waste (materials that City otherwise requires generators to separate for collection in the City's organics and recycling collection program) generated on site from Solid Waste in a manner consistent with §§ 18984.1 and 18984.2, or must haul Organic Waste to a High Diversion Organic Waste Processing Facility as required by § 18984.3. B. Self -Haulers must haul their Source Separated Organic Waste to a Solid Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or recovers Source Separated Organic Waste. C. Self -Haulers must keep a record of the amount of Organic Waste delivered to each Solid Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or recovers Organic Waste; these records must be kept for a minimum of five years and are subject to Inspection by the City upon request. The records must include the following information: Delivery receipts and weight tickets from the entity accepting the waste. 2. The amount of material in cubic yards or tons transported by the generator to each entity. 3. If the material is transported to an entity that does not have scales on -site or employs scales incapable of weighing the Self-Hauler's vehicle in a manner that allows it to determine the weight of materials received, the Self -Hauler is not required to record the weight of material but must keep a record of the entities that received the Organic Waste. D. Except for a residential Organic Waste Generator that self -hauls Organic Waste, Self -Haulers that are Commercial Businesses (including Multi -Family Self -Haulers) must provide any information required by City within 60 days after City sends the request. Page 86 of 500 City of Ell Segundo Ordinance No. Page 12 of 15 5-9-11 Procurement Requirements for City Departments, Direct Service Providers, and Vendors. A. City's direct service providers must comply with the City's Recovered Organic Waste Product and Recycled -Content Paper procurement policy. B. All vendors providing Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper must: If fitness and quality are equal, provide Recycled -Content Paper Products and Recycled -Content Printing and Writing Paper that consists of at least 30 percent, by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber instead of non -recycled products whenever recycled Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper are available at the same or lesser total cost than non -recycled items or at a total cost of no more than 10% of the total cost for non -recycled items. 2. Provide Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper that meet Federal Trade Commission recyclability standard as defined in 16 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 260.12 (January 1, 2013). 3. Certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, the minimum percentage of postconsumer material in the Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper offered or sold to the City. This certification requirement may be waived if the percentage of postconsumer material in the Paper Products, Printing and Writing Paper, or both can be verified by a product label, catalog, invoice, or a manufacturer or vendor internet website. 4. Certify in writing, on invoices or receipts provided, that the Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper offered or sold to the City is eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as defined in 16 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 260.12 (January 1, 2013). 5. Provide records to the City's Recovered Organic Waste Product procurement recordkeeping Designee, in accordance with the City's Recycled -Content Paper procurement policy(ies) of all Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper purchases within 30 days of the purchase (both recycled -content and non -recycled content, if any is purchased) made by any division or department or employee of the City. Records must include a copy (electronic or paper) of the invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications as required by this chapter for recycled -content purchases, purchaser name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content (including products that contain none), and if non -recycled content Page 87 of 500 City of Ell Segundo Ordinance No. Page 13 of 15 Paper Products or Printing and Writing Papers are provided, include a description of why Recycled -Content Paper Products or Printing and Writing Papers were not provided. 5-9-12 Inspections and Investigations by City. Designees are authorized to conduct inspections and investigations, at random or otherwise, of any collection container, collection vehicle loads, or transfer, processing, or disposal facility for materials collected from generators, or Source Separated materials to confirm compliance with this chapter by Organic Waste Generators, Commercial Businesses (including Multi -Family Residential Dwellings), property owners, Commercial Edible Food Generators, haulers, Self -Haulers, Food Recovery Services, and Food Recovery Organizations, subject to applicable laws. 5-9-13 Enforcement. Subject to the requirements of § 18995.4 including, without limitation, the need for a 60-day compliance period after issuing a Notice of Violation, the City may enforce this chapter in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, ESMC Chapters 1-2, 1-2A, and 5-2." SECTION 2: Education Period for Noncompliance. Beginning January 1, 2022 and through December 31, 2023, City or Designee will conduct Inspections, Route Reviews or waste evaluations, and Compliance Reviews, depending upon the type of regulated entity, to determine compliance with this Ordinance. If City determines that Organic Waste Generator, Self -Hauler, hauler, Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generator, Food Recovery Organization, Food Recovery Service, or other entity is not in compliance, it will provide educational materials to the entity describing its obligations under this chapter and a notice that compliance is required by January 1, 2022, and that violations may be subject to administrative civil penalties starting on January 1, 2024. Beginning January 1, 2024, the City may enforce the ESMC in accordance with ESMC Chapters 1-2, 1-2A, and 5-2. SECTION 3. Environmental Review. This Ordinance was reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"). Based upon that review, this Ordinance is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 4. Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic Page 88 of 500 City of El Segundo Ordinance No. Page 14 of 15 signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. SECTION 5. Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council's intent that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance. SECTION 6. Enforceability. Repeal or amendment of any provision of the MPMC will not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before this Ordinance's effective date. Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. SECTION 8. Recording. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the city of El Segundo's book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within 15 days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. SECTION 9. Execution. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Ordinance signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto. SECTION 10. Effectiveness. This Ordinance will take effect on the 30th day following its final passage and adoption. It may be enforced commencing on January 1, 2022. ORDINANCE NO. HAD ITS FIRST READING ON , ITS SECOND READING ON , AND WAS DULY PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AT ITS REGULAR MEETING OF Drew Boyles, Mayor ATTEST: Page 89 of 500 City of El Segundo Ordinance No. Page 15 of 15 Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark Hensley, City Attorney Page 90 of 500 {:ICVoy ELEUND TITLE: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.13 Government Finance Officers Association Award for Financial Reporting RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Government Finance Officers Association award for excellence in financial reporting for the City's Fiscal Year 2019-20 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A BACKGROUND: The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) established the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Program in 1945 to encourage and assist state and local governments to go beyond the minimum requirements of generally accepted accounting principles to prepare annual comprehensive financial reports that evidence the spirit of transparency and full disclosure and then to recognize individual governments that succeed in achieving that goal. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. Staff will continue to strive for excellence in order to meet the Certificate of Achievement program requirements in future years. DISCUSSION: GFOA awarded the City of El Segundo the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the City's FY 2019-20 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. The award represents a significant and continuing achievement by the City. It demonstrates the commitment of the City Council and staff to meet the highest principles of government financial reporting and reflects the City's philosophy of Page 91 of 500 GFOA Award December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 2 transparency to its residents and other stakeholders. CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability Objective 5B: El Segundo approaches its work in a financially strategic and responsible way. PREPARED BY: Joseph Lillio, Chief Financial Officer REVIEWED BY: Joseph Lillio, Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Announcement of Award to City_Nov 2021 2. GFOA Press Release —Nov 2021 Page 92 of 500 Government Finance Officers Association 203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2700 Chicago, Illinois 60601-1210 312.977.9700 `fax: 312.977.4806 11/12/2021 Drew Boyles Mayor City of El Segundo, California Dear Mayor Boyles: We are pleased to notify you that your annual comprehensive financial report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 qualifies for GFOA's Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. When a Certificate of Achievement is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement (AFRA) is also presented to the individual(s) or department designated by the government as primarily responsible for its having earned the Certificate. This award has been sent to the submitter as designated on the application. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and give appropriate publicity to this notable achievement. A sample news release is included to assist with this effort. We hope that your example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting. Sincerely, Michele Mark Levine Director, Technical Services Page 93 of 500 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 11/12/2021 For more information contact: Michele Mark Levine, Director/TSC Phone: (312) 977-9700 Fax: (312) 977-4806 Email: mlevine@gfoa.org (Chicago, Illinois) —Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) has awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to City of El Segundo for its annual comprehensive financial report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020. The report has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program, which includes demonstrating a constructive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the report. The Certificate of Achievement is'the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) advances excellence in government finance byproviding best practices, professional development, resources, and practical research for more than 21,000 members and the communities they serve. 203 NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 2700, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601-1210 Page 94 of 500 Give} City Council Agenda Statement ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Consent Item Number: B.14 TITLE: Resolution Allowing Public Meetings to Continue to be Conducted via Teleconferencing Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution to allow public meetings to continue to be conducted via teleconferencing pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 361 FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: In order to address the expiration of the Governor's Orders regarding teleconferencing, Assembly Bill No. 361 ("AB 361 ") took effect which, among other things, amends certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act ("Brown Act") governing open meetings to allow teleconferencing, including internet-based video conferencing, in a manner similar to previously issued gubernatorial executive orders. DISCUSSION: The proposed resolution would make the requisite findings for the City Council to continue using teleconferencing protocols for its public meetings, subject to certain notice, access, and participation requirements. It would also require City Council to reconsider the state of emergency conditions and consider whether certain findings can be made to support continued use of the teleconferencing procedures and prohibit all Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies, including applicable commissions, committees, and boards, from meeting exclusively in person except as determined by the City Manager or until the Council provides further direction in the future. The proposed resolution would direct all Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies, including applicable commissions, committees, and boards, to consider the continued adoption of findings allowing for its conducting public meetings via teleconferencing, as applicable. Page 95 of 500 Continue conducting meetings via Teleconferencing Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 2 CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Objective 1 A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external customers. Objective 1 B: El Segundo's engagement with the community ensures excellence. PREPARED BY: Joaquin Vasquez, Assistant City Attorney REVIEWED BY: Mark Hensley, City Attorney APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Resolution AB361 Extension 12/07/2021 Page 96 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FINDING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS EXIST TO CONTINUE CONDUCTING PUBLIC MEETINGS VIA TELECONFERENCING PURUSANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 361 AND DIRECTING CITY COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS, AND BOARDS TO TAKE CERTAIN ASSOCIATED ACTIONS. The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds and declares as follows: A. On March 4, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency to exist in California due to the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic. B. This gubernatorial proclamation, among other things, suspended local government emergency declaration, reporting, and extension requirements of Government Code § 8630 for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. C. Effective September 16, 2021, Assembly Bill No. 361 ("AB 361 ") took effect which, among other things, amends certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act ("Brown Act") governing open meetings to allow teleconferencing, including internet-based video conferencing, in a manner similar to previously issued gubernatorial executive orders. D. During a proclaimed state of emergency, AB 361 allows a legislative body, like the City Council, to continue utilizing teleconferencing to conduct public meetings under certain circumstances, provided the legislative body makes certain findings. E. The City Council has previously adopted and made findings to continue meeting via teleconferencing pursuant to AB 361 and seeks to make additional findings under Government Code § 54953(e) to continue such teleconferencing use. SECTION 2. Teleconferencing A. Pursuant to Government Code § 54953(e), the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency finds as follows: 1. The state of California continues to be in a declared state of emergency pursuant to Government Code § 8625 (the California Emergency Services Act; see Government Code § 54953(e)(3); -1- Page 97 of 500 see also Governor's Proclamation dated March 4, 2020), which ; and 2. Based upon the most recent Order of the Health Officer for County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health (dated September 17, 2021 and effective October 7, 2021), masks and social distancing continue to be necessary to curb the spread of COVID-19 (Government Code § 54953(e)(3)(B)(ii)). B. Accordingly, to protect public health and safety the City Council: 1. finds that it is in the public interest to conduct public meetings of its legislative bodies via teleconference as defined by Government Code § 54953; 2. prohibits all Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies, including applicable commissions, committees, and boards, from meeting exclusively in person, except as determined by the City Manager or until the City Council provides futher direction in the future; and 3. directs all such Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies, including applicable commissions, committees, and boards, to consider the continued adoption of findings allowing for its conduct public meetings via teleconference as defined by Government Code § 54953 at any meeting occuring after the date of this Resolution. C. The City Council will adhere to all requirements of Government Code § 54953 governing teleconferencing during the emergency including, without limitation, posting agendas; allowing for real-time public comment via either call -in or internet-based; allowing for written communications that will be either read or summarized into the record during the meeting as determined by the City Council; and protecting the statutory and constitutional rights of all persons appearing before the legislative body. No physical location will be provided for persons wishing to provide real-time public comment. SECTION 3. Reporting. Every 30 days following adoption of this Resolution, the City Council will reconsider the extension of the teleconferencing method of public meetings in accordance with Government Code § 54953(e)(3). Such determinations may be placed on the consent calendar. SECTION 4. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. -2- Page 98 of 500 SECTION 5. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded. SECTION 7. City Clerk Actions. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make a record of this action in the meeting's minutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 12021. Drew Boyles, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1 I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of , 2021, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Tracy Weaver, -3- Page 99 of 500 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney Page 100 of 500 {:ICVoy ELEUND TITLE: City Council Agenda Statement Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Public Hearings Item Number: C.16 Proposed Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and Training Facility Development and Raytheon Storage Facility Relocation (2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution adopting an Addendum to the certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR); 2. Waive first reading and introduce an ordinance approving a second amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02 (Agreement No. 4972A), and minor modifications to Specific Plan No. 11-01 Revision A; 3. Adopt resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 (SUB21-03) and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01 for development of a new corporate headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers on a 13.7-acre site, in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7" and "8"); and 4. Adopt resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 21-02 for a storage facility located in the southeast Dortion of lot 18 in Phase IV. FISCAL IMPACT: As proposed, development of this project and relocation of the storage facility will have minimal financial benefit to the City's General Fund. The 2015 Gross Fiscal Impact and Economic Benefit Analysis for the overall El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) estimated a possible General Fund annual revenue increase of up to $2,600,000 at theoretical buildout of the full ESSCSP area. After the proposed project is developed, the maximum future recurring General Fund revenue amount will be lower than initially estimated due to this proposed use not being a more traditional office building and/or retail development. The proposed Development Agreement Amendment includes three one-time Page 101 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 13 contributions of $1,000,000 for a total of $3,000,000 to be deposited into the City's General Fund to be used to support The Plunge swimming pool rehabilitation capital improvement project. :T_[81,`0l zloll] 0193 The ESSCSP (previously called a "Precise Plan") was adopted in 1978, resulting in the development of 11 structures throughout the site totaling 1,892,513 sf of net floor area (approximate floor area of 0.29), located in the southeast quadrant of El Segundo, east of Highway 1 (Pacific Coast Highway), and bound by El Segundo Blvd. to the north, the elevated Metro C Line (Green Line) and an older industrial subdivision on Coral Circle to the east, the Top Golf facility and golf course to the west, and Plaza El Segundo and a Union Pacific Railraod to the south (Vicinity and Location Map shown in Figure 2 of the attached Planning Commission staff report dated November 18, 2021). In 2015/16, the ESSCSP was amended, permitting an increased allowable floor area of 0.60, and establishing four development phases for the ESSCSP area. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed development of Phase II of the ESSCSP. At the public hearing, in addition to the project proponent, approximately 12 speakers addressed the Planning Commission, all speaking in favor of the project. After discussing the merits of the project, and asking questions of staff and the applicant regarding the proposed amendment to DA No. 11-02 and the proposed project, the Planning Commission adopted resolutions (attached) recommending City Council adopt an addendum to the certified EIR and approve the proposed projects entitlement applications on a 5-0 vote. The Planning Commission recommendation included one additional condition of approval, discussed below. The proposed amendment to DA No. 11-02, minor modifications to ESSCSP, addendum to the ESSCSP Environmental Impact Report, vesting tentative map, and corresponding Site Plan Reviews, require approval by City Council. DISCUSSION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves two applicants, CDC -MAR and Raytheon. 1. CDC -MAR proposes a new corporate office headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers of the National Football League, located within the Phase II area of the ESSCSP. 2. Raytheon proposes the demolition of a storage/warehouse currently located within the Phase II area, to be reconstructed within the Phase IV area of the Page 102 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 13 ESSCSP. To facilitate the proposed project, an amendment to DA No. 11-02 is also proposed. The entitlement applications and associated project are described below. Proposed Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and Training Facility • Site Plan Review SPR 21-01: Proposed construction of a new professional sports headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers on Lots 7 and 8 (Phase II Specific Plan area), which includes: o A three-story, 56-foot-high building with a mezzanine totaling approximately 143,702 gross sf. (131,207 net sf.), accommodating offices, dining areas, an auditorium, conference rooms, studio area, locker rooms, training rooms, a weight room, office space, storage rooms, a service area, and mechanical and electrical rooms; o Two storage buildings for groundskeeping and maintenance totaling approximately 4,800 square feet (4,368 sf. net floor area), located near the facility's northeastern corner; o Three football practice fields on the eastern side of the site; o 32-foot high poles and privacy netting along the eastern side of the site to screen the fields from Los Angeles County Metro's above -grade commuter line that abuts the site; o 348 parking spaces; and o Removal/demolition of warehouse/storage facilities E-20 and E-21 on Parcel 7 and 8. The proposed project is comprised of a headquarters office building housing the business operations staff near the center of the site; three natural grass fields on the eastern side of the site that are to be used for team practices and scrimmages; a total of 348 at grade parking spaces along the southern and western portions of the site; and a pair of groundskeeping and maintenance buildings totaling approximately 4,800 sf near the northeastern corner of the site to provide easy access to care for and maintain the three playing fields. Perimeter fencing with scrim, preventing visibility into the training sports facility and the fields from the Metro line, and will start at the east edge of the building and surround the entirety of the playing field areas. Page 103 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 4 of 13 The proposed headquarters building houses business operations staff with typical hours from 6:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Approximately 270 personnel are anticipated to travel to and from the project site on a typical workday. Business operations staff and other employees will enter the building from the south, through a secured gated area, while visitors, media or other staff will enter the building from the West, through the main entry lobby. Page 104 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 5 of 13 As illustrated above, the exterior of the building includes an iconic design and incorporates graphic elements to create a one -of -a -kind training facility. The proposed height of the building is 54 feet to the top of the parapet. Exterior materials include precast concrete, fiber cement panel, aluminum metal panel, and a mix of curtainwall and storefront glazing. The metallic sheen of the metal panel and the matte finish of the precast concrete provide contrast within the fagade design. Exterior glazing provides transparency and transmission of natural light, yet visual sun control when needed. A skylight extends over the lobby atrium and brings daylight into the center of the building. Specific Plan 11-01, Revision A: Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP include updating various exhibits contained in the ESSCSP due to the Nash Street extension, recreational facilities, and Coral Circle connection. Specifically, Exhibit No's. 5-12 of the ESSCSP document will be updated to illustrate how lot configurations would change with the realignment of Nash Street and with the approval of the proposed development projects. It is necessary to update the Land Use Plan and the Conceptual Site Plan to depict a revised layout of the Raytheon Recreational Facility and to depict a modified alignment of Nash Street which is needed to maintain the private recreation area and to create an appropriately sized site necessary for the development of the proposed headquarters and training facility. For additional information regarding the various exhibit changes in the specific plan document, including utility and infrastructure exhibits, please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report dated November 18, 2021. Subdivision No. SUB 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507). The proposed subdivision map proposes modifying 13 parcels identified in tract map No. 71551, which Page 105 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 6 of 13 will facilitate finalizing the new Nash Street alignment and accommodating adjustments to parcels necessary to build the proposed project. For reference, below are depictions of the existing, approved subdivision illustrating the Nash Street extension, and the proposed subdivision illustrating the new Nash Street alignment. The existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 divides the Specific Plan Area into 26 individual lots. Although the proposed subdivision modifies 13 parcels of the existing subdivision, the new Tract Map will not increase the number of lots and all resulting parcels will comply with the minimum lot standards. Existing Subdivision and flash Street extension L TF R -1 � Y •-X Page 106 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 7 of 13 Proposed Subdivision and Nash Street exftnsion Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02: The proposed amendment to DA No. 11-02 includes amending the terms and obligations between the City of El Segundo, CDC Mar East Campus 1, LLC and Raytheon Company. The following is a summary of the proposed Development Agreement amendment: The ESSCSP area is subject to a development agreement that was approved by the City in 2016, which was modified in 2019. Raytheon and CDC/Mar are seeking amendments to the development agreement. There are three obligations that would be triggered by the projects proposed by Raytheon and CDC/Mar. The first two are the Nash Street and Continental Boulevard extensions. As described below, Raytheon is seeking to delay the implementation of the Continental Boulevard extension and the Nash Street Extensions as it relates to the relocation of its storage facility and CDC/Mar will have the obligation to construct the Nash Street extension if the Chargers project proceeds. Page 107 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 8 of 13 The third is a requirement that 7.54 acres of land within the Specific Plan area to be used for Open Space and Recreational purposes. This is allowed to be accomplished by either Raytheon making an irrevocable offer of dedication of 7.54 acres of land to the City for recreational/open space area use or provide employees within the Specific Plan area permanent access to the 7.54 acre recreational area in the ESSCSP area. As an alternative to this requirement, the development agreement provides the City and Developer may agree in their discretion to explore other means of addressing this recreation/open space requirement. Raytheon's relocation of its storage facility would also trigger this requirement, but Raytheon is seeking an exception to this requirement for the relocation. CDC/Mar's proposed project triggers both the Nash Street and park requirements discussed above. The reason for this is that three acres of property are being proposed to be moved from Phase IV of the ESSCSP and construction on properties located in Phase IV trigger the Nash Street and park requirement. CDC/Mar is proposing, with Raytheon's permission and request, that CDC/Mar be allowed to pay $3 million towards The Plunge Saari Swim Stadium Pool Rehabilitation capital improvement project to delay the park requirement until when and if the requirement is triggered again in the future. The $3 million is proposed to be paid as follows: $1 million when the project entitlements are approved and executed; $1 million when CDC/Mar is issued a building permit for the project; and $1 million when a certificate of occupancy is issued for the project. There are deadlines associated with these payments and the right to develop the sports complex project development will expire if the deadlines lapse. It should be noted that the size of the recreation area is proposed to be decreased slightly from 7.54 to 7.34 acres due to the reconfiguration of the parcels to accommodate the proposed project. If for some reason the Chargers project does not move forward then CDC/Mar have the option of either (1) returning the three acres to Raytheon and moving the three acres back into Phase IV of the ESSCSP, and the City will have to return whatever payments that it has received to CDC/Mar, or (2) CDC/Mar can choose to let the City keep the payments it has received and the City shall have the right to approve in its sole discretion whatever project or buildings that CDC/Mar propose to construct on the three acres. Raytheon's proposed project to move its approximately 5,500 square footage storage building triggers all three of the above development requirements. Raytheon wants to delay the Continental Boulevard extension and park requirement until the next development and is requiring CDC/Mar to construct the Nash Street extension if its project proceeds. As consideration for this extension, Raytheon is proposing to execute a "Recreation Facilities Use Agreement" with the City which would give the City access to utilize the recreation facilities/fields located on the Raytheon property between the hours of 5:00 and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on the Page 108 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 9 of 13 weekends. The recreation areas will not be open to the public on a "drop -in" basis but rather must be scheduled in advance as agreed to by the City and Raytheon. The use of Raytheon facilities will mainly be limited to practice uses, but competitive team play by youth sports on the weekends will be allowed with restrictions. Raytheon employees will be given priority use over the facilities for scheduling purposes. The use restrictions regarding competitive team play and joint use of the facilities by Raytheon employees and the City at the same time arise out of security concerns by Raytheon and the need to limit the number of people utilizing the facilities at the same time. The agreement provides for a process whereby the City and Raytheon will cooperate in scheduling the City's use of the facilities. Proposed Relocation of Raytheon Storage Facility Proposed construction of a storage building on Lot 18 (Phase IV Plan Area). The proposed building is a 5,865 sf storage/warehouse replacing two existing buildings to be removed in conjunction with the proposed headquarters and training facility on Lots 7 and 8. The storage building will be used for Raytheon's business activities and does not include any employee -occupiable space. The proposed storage building is one-story, at approximately 21 feet and 2 inches high. Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way will remain. A proposed 6-foot-high chain link fence around the building's perimeter, includes two chain link gates and two chain link rolling gates. The proposed storage/warehouse will serve as a storage building ancillary to the primary buildings located on the primary Raytheon Campus site. ANALYSIS The Planning Commission reviewed all project components (i.e. architecture, design, fencing, lighting and signage, access, parking and loading, landscaping, and land use plans) in consideration of the required findings associated with the General Plan, ESSCSP, Subdivision Map, and Site Plan Review, outlined in the attached Planning Commission staff report, dated November 18, 2021. While the Planning Commission expressed overall support for the project and ultimately recommended approval, the Commission's discussion focused on the proposed amendments to DA 11-02. Specifically, the Planning Commission expressed concern that the proposed Second Amendment allows further development in the ESSCSP area to occur without dedicating recreation/open space as stipulated in the original DA and in the First Amendment to the DA. The original DA approved in 2016 required dedication of 7.54 acres of recreation/open space when more than 20-percent of the ESSCSP campus area is sold. In 2019, approval of the First Amendment to DA No. 11-02 allowed development of the Phase ' retail center (currently under construction) to proceed without dedicating 7.54 acres of recreation/open space. Page 109 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 10 of 13 The Planning Commission expressed concern that the proposed Second Amendment to DA No. 11-02 further prolongs the dedication of the recreation/open space that was originally required when the specific plan was approved in 2016. The Planning Commission discussed that on two previous occasions, the dedication of recreation/open space would occur at specified phases of development, yet the applicant is appearing again before the City requesting to prolong dedication of the recreation/open space and reduce the recreation/open space area from 7.54 acres to 7.34 acres. Since the proposed amendment would further delay the dedication requirement until the next development is built in the Specific Plan area, the Planning Commission considered several scenarios which may result in no further development or recreation/open space dedication. After consideration and discussion, the Planning Commission recommendation included a condition of approval requiring that the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City committing to effectuate either Section 9.2 or Section 9.3 of Development Agreement No. 4972A regarding the recreation/open space area, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Butler building. The condition is included as conditions of approval no. 11 in the attached City Council resolution for the Raytheon storage building, and states: "Prior to issuance of a building permit of the Raytheon storage building, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City committing to effectuate either Section 9.2 or Section 9.3 of Development Agreement No. 4972A regarding the recreation/open space area." Subsequent to the November 18, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant provided several requested amendments to the Project's related conditions of approval. The following outlines the requested amendments in strut and underline, with staff's recommendation: Proposed Modification Resolution No. 2904 - Relocation of Raytheon• .• Facility - • The appliGant must build the Nash ■_ velepmeRt ■ 1 ■ .. .. .. -- Staff Recommendation Accept deletion, proposed amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02 defers improvements associated with Phase IV of the ESSCSP. #69 The applicant MYSt Genctri IGt Glass 11 Accept deletion, proposed amendment to biGYGIe lanes On the Nash Street Extension Development Agreement No. 11-02 defers ,n acGOrda,TGe with the El Segundo South improvements associated with Phase IV of Campus SpeGifin Plan and Section 7.5 ef the ESSCSP. the Development Agreement. #QQ The applicant mi ict Geenerate Wroth the Accept deletion, proposed amendment to Page 110 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 11 of 13 Resolution No. 2903 - Development of the LA Chargers Headquarters and Training Facility #4 Final design of the 32-foot high poles and netting along the eastern side and northern side adjacent to the fields shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission through a Site Plan Review Amendment prior to issuance of a permit for the fields and/or associated lighting. Canal design shall innl,,de the quantity and Iona+inn of poles type of netting and netting that is retran+ahle and Gold evtended during times when the fields are iced for training and renreatienal activities involving halls and lowered at the , �nnnl,,sinn of the renreatinnal an+iVity. Lastly, shall be plantedaInng the length of the pole and netting and shall he maintained at a minimum height of 16 -fee+ The hedge shall be plaRT rising FiGUS on,rr Dedlorarp„s, or similar type of species approved by the Development Sopranos DeFectnr �cccvr. #9 All landscaping must be in substantial conformance to the ESSCSP Master Landscape Plan and a Landscape Plan must be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department. Trees must be of a species that provides for large canopy and shade. The use of palm trees shall not be permitted in strategic areas consistent with the ESSCSP Master Landscape Plan and a Landscape Plan and approved by the Development Services Director. Development Agreement No. 11-02 defers improvements associated with Phase IV of the ESSCSP. City Council to determine the specificity or ambiguity of the final design for Planning Commission consideration of the 32-foot poles and netting system. Specificity provides assurance that final product that Planning Commission considers is consistent with intent of City Council approval. Ambiguity provides greater flexibility for final design, however, there is less assurance that the final product that Planning Commission considers will be consistent with intent of City Council approval. Accept edit, modifications are consistent with the intent of staff and direction of Planning Commission to allow use of palm trees as accents within entry, but not throughout entire project site. #60 The Police Department shall Staff suggested modified language: deterreview and reasonably approve #60 The Police Department shall Page 111 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 12 of 13 the monitoring and recording location of the de+ereview and approve security cameras, which include, but are the monitoring and recording location of the not limited to: tenant areas such as all exterior and interior entry doors, cash handling/counting areas, the manager's office, the safe, parking lots and parking lot entries/exits; non -tenant areas such as common spaces and parking lots; and any other areas deemed necessary by the Police Department. #63 All landscaping s#a4must be in substantial conformance to the ESSCSP Master Landscape Plan and a Landscape Plan must be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department.-4e CONCLUSION security cameras, which include, but are not limited to: tenant areas such as all exterior and interior entry doors, cash handling/counting areas, the manager's office, the safe, parking lots and parking lot entries/exits; non -tenant areas such as common spaces and parking lots; and any other areas deemed necessary by the Police Department. Accept edit, not applicable in proposed project. Detailed in the attached staff report to the Planning Commission dated November 18, 2021, staff and the Planning Commission believe that the necessary findings can be made to approve this project. Staff and Planning Commission are recommending approval of the project. However, the Planning Commission further recommends including a condition requiring Raytheon enter into an agreement with the City prior to issuance of a building permit for the Butler building committing to either Section 9.2 or 9.3 of DA No. 4972A. Staff recommends City Council consider the Planning Commission's recommendations, approve the ordinance, read into the record any additional conditions that may be necessary, and adopt the attached Resolutions. Page 112 of 500 Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility December 7, 2021 Page 13 of 13 If approved, the Ordinance will be brought back to City Council for second reading at the December 21, 2021 City Council meeting, and the Second Amendment to DA 11-02 and corresponding Specific Plan revisions will become effective January 22, 2022. CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability Objective 5A: El Segundo promotes economic growth and vitality for business and the community. PREPARED BY: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Principal Planner REVIEWED BY: Michael Allen, AICP, Development Services Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Ordinance approving Second Amendment to DA 2. City Council Resolution approving Addendum 3. Final Addendum to EIR 4. City Council Resolution approving Raytheon Storage Building 5. City Council Resolution approving LA Chargers Building 6. Plans (Raytheon Storage Building) 7. Plans (LA Chargers Headquarters and Practice Facility) 8. Proposed Subdivision Map 9. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated 11-18-2021 (without attachments) Page 113 of 500 ORDINANCE NO. AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 11-02 19:144 k W«6111, [a] I0Ile] *K61 V B7_11 Z I_F'i 76] N 1161TiT&I NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.Recitals. The City Council declares as follows: A. On January 19, 2016, the City Council approved and adopted Development Agreement No. 11-02, El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan ("ESSCSP"), and the associated environmental impact report. B. On September 3, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1589 amending Development Agreement No. 11-02 to modify the development's phasing, implementation of certain improvements, and mitigation measures. C. On October 4, 2021, CDC Mar Campus I, LLC filed an application for Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP No. 11-01 Revision "A"; second amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02 ("Development Agreement Amendment"); Site Plan Review No. 21-01; Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83501; and Environmental Assessment No. 1305 to adopt an addendum ("Addendum") to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EA-905) ("FEIR") for the ESSCSP (State Clearinghouse No. 2012101081) for the for construction of a three-story building with partial basement totaling approximately 143,250 gross square feet and 122,080 square feet of net floor area; athletic practice fields; and parking in surface lots for a new sports facility on a 13.7 acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus, located at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7 and 8) (the "Campus"). The development proposal identified in the preceding sentence is subsequently referred to as the "Project." D. The City Development Services Department ("Department") reviewed the Project applications for, among other things, consistency with the City's General Plan, El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC"), and the ESSCSP. E. The Department also reviewed the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and its associated promulgated regulations ("CEQA Regulations"). F. The Applicant and parties to Development Agreement No. 11-02—the Raytheon Company and City —seek to approve the Amended Development Agreement to delay the implementation of the Continental Boulevard extension, postpone the Nash Street extension, as relates to the relocation of the storage facility, and obligate the Applicant to construct the Nash Street extension if its sports facility project proceeds. The Applicant also proposes to pay $3 million toward the Plunge Page 114 of 500 Saari Swim Stadium Pool Rehabilitation capital improvement project to delay park and open space requirements triggered by the Project. Additional description of the proposed modifications to the Amended Development Agreement are set forth in the staff report accompanying this Ordinance, which was presented to the City Council on December 7, 2021 and incorporated into this Ordinance by reference. G. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with Government Code § 65864 et seq. ("State Development Agreement Law"), to receive oral and written testimony and evidence regarding proposed entitlements associated with the Project, including the proposed Amended Development Agreement and Addendum H. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolutions Nos. 2902, 2903, and 2904 recommending City Council approval of the Project approvals set forth in paragraphs A and B, above. In accordance with the Development Agreement Law, the City Council conducted a duly notice public hearing at its December 7, 2021 regular meeting to consider the Amended Development Agreement in light of all testimony and evidence. Notice of such public hearing was published in the El Segundo Herald on November 25, 2021, in accordance with Government Code § 65867. J. After the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council approved this Ordinance for first reading, and, at its regular meeting of December 7, adopted this Ordinance via second reading in accordance with the findings set forth below. SECTION 2. Findings in Support of Development Agreement Amendment. The City Council finds as follows, in accordance with Government Code Section 65867.5: A. General Plan Consistency: The Development Agreement Amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan and will not obstruct their attainment as the Project is consistent with the following: Economic Development Element: The City's Economic Development Element of the General Plan specifies the following: Obj. ED1-2: Center diversification efforts on targeted industries that meet the City's criteria for job creation, growth potential, fiscal impact, and fit with local resources. Policy ED1-2.1: Seek to expand El Segundo's retail and commercial base so that the diverse needs of the City's business and residential communities are met. The Project promotes economic development and improves the City's tax base through inclusion of a broader range of office and land uses that contribute to the 2 Page 115 of 500 balance and sustainability of local economy and patronage of commercial uses in the area of the project site. Land Use Element: The City's Economic Development Element of the General Plan specifies the following: Goal LU7: Provide the highest quality public facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community. Policy LU7-1.2: No new development shall be allowed unless adequate public facilities are in place or provided for. Policy LU7-2.3: All new development shall place utilities underground. The Project is required to pay development impact fees, including for facilities, vehicles, and equipment for law enforcement, fire suppression, and general services, as well as road projects. Further, the Project site is located in an urbanized area with adequate infrastructure in place to accommodate the Project. Open Space Element: Goal OS1: Provide and maintain high quality open space and recreational facilities that meet the needs of the existing and future residents and employees within the City. The Project will pay impact fees, including those for general services, which will be used to fund public pools. Further, the DA Amendment contains provisions to provide an alternative by allowing public use of Raytheon's existing employee park . B. ESSCSP Consistency: The Development Agreement Amendment is consistent with the ESSCSP because it will allow the creation of job opportunities and balance growth, local resources and infrastructure capacity and need. Further, the Development Agreement Amendment will provide a basis for a positive contribution to the maintenance and expansion the City's facilities. SECTION 3. Approval of Development Agreement Amendment. Pursuant to the findings set forth above, the City Council approves the Development Agreement Amendment subject to such necessary minor, conforming, and clarifying changes consistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, prior to the execution thereof. The full text of the Development Agreement, as hereby amended, is attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 4. Environmental Review. On December 7, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. approving an Addendum to the FEIR for the ESSCSP (State Clearinghouse No. 2012101081) for the Project which, among other things, duly assesses the environmental impact of this Ordinance, the Development Agreement Amendment, Page 116 of 500 and the Project, in accordance with CEQA. This Ordinance incorporates the environmental findings and analysis set forth in Resolution No. by reference. SECTION 5. Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council's intent that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance. SECTION 6. Inconsistent Provisions. Any provision of the El Segundo Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to implement the provisions of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. SECTION 8. Publication and Effective Date. The Mayor will sign and the City Clerk will attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk will cause the same to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. This Ordinance will take effect on the 30th day following its final passage and adoption. SECTION 9. Execution of Ordinance and Development Agreement Amendment. The Mayor or presiding officer is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Ordinance signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto. The City Manager is delegated to execute the Development Agreement Amendment and all other associated documents to effectuate its terms. SECTION 10. Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code § 16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. SECTION 11. Recordation. In accordance with Government Code § 65868.5, within 10 days of full execution of the Development Agreement Amendment, the City Clerk will cause a copy of the Development Agreement Amendment to be recorded in the office of the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. HAD ITS FIRST READING ON , ITS SECOND READING ON , AND WAS DULY PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AT ITS REGULAR MEETING OF 4 Page 117 of 500 Drew Boyles, Mayor ATTEST: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark Hensley, City Attorney Page 118 of 500 EXHIBIT "A" SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 11-02 Page 119 of 500 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 350 Main Street El Segundo, California 90245 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code § 6103 SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1 LLC, AND RAYTHEON COMPANY THIS AGREEMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN TEN DAYS OF EXECUTION BY ALL PARTIES HERETO PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNMENT CODE § 65868.5 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 120 of 500 SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Second Amendment to Development Agreement ("Second Amendment") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ("City"), a general law city and municipal corporation, RAYTHEON COMPANY ("Developer" or "RAYTHEON"), a Delaware corporation, and CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1 LLC ("CDC MAR"), a California limited liability company, as of this , 2021, City, CDC MAR and Developer are also individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, the City and Developer entered into a Development Agreement ("Agreement") on or about the 24th day of March, 2016 with respect to the real property identified on Exhibit A thereto; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer entered into that certain First Amendment to the Agreement ("First Amendment") on or about November 5, 2019; and WHEREAS, Developer and CDC MAR executed that certain Assignment and Assumption Agreement recorded April 4, 2021 as County of Los Angeles Recorder's Office document No. 20210545516, by which CDC MAR became a part of the Agreement and First Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Agreement with this Second Amendment to further specify phasing of the Project and the timing of certain Project improvements and/or conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, City, CDC MAR and Developer agree as follows: 1. Section 1 of the Agreement ("Definitions") shall be amended as following: "Effective Date" shall be amended to include the following definition: As to the Second Amendment, the Effective Date shall be the date of the Enabling Ordinance as to the Second Amendment. "Enabling Ordinance" shall be amended to include the following definition: As to the Second Amendment, the enabling ordinance is Ordinance No. "Project Approvals" shall be amended to include the following items: 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 121 of 500 • First Amendment to the Development Agreement between City and Developer dated November 5, 2019; Plan"); • Minor Modifications to Specific Plan 11-01 Revision A ("Modified Specific • This Second Amendment (DA 11-02); Addendum to the Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project Final EIR (A# 2012101081); • Environmental Assessment No. EA-1305 • Vesting Subdivision Map No. 83507 (21-02) as approved by Resolution No. • Site Plan Review 21-01 and Planning Commission Resolution 2903 (Sports Facility) • Site Plan Review 21-02 and Planning Commission Resolution 2904 (Storage Facility) "Sports Complex Project" means the building of no more than 150,000 square feet of building area and sports practice and workout facilities on approximately 14 acres of land for use by the Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and practice facilities which is more specifically described in the Project Approvals. 2. Revised Exhibit F and Exhibit G (referenced below) are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Section 7.10 is hereby added to read as follows: "7.10 Relocation Project. If and only if the Recreation Facilities Use Agreement ("RFUA") in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Revised Exhibit D is executed by RAYTHEON and the City and is in full force and effect, the relocation of the existing uses within Buildings E-20 and E-21 to one or more new buildings that will be constructed on Parcel 18 of the Modified Specific Plan ("Relocation Project"), shall be deemed to not trigger the requirements of Section 7.1.2 or 7.2.1 above, provided said new building or buildings have a total net square footage less than or equal to the combined net square footage of Buildings E-20 and E-21 as described in Exhibit B. -2- 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 122 of 500 4. The Agreement and First Amendment are amended such that all references to Parcels 1 through 26 in the Agreement shall refer to those Parcels as they are depicted in Exhibit 5 to the Modified Specific Plan rather than in Vesting Map No. 71551 or Vesting Map No. 83507. 5. Section 9.4 is hereby added to read as follows: "9.4 The Sports Complex Project and the Relocation Project shall not trigger the requirements of Sections 9 of this Agreement, including sections 9.1, 9.2, or 9.3 of this Agreement which are alternative options for Raytheon or CDC Mar to meet the requirements of Section 9 of this Agreement. If the City receives the first $1 million payment pursuant to Section, and it is not subsequently required to return it to CDC Mar, then the 7.54 acre requirement set forth in Section 9, shall be reduced to 7.34 acres. 6. Section 10.4 is hereby added to read as follows: 10.4 CDC/MAR Payments to City a. Upon City's final approval of the items listed under "Project Approvals" above, CDC MAR shall deposit with the City $1,000,000. The $1,000,000 once deposited with the City shall be non-refundable to CDC MAR and shall only be used by the City for Approved Expenditures for the Urho Saari Swim Stadium ("The Plunge") as defined below in subsection (b). b. The use of the Deposit shall be limited to capital projects for The Plunge, specifically hard and soft costs of the City Council -approved project (the "Approved Expenditures"). C. In addition to subsection (a) above, CDC MAR shall deposit into an escrow account $2,000,000 ("the "Deposit") upon CDC MAR purchase of the land required for the Sports Complex Project which shall take place within 10 days of the date that all of the entitlements required for the Sports Complex Project are approved and past all applicable challenge periods (the "Close of Escrow") and in no event later than six months after the Effective Date unless a legal challenge is filed challenging said entitlements. If a legal challenge is filed, the time period for depositing the $2,000,000 into escrow shall be the later of the (i) Close of Escrow, or (ii) six months after the date that the litigation is fully adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction or is settled by the parties thereto. d. The Deposit shall be released from the escrow account to the City in phases as follows: (1) $1,000,000 upon the City's issuance of a building permit for construction of the Sports Complex Project; and (2) $1,000,000 upon City's issuance of the permanent certificate of occupancy for the entire Sports Complex Project (the "Permanent C of O"). e. Except as set forth in Section 10.4.g., once an amount has been released from escrow to the City, the City shall be entitled to keep and use such amount; however the amounts received by the City shall only be used for Approved Expenditures f. If no building permit is issued for the Sports Complex Project within twelve (12) months of the Effective Date, the Deposit shall be released to CDC MAR. -3- 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 123 of 500 g. If the approximate three (3) acres of land that is being transferred by Raytheon to CDC Mar for purposes of constructing the Sports Complex Project (Described in Exhibit G), which acreage was part of Phase IV is not developed for purposes of the Sports Complex Project within the time periods set forth above, then the right to develop the three acres for the Sports Complex Project shall terminate and either CDC Mar may (i) transfer the three acres back to Raytheon (subject to Raytheon's sole discretion) and the parcels will be reconfigured to the substantially conform to their legal descriptions and the three acres will be returned to Phase IV, and the City will return any payments it has received pursuant to this Section 10.4 to CDC MAR, or (ii) the City Council has the right in its sole discretion to approve another development or structure(s) to be built on the three acres. Additionally, if the Sports Complex Projects does not proceed then the suspension of the transfer of development rights will apply to the three acres described on Exhibit G unless and until the City has approved a project or building pursuant to this Section 10.4.g. h.. The City and CDC MAR designate First American as the escrow company and shall provide written instructions to same consistent with the terms of this Second Amendment. 7. Section 4.14 is hereby added to read as follows: Section 4.14: Transfer of Development Rights: Any right to transfer development rights as provided for in the Project Approvals is hereby suspended with regard to properties located within Phase III and Phase IV in Exhibit F unless and until the requirements of Section 9 of this Agreement are satisfied and either 9.1, 9.2, or 9.3 have been implemented. This Section shall not apply to Phases I and II in Exhibit F. 8. Section 23 ("Notices") is hereby amendment to include the following: To CDC MAR: CDC MAR East Campus 1 LLC c/o Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200 El Segundo, CA 90245 Attn: Richard C. Lundquist Email: rundquist@continentaldevelopment.com With a copy to: Continental Development Corporation 2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200 El Segundo, CA 90245 Attn: Alex J. Rose. Email: arose@continentaldevelopment.com and Mar Ventures, Inc. 721 N. Douglas Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Attn: Allan W. Mackenzie Email: allan.mackenzie@marventures.com -4- 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 124 of 500 and Best Best & Krieger 300 S. Grand Ave, Suite 2500 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attn: Seth Merewitz, Esq. Email: seth.merewitz@bbklaw.com 8. Except with respect to the specific changes made in this Second Amendment, the entire Agreement and First Amendment shall remain in full force and effect and not be amended or superseded by this Second Amendment. Furthermore, each party represents and warrants that to its knowledge that the other party has fulfilled those obligations that have matured as of the date of this Second Amendment. The individuals and parties executing the Agreement below, respectively warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement. -5- 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 125 of 500 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer, CDC MAR and City of El Segundo have executed this Second Amendment on the date first above written. CITY CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation Drew Boyles, Mayor ATTEST: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark Hensley, City Attorney CDC MAR CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1 LLC, a California limited liability company DEVELOPER RAYTHEON COMPANY, a Delaware corporation By: [TBD] Its: By: CDC East Campus 1 LLC, a California limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Continental Development Corporation, a California corporation Its Managing Member By:_ Name: Title: 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 126 of 500 EXHIBIT D [INSERT PARK RFUA] EXHIBIT D -I- 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 127 of 500 RECREATION FACILITY USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND RAYTHEON COMPANY REGARDING USE OF RECREATIONAL FIELDS This Recreation Facility Use Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of El Segundo ("City") and Raytheon Company, a Delaware corporation ("RTX") as of January 1, 2022. RECITALS: A. The City has a lack of recreational fields available for its residents and RTX owns improved recreational fields and parking lots on the RTX Campus. B. The City and RTX have had an informal arrangement for many years concerning the use of the improved recreational fields and parking lots on the RTX Campus. C. The City and RTX are now interested in entering into this Agreement for the City's use of the RTX property for recreational purposes for local employees, residents and local user groups (collectively, "City Participants") as defined herein. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED: 1. City's Use of RTX Recreational Fields. RTX shall grant the City, subject to the conditions herein, a non-exclusive license to allow City Participants to use RTX's improved recreational fields located on the RTX Campus, as set forth herein as Exhibit A and includes the various types of recreation facilities included in Exhibit A, without limitation the tennis courts ("Recreational Fields"). The City shall further have a non- exclusive right to limited parking by City Participants in connection with the Recreational Field use, as reasonably designated by RTX and as may be adjusted from time to time. All use by City Participants shall be scheduled in advance and set forth herein as the Recreation Facilities shall not be open for "drop -by" or unscheduled use by the City Participants. The City shall be allowed to schedule use of the Recreational Fields for City Participants from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on the weekends. Also, the City shall be allowed to schedule use of the Recreation Fields on a case -by -case basis subject to the reasonable discretion of RTX. The Recreational Fields are used by employees of RTX and for RTX events and RTX will have first priority in use. Based upon security and other operational concerns, the joint use by RTX and City Participants may be allowed at RTX's reasonable discretion for the purpose of limiting the total number of individuals using the Recreational Fields at the same time or not permitting incompatible uses on the Recreation Fields at the same times. City Participants shall be limited to using the Recreational Fields for practice purposes and competitive games between two or more teams shall not be allowed. However, RTX may approve of use the Recreational Fields for such competitive games in its reasonable discretion for youth sports teams on the weekends. All or portions of the Recreational Fields may be shut down by RTX in its reasonable discretion for repair purposes to allow for the grass playing field 65331.00002\34261898.3 Page 128 of 500 areas to be reseeded/rejuvenated or repaired and for maintenance or repair purposes of other facilities. 2. Closure of Fields. RTX has the right in its sole discretion to shut down the Recreation Fields due to national emergencies, pandemics or other similar situations or due to local, state or federal mandates or recommendations, or arising from the reasonable security issues of RTX or its government customers, and the City shall not be able to utilize the Recreation Fields during such time period. 3. RTX and City Scheduling. On at least a quarterly basis RTX and the City shall meet for purposes of allowing the City to schedule use of the Recreation Fields by City Participants in accordance with the above rights and restrictions. These meetings will be used to coordinate the scheduling of RTX and the City's use of the fields for purposes of allowing the City to provide use of the Recreation Fields for City Participants that have ongoing or seasonal needs for recreation fields. Case -by -case uses that are known in advance shall also be discussed at these meetings but can also be communicated about at any time. 4. City's Use Policy. All use of the Recreational Fields, once approved by RTX as set forth above, shall be administered by and through City. The City has an approved "Athletic Field/Facility Use and Allocation Policy," as set forth herein as Exhibit B ("City Policy"). City shall utilize the City Policy (e.g. Process for Obtaining Permits, Liability Insurance Requirements, Miscellaneous Rules, Trash/Field Clean, Athletic Field/Facility Use Rules and Regulations, Application and Agreement Request) and require all users of the Recreational Fields to comply with the relevant provisions and requirements of the City Policy. Any changes to the City Policy are subject to review by RTX for use of the Recreational Fields. 5. Compliance with RTX Rules and Regulations. The use by the City and City Participants of the Recreational Fields and associated parking shall comply with RTX rules and regulations, including but not limited to the requirement that City Participants sign a Use Agreement and Agreement to Release and Indemnify RTX. Failure by any user to comply with the RTX Park Rules shall result in suspension of the such user's use of the Recreational Fields. The current TRX rules and regulations and use agreement, and release and indemnity agreement are attached hereto as Exhibit C and RTX retains the right to amend these rules, regulations and agreements from time to time in its reasonable discretion. 6. Maintenance Obli ate. RTX shall be solely responsible for all maintenance obligations of the Recreational Fields. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, City shall have no financial liability for the use of the Recreational Fields. 7. Liability Insurance; Indemnity. a. RTX shall require liability insurance from City and all users in the amounts set for in the Liability Insurance Requirements section of the City Policy. City 65331.00002\34261898.3 2 Page 129 of 500 shall provide, upon request by RTX, evidence of such coverages, which shall name RTX as an additional insured. b. The City hereby agree to indemnify and hold RTX harmless from and against all claims, losses, liabilities, obligations, costs, expenses and damages, whether incidental, consequential or special, including legal fees and expenses, arising out of (i) City Participants' use and occupancy on the Recreational Fields pursuant to this Agreement, (ii) any breach or default on their part in the performance of any of their obligations under this Agreement, or (iii) any act or negligence of the City or of any of their agents, contractors, servants, employees or licensees with respect to the Recreational Fields. The City's indemnity shall not extend to claims, losses, liabilities, obligations, costs, expenses and damages, whether incidental, consequential or special, including legal fees and expenses, arising out of the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of RTX. This indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement. 8. Term; Termination. This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2022, and shall continue in effect at least until the earlier of (i) January 1, 2036, (ii) expiration of the Development Agreement between the City and RTX dated March 24, 2016, and any amendments thereto, or (iii) the satisfaction by RTX of the requirements set forth in Section 9 of such Development Agreement. Thereafter, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed from year to year, unless either party gives notice to the other party, on or before May 1 of each year, of its intent to seek amendment or not to renew this Agreement. 9. Security. The Recreational Fields are located within a secure campus and all users will be subject to the security requirements of RTX and will be required to be pre - approved for entry and provide required identification. No one will be admitted that is not pre -approved by RTX in their sole discretion. 10. Notice. Notices under this Agreement shall be given in writing, by personal delivery, or first class mail, addressed to: City of El Segundo Attn: City Manager 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 City of El Segundo Attn: City Clerk 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Raytheon Company Attn: [address] 65331.00002\34261898.3 Page 130 of 500 Either party may change the person or address to which notices shall be given by providing written notice to the other party. 11. Complete and Final Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein, and represents the complete and final expression of the parties and supersedes any prior written or oral discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements between the parties. 12. Successors and Assigns; Transfer or Sale. No interest in this Agreement shall be sold, assigned, pledged or alienated in any manner without the written consent of the other party. This Agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 13. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is not intended to and shall not be construed to give any person or entity other than the parties signatory hereto, or their respective successors, assigns, heirs and legal representatives any interest or rights (including without limitation any third party beneficiary rights) with respect to or in connection with any Agreement or provision contained herein or contemplated hereby. 14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together constitute one and the same document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have approved the execution of this Agreement by their duly authorized representatives, this day of , 2021. CITY OF EL SEGUNDO Mayor, City of El Segundo Dated: .2021 Attest: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Mark Hensley, City Attorney 65331.00002\34261898.3 4 Page 131 of 500 RAYTHEON COMPANY By: Dated: .2021 653 31.00002\34261898.3 Page 132 of 500 EXHIBIT "A" RECREATIONAL FIELDS [Insert Map of Recreational Fields] 65331.00002\34261898.3 Page 133 of 500 A 6 ; + + I - 2 sporting events per day 1 softball field 1 soccer field _'" ► y.+ Picnic area — considered special event Tennis courts- . � special event -- fir' Softbal r field S � a• °ccer field •*ir.,G,- Softball field = r "a 21 -49 Page 134 of 500 EXHIBIT `B" CITY POLICY [Insert 2015 Athletic Field/Facility Use and Allocation Policy] 65331.00002\34261898.3 Page 135 of 500 Raytheon Employee Park Rules Hours: Sunrise to 9:00 p.m. Prior approval/authorization required to use the park • The park is for company use only and is not open to the public- Only employees and their guest (s) are allowed. Public or special event use must be coordinated through the City of El Segundo contact Shawn Green 310 227-5937. • Park guest(s) - Must adhere to all state and local public health guidance and regulations • Park guest must be accompanied by an employee at all times, unless authorized as an approved event through the City of El Segundo • Park guest must clean up after themselves • Park guest must bring their own equipment and remove the equipment when they leave • No animals or pets permitted (except for service animals) • No alcoholic beverages allowed without prior written approval • The following items and activities are prohibited: golf, baseball, skateboards, skates, bicycles, boomerangs, kites, model rockets, and powered or remote controlled models or toys • No vehicles are allowed on the park grounds • Raytheon assumes no liability for lost or stolen items — use the park at your own risk To report an emergency, call 310.607.7777 For questions contact Shawn Green 310 227-5937 Page 136 of 500 Raytheon El Segundo Baseball Field Use Agreement And Agreement To Release And Indemnify On , 2021 ("Effective Date"), Raytheon Company ("Raytheon") hereby grants "(COMPANY NAME)" permission to enter onto the Raytheon property located at 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA, for the sole purpose of using Raytheon's baseball field (the "Facility") by (COMPANY NAME)'s participants (hereinafter referred to as the "Activity"). Raytheon and (COMPANY NAME) understand and agree to the following: Facility Use License: Raytheon hereby authorizes (COMPANY NAME) and its participants, including players, families, spectators, umpires and (COMPANY NAME) officials to enter Raytheon's property to use the Facility, including the adjacent parking lot and bathrooms. 2. Term: The time periods for this agreement is from ,and may be extended only if the parties mutually agree in writing. 3. Entry on and Use of Raytheon Property: The Facility is located on a restricted access property, so (COMPANY NAME) participants must do the following to gain entry: a. Enter the property through the gate at the intersection of El Segundo and Intercontinental Boulevards; b. Inform the security guard the purpose of the entry; c. Show photo identification and, if requested, have their vehicle visually searched (as all cars entering the property are required to do); d. Park in the lot nearest to the baseball field; e. Comply with all traffic control signs; f. Comply with Raytheon Security guidance and instructions to ensure safety at all times on the property; g. Comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations; h. Depart the property immediately when instructed by Raytheon Security, and refusal to do so will be treated as trespassing subject to legal enforcement; and i. Remove all equipment and trash from the Facility at the end of each day's use. 4. Facility Schedule Coordination: To ensure the Facility is available for use on (COMPANY NAME)'s requested dates and times, (COMPANY NAME) must coordinate with Chanea Banks (cm ban ks(@raytheon.com); 310-505-9677) at least 30 days in advance of the first use. Raytheon reserves the right to deny any request for use of the Facility and/or limit access to the Facility with or without advance notice. However, Raytheon will use reasonable efforts to provide advance notice to Page 137 of 500 (COMPANY NAME) of all scheduling changes and to ensure Security is informed of (COMPANY NAME)'s scheduled use. 5. Termination: Raytheon may terminate this agreement at any time with a 30-days advance written notice. In its sole discretion, Raytheon may terminate this agreement immediately if (COMPANY NAME) participants: a. Violate Raytheon rules and regulations pertaining to access to the property or use of the Facility; or b. Cause damage to the Facility or any other facilities or appurtenances on the Raytheon property. 6. Disputes & Remedies: a. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party's rights and remedies under this agreement are in addition to its rights and remedies at law or in equity. A party's failure to enforce any of its rights shall not constitute a waiver of such rights or of any other rights and shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of any such provisions, rights or remedies; rather, the same shall remain in full force and effect. 7. Publicity: A party may only use the other party's name, logo, trademark, service mark, or trade dress for the purpose of advertising, making a news release, creating a business reference, creating website content or endorsement, with that party's prior written consent. 8. Warranty: 9. Raytheon does not warrant the condition of the Facility for (COMPANY NAME)'s use. (COMPANY NAME) agrees to use the Facility as -is and accepts responsibility for putting the Facility in the condition needed for its use. 10. (COMPANY NAME) shall be liable for all damage to the Facility and its appurtenances caused by (COMPANY NAME) participants, and shall reimburse Raytheon for reasonable repair or replacement costs, including Raytheon's reasonable management. costs. 11.Assignment: Neither party may assign this agreement without the other party's prior written consent. 12. Relationship: This agreement does not constitute or create a joint venture, pooling arrangement, partnership, or formal business organization of any kind, and the parties' rights and obligations are only those expressly set forth herein. Neither party has the authority to bind the other except to the extent expressly authorized herein. Neither party shall act as an agent for the other. 2 Page 138 of 500 13. Limitation of Liabili a. Indemnity: In consideration of the permission hereby extended to (COMPANY NAME) by Raytheon under this agreement, (COMPANY NAME) hereby agrees to release, indemnify and hold harmless Raytheon (including, but not limited to its officers, directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns), from any and all liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, for personal injury, property damage or other claims, known or unknown and whether or not well founded in fact or law, which third parties or (COMPANY NAME) (including, but not limited to its officers, directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns) has or may have arising as a result of the permission extended to (COMPANY NAME) pursuant to this agreement. 14.Insurance: a. (COMPANY NAME) shall maintain Commercial General Liability coverage (including bodily injury and property damage, products / completed operations coverage and contractual liability coverage) with a limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence. b. Upon Raytheon's request, (COMPANY NAME) shall (i) provide Raytheon with certificates of insurance evidencing required insurance, (ii) arrange for a waiver of subrogation in favor of Raytheon, and (iii) in the case of the Commercial General Liability policies direct that Raytheon be added as an additional insured. 15. Notices: All notices under this agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly delivered when sent to the other party by (a) certified mail or express mail at the following address (or such address as a Party designates in writing), or (b) by email to the following address when the other party confirms receipt of the email. Raytheon Company Company Name 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd. Street Address M/S EO/E04/P120 City, Zip Code El Segundo, CA 90254 Supply Chain Management Contact Name. ATTN: Kelly Bennett Phone: Email: kel ly. J. ben nett(a-),raytheon. com Email: 16.COVID Regulation Compliance: (COMPANY NAME) shall be solely responsible for compliance with all state and local public health guidance and regulations. By signing below, (COMPANY NAME) acknowledges that it has read and understands this agreement. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, which shall be the forum for any actions filed under or incident to this agreement or to the Activity. If 3 Page 139 of 500 any portion of this agreement is held invalid, the rest of the document shall continue in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties executed this agreement in duplicate originals by their duly authorized representatives effective as of the day and year last below written. Raytheon Company Signature Name: Title: Supply Chain Management Date: , 2021 0 COMPANY NAME Signature Name: Title: Date: 2021 Page 140 of 500 EXHIBIT F [INSERT REVISED] EXHIBIT F -2- 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 141 of 500 4:{:I : M flui Z > U Z 00 EL SEGUNDO BLVD ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ o a .. NOTA ■ ART 16 15 -• •••■- ♦ ♦ 2 ♦ ♦ 3 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ .. ...� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 ♦ .. .. ■.14 ... ■■ ........ ... .. ...... ■ ■ 024 ■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■■ Q' N �- ■■■ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ �GJ� 19.■r.... ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ P` .. .... PHASE IV 0 5 18 O Gay 12 1 11 uW / 2 10 2y _ ■ . 0 .....::::'::PHA E II PHASE I F � N .............. GAF '----' PHASE II s - PHASE III PHASE IV Page 142 of 500 I Exhibit Parcel # Tract Map 71551 "ract Map 83567 I 1 1 - I Z I 3 4 5 G I $ 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I 13 I 14 I 15 I 16 16 I 17 17 I 18 - 1 I 19 - 2 I 20 - 3 I 21 4 I 22 - 12 I 23 - 13 I 24 24 - I 25 25 - I 26 26 - Page 143 of 500 EXHIBIT G [INSERT 3 ACRES PARCEL] EXHIBIT G -3- 65331.00005\34591924.3 Page 144 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM (EA-1305) TO THE EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPROVED UNDER EA-905 TO ANALYZE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SPORTS FACILITY WITH ASSOCIATED PRACTICE FIELDS WITHIN PHASE II OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND A NEW STORAGE BUILDING WITHIN PHASE IV OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN. The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds: A. On December 15, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4958, certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report (EA-905) ("FEIR") for the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2012101081). B. In approving Resolution 4958, the Council found that: 1. The City completed a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for this project and a noticed Public Scoping meeting was conducted on November 5, 2012 pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines §15083. A Notice of Preparation of the DEIR was circulated for public review from October 29, 2012 to November 28, 2012 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15082. A Notice of Completion for the DEIR was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research on July 14, 2014 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15085. The public comment and review period for the DEIR was open between July 14, 2014 and August 27, 2014 in compliance with CEQA Guidelines §15087. 2. The FEIR was reviewed by the City Council and the information contained in the FEIR was considered by the City Council before approving the project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15090. 3. The FEIR was prepared under the City's direction and reflects its independent judgment and analysis of the environmental impacts and comments received on the DEIR. 4. The DEIR generally identified, for each potentially significant impact of the project, one or more corresponding mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a level of insignificance, with the exception of air quality and noise impacts. The City Council found that nearly all of the potentially significant impacts identified in the DEIR were mitigated by corresponding mitigation measures to the extent set forth in the DEIR. 5. Written findings were considered for each of the significant environmental effects identified in the DEIR before certifying the FEIR, which included a Page 145 of 500 rationale of how mitigation measures lessened the significant environmental effects to a less than significant level for those effects that were identified as mitigatable. For the four environmental effects that were identified in the DEIR as not mitigatable to a less than significant level (Land Use and Planning, Transportation and Traffic, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions), the findings provide a rationale on how proposed mitigation measures have substantially lessened the four environmental effects 6. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15093, a Statement of Overriding Consideration ("SOC") was included in the project's record for City Council consideration that identified specific reasons to support approval of the project based on information in the FEIR and in the project's record. 7. The specific issues included in the SOC considered by the City Council were: a) The project helps foster economic development, business retention, municipal tax base and job creation in the City; b) The project provides opportunity for the City's largest employer to grow and expand operations within the City; c) project approval will trigger one annual payment of $500,000 and five subsequent annual payments of $700,000 towards the City's General Fund for a total of $4,000,000 that can be used by the City for any purpose; d) If the Nash Street Extension roadway improvements are not completed within 10 years of project approval, then the applicant would pay the City an additional $5,000,000; e) An additional fee of $.50 per square foot of new development is required to be paid as development of the project occurs (resulting in $1,000,000 if the conceptual plan is fully built); f) Roadway improvements consistent with the General Plan will result from the project; g) Bicycle and Pedestrian network improvements will be constructed as part of the project; h) Increased density at the project location is consistent with regional growth strategies, such as the SCAG Compass Blueprint Growth Vision Program; and i) The project could result in potential benefits such as access to additional land for roadway links, potential for the City to accept land for a new public park and a monetary contribution, up to $375,000, to City sewer improvements. C. On October 4, 2021, Lionel Uhry filed applications for Minor Modifications to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan ("ESSCSP") No. 11-01 Revision A, Second Amendment to Development Agreement ("DA") No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 (SUB21-03), Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01, and Environmental Assessment ("EA") No. 1305 to adopt an Addendum to the certified FEIR, for construction of a three-story building with partial basement totaling approximately 143,250 gross square feet and 122,080 square feet of net floor area, athletic practice fields, and parking in surface lots for a new sports facility for an organization on a 13.7- acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7 and 8). oil Page 146 of 500 D. On October 4, 2021, Emily Murray, Esq. filed an application for Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-02 for the construction of a one-story storage building totaling 5,865 gross square feet and 5,237 of net floor area for Raytheon's use in the southeast portion of section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard (Parcel 18). The proposed storage building would replace buildings E-20 and E-21, which would be demolished in favor of the new storage building. E. Approval of the proposed project ("Project") is a subsequent discretionary action in furtherance of the ESSCSP and requires minor amendments thereto. F. The applications have been reviewed by the City's Development Services Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan, and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") and the ESSCSP. G. The Development Services Department commissioned Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to evaluate the environmental impact of the proposed modifications to the ESSCSP FEIR in light of the standards for subsequent environmental review outlined in Public Resources Code §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162. Based on Kimley-Horn and Associates' evaluation of the environmental impact of the proposed modifications to the ESSCSP project, it prepared an Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15164. H. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Addendum. The Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information, findings and conclusions contained in the Addendum to the FEIR, including, without limitation, the FEIR and supporting documents, together with all comments provided at the public hearing and all other information in the administrative record. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the Addendum. SECTION 2. Approval and Findings in Support. The City Council approves the Addendum to the FEIR based upon the following: A. The Addendum to FEIR was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission during a public hearing at its meeting held on November 18, 2021 at which the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 2902, recommending City Council adoption of the Addendum to the FEIR. B. The City is the lead agency for the Project. The Addendum was prepared for the Project in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and is adequate and appropriate for the City's use as the lead agency. C. Based upon the totality of the evidence in the record and as demonstrated by the analysis set forth in the Addendum, none of the conditions described in Sections 3 Page 147 of 500 15162 or 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative declaration have occurred. Specifically: 1. The proposed modifications to the ESSCSP and the related entitlements do not constitute substantial changes in the project that will require major revisions to the FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. 2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions of the FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. 3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous FEIR was certified, that shows any of the following: (A) the modifications will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the certified FEIR; (B) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the certified FEIR; (C) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or (D) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the certified FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. D. The evaluation of the proposed modifications to the ESSCSP project, FEIR, and Addendum reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis based on its review of the entire administrative record. E. The City Council finds and determines that the ESSCSP FEIR, together with the Addendum, satisfy of all the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Project. F. All Conditions and Mitigation Measures identified in the FEIR, on file with the State of California (SCH # 2012101081), remain in full force and effect. G. Per State CEQA Guidelines section 15164(c), the Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review but can be attached to the adopted FEIR. SECTION 3. Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determination in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City n Page 148 of 500 Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 4. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. SECTION 5. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. SECTION 6. Signature Authority. The Mayor or presiding officer is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk or her duly appointed deputy is directed to attest thereto. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately. SECTION 8. City Clerk Direction. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make a record of this action in the meeting's minutes. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of Drew Boyles, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1 SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO , 2021. I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: 5 Page 149 of 500 ABSENT: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney Page 150 of 500 Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum to the Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2012101081) November 2021 JO 191^ W..�R L �� S Y Page 151 of 500 ADDENDUM TO THE RAYTHEON EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2012101081) PROFESSIONAL SPORTS HEADQUARTERS AND TRAINING FACILITY PROJECT Prepared For: City of El Segundo 350 Main Street El Segundo, CA 90245 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1100 W. Town and Country, Suite 700 Orange, CA 92868 November 2021 Page 152 of 500 Page 153 of 500 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Addendum...................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements................................................................................1-1 1.3 Background and History......................................................................................................1-2 1.4 Summary of Analysis and Findings.......................................................................................1-3 1.5 Incorporation by Reference.................................................................................................1-4 2 Proposed Project Description......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Proposed Project Location and Setting................................................................................2-1 2.2 Proposed Project Characteristics.........................................................................................2-3 2.3 Proposed Project Approvals................................................................................................2-9 3 ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary................................................................... 3-1 4 Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis...........................................................................4-1 4.1 Aesthetics...........................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources....................................................................................4-4 4.3 Air Quality...........................................................................................................................4-6 4.4 Biological Resources..........................................................................................................4-12 4.5 Cultural Resources............................................................................................................4-15 4.6 Geology and Soils..............................................................................................................4-17 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change)....................................................................4-22 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.....................................................................................4-27 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality............................................................................................4-34 4.10 Land Use and Planning......................................................................................................4-39 4.11 Mineral Resources.............................................................................................................4-42 4.12 Noise.................................................................................................................................4-43 4.13 Population and Housing....................................................................................................4-46 4.14 Public Services...................................................................................................................4-48 4.15 Recreation.........................................................................................................................4-53 4.16 Transportation..................................................................................................................4-53 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems.............................................................................................4-58 4.18 Wildfire.............................................................................................................................4-64 4.19 Energy...............................................................................................................................4-64 4.20 Tribal Cultural Resources...................................................................................................4-66 Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 i Page 154 of 500 Table of Contents LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 2-1: Development Agreement Phases..................................................................................... 2-11 Exhibit 2-2: Regional Context.............................................................................................................. 2-13 Exhibit2-3: Local Context................................................................................................................... 2-15 Exhibit 2-4: Proposed Project Within the ESSCSP................................................................................ 2-17 Exhibit 2-5: Conceptual Site Plan for Corporate Headquarters............................................................ 2-19 Exhibit 2-6: Corporate Headquarters Elevations.................................................................................. 2-21 Exhibit 2-7: Conceptual Site Plan for Storage Building.........................................................................2-23 Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan...................................................................................................... 2-25 Exhibit 2-9: Revised Conceptual Site Plan............................................................................................ 2-27 Exhibit 2-10: Conceptual Landscape Plan............................................................................................ 2-29 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: Existing Raytheon Campus Uses........................................................................................... 2-2 Table 2-2: Existing Conceptual Development Scenario......................................................................... 2-3 Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Development Scenarios ............................................. 2-4 Table 2-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Tract Maps................................................................ 2-7 Table 4-1: Proposed Project Operational Emissions............................................................................4-10 Table 4-2: Proposed Project Business As Usual Greenhouse Gas Emissions.........................................4-24 Table 4-3: Proposed Project Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions.....................................................4-25 Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Employment Forecast..............................................4-47 Table 4-5: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Trip Generation.......................................................4-55 Table 4-6: Proposed Project Potable Water Demand..........................................................................4-61 Table 4-7: Proposed Project Wastewater Generation.........................................................................4-62 Table 4-8: Proposed Project Solid Waste Generation..........................................................................4-63 LIST OF APPENDICES A. ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table B. Inventory of Applicable Mitigation Measures C. Trip Generation Assessment Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project ii November 2021 Page 155 of 500 1.0 Introduction Page 156 of 500 1. Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of the Addendum This Addendum to the certified Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (State Clearinghouse #No. 2012101081) (RBF Consulting, January 2015) has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] §§21000 et seq.); the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR] §§15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementing CEQA as set forth by the City of El Segundo (City). This Addendum has been prepared to address minor changes to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) (Specific Plan No. 11-01), as described below, resulting from the proposed Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project (Proposed Project). 1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements The City is the Lead Agency under CEQA. When only some changes or additions to a previously certified EIR are necessary and none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines §15162 are met, CEQA allows the lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR (State CEQA Guidelines §15164(a)). State CEQA Guidelines §15164 state the following concerning an Addendum to an EIR: (a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in §15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in §15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. (d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to §15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. State CEQA Guidelines §15162(a) specifies that when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 1-1 Page 157 of 500 1. Introduction (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Additionally, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15162(b), if changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of [an EIR or] a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under State CEQA Guidelines § 15162(a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. New State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G thresholds do not constitute "new information" requiring additional environmental review.' State CEQA Guidelines §15164(a) states that "a lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in §15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." Refer also to Section 1.4: Summary of Analysis and Findings below for findings concerning the Proposed Project. 1.3 Background and History In 1978, a Precise Plan was approved for the approximately 142.28 gross acre Raytheon Company's Space and Airborne Systems (SAS) facility Campus site (Raytheon Campus or Campus) in the City's southeast portion to construct a total of 2,575,000 square feet (SF) of improvements for a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.42. In 1987, the City Council approved the last modification of the Precise Plan. Under the existing 1 Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 1-2 Page 158 of 500 1. Introduction approvals at that time, the Campus was built close to the maximum FAR allowed, which caused the Raytheon Company (Raytheon) to utilize property in other areas outside the Campus. To make efficient use of the Campus, Raytheon proposed the ESSCSP in December 2011 to allow development of the Specific Plan area in several phases. The ESSCSP established a maximum allowable development intensity within the 142-acre Specific Plan area of 3,718,889 net SF (4,231,547 gross SF)3 with any combination of allowed uses, provided that the FAR does not exceed a specified development square footage (at a maximum FAR of 0.60 within the ESSCSP area) and the specified peak hour trip ceiling on new development (26,585 daily trips, 3,042 AM peak hour trips, and 3,120 PM peak hour trips). It is noted, concerning Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part) where the Proposed Project would be located, the ESSCSP anticipated development of approximately 327,680 net SF (367,002 gross SF) as discussed in detail in Section 2.1.3: Existing General Plan and Zoning, below. For purposes of this analysis, the entitled/assumed development of Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part) hereinafter, is referred to as the "Approved Project." As of October 21, 2021 (i.e., inclusive of Phase I entitled development), approximately 1,866,750 net SF (approximately 2,095,950 gross SF) of entitled floor area remains within the ESSCSP; see Appendix A: ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table. An EIR was prepared to analyze the potential environmental impacts resulting from ESSCSP implementation. On December 15, 2015, the City adopted Resolution No. 4958, certifying the FEIR (Environmental Assessment No. EA-905), State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2012101081, in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. On January 19, 2016, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1516 approving the ESSCSP. Among others, the approvals included Subdivision No. SUB 11-02 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 71551) and Development Agreement No. DA 11-02. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 71551, which divided the ESSCSP area into 26 individual lots, was recorded November 27, 2019 (Instrument No. 20191313306); see Exhibit 2-1: Development Agreement Phases. Development Agreement No. DA 11-02 between the City and Raytheon Company, which specified the standards and conditions that would govern the property's development and detailed the Applicant's and City's obligations, was recorded on December 13, 2016. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement, which was recorded on November 13, 2019, established four development phases for the ESSCSP area; see Exhibit 2-1. On October 4, 2021, the City received applications for the Proposed Project. 1.4 Summary of Analysis and Findings Based upon the analysis of potential environmental consequences anticipated to occur from implementation of the Proposed Project (see Section 4.0: Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis), the Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated for in the FEIR. As demonstrated in this Addendum, the Proposed Project's potential impacts would either be the same or less than those anticipated for the Approved Project in the FEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the 2 Net square footage is the usable area of a specified space and excludes unusable space (e.g., common areas, hallways, and mechanical rooms). 3 Gross square footage contains all areas of a building, including maintenance areas, walkways, balconies, attics, common areas, and any walkable areas of the building. Parking lots are not included in gross square footage. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 1-3 Page 159 of 500 1. Introduction Proposed Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in the FEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines §15164, this Addendum to the previously certified FEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decision -making body must consider the whole of the data presented in the FEIR, as augmented by this Addendum. 1.5 Incorporation by Reference State CEQA Guidelines §15150 encourages environmental documents to incorporate by reference other documents that provide relevant data and analysis. The documents outlined below, which were utilized during preparation of this Addendum to the FEIR, are a matter of public record and are hereby incorporated by reference. These documents are available for review at the City of El Segundo Development Services Department, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245. • El Segundo General Plan • El Segundo General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report • El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11-01) (RBF Consulting, October 2015) • Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #No. 2012101081) (RBF Consulting, January 2015) Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 1-4 Page 160 of 500 2.0 Proposed Project Description Page 161 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description 2 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Proposed Project Location and Setting 2.1.1 Proposed Project Location The approximately 142-acre ESSCSP area is in the County of Los Angeles, approximately 19 miles southwest of Downtown Los Angeles; see Exhibit 2-2: Regional Context and Exhibit 2-3: Local Context. The Proposed Project involves 63.13 acres within the ESSCP area when accounting for all lots where modifications are proposed; see Exhibit 2-4: Proposed Project Within the ESSCSP for the Proposed Project's location within the ESSCSP area. 2.1.2 Proposed Project Setting (Existing Conditions) The ESSCSP area is in the City's southeast quadrant, in a predominantly light industrial area. The ESSCSP area is bounded by El Segundo Boulevard to the north, the elevated Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) C (Green) Line and an older industrial subdivision on Coral Circle to the east, a Union Pacific Railroad spur and the El Segundo sump to the south, and a Southern California Edison high voltage transmission easement to the west. The existing Raytheon Campus, inclusive of the demolition, includes approximately 1,788,889 net SF of mixed development within the 142-acre ESSCSP area. As indicated in Table 2-1: Existing Raytheon Campus Uses, there are 11 buildings on the Campus, including a recreation facility. The Proposed Project site is on generally level terrain and is fully built out and improved. Within Lots 7 and 8, the Proposed Project site is developed with various Raytheon uses/facilities, including approximately 13,196 SF of floor space in three buildings (E-20, which consists of two buildings, and E-21) used for storage and ancillary uses, various shade and other structures, an asphalt -paved surface parking lot, and ornamental landscaping. Within Lot 18, where the new storage building would be constructed, the Proposed Project site is developed with an unused wastewater treatment facility and an asphalt -paved surface parking lot, both Raytheon facilities. The following uses surround the Proposed Project site: • North: Raytheon Campus and associated surface parking lot; • South: Vacant lot and Union Pacific Railroad spur; • East: Metro C (Green) Line light rail and commercial offices; and • West: Vacant lot and the Edward C. Little Water Recycling Facility. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 2-1 Page 162 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description Table 2-1: Existing Raytheon Campus Uses Building Use Net Square Footage E-1 Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse 996,871 E-2 Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse 39,082 E-3 Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse 28,383 E-4 Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse 670,619 E-5 Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse 1,705 E-6 Office 2,263 E-7 Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse 49,966 E-201,2 Warehouse 9,245 E-211,2 Office, Warehouse 3,951 E-232 Warehouse 428 E-242,3 Recreation 0 Subtotal 1,802,5134 E-20, E-21, SP and FOR Assumed as Demolished -13,624 E-23, E-242 Total Existing Campus Uses After Demolition 1,788,889 Notes: 1. On the Proposed Project site. 2. Buildings E-20 (9,245 SF), E-21 (3,951 SF), E-23 (428), and E-24 (0 SF) were assumed as demolished and thus were previously excluded from the Existing Campus Uses calculation; see ESSCSP Table III-1, Land Use Summary, and FEIR Table 3-4, Land Use Summary. 3. Building E-24 includes locker rooms, restroom and shower rooms which are non - assignable areas for purposes of net square footage. 4. See FOR Table 3-1, Existing Development. Source: ESSCSP Table 1-1, Existing Uses. 2.1.3 Existing General Plan and Zoning The El Segundo General Plan (ESGP) Land Use Map depicts the City's land use designations and indicates the Proposed Project site is designated "El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan." The ESGP Land Use Element further describes the ESSCSP, as follows: "Permits a mix of office, commercial, retail, research and development, industrial, and related recreational uses. The maximum overall FAR in the Specific Plan is 0.60, based on the gross square foot size of the Specific Plan project area. (Reso 4958, GPA 11-01, 9/1/09)." The El Segundo Zoning Map depicts the location and boundaries of the City's various zones and indicates the Proposed Project site is zoned "ESSCSP — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan," which allows for commercial/office mixed -use, office/industrial mixed -use, and recreation/open space uses. The ESSCSP is a comprehensive policy and regulatory guidance document for the development of all properties within Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-2 November 2021 Page 163 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description the ESSCSP area. By providing the necessary regulatory and design guidance, the ESSCSP ensures that future development implements the ESGP goals and policies. The ESSCSP includes a land use plan, among other components. The ESSCSP Land Use Plan establishes the maximum allowable development within the ESSCSP area boundaries. As stated in the ESSCSP, the maximum development potential within the 142.28-acre Campus is based upon a FAR of 0.60, resulting in a maximum development intensity of 3,718,889 net SF (4,231,547 gross SF). ESSCSP Table III-1, Land Use Summary, anticipates that the allowed new development would total 1,930,000 net SF, or 2,161,600 gross SF.4 To allow for maximum flexibility within the Specific Plan area, the ESSCSP utilizes a mixed -use concept, with regulatory mechanisms to allow for transfers between land use types and planning areas, subject to various requirements concerning FAR, allowable land uses, and AM, PM, and daily trip generation ceilings. ESSCSP Exhibit 5, Land Use Plan, depicts the ESSCSP's land use plan and indicates the Proposed Project site is designated Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) and Recreation/Open Space (REC/OS). The Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use category includes a full range of commercial, office, warehousing, and light industrial land uses, allowing for new light industrial/R&D, office, and commercial uses. The Recreation/Open Space category includes the ESSCSP's private recreation facility. The ESSCSP's conceptual site plan is shown in ESSCSP Exhibit 6, Conceptual Site Plan. ESSCSP Table III-2, Land Use — Project Development Scenario, shows a potential implementation of the ESSCSP's land uses and standards based upon Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 71551 and the Conceptual Site Plan depicted in ESSCSP Exhibit 6. Table 2-2: Existing Conceptual Development Scenario provides the existing conceptual development capacity specifically concerning Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part), based on ESSCSP Table 111-2. Table 2-2: Existing Conceptual Development Scenario Building Building Assumed Lot Use Acres Area (Net) Area (SF) (Gross) (SF) FAR 7 Office 4.75 163,840 183,500.8 0.79 8 Office 5.81 163,840 183,500.8 0.65 18 (in part)' Not applicable Total 10.56 327,680 367,002 Note: 1. For Lot 18, the Specific Plan assumed 670,619 net SF (783,689 gross SF) of Existing Campus Uses - no new development was assumed. Source: ESSCSP Table III-2, Land Use — Project Development Scenario. 2.2 Proposed Project Characteristics The Applicant seeks approval of the Proposed Project for development of a corporate office headquarters on Lots 7 and 8 (ESSCSP Phase II area) and a pre-engineered manufactured storage building on Lot 18 (ESSCSP Phase IV area), at the ESSCSP area's southeast corner. Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and 4 City of El Segundo. (2015). El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Retrieved from https://www.elsegundo.org/home/showpublisheddocument/351/637110579836730000 (accessed August27,2021). Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 2-3 Page 164 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description Proposed Development Scenarios, compares the Proposed Project's development capacity to the Approved Project's development capacity. Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Development Scenarios Description Use Building Area (Net) (SF) Building Area (Gross) (SF) Existing Conceptual Development Scenario Lots 7 & 8 Office 327,680 367,002 Proposed Conceptual Development Scenario Lots 7 & 8 Building E-20 Demolition' Warehouse -9,245 -9,245 Lots 7 & 8 Building E-21 Demolition' Warehouse -3,951 -3,951 Subtotal Demolition -13,196 -13,196 Lots 7 & 8 New Construction Office 126,448 148,050 Lot 18 (in part) Warehouse 5,237 5,865 Totalz 131,685 153,915 Change (number) -195,995 -213,087 Change (percent) -60% -58% Notes: 1. Buildings E-20 (9,245 SF) and E-21 (3,951 SF) were assumed as demolished and thus were previously excluded from the Existing Campus Uses calculation; see ESSCSP Table III-1 and FEIR Table 3-4. 2. No credit taken for demolished Buildings E-20 and E-21 given these were previously excluded from Existing Campus Uses calculation; see Note No. 1 above. To accommodate the proposed development, the Proposed Project involves the following entitlements: SPR No. 21-01 for Site Plan Review of the Phase II area and SPR 21-02 for Site Plan Review of the Phase IV area; Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP (Specific Plan No. 11-01); Subdivision No. SUB 21-03 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507; and Amendment No. 2 to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02. 2.2.1 Site Plan Review The Proposed Project involves four key components: (1) The first component is the construction of a three-story corporate headquarters building totaling approximately 122,080 net SF (approximately 143,250 gross SF); see Exhibit 2-5: Conceptual Site Plan for Corporate Headquarters and Exhibit 2-6: Corporate Headquarters Elevations. The headquarters building would include dining areas, an auditorium, conference rooms, locker rooms, training rooms, a weight room, office space, storage rooms, a service area, and mechanical and electrical rooms. The headquarters building would have a maximum height of approximately 50 feet above ground surface (54 feet to top of parapet at elevator overrun); see Exhibit 2-5 and Exhibit 2-6. The headquarters building would house operations and business operations staff with typical business hours from 6:30 AM to 5:30 PM. A total of approximately 270 personnel would be employed at the corporate headquarters on a typical workday. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-4 November 2021 Page 165 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description (2) The second component is the construction of two single -story groundskeeping and maintenance buildings totaling approximately 4,368 net SF (approximately 4,800 gross SF) at the Proposed Project site's northeastern corner. (3) The third component is the construction of three full-size natural grass fields with a 29 feet and 4 inch to 30-foot wide artificial turf perimeter are proposed at the site's eastern portion. The three natural grass fields with the artificial turf perimeter would be 362 feet wide by 546 feet long. To serve Proposed Project components 1 through 3, 348 at -grade parking spaces would be provided in two surface parking lots (i.e., southern and eastern). Of the 348 parking spaces, 24 spaces would be electric vehicle (EV)-capable. A security booth would be located at the corporate headquarters' southern parking lot. Six types of perimeter fencing are proposed on the corporate headquarters site to buffer views of the proposed uses from adjacent areas, and specifically to prevent visibility into the corporate headquarters building and grass fields. • Type 1 and Type 2 Fencing: 8-foot high black metal vertical picket security fence around the perimeter of the fields. The fencing would be located to the north of the field adjacent to South Hughes Way and to the east and south of the fields adjacent to the maintenance building and parking lot. Additional colored panels for banners located at the entrance to the fields in proximity to the maintenance access drive are proposed. • Type 3 Fencing: 32-foot high tall netting to block views from the elevated Metro C (Green) Line to the Proposed Project site. • Type 4 Fencing: 8.0-foot high black chain link fencing along the Proposed Project site's southern boundary adjacent to the southern surface parking lot. • Type 5 Fencing: Existing 8-foot high silver chain link fencing to the west of the Type 4 fencing along the Proposed Project site's southern boundary to the south of the western surface parking lot. • Type 6 Fencing: 3.5-foot high black fencing located along the western parking lot's northern boundary. (4) The fourth component is the construction of a pre-engineered manufactured storage building totaling approximately 5,237 net SF (5,865 gross SF); see Exhibit 2-7: Conceptual Site Plan for Storage Building. The storage building would be used for Raytheon's business activities and does not include any employee -occupiable space. The building would be one-story and would be approximately 21 feet and 2 inches high. The building would be located on an existing foundation. Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way would remain. A 6-foot high chain link fence would be provided around the building's perimeter, with two chain link gates and two chain link rolling gates. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-5 November 2021 Page 166 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description 2.2.2 Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP (Specific Plan No. 11-01) The ESSCSP includes a land use plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 5) to establish the land use plan categories within the ESSCSP area boundaries. Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan depicts the existing and proposed ESSCSP land use plans. Exhibit 2-9: Revised Conceptual Site Plan depicts the existing and proposed ESSCSP conceptual site plan. To implement these proposed changes, the following Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP are proposed: • Exhibits. Modifications to various ESSCSP exhibits are proposed, including the Land Use Plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 5), Conceptual Site Plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 6), Vesting Tentative Map #71551(ESSCSP Exhibit 7), Utilities (ESSCSP Exhibits 8 through 12), and Infrastructure (Exhibits 13 through 16). • Nash Street Extension. The proposed modifications include realigning the Nash Street extension. The modifications to the Nash Street extension require minor utility relocations, as depicted in proposed ESSCSP Exhibits 8 through 16. • Recreational Facilities. The proposed modifications would decrease the land available for the ESSCSP Raytheon employee private outdoor recreational facilities (from approximately 7.54 acres on Lot 11 to approximately 7.34 acres on Lots 10 and 11). • Coral Circle Connection. The proposed modifications would realign/relocate the Coral Circle connection to the Nash Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The proposed modified circulation pattern would continue to provide for possible future connection from the Nash Street extension to Coral Circle (an easement through Lots 20 and 22) and capacity for additional parking for the Coral Circle businesses (Lots 20 and 22). Various ESSCSP text revisions are also proposed to account for the modifications described above. 2.2.3 Subdivision No. Sub 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507) Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 83507 would be required to finalize the proposed Nash Street extension and accommodate lots needed to implement the Proposed Project. VTTM No. 83507 proposes a new one phase subdivision of the property into 26 separate parcels, including parcels for future streets. Table 2-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Tract Maps details the VTTM modifications to implement the Proposed Project: Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-6 November 2021 Page 167 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description Table 2-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Tract Maps Existing Proposed Lot # VTTM No. 715511 Lot Number Lot Size VTTM No. 835072 Lot Number Lot Size 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 - 312,543 5 190,853 6 - 195,471 6 198,958 7 - 206,967 7 248,588 8 - 253,088 8 351,412 9 - 73,235 9 121,690 10 - 65,052 10 150,961 11 - 328,296 11 168,966 12 12 - 13 13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 - 799,640 1 801,916 19 - 363,159 2 342,894 20 - 15,941 3 28,004 21 - 99,992 4 100,387 22 - 14,458 12 18,233 23 - 21,944 13 26,904 24 24 - 25 25 - 26 26 - Notes: 1. The existing lot numbers are provided under "Land Use Plan (Existing)" in Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan. 2. The proposed lot numbers are provided under "Land Use Plan (Proposed)" in Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan. 2.2.4 Lighting and Signage Various types of lighting would be provided across the Proposed Project site. The corporate headquarters' southern and western parking lots would include lighting fixtures above the parking spaces and along the parking lot perimeters. Additionally, similar lighting fixtures would be provided adjacent to the maintenance building east of the grass fields (as described in the Site Plan Review subsection above). For Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-7 November 2021 Page 168 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description the corporate headquarters building, ceiling slot lighting would be fixed to the fagade along the building's western frontage. Floodlights with glare control and mounted lights behind fagade screens would be provided on the headquarters building southern frontage. Pedestrian pole lights would be provided by the headquarters building lobby. Ten approximately 70-feet high mounted poles with high performance low -spill LED shielded fixtures approximately 70 feet high would be provided around the natural grass fields. The fixtures would provide an average of 150 footcandles at the playing surface, with a maximum of 8 footcandles of spill light at the Proposed Project site boundary. While there is potential for nighttime use of the fields, the Proposed Project would comply with ESSCSP Chapter V, Design Guidelines, which states that all lighting would prevent direct glare onto adjacent properties. Signage will consist of internally illuminated wall signs, illuminated freestanding letters and surface applied architectural wall graphics with team and/or sponsor -related branding. Signage would be provided on all four elevations of the headquarters building. A monument sign, approximately 16.5 feet wide by 5 feet tall made of concrete and aluminum, is proposed at the western corner of the Proposed Project site by South Hughes Way. The monument sign would include illuminated graphics. 2.2.5 Access Regional access to the Proposed Project site would continue to be provided via 1-105 to the north, with an exit at North Nash Street, and via 1-405 to the east, with an exit at West El Segundo Boulevard. Local access to the Proposed Project would be provided via South Hughes Way, which is a six -lane divided roadway trending in an east -west direction. This entrance would provide right -in and right -out only traffic. Secondary access would be provided via the proposed North Nash Street extension, which would be a four -lane undivided roadway trending in a north -south orientation. This entrance would allow both left and right turns for ingress and egress traffic. Both streets would provide bicycle and pedestrian access to the Proposed Project site. Headquarters employees and visitors would enter the headquarters building from the south via a secured gated area. Visitors, media, or other staff would enter the building through the west via the main entry lobby. 2.2.6 Parking The Proposed Project would provide 348 at -grade parking spaces at two surface parking lots (i.e., southern and western). Of the 348 spaces, 24 would be EV-capable. Parking for staff and visitors would be provided at the western portion of the Proposed Project site to the west of the headquarters building. All 158 spaces for staff and visitor parking would be standard (9'x19') stalls. On the southern portion of the Proposed Project site, 187 spaces would be provided for employee parking. An additional three spaces would be provided east of the grass fields for the maintenance building. Bus parking would be provided along the headquarters building. Parking would be provided through controlled access that incorporates gates and security cameras. A truck dock and loading/staging area is proposed at the headquarters building southwest corner, adjacent to the building's main equipment storage area. In total, 20 bicycle parking stalls would be provided south of the headquarters building. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 2-8 Page 169 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description 2.2.7 Landscaping The Proposed Project's landscaping is depicted in Exhibit 2-10: Conceptual Landscape Plan. The Proposed Project would include approximately 325,458 SF of landscaped area. Planted areas (40,814 SF) would be provided around the headquarters building perimeter and as buffers to the south and east of the Proposed Project site. Hardscape (approximately 30,030 SF) would include a paved plaza to the west of building and a paved paseo and maintenance access to the north of the building. The sports fields would be natural grass (approximately 197,652 SF), while the fields' edges would be artificial turf (approximately 56,692 SF). There are 58 trees existing on -site, none of which would be retained. The Nash Street frontage would provide approximately 47 street trees. In the parking area, the Proposed Project would provide 32 trees, with the other 32 trees substituted by overhead photovoltaic (PV) panels. The ESSCSP requires that landscaped areas must cover five percent of the vehicular use area, and that each parking space must be located within 30 feet of a tree. Of this requirement, the Proposed Project would substitute 22 trees with the overhead PV panels. 2.2.8 Site Excavation and Grading Proposed Project development would require approximately 45,000 cubic yards (cy) of cut and 61,000 cy of fill, resulting in a net of 16,000 cy of fill import. 2.2.9 Construction Schedule Construction would occur in one phase for a total of 25 months. Construction would take place Monday through Saturday from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Demolition and site grading would start in April 2022 and last until September 2022. Approximately 13,196 SF of existing building space in Lots 7 and 8 would be demolished and the wastewater treatment facility in Lot 18 would be removed. Building and site construction is anticipated to begin September 2022 and is anticipated to end May 2024. The Proposed Project is estimated to be operational in May 2024. 2.3 Proposed Project Approvals The City is the Lead Agency as set forth in Public Resources Code §21067 and is responsible for reviewing and approving this Addendum to the FEIR. In addition to the Addendum, the City will consider the following discretionary approvals for the Proposed Project: • Environmental Assessment No. EA-1305; • Site Plan Review No. 21-01 for Sports Facility; • Site Plan Review No. 21-02 for Storage Facility; • Minor Modifications to Specific Plan No. 11-01; • A new Subdivision Map No. 21-03; and • A Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 2-9 Page 170 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-10 November 2021 Page 171 of 500 VAPHASE1 PHASE I WPHASE1 r� Source: Amended 2019 Exhibit P H w Z W J F- Z J � � m Gi ecr_i ininn Ri yin EXHIBIT 2-1: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PHASES Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR Kimley»>Horn Page 172 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-12 November 2021 Page 173 of 500 VL 4 ' •'�a' I -, L. Sr181I �$S I L w r ` r � r dw . � �,V y . 7• h it jt I i ; r r a'd ` 1 ' - 4 AL r + Proje Site .i xO -- - ` TO JL jr 9 .t ndA r,nc7 ;tln1 t ramIF ' s 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-14 November 2021 Page 175 of 500 Im' I,- �41 IL 9t _East El Seciundi� 66uley;d ;j cn 40 ..�-%.I.35'th S tre f'4 ass ?D J.Aipi:4 JF 31 R. 4M A7 Ll.. R6secr4ris.Avenue 41 _rrw 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-16 November 2021 Page 177 of 500 0" sip d; 0 'A' NNO :e Aa e rTdo B Awlevard cn, El Segundo South Cam pec so Nit ific cn CD Ph cn z F0 1f pip:AV# - 1. I j;- M;imlr . /�" ` y� _ I'. . < ji CD lD COL Proid West 'l 35t -.;n L U ;J- kosecrans Avenue L! l" ak U. a V i j p 'k' MA I 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-18 November 2021 Page 179 of 500 CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY SOCAL EDISON UTILIT PARKING COUNTS - VEHICLE & BIKE A-/ yTF. Ref NoM I EXHIBIT 2-5: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FOR CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS Kimley >> Horn Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR Page 180 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-20 November 2021 Page 181 of 500 --1 SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE 1.250 SF 300 SF 4.760 SF SIGN GE lsl WEST ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE PARKING LOT TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,732 SF NEW- SIGNAGE SIGNAGE 240 SF 650 SF SIGNAGE 2.5'•120' EAST ELEVATION- FACING TOWARD THE FIELD TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,814 SF NORTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE STREET SIGNAGE SIGNAGE 160 SF TOTAL FACADE AREA: 10,618 SF SIG AGE fill L SOUTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE RAIL YARD TOTAL FACADE AREA: 11,200 SF EXHIBIT 2-6: CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS ELEVATIONS Kimley>>> Horn Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR Page 182 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-22 November 2021 Page 183 of 500 --------------- OVERED . HEMICA STORAG W CAGE I ING PMENTi _ �T INS SECURED STORAGE SHED UTILITY YARD EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN EXISTING EQUIPMENT DEMOLISHED/REMOVED FOR PROPOSED BUILDING maw_ - 14 NEW PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING STREET ABOVE RETAINING WALL W/ 6' TALL -10 FEET ABOVE UTILITY CHAINLINK FENCE ABOVE YARD -EXISTING EQUIPMENT e TO REMAIN I F 7MZEIIANIC LIQUID MA NITROGEN EXISTING / EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING PROJECT SITE CURRENT SITE PHOTO OVERALL SITE PLAN EXHIBIT 2-7: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FOR STORAGE BUILDING ]1rKirn1ey\)) Horn Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR Page 184 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-24 November 2021 Page 185 of 500 L� CMU ... 2 16 10 (M 1 24 14 cMu 24 -. s CMU a UC/OS O/IMU, L 17 01 U 0/IM 0/IMU 1 9 26 `REC 06 i �� 26 0/IMU 19 5 18 18 25 23 25 e 11 23 � cios 12 22 it REc/OS - 22 10 21 6 21 6 910 --20 20 i �Tziil 2 8 8 - /IMU O/IMU Land Use Plan (Existing) =Commercial/Office Mixed Use Land Use Plan (Proposed) - CanrywcW / 01ke Moved Use -Office / Idust ial Mixed Use - Office / Ind MmW Moved Use -Recreation /Open Space Recreaor/Open Space EXHIBIT 2-8: REVISED LAND USE PLAN Kimley >> Horn Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR Page 186 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-26 November 2021 Page 187 of 500 4:uw[91..: � C:ol].-W'• 3 scsscurvoae dc r_.a-..--• - — —_ TS- F __-_ __ •t 9 +. 3 14' 3 14 24 « 24 '� � F � � ♦ 1 fir„ �xTy �� � � „ � 4 � � r, r 17 17 13 6 (YJ i 7 PM f1Tl i l•J f T. Eo E 19 26 '5 q `-; 26 5 18 .:L p 25 s\ 23 25 12 12 22 22 10 21 .. 21 6 a-20 =; 20 � � � 1 ell ,. OF C*s ' s EXHIBIT 2-9: REVISED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Kimley >> Horn Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR Page 188 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-28 November 2021 Page 189 of 500 MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS V \s\ O I�--1 , METRO GREEN LINE II 1 11 PROPERTY LINE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 4 ll ARCHITECTURE OVERHEAD ``. \� ♦ \ \ \h \ �S zi O SOCAL EDISON LOADING DOCK UTILITY YARD ` SECU�T. SOLAR PANELS (ABOVE)' fir,,' e r' ,"" ; LANDSCAPE AREA BUILDING PERIMETER ao<.� Wx1 swTV ZlMm cows vox. u xxuuu xaumxTu onnx w (n w EuixsruE sxu eE xixiuuu w (1) — mE aeu 1 w mE 111Na non maE - umnou my EABBE sm non - xnTuxu uw ,esx savT VEHICULAR USE AREA (VUA) we (1) ma lax E\mY Txxe mwswB (AM) WME 1¢r w wA u ienoscwc uus sx4ne swT —T (W. (-) — lac i..T ws , — vxon— — rcx-- as (WA) muAY FEET. M11. / ],wa - B< mai iswxfn (s) - Lwrto( m (aa) IE a i T�E.11 A.wD u x w x w ((El wo PROPERTY PERIMETER ttx Eu+Exu ,uB scrum cnsw vox: (p wABE ma uusT BE vxourcB vw —1 Rzs) w 1—T EXHIBIT 2-10: CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR > F y O VEHICULAR USE AREA O2 PLANTED SLOPE r r O3 PAVED PLAZA O PAVED PASEO AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS O POOLAREA © PLANTED BUFFER O SPORTS FIELDS Kimley ))Horn Page 190 of 500 2. Proposed Project Description This page intentionally left blank Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 2-30 November 2021 Page 191 of 500 3.0 ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Page 192 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary 3 ESSCSP FEIR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY The ESSCSP FEIR's environmental impacts are summarized below: Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated 1. AESTHETICS. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, ❑ forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-1 November 2021 Page 193 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-2 November 2021 Page 194 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ❑ on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-3 November 2021 Page 195 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ Z ❑ ❑ 3) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ Z ❑ liquefaction? 4) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ❑ that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the California Building Code (2001), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ❑ of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ® ❑ ❑ ❑ indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ® ❑ ❑ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-4 November 2021 Page 196 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ® ❑ ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ ® ❑ acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or ❑ ® ❑ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-5 November 2021 Page 197 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Z ❑ ❑ ❑ site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Z ❑ ❑ ❑ site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ® ❑ ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?? ❑ 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ® ❑ ❑ ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating and environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ❑ or natural community conservation plan? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-6 November 2021 Page 198 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important ❑ mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 12. NOISE. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ❑ ® ❑ levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ ® ❑ ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within the vicinity of a private ❑ ® ❑ airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ ® ❑ directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-7 November 2021 Page 199 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? 2) Police protection? 3) Schools? 4) Parks? 5) Other public facilities? 15. RECREATION. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ ® ❑ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ❑ ® ❑ require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-8 November 2021 Page 200 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the ESSCSP project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ ® ❑ applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ ® ❑ ❑ water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ® ❑ project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-9 November 2021 Page 201 of 500 3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary Significant Less Than and Significant Less Than No With Significant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact Issues Impact Incorporated e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ regulations related to solid waste? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 3-10 November 2021 Page 202 of 500 we Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Page 203 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4 PROPOSED PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The scope of the City's review of the Proposed Project is set forth in the State CEQA Guidelines. As stated in Section 1.2: Statutory Authority and Requirements, this review is limited to evaluating the Proposed Project's environmental effects when compared to the Approved Project, as evaluated in the FEIR. This Addendum also considers new information, if any, of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the FEIR was certified. As stated in Section 1.4: Summary of Analysis and Findings, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15162, since the City has determined that Proposed Project implementation does not propose substantial changes to the Approved Project, no substantial changes in circumstances would occur which would require major revisions to the FEIR, and no new information of substantial importance has been revealed since the certification of FEIR that would result in either new significant effects or an increase in the severity of previously analyzed significant effects. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was developed to monitor the FEIR's recommended mitigation measures. The MMRP was adopted as a part of the FEIR to avoid or mitigate the ESSCSP's significant environmental impacts. The previously adopted mitigation measures applicable to the Proposed Project will be imposed as conditions of approval for the Proposed Project, as applicable. The mitigation measures applicable to the Approved Project are contained in Appendix B: Inventory of Applicable Mitigation Measures. 4.1 Aesthetics 4.1a Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.1-1) The FEIR concluded the ESSCSP would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista because none are present within the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no scenic vistas present within the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on scenic vistas, and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning scenic vistas would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.1b Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-1 Page 204 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.1-1) The FEIR concluded there are no State scenic highways located adjacent to the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not substantially damage scenic resources within State scenic highway. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no State scenic highways in the Proposed Project site's vicinity.5 Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on scenic resources within a State scenic highway, and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning scenic resources within a State Scenic Highway would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.1c If in a non -urbanized area, would the Project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.1-1— 4-1.4) Concerning visual character, the FEIR noted the ESSCSP area is dominated by the existing Raytheon SAS facility located primarily in the ESSCSP's central portion. Other uses that contribute to the ESSCSP area's visual character are the Metro C (Green) Line El Segundo Station and elevated railway, as well as the recreational areas located at the ESSCSP's northwest corner. The ESSCSP area is surrounded by urban/developed land, with no defining or cohesive architectural theme. While ESSCSP implementation would significantly alterthe area's visual character, it would not substantially degrade the visual character or quality of the ESSCSP area or its surroundings. Furthermore, all future development within the ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with ESSCSP provisions concerning permitted uses, development standards, and FAR limitations, which would ensure they would not degrade the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Moreover, the ESSCSP includes design guidelines that address criteria concerning buildings, landscaping, and signage, and are intended to promote the quality of design planned for the ESSCSP area. Therefore, adherence to the specified ESSCSP regulations and consideration to the specified guidelines, which the City would verify through the Site Plan Review process, would ensure that any future development would avoid conflicts with the character of the surrounding development. The ESSCSP would result in a less than significant impact concerning effects to visual character or quality. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site, which is in an urbanized area, is developed with various Raytheon uses/facilities, including three buildings used for storage and ancillary uses, various shade and other structures, various storage containers, an asphalt -paved surface parking lot, a s State of California, Department of Transportation Website, California Scenic Highway Mapping System, Officially Designated State and County Scenic Highways, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic/schwy.htm, Accessed September 21, 2021. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-2 Page 205 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis wastewater treatment facility, and ornamental landscaping. On the Proposed Project site's northern portion, existing uses would be replaced by a one-story butler building. On the Proposed Project site's southern portion, existing uses would be replaced by a three-story corporate headquarters building, two single -story groundskeeping and maintenance buildings, a sports practice facility (i.e., three full-size natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter), and a surface parking lot. The proposed uses would be visually compatible with the other land uses within the ESSCSP and in its vicinity. Through the Site Plan Review process, the City would verify the Proposed Project's consistency with the in ESSCSP's zoning and other regulations that govern visual and scenic quality, which are found in ESSCSP Section V: Design Guidelines, and ESSCSP Section VI: Development Standards. Therefore, following compliance with ESSCSP and City standards, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning regulations governing scenic quality and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning scenic quality would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.1d Would the Project create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.1-4 — 4.1-5) The FEIR noted that no light-sensitive land uses are located within or adjacent to the ESSCSP area. Additionally, future ESSCSP development would have similar light sources as existing development within and surrounding the area. Future ESSCSP land uses would develop as in -fill property that is surrounded by other commercial and industrial developments. Furthermore, the ESSCSP includes standards that are intended to ensure that exterior lighting is designed and located to avoid intrusive effects on adjacent properties. Future development within the ESSCSP would be reviewed by the City through the Site Plan Review process to verify compliance with ESSCSP exterior lighting standards. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur concerning light and glare. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: There are no light-sensitive land uses located on or near the Proposed Project site. The Proposed Project involves development of a corporate headquarters office building that would create new sources of light, including light emanating from building interiors passing through windows, and light from exterior sources (i.e., building illumination, security lighting, parking lot lighting, and landscape lighting). However, these light sources would be similar to those that exist within and surrounding the ESSCSP area. The southern and western parking lots would include lighting fixtures throughout the parking lot and along the parking lot perimeters. Additionally, mounted pole lighting would be provided around the natural grass fields, which could be utilized during nighttime hours. The fixtures would provide an average of 150 footcandles at the playing surface, with a maximum of 8 footcandles of spill light at the Proposed Project site boundary. While there is potential for nighttime use of the natural fields, the Proposed Project would comply with ESSCSP Chapter V, Design Guidelines, which states that all lighting would prevent direct glare onto adjacent properties. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-3 Page 206 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Although the Proposed Project would create new light sources, no light-sensitive land uses would be adversely affected by the Proposed Project, since none are located on or near the Proposed Project site. Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with ESSCSP standards found in Sections V and VI that are intended to ensure that the exterior lighting is designed and located to avoid intrusive effects on adjacent properties. Namely, the lighting design standards require that the type and location of parking area and building lighting prevent direct glare on to adjacent properties. To avoid adverse lighting effects, the City would verify the Proposed Project's compliance with the relevant ESSCSP standards through the Site Plan Review process. Therefore, following compliance with ESSCSP and City standards, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning light and glare and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning light and glare would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources 4.2a Would the Project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-1) The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP is not designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There is no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Important within ESSCSP boundaries. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on agricultural resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning agricultural resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.2b Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2) No agricultural zoning exists and no agricultural uses are permitted within the ESSCSP. Additionally, the ESSCSP is not part of a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There is no existing zoning for agricultural uses within or near the Proposed Project site. Further, the Proposed Project area is not part of Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract and no mitigation Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-4 Page 207 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis is required. No new or more severe impact concerning agricultural resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.2c Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2) The FEIR concluded there are no existing forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned areas within the ESSCSP. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no existing forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned areas within or near the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning forestry resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.2d Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non forest use? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2) The FEIR concluded there is no existing forestland within or near the ESSCSP. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no conversion of forest land to non -forest use would occur. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There is no existing forestland within or near the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in loss of forest land or its conversion to non -forest use and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning forestry resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.2e Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non forest use? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-5 Page 208 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2) The FEIR concluded no Farmland or forest land exist within or near the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: No Farmland or forest lands exist within or near the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not involve changes in the existing environment which, could result in conversion of Farmland or forest land and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning agricultural or forestry resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.3 Air Quality 4.3a Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.3-22 — 5.3-25) The FEIR analyzed the ESSCSP's potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). ESSCSP construction emissions would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of Mitigation Measures (MM) AQ-1 through AQ-4. ESSCSP operational emissions, however, would exceed the SCAQMD operational thresholds. Therefore, the ESSCSP could cause or affect a violation of the ambient air quality standards. While the ESSCSP would be consistent with the AQMP's goals and policies related to land use and growth, it would result in significant and unavoidable operational emissions due to exceedance of reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxide (NOx), and carbon monoxide (CO) thresholds. Thus, the ESSCSP would conflict with the 2012 AQMP resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: As detailed in Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Development Scenarios, the Proposed Project would develop approximately 58 percent less floor area (approximately 213,087 gross less SF) than the Approved Project. Additionally, as addressed in Threshold 4.16b Analysis of Proposed Project below, the Proposed Project would result in approximately 55 percent fewer daily vehicle trips than the Approved Project. As indicated in Table 4-1: Proposed Project Operational Emissions below, the Proposed Project's operational emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD operational thresholds. Proposed Project impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning conflicts with or obstructing implementation of the applicable air quality plan would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures AQ-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and Building Safety must approve Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications that comply with SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust emissions must Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-6 Page 209 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis be controlled by regular watering or other dust prevention measures, and Rule 402, which requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off -site as specified in the SCAQMD's Rules and Regulations. Implementation of the following measures would reduce short-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors: ■ All active portions of the construction site must be watered every three hours during daily construction activities and when dust is observed migrating from the Project site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. ■ Appoint a construction relations officer to act as a community liaison concerning on -site construction activity including resolution of issues related to particulate matter generation. ■ Pave or apply water every three hours during daily construction activities or apply non- toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas. More frequent watering must occur if dust is observed migrating from the site during site disturbance. ■ Any on -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or other dusty material must be enclosed, covered, watered twice daily, or non -toxic soil binders shall be applied. ■ All grading and excavation operations must be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour. ■ Disturbed areas must be replaced with ground cover or paved immediately after construction is completed in the affected area. ■ Track -out devices such as gravel bed track -out aprons (3 inches deep, 25 feet long, 12 feet wide per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes) are required to reduce mud/dirt trackout from unpaved truck exit routes. Alternatively a wheel washer must be used at truck exit routes. ■ On -site vehicle speed must be limited to 15 miles per hour. ■ All material transported off -site must be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust before departing the job site. ■ Reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas. AQ-2 During construction, all trucks hauling excavated or graded material on -site must comply with Vehicle Code § 23114 (Spilling Loads on Highways) regulating the manner for preventing material spilling onto public streets and roads. Before the City issues Grading Permits, the Project Applicant must demonstrate to the Director of Public Works how operations comply with Vehicle Code § 23114 during hauling activities, as applicable. AQ-3 The following measures must be implemented bythe contractor to reduce ROG emissions resulting from application of architectural coatings: ■ Use high -pressure -low -volume (HPLV) paint applicators with a minimum transfer efficiency of at least 50 percent; Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-7 Page 210 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis ■ Use pre -painted construction materials; and ■ VOC content of architectural coatings cannot exceed 35 grams per liter. AQ-4 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the construction contractor must provide evidence to the Public Works Director that the following measures are implemented during construction. See also MM GHG-1. ■ Provide temporary traffic controls such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. ■ Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on - and off -site. ■ Improve traffic flow by signal synchronization, and ensure that all vehicles and equipment will be properly tuned and maintained according to manufacturers' specifications. ■ Require the use of electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators. ■ Require the use of 2010 and newer diesel haul trucks (e.g., material delivery trucks and soil import/export) and if the Director determines that 2010 model year or newer diesel trucks cannot be obtained then trucks that meet EPA 2007 model year NOx emissions requirements may be used. ■ During Project construction, all internal combustion engines/construction, equipment operating on the project site must meet EPA -Certified Tier 3 emissions standards, or higher according to the following: o Project start, to December 31, 2014: All off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower must meet Tier 3 off -road emissions standards. In addition, all construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. Any emissions control device used by the contractor must achieve emissions reductions that are not less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations. o Post -January 1, 2015: All off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower must meet the Tier 4 emission standards, where available. In addition, all construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. Any emissions control device used by the contractor must achieve emissions reductions that are not less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations. o A copy of each unit's certified tier specification, BACT documentation, and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit must be provided at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. See also MM GHG-1 under Section 4.7: Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change), below. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-8 Page 211 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.3b Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.3-11— 5.3-19) Construction Emissions As stated in the FEIR, ESSCSP construction would result in short-term grading and building construction and exhaust emissions from construction equipment and construction crew motor vehicles. Maximum particulate matter emissions would occur during the initial stages of construction (e.g., grading activities). The unmitigated particulate matter levels would be below the SCAQMD thresholds without implementation of specific dust reduction measures. Notwithstanding, the ESSCSP would implement MM AQ-1 and AQ-2 to ensure that impacts are minimized. Regarding gaseous and particulate emissions, the application of asphalt and surface coatings creates ROG emissions, which are ozone (03) precursors. The ESSCSP would implement MM AQ-3 to ensure that ROG emissions would be less than significant. Regarding exhaust emissions from construction equipment and trucks, the ESSCSP would require implementation of MM AQ-4 to ensure that construction utilizes diesel construction equipment that complies with at least Tier 3-level emission standards during all construction phases, which would reduce construction equipment and worker vehicle exhaust emissions to below SCAQMD thresholds and result in less than significant impacts. With implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, construction -related impacts would be less than significant. Operational Emissions As stated in the FEIR, ESSCSP operational emissions would result from stationary and mobile sources during normal daily activities. Stationary area source emissions would be generated by consumption of natural gas for space and water heating devices, operation of landscape maintenance equipment, and use of consumer products. Stationary energy emissions would be generated by energy consumption associated with the ESSCSP. Mobile source emissions would be generated by the motor vehicles traveling to and from the ESSCSP area. While the ESSCSP is located within 0.25 mile of the Metro C (Green) Line light rail station and new development would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-16 to provide facilities that encourage multimodal transportation as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle trips, operational emissions would exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Despite implementation of MM GHG-1, reductions from the site's proximity to transit, and compliance with the ESMC, ESSCSP operational emissions would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG, NOx, and CO, thus, would remain significant and unavoidable. Operational impacts related to SOx and particulate matter emissions would be below the SCAQMD thresholds and would be less than significant. Cumulative Emissions As concluded in the FEIR, the ESSCSP would result in less than significant construction impacts with implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4. Thus, when combined with other projects in the area, cumulative construction -related impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. Regarding operations, given the South Coast Air Basin's nonattainment status for Os, PM4.5, and PM1o, additional emissions from the related projects would result in ROG, NOx, PM4.5, and PM10 emissions that would exceed SCAQMD thresholds. The ESSCSP would result in significant and unavoidable operational emissions for regional ROG, NOx, and CO, despite implementation of MM GHG-1. Thus, when Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-9 Page 212 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis combined with other related projects, cumulative operational impacts would be significant and unavoidable, and no other feasible mitigation measures would be available. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: Construction As previously stated, the Proposed Project involves development of 153,915 gross SF, or approximately 213,087 less gross SF (58 percent less floor area) than the Approved Project. Given the Proposed Project would require less construction than the Approved Project, construction -related emissions for the Proposed Project would also be proportionately less than the Approved Project. With implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, the Proposed Project's construction -related impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Operations The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but with approximately 58 percent less gross floor area as compared to the Approved Project, resulting in approximately 55 percent fewer daily vehicle trips. As stated in Table 4-1: Proposed Project Operational Emissions, the total Proposed Project -related operational unmitigated emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds. The Proposed Project's operational -related impacts would be less than significant. Table 4-1: Proposed Project Operational Emissions Pollutant (pounds/day) Emissions Source' ROG NOx CO SOx PMlo PMa.s Proposed Unmitigated Net Emissions Area' 3.99 0 0.02 0 0 0 Energy' 0.04 0.40 0.34 < 1 0.03 0.03 Mobile 4.93 11.95 50.90 0.17 11.86 3.32 Total Proposed Unmitigated 11.89 3.35 Emissions4 8.96 14.35 51.26 0.17 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Based on FEIR Table 5.3-6: Long -Term Operational Air Emissions. 2. The Proposed Project operational area and energy source emissions were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's floor area (140,719 gross SF) comprising approximately 7.1 percent of the ESSCSP total entitled additional development (2,161,600 gross SF), as evaluated in the FEIR. 3. The Proposed Project operational mobile source emissions were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's forecast new trips (1,808 daily trips) comprising approximately 6.8 percent of the ESSCSP total daily trips (26,585 daily trips), as evaluated in the FEIR. 4. Totals may not add up due to rounding. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-10 Page 213 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Cumulative The Proposed Project would be constructed in the South Coast Air Basin, which is nonattainment for 03, PM2.5, and PM1o, and additional emissions from the related projects would continue to result in ROG, NOx, PM2.5, and PM10 emissions in excess of SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, with implementation of MM GHG-1, cumulative operational -related impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as concluded in the FEIR. It is noted that although the Proposed Project would result in a significant and unavoidable impact concerning cumulative operational emissions, this significant and unavoidable impact was previously identified in the FEIR. No new or more severe impact concerning a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant would occur, as a result of the Proposed Project. As described above, the Proposed Project would result in proportionately less operational emissions as compared to the Approved Project's operational emissions. Therefore, an additional finding concerning this significant impact is not required, since such a finding was already made in adopting the original FEIR, and this Addendum is the proper CEQA document per State CEQA Guidelines §§15162 and 15164 because no new significant environmental impacts have been identified. FOR Mitieation Measures See MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, above, and MM GHG-1, below. 4.3c Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.3-20 — 5.3-22) The sensitive receptors nearest the ESSCSP area are the institutional uses located approximately 82 feet to the east. With implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, ESSCSP mitigated on -site construction emissions would not exceed the Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) and localized significance impacts for ESSCSP construction would be less than significant. During ESSCSP operations, area source emissions would be negligible and would not exceed the LSTs, thus operational impacts would be less than significant. As stated in the FEIR, there would be no CO hotspots at any of the intersections studied in the FEIR. Therefore, impacts regarding CO hotspots would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: As previously stated, the Proposed Project would develop approximately 58 percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project. Given the Proposed Project would require less construction on the Proposed Project site than the Approved Project, construction -related emissions for the Proposed Project would also be proportionately less than that of the Approved Project. With implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, the Proposed Project's construction -related impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Concerning operations, the Proposed Project would develop a corporate headquarters building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse. As the uses determined in the ESSCSP would result in negligible operational area source emissions and would not exceed the LSTs, and the Proposed Project involves 58 percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project, the Proposed Project's operational area source emissions would also be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-11 Page 214 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis FOR Mitigation Measures See MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, above. 4.3d Would the Project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.3-2) The FEIR concluded that construction -related odors would be intermittent, short-term in nature, and would cease upon project completion. Concerning long-term operations, the FEIR determined that the ESSCSP's proposed development would not include land uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors. Therefore, the FEIR found that impacts related to odors would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project's construction -related odors would be intermittent, short-term in nature, and would cease upon Proposed Project completion. The Proposed Project involves development of a corporate headquarter building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse land uses, which are not identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning odors. No new or more severe impact concerning odors would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.4 Biological Resources 4.4a Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.4-1— 4.4-2) The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of, and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been permanently altered due to construction of aboveground improvements. Future development occurring within the ESSCSP area would not impact, either directly or through habitat modification, any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, present on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-12 Page 215 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis these species and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning these species would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.4b Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2) The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been permanently altered due to the construction of aboveground improvements. Future development occurring within the ESSCSP area would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service present on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on these resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.4c Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2) The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been permanently altered due to the construction of aboveground improvements. Since there are no State or federally protected wetlands on -site, future development occurring within the ESSCSP area would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no state or federally protected wetlands present on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on wetlands and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning wetlands would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-13 Page 216 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.4d Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2) The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been permanently altered due to the construction of aboveground improvements. Future development occurring within the ESSCSP area would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or native wildlife nursery sites present on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impacts on those resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning those species, corridors, or nursery sites would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.4e Would the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances related to protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2) The FEIR identified that there are no local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance that are relevant to the ESSCSP. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance that are relevant to the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning those policies or ordinances would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-14 Page 217 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.4f Would the Project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2) The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP is not within the jurisdiction of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project site is not within the jurisdiction of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan; therefore, the Proposed Project would result in no impact and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning those policies or ordinances would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.5 Cultural Resources 4.5a Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant Section 15064.5? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-1) The ESSCSP is currently developed with the Raytheon Company's SAS facility. The FEIR determined that none of the 11 existing buildings within the ESSCSP area would qualify as a historical resource as defined in State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5. ESMC Chapter 15-14, Historic Preservation, provides for the identification, protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of historic buildings and structures within the City that reflect special elements of the City's historical heritage. The El Segundo Department of Community, Economic, and Development Services maintains a designated cultural resources list, and none of the existing buildings or structures are listed as a designated cultural resource. The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP would not cause a change in the significance of a historical resource. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no historical resources present within the ESSCSP, and therefore, the Proposed Project site. No historical resource would be demolished or materially altered. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. No impact would occur in this regard and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning historical resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-15 Page 218 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.5b Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEOA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-1) The FEIR determined that there are no known designated cultural (i.e., archaeological) resources present within the ESSCSP area. The ESSCSP area has already been subject to extensive disruption and may contain artificial fill materials. Given the highly disturbed condition of the ESSCSP area, the potential for ground - disturbing activities to impact an as yet unidentified archaeological resource is considered remote. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning archaeological resources. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site has already been subject to extensive disruption and may contain artificial fill materials. There are no known designated cultural (i.e., archaeological) resources present on the Proposed Project site. Additionally, the Proposed Project site consists of, and is surrounded by, urban/developed land that has been permanently altered due to the construction of below and aboveground improvements (i.e., buildings, parking lots, roads, hardscapes, and utilities). Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed condition, the potential for ground -disturbing activities to impact an as yet unidentified archeological resource is considered remote. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. No impact would occur in this regard and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning archaeological resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.5c Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? While the FEIR addressed the ESSCSP's potential impacts on paleontological resources under Cultural Resources, due to the State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G update which organized these issues under Geology and Soils, the discussion on paleontological resources and unique geologic features is now addressed under Threshold 4.6f below. 4.5d Would the Project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-2) The FEIR determined that the ESSCSP area is already highly disturbed, and the potential to disturb any human remains is remote. Additionally, no conditions exist that suggest human remains are likely to be found during ESSCSP construction activities. Nevertheless, if human remains were found, the remains Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-16 Page 219 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis would require proper treatment in accordance with applicable laws, including Public Resources Code §§5097, et seq., and Health and Safety Code §§7050.5-7055. The requirements and procedures set forth in Public Resources Code § 5097.98 would be implemented if human remains are discovered, including notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission and consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the "most likely descendant." If human remains are found during excavation, excavation must stop in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent remains until the County coroner investigates and the remains have been investigated and appropriate recommendations have been made for the treatment and disposition of the remains. Therefore, with compliance with applicable law regarding human remains, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning human remains. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed condition, the potential for the Proposed Project to disturb any human remains is remote. If human remains were found, these would require proper treatment in accordance with applicable laws pertaining to proper treatment, discovery, and notification, as detailed in the FEIR. Therefore, the Proposed Project's potential impacts concerning disturbance of human remains, would be less than significant, following compliance with the established regulatory framework. No new or more severe impact concerning human remains would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.6 Geology and Soils 4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk loss, injury, or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.6-1— 4.6-2) The FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP would not be affected by an Alquist Priolo (AP) Earthquake Fault Zone, as none is present within the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving rupture of a known earthquake fault. The FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project site is not affected by an AP Earthquake Fault Zone since there is none within the Proposed Project area. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause potential substantial adverse effects involving rupture of a known earthquake fault. No impact would occur in this regard and Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-17 Page 220 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning rupture of a known earthquake fault would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk loss, injury, or death involving: (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.6-17 — 5.6-18) The FEIR concluded the ESSCSP is within a seismically active Southern California region that could experience strong seismic ground shaking. The ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with the City's regulatory controls (i.e., California Building Code and ESMC Chapter 13-1), as well as ESSCSP-specific mitigation measures, which would reduce potential seismic and geologic impacts, including the. All structures developed within the ESSCSP area would be designed to withstand "design -level" earthquakes as set forth in the latest edition of the California Building Code. With compliance with the applicable regulations, potential adverse impacts to new structures due to strong, seismically -induced, vibratory ground motion would be sufficiently mitigated through proper seismic design. The FEIR concluded that, with compliance with the California Building Code, ESMC, and MM GEO-1, impacts regarding the exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving strong seismic ground shaking would be reduced to a less than significant level. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site is within the ESSCSP area and, thus, would be exposed to potential hazards associated with strong seismic ground shaking, as described above. The Proposed Project would be subject to the City's regulatory framework (i.e., California Building Code and ESMC Chapter 13-1), as well as MM GEO-1, which requires a lot -specific Geotechnical/Soils Investigation, to reduce the potentially significant impacts involving strong seismic ground shaking to a less than significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning strong seismic ground shaking would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures GEO-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit or Building Permit, a lot -specific Geotechnical/Soils Investigation must be conducted, to a satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety. The Geotechnical/Soils Investigation must: ■ Be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the California Building Code by a civil engineer registered in this State; ■ Comply with the recommendations specified in the Geology, Soils, Seismicity Report in Support of Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (D. Scott Magorien, C.E.G., March 6, 2013); and ■ Recommend the appropriate corrective action, which is likely to prevent structural damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in the area where geotechnical/soils problems exist. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-18 Page 221 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk loss, injury, or death involving: (iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.6-18) The FEIR concluded that the geologic materials that underlie the ESSCSP area include a late Pleistocene age dune sand and undocumented artificial fill soils more than 18 feet deep, which would have sufficient soil engineering strengths to provide foundation support for proposed structures. However, the undocumented artificial fill soils that are present in the southeast corner of the ESSCSP area are considered compressible and subject to consolidation due to the lack of adequate documentation when they were placed. The susceptibility of the loose and undocumented fill soils would result in potentially significant impacts concerning liquefaction. The FEIR recommended that the undocumented fill soils and loose soil deposits be removed and replaced as properly engineered fill, in order to mitigate seismically - induced ground failure. The City regulates developments under the requirements of the California Building Code, ESMC, and ESSCSP-specific mitigation measures to reduce potential geologic and soils impacts. Implementation of MM GEO-1 would reduce impacts related to seismically -induced ground failure (i.e., liquefaction) to less than significant levels. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site is in the southeast portion of the ESSCSP area (i.e., Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part)), where the FEIR reported undocumented artificial fill soils were more than 18 feet thick and that would be compressible and subject to consolidation, resulting in potentially significant impacts concerning liquefaction. The Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the California Building Code and ESMC, as well as MM GEC-1, to reduce potentially significant impacts involving seismic -related ground failure (i.e., liquefaction) to a less than significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning liquefaction would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures See MM GEO-1, above. 4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk loss, injury, or death involving: (iv) Landslides? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.6-2) The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP and its surroundings are generally level, with elevations ranging from approximately 100 feet above mean sea level (amsl) on the eastern portion of the ESSCSP to approximately 120 feet amsl at the northwest corner. Given the ESSCSP area's topography, there is no potential for seismically -induced landslides. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-19 Page 222 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project site and its surroundings are relatively level. Given the Proposed Project site's topography, there is no potential for seismically -induced landslides. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause adverse effects involving landslides and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning landslides would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.6b Would the Project result in substantial erosion or loss of topsoil? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.6-19) The FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP area is essentially flat and does not possess site conditions necessarily conducive to soil erosion. During construction, the ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process and ESMC Chapter 5-4-9, which specifies that each person applying to the City fora Grading or Building Permit for projects for which compliance with regulations governing State construction activity stormwater permits must submit satisfactory proof to the Cityfor compliance. Following compliance with all applicable regulations, impacts regarding erosion or loss of topsoil would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site is level and does not possess site conditions necessarily conducive to soil erosion. Although the Proposed Project would result in ground -disrupting activities that would result in short-term soil erosion, the Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the NPDES permitting process and ESMC Chapter 5-4-9. Following compliance with applicable regulations, impacts regarding erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning erosion or loss of topsoil would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.6c Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.6-19 — 5.6-20) The FEIR concluded that construction activities, including excavations associated with remedial grading/ground stabilization and underground utilities, may encounter poorly unconsolidated/ noncohesive artificial fill, which would be subject to sloughing and caving. The grading plans for the ESSCSP noted that the fill and cut slopes in the southeastern portion of the ESSCSP area may be prone to instability, and impacts concerning unstable soils would be potentially significant. The ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with the California Building Code, ESMC Chapter 14-1-9, and ESSCSP-specific recommendations (see MM GEO-1) related to removal of undocumented fill soils and replacement as Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-20 Page 223 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis properly engineered fill to reduce impacts related to unstable soils, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site would be located in the southeast portion of the ESSCSP area (i.e., Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part)), where the FEIR reported undocumented artificial fill soils that would be subject to sloughing and caving. The Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the California Building Code, ESMC, and MM GEO-1, which would reduce the potentially significant impacts involving unstable soils to a less than significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning unstable soils would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures See MM GEO-1, above. 4.6d Would the Project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code, creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.6-20) The FEIR concluded that the native and undocumented clay soils present in the ESSCSP exhibit a high expansion potential. Therefore, the potential for expansive soils to impact new development is high and potentially significant. The ESSCSP's Geology and Soils Report (FEIR Appendix 10-06) recommended that all moderately to high expansive clay soils that are encountered should not be reused as engineered fill, but rather be disposed of off -site. The ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with the California Building Code, ESMC Chapter 14-1-9, and ESSCSP-specific recommendations (see MM GEO-1) related to removal of all moderately to highly expansive clay soils and avoidance of clayey soils in compacted fill to reduce impacts related to expansive soils to a less than significant level. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site could contain native and undocumented clay soils that may exhibit a high expansion potential, creating substantial risk to life or property. However, the Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the California Building Code, ESMC, and MM GEO-1 to reduce the potentially significant impacts involving expansive soils to a less than significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning expansive soils would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures See MM GEO-1, above. 4.6e Would the Project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewer are not available for the disposal of waste water? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-21 Page 224 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.6-3) The FEIR identified that sewers would be available for disposal of wastewater generated by the ESSCSP and septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would not be permitted. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: Sewers are available for disposal of the Proposed Project's wastewater, and no septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would be used. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact concerning use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems for disposal of wastewater and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.6f Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-2) The FEIR determined that the ESSCSP area has already been subject to extensive disruption and may contain artificial fill materials. Additionally, there are no unique geologic features present within the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning paleontological resources or site or unique geologic feature. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site has already been subject to extensive disruption and may contain artificial fill materials. Additionally, according to the FEIR, there are no unique geologic features present within the Proposed Project site. Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed condition, the Proposed Project's potential to impact an as yet unidentified paleontological resource is considered remote. Therefore, Proposed Project implementation would result in a less than significant impact involving the potential destruction of a paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. No new or more severe impact concerning paleontological resources or site or unique geologic features would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change) 4.7a Would the Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-22 Page 225 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.4-13 — 5.4-17) The FEIR concluded that construction would generate GHG emissions through on -site use of heavy-duty construction equipment and off -site vehicle trips made by construction workers as well as haul/delivery trucks that would travel to and from the ESSCSP area. Mobile -source GHG emissions would result from the use of construction equipment, including, but not limited to, graders, scrapers, bulldozers, wheeled loaders, and cranes. ESSCSP operations would result in GHG emissions related to natural gas usage, automobile emissions, energy consumption, solid waste generation, and water demand. All future development within the ESSCSP area would be required to comply with ESMC Chapters 10-2, Water Conservation in Landscaping, and 10-5, Water Conservation, to promote water conservation in landscaping and to utilize drought water conservation programs. Future development would also be subject to compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-16, Developer Transportation Demand Management, which would provide facilities to encourage and accommodate the use of ridesharing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle trips. Further compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-16-4, Monitoring, would ensure that physical facilities be verified through the City's existing development review process. Following compliance with ESMC requirements and implementation of MM GHG-1, the ESSCSP would result in reduced GHG emissions from water conservation and efficiency, energy efficiency, solid waste reduction, and land use efficiency measures. Despite compliance with the ESMC and implementation of MM GHG-1, the ESSCSP's GHG emissions would exceed the per capita per year project -level GHG threshold of 4.8 Metric Tons of CO2 equivalent per year (MTCO2eq/year), and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The FEIR concluded that despite compliance with the ESMC and implementation of MM GHG-1, the ESSCSP would exceed the per capita per year project -level GHG threshold of 4.8 MTCO2eq/year. As stated in Table 4-2: Proposed Project Business As Usual Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the total Proposed Project -related unmitigated GHG emissions would be 2,635.00 MTCO2eq/year, or 6.99 MTCO2eq/year based on the Proposed Project's service population of 377 employees. Therefore, the Proposed Project's unmitigated GHG emissions would exceed the 4.8 MTCO2eq per capita per year project -level GHG threshold, and impacts would be potentially significant. With implementation of MM GHG-1, as stated in Table 4-3: Proposed Project Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the total Proposed Project -related mitigated GHG emissions would be 433.81 MTCO2eq/year, or 1.15 MTCO2eq/year, based on the Proposed Project's service population of 377 employees. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not exceed the 4.8 MTCO2eq per capita per year project -level GHG threshold, with implementation of MM GHG-1. Proposed Project impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. No new or more severe impact concerning generated GHG emissions would occur, as a result of the Proposed Project. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-23 Page 226 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Table 4-2: Proposed Project Business As Usual Greenhouse Gas Emissions CO2 CH4 N20 Source' Metric Metric MTCO2 Metric MTCO2 Total Tons/year Tons/year eq Tons/year eq MTCO2eg2 Direct Emissions Construction Phase 1(amortized over 30 years)' 2.51 0.0 <1 0.0 0.0 2.51 Construction Phase 2 (amortized over 30 years) 3 9.76 <1 0.02 0.0 0.0 9.78 Area Source' 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.004 Mobile Source 1,655.12 0.06 1.17 0.0 0.0 1,656.35 Total Unmitigated Direct Emissions2 1,667.40 0.06 1.19 0.0 0.0 1,668.64 Indirect Emissions Energy' 714.78 0.03 0.65 0.01 2.33 717.79 Solid Waste 29.82 1.76 37.01 0.0 0.0 68.59 Water Demand 153.64 0.88 18.57 0.02 6.85 179.97 Total Unmitigated Indirect Emissions2 898.24 2.68 56.22 0.03 9.18 966.35 Total Net Proposed Project -Related Emissions2 2,635.00 MTCO2eq/year Unmitigated Per Capita Emissions' 6.99 MTCO2eq/year Per Capita Threshold 4.8 MTCO2eq/year Unmitigated GHG Emissions Exceed Per Capita Threshold? Yes Notes: 1. Based on FOR Table 5.4-1: Business As Usual Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2. Totals may be slightly off due to rounding. 3. The Proposed Project construction and operational emissions from area source, energy, solid waste, and water demand were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's proposed floor area (153,915 gross SF) comprising approximately 7.1 percent of the ESSCSP total entitled additional development (2,161,600 gross SF), as evaluated in the FEIR. 4. The Proposed Project mobile source operational emissions were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's forecast new trips (1,808 daily trips) comprising approximately 6.8 percent of the ESSCSP total daily trips (26,585 daily trips), as evaluated in the FEIR. 5. Per capita emissions are based on a service population of 377 employees; see Section 4.13: Population and Housing. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 4-24 November 2021 Page 227 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Table 4-3: Proposed Project Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions CO2 CH4 N20 Source' Metric Metric MTCO2 Metric MTCO2 Total Tons/year Tons/year eq Tons/year eq MTCO2eg2 Direct Emissions Construction Phase 1(amortized over 30 years)' 2.51 0.0 <1 0.0 0.0 2.51 Construction Phase 2 (amortized over 30 years) 3 9.76 <1 0.02 0.0 0.0 9.78 Area Source' 0.004 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.004 Mobile Source 1,024.71 0.04 0.74 0.0 0.0 1,025.49 Total Mitigated Direct Emissions2 1,036.98 0.04 0.77 0.0 0.0 1,037.78 Indirect Emissions Energy3 29.59 0.03 0.61 0.01 2.17 32.40 Solid Waste 14.91 0.88 18.51 0.0 0.0 34.30 Water Demand 129.13 0.71 14/86 0.02 5.49 150.21 Total Mitigated Indirect Emissions2 173.63 1.62 33.97 0.02 7.66 216.90 Total Net Proposed Project -Related 433.81 MTCOzeq/year Emissions2 Mitigated Per Capita Emissions' 1.15 MTCO2eq/year Per Capita Threshold 4.8 MTCO2eq/year Mitigated GHG Emissions Exceed Per Capita Threshold? No Notes: 1. Based on FOR Table 5.4-2: Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2. Totals may be slightly off due to rounding. 3. The Proposed Project construction and operational emissions from area source, energy, solid waste, and water demand were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's proposed floor area (153,915 gross SF) comprising approximately 7.1 percent of the ESSCSP total entitled additional development (2,161,600 gross SF), as evaluated in the FEIR. 4. The Proposed Project mobile source operational emissions were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's forecast new trips (1,808 daily trips) comprising approximately 6.8 percent of the ESSCSP total daily trips (26,585 daily trips), as evaluated in the FEIR. 5. Per capita emissions are based on a service population of 377 employees; see Section 4.13: Population and Housing. FOR Mitigation Measures GHG-1 The Project must incorporate the improvements listed below to ensure consistency with applicable law. The Project Applicant must demonstrate compliance with this measure to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Safety Director before the City issues building permits or certificates of occupancy. Energy Efficiency ■ Design buildings to be energy efficient, 15 percent above Title 24 requirements (building permit). Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 4-25 November 2021 Page 228 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis ■ Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees (building permit). ■ Install high efficiency lighting, and energy efficient heating and cooling systems (building permit). ■ Reduce unnecessary outdoor lighting (building permit). Water Conservation and Efficiency ■ Install water -efficient fixtures (e.g., faucets, toilets, showers) (Building Permit). Solid Waste ■ Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard) (Building Permit). ■ Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and adequate recycling containers located in public areas (Occupancy Permit). 4.7b Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.4-17 — 5.4-18) The FEIR concluded that the City does not have an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. However, the City's Environmental Committee would review current City environment practices, identify new environmental goals and objectives, and develop a framework for protecting the City's quality of life while moderating the growth demands upon the City's natural resources and the impacts that consumption has upon the environment. The ESSCSP would be subject to all applicable regulatory requirements, which would reduce the ESSCSP's generated GHG emissions. The ESSCSP proposed mixed -uses that would inherently reduce vehicle trips, vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and related GHG emissions. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not conflict with applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning conflicting with applicable GHG reduction plan, policy, or regulation. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, as discuss above and in the FEIR. The Proposed Project would include related uses that would reduce vehicle trips through internal trip capture, VMT, and related GHG emissions. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would include energy efficient lighting and electric vehicle (EV) parking, which would reduce operational GHG emissions. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with applicable GHG reduction plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, and a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-26 Page 229 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 4.8a Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 4.8b Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-16 — 5.7-25) The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area is listed on the GeoTracker database (maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB]) and is reported as a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cleanup site. The LUST case is reported to be closed as of July 22, 1996; therefore, it is not anticipated that an environmental condition exists in the ESSCSP area, as a result of the former LUST. Notwithstanding, the FEIR concluded that site disturbance and demolition activities could encounter a variety of potentially hazardous materials, which could expose workers and the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions. Potential petroleum -based fuel spills from construction equipment would not be considered significant due to the small volume and low concentration of hazardous materials utilized during construction. Implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-5 would reduce potential impacts from construction activities that would result in accidental conditions within the ESSCSP area. Also, if unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during construction which may involve hazardous wastes/materials, the contractor would be required to comply with MM HAZ-6 to immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, remove workers and the public, secure the areas, and notify the El Segundo Fire Department (ESFD). Use of standard construction controls and safety procedures, and implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-5, would avoid and lessen the potential for accidental release of such substances into the environment in the event of a spill. Following compliance with applicable federal, State, and local regulatory requirements, and with implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-6, the potentially significant impacts during construction related to creating a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would be reduced to less than significant levels. Future ESSCSP development would consist of office, warehouse, light industrial, and commercial uses. Hazardous materials would be routinely used, stored, and/or handled onsite during operations. All hazardous materials or chemicals used by the onsite uses would be filed on record with the ESFD, the designated Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City, and would be routinely inspected to ensure that all materials are being stored, handled, and used in affordance with all applicable federal, State, and local standards and regulations to reduce the potential for a hazardous materials incident. As the California Highway Patrol and the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan have identified transportation routes and corridors in and near the City as suitable for transporting hazardous materials and wastes, transportation of all hazardous materials onsite and to/from the ESSCSP area would adhere to all applicable Caltrans protocols and the General Plan Public Safety Element's goal to periodically review and reevaluate the City's Emergency Operations Plans. Any facilities containing hazardous materials for transport, storage, or use would comply with all City, Los Angeles County (County), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) requirements. Based on the Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-27 Page 230 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis moderate potential for contaminated groundwater underlying the ESSCSP area, vapor intrusion into proposed structures as a result of the contamination plumes could occur. Implementation of MM HAZ-5 would require a qualified site characterization specialist to conduct updated site characterization at the ESSCSP before issuance of any Building Permits. Furthermore, as required by MM HAZ-7, before the City issues any building permit, vapor intrusion investigations would be required to be conducted by a qualified Environmental Professional, in consultation with the ESFD. With implementation of MM HAZ-5 and HAZ- 7, and with compliance with all applicable regulations, impacts during operation would be reduced to less than significant levels. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor data management system for hazardous waste facilities and sites shows that there are no active cases on or within a 4,000 foot radius of the Proposed Project site.6 Additionally, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker database confirmed the LUST closure and that no other LUST cleanup sites exist on the Proposed Project site.' Notwithstanding, site disturbance, demolition, and/or construction associated with the Proposed Project could disturb existing hazardous materials associated with structures and contaminated soil and groundwater. A former hazardous waste storage area (designated as SWMU-1 in the FEIR) would be demolished in the location where the Proposed Project would construct the southern parking lot. A former wastewater pretreatment system (designated as SWMU-2 in the FEIR) would be demolished where the Proposed Project would construct a warehouse. Therefore, Proposed Project construction could release hazardous materials into the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions. The Proposed Project would implement MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-5 to reduce potential construction -related impacts that may result from accidental conditions at the Proposed Project site. The Proposed Project contractor would also be required to comply with MM HAZ-6 if unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during construction. Other means by which accidental spills could occur during Proposed Project construction involve use of construction equipment that may result in petroleum -based fuel spills; however, the level of risk associated with this type of spill is not considered significant due to the small volume and low concentration of hazardous materials utilized during construction. Standard construction practices would be observed to appropriately contain and remediate any materials released pursuant to local, State, and Federal regulations. The Proposed Project contractor would be required to comply with the established regulatory framework to avoid and minimize the potential for accidental release of such substances into the environment in the event of a spill. Proposed Project impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Proposed Project operations would include a corporate office headquarters, natural grass fields, and a warehouse. The warehouse building would store waste and other maintenance equipment required for the Project. These land uses are not expected to require the use of substantial quantities of hazardous materials or to generate significant quantities of hazardous waste that would require routine transport 6 California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor Search for 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, CA 90245 with 4,000 feet search radius, http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/?surl=7fz69. Accessed October 25, 2021. 7 State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker database Search for 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, CA, https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile report?global id=T0603792958. Accessed October 25, 2021. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-28 Page 231 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis offsite for disposal. Typical commercial land uses generally require routine use of small quantities of flammable, hazardous, and/or toxic materials for operation and maintenance purposes. Continued maintenance of the natural grass fields would require use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fuel for machinery and mechanical equipment. Such substances would also be used for landscape maintenance. While the Proposed Project would involve use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials, it would be similar to that which occurs under existing conditions and elsewhere within the ESSCSP. Due to the nature of the proposed land uses, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to involve facilities or activities that would produce or use substantial quantities of hazardous materials or require the routine transport of hazardous materials to and from the site that may adversely affect the public or the environment. Proposed Project operations would be required to comply with all applicable federal, State, and local standards and regulations concerning the routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials. Regarding vapor intrusion, based on the moderate potential for contaminated groundwater underlying the Proposed Project site, vapor intrusion into proposed structures as a result of contamination plumes could occur. The Proposed Project would implement MM HAZ-5 and HAZ-7 to ensure that vapor intrusion investigations are conducted prior to issuance of any building permits. Therefore, following compliance with all applicable standards and regulations, and with implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-7, the Proposed Project's potential impacts concerning the creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment would be reduced to less than significant levels. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 Before a Grading Permit is issued, the actual location of onsite oil/gas wells must be verified with DOGGR. All onsite wells present must be properly plugged and abandoned per current DOGGR, DTSC, and RWQCB requirements. Further, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization experience must verify through soil sampling that no residual contamination has resulted from historic oil/gas production activities onsite. HAZ-2 Before a Grading Permit is issued, soil sampling must be conducted within the portions of the Project site that have historically been utilized for agricultural purposes and may contain pesticide residues in the soil, as determined by a qualified Phase II/site characterization specialist. The sampling, conducted in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department, must determine if pesticide concentrations exceed established regulatory requirements and identify further site characterization and remedial activities, if necessary. Should further site characterization/remedial activities be required, these activities shall be conducted per the applicable regulatory agency requirements, as directed by the El Segundo Fire Department. HAZ-3 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization experience must determine, based on the Current Conditions Report (CCR), RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan), and sampling and analysis conducted in accordance with the RFI Work Plan, whether subsurface release of hazardous materials/waste to the soil/groundwater associated with the existing storage facilities has occurred. If subsurface release of hazardous materials/waste to the soil/groundwater has occurred, the environmental consultant must determine if Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-29 Page 232 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis contaminant concentrations exceed established regulatory requirements and identify further site characterization and remedial activities, if necessary. Should further site characterization/remedial activities be required, these activities must be conducted per the applicable regulatory agency requirements. HAZ-4 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization experience must prepare a Worker Safety Plan to ensure construction worker safety during grading/excavation activities, based on their review the following documents: ■ Current Conditions Report (CCR); ■ RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan); ■ Findings of the RFI Work Plan's Sampling and Analysis; and ■ Existing Hazardous Materials Conditions Assessment. HAZ-5 An environmental professional with Phase II/site characterization experience must conduct an inspection of existing onsite structures before building renovation/demolition activities. The inspection must determine whether or not testing is required to confirm the presence or absence of hazardous substances in building materials (e.g., sinks, drains, piping, flooring, walls, ceiling tiles). Should testing be required and results determine that hazardous substances are present in onsite building materials, the Phase II/site characterization specialist must determine appropriate prevention/remediation measures that are required and/or the methods for proper disposal of hazardous waste at an approved landfill facility, if required. HAZ-6 If during construction unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered by the contractor that are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor must comply with the following: ■ Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; ■ Notify the Director of Public Works of the City of El Segundo; ■ Secure the area as directed by the Director of Public Works; and ■ Notify the El Segundo Fire Department (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Public Works). The Fire Department's Environmental Safety Manager can advise the responsible party of further actions that must be taken, if required. HAZ-7 Before any Building Permit is issued, vapor intrusion investigations must be conducted by a qualified Environmental Professional, in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department. Should the Environmental Professional determine that proposed buildings could be impacted by vapor intrusion, the Environmental Professional, in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department, must recommend that specific measures be incorporated into the buildings' design that would reduce these indoor air quality concentrations to below regulatory thresholds, as directed by the El Segundo Fire Department. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-30 Page 233 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.8c Would the Project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. S.7-26) The FEIR identified the following existing schools located within one -quarter mile of the ESSCSP area: Beach Babies LLC (located 750 feet east and 1,385 feet north of the ESSCSP area) and Wondertree Kids (located 1,065 feet south of the ESSCSP area). The ESSCSP could result in hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes. However, buffers in the form of roadways and intervening structures would separate the proposed uses within the ESSCSP from the existing nearby schools, which would maintain the risk to acceptable levels. Furthermore, the hazardous substances that may be handled, used, and stored within the ESSCSP area would be required to comply with federal, State, and local regulations, which is considered adequate to offset the potential negative effects related to the hazardous materials associated with future development within the ESSCSP. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning emitting hazardous emissions or handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: Beach Babies LLC is approximately 1,653 feet (0.3 miles) southeast of the Proposed Project site. Wondertree Kids was identified as being 1,065 feet (0.2 miles) south of the Proposed Project site, but no longer exists at that location. Therefore there are no existing school sites within 0.25 miles of the Proposed Project site. The Proposed Project involves a corporate headquarters building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse, all of which would utilize typical small quantities of hazardous materials for operation and maintenance purposes. The maintenance of the natural grass fields would require the use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fuel for machinery and mechanical equipment. However, these proposed uses would not emit hazardous emissions. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to involve facilities or activities that would result in hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials. Additionally, buffers in the form of roadways and intervening structures would separate the Proposed Project site from nearby existing schools. Furthermore, the Proposed Project's proposed uses would be required to comply with the established federal, State, and local regulatory framework, as it relates to emitting hazardous emission or handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. Therefore, following compliance with all applicable standards and regulations, impacts concerning emitting hazardous emissions or handling hazardous materials within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.8d Would the Project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-31 Page 234 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-26 — 5.7-27) The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area is listed on the GeoTracker database (maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB]) and is reported as a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cleanup site. The LUST case is reported to be closed as of July 22, 1996; therefore, it is not anticipated that an environmental condition exists in the ESSCSP area as a result of the former LUST. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact related to the ESSCSP being located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The FEIR reported a closed LUST case on the Raytheon Campus due to soil contamination, - however, as the LUST case was closed on July 22, 1996, the LUST is not considered an environmental condition. Furthermore, the DTSC EnviroStor data management system for hazardous waste facilities and sites shows that there are no active cases on or within a 4,000-foot radius of the Proposed Project site. Additionally, the SWRCB GeoTracker database confirmed the LUST closure and that no other LUST cleanup sites exist on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact would occur in this regard. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.8e For a Project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working the project area? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.8-2 — 4.8-3) The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area is located approximately 0.76 miles south of the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), but the ESSCSP area is not located within the LAX Planning Boundary/Airport Influence Area. The ESSCSP is located approximately 1.9 miles west of Hawthorne Municipal Airport (HMA), butthe ESSCSP area is not located within the HMA Planning Area Boundary/Airport Influence Area. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: Although the Proposed Project would be located within 2.0 miles of LAX and HMA, the Proposed Project site is not within the LAX Planning Boundary/Airport Influence Area orthe HMA Planning Area Boundary/Airport Influence Area. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in an airport - related safety hazard for people working on the Proposed Project site and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning airport -related safety hazards would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-32 Page 235 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.8f Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-27 — 5.7-28) The FEIR identified that the General Plan does not identify primary evacuation routes within the City; however, East El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard are major arterial streets and would be used by persons evacuating the ESSCSP in the event of an emergency. Construction of proposed roadway improvements could temporarily block emergency access and/or evacuation routes, which would affect access along El Segundo Boulevard. Impacts during construction would be temporary and would only affect El Segundo Boulevard, and as such, would be unlikely to interfere with emergency response vehicles (e.g., fire, police, or ambulance). Implementation of MM HAZ-8 would require future development in the ESSCSP to notify the El Segundo Fire, Police, Public Works, and Planning and Building Safety Departments of construction activities that would impede movement along roadways adjacent to the ESSCSP and to allow for uninterrupted emergency access and maintenance of evacuation routes. Furthermore, the City has an adopted Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, which identifies activities that would assist the City in reducing risk and preventing loss from future hazardous events, including those involving evacuation. The City would implement evacuation -related mitigation actions on an ongoing basis which would further minimize impacts resulting from the ESSCSP's potential interference with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. With implementation of MM HAZ-8 and the City's continued compliance with the Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site would not be located adjacent to East El Segundo Boulevard or Sepulveda Boulevard, both of which were identified in the FEIR as being streets that would be used by persons evacuating the ESSCSP in the event of an emergency. Construction activities associated with the proposed uses would occur on the subject sites, thus, would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Notwithstanding, Proposed Project construction would implement MM HAZ- 8 to ensure coordination with the El Segundo Fire, Police, Public Works, and Planning and Building Safety Departments such that construction activities would not impede movement along East El Segundo Boulevard or Sepulveda Boulevard and to allow for uninterrupted emergency access and maintenance of evacuation routes. The proposed Nash Street extension would not result in any closures that would impede traffic/emergency access. The City would continue to implement evacuation -related mitigation actions from the City's Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, which would further minimize the potential for the Proposed Project to interfere with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore, with implementation of MM HAZ-8 and the City's continued compliance with the Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, impacts related to potentially impairing implementation of or physically interfering with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be reduced to less than significant levels. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-8 At least three business days before any lane closure, the construction contractor must notify the El Segundo Fire Department, El Segundo Police Department, El Segundo Public Works Department, and the El Segundo Planning and Building Safety Department of Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-33 Page 236 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis construction activities that would impede movement (such as road or lane closures) along roadways immediately adjacent to the development area, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access and maintenance of evacuation routes. 4.8g Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.8-3) The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area consists of, and is surrounded by, urban/developed land, and implementation of the ESSCSP would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project site consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land. The Proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning wildland fires would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.9a Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.8-17 — 5.8-19) The FEIR concluded that construction activities would result in short-term impacts to water quality; therefore, the ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with General Construction Permit requirements. Before the City issues grading permits, the Applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to control common pollutants such as suspended soil in stormwater runoff from leaving the ESSCSP area. The SWPPP would include an Erosion Control Plan and appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize erosion and restrict sedimentation of the storm drain downstream. With compliance with the NPDES and ESMC requirements, construction activities would have a less than significant impact on water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. A reduction in permeable surfaces, which allow for rain and runoff to infiltrate into the ground, would result in the potential to affect long-term water quality during operation. ESSCSP implementation would not result in a reduction of permeable surfaces, but stormwater and nuisance water runoff associated with the proposed uses under the ESSCSP could have the potential to affect water quality. The ESSCSP could potentially include organics, trash, debris, oil/grease, nutrients, metals, and sediment, which could have a significant adverse impact to stormwater quality if not mitigated. The ESSCSP would implement post -construction controls under the MS4 Permit to mitigate stormwater pollution, which would include BMPs to control pollutants, pollutant loads, and runoff volume. Future development under the ESSCSP Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-34 Page 237 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis would be subject to compliance with NPDES requirements, MS4 Permit Order requirements, and must implement BMPs. Therefore, following compliance with all applicable permit and ESMC requirements, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact related to violating water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrading surface or groundwater quality. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would include construction activities that would be subject to compliance with General Construction Permit requirements. The Applicant would prepare a SWPPP to control common pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving the Proposed Project site during construction. The SWPPP would include BMPs to minimize erosion and restrict sedimentation of the storm drain downstream. Further, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with all NPDES and MS4 Permit Order requirements. Therefore, Proposed Project impacts during construction would be less than significant as it relates to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Proposed Project operations could result in organics, trash, debris, oil/grease, nutrients, metals, and sediment which could have a significant adverse impact to stormwater quality. The Proposed Project would be required to mitigate stormwater pollution through the implementation of BMPs to control pollutants, pollutant loads, and runoff volume. Therefore, following compliance with all applicable permit and ESMC requirements, Proposed Project implementation would result in a less than significant impact related to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. No new or more severe impact concerning water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.9b Would the Project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.8-26) The FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP would not interfere with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level, since the ESSCSP is not located within a groundwater recharge area. Furthermore, the ESSCSP would not reduce the ability of surface waters to be absorbed or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge as the ESSCSP's imperviousness is expected to decrease upon buildout. The City does not use groundwater as a potable water source, so the ESSCSP would not deplete groundwater supplies. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact related to groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: While the Proposed Project would generate a water demand on the Proposed Project site, as discussed under Threshold 4.17b Analysis of Proposed Project, the City does not use groundwater as a potable water source. Therefore, the Proposed Project's water demands would not Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-35 Page 238 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis decrease groundwater supplies. Also, the Proposed Project would not interfere with groundwater recharge given the Proposed Project site is not within a groundwater recharge area and the Proposed Project would increase onsite pervious areas by replacing impermeable surface parking area with three permeable full-size natural grass fields. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge. No new or more severe impact concerning groundwater would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.9c Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site; or iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provided substantial additional resources of polluted runoff? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.8-19 — 5.8-26) See Threshold 4.9a Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above concerning ESSCSP erosion and water quality. The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would be served by approximately 7,000 linear feet of new onsite storm drain lines, with a maximum pipe diameter of 54 inches; see FEIR Exhibit 5.8-3: Proposed Stormwater and Site Drainage System. The ESSCSP area would continue to drain northwest to southeast; see FEIR Exhibit 5.8-4: Proposed Conditions Hydrology. Reconfiguration of site roadways and replacement of existing buildings and surface parking lots with new buildings and parking lots/structures would change drainage patterns and locations/amounts of impervious surface areas. The sub -drainage areas would continue to flow to the City's storm drain along the ESSCSP area's eastern and southern edges. The minor offsite flow from El Segundo Boulevard and the property to the south would continue unobstructed to combine with onsite flows. The ESSCSP area's average imperviousness is anticipated to decrease from 79.5 percent to 70.0 percent, and there would be no net increase in stormwater discharge from the ESSCSP area. The FEIR concluded that onsite detention would not be required, and an increase in the rate or amount of stormwater runoff above existing conditions would not occur. However, final hydrology calculations would be required to verify that detention facilities are not required in each of the proposed sub -drainage areas. MM HWQ-1 and HWQ-2 would require that a Construction -Level Hydrology and Hydraulic Study be conducted before any Grading Permit is issued to verify whether detention facilities are required in each proposed sub -area. Compliance with MM HWQ-1 and HWQ-2 would reduce the potential impacts from drainage and runoff to less than significant levels. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-36 Page 239 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project involves development of a corporate headquarters building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse. The fields would replace existing surface parking lots and ornamental landscaping, which would provide more pervious surfaces on the Proposed Project site, as compared to the Approved Project. FEIR Exhibit 5.8-4 depicts the site's drainage patterns upon Proposed Project implementation, which would closely match existing drainage patterns. FEIR Exhibit 5.8-3 depicts existing and proposed storm drains and indicates that a new storm drain is proposed within the Nash Street extension, just north of the proposed corporate headquarters building. Additional storm drains would be developed as part of the ESSCSP. The Proposed Project would implement MM HWQ-1 and HQW-2, which require that a Construction -Level Hydrology and Hydraulic Study be conducted before any Grading Permit is issued to verify whether detention facilities would be required in each proposed sub -area. If so required, it is assumed these would be located onsite. Compliance with MM HWQ-1 and HWQ-2 would reduce the potential impacts from drainage and runoff, including flooding on- or off -site, to less than significant levels. No new or more severe impact concerning groundwater would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures HWQ-1 Before the City issues any grading permit, the Applicant must conduct a Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study to determine potential storm water runoff rates and peak flows from the Project site per County of Los Angeles methodology. The 50-year storm flows for both existing and proposed Project conditions must be included in the study. The Study must be completed by a qualified professional, approved by the Director of Public Works, and be consistent with standard engineering practices for the region, including the use of the Los Angeles County Manual. The Study must demonstrate the effect of storm water discharges to any City, County, or other agency -owned drainage or flood control facility, as mitigated and be designed and implemented to prevent an increase in the rate or amount of storm water runoff above the baseline condition. The Study must also determine whether onsite detention is required. If the final hydrology calculations determine that onsite detention is required to avoid downstream impacts, the Study must also identify the necessary flood control mitigation, which may include a surface stormwater detention pond, subsurface detention structure, or subsurface detention pipes. The construction level hydrology calculations and Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be prepared and reviewed by the Director of Public Works and Building Official before any Grading Permit is issued. HWQ-2 Before the City issues any permit for development of an individual parcel, the Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be updated and submitted to the Director of Public Works for review. The phasing must be implemented to prevent an increase in the rate or amount of storm water runoff above the baseline condition. 4.9c Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: iv) impede or redirect flood flows? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-37 Page 240 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.9-3 — 4.9-4) The FEIR concluded that the entire City is placed in Zone X pursuant to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 1770F, Map No. 06037C1T10F, which indicates that the City is in an area of minimal flood hazard. Therefore, the entire ESSCSP area would not have any risk of flood hazards. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact as it relates to impeding or redirecting flood flows. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project site is within an area of minimal flood hazard. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact concerning the potential to alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.9d Would the Project, in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.9-4) The FEIR concluded that the entire City is placed in Zone X pursuant to FEMA FIRM Panel 1770F, Map No. 06037C1T10F, which indicates that the City is in an area of minimal flood hazard. Therefore, the entire ESSCSP area would not have any risk of flood hazards. Furthermore, the ESSCSP is not located within a levee, dam, or tsunami inundation area. There are also no enclosed bodies of water that are located in the vicinity of the ESSCSP, which could cause a seiche. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact as it relates to flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project site was identified as being in an area of minimal flood hazard. The Proposed Project site is located away from any waterbodies or coastal zones, thus, would not be within a levee, dam, or tsunami inundation area or subject to a seiche. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact concerning the risk release of pollutants due to inundation and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.9e Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-38 Page 241 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis Not applicable since this threshold was not analyzed in the FEIR. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.9a Analysis of Proposed Project above concerning water quality control plan compliance. See Threshold 4.9b Analysis of Proposed Project above concerning sustainable groundwater management plan compliance. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.10 Land Use and Planning 4.10a Would the Project physically divide an established community? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.10-1) The FEIR identified that the City is generally described according to quadrants. The City's residential uses are located in the northwest quadrant, and the non-residential land uses are located in the remaining three quadrants. The ESSCSP encompasses approximately 142 acres in the City's southeast quadrant. The ESSCSP proposed commercial and industrial mixed -use development, which would be consistent with the City's existing land use pattern. The ESSCSP would not physically divide an established community. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project would develop a corporate headquarters building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse within the ESSCSP, and the proposed land uses would be consistent with the ESSCSP's land use plan. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on physically dividing an established community and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning physically dividing an established community would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.10b Would the Project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.1-21— 5.1-28) According to the FEIR, the ESSCSP is determined to be consistent with the relevant SCAG's 2012 RTP/SCS goals and adopted growth forecasts, the ESMC, and General Plan Policies, excluding the following Circulation Element Policies: • Circulation Element Policy C1-1.2: Pursue implementation of all Circulation Element policies such that all Master Plan roadways are upgraded and maintained at acceptable levels of service (LOS). Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-39 Page 242 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis o Reason for ESSCSP inconsistency with policy: With implementation of identified feasible mitigation in FEIR Section 5.2: Transportation, the impacts at El Segundo Intersections 29, 32, 38, 48, 50, and 51 would remain significant and unavoidable, and acceptable levels of service would not be maintained at these intersections. Therefore, the ESSCSP would conflict with Policy C1-1.2, resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. • Circulation Element Policy C1-1.5: Implement roadway and intersection upgrades to full Circulation Element standards when needed to improve traffic operating conditions and to serve development. o Reason for ESSCSP inconsistency with policy: See Policy C1-1.2 above. • Circulation Element Policy C1-1.10: Ensure that new roadway links are constructed as designated in the Master Plan and link with existing roadways within the City such that efficient operation of the circulation system is maintained at an operating Level of Service "D" or better. o Reason for ESSCSP inconsistency with policy: See Policy C1-1.2 above. No feasible mitigation is available to reduce potential impacts. Therefore, implementation of the ESSCSP would result in a significant and unavoidable impact regarding conflicts with Circulation Element Policies C1-1.2, C1-1.5, and C1-1.10. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: As noted above, the FEIR concluded implementation of the ESSCSP would result in a significant and unavoidable impact regarding conflicts with Circulation Element Policies C1-1.2, C1-1.5, and C1-1.10. It is anticipated the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning compliance with these policies given: Level of Service (LOS) is no longer a metric for transportation impact analysis; and the Proposed Project involves development that provides approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and generates approximately 55 percent fewer trips compared to the Approved Project. State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3 codifies the change from LOS to VMT as a metric for transportation impact analysis. Pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 743, VMT analysis is the primary method for determining CEQA impacts. The City has completed a preliminary Draft SB 743 Implementation Guidelines (Kimley-Horn, November 2020) for purposes of analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA and anticipates that after some revisions, the Guidelines will be adopted by May 2022. As the Proposed Project would develop the same uses as proposed in the ESSCSP, the Proposed Project would be consistent with SCAG's 2012 RTP/SCS. The Proposed Project involves development that provides approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and generates approximately 55 percent fewer trips compared to the Approved Project. As described in Section 4.13: Population and Housing, below, the Proposed Project would generate approximately 377 employees on the Proposed Project site (including the early arriving employees). It is unknown if any of these employees would choose to relocate to the City, increasing the City's population. Since the Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but provides approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would have less potential population growth on the Proposed Project site than what was anticipated for the Approved Project, and the Proposed Project would be consistent with the adopted growth forecasts. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-40 Page 243 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis The Proposed Project's modifications include realigning the Nash Street extension and realigning/relocating the Coral Circle connection to the Nash Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The proposed modified circulation pattern would continue to provide for possible future connection from the Nash Street extension to Coral Circle and capacity for additional parking for the Coral Circle businesses. The City's Public Works Department conducted an analysis of the Nash Street extension and Coral Circle connection's compliance concerning function, capacity, capacity, and street classification and standards with the General Plan Circulation Element; the ESMC; and the ESSCSP.B Therefore, the Nash Street extension and Coral Circle connection would be in substantial compliance with the General Plan Circulation Element concerning function, capacity, and street classification and standards. Furthermore, the City's Public Works Department provide the following conditions of approval: 1. The Applicant must build the Nash Street roadway extension and associated public improvements in accordance with Development Agreement Section 7.1. Nash Street roadway extension design and construction is subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works and Director of Development Services. 2. The Applicant must construct Class II bicycle lanes in the Nash Street roadway extension in accordance with the ESSCSP and Development Agreement Section 7.5. 3. The Applicant must record a 20-year irrevocable offer of dedication of Lots 20 and 22 (Coral Circle Connection) of Vesting Map No. 71551 in accordance with the ESSCSP and Development Agreement Section 7.7. Before recordation, the irrevocable offer to dedicate must be reviewed and approved by the Director of Development Services, the Director of Public Works, and the City Attorney. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with the Circulation Element, and impacts would be less than significant. ESSCSP Table III-1: Land Use Summary, anticipates that the allowed new development would total 1,930,000 net SF (2,161,600 gross SF). To allow for maximum flexibility within the ESSCSP area, the ESSCSP utilizes a mixed -use concept, with regulatory mechanisms to allow for transfers between land use types and planning areas, subject to various requirements concerning FAR, allowable land uses, and AM, PM, and daily trip generation ceilings. As of October 21, 2021 (i.e., inclusive of Phase I entitled development only), approximately 1,866,750 net SF (approximately 2,095,950 gross SF) of entitled floor area remains within the ESSCSP; see Appendix A: ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table. The Proposed Project involves development of approximately 131,685 net SF (approximately 153,915 gross SF) of floor area; see Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Development Scenarios. With implementation of the Proposed Project, approximately 1,735,065 net SF (approximately 1,942,035 gross SF) of entitled floor area would remain within the ESSCSP. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause the allowed new development within the ESSCSP, as detailed in ESSCSP Table III-1: Land Use Summary, to be exceeded. Overall, the Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the ESSCSP and ESMC. The Proposed Project would also be consistent with the General Plan, with the exclusion of the Circulation Element Policies listed above. No new or more severe impact concerning conflicting with any land use plan, policy, 8 L. Carver, personal communication, October 21, 2021. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-41 Page 244 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.11 Mineral Resources 4.11a Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.11-1) The FEIR concluded that no State -designated mines or mineral producers currently exist within the ESSCSP, and the ESSCSP area does not maintain any natural mineral resources. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no State -designated mines, mineral producers, or maintenance of any natural mineral resources within the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on mineral resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning mineral resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.11b Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resources recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.11-1) The FEIR concluded that no State -designated mines or mineral producers exist within the ESSCSP, and the ESSCSP area does not maintain any natural mineral resources. The ESSCSP would not result in the loss of availability of locally important mineral resources recovery sites. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: There are no State -designated mines, mineral producers, or maintenance of any natural mineral resources within the Proposed Project Site. The Proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of locally important mineral resources recovery areas. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on mineral resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning mineral resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-42 Page 245 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.12 Noise 4.12a Would the Project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.5-13 — 5.5-15, 5.5-17 — 5.5-22) Construction The FEIR concluded that construction -related noise impacts could occur during site preparation, which can create the highest levels of noise. Noise from construction activities is generated by two primarily sources: 1) the transport of workers and equipment to construction sites, and 2) the noise related to active construction equipment. Sensitive receptors adjacent to the ESSCSP area would be exposed to sporadic high noise levels associated with construction activities. Construction traffic would access potential construction sites within the ESSCSP area from major roadways, including El Segundo Boulevard, Sepulveda Boulevard, and Hughes Way. The closest sensitive receptors to the ESSCSP are immediately adjacent to the east (Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church) and west (The Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course); see FEIR Table 5.5-4: Surrounding Off -Site Sensitive Receptors. As noted in the FEIR, the majority of construction would occur at distances of 50 to 400 feet or more from the nearest sensitive receptors and would not be expected to interfere with normal recreational or institutional activities. Furthermore, construction activities would begin in one specific area within the ESSCSP and subsequently move to the other specific areas. Therefore, construction would not occur in any one location for an extended period of time. All development within the ESSCSP area would be subject to the General Plan Noise Element and ESMC Chapter 7-2 (Noise and Vibration). Furthermore, the ESSCSP would implement MM N-1 to reduce construction noise associated with future development by requiring preparation of a Construction Noise Management Plan to limit construction to the less noise sensitive periods of the day (i.e., between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM) and ensuring that proper operating procedures are followed during construction such that nearby sensitive receptors are not adversely affected by noise (pursuant to ESMC Chapter 7-2-4 standards). Operations The FEIR determined that off -site (traffic) noise levels resulting from the ESSCSP would not result in significant impacts. The ESSCSP would generate long-term stationary noise from delivery trucks, mechanical equipment (air conditioners, trash compactors, emergency generators, etc.), light industrial production (manufacturing equipment, etc.), and typical parking lot activities (e.g., parking lot traffic and car door slamming). The noise levels from the delivery trucks are within the City's allowable exterior noise level thresholds for churches and outdoor sports parks; therefore, the Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church and The Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course would not be directly exposed to excessive noise levels from the delivery trucks. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-43 Page 246 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis The ESSCSP's mechanical equipment would result in potential noise levels below the City's limits. The Metro C (Green) Line would further buffer the ESSCSP's mechanical equipment noise from the Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church and would mask any noise from the ESSCSP's mechanical equipment. Impacts from mechanical equipment would be less than significant. The FEIR concluded that noise associated with the ESSCSP's proposed parking structures would be of greatest annoyance to the sensitive receptors, these noise levels at the exterior of the sensitive receptors would not exceed the City's exterior standards, and impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, ESSCSP operations would result in less than significant impacts. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: Construction The Proposed Project site would be located farther from The Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course, but still adjacent to the Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church. Given the Proposed Project would require less construction on the Project site than the Approved Project, the length of construction and level of construction activities would be proportionately less than the Approved Project and as set forth in the FEIR. Proposed Project construction would be subject to the General Plan Noise Element and ESMC Chapter 7-2 (Noise and Vibration). Furthermore, Proposed Project construction would implement MM N- 1 to reduce construction noise associated with future development by requiring preparation of a Construction Noise Management Plan to limit construction to the less noise sensitive periods of the day (i.e., between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM) and ensuring that proper operating procedures are followed during construction such that nearby sensitive receptors are not adversely affected by noise (pursuant to ESMC Chapter 7-2-4 standards). Proposed Project impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning the generation of substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. Operations The Proposed Project involves approximately 58 percent less (gross SF) development and approximately 55 percent fewer trips, as compared to the Approved Project. As the FEIR determined that off -site (traffic) noise levels resulting from the ESSCSP would be less than significant, the Proposed Project would also result in less than significant off -site noise levels. Proposed Project operations would include delivery trucks that could not expose sensitive receptors to excessive noise levels from the delivery trucks. The noise from the Proposed Project's mechanical equipment would be buffered by the Metro C (Green) Line, and impacts would be less than significant. Proposed Project impacts from operations would be less than significant. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning the generation of substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures N-1 Before the City issues grading permits, the Project Applicant must demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works that the Project complies with the following: Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-44 Page 247 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis ■ All construction equipment must be equipped with mufflers and sound control devices (e.g., intake silencers and noise shrouds) no less effective than those provided on the original equipment and no equipment shall have an un-muffled exhaust. ■ The contractor must maintain and tune-up all construction equipment to minimize noise emissions. ■ Stationary equipment must be placed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance to the sensitive receptors. ■ All equipment servicing must be performed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance to the sensitive receptors. ■ Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for project construction are required to be hydraulically or electronically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. However, where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler must be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves must be used where feasible, and this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures must be used, such as drills rather than impact equipment, whenever feasible. ■ A qualified "Noise Disturbance Coordinator" will be retained amongst the construction crew to be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within 24 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, malfunctioning muffler, etc.) and implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Director of Planning and Building Safety. ■ Select demolition methods to minimize vibration, where possible (e.g., sawing masonry into sections rather than demolishing it by pavement breakers). 4.12b Would the Project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.5-16 — 5.5-17) The FEIR concluded that groundborne noise and vibration would occur during construction activities due to operation of heavy-duty trucks, backhoes, and other heavy-duty construction equipment. Operation of construction equipment would generate vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish rapidly in amplitude with distance from the source. As indicated in FEIR Table 5.5-8: Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment, the vibration velocities from the construction equipment that would be utilized during ESSCSP construction combined with the commercial/light industrial and institutional uses located approximately 50 feet east of the ESSCSP area would be below the 0.2 inch -per -second PPV significance threshold. Vibration impacts associated with construction would be less than significant. The uses proposed in the ESSCSP are not anticipated to generate high levels of groundborne noise and vibration. Therefore, vibration impacts associated with operations would be less than significant. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project 4-45 November 2021 Page 248 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: Proposed Project construction could generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used. The Proposed Project site would be located farther from The Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course, but still adjacent to the Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church. Given the Proposed Project would require less construction on the Proposed Project site than the Approved Project, the length of construction and level of construction activities would be proportionately less than the Approved Project. As construction would be reduced as compared to the Approved Project, Proposed Project construction vibration impacts would be less than significant. The Proposed Project's uses are not anticipated to generate excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels. Operations of the Proposed Project would include truck deliveries. Due to the rapid drop-off rate of ground -borne vibration and the short duration of the associated events, vehicular traffic -induced ground -borne vibration is rarely perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way, and rarely results in vibration levels that cause damage to buildings in the vicinity. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.12c For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.12-2) See Threshold 4.8e Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.8e Analysis of Proposed Project above. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.13 Population and Housing 4.13a Would the Project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.9-8 — 5.9-11) As indicated in the FEIR, the ESSCSP would not propose new residential land uses, and therefore, would not induce population growth directly through housing. Additionally, although the ESSCSP would propose improvements/modifications to existing roads and infrastructure, it would not involve the extension of roads or other infrastructure into undeveloped areas. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not induce population growth indirectly through extension of roads or other infrastructure. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-46 Page 249 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis As shown in FEIR Table 5.9-8: Project Compared to Existing Conditions, the ESSCSP would increase the City's employment by 4,598 jobs, or approximately 5.1 percent over existing conditions in 2015. The ESSCSP's increase in employment could result in population growth within the City, as the potential exists that future employees could relocate to the City. However, estimating the number of employees who could relocate to the City would be highly speculative. Furthermore, numerous alternative housing opportunities would be available to future employees. The ESSCSP's potential population growth is considered less than significant, since it is anticipated that significantly fewer than 377 of the Proposed Project's future employees would chose to relocate to the City due to the availability of numerous alternative housing opportunities within the City and neighboring cities and jobs created by the Proposed Project could be filled in part by the approximately 20,200 unemployed persons who already reside in the City and neighboring cities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop residential land uses, and therefore, would not induce population growth directly through housing. The Proposed Project would propose improvements/modifications to existing roads and infrastructure to serve the new uses on the Proposed Project site, but would not extend into undeveloped areas. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not induce population growth indirectly through extension of roads or other infrastructure. As shown in Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Employment Forecast, Proposed Project implementation would increase the City's employment by approximately 377 jobs, or approximately 49 percent fewer jobs, as compared to 744 jobs estimated for the Approved Project. When compared to the existing conditions in the City as noted in the FEIR, the Proposed Project would increase the City's employment by approximately 0.74 percent (377 jobs) over existing conditions (50,902 jobs). The Proposed Project's potential population growth from new employees relocating to the City is considered less than significant, since the Proposed Project's future employees could also choose to relocate to available alternative housing opportunities in neighboring jurisdictions. Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Employment Forecast 1 Land Use Employment Factor (SF per Employee)' Square Feet (net) Employment Estimate Existing Conceptual Development Scenario Office 440 327,680 744 Proposed Conceptual Development Scenario Office 440 126,448 288 Warehouse 1,518 5,237 4 Special Staff NA 85 Total Proposed Project 131,685 377 Proposed Project Compared to Existing Conceptual Development Scenario (number) -367 Proposed Project Compared to Existing Conceptual Development Scenario (percent) -49% Note: 1. Based on FEIR Table 5.9-7: Project Employment Forecast. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-47 Page 250 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis The Proposed Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth through employment in the City, either directly or indirectly, and impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning population and housing would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.13b Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.13-2) As indicated in the FEIR, no housing units exist in the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP would not displace housing or people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project would not displace housing or people in the ESSCSP. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on displacement and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning displacement would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.14 Public Services 4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: (i) Fire protection? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-7 — 5.10-8) The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would not propose new or physically altered fire protection facilities. While the ESSCSP would increase the non-residential land uses, which would result in an increased demand for fire protection services, the ESFD confirmed there would be no need to add a new fire station as a result of the ESSCSP. The FEIR also concluded that the ESSCSP would not increase response times to the ESSCSP area or surrounding vicinity or require the construction of new or physically altered fire protection facilities. The ESSCSP would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the ESSCSP's development impact on the City's fire protection services. Compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that applicants of future development projects within the ESSCSP area pay their fair share of the costs of providing the necessary public services and public facilities, including fire suppression facilities, vehicles, and equipment. All future development would also comply with the requirements set forth in Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-48 Page 251 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis the California Fire Code, California Building Code, and ESMC Title 13, Building Regulations. Therefore, compliance with all applicable codes and regulations, as well as ESMC Chapter 15-27A, would ensure that the ESSCSP would result in less than significant impacts to fire protection services. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop new or physically altered fire protection facilities. The Proposed Project's land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed Project's development impact on the City's fire protection services. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the California Fire Code, California Building Code, and ESMC Title 13 to ensure that the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to fire protection services. No new or more severe impact concerning fire protection services would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: (ii) Police protection? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-8 — 5.10-9) The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would not propose new or physically altered police protection facilities. While the ESSCSP would increase the non-residential land uses, which would result in an increased demand for police protection services, the El Segundo Police Department (ESPD) confirmed there would be no need to add a new police station as a result of the ESSCSP. The FEIR noted that according to the ESPD, the ESSCSP would increase calls for service, which would increase response times and potentially require an additional officer or resources. The ESSCSP would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the ESSCSP's development impact on the City's police protection services. Compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that applicants of future development projects within the ESSCSP area pay their fair share of the costs of providing the necessary public services and public facilities, including law enforcement facilities, vehicles, and equipment. All future development would also comply with the ESPD's security requirements, which include lighting, landscaping, addressing, bicycle racks, trash dumpsters, access control, doors and door hardware, parking structures, security cameras, and tenant improvement requirements for individual commercial/retail establishments, among others. The ESPD would review each future site plan before approval and impose standard conditions of approval to ensure adequate design features are included to minimize any potential increase in demand for police protection services. Therefore, compliance with ESPD's security requirements and ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that the ESSCSP would result in a less than significant impact to police protection services. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-49 Page 252 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop new or physically altered police protection facilities. The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. The Proposed Project would include various types of lighting surrounding the parking lot perimeters and around the corporate headquarters and maintenance buildings to minimize darkened areas and potential hazards. The parking lots would be tended by a security booth, and all entrances to the buildings on -site would be through a secured gated area or main entry lobby. Six types of perimeter fencing would also be proposed around the Proposed Project site, corporate headquarters building, and surface parking lots. Given the Proposed Project's scope and nature, it is not anticipated to result in an increase in response times or require additional officers or resources. Also, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed Project's development impact on the City's police protection services. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the ESPD's security requirements and ESMC Chapter 15-27A to ensure that the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to police protection services. No new or more severe impact concerning police protection services would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: (iii) Schools? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-9 — 5.10-10) The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would be situated within the Wiseburn School District (WSD) and the Centinela Valley Union High School District (CVUHSD). The ESSCSP does not propose new or physically altered school facilities. However, the ESSCSP would increase the non-residential land uses, which could indirectly result in increased enrollment within the WSD and CVUHSD. As noted in the FEIR, the WSD does not base its attendance on student generation rates, and enrollment is regulated through inter -district permits. Therefore, any increase in enrollment in the WSD would be limited. The CVUHSD also does not utilize student generation rates. Under Education Code §§ 17620, et seq., school districts collect impact fees from developers of new commercial/industrial building space. Pursuant to Government Code §65996, school fees imposed through the Education Code are deemed to be full mitigation for new development projects, and no additional mitigation measures would be imposed by the City. Developer impact fees would be imposed on future applicants within the ESSCSP area. Thus, compliance with the Education Code and Government Code would ensure that the ESSCSP would result in less than significant impacts to schools. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-50 Page 253 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop new or physically altered school facilities. The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. The Proposed Project would comply with the Education Code and Government Code, and the Project Applicant would pay the impact fee to offset the cost of providing services for any additional students generated by the Proposed Project. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to schools. No new or more severe impact concerning schools would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: (iv) Parks? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-11— 5.10-12) The FEIR indicated that the there are approximately 16 acres of privately -owned recreational resources in the northwest corner of the ESSCSP, which is available for private use by Raytheon's employees. The ESSCSP would remove those private outdoor recreational uses and provide approximately 7.5 acres of new recreational facilities at the southeast corner of the Raytheon Campus, which would also be available for private use by Raytheon's employees. The ESSCSP would not involve residential development and therefore, would not induce substantial population growth through new residential development that would generate a significant demand for park facilities. The existing employees in the ESSCSP would utilize the existing and new park and recreational facilities offered by the ESSCSP and would have minimal opportunity to use the City's facilities. The ESSCSP would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15- 27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the ESSCSP's development impact on the City's parks and recreational facilities. Compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that applicants of future development projects within the ESSCSP area pay their fair share of the costs of providing the necessary public services and public facilities, including parks/open space and recreational facilities and public use (community centers) facilities. Therefore, compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that the ESSCSP would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the need for new or physically altered park facilities, and impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. While the Proposed Project would not develop new or physically altered parks or recreational facilities, the proposed corporate headquarters building would include Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-51 Page 254 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis various amenities, such as training and weight rooms, an auditorium, and natural grass fields for internal use. Additionally, the ESSCSP included a private outdoor recreational facility for Raytheon employees totaling 7.54 acres within Lot 11. The Proposed Project would decrease the land available for this private facility to approximately 7.34 acres on Lots 10 and 11 (a decrease of 0.20 acres). This change would not generate the need for new or physically altered recreational facilities elsewhere to meet any parkland standard given it is a private facility. Additionally, the Proposed Project would not generate any demand for recreational facilities given it does not include residential uses but does include various private recreational amenities for internal use. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed Project's development impact on the City's parks and recreational facilities. Therefore, compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to parks and recreational facilities. No new or more severe impact concerning parks and recreational facilities' would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: (v) Other Public Facilities? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.14-3) The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would not include residential development or induce substantial population growth. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not generate a significant demand for new physically altered library facilities or result in adverse physical impacts associated with library facilities. The ESSCSP would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the ESSCSP's development impact on the City's libraries. Compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that applicants of future development projects within the ESSCSP area pay their fair share of the costs of providing the necessary public services and public facilities. Therefore, compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that the ESSCSP would result in less than significant impacts to library facilities. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not include residential development that would generate substantial population growth generating a demand for library facilities. The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. The Proposed Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-52 Page 255 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed Project's development impact on the City's libraries. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A to ensure that the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to library facilities. No new or more severe impact concerning libraries would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.15 Recreation 4.15a Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.15-1) See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Analysis of Proposed Project above. FOR Mitijzation Measures No mitigation required. 4.15b Would the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-11— 5.10-12) See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Analysis of Proposed Project above. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.16 Transportation 4.16a Would the Project conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.2-34 — 5.2-110) The FEIR studied 71 intersections that would be located in the cities of El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, Hawthorne, and Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles. The ESSCSP proposes to Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-53 Page 256 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis establish a net additional 2,142,457 gross SF over existing conditions. As shown in FEIR Table 5.2-27: Forecast Long -Range With Project Buildout Conditions Peak Hour Study Intersection LOS, with the addition of the trips generated by ESSCSP buildout, 13 intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) (LOS D or better), and 11 intersections would result in significant impacts. Implementation of MM TRA-1 through TRA-7 would reduce traffic impacts at Intersections 29, 32, 48, 49, 50, 53, and 55; however, only Intersection 49 would be reduced to a less than significant level. No mitigation would be feasible due to right-of-way limitations and existing structures at Intersections 38, 51, 62, and 69. Therefore, impacts at Intersections 29, 32, 38, 48, 50, 51, 53, 55, 62, and 69 would remain significant and unavoidable. For the State Highway intersections, the ESSCSP would have potentially significant impacts at Intersections 7, 13, and 57. With implementation of MM TRA-8 and TRA-9, traffic impacts would be reduced at Intersection 57 to less than significant levels. However, Intersections 7, which would have no feasible mitigation measures due to right-of-way limitations and existing structures) and 13 would also remain significant and unavoidable. The FEIR identified the following transit services available in the ESSCSP's vicinity: • Metro Bus Line Route 125 travels along Rosecrans Avenue and intersects Sepulveda Boulevard • Metro Bus Line Route 232 travels along Sepulveda Boulevard and intersects Rosecrans Avenue • Metro C (Green) Line 801 travels alongside the ESSCSP and stops at El Segundo Station, located at El Segundo Boulevard and Nash Street The ESSCSP is forecast to generate approximately 149 AM peak hour transit trips, approximately 153 PM peak hour transit trips, and approximately 1,303 daily transit trips. Since the ESSCSP transit trips can be accommodated by existing transit service in the vicinity, no significant transit impacts would occur, and impacts would be less than significant. There are no bicycle facilities located in the ESSCSP's vicinity. ESMC Chapter 15-16 sets forth requirements for major new developments to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate the use of ridesharing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle trips. According to the ESCM Chapter 15-16-2, before approval of any development project, the Applicant must provide for, at a minimum, all of the applicable Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and trip reduction measures. As described in FEIR Table 5.1-1: General Plan Consistency Analysis, the ESSCSP proposes a 6.0-foot wide Class II, on -street bicycle lane, on each side of the street, within the Nash Street extension. Therefore, following compliance with the ESMC, impacts would be less than significant related to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Overall, the FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to conflicting with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and approximately 55 percent fewer trips when compared to the Approved Project. The ESSCSP has a trip ceiling of 3,042 AM peak hourtrips, 3,120 total PM peak hour trips, and 26,585 total daily trips; see ESSCSP Table III-3: Project Trip Ceiling for Trips Associated with New Development Within the ESSCSP Area. As of Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-54 Page 257 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis October 21, 2021 (i.e., inclusive of Phase I entitled development), approximately 2,954 AM peak hour trips, approximately 2,965 PM peak hour trips, and approximately 24,756 total daily trips remain within the ESSCSP; see Appendix A: ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table. As shown in the Trip Generation Assessment- ESSCSP—Southeast Quad (Fehr & Peers, October 28, 2021) (see Appendix C: Trip Generation Assessment)' and in Table 4-5: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Trip Generation, the Proposed Project would generate a 267 AM peak hour trips, 230 PM peak hour trips, and 1,808 total daily trips. As shown in Table 4-5, the Proposed Project would result in approximately 55 percent fewer daily vehicle trips than the Approved Project. Table 4-5: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Trip Generation Estimated Trip Generation' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE In I Out FTotal In Out Total Land Use Code Size Daily ESSCSP ESSCSP All Uses N/A 26,585 2,634 408 3,042 631 2,489 3,120 Existing Conceptual Development Scenario' Office 710 367,002 4,048 504 69 573 93 454 547 SF (48) (0) (0) (0) (1) (4) (5) Proposed Conceptual Development Scenario Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility 148,050 1,633 203 28 231 38 183 221 Internal capture (1% PM / 1% 710 SF (16) 0 0 0 0 (2) (2) ADT)3 Special staff -' 85 emp 170 34 0 34 0 9 9 Subtotal Lots land 8 -- -- 1,787 237 28 265 38 190 228 Warehouse 150 5,865 SF 21 2 0 2 1 1 2 Total Proposed Project Trips 1,808 239 28 267 39 191 230 Proposed Project Compared to Existing Conceptual Development Scenario (number) -2,240 Proposed Project Compared to Existing Conceptual Development Scenario (percent) -55% Proposed Project Proportion of ESSCSP 6.8% Notes: 1. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition 2. Source: Fehr & Peers, Trip Generation Assessment - ESSCSP —Southeast Quad, October 28, 2021. 3. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or already operating within the site (Raytheon South Campus). 4. All employees were assumed to travel in single occupancy vehicles. To be conservative, 40% of the employees were assumed to travel during the AM peak hour and 10% in the PM peak hour. PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent; KSF = Thousand Square Feet Source: Fehr & Peers, Trip Generation Assessment — ESSCSP — Southeast Quad, October 28, 2021. Provided in Appendix C. 9 Kimley-Horn conducted a third -party review of the Proposed Project's Trip Generation Assessment on behalf of the City; see Appendix C: Trip Generation Assessment. The third -party review concluded the analyses meet the applicable provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-55 Page 258 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis With implementation of the Proposed Project, approximately 2,687 AM peak hour trips, approximately 2,735 PM peak hour trips, and approximately 22,948 total daily trips would remain within the ESSCSP. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause the ESSCSP trip ceiling, as detailed in ESSCSP Table III-3, to be exceeded, and impacts related to the circulation system would be less than significant. See Threshold 4.10b Analysis of Proposed Project above concerning consistency with programs, plans, ordinances, and policies addressingthe circulation system. The Proposed Project would complywith ESMC Chapter 15-16, which requires the Project to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate the use of ridesharing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle trips. The Proposed Project would also include applicable TDM and trip reduction measures. As noted in Threshold 4.10b Analysis of Proposed Project above, the Proposed Project would be required to implement the City's Public Works Department conditions of approval related to the Nash Street extension. Therefore, impacts related to conflicting with program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.16b Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis Not applicable since this threshold was not analyzed in the FEIR. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3 codifies the change from LOS to VMT as a metric for transportation impact analysis. Pursuant to SB 743, VMT analysis is the primary method for determining transportation impacts under CEQA. The City is in the process of developing SB 743 implementation guidelines related to VMT analysis. Therefore, the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR)'s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA will be utilized for the VMT analysis. OPR acknowledges that CEQA documents released for public review before July 1, 2020 are not required to incorporate a VMT analysis, and that CEQA analyses prepared after July 1, 2020 may rely on a previously certified EIR that analyzes traffic impacts using the LOS metric. Lead agencies may use their discretion to determine if a VMT analysis is not required for later -prepared documents.10 See, e.g., CREED v. San Diego (2011) 196 Cal.AppAth 515; Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.AppAth 1301, 1320.) Therefore, a VMT analysis is not required for the Proposed Project. Notwithstanding, based on the VMT-based analysis provided below, the Proposed Project is presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact concerning VMT. The OPR Guidelines state that projects located within half mile from an existing major transit stop or within half of a mile from an existing stop along a high -quality transit corridor can be screened out, and 10 California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, SB 743 Frequently Asked Questions, https://opr.ca.gov/cega/sb 743/fag.html#draft-docs. Accessed November 3, 2021. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-56 Page 259 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis thus presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact. As the Proposed Project would be located less than 0.5 miles south of the Metro C (Green) Line El Segundo station, the Proposed Project is screened out and is presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact concerning VMT. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.16c Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.2-34 — 5.2-110) The FEIR concluded that while the proposed ESSCSP development would not result in incompatible uses, the ESSCSP's generated trips would result in impacts at study area intersections, which could lead to increased transportation hazards at study area intersections (e.g., a dangerous intersection). Therefore, ESSCSP implementation would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to increased hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use. Analysis of Proposed Project Significant and Unavoidable Impact: The Proposed Project would develop uses that are consistent with those assumed in the ESSCSP land use plan and evaluated in the FEIR. The Proposed Project land uses that would be consistent with the ESSCSP's land use plan and not result in incompatible uses. Additionally, the Proposed Project would result in approximately 55 percent fewer daily vehicle trips than the Approved Project. However, the Proposed Project would generate 1,808 total daily trips, which could lead to increased transportation hazards at study area intersections (e.g., a dangerous intersection). Therefore, the Proposed Project's uses could increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses, resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact, as concluded in the FEIR. It is noted that although the Proposed Project would result in a significant and unavoidable impact concerning increased transportation hazards, this significant and unavoidable impact was previously identified in the FEIR. No new or more severe impact concerning increased transportation hazards would occur, as a result of the Proposed Project. As described above, the Proposed Project would result in 55 percent less total daily trips, as compared to the Approved Project. Therefore, an additional finding concerning this significant impact is not required, since such a finding was already made in adopting the original FEIR, and this Addendum is the proper CEQA document per State CEQA Guidelines §§15162 and 15164 because no new significant environmental impacts have been identified. The Proposed Project's modifications to realign the Nash Street extension would require minor utility relocations. The Proposed Project would also realign/relocate the Coral Circle connection to the Nash Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The proposed modified circulation pattern would continue to provide for possible future connection from the Nash Street extension to Coral Circle (an easement through Lots 20 and 22) and capacity for additional parking for the Coral Circle businesses (Lots 20 and 22). As noted in Response to Threshold 4.10b Analysis of Proposed Project above, the City's Public Works Department analyzed the Nash Street extension and Coral Circle connection for compliance concerning function, capacity, and street classification and standards with the General Plan Circulation Element, the ESMC, and the ESSCSP, and found that the two proposed modifications would be in substantial Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-57 Page 260 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis compliance.11 The Proposed Project would implement the City's Public Works Department conditions of approval related to the Nash Street extension, which would also require that the design and construction of the Nash Street extension be subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works and Director of Development Services. Complying with the conditions of approval would further ensure that the Proposed Project would not increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses. Impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning increasing hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.16d Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-27 — 5.7-34) See Threshold 4.8f Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: See Threshold 4.8f Analysis of Proposed Project above. FOR Mitigation Measures See MM HAZ-8, above. 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems 4.17a Would the Project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-24 — 5.11-28, 5.11-35 — 5.11-36) See Threshold 4.9c Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above concerning storm water drainage improvements. See Threshold 4.9a Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above concerning electric power and natural gas improvements. Water The FEIR quantified the proposed potable water use within the ESSCSP based on the proposed land uses to be 308,168 gallons per day (gpd) or 457.3 acre-feet per year (AFY). The ESSCSP proposed a potable water system with three connection points to serve the proposed land uses, and approximately 6,600 linear feet of water lines within the ESSCSP boundary. Regarding fire flow, the City defers to Los Angeles County Fire Department standards, and all final fire flows would be based on building size, construction 11 L. Carver, personal communication, October 21, 2021. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-58 Page 261 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis type, and relationship to other structures. MM USS-1 was recommended to require an additional analysis to determine the most feasible method for reducing velocities in the City's existing water system, which would also indicate the potential need to parallel off -site City pipelines or add service connections points for the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP also proposed recycled water use for irrigating existing and new landscaped areas. Therefore, the ESSCSP would require and result in the construction of new water facilities; however, the construction would occur primarily within the road rights -of -way, and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Wastewater The FEIR quantified the ESSCSP's projected average daily wastewater generation to be 308,168 gpd. As identified in the FEIR, sufficient capacity exists to sewer the entire ESSCSP in the southerly trunk; therefore, the ESSCSP would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects. However, the FEIR also identified that the Applicant may discharge a portion of the wastewater for the ESSCSP to the northerly trunk in El Segundo Boulevard. The ESSCSP would require additional capacity to the northerly trunk and would upsize the critical pipe segment. In the event the City permits the Applicant to sewer a portion of the development in the ESSCSP to the northerly trunk, the ESSCSP would be required to implement MM USS-2 such that an adequately sized relief sewer be installed within Douglas Street that connects with the trunk line at Coral Circle and Douglas Street and diverts sufficient sewer flow from the northerly trunk to provide adequate capacity. The FEIR concluded that implementation of the ESSCSP would not result in significant impacts concerning utilities and service systems. However, the implementation of the below referenced Mitigation Measures was recommended. Telecommunication Facilities The FEIR identified that telecommunications service to the ESSCSP area is proposed via the existing line located along the ESSCFSP's eastern boundary, within the property line. There would be one connection point to serve the ESSCSP, approximately mid -way along the eastern property line. All construction impacts would occur primarily within the road rights -of -way. The FEIR concluded that implementation of the ESSCSP would not result in significant impacts related to telecommunications, and no mitigation is required. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: Water The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would demand approximately 308,168 gpd or 457.3 AFY. The ESSCSP would include three new connection points to serve the ESSCSP. The Proposed Project would be located within the ESSCSP and would include similar uses already analyzed in the FEIR, but would develop approximately 58 percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project. As concluded in Threshold 4.17b Analysis of Proposed Project below, while the Proposed Project's water demand would be less than the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would still be required to implement MM USS-1 Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-59 Page 262 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis to require additional analysis of the regional system to reduce system velocities during peak system demands. With implementation of MM USS-1, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Wastewater The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would generate approximately 308,168 gpd of wastewater. The Proposed Project would be located within the ESSCSP and would include similar uses but would develop approximately 58 percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project. This analysis assumes the Proposed Project would be serviced by the City's existing 21-inch trunk sewer (D-207) (i.e., the "southerly trunk sewer") located near the Proposed Project site's southeast corner; see FEIR Exhibit 5.11-3: Existing Sewer System. The FEIR concluded that the entire ESSCSP could be serviced by the southerly trunk, which would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater facilities or expansion of existing facilities. As concluded in Threshold 4.17c Analysis of Proposed Project below, the Proposed Project's wastewater generation would be less than the Approved Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Telecommunication Facilities The Proposed Project site is located in a developed and urbanized area in the City and the ESSCSP that is already served by existing telecommunication services. The Proposed Project would install telecommunication lines in El Segundo Boulevard and along the western boundary of the ESSCSP. Existing telecommunication lines exist along the eastern boundary of the ESSCSP. Construction impacts associated with the installation of new telecommunication infrastructure were already analyzed as part of the FEIR. Installation of the infrastructure would be limited to on -site distribution and minor off -site work associated with connections to the public systems. Therefore, it is anticipated that the Proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects that have not already been addressed in the FEIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Conclusion Overall, impacts concerning water facilities would be less than significant with implementation of MM USS-1. Impacts concerning wastewater and telecommunication facilities would be less than significant. No new or more severe impacts concerning relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures USS-1 Before the City issues a building permit, the Applicant's Engineering Representative must coordinate with the Director of Public Works, or designee, to increase capacity of the City's High Pressure Zone in the vicinity of the Project site. This will include, at a minimum, regional system analysis of the City's Water System using the City's system -wide computer model with the goal of reducing system velocities during peak demands adjacent to the Project site. The Director of Public Works, or designee, will determine the system improvement options that are required. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-60 Page 263 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.17b Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-34 — 5.11-35) The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would demand approximately 308,168 gpd or 457.3 AFY. In accordance with SB 610 and SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was prepared for the ESSCSP to verifythat sufficient water supply is available to the water provider during normal, single dry, and multiple dry years within a 20-year projection that would meet the ESSCSP's projected demand, in addition to existing and planned future uses. The FEIR concluded there would be sufficient water supplies available to serve the ESSCSP from existing entitlement and resources, and no new or expanded entitlement would be needed. Impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would develop land uses that would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, although with approximately 58 percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project. As shown in Table 4-6: Proposed Project Potable Water Demand, the Proposed Project's water demand is estimated to be approximately 25,420.5 gpd. The Proposed Project's natural grass fields would utilize recycled water as proposed in the ESSCSP; therefore, the fields would not generate additional potable water demand that was not anticipated as part of the ESSCSP and analyzed in the FEIR. Table 4-6: Proposed Project Potable Water Demand Land Use' Square Feet Flow Factor Average Flow (gpd) Office 126,448 200 gpd/ksf 25,289.6 Warehouse 5,237 25 gpd/ksf 130.9 Total Proposed Project 25,420.5 Note: 1. Based on FEIR Table 5.11-6: Project Potable Water Demand. As the Proposed Project would develop less square footage than the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would be adequately served by the water provider and impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning sufficient water supply would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.17c Would the Project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-35 — 5.11-36) The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would generate approximately 308,168 gpd of wastewater. The Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP) was operating at approximately 66 percent capacity based on a design capacity of 400 million gallons per day (MGD) and the current (at time of EIR Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-61 Page 264 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis preparation) treatment totaled approximately 265.4 MGD. Therefore, approximately 134.6 MGD of available capacity existed at the JWPCP to serve the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP's 308,168 gpd (or 0.31 MGD) would not exceed the available capacity at the JWPCP and impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would develop land uses that would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP and would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. As shown in Table 4-7: Proposed Project Wastewater Generation, the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate 25,420.5 gpd (0.03 MGD) of wastewater. Table 4-7: Proposed Project Wastewater Generation Land Use' Square Feet Flow Factor Average Flow (gpd) Office 126,448 200 gpd/ksf 25,289.6 Warehouse 5,237 25 gpd/ksf 130.9 Total Proposed Project 25,420.5 Note: 1. Based on FOR Table 5.11-8: Project Wastewater Generation. As the Proposed Project would develop less square footage than the Approved Project, the JWPCP would have adequate and sufficient capacity to accommodate the Proposed Project, and the JWPCP would not be required to increase its design capacity. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on wastewater. No new or more severe impact concerning wastewater treatment provider and capacity would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.17d Would the Project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-36 — 5.11-38) The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would generate approximately 8,761 tons per year (tpy) of solid waste. Consolidated Disposal Inc. would provide solid waste collection services to the ESSCSP are and would be able to serve the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP would be served by a landfill with permitted capacity to accommodate the ESSCSP's solid waste disposal needs. Further, as described Threshold 4.17e Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis below, the ESSCSP would comply with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) to divert solid waste. Some source reduction programs available to the commercial uses proposed within the ESSCSP include Commercial On -Site Greenwaste Pick -Up; Electronic Waste; Commercial On -site Pick -Up; and Business Waste Reduction Program. Compliance with the SRRE would reduce the volume of solid waste ultimately disposed of at the landfill. Compliance with the SRRE would also allow the ESSCSP to further the City's goal of exceeding Assembly Bill (AB) 939's 50 percent diversion requirement. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not result in solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Impacts would be less than significant. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-62 Page 265 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would develop land uses that would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, and would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. As shown in Table 4-8: Proposed Project Solid Waste Generation, the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 723.4 tpy, which would be accommodated at the same landfills with permitted capacity to accommodate the ESSCSP's 8,761 tpy of solid waste. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the SRRE to divert solid waste, which would assist the City in meeting and exceeding the AB 939's diversion requirements. Table 4-8: Proposed Project Solid Waste Generation Land Use' Employees2 Generation Rate (Ibs/day/emp) Generation (Ibs/day) Generation (tpy) Office 288 10.53 3,032.6 553.5 Warehouse 4 8.93 35.7 6.5 Special Staff 85 10.53 895.1 163.4 Total Proposed Project 3,963.4 723.4 Notes: 1. Based on FOR Table 5.11-6: Project Potable Water Demand. 2. Based on Table 4-4: Proposed Project Employment Forecast. As the Proposed Project would develop less square footage than what was anticipated on the Proposed Project site under the ESSCSP, the Proposed Project would be adequately served by the identified landfills and impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning solid waste generation would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.17e Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-36 — 5.11-38) See Threshold 4.17d Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above. Analysis of Proposed Project Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.17d Analysis of Proposed Project above. FEIR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-63 Page 266 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis 4.18 Wildfire 4.18a If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 4.18b If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? 4.18c If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency watersources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? 4.18d If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.8-3) The revised State CEQA Guidelines include a new separate discussion for Wildfire hazards. Although not addressed as a separate threshold, the FEIR's Hazards and Hazardous Materials analysis (see Threshold 4.8g Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above) noted that the ESSCSP area consists of, and is surrounded by, urban/developed land. Furthermore, the ESSCSP is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Analysis of Proposed Project No Impact: The Proposed Project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact concerning wildfires, and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning wildfires would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.19 Energy 4.19a Would the Project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-64 Page 267 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 6-6 — 6-9) The updated State CEQA Guidelines include a new separate threshold for Energy. Although not addressed as a separate threshold in the FEIR, the FEIR analyzed energy conservation in FEIR Section 6.4.1: Project Energy Consumption. Regarding energy utilized during short-term construction, the ESSCSP would incorporate MM AQ-4 to ensure that development associated with the ESSCSP would utilize diesel construction equipment that complies with at least Tier 3-level emissions standards. The use of Tier-3 off -road engines would improve the fuel economy of the equipment fleet. There are no unusual characteristics of the ESSCSP that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy -efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State. Implementation of MM AQ-4 would further minimize energy utilized during construction. Therefore, it is expected that fuel consumption associated with ESSCSP construction would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary than other similar development projects of this nature. Impacts would be less than significant. During operations, the ESSCSP would not result in any unusual characteristics that would result in excessive long-term operational fuel consumption. The ESSCSP is located adjacent to the Metro C (Green) Line, which would reduce the use of transportation fuel. Future development within the ESSCSP would also be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-16, which would require developments to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate the use of ridesharing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting. The ESSCSP would also include bicycle network improvements. Therefore, the ESSCSP would reduce the use of transportation energy. For building energy, the ESSCSP would implement MM GHG-1 and include several energy efficiency measures, including exceeding Title 24 requirements as set forth in the CCR, high -efficiency lighting, shade trees, and high efficiency heating and cooling systems. The ESSCSP would adhere to all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency, including Title 24 standards, the California Building Code, Energy Code, Mechanical Code, Fire Code, and CALGreen Code. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy during operation, and impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project The Proposed Project would require less construction on the Proposed Project site than assumed for the Approved Project. Therefore, energy used during construction would be less than the Approved Project. During operation, the Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and would generate approximately 55 percent fewer trips when compared to the Approved Project. Therefore, the energy required for the Proposed Project and the transportation fuel associated with the Proposed Project vehicle trips would also be proportionately less than the Approved Project. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-16 to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate multi -modal transportation. The Proposed Project would implement MM GHG-1 and several energy efficiency measures to further minimize the energy required for the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy and impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning the consumption of energy resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-65 Page 268 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.19b Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 6-6 — 6-9) The updated State CEQA Guidelines include a new separate threshold for Energy. Although not addressed as a separate threshold in the FEIR, the FEIR analyzed energy conservation in FEIR Section 6.4.1: Project Energy Consumption. Regarding conflicting with or obstructing a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, the ESSCSP would comply with all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency. ESSCSP development would not preclude or conflict with plans or policies for renewable energy. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of Proposed Project The Proposed Project would comply with all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency. Through implementation of MM GHG-1, the Proposed Project would comply with requirements of Title 24, which would include installing high efficiency lighting, HVAC systems, water -efficient fixtures, etc. Therefore, development of the Proposed Project would not preclude or conflict with plans or policies for renewable energy, and impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning conflicts with or obstruction of a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. 4.20 Tribal Cultural Resources 4.20a Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? 4.20b Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-66 Page 269 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis Not applicable since tribal cultural resources were not analyzed in the FEIR. Analysis of Proposed Project This section briefly examines potential impacts related to tribal cultural resources that could result from the Proposed Project. This analysis is based primarily on the FEIR's Cultural Resources analysis and as described under Thresholds 4.5a through 4.5d above. Public Resource Code (PRC) §21074 defines a tribal cultural resource as follows: (a) "Tribal cultural resources" are either of the following: (1) Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: (A) Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. (B) Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. (2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. (b) A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. (c) A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a "nonunique archaeological resource" as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms with the criteria of subdivision (a). PRC §5020.1(k) states: (k) "Local register of historical resources" means a list of properties officially designated or recognized as historically significant by a local government pursuant to a local ordinance or resolution. PRC §5024.1(c) states: (c) A resource may be listed as an historical resource in the California Register if it meets any of the following National Register of Historic Places criteria: (1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-67 Page 270 of 500 4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. As stated in the FEIR, the ESSCSP area has already been subject to extensive disruption and may contain artificial fill materials. Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed condition, the potential for ground -disturbing activities to impact an as yet unidentified tribal cultural resource is considered remote. The ESSCSP Notice of Preparation was filed in 2009; therefore, AB 52, which was enacted on July 1, 2015, does not apply to this Proposed Project as the CEQA document is an Addendum to the FEIR and not subject to the provisions of AB 52. Based on the above, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning tribal cultural resources; however, as discussed in Threshold 4.5d Analysis of Proposed Project, if human remains are discovered during excavation of a site, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the same regulations as detailed in the FEIR as it relates to proper treatment, discovery, and notification. Impacts related to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. FOR Mitigation Measures No mitigation required. Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021 4-68 Page 271 of 500 Appendix A ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table Page 272 of 500 South Campus Development Tracking Table - Square Feet and FAR As of October 24, 2021 Land Use IMMrpmBuilding Area Building Area (Net Square Feet) (Gross Square Feet) South Campus Specific Plan Entitled Square Feet Office 1,565,000 1,752,800 Warehouse/Storage 82,000 91,840 Light Industrial 150,000 168,000 Commercial 133,000 148,960 Subtotal Entitled Additional Development 1,930,000 2,161,600 Existing Campus Uses- 1,788,889 2,069,947 Total Campus Entitled Square Feet 3,718,889 4,231,547 Phase I - New Development Office 40,600 43,000 Warehouse/Storage - - Light Industrial - - Commercial 22,650 22,650 Total Phase I Square Feet 1 63,250 1 65,650 Phase II - New Development Office Warehouse/Storage Light Industrial - - Commercial - - Total Phase II Square Feet - - Phase III - New Development Office - - Warehouse/Storage - - Light Industrial - - Commercial - - Total Phase III Square Feet - - Phase IV - New Development Office - - Warehouse/Storage Light Industrial - - Commercial - - Total Phase IV Square Feet - - Remaining South Campus Specific Plan Entitled Square Feet Office 1,524,400 1,709,800 Warehouse/Storage 82,000 91,840 Light Industrial 150,000 168,000 Commercial 110,350 126,310 Subtotal Remaining Specific Plan Entitled Square Feet 1,866,750 2,095,950 Existing Campus Uses- 1,788,889 2,069,947 Total Campus Entitled Square Feet 3,718,889 4,231,547 South Campus Specific Plan FAR Total Entitled FAR 0.60 Total FAR of Existing Development 0.29 Total FAR of New Development 0.01 Total FAR of Existing & New Development 0.30 Total FAR Remaining 0.30 1Pa e 273 of 500 South Campus Development Tracking Table - Trip Generations As of October 21, 2021 South Campus Specific Plan Development AM Peak Hour Trips In Out Total , PM Peak Hour Trips = In Out Total Daily Trips Phase I New Development Trii Counts AM Peak Hour Trips - In Out Total= PM Peak Hour Trips - In Out Total= Total Daily Trips Phase III New Development AM Peak Hour Trips In Out T� 1 1 PM Peak Ho In 1 Total Daily Trips Phase 11 New Development AM Peak Hour Trips In Out 1 1 PM Peak Hour Trips In Out 1 1 Total Daily Trips 1 Phase IV New Development AM Peak Hour Trips In Out - 1 PM Peak Hour Trips In Out Total Daily Trips _ i �i I � AM Peak Hour Trips A . In Out PM Peak Hour Trips = In Out To� = Total Daily Trips Page 274 of 500 Appendix B Inventory of Applicable Mitigation Measures Page 275 of 500 AQ-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and Building Safety must approve Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications that comply with SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust emissions must be controlled by regular watering or other dust prevention measures, and Rule 402, which requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off -site as specified in the SCAQMD's Rules and Regulations. Implementation of the following measures would reduce short-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors: ■ All active portions of the construction site must be watered every three hours during daily construction activities and when dust is observed migrating from the Project site to prevent excessive amounts of dust. ■ Appoint a construction relations officer to act as a community liaison concerning on -site construction activity including resolution of issues related to particulate matter generation. ■ Pave or apply water every three hours during daily construction activities or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas. More frequent watering must occur if dust is observed migrating from the site during site disturbance. ■ Any on -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or other dusty material must be enclosed, covered, watered twice daily, or non -toxic soil binders shall be applied. ■ All grading and excavation operations must be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour. ■ Disturbed areas must be replaced with ground cover or paved immediately after construction is completed in the affected area. ■ Track -out devices such as gravel bed track -out aprons (3 inches deep, 25 feet long, 12 feet wide per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes) are required to reduce mud/dirt trackout from unpaved truck exit routes. Alternatively a wheel washer must be used at truck exit routes. ■ On -site vehicle speed must be limited to 15 miles per hour. ■ All material transported off -site must be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust before departing the job site. ■ Reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas. AQ-2 During construction, all trucks hauling excavated or graded material on -site must comply with Vehicle Code § 23114 (Spilling Loads on Highways) regulating the manner for preventing material spilling onto public streets and roads. Before the City issues Grading Permits, the Project Applicant must demonstrate to the Director of Public Works how operations comply with Vehicle Code § 23114 during hauling activities, as applicable. AQ-3 The following measures must be implemented by the contractor to reduce ROG emissions resulting from application of architectural coatings: ■ Use high -pressure -low -volume (HPLV) paint applicators with a minimum transfer efficiency of at least 50 percent; ■ Use pre -painted construction materials; and Page 276 of 500 ■ VOC content of architectural coatings cannot exceed 35 grams per liter. AQ-4 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the construction contractor must provide evidence to the Public Works Director that the following measures are implemented during construction. See also MM GHG-1. ■ Provide temporary traffic controls such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow. ■ Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on- and off - site. ■ Improve traffic flow by signal synchronization, and ensure that all vehicles and equipment will be properly tuned and maintained according to manufacturers' specifications. ■ Require the use of electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators. ■ Require the use of 2010 and newer diesel haul trucks (e.g., material delivery trucks and soil import/export) and if the Director determines that 2010 model year or newer diesel trucks cannot be obtained then trucks that meet EPA 2007 model year NOx emissions requirements may be used. ■ During Project construction, all internal combustion engines/construction, equipment operating on the project site must meet EPA -Certified Tier 3 emissions standards, or higher according to the following: o Project start, to December 31, 2014: All off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower must meet Tier 3 off -road emissions standards. In addition, all construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. Any emissions control device used by the contractor must achieve emissions reductions that are not less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations. o Post -January 1, 2015: All off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower must meet the Tier 4 emission standards, where available. In addition, all construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. Any emissions control device used by the contractor must achieve emissions reductions that are not less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations. o A copy of each unit's certified tier specification, BACT documentation, and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit must be provided at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. GEO-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit or Building Permit, a lot -specific Geotechnical/Soils Investigation must be conducted, to a satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety. The Geotechnical/Soils Investigation must: ■ Be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the California Building Code by a civil engineer registered in this State; Page 277 of 500 ■ Comply with the recommendations specified in the Geology, Soils, Seismicity Report in Support of Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (D. Scott Magorien, C.E.G., March 6, 2013); and ■ Recommend the appropriate corrective action, which is likely to prevent structural damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in the area where geotechnical/soils problems exist. GHG-1 The Project must incorporate the improvements listed below to ensure consistency with applicable law. The Project Applicant must demonstrate compliance with this measure to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Safety Director before the City issues building permits or certificates of occupancy. Energy Efficiency ■ Design buildings to be energy efficient, 15 percent above Title 24 requirements (building permit). ■ Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees (building permit). ■ Install high efficiency lighting, and energy efficient heating and cooling systems (building permit). ■ Reduce unnecessary outdoor lighting (building permit). Water Conservation and Efficiency ■ Install water -efficient fixtures (e.g., faucets, toilets, showers) (Building Permit). Solid Waste ■ Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard) (Building Permit). ■ Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and adequate recycling containers located in public areas (Occupancy Permit). HAZ-1 Before a Grading Permit is issued, the actual location of onsite oil/gas wells must be verified with DOGGR. All onsite wells present must be properly plugged and abandoned per current DOGGR, DTSC, and RWQCB requirements. Further, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization experience must verify through soil sampling that no residual contamination has resulted from historic oil/gas production activities onsite. HAZ-2 Before a Grading Permit is issued, soil sampling must be conducted within the portions of the Project site that have historically been utilized for agricultural purposes and may contain pesticide residues in the soil, as determined by a qualified Phase II/site characterization specialist. The sampling, conducted in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department, must determine if pesticide concentrations exceed established regulatory requirements and identify further site characterization and remedial activities, if necessary. Should further site characterization/remedial activities be required, these activities shall be conducted per the applicable regulatory agency requirements, as directed by the El Segundo Fire Department. HAZ-3 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization experience must determine, based on the Current Conditions Report (CCR), RCRA Facility Page 278 of 500 Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan), and sampling and analysis conducted in accordance with the RFI Work Plan, whether subsurface release of hazardous materials/waste to the soil/groundwater associated with the existing storage facilities has occurred. If subsurface release of hazardous materials/waste to the soil/groundwater has occurred, the environmental consultant must determine if contaminant concentrations exceed established regulatory requirements and identify further site characterization and remedial activities, if necessary. Should further site characterization/remedial activities be required, these activities must be conducted per the applicable regulatory agency requirements. HAZ-4 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization experience must prepare a Worker Safety Plan to ensure construction worker safety during grading/excavation activities, based on their review the following documents: ■ Current Conditions Report (CCR); ■ RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan); ■ Findings of the RFI Work Plan's Sampling and Analysis; and ■ Existing Hazardous Materials Conditions Assessment. HAZ-5 An environmental professional with Phase II/site characterization experience must conduct an inspection of existing onsite structures before building renovation/demolition activities. The inspection must determine whether or not testing is required to confirm the presence or absence of hazardous substances in building materials (e.g., sinks, drains, piping, flooring, walls, ceiling tiles). Should testing be required and results determine that hazardous substances are present in onsite building materials, the Phase II/site characterization specialist must determine appropriate prevention/remediation measures that are required and/or the methods for proper disposal of hazardous waste at an approved landfill facility, if required. HAZ-6 If during construction unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered by the contractor that are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor must comply with the following: ■ Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; ■ Notify the Director of Public Works of the City of El Segundo; ■ Secure the area as directed by the Director of Public Works; and ■ Notify the El Segundo Fire Department (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Public Works). The Fire Department's Environmental Safety Manager can advise the responsible party of further actions that must be taken, if required. HAZ-7 Before any Building Permit is issued, vapor intrusion investigations must be conducted by a qualified Environmental Professional, in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department. Should the Environmental Professional determine that proposed buildings could be impacted by vapor intrusion, the Environmental Professional, in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department, must recommend that specific measures be incorporated into the buildings' design Page 279 of 500 that would reduce these indoor air quality concentrations to below regulatory thresholds, as directed by the El Segundo Fire Department. HAZ-8 At least three business days before any lane closure, the construction contractor must notify the El Segundo Fire Department, El Segundo Police Department, El Segundo Public Works Department, and the El Segundo Planning and Building Safety Department of construction activities that would impede movement (such as road or lane closures) along roadways immediately adjacent to the development area, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access and maintenance of evacuation routes. HWQ-1 Before the City issues any grading permit, the Applicant must conduct a Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study to determine potential storm water runoff rates and peak flows from the Project site per County of Los Angeles methodology. The 50-year storm flows for both existing and proposed Project conditions must be included in the study. The Study must be completed by a qualified professional, approved by the Director of Public Works, and be consistent with standard engineering practices for the region, including the use of the Los Angeles County Manual. The Study must demonstrate the effect of storm water discharges to any City, County, or other agency -owned drainage or flood control facility, as mitigated and be designed and implemented to prevent an increase in the rate or amount of storm water runoff above the baseline condition. The Study must also determine whether onsite detention is required. If the final hydrology calculations determine that onsite detention is required to avoid downstream impacts, the Study must also identifythe necessary flood control mitigation, which may include a surface stormwater detention pond, subsurface detention structure, or subsurface detention pipes. The construction level hydrology calculations and Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be prepared and reviewed by the Director of Public Works and Building Official before any Grading Permit is issued. HWQ-2 Before the City issues any permit for development of an individual parcel, the Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be updated and submitted to the Director of Public Works for review. The phasing must be implemented to prevent an increase in the rate or amount of storm water runoff above the baseline condition. N-1 Before the City issues grading permits, the Project Applicant must demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works that the Project complies with the following: ■ All construction equipment must be equipped with mufflers and sound control devices (e.g., intake silencers and noise shrouds) no less effective than those provided on the original equipment and no equipment shall have an un-muffled exhaust. ■ The contractor must maintain and tune-up all construction equipment to minimize noise emissions. ■ Stationary equipment must be placed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance to the sensitive receptors. ■ All equipment servicing must be performed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance to the sensitive receptors. Page 280 of 500 ■ Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for project construction are required to be hydraulically or electronically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. However, where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler must be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves must be used where feasible, and this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures must be used, such as drills rather than impact equipment, whenever feasible. ■ A qualified "Noise Disturbance Coordinator" will be retained amongst the construction crew to be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within 24 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, malfunctioning muffler, etc.) and implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Director of Planning and Building Safety. ■ Select demolition methods to minimize vibration, where possible (e.g., sawing masonry into sections rather than demolishing it by pavement breakers). USS-1 Before the City issues a building permit, the Applicant's Engineering Representative must coordinate with the Director of Public Works, or designee, to increase capacity of the City's High Pressure Zone in the vicinity of the Project site. This will include, at a minimum, regional system analysis of the City's Water System using the City's system -wide computer model with the goal of reducing system velocities during peak demands adjacent to the Project site. The Director of Public Works, or designee, will determine the system improvement options that are required. Page 281 of 500 Appendix C Trip Generation Assessment Page 282 of 500 Kimley»>Horn TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, City of El Segundo From: Rita Garcia Date: November 9, 2021 Subject: Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project, Trip Generation Assessment Peer Review Kimley-Horn has conducted a follow-up third -party peer review of the Project's Trip Generation Assessment (Fehr & Peers, October 2021) on behalf of the City of El Segundo to verify that Kimley-Horn's September 15, 2021 third -party peer review Technical Memorandum (TM) recommendations have been incorporated. The revised October 2021 Trip Generation Assessment addressed the third -party peer review comments and thus is in compliance with the TM recommendations. The analysis, as revised, meets the applicable provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines and is adequate for inclusion in the Project Addendum. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 714.786.6116 or Rita. GarciaCa)-kim ley-horn.com with any questions. Page 283 of 500 FEHR�PEERS Memorandum Date: October 28, 2021 To: Lionel Uhry, Senior Vice President, Mar Ventures, Inc From: Anjum Bawa, AICP Subject: Trip Generation Assessment — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Southeast Quad PT27-0060 This memorandum summarizes a trip generation assessment conducted to evaluate construction of a corporate headquarters and a recreation facility on El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Parcels 7 and 8. A separate trip generation assessment is also provided for the construction of a warehouse building (Butler Building) on Parcel 18. Provided below is a detailed summary of the proposed changes and results of our trip generation assessment. Background The October 2015 update to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSC-SP) provided Raytheon the flexibility to either expand its existing operations or develop a mixed -use project that would be compatible with the existing Raytheon Campus facilities and operations. The roughly 142.28-acre specific plan area is allowed a maximum development intensity of 3,718,889 net square feet. Figure 1 illustrates ESSC-SP land -use plan, which identified the various parcels and designated land -use types. Figure 2 shows a conceptual site plan of the approved development as part of the Specific Plan. Table 1 shows a summary of land -use type and maximum development allowable for each parcel. 600 Wilshire Boulevard I Suite 1050 1 Los Angeles, CA 90017 1 (213) 261-3050 1 Fax (310) 394-7663 www.fehrandpeers.com Page 284 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 2of18 Figure 1 —Current El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Land Use Plan • ,�� =-Ming�. 4 (MU 2.1 --= REC/(OS 17 0/IMU 13 1 0/Ih1U` 26 ±REC 0/IMU 1106 19 25 --23 1 REMS 22 11 OPPY �i i o 20 7 w, 0/IMU Corrxnoraal i OMico Mixed Use CNtice / Industrial Mmed Use 0 RecrealoNOpen Space Source: Exhibit 5, El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, Specific Plan No. 11-01, City of El Segundo, October 2015 Page 285 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 3 of 18 Figure 2 — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Conceptual Site Plan v' 26 25 .1 W..-I — 18 6 T � ncmtnaK« 1 Source: Exhibit 6 — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, Specific Plan No. 11-01, City of El Segundo, October 2075 Page 286 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 4 of 18 Table 1 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Development by Parcel 110 Parcel Use Acreage Building ding Area (GroSS)2 Assumed FAR' Comm erciallOffice Mixed Use (CMU) 2 Office 4.87 380,040 425,644.80 1.79 3 Office 2.57 191,540 214,524.80 1.71 4 Office 5.20 191,540 214,524.80 0.84 14 Commercial 4.01 50,000 56,000 0.29 15 Commercial 3.99 46,000 51,520 0.26 16 Commercial 3.36 37,000 41,440 0.25 Subtotal 24.00 896,120 1,003,654.4 0,86 Officellndustrial Mixed Use (Oil MU) 1 Office 10.02 191,540 214,524.8 0.44 5 Existing 7.17 67,465 82,412 0.22 6 Warehouse Light Ind. 4.53 82,000 150,000 91,840 168,000 1.18 7 Office 4.75 163,840 183,500.8 0.79 8 Office 5.81 163,840 183,500.8 0.65 9 Office 1.68 160,840 180,140.8 2.20 10 Parking structure 1.49 -- -- -- 12 Existing 7.78 53,934 82,798 0.16 13 Office 2.71 121,820 136,438.4 1.03 17 Existing 22.32 996,871 1,121,048 1.03 18 Existing 18.36 670,619 783,689 0.84 Subtotal 86.62 2,822,769 3,227,892.E 0.75 TOTAL DEV 110.62 3,718,8894 4,231,547 0.77 19-26 RoadslOS 18.07 -- -- -- 11 Recreation 7.54 El Segundo Blvd. New Dedication Road and Bike Path 0.83 - El Segundo Blvd. Existing Dedication Road 5.22 -- TOTAL 1 142.28 1 1 1 0.60 2 Gross building area of new construction is assumed to be 1.12% of net area. Twelve (12) percent of gross area is excluded, accounting for elevators, stairwells, and other non occupied space. 3 FAR calculation yields a net building area. Total allowable intensity would be capped at a potential maximum of 3,718,889 net square feet. Source: Table 111-2 - Land Use - Project Development Scenario, El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, Specific Plan No. 7 7-0 7, City of El Segundo, October 2075 Page 287 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 5 of 18 The Specific Plan's Development Regulation allow for transfers between land use types and planning areas, subject to the following requirements: • The overall FAR of the Campus cannot exceed 0.60 based on the gross acreage of the site, resulting in a maximum development intensity of 3,718,889 net square feet of building area (4,231, 547 square feet gross building area); • Land uses conform to allowable uses as outlined in the Permitted Use Table in the Development Standards section of this Specific Plan; and • The total number of traffic trips cannot exceed the trip ceiling established for the Project. The trip ceiling for trip generation of new development within the Project area is: o 631 PM peak hour inbound trips and 2,489 PM peak hour outbound trips, for a total of 3,120 PM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project. 0 2,634 AM peak hour inbound trips and 408 outbound AM peak hour trips, for a total of 3,042 AM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project. 0 26,585 daily trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project. Table 2 summarizes the trip ceiling for the proposed development as provided in the approved ESSC-SP. Table 2 — Ell Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Development Trip Ceiling Total Daily Trips Source: Table 111-3 - Project Trip Ceiling for trips associated with new development within the ESSCSP area. El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, Specific Plan No. 11-01, City of El Segundo, October 2075 Page 288 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 6 of 18 The subject of this analysis is the corporate headquarters and recreation facility proposed on El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Parcels 7 and 8 considering the Specific Plan's permitted 367,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA) of office use. Provided below is a summary of the proposed use. To accommodate the proposed use, the ESSC-SP will also be updated. The Project's proposed land use plan, conceptual plan, and summary of development are provided in Appendix A. Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility The roughly 13.2-acre corporate headquarters is proposed to include a 3-story building with a partial basement, approximately 148,050 square feet GFA including in-house fitness facilities together with 5.8 acres of open, green space and 348 stall surface parking area. The facility will span roughly 14-acre within Parcels 7 and 8 of the ESSC-SP. Primary vehicular access to the Project site is proposed via a primary driveway located along the southside of proposed Nash Street Extension. A secondary driveway access to the site is proposed along the east edge of the site, also along southside of Nash Street extension. Both driveways will provide bicycle and pedestrian access as well. Typical hours of operation for the facility will be from 6:30 am to 5:30 pm, with selected periods of the year extending into the evening. Provided below is a detailed trip generation analysis for the proposed facility. Trip Generation ESSC-SP was approved for 3,718,889 net square feet of building area (4,231, 547 square feet gross building area (GFA)) and a trip ceiling within the Project area as follows: • 631 PM peak hour inbound trips and 2,489 PM peak hour outbound trips, for a total of 3,120 PM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project. • 2,634 AM peak hour inbound trips and 408 outbound AM peak hour trips, for a total of 3,042 AM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project. • 26,585 daily trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project. Provided below is a detailed trip generation summary for both Phases 1 and Phase 2 — Full Buildout of the Specific Plan. Page 289 of 500 TABLE 3 EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN - PHASE 1 (NASH STREET EXCHANGE) TRIP GENERATION ITE Land Trip Generation Rates [a] Estimated Trip Generation Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trip Rate Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Land Use Size Use Code Rate Rate % In % Out Rate % In % Out Unit Trips In Out Total In Out Total PROPOSED PROJECT Medical Office 720 43.000 ksf 34.80 2.78 78% 22% 3.46 28% 72% per ksf 1,496 94 26 120 42 107 149 Internal capture [b] 15% 15% 15% (224) (14) (4) (18) (6) (16) (22) Transit credit [c] 15% 15% 15% (191) (12) (3) (15) (5) (14) (19) Pass -by (d) 10% 10% 10% (108) M u a M L) 0 1 Net External Medical Office 3.81 48% 52% 973 61 17 78 28 69 97 Retail (open after 10 am) 820 12.100 ksf 37.75 0.00 62% 38% per ksf 457 0 0 0 22 24 46 Internal capture [b] 5% 0% 5% (23) 0 0 0 (1) (1) (2) Transit credit [c] 5% 5% 5% (22) 0 0 0 (1) (1) (2) Pass -by [e] 0% 0% 34% 0 0 0 0 M M (14) Net External Retail 412 0 0 0 13 15 28 Retail 820 13.025 ksf 37.75 0.94 62% 38% 3.81 48% 52% per ksf 492 7 5 12 24 26 50 Internal capture [b] 5% 5% 5% (25) (1) 0 (1) (1) (2) (3) Transit credit [c] 5% 5% 5% (23) (1) 0 (1) (1) (1) (2) Pass -by [e] 0% 0% 34% 0 0 0 0 M jet Net External Retail 1 444 5 5 10 15 15 30 A. Total Project Trips 1,829 66 22 88 56 99 155 B. Total trips approved for Phase I Development per Raytheon South Campus Specific Plan EIR (October, 2015) 3775 89 225 Net trips available after proposed Phase I development (8-A) 1,946 1 70 Notes: a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017, unless otherwise noted. b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occuring between land uses proposed or already operating within the site (Raytheon South Campus). c. Trip generation adjustment discount associated with proximity to transit service for similar sites based on recommendations published by Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LAMTA) and ITE. d. Informed by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation pass -by trip rate, derived from surveys published in the 'Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Recommended Practice," 2003. e. Source: Appendix A - Table 2: Summary of Trip Generation Rates and Trip Credits within the Raytheon report for retail land use. Page 290 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 8 of 18 Table 4 — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Phase 2 (Full Buildout) Trip Generation AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily Land Use Trips In Out Total In Out Total 136.438 tsf General Office 187 26 213 34 169 203 1,505 ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT) 0 0 0 0 -2 -2 -15 ITE Transit Service & Light Rail Trip Adjustment (5%) * -9 -1 -10 -2 -8 -10 -75 Subtotal General Office 178 25 203 32 159 191 1,415 1,615.483 tsf General Office 2,213 307 2,520 404 2,003 2,407 17,819 ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT) 0 0 0 -4 -20 -24 -178 Subtotal General Office 2,213 307 2,520 400 1,983 2,383 17,641 73.577 tsf Warehouse 18 4 22 6 18 24 262 ITE Internal Trip Capture (1% PM, 1 % ADT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3 Subtotal Warehouse 18 4 22 6 18 24 259 168 tsf Light Industrial 136 18 154 20 143 163 1,171 ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT) 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 -12 Subtotal Light Industrial 136 18 154 20 142 162 1,159 148.96 tsf Retail' 89 54 143 265 287 552 6,361 ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT) 0 0 0 -3 -3 -6 -64 ITE Pass -by Trip Reduction (34% PM) 0 0 0 -89 -97 -186 -186 Subtotal Retail 89 54 143 173 187 360 6,111 Proposed Project Trip Generation 2,634 1 408 1 3,042 631 2,489 13,120 26,585 Note: tsf = thousand square feet; 1 = includes 92.96 tsf of retail land use associated with Phase 1 project; * = trip generation adjustment discount associated with proximity to transit service for similar sites based on recommendations published by LOS Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LAMTA) and ITE. Source: Table 72, Transportation Impact Study, El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2075 The trip generation analysis shown in Tables 3 was obtained from June 2019 site plan approval of proposed Phase 1 commercial development (also known as Nash Street Exchange). Information presented in Table 4 was obtained from the ESSC-SP Environmental Impact Report. The analyses were conducted using trip generation rates provided in Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook (gch Edition). Parcels 7 and 8 were determined to be located outside a convenient walking distance to the Green Line light rail transit (LRT), therefore, a transit trip credit of 5% was not applied to office use proposed for these two parcels. Table 5 shows trip rates used to calculate trip generation for the proposed project. Page 291 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 9 of 18 Table 5 — Trip Generation Rates Land Use ITE Land Use Code Trip Generation Rates [a] Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trip Rate Rate Rate % In % Out Rate % In % Out Unit General Office 710 11.03 1.56 88% 12% 1.49 17% 83% per ksf Notes: a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition. Table 6 summarizes trip generation estimates for general office use for Parcels 7 and 8 in the ESSC-SP. As shown in Table 6, Parcels 7 and 8 were expected to generate a total of 4008 daily trips, of which 573 trips (504 inbound/69 outbound) would occur in the AM peak hour and 542 trips (92 inbound/450 outbound) would occur in the PM peak hour. Table 6 — Ell Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Trip Generation for Parcels 7 and 8 (As Approved in 2015) ITE Estimated Trip Generation [a] Land Use Land e Size Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Code Trips In Out Total In Out Total Parcels 7 and 8 General Office 710 367.000 ksf 4,048 504 69 573 93 454 547 Internal capture 7 % PM/ 7 % ADT[b] (40) 0 0 0 (1) (4) (5) Total Trips Estimated for Parcels 7 and 8 4,008 504 69 573 92 450 542 Notes: a. Source: Consistent with the 2015 El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, rates from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition were used. b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or already operating within the site (El Segundo South Campus). Page 292 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 10 of 18 Trip Generation — Proposed Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility The proposed corporate headquarters would include a 148,050 square GFA corporate office, including in-house fitness facilities. Considering the general nature of the proposed use, we used the following approach to estimate daily, morning and afternoon peak hour trips for the facility: 1. Estimate trips for the 148,050 square feet corporate office using trip rates provided in ITE Trip Generation Handbook 9t" Edition. 2. A special group of approximately 85 staff personnel will arrive at the project site in the morning between 6:30 AM and 8:00 AM and departing by 3:00 PM. These staff members are not part of corporate office functions and will travel to/from the project to use its fitness facilities and recreation area. Therefore, trips generated by these 85 staff members were accounted for separately from the office use. 3. Add the estimates from 1 and 2 to calculate total trips generated by the proposed facility. To be consistent with the 2015 ESSC-SP, we used trip generation rates for general office provided in ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9t" Edition. All 85 early arriving/early departing staff members were assumed to travel to/from the facility in single occupancy vehicles (SOVs). Although majority of the early arriving/early departing staff would likely arrive at the facility between 6:30 AM and 8:00 AM and leave by 3:00 PM; for the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that 40% will arrive during the morning peak commute hour' and 10% will depart the facility during the afternoon peak hour of commute. Table 7 summarize total trips estimated to occur from the proposed corporate headquarters and recreation facility. ' Peak hour of commute is the one hour within the morning and evening commuter peak periods when the traffic on the adjacent street is the highest on a weekday. Morning and evening peak commuting periods are 7:00 AM — 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM — 6:00 PM, respectively. Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Appendix A — Glossary Page 293 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 11 of 18 Table 7 — Trip Generation Estimates Proposed Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility on Parcels 7 and 8 ITE Estimated Trip Generation [a] Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Land Land Use e Size Code Trips In Out Total In Out Total Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility 710 148.050 ksf 1,633 203 28 231 38 183 221 Internal capture (1 % PM/ 1 % (16) 0 0 0 0 (2) (2) ADT) [b] Subtotal 7,677 203 28 237 38 181 279 Special staff [c] 85 emp 170 34 0 34 0 9 9 Total Trips from Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility 1,787 237 28 265 38 190 228 Total Trips Approved for Parcels 7 and 8 in 2075 El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan 4,008 504 69 573 92 450 542 Un-used Trips Available for Transfer 2,221 267 41 308 54 260 314 to Other Parcels Notes: a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition. b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or already operating within the site (Raytheon South Campus). c. All employees were assumed to travel in single occupancy vehicles. To be conservative 40% of the employees were assumed to travel during the AM peak hour and 10% in the PM peak hour. Butler Building A 5,865-sf warehouse is proposed on Parcel 18 of the ESSC-SP. Site plan for the proposed building is provided in Appendix B. Trip Generation — Butler Building The proposed Butler building would involve construction of a 5,865 square GBA of warehousing use. To be consistent with the 2015 ESSC-SP, we used trip generation rates for a warehouse use (ITE 150) provided in ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition. Table 8 summarize total trips estimated to occur from the proposed warehouse use. Page 294 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 12 of 18 bpi Table 8 — Trip Generation Estimates Proposed Butler Building (Warehouse) on Parcel 18 ITE Estimated Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Land Use Use Size Daily Trips Trips Trips In Out Total In Out Total Code Parcel 18 Warehouse 150 5.865 ksf 21 2 0 2 1 1 2 7% Internal capture [b] 0 0 0 0 0 (0) (0) Total Trips Estimated for Parcel 6 21 2 0 2 1 1 2 11 Notes: a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition. Trip generation rates for warehouse land use (ITE 150): Daily average rate= 3.56 per 1,000 sf; 50% inbound/50% outbound AM Peak Hour average rate = 0.30 per 1,000 sf; 79% inbound/21 % outbound PM Peak Hour average rate = 0.32 per 1,000 sf; 25% inbound/75% outbound b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or already operating within the site (Raytheon South Campus). Findings and Conclusion As shown in Table 5, the proposed corporate headquarters and recreation facility will generate a total of 1,787 daily trips, of which 265 trips (237 inbound/28 outbound) would occur in the AM peak hour and 228 trips (38 inbound/190 outbound) would occur in the PM peak hour. When compared to the trips anticipated for Parcels 7 and 8 in the approved ESSC-SP (Table 4), the proposed training facility will generate 2,221 fewer daily trips, 308 fewer AM peak hour trips, and 314 fewer PM peak hour trips. Since, the 2015 ESSC-SP allowed for maximum flexibility within the Specific Plan area, with mechanisms in the Specific Plan's Development Regulation to allow for transfers between land use types and planning areas, these un-used trips can be transferred towards future development of other parcels within the ESSC-SP. The proposed Butler building, a warehouse use, will generate a total of 21 daily trips, of which 2 trips (2 inbound/0 outbound) would occur in the AM peak hour and 2 trips (1 inbound/1 outbound) would occur in the PM peak hour. Table 9 provides a summary of total trips added by the corporate headquarter/recreation facility and Butler Building together. Page 295 of 500 Lionel Uhry October 28, 2021 Page 13 of 18 Table 9 — Summary of Total Net New Trip Generation Net New Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Proposed Use Parcel # Daily In Out Total In Out Total Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility Parcels 7 and 8 1,787 237 28 265 38 190 228 Butler Building Parcel 18 21 2 0 2 1 1 2 Total Net New Trips 1,808 239 28 267 39 191 230 Page 296 of 500 Appendix - Appendix A-1 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Land Use Plan - Appendix A-2 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Proposed Conceptual Site Plan - Appendix A-3 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Proposed Development by Parcel - Appendix B — Butler Building Proposed Site Plan Page 297 of 500 Appendix A-1 El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Land Use Plan CMU �, Nbkkl CMU NN O/IMU - Commercial / Office Mixed Use - Office / Idustrial Mixed Use - Recreation / Open Space Source: Mar Ventures, Inc. REC/OS Page 298 of 500 Appendix A-2 El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Conceptual Site Plan Source: Mar Ventures, Inc. Page 299 of 500 Appendix A-3 El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Development by Parcel d�MAcreageParcel illimb (Net) (Gross) 2 FAR 3 Commercial Office Mixed Use (CMU) 2 Office 4.85 380,040 425,645 1.80 3 Office 2.57 191,540 214,525 1.71 4 Office 5.20 191,540 214,525 0.85 14 Commercial 3.93 50,000 56,000 0.29 15 Commercial 3.99 46,000 51,520 0.26 16 Commercial 3.35 37,000 41,440 0.25 Subtotal 23.90 896,120 1,003,654 0.86 Office/Industrial Mixed Use 1 Office 10.01 191,540 214,525 0.44 5 Existing 7.17 228,305 262,553 0.73 6 Warehouse Light Ind. 4.57 82,000 150,000 91,840 168,000 1.17 7 Office 5.71 163,840 183,500.8 0.66 8 Office 8.07 163,840 183,500.8 0.47 12 Existing 7.78 53,934 82,798 0.16 13 Office 2.71 121,820 136,438.4 1.03 17 Existing 22.32 996,871 1,121,048 1.03 18 Existing 18.41 670,619 783,689 0.84 Subtotal 86.74 2,822,769 3,227,892.6 0.75 TOTAL DEV 110.65 3,718,889 4,231,547 0.77 19-26 Roads/OS 18.24 - - - 9-11 Recreation 7.34 0 0 - El Segundo Blvd. New Dedication Road and Bike Path 0.83 - - El Segundo Blvd. Existing Dedication Road 5.22 - - - TOTAL 142.28 - - 0.60 Source: Mar Ventures, Inc. Page 300 of 500 Appendix B Butler Building Proposed Site Plan .® uaornw�� a cos \ 6�9 Ial E . x Ntl1d 3LS , Q `\�\6_/� - i = 3DVXJVd M3N3tl NVId 311E 9 I1 I � I I � I I I � i I - I I a O I k � I _ w � � w ¢ qq � o z � F rn � z l I� F a w so w m I U U I 6S (l C7z ~x1< �zZ xh W K U I W U = I w I „zloz a w O awm 0 o ( I Z80O I ~X o_ U W I W 0 O I a Z LLl I I ; I I ; I C7zZ _ 0 c7 L'11 .-- Page 301 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 21-02 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ONE-STORY STORAGE BUILDING ON THE RAYTHEON CAMPUS AT 2000 EAST EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD WITHIN THE EL SEGUNDO SOUTHEAST CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (LOT 18 AND TRACT MAP 71551). The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds: A. On October 4, 2021, Raytheon Corporation, filed an application for Site Plan Review 21-02 construction of a new storage building (Butler building) totaling 5,865 gross square feet (5,237 net square feet) at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard ("Project"). B. The application was reviewed by the City's Development Services Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan, and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan ("ESSCSP"). C. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA"), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"). D. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the proposed Site Plan Review No. 21-02. E. The Planning Commission considered the information provided by City staff, public testimony, and the applicant, and adopted its Resolution No. 2904 recommending City Council approval of Site Plan Review No. 21-02. SECTION 2. Factual Findings and Conclusions. The City Council finds and concludes: A. The subject site is located in Phase IV of the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard. B. Phase IV of the El Segundo Campus Specific Plan is in the Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use designation which allows for new light industrial uses consistent with the existing Raytheon Campus facility and specifically within lot 18 where the primary buildings are located. C. The proposed storage building would be a one-story, 21'-2" tall, butler building totaling 5,875 gross square feet (5,237 net square feet) and would be located in the Page 302 of 500 southeast portion of the Raytheon Campus (Lot 18) and would be ancillary to the primary buildings. D. With regard to the City's General Plan and ESSCSP, considering all of its aspects, the proposed Project will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and ESSCSP and not obstruct their attainment. Specifically: 1. The ESSCSP was adopted in 2015 and amended the General Plan to create consistent land use designations and therefore was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan. 2. The ESSCSP serves as the regulatory document to implement the General Plan for this area of the city, by ensuring that all new developments in the area are consistent and in compliance with the standards set forth in the Specific Plan. 3. The Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use of the ESSCSP allows for new light industrial and storage uses consistent with the existing Raytheon Campus facility. 4. Objective LU5-6 of the ESSCSP seeks to encourage a mix of office and light industrial uses in industrial areas. For this proposed storage building, a new storage building helps to attain this goal by creating a new, clean, and organized area of lot 18 in furtherance of the Raytheon Campus. Furthermore, the newly proposed storage building will meet the design standards of the ESSCSP. E. With regard to Site Plan Review Findings Under ESMC § 15-30, The City Council finds: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the El Segundo General Plan, the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, and the Zoning Code. a. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo General Plan as identified above. b. The proposed development will be located within the Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use of the ESSCSP which allows for new light industrial and storage uses consistent with the existing Raytheon Campus facility. c. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Objective LU 5-6 to encourage a mix of office and light industrial uses in industrial areas. The construction of a new 5,865 storage building would further this Objective and would further enhance the area with development that is compliant with the established ESSCSP design guidelines. E Page 303 of 500 d. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo Zoning Code in that a full review of the project has been completed and the project has been found to be compliant with all relevant property development standards, including but not limited to, height, setbacks, parking, and floor area. 2. The proposed Project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is located since it will be ancillary to the primary structures as part of the Raytheon Campus. Specifically, the design, layout, and use of the proposed building will be compatible with the industrial use and appearance of the Project site that includes large, low scale buildings in a campus setting, along with surface parking spaces, truck loading area and travel lanes, and other ancillary structures for storage and warehousing. Furthermore, the location and site layout of the proposed storage building will not impact or interrupt the way existing uses on the subject site operate. 3. The proposed Project will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City as evidenced by an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") Addendum that was prepared and has determined that the proposed project would not have any new or detrimental impacts than previously identified in the original EIR. There will not be any new environmental impacts due to the construction of the proposed storage building and, therefore, there will not be any adverse effects on the general welfare of the city. Furthermore, and as discussed above, the proposed project is also consistent with the El Segundo General Plan and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. F. With regard to Site Plan Review Criteria Under Section VII.D.4 of the ESSCSP, The City Council finds that the Project's site plan, architecture, and landscape design are consistent with the Specific Plan because the site plan has been evaluated for compliance with the ESSCSP and specifically for compliance with the zoning for the site, including design guidelines and development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to achieve a high quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture, orientation and massing, parking and loading, landscaping, lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The proposed storage building has been evaluated in the context of the standards from the ESSPSP and have been determined to be compliant and therefore the project is consistent with these guidelines and standards. SECTION 3. Environmental Review. Concurrent with its review of this Resolution, the City Council will consider adoption of an Addendum to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report prepared to analyze the environmental effects of the proposed Project. The factual findings and conclusions set forth in such Resolution are incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. Approval. The City Council hereby approves Site Plan Review No. 21- 02 subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A." SECTION 5. Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determination in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, 3 Page 304 of 500 both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 6. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. SECTION 7. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. SECTION 8. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately upon the effective date of Ordinance No. _ approving an amendment to associated Project's Development Agreement, and the Ordinance's adoption and effectiveness are conditions precedent to this Resolution taking effect. Thereafter, this Resolution will remain effective unless repealed or superseded. SECTION 10. City Clerk Direction. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make a record of this action in the meeting's minutes. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 12021. Drew Boyles, Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1 I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was so passed 2 Page 305 of 500 and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk /_1»00]Tki21o7_u2to] go] VJA Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney 5 Page 306 of 500 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC), the Raytheon Corporation ("Applicant" or "Owner") agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of El Segundo's approval of Site Plan Review No. 21-02 ("Project Conditions"): Zoning Conditions 1. This approval is for the project as shown on the plans approved by the Planning Commission on November 18, 2021 and approved by City Council on and on file with the Development Services Department. 2. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit for the project, the applicant must submit plans, showing that the project substantially complies with the plans and conditions of approval on file with the Development Services Department. The Development Services Director is authorized to approve minor modifications to the approved plans or any of the conditions if such modifications achieve substantially the same results as would strict compliance with said plans and conditions. Any subsequent modification must be referred to the Development Services Director for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission and/or City Council review and approval of the proposed modification. 3. This approval allows for construction a storage building facility on Lot 18 (Phase IV Specific Plan area). Specifically, the approved construction includes the following: a) a one-story building totaling approximately 5,865 gross square feet and 5,237 square feet of net floor area A change in use(s) or change(s) in the allocation of square footages specified above must be referred to the Development Services Director for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission and/or City Council review and approval of the proposed changes. 4. All lighting must comply with the ESSCSP Master Lighting Plan, including: • All light fixtures and supporting poles throughout the facility shall be architecturally compatible with the architecture of the building. • Wall -mounted lighting, including security lighting, shall be compatible with the architecture of the building. 5. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit a photometric lighting plan that illustrates spill light at the project boundary shall not exceed 8 foot-candles. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department. Exterior building and parking lot lights shall be provided with decorative lighting fixtures. Exterior lighting for the project shall be designed to be confined to within the project site. Light shields shall be used to block light and reduce spill over light and glare as necessary. Prior to the final inspection and issuance of a Page 307 of 500 certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall schedule an evening inspection with the Planning Division to verify compliance with this requirement, and to ensure that lighting is appropriately shielded to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, the proposed chain link fence associated with the new storage building shall either be removed from the project plans if it is determined that the fence is not required during the plan check process or a landscape plan shall be prepared to Development Services Director's satisfaction to screen and soften the appearance of the fencing. 7. All landscaping must be in substantial conformance to the ESSCSP Master Landscape Plan. Tree must be of a species that provides for large canopy and shade. The use of palm trees shall not be permitted. 8. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit or as otherwise appropriate, a matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the City, as applicable, for review and compliance with: • The ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance 1589). • All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of Development Agreement 11-02 as amended. 9. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the project shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable mitigation measures in the MMRP for the ESSC-SP EIR and project COA. A final mitigation and COA monitoring matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the City. • the ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance 1589). • All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of Development Agreement 11-02 as amended. 10. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be architecturally screened in accordance with ESMC Section 15-2-8(C). Prior to permit final, the equipment shall be adequately screened to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. General Conditions 11. Prior to issuance of a building permit of the Raytheon storage building, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City committing to effectuate either Section 9.2 7 Page 308 of 500 or Section 9.3 of Development Agreement No. 4972A regarding the recreation/open space area. 12. The project is subject to the Public Art or In -Lieu Fee Requirement (Cultural Development Program) established by City Council Ordinance 1594, which requires placement of public art on -site or payment of in -lieu fees to the Cultural Development Fund. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an application to the Community Services Department and shall either: a) enter into an agreement with the City of El Segundo to provide public art onsite; or, b) in -lieu of commissioning public art onsite, pay a fee equal to 1 % of the project cost to the City's Cultural Development Fund. 13. A positive balance shall be maintained in all project Reimbursement Accounts at all times. If the balance of the Reimbursement Account(s) associated with the project becomes negative at any time, all work on the project shall be suspended, including the issuance of permits and project inspections, until such time as the sufficient funds are deposited to return the account(s) to a positive balance. 14. A weatherproof notice/sign to report dust, noise, or other construction -related impacts shall be posted and prominently displayed on the construction fencing clearly visible to the public from along the abutting street(s). The notice/sign shall set forth the name of the person(s) responsible for the construction site and a phone number(s) to be called in the event that a construction -related impact occurs. 15. Landscaping must conform to the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping requirements as set forth in ESMC Chapter 15. 16. All utility lines installed to serve the new construction shall be placed underground. 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of any existing utility resulting from the development. 18. Pedestrian walkways within the project must include admixture colored concrete and/or design that enhance and complement the project. 19. The project site shall be fenced and screened during construction. 20. All areas within the project site shall be maintained free of trash and debris. 21. Erosion control devices shall be installed at all perimeter openings and slopes. No sediment shall leave the job site. All newly graded surfaces not immediately involved in construction shall have some method of erosion protection, i.e., mulching, fiber fabric, planting, or tackifier. 22. Water spraying or other approved methods shall be used during grading operations to control fugitive dust. Recycled water shall be used for grading operations whenever available. Page 309 of 500 23. The owner or contractor must conduct daily street sweeping along the streets abutting the project site(s). 24. In the event that a Planning, Building, Public Works, Fire Department or Police Department requirement are in conflict, the stricter standard shall apply. Impact Fee Conditions 25. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time fire services mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. 26. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time police services mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. 27. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time park services mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. 28. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time traffic mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. Building Safety Conditions 29. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the California Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building Standards Code in effect at the time of the plan submittal to Building and Safety Division for plan review. 30. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the 2019 editions of the California Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building Standards Code. 31. Construction projects must comply with Best Management Practices for construction and storm -water runoff requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MS4 Permit. Construction activity resulting in a land disturbance of one acre or more, or less than one acre but part of a larger common plan of development or sale must obtain the (SWPPP) Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit. 32. A site -specific soils and geotechnical report must be submitted to Building and Safety Division for review and approval. The report shall comply with the minimum E Page 310 of 500 requirements of Chapter 18 of the CBC and shall address the possible sulfate content of the soils. 33. A stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required to certify the location of the new construction in relation to the setbacks prior to the first foundation inspection and stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required to certify the height of the structures prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 34. The applicant shall obtain a building, grading, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, demolition permit for the project. 35. Plans submitted for plan check must be stamped by a State -licensed architect or engineer and shall include: a) Complete structural calculations, details, notes and material specifications. b) Complete Accessibility Plan with a statement from a California Certified Access Specialist (CASp) indicating that a plan review has been performed and that it complies with the requirements of Chapter 11A &11 B of the CBC. c) A stamped and signed Boundary and Topographic survey by a California licensed Land Surveyor. d) A complete grading and drainage plan showing compliance with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) Low Impact Development (LID) requirement. The Los Angeles County LID Manual may be used as a guideline for preparing the LID report. e) Hydrology report along with hydraulic calculations. f) Complete energy calculations, details, notes, and material specifications. 36. Applicant shall submit a site -wide New Address Issuance request to the Building Division. Approved building addresses to be shown on the submitted plans. 37. Applicant shall pay all development fees, including school district developer fees, prior to issuance of building permits. Fire Department Conditions 38. Before the City issues a building permit, the applicant must provide Fire Life Safety Plans to the Fire Department for review and approval, which include, without limitation, the following: a) Fire lanes; b) Fire lane signage; c) Fire lane access; d) Fire hydrant locations; 10 Page 311 of 500 e) Minimum acceptable flow from any fire hydrant must be 2,000 gallon per minute at 20 psi; f) Fire safety precautions during demolition and construction; g) Emergency site access during construction; h) Permanent fire department access; 39. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided, installed in accordance with CFC 903 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 13. 40. A fire alarm system shall be provided, installed in accordance with CFC 907 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 72. 41. An on -site private hydrant shall be provided within 600 feet of the structure. Private fire hydrants must be installed and maintained in accordance with El Segundo Fire Department Regulation " Fire Hydrant and Private Fire Main System Installation". 42. Applicant shall submit a Hazardous Materials Management Plan prior to occupancy. 43. A knox boxes shall be provided for one of the man gates. 44. The applicant must develop and submit an Evacuation Plan and Procedures for review and approval by the Fire Department. Before the City issues each Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must provide evidence to the Fire Department that the approved Evacuation Plan and Procedures were implemented. Police Department Conditions 45. The applicant shall comply with the requirements contained in Municipal Code Chapter 13.20, Security Code. Landscaping 46. All landscaping shall be low profile around perimeter fencing, windows, doors and entryways taking special care not to limit visibility or provide climbing access. Floral or grass ground cover is recommended. Bushes shall be trimmed to 2 to 3 feet high and away from buildings. Dense bushes shall not be clumped together; this provides a hiding place for criminal activity. Trees shall be trimmed up to 7 feet. 47. Trees/bushes/shrubs shall not be planted next to or near any light fixture/standard/bollard. When grown to maturity this landscaping will block the light and reduce lighting on the ground surface. 48. Trees with high canopies are preferred when planted near light standards. 11 Page 312 of 500 Lighting 49. All parking lots shall be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1.25 footcandles of light on the ground surface during hours of darkness. 50. All exterior pedestrian walkways, interior common corridors, and open parking lots shall be illuminated with a minimum maintained one foot-candle of light on the walking, parking or driving surface during the hours of operation and one hour thereafter. The addressing, all exterior entry doors, walkways, bicycle racks and trash dumpsters shall be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1 footcandle of light on the ground surface during hours of darkness. 51. A site plan shall be provided, showing buildings, parking area, walkways, detailed landscaping, fixture schedule, mounting height, lighting ratio and a point -by -point photometric calculation of the required light levels. Foot-candles shall be measured at grade on a horizontal plane and conform to a uniformity ratio of six to one (6:1) average/minimum. Landscaping shall not be planted to obscure required light levels with light fixtures exceeding eight -feet (8') in height installed at least two -feet (2') from a tree's canopy at 70 percent maturity. A photometric study, which includes all of the above, shall also be provided prior to issuing of a Building Permit. A site plan shall be provided showing buildings, parking areas, walkways, and the point -by -point photometric calculation of the required light levels. Footcandles shall be measured on a horizontal plane and conform to a uniformity ratio of 4:1 average/minimum. Doors/Hardware 52. Entry and Mechanical/Electrical/Fire doors shall comply with El Segundo Police Department Approved Security Hardware list. Security Plan 53. A security plan shall be submitted, if the Police Department deems it necessary, due to the type of business, hours of operation, location, and propensity to crime. Public Works Conditions "City Engineer" = City Engineer or his/her designee throughout this document. General 54. The applicant calculated a fair share percentage of .06% contribution towards each traffic improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR MM TRA-1 through 9 improvements based on the methodology provided in the First Amendment of the DA No. 11-02 Section 7.9, "...the `Fair Share' is determined by dividing the number of PM peak hour trips produced by the individual development seeking a Certificate of Occupancy by the total Project PM peak hour trips Ceiling as noted in City Council Ordinance No. 1516, Exhibit D `Conditions of Approval' (3,120)." The applicant shall continue to work 12 Page 313 of 500 with the City to determine the total construction value of the TRA-1 through 9 improvements that permit "fair share" contributions as opposed to actual construction, as submitted by a State licensed Civil Engineer and accepted and approved by the City Engineer. 55. The applicant shall submit a .06% fair share contribution towards each traffic improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR to the City prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 56. All work in the City's right-of-way or on City -owned and maintained facilities shall require review and approval of the City Engineer or his/her designee. "City Engineer" = City Engineer or his/her designee throughout this document. 57. The applicant shall ensure that encroachment permits are secured from the Public Works Department/Engineering Division before commencing any and all work in the City's public right-of-way (ROW), including lane closures. 58. Construction inspection shall be coordinated with the Public Works Inspector and no construction shall deviate from the approved plans without approval of the City Engineer. If plan deviations are necessary, the applicant shall provide a revised plan or details of the proposed change for review and approval of the City Engineer prior to construction. 59. Prior to issuing of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure installation of all improvements required by the Public Works Department are inspected and approved by the City Engineer. 60. All construction -related parking shall be accommodated on -site or on other private property. No construction related parking shall be permitted off -site in the public right- of-way. 61. A grading and drainage plan shall be provided and stamped by a California (CA) State - licensed civil engineer as part of the Building Permit process. 62. A utility plan shall be provided that shows all existing and proposed utility lines and their sizes (sewer, water, gas, storm drain, electrical, etc.), including easements, within 200 feet of the project site boundary. 63. All record drawings (PDF and CAD format) and supporting documentation shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division prior to scheduling the project's final inspection. 64. Haul trucks are to use PCH north to Imperial Highway and PCH south to El Segundo Boulevard. All three of these streets are currently designated as truck routes in the City. 13 Page 314 of 500 Street Improvements & Traffic Control 65. The applicant must build the Nash Street roadway extension and associated public improvements in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement. The design and construction of the Nash Street roadway extension is subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and Building Safety. 66. The applicant must construct Class II bicycle lanes in the Nash Street Extension in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and Section 7.5 of the Development Agreement. 67. The applicant is required to obtain any necessary approvals from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) for any work that involves encroachment onto Metro easement areas or right-of-ways. These approvals may include, without limitation, pedestrian, bicycle and roadway easements and temporary right -of -entry agreements. 68. All new sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps shall be constructed per the latest Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC) "Greenbook" and City standards. New sidewalk to be a minimum of 5' wide. 69. All existing sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps that are broken or not in conformance with the latest SPPWC or City standards shall be removed and constructed per the latest SPPWC and City standards. 70. Any obstruction located within existing curb ramps shall be relocated. 71. All unused driveways shall be removed and replaced with full -height curb, gutter and sidewalk per SPPWC standards and City standards. 72. The applicant shall provide a minimum 4' sidewalk clearance around any obstruction in the sidewalk i.e. posts, power poles, etc. 73. PG-64-10 tack coat and hot mix asphalt shall be used for all slot paving required next to new concrete installations. Slot paving shall be 3 feet wide and 1 foot deep, consisting of 6 inches of asphalt over 6 inches of base. 74. The applicant shall provide street signing and striping plans for the new development. All striping in the public ROW shall consist of thermoplastic paint per the latest CA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 75. The applicant shall provide traffic control plans for all work requiring a lane closure. 76. The work scheduled in the public right-of-way on major arterial streets shall be Monday through Friday from gam to 3pm, except holidays. Work scheduled on all other street classifications shall be Monday through Friday from 7am to 4pm. Contractor shall obtain 14 Page 315 of 500 prior approval from the City Engineer for performing weekend work, night work, or work on a holiday. 77. During construction, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide safe pedestrian traffic control around the site. A pedestrian protection plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the City Engineer. This may include but not be limited to signs, flashing lights, barricades and flag persons. 78. Once the ROW improvements are accepted by the City Engineer, they are not to be used for staging building construction activities, including but not limited to, storage of construction materials and equipment. The street and sidewalks shall be kept free of construction debris, mud and other obstacles and shall remain open to traffic at all times. The applicant shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repair to any damage to improvements caused by its use, or its Contractors' and Subcontractors' use, of the improvements after acceptance by the City Engineer. 79. The applicant shall submit any new traffic signal plans to the City Public Works Department and LA County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) for review and approval. The applicant will coordinate all inspections with the LACDPW inspector for acceptance of the traffic signal poles and related equipment. The applicant will inform the City of any updates during this process. 80. The applicant must comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project. All mitigation measures and conditions of approval must be listed on the plans submitted for plan check and the plans for which a building permit is issued. Water 81. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing City owned water main lines. The applicant must submit a water study to determine if there is a capacity deficiency in the affected water main lines and if so, water main upgrades will be required. The water study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 82. Any existing water meters, potable water service connections, fire backflow devices and potable water backflow devices must be upgraded to current City Water Division standards. Backflow devices shall be placed or relocated onto private property. 83. City water mains cannot be located on private property. The applicant must provide a main meter in the public right-of-way. 84. The applicant must submit plans for water system upgrades to the City of El Segundo Public Works Department for review and approval. 85. Any unused water laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the City main. The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide traffic control plans and shoring plans. 15 Page 316 of 500 Sewer 86. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing sewer main lines. The applicant must submit a sewer study to determine if there is a capacity deficiency in the affected sewer main lines and if so, sewer upgrades will be required. The sewer study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 87. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, proof of payment of the sewer connection fee to the Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) must be provided to the City Engineer. LACSD can be reached at (310) 638-1161. 88. Any unused sanitary sewer laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the City main. The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide traffic control plans and shoring plans. 89. The applicant must contact the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Industrial Waste Section and receive a determination as to the necessity of a permit for industrial waste discharge before City approval of a Site Plan Review for any project within the ESSCSP. Storm Drain 90. Provide a Low Impact Development Study (LID) signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer. Make sure to comply with the project design requirements to retain on site (infiltrate or store for use) volume of runoff from 3/4 inch storm or the 85t" percentile 24-hour storm, whichever is greater (SWQDv). 91. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to size appropriate storm drain facilities to control on -site drainage and mitigate off -site impacts. Refer to the most recent Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual. Instructions and the manual are available at the County website at http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wrd/Publication/index.cfm. Calculations shall be signed by a registered civil engineer. 92. The project shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements and shall provide Best Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment control, construction material control and erosion control. Landscaping & Irrigation 93. Irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. All irrigation meters and mechanical equipment shall meet the City Water Division standards. 94. All public landscape improvements shall be designed to City standards and approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 16 Page 317 of 500 95. The property owner shall maintain all landscaping and irrigation in the public ROW fronting the property. 96. The applicant shall coordinate any tree removals in the public right-of-way with the Parks & Recreation Department prior to the start of construction. 97. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a landscaping and lighting assessment district for the Nash Street Extension in accordance with Section 7.1.6 of the Development Agreement. 98. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a landscaping and lighting assessment district for the Continental Boulevard Extension in accordance with Section 7.2.5 of the Development Agreement if a dedication of the Continental Boulevard roadway extension and associated improvements is accepted by the City. Miscellaneous Conditions 99. Approval of this permit shall not be construed as a waiver of applicable and appropriate zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County and/or City laws and regulations. Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other requirements of the ESMC shall apply. 100. Failure to comply with and adhere to all of these conditions of approval may be cause to revoke the approval of the project by the Planning Commission, or City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the ESMC. 101. In the event that any of these conditions conflict with the recommendations and/or requirements of another permitting agency or City Department, the stricter standard shall apply. 102. The applicant and its successors in interest shall indemnify, protect, defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and hold harmless, the City, and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs, and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims") arising out of or in any way relating this project, any discretionary approvals granted by the City related to the development of the project, or the environmental review conducted under California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., for the project. If the City Attorney is required to enforce any conditions of approval, all costs, including attorney's fees, shall be paid for by the applicant. The Applicant agrees to defend the City (at the City's request and with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will indemnify the City for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this section "the City" includes the City of El Segundo's elected officials, appointed officials, officers, and employees. 17 Page 318 of 500 By signing this document, , on behalf of Raytheon Corporation, certifies that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to the Project Conditions listed in this document. Name, Title (Raytheon Corporation) {If Corporation or similar entity, needs two officer signatures or evidence that one signature binds the company) Page 319 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING (1) A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 83507,(2) A MINOR MOIDIFCATION TO THE EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN (NO. 11-01), AND (3) SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 21-01 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW PROFESSIONAL SPORTS HEADQUARTERS AND TRAINING FACILITY WITHIN THE SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds: A. On October 4, 2021, CDC Mar Campus I, LLC, filed an application for Second Amendment to Development Agreement ("DA") No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 ("SUB 21-03"), Minor Modifications to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan ("ESSCSP") No. 11-01 Revision A, and Site Plan Review ("SPR") No. 21-01, and Environmental Assessment ("EX) No. 1305 to adopt an Addendum to the certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the development of a new professional sports headquarters and training facility on a 13.7-acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7 and 8) ("Project"). B. The ESSCSP and Environmental Impact Report (EA-905), Development Agreement No. 11-02, and related conditions of approval, were originally approved and adopted on January 19, 2016 (Ordinance No. 1516). C. The City Council approved an amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02 on September 3, 2019 (Ordinance No. 1589). That amendment made changes to the phasing of projects and reassigned certain improvements and mitigation measures among project phases. D. Approval of the proposed Project is a subsequent discretionary action in furtherance of the ESSCSP. E. The Project application was reviewed by the City's Development Services Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan, and conformity with the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") and the ESSCSP. F. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Project. G. The Planning Commission considered the information all comments made at the regularly scheduled meeting, and all other information in the administrative record, and adopted its Resolution No. 2903, recommending City Council approval of the Project entitlements and approvals referenced above. Page 320 of 500 SECTION 2. General Plan and Specific Plan Findings. The City Council finds that the proposed Project will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and ESSCSP and will not obstruct their attainment. Specifically: A. The ESSCSP was adopted in 2015 and amended the General Plan to create consistent land use designations and therefore was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan. B. The ESSCSP serves as the regulatory document to implement the General Plan for this area of the city by ensuring that all new developments in the area are consistent and in compliance with the standards set forth in the Specific Plan. C. The proposed corporate offices for the sports facility, fields, and associated facilities have been reviewed for compliance with the ESSCSP standards for site planning and design and have been found to be consistent with the Specific Plan standards as shown on the plans dated October 21, 2021. D. The Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use of the ESSCSP allows for new corporate offices and associated uses which are consistent with the permitted land uses within this land use designation. Specifically, the development of the sports facility office building and associated sports fields and ancillary uses are compatible and consistent with the existing uses in the general vicinity and would help facilitate the expansion of the existing campus. E. The scope and goals of the ESSCSP notes that the intent of the specific plan area is to "...serve the mission of economic development in the City, which is to create, maintain, and implement a business climate that fosters a strong economic community, develop a strategic plan that will result in business retention and attraction, provide an effective level of City services to all elements of the community, and maintain the quality of life that has characterized El Segundo for more than nine decades." Further, the ESSCSP states that "Permitted uses within the Campus are intended to create job opportunities and seek balance between growth, local resources, and infrastructure capacity." The sports facility with headquarters/office uses would create job opportunities and promote economic growth consistent with the goals of the ESSCSP. Furthermore, Economic Development Goal ED1 of the ESSCSP seeks a strong, healthy economic community in which all diverse stakeholders may benefit. SECTION 3. Findings for Approval of ESSCSP Minor Modifications. The City Council finds: A. The proposed Project is consistent with the Development and Design Standards, Applicable Rules, and Project Approvals which are required pursuant to the ESSCSP. B. It is necessary to update the Land Use Plan and the Conceptual Site Plan (ESSCSP Exhibits 5 and 6) to depict a revised layout of the Raytheon Recreational Facility and to depict a modified alignment of the Nash Street extension which is needed to 2 Page 321 of 500 maintain the private recreation area and to create an appropriately sized site necessary for the development of the organization's sports facility headquarters and athletic fields. These changes to the ESSCSP's exhibits are not among or akin to the list of changes that constitute "Major Modifications" pursuant to Section VII.C.1 of the ESSCSP. Consequently, the proposed changes constitute Minor Modifications pursuant to Section VII.C.2 of the ESSCSP. C. It is necessary to update the Vesting Tentative Map #71551 (ESSCSP Exhibit 7) to map the new not sizes and dimensions as a result of the Nash Street extension modified alignment. These changes to the ESSCSP's exhibits are not among or akin to the list of changes that constitute "Major Modifications" pursuant to Section VII.C.1 of the ESSCSP. Consequently, the proposed changes constitute Minor Modifications pursuant to Section VII.C.2 of the ESSCSP. D. It is necessary to update the Utilities and Infrastructure Exhibits (ESSCSP Exhibits 8-12) due to the Nash Street extension modified alignment. These changes to the ESSCSP's exhibits are not among or akin to the list of changes that constitute "Major Modifications" pursuant to Section VII.C.1 of the ESSCSP. Consequently, the proposed changes constitute Minor Modifications pursuant to Section VII.C.2 of the ESSCSP. E. The proposed Minor Modifications are consistent with the Specific Plan in that Section VII. (Administration) C. 2. of the ESSCSP specifically authorizes Minor Modifications to the Land Use Plan (ESSC-SP Exhibit 5), Conceptual Site Plan (ESSC-SP Exhibit 6), Vesting Tentative Map #71551 (ESSC-SP Exhibit 7), and Utilities and Infrastructure (ESSC-SP Exhibits 8 through 12). Updated Exhibits 5 through 12 are contained in attached Exhibit B. SECTION 4. Findings for Approval of Site Plan Review Per ESMC § 15-30. The City Council finds: A. The proposed Project is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the El Segundo General Plan, the ESSCSP, and the El Segundo Zoning Code. The proposed Project is in substantial compliance with the ESSCSP as originally approved. The ESSCSP permits a mix of office, commercial, retail, research and development, industrial and related recreational uses. The maximum overall FAR in the ESSCSP is 0.60 based on the gross square foot size of the Specific Plan area. The proposed Project is consistent with the following goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan as modified: 1. Goal LU-7 from the Land Use Element of the General Plan outlines the City's objectives of providing the highest quality public facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community. The proposed development is consistent with this goal. For example, the Developer will construct the Hughes Way/Nash Street Extension concurrent with the proposed Project. The street will be dedicated to the City for public right-of-way purposes. 3 Page 322 of 500 2. The ESSCSP sets forth the zoning for the site, which includes design guidelines and development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to achieve a high -quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture, orientation and massing, architecture, parking and loading, landscaping, lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The proposed development is consistent with these guidelines and standards. 3. Goal ED1 from the Economic Development Element of the General Plan outlines the City's objectives to create in El Segundo a strong, healthy economic community in which all diverse stakeholders may benefit. The proposed project directly advances the following economic development policies and objectives: a. Policy ED1-1.1: Maintain economic development as one of the City's and the business and residential communities' top priorities. b. Policy ED1-1.2: Focus short -run economic development efforts on business retention and focus longer -run efforts on the diversification of El Segundo's economic base in order to meet quality of life goals. c. Objective ED1-2: Center diversification efforts on targeted industries that meet the City's criteria for job creation, growth potential, fiscal impact, and fit with local resources. B. The proposed Project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is located. 1. The City of El Segundo has distinctive land use patterns, which are divided into four quadrants by the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and El Segundo Boulevard. Compatibility of an individual land use is determined mainly by its relationship to other uses within its quadrant. The ESSCSP area is located in the southeastern quadrant of the City of El Segundo which is east of Pacific Coast Highway and south of El Segundo Boulevard. The design and implementation of this Specific Plan Phase II relates directly to the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and would be functionally compatible with other uses within the Specific Plan area. 2. The Project promotes public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice. The ESSCSP includes a range of commercial and industrial uses that will contribute to job creation opportunities and balance growth with local resources and infrastructure capacity. The proposed Project incorporates comprehensive features for site layout, building design, architecture, landscape, lighting, walls and fences and sustainability which are consistent with the ESSCSP. The proposed Project will enhance job creation opportunities and provide a development that balances growth with local resources and infrastructure capacity. C. The proposed Project will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City. 4 Page 323 of 500 1. The Project will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City. The proposed development will promote the orderly development of property, the preservation of property values, and would be consistent with surrounding development and will not adversely affect the value of neighboring properties. The proposed ESSCSP development standards and Development Agreement will ensure that the project will be developed in an orderly fashion. 2. Goal C2 from the General Plan Circulation Element outlines the City's objectives to provide a circulation system that incorporates alternatives to the single -occupant vehicle, to create a balance among travel modes based on travel needs, costs, social values, user acceptance, and air quality considerations. The proposed project will enhance the general welfare of the City because the project will construct a Class 2 bicycle lane as indicated in the ESSCSP Circulation Plan (Section D of the ESSCSP). The project will provide for infrastructure and facilitate access for various modes of travel including automobiles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian. One example is the ESSCSP project to connect Hughes Way with Nash Street through the south and eastern portions of the Campus. The Hughes Way/Nash Street Extension will be dedicated to the City as a Secondary Arterial. SECTION 5. Findings for Approval of Subdivision -Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The City Council finds that grounds for denial findings cannot be made pursuant to ESMC § 14-1-6 for the following reasons: A. The proposed Project map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Government Code § 65451. This Project generally meets the goals and objectives of the General Plan, and it is consistent with the ESSCSP. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 83507 proposes to modify 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551, while the other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. Each of the 13 modified parcels will vary in size and will comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the ESSCSP. B. The design of the proposed Project subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and the ESSCSP since each of the 13 modified parcels will vary in size and will comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the ESSCSP. C. The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development in that the proposed lots meet the size and dimension requirements to allow the subdivision of the existing project site. Furthermore, the land use and zoning designations of the ESSCSP allows the proposed Project. D. The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. VTTM No. 83507 proposes to separate and change 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. The proposed lots vary in size 5 Page 324 of 500 and meet the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. The proposed maximum development density is a 0.6 Floor Area Ratio (FAR). This density is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. This density is also generally in conformance with the maximum FAR allowed in the ESSCSP. Each new lot will meet or exceed the minimum size and dimension requirements. E. The design of the Project subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is for the purpose of separating and altering 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. The proposed lots would vary in size and meet the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and this action would not have the impact of causing substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injuring fish or wildlife or their habitat because the proposed VTTM would only serve to alter parcels of an existing VTTM that has been previously analyzed for environmental impacts and analyzed through an EIR Addendum. The proposed project site is currently improved with approximately 2,089,948 gross square feet of existing Raytheon Company office, industrial and warehouse development, an outdoor recreational area, and 6,873 parking spaces in approximately 20 surface parking lots. The project site is also predominately surrounded by developed urban land permanently altered with buildings, roads and hardscape. There are no fish or wildlife habitats on the site that could be damaged by the proposed subdivision or new development. F. The design of the Project subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map would not cause serious public health problems in that the map is for the purpose of creating a new subdivision map which would authorize a revision of the size and dimensions for 13 of the existing 26 parcels in the ESSCSP area and the new lot configurations would be compliant with the standards related to lot size and dimensions as established in the ESSCSP. G. The design of the Project subdivision will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed subdivision is not anticipated to conflict with any known easements located at or near the property. The proposed parcel configuration on the site has been oriented to avoid conflicts with existing easements, such as the existing Metro Green Line elevated rail alignment. SECTION 6. Environmental Review. Concurrent with its review of this Resolution, the City Council will consider adoption of an Addendum to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to EA No. 1305, prepared to analyze the environmental effects of the proposed Project. The factual findings and conclusions set forth in such Resolution are incorporated herein by reference. L Page 325 of 500 SECTION 7. Approval. The City Council approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507, Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP No. 11-01 Revision A, and Site Plan Review No. 21-01 subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. SECTION 8. Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determination in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 9. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. SECTION 10. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. SECTION 11. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto. SECTION 12. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately upon the effective date of Ordinance No. _ approving an amendment to associated Project's Development Agreement, and the Ordinance's adoption and effectiveness are conditions precedent to this Resolution taking effect. Thereafter, this Resolution will remain effective unless repealed or superseded. SECTION 13. City Clerk Direction. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make a record of this action in the meeting's minutes. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 12021. ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) 7 Drew Boyles, Mayor Page 326 of 500 I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney Page 327 of 500 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMU) and all provisions of the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, CDC Mar Campus I, LLC (the "Applicant" or "Owner") agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of El Segundo's approval of Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01, and Environmental Assessment (EA) No. 1305 ("Project Conditions"): Zonina Conditions 1. This approval is for the project as shown on the plans approved by the Planning Commission on November 18, 2021 and approved by City Council on and on file with the Development Services Department. 2. Prior to issuance of any permit for the project, the applicant must submit plans, showing that the project substantially complies with the plans and conditions of approval on file with the Development Services Department. The Development Services Director is authorized to approve minor modifications to the approved plans or any of the conditions if such modifications achieve substantially the same results as would strict compliance with said plans and conditions. Any subsequent modification must be referred to the Development Services Director for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission and/or City Council review and approval of the proposed modification. 3. This approval allows for construction of a new professional sports headquarters and training facility on Lots 7 and 8 (Phase II Specific Plan area). Specifically, the approved construction includes the following: a) a three-story plus mezzanine, 56-foot high building (from lowest grade adjacent to building to top of parapet) totaling approximately 143,702 gross square feet and 131,207 square feet of net floor area, accommodating offices, dining areas, an auditorium, conference rooms, studio area, locker rooms, training rooms, a weight room, office space, storage rooms, a service area, and mechanical and electrical rooms; b) two storage buildings for groundskeeping and maintenance totaling approximately 4,800 square feet (4,368 square feet net floor area) located near the facility's northeastern corner; c) three natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter on the eastern side of the facility; d) 32-foot high poles and netting along the eastern side and northern side of the site to screen the fields from LA Metro's above -grade commuter line that abuts the site; e) 347 parking spaces at two surface lots adjacent to the building, including 24 electric vehicle (EV)-capable spaces. A security booth would be located at the corporate headquarters' southern parking lot; f) Removal/demolition of E-20 and E-21 warehouse/storage facilities on Parcel 7 and 8. E Page 328 of 500 A change in uses or changes in the allocation of square footages specified above must be referred to the Development Director for a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission and/or City Council review and approval of the proposed changes. 4. Final design of the 32-foot high poles and netting along the eastern side and northern side adjacent to the fields shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission through a Site Plan Review Amendment prior to issuance of a permit for the fields and/or associated lighting. Final design shall include the quantity and location of poles, type of netting, and netting that is retractable and only extended during times when the fields are used for training and recreational activities involving balls, and lowered at the conclusion of the recreational activity. Lastly, a hedge shall be planted along the length of the pole and netting and shall be maintained at a minimum height of 16-feet. The hedge shall be planted using Ficus or Podocarpus, or similar type of species approved by the Development Services Director. 5. Any signs shown on the site and elevation plans are conceptual only. Signs proposed for the project, including monument signs, shall be designed to conform to the sign provisions of the and ESSC-SP Master Sign Program, ESMC, and shall require separate application and approval by the Development Services Director or designee. A revised Master Sign Program must be submitted and approved by the Development Services Director or designee prior to building permit final. 6. Prior to issuance of any permit, final fencing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department, including a block wall design for the proposed Type 4 fencing and to work with Southern California Edison to achieve a block wall design for the Type 5 fencing. 7. All lighting must comply with the ESSC-SP Master Lighting Plan, including: a) All light fixtures and supporting poles throughout the facility shall be architecturally compatible with the architecture of the building. b) Wall -mounted lighting, including security lighting, shall be compatible with the architecture of the building. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a photometric lighting plan that illustrates spill light at the project boundary shall not exceed 8 foot-candles. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department. Exterior building and parking lot lights shall be provided with decorative lighting fixtures. Exterior lighting for the project shall be designed to be confined to within the project site. Light shields shall be used to block light and reduce spill over light and glare as necessary. Prior to the final inspection and issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall schedule an evening inspection with the Planning Division to verify compliance with this requirement, and to ensure that lighting is appropriately shielded to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 10 Page 329 of 500 9. All landscaping must be in substantial conformance to the ESSCSP Master Landscape Plan and a Landscape Plan must be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department. Trees must be of a species that provides for large canopy and shade. The use of palm trees shall not be permitted. 10. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit or as otherwise appropriate, a matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the City, as applicable, for review and compliance with: • The ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance 1589). • All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of Development Agreement 11-02 as amended. 11. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the project shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable mitigation measures in the MMRP for the ESSC-SP EIR and project COA. A final mitigation and COA monitoring matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the City. • the ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance 1589). • All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of Development Agreement 11-02 as amended. 12. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be architecturally screened in accordance with ESMC Section 15-2-8(C). Prior to permit final, the equipment shall be adequately screened to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 13. All building and drainage gutters, down spouts, vents and other protrusions shall be concealed from view within the exterior walls. Ladders for roof access shall be mounted on the inside of the building. 14. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by a City approved waste hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project. 15. The Applicant shall provide receptacles (bins) for the collection of refuse and recyclable materials, as well as a hose bib for washing collection areas. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide documentation from a City approved waste hauler stating that the number and size of bins provided for the collection of refuse and recyclable materials generated by the project is adequate. 11 Page 330 of 500 16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide documentation from a City approved waste hauler stating that the dimensions of the refuse storage enclosure are of adequate size to accommodate containers consistent with the current methods of collection, are designed with a walk-in access component, and located and designed to facilitate trash truck access and pickup. 17. Trash enclosures on the property shall be either fully enclosed within the building or must be adequately screened per the ESSC-SP and ESMC. Further, the gates shall include architectural paneling or finishing that is consistent with the paneling or finishing of the headquarters building. Lastly, trash enclosure areas for the project shall have a non-combustible decorative cover that matches the building's architecture. General Conditions 18. The project is subject to the Public Art or In -Lieu Fee Requirement (Cultural Development Program) established by City Council Ordinance 1594, which requires placement of public art on -site or payment of in -lieu fees to the Cultural Development Fund. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an application to the Community Services Department and shall either: a) enter into an agreement with the City of El Segundo to provide public art onsite; or, b) in -lieu of commissioning public art onsite, pay a fee equal to 1 % of the project cost to the City's Cultural Development Fund. 19. A positive balance shall be maintained in all project Reimbursement Accounts at all times consistent with the Reimbursement Agreement. If the balance of the Reimbursement Account(s) associated with the project becomes negative at any time, all work on the project shall be suspended, including the issuance of permits and project inspections, until such time as the sufficient funds are deposited to return the account(s) to a positive balance. 20. A weatherproof notice/sign to report dust, noise, or other construction -related impacts shall be posted and prominently displayed on the construction fencing clearly visible to the public from along the abutting street(s). The notice/sign shall set forth the name of the person(s) responsible for the construction site and a phone number(s) to be called in the event that a construction -related impact occurs. 21. Reclaimed water must be utilized for all landscaped areas. 22. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, landscaping plans must be submitted to the Development Services Department that conform to the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping requirements as set forth in ESMC Chapter 15. 23. All utilities lines installed to serve the new construction shall be placed underground. 24. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of any existing utility necessary as a result of the development. 12 Page 331 of 500 25. Pedestrian walkways within the project must include admixture colored concrete and/or design that enhance and complement the project. 26. The project site shall be fenced and screened during construction. 27. All areas within the project site shall be maintained free of trash and debris. 28. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, an erosion control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and the Public Works Director. 29. Water spraying or other approved methods shall be used during grading operations to control fugitive dust. Recycled water shall be used for grading operations whenever available. 30. During the grading phase and as needed during the remainder of the construction phase, the owner or contractor must conduct daily street sweeping along the streets abutting the project site(s). 31. In the event that a Planning, Building, Public Works, Fire Department or Police Department requirement are in conflict, the stricter standard shall apply. Impact Fee Conditions 32. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time fire services mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. 33. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time police services mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. 34. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time park services mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. 35. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time traffic mitigation fee. The fee amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued. Building Safety Conditions 36. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the California Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building Standards Code in effect at the time of the plan submittal to Building and Safety Division for plan review. 13 Page 332 of 500 37. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the 2019 editions of the California Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building Standards Code. 38. Construction projects must comply with Best Management Practices for construction and storm -water runoff requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MS4 Permit. Construction activity resulting in a land disturbance of one acre or more, or less than one acre but part of a larger common plan of development or sale must obtain the (SWPPP) Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit. 39. A site -specific soils and geotechnical report must be submitted to Building and Safety Division for review and approval. The report shall comply with the minimum requirements of Chapter 18 of the CBC and shall address the possible sulfate content of the soils. 40. A stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required to certify the location of the new construction in relation to the setbacks prior to the first foundation inspection and stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required to certify the height of the structures prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 41. The applicant shall obtain a building, grading, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, demolition permit for the project. 42. Plans submitted for plan check must be stamped by a State -licensed architect or engineer and shall include: a) Complete structural calculations, details, notes and material specifications. b) Complete Accessibility Plan with a statement from a California Certified Access Specialist (CASp) indicating that a plan review has been performed and that it complies with the requirements of Chapter 11A &11 B of the CBC. c) A stamped and signed Boundary and Topographic survey by a California licensed Land Surveyor. d) A complete grading and drainage plan showing compliance with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) Low Impact Development (LID) requirement. The Los Angeles County LID Manual may be used as a guideline for preparing the LID report. e) Hydrology report along with hydraulic calculations. f) Complete energy calculations, details, notes, and material specifications. 43. Applicant shall submit a site -wide New Address Issuance request to the Building Division. Approved building addresses to be shown on the submitted plans. 14 Page 333 of 500 44. Applicant shall pay all development fees, including school district developer fees, prior to issuance of building permits. Fire Department Conditions 45. Before the City issues a building permit, the applicant must provide Fire Life Safety Plans to the Fire Department for review and approval, which include, without limitation, the following: a) Fire lanes; b) Fire lane signage; c) Fire lane access; d) Fire hydrant locations; e) Minimum acceptable flow from any fire hydrant must be 2,000 gallon per minute at 20 psi; f) Fire safety precautions during demolition and construction; g) Emergency site access during construction; h) Permanent fire department access; 46. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout the Main Facility, installed in accordance with CFC 903 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 13. The Maintenance and Groundskeeping buildings may also require fire sprinkler system installation based on final occupancy classification and CFC 903 requirements. 47. A fire alarm system shall be provided throughout the Main Building, installed in accordance with CFC 907 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 72. The Maintenance and Groundskeeping buildings may also require fire alarm system installation based on final occupancy classification and CFC 907 requirements. 48. The fire access road (artificial turf) on the east side of the Main Building shall be capable of supporting a 75,000 load. The access road shall be a minimum width of 26 feet. The access road shall either be provided a turnaround or exit access to Hughes Way. 49. A Class I standpipe system shall be provided for the Main Building, installed in accordance with CFC 905. 50. A minimum of one EMS capable elevator shall be provided for the Main Building. 51. An Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System shall be provided for the Main Building. 52. Public hydrants shall be provided on the street frontage for the Main Facility and the two east buildings. 53. An on -site private hydrant shall be provided on the south side of the Main Facility at an approved location. Private fire hydrants must be installed and maintained in accordance 15 Page 334 of 500 with El Segundo Fire Department Regulation "Fire Hydrant and Private Fire Main System Installation". 54. A ladder truck access road is required on the west side of the Main Facility. The access road shall be a minimum width of 26 feet. The access road shall be located a minimum of 15 feet but no more than 30 feet away from the structure. A fire access plan shall be submitted and indicate widths at all points and turning radii. 55. Applicant shall submit a Hazardous Materials Management Plan for the Maintenance and Groundskeeping buildings. 56. Knox boxes and/or knox switches shall be provided for all structures, all designated emergency access gates to the property, and for all parking control access devices. 57. The applicant must develop and submit an Evacuation Plan and Procedures for review and approval by the Fire Department. Before the City issues each Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must provide evidence to the Fire Department that the approved Evacuation Plan and Procedures were implemented. Police Department Conditions 58. Bicycle racks shall be located in a busy, well -lit location. This will provide optimum security for persons and property. 59. Security cameras shall be installed in all new commercial establishments if the Police Department deems it necessary due to the type of business, hours of operation, location and propensity to crime. 60. The Police Department shall determine the monitoring and recording location of the security cameras, which include, but are not limited to: tenant areas such as all exterior and interior entry doors, cash handling/counting areas, the manager's office, the safe, parking lots and parking lot entries/exits; non -tenant areas such as common spaces and parking lots; and any other areas deemed necessary by the Police Department. 61. Monitor and recording equipment shall be stored in a secure area. 62. The applicant shall comply with the requirements contained in Municipal Code Chapter 13.20, Security Code. Landscaping 63. All landscaping shall be low profile around perimeter fencing, windows, doors and entryways taking special care not to limit visibility or provide climbing access. Floral or grass ground cover is recommended. Bushes shall be trimmed to 2 to 3 feet high and away from buildings. Dense bushes shall not be clumped together; this provides a hiding place for criminal activity. Trees shall be trimmed up to 7 feet. 16 Page 335 of 500 64. Trees/bushes/shrubs shall not be planted next to or near any light fixture/standard/bollard. When grown to maturity this landscaping will block the light and reduce lighting on the ground surface. 65. Trees with high canopies are preferred when planted near light standards Lighting 66. All parking lots shall be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1.25 footcandles of light on the ground surface during hours of darkness. 67. The addressing, all exterior entry doors, walkways, bicycle racks and trash dumpsters shall be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1 footcandle of light on the ground surface during hours of darkness. 68. Walkways in retail applications shall use light standards with lighting mounted 12 to 14 feet for a better spread of light. Bollards cannot accomplish this. 69. A photometric study, which includes all of the above, shall also be provided prior to issuing of a Building Permit. A site plan shall be provided showing buildings, parking areas, walkways, and the point -by -point photometric calculation of the required light levels. Footcandles shall be measured on a horizontal plane and conform to a uniformity ratio of 4:1 average/minimum. Doors/Hardware 70. Entry and Mechanical/Electrical/Fire doors shall comply with El Segundo Police Department Approved Security Hardware list. Security Cameras 71. Security cameras shall be installed in all new commercial/retail establishments if the Police Department deems it necessary due to the type of business, hours of operation, location and propensity to crime. 72. The Police Department's minimum camera requirements shall be listed after the Camera Specifications upon a formal submittal. 73. Camera Specifications: • All security cameras shall be in color. • The recording equipment shall be digital and shall have a minimum of twenty one (21) days of storage capacity. • Cameras shall be of the highest resolution. • There shall be a monitor connected to the recording equipment to play back and review the video. The equipment shall be stored in a secure area. • Security camera recordings shall be made available to law enforcement. 17 Page 336 of 500 Public Works "City Engineer" = City Engineer or his/her designee throughout this document. General 74. The applicant has calculated a fair share percentage of 10.06% contribution towards each traffic improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR MM TRA-1 through 9 improvements based on the methodology provided in the First Amendment of the DA No. 11-02 Section 7.9, "...the `Fair Share' is determined by dividing the number of PM peak hour trips produced by the individual development seeking a Certificate of Occupancy by the total Project PM peak hour trips Ceiling as noted in City Council Ordinance No. 1516, Exhibit D `Conditions of Approval' (3,120)." The applicant shall continue to work with the City to determine the total construction value (cost estimate for design and building for improvement and right-of-way acquisition) of the TRA-1 through 9 improvements that permit "fair share" contributions as opposed to actual construction, as submitted by a State licensed Civil Engineer and accepted and approved by the City Engineer. 75. The applicant shall submit 10.06% fair share contribution towards each traffic improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR to the City prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 76. All work in the City's right-of-way (ROW) or on City -owned and maintained facilities shall require review and approval of the City Engineer or his/her designee. 77. The applicant shall ensure that encroachment permits are secured from the Public Works Department/Engineering Division before commencing any and all work in the City's public ROW, including lane closures. 78. Construction inspection shall be coordinated with the Public Works Inspector and no construction shall deviate from the approved plans without approval of the City Engineer. If plan deviations are necessary, the applicant shall provide a revised plan or details of the proposed change for review and approval of the City Engineer prior to construction. 79. Prior to issuing of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure installation of all improvements required by the Public Works Department are inspected and approved by the City Engineer. 80. All construction -related parking shall be accommodated on -site or on other private property. No construction related parking shall be permitted off -site in the public ROW. 81. A grading and drainage plan shall be provided and stamped by a California (CA) State - licensed civil engineer as part of the Building Permit process. Page 337 of 500 82. A utility plan shall be provided that shows all existing and proposed utility lines and their sizes (sewer, water, gas, storm drain, electrical, etc.), including easements, within 200 feet of the project site boundary. 83. All record drawings (PDF and CAD format) and supporting documentation shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division prior to scheduling the project's final inspection. 84. Haul trucks are to use PCH north to Imperial Highway and PCH south to El Segundo Boulevard. All three of these streets are currently designated as truck routes in the City. Street Improvements & Traffic Control 85. The applicant must build the Nash Street roadway extension and associated public improvements in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement. The design and construction of the Nash Street roadway extension is subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and Building Safety. 86. The applicant must construct Class II bicycle lanes in the Nash Street Extension in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and Section 7.5 of the Development Agreement. 87. The applicant must record a 20-year irrevocable offer of dedication of Parcels 20 and 22 of Vesting Map No. 71551, what will become Lots 3 and 12 of Vesting Map No. 83507, (Coral Circle Connection) in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and Section 7.7 of the Development Agreement. Before recordation, the irrevocable offer to dedicate must be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building Safety, the Director of Public Works and the City Attorney. 88. The applicant is required to obtain any necessary approvals from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) for any work that involves encroachment onto Metro easement areas or right-of-ways. These approvals may include, without limitation, pedestrian, bicycle and roadway easements and temporary right -of -entry agreements. 89. All new sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps shall be constructed per the latest Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC) "Greenbook" and City standards. New sidewalk to be a minimum of 5' wide. 90. All existing sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps that are broken or not in conformance with the latest SPPWC or City standards shall be removed and constructed per the latest SPPWC and City standards. 91. Any obstruction located within existing curb ramps shall be relocated. 19 Page 338 of 500 92. All unused driveways shall be removed and replaced with full -height curb, gutter and sidewalk per SPPWC standards and City standards. 93. The applicant shall provide a minimum 4' sidewalk clearance around any obstruction in the sidewalk i.e. posts, power poles, etc. 94. PG-64-10 tack coat and hot mix asphalt shall be used for all slot paving required next to new concrete installations. Slot paving shall be 3 feet wide and 1 foot deep, consisting of 6 inches of asphalt over 6 inches of base. 95. The applicant shall provide street signing and striping plans for the new development. All striping in the public ROW shall consist of thermoplastic paint per the latest CA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 96. The applicant shall provide traffic control plans for all work requiring a lane closure. 97. The work scheduled in the public right-of-way on major arterial streets shall be Monday through Friday from 9am to 3pm, except holidays. Work scheduled on all other street classifications shall be Monday through Friday from 7am to 4pm. Contractor shall obtain prior approval from the City Engineer for performing weekend work, night work, or work on a holiday. 98. During construction, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide safe pedestrian traffic control around the site. A pedestrian protection plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the City Engineer. This may include but not be limited to signs, flashing lights, barricades and flag persons. 99. Once the ROW improvements are accepted by the City Engineer, they are not to be used for staging building construction activities, including but not limited to, storage of construction materials and equipment. The street and sidewalks shall be kept free of construction debris, mud and other obstacles and shall remain open to traffic at all times. The applicant shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repair to any damage to improvements caused by its use, or its Contractors' and Subcontractors' use, of the improvements after acceptance by the City Engineer. 100. The applicant shall submit any new traffic signal plans to the City Public Works Department and LA County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) for review and approval. The applicant will coordinate all inspections with the LACDPW inspector for acceptance of the traffic signal poles and related equipment. The applicant will inform the City of any updates during this process. 101. The applicant must comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project. All mitigation measures and conditions of approval must be listed on the plans submitted for plan check and the plans for which a building permit is issued. 20 Page 339 of 500 Water 102. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing City owned water main lines. The applicant must submit a water study to determine if there is a capacity deficiency in the affected water main lines and if so, water main upgrades will be required. The water study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 103. Any existing water meters, potable water service connections, fire backflow devices and potable water backflow devices must be upgraded to current City Water Division standards. Backflow devices shall be placed or relocated onto private property. 104. City water mains cannot be located on private property. The applicant must provide a main meter in the public right-of-way. 105. The applicant must submit plans for water system upgrades to the City of El Segundo Public Works Department for review and approval. 106. Any unused water laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the City main. The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide traffic control plans and shoring plans. Sewer 107. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing sewer main lines. The applicant must submit a sewer study to determine if there is a capacity deficiency in the affected sewer main lines and if so, sewer upgrades will be required. The sewer study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 108. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, proof of payment of the sewer connection fee to the Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) must be provided to the City Engineer. LACSD can be reached at (310) 638-1161. 109. Any unused sanitary sewer laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the City main. The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide traffic control plans and shoring plans. 110. The applicant must contact the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Industrial Waste Section and receive a determination as to the necessity of a permit for industrial waste discharge before City approval of a Site Plan Review for any project within the ESSCSP. Storm Drain 111. Provide a Low Impact Development Study (LID) signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer. Make sure to comply with the project design requirements to retain on site (infiltrate or store for use) volume of runoff from 1/4 inch storm or the 85th percentile 24-hour storm, whichever is greater (SWQDv). 21 Page 340 of 500 112. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to size appropriate storm drain facilities to control on -site drainage and mitigate off -site impacts. Refer to the most recent Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual. Instructions and the manual are available at the County website at http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wrd/Publication/index.cfm. Calculations shall be signed by a registered civil engineer. 113. The project shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements and shall provide Best Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment control, construction material control and erosion control. Landscaping & Irrigation 114. Irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. All irrigation meters and mechanical equipment shall meet the City Water Division standards. 115. All public landscape improvements shall be designed to City standards and approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. 116. The property owner shall maintain all landscaping and irrigation in the public ROW fronting the property. 117. The applicant shall coordinate any tree removals in the public right-of-way with the Parks & Recreation Department prior to the start of construction. 118. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a landscaping and lighting assessment district for the Nash Street Extension in accordance with Section 7.1.6 of the Development Agreement. Miscellaneous Conditions 119. Approval of this permit shall not be construed as a waiver of applicable and appropriate zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County and/or City laws and regulations. Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other requirements of the ESMC shall apply. 120. Failure to comply with and adhere to all of these conditions of approval may be cause to revoke the approval of the project by the Planning Commission, or City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the ESMC. 121. In the event that any of these conditions conflict with the recommendations and/or requirements of another permitting agency or City Department, the stricter standard shall apply. 122. The applicant and its successors in interest shall indemnify, protect, defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and hold harmless, the City, and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, 22 Page 341 of 500 employees, and agents from and against any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs, and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims") arising out of or in any way relating this project, any discretionary approvals granted by the City related to the development of the project, or the environmental review conducted under California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., for the project. If the City Attorney is required to enforce any conditions of approval, all costs, including attorney's fees, shall be paid for by the applicant. The Applicant agrees to defend the City (at the City's request and with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will indemnify the City for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this section "the City" includes the City of El Segundo's elected officials, appointed officials, officers, and employees. By signing this document, certifies that he/she has read, understands, this document. Name, Title (CDC Mar Campus I, LLC) , on behalf of CDC Mar Campus I, LLC, and agrees to the Project Conditions listed in {If Corporation or similar entity, needs two officer signatures or evidence that one signature binds the company} 23 Page 342 of 500 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. Exhibit B MINOR MODIFICATION TO ESSCSP 24 Page 343 of 500 ire -Commercial / Office Mixed Use -Office / Idustrial Mixed Use - Recreation / Open Space EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLAN Page 344 of 500 —ss 1Elcy EPATH - L EL SEGlINGO ELVO = __ _ sr K , .17 . 01- IT +. > D cTR i F.D 11 26 5 18 1g F 25 23r l r� EXHIBIT 6 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Page 345 of 500 EXHIBIT 7A SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL EXHIBIT INCLUSIVE OF VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 83507 Page 346 of 500 x h\ PH Pi U 'FIT �A FH Fl FH FH i 3 � ; FHFH PROPOSED \ � CWATER LINE H �= PLAN SCALE: 1" = 400' LEGEND aw PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER — w EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER UTILITY TO BE REMOVED �FH FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED VAT,RTINE RAYTHEDN SITE EX. WATER \ LINE EX. WATER r LINE O w( II1 H � 1 KOPC�SEU „ W AT�H`�-LINE r FH - /� EX. WATER LINE EXHIBIT 8 CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN i Page 347 of 500 DO BLVI JOIN EX. E v PROPOSEDRECLNIMED a. WA TF i.iNF. � X. ILGCL I iMED R . EX. ItEC'L U2'iEl) N°ATRR (.T\F. jY O ATF.R I.TNF. ' RAYTHEONSITE X. RECLAIMED v' i WATER LING ' H}h' RW PROPOSED RECTAIMFED WNFER LINE - �Y 1 PLAN _ j SCALE: 1" 400' LEGEND Rw PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER 'Rlv_, mow- EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER UTILITY TO 6E REMOVED FIRE HYDRANT tti� RAYTHEON I■I - o `FX. RECLAIMED �S l4ATEHLINE PR(IPCAlCD s RECLAIMED-r - 'WATERLINE# y FX. RFCT.ATMF.T)1 "` ` ter'✓..a �. -T PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER EXHIBIT EXHIBIT 9 CONCEPTUAL RECLAIMED WATER PLAN Page 348 of 500 EXHIBIT 10 CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN Page 349 of 500 .JOIN EX. irk I ❑ STORM DRAIN L.X y�i RCP \\ RC [7 JOIN EX 1n ° / � _ STORN1 DRAI STORM DRAIN lj sd PROPOSED sd C STORM DRAIN I \ O aq e v i.' EX RCP STPRM DRATN �r o i RAYTHEONSUE ° EX. 1S`RCP �J-STORM DRAIN 9 0 PROPOSED _q JOIN EX. - PLAN STORM DRAIN TORM D SCALE: 1" = 400' hod° so I sa i' LEGEND 5° So PROPOSED STORM DRAIN —so— — EXISTING STORM DRAIN UTILITY TO BE REMOVED �P \ -: FLOW ARROW r�`� ® PROPOSE si ,<STORM DRAI EXHIBIT 11 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN RCP �W 1 STORM DRAIN ') EX„yq'RCP - STORM RAT 'i 1. PROPOSED" STORM DRAIN _ J RX ioz RCP -� F STORM DRAIN I -. JOIN EX. .r W STORM DRAIN li =- -�- EX. i8 RCP STORM DRAIN I I F,X.54" R p� —STORM DRAIN I EX. 10" RCP I.�TOR1N DRAIN j` CI x EX. 5q" RCP E STORM DRAIN tj DRAIN Page 350 of 500 EXHIBIT 12 ELECTRIC, GAS AND TELECOMMUNICATION CONCEPTUAL PLAN Page 351 of 500 0 J m It 0 Ali O z Z rn Q U (D O w cn o z J w Z) (j LL. w o w N SITE PLAN REVIEW PACKAGE - SEPTEMBER 27 o1'°° �z� PRE-ENGINEERED MANUFACTURED BUILDING m U a0.s EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN EL SEGUNDO CALIFORNIA LL1 73 °z� U L Z o� >Zo U CO a dQ w°0') _ �C) t` N ry ARCh,/TFC� f \G��SEO • GREG HONG _ * C-35772 REN A 1 /30/2021 1.. CA0 w Um20 f H H f H J U � W H f H JH�f Q i w d ¢ w ' O a z� N a 3oK gz wa0. ow N x' -- Q z clYa w z z LL oNz a3 m z z LL! �wwa f � +� �- � J a " NOZ woZZ ¢¢ ~QOU f fir' �. "�- •i � �R r r O G 6 w 7 w fh U 0 K U li W N '� Y U 0J 2K0K 7UV w O w N(/� H�QW SITE PLAN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROJECT DATA PROJECT: SITE PLAN REVIEW PACKAGE 1. ALL PERSONS WORKING AT THE SITE SHOULD OBTAIN, READ AND UNDERSTAND THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ADDRESS: 2000 EAST EL SEGUNDO ' r 'MA PAMPHLET FOR THE TYPE(S) OF CONSTRUCTION BEING DONE. EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 0 Ln > 2. STOCKPILES OF STORED OUTDOOR DEMOLITION DEBRIS, CEMENT, SAND, ETC. MUST BE COVERED WITH A WATER ZONING EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN • �`:. -, ;^ ' �' ry1 �: -3 PROOF MATERIALS TO PREVENT BEING WASHED OFF SITE. 3. FUELS, OILS, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER LIQUID MATERIALS MUST BE KEPT INDOORS OR KEPT INSIDE BERMED DESIGNATION: LEGAL PARCEL MAP 4138, SHEET 32, P.A. 4138-14, TRA 9888 pqr� AREAS. SPILLS MUST NOT BE WASHED TO THE STREET. DESCRIPTION: -� ti... ♦ "" J �" ♦ ♦ 4. ANY CONSTRUCTION WASTE MUST NOT BE WASHED INTO STREET, STORM DRAIN CATCH BASINS, OR PUBLIC APN: 4138-032-018 w w w ♦ RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALL DUST AND SLURRY FROM CONCRETE CUTTING MUST BE REMOVED USING A WET -DRY VACUUM OR EQUIVALENT. OWNER: RAYTHEON o j w Z ` •''�~ �' DESIGN THE AUSTIN COMPANY co co D_ 5. TRASH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION SOLID WASTES MUST BE PLACED IN A COVERED TRASH RECEPTACLE. PROFESSIONALS: 6410 OAK CANYON, SUITE 150 Lo U :�. IRVINE, CA 92618 � 0 0 6. THERE SHALL BE NO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES WASHED ON SITE. THERE SHALL BE NO ERODED SOIL OR DISTURBED (949) 451 -9000 a SLOPES ON THIS PROJECT. a Y GOVERNING 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE SCOPE OF WORK CODES: 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE _ 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE m zzz 0 0 1 U BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL SUPERVISION, LABOR TOOLS, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE o LOCATION a�D WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS: 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE o0O0 0 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY o --BUILD NEW PRE-ENGINEERED MANUFACTURED BUILDING (PEMB) STANDARDS Z - d PLANNED BY: CN -CONCRETE PAD AND FOUNDATION UNDER PEMB -REROUTE SPECIFIC ITEMS AS SHOW ON THE DRAWINGS, REROUTE HHW PIPING, LEAVE TANKS, EQUIPMENT, PUMPS, PIPING, NUMBER OF STORIES 1 STORY PRE-ENGINEERED MANUFACTURED BUILDING VICINITY MAP DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL PIPING ACCESSORIES AND CONTROLS IN PLACE AS INDICATED TO PEMB. HEIGHT= 21'-2"± -INSTALL CONCRETE AGGREGATE BASE. FENCE, AND GATE PER DETAILS. -VACATE EXISTING CONTROL ROOM. BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED. APPROVED BY: RL LLI -PROVIDE COLD WATER SUPPLY VALVE TRAINS AND PRESSURE REGULATOR TO PEMB. CONSTRUCTION U CTI O N -PROVIDE EXHAUST FANS TO VENTILATE THE STORAGE AREAS AND OTHER INDOOR SPACES. P TYPE: I I - B (D -PROVIDE AIR-CONDITIONING TO SERVE THE CHEMICAL STORAGE ROOM FOR TEMPERATURE CONTROL. FIRE PROTECTION: NONE EL SEGUNDO BLVD Co V Q 405 OCCUPANCY/USE: CURRENT-F (FACTORY AND INDUSTRIAL) DRAWING SCHEDULE PROPOSED-S1 D FLOOR AREA: 5,865 SF m w cn Q W w 0 `� SITE 0- w cn J THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IDEAS, DESIGNS, AND Z J ARCHITECTURAL °' ARRANGEMENTS REPRESENTED THEREBY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE 0 Z T001 TITLE SHEET PROPERTY OF RAYTHEON. NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE COPIED, DISCLOSED w Q A100 SITE PLAN I o TO OTHERS, OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY WORK OR PROJECT OTHER 2 Q A101 LANDSCAPE PLAN THAN THE SPECIFIC PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND W Q A110 FLOOR PLAN DEVELOPED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF RAYTHEON. VISUAL CONTACT cf) A111 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WITH THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE CONCLUSIVE ROSECRANS AVE. A112 RENDERINGS& BUILDING MATERIALS EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. A113 EXTERIOR LIGHTING CALCULATIONS BLDG: FLR: PKG: PROJECT AL LOCATION PAGE:01 OF 05 SHEET#:T001 RAYTHEON PM: AMANDAANGUTANO (310) 529-1728 Page 352 of 500 1 o , 1 1 I OVERED . 1 1 I u � '.'\HEMICA ------------------ STORAGE CAG E "Nommok—A STORAGE SHED EXISTING BUILDING t� e SECURED UTILITY YARD r. EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN EXISTING EQUIPMENT DEMOLISH EDREMOVED FOR PROPOSED BUILDING SITE PLAN EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL Wl6' TALL CHAINLINK FENCE ABOVE r :-jp- IL L' : \\� M ABOVE GRO ATER�fRANSFER oPunAen0 -fi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W2 ANKS :: a EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN �i O c 0 O O O O O O dECHANICA1 EQUPMENT �I x x EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING STREET ABOVE -10 FEET ABOVE UTILITY YARD LIQUID NITROGEN PROJECT SITE r .1 ----------- 0 > CO N O rn 0 Q Z U w C) (f) Z w� ww C)w 0 CV �z-L o '' d �� Q• w =3 0 Z(" U _3 z o F- } o zo Q� U Q� W U� orn _ 1 1 1 1 \G�NSED ARCy,T� GREG HONG * C-35772 RE N .11 /30/2021 ��qTF OF � �F��\� CA VI 0, V w K N UmOZoZ r 0.Q U � W O Q wa� > m O w Z � � agV)0.a. ow U�¢ /Q V � ZYa z K W ti m 7 O m z z U w W aJJ QW O = N w O U (� LL W .0 w O um z� rL w }t O N W -d O Y O U V O K U 1� W N J W Z 0 D) W ir ww w> 0�w or o� LLz w W J � U L o � r � Ln a Q 0 Y 2 U } z z CO U U W c` cal Q � o o c\ 00 00 Z. 00 PLANNED BY: CN DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL APPROVED BY: RL W . " K =� m �w a w> w _ _ I = J cm2 t ................. w Fir f is ♦ l , .. ' 1 CURRENT SITE PHOTO BLDG: FLR: PKG: 0 10' 20' 40' 80' OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 N `mom PAGE:02 OF 05 1 /1-20'-011 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" SHEET#: Al 00 Page 353 of 500 PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS M > Lr) J It CO NO O rn M Q z U 0 O w o cn z J Z) w (j LLI W O J O W O N m U 0. Q C W 73 WW .W �= U w O Zp U � W Q H H H H H H H H JH03 J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wz�5 L, > OQmx OQz3� z 3agz_ way Q O w N O z z � a z3�^z w m z �3 O � zwa Q wUUQ /� LL Nj ZNZ�QZQ ~¢OU w �w�Q Z K K Q p (%j N 7 Y z aU w O U 1� W U U fw/1 UJ w0 w �K!wW a a , a Q 0 Y , 2 U �zz W cal c� H � c ao� o00« or - PLANNED BY: CN DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL APPROVED BY: RL rw V U Q n m 3: 75 w w 0- w ..�o 0� z z OQ wJ >-w Q ~ 0� Cn z = cn c� z J O OQ C)r- ::D LUQ w U BLDG: ---- FLR: PKG: PAGE: 04 OF 05 SHEETM A1131 Page 354 of 500 ELEVATION DRAWINGS C, lq c0 N C) 0 rn Q Q � U w o cn z 6% w . w LLJ C/) o w 0 N METAL ROOF PANEL, EXTERIOR DOOR. COLOR TO >, 00 PRB TYPE PANEL, EXISTING SAMPLE PORT BOX O MATCH WALL PANELS Z COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL EXTERIOR DOOR, COLOR TO EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT p„ v MATCH WALL PANELS FIXTURE FIXTURE FIXTURE FIXTURE ABOVE DOOR FIXTURE D uJ O z � a� EXISTING -6 FOOT TALL V N CHAINLINK FENCING Z 0 GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH WALL PANEL COLOR CD Q o � U � EXISTING -10 FOOT TALL QLn EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT CONCRETE WALL BEYOND W O FIXTURE ABOVE DOOR o Cl METAL WALL PANEL, Cj io PRB TYPE PANEL. COLOR: LIGHT STONE r- N NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 4 1 /8"=V-0" z O j U w W w J W w lJ w W F p - Qtea` 0/y LL t�N�� O N O � Z Q O W F W C7yN� WW z Y o V) METAL ROOF PANEL. z a1ca O 2 PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL z Q U W a O EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT WALL LOUVER TO MATCH WALL EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT � 0 FIXTURE PANEL COLOR, TYPICAL FIXTURE FIXTURE r FIXTURE W� O N _ A N GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH WALL PANEL COLOR `ID N N METAL WALL PANEL, o PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: LIGHT STONE `n z O Ln w w SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 5 1 /8"=1'-0" _ W� w > w w o� w z w w UU L� Ln w o Q � o c) a a a 0 U } CO Z U Z U W ~Q c� o c� 0 N CO O O Q Z rHIN'Trd PLANNED BY: CN DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL APPROVED BY: RL (W V EXISTING 6 FOOT TALL EXISTING 6 FOOT TALL Q CHAINLINK FENCE CHAINLINK FENCE Y U Q METAL ROOF PANEL, METAL ROOF PANEL. W co Z PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL TOP OF ROOF EXISTING LANDSCAPING EXISTING LANDSCAPING TOP OF ROOF 12 PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL 0 12 TO REMAIN TO REMAIN 4 Cm W _ a 4 `i VN. cV I G W Q EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE METAL WALL PANEL. = RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL = METAL WALL PANEL, W PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: LIGHT STONE oft f PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: LIGHT STONE Z c i c2 N Z O Q i t _j IY = , EXISTING STREET GRADE EXISTING STREET GRADE _ a- W GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH of I GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH I—WALL PANEL COLOR o -10 FEET ABOVE SECURE UTILITY -10 FEET ABOVE SECURE UTILITY _ \ WALL PANEL COLOR t YARD YARD \ W o x 0 \� �j WALL LOUVER TO MATCH WALL Of Ll PANEL COLOR BLDG: FLR: PKG: PAGE: 04 OF 05 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3 1 /81.-0 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8.1-0 SHEET#: Al 1 1 _ _ Page 355 of 500 STORAGE SHED EXISTING BUILDING SECURE UTILITY YARD LANDSCAPE PLAN ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO 77 REMAIN SPECIES: BOX ELDER <= HEIGHT: 15-20 FEET 5104 �Mffl -low PON'"" 09 OT OAF L91 pl, iu EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL Wl6' TALL CHAINLINK FENCE ABOVE X ABOV GROUND VATER�RANSFER P MPS0 0 "1, 0 LN2 TANKS L X EXISTING - - ------------ EOUIPMENT TO REMAIN O O O O O O O O O O O MECHANIC EQUPME� x EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING STREET ABOVE -10 FEET ABOVE UTILITY YARD LIQUID NITROGEN STORAGE TANKS PROJECT SITE LANDSCAPING NOTES: -NO LANDSCAPING IS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING IS LOCATED AT STREET LEVEL 10 FEET ABOVE THE SECURE UTILITY YARD & PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING. -NO REMOVAL, RELOCATION OR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK -ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION TO REMAIN. NO REMOVAL, RELOCATION OR ADDITIONAL IRRIGATION WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK. C� 1 �IIII '• i , _ CURRENT SITE PHOTO 0 10' 20' 40' 80' OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 N :mom 1 =20 -0 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" 0 > CD CD N O m 0 Q z U (D O w o cn z w O . w o J o w 0 CV 'z' °° 0 0) U 0. U L OZcu a) U > — 3 O (n Z cc::))Qrn U Y Q� W O0i o _ 0, CO \G�NSED ARCy�T�CI GREG HONG * C-35772 RE N .11 /30/2021 ��qTF OF � �F��\� CA wo 0, V KW N UmOo � C> " Q Q Q Q Q U � W O Comm 0 O Q wa� > m O w agw of 'n 0. a. Q ow ZYa z w W ti a;,Z m 7 O m z z U w W aJ QW O = O N U .0 ZN O w O um z� }t N W -d D Y J U V 0 K U 1� W N J W xKQ W Z 0 D) W ir ww w > 0� W or o� LLz W W J � U L Ln o � r � t� a Q Y 2 U } z z CO U W c` c\ � o Q o c\ 0 00 00 00 Z. PLANNED BY: CN DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL APPROVED BY: RL L1J Q a a- m� w LJJ Q W w cn Q OZ Q Lu J < � Q. v ) BLDG: ---- FLR: PKG: PAGE: 02 OF 05 SHEET#: Al 01 Page 356 of 500 COLORS & MATERIALS 0 J It m NO O rn 0 Q i � U (D O W 0 L7 z J � EXPOSED w w co FASTENING O J O W SYSTEMS O N 2 PBR N 0 a. Q to i z z �: ,,^^ z O VI Q D O U The PBR panel is commonly used for a wide variety of architectural, agricultural, commercial and industrial Q applications. PBR is a structural panel and an exposed fastener panel that can be used for both roof and wall o 6 applications. The minimum roof slope for PBR is'/2:12. It 0') ce Features and Benefits: • Numerous UL 580 ratings are available, as well as UL 790, Class A for external fire, roof assembly for UL 263 for internal fire and the UL 2218 Class 4 impact rating. • PBR carries Florida approval, Dade county ratings and FM 4471 approval standard for Class 1 panel roofs. Product Specifications • Applications: Roof and Wall • Gauges: 26 (Standard); 29, 24, 22 (Optional) • Coverage Widths: 36" • Finishes: Smooth (standard); • Rib Spacing: 12" on center Embossed (optional) ss° ria" • Coatings: Galvalume Plus, Signature* 200, •Rib Height: 1-1/4" 12" Signature®300 • Minimum Slope: 1/2:12 • Panel Attachment: Exposed Fastening System Wo Z 0: F j j O y U m w p .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. cb a w w w w Q ¢ < Q o 0 0 0 w w w ¢ < a 0 0 0 w wFp a WZ00: o J W 0: WE� O WWmm Fi "�'` z J V) 0E z Q_ Q o�ati C., Xw / P1 V z G z w ga 3 v' z m z }} J j z UWWa w OD Q N )Iz LL ~ z O U W COLOR CHARTS W K _r RENDERINGS OF 0 YOU~ rwzm U U 1� W N OJ s HKQW HINJA WHITE BRIGHTWHITE POLAR WHITE IVORY LIGHTSTONE SEA WOLF SAHARA TAN TERRA GOTTA COUNTRY RED COCOA BRO', ,ASH GRAY OLD TOWN GRAY CHARCOAL BURNISHED SLATE BURGUNDY o a o_ Q , Y x' U m U U W Q G cal o eo c� 0 eo HAWAIIAN BLUE TAHOE BLUE PATINA GREPNI DENALI GREEN EMERALD GREEN O o O -H . . . . . . ... PLANNED BY: CN DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL APPROVED BY: RL w CD C(=)PPER PENNY Q U Q � m 2 w � z o J m 0- w Z Z O w Q Q 06 cn z LL 0:� 0� U) BLDG: ---- I FIR: PKG: L PAGE: 04 OF 05 1 SHEET#: A112 Page 357 of 500 FLOOR PLAN > Ln lq CO N O ID rn � Q z U CD O wbw w cn z z _ D w O . w o o w 0 N � � O C, 0) U jL U L O Z ca a) U Z z Oo Qrn U YL0 QI- w °0i o _ cy, 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EXISTING 10 FOOT TALL CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 5 111 wo 0M Z> Um00 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -w� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z W' 194-6 3/8" Q W�m� f O N in33 r n r n 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 r n r -11 5/8 12 -11 n r rr r n 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 r n 12 -11 5/8 r n 12 -11 5/8 r n J 12 -11 5/8 Q r n r n r n r n r n r n 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 a- Khd �Naa Z�4x - O e- z3v z 0 128'-10" z �o - - ---- - -- LL --- z a m m - Q W00 tt N N o ZZQ- OZUU ELE� ELEC fi ELEC JAITOR ' � Z� a } aa � 10 107 106 105 26 —2 W N t �I ZK�U 0( f~/I W it 7 Y U U ��WW W W J � xlsi,��swzv V'--Ne %.oe::-3kl Le000c STORAGE ROOM U C-i V) 104 6 FOOT TALL CHAIN LINK FE CING o IF \' M I — STORAGE B 2 1 1 1 STORAGE AREA WASTEOPEN STORAGE AREA 103 3 101 �02 111 E SAMPLE E z o PORT Ln > E, w A 10'WX12,H SECTIONAL DOOR 0 BUILDING TOTAL AREA: 5,865 S.F. 0- c 10'WX12'H SECTIONAL DOOR \ CONCRETE FILLED PIPE w w BOLLARDS AROUND CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDS uj w DOOR OPENING FINISH CONCRETE SURFACE 4 AROUND DOOR OPENING o Qf w FLUSH WITH ADJACENT ASPHALT 1 1 1 � u CHAINLINK WITH ROLLING GATE PAVING CHAINLINK WITH ROLLING GATE Ln o< �o 0 ( L a CHAINLINK MAN GATE CHAINLINK MAN GATE 6 FOOT TALL CHAIN LINK FENCING Y U } CO z U z U W n o Q 0 o 00 c\ 00 0 0 O z� PLANNED BY: CN DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL APPROVED BY: RL (W V Y U a- m � w w > r2 w Z Q OQ d- Lu _� o �w o 0 4' 8' 16' 32" Q [- LL N6m= I Q� c/) SCALE: 8" =V-0" BLDG: ---- FLR: PKG: PAGE: 04 OF 05 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: � 1/8 =1-0 SHEET#: All0 _ Page 358 of 500 Page 359 of 502 PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE WATER SUPPLY &SEWER CALCULATION 0 PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY PERMIT NO: 014735 1955 Workman Mill Road / Whittier, CA Mailing Address: P.O. Box 4998 / Whittier, California 90607-4998 Facility ID 2024182 Robert C. Ferrante, Chief Engineer and General Manager (562) 699-7411 o1 CHECK ONE: ❑ New Sewer Connection ® Existing Sewer Connection 02 Applicant Raytheon Company (Legal Company Name) 03 Check one and fill in appropriate information ® Corporation Name Raytheon � Company CO281489 Year Incorporated 1953 State of Incorporation MA ID# 95-1778500 ❑ Partnership Name Partners ❑ Sole Proprietor Name Business Names o4 Situs Address 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245-0902 (Street) (City) (State) (zip) 05 Mailing Address 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245-0902 (Street) (City) (State) (zip) 06 Point of Discharge Connects to local sewer line on S. Aviation Blvd. 07 Number of years applicant has been in business at present location 66 (yrs) (months) oa Name of Property Owner Raytheon Compan Address of Property Owner 870 Winter St., Waltham, MA 02451-1446 781.522.5000 (Street) (City) (zip) (Telephone Number) os Assessors Map Book No. ® 1❑ 0 ® Page No. 11 ® Parcel No. 0 ® 07 10 Type of Industry Aerospace (Electronic parts/ components assemb} 3 ® t] 111 , 3❑ © ❑7 (General Description) (Federal SIC No.) 11 Number of Employees (Full Time) 3538 (Part Time) 12 Raw Materials Used Aluminum, Inorganic Acids, Paint, Oils, Non -Chlorinated Solvents, Aqueous Cleaners, Alkaline (General Description - Add Additional Sheets as Needed) (Daily Amount Used) 13 Products Produced Reasearch, Design and Test for Military Applications and Electronic Board Assembly (General Description - Add Additional Sheets as Needed) (Daily Amount Produced) 14 Wastewater Producing Operations Aqueous cleaning and defluxing, lab sinks, lab fume hood scrubbers, cooling tower bleed laboratory DI water, ion exchange regeneration and rainwater. (Full Description - Add Additional Sheets as Needed) MMT®W®Th® 15 Time of Discharge 6 AM® PM❑ 10 AM[:] PM®, Shifts per day 2 Days per Week F® Sa❑ Su❑ 16 Wastewater Flow Rate 79,000 Gallons per Day 409 Gallons per Minute (Average) (Peak) 17 Constituents of Wastewater Discharge Metals, pH Neutralized Rinsewaters, Suspended Solids, BOD/COD and Sanitary Wastewater (General Description - Attach Chemical Analysis Results to the Application) 18 Person in company responsible for industrial wastewater discharge Manju Mohan EHSS Engineer 310.647.1204 (Name) (Position) (Telephone Number) I affirm that all information furnished is true a ect)anthat the applicant will comply with the conditions stated on the back of this permit form. 2� 2 11 Date ,2019 1s Signature for Applicant I Director, EHSS (Company Administrative Official) WameT (Position) 20 Approved/Reviewed by City or County Official Approved by Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Date _ I 1 /Vi I Date February 18, 2021 ❑ L.A. County Department of Public Works Expiration Date February 17, 2026 City of b U Robert C. Ferrante, Chief En in�_,�Jral Manager RIFY Name L, 'A By Position L i T.,`tice r Position Senior Civil Engineer -p r Note: Please submit application first to the applicable City or County agency in which the point of discharge is located. Please contact the local agency for the required permit -processing fee. Submit the original application (Do not endQ�i ). D��.. � �1� � � r>,� D0C # mll1 1 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE Pre-engineered Manufactured Building Project does not apply to LA County LID requirements. No water treatment conducted within building. See industrial wastewater discharge permit and separately attached NPDES Industrial General Permit Order to existing site wastewater treatment. WATER SUPPLY AND SEWER CALCULATION Job Name: Raytheon Bldg E-22 Location: El Segundo, CA W. O. No. 20406 Date: September 29, 2021 Calculated By: MAO Created By: MAO Building E 22 *Fixture units based on California Plumbina Code 2019, Table 702.1 for Drainaae and Table A103.1 for Water FIXTURE QTY SANITARY SEWER DOM. COLD WATER DOM. HOT WATER DOMESTIC WATER DFU/Fixt* Total DFU FU/Fixt Total FU FU/Fixt Total FU WSFU/Fixt* Total WSFU Water closet, flush valve, 1.6 gpf 4.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 Urinal, wall hung, 1.0 gpf 2.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 Urinal, wall hung, waterless 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lavatory, single (water) 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 1.50 0.00 2.00 0.00 Lavatory, single (sanitary) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lavatory, in sets of two or three (sanitary) 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pantry Sink 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.40 0.00 Kitchen Sink 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.40 0.00 Hand Wash Sink 1 2.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 1.13 0.00 1.50 0.00 Drinking Fountain 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 Shower 3.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.40 0.00 Service sink, 3" 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 Floor drain, 2" 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Floor sink, 2" 2 2.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hose bibb 1 0.00 0.00 2.50 2.50 0.00 0.00 2.50 2.50 Hose bibb, each additional AL 8 0.00 0.00 1.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 8.00 Dishwasher J A 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.00 1.40 0.00 Note: Quantity count includes shell & core and tenant improvement. TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS 7.000 13.500 0.000 13.500 EQUIVALENT FLOW, GPM Pipe Friction Loss (ft/100ft) EQUIVALENT PIPE SIZE, in Slope (in/ft) 1/4 29.800 #N/A 29.800 - 9.946 9.946 9.946 2" 1-1/2" #N/A 1-1/2" APPENDIX A 0.1 CHART A 105.1(1) 10 000 8000 6000 5000 4000 51061TI, `610 1000 800 600 500 400 200 S E Q. w c 100 0 80 to a1 60 0 60 J 40 30 20 10 8 6 5 4 3 2 1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100 FRICTION LOSS IN HEAD (pounds -force per square inch) PER 100-FOOT LENGTH For SI units: 1 inch = 25 mm, I gallon per minute = 0.06 L/s, I pound -force per square inch = 6.8947 kPa, I foot = 304.8 mm, I foot per second = 0.3048 m/s 0 > Ln J CO N O rn 0 z U (D O w 0 cn z J Lu (� Uj W Cn CD J O W 0 N O >4 00 r 0) U Q, U .� us U=3) 0 z co U > Z O i~!I a o U rn Q"t O1+ o_ rn I~ � 0 WW i .W U m Oa p U W H H ♦J H H H H H J ♦- � o L-i J Q waa > �amW Oaz3� K N 3ogz_ way Q_ Q O w tail .F_�� C�Z z a w �;Nz m z O � z Uw t1 �009 ,., 00 MOOS- ~¢OU 0 �WtYJ ! za'zoaCIC 0 c .y 0 U a U W W �J w �KQW z 0 1n w W PLANNED BY: CN DESIGNED BY: CN CHECKED BY: RL APPROVED BY: RL W CU Q m W W 5; 0- w zz OQ W J Q - LLI 0� () z O 06 J J Z) 0-U 0- J � Q cn U 0� 01� W LIJ Q W w 362 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE BLDG: ---- FLR: PKG: PAGE: 04 OF 05 SHEET#: A114 Page 360 of 500 ft Ir 16, 'S — r _ jr ■ 4 ' iY J• L ■ - - _ - ice•" ! , �: . ' �� _. of i - i L ~ •, ' ,y titi- liph J _ :•L• ; �- or— F - I ,rr Jr IL + a Y 1 + r � } +' _ _ 5 -� - PSfi I �'. T T ~— l �� i4 y _lfY r 7 J •r• ' F f r_ - a ��z PL NAIL Jf #_ r1 - 7 11 � _ Jl��j #}_ _ ■ � 'i X It J. rII x 1'+ - Lam- -` _ ,•1 Y OF .IdllpAr SSS _ y + �I L, L _ , _ +Y� +�� x ,y 94. l aor + - Or Nr % Nook -4A t -%-. ■ (a - ff r 9IRr # y 3 -: _�_ +�_■ - - :*- i •� tip. - t F _ t •.� �� ,� " ,tom �� L . r � r _ ' Aor � c •F t • Sir * * r S -• •� .�'� I�. `• L _ _ ,. i" _ F { - •Ya _ 7 x'` as - �I �1 •r _� { ,r'n _ ,may .:I + , - - + �. �. +~r :% -' M1 _ _ fM1 n } + ' �' • '. .'! a r J• _ ' ` . ~ '� _ _ _ it l# �, �•1 , mx '� h �� � J ' ^+�• k a '•+i r'.' y --• ii ' F' *+ . -. MAI 9. Ae— : _ .1 � .: ' r...r : fT- F r yrM i+l•A•' y `Ir # r ;' i - + • _ i ..4 .fir _ - f _ ,j� - J' �. + T C ` terrr • 1�i , r L' if 1 ibr x.+ T r,- 1p • '�' � I.1 • a r . # i .: � � - ' +�'�'• {l;a,•- � .,�- � � � l �: �F � '� � r f f�/{f �� .�� ,� 'y� � ' � _• �r � � � • �r� _ ,,1l��,,{{r{r{��� 7 f rf .,� 4CA, ink aw �. •a, t ,. . r r 1 _ Or IF + r p+�"F dor ' ' ..pry y - p F. go F T — t . _..j. lC. I L_ t •r •I• �. r -� F ••• -. 4. ,_ y .�T' r _ .�_�' r +` �} #�-! ••+c : - -- : :+.• *�_ - - 1, } r�•- 5 :. _ •' _ - -" *r ti ' . ! `~ t r o-, err d: r• � M1 ,..- _ F +'_ a' ' N L :wr . -, -:� X - , , I- I , -y - :J; r I+' •1� '+h :rt R+=- r:w• rY, 4� c- �4�ii r IF •_i - CF + :r:S- kM1l�• " Ile : T ,� ' J _ - _ _ _ �~ 4'i7L• ' cL • - - _ , ` F : • - _ `Y k y .. �L {' a z. •:~ter 'F : ` 1' + •�_ _: _ r } ':t y * F . F: T*! yyrrc�J4.rL i� 1 �l r -OF9. lli".•` F 1w'.,� .� L . ' `{tom•" IA f'• it 'f s•_ 'k� . �4- •�.. av •'file.•+ r}• ' �' f -` + �-X'+` .1+•F {_ �r . r -1 L •' ',.• - r 'fir ;y,� •i�J1F 'i f�2- W06c•;l��f l ' y r 'M + 1 ;1 S{ �'_ ` L f�n� lr' _- ,++h_ ..6'- r+L. � - i1. Y• fi• } ' . ?d: r , t i }L.1` ` J +•it _' '. J- - -. - r L� - _ ,.� r • _ i �_ ~L -16 _ Y.�;, t - F ha'� i ~ ',1 s l4: wr . yn3 .+k1; R`r u• A•' r. + aR kLr :%i' �Y I J • - .: - '•! :� r ■ .i}_ - l { M1:•}'�IF L r . - F��L' T'+S1v - { -r••L {.: # -L F T _ . YKlip, +r•:•+T(:{IV " !a '� T' ' .. L r'4 �• }T'`1 _ _ A, F 1 +}+. ,- _-t •L2'r ,vim 3• .�:• * -1• L r'. �,■+. l"s --- _ �' - _, +* ~ *A - ��� "+�'' f y�,-.�J-- I�..,T.••�+�� f�•fir_ I' � T,. �,. F .:4 � � - ••__?� -, � ?d r rr Vt-.MW-C .9 W* - ti hm Je 1 t3 J.-" f T{gIr, t .+ M 1 t • J Ar ti fL .I - • , ,� + 1 y fir' : r.. w t� Owl • :r _ ,T+kL F 'f: . L' 4y 'L .4 '.. r � • �f ' - - .:.. � L ,''f' - A, I a LIN F' - �r ' _ �'4S •yy a Y 0. ar. t. +�• �•� � ' . kin �A - -- _ ti •., k' : c RA -OW. Rzi ':�•� +' : .'':�'_ JAI .'• ` �' AL r y yrt , .� • Q ,p_ . k kr - f , ;. y - �*' • 4' �•, f -W F6 1; r _ 0 r Y } r . N , .- . V . r —.a v . naa \/F N-IF I Ilw ;ONTINENTA IIEVELOPMEI 01:N: mlar=Faw AS AP L04ei a L0192: [01:421:I! 1 �: 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS The Los Angeles Chargers Training Facility is a (3) story building with a partial mezzanine, approximately 143,250 sf, and houses the Los Angeles Chargers organization, which is comprised of the Team (Players and Coaches), Football Operations and Business Operations staff. The site is situated in El Segundo, on a 14-acre site, bounded to the north by S. Hughes Way, to the east by the Metro Green Line and to the west by a Sothern California Edison easement. It will have (3) full-size natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter. There will also be approximately 345 at grade parking spaces, broken into two groupings with staff and visitors parking in the northwest, and players and coaches parking in the south. The Southern California Edison easement will potentially be utilized for overflow parking when training camp is being held. A separate 4,800 sf groundskeeping and maintenance building anchors the northeastern corner of the site and provides easy access to care for and maintain the three playing fields. Perimeter fencing with scrim will prevent visibility into the training facility and the fields and will start at the East edge of the building and surround the entirety of the playing field areas. Pedestrian and vehicle flow in and around the site is important to understand. Players & coaches will be entering the building from the South, through a secure gated area that allows them to remain separate and protected from other activities on site. The parking for both players and coaches will be through controlled access and incorporate both gates and security cameras. Any visitors, media or other staff will enter the building on the west facade, through the main entry lobby. A bus loading zone lines the western edge of the building, and will be used for the pick up and drop off of guests attending the LUX Club, as well as any team related events that require bussing. A truck dock and loading / staging area is located in the southwest corner of the building and is equipped to receive large and small deliveries. It is adjacent to the building's main equipment storage area. The exterior of the building is to be an iconic design that personifies the Los Angeles Chargers brand and incorporates graphic elements, signage and bolt -like shapes to create a one -of -a - kind training facility that is unmistakably "Chargers". Precast concrete, panels, profiled metal panels, and a mix of curtainwall and storefront glazing will be the primary materials on the exterior. The metallic sheen of the metal panel and the matte finish of the precast concrete work together to add sophistication and complexity to the facades. Exterior glazing will be a mix of clear vision glass and fritted glass to provide transparency and transmission of natural light, yet visual privacy and sun control when needed. A skylight stretches over the lobby atrium and brings daylight into the center of the building. Exterior glass rails with a recessed stainless steel shoe will line the perimeter of the outdoor terraces and extra deep roof overhangs will help with shading. The outdoor terraces will feature pedestal pavers at the floor line with drainage below. An outdoor elevated turf area will line the southeast edge of the second floor above the locker room. It will be directly accessed from the team meeting rooms and will be utilized for walk throughs. Overall health and wellness is an important aspect of training facility design. In order for an organization to function at its optimal performance, health and wellness cannot only be geared toward the players, but toward the entirety of the staff and building occupants. Some of the most important features to be incorporated in the building are: • Air Quality — creating opportunities for an indoor / outdoor experience, increasing air flow and movement • Interaction with Nature — visual connectivity to the fields and landscaping from the majority of occupied spaces • Lighting — using an appropriate level of lighting for each space, taking advantage of natural light and eliminating glare • Social Interaction and Collaboration — creating spaces that allow for departmental overlap to spark creativity • Acoustics — separation of spaces that require a lively and loud environment from spaces that need to be quiet or restorative • Activity — encourage the use of stairs and walking through efficient planning and functional space arrangement • Water & Nutrition — providing water bottle filling stations and food pantries in regularized locations throughout the building • Restorative Environment — creating zones of quiet and relaxation to decompress and unwind • Ergonomics — provide furniture and equipment that enhance the user experience, such as adjustable task chairs and task lighting • Autonomy & User Control — allowing users to have control over their personal thermal comfort, lighting and noise levels PROJECT INFORMATION THE LA CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY & HEADQUARTERS IS CLASSIFIED AS A THREE (3) STORY ABOVE GROUND + A MEZZANINE, MIXED -USE OCCUPANCY, WITH THE PRIMARY OCCUPANCY AS GROUP A-3. OCCUPANCIES INCLUDED WITHIN THIS BUILDING: A-2 (DINING AREAS) A-3 (AUDITORIUM, CONFERENCE ROOMS, LOCKER ROOMS, TRAINING ROOM, WEIGHT ROOM, POOL) B (OFFICE SPACE) S-1 (STORAGE ROOMS, SERVICE AREAS) S-2 (MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ROOMS) PROJECT FAR: 0.25 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 54'-0" AT TOP OF PARAPET AT ELEVATOR OVERRUN DESIGN OBJECTIVES • TO DESIGN A STATE-OF-THE-ART TRAINING FACILITY FOR THE LOS ANGELES CHARGERS, BUILT IN THE HEART OF LA • TO PROVIDE THE BEST OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRAINING AND CONDITIONING WITH DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PRACTICE FIELDS, ENSURING TEAM EFFICIENCY • TO PROVIDE AN INDOOR / OUTDOOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ATMOSPHERE, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THERMAL COMFORT, DAYLIGHTING AND VIEWS CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT CONTINENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CONTACT:ALEX ROSE 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE, SUITE 200 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 D: (310) 640 1520 X227 CLIENT MAR VENTURES, INC. CONTACT: LIONEL UHRY 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 D: (310) 7818261 CLIENT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS CONTACT:FRED MAAS HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0: (714) 540 7100 ARCHITECT GENSLER CONTACT: RON TURNER 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 0: (213) 327 3600 D: (213) 327 3780 CIVIL ENGINEER KPFF CONTACT: DAVID MCGRAW 700 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 0: (213) 418 0201 D: (213) 266 5252 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SWA CONTACT: ROMAN CHILI 811 WEST 7TH STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 0: (213) 236 9090 MEP + LIGHTING ENGINEERS HENDERSON ENGINEERS CONTACT: BRIAN O'NEIL 510 WEST 6TH STREET, SUITE 800 LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 0: (213) 254 4750 D: (213) 254 4726 ARCHITECTURAL E-A.1 -COVER SHEET E-A.2 - PROJECT INFORMATION E-A.3 - ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN E-AA - OVERALL ELEVATIONS E-A.5 - OVERALL ELEVATIONS E-A.6 - 3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS E-A.7 - 3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS E-A.8 - 3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS E-A.9 - SITE FENCING DIAGRAM + SECURITY BOOTH CUT SHEETS E-A.10 - MAIN BUILDING PLANS - B1 & L1 E-A.11 - MAIN BUILDING PLANS - L2 & L3 E-A.12 - GROUNDSKEEPING PLANS & ELEVATIONS E-A.13 - MATERIALS PALETTE CIVIL E-C.1 - SITE PLAN E-C.2 - VEHICLE TURNING ANALYSIS ELECTRICAL E-E.1 - PARKING LOT PHOTOMETRIC STUDY E-E.2 - FIELD PHOTOMETRIC STUDY E-E.3 - EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH E-EA - EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH E-E.5 - EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH E-E.6 - EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH LANDSCAPE E-L.1 - ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN E-L.2 - PLANT PALETTE GRAPHICS E-G.1 - SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS E-G.2 - SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS E-G.3 - MONUMENT SIGN - E. EL SEGUNDO BLVD. 1 .11 f - - . L ' !M f Alf • I 4PI j + r -` ram; LJ Or At � ' 1 Amp Z i oe 49 } ... JL r• '� •4� 4� •� 7 � � r 4 I +. Y ' ROSECRANS AVE.4' Z� O J dh VICINITY MAP wk r y � f PIL #� - ■ �Ilw rL! Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME PROJECT INFORMATION ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-A.2 Page 362 of 500 CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY MONUMENT SIGNAGE; PROVIDE POWER FOR ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE �Oq,D, \� rRljch SOCAL EDISON UTILITY YARD PARKING COUNTS - VEHICLE & BIKE TYPE / CLASSIFICATION GROSS BUILDING SF NET BUILDING SF PARKING PER SF SPACES I STALLS REQUIRED MAIN BUILDING OFFICE 143,250 122,080 1/300 FOR 1ST 25,000 SF 84 1/350 FOR 2ND 25,000 SF 72 1/400 FOR REST - 72,080 SF 181 GROUNDSKEEPING BUILDING MAINTENANCE & STORAGE 4,800 4,368 1 PER EA. 1,000 SF 5 TOTAL REQUIRED: 342 TOTAL PROVIDED: 348 SURPLUS / DEFICIT: +6 ADA PARKING REQUIRED: (8) ADA SPACES, (2) OF WHICH ARE VAN PARKING ADA PARKING PROVIDED: (9) ADA SPACES, (2) OF WHICH ARE VAN PARKING BIKE PARKING REQUIRED (NONRESIDENTIAL): 15,000 4 FOR 1ST 15,000 SF 4 111,448 5% FOR PORTION ABOVE 15,000 16 TOTAL BIKE PARKING REQUIRED: 20 OPERABLE GATE FOR FIRE TRUCK ACCESS PREFABRICATED SECURITY - BOOTH WITH METAL PANEL TO MATCH MAIN BUILDING RED DASHED LINE INDICATES THE LIMITS -OF -WORK (LOW) FOR THIS PROJECT SOLAR SHADE CANOPIES, TYP. PARKING CONTROL ACCESS DEVICES W-CARD READERS I I I I PREFABRICATED METAL BUILDING W-METAL PANEL VENEER TO MATCH THE MAIN BUILDING I I I I I I I I \ I I \ \ O 1 w 0 00 Q J_ Q F- J 0 w H Q w J w w z J Z w w 0 Of F- LU (2)14'X14'X6'TALL CMU SAND & FERTILIZER BINS UTILITY EASEMENT LINE METRO EASEMENT LINE 17 PROPERTY LINE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN SCALE. 1 - 40 -0 CLIENTS I PROJECT I SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER Ref North A--� Q:S) Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE E-A.3 Pagb 363 of 500 50 T 20' 0" 0' T 50 Ora 35 ;-0)) 2C 0 I—oll MATERIAL LEGEND CONC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE WALL CONC-2 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE L�J ST-1 PAINTED STUCCO WHITE n Lei • Mm • • • • • G LZ-1 CLEAR GLASS SOLARBAN72 GLZ-2 LOW-E TINTED GLASS SOLARBAN90 MT-1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANEL WHITE MT-2 FLAT SEAM METAL SOFFIT PANEL WOOD VENEER MT-3 FLAT SEAM METAL WALL PANEL WHITE MT-4 PERFORATED METAL PANEL SILVER WEST ELEVATION o: -. -.4 � PT-2 ACCENT PAINT "CHARGERS" BLUE EAST -ELEVATION Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME OVERALL ELEVATIONS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-AA Page 364 of 500 MATERIAL LEGEND CONC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE WALL 50'-0" y� 35'-0" Y 20'-0" I 3 01 0fa 5C 3E 2C 0� CONC-2 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE ST-1 PAINTED STUCCO WHITE �IIIIIII'llllllllllllll� ffiT1RW7 � •�0 •�iT1R�� �•�1i� SOUTH ELEVATION :.C�� � •�1i� � •CTa� � •�Iia��� � � •�iT1R� � •�iT1R�.7 NORTH ELEVATION G LZ-1 CLEAR GLASS SOLARBAN72 GLZ-2 LOW-E TINTED GLASS SOLARBAN90 MT-1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANEL WHITE MT-2 FLAT SEAM METAL SOFFIT PANEL WOOD VENEER MT-3 FLAT SEAM METAL WALL PANEL WHITE MT-4 PERFORATED METAL PANEL SILVER MT-5 PAINTED METAL LOUVERS SILVER PT-1 SILVER PAINT TO MATCH METAL PANEL PT-2 ACCENT PAINT "CHARGERS" BLUE :.rsa� :.rsa Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ&TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME OVERALL ELEVATIONS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-A.5 Pag� 365 of 500 rw4 zi y 1 ,� __ i � , •: � �. �F`: Sri k� �'�.. ' -��� � ir, 4' �r ~" t�• ..f4��. r. � :.� �S:-. �'• r �' 1,' L'. �rt >,� `,1. j ..� ��b� r � /. ••sue. \' -�� �r. � ' l.0 .ti�t�� k �'��' ux�r � '�� --4- +,1,. ""'•; .4r• • •_�;A.� r3�`t��.r',:""'� ': ��; �y" :�+ ."J �5 ^�• ~r_�,•i :` •'+ ;•' it-�� `k�4�G-.•' �r '� � r�• f`' �"'" �� � Wit•' y _ : � -4 }; �?�• f.'`r . ' ♦.Y ,, ,.- ,.�,'�-"`" �` � „��AV � rxi ;�!- - � �' ` ^-.L r+� t7 �j � 4 +Il 4 _ ! - .� �f M�;a r?-'�. _ �'�' _ • 1 r' - a,c• .a' � i ` Lf � �rn r� �, �7f � '� , , i r•f + • ��'�ra.k �� }'_ % ir.'.. •ems 'fir' t l m Ai A mk ■I L 11111111111111�1111l�lI�I�II"Mu�pll��Iiilil' I�I�111iiilllll I • rrr■.a■r cif Trww■■■ ,a •i - l wt•■■rr■rr.w ■■r _ ■w■■w■■■!f*Y■■ •f �■■■■■■w.■■... 11 .e]� IS�:' Ji ■■■■lwwrr■wwrw 4 #��� �kk:i:���l� �- ! ir.r ��.::. �i t_..xt, r k1 `�lkllra� k.a IL —� S Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME 3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-A■6 Pagb 366 of 500 r I jr ., r. — ter, • ,� t ' ,' _ I' 'k F.._ . yrr x I + r � L 4b XF it L05ANGELES l- W ', J 11H t ^r milli -Jio LOS ANCELEN CHARM" T r I II ,"Ilt bliily ;'wiirt �i• iilr 11 ��Ip,i '�. 1�`J:' • l:krs l' - ,,J��piq�N��l� ��i�i�'�Il�jl �dl:iv ii� s��' �ti 2 . F.. GVNTINCNTAL ansier MAR VENTURES INC_ DEVELAPMENT CARP_ LAS ANrELES C-I� IRrER-R LOS A ALOW aL0,92:WF:411Lat C milli -Jio LOS ANCELEN CHARM" T r I II ,"Ilt bliily ;'wiirt �i• iilr 11 ��Ip,i '�. 1�`J:' • l:krs l' - ,,J��piq�N��l� ��i�i�'�Il�jl �dl:iv ii� s��' �ti 2 . F.. GVNTINCNTAL ansier MAR VENTURES INC_ DEVELAPMENT CARP_ LAS ANrELES C-I� IRrER-R LOS A ALOW aL0,92:WF:411Lat C AM-- -2 OWS-41 dim 11jol $L 77 0 AJF oil - Ai lop' W �pn Air n WIN wr - 49 _*ft m =.i -%. _ Inumum. I : 0 POEMS y W.44 MN . . ............ ++ n� . . . . .. 4. - --------- 016, -pull r L i k A 3nsler GUNTINENTAL MAR UFNTt]RF-e% INC- � nFVFLnPMFNTr- nRF n_R ANr.FLF_R r_14ARr.FR_R � LOS P F,k] 0jej a 111 LI [el :f 0! L04T 11] a L:1 : [p]F4,11 I a II I k �Jjq I I I W1 Ilk j I IVOR L49L L two- FENCING DIAGRAM FENCING TYPES I FC..FNn -••••••••••• THIGH METAL VERTICAL PICKET SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB, TYP. BLACK VINYL PRINTED SCRIM ON INSIDE OF FENCE TREES & PLANTING IN 5' BUFFER BETWEEN FENCE AND SIDEWALK m0000000000• THIGH METAL VERTICAL PICKET SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB, TYP. BLACK VINYL PRINTED SCRIM ON INSIDE OF FENCE •••••••••••• 45' HIGH TALL NETTING TO BLOCK VIEWS FROM ELEVATED METRO LINE • 0000•••••• 8' HIGH BLACK VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCING • 0000•••••• EXISTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CHAINLINK FENCE • 0000•••••• 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL FENCE -VERTICAL PICKETS PLANTING IN 5' BUFFER BETWEEN FENCE AND SIDEWALK SECURITY BOOTH DESIGN. TYPE 6 FENCE PRODUCT -VISTA SERIES, CUSTOM BOOTH DESIGN MANUFACTURER - MFI COLOR - WHITE o '- ]vLTiHANO insCu � CALVO M $M;_ OR AL"INUM nQK FRAME PAINT FINISH K+SULATE4 WALLS CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY PREFABRICATED SECURITY — BOOTH WITH METAL PANEL TO MATCH MAIN BUILDING VISTA SERIES 1/4• TEMPERED SATEn' GLASS — iNSULALIED ROOF Mardan Fabrication HCAYv-Outr cook ROLLYR5 R TRACK — Tel: (800) 882-5820 Fax(855) 313-4159 www.mardonfab.com WAIIiIRPRDOf SEALANT 3' INSUUSTED QODF FLUOR. L*ft FIXTUNE 5"To4/DLL- SIECEPt, SHEET WMXT UT: DGK _ LW CENTER PAxEI swum DOOR FINlSNED MOOR ELEC. ROITCH-M AREA flECES5ILQ G DOOR 41:AvfrLOOR FRAME RDUGH-IN LOCADON DOOR Standard Plans E F7 -_ -I M =_ Sliding Door Left Sliding Door Right Two Sliding Doors Right Rear Rear Center Left Rear Swing Door Swing Door Swing Door Side Swing Door Sliding & Swing Door Guard Booth w/Restroom Guard Booth w/Restroom Two Directional E a-: -1 Forward Sliding Door Two Attendant Toll Booth r u.ilfi—Ilca Q--tL. Custom Shapes PBERIRSHEO wwTE STuCOo_ZosSEO CEIUNG , 1 /4" 7EMPEREtl PREnNSHEO SAFEV GLASS INr. HALL ALUWNUM GLAZING SASH HK]H SECURiTy HOOK -BOLT LOCK W/RENWABLE CYLINDER AIR aDkpMGNER GALVAN12E0 SrifL OR ALVMRLUM xAL,ts {PAINTCL]] IN5ULATEp TOP_mumG WALL INTECRAL— Roofs and Windows Standard Roof Profile Economy Roof Profile Flush Fascia/Butt Gloss Horizontal Sliding Window ADA Height Sliding Window P� ® B® o 0 0 f Peaked Roof/Step Fascia Hip Roof/Wall Moldings Single Hung Windows Ticket Windows Offset Overhang Colonial Style Mullions Colonial Style Mullions Overhang High Profile Fascia PARKING CONTROL ACCESS DEVICES W-CARD READERS I , LU o J TYPE 3 o —TYPE 2 _ LU LU w O �I z J LU LU o� ry LU - � O• I PAIR OF 8' WIDE ACCESS GATES FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS TO FIELDS UTILITY EASEMENT LINE METRO EASEMENT LINE PROPERTY LINE TYPE 3 TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 FENCE PRODUCT - MONTAGE COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURER - AMERISTAR COLOR - BLACK HEIGHT - 8' HIGH PANEL SCRIM PRODUCT -VINYL WINDSCREEN - 100% BLOCKAGE - 130Z MANUFACTURER - COLLINS COMPANY COLOR - ROYAL BLUE WITH CHARGERS COLOR GRAPHICS HEIGHT - 6' TALL °I16 } � - 1jlot, .4 TYPE 3 FENCE PRODUCT - WOODLAND PRO CAMO NETTING - FIRE RETARDANT (BULK ROLL) MANUFACTURER - CAMO NETS USA COLOR - GREEN / BROWN HEIGHT - 7'-10"W X 2551 _PIP ��� I `'•+.may � :�. dbdh TYPE 4 FENCE PRODUCT - VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK MANUFACTURER - N/A COLOR - BLACK HEIGHT - 8' HIGH TYPE 6 FENCE PRODUCT - MONTAGE PLUS MANUFACTURER - AMERISTAR COLOR - BLACK HEIGHT - 42" HIGH �rY TYPE 5 FENCE PRODUCT - EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE MANUFACTURER - N/A COLOR - GALVANIZED, SILVER HEIGHT - 8' HIGH Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ&TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME SITE FENCING DIAGRAM + SECURITY BOOTH CUT SHEETS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-A.9 Pagel 369 of 500 A B C C.7 D D.5 E F C9 FLOOR PLAN - MEZZANINE NET SF: 5,122 SF 3 SCALE. 1/16 - 1-0 N 7 0 N CV 8 O EO co 0 bo N 1R-E E F 12'-4" ELEV 1 PIT ELEV 2 PIT D D.5 23'-0" STAIR 4 I I ELEV 4 PIT El 23'-0" 14'-8" 12'-4" E)(F G 29'-0" 29'-0" 4- 0" 1' 41'-0" H H.5 T6- J.2 34'-0" 0"L. G) (H I I 34'-011 6'-0" H.5 J J.2 0 N GV c7 E ) co i� iai i� 7 iae] maul D E T G H 50'-0" 29'-0" 41'-0" � vv�iv G noov 12'-4" (1-1.5 T6- J.2 34'-0" 0" 0 0 co STAIR 7 0 in co CV N �3) 44) 4 5 ) 46) 48) �9) 410 as FLOOR PLAN - BASEMENT NET SF: 1,770 SF FLOOR PLAN - FIELD LEVEL NET SF: 49,357 SF 1 SCALE. 1/16 - 1-0 2 SCALE. 1/16 - 1-0 CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER CONTINENTAL Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY MAIN BUILDING PLANS - B1 & L1 E-A.10 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET ©2021 Gensler COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PagE 370 of 500 ON CV 7 I T F37'-811 2'-4' 29'-Off G H 'HY-O"' 5 J J.2 6'-0" 12'-4" 29'-0" 41'-0" 34'-011 [6- - Oi D F G H H.5 J J.2 3 ED M TAIR 7 5 N TAIR 6 0 N CV O ED co O EO N co lL 7 10 12 (:6 N 7 — I E F 37'-8" 12'-4" 29'-0" G 41'-0" H J J.2 6'-0" FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 02 NET SF: 44,569 SF 2 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 03 NET SF: 39,784 SF SCALE. 1/16 = 1-0 SCALE. 1/16 = 1-0 CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER CONTINENTAL Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY MAIN BUILDING PLANS - L2 & L3 E-A.11 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 ©2021 Gensler Pagb 371 of 500 10 ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING NORTH SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING SOUTH 9 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING EAST 5 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING WEST 4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" •• • • • • • • • • • • • • ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE EAST ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE SOUTH 8 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE WEST 7 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" GROUNDSKEEPING PERSPECTIVE 6 SCALE: ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE NORTH 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING PLAN NET SF: 4,800 SF 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME GROUNDSKEEPING BUILDING - PLANS & ELEVATIONS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-A.12 ge 372 of 500 :v: i • WOOL.. a� F .i�yY. Fi'- a• Cp iit.• JAN Irl 14 m — — . wo GLZm2** ... ........... `..,��� ......,.,��,,, Illllllllll Zi- Li—i-i HAI Iliflllllll � �- Illllllillll I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�LI�I MT-1 MT-2 MT-3 MT-4 MT-5 MATERIALS CONC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE WALL CONC-2 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE WALL PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 GLZ-1 CLEAR GLASS SOLARBAN72 STmi GLZ-2 LOW-E GLASS SOLARBAN90 MT-1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANEL - SILVER MT-2 FLAT SEAM METAL SOFFIT PANEL - WOOD VENEER MT-3 FLAT SEAM METAL WALL PANEL - WHITE MT-4 PERFORATED METAL PANEL - 43% OPEN MT-5 PAINTED METAL LOUVERS - WHITE PT-1 WHITE PAINT TO MATCH METAL WALL PANEL PT-2 ACCENT PAINT "CHARGERS" BLUE PT-3 SILVER PAINT TO MATCH STANDING SEAM METAL PANEL ST-1 SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO - WHITE CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER CONTINENTAL Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY MATERIALS PALETTE E-A.13 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET ©2021 Gensler COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Page 373 of 500 1► 0 20' 40' SCALE: 1 "=40' Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 700 South Flower Street Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 www.kpff.com ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME SITE PLAN ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-C.1 Pag 374 of 500 / FIRE TRUCK ACCESS -OPTION 1 FIRE TRUCK ACCESS - OPTION 2 N 0 20' 40' SCALE: 1 "=40' N 0 20' 40' SCALE: 1 "=40' Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 700 South Flower Street Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 www.kpff.com ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ&TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME VEHICLE TURNING ANALYSIS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-C.2 Pag 375 of 500 dp D-Series Size 1 LED Area Lumoinaoire WEI Huy Arne rican Side R I ��dP MONUMENT SIGNAGE; PROVIDE POWER FOR II I I IRAIAIATEM C1I(1AIA(1C ecurity CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY Calculation Summary Label CalcT pe Unit. s Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Maintenance Parking Illuminance Fc 2.08 9.7 0.8 2.0 12.1 parking lot Illuminance Fc 2.02 11.9r 0.01 202.00 1195 Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.45 1.E 0.0 N.A. N.A. gate enterance Illuminance Fc 5.5 12.wJ 1.7 3.32 7.0 gate exit Illuminance Fc 1.38 1.5 1.2 1.15 1.25 Maintenance Parking Illuminance Fc 2.37 9.7 1.0 2.37 9.70 Roadway Illuminance Fc 1.60 5.F- 0.4 4.50 14.00 South parking lot Illuminance Fc 2.35 7. 0.6 3.92 11.67 Truest parking lot Illuminance Fc 2.18 4.4 0.6 2.735.50 all Pack Lu inaire Luminai re S ciedul-e S col Qty Label Arrang-erent Total Lamp Lumens LLF Des Gripti on 20 B SINGLE N.A. 0.700 aS l LEI} P3 40IL 73H NVOLT 26 A SINGLE N . A . 0.700 aS l LEI} P3 4 OIL ELr6 NVOLT E?mC SINGLE N. A. 0.700 SEA-E[>G- 3M-xx- 0 6 -E-UL- 7 0 0 -4 0 h. RED DASHED LINE INDICATES THE LIMITS -OF -WORK (LOW) FOR THIS PROJECT 8' HIGH CUSTOM METAL VERTICAL SLAT SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB, TYP. ° SOLAR SHADE CANOPIES, TYP. PARKING CONTROL ACCESS DEVICES W-CARD READERS PAIR OF 8' WIDE ACCESS GATES FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS TO FIELDS 0 (2) 14'X 14'X 6'TALL CONCRETE SOIL BINS 0 UTILITY EASEMENT LINE 0 0 - METRO EASEMENT LINE 0 0 - PROPERTY LINE 0 0 a t 1 t 1 .1 .1 .1 2 .9 5 8' HIGH CUSTOM METAL VERTICAL SLAT 5 SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER 5 5 OF THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH 5 CONCRETE CURB, TYP. Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME PARKING LOT PHOTOMETRIC STUDY ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-E.1 142 -1 40 173 129 105 1 hl hl 1 11� 14 1 14 04 I111 1111 1141 M404 +1 65 149 1 142 1 124 11 151 .1 5Y Fr 7 17 v .153 �h�l ICI 1■1 1 �h�h 1111 1111 Ills hih� 1 P 1 �� 11 1 1 1 1 14 Pi rijin 1 1 1 1 in ti r 60 65 ' 4119 1 70 11110 11111111 11 h4 1hlh hlhl 1111 �141 1�1� 4 hd h h11 h r 1 4 h4 h hl h1 1 I 1 I 114 1 r4 r4 16 *152 39 141 149 742 138 134 F2 T. ;148.1 78 ,1 1 1 1 1 71 1 1 1 1 62 114114 91 .163 N *1 00 56 14 h11h 1111 114 4r111h A hd h hI I V 1 I 1 I 11 I P F 114 q r4 h 61 152 13�� I 1 13 139 744 _ 125 143 14 I m M #149 1 401 173 129 I r r I F4 F 3 I I � I r; Do 3 - - I F4 4 op-_� 117 17 5 J 7 t1 15 15 6 V F179 177 III 1111 �r�r 1 1 �h�h h�h� 1111 Ir1h h�h� �h�h h�h� 11�1 1■1■ 11�1 I� t1�1 I I I rr r , 1, 1# Ellin *1?2 1 17 hr hi TlYb 114 1 r rr h 1111 1, 17}I58 151 f 151 4106 157 67 172 172 170 73 172 58 A 58 151 till 1411 414P h4h4 4h11h h1111,1111 11111 1404 411111111 hlhI'll 111 114P 14P4 401111 011111 1111 111P 1g11111 411111 dIr 11r1 Jrgr 040i 40J1 I q I 1J611■ �hrh hrhr 1111 114r r4h4 4040 040r 1111 1111 11P1 -1 1 � 0 150 66 +179 177 1 20 #1 50 40 #161 1 132 1 � 4 132 A 56 .141 J } 29 }127 �1 I I I }� Ill1�141 .132 F7 C G) Z M Name: Football- 1 Size- 350' x 160' Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0' Height: 3.0' above grade =11111111111�o� 7MAITAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Entire Grid Guaranteed Average,. 1w Scan Average,, 153,03 Maximum: 179 Mill inirnum: 124 Avg / Min: 1L24 uc (adjacent pts); 1.34 CU: 0.77 CV: Q_10 No. of Points: 72 -UMINAIRE INFORMATION Applied Circuits: A Color I CRI: 5700K - 75 CRI No. of Luminaires: 89 Total Load: 117.01 kW Guaranteed Performance: The ILLUMINATION described above I s guaranteed per +dour M uscD Warranty document and includes a 0.95 dirt depreciation factor. Field Measu renne nts: Individual field measurements may vary from computer -calculated predictions and should be taken in alccordalnce wIlth IESNA RP-6-15. Electricarl System Requimmants, Refer to Amperage Drowv Chart and/oir the "Musco control System Summary" for electrical sizing_ Installation Requirements: Results assume ± 3% nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structures located within 3 feet (1 m ) of design locations. Name: Football- 2 Sloe; 360, x 160` Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0' Height: 3.0' abot+e grade �+ 7MAlNED HORIZONTAtiL FOOTCANDLES Entire Grid Guaranteed Average; 150 Scan Average: 155.72 maximum: 179 Minimum: 124 Avg / Min: 1.26 Max/ Min. 1.45 UG (adjacent pts): 1.34 Cu: 0.78 CV: 0.11 No. of Points: 72 LUMINAIRE INFORMATION Appliied Circuits: B Color f CRI: 5700K - 75 CRI No. of Luminaires: 90 Total Load: 118.44 kW Guaranteed Performance: The ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed per your M usco Warranty dowment and includes a 0.95 dirt depreciation factor_ Field lYMeasurements: I ndividuaI field measurements may vary from computer -calculated predictions and should be taken in accordance with IESNA RP-6-15. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirernerrts: Results assume ± 3% nami nal voltage at line side of the driver and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locations_ Nary: Football- 3 Size: 360' x 1.60' Spacing: 30.0X 30.0' Height. 3.0' above grade kJ k1 ■11 N1�41NTAIN ED HORIZONTAL FOOTCAN DLES Entire Grid Guaranteed Aacra:ge. 250 Scan Average= 153.17 Maximum: 180 Minimum: 124 Av.g Kiln: 1.23 Max Min 1AS 4J C (adf a cent pts)= 1.34 CUl 0.78 cv+ 0.10 No. of PoInts: 72 LU15 INAIRE INFORMATION Applied Circuits: C Color •Cal: 570DK - 75 CRI No. of Luminaires, 89 Total Load; 117.01 k Gtiaranteed Perforwnce; The ILLUMINATION descrll�ed above Is C uaranteed per yn u r M used Warm my docu rnent a n d i ncl Ides a 0, 9S d i rt depreci atiarl factor_ Field rVJc asu rem a nts : Individual field m easu real-ents may vary fro m compute r-ca Iculated pred i cti o ns a Ind s hould be take n In a€-ordance with I ESN A RP-6-15_ Electrical System Requirements; Refler to Amperage Draw Cha rt and/or t he "Musco Control System 5 u rn ma ry' for electrical sizing_ Installation Requirements. Resu Its assume ± 3 nornina I voltage at I i n e Side of the d rive r a Ind struc:tu res I ocated with i n 3 fleet (1 m) of design I ucations , i I r INCLUDES: - Football- 1 • Foot ba 1 I- ?_ - Football- 3 Electrical System Req u i r8 me n t s: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System 5 u m m a ryll for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results ass u me ± 3 nominal voltag-e at line side of the driver and structures located within .3 feet (1 m) of design locations. Pole Luminaires QTY LOCATION ELEVATION HEIGHT 70' TYPE TLC-LED-1500 POLE 19 4 F1-F2 ? t ' - F9- F10 15.5p TLC-PT-57 5 3 F r FR - 17.i) TLC-BT-57 5 2/2 70' TLC- LE D-1500 26 2 F4r F 7 701 - 20' TLC- BT-5 7 5 2/2 * ? .' 70' TLC- L E D-1500 1 1 F 5 TLC-BT-57 5 2 2j' TLC-OT-57 5 .2 70r TLC- LE D-1SOO 216 2or TLC- BT- r ..� TLC-BT-5 7 5 2 70' TLC-LED-1500 26 10 TOTALS 269 This st ru cture u ti I izes a back -to -%a ck m o u nt ng config u ratio n rB Ia�Specis 7flietio .90 M in Poore Ling Ampera a Per (max d ra w� LuMinaire Single Ph Voltage (WI trkl (WI' I ) two �60} TLC LED-1500 B_5 8.1 7..1 6.4 5_ 1 4_7 3.7 TLC-ST-575 3_4 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.0 1.9 1.5, ■■11611- G1L` IJ J ■L' ' J Jr 0 L,' ■ r 1 �r aaf6%. R3 f F1 F2 P.3 TLC for LED Total Light Control NaMe: spill Spacing: 30.0' Height,, 3_0' above grade HORIZONTAL FOOTCAN DLE5 Entire Grid Scan Average: 1.1989 Maximum 7.59 Minimum: 0.00 No. of Points: 72 LUMINAIRE INFORMATION Applied Circuits: A, Be C No. of Luminaires: 268 Tota I Load. 352.46 k1 Guaranteed Performance: The ILLUMINATION described a Bove is gua ra nteed per Your M usco Warranty docu men#. Field Measurements: Ind iMidua I field measurements may vary from -computer-calculated predictions and should be taken in accordance with IESNA R P-G 15. Electrical System Requ i rements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System 5ulmmary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume ± 3 no minall voltage at line side of the driver and structures ocated wi thin 3 feet (1m) of design locations_ f � �Jx F-• 1-0 aF � o mom it! 111111111 11 91M in 03 35 F3 040 0 i ' S111 �• 0 'IN 1 1 IN 1 DLENNIE %03 06 P ' -F F7 F8 .hill; I 54 .. ..... 02 ... ..� .... 1 1111 111 11 111 1111� 11116 1111 111 111 It 05 13 .1111 '1111 1111� 111 1 1111 111 1111 1111 111 1111 1111 111 '•11 111• OS %r, •I r .22 IFI LLLL,-- ----- ...... ........ ---- t -------- ----- ...... 11).113 .113.05 Il1 1- .JI*F77 Y�,'� J ' ll_ ... "Jr_ 1111 1111 � ••,1 11•• •••, ,•• ....... ... ... Jill ...... .... .. .1111. ., 111. ... ... .. ....... 111 11 1111 11 1111 1 1111 ..... .... .. 1111 1111 11 IIII 1 1111 _ ..... ..... I 1 , AMP Jr rr -XI r _ Ir 1 4 Ify S�EllpJ 7 ■1 .1y� J Q J -- • 1,ji.0 r J NOT ES: An ;Bf# sol id wal I around th a fiiel ds, have been i n cl u ded i nto the spill sea ns- Pole location(s) +dimensionis are relativE to 0,0 reference point(s) � A C= MU We Make It Happen:-. Nut to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musca Sports Lighting, LLC. 019B1. 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LL0. Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME FIELD PHOTOMETRIC STUDY ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-E.2 LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES LINE OF BUILM TYPE SL1 - OPTION A 15' TALL PEDESTRIAN POLE SYMMETRIC TYPE V DISTRIBUTION 3000K TYPE SL2 ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT WITH ASYMMETRIC WALL WASH 15X90-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION RG B+3000 K TYPE SL5 UPLIGHT COVE FIXTURE MOUNTED BEHIND FACADE SCREEN 60X60 DISTRIBUTION 3000K TYPE SL1 - OPTION B F TYPE SL1 - OPTION C TYPE SL3 BUILDING MOUNT FLOODLIGHT WITH GLARE CONTROL SNOOT 40-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION 3000K TYPE SL6 LINEAR LOW -VOLTAGE LENSED LIGHT FIXTURE BEHIND ACRYLIC PANEL OF FACADE SCREEN 62-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION 4000K r. TYPE SL4 TYPE SL1 - OPTION D FACADE GRAZE FIXTURE WITHIN CEILING SLOT 30X30 DISTRIBUTION 3000K TYPE WL1 WALL MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE WITH TYPE III DISTRIBUTION 4000K 1 ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - ILLUSTRATIVE PLAZA LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER CONTINENTAL Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH E-E.3 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET ©2021 Gensler COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Pag 378 of 500 LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES TYPE SL1 - OPTION A 15' TALL PEDESTRIAN POLE SYMMETRIC TYPE V DISTRIBUTION 3000K TYPE SL1 - OPTION C Oil TYPE SL4 FACADE GRAZE FIXTURE WITHIN CEILING SLOT 30X30 DISTRIBUTION 3000K TYPE SL2 ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT WITH ASYMMETRIC WALL WASH 15X90-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION TYPE SL1 - OPTION B TYPE SL1 - OPTION D TYPE SL6 LINEAR LOW -VOLTAGE LIGHT FIXTURE BEHIND ACRYLIC PANEL OF FACADE SCREEN 62-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION 4000K RGB+3000K TYPE DL1 TYPE SL7 ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT WITH HEX -CELL LOUVER GLARE CONTROL 60-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION RGB+3000 K 2" RECESSED ADJUSTABLE DOWNLIGHT 3000K Top view (as installed) 1 Top view Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-EA Pag 379 of 500 LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES TYPE SL1 - OPTION A 15' TALL PEDESTRIAN POLE SYMMETRIC TYPE V DISTRIBUTION 3000K TYPE SL1 - OPTION C TYPE SL2 ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT WITH ASYMMETRIC WALL WASH 15X90-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION RGB+3000K TYPE SL7 ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT WITH HEX -CELL LOUVER GLARE CONTROL 60-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION RGB+3000 K TYPE SL1 - OPTION B TYPE SL1 - OPTION D TYPE DL1 2" RECESSED ADJUSTABLE DOWNLIGHT 3000K Top View (as insiallad) Top view Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-E.5 Pag 380 of 500 0 TYPE SL3 & SL5 TYPE SL6 1 `11111`����gp��u���1111111111111��i ,t�1,ir 111111111111111DVa . WM� M. lip --- 40 Jam` TYPE SL6 TYPE SL4 TYPE WL1 X MOL �N IIIIIIII I llljjl ��I11��1111111 {1�1111/Ijjlllllll� r i 1jI! fill' P....... ... r TYPE DL1 own TYPE SL3 & SL5 -,Wo ansler IMAR VFMTl1RFS INC_ I GUNTINhNTAL nFVFLAPMFNT CARP- I LAS AMCFLFS CHAR •16*1K ALMILIaLOIR :[01:411Lot i :�[91L I IA J JLois 1i r r_lmn., M~, ' LANDSCAPE AREA PLANTED AREAS 40,814 SQFT HARDSCAPE AREAS 30,030 SQFT SPORTS FIELD EDGE - ARTIFICIAL TURF 56,962 SQFT SPORTS FIELD - NATURAL LAWN 197,652 SQFT TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREAS 325,458 SQFT PROPERTY PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS PER GENERAL AND SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN: (1) SHADE TREE MUST BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY (25) OF STREET FRONTAGE. STREET FRONTAGE: 1,046 LF = 42 TREES REQUIRED TREES PROVIDED:47 Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 pr r otl Ll OF, 00!IIIIII 00 00 / / 00 00 ` SOCAL EDISON LOADING DOCK , /- , UTILITY YARD �.� fir:,- ,//��� vo 00 00 / 00 0� 0000 SECURITY BOOTH 00 00 /�.�. 00 SOLAR PANELS (ABOVE) BUILDING PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS PER GENERAL AND SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN: A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DEPTH OF (5) OF LANDSCAPE SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE BUILDING. PROVIDED: LANDSCAPE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED A MINIMUM OF (5) AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING (REFER TO THIS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE AREA). VEHICULAR USE AREA (VUA) GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS: THERE SHALL BE ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY THREE THOUSAND (3,000) SQUARE FEET OF VUA, WITH LANDSCAPE AREAS TO COVER FIVE PERCENT (5%). (VUA) SQUARE FEET: 194,142 LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 26,077 PERCENTAGE: 13.4% (VUA) SQUARE FEET: 194,142 / 3,000 = 64 TREES REQUIRED GENERAL PLAN: TREES PROVIDED: 32 32 TREES SUBSTITUTED BY OVERHEAD PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN REQUIREMENTS: LANDSCAPE AREAS TO COVER FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF THE VUA, WITH A MINIMUM OF (5) BUFFERS AT ALL PARKING LOT EDGES. EACH PARKING SPACE MUST BE LOCATED WITH (30') OF A TREE, AND ALL PLANTING AREAS CONTAINING TREES MUCH HAVE A MINIMUM (5) WIDTH. SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN: 22 TREES SUBSTITUTED BY OVERHEAD PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS l\k'0 ■ 1 r-- METRO GREEN LINE PROPERTY LINE ♦♦ 1, ♦♦ 6 _ .= ♦♦ :� o ♦ -�-� ♦=� h 1p%I r V. *&IIIIIII� ■ ■ 1 VA • ,1 Alk 1b II i&�, 0 I j l r 1O VEHICULAR USE AREA N 2O PLANTED SLOPE 3O PAVED PLAZA 4O PAVED PASEO AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS 5O POOL AREA 6O PLANTED BUFFER 7O SPORTS FIELDS SHEET NUMBER E-L.1 0 20' 40' 1"=40' Page 382 of 500 TREES SUCCULENTS JIV ti jty v ,1119 tr, y - • f +I• { �py1�•� Ar 4/ IF 1 4 '�'` - % _ �`-1 �k �:� �•� +V ',�` '�rllI ���', Jig ��: �+ — ��'='y --':; r' f! \' `\ fit\ v �� `� t #1�,/'� w •+\. ', # y I t �. ''x+.'v�-•i' i ,-v,,, _,'.'. _ 1 ! , f ~ it ?+..� ` rr a. �. - ♦.• . i, tir Jr!x� _ . ♦ J ��`'iaar.�,yYlk-,-,-��+� •� - / �r.. r ' 1F,� -1' '*f0� � � `� \ y I # 'Afi ' .7T �16.:• ... e p f r- r� r � -t + 1F' �• fir,, 1/ x: `' SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER �•r� `• . ;�� `�`+ :� � � . �,. -�. _- .... '� III � I - rs'. IF •1 1 1 •_i y '' 1S''y5x ti _ ! I 1 •I 1 �_ 11141.1 1�• r � Ypg , 1 �`. � /h,� � s• � .' � �' y' ,� 1 1 r � ti l4` •'' `� i.. y r' i'' +II �'' rff ,� 'i/+ -' + • •� _ j'• 4. ' ` l _ . w4�� r �+ '_ v _'„ �!' 1'. 1 1 F` n �� .,�' s�'�`PI '�V / �' V y� f7�t' �,I•�J,f1i�l;li ��ew' _ r f . r I e. - �,7 _ � - � � r'r"" "'ti ! ' f f � i '�' +..tipIS 'i%'�',�' �'''l, '''ri•L I' ll�i l - h. ?1j 1'{°�',r t`1r J r-• yrfi�• .�... ,3 - J� - ,r �`+ '♦'4�� + r e� • „'_ �R' yi r"•. w -,+' i<-} +C i.\' P. - {�,4ti, 1'. 511''I'E'I�' 4ti i rl1�r'j,r' �., 1 _ J Z ♦ * ♦1 1 1 �� 1 'i �. ?-� y , ♦'r '.z' ` � ', r L , . �J 4141� Jfs_ R�.'1 r'if � � � r *.'►' � � .�" r ;"R�►e... ? ��� �� ��; � 1'�, , , 1' • r � � 'r :ice, r r + ,+� •, • rr _ I �;_.-.,��� 4 _ �It� - - - :: � ? � ,,,�"` �. � - ri l . 5?� \ e`,Y\5�„� �' � �;;{ I� IrAry` t`• } rJ�! `,{ - r • ,',�/ f;' ♦: .' � . -710 `�. � �+'�t•�', Yt' � ��I�`.f 1��� r' _ _ _ s.ss �-�_�.-,.-a.'- - ,i,^:;'�.. '?'r � +�� \ �,.. a� /F" r ;�T �' ✓�,. �I f \ , \ : } .r tea- 2 ':� � 1 - �.� j 'r .t rF 7f,• } • Vie;. ��,:\ 33� � 'ii`id� - �� � ' i °�y y '�• 1 ♦ � f. � . -� i I --..-.sane ±�. frF p' '9i � i• Yf ,* _ � ��' , 1►� .F� 4' \ s � � `��al�'� '1Q y � :� i r ���'x f * _ ��y� 5 r� 1 i � _ ��T '� .i � ,{ ;® •.��!,� .:!= �-; 4 ;�, s , *f. szti .� +_' r.�.[ f "-r1 ,f'" ,,...f _ _ r_d 'I �; `� �� �.. T = kr '! K '� ;ry 'k I .' Ir. It 'i, '%Ri� r• i r - r/ •��....���d \ ����. A -,- ,� - - tea,a r r �oX',�-= ' '— i r �"�-- �. 1 �' p�:i1r J.r � `�1� •.��f �_ �r _ _w�L.,��-�= •+ - �` � ` � •� f '+ 1� ; V � ��j , �/'$ ' w � - , � � f . } �`T �ri - I 1 • � 1� 1 ti 1� 1 soN vim%`- _i�'•+t'iis. tlatll '.��-'.. d:•"----•''w$'�' ;'i a0.-} >..': r +fry ,1-rf'.�'i.. .a +�,.+:G.�•,�_ al �'�4. '�:iY''i',r .± s_ - �7' 1� �.� 1 .1 r .�Yi CHONDROPETALUM ELEPHANTINUM DIETES IRIDIOIDES FICUS PUMILA JUNCUS PATENS LEYMUS CONDENSATUS Large Cape Rush Fortnight Lily Creeping Fig California Grey Rush Sand Ryegrass , - .: �.. .-:. r.3.- - - - r�J-)., - NI•Z - . l� �� r rwj- :4I - My„ f- ' � - -"tf _ >f•' r 4+4 ��[ _ . , y� •' i %i Fh- ` k R r y r \ +\ r l - �• � .'. � �' �,.- - i1i[ __�. ..F � � I «.. 'A i 3 - C, J� L �Y^4 ,•ti"+ Lf' � � I r, ,��' �, ` �.•� • _, 'ti'.� rrf 1 r • ^rL' :3 r .y4., - dp _ f ra - / 9 - I ►� Y •L l Y xa" I i i •' t , dam` a e .� ; � • >I r '�' f.'s::�;'f '.fir' �`::� ' �� � �„• '.`*"R r i+ r 4 `� ~ �: �; .i�' , ;9�' ,: 4 � q � •�'' - ;� -'tc'. � `'S;;,*` � • ;cr' alf . � ` - r.:� . r}-' �, r a �' � � ' + + _iA �• y 'i� ti .- i y I� ar r ,r.s. Rey .� r 55 f 1. l� Yl F .. - - e ►. fi , ' _ lb INC - Ya r �_ •F1 5 R ? Rr r ?i' •ram .S'j N r f i i ti' � 1I� G �{,h. 7T �f* /a 5 � �. 1 4 4 'S` r �JR,,��-•'7 5,'.r'� - F r�� ,.Y . "I 7� �tx i .t ' '3 r - ,?+ .- - ,.rar `•or5�ri,�'. r+- - „a,'• y , s +" : ! r:' . ,/� j ..r' - _ ' _ _ � fi. f j �'. `4.� � �' � •ea„l L.� •� ♦ r �I � � , h • i � �• _ `4gyr• `jrf,� .Er 2'sri'yi'' }r� .'t�� '[n'- �• - Y ra -!♦' +'. '`Ca`,:li' . 'ti �� � � � •Ey :�•�# .�#lr} _ y _ � �. � y � :S*! �'i: �` c t+ �}• } �K ��rw;�r{a. :►� +r,,. - .�1•: \'�r��4-' ��_ -� .��+ �k ..e �:s ., Y. tia •, "1� '� 7 ; ice'' :r�,G> �`-- -+Y�� ff f -a•. r ti< ;. l �• f ;'. �'.e1 � E�'��l. �i ``. + f,4 - ti - R� .Yr '+"�, •!`-' ,, 1f ♦ + r -}+ - ./- y f f r r� 4, N �-b-Ij Pr" .♦ _ �$.\ ;-'.�ti'.�.'a- s; 4...'>k•,7�.} ?lr.. x� . '` . ` { �j "•I �' N � -l• Y � �f(� sr L .. •� ��� �. ,�.� ����'. V �1 `�_ ',xl�:�c Y � ,{-� ! j'y6.• - 1 ''y - � 7 Y `R r A �$.• F+?w�:b/'?+I.+q-�. . �. r [- ,� }�' \ t , V' 1.' -_ a ti r�� ' • f .-y >v yF'•�. ! � . �F ` ,.k�j`+ .-. rf�+r �''. �r.�.yy�a :- �_ k� ��tir ii�.1� ►�r�ir "# a'�7- .'k =.5� - !% ! f' c J/ r F a'� Y�,ny �yf. �i'-��-•'�•��'S'+Y->.t � Vt.?i IA l� - i • �.� ` Y� �. ..i..`� . .',✓� � � '� _ _ .�~, r.r1.ti. CAREX PRAEGRACILIS CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS PHORMIUM COLENS01 SALVIA CLEVELANDII SENECIO MANDRALISCAE California Field Sedge Yankee Point Mountain Flax salvia Cleveland Blue Chalksticks SELECTED PLANTS FROM WUCOLS LIST. CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER Gensler CONTINENTAL MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY PLANT PALETTE E-L.2 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Page 383 of 500 �n, 1 1 1 25' 1 1 r 5, 1 - - - - J L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SIGNAGE 17250 SF 1 1 SIGNAGE 240 SF SIGNAGE 300 S w 1 1 SIGNAGE 850 SF art -. Z- ielr SIGNAGE 4, 760 SF sm r — � — 7 18' 1 I SIGNAGE 108 SF pw• *- WEST ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE PARKING LOT SIGNAGE 2.5' X 120' TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,732 SF EAST ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE FIELD TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,814 SF Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-G.1 Pag� 384 of 500 SIGNAGE 160 SF SIGNAGE 21250 SF 1 I 1 1 1 1 I SIGNAGE 648 SF SIGNAGE 13280 Si SIGNAGE 750 SF NORTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE STREET TOTAL FACADE AREA: 10,618 SF SOUTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE RAIL YARD TOTAL FACADE AREA: 11,200 SF Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-G.2 Pag� 385 of 500 PUSH THROUGH INTERNALLY FABRICATED ILLUMINATED LOGO AND � BOX WITH N DIMENSIONAL LETTERS WITH FINE B 16 P-61P VDALWN-:51GHALE =Pffu1 DF FrntiFR F%-A LLVVI T.-ED UCV.CE EL I P Tr) PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION MATERIALS ! COLORS FINE BRUSHED ALUMINUM PANEL W' CONCRETE ENTE RLJ N E C F 3 H U C- H E 3 VJA PANTO N E 1 2C PANTO N E 285C Gensler 500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 213.327.3600 ©2021 Gensler CLIENTS MAR VENTURES INC. 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 LOS ANGELES CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER 3333 SUSAN STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PROJECT LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY SHEET NAME MONUMENT SIGN ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SHEET NUMBER E-G.3 Pagb 386 of 500 VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) COMMENTS SITE ADDRESS . . . . . . . . 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 83507 19 & 63 . . . . . . . . DECLARATION OF SPECIAL USE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2019-1466051, O.R. 20 & 64 . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED JANUARY 3, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2020-0006369, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE, EXACT LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE. 21 . . . . . . . . . . LAND USE COVENANT AND AGREEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESTRICTIONS RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2020-1306546, O.R. 28 . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT OF CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BELOW SURFACE GRADE, BURIED, LATERAL SEWER GRANTED RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1980, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 80-1197787, O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 30 . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED APRIL 15, 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 82-390912, O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 33 . . . . . . . . . . DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20161579230, O.R. AND MODIFIED PER ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 3, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20170489962, O.R. AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20191228494, O.R. AND MODIFIED PER DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 7, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0545516, O.R. 35 & 57 . . . . . . . . . . DECLARATION OF SPECIAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED RECORDED MAY 2, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20170489958, O.R. AND MODIFICATIONS THERETO PER 2019-1466048. 36 & 59 . . . . . . . . AGREEMENT FOR PERFORMANCE OF DESIGNATED WORK RECORDED MAY 2, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20170489961 O.R. 38 . . . . . . . . . . ANY RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR INTERESTS THAT MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY MAP DATED FEBRUARY 8, 2021 AND REVISED MARCH 8, 2021, BY KPFF, PROJECT NO. 2000081. 39 & 65 . . . . . . . . . . . DECLARATION OF SPECIAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED APRIL 5, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2021-0545514, O.R. DATE OF SURVEY . . . . . . MARCH 4TH, 7TH, 30TH, & 31 TH, & APRIL 1ST, 5TH, & 7TH OF 2020 OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP No: 71551 M.B. 1418 PAGE 45-55 WAS 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS, UTILIZING THE TARGET AREA AND IMPROVEMENTS, UTILIZING THREE (3) EXISTING STRUCTURES AND VEHICULAR BASIS OF BEARING . . . . . . THE BEARING OF N 89°47'49" W ALONG THE CENTERLINE AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS OF OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED APRIL 5, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2021-0545517, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE, TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY EXACT LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE. UTILITY NOTE . . . . . . . . . ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN/HEREON THIS MAP CONSISTING OF 13 SHEETS WERE OBTAINED FROM ACTUAL SURVEY OF UTILITY MARKINGS FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC DETECTION, AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM INDIVIDUAL PROVIDERS, CITY RECORDS, ELECTRONIC DATABASE, OR A COMBINATION THEREOF. 41 . . . . . . . . . . ACCESS EASEMENT OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED APRIL 5, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0545518, O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE, EXACT ALL SAID UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY, HAVING BEEN OBTAINED FROM OTHER SOURCES, NOT CONNECTED WITH THIS COMPANY OR LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SAID INFORMATION AND ANY USER OF THIS INFORMATION SHOULD CONTACT THE UTILITY OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY DIRECTLY IN PLANNING, CONSTRUCTION, OR ANY SUCH MATTER RELATIVE TO THE UTILITIES. 46 . . . . . . . . . . BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES OR RIGHTS WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF RECORD OF SURVEY MAP BK 89 PGS. 25-26 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY. APN NO. . . . . . . . . . . . 4138-032-005, 4138-032-006, 4138-032-007, 4138-032-008, 4138-032-009, 4138-032-010, 4138-032-01 1, 4138-032-018, 4138-032-019, 4138-032-020, 4138-032-021, 4138-032-022 AND 4138-032-023. 50 51 . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION AND ACCESS ROAD PURPOSES AND MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF AN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED AUGUST 19, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO 80-794764, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. ACCESS EASEMENT BENCHMARK . . . . . . . . . BENCHMARK J-36 SPIKE IN SE CURB AVIATION AND 120TH, 1' N OF BCR (SY4787) (BM K53) LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE THE MISSING EXHIBIT "A" PAGE IN SAID DEED. ELEVATION 96.72 FEET YEAR ADJUSTED: 1962 52 . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF 32 & 42 DIAMETER WATERLINE AND MAINTENANCE OF BLENDING STATION STRUCTURE OF WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECORDED MAY 19, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 94-973125, O.R., PLOTTED HEREON, EASEMENT LIES OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY. 52A . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCT, USE, MAINTAIN, ALTER, ADD TO, REPAIR, REPLACE INSPECT AND/OR REMOVE BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, POLES, TOWERS AND ETC. TITLE REPORT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT NO. 00158720-987-OCI-DJ4, DATED AUGUST 3, 2021, AMENDED AUGUST 27, 2021., AMENDMENT NO. B. FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED MAY 12, 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 82-487217, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. LEGAL . . . . . THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 OF TRACT NO. 71551, IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP 60 . . . . . . . . . MASTER COVENANT AND AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 2018 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2018-148701 , O.R. FILED IN BOOK 1418, PAGES 45 THROUGH 55, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM, ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS, GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6903 OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE AND ALL OTHER MINERALS, WHETHER SIMILAR TO THOSE HEREIN SPECIFIED OR NOT, WITHIN OR THAT MAY BE PRODUCED FROM THE PROPERTY BELOW A DEPTH OF FIVE 61 . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONDUITS AND VAULTS OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 9, 2018 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2018-231193, O.R. AND HUNDRED (500) FEET, AS RESERVED BY DEED EXECUTED BY CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., A CORPORATION, RECORDED ON NOVEMBER 28, 1978 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 78-1317577, OF MODIFICATIONS THERETO PER 2019-343932, NOT PLOTTED. EASEMENT LIES OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY. EXACT LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE. OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH ALSO RECITES, "PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ALL RIGHTS AND INTEREST IN THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE LAND MASS OF THE PROPERTY TO A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET ARE HEREBY CONVEYED TO GRANTEE, NO RIGHT OR INTEREST OF ANY KIND THEREIN, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BEING EXCEPTED OR 67 . . . . . . . . . ANY EASEMENTS NOT DISCLOSED BY THOSE PUBLIC RECORDS WHICH IMPART CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AS TO MATTERS AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY AND RESERVED TO GRANTOR EXCEPT AS HEREINAFTER EXPRESSLY SET FORTH" WHICH ARE NOT VISIBLE AND APPARENT FROM AN INSPECTION OF THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND. # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INDICATES TITLE REPORT EXCEPTION NO. 68 . . . . . . . . . ANY MATTERS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY AN INSPECTION AND/OR BY A CORRECT ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF PROPERTY. ®. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INDICATES TITLE REPORT EXCEPTION NO. PLOTTED HEREON 69 . . . . . . . . . ANY RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES IN POSSESSION OF A PORTION OF, OR ALL OF, SAID LAND, WHICH RIGHTS ARE NOT DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2❑. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES, UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES AND CONDUITS OF HAGEE-LEWIS PETROLEUM CORPORATION RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 1978 AS INSTRUMENT NO 78-1193524, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON 3 4 22 23 47 48 . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN FAVOR OF CHEVRON USA INC FOR DRILLING, AND MAINTAINING OIL WELLS AND FOR PIPELINE PURPOSES RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 1978 AS INSTRUMENT NO 78-1317577, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY "EASEMENT PARCEL" LIES OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY WITHIN EL SEGUNDO BLVD. 5, 24 & 49 . . . . . . . . . . . AND EASEMENT TO DISCHARGE NOISE, LIGHT, HEAR AND GASEOUS AND PARTICULATE MATTER UPON AND OVER THE PROPERTY, NO DOCUMENT NOTED, AFFECTS PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE. 6❑ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS PER DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 1978 AS INST NO 78-1317579 O.R. AND MODIFIED MAY 21, 1979 AS INST NO. 79-546231 O.R. AND NOVEMBER 18, 1981 AS INST NO. 81-1140869 O.R. AFFECTS ACCESS ROAD TO LOT 19. HUGHS ROAD LIES OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. 7 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 AND 70 FOOT WIDE EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES RECORDED JULY 25, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO 79-817589, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 8 26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN FAVOR OF PACIFIC TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY PURPOSES RECORDED AUGUST 14,1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 79-895746, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. �9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND A 18 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO 80-1197785, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 10 27 . . . . . . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, STORM DRAIN EASEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 80-1197786 O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 11 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND A 42 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE LA CO. FLOOD CONTROL FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES RECORDED MARCH 20, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT 81-285968, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 12 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO 06-2216963, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 13 32 53 . . . . . . . . . . UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM EASEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20080316665, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 14 & 54 . . . . . . . . . . DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20161579230, O.R. AND MODIFIED PER ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 3, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20170489962, O.R. AND OPERATING MEMORANDUM NO. 1 EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RAYTHEON) RECORDED SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20191072116 AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20191228494, O.R. 15 & 55 . . . . . . . . . . CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20161609377, O.R. 16, 34 & 56 . . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED MAY 3, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20170489957, O.R. AND MODIFICATIONS THERETO PER 2020-0378566 AND 2020-0378567 O.R. 17 58 . . . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 2, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20170489960 O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. 18 37 62 . . . . . . . . . . INGRESS, EGRESS SANITARY SEWER, DRAINAGE, STORM DRAIN, PUBLIC UTILITIES, EMERGENCY ACCESS, FIRE HYDRANT, WATER METER, WATER LINE, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SIDEWALK PURPOSES AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON TRACT NO 71551, M.B. 1418, PGS. 45-55 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2019-1313306 O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. SETBACK TABLE PER CITY OF EL SEGUNDO (PROPOSED ZONING) BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE CAMPUS MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FIVE FEET (25) FROM THE ADJOINING PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD, THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF NASH STREET, AND THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD, EXCEPT FOR LOTS WITH FRONTAGE ON THE PORTION OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD LOCATED EAST OF THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AND WEST OF THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF NASH STREET. FOR LOTS WITH FRONTAGE ON THE PORTION OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD LOCATED EAST OF THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AND WEST OF THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF NASH STREET, BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN FEET (15') FROM THE ADJOINING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD. BUILDING AND STRUCTURE SETBACKS WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN MUST BE A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN FEET (15') FROM EACH LOT LINE. ACTUAL REQUIRED SETBACKS MAY VARY DEPENDING ON BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS THAT RELATE TO TYPE AND HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. PERMITTED INTRUSIONS INTO SETBACKS ARE IDENTIFIED IN ESMC §15-2-7. THE CLASS 1 BICYCLE PATH LOCATED ADJACENT TO EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD MAY ALSO BE LOCATED WITHIN REQUIRED SETBACK AREAS AS LONG AS A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 5 FEET IS MAINTAINED FROM ANY BUILDING. PROJECT NOTES THOMAS BROS. GUIDE: 732-1G GENERAL LAND USE: ESSCSP (EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN) COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: NONE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA: EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN EXISTING UTILITIES: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE OBTAINED FROM CITY EL SEGUNDO SUBSTRUCTURE MAPS & GROUND SURVEY DATA. CERTAIN UTILITIES SUCH AS TRAFFIC SIGNAL LINES AND ABANDONED LINES MAY NOT BE SHOWN HEREON. PROPOSED UTILITIES: SEWAGE AND DRAINAGE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS. THE SITE SHALL TIE INTO EXISTING SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE. LOT CONFIGURATIONS AND SIZES ARE APPROXIMATE IN NATURE AND WILL BE FINALIZED DURING THE FINAL MAP PHASE. In214w/110Qz Sol yIIOV21i]:iff-11I*616MECIIIIIII 721IIIIIIII01:1121VY11ilk121b7:1'tV141mII UWTIZ&O WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO CONSOLIDATE LOTS. REQUEST IS MADE FOR A HAUL ROUTE. WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO PHASE THE FINAL MAPS. THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS MAP IS SUBJECT TO THE GOVERNING PLANNING AND ZONING REGULATIONS. PURSUANT TO THE PROJECT APPROVALS, THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATED TO A PARTICULAR LOT MAY BE INCREASED OR DECREASED AS LONG AS: (1) THE OVERALL AGGREGATE MAXIMUM PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT IS NOT EXCEEDED; (2) TRANSFERS OF DENSITY OR UNITS AMONG LOTS SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A RECORDED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OWNER OF THE LOT RELINQUISHING DENSITY AND THE OWNER OF THE LOT RECEIVING DENSITY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT APPROVALS, WITHOUT FURTHER AMENDMENT TO THIS MAP. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AUTHORITY OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, AND AS PROVIDED UNDER CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66427 (E), THE PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINED ON THE WITHIN MAP MAY BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED BY MEANS OF CONDOMINIUM PLAN OR PLANS WITHOUT NEED OF FURTHER CITY OR COUNTY APPROVALS PROVIDED THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CONDOMINIUM UNITS DOES NOT EXCEED _______ , CONSISTING OF AN AGGREGATE OF _______ RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS. SITE AREA EXISTING LOT AREA EXISTING LOT 5 312,543 SQ. FT. OR 7.175 ACRES EXISTING LOT 6 195,471 SQ. FT. OR 4.487 ACRES EXISTING LOT 7 206,967 SQ. FT. OR 4.751 ACRES EXISTING LOT 8 252,881 SQ. FT. OR 5.805 ACRES EXISTING LOT 9 73,235 SQ. FT. OR 1.681 ACRES EXISTING LOT 10 65,052 SO. FT. OR 1.493 ACRES EXISTING LOT 11 328,296 SQ. FT. OR 7.537 ACRES EXISTING LOT 18 799,640 SQ. FT. OR 18.357 ACRES EXISTING LOT 19 363,159 SQ. FT. OR 8.337 ACRES EXISTING LOT 20 15,170 SQ. FT. OR 0.348 ACRES EXISTING LOT 21 99,992 SQ. FT. OR 2.296 ACRES EXISTING LOT 22 14,250 SQ. FT. OR 0.327 ACRES EXISTING LOT 23 21,425 SQ. FT. OR 0.492 ACRES PROPOSED LOT AREA PROPOSED LOT 1 801,916 SQ. FT. OR 18.409 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 2 342,895 SQ. FT. OR 7.872 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 3 27,130 SQ. FT. OR 0.622 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 4 100,387 SQ. FT. OR 2.305 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 5 190,853 SQ. FT. OR 4.381 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 6 198,958 SQ. FT. OR 4.567 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 7 248,588 SQ. FT. OR 5.707 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 8 351,204 SQ. FT. OR 8.063 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 9 121,690 SQ. FT. OR 2.794 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 10 150,961 SQ. FT. OR 3.466 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 11 168,966 SQ. FT. OR 3.879 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 12 18,129 SQ. FT. OR 0.416 ACRES PROPOSED LOT 13 26,385 SQ. FT. OR 0.606 ACRES PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: Digitally signed by Robert S. Rogers, PLS Robert S. Roryer$, PLS DN: C=US, E=buck.ragers@kpff.com, y O=KPFF, CN="Robert S. Rogers, PLS" Date: 2021.11.04 13:48:00-07'00' ROBERT S. ROGERS, PLS 8348 buck.rogers@kpff.com CAND SU� * No.8348 \F OF CAOV G 0 SI L/ lKpff 700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 F: 213, 266.5294 www. koff. com --NERAL NOTES: NNERS: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC JBDIVIDER: CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 ATTN: LIONEL UHRY (310) 782-2525 ,ND SURVEYOR: KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348 (213) 418-0201 REVISIONS DATE ISSUED FOR DATE 11/02/2021 PROJECT NUMBER 2000081 DRAWN BY DG/SR CHECKED BY BR SCALE AS SPECIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SHEET NUMBER SHEET 1 OF 6 PROPOSED RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENTS (IF ANY) ARE YET TO BE DETERMINED. Page 387 of 500 6 0 100' 200' SCALE: 1 "=200' mr-� Iff"m a] _ C1la r a= WIV"-7 mraffal a] LINE TABLE NO. BEARING LENGTH L1 N00°10'54"E 33.48' L2 S44°47'45"E 2.49' L3 S45'12'15"W 10.00' L4 N45'12'15"E 12.00' L5 S89°47'45"E 7.07' L6 S44°47'45"E 2.00' L7 SOO'12'15"W 7.07' L8 S45'12'15"W 12.00' L9 N45°12'15"E 9.00' L10 S89°47'45"E 14.14' (-*nK1T1n1C:n1TA 1 7►' Jim1i70 11 1121011i0111, ARC TABLE NO. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00,18,00" 5689.60' 29.79' C2 00°36'00" 2824.82 29.58' C3 00°54'00" 1869.91' 29.37' C4 01°12'00" 1392.47' 29.16' C5 01°30'00" 1106.01' 28.96' C6 58°58'20" 49.00' 50.43' C7 90,00,00" 29.00' 45.55' C8 90°00'00" 9.00' 14.14' VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 8350 7 EMSThG LOTS AND EMSTING SITE CONDMONS PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE CENTERLINE EASEMENT LINE N NASH STREET rL S&W LS 5810 BOULEVARD I PER TRACT 71551 M.B. 1418-45 22601 IE CAL SEGUNDO HLMDD 0007AL 2250 CAST ILL + SECUMBO LLC 12 31 APN 4138-014-917 (NOT A PART) 185 3 DOUGLAS 27 SOCAL pAR71NIERS II I \\\\\141 38-01 3-026 DOUGLAS BY ?ACO Ff C BELL 4 �3��Oo 1 �3��Oo 0 =12 31 APN 4138-014-917 ___ CORAL C� R ( NOT A PART) FPCH LLCM 1 36-01 3-003 --APN 4138-014-917 (NOT A PART LOT 23 AREA= 21,944 SQ. FT. OR 0.5 4 ACRES 8 26 3001 CORAL COIIR 0 K]AH CAp[ITAL LLC 413��013�004 0 12 31 APN 4138-014-917 (NOT A PART) CORAL CR X G AK CAPI]7AL LLCM 1 29 O N �34�3 CORAL aR OCOCLaKvPE CIARQ 37IIAH N - CLLOO�nMSHI]p �N1C0 41 38- 1 3- 00 6 353 CORAL RAL UR I NM ER PROP R71IIES IINIC II I 41 �3��Oo 1 �3�Oo 0077 IIII LOT 22 AREA= 14,458 SQ. FT. OR 0.332 ACRES + 365 CORAL COI]R WIILLIIAfMI COODCLI)C KI RTHUR H OREEN1[3ERG 41 38- 1 3-008 LOT 20 AREA= 15,941 SQ. FT. OR 0.366 ACRES 12 31 APN 4138-014-917 (NOT A PART) 01 CORAL CO n HCP 401 CORAL LLCM 41 �30�Oo 1 �3�OOg + ►l i w 2'47 - 913.89' - =72.52 '_ s� a a lid DETAIL B A=9 DETAIL A L_ J ;PY FTI 92.4 z a lqjff 700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 F: 213.266.5294 www. kpff. com �ENERALNOTES: JWNERS: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC SUBDIVIDER: CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 ATTN: LIONEL UHRY (310) 782-2525 _AND SURVEYOR: KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348 (213) 418-0201 REVISIONS DATE ISSUED FOR DATE 11 /02/2021 PROJECT NUMBER 2000081 DRAWN BY DG/SR CHECKED BY BR SCALE AS SPECIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SHEET NUMBER SHEET 2 OF 6 Page 388 of 500 VESTING TENTATIVE TRA CTMAP No. 83507 PROPOSED LOTS 1Ut�.UU I1 �1 ULEVARD q- APN 4138-014-917 (NOT A PART) APN 4138-014-917 (NOT A PART) DETAIL A S. �v00 s5r. 5F o LOT 17 a o �o�� z APN 4138-014-917 ( NOT A PART) I-�� 8 2 6 o �`V S?ems, LOT9ems,�� >6� O �\ 6,o 00 ,�° � �_�. o Ln AREA= 121,690 SQ. FT. cb 9 O 's o /i N OR 2.794 ACRES ��` �' tx p, 5 2 A o �� �`� �`��' r i t oz CIA o -� P r co ��` 12 31 APN 4138-014-917 ,_x\\ (NOT A PART) ��� o) LOT 5 O AREA= 190,853 SQ. FT. OR 4.381 ACRES h w CD °gyp A=11 °07'31" � 0 0 0G3T p OF �� o � oo, � \ L=60.19, �O� p5�0 O ro _ THIS SU o IO V UMOO N � O � I� z 13 52A LOT 1 O i AREA= 801 916 SQ. FT. OR 18.409 ACRES 32 53 1 1 29 w 52A roll `\'°°�V"q' �°> C�^\I'D 00w� LOT 11 N o AREA= 168,966 SQ. FT. IM AREA= 26,904 SQ. FT. OR 0.618 ACRES Z rL OR 3.879 ACRES ARC TABLE NO. DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 00°18'00" 5689.60' 29.79' C2 00°36'00" 2824.82 29.58' C3 00°54'00" 1869.91' 29.37' C4 01°12'00" 1 1,392. 47'11 29.16' C5 1 01°30'00" 1 1106.01' 28.96' N 6 0 65' 130' / SCALE: 1 "=130' / >4 � r 6999 0b>, , N 1­d- AREA= 18,233 SQ. FT. OR 0.419 ACRES AREA= 28,004 SQ. FT. OR 0.643 ACRES 12 31 APN 4138-014-917 1 (NOT A PART) N o LO LINETYPES i i PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE CENTERLINE EASEMENT LINE w ►, G 0 S L 1Tff 700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 F: 213, 266.5294 www. kpff. com ENERAL NOTES: WNERS: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC UBDIVIDER: CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 ATTN: LIONEL UHRY (310) 782-2525 AND SURVEYOR: KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348 (213) 418-0201 REVISIONS DATE ISSUED FOR DATE 11/02/2021 PROJECT NUMBER 2000081 DRAWN BY DG/SR CHECKED BY BR SCALE AS SPECIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SHEET NUMBER SHEET 3 OF 6 Page 389 of 500 VESTING TENTA TI VE TRA C T MAP No. PROPOSED LOTS, PROPOSED DEMOLITION AND PROPOSED ROAD 7-'' rn 835077 Ef CE VARD q- APN 4138-014-917 INOT A PART) 2 31 APN 4 �138-014-917 (NOT A PART) F-917 (NOT A PART) 138-014-917 � PART) ,, ►� 12 31 ]APN 4138-014-917 P iy (NOT A PART) I P � TION / RE R 31 2 -014 1� A ( OT T A /8 i 28 LINETYPES PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE CENTERLINE EASEMENT LINE DEMOLITION AREA LIMIT EXCEPT METRO RAIL (MTA) AND APPURTENANT STRUCTURES AND/OR OTHER STRUCTURES/FACILITIES AS RESERVED IN TITLE DOCUMENTS G 0 S L 1Tff 700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 F: 213.266.5294 www. kpff. com ENERAL NOTES: WNERS: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC UBDIVIDER: CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 ATTN: LIONEL UHRY (310) 782-2525 AND SURVEYOR: KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348 (213) 418-0201 REVISIONS DATE ISSUED FOR DATE 11 /02/2021 PROJECT NUMBER 2000081 DRAWN BY DG/SR CHECKED BY BR SCALE AS SPECIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SHEET NUMBER SHEET 4 OF 6 Page 390 of 500 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 8350 7 ESTABLISHED INT PER - — IILLECIBLE S04016'52"W• i . . �� .,I . — : • �i7 �,_ •, EEL SEGUNDO• BLVD i��r �� i ��L T I I IT,4L 260 EAST EL �I1 U® �� ,• mm ��I E DO• LLC ;�► ���� I� � , ®® I 4138-013-02 mm !� w� /r D •OU L T a MIMIA'- — �-- � r�i�ii�— �� �� � �' I 138-013-02: • i � � ���� �� n.� � Ali i I 'III • � ' • ' p ► � � � �� ��"�'" !;' � 2u1 CORAL CIR � � � a,, �������� ��� (�I � FFPCH LLC • / •.� �` i, RN �• ,�� +` �� � ` /4t ` \ ,III ��, II ;� ®� ,� � '� �� � "�•��� ������ ♦e ,I�a�l �� . �i/. 301 CORAL CIR � �� '� ,,,0 '. III • - . - TR ��' �► it M. = 141 : 45-55 : �` . ► ,, �;, 1=—� i i I• � I � it � I � 1 � ,• ��� ��� s �� � I• � ► �� •� 343 COO FiAL IR • E IDE CHRISTIAN ' �' ��� �� �4 �� I'�,I � FELLO• W`,�HIP INC \/ "'�<-_ •�'� � � .• �; I 4138-013-00 I �:� � gip; ,� �, 1 �� �I� �.1','_:�ME' P��-.•OPERTIE INC � /�\ Ili 4138-013-007 ,_� � ��•., • / � f� �' ► � � ! � � :�il u�j 365 CORAL CIR d®M - �� � �� � •d ���I,'G� WILLIA�1 GO• •ODGLICK / Mill RFF�IM.I ►ON �� / �ie ICI 4138 013 008 ��� •� G �/ I, i �� � I� ilp�I �� 01 CORAL C I ���I., `tea/ ��I' ,•, , D'',,, ,,,,, '°, ��� _ ��� �/ i 1 - - ,, �� 1�o1 IN I 1002rdli N 6 0 100' 200' SCALE: 1 "=200' LINETYPES 4"OIL SC • PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE CENTERLINE EASEMENT LINE OIL UTILITY LINES OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES ELECTRICAL LINE STORM DRAIN LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE WATER LINE GAS LINE RECLAIMED WATER FIRE WATER IRRIGATION WATER PETROLEUM LINE COMMUNICATION LINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PLUGGED OIL WELLS PER CaIGEM/DOGGR GIS DATA MAP DETAIL B A=9 DETAIL A N.T.S. .G I I w lqjff 700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 F: 213.266.5294 www.kpff.com �ENERALNOTES: JWNERS: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC SUBDIVIDER: CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 ATTN: LIONEL UHRY (310) 782-2525 -AND SURVEYOR: KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348 (213) 418-0201 REVISIONS DATE ISSUED FOR DATE 11 /02/2021 PROJECT NUMBER 2000081 DRAWN BY DG/SR CHECKED BY BR SCALE AS SPECIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SHEET NUMBER SHEET 5 OF 6 Page 391 of 500 ?t,PROPOSED LOTS AND EMST�NG UTUT�ES_���r���������rl��n! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGrTJ �%s��'�_ --_ - --.nrc_��:'— ��� 11 �I v fAM NO MA IIII IIN �J � I, i ��■Ifh1 �• ip � T i' iti .. � c � �.��.`= \ � III `,! +� NOO.T PAST �JF ��•�APN 4138-014-917 �, IVI. B. 1 n18 45-55 € h \,�♦�, ®�11 A .A. _/I --_- —���- '•• ���i„��►i�i•� ( n �....•/ �'t+, ,III NEW, , ,, m��� ���� �.. / �'�� � �� I�I � I I"'`III I� hr' � j� � I� � �` '� '�`�'�� � • . • • •' 1 �.I. �I�1Y3i�L�' i'! ��i�'YIi)� � \�%,.. I / � R d� �� , 7 �I .!)+) I �� ��'���j �=�� '� _ ''�� +r' ;� .A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' � •_• ' ••• , • •' :�* � I � I�-��� _`:•�� '!.5 �I�-�i��� � ,1►�M�// •�/// //���/ III�IIIIII�// •// .=///i .` �1� 1r, � nAA�. �, .VA\� '. VAAVA�< ���,� ��A��%` � �• �Ir�1 �/�/ APN ''NN , , , //�i/i/ �/ �, �/ // �/ ' //�� � �i,� AA�VA A��A �,,. i R N O• 1551 '� . ��' � v i / /% //s / /�/ /� � � / / / �,� • � w v� / IVI . � . 141� 4 � 5 5 ICI �,,� • I - 4138-014-917 IIIIII!,I 111 IIIIV IIIIIIIUI"liilll�l� O A PART) Il�lil�ii►► � � . // // // // // /% / / i►/ _ /� �,� i � j / vvA�'; �� � � 'III Illllililill►VA � , � .I� // / / //// / / i--/i / � / � -. � v►v v � THIS UBDIVI ION ��� °'IIIV'I�li � ICI / r I ull / � � vA � VA \ VA \ VA • _ .�� , .a0 �� � � ` . . ♦♦ fir) �, _ � vv vA� vA \ V� V� VA VA �' �� ♦ ��� :%'- //// //��////// • ���►o` �� ,�'�� <ri ��a'� • `♦ �j�� �• � ;` • � iI ��U� vA �A `V � � A VAAAVA� VAA - / / , , - , = � ., �*' � ,� � 1- • •t � �, �V /► , �°I , v` w ,vim; vvw�� vvv ///i /// �/ �• �'%�/�i ��+0'`���, � . ,,, � � � �'' � o�'�;� �jll . ' VAA ��A VA VA wA VA \ - / WINE � ��� ���,, f dl�,,..►� � o��i, vvvv v/vvvv �v vv vv v v;,• v / // III� ..�. IIIIIII li �II\ IIIIIIII,!� •' // /�/ �♦ �/ ` Illllllg � •�� II Illlllllu\ \ \ . APN I i I •(NOT A PART) •��;r � � ���!�� �. ��.. �►��, I I Elm - � = � r .• �` ��!Ip'�,� ♦~ *� .�' �� � �� � �I` �\ �1►♦��`?r"=11 ' IIII \\ � ll„ uuiili � / I�ii► :- �.� .,� % �III1\III I % , ! �. :, AAA` � , �� _� .� <©® 1 fill • '� �•, IN, 101,11 600 No I��. A \ V �� PART) L� Iljlllll�llllli �;; �y� �� � , � �+�1;�;„ I � • !-It%`I HIS SUBDI�'i�IOO ��,. j �1� � ,���i. �.O' � III- ,•••���� \, �\ ,ti���� ��,� �>.. ��� \fir',, , `'� � / �' ; ; � /�5•��`�` ��,,,, \ ;`� \. lul„Ip.l II cp �'°. / \ �� '�f ✓i %`�� Ili, � \ i .�• '�`�, � � -�f� �`��� / ��°; , ,, � F N � . 71551 / _.� ,,,,,♦ .,, �,�i � ;, lip `'�;.,. �� i' ���'� �� <,`� ,, ��S t►M. - 1418 45-55/ �., �, � r� �. 1�11►11�. � IIIIIjIU!II " � � � � IIII �D��I„. i � �. �II - �O` ,: ` • �� �� - �1■ ����' -.. � .♦ _Lire...,•.+ � � .,�., � o``O�� � � � ,�' ' �������•��''' `.♦ . ' �� . • �� �; � _--�il...v'�t � �iiY� � �/ O` .. ,gyp ��� � � V�` '� � � � �'� III � � � � f � � III IIIIIIIIIIIIII// III " IIIIIIIIII^III; � IIIIIII I III III C c .� !� ,,►t �� `� � ��� . �.��� � � � � Iu�Vliiiluuululil�o° IIII � �` � IIII I \ \M APN 4138-014-917 \\ l � `• \\, �� �' ��) \ Ilplil,�1,, IIIIIII/1/, � ''��� ,+�� ,�, ,��,o � � � � \- ,7irI II•� L� ;, �. �,� � „�* ��;�. ••.� ��.✓ . \•r` ,. :��ice/ % �'� _♦ _�,VII� � �KmmN�'\■ (NOT A 6ART 18 ' (IIIIIII;. � III Ilol /�� �i ��i:�\�� /r �� � . ' �� •� � / ,,�,�\� \ ������ rr,_ I I► IIII III► � � mal "Al 1�� \' ��rh � � � � jP '�� �� n n \ — � _ __� � DTI • � � � ��� . c ' .ilk • �'+,IN,,,- /• 1 ��'•-i • , , II �4. � � � � ` � � � ��,� � �I.AI' '\ `'��, • , n Imo•/�%I� ,oa 9� N C7 ' .Q 0/ _ ,�z lxl� NOT A PART ��o 0 r / ■ LINETYPES N 0 65' 130' SCALE: 1 "=130' 4"UIL OHU E SD SS w PROPERTY LINE LOT LI N E RIGHT OF WAY LINE CENTERLINE EASEMENT LINE OIL UTILITY LINES OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES ELECTRICAL LINE STORM DRAIN LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE WATER LINE GAS LINE RECLAIMED WATER FIRE WATER IRRIGATION WATER PETROLEUM LINE COMMUNICATION LINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PLUGGED OIL WELLS PER CaIGEM/DOGGR GIS DATA MAP G 0 S L ii7ff 1 AND 700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 O: 213.418.0201 F: 213.266.5294 www.kpff.com ENERAL NOTES: WNERS: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC UBDIVIDER: CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 ATTN: LIONEL UHRY (310) 782-2525 SURVEYOR: KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348 (213) 418-0201 REVISIONS DATE ISSUED FOR DATE 11 /02/2021 PROJECT NUMBER 2000081 DRAWN BY DG/SR CHECKED BY BR SCALE AS SPECIFIED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SHEET NUMBER SHEET 6 OF 6 Page 392 of 500 Gil 'Y Ok E L S E G U N D O Planning Commission Agenda Statement Meeting Date: November 18, 2021 Agenda Heading: New Business TITLE: Proposed Los Angeles Chargers National Football League Headquarters and Training Facility located at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Planning Commission: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 2902, recommending the City Council adopt an Addendum to the certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR); 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2903, recommending the City Council approve Second Amendment to Development Agreement (DA) No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 (SUB21-03), Minor Modifications to Specific Plan (SP) No. 11-01 Revision A, and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01, and Environmental Assessment (EA) No. 1305 to adopt an Addendum to the certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for development of a new sports facility for the Los Angeles Chargers on a 13.7-acre site, in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels " 7" and "8"); and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2904, recommending the City Council approve the Site Plan Review No. 21-02 for a storage facility located in the southeast portion of lot 18 in Phase IV. BACKGROUND: In 1978, a Precise Plan was approved for Hughes Aircraft (which merged with Raytheon Company in December 1997) to build a total of 2,575,000 square feet (sf.) of improvements on the campus for a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.42. Between 1978 and 1987, the Precise Plan was amended several times, resulting in the development of 11 structures throughout the site totaling approximately 1,802,513 sf. of net floor area (approximate FAR of 0.29). In 2015, Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) EA-905 for the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2012101081) was certified by City Council. El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP), Development Agreement DA No. 11-02, and a Page 393 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 2 subdivision were approved, establishing development standards for the campus site, increasing the maximum allowable FAR to 0.60, and dividing the ESSCSP area into 26 individual lots. The Ordinance effectuating the ESSCSP and corresponding development agreement was subsequently adopted on January 19, 2016, and the final map was recorded on November 27, 2019 (Instrument No. 20191313306). The Development Agreement between the City and Raytheon Company, specifying the standards and conditions that would govern the property's development and detailing the Applicant's and City's obligations, was recorded December 13, 2016. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement, recorded on November 13, 2019, established four development phases for the ESSCSP area, illustrated in Figure 1 below. PHASE I - PHASE H = PHASE III © PHASE IV ;—: A ,<,aea 1)-1,p, .Areemem zo 19 ExI ibm LN, i �!Ai, EL SEGUNDO BLVG 17 • 1 9 r • X� - PHASE IV 78 12 6 \ Z 10 NOT A ART 1a 24 13 7 P Ella G�F�G Figure 1: Specific Plan Development Agreement Phases SITE DESCRIPTION: The ESSCSP covers approximately 142 acres in the southeast quadrant of El Segundo, east of Highway 1 (Pacific Coast Highway). The Specific Plan Area is bounded by El Segundo Boulevard to the north, the elevated Metro C Line (Green Line) and an older industrial subdivision on Coral Circle to the east, the Top Golf facility and golf course to the west that is currently under construction, and Plaza El Segundo and a Union Pacific Railroad to the south. Page 394 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 3 The applicants are requesting entitlements for the project site which consists of Lots 7, 8, for the Chargers Facility and Lot 18 for the Raytheon storage building of the ESSCSP area, located in the southerly and southeasterly areas of the ESSCSP site, outlined in Figure 2 below. Figure 2: Aerial of Specific Plan area and Proiect Site PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project involves two applicants (Raytheon and CDC -MAR). The proposed Project includes a corporate office headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers of the National Football League, on Lots 7 and 8 at the southeast portion of the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) area. The proposed development consists of a three-story, 143,250 gross sf. (122,080 net sf.) building, two groundskeeping and maintenance warehouse/storage buildings totaling 4,800 gross sf. (4,368 net sf.), three full size sports fields, privacy netting/poles up to 32-feet in height along the sports fields' eastern and southern boundaries, and two on -site surface parking lots with 348 total parking spaces. Page 395 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 4 Application Summaries: Site Plan Review SPR 21-02: Proposed construction of a storage building on Lot 18 (Phase IV Plan area). The proposed building is a 5,865 sf. storage/warehouse replacing two existing buildings to be removed in conjunction with the proposed headquarters and training facility on Lots 7 and 8. The storage building will be used for Raytheon's business activities and does not include any employee -occupiable space. The proposed storage building is one-story, at approximately 21 feet and 2 inches high. Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way will remain. A proposed 6-foot-high chain link fence around the building's perimeter, includes two chain link gates and two chain link rolling gates. The proposed storage/warehouse will serve as a storage building ancillary to the primary buildings located on the primary Raytheon Campus site. Site Plan Review SPR 21-01: Proposed construction of a new professional sports headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers (Project) on Lots 7 and 8 (Phase II Specific Plan area). Specifically, the Project includes the following: a) A three-story, 50-foot-high building with partial basement totaling approximately 143,250 gross sf. (122,080 net sf.), accommodating offices, dining areas, an auditorium, conference rooms, studio area, locker rooms, training rooms, a weight room, office space, storage rooms, a service area, and mechanical and electrical rooms; b) Two storage buildings for groundskeeping and maintenance totaling approximately 4,800 square feet (4,368 sf. net floor area) located near the facility's northeastern corner; c) Three natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter on the eastern side of the facility; d) 32-foot high poles and privacy netting along the eastern side of the site to screen the field from LA Metro's above -grade commuter line that abuts the site; e) 348 parking spaces at two surface lots adjacent to the building, including 24 electric vehicle (EV)-capable spaces. A proposed security booth is located at the corporate headquarters' southern parking lot; and, f) Removal/demolition of E-20 and E-21 warehouse/storage facilities on Parcel 7 and 8. Specific Plan 11-01, Revision A: Minor Modifications are necessary to update various Exhibits of the ESSCSP due to the Nash Street Extension, Recreational Facilities, and Coral Circle Connection. Specifically, Exhibits 5-12 of the ESSCSP need to be updated to show how the lot configurations would change with the realignment of Nash Street Extension and with the approval of the project. Subdivision No. SUB 21-03: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 that modifies Parcel Nos. 5 through 11 and 18 through 23 of the previously approved and recorded tract map No. 71551. Modifications to these lots facilitate finalizing the new Nash Street alignment and accommodates adjustments to parcels necessary to build the proposed Project. Page 396 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 5 Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02: Amend terms and obligations between the City of El Segundo, CDC Mar East Campus 1, LLC and Raytheon Company (outlined below). DISCUSSION: Site Plan Review A Site Plan Review is required to confirm that the proposed Project is in conformance with the standards of the ESSCSP including uses, density, approved FAR, Design Guidelines, and trip generation limitations. Site Plan Review SPR 21-02— Storage Building The proposed storage building project consists of a 5,865 gross sf., one- story, 21 feet in height, pre-engineered manufactured building. The proposed building is placed on an existing foundation located in the southwest corner of Parcel 18 (APN#: 4138032018) and located 15 feet from the parcel line, consistent with the setback standard of the ESSCSP. The building will serve as a storage structure for Raytheon's business activities and does not include any employee occupiable space. The proposed storage building is a prefabricated metal structure with light stone colored metal wall panels, and a galvanized steel colored metal roof panel system. The building includes thirteen (13) LED wall pack energy efficient lighting fixtures mounted to the along each of the building's elevations and above the doorways. Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way will remain. A proposed 6-foot-high chain link fence is provided around the building's perimeter, with two chain link gates and two chain link rolling gates. This fence is required to be planted with landscaping to soften the appearance. Submitted plans do not indicate any signage for the proposed storage building, however any signage proposed in the future would need to comply with the ESSCSP signage standards. Site Plan Review SPR 21-01— Sports Facility The applicant proposes development of a new sports facility for the Los Angeles Chargers football organization on a 13.7- acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus. The site is bounded to the north by existing Raytheon surface parking, to the south by vacant land, to the east by the Metro Green Line light rail, and to the west by vacant land. The project area is currently used as a parking lot for Raytheon. Illustrated in Figures 3 and 4 below, the proposed project will be comprised of a new three-story building, three practice fields, and parking in surface lots to serve the sports facility. Page 397 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 6 Figure 3: Aerial view of project site Figure 4: Proposed Site Plan 4 AWA M ILLIYIBYYCF FAIYGYAB -Z The proposed Project is comprised of a headquarter office building housing Operations and Business Operations staff near the center of the site; three natural grass fields on the eastern side of the site that to be used for team practices and scrimmages; a total of 348 at grade parking spaces along the southern and western portions of the site; and a pair of Page 398 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 7 groundskeeping and maintenance buildings totaling approximately 4,800 sf. near the northeastern corner of the site to provide easy access to care for and maintain the three playing fields. Perimeter fencing with scrim, preventing visibility into the training sports facility and the fields from the Metro line, and will start at the east edge of the building and surround the entirety of the playing field areas. The proposed headquarters building houses operations and business operations staff with typical business hours from 6:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Approximately 270 personnel are anticipated to travel to and from the Project site on a typical workday. Business operation staff and other employees will enter the building from the south, through a secured gated area; while visitors, media or other staff will enter the building from the West, through the main entry lobby. Architecture/Design Illustrated in Figure 5, the exterior of the building includes an iconic design and incorporates graphic elements to create a one -of -a -kind training facility. The height of the building is 54 feet to the top of the parapet. Exterior materials include precast concrete, fiber cement panel, aluminum metal panel, and a mix of curtainwall and storefront glazing. The metallic sheen of the metal panel and the matte finish of the precast concrete provide contrast for intended sophistication and complexity to the fagade design. Exterior glazing provides transparency and transmission of natural light, yet visual sun control when needed. A skylight extends over the lobby atrium and brings daylight into the center of the building. Figure 5: Exterior Renderinq Perspective Page 399 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 8 Fencing Six types of perimeter fencing are proposed on the corporate headquarters site to buffer views of the proposed uses from adjacent areas, and specifically to prevent visibility into the training sports facility and grass fields. • Type 1 and Type 2 Fencing: 8-foot-high black metal vertical picket security fence around the perimeter of the fields. The fencing will be located to the north of the field adjacent to South Hughes Way and to the east and south of the fields adjacent to the maintenance building and parking lot. Additional colored panels for banners located at the entrance to the fields in proximity to the maintenance access drive are proposed. Lastly, the fencing will be covered with scrim to minimize visibility from vehicles and pedestrians along the adjacent roadway. • Type 3 Fencing: 32-foot-high tall poles and netting along the east to block views from the elevated abutting Metro C (Green) Line onto the Project site. • Type 4 Fencing: 8-foot-high black chain link fencing along the Project site's southern boundary adjacent to the southern surface parking lot. • Type 5 Fencing: Existing 8-foot-high silver chain link fencing to the west of the Type 4 fencing along the Project site's southern boundary to the south of the western surface parking lot. • Type 6 Fencing: 42" high guardrail black fencing located along the western parking lot's northern boundary. Lighting and Signage Various types of lighting are proposed throughout the Project site. The corporate headquarters' southern and western parking lots include lighting fixtures above the parking spaces and along the parking lot perimeters. Similar lighting fixtures are provided adjacent to the maintenance building east of the grass fields (as described in the Site Plan Review subsection above). The corporate headquarters building includes ceiling slot lighting fixed to the fagade along the building's western frontage. Floodlights with glare control and mounted lights behind fagade screens are provided on the headquarters building southern frontage. Pedestrian pole lights are provided by the headquarters building lobby. While there is potential for nighttime use of the fields, as stated in ESSCSP Chapter V, Design Guidelines, all lighting will prevent direct glare onto adjacent properties. The three practice fields will be lighted by high performance low -spill LED shielded fixtures mounted on ten 70'-high poles providing an average of 150 foot- candles at the playing surface with maximum of 8 foot-candles of spill light at property line. Layout, detailed specifications, and photometric analysis are included with the project plans Page 400 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 9 and will be reviewed in detail for compliance during the plan check review process prior to the issuance of a building permit. Proposed signage is provided on all four elevations of the headquarters building. A 16'-6" wide by 5-0" (82.5 sf.) tall concrete and aluminum monument sign with illuminated sponsor/team graphics is located at the western corner of the Project site, at the parking lot entrance facing South Hughes Way. Signage consists of internally illuminated wall signs, illuminated freestanding letters and surface applied architectural wall graphics with team and/or sponsor related branding. The proposed signage is under 20% of each fagade as identified in the current Master Signage Plan. Access Regional access to the Project site is provided via 1-105 to the north, with an exit at North Nash Street, and via 1-405 to the east, with an exit at West El Segundo Boulevard. Local access to the proposed Project is provided via South Hughes Way, which is a six -lane divided roadway trending in an east -west direction. Secondary access is be provided via the proposed North Nash Street extension, which will be a four -lane undivided roadway trending in a north -south direction. Both streets will provide bicycle and pedestrian access to the Project site. Once on site, employees and players will enter the headquarters building from the south. Visitors, media, or other staff will enter the building through the west via the main entry lobby. Parking and Loading The proposed Project proposes two parking lots providing a total of 348 at -grade parking spaces, including 24 electric vehicle (EV) capable. Specifically, the parking lot to the west of the building provides 158 spaces for staff and visitor parking, while the parking lot to the south of the building provides 187 spaces for player and coach parking. Access to the southern player and coach parking lot will be controlled via a security booth and gate. An additional three spaces are provided east of the grass fields for the maintenance building. Lastly, bus parking will be accommodated along the western parking lot. In total, 20 bicycle parking stalls will be provided in various locations around the headquarters building. A truck dock and loading/staging area is proposed at the headquarters building southwest corner, adjacent to the building's main equipment storage area. Page 401 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 10 Landscaping The Project proposes approximately 325,458 sf. of landscaped area. Planted areas (40,814 sf.) are proposed around the headquarters building perimeter and serve as buffers to the south and east of the Project site. Proposed hardscape (approximately 30,030 sf.) includes a paved plaza to the west of the building and a paved paseo and maintenance access to the north of the building. The proposed sports fields are natural grass (approximately 197,652 sf.), while the fields' edges are artificial turf (approximately 56,692 sf.). The Nash Street frontage provides approximately 47 street trees. In the parking area, the Project provides 32 trees. A landscape plan will be required to reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department. Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP (Specific Plan No. 11-01) The proposed Project results in several minor modifications to the existing Specific Plan. These include modifications to the Land Use Plan, the Conceptual Site Plan, and various other Exhibits to accommodate infrastructure sizing based on final designs. To implement these proposed changes, the following Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP are proposed: • Exhibits. Modifications to various exhibits are proposed, including the Land Use Plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 5), Conceptual Site Plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 6), Vesting Tentative Map #71551 (ESSCSP Exhibit 7), and Utilities and Infrastructure (ESSCSP Exhibits 8 through 12). • Nash Street Extension. The proposed modifications include realigning the Nash Street extension. The modifications to the Nash Street extension require minor utility relocations, as depicted in proposed ESSCSP Exhibits 8 through 12. Nash Street extension may require modifications to infrastructure sizing based upon final design and engineering plans that will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. • Recreational Facilities. The proposed modifications would decrease the land available for the ESSCSP Raytheon employee private outdoor recreational facilities (from approximately 7.54 acres on Lot 11 to approximately 7.34 acres on Lots 10 and 11). • Coral Circle Connection. The proposed modifications would realign/relocate the Coral Circle connection to the Nash Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The proposed modified circulation pattern will continue to provide for future connection from the Nash Street extension to Coral Circle (an easement through Lots 20 and 22) and capacity for additional parking for the Coral Circle businesses (Lots 20 and 22). Land Use Plan and Conceptual Site Plan Exhibits Presented below for reference are: • Existing and Proposed Land Use Plan (Exhibit 5) for the ESSCSP Page 402 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 11 • Existing and Proposed Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit 6) for the ESSCSP The Land Use Plan depicts the land uses which established the basis of the ESSCSP. There are three major land use categories in the Specific Plan: Commercial/Office Mixed Use (CMU), Office Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU), and Recreation/Open Space (REC/OS). It is necessary to update the Land Use Plan and the Conceptual Site Plan to depict a revised layout of the Raytheon Recreational Facility and to depict a modified alignment of the Nash Street extension which is needed to maintain the private recreation area and to create an appropriately sized site necessary for the development of the organization's headquarters and facility. The following changes are proposed for the Land Use Plan (Exhibit 5) and the Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit 6) in the ESSCSP: • Parcels 9, 10 and 11 become 10 and 11 on the revised Exhibits 5 and 6 • Split Parcel 5 (becomes 5 and 9 on the revised Exhibits 5 and 6) • Raytheon Recreational Facility changes from 328,296 square feet on Parcel 11 to 319,927 square feet on a combination of Parcels 10 and 11. Page 403 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 12 i 01Mu I CO 25 - REcips k onmu r ■ V J 7 8 �M ~". OAMV CIMWC19 Oft, M,.Sd Use OMwce r IndvOnel Muold Use Recrea7orvOpen Space EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLAN (EXISTING) Located on page 24 of the ESSCSP Page 404 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 13 CMu O/1 1 26 25 -Commercial / Office, Mixed Use -Office / Idustrial Mixed Use -Recreation / Open Space CMu CMu 24 REC/OS 17 O/IMU 1_2 EXHIBIT 5 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN -9 '_3 '2 1LT1, 20 Page 405 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 14 i4 EXHIBIT 6 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN (EXISTING) Located on Page 25 of the ESSCP 24 19 23 22 EXHIBIT 5 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN (PROPOSED) *Drawing to be updated with approved project plan Page 406 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 15 A minor modification to the Nash Street extension landscaped medians and parkway is proposed to allow for infrastructure sizing. In certain segments of the roadway reduced or increased width to the median and/or parkway will be necessary based on final engineering and design plans. Utility and Infrastructure Exhibits The Specific Plan includes various utility and infrastructure Exhibits (pg. 32, 34, 36, 38 and 40). The following updated Exhibits to the ESSCSP are: Exhibit 8 — Conceptual Water Plan Exhibit 9 — Conceptual Reclaimed Water Plan Exhibit 10 — Conceptual Sewer Plan Exhibit 11 — Conceptual Drainage Plan Exhibit 12 — Electric, Gas, and Telecommunications Plan NH I i a FI1 .rl FH PROP091 n WATLR LINL H. PLAN SCALE: 1" = 400•LEGE1� _''�-- ow— PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER w EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER fUTILITY TO BE REMOVED j1,FH FIRE HYDRANT EXHIBIT 8 CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN 1•ROPOSM VAnM LINE RAYTI1B0N SPTC EX. WATER I.IM1F. n TX WATER 4 YHA �lI� `1H k'H t i WATER s.nus . nI II L1NF. d� Ik f'- Page 407 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 16 - - ----- �---XW-.�---=-�_=--=-=-=-�=•�--=_ice_- •- FL 5 cuN_DO BLVD . \ PRO ,(-TA J YF[TaOIN m+E ercTalac�+ -- Y ATEY LINEWAI-EKLLN]S . � � PROPOSI71 p I ' REC AIDEM e WA TF L1NRIf IA- - f WATPJE-LId`F. N WATER LTNF :°. X-RPCLAMIFI) + :ATER LTNS RN' KW { PROPOSED ^ RP,C TAIMrn PLAN WAILY LINE SCALE: I- = 400' t C L.G1E1�11.+ TRW— PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER '*w, 3 '--Rw--- EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER UTILITY TO HE REMOVED .�. FIRE HYDRANT RAYTHEON 1'r,lEML1Hll �� T s I fl i1 � 1(1;(�f A1MH1�4�4 P FW. RECTA174R.P) WATER LUN-F 7 PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER EXHIBIT EXHIBIT 9 CONCEPTUAL RECLAIMED WATER PLAN -Ww aaw +wsl li;w o- P Ro ° LINE L SEWER JOIN EX,, { BEWEIj., `. EX. SEWER LINE I' r RAYTHEON SITE 1 v �, •�'. %. SEWER LINE ' PROPOSED PLAN SEWER LINE ° I � LEGEND \ - -Sl — PROPOSED SEWER O INE ss.\ =s — EXISTING SEWER,., ...... UTILITY TO BE REMOVED FLOW ARROW k" �� ( EXHIBIT 10 CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN J, 6SEWER LINE 77�5— Page 408 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 17 ]DINEX_ 2 d' ,a• PROPMF STORM D1 i S.C.oS" RCP 5 M DRAIN r RAYTHF.DN SITE �. EX.18`RCI' STORM DRAIN PR01'OSED PLAN S ORIM DIWIN SCALE: T" = 400'2oy mo s j § iEC3END .° I -w- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN -sa EXISTING STORM DRAIN UTILITY TO BE REMOVEDP� FLOW ARROW a5 ' PRQI OSED GX. 96. RCP •— W 57Y1RhF DRAIN f -X 9q RCP .` �SfORM DRAIN ZPR—Op DRAINPOSHD _ ._- \. �a7• RCP r SiORI DRAIN STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN Li JOIN M/ k•.n. 54' nun STORM' RRA'i RM ORIfl n �' ^ SEX. I.' RGP t a; ST RM RAI s ,�" .-'- RS.. c' 110 Ci RhF ultnl�I .Y& F91 a EXHIBIT 11 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN EXHIBIT 12 ELECTRIC, GAS & TELECOMMUNICATION CONCEPTUAL PLAN Page 409 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 18 Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02 The proposed project requires modifications to the Development Agreement. The Second Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City of El Segundo and Raytheon Company (redlined to depict revisions) is attached for reference. The role of the Planning Commission regarding the development agreement amendment is limited to determining whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan. Since the amendment does not propose any uses or raise issues inconsistent with the General Plan, staff recommends that the Commission make the required consistency finding for the amendment. The following is a summary of the proposed Development Agreement amendment: The Specific Plan area is subject to a development agreement that was approved by the City in 2016, which was modified in 2019. Raytheon and CDC/Mar are seeking amendments to the development agreement. There are three obligations that would be triggered by the projects proposed by Raytheon and CDC/Mar. The first two are the Nash Street and Continental Boulevard extensions. As described below, Raytheon is seeking to delay the implementation of the Continental Boulevard extension, but the Nash Street extension sill go forwards as part this project. The third is a requirement that 7.54 acres of land within the Specific Plan area to be used for Open Space and Recreational purposes. This is allowed to be accomplished by either Raytheon making an irrevocable offer of dedication of 7.54 acres of land to the City for recreational/open space area use or provide employees within the Specific Plan area permanent access to the 7.54 acre recreational area in the Specific Plan area. As an alternative to this requirement, the development agreement provides the City and Developer may agree in their discretion to explore other means of addressing this recreation/open space requirement. CDC/Mar's proposed project trigger both the Nash Street and park requirement discussed above. CDC/Mar is proposing that it be allowed to pay $3 million to City's general fund to delay these requirements until the next development built in the Specific Plan area. Staff is recommending that the $3 million community benefit contribution will be used to support City of El Segundo capital improvement projects (such as for The Plunge Saari Swim Stadium Pool Rehabilitation capital improvement project), as determined by the City Council. The $3 million is proposed to be paid as follows: $1 million when CDC/Mar closes escrow on the property; $1 million when CDC/Mar is issued a building permit for the project; and $1 million when a certificate of occupancy is issued for the project. There are deadlines associated with these payments and the development agreement amendment will become null and void if the deadlines lapse. It should be noted that the size of the recreation area is proposed to be decreased slightly from 7.54 to 7.34 acres due to the reconfiguration of the parcels to accommodate the proposed project. Page 410 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 19 Raytheon's proposed project to move its approximately 5,500 square footage storage building triggers all three of the above development requirements. Raytheon wants to delay the Continental Boulevard extension and park requirement until the next development. As consideration for this extension, Raytheon is proposing to execute an agreement with the City which would give the City access to utilize the recreation facilities/fields located on the Raytheon property between the hours of 5:00 and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on the weekends. The recreation areas will not be open to the public on a "drop -in" basis but rather must be scheduled in advance as agreed to by the City and Raytheon. The use of Raytheon facilities will mainly be limited to practice uses but competitive team play by youth sports on the weekends will be allowed with restrictions. Raytheon employees will be given priority use over the facilities for scheduling purposes. The use restrictions regarding competitive team play and joint use of the facilities by Raytheon employees and the City at the same time arise out of security concerns by Raytheon and the need to limit the number of people utilizing the facilities at the same time. The agreement provides for a process whereby the City and Raytheon will cooperate in scheduling the City's use of the facilities. Subdivision Map SUB 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507) For reference, presented below are depictions of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551, Exhibit 7 in the Specific Plan, and the proposed Exhibit 7, Vesting Tentative Map No. 83507. The existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 divided the Specific Plan Area into 26 individual lots. VTTM No. 83507 proposes to separate and change 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. With the new Map, the total number of individual lots within the Specific Plan Area will remain unchanged, and all resulting parcels will meet minimum City lot standards. Page 411 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 20 EXHIBIT 7 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP #71551 (EXISTING) Page 412 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 21 EXHIBIT 7A SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL EXHIBIT INCLUSIVE OF VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 83507 (PROPOSED) Page 413 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 22 Exhibit Pnivel # Tract Map 71551 Tract Map 83507 1 1 - 2 2 - 5 5 - 4 4 - 5 - 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 1Z - 18 15 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 17 17 18 - 1 19 - 2 20 3 21 4 22 12 23 18 24 - 25 - 26 EXHIBIT 7B CONVERSION TABLE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 83507 (PROPOSED) & FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 71551 Page 414 of 500 EA-1305, et. al. November 18, 2021 Page 23 FINDINGS In considering the proposed project, the Planning Commission reviews components of each requested application and considers the merits of the project(s) to make a recommendation for City Council's consideration. This will include recommending that the project is consistent with the findings associated with the General Plan, Specific Plan, Subdivision Map, and Site Plan Review. The following are the findings in boldface, following by staff's analysis in normal type. Specific Plan Revision A The proposed amendment is consistent with goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan: Economic Development Element The City's Economic Development Element of the General Plan specifies the following: Objective ED1-2: Center diversification efforts on targeted industries that meet the City's criteria for job creation, growth potential, fiscal impact, and fit with local resources. Policy ED1-2.1: Seek to expand El Segundo's retail and commercial base so that the diverse needs of the City's business and residential communities are met. The proposed amendments are consistent with the General Plan's Economic Development Element and directly implements and furthers the General Plan's goals, objectives and policies above because it promotes economic development and improves the City's tax base through inclusion "of a full range of commercial, office, warehousing, and light industrial land uses, allowing for new light industrial/R&D, office, and commercial uses consistent with the existing Campus." According to the Gross Fiscal Impact and Economic Benefit Analysis prepared by The Kosmont Companies dated August 2015, the anticipated benefits of the existing ESSCSP included an estimated increase in the City's annual tax revenue by $2.6 million at buildout. In addition, the analysis projected that the buildout of the project results in 4,598 permanent jobs. The proposed project and uses produce the amount of employees that office and recreational facilities produce, business license tax revenues, and would fit with local resources to generate retail sales tax generated in proximity to the Specific Plan area. As such, staff believes the proposed project is consistent with Objective ED1-2 and Policy ED1-2.1. As such, staff believes this finding can be made. Page 415 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 24 Land Use Element The City's Land Use Element of the General Plan specifies the following: Objective LU4-4: Provide areas where development has the flexibility to mix uses, in an effort to provide synergistic relationships which have the potential to maximize economic benefit, reduce traffic impacts, and encourage pedestrian environments. Objective LU5-6: Seeks to encourage a mix of office and light industrial uses in industrial areas. The proposed amendments are consistent with the General Plan's Land Use Element and directly implements and furthers the General Plan's goals, objectives and policies above because the proposed sports facility and training center adds a new corporate office building and athletic fields and will integrate into the corporate campus environment and will introduce an iconic architectural style, have minimal traffic impacts, and enlivens the campus, creating positive direct and indirect economic impacts consistent with Objective LU4-4. Further, the project incorporates comprehensive features for site layout, building design, architecture, landscape, signs, and lighting, consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan. Lastly, a new storage building helps to attain this Objective LU5- 6 by creating a new, clean, and organized area of lot 18 in furtherance of the Raytheon Campus. As such, staff believes this finding can be made. Circulation Element The City's Circulation Element of the General Plan specifies the following: Objective C1-1 Provide a roadway system that accommodates the City's existing and projected land use and circulation needs. Policy C1-1.4 Construct missing roadway links to complete the roadway system designated in the Circulation Element when needed to improve traffic operating conditions and to serve development. The proposed Project results in the Nash Street roadway extension buildout, and associated public improvements in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement. With the development of the Specific Plan, Hughes Way will be connected to Nash Street through the south and eastern portions of the Campus (Parcel 19). The street will be dedicated to the City for public right-of-way purposes as a Secondary Arterial with a bicycle facility. The roadway design will be sufficient to accommodate the projected traffic and will connect the internal roadway to provide access through the specific plan area. As such, staff believes the proposed project is consistent with Objective C1-1 and Policy C1-1.4 of the Circulation Element. Page 416 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 25 Objective C2-2: Provide a bikeway system throughout the City to support and encourage the use of the bicycle as a safe and convenient travel mode within the City's circulation system. Policy C2-2.6: Encourage design of new streets with the potential for Class I or Class 11 bicycle routes that separate the automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian to the maximum extent feasible. Goal C2 from the General Plan Circulation Element outlines the City's objectives to provide a circulation system that incorporates alternatives to the single- occupant vehicle, to create a balance among travel modes based on travel needs, costs, social values, user acceptance, and air quality considerations. The proposed project will enhance the general welfare of the City because the proposed project includes a Class 2 or Class I bicycle facility along the new roadway Nash Street Extension. The Project will provide for infrastructure and facilitate access for various modes of travel including automobiles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian. As such, staff believes the proposed project is consistent with Objective C2-2 and Policy C2-2.6 of the Circulation Element. As such, staff believes this finding can be made. The proposed project is in substantial compliance with the intent of the Specific Plan. The ESSCSP's scope and goals notes that the intent of the ESSCSP area is to "...serve the mission of economic development in the City, which is to create, maintain, and implement a business climate that fosters a strong economic community, develop a strategic plan that will result in business retention and attraction, provide an effective level of City services to all elements of the community, and maintain the quality of life that has characterized El Segundo for more than nine decades." Further, the Specific Plan states that "Permitted uses within the Campus are intended to create job opportunities and seek balance between growth, local resources, and infrastructure capacity." The sports facility with headquarters/office uses creates job opportunities and promotes economic growth. According to the Gross Fiscal Impact and Economic Benefit Analysis prepared by The Kosmont Companies dated August 2015, the anticipated benefits of the existing ESSCSP included an estimated increase in the City's annual tax revenue by $2.6 million at buildout. In addition, the analysis projected that the buildout of the project would result in 4,598 permanent jobs. The proposed project and uses will produce the amount of employees that office and recreational facilities produce, business license tax revenues, and would generate retail sales tax generated in proximity to the Specific Plan area. As such, staff believes this finding can be made. Page 417 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 26 The Specific Plan area is located adjacent to the El Segundo station of Metro's Green Line and is a prime location for projects that would serve the mission of economic development in the City. The addition of a sports training facility and corporate headquarters/office use in the Specific Plan area will promote the economic potential of the Specific Plan area. Therefore, staff believes that the proposed project and uses comply in compliance with the intent of the approved Specific Plan. As such, based upon the information above, staff believes that the proposed Sports Facility is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan development standards and design guidelines. Subdivision No. SUB 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map) According to El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC) Section 14-1-6, the Planning Commission shall deny approval of a vesting tentative map if it makes any of the following findings consistent with section 66474 of the California Government Code. For the proposed project findings can be made to approve the proposed vesting tentative map and the justification in the affirmative of the findings are discussed below: A. The proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the California Government Code. This finding cannot be met because the proposed Project meets the goals and objectives of the General Plan, and it is consistent with the ESSCSP. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 83507 proposes to modify 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. The proposed modifications result in lots with varying sizes that continue to comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. B. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general plan or specific plans as specified in section 65451 of the California Government Code. This finding cannot be met because the proposed vesting tentative map would be consistent with the ESSCSP in that it would be compliant with the standards for lot sizes and dimensions. C. The site is not physically suitable for the type of development. This finding cannot be met in that the proposed lots meet the size and dimension requirements to allow the subdivision of the existing project site. Furthermore, the land use and zoning designations of the ESSCSP allows the proposed development. Page 418 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 27 D. The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. VTTM No. 83507 proposes to modify 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. The proposed modifications result in lots with varying sizes that continue to comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. The proposed maximum development density is a 0.6 Floor Area Ratio (FAR). This density is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. This density is also generally in conformance with the maximum FAR allowed in the ESSCSP. Each new lot will meet or exceed the minimum size and dimension requirements. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The proposed Project site is currently improved with approximately 2,089,948 gross sf. of existing Raytheon Company office, industrial and warehouse development, an outdoor recreational area, and 6,873 parking spaces in approximately 20 surface parking lots. The project site is also predominately surrounded by developed urban land permanently altered with buildings, roads and hardscape. There are no fish or wildlife habitats on the site that could be damaged by the proposed subdivision or new development. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is for the purpose of separating and altering 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. The modifications result in lots with varying sizes that continue to comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and this action will not have the impact of causing substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the proposed VTTM would only serve to alter parcels of an existing VTTM that has been previously analyzed for environmental impacts and analyzed through an EIR Addendum. F. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map would not cause serious public health problems in that the map is for the purpose of creating a new subdivision map which would authorize a revision of the size and dimensions for 13 of the existing 26 parcels in the ESSCSP area and the new lot configurations would be compliant with the standards related to lot size and dimensions as established in the ESSCSP. G. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Page 419 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 28 The proposed subdivision is not anticipated to conflict with any known easements located at or near the property. The proposed parcel configuration on the site has been oriented to avoid conflicts with existing easements, such as the existing Metro Green Line elevated rail alignment. Site Plan Review 21-01 and Site Plan Review 21-02 Both the El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC) and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) provide criteria for reviewing and approving Site Plans. Both the Municipal Code and Specific Plan indicate that the Planning Commission, or City Council on appeal, have the authority to approve a site plan review application if certain findings can be made in support of the projects. Among the criteria for consideration are site and design considerations including, but not limited, to parcel orientation and shape, placement of buildings, setbacks, building materials and design, distances between buildings, circulation, parking, fences, and signage. In consideration of these criteria, ESMC Section 15-30-4 D states that the Commission may approve or conditionally approve a Site Plan if it makes the following findings: 1) The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the general plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Zoning code; 2) The project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is located; and 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City. Under Section D. 4 of the ESSCSP, the Planning Commission may approve a Site Plan if it makes the following finding: that the site plan, architecture, and landscape design are consistent with the Specific Plan. Accordingly, the analysis below addresses these criteria and findings for both the Municipal Code and ESSCSP and the site plans have been found to be consistent with the requisite findings. Site Plan Review 21-01 Findings pursuant to Section 15-30 of the ESMC. A. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the El Segundo General Plan, the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, and the El Segundo Zoning Code. The proposed Project complies with the originally approved El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. The ESSCSP permits a mix of office, commercial, retail, research and development, industrial and related recreational uses and authorizes a 0.60 maximum overall FAR in the ESSCSP, based on the gross square foot size of the Specific Plan area. Further, The ESSCSP sets forth the zoning for the site, which includes design guidelines and development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to Page 420 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 29 achieve a high -quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture, orientation and massing, parking and loading, landscaping, lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The proposed development has been evaluated in the context of the standards from the ESSP-SP and staff believes the project complies and is consistent with these guidelines and standards. General Plan Land Use Goal LU-7 outlines the City's objectives of providing the highest quality public facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community. The proposed development is consistent with this goal since the applicant will construct the Hughes Way/Nash Street Extension concurrent with the proposed Project. The street will be dedicated to the City for public right-of-way purposes. Further, General Plan Economic Development Element Goal ED1 outlines the City's objectives to create a strong, healthy economic community in which all diverse stakeholders may benefit. The proposed Project is consistent with Economic Development element policies and objectives since it maintains economic development as one of the City's and the business and residential communities' top priorities, it diversifies the City's economic base to meet quality of life goals, and results in job creation and growth potential. As such, staff believes this finding can be made. B. The proposed project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is located. El Segundo has distinctive land use patterns, which are divided into four quadrants by the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and El Segundo Boulevard. Compatibility of an individual land use is determined mainly by its relationship to other uses within its quadrant. The ESSCSP area is in the southeastern quadrant, which is east of Pacific Coast Highway and south of El Segundo Boulevard. The design and implementation of this Specific Plan Phase II relates directly to its position within this larger context by land uses that are consistent and compatible with the area. Further, the Project conforms to public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice. The ESSCSP includes a range of commercial and industrial uses that will contribute to job creation opportunities and balance growth with local resources and infrastructure capacity. The proposed Project incorporates comprehensive features for site layout, building design, architecture, landscape, lighting, walls and fences and sustainability, which are consistent with the ESSCSP. The proposed Project will enhance job creation opportunities and provide a development that balances growth with local resources and infrastructure capacity. As such, staff believes this finding can be made. C. The proposed development will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City. The proposed ESSCSP development standards and Development Agreement ensure that the Project is developed in an orderly fashion. The Project's consistency with these standards, its design and configuration result in a project that will not adversely affect the Page 421 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 30 general welfare of the City. Further, the proposed project will promote the orderly development of property, the preservation of property values, and will be consistent with surrounding development and will not adversely affect the value of neighboring properties. Lastly, General Plan Circulation Element Goal C2 outlines the City's objectives to provide a circulation system that incorporates alternatives to the single -occupant vehicle, to create a balance among travel modes based on travel needs, costs, social values, user acceptance, and air quality considerations. The proposed Project will enhance the general welfare of the City by constructing a Class 2 bicycle lane as indicated in the ESSCSP Circulation Plan (Section D of the ESSCSP). The Project will provide for infrastructure and facilitate access for various modes of travel including automobiles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian. One example is the ESSC- SP project to connect Hughes Way with Nash Street through the south and eastern portions of the Campus. The Hughes Way/Nash Street Extension will be dedicated to the City as a Secondary Arterial. As such, staff believes this finding can be made. Site Plan Review 21-01 Findings pursuant to Section D. 4 of the ESSCSP. A. The site plan, architecture, and landscape design are consistent with the Specific Plan. The proposed Project is consistent with the finding above because the site plan has been evaluated for compliance with the ESSCSP and specifically for compliance with the zoning for the site, including design guidelines and development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to achieve a high -quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture, orientation and massing, parking and loading, landscaping, lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The Project incorporates comprehensive features for site layout, building design, architecture, landscape, signs, and lighting which are consistent with the Specific Plan. As such, staff believes the project is consistent with these guidelines and standards, and this finding can be made. Site Plan Review 21-02 Findings pursuant to Section 15-30 of the ESMC. A. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the El Segundo General Plan, the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, and the Zoning Code. 1. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo General Plan as identified in Section 4 of this Resolution. 2. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Objective LU5-6 to encourage a mix of office and light industrial uses in industrial areas. The construction of a new 5,865 sf. storage building would be consistent Page 422 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 31 with this Objective and would further enhance the area with development that is compliant with the established ESSCSP design guidelines. 3. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo Zoning Code in that a full review of the project has been completed and the project has been found to be compliant with all relevant property development standards, including but not limited to, height, setbacks, parking, and floor area. B. The proposed project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is located. 1. The proposed storage building is ancillary to the primary structures as part of the Raytheon Campus. Specifically, the design, layout, and use of the proposed building will be compatible with the industrial use and appearance of the project site that includes large, low scale buildings in a campus setting, along with surface parking spaces, truck loading area and travel lanes, and other ancillary structures for storage and warehousing. Furthermore, the location and site layout of the proposed storage building will not impact or interrupt the way existing uses on the subject site operate. C. The proposed development will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City. 1. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum has been prepared to analyze the proposed project for consistency with the original ESSCSP EIR and to determine that the proposed Project would not have any new or detrimental impacts than previously identified in the original EIR. It was determined that there would not be any new environmental impacts due to the construction of the newly proposed storage building, and; therefore, it can be determined that there would not be any adverse effects on the general welfare of the city. Furthermore, and as indicated in Section 4 of the Resolution, the proposed project is also consistent with the El Segundo General Plan and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Site Plan Review 21-02 Findings pursuant to Section D. 4 of the ESSCSP. A. The site plan, architecture, and landscape design are consistent with the Specific Plan. 1. The proposed Project is consistent with the finding above because the site plan has been evaluated for compliance with the ESSCSP and specifically for compliance with the zoning for the site, including design guidelines and development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to achieve a high -quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture, Page 423 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 32 orientation and massing, parking and loading, landscaping, lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The proposed storage building has been evaluated in the context of the standards from the ESSPSP and have been determined to be compliant and therefore the project is consistent with these guidelines and standards. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW On December 15, 2015, the City adopted Resolution No. 4958, certifying the ESSCSP FEIR (Environmental Assessment No. EA-905), State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2012101081, in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The certified EIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the ESSCSP. Since the proposed Project deviates from the approved specific plan, the City's environmental consultant independently reviewed the modifications and determined that no new significant environmental impacts would result, and the modifications will not increase the severity of any effects previously identified in the EIR. As such, an Addendum has been prepared to address the minor changes to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) (Specific Plan No. 11-01), resulting from the proposed project. Based upon the proposed Project, a fair share percentage has been calculated towards each traffic improvement identified in the ESSCSP EIR's traffic mitigation measures TRA- 1 through 9. The 10.6% contribution is based on the methodology provided in the First Amendment of the DA No. 11-02 Section 7.9, which states that "...the `Fair Share' is determined by dividing the number of PM peak hour trips produced by the individual development seeking a Certificate of Occupancy by the total Project PM peak hour trips Ceiling as noted in City Council Ordinance No. 1516, Exhibit D `Conditions of Approval' (3,120)." The applicant will need to continue to work with the City to determine the total construction value (cost estimate for design and building for improvement, and for right- of-way acquisition) of the TRA-1 through 9 improvements to be accepted and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall submit 10.06% fair share contribution towards each traffic improvement identified in the ESSCSP EIR per DA No. 11-02 Amendment 1 Section 7.9, to the City prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION During the public comment period, staff received a comment (attached) citing a newspaper article that indicated 5,000 fans for events. It is important to note that the applicant has not decided whether such events will occur. Consequently, special events and related 5,000 spectators/fans is not part of the proposed project. Further, any special event in the future would require submittal of a temporary event permit that would be reviewed based upon details of anticipated attendance, duration and logistics. Page 424 of 500 EA-1305 November 18, 2021 Page 33 RECOMMENDATION The proposed project involves a new three-story Los Angeles Chargers headquarters and training facility along with associated structures, athletic fields, and surface level parking. Additionally, a new one-story storage building for use by Raytheon would also be constructed. The Project complies with the development standards as set forth in the El the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Furthermore, based on the EIR Addendum prepared for this project, the Project does not create new significant adverse impacts or increase the severity of a significant adverse impact identified in the original EIR. Therefore, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 2902 recommending City Council adopt an Addendum to the original ESSCSP EIR; adopt Resolution 2903 recommending City Council approve the Second Amendment to Development Agreement (DA) No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 (SUB21-03), Minor Modifications to Specific Plan (SP) No. 11-01 Revision A, and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01 for development of a new professional sports headquarters and training facility on a 13.7-acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7" and "8"); and adopt Resolution 2904 recommending City Council approve Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-02 for a Storage Facility to be located in the southeast portion of lot 18 in Phase IV. ORIGINATED BY: Bradley J. Misner, AICP Contract Planner REVIEWED BY: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Planning Manager APPROVED BY: Michael Allen, AICP, Director of Development Services ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2902 Exhibit A —Addendum to ESSCSP EIR 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2903 Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval Exhibit B — Minor Modifications to ESSCSP 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2904 Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 4. Sports Facility Proposed Development Plans/Exhibits dated October 21, 2021 5. Butler Building Proposed Development Plans/Exhibits dated October 21, 2021 6. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 83507 7. Final Draft DA Amendment and Park Use MOU 8. Public Comment Page 425 of 500 Give} City Council Agenda Statement ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Staff Presentations Item Number: D.17 TITLE: Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the City's participation in two national opioid litigation settlements and authorizing the City Manager to execute related participation and related implementation agreements. FISCAL IMPACT: Based on information from the administrator for the Litigation plaintiffs' Settlement and the Office of the State of Attorney General, the City is estimated to receive a maximum settlement sum of $516,000 over the term of years discussed above. This estimated total sum assumes a maximum of 100 percent participation from the total potential eligible states, counties, and cities. The City's final settlement share will be determined after January 2, 2022, the final day for jurisdictions to opt into the settlement. Upon this determination, the City would elect whether to direct its funds to the county of Los Angeles ("County") or receive the funds directly at least 60 days before the first distribution. Funds must be used within certain time limitations for so-called "Opioid Remediation Uses," such as expanding training for the first responders' use of FDA - approved drugs to reverse overdoses, with at least 50 percent of the total funds being used for "High Impact Abatement Activities," including funding intervention measures to prevent addition in vulnerable youth. The City's direct receipt of the settlement funds would also require the City's annual reporting of its funding and subject it to related auditing. The City would make a determination annually whether to receive forthcoming settlement funds directly or direct them to the County without being bound by any previous year's funding decision. BACKGROUND: Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is multidistrict litigation ("Litigation") numerous public entity plaintiffs have pursued against the manufacturers and distributors of various opioids based on the allegation that the Page 426 of 500 Resolution Approving Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 3 defendants' unlawful conduct caused the opioid epidemic. On or about July 1, 2021, a proposed nationwide tentative global settlement ("Settlement") was reached between the plaintiffs in the Litigation and several of the defendants, specifically McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation (collectively, "Distributors"), and Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil- Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. (collectively, "Manufacturers") (all collectively, "Settling Defendants"). The Settlement's terms are set forth in the Distributors Master Settlement Agreement and Manufacturers Master Settlement Agreement (collectively "Settlement Agreements"), and copies of the Settlement Agreements are on file with the City Clerk and available upon request. (The Settlement Agreements' text is also available for download: https:HnationaIopioidsettlement.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/1 1 /Final-Distributor- Settlement-Agreement-10.22.2021-Exhibit-Updates .pdfand https:HnationaIopioidsettlement.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/1 1 /Janssen-agreement- 20211105.pdf) The Settlement would require the Distributors and Manufacturers to respectively pay approximately $21 billion over 18 years and $5 billion over seven years to participating states, counties, and cities. The state of California ("State") would receive approximately $2.2 billion of the estimated $21 billion total, a portion of which would be distributed to counties and cities. Local subdivisions with a population over 10,000, including the City, that are not plaintiffs in the Litigation can participate in the Settlement and obtain certain Settlement funds, in exchange for a release of claims against the Settling Defendants. The total amount of Settlement funds increases in proportion to the number of states and local subdivisions that opt in to participate in the Settlement. DISCUSSION: To participate in the Settlement, the City must execute two allocation agreements with the State to facilitate the distribution of Settlement funds for the City ("Allocation Agreements")(The Subdivision Agreements' text is also available for download: https://oag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/final-proposed-ca-state-subdivision- agreement-distributors-settlement.pdf; https://oag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/final- proposed-ca-state-subdivision-agreement-Janssen-settlement.pdf.). The City must also execute two participation forms ("Participation Forms")(Included as Exhibit "K" to each of the Settlement Agreements) to confirm its participation in the Settlement and the terms of the Settlement Agreement, including the dismissal of the Litigation, payment of Settlement funds, and associated release of claims against the Settlement Defendants. Copies of the Allocation Agreements and Participation Forms are on file with the City Clerk and available upon request. The proposed Resolution would approve the City's participation in the Settlement and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary related agreements and forms as approved by the City Attorney. Page 427 of 500 Resolution Approving Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 3 CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 2: Support Community Safety and Preparedness Objective: El Segundo is a safe and prepared city. PREPARED BY: Joaquin Vasquez, Assistant City Attorney REVIEWED BY: Mark Hensley, City Attorney APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution - Opioid Settlements Page 428 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN TWO NATIONAL OPIOID LITIGATION SETTLEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER EXECUTION OF RELATED PARTICIPATION AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS. The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds as follows: A. Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is multidistrict litigation ("Litigation") numerous public entity plaintiffs have pursued against the manufacturers and distributors of various opioids based on the allegation that the defendants' unlawful conduct caused the opioid epidemic. B. On or about July 1, 2021, a proposed nationwide tentative global settlement ("Settlement") was reached between the plaintiffs in the Litigation and several of the defendants, specifically McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation (collectively, "Distributors"), and Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. (collectively, "Manufacturers") (all collectively, "Settling Defendants"). C. The Settlement's terms are set forth in the Distributors Master Settlement Agreement and the Manufacturers Master Settlement Agreement (collectively "Settlement Agreements"), and copies of the Settlement Agreements are on file with the City Clerk and available upon request. D. The Settlement would require the Distributors and Manufacturers to respectively pay approximately $21 billion over 18 years and $5 billion over seven years to participating states, counties, and cities. E. The state of California ("State") would receive approximately $2.2 billion of the estimated $21 billion total, a portion which would be distributed to counties and cities. F. Under the Settlement, local subdivisions with population over 10,000, including the city of El Segundo (the "City"), that are not plaintiffs in the Litigation may participate in the Settlement and obtain certain Settlement funds, in exchange for a release of claims against the Settling Defendants. G. The total amount of Settlement funds increases in proportion to the number of states and local subdivisions that opt in to participate in the Settlement. H. To participate in the Settlement, the City must execute two allocation agreements with the State to facilitate the distribution Settlement funds for the Page 429 of 500 Resolution No. Page 2of3 City ("Allocation Agreements"). Copies of the Allocation Agreements are on file with the City Clerk and available upon request. The City must also execute two participation forms ("Participation Forms") to confirm its participation in the Settlement and the terms of the Settlement Agreement, including the dismissal of the Litigation, payment of Settlement funds, and associated release of claims against the Settlement Defendants. Copies of the Participation Forms are on file with the City Clerk and available upon request. SECTION 2. Approval and Authorization. The City Council approves the City's participation in the Settlement and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Allocation Agreements, Participation Forms, and all other necessary documents —subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney or designee —to effectuate such participation. SECTION 3. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. SECTION 4. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature. SECTION 5. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded. SECTION 7. City Clerk Actions. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make a record of this action in the meeting's minutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Drew Boyles, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ) Page 430 of 500 Resolution No. Page 3of3 I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk /_1NU:;I0T/21o7_v2to] 2IfflV0751 Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney Page 431 of 500 {.,rVoy City Council Agenda Statement ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Staff Presentations Item Number: D.18 TITLE: Citywide Salary Schedule Update RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution to approve the Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4, 2011, with revisions through December 7, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: The attached schedule reflects positions and salaries previously approved by City Council and incorporated in the adopted FY 2021-2022 Citywide Budget. Sufficient funding for State of California mandated minimum wage increase is available in the adopted budget. No new funding is required for FY 2021-2022. BACKGROUND: The City of El Segundo contracts with the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS) for retirement benefits. CaIPERS requires that the governing bodies of their contracting agencies approve and post publicly available salary schedules for their employees. The City Council has previously approved the positions and salaries reflected on the attached pay schedule through resolutions for Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU"), salaries and conditions of employment for various unrepresented employee groups, contract employees and elected officials, as well as mandated minimum wage increases. The City posts these approved salary schedules, in conjunction with the MOUs, contracts and resolutions, on the City's internet website for public review. Effective January 1, 2022, the State of California is mandating a minimum wage increase from $14.00 to $15.00 per hour. To comply with the law, employees in positions with a pay rate below $15.00 per hour will be placed in the next available salary step to bring their pay rate to the new minimum wage. In order to more clearly adhere to CaIPERS guidelines that were implemented in August Page 432 of 500 Adoption of Citywide Salary Schedule and Revisions Through January 1, 2022 December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 3 2011 and to confirm the City is in compliance with Government Code §20636 and California Code of Regulations ("CCR") §570.5, the attached Citywide salary schedule effective October 4, 2011 with revisions through December 7, 2021, is being submitted for the City Council to approve. DISCUSSION: On August 10, 2011, CaIPERS implemented CCR 570.5 which requires that the City Council regularly adopt a Citywide Public Pay Schedule listing the pay rates/ranges for all City of El Segundo established positions, including the City Council, Elected Officials, and City Manager. The City Council has adopted contracts, MOUs, revised classifications, and minimum salary range adjustments, which have resulted in changes to the wages of certain positions. CalPERS determines the amount of "compensation earnable" as defined under Government Code Sections §20630, 20636, and 20636.1 as a pay rate limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule that meets the following requirements: Has been duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with the requirements of applicable public meetings laws; 2. Identifies the position title for every employee position; 3. Shows the payrate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for each identified position; 4. Indicates the time base such as hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually; 5. It is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's Internet website; 6. Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions; 7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and 8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the payrate. To confirm compliance with CalPERS regulations, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4, 2011 with revisions through December 7, 2021, and also approving adjustments to salaries for positions below the State of California mandated minimum wage rate of $15.00 per hour. Page 433 of 500 Adoption of Citywide Salary Schedule and Revisions Through January 1, 2022 December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 3 CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Objective 1 A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external customers. Goal 3: Develop as a Choice Employer and Workforce Objective: El Segundo is a city employer of choice and consistently hires for the future, with a workforce that is inspired, world -class and engaged, demonstrating increasing stability and innovation. PREPARED BY: Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director REVIEWED BY: Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Resolution - Citywide Salary Schedule 2. Citywide Salary Schedule Effective October 4, 2011 and Revisions Through December 7, 2021 Page 434 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. Number A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 4, 2011, WITH REVISIONS THROUGH DECEMBER 7, 2021 WHEREAS, (1) the City Council shall approve the salary pay rates and ranges for each classified position and may update them from time -to -time as deemed necessary pursuant to the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, (2) the State of California minimum wage law will increase from $14.00 per hour to $15.00 per hour, effective January 1, 2022, requiring a revision to the hourly pay schedule for part-time/hourly/non-permanent/temporary and non -classified employees accordingly; and WHEREAS, (3) to comply with California Code of Regulations ("CCR") 570.5, which was adopted by CalPERS April 13, 2011, with an effective date of August 10, 2011, the City's salary schedule effective October 4, 2011 with revisions through December 7, 2021, must be adopted by the governing body (i.e. City Council); now, therefore be it RESOLVED, (a) The City Council does herby approve and adopt the Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4, 2011, with all revisions through December 7, 2021 bringing the City into compliance with CCR 570 and the State of California minimum wage increase, effective January 1, 2022 (Exhibit 1). RESOLVED, (b) With the exception of having been approved and adopted by the agency's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meeting laws, all required elements necessary to meet the definition for a publicly available pay schedule were met. This includes: • Identifies the position title for every employee position; • Shows the pay rate for every identified position, which may be stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range; • Indicates the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bimonthly, bi- weekly, or annually; • Is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible an available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's internet website; • Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions; • Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and • Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate. RESOLVED, (c) That the executive body appoint and direct, and it does hereby appoint and direct, the City Clerk to file with the Board a verified copy of this resolution, and to perform on behalf of City of El Segundo all functions required of it under the Act; and be it further Page 435 of 500 RESOLVED, (d) That coverage under the Act be effective on December 7, 2021. Adopted at a regular meeting of the El Segundo City Council at El Segundo, CA, this 7th day of December, 2021. Signed: Drew Boyles, Mayor Attest: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk Attachment: Exhibit 1- Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4, 2011 and all Revisions through December 7, 2021. Page 436 of 500 Page 437 of 500 CITYWIDE PUBLIC PAY SCHEDULE - EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 4, 2011 REVISION DATE - DECEMBER 7, 2021 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL ESCEA SALARY SCHEDULE 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Accounting Technician ESCEA 22 Hourly 26.73 4633.14 55597.68 28.07 4864.80 58377.60 29.47 5108.04 61296.48 30.94 5363.44 64361.28 32.49 5631.61 67579.32 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Accounts Specialist I ESCEA 12 Hourly 20.88 3619.38 43432.56 21.93 3800.35 45604.20 23.02 3990.37 47884.44 24.17 4189.89 50278.68 25.38 4399.39 52792.68 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Accounts Specialist II ESCEA 18 Hourly 24.22 4197.42 50369.04 25.43 4407.28 52887.36 26.70 4627.64 55531.68 28.03 4859.02 58308.24 29.43 5101.96 61223.52 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Administrative Specialist ESCEA 21 Hourly 26.08 4520.14 54241.68 27.38 4746.14 56953.68 28.75 4983.45 59801.40 30.19 5232.62 62791.44 31.70 5494.26 65931.12 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Administrative Technical Specialist ESCEA 29 Hourly 31.77 5507.35 66088.20 33.36 5782.73 69392.76 35.03 6071.86 72862.32 36.78 6375.45 76505.40 38.62 6694.23 80330.76 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Assistant Planner ESCEA 33 Hourly 35.07 6079.08 72948.96 36.83 6383.04 76596.48 38.67 6702.19 80426.28 40.60 7037.31 84447.72 42.63 7389.17 88670.04 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Building Inspector I ESCEA 32 Hourly 34.22 5930.81 71169.72 35.93 6227.35 74728.20 37.72 6538.72 78464.64 39.61 6865.66 82387.92 41.59 7208.95 86507.40 Page 438 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Building Inspector II ESCEA 36 Hourly 37.77 6546.51 78558.12 39.66 6873.83 82485.96 41.64 7217.52 86610.24 43.72 7578.40 90940.80 45.91 7957.32 95487.84 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Civil Engineering Assistant ESCEA 34 Hourly 35.95 6231.08 74772.96 37.75 6542.63 78511.56 39.63 6869.76 82437.12 41.61 7213.24 86558.88 43.70 7573.90 90886.80 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Code Compliance Inspector ESCEA 36 Hourly 37.77 6546.51 78558.12 39.66 6873.83 82485.96 41.64 7217.52 86610.24 43.72 7578.40 90940.80 45.91 7957.32 95487.84 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Community Cable Program Specialist ESCEA 32 Hourly 34.22 5930.81 71169.72 35.93 6227.35 74728.20 37.72 6538.72 78464.64 39.61 6865.66 82387.92 41.59 7208.95 86507.40 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Computer Graphics Designer ESCEA 34 Hourly 35.95 6231.08 74772.96 37.75 6542.63 78511.56 39.63 6869.76 82437.12 41.61 7213.24 86558.88 43.70 7573.90 90886.80 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5232 Cultural Arts Coordinator ESCEA 35S Hourly 38.06 6597.49 79169.88 39.97 6927.37 83128.44 41.96 7273.73 87284.76 44.06 7637.42 91649.04 46.27 8019.29 96231.48 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Custodian ESCEA 11 Hourly 20.37 3531.11 42373.32 21.39 3707.67 44492.04 22.46 3893.06 46716.72 23.58 4087.71 49052.52 24.76 4292.09 51505.08 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Economic Development Coordinator ESCEA 33 Hourly 35.07 6079.08 72948.96 36.83 6383.04 76596.48 38.67 6702.19 80426.28 40.60 7037.31 84447.72 42.63 7389.17 88670.04 Page 439 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Engineering Technician ESCEA 30 Hourly 32.57 5645.04 67740.48 34.20 5927.29 71127.48 35.91 6223.66 74683.92 37.70 6534.84 78418.08 39.59 6861.59 82339.08 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Equipment Mechanic I ESCEA 22 Hourly 26.73 4633.14 55597.68 28.07 4864.80 58377.60 29.47 5108.04 61296.48 30.94 5363.44 64361.28 32.49 5631.61 67579.32 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Equipment Mechanic II ESCEA 27 Hourly 30.24 5241.99 62903.88 31.75 5504.09 66049.08 33.34 5779.29 69351.48 35.01 6068.25 72819.00 36.76 6371.66 76459.92 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Facilities Systems Mechanic ESCEA 32 Hourly 34.22 5930.81 71169.72 35.93 6227.35 74728.20 37.72 6538.72 78464.64 39.61 6865.66 82387.92 41.59 7208.95 86507.40 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Fire Equipment Mechanic ESCEA 30 Hourly 32.57 5645.04 67740.48 34.20 5927.29 71127.48 35.91 6223.66 74683.92 37.70 6534.84 78418.08 39.59 6861.59 82339.08 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Fire Prevention Specialist ESCEA 34 Hourly 35.95 6231.08 74772.96 37.75 6542.63 78511.56 39.63 6869.76 82437.12 41.61 7213.24 86558.88 43.70 7573.90 90886.80 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Library Assistant ESCEA 20 Hourly 25.44 4409.90 52918.80 26.71 4630.39 55564.68 28.05 4861.91 58342.92 29.45 5105.00 61260.00 30.92 5360.25 64323.00 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Library Clerk I ESCEA 7 Hourly 18.46 3199.00 38388.00 19.38 3358.96 40307.52 20.35 3526.90 42322.80 21.36 3703.25 44439.00 22.43 3888.42 46661.04 Page 440 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Library Clerk II ESCEA 11 Hourly 20.37 3531.11 42373.32 21.39 3707.67 44492.04 22.46 3893.06 46716.72 23.58 4087.71 49052.52 24.76 4292.09 51505.08 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 License/Permit Specialist I ESCEA 17 Hourly 23.63 4095.01 49140.12 24.81 4299.76 51597.12 26.05 4514.76 54177.12 27.35 4740.49 56885.88 28.72 4977.52 59730.24 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 License/Permit Specialist II ESCEA 22 Hourly 26.73 4633.14 55597.68 28.07 4864.80 58377.60 29.47 5108.04 61296.48 30.94 5363.44 64361.28 32.49 5631.61 67579.32 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Maintenance Craftsworker ESCEA 29 Hourly 31.77 5507.35 66088.20 33.36 5782.73 69392.76 35.03 6071.86 72862.32 36.78 6375.45 76505.40 38.62 6694.23 80330.76 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Meter Reader/Repairer ESCEA 26 Hourly 29.50 5114.12 61369.44 30.98 5369.83 64437.96 32.53 5638.32 67659.84 34.16 5920.24 71042.88 35.86 6216.25 74595.00 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Network Assistant ESCEA 22 Hourly 26.73 4633.14 55597.68 28.07 4864.80 58377.60 29.47 5108.04 61296.48 30.94 5363.44 64361.28 32.49 5631.61 67579.32 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Office Specialist I ESCEA 11 Hourly 20.37 3531.11 42373.32 21.39 3707.67 44492.04 22.46 3893.06 46716.72 23.58 4087.71 49052.52 24.76 4292.09 51505.08 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Office Specialist 11 ESCEA 17 Hourly 23.63 4095.01 49140.12 24.81 4299.76 51597.12 26.05 4514.76 54177.12 27.35 4740.49 56885.88 28.72 4977.52 59730.24 Page 441 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Park Maintenance Worker I ESCEA 15 Hourly 22.49 3897.70 46772.40 23.61 4092.58 49110.96 24.79 4297.21 51566.52 26.03 4512.07 54144.84 27.33 4737.67 56852.04 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Park Maintenance Worker II ESCEA 19 Hourly 24.82 4302.33 51627.96 26.06 4517.45 54209.40 27.37 4743.32 56919.84 28.73 4980.49 59765.88 30.17 5229.52 62754.24 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Planning Technician ESCEA 23 Hourly 27.40 4748.98 56987.76 28.77 4986.42 59837.04 30.21 5235.74 62828.88 31.72 5497.53 65970.36 33.30 5772.41 69268.92 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Pool Maintenance Technician ESCEA 25 Hourly 28.78 4989.39 59872.68 30.22 5238.86 62866.32 31.74 5500.81 66009.72 33.32 5775.85 69310.20 34.99 6064.64 72775.68 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Public Works Inspector ESCEA 22 Hourly 26.73 4633.14 55597.68 28.07 4864.80 58377.60 29.47 5108.04 61296.48 30.94 5363.44 64361.28 32.49 5631.61 67579.32 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Records Technician ESCEA 23 Hourly 27.40 4748.98 56987.76 28.77 4986.42 59837.04 30.21 5235.74 62828.88 31.72 5497.53 65970.36 33.30 5772.41 69268.92 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Recreation Coordinator ESCEA 25 Hourly 28.78 4989.39 59872.68 30.22 5238.86 62866.32 31.74 5500.81 66009.72 33.32 5775.85 69310.20 34.99 6064.64 72775.68 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Revenue Inspector ESCEA 33 Hourly 35.07 6079.08 72948.96 36.83 6383.04 76596.48 38.67 6702.19 80426.28 40.60 7037.31 84447.72 42.63 7389.17 88670.04 Page 442 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Senior Administrative Specialist ESCEA 25 Hourly 28.78 4989.39 59872.68 30.22 5238.86 62866.32 31.74 5500.81 66009.72 33.32 5775.85 69310.20 34.99 6064.64 72775.68 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Senior Library Assistant ESCEA 27 Hourly 30.24 5241.99 62903.88 31.75 5504.09 66049.08 33.34 5779.29 69351.48 35.01 6068.25 72819.00 36.76 6371.66 76459.92 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Senior Network Assistant ESCEA 26 Hourly 29.50 5114.12 61369.44 30.98 5369.83 64437.96 32.53 5638.32 67659.84 34.16 5920.24 71042.88 35.86 6216.25 74595.00 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Street Maintenance Leadworker ESCEA 28 Hourly 31.00 5373.03 64476.36 32.55 5641.68 67700.16 34.18 5923.76 71085.12 35.88 6219.95 74639.40 37.68 6530.95 78371.40 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Street Maintenance Worker I ESCEA 15 Hourly 22.49 3897.70 46772.40 23.61 4092.58 49110.96 24.79 4297.21 51566.52 26.03 4512.07 54144.84 27.33 4737.67 56852.04 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Street Maintenance Worker II ESCEA 19 Hourly 24.82 4302.33 51627.96 26.06 4517.45 54209.40 27.37 4743.32 56919.84 28.73 4980.49 59765.88 30.17 5229.52 62754.24 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Tree Maintenance Worker ESCEA 22 Hourly 26.73 4633.14 55597.68 28.07 4864.80 58377.60 29.47 5108.04 61296.48 30.94 5363.44 64361.28 32.49 5631.61 67579.32 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Wastewater Maintenance Leadworker ESCEA 28 Hourly 31.00 5373.03 64476.36 32.55 5641.68 67700.16 34.18 5923.76 71085.12 35.88 6219.95 74639.40 37.68 6530.95 78371.40 Page 443 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Wastewater Maintenance Worker I ESCEA 18 Hourly 24.22 4197.42 50369.04 25.43 4407.28 52887.36 26.70 4627.64 55531.68 28.03 4859.02 58308.24 29.43 5101.96 61223.52 3/19/2019 10/1/2021 5683 Wastewater Maintenance Worker II ESCEA 22 Hourly 26.73 4633.14 55597.68 28.07 4864.80 58377.60 29.47 5108.04 61296.48 30.94 5363.44 64361.28 32.49 5631.61 67579.32 Page 444 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL PSSEA SALARY SCHEDULE 4/16/2019 10/1/2021 5687 Crime Scene Investigator I PSSEA 29ps Hourly 30.29 5250.00 63000.00 31.80 5512.50 66150.00 33.39 5788.13 69457.56 35.06 6077.53 72930.36 36.82 6381.41 76576.92 4/16/2019 10/1/2021 5687 Crime Scene Investigator II PSSEA 21ps Hourly 33.43 5795.01 69540.12 35.10 6084.77 73017.24 36.86 6389.00 76668.00 38.70 6708.45 80501.40 40.64 7043.88 84526.56 4/16/2019 10/1/2021 5687 Police Assistant I PSSEA 13ps Hourly 21.79 3776.36 45316.32 22.88 3965.18 47582.16 24.02 4163.44 49961.28 25.22 4371.61 52459.32 26.48 4590.19 55082.28 4/16/2019 10/1/2021 5687 Police Assistant 11 PSSEA 17ps Hourly 24.05 4168.40 50020.80 25.25 4376.82 52521.84 26.51 4595.66 55147.92 27.84 4825.44 57905.28 29.23 5066.72 60800.64 4/16/2019 10/1/2021 5687 Police Service Officer I PSSEA 22ps Hourly 26.21 4543.07 54516.84 27.52 4770.23 57242.76 28.90 5008.74 60104.88 30.34 5259.18 63110.16 31.86 5522.14 66265.68 4/16/2019 10/1/2021 5687 Police Service Officer 11 PSSEA 26ps Hourly 28.93 5014.71 60176.52 30.38 5265.45 63185.40 31.90 5528.72 66344.64 33.49 5805.16 69661.92 35.17 6095.41 73144.92 Page 445 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL POLICE OFFICER ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE 11/24/2018 5627 Police Officer ESPOA 687 Hourly 41.20 7142.18 85706.16 43.27 7499.29 89991.48 45.43 7874.26 94491.12 47.70 8267.97 99215.64 50.08 8681.37 104176.44 55.09 9549.50 114594.00 11/24/2018 5627 Police Sergeant ESPOA 700 Hourly 51.62 8947.68 107372.16 54.20 9395.06 112740.72 56.91 9864.82 118377.84 59.76 10358.06 124296.72 62.75 10875.96 130511.52 69.02 11963.56 143562.72 Page 446 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL EL SEGUNDO POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE 11/5/2019 10/1/2021 5185 Police Lieutenant ESPMA 56P Hourly 74.18 12857.42 154289.04 77.89 13500.29 162003.48 81.78 14175.30 170103.60 85.87 14884.07 178608.84 90.16 15628.27 187539.24 11/5/2019 10/1/2021 5185 Police Captain ESPMA 61P Hourly 86.69 15026.89 180322.68 91.03 15778.23 189338.76 95.58 16567.14 198805.68 100.36 17395.50 208746.00 105.38 18265.27 219183.24 Page 447 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL EL SEGUNDO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE 11/24/2018 5628 Firefighter ESFA -IAFF 483 Hourly 37.72 6537.32 78447.84 39.53 6852.09 82225.08 41.44 7182.58 86190.96 43.44 7529.60 90355.20 45.54 7893.94 94727.28 47.75 8276.52 99318.24 11/24/2018 5628 Fire Paramedic ESFA - IAFF 497 Hourly 45.63 7909.64 94915.68 47.84 8293.01 99516.12 50.17 8695.53 104346.36 52.60 9118.19 109418.28 55.17 9561.99 114743.88 11/24/2018 5628 Fire Engineer ESFA - IAFF 497 Hourly 45.63 7909.64 94915.68 47.84 8293.01 99516.12 50.17 8695.53 104346.36 52.60 9118.19 109418.28 55.17 9561.99 114743.88 11/24/2018 5628 Fire Captain ESFA - IAFF 510 Hourly 52.71 9136.40 109636.80 55.28 9581.09 114973.08 57.97 10048.04 120576.48 60.80 10538.32 126459.84 63.77 11053.11 132637.32 Page 448 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Crime Prevention Analyst I SPEA 30S Hourly 36.56 6336.61 76039.32 38.39 6653.44 79841.28 40.30 6986.11 83833.32 42.32 7335.42 88025.04 44.44 7702.19 92426.28 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Deputy City Treasurer I SPEA 30S Hourly 36.56 6336.61 76039.32 38.39 6653.44 79841.28 40.30 6986.11 83833.32 42.32 7335.42 88025.04 44.44 7702.19 92426.28 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Librarian I SPEA 32S Hourly 38.06 6597.49 79169.88 39.97 6927.37 83128.44 41.96 7273.73 87284.76 44.06 7637.42 91649.04 46.27 8019.29 96231.48 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Administrative Analyst SPEA 33S Hourly 38.84 6732.84 80794.08 40.79 7069.49 84833.88 42.82 7422.96 89075.52 44.97 7794.11 93529.32 47.21 8183.81 98205.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Property Owner Coordinator SPEA 33S Hourly 38.84 6732.84 80794.08 40.79 7069.49 84833.88 42.82 7422.96 89075.52 44.97 7794.11 93529.32 47.21 8183.81 98205.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Recreation Supervisor SPEA 33S Hourly 38.84 6732.84 80794.08 40.79 7069.49 84833.88 42.82 7422.96 89075.52 44.97 7794.11 93529.32 47.21 8183.81 98205.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Wellness Coordinator SPEA 33S Hourly 38.84 6732.84 80794.08 40.79 7069.49 84833.88 42.82 7422.96 89075.52 44.97 7794.11 93529.32 47.21 8183.81 98205.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Crime Prevention Analyst 11 SPEA 34S Hourly 39.64 6871.58 82458.96 41.63 7215.16 86581.92 43.71 7575.92 90911.04 45.89 7954.72 95456.64 48.19 8352.45 100229.40 Page 449 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Equipment Maint. Supervisor SPEA 37S Hourly 42.17 7308.94 87707.28 44.28 7674.39 92092.68 46.49 8058.11 96697.32 48.81 8461.01 101532.12 51.25 8884.06 106608.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Park Maintenance Supervisor SPEA 37S Hourly 42.17 7308.94 87707.28 44.28 7674.39 92092.68 46.49 8058.11 96697.32 48.81 8461.01 101532.12 51.25 8884.06 106608.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Project Specialist/ Sr. Accountant SPEA 37S Hourly 42.17 7308.94 87707.28 44.28 7674.39 92092.68 46.49 8058.11 96697.32 48.81 8461.01 101532.12 51.25 8884.06 106608.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Street Maintenance Supervisor SPEA 37S Hourly 42.17 7308.94 87707.28 44.28 7674.39 92092.68 46.49 8058.11 96697.32 48.81 8461.01 101532.12 51.25 8884.06 106608.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Water/WastewaterSupervisor SPEA 37S Hourly 42.17 7308.94 87707.28 44.28 7674.39 92092.68 46.49 8058.11 96697.32 48.81 8461.01 101532.12 51.25 8884.06 106608.72 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Construction Coordinator SPEA 38S Hourly 43.05 7462.06 89544.72 45.20 7835.17 94022.04 47.46 8226.92 98723.04 49.84 8638.27 103659.24 52.33 9070.18 108842.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 GIS Analyst SPEA 38S Hourly 43.05 7462.06 89544.72 45.20 7835.17 94022.04 47.46 8226.92 98723.04 49.84 8638.27 103659.24 52.33 9070.18 108842.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Program Coordinator SPEA 38S Hourly 43.05 7462.06 89544.72 45.20 7835.17 94022.04 47.46 8226.92 98723.04 49.84 8638.27 103659.24 52.33 9070.18 108842.16 Page 450 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 RSI Design Coordinator SPEA 38S Hourly 43.05 7462.06 89544.72 45.20 7835.17 94022.04 47.46 8226.92 98723.04 49.84 8638.27 103659.24 52.33 9070.18 108842.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Information Systems Developer SPEA 39S Hourly 43.96 7619.04 91428.48 46.15 7999.99 95999.88 48.46 8399.99 100799.88 50.88 8819.99 105839.88 53.43 9260.99 111131.88 11/3/2020 10/1/2021 NA Media Supervisor SPEA 40S Hourly 43.96 7619.04 91428.48 46.15 7999.99 95999.88 48.46 8399.99 100799.88 50.88 8819.99 105839.88 53.43 9260.99 111131.88 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Accounting Supervisor SPEA 40S Hourly 44.88 7779.92 93359.04 47.13 8168.91 98026.92 49.48 8577.36 102928.32 51.96 9006.23 108074.76 54.56 9456.54 113478.48 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Economic Development Analyst SPEA 40S Hourly 44.88 7779.92 93359.04 47.13 8168.91 98026.92 49.48 8577.36 102928.32 51.96 9006.23 108074.76 54.56 9456.54 113478.48 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Police Records Supervisor SPEA 40S Hourly 44.88 7779.92 93359.04 47.13 8168.91 98026.92 49.48 8577.36 102928.32 51.96 9006.23 108074.76 54.56 9456.54 113478.48 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Senior Administrative Analyst SPEA 40S Hourly 44.88 7779.92 93359.04 47.13 8168.91 98026.92 49.48 8577.36 102928.32 51.96 9006.23 108074.76 54.56 9456.54 113478.48 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Associate Engineer SPEA 42S Hourly 46.81 8113.85 97366.20 49.15 8519.54 102234.48 51.61 8945.52 107346.24 54.19 9392.80 112713.60 56.90 9862.43 118349.16 Page 451 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Facilities Maintenance Supervisor SPEA 42S Hourly 46.81 8113.85 97366.20 49.15 8519.54 102234.48 51.61 8945.52 107346.24 54.19 9392.80 112713.60 56.90 9862.43 118349.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Plan Check Engineer SPEA 42S Hourly 46.81 8113.85 97366.20 49.15 8519.54 102234.48 51.61 8945.52 107346.24 54.19 9392.80 112713.60 56.90 9862.43 118349.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Purchasing Agent SPEA 42S Hourly 46.81 8113.85 97366.20 49.15 8519.54 102234.48 51.61 8945.52 107346.24 54.19 9392.80 112713.60 56.90 9862.43 118349.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 RSI Supervisor SPEA 42S Hourly 46.81 8113.85 97366.20 49.15 8519.54 102234.48 51.61 8945.52 107346.24 54.19 9392.80 112713.60 56.90 9862.43 118349.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Information System Specialist SPEA 43S Hourly 47.81 8287.10 99445.20 50.20 8701.46 104417.52 52.71 9136.53 109638.36 55.35 9593.36 115120.32 58.11 10073.02 120876.24 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Senior Building Inspector SPEA 44S Hourly 48.83 8464.69 101576.28 51.28 8887.93 106655.16 53.84 9332.32 111987.84 56.53 9798.94 117587.28 59.36 10288.88 123466.56 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Assistant Fire Marshall SPEA 45S Hourly 49.88 8646.73 103760.76 52.38 9079.06 108948.72 55.00 9533.02 114396.24 57.75 10009.67 120116.04 60.64 10510.15 126121.80 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Emergency Management Coordinator SPEA 45S Hourly 49.88 8646.73 103760.76 52.38 9079.06 108948.72 55.00 9533.02 114396.24 57.75 10009.67 120116.04 60.64 10510.15 126121.80 Page 452 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Principal Environmental Specialist SPEA 45S Hourly 49.88 8646.73 103760.76 52.38 9079.06 108948.72 55.00 9533.02 114396.24 57.75 10009.67 120116.04 60.64 10510.15 126121.80 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Senior Engineer Associate SPEA 46S Hourly 50.96 8833.30 105999.60 53.51 9274.97 111299.64 56.18 9738.71 116864.52 58.99 10225.65 122707.80 61.94 10736.93 128843.16 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Technical Services Analyst SPEA 47S Hourly 52.06 9024.54 108294.48 54.67 9475.77 113709.24 57.40 9949.56 119394.72 60.27 10447.04 125364.48 63.28 10969.39 131632.68 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Fire Marshall SPEA 49S Hourly 54.35 9421.48 113057.76 57.07 9892.56 118710.72 59.93 10387.19 124646.28 62.92 10906.54 130878.48 66.07 11451.87 137422.44 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Principal Planner SPEA 52S Hourly 58.01 10054.88 120658.56 60.91 10557.63 126691.56 63.95 11085.51 133026.12 67.15 11639.78 139677.36 70.51 12221.77 146661.24 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Senior Plan Check Engineer SPEA 52S Hourly 58.01 10054.88 120658.56 60.91 10557.63 126691.56 63.95 11085.51 133026.12 67.15 11639.78 139677.36 70.51 12221.77 146661.24 10/1/2019 10/1/2021 5759 Environmental Safety Manager SPEA 53S Hourly 58.76 10185.73 122228.76 61.70 10695.02 128340.24 64.79 11229.77 134757.24 68.03 11791.26 141495.12 71.43 12380.82 148569.84 Page 453 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL UNREPRESENTED: EXECUTIVE, MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES 11/3/2020 5232 Deputy City Manager EXECUTIVE 60d Salaried 68.20 11822.00 141864.00 92.87 16098.00 193176.00 6/4/2019 5154 Chief of Police EXECUTIVE 60f Salaried 101.66 17620.73 211448.76 125.41 21737.72 260852.64 6/4/2019 5154 Fire Chief EXECUTIVE 70f Salaried 96.69 16760.14 201121.68 116.03 20112.17 241346.04 11/3/2020 5232 Chief Financial Officer EXECUTIVE 64d Salaried 77.39 13415.00 160980.00 92.87 16098.00 193176.00 11/3/2020 5232 Director of Human Resources EXECUTIVE 64d Salaried 77.39 13415.00 160980.00 92.87 16098.00 193176.00 11/3/2020 5232 Information Technology Services Director EXECUTIVE 64d Salaried 77.39 13415.00 160980.00 92.87 16098.00 193176.00 11/3/2020 5232 Community Services Director EXECUTIVE 64d Salaried 77.39 13415.00 160980.00 92.87 16098.00 193176.00 11/3/2020 5232 Development Services Director EXECUTIVE 64d Salaried 78.35 13581.00 162972.00 102.12 17700.00 212400.00 6/4/2019 5154 Director of Public Works EXECUTIVE 64d Salaried 77.39 13415.00 160980.00 92.87 16098.00 193176.00 6/4/2019 5154 Accounting Manager MANAGEMENT 51m Salaried 58.10 10070.98 120851.76 69.72 12085.18 145022.16 6/4/2019 5154 Assistant City Engineer MANAGEMENT 56m Salaried 60.70 10521.52 126258.24 72.84 12625.83 151509.96 6/4/2019 5154 Battalion Chief MANAGEMENT 60f Salaried 75.24 13041.06 156492.72 90.28 15649.27 187791.24 6/4/2019 5154 Building Safety Manager MANAGEMENT 60f Salaried 64.83 11236.58 134838.96 77.79 13483.89 161806.68 6/4/2019 5154 City Engineer (At -Will) MANAGEMENT 60m Salaried 68.91 11943.54 143322.48 82.69 14332.25 171987.00 6/4/2019 5154 Community Cable Program Manager MANAGEMENT 51m Salaried 58.10 10070.98 120851.76 69.72 12085.18 145022.16 11/3/2020 NA Communications & Legislative Affairs Manager MANAGEMENT 51m Salaried 58.10 10070.98 120851.76 69.72 12085.18 145022.16 6/4/2019 5154 Deputy City Clerk I MANAGEMENT 27m Salaried 35.43 6140.99 73691.88 42.27 7325.99 87911.88 6/4/2019 5154 Deputy City Clerk II MANAGEMENT 36m Salaried 39.57 6859.26 82311.12 47.49 8231.11 98773.32 6/4/2019 5154 Deputy City Treasurer II MANAGEMENT 30s Salaried 44.05 7635.47 91625.64 52.86 9162.56 109950.72 6/4/2019 5154 Finance Manager MANAGEMENT 55m Salaried 59.38 10292.33 123507.96 71.25 12350.80 148209.60 Page 454 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 6/4/2019 5154 General Services Manager MANAGEMENT 53m Salaried 59.04 10233.12 122797.44 70.84 12279.74 147356.88 6/4/2019 5154 Human Resources Manager MANAGEMENT 51m Salaried 58.10 10070.98 120851.76 69.72 12085.18 145022.16 6/4/2019 5154 Information Systems Manager MANAGEMENT 54m Salaried 62.04 10753.00 129036.00 74.44 12903.60 154843.20 6/4/2019 5154 Librarian II MANAGEMENT 37m Salaried 41.97 7274.57 87294.84 50.36 8729.48 104753.76 11/3/2020 1620 Library Services Manager MANAGEMENT 50m Salaried 56.85 9854.65 118255.80 68.22 11825.58 141906.96 6/4/2019 5154 Park Maintenance Superintendent MANAGEMENT 48m Salaried 54.45 9437.67 113252.04 65.34 11325.20 135902.40 6/4/2019 5154 Planning Manager MANAGEMENT 56m Salaried 64.83 11236.58 134838.96 77.79 13483.89 161806.68 6/4/2019 5154 Recreation Superintendent MANAGEMENT 50m Salaried 56.85 9854.65 118255.80 68.22 11825.58 141906.96 6/4/2019 5154 Revenue Manager MANAGEMENT 51m Salaried 58.10 10070.98 120851.76 69.72 12085.18 145022.16 11/3/2020 5232 Risk Manager MANAGEMENT 52m Salaried 58.10 10071.00 120852.00 69.72 12085.00 145020.00 6/4/2019 5154 Senior Librarian MANAGEMENT 39m Salaried 44.98 7796.33 93555.96 53.97 9355.60 112267.20 11/3/2020 5232 Treasury & Customer Service Manager MANAGEMENT 141 Salaried 59.38 10292.00 123504.00 71.26 12351.00 148212.00 6/4/2019 5154 Accountant CONFIDENTIAL 31m Salaried 38.16 6614.09 79369.08 45.79 7936.91 95242.92 6/4/2019 5154 Executive Assistant CONFIDENTIAL 34m Salaried 37.98 6582.92 78995.04 45.57 7899.51 94794.12 6/4/2019 5154 Human Resources Analyst CONFIDENTIAL 34m Salaried 40.56 7030.31 84363.72 48.67 8436.37 101236.44 6/4/2019 NA Human Resources Technician CONFIDENTIAL 18m Salaried 29.58 5127.76 61533.12 35.50 6153.32 73839.84 6/4/2019 5154 Management Analyst CONFIDENTIAL 35m Salaried 41.40 7176.04 86112.48 49.68 8611.25 103335.00 6/4/2019 5154 Payroll Accountant CONFIDENTIAL 31m Salaried 38.16 6614.09 79369.08 45.79 7936.91 95242.92 6/4/2019 5154 Principal Civil Engineer CONFIDENTIAL 51m Salaried 58.10 10070.98 120851.76 69.72 12085.18 145022.16 6/4/2019 5154 Senior Civil Engineer (At -Will) CONFIDENTIAL 48m Salaried 54.45 9437.67 113252.04 65.34 11325.20 135902.40 Page 455 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 6/4/2019 5154 Senior Executive Assistant (At -Will) CONFIDENTIAL 35m Salaried 41.40 7176.04 86112.48 49.68 8611.25 103335.00 6/4/2019 5154 Senior Human Resources Analyst CONFIDENTIAL 39m Salaried 44.98 7796.33 93555.96 53.97 9355.60 112267.20 6/4/2019 5154 Senior Management Analyst CONFIDENTIAL 39m Salaried 44.98 7796.33 93555.96 53.97 9355.60 112267.20 Page 456 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL CONTRACTS 6/19/2019 10/19/2021 5720 City Manager CONTRACT 227 Salaried 124.85 21641.66 259700.00 ELECTED OFFICIALS IL 3/7/2006 Ordinance 1392 Council Member ELECTED 290 Stipend 900.00 6/4/2019 5154 City Clerk ELECTED 209 Stipend 2375.00 6/5/2019 5154 City Treasurer ELECTED 236 Stipend 2375.00 Page 457 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE 12/14/2020 5243 Administrative Intern PT TEMPORARY 28pt Hourly 15.00 2600.00 31200.00 15.75 2730.00 32760.00 16.54 2866.93 34403.20 17.36 3009.07 36108.80 18.23 3159.87 37918.40 19.14 3317.60 39811.20 12/14/2020 5243 Library Assistant PT TEMPORARY 20h Hourly 21.37 3704.13 44449.60 22.44 3889.60 46675.20 23.56 4083.73 49004.80 24.74 4288.27 51459.20 25.98 4503.20 54038.40 12/14/2020 5243 Library Clerk PT TEMPORARY 7h Hourly 15.50 2686.67 32240.00 16.28 2821.87 33862.40 17.09 2962.27 35547.20 17.95 3111.33 37336.00 18.84 3265.60 39187.20 12/14/2020 5243 Lifeguard PT TEMPORARY 680 Hourly 15.00 2600.00 31200.00 15.75 2730.00 32760.00 16.54 2866.93 34403.20 17.36 3009.07 36108.80 18.23 3159.87 37918.40 19.14 3317.60 39811.20 11/3/2020 NA Park Maintenance Worker I - PT TEMPORARY 15H Hourly 24.82 4,302.33 51,627.96 26.06 4,517.45 54,209.40 27.37 4,743.32 56,919.84 28.73 3,979.73 47,756.80 30.17 5,229.52 62,754.24 12/14/2020 5243 Police Cadet PT TEMPORARY 05c Hourly 16.27 2820.13 33841.60 17.08 2960.53 35526.40 17.94 3109.60 37315.20 18.83 3263.87 39166.40 19.78 3428.53 41142.40 20.77 3600.13 43201.60 2/21/2017 5025 Police Officer Trainee TEMPORARY NA Hourly 29.06 5038.42 60444.80 30.52 5290.35 63481.60 32.04 5554.86 66643.20 33.64 5832.61 69971.20 35.33 6124.22 73486.40 Page 458 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 12/14/2020 11/2/2021 5243 Recreation Assistant PT TEMPORARY 2pt Hourly 15.44 2676.27 32115.20 16.21 2809.73 33716.80 17.02 2950.13 35401.60 17.87 3097.47 37169.60 12/14/2020 5243 Recreation Leader PT TEMPORARY 11pt Hourly 15.00 2600.00 31200.00 15.75 2730.00 32760.00 16.54 2866.93 34403.20 17.36 3009.07 36108.80 18.23 3159.87 37918.40 19.14 3317.60 39811.20 12/14/2020 5243 Senior Recreation Leader PT TEMPORARY 21 pt Hourly 16.00 2773.33 33280.00 16.80 2912.00 34944.00 17.64 3057.60 36691.20 18.52 3210.13 38521.60 19.45 3371.33 40456.00 20.42 3539.47 42473.60 12/14/2020 5243 Recreation Specialist PT TEMPORARY 31pt Hourly 18.29 3170.27 38043.20 19.20 3328.00 39936.00 20.16 3494.40 41932.80 21.17 3669.47 44033.60 22.23 3853.20 46238.40 23.34 4045.60 48547.20 12/14/2020 5243 Senior Lifeguard PT TEMPORARY 681 Hourly 18.00 3120.00 37440.00 18.90 3276.00 39312.00 19.85 3440.67 41288.00 20.84 3612.27 43347.20 21.88 3792.53 45510.40 22.97 3981.47 47777.60 12/14/2020 5243 Penior Video Technician/Media Specialist TEMPORARY 31 pt Hourly 17.25 2990.00 35880.00 18.11 3139.07 37668.80 19.02 3296.80 39561.60 19.97 3461.47 41537.60 20.97 3634.80 43617.60 22.02 3816.80 45801.60 12/14/2020 5243 Senior Video Technician II PT TEMPORARY 35pt Hourly 22.25 3856.67 46280.00 23.36 4049.07 48588.80 24.53 4251.87 51022.40 25.76 4465.07 53580.80 27.05 4688.67 56264.00 28.40 4922.67 59072.00 Page 459 of 500 EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY REVISION EFFECTIVE DATE AGREEMENT NUMBER JOB CLASS TITLE GROUP BU GRADE PAY TYPE HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL 12/14/2020 11/2/2021 5243 Video Technician II/Media Assistant PT TEMPORARY 12pt Hourly 15.44 2676.27 32115.20 16.21 2809.73 33716.80 17.02 2950.13 35401.60 17.87 3097.47 37169.60 18.76 3251.73 39020.80 19.69 3412.93 40955.20 12/14/2020 5243 Shuttle Driver PT TEMPORARY 38pt Hourly 17.25 2990.00 35880.00 18.11 3139.07 37668.80 19.02 3296.80 39561.60 19.97 3461.47 41537.60 20.97 3634.80 43617.60 22.02 3816.80 45801.60 12/14/2020 5243 Swim Instructor PT TEMPORARY 682 Hourly 16.50 2860.00 34320.00 17.33 3003.87 36046.40 18.19 3152.93 37835.20 19.10 3310.67 39728.00 20.06 3477.07 41724.80 21.06 3650.40 43804.80 6/15/2021 5270 Special Projects Administrator PT TEMPORARY 40pt Hourly 25.00 4333.33 52000.00 125.00 21666.67 260000 3/16/2021 5254 Police Services Officer II PT TEMPORARY 26ps Hourly 28.37 4917.47 59009.60 34.48 5976.53 71718.40 3/2/2021 5252 Public Safety Officer II PT TEMPORARY 26ps Hourly 27.81 4820.40 57844.80 33.80 5858.67 70304.00 3/2/2021 5252 Fire Marshal PT TEMPORARY 49S Hourly 52.24 9054.93 108659.20 63.50 11006.67 132080.00 3/2/2021 5252 Battalion Chief PT TEMPORARY 60F Hourly 75.24 13041.60 156499.20 90.28 15648.53 187782.40 Page 460 of 500 City of El Segundo List of Revisions to the City Wide Salary Schedule 10/04/2011 - 12/07/2021 Revision Dates Group % of Revision Revision Council Adoption Date 10/1/2021 PMA 3.00 1/16/2020 10/1/2021 CEA 2.00 3/20/2019 10/1/2021 PSSEA 2.00 10/1/2018 10/1/2021 SPEA 2.00 10/1/2018 4/20/2021 MC - Reclassification of HR Assistant to HR Technician 4/20/2021 12/15/2020 Unrepresented Part-time salary 12/15/2020 12/14/2020 Unrepresented - Administrative Intern 12/14/2020 11/20/2020 MC - Risk Manager, Library Services Manager, Deputy City Manager, HR Director, Community Services Director, Development Services Director, IT Services Director, Treasury and Customer Service Manager, Chief Financial Officer 11/20/2020 11/3/2020 MC - Communications and Legislative Affairs Manager 11/3/2020 10/1/2020 PMA 3.00 1/16/2020 10/1/2020 CEA 2.00 3/20/2019 10/1/2020 FFA 2.50 10/1/2018 10/1/2020 POA 2.00 10/1/2018 10/1/2020 PSSEA 2.00 10/1/2018 10/1/2020 SPEA 2.00 10/1/2018 10/1/2019 FFA 2.50 10/1/2018 10/1/2019 POA 2.00 10/1/2018 6/4/2019 MC - 6/4/2019 6/5/2018 Unrepresented New PT Lifeguard and Senior Lifeguard 6/5/2018 1/6/2018 SPEA - Accounting Supervisor 1/6/2018 1/6/2018 SPEA - Assistant Fire Marshal 1/6/2018 6/20/2017 MC Director of Information Systems (At -will) 6/20/2017 5/13/2017 CEA - Records Technician 9/20/2016 5/13/2017 CEA - Crime Scene Investigator 5/13/2017 4/18/2017 MC - Accountant 4/18/2017 4/15/2017 PSSEA - Police Assistant 1 4/15/2017 3/4/2017 Unrepresented - Police Officer Trainee 2/21/2017 3/4/2017 POA - Police Sergeant 3/4/2017 10/1/2016 FFA 3.00 10/1/2014 10/1/2016 FFA - Fire Paramedic, Firefighter 10/1/2016 Page 1 of 2 Page 461 of 500 City of El Segundo List of Revisions to the City Wide Salary Schedule 10/04/2011 - 12/07/2021 Revision Dates Group % of Revision Revision Council Adoption Date 3/15/2016 Elected - City Treasurer 3/15/2016 12/26/2015 MC - Accounting Manager 12/26/2015 12/26/2015 MC - Executives 12/26/2015 12/26/2015 MC - Planning Manager 12/26/2015 11/28/2015 FFA 2.00 10/1/2014 9/21/2013 CEA - COLA 9/21/2013 10/1/2012 PMA - COLA 9/27/2011 10/1/2012 PSSEA ICOLA 10/1/2011 10/1/2011 POA I COLA 10/3/2011 Page 2 of 2 Page 462 of 500 {.,rVoy City Council Agenda Statement ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Staff Presentations Item Number: D.19 TITLE: Amendment to City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions amending the City Contributions for CalPERS medical premiums for the Executive Management and Mid-Management/Confidential groups covered under the City of El Segundo Administrative Code, Title 1A Salaries and Conditions of Employment, Chapter 1A2 Management -Confidential Series. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impact for FY2021-22 is $36,000, assuming all eligible employees participate in medical coverage. Sufficient funding for actions related to this recommendation is included in the adopted Citywide Budget. No new funding is needed for this fiscal year. 7_[81:(r]:A1l1►113 The Executive Management and Mid-Management/Confidential employee groups (Management Confidential series) are unrepresented and do not engage in the collective bargaining process for changes to wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment. Instead, their salaries and conditions of employment are provided in the Administrative Code Title 1A, Chapter 1A-2 and are subject to change from time to time by City Council resolution. The health allowance for employees in the Management Confidential series includes two components, a medical contribution and flexible benefit. The medical contribution is subject to the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) and the designated allowance may only be used towards the cost of CaIPERS medical plan premiums. The medical contribution was last adjusted to $782 for Executive Management and to $585 for Mid- Management/Confidential effective June 1, 2016. Under the Administrative Code, employees are provided with a flexible benefit allowance which may be used towards eligible benefits under the plan including medical premiums. In May 2019, the flexible benefit allowance was adjusted to $718 for Page 463 of 500 Amendment to the City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 3 Executive Management and to $915 for Mid-Management/Confidential. The City total monthly health allowance (medical contribution and flexible benefit) for both groups equals $1,500. Q 6*9111*4Is] ►F CalPERS requires contracting agencies participating in the Health Plan under PEMHCA to submit a change resolution approved by the City Council to amend the employer contribution for medical premiums. Resolutions were approved by City Council for represented labor groups with negotiated increases to monthly medical allowances effective January 2022. Over time, these scheduled increases to the medical plans have brought parity to the represented groups with a monthly allowance for active employees to $1,650. Absent the collective bargaining process, the total monthly health allowance for the Management Confidential series has remained at $1,500 since 2019. The following illustrates the proposed changes to Administrative Code Title 1A, Chapter 1A-2, Section 1A2.105 Flexible Benefit Plan for positions in the Executive Management and Mid-Management/Confidential Groups as listed in the attached Resolutions: Effective February 1, 2022, an increase to the medical contribution for Executive Management of $150 towards the medical allowance, which will increase the monthly contribution from $782 to $932. The total combined health contribution is $1,650. Medical Contribution per Month Flexible Benefit per Month Total Monthly Health Allowance $932 $718 $1,650 2. Effective February 1, 2022, an increase to the medical contribution for Management/Confidential of $150 towards the medical allowance, which will increase the monthly contribution from $585 to $735. The total combined health contribution is $1,650. Medical Contribution per Month Flexible Benefit per Month Total Monthly Health Allowance $735 $915 $1,650 The proposed $150 monthly medical contribution increase provides a balanced approach to labor relations with the Management Confidential series employees. The Page 464 of 500 Amendment to the City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums December 7, 2021 Page 3 of 3 maximum fiscal impact over a 12-month period, assuming all eligible employees participate in medical coverage, is $86,400. Upon approval, Human Resources will ensure that the resolutions are recorded with CalPERS and will work with Finance to implement the amendments to the City's contribution to medical premiums. CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 3: Develop as a Choice Employer and Workforce Objective: El Segundo is a city employer of choice and consistently hires for the future, with a workforce that is inspired, world -class and engaged, demonstrating increasing stability and innovation. PREPARED BY: Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director REVIEWED BY: Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Resolution Fixing the Employer Contribution 006 El Segundo Executive Management 2. Resolution Fixing the Employer Contribution 001 El Segundo El Segundo Mid - Management Confidential Page 465 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. Number FIXING THE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT AT AN EQUAL AMOUNT FOR EMPLOYEES AND ANNUITANTS WITH RESPECT TO A RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION 006 EL SEGUNDO EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT WHEREAS, (1) City of El Segundo is a contracting agency under Government Code Section 22920 and subject to the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (the "Act") for participation by members of El Segundo City Employees' Association; and WHEREAS, (2) Government Code Section 22892(a) provides that a contracting agency subject to Act shall fix the amount of the employer contribution by resolution; and WHEREAS, (3) Government Code Section 22892(b) provides that the employer contribution shall be an equal amount for both employees and annuitants, but may not be less than the amount prescribed by Section 22892(b) of the Act; now, therefore be it RESOLVED, (a) That the employer contribution for each employee or annuitant shall be the amount necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including the enrollment of family members, in a health benefits plan up to a maximum of $1,650.00 per month, plus administrative fees and Contingency Reserve Fund assessments; and be it further RESOLVED, (b) City of El Segundo has fully complied with any and all applicable provisions of Government Code Section 7507 in electing the benefits set forth above; and be it further RESOLVED, (c) That the participation of the employees and annuitants of City of El Segundo shall be subject to determination of its status as an "agency or instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State" that is eligible to participate in a governmental plan within the meaning of Section 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, upon publication of final Regulations pursuant to such Section. If it is determined that City of El Segundo would not qualify as an agency or instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State under such final Regulations, CalPERS may be obligated, and reserves the right to terminate the health coverage of all participants of the employer; and be it further RESOLVED, (d) That the executive body appoint and direct, and it does hereby appoint and direct, the City Clerk to file with the Board a verified copy of this resolution, and to perform on behalf of City of El Segundo all functions required of it under the Act; and be it further RESOLVED, (e) That coverage under the Act be effective on February 1, 2022. Page 466 of 500 Adopted at a regular meeting of the El Segundo City Council at El Segundo, CA, this 71" day of December, 2021. Signed: Attest: Drew Boyles, Mayor Tracy Weaver, City Clerk Page 467 of 500 RESOLUTION NO. Number FIXING THE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT AT AN EQUAL AMOUNT FOR EMPLOYEES AND ANNUITANTS WITH RESPECT TO A RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION 001 EL SEGUNDO MID-MANAGEMENT/CONFIDENTIAL WHEREAS, (1) City of El Segundo is a contracting agency under Government Code Section 22920 and subject to the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (the "Act") for participation by members of El Segundo City Employees' Association; and WHEREAS, (2) Government Code Section 22892(a) provides that a contracting agency subject to Act shall fix the amount of the employer contribution by resolution; and WHEREAS, (3) Government Code Section 22892(b) provides that the employer contribution shall be an equal amount for both employees and annuitants, but may not be less than the amount prescribed by Section 22892(b) of the Act; now, therefore be it RESOLVED, (a) That the employer contribution for each employee or annuitant shall be the amount necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including the enrollment of family members, in a health benefits plan up to a maximum of $1,650.00 per month, plus administrative fees and Contingency Reserve Fund assessments; and be it further RESOLVED, (b) City of El Segundo has fully complied with any and all applicable provisions of Government Code Section 7507 in electing the benefits set forth above; and be it further RESOLVED, (c) That the participation of the employees and annuitants of City of El Segundo shall be subject to determination of its status as an "agency or instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State" that is eligible to participate in a governmental plan within the meaning of Section 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, upon publication of final Regulations pursuant to such Section. If it is determined that City of El Segundo would not qualify as an agency or instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State under such final Regulations, CalPERS may be obligated, and reserves the right to terminate the health coverage of all participants of the employer; and be it further RESOLVED, (d) That the executive body appoint and direct, and it does hereby appoint and direct, the City Clerk to file with the Board a verified copy of this resolution, and to perform on behalf of City of El Segundo all functions required of it under the Act; and be it further RESOLVED, (e) That coverage under the Act be effective on February 1, 2022. Page 468 of 500 Adopted at a regular meeting of the El Segundo City Council at El Segundo, CA, this 71" day of December, 2021. Signed: Attest: Drew Boyles, Mayor Tracy Weaver, City Clerk Page 469 of 500 {.,rVoy City Council Agenda Statement ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021 Agenda Heading: Reports - City Treasurer Item Number: G.20 TITLE: Investment Portfolio Report for September 2021 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Treasury Department provides an Investment Portfolio Report presentation to City Council on a quarterly basis. The report includes the status of Treasury investment activities and related economic indicators as of September 2021. DISCUSSION: See attached Investment Portfolio Report. CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE: Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability Objective B: El Segundo approaches its work in a financially strategic and responsible way. Page 470 of 500 Presentation of Investment Portfolio Report for September 2021 December 7, 2021 Page 2 of 2 PREPARED BY: Dino Marsocci, Revenue Manager/Deputy Treasurer REVIEWED BY: Matthew Robinson, City Treasurer APPROVED BY: Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: September 2021 Portfolio Report Page 471 of 500 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO City of El Segundo Investment Portfolio Report September 2021 Certified By: City Treasurer's Office CITY OF ELSEGUNDO Portfolio Portfolio Summary As of September 2021 Portfolio Type / Security Type Liquidity Reserve $50,257,100 a, $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $16,794,365 $9, $ 11,746,929 $7,260,825 $7,122,245823,368 $0 $84,426 $757,770 $50,257,100 $40,000,000 m 0 m0 $20,000,000 $16,307,268 $11,626,058 $6,936,878 $7,109,655 $6,991,712 M $0 $84,426 M $760,658 48.40% m 40.00% 0 0 0 20.00% 16.17% 9.46 % 11.31% 6.99 % 6.86% 0.00% 0.08% 0.73% r 3 2.85 2.11 a 2 a' 1.77 1.74 v 1 LK— 0.53 i 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00% 2.74% v 2.54% y 2.17% 2.14% 2.34% > 2.00% a 1.00% 0 0 IR 0.32% 0.21% 0.00 % 0.05% �—w CAMP-JPAP Cash LAIF Government Medium Term Notes Municipal Bonds Negotiable Certificates of Supranational Obligations Deposit Security Type CAMP-JPAP Cash Government LAIF Medium Term Notes Municipal Bonds Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Supranational Obligations Page 474 of 500 Investments by Security Type As of September 2021 Supranational Obligations CAMP-JPAP $757,770 $84,426 Cash Negotiable C $1 Municipal Bonds $7,122, 245 Medium Term Notes $11,746,929 Security Type CAMP -JPAP Cash Government LAIF Medium Term Notes Municipal Bonds Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Supranational Obligations Page 475 of 500 Reserve Portfolio Ladder by Quarter As of September 2021 $15,000,000 $14,000,000 $13,000,000 $12,000,000 $11,000,000 $10,000,000 $9,000,000 w $8,000,000 m a $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 Quarter ■ Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Page 476 of 500 $50,000,000 $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 m a 2 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $9,823,368 $5,000,000 $0 Cash $So,257,100 LAIF Investments by Maturity Date As of September 2021 $10,113, 393 $8,584,400 $2,226,372 $84,426 $491,673 $740,767 � �� = M CAMP - JPAP < 30 Days 31 to 90 Days 91 to 180 Days 181 to 365 Days 1 to 2 Years $13,516,313 $3,108,989 2 to 3 Years 3 to 4 Years $4,900,225 4 to 5 Years Page 477 of 500 Portfolio As of September 2021 PortfolioTy.. Security Type Issuer CUSIP Days to Maturity Coupon Par Value Market Value Book Value UnrealizedP/L Liquidity Cash Bank Custodial Cash Cash 1 0.45% $6,936,878 $6,936,878 $6,936,878 $0 1 0.00% $2,886,490 $2,886,490 $0 LAIF LAIF LAIF 1 0.21% $50,257,100 $50,257,100 $50,257,100 $0 CAMP-JPAP CAMP-JPAP CAMP-JPAP 1 0.05% $84,426 $84,426 $84,426 $0 Reserve Government F H L M C FNMA FEDERAL AGRI MTG CORP FEDERAL FARM CREDIT B FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTH 3137EAENS 3135GOQ89 31422BPQ7 3133EKSN7 3133EKVE3 3130A1XJ2 880591ER9 627 2.64% $1,000,000 $1,042,940 $1,017,080 $0 7 1.37% $1,000,000 $1,000,220 $978,260 $0 783 1.58% $500,000 $513,705 $499,884 $0 634 1.73% $1,000,000 $1,026,020 $998,607 292 1.82% $1,000,000 $1,014,510 $999,900 $0 $0 988 2.70% $2,000,000 $2,129,300 $2,089,405 $0 1,081 2.69% $500,000 $534,130 $526,520 $0 Medium Term Notes AMAZON COM INC APPLE INC ASTRAZENECA FINANCE L BANK OF AMERICA CORP BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY IN CATERPILLAR FINLSERV CIGNACORP CITIGROUP INC COCA COLA CO THE ESTEE LAUDER CO INC GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP I INTERCONTINENTAL EXCH JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITIO MORGAN STANLEY NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL ORACLE CORP STRYKER CORP TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT C UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITEDHEALTH GROUP IN WAL MARTSTORES INC WELLS FARGO COMPANY 023135AJ5 037833AK6 04636NAA1 06051GFX2 084670BR8 14913QAA7 12SS23AGS 172967KNO 191216CL2 29736RANO 38141GXJ8 45866FAD6 478111AB3 582839AH9 61746BDZ6 64952WCSO 68389XBL8 863667AH4 89236TCQ6 911312BT2 91324PDN9 931142DU4 949746SK8 425 2.45% $500,000 $509,910 $499,990 $0 580 2.32% $500,000 $516,190 $480,685 $0 1,701 1.20% $500,000 $500,125 $501,040 $0 1,662 3.21% $500,000 $545,965 $554,155 $0 531 2.67% $500,000 $515,585 $513,756 $0 249 2.36% $500,000 $507,640 $500,000 $0 1,507 3.71% $500,000 $555,640 $564,210 $0 1,674 3.12% $500,000 $544,310 $550,715 $0 1,072 1.69% $500,000 $518,335 $493,865 $0 1,158 1.92% $500,000 $519,985 $501,600 $0 1,279 3.26% $500,000 $537,550 $545,605 $0 1,523 3.41% $500,000 $549,480 $557,000 $0 592 2.67% $145,000 $150,264 $141,068 $0 1,507 3.70% $500,000 $556,780 $565,170 $0 1,580 3.50% $500,000 $553,500 $561,240 $0 253 2.27% $500,000 $507,235 $500,000 $0 715 2.32% $500,000 $517,305 $492,550 $0 1,493 3.12% $500,000 $541,680 $548,175 $0 286 2.75% $500,000 $509,900 $490,620 $0 1,067 2.11% $500,000 $521,955 $504,105 $0 1,537 3.35% $500,000 $552,745 $560,625 $0 441 2.30% $500,000 $510,585 $498,935 $0 481 3.04% $500,000 $504,265 $500,950 $0 Municipal Bonds CONNECTICUTST B CONNECTICUT ST TXBL S GOODRICH MI AREA SCH HOUSTON TX REF SER B LA QUINTA CA REDEV AG LAS VEGAS NV TAXABLE NEW YORK NY TXBL FISC ONTARIO CA INTERNATIO OREGON ST DEPTADMINI TULSA CNTY OKLA INDPT 20772JL75 20772KGN3 382406PY6 4423315T7 5042013CL4 5176968H6 64966QCA6 683042AJ4 68607VT47 899593MG9 305 2.71% $500,000 $510,660 $508,400 $0 928 2.87% $1,000,000 $1,059,180 $1,064,850 $0 578 2.63% $300,000 $310,740 $304,584 $0 883 1.89% $1,000,000 $1,032,SSO $1,006,410 $0 336 2.85% $1,000,000 $1,024,240 $1,007,590 $0 244 3.09% $545,000 $555,230 $546,363 $0 1,036 2.04% $1,000,000 $1,041,610 $1,003,750 $0 1,323 2.72% $500,000 $533,525 $538,090 $0 914 2.67% $500,000 $527,220 $510,125 $0 975 2.47% $500,000 $527,290 $501,550 $0 Page 478 of 500 Portfolio As of September 2021 PortfolioTy.. Security Type Issuer CUSIP Days to Maturity Coupon Reserve Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 1ST SECURITY BANK OF ABACUS FEDERAL SAVING ALLEGIANCE BNKTEXAS ALLY BK MIDVALE UTAH ALMA BK ASTORIA NEW Y AMERICAN EXPRESS CENT AMERICAN ST BK SIOUX BALBOA THRIFT LN ASSN BANK BARODA NEW YORK BANK MIDWEST SPIRIT L BANK OF NEW ENGLAND BANK3 BELL BANK CORP BELMONT SAVING BANK B CAPITAL ONE BANK USA CITADEL FED CR UN EXT COMENITY CAP BK SALT COMMERCE BKGENEVA MI COMMERCIAL BK HARROGA CONGRESSIONAL BK POTO DENVER SVGS BK IOWA DISCOVER BANK DNB FIRST NATL ASSN EAGLE BANK ENCORE BK LITTLE ROCK ENERBANK USA SALT LAK ENTERPRISE BANK PA FIRST BK HIGHLAND PK FIRST FIRS BKTR CONV FIRST NATIONAL BANKO FIRST PREMIER BANK FIRSTST BK BUXTON NO GENOA BKG CO OHIO GRAND RIV BK GRANDVIL HORIZON BK WAVERLY NE INDUSTRIAL COMLBKCH KNOXTVA EMPL CREDIT KS STATEBANK MANHATTA LAFAYETTE FED CR UN R LAKESIDE BK CHICAGO I LIVE OAK BANKING COMP LUANA SAVINGS BK IOWA 33625CCP2 00257TBF2 01748DAX4 02007GKC6 020080BLO 02587DU55 029728BA9 05765LAYB 06062QXG4 063615BP2 06426KBE7 06653LAJ9 07815ABA4 08O515CG2 14042OL24 17286TAGO 20033AXE1 200S6QRZ8 20143PDXS 20726AAZ1 249398BT4 2546726Y9 25590AAH3 27002YEJ1 29260MAM7 29278TMN7 29367RKT2 319141JC2 320165JKO 32112UDMO 33610RRF2 33648RAZ2 37234809 38644ABP3 44042TBQ6 45581EAX9 499724AD4 50116CBFS 50625LAE3 S1210SMYO 538036GU2 S49104FXO 1,034 1.92% 1,037 1.92% 364 2.11% 249 2.46% 1,077 1.69% 243 2.36% 939 2.38% 657 1.99% 54 1.85% 330 2.97% 966 2.51% 533 0.89% 172 0.90% 151 2.57% 19 1.70% 1,246 1.60% 4 2.10% 1,000 2.20% 622 2.36% 211 2.42% 629 2.18% 306 2.26% 266 1.97% 383 2.49% 683 1.94% 783 1.75% 959 2.47% 397 2.100/0 1,070 1.69% 824 1.70% 350 1.96% 705 1.61% 1,035 1.88% 1,037 1.92% 698 1.64% 638 3.14% 699 3.08% 594 2.23% 727 3.12% 83 1.94% 1,154 1.78% 26 2.30% MAINSTREET BANK 56065GAG3I 939 2.47% MID MO BKSPRINGFIELD 59541KBV8 I 1,021 1.83% Par Value Market Value Book Value Unrealized P/L $245,000 $254,624 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $254,626 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $249,991 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $249,072 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $252,972 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $248,805 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $257,346 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $252,651 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $245,642 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $251,637 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $258,529 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $247,406 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $245,931 $245,000 $0 $245,0O0 $247,519 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $245,174 $245,O00 $0 $245,000 $252,914 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $245,054 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $256,483 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $254,011 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $248,374 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $253,249 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $249,596 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $248,452 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $251,248 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $252,632 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $252,294 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $258,144 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $250,385 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $252,960 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $252,225 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $249,469 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $251,145 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $254,283 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $254,626 $245,000 $0 $231,000 $239,140 $227,867 $0 $245,000 $257,850 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $258,607 $245,O00 $0 $200,000 $206,610 $199,700 $0 $245,000 $259,284 $245,O00 $0 $245,000 $246,031 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $254,065 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $245,390 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $257,970 $245,000 $0 $245,000 $253,894 $245,000 $0 Page 479 of 500 Portfolio As of September 2021 PortfolioTy.. Security Type Issuer CUSIP Days to Maturity Coupon Par Value Market Value Book Value UnrealizedP/L Reserve Negotiable Certificates of Deposit MORGAN STANLEY BK N A MORGAN STANLEY PVT BK NEIGHBORS FCU BATON R NORTHFIELD BANK PARK VIEW FCU HARRISO PIONEER BKSSBAUSTIN PLAINS ST BKTEX POPPY BK SANTA ROSA C PREFERRED BANK LA CAL PRIVATE BANK AND TRUS RAYMOND JAMES BANK NA RELIANCE SVGS BK ALTO RIA FED CR UN RIVERBANK POCAHONTAS SALLIE MAE BANK SPRING BK BRONX NY STONE BK MTN VIEW ARK UBS BANK USA ULTIMABKMINN WINGER UPPER PENNISUA STATE WASHINGTON FEDERAL WELLS FARGO BANK NA WELLS FARGO NATL BK W 61690UPF1 61760AYR4 64017AAM6 66612ABV9 70087TAA3 723605ASO 726547BK7 73319FAF6 740367HP5 74267GVX2 75472RAU5 75950XAF6 749622ALO 76857AAB7 79S4S03Q6 849430AS2 861S8RAV1 90348JCR9 90385LCR8 91630PASO 938828BJ8 9497631396 94949SAF2 1,156 1.87% $245,000 $254,837 $245,000 0 924 2.65% $245,000 $259,053 $245,000 $0 728 3.12% $245,000 $259,308 $245,000 $0 20 1.95% $245,000 $245,252 $245,000 $0 341 1.77% $245,000 $248,891 $245,000 $0 18 2.40% $245,000 $245,282 $245,000 $0 995 2.20% $245,000 $256,451 $245,000 $0 1,265 1.09% $245,000 $248,386 $245,000 $0 1,051 1.92% $24S,000 $254,678 $24S,000 $0 217 1.98% $200,000 $202,294 $199,700 $0 1,187 1.78% $24S,000 $254,278 $24S,000 $0 145 2.48% $245,000 $247,318 $245,000 $0 817 2.39% $24S,000 $256,287 $24S,000 $0 627 2.27% $24S,000 $2S3,649 $24S,000 $0 270 2.21% $24S,000 $248,974 $24S,000 $0 343 1.96% $245,000 $249,373 $245,000 $0 550 2.97% $245,000 $255,560 $245,000 $0 607 3.01% $245,000 $256,721 $245,000 $0 363 3.01% $245,000 $252,289 $245,000 $0 1,184 1.69% $245,000 $253,450 $245,000 $0 1,058 1.97% $245,000 $255,055 $245,000 $0 967 2.51% $245,000 $258,539 $245,000 $0 1 456 1.81% $245,000 $250,135 $245,000 $0 Supranational Obligations INTERAMERICAN DEVEL 45818WCK0 193 2.34% $750,000 $757,770 $760,658 $0 Page 480 of 500 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO Transactions Transactions Prior 3 Months as of September 2021 Page 482 of 500 Interest Received As of September 2021 Transaction Date Category 2020 2021 0 INTEREST Category Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Grand Total FULLCALL $1500,000 $1,310,879 MATURED PURCHASED $1,000,000 INTEREST $500,000 $166,103 $80 859 $166,750 $112,406 $123,430 $120,838 $184,682 $99046 $46,785 $58,386 , $47,507 $104,088 $0 $2,505,209 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 FULL CALL $1,000,000 $5O5,2O9 $10,000,000 I 1 1 1 I $9,8= MATURED $5,000,000 $0 $0 ($2,000,000) PURCHASED ($4,000,000) ($6,000,000) $735,000 $1,000,000 $2,695,000 $1,745,000 $245,000 $490,000 $245,000 $245,000 $745,000 $990,000 $745,000 October November December I January February March I April May ($6,046,025) I I ($6,046,025) June I July August September I Total Page 483 of 500 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO Compliance Asset Class Compliance As of September 2021 Security Type In Compliance? Max Weight Weight Par Value Book Value Market Value Cash Y 100% 9.46% $9,823,368 $6,936,878 $9,823,368 LAIF Y 100% 48.40% $50,257,100 $50,257,100 $50,257,100 CAMP-JPAP Y 30% 0.08% $84,426 $84,426 $84,426 Government Y 100% 6.99% $7,000,000 $7,109,655 $7,260,825 Medium Term Notes Y 15% 11.31% $11,145,000 $11,626,058 $11,746,929 Municipal Bonds Y 10% 6.86% $6,845,000 $6,991,712 $7,122,245 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Y 30% 16.17% $16,311,000 $16,307,268 $16,794,365 Supranational Obligations Y 10% 0.73% $750,000 $760,658 $757,770 Totals 100.00% $102,215,894 $100,073,754 $103,847,027 Page 485 of 500 Rating Compliance As of September 2021 Security Type Issuer CUSIP S&P Rating Moody Rating In Compliance? I Market Value Medium Term Notes AMAZON COM INC 023135AJ5 AA Al Y $509,910 APPLEINC 037833AK6 AA+ AA1 Y $516,190 ASTRAZENECA FINANCE L 04636NAAl A- A3 Y $500,125 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 060S1GFX2 A- A2 Y $545,965 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY IN 084670BR8 AA AA2 Y $515,585 CATERPILLAR FINLSERV 14913QAA7 A A2 Y $S07,640 CIGNACORP 125523AGS A- BAA1 Y $555,640 CITIGROUP INC 172967KNO BBB+ A3 Y $544,310 COCA COLA CO THE 191216CL2 A+ Al Y $518,335 ESTEE LAUDER CO INC 29736RANO A+ Al Y $519,985 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP I 38141GXJ8 BBB+ A2 Y $537,550 INTERCONTINENTAL EXCH 45866FAD6 BBB+ A3 Y $549,480 JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH 478111AB3 AA- AA2 Y $150,264 MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITIO 582839AH9 A- A3 Y $556,780 MORGAN STANLEY 61746BDZ6 BBB+ Al Y $553,500 NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL 649S2WCS0 AA+ AAA Y $S07,23S ORACLE CORP 68389XBLS BBB+ BAA2 Y $517,305 STRYKER CORP 863667AH4 A- BAA1 Y $541,680 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT C 89236TCQ6 A+ Al Y $509,900 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 911312BT2 A- A2 Y $521,955 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP IN 91324PDN9 A+ A3 Y $552,745 WAL MART STORES INC 931142DU4 AA AA2 Y $510,585 WELLS FARGO COMPANY 949746SK8 BBB+ Al Y $SO4,26S Municipal Bonds CONNECTICUTSTB 20772JL75 A+ AA3 Y $510,660 CONNECTICUT STTXBL S 20772KGN3 A+ AA3 Y $1,059,180 GOODRICH MI AREA SCH 382406PY6 AA N/A Y $310,740 HOUSTON TX REF SER B 4423315T7 AA AA3 Y $1,032,550 LA QUINTA CA REDEV AG 50420BCL4 AA- N/A Y $1,024,240 LAS VEGAS NV TAXABLE 5176968H6 AA AA2 Y $555,230 NEW YORK NYTXBL FISC 64966QCA6 AA AA2 Y $1,041,610 ONTARIO CA INTERNATIO 683042AJ4 AA N/A Y $533,525 OREGON ST DEPTADMINI 68607VT47 AAA AA2 Y $527,220 TULSA CNTY OKLA INDPT 899593MG9 N/A AA2 Y $527,290 SupranationalObligatio.. INTER AMERICAN DEVEL 45818WCKO AAA AAA Y $757,770 Veight Maximum %of Portfolio 0.49% 3.00% 0.50% 3.00% 0.48% 3.00% 0.53% 3.00% 0.50% 3.00% 0.49% 3.00% 0.54% 3.00% 0.52% 3.00% 0.50% 3.00% 0.50% 3.00% 0.52% 3.00% 0.53% 3.00% 0.14% 3.00% 0.54% 3.00% 0.53% 3.00% 0.49% 3.00% 0.50% 3.00% 0.52% 3.00% 0.49% 3.00% 0.50% 3.00% 0.53% 3.00% 0.49% 3.00% 0.49% 3.00% 0.49% 5.00% 1.02% 5.00% 0.30% 5.00% 0.99% 5.00% 0.99% 5.00% 0.53% 5.00% 1.00% 5.00% 0.51% 5.00% 0.51% 5.00% 0.51% 5.00% 0.73% 3.00% Page 486 of 500 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO LAIF 13 12 11 10 9 8 C E 7 0 0 t 0 n a 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 LAI F Apportionment Rates As of September 2021 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 Date Page 488 of 500 LAIF Diagnostics As of September 2021 Jun 1, 19 Aug 1, 19 Oct 1, 19 Dec 1, 19 Feb 1, 20 Apr 1, 20 Jun 1, 20 Aug 1, 20 Oct 1, 20 Dec 1, 20 Feb 1, 21 Apr 1, 21 Jun 1, 21 Aug 1, 21 Oct 1, 21 Date (Daily Rates) Measure Names Average Maturity Daily Quarter to Date Page 489 of 500 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO City Cash Flows $14,000,000 $13,000,000 $12,000,000 $11,000,000 $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,967,35 m > $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,190,K $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 September2020 Rol I i ng 1-3-Month Cash Flow Ana lysis As of September 2021 $13,922,249 November202O January2021 March2021 May2021 July2021 Month of Date 1,458,994 $5,160,915 September2021 Measure Names Credits Debits Page 491 of 500 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 ($2,000,000) m ($4,000,000) ($6,000,000) ($8,000,000) ($10,000,000) ($12,000,000) ($14,000,000) ($16,000,000) Net Change in Cash by Year As of September 2021 $9,692,177 ,938 3,477) 3,079) ($15,333,461) October November December January February March April May June July August September Month Years Last Year This Year Two Years Ago Page 492 of 500 Historic Drawdowns As of September 2021 $18,000,000 Measure Names $16,979,291 $17,052,791 $16,948,871 Delta Cash $16,000,000 $15,535,731 6,351,446 $15,676,236 $15,792,747 Rolling 12-Month Cumulative Drawdown 15,462,119 $14,813,086 $14,032,868 $14,000,000 14,761,324 $13,373,290 $13,414,296 $13,023,476 $12,000,000 $12 4,634 $11,6 29 $12,094,066 $11,850,289 $11,501,875 $10,000,000 $10,389,932 $10,021,393 $10 2,234 $9,444,192 $9,589,722 $8,550,295 $9,131,765 $9,692,17 $8,865,921 $8,000,000 $7,749,892 $8,007,816 $6,740,588 $6,444,394 $7,136,971 $6,000,000 $5,329,544 $6,198,611 $5,976,411 $6,1 ,113 $6,333,031 5,887,881 $5,497,816 $4,642,243 $5,067,055 $3,952,705 $3,893,993 $ '372,399 $4,504,116 $4,000,000 $3,304,431 $2,952,653 $4,143,573 $3,715,617 $3,3 ,584 $2,729,214 $2,784,224 $2,000,000 $2,012,203 $ 546,021 $2,858,340 $598,744 $17,938 $0 $ .. ..73 _ .__.. .. . ._______ _. ..... ... ..........._... ............... ($ ,071,301)..... ($754, 4).. $419,231 _... .. $442,055......... $45,591 __.. ___ _.._. ($688,897) ($844,184) ($638326) ($442,630) , ($1,493,637) ($953,953) ($2,000,000) ($2,849,212) ($2,296,277) ($2,009,831) ( 2,745,298) $1,773,595) ($4,000,000) ($3,489,461) ($3,977,017) ($2,628,379) ($2,906,612) ($2,927,208) ($3,312,421) ($3,298,079) ($3,733,785) ($3,764,529) ($4,012,919) ($3,897,279) ($4,483,630)($4,180,579) ($6,000,000) ($8,000,000) ($7,520,128) ($10,000,000) ($9,659,128) ($9,780,664) ($12,000,000) ($14,000,000) ($16,000,000) ($15,333,461) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Date Page 493 of 500 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO Economic Environment 0.85% 0.80% 0.75% 0.70% 0.65% 0.60% 0.55% 0.50% a 0.45% m o! 0.40% 0.35% 0.30% 0.25% 0.20% 0.15% 0.10% 0.05% 0.00% U.S. Treasury Yield Curve As of September 2021 0.84% ).80% ).62% ).37% ).27% 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 6 Month 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 Year Month September2020 December2020 March 2021 June 2021 September 2021 Page 495 of 500 2-60%2.62% 2.60% 2 2. 2.40% 2. 2.20% 2.00% 1.80% 1.60% 1.00% 0.80% 0.60% 0.40% 0.20% 0.00% U.S. Treasury Maturity Through Time As of September 2021 Dec 1,18 Marl,19 Jun 1,19 Sep 1,19 Dec 1,19 Mar 1,20 Jun 1, 20 Sep 1, 20 Dec 1, 20 Marl, 21 Jun 1, 21 Sep 1, 21 Date Measure Names 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 6 Month 1Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 Year Page 496 of 500 10-Year Minus 3-Month Treasury Yield Spread As of September 2021 S.S 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.0 2.S Fit 1.5 1.0 0.5 ................. ............................................... 0.0 % ............................................ .. . . .... ...... .... .... ...... .... .... -0.5 -1.0 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 Date Page 497 of 500 Unemployment vs Inflation As of September 2021 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 w m 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ...... -1 -2 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 PC Date Measure Names Realized Inflation Unemployment Rate Page 498 of 500 5-Year Breakeven Inflation Prediction As of September 2021 3.0 i t 2.s x 2.0 Si JJ� Ls a On ` 1.0 a .. o.s a a a Y t N {ff . Y -0.5 1.0 � 1.s , 2.0 2.5 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Date Page 499 of 500 CITY OF ELSEGUNDO I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as approved by the City Council on 6/1/18. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The investment program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. Sources for the valuations are as follows: Federal Agency Issues, Treasury Securities and Miscellaneous Securities: Union Bank, the custodial agent for the City of El Segundo. Detailed information on all purchase and sale transactions follows the Investment Portfolio Details section. Matthew Robinson, City Treasurer Date d