Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2021 Dec 07 - CC PACKETAGENDA
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2021
4:00 PM CLOSED SESSION
6:00 PM OPEN SESSION
MEETING ID: 964 5963 7962
PIN: 730770
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
350 MAIN STREET, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
PUBLIC ADVISORY.
THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AND/OR LOBBY WILL ONLY BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARING.
(Face masks/coverings are required to be worn inside City facilities)
Drew Boyles, Mayor
Chris Pimentel, Mayor Pro Tern
Carol Pirsztuk, Councilmember
Scot Nicol, Councilmember
Lance Giroux, Councilmember
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
Matthew Robinson, City Treasurer
Executive Team
Scott Mitnick, City Manager
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
Jaime Bermudez, Interim Police Chief
Michael Allen, Dev. Services Director
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
Melissa McCollum, Com. Services Dir.
Mark Hensley, City Attorney
Joe Lillio, Chief Financial Officer
Deena Lee, Fire Chief
Rebecca Redyk, HR Director
Charles Mallory, IT Director
MISSION STATEMENT:
"Provide a great place to live, work, and visit."
VISION STATEMENT:
"Be a global innovation leader where big ideas take off while
maintaining our unique small town character."
1
Page 1 of 500
How Can Members of the Public Observe and Provide Public Comments?
• Residents can watch the meeting live via Spectrum Channel 3, AT&T U-Verse
Channel 99 and/or El Segundo TV at YouTube.com. Access remotely via Zoom
from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device or by phone. Use URL
https:Hzoom.us/j/96459637962 and enter PIN: 730770 or visit www.zoom.us on
device of choice, click on "Join a Meeting" and enter meeting ID and PIN.
• Join by phone at 1-669-900-9128 and enter meeting ID and PIN. Your phone
number is captured by the Zoom software and is subject to the Public
Records Act. Dial *67 BEFORE dialing in to remain anonymous.
• For Public Communications, members of the public may provide comments in the
Lobby and/or Council Chamber or via Zoom. For in person comments, please fill
out a Speaker Card located in the Chamber Lobby and for Zoom comments,
notify meeting host by raising your virtual hand (see hand icon at bottom of
screen) and you will be invited to speak. (If you do not wish for your name to
appear on the screen, then use the drop -down menu and click on "rename" to
rename yourself "anonymous") Please note that you will be placed in a "listen
only" mode and your video feed will not be shared with City Council or members
of the public.
• For written communication, submit to ALLELECTEDOFFICIALS(a)-elsegundo.org
by 3:00 PM to be uploaded to the Website. Emails received after 3:00 PM will be
posted the next day.
• For Public Hearings, members of the public may provide comments in the Lobby
and/or Council Chamber or via Zoom.
• Speaker cards and attendee's information captured by Zoom software will be
considered public documents subject to possible posting on the City's Website
and are subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.
Additional Information:
The City Council, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly
posted and listed agenda items. Any writings or documents given to a majority of City
Council regarding any matter on this agenda that the City received after issuing the
agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's Office during normal
business hours. Such documents may also be posted on the City's website at
www.elsegundo.org and additional copies will be available at the City Council meeting.
Unless otherwise noted in the agenda, the public can only comment on City -related
business that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council and/or items listed on the
agenda during the Public Communications portions of the Meeting. Additionally,
members of the public can comment on any Public Hearing item on the agenda during
the Public Hearing portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes
per person. Before speaking to the City Council, please state: your name, residence,
and organization/group you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
2
Page 2 of 500
4:00 PM CLOSED SESSION — CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (RELATED TO CITY BUSINESS ONLY — 5-MINUTE
LIMIT PER PERSON, 30-MINUTE LIMIT TOTAL) Individuals who have received value
of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees
speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing
City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of $250.
While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow City Council to take
action on any item not on the agenda. City Council and/or City Manager will respond to
comments after Public Communications is closed.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS
RECESS INTO CLOSED SESSION: City Council may move into a closed session
pursuant to applicable law, including the Brown Act (Government Code Section
§54960, et seq.) for purposes of conferring with City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or
conferring with City Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing
matters covered under Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and/or
conferring with City's Labor Negotiators.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (GOV'T CODE
§54956.9(D)(1): -2- MATTER(S)
1. Eric Moore (retired Fire Department Battalion Chief) v. City of El Segundo,
Workers Compensation Appeals Board, Case No. ADJ12509749
2. Michael Ward (retired Maintenance Worker) v. City of El Segundo, Workers
Compensation Appeals Board, Case No. ADJ11677036
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d) (2) and (3):
-1- matter.
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter.
6:00 PM — CONVENE OPEN SESSION — CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
INVOCATION — Pastor Scott Tannehill, The Bridge Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Councilmember Pirsztuk
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
1. Ainsley Gulden - Eagle Scout Holiday Project Commendation
2. Candy Cane Lane Event
3. Annual Holiday Parade
4. Los Angeles Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant Spill Update
3
Page 3 of 500
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (RELATED TO CITY BUSINESS ONLY — 5 MINUTE
LIMIT PER PERSON, 30 MINUTE LIMIT TOTAL) Individuals who have received value
of $50 or more to communicate to the City Council on behalf of another, and employees
speaking on behalf of their employer, must so identify themselves prior to addressing
the City Council. Failure to do so shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of
$250. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow Council to take
action on any item not on the agenda. The Council will respond to comments after
Public Communications is closed.
CITY MANAGER FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS — (Related to Public Communications)
A. PROCEDURAL MOTIONS
Read all Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda by Title Only
Recommendation - Approval
B. CONSENT
5. City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommendation -
Approve Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2021.
6. Warrant Demand Register for November 17, 2021 through December 07,
2021
Recommendation -
Ratify payroll and employee benefit checks; checks released early due to
contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments;
and, wire transfers.
2. Approve Warrant Demand Register numbers 10A, 10B and 10C: warrant
numbers 3038131 through 3038426, and 9002280 through 9002283.
7. Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project
Recommendation —
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Standard Public Works Contract with
Corral Construction & Development, Inc. in the amount of $144,044.00 for the
Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project, Project No. PW 22-02,
and authorize an additional $21,956.00 as contingency funds for potential
unforeseen conditions.
0
Page 4 of 500
8. Notice of Completion of the Utility Verification and Investigation Services
Project
Recommendation -
Accept the Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project No. PW
20-16 by T2 UES, Inc. as complete.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder's Office.
9. Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project
Recommendation -
Adopt resolution to approve plans and specifications for the Fire Stations
1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project No. PW 22-03.
2. Authorize staff to advertise the project for construction.
10. City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project
Recommendation -
1. Adopt resolution approving the plans and specifications of the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the City Hall Public Restroom
Improvements Project (CDBG Project 602294-20), Project No. PW 21-08.
2. Authorize staff to advertise the City Hall Public Restroom Improvements
Project 602294-20, Project No. PW 21-08 for construction.
11. Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements Project
Recommendation -
Adopt resolution to approve engineering plans and construction
specifications for the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom
Improvements, Project No. PW 21-09.
2. Authorize staff to advertise the Recreation Park Checkout Building
Restroom Improvements, Project No. PW 21-09 for construction.
3. Approve an additional appropriation of $300,000 from the unassigned
General Fund Balance.
5
Page 5 of 500
12. Adoption of Ordinance Adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of the El Segundo
Municipal Code Regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction
Recommendation —
Waive the second reading and adopt an ordinance adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of
El Segundo Municipal Code regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal
Reduction.
13. Government Finance Officers Association Award for Financial Reporting
Recommendation —
Receive and file the Government Finance Officers Association award for
excellence in financial reporting for the City's Fiscal Year 2019-20 Annual
Comprehensive Financial Report.
14. Resolution Allowing Public Meetings to Continue to be Conducted via
Teleconferencing Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361
Recommendation —
Approve a resolution to allow public meetings to continue to be conducted via
teleconferencing pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 361.
C. PUBLIC HEARINGS
15. Preferential Parking Zone 2 for Portions of California Street, Holly Avenue,
and Kansas Street
Recommendation —
Continue the public hearing until the January 18, 2022 City Council Meeting.
A
Page 6 of 500
16. Proposed Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and Training Facility
Development, and Raytheon Storage Facility Relocation (2000 E. El
Segundo Boulevard)
Recommendation -
Adopt resolution adopting an Addendum to the certified El Segundo
South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Environmental Impact Report
(EIR);
2. Waive first reading and introduce an ordinance approving a second
amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02 (Agreement No.
4972A), and minor modifications to Specific Plan No. 11-01 Revision A;
3. Adopt resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507
(SUB21-03) and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01 for development of a
new corporate headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles
Chargers on a 13.7-acre site, in the southeast section of the Raytheon
campus at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7" and "8"); and,
4. Adopt resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 21-02 for a storage
facility located in the southeast portion of lot 18 in Phase IV.
D. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
17. Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements
Recommendation —
Adopt resolution approving the City's participation in two national opioid litigation
settlements and authorizing the City Manager to execute related participation
and related implementation agreements.
18. Citywide Salary Schedule Update
Recommendation —
Adopt resolution to approve the Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4,
2011, with revisions through December 7, 2021.
19. Amendment to City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums
Recommendation —
Adopt resolutions amending the City Contributions for CalPERS medical
premiums for the Executive Management and Mid-Management/Confidential
groups covered under the City of El Segundo Administrative Code, Title 1A
Salaries and Conditions of Employment, Chapter 1A2 Management -Confidential
Series.
E. COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS PRESENTATIONS
F. REPORTS - CITY CLERK
7
Page 7 of 500
G. REPORTS - CITY TREASURER
20. Investment Portfolio Report for September 2021
Recommendation —
Receive and file.
H. REPORTS - COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBER GIROUX
COUNCILMEMBER NICOL
COUNCILMEMBER PIRSZTUK
MAYOR PRO TEM PIMENTEL
MAYOR BOYLES
I. REPORTS - CITY ATTORNEY
J. REPORTS/FOLLOW-UP - CITY MANAGER
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including
the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for the purposes of
conferring with the City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with the City
Attorney on potential and/or existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under
Government Code Section §54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with the City's Labor
Negotiators.
REPORT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION (if required)
MEMORIALS
ADJOURNMENT
POSTED:
DATE: December 3, 2021
TIME: 5:00 PM
BY: Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
Page 8 of 500
ommellbatt"On
City of (91 *eguubo, California
WHEREAS, Ainsley Gulden, Eagle Scout Candidate, and model El
Segundo youth was inspired to bring holiday cheer to her
community for all ages to enjoy; and
WHEREAS, Ainsley's ability to use her woodworking talents to plan and
implement her vision, while showcasing exceptional
organizational and leadership skills as she guided her team of
Scouts and volunteers through the process of designing,
building, and transforming Library Park's Gazebo into a
whimsical gingerbread house; and
WHEREAS, Ainsley's desire for her gingerbread decorations to bring years
of holiday cheer and smiles shines through in her thoughtful
designs, quality control and professional product; and
WHEREAS, Ainsley's diligence and perseverance is evident in her
commitment to achieving the highest level rank as an Eagle
Scout, and continued focus on seeing through her Eagle
Scout Service Project will be a benefit for the whole
community to enjoy.
NOW, THEREFORE, on this 7t" day of December, 2021, the Mayor and
Members of the City Council of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby take
great honor in commending Ainsley Gulden on completing her Eagle Scout
Service Project and adding to El Segundo's hometown charm in Library Park
where children play and residents of all ages gather to enjoy the outdoors.
Mayor Drew Boy(es
�dayor Pro 2'em Chris Pimentel Council9dember Caro(Birsztuk
Counci(,TemberScot Xico( Councif9demberLance Giroux
Page 9 of 500
tortamatt"On
Citp of (EC *egunbo, California
WHEREAS, Great and wonderful events are many times the inspiration of one person, like Ken Bailey,
whose simple idea that a decorated tree be placed at the end of the cul-de-sac on the 1200
Block of East Acacia Avenue in celebration of a neighborhood Christmas in 1949, is 72 years
later an annual holiday tradition in El Segundo, worthy of national media coverage, and
known as Candy Cane Lane; and
WHEREAS, Candy Cane Lane features Santa Claus arriving on top of a horn -blowing El Segundo Fire
Engine to light the beautifully decorated homes on Candy Cane Lane. Unfortunately, this
year Santa will immediately be returning to the North Pole after he lights up the lane due to
COVID 19 safety protocols; and
WHEREAS, Homes, yards and magnolia trees are brightly decorated while property owners dress up their
homes for all the oohs and aahs and the tradition of Candy Cane Lane. A few good merry
men of Candy Cane Lane, have given their merry Ho, Ho, Ho's, year after year, in the
Santa suit donated by Chevron. A big thanks to Spring Cleaners for generously making sure
Santa's suit is sparkling for the season. The El Segundo Police Department, the El Segundo
Volunteer Program and the El Segundo Recreational Park Department Heads who make
sure the crowds maneuver down the Lane in a safe and orderly fashion; and
WHEREAS, Least we forget, we herein list the names of the folks that are synonymous with Candy
Cane Lane: Eyres, Klingamans, Stocks, Esdins, Salehs, McEwan, Lees, Moores,
Turnbulls, McCulloughs, de Lambertyes, Guidone, Laughlin & Barre Mitchells, Gans,
Hudspeths, Harts, Doukakis's, Brunnenkants, Phillips, Stosser & Szeto, Leachs, Kehls,
Wongs, Schlendering, Wisiniakowski, Armacost & Hoggs.
NOW, THEREFORE, on this 7`' day of December, 2021, the Mayor and Members of the City Council of
the City of El Segundo, California, proclaim the 1200 Block of East Acacia Avenue as CANDY CANE
LANE from December 11, 2021 at 7:00 p.m., through December 23, 2021 and invite the young and young
at heart to experience the wonders of this El Segundo holiday tradition.
.Mayor Drew Boyfes
�44ayor Pro Tem Chris lnimentel CounciCWember CaroC(irsztuk
CounclOdember Scot Rico( CouncdWemberLance Giroux
Page 10 of 500
rortamatt"011
CCitp of CCC *eguubo, California
WHEREAS, The E1 Segundo Chamber of Commerce has given E1
Segundo the Annual Holiday Parade for the past 57 years, a
tradition which both celebrates El Segundo and calls forth
the Holiday Season; and
WHEREAS, The parade, to be held Sunday, December 12, 2021 from
1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., with a theme of Merry on Main, will
assemble on the corner of Imperial Avenue and Main, and
continue down Main Street, disbanding at E1 Segundo
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, The parade will start with the Grand Marshall, end with the
traditional Grand Finale - the Chevron Fire Truck, bringing
Santa Claus through downtown E1 Segundo, and in
between, the crowds will be treated to a few surprises.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and Members of the City Council of the
City of El Segundo, California, do hereby proclaim Sunday, December 12,
2021, as the 57th Annual E1 Segundo Holiday Parade, and invite the
community to all the traditional E1 Segundo holiday events and wish the
Chamber of Commerce many more years of marching down Main Street.
�I1ayor Drew Boyles
W ayor Pro rIem Chris lnimentel Council Member Carol Birsztuk
CounciOlember Scot Nicol CouncilWemberLance Giroux
Page 11 of 500
MEETING MINUTES OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2021
CLOSED SESSION — Due to lack of quorum at 4:00 PM, Mayor Boyles called to order
at 5:00 PM
ROLL CALL
Mayor Boyles -
Present
Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel -
Present
Council Member Pirsztuk -
Present
Council Member Nicol -
Present
Council Member Giroux -
Present
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION — (Related to City Business Only — 5-minute limit per
person, 30-minute limit total) None
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Mayor Boyles announced that Council would be meeting in closed session pursuant to
the items listed on the Agenda.
CLOSED SESSION:
City Council may move into a closed session pursuant to applicable law, including the
Brown Act (Government Code Section §54960, et seq.) for purposes of conferring with
City's Real Property Negotiator; and/or conferring with City Attorney on potential and/or
existing litigation; and/or discussing matters covered under Government Code Section
§54957 (Personnel); and/or conferring with City's Labor Negotiators as follows. -
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNCIL —ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d) (2)
and (3): -1- matter(s)
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(c): -1- matter(s)
Adjourned Closed Session at 5:50 PM
OPEN SESSION — Mayor Boyles called to order at 6:01 PM
ROLL CALL
Mayor Boyles -
Present
Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel -
Present
Council Member Pirsztuk -
Present
Council Member Nicol -
Present
Council Member Giroux -
Present
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 1
Page 12 of 500
INVOCATION — Pastor Rob McKenna, The Bridge Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
1. Holiday Events update given by Ryan Delgado, Recreation and Parks Supervisor
and Kristina Kora-Beckman, Community Services Education and Outreach. Few
dates to remember; Menorah Lighting is December 1 st in the City Hall Plaza from
5:30 -6:00 PM, Annual Tree Lighting event is December 2nd on Main Street in
front of the Plaza from 3:00 -7.00 PM, new event, Festival of Holidays is
December 3rd in the Plaza from 4:00 — 8:00 PM and the annual Christmas dinner
will be held on Christmas Eve, December 241", to RSVP call 310.524.2705 and if
you wish to have your dinner delivered call 310.524.2706.
2. Los Angeles Hyperion Treatment Plant Wastewater Spill and Recovery Update,
report given by Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS — (Related to City Business Only — 5-minute limit per
person, 30-minute limit total)
In Chamber -
Marianne Bjorklund, resident, commented on the increased coyote sightings in town.
Sheena Parks, resident, and El Segundo Little League (ESLL) Board Member,
commented on the need for a new working scoreboard at Brett Field.
Matthew Robinson, resident, requested Council to declare El Segundo a Constitutional
Republic City to protect the rights of citizens and those who work in El Segundo.
Geoff Gerny, resident, firefighter and FFA President, commented on the Council's
decision to brown out Engine 32.
Steve Dunlop, resident, commented on the City's coyote management plan and the
increased coyote sightings in town.
Via Zoom -
Julie Holop, resident, commented on the Teen Girl Space Coalition, which is mentioned
in the Recreation Park Master Plan on pages 24 and 29. Asked Council to consider
allocating space and funding for this project.
Carisma De Anda, resident, in favor, along with other youth, of the Aviation Greenway
Project.
CITY MANAGER FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS:
Interim Police Chief Bermudez commented on the increased coyote sightings and what
is being done. Mentioned there will be a meeting with the Department of Fish and
Wildlife on December 9t" at 5:30 PM at Joslyn Center, encouraged all to attend. Elias
Sassoon, Public Works Director, commented on the ESLL scoreboard and what the
next steps are to replace the current scoreboard. Scott Mitnick, City Manager
commented on browning out Engine 32.
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 2
Page 13 of 500
A. Read all Ordinances and Resolutions on the Agenda by Title Only.
MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk to read
all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda by title only. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
B. CONSENT:
3. Approve Regular City Council Minutes of November 2, 2021.
(Fiscal Impact: None)
4. Approve warrants demand register for October 25, 2021 through November 16,
2021, numbers 98A and 9B and warrant numbers 3037945 through 30381304,
and 9002243 through 9002279. Ratify Payroll and employee benefit Checks;
Checks released early due to contracts or agreement; Emergency disbursements
and/or adjustments; and, Wire transfers.
(Fiscal Impact: $1,240,449.10 ($805,421.58 in check warrants and $435,027.52
in wire warrants))
5. Authorize City Manager to execute standard Public Works Construction Contract
No. 6212 with Union Construction Company for $662,525 for the Civic Center
Maintenance and Repairs project and authorize an additional $132,000 as
contingency funds for potential unforeseen conditions. (Project No. PW 21-11)
(Fiscal Impact: $850,000.00)
6. PULLED BY MAYOR BOYLES
8. Authorize the City Manager to execute Professional Services Agreement No.
6214 with Bureau Veritas to prepare an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Transition Policy for the City in the amount of $150,000.
(Fiscal Impact: $150,000.00)
9. PULLED BY MAYOR PRO TEM PIMENTEL
10. Adopt Resolution No. 5284 adopting a Citywide Records Retention schedule for
City documents.
(Fiscal Impact: Savings in reduced storage expenses and improved operational
efficiency)
11. PULLED BY MAYOR PRO TEM PIMENTEL
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 3
Page 14 of 500
12. Waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1629 for Environmental
Assessment No. 1240 and Zone Text Amendment No. ZTA 18-07, amending
Municipal Code Title 15 (Zoning Regulations), Chapter 14: Historic Preservation,
Chapter 15: Off-street Parking and Loading Spaces, Chapter 22: Administrative
Determinations, Administrative Use Permits, and Adjustments, Chapter 23:
Director Discretionary Decisions, Chapter 24: Variances and Conditional Use
Permits, Chapter 25: Site Plan Review, Chapter 26: Coastal Zone Development
Permits, Chapter 27: Amendments, Chapter 28: Public Hearings, and Chapter
29: Appeals, and streamline the review and approval processes for discretionary
applications.
(Fiscal Impact: None)
MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Nicol, approving
Consent Agenda items 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 12 . MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOICE VOTE. 5/0
PULLED ITEMS:
6. 2022 City Council Meeting Calendar
Mayor Boyles requested the July 19, 2022 meeting date be added to the calendar as
part of the summer recess.
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Council discussion
MOTION by Mayor Boyles, SECONDED by Council Member Nicol approving the 2022
City Council calendar and adding the July 19, 2022 meeting date as part of the summer
recess. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/1 YES: Boyles Pimentel,
Nicol Giroux NO: Pirsztuk
7. Purchase of One New Ford F-550 Dump Truck
(Fiscal Impact: $66,383.00)
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director answered Councils questions regarding the need
to purchase the dump truck.
Council discussion
MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles pursuant to El
Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") § 1-7-9 (C), waive the bidding process and
purchase one (1) new Ford F-550 dump truck for use by the Public Works Department
and authorize the City Manager to execute a Agreement No. 6213 to purchase one (1)
new Ford F-550 Dump Truck. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
9. Resolution Approving Application for Per Capita Grant Funds
(Fiscal Impact: $188,087.00)
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 4
Page 15 of 500
Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel pulled the item to explain to the residents the process of
updating the Acacia Park and congratulate staff on a job well done.
Council discussion
MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles adopting
Resolution No. 5283 allowing an application to Per Capita Grant Funds to receive
funding from the Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018 ( Proposition 68). MOTION
PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
11. Resolution to Rescind Intent to Withdraw Membership from Independent Cities
Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) for FY 22/23 and Provide Written Notice of
Intent to Withdraw in FY 23/24
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel pulled the item to clarify the item to residents.
MOTION by Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel, SECONDED by Council Member Giroux
adopting Resolution No. 5285 authorizing the City Manager to rescind the written notice
of intent to withdraw membership from the Independent Cities Risk Management
Authority (ICRMA) for FY 22/23 and adopt Resolution No. 5286 authorizing the City
Manager to provide written notice of intent to withdraw membership from the
Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA) for FY 23/24. MOTION
PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
C. PUBLIC HEARING:
13. Resolution Adopting Preferential Parking Zone 2 for Portions of California Street,
Holly Avenue, and Kansas Street.
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Mayor Boyles stated the Public Hearing is continued to the December 7, 2021 City
Council Meeting.
D. STAFF PRESENTATIONS:
14. Candy Cane Lane Update and Safety Plan
(Fiscal Impact: $46,955.00)
Melissa McCollum, Community Services Director presented and reported on the item.
Jaime Bermudez, Interim Police Chief answered Councils questions.
Council discussion
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 5
Page 16 of 500
MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk
approving the traffic and pedestrian safety plan and related expenditures for the Candy
Cane Lane annual holiday lights event in the 1200 block of East Acacia Avenue and
surrounding neighborhood. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 5/0
MOTION by Council Member Pirsztuk, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles approving an
appropriation from the General Fund Balance Reserve (001-299-0000-2990) in the
amount of $46,955 to Recreation Special Events (001-400-5210-4101 for $36,000 and
001-400-5210-6214 for $10,955). MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE.
5/0
Recessed at 7:45 PM
Reconvened at 7:58 PM
15. Recreation Park Needs Assessment and Master Plan Recommendations
(Fiscal Impact: See staff report for fiscal impact narrative )
Melissa McCollum, Community Services Director and Zachary Mueting, Consultant with
RJM Design Group gave a presentation and answered Council's questions.
Council discussion
Council consensus to receive and file review of proposed Recreation Park Needs
Assessment and Master Plan, continue the item, no action this evening, schedule 2-2-1
meetings (individual meetings with staff and consultant) and schedule a work study
session meeting that possibly includes the Recreation and Parks Commission.
16. LA Metro Funding for Law Enforcement Services
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Jaime Bermudez, Interim Police Chief reported on the item.
Council discussion
MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Nicol to support
funding for LA Metro to maintain law enforcement services. MOTION PASSED BY
UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. 4/0 (Mayor Pro Tern left dais)
17. Conversion of Hillcrest Street and West Pine Avenue Intersection from Two -Way
Stop Signs to Four Way Stop Signs.
(Fiscal Impact: $500.00 estimation)
Scott Mitnick, City Manager reported on the item.
Council discussion
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 6
Page 17 of 500
MOTION by Council Member Nicol, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk directing
staff to install four-way stop signs at the intersection of Hillcrest Street and West Pine
Avenue. (Reference Resolution No. 5287) MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.
4/0 (Mayor Pro Tern left dais)
18. Resolution to Support the Brand -Huang -Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative,
Providing the City Land Use and Zoning Laws Override Conflicting State Laws
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Portland Bates, Senior Management Analyst reported on the item.
Council discussion
Mark Hensley, City Attorney read the resolution by title only;
RESOLUTION NO. 5288
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
SUPPORTING THE "BRAN D-HUANG-MENDOZA TRIPARTISAN LAND USE
INITIATIVE ENSURING LOCAL ZONING AND LAND USE AUTHORITY
MOTION by Council Member Giroux, SECONDED by Council Member Pirsztuk
adopting Resolution No. 5288. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. 4/0
(Mayor Pro Tern left dais)
19. Fiscal Year 2021-2022 First Quarter Financial Review
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Joe Lillio, Chief Financial Officer gave a presentation and answered Council's
questions.
Council discussion
Council consensus to receive and file the first quarter financial review.
MOTION by Council Member Nicol, SECONDED by Mayor Boyles authorizing staff to
form a City Council Finance Committee appointing Council Member Pirsztuk and
Council Member Giroux to serve on the committee. The bylaws will be brought back to a
future Council meeting for Council approval. MOTION PASSED BY UNANIMOUS
VOTE. 4/0 (Mayor Pro Tern left dais)
20. Ordinance Adding Chapter 8 to Title 5 of the El Segundo Municipal Code
Regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction (SB 1383)
(Fiscal Impact: None)
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director reported on the item and answered Council's
questions.
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 7
Page 18 of 500
Council discussion
Mark Hensley, City Attorney read the Ordinance by title only;
ORDINANCE NO. 1630
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 5 OF THE EL SEGUNDO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL
REDUCTION
Council Member Pirsztuk introduced Ordinance No. 1630.
Second reading and possible adoption scheduled for the regular City Council meeting
on December 7, 2021.
E. COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS PRESENTATIONS: None
F. REPORTS — CITY CLERK — Mentioned the December 21, 2021 City Council
meeting has been reinstated.
G. REPORTS — CITY TREASURER — Not Present
H. REPORTS — COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Giroux — No report
Council Member Nicol — Mentioned he would like Barbara Voss, Deputy City
Manager to look into a marketing push with local hotels in our city for the
upcoming Superbowl at SoFi Stadium in February 2022 and asked all who are
interested in the Christmas Eve Dinner to please reach out and RSVP at
310.2705 or request a meal delivery at 310.524.2706.
Council Member Pirsztuk — Thanked staff for their time and effort with the
Recreation Park Assessment Needs survey and thanked the Recreation and
Parks Commission for their time and input as well.
Mayor Pro Tern Pimentel — No report
Mayor Boyles — Will attend the South Bay Council of Governments (SBCOG)
Board of Directors meeting on Thursday, November 18, 2021 and wished
everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
REPORTS — CITY ATTORNEY — No report
J. REPORTS/FOLLOW-UP — CITY MANAGER — Will follow-up with Council
regarding the Recreation Park Assessment Survey, stated the next City Council
meeting will be held December 7, 2021 and reminded everyone City Hall will be
closed on November 25t" and 26t" next week for the Thanksgiving Holiday.
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 8
Page 19 of 500
MEMORIALS — Calvin Smith
Adjournment at 9.39 PM
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 16, 2021
PAGE 9
Page 20 of 500
{:ICVoy
ELEUND
TITLE:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.6
Warrant Demand Register for November 17, 2021 through December 07, 2021
RECOMMENDATION:
Ratify payroll and employee benefit checks; checks released early due to
contracts or agreements; emergency disbursements and/or adjustments; and,
wire transfers.
2. Approve Warrant Demand Register numbers 10A, 10B and 10C: warrant
numbers 3038131 through 3038426, and 9002280 through 9002283.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The warrants presented were drawn in payment of demands included within the FY
2021-2022 Adopted Budget. The total of $5,805,474.96 ($1,302,191.04 in check
warrants and $4,503,283.92 in wire warrants) are for demands drawn on the FY 2021-
2022 Budget.
BACKGROUND:
California Government Code Section 37208 provides General Law cities flexibility in
how budgeted warrants, demands, and payroll are audited and ratified by their
legislative body. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the California Government Code,
warrants drawn in payments of demands are certified by the City's Chief Financial
Officer and City Manager as conforming to the authorized expenditures set forth in the
City Council adopted budget need not be audited by the City Council prior to payment,
but may be presented to the City Council at the first meeting after delivery.
In government finance, a warrant is a written order to pay that instructs a federal, state,
county, or city government treasurer to pay the warrant holder on demand or after a
specific date. Such warrants look like checks and clear through the banking system like
checks. Warrants are issued for payroll to individual employees, accounts payable to
vendors, to local governments, and to companies or individual taxpayers receiving a
Page 21 of 500
Warrant Demand Register
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 2
refund.
DISCUSSION:
The attached Warrants Listing delineates the warrants that have been paid for the
period identified above. The Chief Financial Officer certifies that the listed warrants
were drawn in payment of demands conforming to the adopted budget and that these
demands are being presented to the City Council at its first meeting after the delivery of
the warrants.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability
Objective 5B: El Segundo approaches its work in a financially strategic and responsible
way.
PREPARED BY:
Wei Cao, CPA, CPFO, Management Analyst
REVIEWED BY:
Joseph Lillio, Chief Financial Officer
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Register 10a summary pages
2. Register 10b summary pages
3. Register 10c summary pages
Page 22 of 500
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
WARRANTS TOTALS BY FUND
3038131 - 3038238 DATE OF APPROVAL: AS OF 12r7121
9002280 - 9002282
Oct GENERAL FUND 352.123.26
104 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND -
106 STATE GAS TAX FUND
105 ASSOCIATED RECREATION ACTIVITIES FUND
109 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
110 MEAURE"R" -
ill COMM_DEVEL BLOCK GRANT -
112 PROP'A"TRANSPORTATION -
114 PROP U' TRANSPORTATION 16.140.18
115 AIR QUALITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM -
116 HOME SOUND INSTALLATION FUND -
117 HYPERION MITIGATION FUND
I la TOA ARTICLE 3 - SB 621 BIKEWAY FUND 57,466,07
119 MTA GRANT -
120 C.O.P.S. FUND
121 FEMA
122 L AW A FUND
123 PSAF PROPERTY TAX PUBLIC SAFETY -
124 FEDERAL GRANTS -
125 STATE GRANT 3,093.75
126 PIP CUPA PROGRAM OVERSIGHT SURCHARGE -
128 SB-1
129 CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM -
130 AFFORDABLE HOUSING -
131 COUNTY STORM WATER PROGRAM 5,000.00
202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT%73 -
301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -
302 INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUND -
4C5 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE -
501 WATER UTILITY FUND 3,621.20
502 WASTEWATER FUND 1,57752
503 GOLF COURSE FUND 2,000.00
505 SOLID WASTE FUND -
601 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 25,000.00
602 LIABILITY INSURANCE 192.00
603 WORKERS COMP. RESERVEANSURANCE -
701 RETIRED EMP. INSURANCE -
702 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND -DEVELOPER FEES -
703 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND -OTHER 1,500.00
704 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
706 OUTSIDE SERVICES TRUST
TOTALWARRANTS 3 468,144.08
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Information on actual expenditures is available in the Director of Finance's office in the
City of El Segundo.
I certify as to the accuracy of the Demands and the availability of fund for payment thereof.
For Approval: Regular checks held for City council authorization to release.
CODES: VOID CHECKS DUE TO ALIGNMENT:
NIA
R = Computer generated checks for all non-emergencyfurgency payments for materials, supplies and
services in support of City Operations
VOID CHECKS DUE TO INCORRECT CHECK DATE:
For Ratification:
A = Payroll and Employee Benefit checks VOID CHECKS DUE TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE ERROR:
AP - U = Computer generated Early Release disbursements and/or adjustments approved by the City
Manager. Such as: payments for utility services, petty cash and employee travel expense NOTES
reimbursements, various refunds, contract employee services consistent with current contractual
agreements, instances where prompt payment discounts can be obtained or late payment penalties
can be avoided or when a situation arises that the City Manager approves.
H = Handwritten Early Release tlisburserrf7!}j�ts and/or dl stmenls approved by the City Manager.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER � � j CITY MANAGER
DATE: �Y\ (' DATE:
REGISTER R 10A
Page 23 of 500
D
0
r
r
D
�
O
=
>
m
O D
D n
r O
D z
N
n
m
O m
m z
K 0
rn
z
� C
-i
U)
CO
Cn
cnO
AAAA4h.
A p
M O) W N
O
O O O O O
O
O
O
C)aJ
Dmcnm
m m
7 n
nn - =
3 C. N m (Q
C (emu
3 CD
o
0
3 cn m
CD m i7 0
v �
O
41 �.
m
z
3 m
v
w
m
m
0 v
m
m
m
C
n
m
(D
r
O
m
z
A
W
W
W
O
O
cn v 0)
�1
CU
A U1 W fV
W
W
W
s N Ul cn
N N W j p N N .... N N N — 0
A A N CO V p Un A A N —— W N —+ m
0 0 0 0 O O O O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0
A W O O O O O --+ p N s N --+ O --�
-nao -,m rZOG)DmmOOOOOO G)
� O O O O cl 0 ——— m
—0- 0' v Q3 < 3 c� 3���� z
00 3' m m 3 �' ?. o D 3 c� n m
(a -O c
v 3 3� 3. 0 3 m c
Cn CD A m cn :3 O D D
(D �m`m �`� o_rn m m cD
W m Qm o v' D 0
0 M. 0 (a c�-i' 3 r 0 Z m
cn �`n y m3_ O m D _OU)i00
O m D v"ccm m cn0Dm
o' m a -I mr r
fn z m m C/)
m z � <
Z y a 0 C
r D mz
m DO
X >O
m —i
m �
z m
z
c
m
(n o
-i
O N W W N (J7 j D
-4 W A A �1 W W r
—1 O N O W IV j
O —I N W A N s A �1 CO W �I v IV co
N A j O W W O W W W A 07 O O W
(O 0 W cn N O N m m m M (.n V N O O
N O A W N W O A O N M M --i m O O
Page 24 of 500
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
11/08/21 THROUGH 11/14/21
Date
Payee
Description
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
14,013.21
EFT Retirement Safety-Fire-PEPRA New 25020
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
27,235.42
EFT Retirement Safety-Police-PEPRA New 25021
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
42,604.04
EFT Retirement Misc - PEPRA New 26013
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
41,761.09
EFT Retirement Misc - Classic 27
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
65,544.00
EFT Retirement Safety Police Classic - 1 st Tier 28
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
58,283.98
EFT Retirement Safety Fire- Classic 30168
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
3,296.92
EFT Retirement Sfty Police Classic-2nd Tier 30169
11/9/2021
Cal Pers
577,422.68
EFT Health Insurance Payment
11/10/2021
West Basin
2,455,802.99
H2O payment
11/12/2021
Mission Square
62,516.64
457 payment Vantagepoint
11/12/2021
Mission Square
1,279.09
401(a) payment Vantagepoint
11/12/2021
Mission Square
550.00
IRA payment Vantagepoint
11/12/2021
ExpertPay
1,763A2
EFT Child support payment
11/01/21-11107/21
Workers Comp Activity
51,252.89
SCRMA checks issued
11/01/21-11/07/21
Liability Trust - Claims
2,132.00
Claim checks issued/(voided)
11/01/21-11/07/21
Retiree Health Insurance
11,697.57
Health Reimbursment checks issued
3,417,155.94
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/15/21
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE: 3,417,155.94
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by:
Treasury & Customer Services Manager Daffi
Chief FA anci I Officer Date
Date
nformation on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo.
PACity TreasurerlWire Transfers\Wire Transfers 07-01-21 to 6-30-22 1 1/15/2021 1 /1
Page 25 of 500
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
WARRANTS TOTALS BY FUND
3038239 - 3038313
DATE OF APPROVAL: AS OF 12f7121
9002283 -
Lot GENERAL FUND 273,115.01
104 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND -
106 STATE GAS TAX FUND 38,491.70
108 ASSOCIATED RECREATION ACTIVITIES FUND -
109 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND -
11D MEAURE"R' -
ill COMM. DEVEL BLOCK GRANT -
112 PROP"N'TRANSPORTATION -
114 PROP"C'TRANSFORTATION -
115 AIR QUALITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM -
116 HOME SOUND INSTALLATION FUND -
117 HYPERION MITIGATION FUND -
118 TDA ARTICLE 3- SS 821 BIKEWAY FUND -
119 MTAGRANF -
120 C.O.P.S. FUND -
121 FEMA
122 LA.W.A FUND -
123 PSAF PROPERTY TAX PUBLIC SAFETY -
124 FEDERAL GRANTS -
125 STATE GRANT 7,800.00
126 AM CUPA PROGRAM OVERSIGHT SURCHARGE 2,352.00
128 se-1 9,062.50
129 CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM -
130 AFFORDABLE HOUSING -
131 COUNTY STORM WATER PROGRAM -
202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICTC73 -
301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 171,737.20
302 INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUND -
4C5 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE -
501 WATER UTILITY FUND 15,144.96
502 WASTEWATER FUND 16,010,07
503 GOLF COURSE FUND -
505 SOLID WASTE FUND -
601 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT -
602 LIABILITY INSURANCE -
603 WORKERS COMP, RESERVEIINSURANCE -
701 RETIREDEMP. INSURANCE -
702 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND - DEVELOPER FEES 438.05
703 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND - OTHER 2,500.00
704 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT -
708 OUTSIDE SERVICES TRUST -
TOTAL WARRANTS
$ 538.371_89
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Information an actual expenditures is available in the Director of Finance's once in the
City of El Segundo.
I certify as to the accuracy of the Demands and the availability of fund for payment thereof.
For Approval Regular checks held for City council authorization to release,
CODES'.
VOID CHECKS DUE TO ALIGNMENT:
N/A
R = Computer generated checks for all non-emergencylurgency payments for materials, supplies and
services in support of City Operations
VOID CHECKS DUE TO INCORRECT CHECK DATE:
For Ratification,
A = Payroll and Employee Benefit checks
VOID CHECKS DUE TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE ERROR:
AP - U = Computer generated Early Release disbursements andfor adjustments approved by the City
Manager. Such as: payments for utility services, petty cash and employee travel expense
NOTES
reimbursements, various refunds, contract employee services consistent with current contractual
agreements, instances where prompt payment discounts can be obtained or late payment penalties
(�] can be avoided or when a situation arises that the City Manager approves.
H = y Handwritten Early Releas cisbur enls tUor adjustments approved by the City Manager.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CITY MANAGER
�•
DATE: y `�'� b—�11 DATE:
I \"L
REGISTERS JOB
Page 26 of 500
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
11/15/21 THROUGH 11/21/21
Date Payee
11/15/2021 IRS
11/15/2021 Employment Development
11/15/2021 Employment Development
11 /17/2021 ExpertPay
11/1712021 Unum
11/18/2021 Pitney Bowes
11/08/21-11/14/21 Workers Comp Activity
11108/21-11/14/21 Liability Trust - Claims
11/08/21-11/14121 Retiree Health Insurance
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/22121
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE:
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by:
Treasury & Customer Services Manager _T
Chief RVAncial Officer
City Manager
Description
281,834.81
Federal941 Deposit
4,680.47
State SDI payment
67,964.97
State PIT Withholding
1,763.42
EFT Child support payment
266.10
Long Term Care Premium - October
10,000.00
Postage for City Hall
1T311.65
SCRMA checks issued
0.00
Claim checks issued/(voided)
0.00
Health Reimbursment checks issued
383,821.42
Date
Date
I ZCl' Z !,
Date
Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo.
383,821.42
PACity TreasurerlWire Transfers\Wire Transfers 07-01-21 to 6-30-22 1 1 /22/2021 1 /1
Page 27 of 500
O 000 r- CD N O O M O
O O O O" LO r M LO O M
0 mr--OuiMmIg0 rl-
T M O O rT M CO CO N
aD l(] In `ct O O In MM M L17
J
<
Ln T O CD r N 'i
V T N O
cq
0
CO
w
z
w
n
z
w
�-
a
x
oa
w
z w m
Z) p 0
J
Q
H
Z
N
w m -
W
[n N a'
cd
Z
C
Jew
�0U
>
10
w
Q
C N a
Q w
[]'
Z
w
p
Ci
J
U
H
U
p
a
Q .�
N o a) a Q)
Z
Q
Z
p
w
.0 > m 0 m
OfJ
w
is
m
C <n Y ca .0 C a) .w tf
w
O 0 N M M 0 C_ .y C 7 O..
U c c
U�Q
LU
.� '
o.� o
t.- 0�a o' 0-0
(�
UUUUUUwa.< 0Z_r
_ _ _
r O r r N CD
a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
r N M T r N d' V' LO O r� 0 r
p
r r r N N N N N N N N (N CO
H
LL
a
N
c)
J
m
M
a
O CO � N
rn C) Cl) r
00 f-CO
N co T1�2
u
E
a
T <
m U)
CO cn
u
_m
U N a CD
O i C
a 1L In a
O O m Nr
O Cl O O
r N It
M M N N
N CD
N 00) 1
0 of ao (0 �r Sri
CO rl- qT O
T 0 N �;
V' V' ti 1 c0
N ti T
z
lu
2
a
0
Y
O
W
C U
w
m
C
_ f4
o
in
to c
a
Z
m
t`a
a
ca y
C
C
O
a N O
0 3 N
0
c
2 E
c W Q) Q
U
cu
a) aD
.-
ED Q) S E
U C
W W Q
�U
0
C�
O O
O O O O O
N O
O
r N M CO CO
OO
�t It
t
LO
7
CO
O
O
O
0)
co
M
T
`
V'
CQ
O
LO
w
Z
cr
p
Z
o
w
Z a
Z
w
D
0
aw
0
a
w
IL
Q 0
~
w
J
!—
0
a
J
U
Q
Page 28 of 500
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
WARRANTS TOTALS BY FUND
3038314 - 3038426 DATE OF APPROVAL: AS OF 1217121
not GENERALFUND 195,249.76
104 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND -
105 STATE GAS TAX FUND 5,002.30
ins ASSOCIATED RECREATION ACTIVITIES FUND -
109 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 242.58
110 MEAURE"R"
111 COMM DEVEL BLOCK GRANT -
112 PROP"A"TRANSPORTATION -
114 PROP'C"TRANSPORTATION -
115 AIR QUALITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM -
116 HOME SOUND INSTALLATION FUND -
117 HYPERION MITIGATION FUND 216.38
116 TOA ARTICLE 3 - SB 821 BIKEWAY FUND -
119 MTA GRANT 14,710.89
120 COPS FUND 13,183.00
121 FEMA -
122 L.AW.A. FUND
123 PSAF PROPERTY TAX PUBLIC SAFETY -
124 FEDERAL GRANTS -
125 STATE GRANT -
126 AlP CUPA PROGRAM OVERSIGHT SURCHARGE 6.27
128 SB�l 17,623.96
129 CERTIFIEDACCESS SPECIALIST PROGRAM -
130 AFFORDABLE HOUSING -
131 COUNTY STORM WATER PROGRAM 7.14325
202 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT*73 -
301 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -
302 INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT FUND -
405 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE -
501 WATER UTILITY FUND 16,325. 17
502 WASTEWATER FUND 4,936,98
503 GOLF COURSE FUND -
505 SOLID WASTE FUND
601 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT -
602 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1.18
603 WORKERS COMP. RESERVOINSURANCE 51.46
701 RETIRED EMP. INSURANCE -
702 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND -DEVELOPER FEES 5.695.37
703 EXPENDABLE TRUST FUND - OTHER 7,494.00
704 CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT 7792.80
708 OUTSIDE SERVICES TRUST
TOTAL WARRANTS $ 295,674.35 Lf_
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Information on actual expenditures is available in the Director of Finance's ofce in the
City of El Segundo.
I certify as to the accuracy of the Demands and the availability of fund for payment thereof.
For Approval: Regular checks held for City council authorization to release.
CODES: VOID CHECKS DUE TO ALIGNMENT:
WA
R = Computer generated checks for all non-emergency7urgency payments for matedafs, supplies and
services in support of City Operations
VOID CHECKS DUE TO INCORRECT CHECK DATE:
For Ratification:
A= Payroll and Employee Benefit checks VOID CHECKS DUE TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE ERROR:
AP- U = Computer generated Early Release disbursements and/or adjustments approved by the City
Manager. Such as: payments for utility services, petty cash and employee travel expense NOTES
reimbursements, various refunds, contract employee services consistent with current contractual
agreements, instances where prompt payment discounts can be obtained or late payment penalties
y can be avoided or when a situation arises that the City Manager approves. 1
H = 34 Handwritten Early �disbumis and/ r adjustments gIppmved by the City Manages
CHIEF PI NCIAL OFFICER CITY MANAGER .[
DATE: DATE:
REGISTER 14 10C
Page 29 of 500
C+
cn 0
4 O
00 CA W N —
oC,
00000
O N
i 0 0
O
O
F-
D
(D(D
CL c
m
3 (n m
CD
CD
•-a �`
D
0
m` 3 m
CD m Za CD
--1 D
m
_
0
0
X
N
Z
3 v
[)
O
m
m
m
N
3.
C
Z
,<
m
m
mCO z
a
m
CD
U
r
O
N
.Q
m
z
D fD
w
71 -4
N O 0-0 00
D (D
_A
_?
�
1 cn cn w —
It Cn
CO
Cb
90
O O N (wD W
0 Cn
N
N
.
co
cn (D C) O N
n ())
—
(D
N W W —1 A
N N W W fA 1V N N N N N N N N— 0
A N CD -I O C" � -� Jh- N — W N 1 rn
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
•P Cl) OO 00CD—ON
it
moon-v rzOODmmOOOOOO O
O
a 0' a3<310`3 Z
m 3 3 3'—o D3 �0-40 m
CL a)
w�3'c033o?w�coo � ru
t c c0i m r D
m CD < O m C D
Q- W CD Q CD O N D 0
3 n • 3
0�r N
m m D -I
CD -m � W O Z
6)co00
m °: n m '[� m �-n D m
o m m CD
r r
cn ' z NCom
G)
Z D o C
r u0
m >0
X
m
m
z m
z
�
c
m
m
0
N N -� N W N D
N 00 N (n �I v CA V C) CD r
m Cn s CD N A CA W 1 0 [n W
i" Cn O 1 Cr CO W 3 O Cn 00 W O N co
W C.O O W CA W CD W N 00 — O -1I N N Cn
Ul V N W CA — M W O m N (D W" V m
CA cn — O W 00 O CO N N 00 m D)
Page 30 of 500
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
PAYMENTS BY WIRE TRANSFER
11/22/21 THROUGH 11/28/21
Date
Payee
11/22/2021
Unum
11/23/2021
Cal Pers
11/23/2021
Cal Pers
11/23/2021
Cal Pers
11/23/2021
Cal Pers
11/23/2021
Cal Pers
11123/2021
Cal Pers
11/23/2021
Cal Pers
11/24/2021
Mission Square
11/24/2021
Mission Square
11/24/2021
Mission Square
11/26/2021
IRS
11/26/2021
Employment Development
11/26/2021
Employment Development
11/15/21-11/21/21
Workers Comp Activity
11/15121-11/21/21
Liability Trust - Claims
11/15/21-11/21/21
Retiree Health Insurance
DATE OF RATIFICATION: 11/29121
TOTAL PAYMENTS BY WIRE:
Description
266.10
Long Term Care Premium - November
13,343.99
EFT Retirement Safety- Fi re-PEPRA New 25020
27,193.73
EFT Retirement Safety-Police-PEPRA New 25021
42,899.67
EFT Retirement Misc - PEPRA New 26013
41,153.23
EFT Retirement Misc - Classic 27
63,155.96
EFT Retirement Safety Police Classic - 1st Tier 28
57235.22
EFT Retirement Safety Fire- Classic 30168
3,296.92
EFT Retirement Sfty Police Classic-2nd Tier 30169
56,090.58
457 payment Vantagepoint
1,198.62
401(a) payment Vantagepoint
550.00
IRA payment Vantagepoint
285,472.96
Federal 941 Deposit
4,354.23
State SDI payment
69,836.66
State PIT Withholding
36,258.69
SCRMA checks issued
0.00
Claim checks issuedl(voided)
0.00
Health Reimbursment checks issued
702, 306.56
Certified as to the accuracy of the wire transfers by:
Treasury & Customer Services Manager
&I� 9/�l
Date
Date
Date
Information on actual expenditures is available in the City Treasurer's Office of the City of El Segundo.
PACity TreasurerlWire Transfers\Wire Transfers 07-01-21 to 6-30-22
702,306.56
11 /29/2021 111
Page 31 of 500
{:ICVoy
ELEUND
TITLE:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.7
Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Standard Public Works Contract with Corral
Construction & Development, Inc. in the amount of $144,044.00 for the Police
Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project, Project No. PW 22-02, and authorize
an additional $21,956.00 as contingency funds for potential unforeseen conditions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget
Amount Budgeted: $250,000
Additional Appropriation: None
Account Number(s): 109-400-3109-8708 (Asset Forfeiture Fund), $166,000
BACKGROUND:
At the September 7, 2021 City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to advertise
this project for construction and solicit bids to demolish and renovate the existing
women's bathroom facility at the Police Department located at 348 Main Street. The
scope of this remodel project includes removing the existing smaller locker room and
utilizing the space to add one more shower stall, maintaining the two existing toilet
stalls, and upgrading the facility to current American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
California Building Code (CBC) requirements.
DISCUSSION:
Page 32 of 500
Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 3
On October 19, 2021, the City Clerk received and opened 8 bids:
1.
Corral Construction & Development, Inc. (Commerce,
$144,044.00
CA)
2.
Urban Professional Builders, Inc. (Pasadena, CA)
$174,000.00
3.
Sanz Construction, Inc. (Alhambra, CA)
$189,000.00
4.
G2K Construction, Inc. (Agoura Hills, CA)
$198,000.00
5.
Golden Sun Enterprise (Van Nuys, CA)
$208,777.00
6.
Sas Constructions (Santa Ana, CA)
$223,000.00
7.
Meyers Construction Co (Long Beach, CA)
$233,000.00
8
Union Construction Co (Glendale, CA)
$228,290.00
A protest against Corral Construction & Development, Inc. (Corral) was received on
October 20, 2021. After reviewing the protest in cooperation with the City Attorney's
Office, staff concluded that Corral remains the lowest responsive and responsible
bidder. The protest and response letters are attached.
Staff checked references and the contractor's license status and found the performance
of their work to be satisfactory. Corral has successfully completed similar projects for
other public agencies.
With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for the bathroom remodel
is as follows:
December 2021
Contract Award
February 2022
Begin Construction
May 2022
Project Completion
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Page 33 of 500
Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 3
Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external
customers.
Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology
Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and
effective community.
PREPARED BY:
Arianne Bola, Sr. Engineer Associate
REVIEWED BY:
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Location Map
3. Bid Log Sheet
4. Bid Protest and Response Letters
5. Contract
Page 34 of 500
ELSEGUNDO PW 22-02 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel
Project Vicinity Map
�,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�••—••—••� Imperi it Awe—••— •�..—• •.——••�•f=FAirF,tiF1
E VVal nut Ave ; I
�Oway 1
I E Sycamore Ave i!
A
s
'
I'
E Maple Aveel
-,AQUAdD
1 +n Hqh
SsYrtfoa z
MariposaAvk,
�.
eguildo garb �
E and Ave c Grand
u
2
io�l4nq�ieS
14V Grand Ave
Air Foma
Ic
EFranklinAve _
dc
a
•
E E I Sequnbo Nvd
<"hw on
E
-E El Segy
Parl
=
.UAAlfbofne
f
91RiA 6
A
O
�
�
U
T Fw
Wau E I
•^
S�utrHa "
O
k
'
a l
W 1111h St
Lenny
rVi ddl-E
Sc hors
W.
Awe
N�e
w9
Y
C
{J
ir
cl
Q
- W R o=_
6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Page 35 of 500
ELSEGUNDO PW 22-02 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel
Project Location Map
--Ay Hall
Cb
Police
I �
Station
,Jv�_.,,
E Holly Ave
-41
I I
Snack
Bar
Fire
Station 1 Public
Parking
Public - Q;JV
Parking
199
Grand Ave W Grand Ave r
t�l
0
376.2 0 188.08 376.2 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
BID LOG
BID NO. PW 22-02
City of El Segundo — Public Works Department
Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project
Date of BID Opening: Tuesday, October 19, 2021
Time of BID Opening: 11 AM
Place of BID Opening: City Clerk's Office
COMPANY NAME/ADDRESS
Total BID Amount
d N)
1.
Sanz Construction, Inc.
2724 W. Main Street
1 .I D (D Q
Alhambra, CA 91801
Received: 1011412021 aD 11:40 AM
2.
SAS Constructions
505 N. Tustin Ave., #128
223 I �(�� e p
Santa Ana, CA 92705
1
Received: 1011912021 10:07 AM
3. Urban Professional Builders, Inc.
157 El Nido Ave.
`__7 LA C)0 CD
V
Pasadena, CA 91107
Received:10/1912021 @ 10:22 AM
4. Corral Construction & Development
5211 E. Washington Blvd. 2-122
�' L-Li
Commerce, CA 90040
Received. 10/1912021 @ 10:30 AM
5.
G2K Construction, Inc.
28348 Roadside Dr., Ste. 205
o
(Do1�
Agoura Hills, CA 91301
V
Received: 1011912021 @ 10:34 AM
6.
Meyers Construction Co.
0 C7O
Received: 1011912021 @D 10:41 AM
7.
Ij0,Oh Wvj%qum/on Co
(�
Received:10 l°1I21 W'MAM
8.
G&AW �uv\ fnteypvi i-ee
Received: t0 1a 12,1
9.
Received:
10.
Received:
Staff Present: City Clerk's Office
4y_Qe[k's Office
PW Representative
FORMS\BIMOPENLOG1
Page 37 of 500
Bola, Arianne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Good morning Ms. Bola:
Urban Builders Estimator <estimator@urbanbuilders.com>
Wednesday, October 20, 2021 11:47 AM
Bola, Arianne
Naji Khalil
Bid Protest
PW 22-02 Police Department Womens Bathroom Remodel Project - Corral Construction
and Development Inc..pdf; PW 22-02 Bid Tally.xlsx
We have examined the apparent lowest bidder's proposal. We noticed the following
deficiencies with "Corral Construction and Development Inc." bid proposal which might render
their bid proposal non responsive:
1- Their Non -Collusion affidavit was not notarized.
2- They failed to list subcontractors for the plumbing and electrical trades. Their bid proposal
clearly states that they hold "B" and "C33" licenses only. As such, they cannot perform those
two trades with their own crew.
We believe that "Corral Construction" proposal is non -responsive.
We look forward to hearing the City of El Segundo's final decision with respect to this our bid
protest.
Thanks and regards,
Eyad Khalil
Urban Professional Builders
310 801 8302
i
Page 38 of 500
November 9, 2021
j EL S
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
• �. G.II! �.. T!. , p l•
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-524-2200
Urban Professional Builders, Inc.
Attn: Naji Haj-Khalil, Owner
157 El Nido Ave.,
Pasadena, CA 91107
Via Email to najikhalil@urbanbuilders.com
Elected Officials:
Subject: Response to Letter of Protest by Urban Professional Builders, Inc. for
Dren'Rny'/es,
Alnyor
PW 22-02 Police Department Women's Bathroom Remodel Project
Chris Pirumfel,
Alayor No Tent
Lance Giroux
Connell Alenrber
Carol Pimr"A,
Dear Mr. Haj-Khalil,
Cauncil Alenrber
Scot Nicol,
Council Alemher
Tracy Weever,
Please refer to Corral Construction & Development, Inc.'s response to Urban Professional
Cig'Clerk
nrinhe,e Rnbinsan,
Builders, I g
By nc.'s bid protest attached with this letter. After reviewing the relevant information
Cig'Treasnrer
concerning your bid protest with our City Attorney's Office, the City of El Segundo staff will
recommend that the City Council award the contract to the lowest bidder Corral Construction
Appointed officials:
& Development, Inc.
Scort Alitnick,
Ciry'Mnsley.
Afnrk D. Hcrtslcy',
We thank you for our interest in the project and hope that you will continue to monitor the Ci 's
Y Y p j p y ty
Cig'Artorrtey
website for future contracting opportunities.
Department Directors:
Sincerely,
Barbara Voss,
-
Depnry Cite Manage'60
Joseph Lillio,
Finance
Ar nne Bola
Beene Lee,
Fire Chief
Senior Associate Engineer
Rebecca Reelyk,
Human Resornes
Charles Afalrory,
information Systems
CC:
Arelissn muff )-s
COINIIInlnlly'.SCrvnCes
Elias Sassoon Public Works Director
,
AficD Allen•
De,•eluplrlenl
Lifan Xu City Engineer
Services
Jaime Rerlmrrle..
�
Joaquin Vazquez, Assistant City Attorney
Interim Pot c Chief
Elias Sassoon,
Arblic jfl kv
350 Main Street, El Segundo, California 90245-3613
Phone (310) 524-2300
Page 39 of 500
Corral Construction#92H.5
5211 E. Washington Boulevard #2-122
Commerce, CA 90040
562 762-6632
11 /4/2021
Arianne Bola
Senior Associate Engineer
City of El Segundo
Public Works Department
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Re: PW22-02 Bid Protest Response
Police Department — Women's Locker Room Project
Hello Ms. Bola:
Our response to the bid protest that was submitted for the above project is as follows.
Non -Collusion Affidavit Not Notarized
1) The non -collusion affidavit form in the bid package did not need to be individually notarized.
Neither the form itself or any instructions state that this form must be individually notarized.
Plumbing & Electrical Subcontractors Were Not Listed
2) As long as the project is in connection to a structure and it requires 2 or more unrelated trades
besides framing or carpentry than a B licensed contractor can self -perform the unrelated trades,
including electrical and plumbing work. (Business & Professions Code, Division 3, Chapter 9,
Article 4, Section 7057(b).
Given the above response you can see that our bid was in fact responsive. We look forward to
working with you on this project. Let me know if you need anything else.
Thank you,
Renee Soto
President
Page 40 of 500
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND
CORRAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
POLICE DEPARTMENT WOMEN'S BATHROOM REMODEL
PROJECT NO.: PW 22-02
This CONTRACT is entered into this 7' day of December, 2021, by and between the
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal corporation ("the City") and
CORRAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC. ("the Contractor").
1. WORK.
A. The Contractor will provide all work required by the Contract Documents (the
"Work"). The Contractor agrees to do additional work arising from changes
ordered by the City in accordance with the Contract Documents.
B. The Contractor and the City agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained
in the Contract Documents;
C. The Contractor will furnish all of the labor; supplies and materials; equipment;
printing; vehicles; transportation; office space and facilities; all tests, testing and
analyses; and all matters whatsoever (except as otherwise expressly specified to
be furnished by the City) needed to perform and complete the Work and provide
the services required of the Contractor by the Contract Documents.
D. "Contract Documents" means the Notice Inviting Bids; Instructions to Bidders;
Supplementary Instructions to Bidders; Proposal; this Contract; Standard
Specifications; Supplementary Conditions; Exhibits; Technical Specifications;
List of Drawings; Drawings; Addenda; Notice to Proceed; Change Orders;
Notice of Completion; and all other documents identified in the Contract
Documents which together form the contract between the City and the Contractor
for the Work. The Contract Documents constitute the complete agreement
between the City and the Contractor and supersede any previous agreements or
understandings.
2. CONTRACT SUM. The City agrees to pay the Contractor a sum not to exceed a total of
One Hundred Forty Four Thousand, Forty Four Dollars ($144,044.00) for the Work in the
manner set forth in the Contract Documents.
3. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE.
A. The Contractor will fully complete the Work within one hundred twenty (120�
calendar days (the "Contract Time.")
B. The Contract Time will commence when the City issues a Notice to Proceed.
Page 41 of 500
The Contract Documents will supersede any conflicting provisions included on
the notice to proceed issued pursuant to this Contract.
C. The Contractor may not perform any Work until:
The Contractor furnishes proof of insurance as required by the Contract
Documents; and
ii. The City gives the Contractor a written, signed, and numbered purchase
order and notice to proceed.
D. By signing this Contract, the Contractor represents to the City that the Contract
Time is reasonable for completion of the Work and that the Contractor will
complete the Work within the Contract Time.
E. Should the Contractor begin the Work before receiving written authorization to
proceed, any such Work is at the Contractor's own cost and risk.
4. DISPUTES. Disputes arising from this contract will be determined in accordance with the
Contract Documents and Public Contracts Code §§ 10240-10240.13.
5. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. In accordance with Public Contracts Code § 9201, the City will
promptly inform the Contractor regarding third -party claims against the Contractor, but in no
event later than ten (10) business days after the City receives such claims. Such notification
will be in writing and forwarded in accordance with the "Notice" section of the Contract
Documents. As more specifically detailed in the Contract Documents, the Contractor agrees
to indemnify and defend the City against any third -party claim.
6. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. The Contractor will provide the City with a
Taxpayer Identification Number.
7. PERMITS AND LICENSES. Unless otherwise provided, the Contractor, at its sole
expense, will obtain and maintain during the Contract Time, all necessary permits, licenses,
and certificates that may be required in connection with the Work.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models,
photographs and reports prepared by the Contractor under the Contract Documents are the
City's property. The Contractor may retain copies of said documents and materials as
desired, but will deliver all original materials to the City upon the City's written notice.
9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the City
harmless as set forth in the Contract Documents. The requirements as to the types and limits
of insurance coverage to be maintained by the Contractor as required by the Contract
Documents, and any approval of such insurance by the City, are not intended to and will not
in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the
Page 42 of 500
Contractor pursuant to the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, to the
provisions concerning indemnification.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City and the Contractor agree that the Contractor
will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in
which is it performed. The Contractor will be free to contract for similar service to be
performed for other employers while under contract with the City. The Contractor is not an
agent or employee of the City and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan,
insurance, bonus or similar benefits the City provides for its employees. Any provision in
this Contract that may appear to give the City the right to direct the Contractor as to the
details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that the
Contractor will follow the direction of the City as to end results of the work only.
11. AUDIT OF RECORDS. The Contractor will maintain full and accurate records with
respect to all services and matters covered under this Contract. The City will have free
access at all reasonable times to such records, and the right to examine and audit the same
and to make transcript therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings
and activities. The Contractor will retain such financial and program service records for at
least three (3) years after termination or final payment under the Contract Documents.
12. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made
when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
The City
City of El Segundo -Public Works
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attention: Arianne Bola
abola@elsegundo.org
(310) 524-2364
The Contractor
Corral Construction & Development, Inc.
5211 E. Washington Boulevard #2-122
Commerce, CA 90040
Attention: Renee Soto
coffal.construction@yahoo.com
(562) 762-6632
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by
the addressee three (3) days after deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and
properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the
time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom
notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph.
13. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. This Contract and every provision herein is for the
exclusive benefit of the Contractor and the City and not for the benefit of any other parry.
There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of the Contractor's or the City's
obligations under this Contract.
14. INTERPRETATION. This Contract was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this
Contract will be in Los Angeles County.
Page 43 of 500
15. EFFECT OF CONFLICT. In the event of any conflict, inconsistency, or incongruity
between any provision of the Contract Documents, precedence will be as follows:
A. This Contract;
B. The Standard Specifications; and
C. Precedence of documents as determined in the Standard Specifications.
16. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of the Contract Documents are declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed
modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion
enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Contract will continue
in full force and effect.
17. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary
action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Contract and
to engage in the actions described herein. This Contract may be modified by written
amendment. The City's city manager, or designee, may execute any such amendment on the
City's behalf.
18. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Contract,
agreements ancillary to this Contract, and related documents to be entered into in connection
with this Contract will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by
facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the
same effect as an original signature.
19. COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS. The parties agree that all of the provisions hereof
will be construed as both covenants and conditions, the same as if the words importing such
covenants and conditions had been used in each separate paragraph.
20. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Contract are for convenience of
reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Contract.
21. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of the
Contract Documents.
Page 44 of 500
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Contract the day and
year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO CORRAL CONSTRUCTION &
DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Scott Mitnick Name:
City Manager Title:
ATTEST:
Taxpayer ID No.
Tracy Weaver,
City Clerk
Contractor State
License No.:
Contractor City Business
License No.:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley,
City Attorney
Insurance Reviewed by:
Page 45 of 500
{:ICVoy
ELEUND
TITLE:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.8
Notice of Completion of the Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Accept the Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project No. PW 20-16 by
T2 UES, Inc. as complete.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's
Office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final cost of the project is $62,200.
Amount Budgeted: $100,000
Additional Appropriation: None
Account Number(s): $20,000 from #501-400-7103-8206 (Water Fund)
$20,000 from #502-400-4301-6215 (Wastewater Fund)
$60,000 from #106-400-4202-6214 (Gas Tax Fund)
BACKGROUND:
On June 15, 2021, City Council awarded a standard Public Works Contract to T2 UES,
Inc. (T2) in the amount of $92,700 and approved a construction contingency amount of
$7,300 to perform underground utility investigation, field survey and mapping services
for the City's underground fiber optic system.
DISCUSSION:
The underground utility investigation began on August 9, 2021 and was completed by
T2 on October 8, 2021. The contractor was able to use a less intrusive investigation
method with minimal excavation to complete the task, and the project cost was reduced
Page 46 of 500
Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 2
from the contract amount of $92,700 to $62,200, resulting in $30,500 savings for the
City. The inspection work was performed by city staff and it was determined that the
project was completed in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the
satisfaction of the City Staff.
Staff recommends that City Council approve the recommended actions as noted.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external
customers.
Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology
Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and
effective community.
PREPARED BY:
Arianne Bola, Sr. Engineer Associate
REVIEWED BY:
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Location Map
3. Notice of Completion
Page 47 of 500
ELSEGUNDO PW 20-16 Utilities Investigation and Verification Services
Project Vicinity Map
�,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�•--••—••� Imperi it Awe—•-- •�..-- •.——••�-f=FAirF,tiF1
E VVal nut Ave ; I
�Oway 1
I E Sycamore Ave i!
A
s
'
I'
E Maple Aveel
-,AQUAdD
1 +n Huh
SsYrtfoa z
MariposaAvk,
�.
eguildo garb �
E and Ave c Grand
u
2
io�l4nq�ieS
14V Grand Ave
Air Foma
Ic
EFranklinAve _
dc
a
•
E E I Sequnbo Nvd
<"hw on
E
-E El Segy
Parl
=
.UAAlfbofne
f
91RiA 6
A
O
�
�
U
T Fw
Z
Wau E I
•^
S�utrHa "
O
k
'
a l
W 1111h St
Lenny
rVi ddl-E
Sc hors
W.
Awe
N�e
w9
Y
C
{J
ir
cl
Q
- W R o=_
6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Page 48 of 500
ELSEGUNDO PW 20-16 Utilities Investigation and Verification Services
Project Location Map
�,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�•--••—••� Imperi it Awe—•-- •�..-- •.——••�-f=FAirF,tiF1
E VVal nut Ave ; I
�Oway 1
I E Sycamore Ave i!
A
s
'
I'
E Maple Aveel
-,AQUAdD
1 +n Huh
SsYrtfoa z
MariposaAvk,
�.
eguildo garb �
E and Ave c Grand
u
2
io�l4nq�ieS
14V Grand Ave
Air Foma
Ic
EFranklinAve _
dc
a
•
E E I Sequnbo Nvd
<"hw on
E
-E El Segy
Parl
=
.UAAlfbofne
f
91RiA 6
A
O
�
�
U
T Fw
Z
•^
S�utrHa "
O
k
'
a l
W 1111h St
Lenny
rVi ddl-E
Sc hors
W.
Awe
N�e
w9
Y
C
{J
ir
cl
Q
- W R o=_
6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Page 49 of 500
Recording Requested by
and When Recorded Mail To:
City Clerk, City Hall
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Project Name: Utility Verification and Investigation Services Project
Project No.: PW 20-16 Contract No. 6105
Notice is hereby given pursuant to State of California Civil Code Section 3093 et seq that:
The undersigned is an officer of the owner of the interest stated below in the property
hereinafter described.
2. The full name of the owner is: City of El Segundo
3. The full address of the owner is: City Hall, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA, 90245
4. The nature of the interest of the owner is: Public Facilities
5. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was field reviewed by the
City Engineer on October 8, 2021. The work done was: underground utility investigation
6. On December 7, 2021, City Council of the City of El Segundo accepted the work of this
contract as being complete and directed the recording of this Notice of Completion in the
Office of the County Recorder.
7. The name of the Contractor for such work of improvement was: T2 UES, Inc.
8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of El
Segundo, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows: city -
owned underground utility investigation services
9. The street address of said property is: El Segundo, CA 90245
Dated:
Elias Sassoon
Public Works Director
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the Director of Public Works/City Engineer of the City El Segundo, the
declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the
contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on , 2021 at El Segundo, California. 90245
Elias Sassoon
Public Works Director
Page 50 of 500
{:ICVoy
EL E UND
TITLE:
Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.9
1. Adopt resolution to approve plans and specifications for the Fire Stations 1 & 2
Floor Replacement Project No. PW 22-03.
2. Authorize staff to advertise the project for construction.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget
Amount Budgeted: $85,000
Additional Appropriation: None
Account Number(s): 301-400-8201-8103 (Capital Improvement Program Fund)
7_[81:(r]:A1l1►113
The City of El Segundo Fire Department has two Fire Stations. Fire Station # 1 is
located at 314 Main Street and the Fire Station # 2 is located at 2261 East Mariposa
Avenue. These two Fire Stations are being utilized 24/7, 365 days per year and the
flooring of these facilities is subject to a tremendous amount of foot traffic. Due to the
age of the existing carpet, the normal tear and wear, and the daily foot traffic, the
replacement of the carpet has become a priority for the Fire Department. This project
was included and has been approved as part of this year's Capital Improvement
Program (CIP).
DISCUSSION:
The scope of this project is to remove the existing carpet flooring and replace it with an
approved durable laminate or tile type flooring system. This proposed flooring system
Page 51 of 500
Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement Project
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 2
looks nice and is much more durable. This proposed flooring is also easier to clean, and
consequently, it provides a more sanitary environment.
With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for this project is as
follows:
December 2021: Advertising and Bid Process
February 2022: Contract Award
March 2022: Begin Construction
June 2022: Project Completion
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external
customers.
Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology
Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and
effective community.
PREPARED BY:
Arianne Bola, Sr. Engineer Associate
REVIEWED BY:
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Location Map
3. Resolution
Page 52 of 500
ELSEGUNDO PW 22-03 Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement
Project Vicinity Map
�,19LiQ3lJj5Sq�•--••—••� Imperi it Awe—•-- •�..-- •.——••�-f=FAirF,tiF1
E VVal nut Ave ; I
�Oway 1
I E Sycamore Ave i!
A
s
E Maple '
I Ir
el -,AQUAdD
1 +n Hqh
SsYrtfoa z
MariposaAvk,
�.
eguildo garb �
E and Ave c Grand
u
2
iorfl4nq�ieS
14V Grand Ave
Air Foma
Ic
EFranklinAve _
dc
a
•
E E I Sequnbo Nvd
<"hw on
-E El Segy
Pare
UA Airborne
IWM6
M
A
O
�
�
�
U
T Fw
Wau E I
•^
S�utrtla "
O
k
'
t
t
W 1111h St
Lenny
rVi ddl-E
Sc hay
W.
Awe
N�e
w9
Y
C
{J
ir
cl
Q
- W R o=_
6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Page 53 of 500
ELSEGUNDO PW 22-03 Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement
Project Location Map
Cb
I �
rt Hall
Police
Station
F Hs-)lly Ave I t
I '
-41
I
I I
Snack
Bar
Fire
Station 1 Public
Parking
Public - ;JV
Parking
1f } 199Grand Ave Ave W Grand Ave f
t�l
0
376.2 0 188.08 376.2 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
ELSEGUNDO PW 22-03 Fire Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement
Project Location Map
s4s
osa Ave
r � -
Fire
Sta do n 2
2399
.�j7[.
E Mariposa Avr
v
ui
sv
N
188.1 0 94.04 188.1 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
FIRE STATIONS 1 & 2 FLOOR REPLACEMENT, PROJECT NO. PW 22-
03, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 830.6 AND ESTABLISHING
A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. The City Engineer prepared plans and specifications for PW 22-03, Fire
Stations 1 & 2 Floor Replacement ("Project") to replace existing carpet
flooring to new resilient flooring. These plans and specifications are
complete. Services related to the Project may begin;
B. The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government
Code § 830.6 with regard to the plans and construction of the Project.
SECTION 2: Design Immunity, Authorization.
A. The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with
the City's standards and are approved.
B. The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual
work on the Project construction commenced.
C. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms with the City's General
Plan.
D. The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City's behalf in
approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans
approved by this Resolution.
E. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to
avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6.
SECTION 3: Project Payment Account. For purposes of the Contract Documents
administering the Project, the City Council directs the City Manager, or designee, to
establish a fund containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay
for the Project ("Project Payment Account"). The Project Payment Account is the sole
source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined in the Contract Document
administering the Project.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution.
SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
Page 1 of 2
Page 56 of 500
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021.
ATTEST:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
for
Mark D. Hensley
City Attorney
Drew Boyles, Mayor
Page 2 of 2
Page 57 of 500
{:ICVoy
EL E UND
TITLE:
City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.10
1. Adopt resolution approving the plans and specifications of the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the City Hall Public Restroom
Improvements Project (CDBG Project 602294-20), Project No. PW 21-08.
2. Authorize staff to advertise the City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project
602294-20, Project No. PW 21-08 for construction.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget
Amount Budgeted: $299,600
Additional Appropriation: No
Account Number(s):
$199,600 from 111-400-2781-8499 (CDBG fund Capital
Improvement Project)
$100,000 from 301-400-8201-8209 (General Fund Capital
Improvement Project)
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the City of El Segundo applies for Federal Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funding from the County of Los Angeles Community Development
Authority (LACDA). This funding is available for community development projects that
meet national objectives, including the American Disability Act (ADA) requirements. The
City Hall Public Restroom Improvements Project meets the CDBG funding criteria and
proposes remodeling of the existing City Hall East Lobby (at main entrance) as well as
the City Council Chamber's Lobby restrooms to remove accessibility barriers and
Page 58 of 500
CDBG City Hall Public Restroom Improvements
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 3
provide ADA-compliant facilities. The ADA compliance related improvements include
removing interior doors and walls as necessary, removing and relocating stall partitions,
providing clear turning spaces, reducing equipment protrusions, providing clear
approach areas, and removing or relocating fixtures and accessories to meet ADA
requirements. While items related to ADA compliance are eligible for CDBG funds,
there are other necessary improvements needed to be included in the project for
efficiency and betterment that are not eligible for CDBG funds. These improvements
include new floor tiles, replacing existing plumbing features with water efficiency
plumbing, upgrading electrical fixtures, and replacing the floor drains. The estimated
cost for these non-ADA related improvements is $100,000, with the source of funding
from the General Fund. As indicated earlier, all these improvements are proposed to
take place in both the women's and men's restrooms in the Civic Center by the main
entrance to City Hall and by the City Council Chamber. The funding for this project is
included in the FY2021-22 adopted budget.
DISCUSSION:
The final engineering plans and specifications for this project are now ready for adoption
and advertisement for construction. The project will be coordinated with other city hall
projects to minimize the impact on staff and the public. Staff respectfully recommends
that City Council approve the adoption of the attached resolution approving the final
engineering plans and specifications for the project and authorizing staff to advertise the
project for construction. It is proposed to construct this project in two phases to minimize
the adverse impact on public restroom availability.
With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for this project is as
follows:
December 2021: Advertising and Bid Process
January 2022: Contract Award
February 2022: Begin Construction
December 2022: Project Completion
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external
customers.
Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology
Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and
Page 59 of 500
CDBG City Hall Public Restroom Improvements
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 3
effective community.
PREPARED BY:
Floriza Rivera, Principal Civil Engineer
REVIEWED BY:
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Location Map
3. Resolution
Page 60 of 500
Vicinity Map
ELEGUNDO CDBG Project Number 602294-20: City Hall Public Restroom Improvements
<
Lennc
W 111th St Middl
Sc hcc
EalnutAve--
I
E Sy cant ore Ave Aa°dYway
L+
EMaple Ave I
43
El Segundo I 1Z
I t.9
High 0 41
Sc hoo I 4!
j
E MariposaAVe -0En
;5 Y
d
---ti
j EI Sep
creation t] x
D Park I Tx
� z
J E Grand Ave r - — LosAngeles
1W Grand
e " ej Air Force
Y Base L�elAirs
E Franklin Ave
H
HP
t.._.._.._..�_.
r E El Segundo Blvd Chevron - — E Ei $egnrd4$trK
Raytheon Space
E+
Employee M and Air borne
.�
Systems
ak1
Lakes b
L
--JIF Coui r-
:n !
U
`
j
r
e
1 Plaza EI I
�'
,nor`
ir, Segundo
WO
15th St I
-
27th St q, Marine
- Avenue
ryPoe Marine Ave Park
6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Page 61 of 500
Location Map
ELF�EGUNDO CDBG Project Number 602294-20: City Hall Public Restroom Improvements
r 2
Police
Station
E Holly Ave
V3
M
4
ra
M
c Lin-nn
� I
� 4
RI S&gUndo 1.
r... r:.
v
--- ------- 1V
R
Legend
— City Boundary
253
Project Location
Phase 1 - Council
Chambers Lobby
Restrooms
Phase 2 - Main (East)
Lobby Restrooms
0
188.1 0 94.04 188.1 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIs
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_AuxiIiary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Notes
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN AND PLANS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CHECKOUT BUILDING RESTROOM
IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 830.6 AND
ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. The City retained Omnis Consulting, Inc. ("Consultant") as the engineer to
design and prepare plans for the Checkout Building Restroom
Improvements;
B. The Consultant informed the City Engineer that these plans are complete
and that construction of the Project may begin;
C. The City Engineer reviewed the completed design and plans for the
Project and agrees with the Consultant that the plans are complete and
the Project may be constructed;
D. The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government
Code § 830.6 with regard to the plans and construction of the Project.
SECTION 2: Design Immunity, Authorization.
A. The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with
the City's standards and are approved.
B. The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual
work on the Project construction commenced.
C. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms to the City's General
Plan.
D. The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City's behalf in
approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans
approved by this Resolution.
E. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to
avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6.
SECTION 3: Project Payment Account. For purposes of the Contract Documents
administering the Project, the City Council directs the City Manager, or designee, to
establish a fund containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay
for the Project ("Project Payment Account"). The Project Payment Account is the sole
Page 1 of 2
Page 63 of 500
source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined in the Contract Document
administering the Project.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution.
SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021.
Drew Boyles, Mayor
/_�11111111*15
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, City Attorney
Joaquin Vazquez, Deputy City Attorney
Page 2of2
Page 64 of 500
{:ICVoy
EL E UND
TITLE:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.11
Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements Project
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution to approve engineering plans and construction specifications for
the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Improvements, Project No. PW
21-09.
2. Authorize staff to advertise the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom
Improvements, Project No. PW 21-09 for construction.
3. Approve an additional appropriation of $300,000 from the unassigned General
Fund Balance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Included in Adopted FY 2021/22 Budget
Amount Budgeted: $200,000 (301-400-8202-8224: CIP fund, Rec. Park Restroom)
Additional Appropriation: Yes - $300,0000 from unassigned General Fund Balance
(001-200-0000-2989). Appropriate $300,000 to General Fund Transfers Out (001-400-
0000-9301) and $300,000 to the CIP Fund Park Restrooms (301-400-8202-8224)
Account Number for Project: $500,000 from 301-400-8202-8224 (CIP fund, Rec. Park
Restroom)
BACKGROUND:
Constructed in the late 1950's and expanded in the early 1980's, the Checkout Building
is one of the most active buildings in Recreation Park, serving the park's various
visitors. Its public restrooms serve almost the entire park and are used frequently. This
facility needs to be rehabilitated and brought into compliance with current Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. On June 15, 2021, the City Council adopted
Page 65 of 500
Checkout Building Restroom Improvements
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 3
the FY 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program Budget, which included $200,000 for
the Recreation Park Checkout Building Restroom Rehabilitation Project.
On September 7, 2021, City Council directed staff to expand the project scope to
include converting the inactive northern portion of the building, formerly shower rooms,
into additional restrooms for general public use. Currently, there are no family restrooms
in the existing facility. This project adds two family restrooms and almost doubles the
available restroom facilities as shown in the following tables:
Existing
Women's
Men's Restroom
No Existing
Total
Facilities
Restroom
Family Restroom
Toilets
3
3
6
Sinks
2
2
0
4
Urinals
N/A
2
0
2
Proposed
Women's
Men's Restroom
Proposed Family
Total
Facilities
Restroom
Restroom
Toilets
5
3
2
10
Sinks
2
2
2
6
Urinals
N/A
2
0
2
DISCUSSION:
The final engineering plans and construction specifications for the expanded Checkout
Building Restroom Improvements project has been completed, and based on these
documents, it is proposed to remove the accessibility barriers in the existing men's and
women's restrooms and convert them into ADA-compliant facilities. In general, the
proposed improvements include the removal and relocation of stall partitions, providing
clear turning spaces, providing clear approach areas, and the removal and relocation of
facilities to adhere to the ADA requirements and new plumbing, as necessary. Further,
this project proposes to expand the restroom facilities by converting the northern area of
the building into general public restrooms.
The estimated cost of this project is $500,000. A total of $200,000 is available from the
Adopted FY 2021-2022 General Fund Capital Improvement Program Budget. Additional
required funding of $300,000 is available from the unassigned General Fund Balance.
There are sufficient funds available in the General Fund Balance after meeting the City's
policy reserve requirement of 20%.
Staff respectfully recommends that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving
the engineering plans and construction specifications for the project and authorizing
staff to advertise the project for construction.
Page 66 of 500
Checkout Building Restroom Improvements
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 3
With the City Council's authorization, the anticipated schedule for this project is as
follows:
December 2021: Advertising and Bid Process
January 2022: Contract Award
February 2022: Begin Construction
July 2022: Project Completion
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Objective 1A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external
customers.
Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology
Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and
effective community.
PREPARED BY:
Floriza Rivera, Principal Civil Engineer
REVIEWED BY:
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Location Map
3. Restroom Locations Map
4. Resolution
Page 67 of 500
Vicinity Map
ELEGUNDO Checkout Building Restroom Improvements
Y
}
J.
4
W 1111h S1
E Walnut Awe it
I E SyramcreAv�, At++'°° YHaY
E Maple Ave �
i _ l i 5egunda ;2, I
v' sari 4 1
srrcoa x '
- i a Madposa Ave -
._..i Hfcrtollon yr *' _ � a_
j EI egut�da Par+ r7i , z
�•_1 `�+ Grand Avo c 2 Lc) AngNi-%
Grand Ave U An Forte
Ic
j EFranklin Ave = dc gage 1r4v°
r
E 1=1 taequTtido Blvd q"hwTvn I E El Segwtdt
Paarrel andAwbofnq +
S
r *Moms
A �
P t
U T he
`r 1 e ke = Q 1
V II r[,Ur38
'L
Pla
z4 E-1
560 u rltlb 1
i
Lenno
Tk4Iddi=
Sc han
rp
W►
6,018.7 1 1 0 3,009.33 6,018.7 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Page 68 of 500
ELSEGUNDO Location Map
Checkout Building Restroom Improvements
Tot Are
Recreation
0Pa rk
a
-- �r►3c
Bar
Ca nopyArea
s
■ Roller
Hockey R
O❑
188.1 0 94.04 188.1 Feet DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from different GIS
sources. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only
and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. The City
of El Segundo will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere from the use of this map.
Legend
-•• City Boundary
❑ Project Location
Notes
ELFSEGUNDO Restroom Locations
Checkout Building Restroom Improvements
NO SCALE
Legend
■ Existing restrooms to
decrease in size and be
remodeled
Mechanical/equipment room to
be enlarged and remodeled
■ Former restrooms/current
storage area to be remodeled
as general -public restrooms
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN AND PLANS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CHECKOUT BUILDING RESTROOM
IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 830.6 AND
ESTABLISHING A PROJECT PAYMENT ACCOUNT.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. The City retained Omnis Consulting, Inc. ("Consultant") as the engineer to
design and prepare plans for the Checkout Building Restroom
Improvements;
B. The Consultant informed the City Engineer that these plans are complete
and that construction of the Project may begin;
C. The City Engineer reviewed the completed design and plans for the
Project and agrees with the Consultant that the plans are complete and
the Project may be constructed;
D. The City Council wishes to obtain the immunities set forth in Government
Code § 830.6 with regard to the plans and construction of the Project.
SECTION 2: Design Immunity, Authorization.
A. The design and plans for the Project are determined to be consistent with
the City's standards and are approved.
B. The design approval set forth in this Resolution occurred before actual
work on the Project construction commenced.
C. The approval granted by this Resolution conforms to the City's General
Plan.
D. The City Engineer, or designee, is authorized to act on the City's behalf in
approving any alterations or modifications of the design and plans
approved by this Resolution.
E. The approval and authorization granted by this Resolution is intended to
avail the City of the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6.
SECTION 3: Project Payment Account. For purposes of the Contract Documents
administering the Project, the City Council directs the City Manager, or designee, to
establish a fund containing sufficient monies from the current fiscal year budget to pay
for the Project ("Project Payment Account"). The Project Payment Account is the sole
Page 1 of 2
Page 71 of 500
source of funds available for the Contract Sum, as defined in the Contract Document
administering the Project.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution.
SECTION 5: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021.
Drew Boyles, Mayor
/_�11111111*15
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARK D. HENSLEY, City Attorney
Joaquin Vazquez, Deputy City Attorney
Page 2of2
Page 72 of 500
{:ICVoy
ELEUND
TITLE:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.12
Adoption of Ordinance Adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of the El Segundo Municipal Code
Regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive the second reading and adopt an ordinance adding Chapter 9 to Title 5 of El
Segundo Municipal Code regarding Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adding this ordinance to the Municipal
Code. Indirect cost of staff time will be absorbed via the City's adopted FY 2021-2022
Annual Budget.
BACKGROUND:
In 2016, Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 1383, establishing methane
emissions reduction targets in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of Short -Lived
Climate Pollutants (SLCP) in various sectors of California's economy. SB 1383 is the
state's most ambitious waste reduction law in the last 30 years and enacts the following
targets to reduce organic waste in landfills:
• Achieve a 50% reduction in the level of the statewide disposal of organic waste
from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75% reduction by 2025
• Recover at least 20% of currently disposed surplus food by 2025
SLCPs, including methane, adversely affect indoor and outdoor air quality. Methane
emissions are more potent than carbon dioxide but live a short time in the atmosphere.
The decomposition of organic waste in landfills is a significant source of methane
emissions. Actions to reduce SLCPs are essential to address the many impacts of
climate change on human health and the environment.
Page 73 of 500
Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 3
On November 16, 2021, the City Council introduced the proposed ordinance for first
reading.
Q 1*9111*4Is] ►F
Since landfills are the third largest producer of methane, the state's SLCP strategy
includes managing organic waste. Food scraps, green waste, paper, and cardboard are
organic materials that account for a significant portion of California's overall waste
stream. Increasing food waste prevention, encouraging edible food rescue, and
expanding the composting and in -vessel digestion of organic waste will reduce methane
from landfill operations. In addition to setting specific emissions reduction goals, SIB
1383 mandates cities and counties to:
• Provide organic waste collection services for all residents and businesses
• Develop and adopt an enforcement mechanism or ordinance by January 2022
• Establish an edible food recovery program
• Update the City's procurement policy to purchase recycled paper content and
recycled organic waste products (e.g., compost, mulch, and renewable natural
gas) at a volume of 0.08 tons/resident
• Provide outreach and education for generators, haulers, facilities, edible food
recovery organizations, and municipal departments
• Plan and secure access for recycling and edible food recovery capacity
• Monitor compliance and conduct enforcement
• Maintain accurate compliance records
To meet the SIB 1383 regulations, jurisdictions throughout the State are required to
adopt an ordinance or other similarly enforceable mechanism by January 1, 2022. The
proposed ordinance will mandate that organic waste generators, haulers, and other
entities subject to the requirements of SIB 1383 regulations and subject to the
jurisdiction's authority, comply with SIB 1383 regulatory requirements. It will also help
reduce food insecurity by requiring commercial edible food generators to arrange to
have the maximum amount of their edible food, that would otherwise be disposed of, be
recovered for human consumption.
Page 74 of 500
Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 3
The proposed ordinance addresses the SB 1383 regulatory requirements the City
needs to enforce on other entities, including requirements for generators to participate
in organic waste collection programs; multi -family and business owners and property
managers to support organic waste disposal reduction; commercial edible food
generators to recover edible food through contracts or written agreements with food
recovery organizations and services; and more.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 2: Support Community Safety and Preparedness
Objective: El Segundo is a safe and prepared city.
Goal 4: Develop and Maintain Quality Infrastructure and Technology
Objective 4A: El Segundo's physical infrastructure supports an appealing, safe and
effective community.
Objective 4B: El Segundo's technology supports effective, efficient, and proactive
operations.
PREPARED BY:
Lifan Xu, City Engineer
REVIEWED BY:
Elias Sassoon, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Organic Waste Ordinance (SB 1383)
Page 75 of 500
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 5 OF THE EL
SEGUNDO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MANDATORY
ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. A new Chapter 9 entitled "Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal
Reduction" is added to Title 5 (Health and Sanitation) of the El Segundo Municipal Code
("ESMC") to read as follows:
"Chapter 9
MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION
5-9-1 Purpose.
This chapter is adopted in accordance with Article XI, § 7 of the California
Constitution and Public Resources Code § 40059 to protect public health,
safety and well-being, to control the spread of vectors, and to limit sources
of air pollution, noise and traffic within the City. This chapter is adopted to
supplement and implement the legal requirements of AB 939 and, in
particular, the SB 1383 Regulations.
5-9-2 Definitions.
Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the
following definitions govern the construction of the words and phrases
used in this chapter. Words and phrases not given a meaning by this
Chapter have the meaning set forth in the Act and the regulations
promulgated to implement the Act, if defined therein, and if not, to the
definitions found in RCRA and the regulations promulgated to implement
RCRA, as amended, or in this code (see Chapter 5-2). References to an
undesignated regulation are to Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
"AB 939" or "Act" means the California Integrated Waste Management Act
of 1989 codified in part at Public Resources Code, §§ 40000 et seq., as
amended.
"City Enforcement Official" means the city manager, or designee.
"Commercial Business" or "Commercial" means a firm, partnership,
Page 1 of 15
Page 76 of 500
City of Ell Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 2 of 15
proprietorship, joint-stock company, corporation, or association, whether
for -profit or nonprofit, strip mall, industrial facility, or a multifamily
residential dwelling, or as otherwise defined in § 18982(a)(6). A Multi -
Family Residential Dwelling that consists of fewer than five units is not a
Commercial Business for purposes of implementing this chapter.
"Commercial Edible Food Generator" includes a Tier One or a Tier Two
Commercial Edible Food Generator as defined in this chapter or as
otherwise defined in 18982(a)(73) and (a)(74). For the purposes of this
definition, Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services are
not Commercial Edible Food Generators pursuant to § 18982(a)(7).
"Compliance Review" means a review of records by the city to determine
compliance with this chapter.
"Community Composting" means any activity that composts green
material, agricultural material, food material, and vegetative food material,
alone or in combination, and the total amount of feedstock and Compost
on -site at any one time does not exceed 100 cubic yards and 750 square
feet, as specified in § 17855(a)(4) or as otherwise defined by § 18982.
"Compost" has the same meaning as in § 17896.2(a)(4), which stated, as
of the effective date of this chapter, that "Compost" means the product
resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic Solid
Wastes that are Source Separated from the municipal Solid Waste
stream, or which are separated at a centralized facility.
"Compostable Plastics" or "Compostable Plastic" means plastic materials
that meet the ASTM D6400 standard for compostability, or as otherwise
described in § 18984.1 or § 18984.2.
"Edible Food" means food intended for human consumption, or as
otherwise defined in § 18982(a)(18). For purposes of this chapter or as
otherwise defined in § 18982(a)(18), "Edible Food" is not Solid Waste if it
is recovered and not discarded. Nothing in this chapter requires or
authorizes the Recovery of Edible Food that does not meet the food safety
requirements of the California Retail Food Code.
"Designee" means the person designated by the city manager pursuant to
§ 18981.2(b).
"Food Recovery" means actions to collect and distribute food for human
consumption that otherwise would be disposed, or as otherwise defined in
§ 18982(a)(24).
Page 77 of 500
City of Ell Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 3 of 15
"Food Waste" means Food Scraps, Food -Soiled Paper, and Compostable
Plastics.
"Gray Container" has the same meaning as in § 18982(28).
"Gray Container Waste" means Solid Waste that is collected in a Gray
Container that is part of a three -container Organic Waste collection
service that prohibits the placement of Organic Waste in the Gray
Container as specified in § 18984.1(a) and (b), or as otherwise defined in
§ 17402(a)(6.5).
"Green Container" has the same meaning as in § 18982(a)(29) and will be
used for the purpose of storage and collection of Source Separated Green
Container Organic Waste.
"Multi -Family Residential Dwelling" or "Multi -Family" means of, from, or
pertaining to residential premises with five or more dwelling units. Multi -
Family premises do not include hotels, motels, or other transient
occupancy facilities, which are considered Commercial Businesses.
"RCRA" means the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act as set forth
at 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901, et seq., as amended.
"SB 1383" means Senate Bill 1383 of 2016 approved by the Governor on
September 19, 2016, which added Health and Safety Code §§ 39730.5,
39730.6, 39730.7, and 39730.8 and added Public Resources Code
Chapter 13.1 (commencing with § 42652), establishing methane
emissions reduction targets in a Statewide effort to reduce emissions of
short-lived climate pollutants as amended, supplemented, superseded,
and replaced from time to time.
"SB 1383 Regulations" or "SB 1383 Regulatory" means or refers to, for the
purposes of this chapter, the Short -Lived Climate Pollutants: Organic
Waste Reduction regulations found at Titles 14 (Chapter 12) and 27 of the
California Code of Regulations.
"Single -Family" means of, from, or pertaining to any residential premises
with fewer than five units.
"Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste" means Source
Separated Organic Waste that can be placed in a Green Container that is
specifically intended for the separate collection of Organic Waste by the
generator, excluding Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste,
carpets, Non-Compostable Paper, and textiles.
Page 78 of 500
City of El Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 4 of 15
"Source Separated Recyclable Materials" means Source Separated Non -
Organic Recyclables and Source Separated Blue Container Organic
Waste.
5-9-3 Requirements for Single -Family Generators.
Except as otherwise provided for Self -Haulers, Single -Family Organic
Waste Generators must:
A. Subscribe to Organic Waste collection services for all generated Organic
Waste. City may review the number and size of a generator's containers to
evaluate adequacy of capacity provided for each type of collection service
for proper separation of materials and containment of materials. Single -
Family generators must adjust their collection service level as directed by
the City to maintain a level of service that is consistent with the purpose of
this chapter. Generators must manage their Organic Waste by preventing or
reducing their Organic Waste, managing Organic Waste on site, and/or
using a Community Composting site pursuant to § 18984.9(c).
B. Participate in the Organic Waste collection service by placing designated
materials in designated containers as described below. It is unlawful to place
Prohibited Container Contaminants in collection containers.
C. Generators must
Place Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, including
Food Waste, in the Green Container;
2. Place Source Separated Recyclable Materials in the Blue
Container; and
3. Place Gray Container Waste in the Gray Container.
D. It is unlawful for Generators to place materials designated for the Gray
Container into the Green Container or Blue Container.
5-9-4 Requirements for Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential
Dwellings.
A. Except as provided for Self -Haulers, all generators that are Commercial
Businesses or Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must subscribe to City's
three container collection services and comply with requirements of those
services as described below.
Page 79 of 500
City of El Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 5 of 15
B. City may review the number and size of a generator's containers and
frequency of collection to evaluate adequacy of capacity provided for each
type of collection service for proper separation of materials and containment
of materials.
C. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must adjust
their collection service level as directed by the City to maintain a level of
service that is consistent with the purpose of this chapter and to avoid
adverse impacts to public health, safety or welfare.
D. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must
participate in the City's Organic Waste collection service by placing
designated materials in designated containers as follows:
Place Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, including
Food Waste, in the Green Container;
2. Place Source Separated Recyclable Materials in the Blue
Container; and
3. Place Gray Container Waste in the Gray Container. Generator must
not place materials designated for the Gray Container into the
Green Container or Blue Container.
E. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must
supply, and allow, employees, contractors, tenants, and customers
unfettered access to collection containers of adequate number and size,
consistent with City's Blue Container, Green Container, and Gray Container
collection service or, if self -hauling, per the Commercial Businesses'
instructions to support its compliance with its self -haul program. All collection
containers must be labeled or colored as set forth below.
F. Commercial Businesses and Multi -Family Residential Dwellings must
provide containers for the collection of Source Separated Green Container
Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials in all indoor and
outdoor areas where disposal containers are provided for customers to
deposit materials generated by that business. Such containers do not need
to be provided in restrooms. If a Commercial Business does not generate
any of the materials that would be collected in one type of container, then
the business does not have to provide that particular container in all areas
where disposal containers are provided for customers.
G. Pursuant to § 18984.9(b), the containers provided by the business must
have either:
Page 80 of 500
City of Ell Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 6 of 15
A body or lid that conforms with the container colors provided
through the collection service provided by City, with either lids
conforming to the color requirements or bodies conforming to the
color requirements or both lids and bodies conforming to color
requirements. A Commercial Business is not required to replace
functional containers, including containers purchased before
January 1, 2022, that do not comply with the requirements of this
subsection before the end of the useful life of those containers, or
before January 1, 2036, whichever comes first.
2. Container labels that include language or graphic images, or both,
indicating the primary material accepted and the primary materials
prohibited in that container, or containers with imprinted text or
graphic images that indicate the primary materials accepted and
primary materials prohibited in the container. Pursuant § 18984.8,
the container labeling requirements are required on new containers
commencing January 1, 2022.
H. Multi -Family Residential Dwellings are not required to comply with container
placement requirements or labeling requirements pursuant to § 18984.9(b).
Commercial Businesses must, to the extent practicable, prohibit employees
from placing materials in a container not designated for those materials per
the City's Blue Container, Green Container, and Gray Container collection
service or, if self -hauling, per the Commercial Businesses' instructions to
support its compliance with its self -haul program.
Commercial Businesses must periodically inspect Blue Containers, Green
Containers, and Gray Containers for contamination and inform employees if
containers are contaminated and of the requirements to keep contaminants
out of those containers pursuant to § 18984.9(b)(3).
K. Commercial Businesses must annually provide information to employees,
contractors, tenants, and customers about Organic Waste Recovery
requirements and about proper sorting of Source Separated Green
Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials.
L. Commercial Businesses must provide education information before or within
14 days of occupation of the premises to new tenants that describes
requirements to keep Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste
and Source Separated Recyclable Materials separate from Gray Container
Waste (when applicable) and the location of containers and the rules
governing their use at each property.
M. Commercial Businesses must provide or arrange access for City or
Page 81 of 500
City of Ell Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 7 of 15
Designee to their properties during all Inspections conducted in accordance
with this chapter to confirm compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
N. If a Commercial Business wants to self -haul, it must meet the Self -Hauler
requirements in this chapter.
O. Nothing in this Section prohibits a generator from preventing or reducing
waste generation, managing Organic Waste on site, or using a Community
Composting site pursuant to § 18984.9(c).
P. Commercial Businesses that are Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible
Food Generators must comply with Food Recovery requirements.
5-9-5 De Minimis Waivers for Generators.
A. The City may waive a Commercial Business's obligation (including Multi -
Family Residential Dwellings) to comply with some or all of the Organic
Waste requirements of this chapter if the Commercial Business provides
documentation that the business generates below a certain amount of
Organic Waste material as described below.
B. Commercial Businesses requesting a de minimis waiver must submit an
application specifying the services that they are requesting a de minimis
waiver for and provide the following documentation:
The Commercial Business's total Solid Waste collection service is
two cubic yards or more per week and Organic Waste subject to
collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less
than 20 gallons per week per applicable container of the business'
total waste; or
2. The Commercial Business' total Solid Waste collection service is
less than two cubic yards per week and Organic Waste subject to
collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less
than 10 gallons per week per applicable container of the business's
total waste.
C. Notify City if circumstances change such that Commercial Business's
Organic Waste exceeds the threshold required for de minimis waiver, in
which case the waiver will be rescinded.
D. Acknowledge that if the City obtains information at any time that the
Commercial Business is exceeding the organic waste thresholds for the de
minimis waiver, that the City will rescind waiver.
Page 82 of 500
City of El Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 8 of 15
E. At least every five years after receiving a de minimis waiver, allow the City to
conduct an inspection for the purpose of verifying continued eligibility for the
de minimis waiver.
5-9-6 Physical Space Waivers.
A. City may waive a Commercial Business's or property owner's obligations
(including Multi -Family Residential Dwellings) to comply with some or all of
the Organic Waste collection service requirements of this code if the
Commercial Business or property owner provides documentation, or the City
obtains evidence, from a hauler, California licensed architect, or California
licensed engineer demonstrating that the premises lacks adequate space for
the collection containers required for compliance with this chapter.
B. A Commercial Business or property owner must request a physical space
waiver through the following process:
Submit an application form specifying the type(s) of collection
services for which a waiver is requested.
2. Provide documentation that the premises lacks adequate space.
3. If City grants a waiver, allow access by a Designee to verify the
ongoing need for a waiver.
5-9-7 Requirements for Commercial Edible Food Generators.
A. Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply with the
requirements of this section commencing January 1, 2022, and Tier Two
Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply commencing January 1,
2024.
B. Large Venue or Large Event operators not providing food services, but
allowing for food to be provided by others, must require Food Facilities
operating at the Large Venue or Large Event to comply with the
requirements of this section commencing January 1, 2024.
C. Commercial Edible Food Generators must:
Arrange to recover the maximum amount of Edible Food that would
otherwise be disposed.
2. Contract with, or enter into a written agreement with, Food
Recovery Organizations or Food Recovery Services for: (i) the
collection of Edible Food for Food Recovery; or (ii) acceptance of
Page 83 of 500
City of Ell Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 9 of 15
the Edible Food that the Commercial Edible Food Generator self -
hauls to the Food Recovery Organization for Food Recovery.
3. Allow City Enforcement Officials, upon reasonable notice, to access
the premises and review records pursuant to § 18991.4.
D. Additionally, Commercial Edible Food Generators must keep, for a minimum
period of five years, records that includes the documentation, contacts, and
such additional information needed to comply with § 18991.3(b) on forms
provided by the City or Designee.
E. Not later than March 31 st of each year commencing no later than February 1,
2023 for Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators and February 1,
2025 for Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator, provide an annual
Food Recovery report to the City that includes the following information:
A copy of all contracts or written agreements established under §
18991.3(b).
2. The quantity of food, measured in annual pounds recovered,
collected or self -hauled to a Food Recovery Service or Food
Recovery Organization for Food Recovery.
3. The name, address and contact information of the Food Recovery
Service or Food Recovery Organization.
F. Nothing in this chapter will be construed to limit or conflict with the
protections provided by the California Good Samaritan Food Donation Act of
2017, the Federal Good Samaritan Act, or share table and school food
donation guidance pursuant to Senate Bill 557 of 2017.
5-9-8 Requirements for Food Recovery Organizations and Services.
A. A Food Recovery Service that has established a contract or written
agreement to collect or receive Edible Food directly from Commercial Edible
Food Generators must keep, for a minimum period of five years, records that
includes the documentation, contacts, and such additional information
needed to comply with § 18991.5 on forms provided by the City or Designee.
B. No later than March 31 st of each year, commencing March 31, 2023 Food
Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services that have their
primary address physically located in the City and contract with or have
written agreements with one or more Commercial Edible Food Generators
pursuant to § 18991.3(b) must report to the City the total pounds of Edible
Food recovered in the previous calendar year from the Tier One and Tier
Page 84 of 500
City of El Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 10 of 15
Two Commercial Edible Food Generators they have established a contract
or written agreement with pursuant to § 18991.3(b).
C. In order to support Edible Food Recovery capacity planning assessments or
other studies conducted by the City Food Recovery Services and Food
Recovery Organizations operating in the City must provide information and
consultation to the City, upon request, regarding existing, or proposed new
or expanded, Food Recovery capacity that could be accessed by the City
and its Commercial Edible Food Generators. A Food Recovery Service or
Food Recovery Organization contacted by the City must respond to such
request for information within 60 days unless a shorter timeframe is
otherwise specified by the City.
5-9-9 Requirements for Haulers and Facility Operators.
A. An exclusive franchised hauler or permitted hauler providing residential,
Commercial, or industrial Organic Waste collection services to generators
within the City's boundaries must meet the following requirements and
standards as a condition of approval of a contract, agreement, or other
authorization with the City to collect Organic Waste:
Through written notice to the City annually on or before March 15tn
identify the facilities to which they will transport Organic Waste
including facilities for Source Separated Recyclable Materials and
Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste.
2. Transport Source Separated Recyclable Materials, Source
Separated Green Container Organic Waste to a facility, operation,
activity, or property that recovers Organic Waste.
3. Obtain approval from the City to haul Organic Waste, unless it is
transporting Source Separated Organic Waste to a Community
Composting site or lawfully transporting C&D in a manner that
complies with § 18989.1 or other applicable law including this code.
B. Owners of facilities, operations, and activities that recover Organic Waste,
including, without limitation, Compost facilities, in -vessel digestion facilities,
and publicly -owned treatment works must, upon City request, provide
information regarding available and potential new or expanded capacity at
their facilities, operations, and activities, including information about
throughput and permitted capacity necessary for planning purposes. Entities
contacted by the City must respond within 60 days after a request is sent by
the City.
C. Community Composting operators, upon City request, will provide
Page 85 of 500
City of El Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 11 of 15
information to the City to support Organic Waste capacity planning,
including, without limitation, an estimate of the amount of Organic Waste
anticipated to be handled at the Community Composting operation. Entities
contacted by the City must respond within 60 days after a request is sent by
the City.
5-9-10 Requirements for Self -Haulers of Organic Waste.
A. Self -Haulers must source separate all recyclable materials and Organic
Waste (materials that City otherwise requires generators to separate for
collection in the City's organics and recycling collection program) generated
on site from Solid Waste in a manner consistent with §§ 18984.1 and
18984.2, or must haul Organic Waste to a High Diversion Organic Waste
Processing Facility as required by § 18984.3.
B. Self -Haulers must haul their Source Separated Organic Waste to a Solid
Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or recovers
Source Separated Organic Waste.
C. Self -Haulers must keep a record of the amount of Organic Waste delivered
to each Solid Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or
recovers Organic Waste; these records must be kept for a minimum of five
years and are subject to Inspection by the City upon request. The records
must include the following information:
Delivery receipts and weight tickets from the entity accepting the
waste.
2. The amount of material in cubic yards or tons transported by the
generator to each entity.
3. If the material is transported to an entity that does not have scales
on -site or employs scales incapable of weighing the Self-Hauler's
vehicle in a manner that allows it to determine the weight of
materials received, the Self -Hauler is not required to record the
weight of material but must keep a record of the entities that
received the Organic Waste.
D. Except for a residential Organic Waste Generator that self -hauls Organic
Waste, Self -Haulers that are Commercial Businesses (including Multi -Family
Self -Haulers) must provide any information required by City within 60 days
after City sends the request.
Page 86 of 500
City of Ell Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 12 of 15
5-9-11 Procurement Requirements for City Departments, Direct Service
Providers, and Vendors.
A. City's direct service providers must comply with the City's Recovered
Organic Waste Product and Recycled -Content Paper procurement policy.
B. All vendors providing Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper must:
If fitness and quality are equal, provide Recycled -Content Paper
Products and Recycled -Content Printing and Writing Paper that
consists of at least 30 percent, by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber
instead of non -recycled products whenever recycled Paper
Products and Printing and Writing Paper are available at the same
or lesser total cost than non -recycled items or at a total cost of no
more than 10% of the total cost for non -recycled items.
2. Provide Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper that meet
Federal Trade Commission recyclability standard as defined in 16
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 260.12 (January 1, 2013).
3. Certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, the minimum percentage
of postconsumer material in the Paper Products and Printing and
Writing Paper offered or sold to the City. This certification
requirement may be waived if the percentage of postconsumer
material in the Paper Products, Printing and Writing Paper, or both
can be verified by a product label, catalog, invoice, or a
manufacturer or vendor internet website.
4. Certify in writing, on invoices or receipts provided, that the Paper
Products and Printing and Writing Paper offered or sold to the City
is eligible to be labeled with an unqualified recyclable label as
defined in 16 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 260.12
(January 1, 2013).
5. Provide records to the City's Recovered Organic Waste Product
procurement recordkeeping Designee, in accordance with the City's
Recycled -Content Paper procurement policy(ies) of all Paper
Products and Printing and Writing Paper purchases within 30 days
of the purchase (both recycled -content and non -recycled content, if
any is purchased) made by any division or department or employee
of the City. Records must include a copy (electronic or paper) of the
invoice or other documentation of purchase, written certifications as
required by this chapter for recycled -content purchases, purchaser
name, quantity purchased, date purchased, and recycled content
(including products that contain none), and if non -recycled content
Page 87 of 500
City of Ell Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 13 of 15
Paper Products or Printing and Writing Papers are provided,
include a description of why Recycled -Content Paper Products or
Printing and Writing Papers were not provided.
5-9-12 Inspections and Investigations by City.
Designees are authorized to conduct inspections and investigations, at
random or otherwise, of any collection container, collection vehicle loads,
or transfer, processing, or disposal facility for materials collected from
generators, or Source Separated materials to confirm compliance with this
chapter by Organic Waste Generators, Commercial Businesses (including
Multi -Family Residential Dwellings), property owners, Commercial Edible
Food Generators, haulers, Self -Haulers, Food Recovery Services, and
Food Recovery Organizations, subject to applicable laws.
5-9-13 Enforcement.
Subject to the requirements of § 18995.4 including, without limitation, the
need for a 60-day compliance period after issuing a Notice of Violation,
the City may enforce this chapter in accordance with applicable law
including, without limitation, ESMC Chapters 1-2, 1-2A, and 5-2."
SECTION 2: Education Period for Noncompliance. Beginning January 1, 2022
and through December 31, 2023, City or Designee will conduct Inspections, Route
Reviews or waste evaluations, and Compliance Reviews, depending upon the type of
regulated entity, to determine compliance with this Ordinance. If City determines that
Organic Waste Generator, Self -Hauler, hauler, Tier One Commercial Edible Food
Generator, Food Recovery Organization, Food Recovery Service, or other entity is not
in compliance, it will provide educational materials to the entity describing its obligations
under this chapter and a notice that compliance is required by January 1, 2022, and that
violations may be subject to administrative civil penalties starting on January 1, 2024.
Beginning January 1, 2024, the City may enforce the ESMC in accordance with ESMC
Chapters 1-2, 1-2A, and 5-2.
SECTION 3. Environmental Review. This Ordinance was reviewed pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.,
"CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations
§§15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"). Based upon that review, this Ordinance is
exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3) because it can be
seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant
effect on the environment.
SECTION 4. Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with
electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic
Page 88 of 500
City of El Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 14 of 15
signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 5. Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed to
achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council's intent that the
provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a
manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.
SECTION 6. Enforceability. Repeal or amendment of any provision of the
MPMC will not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude
prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before this Ordinance's
effective date. Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining
action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is
deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such
invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and,
to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 8. Recording. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the city of El Segundo's book of
original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this
meeting; and, within 15 days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it
to be published or posted in accordance with California law.
SECTION 9. Execution. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized
to affix his signature to this Ordinance signifying its adoption by the City Council of the
City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest
thereto.
SECTION 10. Effectiveness. This Ordinance will take effect on the 30th day
following its final passage and adoption. It may be enforced commencing on January 1,
2022.
ORDINANCE NO. HAD ITS FIRST READING ON , ITS
SECOND READING ON , AND WAS DULY PASSED, APPROVED,
AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AT ITS
REGULAR MEETING OF
Drew Boyles, Mayor
ATTEST:
Page 89 of 500
City of El Segundo
Ordinance No.
Page 15 of 15
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark Hensley, City Attorney
Page 90 of 500
{:ICVoy
ELEUND
TITLE:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.13
Government Finance Officers Association Award for Financial Reporting
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file the Government Finance Officers Association award for excellence in
financial reporting for the City's Fiscal Year 2019-20 Annual Comprehensive Financial
Report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
BACKGROUND:
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) established the Certificate of
Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Program in 1945 to encourage and
assist state and local governments to go beyond the minimum requirements of generally
accepted accounting principles to prepare annual comprehensive financial reports that
evidence the spirit of transparency and full disclosure and then to recognize individual
governments that succeed in achieving that goal.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. Staff will continue to
strive for excellence in order to meet the Certificate of Achievement program
requirements in future years.
DISCUSSION:
GFOA awarded the City of El Segundo the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting for the City's FY 2019-20 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report.
The award represents a significant and continuing achievement by the City. It
demonstrates the commitment of the City Council and staff to meet the highest
principles of government financial reporting and reflects the City's philosophy of
Page 91 of 500
GFOA Award
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 2
transparency to its residents and other stakeholders.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability
Objective 5B: El Segundo approaches its work in a financially strategic and responsible
way.
PREPARED BY:
Joseph Lillio, Chief Financial Officer
REVIEWED BY:
Joseph Lillio, Chief Financial Officer
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Announcement of Award to City_Nov 2021
2. GFOA Press Release —Nov 2021
Page 92 of 500
Government Finance Officers Association
203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2700
Chicago, Illinois 60601-1210
312.977.9700 `fax: 312.977.4806
11/12/2021
Drew Boyles
Mayor
City of El Segundo, California
Dear Mayor Boyles:
We are pleased to notify you that your annual comprehensive financial report for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2020 qualifies for GFOA's Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial
Reporting. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting
and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and
its management.
When a Certificate of Achievement is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting
Achievement (AFRA) is also presented to the individual(s) or department designated by the government
as primarily responsible for its having earned the Certificate. This award has been sent to the submitter as
designated on the application.
We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial
Reporting Achievement, and give appropriate publicity to this notable achievement. A sample news
release is included to assist with this effort.
We hope that your example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and
maintain an appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting.
Sincerely,
Michele Mark Levine
Director, Technical Services
Page 93 of 500
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
11/12/2021
For more information contact:
Michele Mark Levine, Director/TSC
Phone: (312) 977-9700
Fax: (312) 977-4806
Email: mlevine@gfoa.org
(Chicago, Illinois) —Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) has
awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to City of El Segundo for its
annual comprehensive financial report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020. The report has been judged
by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program, which includes demonstrating a constructive
"spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups
to read the report.
The Certificate of Achievement is'the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and
financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its
management.
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) advances excellence in government finance byproviding best
practices, professional development, resources, and practical research for more than 21,000 members and the
communities they serve.
203 NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 2700, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601-1210
Page 94 of 500
Give} City Council Agenda Statement
ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Consent
Item Number: B.14
TITLE:
Resolution Allowing Public Meetings to Continue to be Conducted via Teleconferencing
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a resolution to allow public meetings to continue to be conducted via
teleconferencing pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 361
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
BACKGROUND:
In order to address the expiration of the Governor's Orders regarding teleconferencing,
Assembly Bill No. 361 ("AB 361 ") took effect which, among other things, amends certain
provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act ("Brown Act") governing open meetings to allow
teleconferencing, including internet-based video conferencing, in a manner similar to
previously issued gubernatorial executive orders.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed resolution would make the requisite findings for the City Council to
continue using teleconferencing protocols for its public meetings, subject to certain
notice, access, and participation requirements. It would also require City Council to
reconsider the state of emergency conditions and consider whether certain findings can
be made to support continued use of the teleconferencing procedures and prohibit all
Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies, including applicable commissions,
committees, and boards, from meeting exclusively in person except as determined by
the City Manager or until the Council provides further direction in the future. The
proposed resolution would direct all Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies, including
applicable commissions, committees, and boards, to consider the continued adoption of
findings allowing for its conducting public meetings via teleconferencing, as applicable.
Page 95 of 500
Continue conducting meetings via Teleconferencing Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 2
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Objective 1 A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external
customers.
Objective 1 B: El Segundo's engagement with the community ensures excellence.
PREPARED BY:
Joaquin Vasquez, Assistant City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
Mark Hensley, City Attorney
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Resolution AB361 Extension 12/07/2021
Page 96 of 500
RESOLUTION NO. -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO FINDING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS EXIST TO
CONTINUE CONDUCTING PUBLIC MEETINGS VIA
TELECONFERENCING PURUSANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL NO.
361 AND DIRECTING CITY COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS, AND
BOARDS TO TAKE CERTAIN ASSOCIATED ACTIONS.
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. On March 4, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom proclaimed a State of
Emergency to exist in California due to the threat of the COVID-19
pandemic.
B. This gubernatorial proclamation, among other things, suspended
local government emergency declaration, reporting, and extension
requirements of Government Code § 8630 for the duration of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
C. Effective September 16, 2021, Assembly Bill No. 361 ("AB 361 ") took
effect which, among other things, amends certain provisions of the
Ralph M. Brown Act ("Brown Act") governing open meetings to allow
teleconferencing, including internet-based video conferencing, in a
manner similar to previously issued gubernatorial executive orders.
D. During a proclaimed state of emergency, AB 361 allows a legislative
body, like the City Council, to continue utilizing teleconferencing to
conduct public meetings under certain circumstances, provided the
legislative body makes certain findings.
E. The City Council has previously adopted and made findings to
continue meeting via teleconferencing pursuant to AB 361 and seeks
to make additional findings under Government Code § 54953(e) to
continue such teleconferencing use.
SECTION 2. Teleconferencing
A. Pursuant to Government Code § 54953(e), the City Council has
reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency finds as
follows:
1. The state of California continues to be in a declared state of
emergency pursuant to Government Code § 8625 (the California
Emergency Services Act; see Government Code § 54953(e)(3);
-1-
Page 97 of 500
see also Governor's Proclamation dated March 4, 2020), which ;
and
2. Based upon the most recent Order of the Health Officer for
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health (dated
September 17, 2021 and effective October 7, 2021), masks and
social distancing continue to be necessary to curb the spread of
COVID-19 (Government Code § 54953(e)(3)(B)(ii)).
B. Accordingly, to protect public health and safety the City Council:
1. finds that it is in the public interest to conduct public meetings of
its legislative bodies via teleconference as defined by
Government Code § 54953;
2. prohibits all Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies, including
applicable commissions, committees, and boards, from meeting
exclusively in person, except as determined by the City Manager
or until the City Council provides futher direction in the future; and
3. directs all such Brown Act -subject City legislative bodies,
including applicable commissions, committees, and boards, to
consider the continued adoption of findings allowing for its
conduct public meetings via teleconference as defined by
Government Code § 54953 at any meeting occuring after the date
of this Resolution.
C. The City Council will adhere to all requirements of Government Code §
54953 governing teleconferencing during the emergency including,
without limitation, posting agendas; allowing for real-time public
comment via either call -in or internet-based; allowing for written
communications that will be either read or summarized into the record
during the meeting as determined by the City Council; and protecting the
statutory and constitutional rights of all persons appearing before the
legislative body. No physical location will be provided for persons
wishing to provide real-time public comment.
SECTION 3. Reporting. Every 30 days following adoption of this
Resolution, the City Council will reconsider the extension of the teleconferencing
method of public meetings in accordance with Government Code § 54953(e)(3).
Such determinations may be placed on the consent calendar.
SECTION 4. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with
electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic
signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original
signature.
-2-
Page 98 of 500
SECTION 5. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby
authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City
Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy,
is directed to attest thereto.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately
upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
SECTION 7. City Clerk Actions. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and
make a record of this action in the meeting's minutes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 12021.
Drew Boyles,
Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1
I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of the City is five; that the
foregoing Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City
Council, approved and signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City
Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day
of , 2021, and the same was so passed and adopted by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Tracy Weaver,
-3-
Page 99 of 500
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley,
City Attorney
Page 100 of 500
{:ICVoy
ELEUND
TITLE:
City Council Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Public Hearings
Item Number: C.16
Proposed Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and Training Facility Development and
Raytheon Storage Facility Relocation (2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard)
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution adopting an Addendum to the certified El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR);
2. Waive first reading and introduce an ordinance approving a second amendment
to Development Agreement No. 11-02 (Agreement No. 4972A), and minor
modifications to Specific Plan No. 11-01 Revision A;
3. Adopt resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 (SUB21-03)
and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01 for development of a new corporate
headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers on a 13.7-acre
site, in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 E. El Segundo
Boulevard (Parcels 7" and "8"); and
4. Adopt resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 21-02 for a storage facility
located in the southeast Dortion of lot 18 in Phase IV.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As proposed, development of this project and relocation of the storage facility will have
minimal financial benefit to the City's General Fund. The 2015 Gross Fiscal Impact and
Economic Benefit Analysis for the overall El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
(ESSCSP) estimated a possible General Fund annual revenue increase of up to
$2,600,000 at theoretical buildout of the full ESSCSP area. After the proposed project
is developed, the maximum future recurring General Fund revenue amount will be lower
than initially estimated due to this proposed use not being a more traditional office
building and/or retail development.
The proposed Development Agreement Amendment includes three one-time
Page 101 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 13
contributions of $1,000,000 for a total of $3,000,000 to be deposited into the City's
General Fund to be used to support The Plunge swimming pool rehabilitation capital
improvement project.
:T_[81,`0l zloll] 0193
The ESSCSP (previously called a "Precise Plan") was adopted in 1978, resulting in the
development of 11 structures throughout the site totaling 1,892,513 sf of net floor area
(approximate floor area of 0.29), located in the southeast quadrant of El Segundo, east
of Highway 1 (Pacific Coast Highway), and bound by El Segundo Blvd. to the north, the
elevated Metro C Line (Green Line) and an older industrial subdivision on Coral Circle
to the east, the Top Golf facility and golf course to the west, and Plaza El Segundo and
a Union Pacific Railraod to the south (Vicinity and Location Map shown in Figure 2 of
the attached Planning Commission staff report dated November 18, 2021). In 2015/16,
the ESSCSP was amended, permitting an increased allowable floor area of 0.60, and
establishing four development phases for the ESSCSP area.
On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the proposed development of Phase II of the ESSCSP. At the
public hearing, in addition to the project proponent, approximately 12 speakers
addressed the Planning Commission, all speaking in favor of the project. After
discussing the merits of the project, and asking questions of staff and the applicant
regarding the proposed amendment to DA No. 11-02 and the proposed project, the
Planning Commission adopted resolutions (attached) recommending City Council adopt
an addendum to the certified EIR and approve the proposed projects entitlement
applications on a 5-0 vote. The Planning Commission recommendation included one
additional condition of approval, discussed below.
The proposed amendment to DA No. 11-02, minor modifications to ESSCSP,
addendum to the ESSCSP Environmental Impact Report, vesting tentative map, and
corresponding Site Plan Reviews, require approval by City Council.
DISCUSSION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves two applicants, CDC -MAR and Raytheon.
1. CDC -MAR proposes a new corporate office headquarters and training facility for
the Los Angeles Chargers of the National Football League, located within the
Phase II area of the ESSCSP.
2. Raytheon proposes the demolition of a storage/warehouse currently located
within the Phase II area, to be reconstructed within the Phase IV area of the
Page 102 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 13
ESSCSP.
To facilitate the proposed project, an amendment to DA No. 11-02 is also proposed.
The entitlement applications and associated project are described below.
Proposed Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and Training Facility
• Site Plan Review SPR 21-01: Proposed construction of a new professional
sports headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers on Lots 7
and 8 (Phase II Specific Plan area), which includes:
o A three-story, 56-foot-high building with a mezzanine totaling
approximately 143,702 gross sf. (131,207 net sf.), accommodating offices,
dining areas, an auditorium, conference rooms, studio area, locker rooms,
training rooms, a weight room, office space, storage rooms, a service
area, and mechanical and electrical rooms;
o Two storage buildings for groundskeeping and maintenance totaling
approximately 4,800 square feet (4,368 sf. net floor area), located near the
facility's northeastern corner;
o Three football practice fields on the eastern side of the site;
o 32-foot high poles and privacy netting along the eastern side of the site to
screen the fields from Los Angeles County Metro's above -grade commuter
line that abuts the site;
o 348 parking spaces; and
o Removal/demolition of warehouse/storage facilities E-20 and E-21 on
Parcel 7 and 8.
The proposed project is comprised of a headquarters office building housing the
business operations staff near the center of the site; three natural grass fields on the
eastern side of the site that are to be used for team practices and scrimmages; a total of
348 at grade parking spaces along the southern and western portions of the site; and a
pair of groundskeeping and maintenance buildings totaling approximately 4,800 sf near
the northeastern corner of the site to provide easy access to care for and maintain the
three playing fields. Perimeter fencing with scrim, preventing visibility into the training
sports facility and the fields from the Metro line, and will start at the east edge of the
building and surround the entirety of the playing field areas.
Page 103 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 4 of 13
The proposed headquarters building houses business operations staff with typical hours
from 6:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Approximately 270 personnel are anticipated to travel to and
from the project site on a typical workday. Business operations staff and other
employees will enter the building from the south, through a secured gated area, while
visitors, media or other staff will enter the building from the West, through the main entry
lobby.
Page 104 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 5 of 13
As illustrated above, the exterior of the building includes an iconic design and
incorporates graphic elements to create a one -of -a -kind training facility. The proposed
height of the building is 54 feet to the top of the parapet. Exterior materials include
precast concrete, fiber cement panel, aluminum metal panel, and a mix of curtainwall
and storefront glazing. The metallic sheen of the metal panel and the matte finish of the
precast concrete provide contrast within the fagade design. Exterior glazing provides
transparency and transmission of natural light, yet visual sun control when needed. A
skylight extends over the lobby atrium and brings daylight into the center of the building.
Specific Plan 11-01, Revision A: Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP include updating
various exhibits contained in the ESSCSP due to the Nash Street extension,
recreational facilities, and Coral Circle connection. Specifically, Exhibit No's. 5-12 of the
ESSCSP document will be updated to illustrate how lot configurations would change
with the realignment of Nash Street and with the approval of the proposed development
projects. It is necessary to update the Land Use Plan and the Conceptual Site Plan to
depict a revised layout of the Raytheon Recreational Facility and to depict a modified
alignment of Nash Street which is needed to maintain the private recreation area and to
create an appropriately sized site necessary for the development of the proposed
headquarters and training facility. For additional information regarding the various
exhibit changes in the specific plan document, including utility and infrastructure
exhibits, please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report dated November
18, 2021.
Subdivision No. SUB 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507). The proposed
subdivision map proposes modifying 13 parcels identified in tract map No. 71551, which
Page 105 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 6 of 13
will facilitate finalizing the new Nash Street alignment and accommodating adjustments
to parcels necessary to build the proposed project. For reference, below are depictions
of the existing, approved subdivision illustrating the Nash Street extension, and the
proposed subdivision illustrating the new Nash Street alignment. The existing Vesting
Tentative Map No. 71551 divides the Specific Plan Area into 26 individual lots.
Although the proposed subdivision modifies 13 parcels of the existing subdivision, the
new Tract Map will not increase the number of lots and all resulting parcels will comply
with the minimum lot standards.
Existing Subdivision and flash Street extension
L
TF R
-1 � Y •-X
Page 106 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 7 of 13
Proposed Subdivision and Nash Street exftnsion
Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02: The proposed
amendment to DA No. 11-02 includes amending the terms and obligations between the
City of El Segundo, CDC Mar East Campus 1, LLC and Raytheon Company. The
following is a summary of the proposed Development Agreement amendment:
The ESSCSP area is subject to a development agreement that was approved by the
City in 2016, which was modified in 2019. Raytheon and CDC/Mar are seeking
amendments to the development agreement. There are three obligations that would be
triggered by the projects proposed by Raytheon and CDC/Mar. The first two are the
Nash Street and Continental Boulevard extensions. As described below, Raytheon is
seeking to delay the implementation of the Continental Boulevard extension and the
Nash Street Extensions as it relates to the relocation of its storage facility and CDC/Mar
will have the obligation to construct the Nash Street extension if the Chargers project
proceeds.
Page 107 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 8 of 13
The third is a requirement that 7.54 acres of land within the Specific Plan area to be
used for Open Space and Recreational purposes. This is allowed to be accomplished
by either Raytheon making an irrevocable offer of dedication of 7.54 acres of land to the
City for recreational/open space area use or provide employees within the Specific Plan
area permanent access to the 7.54 acre recreational area in the ESSCSP area. As an
alternative to this requirement, the development agreement provides the City and
Developer may agree in their discretion to explore other means of addressing this
recreation/open space requirement. Raytheon's relocation of its storage facility would
also trigger this requirement, but Raytheon is seeking an exception to this requirement
for the relocation.
CDC/Mar's proposed project triggers both the Nash Street and park requirements
discussed above. The reason for this is that three acres of property are being proposed
to be moved from Phase IV of the ESSCSP and construction on properties located in
Phase IV trigger the Nash Street and park requirement. CDC/Mar is proposing, with
Raytheon's permission and request, that CDC/Mar be allowed to pay $3 million towards
The Plunge Saari Swim Stadium Pool Rehabilitation capital improvement project to
delay the park requirement until when and if the requirement is triggered again in the
future.
The $3 million is proposed to be paid as follows: $1 million when the project
entitlements are approved and executed; $1 million when CDC/Mar is issued a building
permit for the project; and $1 million when a certificate of occupancy is issued for the
project. There are deadlines associated with these payments and the right to develop
the sports complex project development will expire if the deadlines lapse. It should be
noted that the size of the recreation area is proposed to be decreased slightly from 7.54
to 7.34 acres due to the reconfiguration of the parcels to accommodate the proposed
project.
If for some reason the Chargers project does not move forward then CDC/Mar have the
option of either (1) returning the three acres to Raytheon and moving the three acres
back into Phase IV of the ESSCSP, and the City will have to return whatever payments
that it has received to CDC/Mar, or (2) CDC/Mar can choose to let the City keep the
payments it has received and the City shall have the right to approve in its sole
discretion whatever project or buildings that CDC/Mar propose to construct on the three
acres.
Raytheon's proposed project to move its approximately 5,500 square footage storage
building triggers all three of the above development requirements. Raytheon wants to
delay the Continental Boulevard extension and park requirement until the next
development and is requiring CDC/Mar to construct the Nash Street extension if its
project proceeds. As consideration for this extension, Raytheon is proposing to execute
a "Recreation Facilities Use Agreement" with the City which would give the City access
to utilize the recreation facilities/fields located on the Raytheon property between the
hours of 5:00 and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on the
Page 108 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 9 of 13
weekends. The recreation areas will not be open to the public on a "drop -in" basis but
rather must be scheduled in advance as agreed to by the City and Raytheon. The use
of Raytheon facilities will mainly be limited to practice uses, but competitive team play
by youth sports on the weekends will be allowed with restrictions. Raytheon employees
will be given priority use over the facilities for scheduling purposes. The use restrictions
regarding competitive team play and joint use of the facilities by Raytheon employees
and the City at the same time arise out of security concerns by Raytheon and the need
to limit the number of people utilizing the facilities at the same time. The agreement
provides for a process whereby the City and Raytheon will cooperate in scheduling the
City's use of the facilities.
Proposed Relocation of Raytheon Storage Facility
Proposed construction of a storage building on Lot 18 (Phase IV Plan Area). The
proposed building is a 5,865 sf storage/warehouse replacing two existing buildings to be
removed in conjunction with the proposed headquarters and training facility on Lots 7
and 8. The storage building will be used for Raytheon's business activities and does not
include any employee -occupiable space. The proposed storage building is one-story, at
approximately 21 feet and 2 inches high. Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way
will remain. A proposed 6-foot-high chain link fence around the building's perimeter,
includes two chain link gates and two chain link rolling gates. The proposed
storage/warehouse will serve as a storage building ancillary to the primary buildings
located on the primary Raytheon Campus site.
ANALYSIS
The Planning Commission reviewed all project components (i.e. architecture, design,
fencing, lighting and signage, access, parking and loading, landscaping, and land use
plans) in consideration of the required findings associated with the General Plan,
ESSCSP, Subdivision Map, and Site Plan Review, outlined in the attached Planning
Commission staff report, dated November 18, 2021.
While the Planning Commission expressed overall support for the project and ultimately
recommended approval, the Commission's discussion focused on the proposed
amendments to DA 11-02. Specifically, the Planning Commission expressed concern
that the proposed Second Amendment allows further development in the ESSCSP area
to occur without dedicating recreation/open space as stipulated in the original DA and in
the First Amendment to the DA.
The original DA approved in 2016 required dedication of 7.54 acres of recreation/open
space when more than 20-percent of the ESSCSP campus area is sold. In 2019,
approval of the First Amendment to DA No. 11-02 allowed development of the Phase '
retail center (currently under construction) to proceed without dedicating 7.54 acres of
recreation/open space.
Page 109 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 10 of 13
The Planning Commission expressed concern that the proposed Second Amendment to
DA No. 11-02 further prolongs the dedication of the recreation/open space that was
originally required when the specific plan was approved in 2016. The Planning
Commission discussed that on two previous occasions, the dedication of
recreation/open space would occur at specified phases of development, yet the
applicant is appearing again before the City requesting to prolong dedication of the
recreation/open space and reduce the recreation/open space area from 7.54 acres to
7.34 acres. Since the proposed amendment would further delay the dedication
requirement until the next development is built in the Specific Plan area, the Planning
Commission considered several scenarios which may result in no further development
or recreation/open space dedication. After consideration and discussion, the Planning
Commission recommendation included a condition of approval requiring that the
applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City committing to effectuate either
Section 9.2 or Section 9.3 of Development Agreement No. 4972A regarding the
recreation/open space area, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Butler
building. The condition is included as conditions of approval no. 11 in the attached City
Council resolution for the Raytheon storage building, and states: "Prior to issuance of a
building permit of the Raytheon storage building, the applicant shall enter into an
agreement with the City committing to effectuate either Section 9.2 or Section 9.3 of
Development Agreement No. 4972A regarding the recreation/open space area."
Subsequent to the November 18, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant
provided several requested amendments to the Project's related conditions of approval.
The following outlines the requested amendments in strut and underline, with staff's
recommendation:
Proposed Modification
Resolution No. 2904 - Relocation of
Raytheon• .• Facility
-
• The appliGant must build the Nash
■_
velepmeRt
■ 1 ■
.. .. ..
--
Staff Recommendation
Accept deletion, proposed amendment to
Development Agreement No. 11-02 defers
improvements associated with Phase IV of
the ESSCSP.
#69 The applicant MYSt Genctri IGt Glass 11 Accept deletion, proposed amendment to
biGYGIe lanes On the Nash Street Extension Development Agreement No. 11-02 defers
,n acGOrda,TGe with the El Segundo South improvements associated with Phase IV of
Campus SpeGifin Plan and Section 7.5 ef the ESSCSP.
the Development Agreement.
#QQ The applicant mi ict Geenerate Wroth the Accept deletion, proposed amendment to
Page 110 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 11 of 13
Resolution No. 2903 - Development of the
LA Chargers Headquarters and Training
Facility
#4 Final design of the 32-foot high poles
and netting along the eastern side and
northern side adjacent to the fields shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission through a Site Plan Review
Amendment prior to issuance of a permit
for the fields and/or associated lighting.
Canal design shall innl,,de the quantity and
Iona+inn of poles type of netting and
netting that is retran+ahle and Gold
evtended during times when the fields are
iced for training and renreatienal activities
involving halls and lowered at the
,
�nnnl,,sinn of the renreatinnal an+iVity.
Lastly, shall be plantedaInng the
length of the pole and netting and shall he
maintained at a minimum height of 16 -fee+
The hedge shall be plaRT rising FiGUS on,rr
Dedlorarp„s, or similar type of species
approved by the Development Sopranos
DeFectnr
�cccvr.
#9 All landscaping must be in substantial
conformance to the ESSCSP Master
Landscape Plan and a Landscape Plan
must be reviewed and approved by the
Development Services Department. Trees
must be of a species that provides for large
canopy and shade. The use of palm trees
shall not be permitted in strategic areas
consistent with the ESSCSP Master
Landscape Plan and a Landscape Plan
and approved by the Development
Services Director.
Development Agreement No. 11-02 defers
improvements associated with Phase IV of
the ESSCSP.
City Council to determine the specificity or
ambiguity of the final design for Planning
Commission consideration of the 32-foot
poles and netting system.
Specificity provides assurance that final
product that Planning Commission
considers is consistent with intent of City
Council approval.
Ambiguity provides greater flexibility for
final design, however, there is less
assurance that the final product that
Planning Commission considers will be
consistent with intent of City Council
approval.
Accept edit, modifications are consistent
with the intent of staff and direction of
Planning Commission to allow use of palm
trees as accents within entry, but not
throughout entire project site.
#60 The Police Department shall Staff suggested modified language:
deterreview and reasonably approve #60 The Police Department shall
Page 111 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 12 of 13
the monitoring and recording location of the de+ereview and approve
security cameras, which include, but are the monitoring and recording location of the
not limited to: tenant areas such as all
exterior and interior entry doors, cash
handling/counting areas, the manager's
office, the safe, parking lots and parking lot
entries/exits; non -tenant areas such as
common spaces and parking lots; and any
other areas deemed necessary by the
Police Department.
#63 All landscaping s#a4must be in
substantial conformance to the ESSCSP
Master Landscape Plan and a Landscape
Plan must be reviewed and approved by
the Development Services Department.-4e
CONCLUSION
security cameras, which include, but are
not limited to: tenant areas such as all
exterior and interior entry doors, cash
handling/counting areas, the manager's
office, the safe, parking lots and parking lot
entries/exits; non -tenant areas such as
common spaces and parking lots; and any
other areas deemed necessary by the
Police Department.
Accept edit, not applicable in proposed
project.
Detailed in the attached staff report to the Planning Commission dated November 18,
2021, staff and the Planning Commission believe that the necessary findings can be
made to approve this project. Staff and Planning Commission are recommending
approval of the project. However, the Planning Commission further recommends
including a condition requiring Raytheon enter into an agreement with the City prior to
issuance of a building permit for the Butler building committing to either Section 9.2 or
9.3 of DA No. 4972A. Staff recommends City Council consider the Planning
Commission's recommendations, approve the ordinance, read into the record any
additional conditions that may be necessary, and adopt the attached Resolutions.
Page 112 of 500
Proposed Sports Headquarters and Training Facility
December 7, 2021
Page 13 of 13
If approved, the Ordinance will be brought back to City Council for second reading at
the December 21, 2021 City Council meeting, and the Second Amendment to DA 11-02
and corresponding Specific Plan revisions will become effective January 22, 2022.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability
Objective 5A: El Segundo promotes economic growth and vitality for business and the
community.
PREPARED BY:
Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Principal Planner
REVIEWED BY:
Michael Allen, AICP, Development Services Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Ordinance approving Second Amendment to DA
2. City Council Resolution approving Addendum
3. Final Addendum to EIR
4. City Council Resolution approving Raytheon Storage Building
5. City Council Resolution approving LA Chargers Building
6. Plans (Raytheon Storage Building)
7. Plans (LA Chargers Headquarters and Practice Facility)
8. Proposed Subdivision Map
9. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated 11-18-2021 (without attachments)
Page 113 of 500
ORDINANCE NO.
AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE APPROVING A SECOND
AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 11-02
19:144 k W«6111, [a] I0Ile] *K61 V B7_11 Z I_F'i 76] N 1161TiT&I
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.Recitals. The City Council declares as follows:
A. On January 19, 2016, the City Council approved and adopted Development
Agreement No. 11-02, El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan ("ESSCSP"), and
the associated environmental impact report.
B. On September 3, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1589 amending
Development Agreement No. 11-02 to modify the development's phasing,
implementation of certain improvements, and mitigation measures.
C. On October 4, 2021, CDC Mar Campus I, LLC filed an application for Minor
Modifications to the ESSCSP No. 11-01 Revision "A"; second amendment to
Development Agreement No. 11-02 ("Development Agreement Amendment"); Site
Plan Review No. 21-01; Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83501; and
Environmental Assessment No. 1305 to adopt an addendum ("Addendum") to the
Final Environmental Impact Report (EA-905) ("FEIR") for the ESSCSP (State
Clearinghouse No. 2012101081) for the for construction of a three-story building
with partial basement totaling approximately 143,250 gross square feet and
122,080 square feet of net floor area; athletic practice fields; and parking in surface
lots for a new sports facility on a 13.7 acre site in the southeast section of the
Raytheon campus, located at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7 and 8)
(the "Campus"). The development proposal identified in the preceding sentence is
subsequently referred to as the "Project."
D. The City Development Services Department ("Department") reviewed the Project
applications for, among other things, consistency with the City's General Plan, El
Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC"), and the ESSCSP.
E. The Department also reviewed the Project in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and its associated promulgated regulations
("CEQA Regulations").
F. The Applicant and parties to Development Agreement No. 11-02—the Raytheon
Company and City —seek to approve the Amended Development Agreement to
delay the implementation of the Continental Boulevard extension, postpone the
Nash Street extension, as relates to the relocation of the storage facility, and
obligate the Applicant to construct the Nash Street extension if its sports facility
project proceeds. The Applicant also proposes to pay $3 million toward the Plunge
Page 114 of 500
Saari Swim Stadium Pool Rehabilitation capital improvement project to delay park
and open space requirements triggered by the Project. Additional description of
the proposed modifications to the Amended Development Agreement are set forth
in the staff report accompanying this Ordinance, which was presented to the City
Council on December 7, 2021 and incorporated into this Ordinance by reference.
G. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing in accordance with Government Code § 65864 et seq. ("State
Development Agreement Law"), to receive oral and written testimony and evidence
regarding proposed entitlements associated with the Project, including the
proposed Amended Development Agreement and Addendum
H. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolutions Nos.
2902, 2903, and 2904 recommending City Council approval of the Project
approvals set forth in paragraphs A and B, above.
In accordance with the Development Agreement Law, the City Council conducted
a duly notice public hearing at its December 7, 2021 regular meeting to consider
the Amended Development Agreement in light of all testimony and evidence.
Notice of such public hearing was published in the El Segundo Herald on
November 25, 2021, in accordance with Government Code § 65867.
J. After the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council approved this Ordinance
for first reading, and, at its regular meeting of December 7, adopted this Ordinance
via second reading in accordance with the findings set forth below.
SECTION 2. Findings in Support of Development Agreement Amendment. The
City Council finds as follows, in accordance with Government Code Section 65867.5:
A. General Plan Consistency: The Development Agreement Amendment is
consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan and will not
obstruct their attainment as the Project is consistent with the following:
Economic Development Element:
The City's Economic Development Element of the General Plan specifies the
following:
Obj. ED1-2: Center diversification efforts on targeted industries that meet the
City's criteria for job creation, growth potential, fiscal impact, and fit
with local resources.
Policy ED1-2.1: Seek to expand El Segundo's retail and commercial base so that the
diverse needs of the City's business and residential communities are
met.
The Project promotes economic development and improves the City's tax base
through inclusion of a broader range of office and land uses that contribute to the
2
Page 115 of 500
balance and sustainability of local economy and patronage of commercial uses in the
area of the project site.
Land Use Element:
The City's Economic Development Element of the General Plan specifies the
following:
Goal LU7: Provide the highest quality public facilities, services, and public
infrastructure possible to the community.
Policy LU7-1.2: No new development shall be allowed unless adequate public
facilities are in place or provided for.
Policy LU7-2.3: All new development shall place utilities underground.
The Project is required to pay development impact fees, including for facilities,
vehicles, and equipment for law enforcement, fire suppression, and general services,
as well as road projects. Further, the Project site is located in an urbanized area with
adequate infrastructure in place to accommodate the Project.
Open Space Element:
Goal OS1: Provide and maintain high quality open space and recreational
facilities that meet the needs of the existing and future residents and employees within
the City.
The Project will pay impact fees, including those for general services, which will be
used to fund public pools. Further, the DA Amendment contains provisions to provide
an alternative by allowing public use of Raytheon's existing employee park .
B. ESSCSP Consistency: The Development Agreement Amendment is consistent
with the ESSCSP because it will allow the creation of job opportunities and balance
growth, local resources and infrastructure capacity and need. Further, the
Development Agreement Amendment will provide a basis for a positive
contribution to the maintenance and expansion the City's facilities.
SECTION 3. Approval of Development Agreement Amendment. Pursuant to the
findings set forth above, the City Council approves the Development Agreement
Amendment subject to such necessary minor, conforming, and clarifying changes
consistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Manager, in consultation
with the City Attorney, prior to the execution thereof. The full text of the Development
Agreement, as hereby amended, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION 4. Environmental Review. On December 7, 2021, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. approving an Addendum to the FEIR for the ESSCSP (State
Clearinghouse No. 2012101081) for the Project which, among other things, duly assesses
the environmental impact of this Ordinance, the Development Agreement Amendment,
Page 116 of 500
and the Project, in accordance with CEQA. This Ordinance incorporates the environmental
findings and analysis set forth in Resolution No. by reference.
SECTION 5. Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed to achieve
the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council's intent that the provisions of
this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that
facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.
SECTION 6. Inconsistent Provisions. Any provision of the El Segundo Municipal
Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the
extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent
necessary to implement the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 7. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will
not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 8. Publication and Effective Date. The Mayor will sign and the City
Clerk will attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk will cause the same to
be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within fifteen (15) days after its
adoption. This Ordinance will take effect on the 30th day following its final passage and
adoption.
SECTION 9. Execution of Ordinance and Development Agreement Amendment.
The Mayor or presiding officer is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Ordinance
signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or
duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto. The City Manager is delegated to
execute the Development Agreement Amendment and all other associated documents to
effectuate its terms.
SECTION 10. Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with
electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code § 16.5. Such electronic
signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 11. Recordation. In accordance with Government Code §
65868.5, within 10 days of full execution of the Development Agreement Amendment, the
City Clerk will cause a copy of the Development Agreement Amendment to be recorded in
the office of the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk.
ORDINANCE NO. HAD ITS FIRST READING ON , ITS
SECOND READING ON , AND WAS DULY PASSED, APPROVED,
AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AT ITS
REGULAR MEETING OF
4
Page 117 of 500
Drew Boyles, Mayor
ATTEST:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark Hensley, City Attorney
Page 118 of 500
EXHIBIT "A"
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 11-02
Page 119 of 500
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
350 Main Street
El Segundo, California 90245
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
Pursuant to Government Code § 6103
SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1 LLC, AND
RAYTHEON COMPANY
THIS AGREEMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN TEN DAYS OF EXECUTION
BY ALL PARTIES HERETO PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNMENT
CODE § 65868.5
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 120 of 500
SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Second Amendment to Development Agreement ("Second Amendment") is made and
entered into by and between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO ("City"), a general law city and
municipal corporation, RAYTHEON COMPANY ("Developer" or "RAYTHEON"), a Delaware
corporation, and CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1 LLC ("CDC MAR"), a California limited liability
company, as of this , 2021, City, CDC MAR and Developer are also individually
referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and Developer entered into a Development Agreement
("Agreement") on or about the 24th day of March, 2016 with respect to the real property
identified on Exhibit A thereto; and
WHEREAS, the City and Developer entered into that certain First Amendment to the
Agreement ("First Amendment") on or about November 5, 2019; and
WHEREAS, Developer and CDC MAR executed that certain Assignment and Assumption
Agreement recorded April 4, 2021 as County of Los Angeles Recorder's Office document No.
20210545516, by which CDC MAR became a part of the Agreement and First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Agreement with this Second Amendment
to further specify phasing of the Project and the timing of certain Project improvements and/or
conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
in this Agreement, City, CDC MAR and Developer agree as follows:
1. Section 1 of the Agreement ("Definitions") shall be amended as following:
"Effective Date" shall be amended to include the following definition:
As to the Second Amendment, the Effective Date shall be the date of the Enabling
Ordinance as to the Second Amendment.
"Enabling Ordinance" shall be amended to include the following definition:
As to the Second Amendment, the enabling ordinance is Ordinance No.
"Project Approvals" shall be amended to include the following items:
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 121 of 500
• First Amendment to the Development Agreement between City and Developer
dated November 5, 2019;
Plan");
• Minor Modifications to Specific Plan 11-01 Revision A ("Modified Specific
• This Second Amendment (DA 11-02);
Addendum to the Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project Final
EIR (A# 2012101081);
• Environmental Assessment No. EA-1305
• Vesting Subdivision Map No. 83507 (21-02) as approved by Resolution No.
• Site Plan Review 21-01 and Planning Commission Resolution 2903 (Sports
Facility)
• Site Plan Review 21-02 and Planning Commission Resolution 2904 (Storage
Facility)
"Sports Complex Project" means the building of no more than 150,000 square feet of
building area and sports practice and workout facilities on approximately 14 acres of land for use
by the Los Angeles Chargers Headquarters and practice facilities which is more specifically
described in the Project Approvals.
2. Revised Exhibit F and Exhibit G (referenced below) are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
3. Section 7.10 is hereby added to read as follows:
"7.10 Relocation Project.
If and only if the Recreation Facilities Use Agreement ("RFUA") in the form attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference as Revised Exhibit D is executed by RAYTHEON and
the City and is in full force and effect, the relocation of the existing uses within Buildings E-20
and E-21 to one or more new buildings that will be constructed on Parcel 18 of the Modified
Specific Plan ("Relocation Project"), shall be deemed to not trigger the requirements of Section
7.1.2 or 7.2.1 above, provided said new building or buildings have a total net square footage less
than or equal to the combined net square footage of Buildings E-20 and E-21 as described in
Exhibit B.
-2-
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 122 of 500
4. The Agreement and First Amendment are amended such that all references to
Parcels 1 through 26 in the Agreement shall refer to those Parcels as they are depicted in
Exhibit 5 to the Modified Specific Plan rather than in Vesting Map No. 71551 or Vesting
Map No. 83507.
5. Section 9.4 is hereby added to read as follows:
"9.4 The Sports Complex Project and the Relocation Project shall not trigger the
requirements of Sections 9 of this Agreement, including sections 9.1, 9.2, or 9.3 of this
Agreement which are alternative options for Raytheon or CDC Mar to meet the
requirements of Section 9 of this Agreement. If the City receives the first $1 million
payment pursuant to Section, and it is not subsequently required to return it to CDC Mar,
then the 7.54 acre requirement set forth in Section 9, shall be reduced to 7.34 acres.
6. Section 10.4 is hereby added to read as follows:
10.4 CDC/MAR Payments to City
a. Upon City's final approval of the items listed under "Project Approvals" above,
CDC MAR shall deposit with the City $1,000,000. The $1,000,000 once deposited with the City
shall be non-refundable to CDC MAR and shall only be used by the City for Approved
Expenditures for the Urho Saari Swim Stadium ("The Plunge") as defined below in subsection (b).
b. The use of the Deposit shall be limited to capital projects for The Plunge,
specifically hard and soft costs of the City Council -approved project (the "Approved
Expenditures").
C. In addition to subsection (a) above, CDC MAR shall deposit into an escrow account
$2,000,000 ("the "Deposit") upon CDC MAR purchase of the land required for the Sports
Complex Project which shall take place within 10 days of the date that all of the entitlements
required for the Sports Complex Project are approved and past all applicable challenge periods
(the "Close of Escrow") and in no event later than six months after the Effective Date unless a
legal challenge is filed challenging said entitlements. If a legal challenge is filed, the time period
for depositing the $2,000,000 into escrow shall be the later of the (i) Close of Escrow, or (ii) six
months after the date that the litigation is fully adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction or
is settled by the parties thereto.
d. The Deposit shall be released from the escrow account to the City in phases as
follows: (1) $1,000,000 upon the City's issuance of a building permit for construction of the Sports
Complex Project; and (2) $1,000,000 upon City's issuance of the permanent certificate of
occupancy for the entire Sports Complex Project (the "Permanent C of O").
e. Except as set forth in Section 10.4.g., once an amount has been released from
escrow to the City, the City shall be entitled to keep and use such amount; however the amounts
received by the City shall only be used for Approved Expenditures
f. If no building permit is issued for the Sports Complex Project within twelve (12)
months of the Effective Date, the Deposit shall be released to CDC MAR.
-3-
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 123 of 500
g. If the approximate three (3) acres of land that is being transferred by Raytheon to
CDC Mar for purposes of constructing the Sports Complex Project (Described in Exhibit G), which
acreage was part of Phase IV is not developed for purposes of the Sports Complex Project within
the time periods set forth above, then the right to develop the three acres for the Sports Complex
Project shall terminate and either CDC Mar may (i) transfer the three acres back to Raytheon
(subject to Raytheon's sole discretion) and the parcels will be reconfigured to the substantially
conform to their legal descriptions and the three acres will be returned to Phase IV, and the City
will return any payments it has received pursuant to this Section 10.4 to CDC MAR, or (ii) the
City Council has the right in its sole discretion to approve another development or structure(s) to
be built on the three acres. Additionally, if the Sports Complex Projects does not proceed then the
suspension of the transfer of development rights will apply to the three acres described on Exhibit
G unless and until the City has approved a project or building pursuant to this Section 10.4.g.
h.. The City and CDC MAR designate First American as the escrow company and shall
provide written instructions to same consistent with the terms of this Second Amendment.
7. Section 4.14 is hereby added to read as follows:
Section 4.14: Transfer of Development Rights: Any right to transfer development rights
as provided for in the Project Approvals is hereby suspended with regard to properties
located within Phase III and Phase IV in Exhibit F unless and until the requirements of
Section 9 of this Agreement are satisfied and either 9.1, 9.2, or 9.3 have been implemented.
This Section shall not apply to Phases I and II in Exhibit F.
8. Section 23 ("Notices") is hereby amendment to include the following:
To CDC MAR: CDC MAR East Campus 1 LLC
c/o Continental Development Corporation
2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attn: Richard C. Lundquist
Email: rundquist@continentaldevelopment.com
With a copy to: Continental Development Corporation
2041 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attn: Alex J. Rose.
Email: arose@continentaldevelopment.com
and
Mar Ventures, Inc.
721 N. Douglas Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attn: Allan W. Mackenzie
Email: allan.mackenzie@marventures.com
-4-
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 124 of 500
and
Best Best & Krieger
300 S. Grand Ave, Suite 2500
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Attn: Seth Merewitz, Esq.
Email: seth.merewitz@bbklaw.com
8. Except with respect to the specific changes made in this Second Amendment, the
entire Agreement and First Amendment shall remain in full force and effect and not be amended
or superseded by this Second Amendment. Furthermore, each party represents and warrants that
to its knowledge that the other party has fulfilled those obligations that have matured as of the date
of this Second Amendment. The individuals and parties executing the Agreement below,
respectively warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement.
-5-
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 125 of 500
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer, CDC MAR and City of El Segundo have executed
this Second Amendment on the date first above written.
CITY
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO,
a municipal corporation
Drew Boyles, Mayor
ATTEST:
Tracy Weaver,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark Hensley,
City Attorney
CDC MAR
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1 LLC,
a California limited liability company
DEVELOPER
RAYTHEON COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation
By: [TBD]
Its:
By: CDC East Campus 1 LLC,
a California limited liability company
Its Managing Member
By: Continental Development Corporation,
a California corporation
Its Managing Member
By:_
Name:
Title:
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 126 of 500
EXHIBIT D
[INSERT PARK RFUA]
EXHIBIT D
-I-
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 127 of 500
RECREATION FACILITY USE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND RAYTHEON COMPANY
REGARDING USE OF RECREATIONAL FIELDS
This Recreation Facility Use Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and
between the City of El Segundo ("City") and Raytheon Company, a Delaware corporation
("RTX") as of January 1, 2022.
RECITALS:
A. The City has a lack of recreational fields available for its residents and RTX
owns improved recreational fields and parking lots on the RTX Campus.
B. The City and RTX have had an informal arrangement for many years
concerning the use of the improved recreational fields and parking lots on the RTX
Campus.
C. The City and RTX are now interested in entering into this Agreement for
the City's use of the RTX property for recreational purposes for local employees, residents
and local user groups (collectively, "City Participants") as defined herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:
1. City's Use of RTX Recreational Fields. RTX shall grant the City, subject
to the conditions herein, a non-exclusive license to allow City Participants to use RTX's
improved recreational fields located on the RTX Campus, as set forth herein as Exhibit A
and includes the various types of recreation facilities included in Exhibit A, without
limitation the tennis courts ("Recreational Fields"). The City shall further have a non-
exclusive right to limited parking by City Participants in connection with the Recreational
Field use, as reasonably designated by RTX and as may be adjusted from time to time. All
use by City Participants shall be scheduled in advance and set forth herein as the Recreation
Facilities shall not be open for "drop -by" or unscheduled use by the City Participants. The
City shall be allowed to schedule use of the Recreational Fields for City Participants from
5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on the
weekends. Also, the City shall be allowed to schedule use of the Recreation Fields on a
case -by -case basis subject to the reasonable discretion of RTX. The Recreational Fields are
used by employees of RTX and for RTX events and RTX will have first priority in use.
Based upon security and other operational concerns, the joint use by RTX and City
Participants may be allowed at RTX's reasonable discretion for the purpose of limiting the
total number of individuals using the Recreational Fields at the same time or not permitting
incompatible uses on the Recreation Fields at the same times. City Participants shall be
limited to using the Recreational Fields for practice purposes and competitive games
between two or more teams shall not be allowed. However, RTX may approve of use the
Recreational Fields for such competitive games in its reasonable discretion for youth sports
teams on the weekends. All or portions of the Recreational Fields may be shut down by
RTX in its reasonable discretion for repair purposes to allow for the grass playing field
65331.00002\34261898.3
Page 128 of 500
areas to be reseeded/rejuvenated or repaired and for maintenance or repair purposes of
other facilities.
2. Closure of Fields. RTX has the right in its sole discretion to shut down the
Recreation Fields due to national emergencies, pandemics or other similar situations or due
to local, state or federal mandates or recommendations, or arising from the reasonable
security issues of RTX or its government customers, and the City shall not be able to utilize
the Recreation Fields during such time period.
3. RTX and City Scheduling. On at least a quarterly basis RTX and the City
shall meet for purposes of allowing the City to schedule use of the Recreation Fields by
City Participants in accordance with the above rights and restrictions. These meetings will
be used to coordinate the scheduling of RTX and the City's use of the fields for purposes
of allowing the City to provide use of the Recreation Fields for City Participants that have
ongoing or seasonal needs for recreation fields. Case -by -case uses that are known in
advance shall also be discussed at these meetings but can also be communicated about at
any time.
4. City's Use Policy. All use of the Recreational Fields, once approved by
RTX as set forth above, shall be administered by and through City. The City has an
approved "Athletic Field/Facility Use and Allocation Policy," as set forth herein as Exhibit
B ("City Policy"). City shall utilize the City Policy (e.g. Process for Obtaining Permits,
Liability Insurance Requirements, Miscellaneous Rules, Trash/Field Clean, Athletic
Field/Facility Use Rules and Regulations, Application and Agreement Request) and
require all users of the Recreational Fields to comply with the relevant provisions and
requirements of the City Policy. Any changes to the City Policy are subject to review by
RTX for use of the Recreational Fields.
5. Compliance with RTX Rules and Regulations. The use by the City and City
Participants of the Recreational Fields and associated parking shall comply with RTX rules
and regulations, including but not limited to the requirement that City Participants sign a
Use Agreement and Agreement to Release and Indemnify RTX. Failure by any user to
comply with the RTX Park Rules shall result in suspension of the such user's use of the
Recreational Fields. The current TRX rules and regulations and use agreement, and release
and indemnity agreement are attached hereto as Exhibit C and RTX retains the right to
amend these rules, regulations and agreements from time to time in its reasonable
discretion.
6. Maintenance Obli ate. RTX shall be solely responsible for all
maintenance obligations of the Recreational Fields. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in
writing, City shall have no financial liability for the use of the Recreational Fields.
7. Liability Insurance; Indemnity.
a. RTX shall require liability insurance from City and all users in the
amounts set for in the Liability Insurance Requirements section of the City Policy. City
65331.00002\34261898.3 2
Page 129 of 500
shall provide, upon request by RTX, evidence of such coverages, which shall name RTX
as an additional insured.
b. The City hereby agree to indemnify and hold RTX harmless from and
against all claims, losses, liabilities, obligations, costs, expenses and damages, whether
incidental, consequential or special, including legal fees and expenses, arising out of (i)
City Participants' use and occupancy on the Recreational Fields pursuant to this
Agreement, (ii) any breach or default on their part in the performance of any of their
obligations under this Agreement, or (iii) any act or negligence of the City or of any of
their agents, contractors, servants, employees or licensees with respect to the Recreational
Fields. The City's indemnity shall not extend to claims, losses, liabilities, obligations,
costs, expenses and damages, whether incidental, consequential or special, including legal
fees and expenses, arising out of the gross negligence or intentional misconduct of RTX.
This indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement.
8. Term; Termination. This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1,
2022, and shall continue in effect at least until the earlier of (i) January 1, 2036, (ii)
expiration of the Development Agreement between the City and RTX dated March 24,
2016, and any amendments thereto, or (iii) the satisfaction by RTX of the requirements set
forth in Section 9 of such Development Agreement. Thereafter, this Agreement shall be
automatically renewed from year to year, unless either party gives notice to the other party,
on or before May 1 of each year, of its intent to seek amendment or not to renew this
Agreement.
9. Security. The Recreational Fields are located within a secure campus and
all users will be subject to the security requirements of RTX and will be required to be pre -
approved for entry and provide required identification. No one will be admitted that is not
pre -approved by RTX in their sole discretion.
10. Notice. Notices under this Agreement shall be given in writing, by personal
delivery, or first class mail, addressed to:
City of El Segundo
Attn: City Manager
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
City of El Segundo
Attn: City Clerk
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Raytheon Company
Attn:
[address]
65331.00002\34261898.3
Page 130 of 500
Either party may change the person or address to which notices shall be given by providing
written notice to the other party.
11. Complete and Final Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter contained herein, and
represents the complete and final expression of the parties and supersedes any prior written
or oral discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements between the parties.
12. Successors and Assigns; Transfer or Sale. No interest in this Agreement
shall be sold, assigned, pledged or alienated in any manner without the written consent of
the other party. This Agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
13. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is not intended to and
shall not be construed to give any person or entity other than the parties signatory hereto,
or their respective successors, assigns, heirs and legal representatives any interest or rights
(including without limitation any third party beneficiary rights) with respect to or in
connection with any Agreement or provision contained herein or contemplated hereby.
14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together constitute
one and the same document.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have approved the execution of this
Agreement by their duly authorized representatives, this day of , 2021.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Mayor, City of El Segundo
Dated: .2021
Attest:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Mark Hensley, City Attorney
65331.00002\34261898.3 4
Page 131 of 500
RAYTHEON COMPANY
By:
Dated: .2021
653 31.00002\34261898.3
Page 132 of 500
EXHIBIT "A"
RECREATIONAL FIELDS
[Insert Map of Recreational Fields]
65331.00002\34261898.3
Page 133 of 500
A
6 ;
+
+
I -
2 sporting events per day
1 softball field
1 soccer field
_'" ► y.+ Picnic area — considered
special event
Tennis courts-
. � special event
--
fir' Softbal
r field
S � a•
°ccer field
•*ir.,G,- Softball
field =
r "a
21
-49
Page 134 of 500
EXHIBIT `B"
CITY POLICY
[Insert 2015 Athletic Field/Facility Use and Allocation Policy]
65331.00002\34261898.3
Page 135 of 500
Raytheon Employee Park Rules
Hours: Sunrise to 9:00 p.m.
Prior approval/authorization required to use the park
• The park is for company use only and is not open to the public- Only employees and their guest
(s) are allowed. Public or special event use must be coordinated through the City of El Segundo
contact Shawn Green 310 227-5937.
• Park guest(s) - Must adhere to all state and local public health guidance and regulations
• Park guest must be accompanied by an employee at all times, unless authorized as an approved
event through the City of El Segundo
• Park guest must clean up after themselves
• Park guest must bring their own equipment and remove the equipment when they leave
• No animals or pets permitted (except for service animals)
• No alcoholic beverages allowed without prior written approval
• The following items and activities are prohibited: golf, baseball, skateboards, skates, bicycles,
boomerangs, kites, model rockets, and powered or remote controlled models or toys
• No vehicles are allowed on the park grounds
• Raytheon assumes no liability for lost or stolen items — use the park at your own risk
To report an emergency, call 310.607.7777
For questions contact Shawn Green 310 227-5937
Page 136 of 500
Raytheon El Segundo Baseball Field
Use Agreement
And Agreement To Release And Indemnify
On , 2021 ("Effective Date"), Raytheon Company ("Raytheon") hereby
grants "(COMPANY NAME)" permission to enter onto the Raytheon property located at
2000 E. El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA, for the sole purpose of using Raytheon's
baseball field (the "Facility") by (COMPANY NAME)'s participants (hereinafter referred
to as the "Activity"). Raytheon and (COMPANY NAME) understand and agree to the
following:
Facility Use License: Raytheon hereby authorizes (COMPANY NAME) and its
participants, including players, families, spectators, umpires and (COMPANY
NAME) officials to enter Raytheon's property to use the Facility, including the
adjacent parking lot and bathrooms.
2. Term: The time periods for this agreement is from ,and may be
extended only if the parties mutually agree in writing.
3. Entry on and Use of Raytheon Property: The Facility is located on a restricted
access property, so (COMPANY NAME) participants must do the following to gain
entry:
a. Enter the property through the gate at the intersection of El Segundo and
Intercontinental Boulevards;
b. Inform the security guard the purpose of the entry;
c. Show photo identification and, if requested, have their vehicle visually
searched (as all cars entering the property are required to do);
d. Park in the lot nearest to the baseball field;
e. Comply with all traffic control signs;
f. Comply with Raytheon Security guidance and instructions to ensure safety at
all times on the property;
g. Comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations;
h. Depart the property immediately when instructed by Raytheon Security, and
refusal to do so will be treated as trespassing subject to legal enforcement;
and
i. Remove all equipment and trash from the Facility at the end of each day's
use.
4. Facility Schedule Coordination: To ensure the Facility is available for use on
(COMPANY NAME)'s requested dates and times, (COMPANY NAME) must
coordinate with Chanea Banks (cm ban ks(@raytheon.com); 310-505-9677) at least
30 days in advance of the first use. Raytheon reserves the right to deny any request
for use of the Facility and/or limit access to the Facility with or without advance
notice. However, Raytheon will use reasonable efforts to provide advance notice to
Page 137 of 500
(COMPANY NAME) of all scheduling changes and to ensure Security is informed of
(COMPANY NAME)'s scheduled use.
5. Termination: Raytheon may terminate this agreement at any time with a 30-days
advance written notice. In its sole discretion, Raytheon may terminate this
agreement immediately if (COMPANY NAME) participants:
a. Violate Raytheon rules and regulations pertaining to access to the property or
use of the Facility; or
b. Cause damage to the Facility or any other facilities or appurtenances on the
Raytheon property.
6. Disputes & Remedies:
a. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party's rights and remedies under
this agreement are in addition to its rights and remedies at law or in equity. A
party's failure to enforce any of its rights shall not constitute a waiver of such
rights or of any other rights and shall not be construed as a waiver or
relinquishment of any such provisions, rights or remedies; rather, the same
shall remain in full force and effect.
7. Publicity: A party may only use the other party's name, logo, trademark, service
mark, or trade dress for the purpose of advertising, making a news release, creating
a business reference, creating website content or endorsement, with that party's
prior written consent.
8. Warranty:
9. Raytheon does not warrant the condition of the Facility for (COMPANY NAME)'s
use. (COMPANY NAME) agrees to use the Facility as -is and accepts
responsibility for putting the Facility in the condition needed for its use.
10. (COMPANY NAME) shall be liable for all damage to the Facility and its
appurtenances caused by (COMPANY NAME) participants, and shall reimburse
Raytheon for reasonable repair or replacement costs, including Raytheon's
reasonable management. costs.
11.Assignment: Neither party may assign this agreement without the other party's prior
written consent.
12. Relationship: This agreement does not constitute or create a joint venture, pooling
arrangement, partnership, or formal business organization of any kind, and the
parties' rights and obligations are only those expressly set forth herein. Neither party
has the authority to bind the other except to the extent expressly authorized herein.
Neither party shall act as an agent for the other.
2
Page 138 of 500
13. Limitation of Liabili
a. Indemnity: In consideration of the permission hereby extended to (COMPANY
NAME) by Raytheon under this agreement, (COMPANY NAME) hereby agrees
to release, indemnify and hold harmless Raytheon (including, but not limited to
its officers, directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns), from any
and all liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses, including reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs, for personal injury, property damage or other claims,
known or unknown and whether or not well founded in fact or law, which third
parties or (COMPANY NAME) (including, but not limited to its officers,
directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns) has or may have arising
as a result of the permission extended to (COMPANY NAME) pursuant to this
agreement.
14.Insurance:
a. (COMPANY NAME) shall maintain Commercial General Liability coverage
(including bodily injury and property damage, products / completed operations
coverage and contractual liability coverage) with a limit of $1,000,000 per
occurrence.
b. Upon Raytheon's request, (COMPANY NAME) shall (i) provide Raytheon
with certificates of insurance evidencing required insurance, (ii) arrange for a
waiver of subrogation in favor of Raytheon, and (iii) in the case of the
Commercial General Liability policies direct that Raytheon be added as an
additional insured.
15. Notices: All notices under this agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
properly delivered when sent to the other party by (a) certified mail or express mail
at the following address (or such address as a Party designates in writing), or (b) by
email to the following address when the other party confirms receipt of the email.
Raytheon Company
Company Name
2000 E. El Segundo Blvd.
Street Address
M/S EO/E04/P120
City, Zip Code
El Segundo, CA 90254
Supply Chain Management
Contact Name.
ATTN: Kelly Bennett
Phone:
Email: kel ly. J. ben nett(a-),raytheon. com
Email:
16.COVID Regulation Compliance: (COMPANY NAME) shall be solely responsible for
compliance with all state and local public health guidance and regulations.
By signing below, (COMPANY NAME) acknowledges that it has read and understands
this agreement. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
California, which shall be the forum for any actions filed under or incident to this
agreement or to the Activity. If
3
Page 139 of 500
any portion of this agreement is held invalid, the rest of the document shall continue in
full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties executed this agreement in duplicate originals by
their duly authorized representatives effective as of the day and year last below written.
Raytheon Company
Signature
Name:
Title: Supply Chain Management
Date: , 2021
0
COMPANY NAME
Signature
Name:
Title:
Date:
2021
Page 140 of 500
EXHIBIT F
[INSERT REVISED]
EXHIBIT F
-2-
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 141 of 500
4:{:I : M
flui
Z >
U
Z 00
EL SEGUNDO BLVD
♦ ♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
o
a
.. NOTA ■
ART
16 15
-•
•••■-
♦ ♦
2
♦
♦
3
♦
♦
♦
♦
..
...�
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
4
♦
..
..
■.14 ... ■■
........ ...
..
...... ■ ■ 024
■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■■
Q' N
�-
■■■
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
�GJ�
19.■r....
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
P`
.. ....
PHASE IV
0
5
18
O
Gay 12
1 11
uW
/ 2
10 2y _
■ . 0
.....::::'::PHA E II
PHASE I
F
� N .............. GAF
'----'
PHASE II
s
- PHASE III
PHASE IV
Page 142 of 500
I Exhibit Parcel #
Tract Map 71551
"ract Map 83567
I 1
1
-
I Z
I 3
4
5
G
I $
9
I 10
I 11
I 12
I 13
I 14
I 15
I 16
16
I 17
17
I 18
-
1
I 19
-
2
I 20
-
3
I 21
4
I 22
-
12
I 23
-
13
I 24
24
-
I 25
25
-
I 26
26
-
Page 143 of 500
EXHIBIT G
[INSERT 3 ACRES PARCEL]
EXHIBIT G
-3-
65331.00005\34591924.3
Page 144 of 500
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM (EA-1305) TO THE EL
SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT APPROVED UNDER EA-905 TO ANALYZE THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SPORTS FACILITY WITH ASSOCIATED
PRACTICE FIELDS WITHIN PHASE II OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND A
NEW STORAGE BUILDING WITHIN PHASE IV OF THE SPECIFIC
PLAN.
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds:
A. On December 15, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4958, certifying a
Final Environmental Impact Report (EA-905) ("FEIR") for the El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2012101081).
B. In approving Resolution 4958, the Council found that:
1. The City completed a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for
this project and a noticed Public Scoping meeting was conducted on
November 5, 2012 pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")
Guidelines §15083. A Notice of Preparation of the DEIR was circulated for
public review from October 29, 2012 to November 28, 2012 pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines §15082. A Notice of Completion for the DEIR was filed
with the State Office of Planning and Research on July 14, 2014 pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines §15085. The public comment and review period for
the DEIR was open between July 14, 2014 and August 27, 2014 in
compliance with CEQA Guidelines §15087.
2. The FEIR was reviewed by the City Council and the information contained
in the FEIR was considered by the City Council before approving the
project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15090.
3. The FEIR was prepared under the City's direction and reflects its
independent judgment and analysis of the environmental impacts and
comments received on the DEIR.
4. The DEIR generally identified, for each potentially significant impact of the
project, one or more corresponding mitigation measures to reduce
impacts to a level of insignificance, with the exception of air quality and
noise impacts. The City Council found that nearly all of the potentially
significant impacts identified in the DEIR were mitigated by corresponding
mitigation measures to the extent set forth in the DEIR.
5. Written findings were considered for each of the significant environmental
effects identified in the DEIR before certifying the FEIR, which included a
Page 145 of 500
rationale of how mitigation measures lessened the significant
environmental effects to a less than significant level for those effects that
were identified as mitigatable. For the four environmental effects that
were identified in the DEIR as not mitigatable to a less than significant
level (Land Use and Planning, Transportation and Traffic, Air Quality and
Greenhouse Gas Emissions), the findings provide a rationale on how
proposed mitigation measures have substantially lessened the four
environmental effects
6. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15093, a Statement of
Overriding Consideration ("SOC") was included in the project's record
for City Council consideration that identified specific reasons to support
approval of the project based on information in the FEIR and in the
project's record.
7. The specific issues included in the SOC considered by the City Council
were: a) The project helps foster economic development, business
retention, municipal tax base and job creation in the City; b) The project
provides opportunity for the City's largest employer to grow and expand
operations within the City; c) project approval will trigger one annual
payment of $500,000 and five subsequent annual payments of $700,000
towards the City's General Fund for a total of $4,000,000 that can be
used by the City for any purpose; d) If the Nash Street Extension roadway
improvements are not completed within 10 years of project approval, then
the applicant would pay the City an additional $5,000,000; e) An
additional fee of $.50 per square foot of new development is required to be
paid as development of the project occurs (resulting in $1,000,000 if the
conceptual plan is fully built); f) Roadway improvements consistent with
the General Plan will result from the project; g) Bicycle and Pedestrian
network improvements will be constructed as part of the project; h)
Increased density at the project location is consistent with regional growth
strategies, such as the SCAG Compass Blueprint Growth Vision Program;
and i) The project could result in potential benefits such as access to
additional land for roadway links, potential for the City to accept land for a
new public park and a monetary contribution, up to $375,000, to City sewer
improvements.
C. On October 4, 2021, Lionel Uhry filed applications for Minor Modifications to the El
Segundo South Campus Specific Plan ("ESSCSP") No. 11-01 Revision A, Second
Amendment to Development Agreement ("DA") No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 83507 (SUB21-03), Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01, and Environmental
Assessment ("EA") No. 1305 to adopt an Addendum to the certified FEIR, for
construction of a three-story building with partial basement totaling approximately
143,250 gross square feet and 122,080 square feet of net floor area, athletic
practice fields, and parking in surface lots for a new sports facility for an
organization on a 13.7- acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus
at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7 and 8).
oil
Page 146 of 500
D. On October 4, 2021, Emily Murray, Esq. filed an application for Site Plan Review
(SPR) No. 21-02 for the construction of a one-story storage building totaling 5,865
gross square feet and 5,237 of net floor area for Raytheon's use in the southeast
portion of section of the Raytheon campus at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard
(Parcel 18). The proposed storage building would replace buildings E-20 and E-21,
which would be demolished in favor of the new storage building.
E. Approval of the proposed project ("Project") is a subsequent discretionary action in
furtherance of the ESSCSP and requires minor amendments thereto.
F. The applications have been reviewed by the City's Development Services
Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan, and conformity with the
El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") and the ESSCSP.
G. The Development Services Department commissioned Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to evaluate the environmental impact of the proposed modifications
to the ESSCSP FEIR in light of the standards for subsequent environmental review
outlined in Public Resources Code §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162. Based
on Kimley-Horn and Associates' evaluation of the environmental impact of the
proposed modifications to the ESSCSP project, it prepared an Addendum pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines §15164.
H. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Addendum.
The Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information, findings and
conclusions contained in the Addendum to the FEIR, including, without limitation,
the FEIR and supporting documents, together with all comments provided at the
public hearing and all other information in the administrative record. Upon
conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to
recommend that the City Council approve the Addendum.
SECTION 2. Approval and Findings in Support. The City Council approves the
Addendum to the FEIR based upon the following:
A. The Addendum to FEIR was presented to and considered by the Planning
Commission during a public hearing at its meeting held on November 18, 2021 at
which the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 2902, recommending
City Council adoption of the Addendum to the FEIR.
B. The City is the lead agency for the Project. The Addendum was prepared for the
Project in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines
and is adequate and appropriate for the City's use as the lead agency.
C. Based upon the totality of the evidence in the record and as demonstrated by the
analysis set forth in the Addendum, none of the conditions described in Sections
3
Page 147 of 500
15162 or 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent
or supplemental EIR or negative declaration have occurred. Specifically:
1. The proposed modifications to the ESSCSP and the related entitlements do
not constitute substantial changes in the project that will require major
revisions to the FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects.
2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances
under which the project is being undertaken which will require major
revisions of the FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known
and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at
the time the previous FEIR was certified, that shows any of the following: (A)
the modifications will have one or more significant effects not discussed in
the certified FEIR; (B) significant effects previously examined will be
substantially more severe than shown in the certified FEIR; (C) mitigation
measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures
or alternative; or (D) mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the certified FEIR would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but
the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
D. The evaluation of the proposed modifications to the ESSCSP project, FEIR, and
Addendum reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis based on
its review of the entire administrative record.
E. The City Council finds and determines that the ESSCSP FEIR, together with the
Addendum, satisfy of all the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as
the required environmental documentation for the Project.
F. All Conditions and Mitigation Measures identified in the FEIR, on file with the State
of California (SCH # 2012101081), remain in full force and effect.
G. Per State CEQA Guidelines section 15164(c), the Addendum is not required to be
circulated for public review but can be attached to the adopted FEIR.
SECTION 3. Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and
determination in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence,
both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings
and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City
n
Page 148 of 500
Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in
the record as a whole.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will
not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the
provisions of this Resolution are severable.
SECTION 5. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with
electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic
signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 6. Signature Authority. The Mayor or presiding officer is hereby
authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council
of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk or her duly appointed deputy is directed to
attest thereto.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately.
SECTION 8. City Clerk Direction. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make a
record of this action in the meeting's minutes.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
Drew Boyles, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1 SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
, 2021.
I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed
by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was so passed
and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
5
Page 149 of 500
ABSENT:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
Page 150 of 500
Professional Sports Headquarters and
Training Facility Project
Addendum to the Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project
Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2012101081)
November 2021
JO
191^
W..�R
L ��
S Y
Page 151 of 500
ADDENDUM TO THE
RAYTHEON EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS
SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2012101081)
PROFESSIONAL SPORTS HEADQUARTERS AND
TRAINING FACILITY PROJECT
Prepared For:
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Prepared By:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
1100 W. Town and Country, Suite 700
Orange, CA 92868
November 2021
Page 152 of 500
Page 153 of 500
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................1-1
1.1
Purpose of the Addendum...................................................................................................1-1
1.2
Statutory Authority and Requirements................................................................................1-1
1.3
Background and History......................................................................................................1-2
1.4
Summary of Analysis and Findings.......................................................................................1-3
1.5
Incorporation by Reference.................................................................................................1-4
2 Proposed Project Description.........................................................................................................
2-1
2.1
Proposed Project Location and Setting................................................................................2-1
2.2
Proposed Project Characteristics.........................................................................................2-3
2.3
Proposed Project Approvals................................................................................................2-9
3 ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary...................................................................
3-1
4 Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis...........................................................................4-1
4.1
Aesthetics...........................................................................................................................4-1
4.2
Agricultural and Forestry Resources....................................................................................4-4
4.3
Air Quality...........................................................................................................................4-6
4.4
Biological Resources..........................................................................................................4-12
4.5
Cultural Resources............................................................................................................4-15
4.6
Geology and Soils..............................................................................................................4-17
4.7
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change)....................................................................4-22
4.8
Hazards and Hazardous Materials.....................................................................................4-27
4.9
Hydrology and Water Quality............................................................................................4-34
4.10
Land Use and Planning......................................................................................................4-39
4.11
Mineral Resources.............................................................................................................4-42
4.12
Noise.................................................................................................................................4-43
4.13
Population and Housing....................................................................................................4-46
4.14
Public Services...................................................................................................................4-48
4.15
Recreation.........................................................................................................................4-53
4.16
Transportation..................................................................................................................4-53
4.17
Utilities and Service Systems.............................................................................................4-58
4.18
Wildfire.............................................................................................................................4-64
4.19
Energy...............................................................................................................................4-64
4.20
Tribal Cultural Resources...................................................................................................4-66
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
i
Page 154 of 500
Table of Contents
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 2-1: Development Agreement Phases..................................................................................... 2-11
Exhibit 2-2: Regional Context.............................................................................................................. 2-13
Exhibit2-3: Local Context................................................................................................................... 2-15
Exhibit 2-4: Proposed Project Within the ESSCSP................................................................................ 2-17
Exhibit 2-5: Conceptual Site Plan for Corporate Headquarters............................................................ 2-19
Exhibit 2-6: Corporate Headquarters Elevations.................................................................................. 2-21
Exhibit 2-7: Conceptual Site Plan for Storage Building.........................................................................2-23
Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan...................................................................................................... 2-25
Exhibit 2-9: Revised Conceptual Site Plan............................................................................................ 2-27
Exhibit 2-10: Conceptual Landscape Plan............................................................................................ 2-29
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1: Existing Raytheon Campus Uses........................................................................................... 2-2
Table 2-2: Existing Conceptual Development Scenario.........................................................................
2-3
Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Development Scenarios .............................................
2-4
Table 2-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Tract Maps................................................................
2-7
Table 4-1: Proposed Project Operational Emissions............................................................................4-10
Table 4-2: Proposed Project Business As Usual Greenhouse Gas Emissions.........................................4-24
Table 4-3: Proposed Project Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions.....................................................4-25
Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Employment Forecast..............................................4-47
Table 4-5: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Trip Generation.......................................................4-55
Table 4-6: Proposed Project Potable Water Demand..........................................................................4-61
Table 4-7: Proposed Project Wastewater Generation.........................................................................4-62
Table 4-8: Proposed Project Solid Waste Generation..........................................................................4-63
LIST OF APPENDICES
A. ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table
B. Inventory of Applicable Mitigation Measures
C. Trip Generation Assessment
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
ii
November 2021
Page 155 of 500
1.0
Introduction
Page 156 of 500
1. Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose of the Addendum
This Addendum to the certified Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (State Clearinghouse #No. 2012101081) (RBF Consulting,
January 2015) has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] §§21000 et seq.); the State CEQA Guidelines
(Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR] §§15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures
for implementing CEQA as set forth by the City of El Segundo (City).
This Addendum has been prepared to address minor changes to the El Segundo South Campus Specific
Plan (ESSCSP) (Specific Plan No. 11-01), as described below, resulting from the proposed Professional
Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project (Proposed Project).
1.2 Statutory Authority and Requirements
The City is the Lead Agency under CEQA. When only some changes or additions to a previously certified
EIR are necessary and none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines §15162 are met, CEQA
allows the lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR (State CEQA Guidelines
§15164(a)).
State CEQA Guidelines §15164 state the following concerning an Addendum to an EIR:
(a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if
some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in §15162 calling
for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical
changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in §15162 calling for the
preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the
final EIR or adopted negative declaration.
(d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative
declaration prior to making a decision on the project.
(e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to §15162 should be
included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the
record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.
State CEQA Guidelines §15162(a) specifies that when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration
adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency
determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the
following:
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
1-1
Page 157 of 500
1. Introduction
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous
EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as
complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the
previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed
in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
Additionally, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15162(b), if changes to a project or its circumstances
occur or new information becomes available after adoption of [an EIR or] a negative declaration, the lead
agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under State CEQA Guidelines § 15162(a). Otherwise,
the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or
no further documentation.
New State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G thresholds do not constitute "new information" requiring
additional environmental review.' State CEQA Guidelines §15164(a) states that "a lead agency or
responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions
are necessary but none of the conditions described in §15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR
have occurred." Refer also to Section 1.4: Summary of Analysis and Findings below for findings
concerning the Proposed Project.
1.3 Background and History
In 1978, a Precise Plan was approved for the approximately 142.28 gross acre Raytheon Company's Space
and Airborne Systems (SAS) facility Campus site (Raytheon Campus or Campus) in the City's southeast
portion to construct a total of 2,575,000 square feet (SF) of improvements for a floor area ratio (FAR) of
0.42. In 1987, the City Council approved the last modification of the Precise Plan. Under the existing
1 Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
1-2
Page 158 of 500
1. Introduction
approvals at that time, the Campus was built close to the maximum FAR allowed, which caused the
Raytheon Company (Raytheon) to utilize property in other areas outside the Campus. To make efficient
use of the Campus, Raytheon proposed the ESSCSP in December 2011 to allow development of the
Specific Plan area in several phases. The ESSCSP established a maximum allowable development intensity
within the 142-acre Specific Plan area of 3,718,889 net SF (4,231,547 gross SF)3 with any combination of
allowed uses, provided that the FAR does not exceed a specified development square footage (at a
maximum FAR of 0.60 within the ESSCSP area) and the specified peak hour trip ceiling on new
development (26,585 daily trips, 3,042 AM peak hour trips, and 3,120 PM peak hour trips). It is noted,
concerning Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part) where the Proposed Project would be located, the ESSCSP anticipated
development of approximately 327,680 net SF (367,002 gross SF) as discussed in detail in Section 2.1.3:
Existing General Plan and Zoning, below. For purposes of this analysis, the entitled/assumed
development of Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part) hereinafter, is referred to as the "Approved Project."
As of October 21, 2021 (i.e., inclusive of Phase I entitled development), approximately 1,866,750 net SF
(approximately 2,095,950 gross SF) of entitled floor area remains within the ESSCSP; see Appendix A:
ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table.
An EIR was prepared to analyze the potential environmental impacts resulting from ESSCSP
implementation. On December 15, 2015, the City adopted Resolution No. 4958, certifying the FEIR
(Environmental Assessment No. EA-905), State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2012101081, in compliance with
CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. On January 19, 2016, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1516
approving the ESSCSP. Among others, the approvals included Subdivision No. SUB 11-02 (Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 71551) and Development Agreement No. DA 11-02. Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 71551, which divided the ESSCSP area into 26 individual lots, was recorded November 27, 2019
(Instrument No. 20191313306); see Exhibit 2-1: Development Agreement Phases. Development
Agreement No. DA 11-02 between the City and Raytheon Company, which specified the standards and
conditions that would govern the property's development and detailed the Applicant's and City's
obligations, was recorded on December 13, 2016. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement,
which was recorded on November 13, 2019, established four development phases for the ESSCSP area;
see Exhibit 2-1.
On October 4, 2021, the City received applications for the Proposed Project.
1.4 Summary of Analysis and Findings
Based upon the analysis of potential environmental consequences anticipated to occur from
implementation of the Proposed Project (see Section 4.0: Proposed Project Environmental Impact
Analysis), the Proposed Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts that were not
disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated for in the FEIR. As demonstrated in this Addendum, the Proposed
Project's potential impacts would either be the same or less than those anticipated for the Approved
Project in the FEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the
2 Net square footage is the usable area of a specified space and excludes unusable space (e.g., common areas, hallways, and
mechanical rooms).
3 Gross square footage contains all areas of a building, including maintenance areas, walkways, balconies, attics, common areas,
and any walkable areas of the building. Parking lots are not included in gross square footage.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
1-3
Page 159 of 500
1. Introduction
Proposed Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts
than previously addressed in the FEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or
more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with State CEQA
Guidelines §15164, this Addendum to the previously certified FEIR is the appropriate environmental
documentation for the Proposed Project. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decision -making
body must consider the whole of the data presented in the FEIR, as augmented by this Addendum.
1.5 Incorporation by Reference
State CEQA Guidelines §15150 encourages environmental documents to incorporate by reference other
documents that provide relevant data and analysis. The documents outlined below, which were utilized
during preparation of this Addendum to the FEIR, are a matter of public record and are hereby
incorporated by reference. These documents are available for review at the City of El Segundo
Development Services Department, 350 Main Street, El Segundo, CA 90245.
• El Segundo General Plan
• El Segundo General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report
• El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 11-01) (RBF Consulting, October 2015)
• Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Project Final Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse #No. 2012101081) (RBF Consulting, January 2015)
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
1-4
Page 160 of 500
2.0
Proposed Project Description
Page 161 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
2 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Proposed Project Location and Setting
2.1.1 Proposed Project Location
The approximately 142-acre ESSCSP area is in the County of Los Angeles, approximately 19 miles
southwest of Downtown Los Angeles; see Exhibit 2-2: Regional Context and Exhibit 2-3: Local Context.
The Proposed Project involves 63.13 acres within the ESSCP area when accounting for all lots where
modifications are proposed; see Exhibit 2-4: Proposed Project Within the ESSCSP for the Proposed
Project's location within the ESSCSP area.
2.1.2 Proposed Project Setting (Existing Conditions)
The ESSCSP area is in the City's southeast quadrant, in a predominantly light industrial area. The ESSCSP
area is bounded by El Segundo Boulevard to the north, the elevated Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (Metro) C (Green) Line and an older industrial subdivision on Coral Circle to the
east, a Union Pacific Railroad spur and the El Segundo sump to the south, and a Southern California Edison
high voltage transmission easement to the west.
The existing Raytheon Campus, inclusive of the demolition, includes approximately 1,788,889 net SF of
mixed development within the 142-acre ESSCSP area. As indicated in Table 2-1: Existing Raytheon
Campus Uses, there are 11 buildings on the Campus, including a recreation facility.
The Proposed Project site is on generally level terrain and is fully built out and improved. Within Lots 7
and 8, the Proposed Project site is developed with various Raytheon uses/facilities, including
approximately 13,196 SF of floor space in three buildings (E-20, which consists of two buildings, and E-21)
used for storage and ancillary uses, various shade and other structures, an asphalt -paved surface parking
lot, and ornamental landscaping. Within Lot 18, where the new storage building would be constructed,
the Proposed Project site is developed with an unused wastewater treatment facility and an asphalt -paved
surface parking lot, both Raytheon facilities. The following uses surround the Proposed Project site:
• North: Raytheon Campus and associated surface parking lot;
• South: Vacant lot and Union Pacific Railroad spur;
• East: Metro C (Green) Line light rail and commercial offices; and
• West: Vacant lot and the Edward C. Little Water Recycling Facility.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
2-1
Page 162 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
Table 2-1: Existing Raytheon Campus Uses
Building
Use
Net Square Footage
E-1
Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse
996,871
E-2
Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse
39,082
E-3
Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse
28,383
E-4
Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse
670,619
E-5
Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse
1,705
E-6
Office
2,263
E-7
Office, Lab/R&D, Warehouse
49,966
E-201,2
Warehouse
9,245
E-211,2
Office, Warehouse
3,951
E-232
Warehouse
428
E-242,3
Recreation
0
Subtotal
1,802,5134
E-20, E-21,
SP and FOR Assumed as Demolished
-13,624
E-23, E-242
Total Existing Campus Uses After Demolition
1,788,889
Notes:
1. On the Proposed Project site.
2. Buildings E-20 (9,245 SF), E-21 (3,951 SF), E-23 (428), and E-24 (0 SF) were
assumed as demolished and thus were previously excluded from the Existing
Campus Uses calculation; see ESSCSP Table III-1, Land Use Summary, and FEIR
Table 3-4, Land Use Summary.
3. Building E-24 includes locker rooms, restroom and shower rooms which are non -
assignable areas for purposes of net square footage.
4. See FOR Table 3-1, Existing Development.
Source: ESSCSP Table 1-1, Existing Uses.
2.1.3 Existing General Plan and Zoning
The El Segundo General Plan (ESGP) Land Use Map depicts the City's land use designations and indicates
the Proposed Project site is designated "El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan." The ESGP Land Use
Element further describes the ESSCSP, as follows:
"Permits a mix of office, commercial, retail, research and development, industrial, and
related recreational uses. The maximum overall FAR in the Specific Plan is 0.60, based on
the gross square foot size of the Specific Plan project area. (Reso 4958, GPA 11-01,
9/1/09)."
The El Segundo Zoning Map depicts the location and boundaries of the City's various zones and indicates
the Proposed Project site is zoned "ESSCSP — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan," which allows for
commercial/office mixed -use, office/industrial mixed -use, and recreation/open space uses. The ESSCSP is
a comprehensive policy and regulatory guidance document for the development of all properties within
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-2
November 2021
Page 163 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
the ESSCSP area. By providing the necessary regulatory and design guidance, the ESSCSP ensures that
future development implements the ESGP goals and policies.
The ESSCSP includes a land use plan, among other components. The ESSCSP Land Use Plan establishes the
maximum allowable development within the ESSCSP area boundaries. As stated in the ESSCSP, the
maximum development potential within the 142.28-acre Campus is based upon a FAR of 0.60, resulting
in a maximum development intensity of 3,718,889 net SF (4,231,547 gross SF). ESSCSP Table III-1, Land
Use Summary, anticipates that the allowed new development would total 1,930,000 net SF, or 2,161,600
gross SF.4 To allow for maximum flexibility within the Specific Plan area, the ESSCSP utilizes a mixed -use
concept, with regulatory mechanisms to allow for transfers between land use types and planning areas,
subject to various requirements concerning FAR, allowable land uses, and AM, PM, and daily trip
generation ceilings.
ESSCSP Exhibit 5, Land Use Plan, depicts the ESSCSP's land use plan and indicates the Proposed Project
site is designated Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) and Recreation/Open Space (REC/OS). The
Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use category includes a full range of commercial, office,
warehousing, and light industrial land uses, allowing for new light industrial/R&D, office, and commercial
uses. The Recreation/Open Space category includes the ESSCSP's private recreation facility. The ESSCSP's
conceptual site plan is shown in ESSCSP Exhibit 6, Conceptual Site Plan. ESSCSP Table III-2, Land Use —
Project Development Scenario, shows a potential implementation of the ESSCSP's land uses and standards
based upon Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 71551 and the Conceptual Site Plan depicted in ESSCSP
Exhibit 6. Table 2-2: Existing Conceptual Development Scenario provides the existing conceptual
development capacity specifically concerning Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part), based on ESSCSP Table 111-2.
Table 2-2: Existing Conceptual Development Scenario
Building
Building
Assumed
Lot
Use
Acres
Area (Net)
Area
(SF)
(Gross) (SF)
FAR
7
Office
4.75
163,840
183,500.8
0.79
8
Office
5.81
163,840
183,500.8
0.65
18 (in part)'
Not applicable
Total
10.56
327,680
367,002
Note:
1. For Lot 18, the Specific Plan assumed 670,619 net SF (783,689 gross SF) of Existing
Campus Uses - no new development was assumed.
Source: ESSCSP Table III-2, Land Use — Project Development Scenario.
2.2 Proposed Project Characteristics
The Applicant seeks approval of the Proposed Project for development of a corporate office headquarters
on Lots 7 and 8 (ESSCSP Phase II area) and a pre-engineered manufactured storage building on Lot 18
(ESSCSP Phase IV area), at the ESSCSP area's southeast corner. Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and
4 City of El Segundo. (2015). El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Retrieved from
https://www.elsegundo.org/home/showpublisheddocument/351/637110579836730000 (accessed August27,2021).
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
2-3
Page 164 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
Proposed Development Scenarios, compares the Proposed Project's development capacity to the
Approved Project's development capacity.
Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Development Scenarios
Description
Use
Building Area
(Net) (SF)
Building Area
(Gross) (SF)
Existing Conceptual Development Scenario
Lots 7 & 8
Office
327,680
367,002
Proposed Conceptual Development Scenario
Lots 7 & 8 Building E-20 Demolition'
Warehouse
-9,245
-9,245
Lots 7 & 8 Building E-21 Demolition'
Warehouse
-3,951
-3,951
Subtotal Demolition
-13,196
-13,196
Lots 7 & 8 New Construction
Office
126,448
148,050
Lot 18 (in part)
Warehouse
5,237
5,865
Totalz
131,685
153,915
Change (number)
-195,995
-213,087
Change (percent)
-60%
-58%
Notes:
1. Buildings E-20 (9,245 SF) and E-21 (3,951 SF) were assumed as demolished and
thus were previously excluded from the Existing Campus Uses calculation; see
ESSCSP Table III-1 and FEIR Table 3-4.
2. No credit taken for demolished Buildings E-20 and E-21 given these were
previously excluded from Existing Campus Uses calculation; see Note No. 1 above.
To accommodate the proposed development, the Proposed Project involves the following entitlements:
SPR No. 21-01 for Site Plan Review of the Phase II area and SPR 21-02 for Site Plan Review of the Phase IV
area; Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP (Specific Plan No. 11-01); Subdivision No. SUB 21-03 for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 83507; and Amendment No. 2 to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02.
2.2.1 Site Plan Review
The Proposed Project involves four key components:
(1) The first component is the construction of a three-story corporate headquarters building totaling
approximately 122,080 net SF (approximately 143,250 gross SF); see Exhibit 2-5: Conceptual Site
Plan for Corporate Headquarters and Exhibit 2-6: Corporate Headquarters Elevations. The
headquarters building would include dining areas, an auditorium, conference rooms, locker
rooms, training rooms, a weight room, office space, storage rooms, a service area, and mechanical
and electrical rooms. The headquarters building would have a maximum height of approximately
50 feet above ground surface (54 feet to top of parapet at elevator overrun); see Exhibit 2-5 and
Exhibit 2-6.
The headquarters building would house operations and business operations staff with typical
business hours from 6:30 AM to 5:30 PM. A total of approximately 270 personnel would be
employed at the corporate headquarters on a typical workday.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-4
November 2021
Page 165 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
(2) The second component is the construction of two single -story groundskeeping and maintenance
buildings totaling approximately 4,368 net SF (approximately 4,800 gross SF) at the Proposed
Project site's northeastern corner.
(3) The third component is the construction of three full-size natural grass fields with a 29 feet and 4
inch to 30-foot wide artificial turf perimeter are proposed at the site's eastern portion. The three
natural grass fields with the artificial turf perimeter would be 362 feet wide by 546 feet long.
To serve Proposed Project components 1 through 3, 348 at -grade parking spaces would be
provided in two surface parking lots (i.e., southern and eastern). Of the 348 parking spaces, 24
spaces would be electric vehicle (EV)-capable. A security booth would be located at the corporate
headquarters' southern parking lot.
Six types of perimeter fencing are proposed on the corporate headquarters site to buffer views of
the proposed uses from adjacent areas, and specifically to prevent visibility into the corporate
headquarters building and grass fields.
• Type 1 and Type 2 Fencing: 8-foot high black metal vertical picket security fence around the
perimeter of the fields. The fencing would be located to the north of the field adjacent to
South Hughes Way and to the east and south of the fields adjacent to the maintenance
building and parking lot. Additional colored panels for banners located at the entrance to the
fields in proximity to the maintenance access drive are proposed.
• Type 3 Fencing: 32-foot high tall netting to block views from the elevated Metro C (Green)
Line to the Proposed Project site.
• Type 4 Fencing: 8.0-foot high black chain link fencing along the Proposed Project site's
southern boundary adjacent to the southern surface parking lot.
• Type 5 Fencing: Existing 8-foot high silver chain link fencing to the west of the Type 4 fencing
along the Proposed Project site's southern boundary to the south of the western surface
parking lot.
• Type 6 Fencing: 3.5-foot high black fencing located along the western parking lot's northern
boundary.
(4) The fourth component is the construction of a pre-engineered manufactured storage building
totaling approximately 5,237 net SF (5,865 gross SF); see Exhibit 2-7: Conceptual Site Plan for
Storage Building. The storage building would be used for Raytheon's business activities and does
not include any employee -occupiable space. The building would be one-story and would be
approximately 21 feet and 2 inches high. The building would be located on an existing foundation.
Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way would remain. A 6-foot high chain link fence would
be provided around the building's perimeter, with two chain link gates and two chain link rolling
gates.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-5
November 2021
Page 166 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
2.2.2 Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP (Specific Plan No. 11-01)
The ESSCSP includes a land use plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 5) to establish the land use plan categories within the
ESSCSP area boundaries. Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan depicts the existing and proposed ESSCSP
land use plans. Exhibit 2-9: Revised Conceptual Site Plan depicts the existing and proposed ESSCSP
conceptual site plan. To implement these proposed changes, the following Minor Modifications to the
ESSCSP are proposed:
• Exhibits. Modifications to various ESSCSP exhibits are proposed, including the Land Use Plan
(ESSCSP Exhibit 5), Conceptual Site Plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 6), Vesting Tentative Map #71551(ESSCSP
Exhibit 7), Utilities (ESSCSP Exhibits 8 through 12), and Infrastructure (Exhibits 13 through 16).
• Nash Street Extension. The proposed modifications include realigning the Nash Street extension.
The modifications to the Nash Street extension require minor utility relocations, as depicted in
proposed ESSCSP Exhibits 8 through 16.
• Recreational Facilities. The proposed modifications would decrease the land available for the
ESSCSP Raytheon employee private outdoor recreational facilities (from approximately 7.54 acres
on Lot 11 to approximately 7.34 acres on Lots 10 and 11).
• Coral Circle Connection. The proposed modifications would realign/relocate the Coral Circle
connection to the Nash Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The proposed modified
circulation pattern would continue to provide for possible future connection from the Nash Street
extension to Coral Circle (an easement through Lots 20 and 22) and capacity for additional parking
for the Coral Circle businesses (Lots 20 and 22).
Various ESSCSP text revisions are also proposed to account for the modifications described above.
2.2.3 Subdivision No. Sub 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507)
Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 83507 would be required to finalize the proposed Nash Street
extension and accommodate lots needed to implement the Proposed Project. VTTM No. 83507 proposes
a new one phase subdivision of the property into 26 separate parcels, including parcels for future streets.
Table 2-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Tract Maps details the VTTM modifications to implement
the Proposed Project:
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-6
November 2021
Page 167 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
Table 2-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Tract Maps
Existing
Proposed
Lot #
VTTM
No. 715511
Lot Number
Lot
Size
VTTM
No. 835072
Lot Number
Lot
Size
1
1
-
2
2
-
3
3
-
4
4
-
5
-
312,543
5
190,853
6
-
195,471
6
198,958
7
-
206,967
7
248,588
8
-
253,088
8
351,412
9
-
73,235
9
121,690
10
-
65,052
10
150,961
11
-
328,296
11
168,966
12
12
-
13
13
-
14
14
-
15
15
-
16
16
-
17
17
-
18
-
799,640
1
801,916
19
-
363,159
2
342,894
20
-
15,941
3
28,004
21
-
99,992
4
100,387
22
-
14,458
12
18,233
23
-
21,944
13
26,904
24
24
-
25
25
-
26
26
-
Notes:
1. The existing lot numbers are provided under "Land Use Plan
(Existing)" in Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan.
2. The proposed lot numbers are provided under "Land Use Plan
(Proposed)" in Exhibit 2-8: Revised Land Use Plan.
2.2.4 Lighting and Signage
Various types of lighting would be provided across the Proposed Project site. The corporate headquarters'
southern and western parking lots would include lighting fixtures above the parking spaces and along the
parking lot perimeters. Additionally, similar lighting fixtures would be provided adjacent to the
maintenance building east of the grass fields (as described in the Site Plan Review subsection above). For
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-7
November 2021
Page 168 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
the corporate headquarters building, ceiling slot lighting would be fixed to the fagade along the building's
western frontage. Floodlights with glare control and mounted lights behind fagade screens would be
provided on the headquarters building southern frontage. Pedestrian pole lights would be provided by
the headquarters building lobby. Ten approximately 70-feet high mounted poles with high performance
low -spill LED shielded fixtures approximately 70 feet high would be provided around the natural grass
fields. The fixtures would provide an average of 150 footcandles at the playing surface, with a maximum
of 8 footcandles of spill light at the Proposed Project site boundary. While there is potential for nighttime
use of the fields, the Proposed Project would comply with ESSCSP Chapter V, Design Guidelines, which
states that all lighting would prevent direct glare onto adjacent properties.
Signage will consist of internally illuminated wall signs, illuminated freestanding letters and surface
applied architectural wall graphics with team and/or sponsor -related branding. Signage would be
provided on all four elevations of the headquarters building. A monument sign, approximately 16.5 feet
wide by 5 feet tall made of concrete and aluminum, is proposed at the western corner of the Proposed
Project site by South Hughes Way. The monument sign would include illuminated graphics.
2.2.5 Access
Regional access to the Proposed Project site would continue to be provided via 1-105 to the north, with
an exit at North Nash Street, and via 1-405 to the east, with an exit at West El Segundo Boulevard.
Local access to the Proposed Project would be provided via South Hughes Way, which is a six -lane divided
roadway trending in an east -west direction. This entrance would provide right -in and right -out only traffic.
Secondary access would be provided via the proposed North Nash Street extension, which would be a
four -lane undivided roadway trending in a north -south orientation. This entrance would allow both left
and right turns for ingress and egress traffic. Both streets would provide bicycle and pedestrian access to
the Proposed Project site.
Headquarters employees and visitors would enter the headquarters building from the south via a secured
gated area. Visitors, media, or other staff would enter the building through the west via the main entry
lobby.
2.2.6 Parking
The Proposed Project would provide 348 at -grade parking spaces at two surface parking lots (i.e., southern
and western). Of the 348 spaces, 24 would be EV-capable. Parking for staff and visitors would be provided
at the western portion of the Proposed Project site to the west of the headquarters building. All 158
spaces for staff and visitor parking would be standard (9'x19') stalls. On the southern portion of the
Proposed Project site, 187 spaces would be provided for employee parking. An additional three spaces
would be provided east of the grass fields for the maintenance building. Bus parking would be provided
along the headquarters building. Parking would be provided through controlled access that incorporates
gates and security cameras.
A truck dock and loading/staging area is proposed at the headquarters building southwest corner,
adjacent to the building's main equipment storage area. In total, 20 bicycle parking stalls would be
provided south of the headquarters building.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
2-8
Page 169 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
2.2.7 Landscaping
The Proposed Project's landscaping is depicted in Exhibit 2-10: Conceptual Landscape Plan. The Proposed
Project would include approximately 325,458 SF of landscaped area. Planted areas (40,814 SF) would be
provided around the headquarters building perimeter and as buffers to the south and east of the
Proposed Project site. Hardscape (approximately 30,030 SF) would include a paved plaza to the west of
building and a paved paseo and maintenance access to the north of the building. The sports fields would
be natural grass (approximately 197,652 SF), while the fields' edges would be artificial turf (approximately
56,692 SF). There are 58 trees existing on -site, none of which would be retained. The Nash Street frontage
would provide approximately 47 street trees. In the parking area, the Proposed Project would provide 32
trees, with the other 32 trees substituted by overhead photovoltaic (PV) panels. The ESSCSP requires that
landscaped areas must cover five percent of the vehicular use area, and that each parking space must be
located within 30 feet of a tree. Of this requirement, the Proposed Project would substitute 22 trees with
the overhead PV panels.
2.2.8 Site Excavation and Grading
Proposed Project development would require approximately 45,000 cubic yards (cy) of cut and 61,000 cy
of fill, resulting in a net of 16,000 cy of fill import.
2.2.9 Construction Schedule
Construction would occur in one phase for a total of 25 months. Construction would take place Monday
through Saturday from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Demolition and site grading would start in April 2022 and last
until September 2022. Approximately 13,196 SF of existing building space in Lots 7 and 8 would be
demolished and the wastewater treatment facility in Lot 18 would be removed. Building and site
construction is anticipated to begin September 2022 and is anticipated to end May 2024. The Proposed
Project is estimated to be operational in May 2024.
2.3 Proposed Project Approvals
The City is the Lead Agency as set forth in Public Resources Code §21067 and is responsible for reviewing
and approving this Addendum to the FEIR. In addition to the Addendum, the City will consider the
following discretionary approvals for the Proposed Project:
• Environmental Assessment No. EA-1305;
• Site Plan Review No. 21-01 for Sports Facility;
• Site Plan Review No. 21-02 for Storage Facility;
• Minor Modifications to Specific Plan No. 11-01;
• A new Subdivision Map No. 21-03; and
• A Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
2-9
Page 170 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-10
November 2021
Page 171 of 500
VAPHASE1
PHASE I
WPHASE1
r�
Source: Amended
2019 Exhibit P
H w
Z
W J F-
Z J �
� m Gi ecr_i ininn Ri yin
EXHIBIT 2-1: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PHASES
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR
Kimley»>Horn
Page 172 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-12
November 2021
Page 173 of 500
VL
4
' •'�a' I -, L. Sr181I �$S I L w r ` r
� r
dw
. � �,V y . 7• h it
jt
I i ;
r r a'd ` 1
' - 4 AL r +
Proje Site .i xO -- - `
TO
JL
jr 9 .t
ndA
r,nc7 ;tln1
t
ramIF
'
s
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-14
November 2021
Page 175 of 500
Im' I,-
�41
IL
9t
_East El Seciundi� 66uley;d
;j
cn 40
..�-%.I.35'th S
tre
f'4 ass
?D J.Aipi:4
JF
31
R. 4M
A7 Ll..
R6secr4ris.Avenue
41
_rrw
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-16
November 2021
Page 177 of 500
0" sip
d;
0 'A'
NNO :e
Aa
e rTdo B Awlevard
cn,
El Segundo
South Cam pec so Nit
ific
cn
CD
Ph cn
z
F0
1f pip:AV# - 1. I j;- M;imlr . /�" ` y� _ I'. . <
ji
CD lD
COL
Proid
West 'l 35t
-.;n L U
;J-
kosecrans Avenue
L! l"
ak U. a V i j
p
'k' MA I
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-18
November 2021
Page 179 of 500
CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY
SOCAL EDISON UTILIT
PARKING COUNTS - VEHICLE & BIKE
A-/
yTF.
Ref NoM I
EXHIBIT 2-5: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FOR CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS Kimley >> Horn
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR
Page 180 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-20
November 2021
Page 181 of 500
--1
SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE
1.250 SF 300 SF 4.760 SF
SIGN GE
lsl
WEST ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE PARKING LOT
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,732 SF
NEW-
SIGNAGE SIGNAGE
240 SF 650 SF
SIGNAGE
2.5'•120' EAST ELEVATION- FACING TOWARD THE FIELD
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,814 SF
NORTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE STREET
SIGNAGE SIGNAGE
160 SF
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 10,618 SF
SIG AGE
fill
L
SOUTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE RAIL YARD
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 11,200 SF
EXHIBIT 2-6: CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS ELEVATIONS
Kimley>>> Horn
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR
Page 182 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-22
November 2021
Page 183 of 500
---------------
OVERED .
HEMICA
STORAG W
CAGE
I
ING
PMENTi _
�T INS
SECURED
STORAGE SHED UTILITY
YARD
EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO
REMAIN
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
DEMOLISHED/REMOVED FOR
PROPOSED BUILDING
maw_ -
14
NEW PROPOSED
STORAGE BUILDING
EXISTING CONCRETE
EXISTING STREET ABOVE
RETAINING WALL W/ 6' TALL
-10 FEET ABOVE UTILITY
CHAINLINK FENCE ABOVE
YARD
-EXISTING
EQUIPMENT
e TO REMAIN
I
F
7MZEIIANIC LIQUID
MA NITROGEN
EXISTING / EXISTING
BUILDING BUILDING
PROJECT
SITE
CURRENT SITE PHOTO
OVERALL SITE PLAN
EXHIBIT 2-7: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FOR STORAGE BUILDING ]1rKirn1ey\)) Horn
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR
Page 184 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-24
November 2021
Page 185 of 500
L�
CMU
...
2
16 10
(M 1 24
14 cMu 24
-. s
CMU
a UC/OS
O/IMU, L
17 01 U
0/IM
0/IMU
1
9
26 `REC
06
i ��
26
0/IMU 19
5
18
18
25
23
25
e 11 23
� cios
12
22
it
REc/OS - 22
10
21 6
21
6
910 --20
20
i �Tziil
2 8
8 -
/IMU
O/IMU
Land Use Plan (Existing)
=Commercial/Office Mixed Use
Land Use Plan (Proposed)
- CanrywcW / 01ke Moved Use
-Office / Idust ial Mixed Use
- Office / Ind MmW Moved Use
-Recreation /Open Space
Recreaor/Open Space
EXHIBIT 2-8: REVISED LAND USE PLAN
Kimley >> Horn
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training
Facility Project Addendum EIR
Page 186 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-26
November 2021
Page 187 of 500
4:uw[91..: � C:ol].-W'• 3 scsscurvoae dc
r_.a-..--• - — —_
TS- F __-_ __
•t 9
+. 3 14' 3 14
24 « 24
'� � F � � ♦ 1 fir„ �xTy �� � � „ � 4 � � r, r
17 17 13
6 (YJ i
7
PM f1Tl
i l•J f T. Eo
E 19
26 '5 q `-; 26 5 18
.:L p 25 s\ 23
25 12
12 22
22 10
21 ..
21 6
a-20
=; 20
� � � 1 ell
,.
OF
C*s
' s
EXHIBIT 2-9: REVISED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Kimley >> Horn
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR
Page 188 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-28
November 2021
Page 189 of 500
MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS
V \s\ O I�--1 , METRO GREEN LINE
II 1
11
PROPERTY LINE
PEDESTRIAN RAMP 4
ll
ARCHITECTURE
OVERHEAD ``. \� ♦ \ \ \h
\ �S
zi O
SOCAL EDISON LOADING DOCK
UTILITY YARD
` SECU�T.
SOLAR PANELS (ABOVE)'
fir,,' e r' ,"" ;
LANDSCAPE AREA BUILDING PERIMETER
ao<.� Wx1 swTV ZlMm cows vox. u xxuuu xaumxTu onnx w (n w EuixsruE sxu eE
xixiuuu w (1) — mE aeu 1 w mE 111Na
non maE - umnou my EABBE sm
non - xnTuxu uw ,esx savT VEHICULAR USE AREA (VUA)
we (1) ma lax E\mY Txxe mwswB (AM) WME 1¢r w wA
u ienoscwc uus sx4ne swT —T (W.
(-) — lac i..T ws , — vxon— — rcx-- as
(WA) muAY FEET. M11. / ],wa - B< mai iswxfn
(s) - Lwrto( m (aa) IE a i T�E.11 A.wD u x w
x w ((El wo
PROPERTY PERIMETER
ttx Eu+Exu ,uB scrum cnsw vox: (p wABE ma uusT BE vxourcB vw —1 Rzs) w 1—T
EXHIBIT 2-10: CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project Addendum EIR
>
F y
O VEHICULAR USE AREA
O2 PLANTED SLOPE
r r
O3 PAVED PLAZA
O PAVED PASEO AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS
O POOLAREA
© PLANTED BUFFER
O SPORTS FIELDS
Kimley ))Horn
Page 190 of 500
2. Proposed Project Description
This page intentionally left blank
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
2-30
November 2021
Page 191 of 500
3.0
ESSCSP FEIR Environmental
Impact Analysis Summary
Page 192 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
3 ESSCSP FEIR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY
The ESSCSP FEIR's environmental impacts are summarized below:
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
1. AESTHETICS. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to
information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's
inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy
Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted
by the California Air Resources Board. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,
❑
forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-1
November 2021
Page 193 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest
land to non -forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non -forest use?
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non -attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
❑
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
❑
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified
in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-2
November 2021
Page 194 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy
or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines
§ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines §15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
❑
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-3
November 2021
Page 195 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
2) Strong seismic ground shaking?
❑
Z
❑
❑
3) Seismic -related ground failure, including
❑
Z
❑
liquefaction?
4) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
❑
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B
of the California Building Code (2001), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use
❑
of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the disposal
of waste water?
7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
®
❑
❑
❑
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
❑
®
❑
❑
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-4
November 2021
Page 196 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
❑
®
❑
❑
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
❑
®
❑
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
❑
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
❑
®
❑
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop
to a level which would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-5
November 2021
Page 197 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
Z
❑
❑
❑
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of stream or river, in a manner, which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
Z
❑
❑
❑
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which
would result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
®
❑
❑
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard as
mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures,
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
❑
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow??
❑
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
❑
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
®
❑
❑
❑
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local costal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating and
environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan
❑
or natural community conservation plan?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-6
November 2021
Page 198 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
❑
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
❑
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
12. NOISE. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
❑
®
❑
❑
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
❑
®
❑
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
❑
®
❑
❑
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within the vicinity of a private
❑
®
❑
airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
❑
®
❑
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-7
November 2021
Page 199 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new
or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
1) Fire protection?
2) Police protection?
3) Schools?
4) Parks?
5) Other public facilities?
15. RECREATION. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
❑
®
❑
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
❑
®
❑
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy
establishing measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system, taking into
account all modes of transportation including mass
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-8
November 2021
Page 200 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
transit and non -motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system, including but not
limited to intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management
program, including, but not limited to level of service
standards and travel demand measures, or other
standards established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
❑
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities,
or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of
such facilities?
17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the ESSCSP project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
❑
®
❑
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
❑
®
❑
❑
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
❑
®
❑
❑
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
❑
®
❑
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-9
November 2021
Page 201 of 500
3. ESSCSP FEIR Environmental Impact Analysis Summary
Significant Less Than
and Significant Less Than No
With Significant
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Unavoidable Mitigation Impact Impact
Issues Impact Incorporated
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
❑
regulations related to solid waste?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
3-10
November 2021
Page 202 of 500
we
Proposed Project
Environmental Impact
Analysis
Page 203 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4 PROPOSED PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
The scope of the City's review of the Proposed Project is set forth in the State CEQA Guidelines. As stated
in Section 1.2: Statutory Authority and Requirements, this review is limited to evaluating the Proposed
Project's environmental effects when compared to the Approved Project, as evaluated in the FEIR. This
Addendum also considers new information, if any, of substantial importance that was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the FEIR was
certified.
As stated in Section 1.4: Summary of Analysis and Findings, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §15162,
since the City has determined that Proposed Project implementation does not propose substantial
changes to the Approved Project, no substantial changes in circumstances would occur which would
require major revisions to the FEIR, and no new information of substantial importance has been revealed
since the certification of FEIR that would result in either new significant effects or an increase in the
severity of previously analyzed significant effects.
A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was developed to monitor the FEIR's
recommended mitigation measures. The MMRP was adopted as a part of the FEIR to avoid or mitigate the
ESSCSP's significant environmental impacts. The previously adopted mitigation measures applicable to
the Proposed Project will be imposed as conditions of approval for the Proposed Project, as applicable.
The mitigation measures applicable to the Approved Project are contained in Appendix B: Inventory of
Applicable Mitigation Measures.
4.1 Aesthetics
4.1a Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.1-1)
The FEIR concluded the ESSCSP would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista because none
are present within the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no scenic vistas present within the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would have no impact on scenic vistas, and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe
impact concerning scenic vistas would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.1b Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-1
Page 204 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.1-1)
The FEIR concluded there are no State scenic highways located adjacent to the ESSCSP area. Therefore,
the ESSCSP would not substantially damage scenic resources within State scenic highway.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no State scenic highways in the Proposed Project site's vicinity.5 Therefore, the
Proposed Project would have no impact on scenic resources within a State scenic highway, and no
mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning scenic resources within a State Scenic
Highway would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.1c If in a non -urbanized area, would the Project substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced
from publicly accessible vantage point). If in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.1-1— 4-1.4)
Concerning visual character, the FEIR noted the ESSCSP area is dominated by the existing Raytheon SAS
facility located primarily in the ESSCSP's central portion. Other uses that contribute to the ESSCSP area's
visual character are the Metro C (Green) Line El Segundo Station and elevated railway, as well as the
recreational areas located at the ESSCSP's northwest corner. The ESSCSP area is surrounded by
urban/developed land, with no defining or cohesive architectural theme. While ESSCSP implementation
would significantly alterthe area's visual character, it would not substantially degrade the visual character
or quality of the ESSCSP area or its surroundings. Furthermore, all future development within the ESSCSP
would be subject to compliance with ESSCSP provisions concerning permitted uses, development
standards, and FAR limitations, which would ensure they would not degrade the visual character or quality
of the site and its surroundings. Moreover, the ESSCSP includes design guidelines that address criteria
concerning buildings, landscaping, and signage, and are intended to promote the quality of design planned
for the ESSCSP area. Therefore, adherence to the specified ESSCSP regulations and consideration to the
specified guidelines, which the City would verify through the Site Plan Review process, would ensure that
any future development would avoid conflicts with the character of the surrounding development. The
ESSCSP would result in a less than significant impact concerning effects to visual character or quality.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site, which is in an urbanized area, is developed with
various Raytheon uses/facilities, including three buildings used for storage and ancillary uses, various
shade and other structures, various storage containers, an asphalt -paved surface parking lot, a
s State of California, Department of Transportation Website, California Scenic Highway Mapping System,
Officially Designated State and County Scenic Highways, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic/schwy.htm,
Accessed September 21, 2021.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-2
Page 205 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
wastewater treatment facility, and ornamental landscaping. On the Proposed Project site's northern
portion, existing uses would be replaced by a one-story butler building. On the Proposed Project site's
southern portion, existing uses would be replaced by a three-story corporate headquarters building, two
single -story groundskeeping and maintenance buildings, a sports practice facility (i.e., three full-size
natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter), and a surface parking lot. The proposed uses would
be visually compatible with the other land uses within the ESSCSP and in its vicinity. Through the Site Plan
Review process, the City would verify the Proposed Project's consistency with the in ESSCSP's zoning and
other regulations that govern visual and scenic quality, which are found in ESSCSP Section V: Design
Guidelines, and ESSCSP Section VI: Development Standards. Therefore, following compliance with ESSCSP
and City standards, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning
regulations governing scenic quality and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact
concerning scenic quality would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.1d Would the Project create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.1-4 — 4.1-5)
The FEIR noted that no light-sensitive land uses are located within or adjacent to the ESSCSP area.
Additionally, future ESSCSP development would have similar light sources as existing development within
and surrounding the area. Future ESSCSP land uses would develop as in -fill property that is surrounded by
other commercial and industrial developments. Furthermore, the ESSCSP includes standards that are
intended to ensure that exterior lighting is designed and located to avoid intrusive effects on adjacent
properties. Future development within the ESSCSP would be reviewed by the City through the Site Plan
Review process to verify compliance with ESSCSP exterior lighting standards. Therefore, a less than
significant impact would occur concerning light and glare.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: There are no light-sensitive land uses located on or near the Proposed
Project site. The Proposed Project involves development of a corporate headquarters office building that
would create new sources of light, including light emanating from building interiors passing through
windows, and light from exterior sources (i.e., building illumination, security lighting, parking lot lighting,
and landscape lighting). However, these light sources would be similar to those that exist within and
surrounding the ESSCSP area. The southern and western parking lots would include lighting fixtures
throughout the parking lot and along the parking lot perimeters. Additionally, mounted pole lighting
would be provided around the natural grass fields, which could be utilized during nighttime hours. The
fixtures would provide an average of 150 footcandles at the playing surface, with a maximum of 8
footcandles of spill light at the Proposed Project site boundary. While there is potential for nighttime use
of the natural fields, the Proposed Project would comply with ESSCSP Chapter V, Design Guidelines, which
states that all lighting would prevent direct glare onto adjacent properties.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-3
Page 206 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Although the Proposed Project would create new light sources, no light-sensitive land uses would be
adversely affected by the Proposed Project, since none are located on or near the Proposed Project site.
Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with ESSCSP standards found in Sections V and VI
that are intended to ensure that the exterior lighting is designed and located to avoid intrusive effects on
adjacent properties. Namely, the lighting design standards require that the type and location of parking
area and building lighting prevent direct glare on to adjacent properties. To avoid adverse lighting effects,
the City would verify the Proposed Project's compliance with the relevant ESSCSP standards through the
Site Plan Review process. Therefore, following compliance with ESSCSP and City standards, the Proposed
Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning light and glare and no mitigation is
required. No new or more severe impact concerning light and glare would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
4.2a Would the Project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-1)
The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP is not designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There is no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Important within
ESSCSP boundaries. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on agricultural resources and
no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning agricultural resources would occur
as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.2b Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2)
No agricultural zoning exists and no agricultural uses are permitted within the ESSCSP. Additionally, the
ESSCSP is not part of a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There is no existing zoning for agricultural uses within or near the Proposed Project site.
Further, the Proposed Project area is not part of Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the Proposed Project
would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract and no mitigation
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-4
Page 207 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
is required. No new or more severe impact concerning agricultural resources would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.2c Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2)
The FEIR concluded there are no existing forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned areas within the
ESSCSP. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no existing forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned areas within or near the
Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning forestry
resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.2d Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non forest use?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2)
The FEIR concluded there is no existing forestland within or near the ESSCSP. Therefore, the FEIR
concluded no conversion of forest land to non -forest use would occur.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There is no existing forestland within or near the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the
Proposed Project would not result in loss of forest land or its conversion to non -forest use and no
mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning forestry resources would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.2e Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non forest use?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-5
Page 208 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.2-2)
The FEIR concluded no Farmland or forest land exist within or near the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the FEIR
concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: No Farmland or forest lands exist within or near the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the
Proposed Project would not involve changes in the existing environment which, could result in conversion
of Farmland or forest land and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning
agricultural or forestry resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.3 Air Quality
4.3a Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.3-22 — 5.3-25)
The FEIR analyzed the ESSCSP's potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the South Coast
Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). ESSCSP
construction emissions would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of Mitigation
Measures (MM) AQ-1 through AQ-4. ESSCSP operational emissions, however, would exceed the SCAQMD
operational thresholds. Therefore, the ESSCSP could cause or affect a violation of the ambient air quality
standards. While the ESSCSP would be consistent with the AQMP's goals and policies related to land use
and growth, it would result in significant and unavoidable operational emissions due to exceedance of
reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxide (NOx), and carbon monoxide (CO) thresholds. Thus, the ESSCSP
would conflict with the 2012 AQMP resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: As detailed in Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed
Development Scenarios, the Proposed Project would develop approximately 58 percent less floor area
(approximately 213,087 gross less SF) than the Approved Project. Additionally, as addressed in Threshold
4.16b Analysis of Proposed Project below, the Proposed Project would result in approximately 55 percent
fewer daily vehicle trips than the Approved Project. As indicated in Table 4-1: Proposed Project
Operational Emissions below, the Proposed Project's operational emissions would not exceed the
SCAQMD operational thresholds. Proposed Project impacts would be less than significant. No new or more
severe impact concerning conflicts with or obstructing implementation of the applicable air quality plan
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
AQ-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the Director of Public Works and Director of
Planning and Building Safety must approve Grading Plan, Building Plans, and
specifications that comply with SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust emissions must
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-6
Page 209 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
be controlled by regular watering or other dust prevention measures, and Rule 402, which
requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from
creating a nuisance off -site as specified in the SCAQMD's Rules and Regulations.
Implementation of the following measures would reduce short-term fugitive dust impacts
on nearby sensitive receptors:
■ All active portions of the construction site must be watered every three hours during
daily construction activities and when dust is observed migrating from the Project site to
prevent excessive amounts of dust.
■ Appoint a construction relations officer to act as a community liaison concerning on -site
construction activity including resolution of issues related to particulate matter
generation.
■ Pave or apply water every three hours during daily construction activities or apply non-
toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas. More
frequent watering must occur if dust is observed migrating from the site during site
disturbance.
■ Any on -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or other dusty material must be enclosed, covered,
watered twice daily, or non -toxic soil binders shall be applied.
■ All grading and excavation operations must be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25
miles per hour.
■ Disturbed areas must be replaced with ground cover or paved immediately after
construction is completed in the affected area.
■ Track -out devices such as gravel bed track -out aprons (3 inches deep, 25 feet long, 12
feet wide per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes) are required to reduce
mud/dirt trackout from unpaved truck exit routes. Alternatively a wheel washer must be
used at truck exit routes.
■ On -site vehicle speed must be limited to 15 miles per hour.
■ All material transported off -site must be either sufficiently watered or securely covered
to prevent excessive amounts of dust before departing the job site.
■ Reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas.
AQ-2 During construction, all trucks hauling excavated or graded material on -site must comply
with Vehicle Code § 23114 (Spilling Loads on Highways) regulating the manner for
preventing material spilling onto public streets and roads. Before the City issues Grading
Permits, the Project Applicant must demonstrate to the Director of Public Works how
operations comply with Vehicle Code § 23114 during hauling activities, as applicable.
AQ-3 The following measures must be implemented bythe contractor to reduce ROG emissions
resulting from application of architectural coatings:
■ Use high -pressure -low -volume (HPLV) paint applicators with a minimum transfer
efficiency of at least 50 percent;
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-7
Page 210 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
■ Use pre -painted construction materials; and
■ VOC content of architectural coatings cannot exceed 35 grams per liter.
AQ-4 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the construction contractor must provide
evidence to the Public Works Director that the following measures are implemented
during construction. See also MM GHG-1.
■ Provide temporary traffic controls such as a flag person, during all phases of construction
to maintain smooth traffic flow.
■ Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on -
and off -site.
■ Improve traffic flow by signal synchronization, and ensure that all vehicles and
equipment will be properly tuned and maintained according to manufacturers'
specifications.
■ Require the use of electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline
power generators.
■ Require the use of 2010 and newer diesel haul trucks (e.g., material delivery trucks and
soil import/export) and if the Director determines that 2010 model year or newer diesel
trucks cannot be obtained then trucks that meet EPA 2007 model year NOx emissions
requirements may be used.
■ During Project construction, all internal combustion engines/construction, equipment
operating on the project site must meet EPA -Certified Tier 3 emissions standards, or
higher according to the following:
o Project start, to December 31, 2014: All off -road diesel -powered construction
equipment greater than 50 horsepower must meet Tier 3 off -road emissions
standards. In addition, all construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT
devices certified by CARB. Any emissions control device used by the contractor must
achieve emissions reductions that are not less than what could be achieved by a
Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by
CARB regulations.
o Post -January 1, 2015: All off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater
than 50 horsepower must meet the Tier 4 emission standards, where available. In
addition, all construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT devices certified
by CARB. Any emissions control device used by the contractor must achieve
emissions reductions that are not less than what could be achieved by a Level 3
diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB
regulations.
o A copy of each unit's certified tier specification, BACT documentation, and CARB or
SCAQMD operating permit must be provided at the time of mobilization of each
applicable unit of equipment.
See also MM GHG-1 under Section 4.7: Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change), below.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-8
Page 211 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.3b Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.3-11— 5.3-19)
Construction Emissions
As stated in the FEIR, ESSCSP construction would result in short-term grading and building construction
and exhaust emissions from construction equipment and construction crew motor vehicles. Maximum
particulate matter emissions would occur during the initial stages of construction (e.g., grading activities).
The unmitigated particulate matter levels would be below the SCAQMD thresholds without
implementation of specific dust reduction measures. Notwithstanding, the ESSCSP would implement MM
AQ-1 and AQ-2 to ensure that impacts are minimized. Regarding gaseous and particulate emissions, the
application of asphalt and surface coatings creates ROG emissions, which are ozone (03) precursors. The
ESSCSP would implement MM AQ-3 to ensure that ROG emissions would be less than significant.
Regarding exhaust emissions from construction equipment and trucks, the ESSCSP would require
implementation of MM AQ-4 to ensure that construction utilizes diesel construction equipment that
complies with at least Tier 3-level emission standards during all construction phases, which would reduce
construction equipment and worker vehicle exhaust emissions to below SCAQMD thresholds and result
in less than significant impacts. With implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, construction -related
impacts would be less than significant.
Operational Emissions
As stated in the FEIR, ESSCSP operational emissions would result from stationary and mobile sources
during normal daily activities. Stationary area source emissions would be generated by consumption of
natural gas for space and water heating devices, operation of landscape maintenance equipment, and use
of consumer products. Stationary energy emissions would be generated by energy consumption
associated with the ESSCSP. Mobile source emissions would be generated by the motor vehicles traveling
to and from the ESSCSP area. While the ESSCSP is located within 0.25 mile of the Metro C (Green) Line
light rail station and new development would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-16 to provide
facilities that encourage multimodal transportation as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle trips,
operational emissions would exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Despite implementation of MM GHG-1,
reductions from the site's proximity to transit, and compliance with the ESMC, ESSCSP operational
emissions would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG, NOx, and CO, thus, would remain significant and
unavoidable. Operational impacts related to SOx and particulate matter emissions would be below the
SCAQMD thresholds and would be less than significant.
Cumulative Emissions
As concluded in the FEIR, the ESSCSP would result in less than significant construction impacts with
implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4. Thus, when combined with other projects in the area,
cumulative construction -related impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation
measures. Regarding operations, given the South Coast Air Basin's nonattainment status for Os, PM4.5, and
PM1o, additional emissions from the related projects would result in ROG, NOx, PM4.5, and PM10 emissions
that would exceed SCAQMD thresholds. The ESSCSP would result in significant and unavoidable
operational emissions for regional ROG, NOx, and CO, despite implementation of MM GHG-1. Thus, when
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-9
Page 212 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
combined with other related projects, cumulative operational impacts would be significant and
unavoidable, and no other feasible mitigation measures would be available.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated:
Construction
As previously stated, the Proposed Project involves development of 153,915 gross SF, or approximately
213,087 less gross SF (58 percent less floor area) than the Approved Project. Given the Proposed Project
would require less construction than the Approved Project, construction -related emissions for the
Proposed Project would also be proportionately less than the Approved Project. With implementation of
MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, the Proposed Project's construction -related impacts would be reduced to less
than significant.
Operations
The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but
with approximately 58 percent less gross floor area as compared to the Approved Project, resulting in
approximately 55 percent fewer daily vehicle trips. As stated in Table 4-1: Proposed Project Operational
Emissions, the total Proposed Project -related operational unmitigated emissions would not exceed the
SCAQMD thresholds. The Proposed Project's operational -related impacts would be less than significant.
Table 4-1: Proposed Project Operational Emissions
Pollutant (pounds/day)
Emissions Source'
ROG
NOx
CO
SOx
PMlo
PMa.s
Proposed Unmitigated Net Emissions
Area'
3.99
0
0.02
0
0
0
Energy'
0.04
0.40
0.34
< 1
0.03
0.03
Mobile
4.93
11.95
50.90
0.17
11.86
3.32
Total Proposed Unmitigated
11.89
3.35
Emissions4
8.96
14.35
51.26
0.17
SCAQMD Threshold
55
55
550
150
150
55
SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded?
No
No
No
No
No
No
Notes:
1. Based on FEIR Table 5.3-6: Long -Term Operational Air Emissions.
2. The Proposed Project operational area and energy source emissions were calculated proportionately based
on the Proposed Project's floor area (140,719 gross SF) comprising approximately 7.1 percent of the ESSCSP
total entitled additional development (2,161,600 gross SF), as evaluated in the FEIR.
3. The Proposed Project operational mobile source emissions were calculated proportionately based on the
Proposed Project's forecast new trips (1,808 daily trips) comprising approximately 6.8 percent of the ESSCSP
total daily trips (26,585 daily trips), as evaluated in the FEIR.
4. Totals may not add up due to rounding.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-10
Page 213 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Cumulative
The Proposed Project would be constructed in the South Coast Air Basin, which is nonattainment for 03,
PM2.5, and PM1o, and additional emissions from the related projects would continue to result in ROG, NOx,
PM2.5, and PM10 emissions in excess of SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, with implementation of MM
GHG-1, cumulative operational -related impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as concluded
in the FEIR. It is noted that although the Proposed Project would result in a significant and unavoidable
impact concerning cumulative operational emissions, this significant and unavoidable impact was
previously identified in the FEIR. No new or more severe impact concerning a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant would occur, as a result of the Proposed Project. As described above,
the Proposed Project would result in proportionately less operational emissions as compared to the
Approved Project's operational emissions. Therefore, an additional finding concerning this significant
impact is not required, since such a finding was already made in adopting the original FEIR, and this
Addendum is the proper CEQA document per State CEQA Guidelines §§15162 and 15164 because no new
significant environmental impacts have been identified.
FOR Mitieation Measures
See MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, above, and MM GHG-1, below.
4.3c Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.3-20 — 5.3-22)
The sensitive receptors nearest the ESSCSP area are the institutional uses located approximately 82 feet
to the east. With implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, ESSCSP mitigated on -site construction
emissions would not exceed the Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) and localized significance impacts
for ESSCSP construction would be less than significant.
During ESSCSP operations, area source emissions would be negligible and would not exceed the LSTs, thus
operational impacts would be less than significant. As stated in the FEIR, there would be no CO hotspots
at any of the intersections studied in the FEIR. Therefore, impacts regarding CO hotspots would be less
than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: As previously stated, the Proposed Project would develop approximately 58
percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project. Given the Proposed Project would require less
construction on the Proposed Project site than the Approved Project, construction -related emissions for
the Proposed Project would also be proportionately less than that of the Approved Project. With
implementation of MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, the Proposed Project's construction -related impacts would
be reduced to less than significant.
Concerning operations, the Proposed Project would develop a corporate headquarters building, natural
grass fields, and a warehouse. As the uses determined in the ESSCSP would result in negligible operational
area source emissions and would not exceed the LSTs, and the Proposed Project involves 58 percent less
gross floor area than the Approved Project, the Proposed Project's operational area source emissions
would also be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning exposing sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant concentrations would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-11
Page 214 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
FOR Mitigation Measures
See MM AQ-1 through AQ-4, above.
4.3d Would the Project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.3-2)
The FEIR concluded that construction -related odors would be intermittent, short-term in nature, and
would cease upon project completion. Concerning long-term operations, the FEIR determined that the
ESSCSP's proposed development would not include land uses identified by the SCAQMD as being
associated with odors. Therefore, the FEIR found that impacts related to odors would be less than
significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project's construction -related odors would be intermittent,
short-term in nature, and would cease upon Proposed Project completion. The Proposed Project involves
development of a corporate headquarter building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse land uses, which
are not identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors. Therefore, the Proposed Project would
result in a less than significant impact concerning odors. No new or more severe impact concerning odors
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.4 Biological Resources
4.4a Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.4-1— 4.4-2)
The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of, and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been
permanently altered due to construction of aboveground improvements. Future development occurring
within the ESSCSP area would not impact, either directly or through habitat modification, any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore,
the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, present on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-12
Page 215 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
these species and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning these species
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.4b Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2)
The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been
permanently altered due to the construction of aboveground improvements. Future development
occurring within the ESSCSP area would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, the FEIR concluded
no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service present on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no
impact on these resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.4c Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2)
The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been
permanently altered due to the construction of aboveground improvements. Since there are no State or
federally protected wetlands on -site, future development occurring within the ESSCSP area would not
have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no state or federally protected wetlands present on the Proposed Project site.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on wetlands and no mitigation is required. No new
or more severe impact concerning wetlands would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-13
Page 216 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.4d Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede
the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2)
The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land that has been
permanently altered due to the construction of aboveground improvements. Future development
occurring within the ESSCSP area would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in
this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or established native resident
or migratory wildlife corridors or native wildlife nursery sites present on the Proposed Project site.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impacts on those resources and no mitigation is required.
No new or more severe impact concerning those species, corridors, or nursery sites would occur as a result
of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.4e Would the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances related to protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2)
The FEIR identified that there are no local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as
a tree preservation policy or ordinance that are relevant to the ESSCSP. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no
impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance that are relevant to the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources and no
mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning those policies or ordinances would occur
as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-14
Page 217 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.4f Would the Project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.4-2)
The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP is not within the jurisdiction of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation
plan. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project site is not within the jurisdiction of an adopted Habitat Conservation
Plan, Natural Community Conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat
conservation plan; therefore, the Proposed Project would result in no impact and no mitigation is
required. No new or more severe impact concerning those policies or ordinances would occur as a result
of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.5 Cultural Resources
4.5a Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource
pursuant Section 15064.5?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-1)
The ESSCSP is currently developed with the Raytheon Company's SAS facility. The FEIR determined that
none of the 11 existing buildings within the ESSCSP area would qualify as a historical resource as defined
in State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5. ESMC Chapter 15-14, Historic Preservation, provides for the
identification, protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of historic buildings and structures within
the City that reflect special elements of the City's historical heritage. The El Segundo Department of
Community, Economic, and Development Services maintains a designated cultural resources list, and
none of the existing buildings or structures are listed as a designated cultural resource. The FEIR identified
that the ESSCSP would not cause a change in the significance of a historical resource. Therefore, the FEIR
concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no historical resources present within the ESSCSP, and therefore, the Proposed
Project site. No historical resource would be demolished or materially altered. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. No impact would
occur in this regard and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning historical
resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-15
Page 218 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.5b Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to CEOA Guidelines Section 15064.5?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-1)
The FEIR determined that there are no known designated cultural (i.e., archaeological) resources present
within the ESSCSP area. The ESSCSP area has already been subject to extensive disruption and may contain
artificial fill materials. Given the highly disturbed condition of the ESSCSP area, the potential for ground -
disturbing activities to impact an as yet unidentified archaeological resource is considered remote.
Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning archaeological resources.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site has already been subject to extensive disruption
and may contain artificial fill materials. There are no known designated cultural (i.e., archaeological)
resources present on the Proposed Project site. Additionally, the Proposed Project site consists of, and is
surrounded by, urban/developed land that has been permanently altered due to the construction of
below and aboveground improvements (i.e., buildings, parking lots, roads, hardscapes, and utilities).
Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed condition, the potential for ground -disturbing activities
to impact an as yet unidentified archeological resource is considered remote. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. No impact
would occur in this regard and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning
archaeological resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.5c Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
While the FEIR addressed the ESSCSP's potential impacts on paleontological resources under Cultural
Resources, due to the State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G update which organized these issues under
Geology and Soils, the discussion on paleontological resources and unique geologic features is now
addressed under Threshold 4.6f below.
4.5d Would the Project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-2)
The FEIR determined that the ESSCSP area is already highly disturbed, and the potential to disturb any
human remains is remote. Additionally, no conditions exist that suggest human remains are likely to be
found during ESSCSP construction activities. Nevertheless, if human remains were found, the remains
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-16
Page 219 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
would require proper treatment in accordance with applicable laws, including Public Resources Code
§§5097, et seq., and Health and Safety Code §§7050.5-7055. The requirements and procedures set forth
in Public Resources Code § 5097.98 would be implemented if human remains are discovered, including
notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission and
consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the "most
likely descendant." If human remains are found during excavation, excavation must stop in the vicinity of
the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent remains until the County coroner
investigates and the remains have been investigated and appropriate recommendations have been made
for the treatment and disposition of the remains. Therefore, with compliance with applicable law
regarding human remains, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning human remains.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed condition, the potential
for the Proposed Project to disturb any human remains is remote. If human remains were found, these
would require proper treatment in accordance with applicable laws pertaining to proper treatment,
discovery, and notification, as detailed in the FEIR. Therefore, the Proposed Project's potential impacts
concerning disturbance of human remains, would be less than significant, following compliance with the
established regulatory framework. No new or more severe impact concerning human remains would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.6 Geology and Soils
4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the
risk loss, injury, or death involving:
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.6-1— 4.6-2)
The FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP would not be affected by an Alquist Priolo (AP) Earthquake Fault Zone,
as none is present within the ESSCSP area. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not expose people or structures
to potential substantial adverse effects involving rupture of a known earthquake fault. The FEIR concluded
no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project site is not affected by an AP Earthquake Fault Zone since there is none
within the Proposed Project area. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause potential substantial
adverse effects involving rupture of a known earthquake fault. No impact would occur in this regard and
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-17
Page 220 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning rupture of a known earthquake fault
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the
risk loss, injury, or death involving:
(ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.6-17 — 5.6-18)
The FEIR concluded the ESSCSP is within a seismically active Southern California region that could
experience strong seismic ground shaking. The ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with the City's
regulatory controls (i.e., California Building Code and ESMC Chapter 13-1), as well as ESSCSP-specific mitigation
measures, which would reduce potential seismic and geologic impacts, including the. All structures developed
within the ESSCSP area would be designed to withstand "design -level" earthquakes as set forth in the latest
edition of the California Building Code. With compliance with the applicable regulations, potential adverse
impacts to new structures due to strong, seismically -induced, vibratory ground motion would be sufficiently
mitigated through proper seismic design. The FEIR concluded that, with compliance with the California Building
Code, ESMC, and MM GEO-1, impacts regarding the exposure of people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects involving strong seismic ground shaking would be reduced to a less than significant level.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site is within the ESSCSP area
and, thus, would be exposed to potential hazards associated with strong seismic ground shaking, as
described above. The Proposed Project would be subject to the City's regulatory framework (i.e.,
California Building Code and ESMC Chapter 13-1), as well as MM GEO-1, which requires a lot -specific
Geotechnical/Soils Investigation, to reduce the potentially significant impacts involving strong seismic
ground shaking to a less than significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning strong
seismic ground shaking would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
GEO-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit or Building Permit, a lot -specific
Geotechnical/Soils Investigation must be conducted, to a satisfaction of the Director of
Planning and Building Safety. The Geotechnical/Soils Investigation must:
■ Be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the California Building Code by a
civil engineer registered in this State;
■ Comply with the recommendations specified in the Geology, Soils, Seismicity Report in
Support of Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (D. Scott Magorien, C.E.G.,
March 6, 2013); and
■ Recommend the appropriate corrective action, which is likely to prevent structural
damage to each structure proposed to be constructed in the area where
geotechnical/soils problems exist.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-18
Page 221 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the
risk loss, injury, or death involving:
(iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.6-18)
The FEIR concluded that the geologic materials that underlie the ESSCSP area include a late Pleistocene
age dune sand and undocumented artificial fill soils more than 18 feet deep, which would have sufficient
soil engineering strengths to provide foundation support for proposed structures. However, the
undocumented artificial fill soils that are present in the southeast corner of the ESSCSP area are
considered compressible and subject to consolidation due to the lack of adequate documentation when
they were placed. The susceptibility of the loose and undocumented fill soils would result in potentially
significant impacts concerning liquefaction. The FEIR recommended that the undocumented fill soils and
loose soil deposits be removed and replaced as properly engineered fill, in order to mitigate seismically -
induced ground failure. The City regulates developments under the requirements of the California Building
Code, ESMC, and ESSCSP-specific mitigation measures to reduce potential geologic and soils impacts.
Implementation of MM GEO-1 would reduce impacts related to seismically -induced ground failure (i.e.,
liquefaction) to less than significant levels.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site is in the southeast portion
of the ESSCSP area (i.e., Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part)), where the FEIR reported undocumented artificial fill
soils were more than 18 feet thick and that would be compressible and subject to consolidation, resulting
in potentially significant impacts concerning liquefaction. The Proposed Project would be subject to
compliance with the California Building Code and ESMC, as well as MM GEC-1, to reduce potentially
significant impacts involving seismic -related ground failure (i.e., liquefaction) to a less than significant
level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning liquefaction would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
See MM GEO-1, above.
4.6a Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the
risk loss, injury, or death involving:
(iv) Landslides?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.6-2)
The FEIR noted that the ESSCSP and its surroundings are generally level, with elevations ranging from
approximately 100 feet above mean sea level (amsl) on the eastern portion of the ESSCSP to
approximately 120 feet amsl at the northwest corner. Given the ESSCSP area's topography, there is no
potential for seismically -induced landslides. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-19
Page 222 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project site and its surroundings are relatively level. Given the Proposed Project
site's topography, there is no potential for seismically -induced landslides. Therefore, the Proposed Project
would not cause adverse effects involving landslides and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe
impact concerning landslides would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.6b Would the Project result in substantial erosion or loss of topsoil?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.6-19)
The FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP area is essentially flat and does not possess site conditions necessarily
conducive to soil erosion. During construction, the ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process and ESMC Chapter 5-4-9,
which specifies that each person applying to the City fora Grading or Building Permit for projects for which
compliance with regulations governing State construction activity stormwater permits must submit
satisfactory proof to the Cityfor compliance. Following compliance with all applicable regulations, impacts
regarding erosion or loss of topsoil would be less than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site is level and does not possess site conditions
necessarily conducive to soil erosion. Although the Proposed Project would result in ground -disrupting
activities that would result in short-term soil erosion, the Proposed Project would be subject to
compliance with the NPDES permitting process and ESMC Chapter 5-4-9. Following compliance with
applicable regulations, impacts regarding erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant. No
new or more severe impact concerning erosion or loss of topsoil would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.6c Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.6-19 — 5.6-20)
The FEIR concluded that construction activities, including excavations associated with remedial
grading/ground stabilization and underground utilities, may encounter poorly unconsolidated/
noncohesive artificial fill, which would be subject to sloughing and caving. The grading plans for the
ESSCSP noted that the fill and cut slopes in the southeastern portion of the ESSCSP area may be prone to
instability, and impacts concerning unstable soils would be potentially significant. The ESSCSP would be
subject to compliance with the California Building Code, ESMC Chapter 14-1-9, and ESSCSP-specific
recommendations (see MM GEO-1) related to removal of undocumented fill soils and replacement as
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-20
Page 223 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
properly engineered fill to reduce impacts related to unstable soils, which would reduce impacts to a less
than significant level.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site would be located in the
southeast portion of the ESSCSP area (i.e., Lots 7, 8, and 18 (in part)), where the FEIR reported
undocumented artificial fill soils that would be subject to sloughing and caving. The Proposed Project
would be subject to compliance with the California Building Code, ESMC, and MM GEO-1, which would
reduce the potentially significant impacts involving unstable soils to a less than significant level. Therefore,
no new or more severe impact concerning unstable soils would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
See MM GEO-1, above.
4.6d Would the Project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building
Code, creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.6-20)
The FEIR concluded that the native and undocumented clay soils present in the ESSCSP exhibit a high
expansion potential. Therefore, the potential for expansive soils to impact new development is high and
potentially significant. The ESSCSP's Geology and Soils Report (FEIR Appendix 10-06) recommended that
all moderately to high expansive clay soils that are encountered should not be reused as engineered fill,
but rather be disposed of off -site. The ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with the California Building
Code, ESMC Chapter 14-1-9, and ESSCSP-specific recommendations (see MM GEO-1) related to removal
of all moderately to highly expansive clay soils and avoidance of clayey soils in compacted fill to reduce
impacts related to expansive soils to a less than significant level.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site could contain native and
undocumented clay soils that may exhibit a high expansion potential, creating substantial risk to life or
property. However, the Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the California Building
Code, ESMC, and MM GEO-1 to reduce the potentially significant impacts involving expansive soils to a
less than significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning expansive soils would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
See MM GEO-1, above.
4.6e Would the Project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewer are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-21
Page 224 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.6-3)
The FEIR identified that sewers would be available for disposal of wastewater generated by the ESSCSP
and septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would not be permitted. Therefore, the FEIR
concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: Sewers are available for disposal of the Proposed Project's wastewater, and no septic tanks
or alternative wastewater disposal systems would be used. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have
no impact concerning use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems for disposal of
wastewater and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.6f Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.5-2)
The FEIR determined that the ESSCSP area has already been subject to extensive disruption and may
contain artificial fill materials. Additionally, there are no unique geologic features present within the
ESSCSP area. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning paleontological
resources or site or unique geologic feature.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project site has already been subject to extensive disruption
and may contain artificial fill materials. Additionally, according to the FEIR, there are no unique geologic
features present within the Proposed Project site. Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed
condition, the Proposed Project's potential to impact an as yet unidentified paleontological resource is
considered remote. Therefore, Proposed Project implementation would result in a less than significant
impact involving the potential destruction of a paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature.
No new or more severe impact concerning paleontological resources or site or unique geologic features
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Change)
4.7a Would the Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have
a significant impact on the environment?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-22
Page 225 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.4-13 — 5.4-17)
The FEIR concluded that construction would generate GHG emissions through on -site use of heavy-duty
construction equipment and off -site vehicle trips made by construction workers as well as haul/delivery
trucks that would travel to and from the ESSCSP area. Mobile -source GHG emissions would result from
the use of construction equipment, including, but not limited to, graders, scrapers, bulldozers, wheeled
loaders, and cranes.
ESSCSP operations would result in GHG emissions related to natural gas usage, automobile emissions,
energy consumption, solid waste generation, and water demand. All future development within the
ESSCSP area would be required to comply with ESMC Chapters 10-2, Water Conservation in Landscaping,
and 10-5, Water Conservation, to promote water conservation in landscaping and to utilize drought water
conservation programs. Future development would also be subject to compliance with ESMC Chapter
15-16, Developer Transportation Demand Management, which would provide facilities to encourage and
accommodate the use of ridesharing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting as alternatives to single
occupant motor vehicle trips. Further compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-16-4, Monitoring, would ensure
that physical facilities be verified through the City's existing development review process. Following
compliance with ESMC requirements and implementation of MM GHG-1, the ESSCSP would result in
reduced GHG emissions from water conservation and efficiency, energy efficiency, solid waste reduction,
and land use efficiency measures. Despite compliance with the ESMC and implementation of MM GHG-1,
the ESSCSP's GHG emissions would exceed the per capita per year project -level GHG threshold of
4.8 Metric Tons of CO2 equivalent per year (MTCO2eq/year), and impacts would be significant and
unavoidable.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The FEIR concluded that despite compliance with the
ESMC and implementation of MM GHG-1, the ESSCSP would exceed the per capita per year project -level
GHG threshold of 4.8 MTCO2eq/year. As stated in Table 4-2: Proposed Project Business As Usual
Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the total Proposed Project -related unmitigated GHG emissions would be
2,635.00 MTCO2eq/year, or 6.99 MTCO2eq/year based on the Proposed Project's service population of
377 employees. Therefore, the Proposed Project's unmitigated GHG emissions would exceed the
4.8 MTCO2eq per capita per year project -level GHG threshold, and impacts would be potentially
significant.
With implementation of MM GHG-1, as stated in Table 4-3: Proposed Project Mitigated Greenhouse Gas
Emissions, the total Proposed Project -related mitigated GHG emissions would be 433.81 MTCO2eq/year,
or 1.15 MTCO2eq/year, based on the Proposed Project's service population of 377 employees. Therefore,
the Proposed Project would not exceed the 4.8 MTCO2eq per capita per year project -level GHG threshold,
with implementation of MM GHG-1. Proposed Project impacts would be less than significant with
mitigation incorporated. No new or more severe impact concerning generated GHG emissions would
occur, as a result of the Proposed Project.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-23
Page 226 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Table 4-2: Proposed Project Business As Usual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CO2
CH4
N20
Source'
Metric
Metric
MTCO2
Metric
MTCO2
Total
Tons/year
Tons/year
eq
Tons/year
eq
MTCO2eg2
Direct Emissions
Construction Phase 1(amortized over
30 years)'
2.51
0.0
<1
0.0
0.0
2.51
Construction Phase 2 (amortized over
30 years) 3
9.76
<1
0.02
0.0
0.0
9.78
Area Source'
0.004
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.004
Mobile Source
1,655.12
0.06
1.17
0.0
0.0
1,656.35
Total Unmitigated Direct Emissions2
1,667.40
0.06
1.19
0.0
0.0
1,668.64
Indirect Emissions
Energy'
714.78
0.03
0.65
0.01
2.33
717.79
Solid Waste
29.82
1.76
37.01
0.0
0.0
68.59
Water Demand
153.64
0.88
18.57
0.02
6.85
179.97
Total Unmitigated Indirect Emissions2
898.24
2.68
56.22
0.03
9.18
966.35
Total Net Proposed Project -Related
Emissions2
2,635.00 MTCO2eq/year
Unmitigated Per Capita Emissions'
6.99 MTCO2eq/year
Per Capita Threshold
4.8 MTCO2eq/year
Unmitigated GHG Emissions Exceed
Per Capita Threshold?
Yes
Notes:
1. Based on FOR Table 5.4-1: Business As Usual Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
2. Totals may be slightly off due to rounding.
3. The Proposed Project construction and operational emissions from area source, energy, solid waste, and
water demand were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's proposed floor area
(153,915 gross SF) comprising approximately 7.1 percent of the ESSCSP total entitled additional
development (2,161,600 gross SF), as evaluated in the FEIR.
4. The Proposed Project mobile source operational emissions were calculated proportionately based on the
Proposed Project's forecast new trips (1,808 daily trips) comprising approximately 6.8 percent of the ESSCSP
total daily trips (26,585 daily trips), as evaluated in the FEIR.
5. Per capita emissions are based on a service population of 377 employees; see Section 4.13: Population and
Housing.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
4-24
November 2021
Page 227 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Table 4-3: Proposed Project Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CO2
CH4
N20
Source'
Metric
Metric
MTCO2
Metric
MTCO2
Total
Tons/year
Tons/year
eq
Tons/year
eq
MTCO2eg2
Direct Emissions
Construction Phase 1(amortized over
30 years)'
2.51
0.0
<1
0.0
0.0
2.51
Construction Phase 2 (amortized over
30 years) 3
9.76
<1
0.02
0.0
0.0
9.78
Area Source'
0.004
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.004
Mobile Source
1,024.71
0.04
0.74
0.0
0.0
1,025.49
Total Mitigated Direct Emissions2
1,036.98
0.04
0.77
0.0
0.0
1,037.78
Indirect Emissions
Energy3
29.59
0.03
0.61
0.01
2.17
32.40
Solid Waste
14.91
0.88
18.51
0.0
0.0
34.30
Water Demand
129.13
0.71
14/86
0.02
5.49
150.21
Total Mitigated Indirect Emissions2
173.63
1.62
33.97
0.02
7.66
216.90
Total Net Proposed Project -Related
433.81 MTCOzeq/year
Emissions2
Mitigated Per Capita Emissions'
1.15 MTCO2eq/year
Per Capita Threshold
4.8 MTCO2eq/year
Mitigated GHG Emissions Exceed Per
Capita Threshold?
No
Notes:
1. Based on FOR Table 5.4-2: Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
2. Totals may be slightly off due to rounding.
3. The Proposed Project construction and operational emissions from area source, energy, solid waste, and
water demand were calculated proportionately based on the Proposed Project's proposed floor area
(153,915 gross SF) comprising approximately 7.1 percent of the ESSCSP total entitled additional
development (2,161,600 gross SF), as evaluated in the FEIR.
4. The Proposed Project mobile source operational emissions were calculated proportionately based on the
Proposed Project's forecast new trips (1,808 daily trips) comprising approximately 6.8 percent of the ESSCSP
total daily trips (26,585 daily trips), as evaluated in the FEIR.
5. Per capita emissions are based on a service population of 377 employees; see Section 4.13: Population and
Housing.
FOR Mitigation Measures
GHG-1 The Project must incorporate the improvements listed below to ensure consistency with
applicable law. The Project Applicant must demonstrate compliance with this measure to
the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Safety Director before the City issues building
permits or certificates of occupancy.
Energy Efficiency
■ Design buildings to be energy efficient, 15 percent above Title 24 requirements (building
permit).
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
4-25
November 2021
Page 228 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
■ Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, and strategically placed shade
trees (building permit).
■ Install high efficiency lighting, and energy efficient heating and cooling systems (building
permit).
■ Reduce unnecessary outdoor lighting (building permit).
Water Conservation and Efficiency
■ Install water -efficient fixtures (e.g., faucets, toilets, showers) (Building Permit).
Solid Waste
■ Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil,
vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard) (Building Permit).
■ Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and adequate recycling
containers located in public areas (Occupancy Permit).
4.7b Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.4-17 — 5.4-18)
The FEIR concluded that the City does not have an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing GHG emissions. However, the City's Environmental Committee would review current
City environment practices, identify new environmental goals and objectives, and develop a framework
for protecting the City's quality of life while moderating the growth demands upon the City's natural
resources and the impacts that consumption has upon the environment. The ESSCSP would be subject to
all applicable regulatory requirements, which would reduce the ESSCSP's generated GHG emissions. The
ESSCSP proposed mixed -uses that would inherently reduce vehicle trips, vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and
related GHG emissions. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not conflict with applicable plans, policies, or
regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than
significant impact concerning conflicting with applicable GHG reduction plan, policy, or regulation.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the applicable
plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, as discuss above and
in the FEIR. The Proposed Project would include related uses that would reduce vehicle trips through
internal trip capture, VMT, and related GHG emissions. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would include
energy efficient lighting and electric vehicle (EV) parking, which would reduce operational GHG emissions.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with applicable GHG reduction plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, and a less than significant impact would
occur in this regard. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-26
Page 229 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
4.8a Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
4.8b Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-16 — 5.7-25)
The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area is listed on the GeoTracker database (maintained by the State
Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB]) and is reported as a leaking underground storage tank (LUST)
cleanup site. The LUST case is reported to be closed as of July 22, 1996; therefore, it is not anticipated that
an environmental condition exists in the ESSCSP area, as a result of the former LUST. Notwithstanding,
the FEIR concluded that site disturbance and demolition activities could encounter a variety of potentially
hazardous materials, which could expose workers and the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions. Potential petroleum -based fuel spills from construction equipment would
not be considered significant due to the small volume and low concentration of hazardous materials
utilized during construction. Implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-5 would reduce potential impacts
from construction activities that would result in accidental conditions within the ESSCSP area. Also, if
unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during construction which may involve hazardous
wastes/materials, the contractor would be required to comply with MM HAZ-6 to immediately stop work
in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, remove workers and the public, secure the areas, and notify
the El Segundo Fire Department (ESFD). Use of standard construction controls and safety procedures, and
implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-5, would avoid and lessen the potential for accidental release
of such substances into the environment in the event of a spill. Following compliance with applicable
federal, State, and local regulatory requirements, and with implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-6,
the potentially significant impacts during construction related to creating a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would be
reduced to less than significant levels.
Future ESSCSP development would consist of office, warehouse, light industrial, and commercial uses.
Hazardous materials would be routinely used, stored, and/or handled onsite during operations. All
hazardous materials or chemicals used by the onsite uses would be filed on record with the ESFD, the
designated Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City, and would be routinely inspected to
ensure that all materials are being stored, handled, and used in affordance with all applicable federal,
State, and local standards and regulations to reduce the potential for a hazardous materials incident. As
the California Highway Patrol and the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan have
identified transportation routes and corridors in and near the City as suitable for transporting hazardous
materials and wastes, transportation of all hazardous materials onsite and to/from the ESSCSP area would
adhere to all applicable Caltrans protocols and the General Plan Public Safety Element's goal to
periodically review and reevaluate the City's Emergency Operations Plans. Any facilities containing
hazardous materials for transport, storage, or use would comply with all City, Los Angeles County
(County), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), California Environmental Protection
Agency (CaIEPA), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) requirements. Based on the
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-27
Page 230 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
moderate potential for contaminated groundwater underlying the ESSCSP area, vapor intrusion into
proposed structures as a result of the contamination plumes could occur. Implementation of MM HAZ-5
would require a qualified site characterization specialist to conduct updated site characterization at the
ESSCSP before issuance of any Building Permits. Furthermore, as required by MM HAZ-7, before the City
issues any building permit, vapor intrusion investigations would be required to be conducted by a qualified
Environmental Professional, in consultation with the ESFD. With implementation of MM HAZ-5 and HAZ-
7, and with compliance with all applicable regulations, impacts during operation would be reduced to less
than significant levels.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The California Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) EnviroStor data management system for hazardous waste facilities and sites shows that
there are no active cases on or within a 4,000 foot radius of the Proposed Project site.6 Additionally, the
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker database confirmed the LUST closure and that
no other LUST cleanup sites exist on the Proposed Project site.' Notwithstanding, site disturbance,
demolition, and/or construction associated with the Proposed Project could disturb existing hazardous
materials associated with structures and contaminated soil and groundwater. A former hazardous waste
storage area (designated as SWMU-1 in the FEIR) would be demolished in the location where the Proposed
Project would construct the southern parking lot. A former wastewater pretreatment system (designated
as SWMU-2 in the FEIR) would be demolished where the Proposed Project would construct a warehouse.
Therefore, Proposed Project construction could release hazardous materials into the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions. The Proposed Project would implement
MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-5 to reduce potential construction -related impacts that may result from
accidental conditions at the Proposed Project site. The Proposed Project contractor would also be
required to comply with MM HAZ-6 if unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during
construction.
Other means by which accidental spills could occur during Proposed Project construction involve use of
construction equipment that may result in petroleum -based fuel spills; however, the level of risk
associated with this type of spill is not considered significant due to the small volume and low
concentration of hazardous materials utilized during construction. Standard construction practices would
be observed to appropriately contain and remediate any materials released pursuant to local, State, and
Federal regulations. The Proposed Project contractor would be required to comply with the established
regulatory framework to avoid and minimize the potential for accidental release of such substances into
the environment in the event of a spill. Proposed Project impacts in this regard would be less than
significant.
Proposed Project operations would include a corporate office headquarters, natural grass fields, and a
warehouse. The warehouse building would store waste and other maintenance equipment required for
the Project. These land uses are not expected to require the use of substantial quantities of hazardous
materials or to generate significant quantities of hazardous waste that would require routine transport
6 California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor Search for 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, CA
90245 with 4,000 feet search radius, http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/?surl=7fz69. Accessed October 25, 2021.
7 State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker database Search for 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, CA,
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile report?global id=T0603792958. Accessed October 25, 2021.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-28
Page 231 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
offsite for disposal. Typical commercial land uses generally require routine use of small quantities of
flammable, hazardous, and/or toxic materials for operation and maintenance purposes. Continued
maintenance of the natural grass fields would require use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fuel for
machinery and mechanical equipment. Such substances would also be used for landscape maintenance.
While the Proposed Project would involve use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials, it would
be similar to that which occurs under existing conditions and elsewhere within the ESSCSP. Due to the
nature of the proposed land uses, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to involve facilities or activities
that would produce or use substantial quantities of hazardous materials or require the routine transport
of hazardous materials to and from the site that may adversely affect the public or the environment.
Proposed Project operations would be required to comply with all applicable federal, State, and local
standards and regulations concerning the routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials.
Regarding vapor intrusion, based on the moderate potential for contaminated groundwater underlying
the Proposed Project site, vapor intrusion into proposed structures as a result of contamination plumes
could occur. The Proposed Project would implement MM HAZ-5 and HAZ-7 to ensure that vapor intrusion
investigations are conducted prior to issuance of any building permits. Therefore, following compliance
with all applicable standards and regulations, and with implementation of MM HAZ-1 through HAZ-7, the
Proposed Project's potential impacts concerning the creation of a significant hazard to the public or the
environment would be reduced to less than significant levels. No new or more severe impact would occur
as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
HAZ-1 Before a Grading Permit is issued, the actual location of onsite oil/gas wells must be
verified with DOGGR. All onsite wells present must be properly plugged and abandoned
per current DOGGR, DTSC, and RWQCB requirements. Further, an environmental
consultant with Phase II/site characterization experience must verify through soil
sampling that no residual contamination has resulted from historic oil/gas production
activities onsite.
HAZ-2 Before a Grading Permit is issued, soil sampling must be conducted within the portions of
the Project site that have historically been utilized for agricultural purposes and may
contain pesticide residues in the soil, as determined by a qualified Phase II/site
characterization specialist. The sampling, conducted in consultation with the El Segundo
Fire Department, must determine if pesticide concentrations exceed established
regulatory requirements and identify further site characterization and remedial activities,
if necessary. Should further site characterization/remedial activities be required, these
activities shall be conducted per the applicable regulatory agency requirements, as
directed by the El Segundo Fire Department.
HAZ-3 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site
characterization experience must determine, based on the Current Conditions Report
(CCR), RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan), and sampling and analysis
conducted in accordance with the RFI Work Plan, whether subsurface release of
hazardous materials/waste to the soil/groundwater associated with the existing storage
facilities has occurred. If subsurface release of hazardous materials/waste to the
soil/groundwater has occurred, the environmental consultant must determine if
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-29
Page 232 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
contaminant concentrations exceed established regulatory requirements and identify
further site characterization and remedial activities, if necessary. Should further site
characterization/remedial activities be required, these activities must be conducted per
the applicable regulatory agency requirements.
HAZ-4 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site
characterization experience must prepare a Worker Safety Plan to ensure construction
worker safety during grading/excavation activities, based on their review the following
documents:
■ Current Conditions Report (CCR);
■ RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan);
■ Findings of the RFI Work Plan's Sampling and Analysis; and
■ Existing Hazardous Materials Conditions Assessment.
HAZ-5 An environmental professional with Phase II/site characterization experience must
conduct an inspection of existing onsite structures before building renovation/demolition
activities. The inspection must determine whether or not testing is required to confirm
the presence or absence of hazardous substances in building materials (e.g., sinks, drains,
piping, flooring, walls, ceiling tiles). Should testing be required and results determine that
hazardous substances are present in onsite building materials, the Phase II/site
characterization specialist must determine appropriate prevention/remediation
measures that are required and/or the methods for proper disposal of hazardous waste
at an approved landfill facility, if required.
HAZ-6 If during construction unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered by the
contractor that are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor must
comply with the following:
■ Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove
workers and the public from the area;
■ Notify the Director of Public Works of the City of El Segundo;
■ Secure the area as directed by the Director of Public Works; and
■ Notify the El Segundo Fire Department (or other appropriate agency specified by the
Director of Public Works). The Fire Department's Environmental Safety Manager can
advise the responsible party of further actions that must be taken, if required.
HAZ-7 Before any Building Permit is issued, vapor intrusion investigations must be conducted by
a qualified Environmental Professional, in consultation with the El Segundo Fire
Department. Should the Environmental Professional determine that proposed buildings
could be impacted by vapor intrusion, the Environmental Professional, in consultation
with the El Segundo Fire Department, must recommend that specific measures be
incorporated into the buildings' design that would reduce these indoor air quality
concentrations to below regulatory thresholds, as directed by the El Segundo Fire
Department.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-30
Page 233 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.8c Would the Project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. S.7-26)
The FEIR identified the following existing schools located within one -quarter mile of the ESSCSP area:
Beach Babies LLC (located 750 feet east and 1,385 feet north of the ESSCSP area) and Wondertree Kids
(located 1,065 feet south of the ESSCSP area). The ESSCSP could result in hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes. However, buffers in the form of
roadways and intervening structures would separate the proposed uses within the ESSCSP from the
existing nearby schools, which would maintain the risk to acceptable levels. Furthermore, the hazardous
substances that may be handled, used, and stored within the ESSCSP area would be required to comply
with federal, State, and local regulations, which is considered adequate to offset the potential negative
effects related to the hazardous materials associated with future development within the ESSCSP.
Therefore, the FEIR concluded a less than significant impact concerning emitting hazardous emissions or
handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: Beach Babies LLC is approximately 1,653 feet (0.3 miles) southeast of the
Proposed Project site. Wondertree Kids was identified as being 1,065 feet (0.2 miles) south of the
Proposed Project site, but no longer exists at that location. Therefore there are no existing school sites
within 0.25 miles of the Proposed Project site. The Proposed Project involves a corporate headquarters
building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse, all of which would utilize typical small quantities of
hazardous materials for operation and maintenance purposes. The maintenance of the natural grass fields
would require the use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fuel for machinery and mechanical
equipment. However, these proposed uses would not emit hazardous emissions. The Proposed Project is
not anticipated to involve facilities or activities that would result in hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous materials. Additionally, buffers in the form of roadways and intervening structures would
separate the Proposed Project site from nearby existing schools. Furthermore, the Proposed Project's
proposed uses would be required to comply with the established federal, State, and local regulatory
framework, as it relates to emitting hazardous emission or handling hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste. Therefore, following compliance with all applicable standards and
regulations, impacts concerning emitting hazardous emissions or handling hazardous materials within
one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school would be less than significant. No new or more severe
impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.8d Would the Project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and as a result, would create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-31
Page 234 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-26 — 5.7-27)
The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area is listed on the GeoTracker database (maintained by the State
Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB]) and is reported as a leaking underground storage tank (LUST)
cleanup site. The LUST case is reported to be closed as of July 22, 1996; therefore, it is not anticipated that
an environmental condition exists in the ESSCSP area as a result of the former LUST. Therefore, the FEIR
concluded a less than significant impact related to the ESSCSP being located on a site which is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The FEIR reported a closed LUST case on the Raytheon Campus due to soil contamination, -
however, as the LUST case was closed on July 22, 1996, the LUST is not considered an environmental
condition. Furthermore, the DTSC EnviroStor data management system for hazardous waste facilities and
sites shows that there are no active cases on or within a 4,000-foot radius of the Proposed Project site.
Additionally, the SWRCB GeoTracker database confirmed the LUST closure and that no other LUST cleanup
sites exist on the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project site is not included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact would
occur in this regard. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.8e For a Project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working the project area?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.8-2 — 4.8-3)
The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area is located approximately 0.76 miles south of the Los Angeles
International Airport (LAX), but the ESSCSP area is not located within the LAX Planning Boundary/Airport
Influence Area. The ESSCSP is located approximately 1.9 miles west of Hawthorne Municipal Airport
(HMA), butthe ESSCSP area is not located within the HMA Planning Area Boundary/Airport Influence Area.
Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: Although the Proposed Project would be located within 2.0 miles of LAX and HMA, the
Proposed Project site is not within the LAX Planning Boundary/Airport Influence Area orthe HMA Planning
Area Boundary/Airport Influence Area. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in an airport -
related safety hazard for people working on the Proposed Project site and no mitigation is required. No
new or more severe impact concerning airport -related safety hazards would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-32
Page 235 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.8f Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-27 — 5.7-28)
The FEIR identified that the General Plan does not identify primary evacuation routes within the City;
however, East El Segundo Boulevard and Sepulveda Boulevard are major arterial streets and would be
used by persons evacuating the ESSCSP in the event of an emergency. Construction of proposed roadway
improvements could temporarily block emergency access and/or evacuation routes, which would affect
access along El Segundo Boulevard. Impacts during construction would be temporary and would only
affect El Segundo Boulevard, and as such, would be unlikely to interfere with emergency response vehicles
(e.g., fire, police, or ambulance). Implementation of MM HAZ-8 would require future development in the
ESSCSP to notify the El Segundo Fire, Police, Public Works, and Planning and Building Safety Departments
of construction activities that would impede movement along roadways adjacent to the ESSCSP and to
allow for uninterrupted emergency access and maintenance of evacuation routes. Furthermore, the City
has an adopted Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, which identifies activities that would assist the City in
reducing risk and preventing loss from future hazardous events, including those involving evacuation. The
City would implement evacuation -related mitigation actions on an ongoing basis which would further
minimize impacts resulting from the ESSCSP's potential interference with an adopted emergency response
or evacuation plan. With implementation of MM HAZ-8 and the City's continued compliance with the
Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan would reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project site would not be located
adjacent to East El Segundo Boulevard or Sepulveda Boulevard, both of which were identified in the FEIR
as being streets that would be used by persons evacuating the ESSCSP in the event of an emergency.
Construction activities associated with the proposed uses would occur on the subject sites, thus, would
not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan. Notwithstanding, Proposed Project construction would implement MM HAZ-
8 to ensure coordination with the El Segundo Fire, Police, Public Works, and Planning and Building Safety
Departments such that construction activities would not impede movement along East El Segundo
Boulevard or Sepulveda Boulevard and to allow for uninterrupted emergency access and maintenance of
evacuation routes. The proposed Nash Street extension would not result in any closures that would
impede traffic/emergency access. The City would continue to implement evacuation -related mitigation
actions from the City's Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, which would further minimize the potential for the
Proposed Project to interfere with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore, with
implementation of MM HAZ-8 and the City's continued compliance with the Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan,
impacts related to potentially impairing implementation of or physically interfering with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be reduced to less than significant levels.
No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
HAZ-8 At least three business days before any lane closure, the construction contractor must
notify the El Segundo Fire Department, El Segundo Police Department, El Segundo Public
Works Department, and the El Segundo Planning and Building Safety Department of
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-33
Page 236 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
construction activities that would impede movement (such as road or lane closures) along
roadways immediately adjacent to the development area, to allow for uninterrupted
emergency access and maintenance of evacuation routes.
4.8g Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.8-3)
The FEIR identified that the ESSCSP area consists of, and is surrounded by, urban/developed land, and
implementation of the ESSCSP would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving
wildland fires. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project site consists of and is surrounded by urban/developed land. The
Proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires and
no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning wildland fires would occur as a result
of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
4.9a Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.8-17 — 5.8-19)
The FEIR concluded that construction activities would result in short-term impacts to water quality;
therefore, the ESSCSP would be subject to compliance with General Construction Permit requirements.
Before the City issues grading permits, the Applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) to control common pollutants such as suspended soil in stormwater runoff from leaving the
ESSCSP area. The SWPPP would include an Erosion Control Plan and appropriate Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to minimize erosion and restrict sedimentation of the storm drain downstream. With
compliance with the NPDES and ESMC requirements, construction activities would have a less than
significant impact on water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.
A reduction in permeable surfaces, which allow for rain and runoff to infiltrate into the ground, would
result in the potential to affect long-term water quality during operation. ESSCSP implementation would
not result in a reduction of permeable surfaces, but stormwater and nuisance water runoff associated
with the proposed uses under the ESSCSP could have the potential to affect water quality. The ESSCSP
could potentially include organics, trash, debris, oil/grease, nutrients, metals, and sediment, which could
have a significant adverse impact to stormwater quality if not mitigated. The ESSCSP would implement
post -construction controls under the MS4 Permit to mitigate stormwater pollution, which would include
BMPs to control pollutants, pollutant loads, and runoff volume. Future development under the ESSCSP
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-34
Page 237 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
would be subject to compliance with NPDES requirements, MS4 Permit Order requirements, and must
implement BMPs.
Therefore, following compliance with all applicable permit and ESMC requirements, the FEIR concluded a
less than significant impact related to violating water quality standards or waste discharge requirements
or otherwise substantially degrading surface or groundwater quality.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would include construction activities that would be
subject to compliance with General Construction Permit requirements. The Applicant would prepare a
SWPPP to control common pollutants in stormwater runoff leaving the Proposed Project site during
construction. The SWPPP would include BMPs to minimize erosion and restrict sedimentation of the storm
drain downstream. Further, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with all NPDES and MS4
Permit Order requirements. Therefore, Proposed Project impacts during construction would be less than
significant as it relates to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.
Proposed Project operations could result in organics, trash, debris, oil/grease, nutrients, metals, and
sediment which could have a significant adverse impact to stormwater quality. The Proposed Project
would be required to mitigate stormwater pollution through the implementation of BMPs to control
pollutants, pollutant loads, and runoff volume. Therefore, following compliance with all applicable permit
and ESMC requirements, Proposed Project implementation would result in a less than significant impact
related to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. No new or more severe impact
concerning water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.9b Would the Project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management
of the basin?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR p. 5.8-26)
The FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP would not interfere with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level, since the ESSCSP is
not located within a groundwater recharge area. Furthermore, the ESSCSP would not reduce the ability of
surface waters to be absorbed or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge as the ESSCSP's
imperviousness is expected to decrease upon buildout. The City does not use groundwater as a potable
water source, so the ESSCSP would not deplete groundwater supplies. Therefore, the FEIR concluded a
less than significant impact related to groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: While the Proposed Project would generate a water demand on the
Proposed Project site, as discussed under Threshold 4.17b Analysis of Proposed Project, the City does not
use groundwater as a potable water source. Therefore, the Proposed Project's water demands would not
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-35
Page 238 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
decrease groundwater supplies. Also, the Proposed Project would not interfere with groundwater
recharge given the Proposed Project site is not within a groundwater recharge area and the Proposed
Project would increase onsite pervious areas by replacing impermeable surface parking area with three
permeable full-size natural grass fields. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in a less than
significant impact concerning groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge. No new or more severe
impact concerning groundwater would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.9c Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off -site; or
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provided substantial additional resources of polluted runoff?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.8-19 — 5.8-26)
See Threshold 4.9a Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above concerning ESSCSP erosion and
water quality.
The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would be served by approximately 7,000 linear feet of new onsite
storm drain lines, with a maximum pipe diameter of 54 inches; see FEIR Exhibit 5.8-3: Proposed
Stormwater and Site Drainage System. The ESSCSP area would continue to drain northwest to southeast;
see FEIR Exhibit 5.8-4: Proposed Conditions Hydrology. Reconfiguration of site roadways and replacement
of existing buildings and surface parking lots with new buildings and parking lots/structures would change
drainage patterns and locations/amounts of impervious surface areas. The sub -drainage areas would
continue to flow to the City's storm drain along the ESSCSP area's eastern and southern edges. The minor
offsite flow from El Segundo Boulevard and the property to the south would continue unobstructed to
combine with onsite flows. The ESSCSP area's average imperviousness is anticipated to decrease from
79.5 percent to 70.0 percent, and there would be no net increase in stormwater discharge from the
ESSCSP area. The FEIR concluded that onsite detention would not be required, and an increase in the rate
or amount of stormwater runoff above existing conditions would not occur. However, final hydrology
calculations would be required to verify that detention facilities are not required in each of the proposed
sub -drainage areas. MM HWQ-1 and HWQ-2 would require that a Construction -Level Hydrology and
Hydraulic Study be conducted before any Grading Permit is issued to verify whether detention facilities
are required in each proposed sub -area. Compliance with MM HWQ-1 and HWQ-2 would reduce the
potential impacts from drainage and runoff to less than significant levels.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-36
Page 239 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project involves development of a
corporate headquarters building, natural grass fields, and a warehouse. The fields would replace existing
surface parking lots and ornamental landscaping, which would provide more pervious surfaces on the
Proposed Project site, as compared to the Approved Project. FEIR Exhibit 5.8-4 depicts the site's drainage
patterns upon Proposed Project implementation, which would closely match existing drainage patterns.
FEIR Exhibit 5.8-3 depicts existing and proposed storm drains and indicates that a new storm drain is
proposed within the Nash Street extension, just north of the proposed corporate headquarters building.
Additional storm drains would be developed as part of the ESSCSP. The Proposed Project would
implement MM HWQ-1 and HQW-2, which require that a Construction -Level Hydrology and Hydraulic
Study be conducted before any Grading Permit is issued to verify whether detention facilities would be
required in each proposed sub -area. If so required, it is assumed these would be located onsite.
Compliance with MM HWQ-1 and HWQ-2 would reduce the potential impacts from drainage and runoff,
including flooding on- or off -site, to less than significant levels. No new or more severe impact concerning
groundwater would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
HWQ-1 Before the City issues any grading permit, the Applicant must conduct a Construction
Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study to determine potential storm water runoff rates
and peak flows from the Project site per County of Los Angeles methodology. The 50-year
storm flows for both existing and proposed Project conditions must be included in the
study. The Study must be completed by a qualified professional, approved by the Director
of Public Works, and be consistent with standard engineering practices for the region,
including the use of the Los Angeles County Manual. The Study must demonstrate the
effect of storm water discharges to any City, County, or other agency -owned drainage or
flood control facility, as mitigated and be designed and implemented to prevent an
increase in the rate or amount of storm water runoff above the baseline condition.
The Study must also determine whether onsite detention is required. If the final
hydrology calculations determine that onsite detention is required to avoid downstream
impacts, the Study must also identify the necessary flood control mitigation, which may
include a surface stormwater detention pond, subsurface detention structure, or
subsurface detention pipes. The construction level hydrology calculations and
Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be prepared and reviewed by
the Director of Public Works and Building Official before any Grading Permit is issued.
HWQ-2 Before the City issues any permit for development of an individual parcel, the
Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be updated and submitted to
the Director of Public Works for review. The phasing must be implemented to prevent an
increase in the rate or amount of storm water runoff above the baseline condition.
4.9c Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-37
Page 240 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, pp. 4.9-3 — 4.9-4)
The FEIR concluded that the entire City is placed in Zone X pursuant to Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 1770F, Map No. 06037C1T10F, which indicates
that the City is in an area of minimal flood hazard. Therefore, the entire ESSCSP area would not have any
risk of flood hazards. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact as it relates to impeding or redirecting flood
flows.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project site is within an area of minimal flood hazard. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would have no impact concerning the potential to alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows and no mitigation is
required. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.9d Would the Project, in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to
project inundation?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.9-4)
The FEIR concluded that the entire City is placed in Zone X pursuant to FEMA FIRM Panel 1770F, Map No.
06037C1T10F, which indicates that the City is in an area of minimal flood hazard. Therefore, the entire
ESSCSP area would not have any risk of flood hazards. Furthermore, the ESSCSP is not located within a
levee, dam, or tsunami inundation area. There are also no enclosed bodies of water that are located in
the vicinity of the ESSCSP, which could cause a seiche. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact as it relates
to flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project site was identified as being in an area of minimal flood hazard. The
Proposed Project site is located away from any waterbodies or coastal zones, thus, would not be within a
levee, dam, or tsunami inundation area or subject to a seiche. Therefore, the Proposed Project would
have no impact concerning the risk release of pollutants due to inundation and no mitigation is required.
No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.9e Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management plan?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-38
Page 241 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
Not applicable since this threshold was not analyzed in the FEIR.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.9a Analysis of Proposed Project above concerning water
quality control plan compliance. See Threshold 4.9b Analysis of Proposed Project above concerning
sustainable groundwater management plan compliance.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.10 Land Use and Planning
4.10a Would the Project physically divide an established community?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.10-1)
The FEIR identified that the City is generally described according to quadrants. The City's residential uses
are located in the northwest quadrant, and the non-residential land uses are located in the remaining
three quadrants. The ESSCSP encompasses approximately 142 acres in the City's southeast quadrant. The
ESSCSP proposed commercial and industrial mixed -use development, which would be consistent with the
City's existing land use pattern. The ESSCSP would not physically divide an established community.
Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project would develop a corporate headquarters building, natural grass fields,
and a warehouse within the ESSCSP, and the proposed land uses would be consistent with the ESSCSP's
land use plan. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact on physically dividing an established
community and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning physically dividing
an established community would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.10b Would the Project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.1-21— 5.1-28)
According to the FEIR, the ESSCSP is determined to be consistent with the relevant SCAG's 2012 RTP/SCS
goals and adopted growth forecasts, the ESMC, and General Plan Policies, excluding the following
Circulation Element Policies:
• Circulation Element Policy C1-1.2: Pursue implementation of all Circulation Element policies such
that all Master Plan roadways are upgraded and maintained at acceptable levels of service (LOS).
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-39
Page 242 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
o Reason for ESSCSP inconsistency with policy: With implementation of identified feasible
mitigation in FEIR Section 5.2: Transportation, the impacts at El Segundo Intersections 29, 32,
38, 48, 50, and 51 would remain significant and unavoidable, and acceptable levels of service
would not be maintained at these intersections. Therefore, the ESSCSP would conflict with
Policy C1-1.2, resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact.
• Circulation Element Policy C1-1.5: Implement roadway and intersection upgrades to full
Circulation Element standards when needed to improve traffic operating conditions and to serve
development.
o Reason for ESSCSP inconsistency with policy: See Policy C1-1.2 above.
• Circulation Element Policy C1-1.10: Ensure that new roadway links are constructed as designated
in the Master Plan and link with existing roadways within the City such that efficient operation of
the circulation system is maintained at an operating Level of Service "D" or better.
o Reason for ESSCSP inconsistency with policy: See Policy C1-1.2 above.
No feasible mitigation is available to reduce potential impacts. Therefore, implementation of the ESSCSP
would result in a significant and unavoidable impact regarding conflicts with Circulation Element Policies
C1-1.2, C1-1.5, and C1-1.10.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: As noted above, the FEIR concluded implementation of the ESSCSP would
result in a significant and unavoidable impact regarding conflicts with Circulation Element Policies C1-1.2,
C1-1.5, and C1-1.10. It is anticipated the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact
concerning compliance with these policies given: Level of Service (LOS) is no longer a metric for
transportation impact analysis; and the Proposed Project involves development that provides
approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and generates approximately 55 percent fewer trips
compared to the Approved Project. State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3 codifies the change from LOS to VMT
as a metric for transportation impact analysis. Pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 743, VMT analysis is the primary
method for determining CEQA impacts. The City has completed a preliminary Draft SB 743
Implementation Guidelines (Kimley-Horn, November 2020) for purposes of analyzing transportation
impacts under CEQA and anticipates that after some revisions, the Guidelines will be adopted by May
2022.
As the Proposed Project would develop the same uses as proposed in the ESSCSP, the Proposed Project
would be consistent with SCAG's 2012 RTP/SCS. The Proposed Project involves development that provides
approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and generates approximately 55 percent fewer trips
compared to the Approved Project. As described in Section 4.13: Population and Housing, below, the
Proposed Project would generate approximately 377 employees on the Proposed Project site (including
the early arriving employees). It is unknown if any of these employees would choose to relocate to the
City, increasing the City's population. Since the Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar
to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but provides approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when
compared to the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would have less potential population growth on
the Proposed Project site than what was anticipated for the Approved Project, and the Proposed Project
would be consistent with the adopted growth forecasts.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-40
Page 243 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
The Proposed Project's modifications include realigning the Nash Street extension and
realigning/relocating the Coral Circle connection to the Nash Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The
proposed modified circulation pattern would continue to provide for possible future connection from the
Nash Street extension to Coral Circle and capacity for additional parking for the Coral Circle businesses.
The City's Public Works Department conducted an analysis of the Nash Street extension and Coral Circle
connection's compliance concerning function, capacity, capacity, and street classification and standards
with the General Plan Circulation Element; the ESMC; and the ESSCSP.B Therefore, the Nash Street
extension and Coral Circle connection would be in substantial compliance with the General Plan
Circulation Element concerning function, capacity, and street classification and standards. Furthermore,
the City's Public Works Department provide the following conditions of approval:
1. The Applicant must build the Nash Street roadway extension and associated public improvements
in accordance with Development Agreement Section 7.1. Nash Street roadway extension design
and construction is subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works and Director
of Development Services.
2. The Applicant must construct Class II bicycle lanes in the Nash Street roadway extension in
accordance with the ESSCSP and Development Agreement Section 7.5.
3. The Applicant must record a 20-year irrevocable offer of dedication of Lots 20 and 22 (Coral Circle
Connection) of Vesting Map No. 71551 in accordance with the ESSCSP and Development
Agreement Section 7.7. Before recordation, the irrevocable offer to dedicate must be reviewed
and approved by the Director of Development Services, the Director of Public Works, and the City
Attorney.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with the Circulation Element, and impacts would be
less than significant.
ESSCSP Table III-1: Land Use Summary, anticipates that the allowed new development would total
1,930,000 net SF (2,161,600 gross SF). To allow for maximum flexibility within the ESSCSP area, the ESSCSP
utilizes a mixed -use concept, with regulatory mechanisms to allow for transfers between land use types
and planning areas, subject to various requirements concerning FAR, allowable land uses, and AM, PM,
and daily trip generation ceilings. As of October 21, 2021 (i.e., inclusive of Phase I entitled development
only), approximately 1,866,750 net SF (approximately 2,095,950 gross SF) of entitled floor area remains
within the ESSCSP; see Appendix A: ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table. The Proposed Project
involves development of approximately 131,685 net SF (approximately 153,915 gross SF) of floor area;
see Table 2-3: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Development Scenarios. With implementation of
the Proposed Project, approximately 1,735,065 net SF (approximately 1,942,035 gross SF) of entitled floor
area would remain within the ESSCSP. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause the allowed new
development within the ESSCSP, as detailed in ESSCSP Table III-1: Land Use Summary, to be exceeded.
Overall, the Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the ESSCSP and ESMC. The Proposed
Project would also be consistent with the General Plan, with the exclusion of the Circulation Element
Policies listed above. No new or more severe impact concerning conflicting with any land use plan, policy,
8 L. Carver, personal communication, October 21, 2021.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-41
Page 244 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.11 Mineral Resources
4.11a Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of the state?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.11-1)
The FEIR concluded that no State -designated mines or mineral producers currently exist within the
ESSCSP, and the ESSCSP area does not maintain any natural mineral resources. Therefore, the FEIR
concluded no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no State -designated mines, mineral producers, or maintenance of any natural
mineral resources within the Proposed Project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact
on mineral resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact concerning mineral
resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.11b Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resources recovery
site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.11-1)
The FEIR concluded that no State -designated mines or mineral producers exist within the ESSCSP, and the
ESSCSP area does not maintain any natural mineral resources. The ESSCSP would not result in the loss of
availability of locally important mineral resources recovery sites. Therefore, the FEIR concluded no impact
in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: There are no State -designated mines, mineral producers, or maintenance of any natural
mineral resources within the Proposed Project Site. The Proposed Project would not result in the loss of
availability of locally important mineral resources recovery areas. Therefore, the Proposed Project would
have no impact on mineral resources and no mitigation is required. No new or more severe impact
concerning mineral resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-42
Page 245 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.12 Noise
4.12a Would the Project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.5-13 — 5.5-15, 5.5-17 — 5.5-22)
Construction
The FEIR concluded that construction -related noise impacts could occur during site preparation, which
can create the highest levels of noise. Noise from construction activities is generated by two primarily
sources: 1) the transport of workers and equipment to construction sites, and 2) the noise related to active
construction equipment. Sensitive receptors adjacent to the ESSCSP area would be exposed to sporadic
high noise levels associated with construction activities. Construction traffic would access potential
construction sites within the ESSCSP area from major roadways, including El Segundo Boulevard,
Sepulveda Boulevard, and Hughes Way. The closest sensitive receptors to the ESSCSP are immediately
adjacent to the east (Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church) and west (The Lakes at El Segundo Golf
Course); see FEIR Table 5.5-4: Surrounding Off -Site Sensitive Receptors. As noted in the FEIR, the majority
of construction would occur at distances of 50 to 400 feet or more from the nearest sensitive receptors
and would not be expected to interfere with normal recreational or institutional activities. Furthermore,
construction activities would begin in one specific area within the ESSCSP and subsequently move to the
other specific areas. Therefore, construction would not occur in any one location for an extended period
of time. All development within the ESSCSP area would be subject to the General Plan Noise Element and
ESMC Chapter 7-2 (Noise and Vibration). Furthermore, the ESSCSP would implement MM N-1 to reduce
construction noise associated with future development by requiring preparation of a Construction Noise
Management Plan to limit construction to the less noise sensitive periods of the day (i.e., between the
hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM) and ensuring that proper operating procedures are followed during
construction such that nearby sensitive receptors are not adversely affected by noise (pursuant to ESMC
Chapter 7-2-4 standards).
Operations
The FEIR determined that off -site (traffic) noise levels resulting from the ESSCSP would not result in
significant impacts. The ESSCSP would generate long-term stationary noise from delivery trucks,
mechanical equipment (air conditioners, trash compactors, emergency generators, etc.), light industrial
production (manufacturing equipment, etc.), and typical parking lot activities (e.g., parking lot traffic and
car door slamming).
The noise levels from the delivery trucks are within the City's allowable exterior noise level thresholds for
churches and outdoor sports parks; therefore, the Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church and The Lakes
at El Segundo Golf Course would not be directly exposed to excessive noise levels from the delivery trucks.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-43
Page 246 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
The ESSCSP's mechanical equipment would result in potential noise levels below the City's limits. The
Metro C (Green) Line would further buffer the ESSCSP's mechanical equipment noise from the Oceanside
Christian Fellowship Church and would mask any noise from the ESSCSP's mechanical equipment. Impacts
from mechanical equipment would be less than significant.
The FEIR concluded that noise associated with the ESSCSP's proposed parking structures would be of
greatest annoyance to the sensitive receptors, these noise levels at the exterior of the sensitive receptors
would not exceed the City's exterior standards, and impacts would be less than significant. Therefore,
ESSCSP operations would result in less than significant impacts.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated:
Construction
The Proposed Project site would be located farther from The Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course, but still
adjacent to the Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church. Given the Proposed Project would require less
construction on the Project site than the Approved Project, the length of construction and level of
construction activities would be proportionately less than the Approved Project and as set forth in the
FEIR. Proposed Project construction would be subject to the General Plan Noise Element and ESMC
Chapter 7-2 (Noise and Vibration). Furthermore, Proposed Project construction would implement MM N-
1 to reduce construction noise associated with future development by requiring preparation of a
Construction Noise Management Plan to limit construction to the less noise sensitive periods of the day
(i.e., between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM) and ensuring that proper operating procedures are
followed during construction such that nearby sensitive receptors are not adversely affected by noise
(pursuant to ESMC Chapter 7-2-4 standards). Proposed Project impacts would be reduced to a less than
significant level. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning the generation of substantial
temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards would occur as a result
of the Proposed Project.
Operations
The Proposed Project involves approximately 58 percent less (gross SF) development and approximately
55 percent fewer trips, as compared to the Approved Project. As the FEIR determined that off -site (traffic)
noise levels resulting from the ESSCSP would be less than significant, the Proposed Project would also
result in less than significant off -site noise levels. Proposed Project operations would include delivery
trucks that could not expose sensitive receptors to excessive noise levels from the delivery trucks. The
noise from the Proposed Project's mechanical equipment would be buffered by the Metro C (Green) Line,
and impacts would be less than significant. Proposed Project impacts from operations would be less than
significant. Therefore, no new or more severe impact concerning the generation of substantial temporary
or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
N-1 Before the City issues grading permits, the Project Applicant must demonstrate, to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works that the Project complies with the following:
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-44
Page 247 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
■ All construction equipment must be equipped with mufflers and sound control devices
(e.g., intake silencers and noise shrouds) no less effective than those provided on the
original equipment and no equipment shall have an un-muffled exhaust.
■ The contractor must maintain and tune-up all construction equipment to minimize noise
emissions.
■ Stationary equipment must be placed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance to
the sensitive receptors.
■ All equipment servicing must be performed so as to maintain the greatest possible
distance to the sensitive receptors.
■ Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for project
construction are required to be hydraulically or electronically powered wherever
possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically
powered tools. However, where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust
muffler must be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about
10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves must be used where feasible, and this
could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures must be used, such as drills
rather than impact equipment, whenever feasible.
■ A qualified "Noise Disturbance Coordinator" will be retained amongst the construction
crew to be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise.
When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within
24 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting
too early, malfunctioning muffler, etc.) and implement reasonable measures to resolve
the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Director of Planning and Building Safety.
■ Select demolition methods to minimize vibration, where possible (e.g., sawing masonry
into sections rather than demolishing it by pavement breakers).
4.12b Would the Project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.5-16 — 5.5-17)
The FEIR concluded that groundborne noise and vibration would occur during construction activities due
to operation of heavy-duty trucks, backhoes, and other heavy-duty construction equipment. Operation of
construction equipment would generate vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish rapidly
in amplitude with distance from the source. As indicated in FEIR Table 5.5-8: Typical Vibration Levels for
Construction Equipment, the vibration velocities from the construction equipment that would be utilized
during ESSCSP construction combined with the commercial/light industrial and institutional uses located
approximately 50 feet east of the ESSCSP area would be below the 0.2 inch -per -second PPV significance
threshold. Vibration impacts associated with construction would be less than significant. The uses
proposed in the ESSCSP are not anticipated to generate high levels of groundborne noise and vibration.
Therefore, vibration impacts associated with operations would be less than significant.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project
4-45
November 2021
Page 248 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: Proposed Project construction could generate varying degrees of
groundborne vibration depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used.
The Proposed Project site would be located farther from The Lakes at El Segundo Golf Course, but still
adjacent to the Oceanside Christian Fellowship Church. Given the Proposed Project would require less
construction on the Proposed Project site than the Approved Project, the length of construction and level
of construction activities would be proportionately less than the Approved Project. As construction would
be reduced as compared to the Approved Project, Proposed Project construction vibration impacts would
be less than significant. The Proposed Project's uses are not anticipated to generate excessive
groundborne vibration or noise levels. Operations of the Proposed Project would include truck deliveries.
Due to the rapid drop-off rate of ground -borne vibration and the short duration of the associated events,
vehicular traffic -induced ground -borne vibration is rarely perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way,
and rarely results in vibration levels that cause damage to buildings in the vicinity. Therefore, no new or
more severe impact concerning the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.12c For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the Project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.12-2)
See Threshold 4.8e Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.8e Analysis of Proposed Project above.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.13 Population and Housing
4.13a Would the Project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or
indirectly?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.9-8 — 5.9-11)
As indicated in the FEIR, the ESSCSP would not propose new residential land uses, and therefore, would
not induce population growth directly through housing. Additionally, although the ESSCSP would propose
improvements/modifications to existing roads and infrastructure, it would not involve the extension of
roads or other infrastructure into undeveloped areas. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not induce population
growth indirectly through extension of roads or other infrastructure.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-46
Page 249 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
As shown in FEIR Table 5.9-8: Project Compared to Existing Conditions, the ESSCSP would increase the
City's employment by 4,598 jobs, or approximately 5.1 percent over existing conditions in 2015. The
ESSCSP's increase in employment could result in population growth within the City, as the potential exists
that future employees could relocate to the City. However, estimating the number of employees who
could relocate to the City would be highly speculative. Furthermore, numerous alternative housing
opportunities would be available to future employees. The ESSCSP's potential population growth is
considered less than significant, since it is anticipated that significantly fewer than 377 of the Proposed
Project's future employees would chose to relocate to the City due to the availability of numerous
alternative housing opportunities within the City and neighboring cities and jobs created by the Proposed
Project could be filled in part by the approximately 20,200 unemployed persons who already reside in the
City and neighboring cities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop residential land uses, and
therefore, would not induce population growth directly through housing. The Proposed Project would
propose improvements/modifications to existing roads and infrastructure to serve the new uses on the
Proposed Project site, but would not extend into undeveloped areas. Therefore, the Proposed Project
would not induce population growth indirectly through extension of roads or other infrastructure.
As shown in Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Employment Forecast, Proposed Project
implementation would increase the City's employment by approximately 377 jobs, or approximately 49
percent fewer jobs, as compared to 744 jobs estimated for the Approved Project. When compared to the
existing conditions in the City as noted in the FEIR, the Proposed Project would increase the City's
employment by approximately 0.74 percent (377 jobs) over existing conditions (50,902 jobs). The
Proposed Project's potential population growth from new employees relocating to the City is considered
less than significant, since the Proposed Project's future employees could also choose to relocate to
available alternative housing opportunities in neighboring jurisdictions.
Table 4-4: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Employment Forecast
1
Land Use
Employment Factor
(SF per Employee)'
Square
Feet
(net)
Employment
Estimate
Existing Conceptual Development Scenario
Office
440
327,680
744
Proposed Conceptual Development Scenario
Office
440
126,448
288
Warehouse
1,518
5,237
4
Special Staff
NA
85
Total Proposed Project
131,685
377
Proposed Project Compared to Existing Conceptual Development Scenario (number)
-367
Proposed Project Compared to Existing Conceptual Development Scenario (percent)
-49%
Note:
1. Based on FEIR Table 5.9-7: Project Employment Forecast.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-47
Page 250 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
The Proposed Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth through employment
in the City, either directly or indirectly, and impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, no new or
more severe impact concerning population and housing would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.13b Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.13-2)
As indicated in the FEIR, no housing units exist in the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP would not displace housing or
people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, the FEIR concluded
no impact in this regard.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project would not displace housing or people in the ESSCSP. Therefore, the
Proposed Project would have no impact on displacement and no mitigation is required. No new or more
severe impact concerning displacement would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.14 Public Services
4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for:
(i) Fire protection?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-7 — 5.10-8)
The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would not propose new or physically altered fire protection facilities.
While the ESSCSP would increase the non-residential land uses, which would result in an increased
demand for fire protection services, the ESFD confirmed there would be no need to add a new fire station
as a result of the ESSCSP. The FEIR also concluded that the ESSCSP would not increase response times to
the ESSCSP area or surrounding vicinity or require the construction of new or physically altered fire
protection facilities. The ESSCSP would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires
payment of a development impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the ESSCSP's
development impact on the City's fire protection services. Compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would
ensure that applicants of future development projects within the ESSCSP area pay their fair share of the
costs of providing the necessary public services and public facilities, including fire suppression facilities,
vehicles, and equipment. All future development would also comply with the requirements set forth in
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-48
Page 251 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
the California Fire Code, California Building Code, and ESMC Title 13, Building Regulations. Therefore,
compliance with all applicable codes and regulations, as well as ESMC Chapter 15-27A, would ensure that
the ESSCSP would result in less than significant impacts to fire protection services.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop new or physically altered fire
protection facilities. The Proposed Project's land uses would be similar to those permitted under the
ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved
Project. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires
payment of a development impact fee to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed
Project's development impact on the City's fire protection services. The Proposed Project would be
required to comply with the California Fire Code, California Building Code, and ESMC Title 13 to ensure
that the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to fire protection services. No new
or more severe impact concerning fire protection services would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for:
(ii) Police protection?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-8 — 5.10-9)
The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would not propose new or physically altered police protection facilities.
While the ESSCSP would increase the non-residential land uses, which would result in an increased
demand for police protection services, the El Segundo Police Department (ESPD) confirmed there would
be no need to add a new police station as a result of the ESSCSP. The FEIR noted that according to the
ESPD, the ESSCSP would increase calls for service, which would increase response times and potentially
require an additional officer or resources. The ESSCSP would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter
15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent
practicable, the ESSCSP's development impact on the City's police protection services. Compliance with
ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that applicants of future development projects within the ESSCSP
area pay their fair share of the costs of providing the necessary public services and public facilities,
including law enforcement facilities, vehicles, and equipment. All future development would also comply
with the ESPD's security requirements, which include lighting, landscaping, addressing, bicycle racks, trash
dumpsters, access control, doors and door hardware, parking structures, security cameras, and tenant
improvement requirements for individual commercial/retail establishments, among others. The ESPD
would review each future site plan before approval and impose standard conditions of approval to ensure
adequate design features are included to minimize any potential increase in demand for police protection
services. Therefore, compliance with ESPD's security requirements and ESMC Chapter 15-27A would
ensure that the ESSCSP would result in a less than significant impact to police protection services.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-49
Page 252 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop new or physically altered police
protection facilities. The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under
the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the
Approved Project. The Proposed Project would include various types of lighting surrounding the parking
lot perimeters and around the corporate headquarters and maintenance buildings to minimize darkened
areas and potential hazards. The parking lots would be tended by a security booth, and all entrances to
the buildings on -site would be through a secured gated area or main entry lobby. Six types of perimeter
fencing would also be proposed around the Proposed Project site, corporate headquarters building, and
surface parking lots. Given the Proposed Project's scope and nature, it is not anticipated to result in an
increase in response times or require additional officers or resources. Also, the Proposed Project would
be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee
to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed Project's development impact on the City's
police protection services. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the ESPD's security
requirements and ESMC Chapter 15-27A to ensure that the Proposed Project would result in less than
significant impacts to police protection services. No new or more severe impact concerning police
protection services would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for:
(iii) Schools?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-9 — 5.10-10)
The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would be situated within the Wiseburn School District (WSD) and the
Centinela Valley Union High School District (CVUHSD). The ESSCSP does not propose new or physically
altered school facilities. However, the ESSCSP would increase the non-residential land uses, which could
indirectly result in increased enrollment within the WSD and CVUHSD. As noted in the FEIR, the WSD does
not base its attendance on student generation rates, and enrollment is regulated through inter -district
permits. Therefore, any increase in enrollment in the WSD would be limited. The CVUHSD also does not
utilize student generation rates. Under Education Code §§ 17620, et seq., school districts collect impact
fees from developers of new commercial/industrial building space. Pursuant to Government Code
§65996, school fees imposed through the Education Code are deemed to be full mitigation for new
development projects, and no additional mitigation measures would be imposed by the City. Developer
impact fees would be imposed on future applicants within the ESSCSP area. Thus, compliance with the
Education Code and Government Code would ensure that the ESSCSP would result in less than significant
impacts to schools.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-50
Page 253 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not develop new or physically altered school
facilities. The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the
ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved
Project. The Proposed Project would comply with the Education Code and Government Code, and the
Project Applicant would pay the impact fee to offset the cost of providing services for any additional
students generated by the Proposed Project. Therefore, the Proposed Project would result in less than
significant impacts to schools. No new or more severe impact concerning schools would occur as a result
of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for:
(iv) Parks?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-11— 5.10-12)
The FEIR indicated that the there are approximately 16 acres of privately -owned recreational resources in
the northwest corner of the ESSCSP, which is available for private use by Raytheon's employees. The
ESSCSP would remove those private outdoor recreational uses and provide approximately 7.5 acres of
new recreational facilities at the southeast corner of the Raytheon Campus, which would also be available
for private use by Raytheon's employees. The ESSCSP would not involve residential development and
therefore, would not induce substantial population growth through new residential development that
would generate a significant demand for park facilities. The existing employees in the ESSCSP would utilize
the existing and new park and recreational facilities offered by the ESSCSP and would have minimal
opportunity to use the City's facilities. The ESSCSP would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-
27A, which requires payment of a development impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent
practicable, the ESSCSP's development impact on the City's parks and recreational facilities. Compliance
with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that applicants of future development projects within the
ESSCSP area pay their fair share of the costs of providing the necessary public services and public facilities,
including parks/open space and recreational facilities and public use (community centers) facilities.
Therefore, compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that the ESSCSP would not result in
substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the need for new or physically altered park facilities,
and impacts would be less than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those
permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when
compared to the Approved Project. While the Proposed Project would not develop new or physically
altered parks or recreational facilities, the proposed corporate headquarters building would include
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-51
Page 254 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
various amenities, such as training and weight rooms, an auditorium, and natural grass fields for internal
use.
Additionally, the ESSCSP included a private outdoor recreational facility for Raytheon employees totaling
7.54 acres within Lot 11. The Proposed Project would decrease the land available for this private facility
to approximately 7.34 acres on Lots 10 and 11 (a decrease of 0.20 acres). This change would not generate
the need for new or physically altered recreational facilities elsewhere to meet any parkland standard
given it is a private facility. Additionally, the Proposed Project would not generate any demand for
recreational facilities given it does not include residential uses but does include various private
recreational amenities for internal use.
The Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment
of a development impact fee to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed Project's
development impact on the City's parks and recreational facilities. Therefore, compliance with ESMC
Chapter 15-27A would ensure that the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to
parks and recreational facilities. No new or more severe impact concerning parks and recreational
facilities' would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.14a Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for:
(v) Other Public Facilities?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.14-3)
The FEIR indicated that the ESSCSP would not include residential development or induce substantial
population growth. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not generate a significant demand for new physically
altered library facilities or result in adverse physical impacts associated with library facilities. The ESSCSP
would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a development
impact fee, to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the ESSCSP's development impact on the City's
libraries. Compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that applicants of future development
projects within the ESSCSP area pay their fair share of the costs of providing the necessary public services
and public facilities. Therefore, compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-27A would ensure that the ESSCSP
would result in less than significant impacts to library facilities.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not include residential development that would
generate substantial population growth generating a demand for library facilities. The Proposed Project's
proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve
approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when compared to the Approved Project. The Proposed
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-52
Page 255 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Project would be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-27A, which requires payment of a
development impact fee to minimize, to the greatest extent practicable, the Proposed Project's
development impact on the City's libraries. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with ESMC
Chapter 15-27A to ensure that the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to library
facilities. No new or more severe impact concerning libraries would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.15 Recreation
4.15a Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.15-1)
See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Analysis of Proposed Project above.
FOR Mitijzation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.15b Would the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.10-11— 5.10-12)
See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.14a(iv) Analysis of Proposed Project above.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.16 Transportation
4.16a Would the Project conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.2-34 — 5.2-110)
The FEIR studied 71 intersections that would be located in the cities of El Segundo, Manhattan Beach,
Redondo Beach, Hawthorne, and Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles. The ESSCSP proposes to
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-53
Page 256 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
establish a net additional 2,142,457 gross SF over existing conditions. As shown in FEIR Table 5.2-27:
Forecast Long -Range With Project Buildout Conditions Peak Hour Study Intersection LOS, with the
addition of the trips generated by ESSCSP buildout, 13 intersections would continue to operate at an
acceptable Level of Service (LOS) (LOS D or better), and 11 intersections would result in significant impacts.
Implementation of MM TRA-1 through TRA-7 would reduce traffic impacts at Intersections 29, 32, 48, 49,
50, 53, and 55; however, only Intersection 49 would be reduced to a less than significant level. No
mitigation would be feasible due to right-of-way limitations and existing structures at Intersections 38,
51, 62, and 69. Therefore, impacts at Intersections 29, 32, 38, 48, 50, 51, 53, 55, 62, and 69 would remain
significant and unavoidable. For the State Highway intersections, the ESSCSP would have potentially
significant impacts at Intersections 7, 13, and 57. With implementation of MM TRA-8 and TRA-9, traffic
impacts would be reduced at Intersection 57 to less than significant levels. However, Intersections 7,
which would have no feasible mitigation measures due to right-of-way limitations and existing structures)
and 13 would also remain significant and unavoidable.
The FEIR identified the following transit services available in the ESSCSP's vicinity:
• Metro Bus Line Route 125 travels along Rosecrans Avenue and intersects Sepulveda Boulevard
• Metro Bus Line Route 232 travels along Sepulveda Boulevard and intersects Rosecrans Avenue
• Metro C (Green) Line 801 travels alongside the ESSCSP and stops at El Segundo Station, located at
El Segundo Boulevard and Nash Street
The ESSCSP is forecast to generate approximately 149 AM peak hour transit trips, approximately 153 PM
peak hour transit trips, and approximately 1,303 daily transit trips. Since the ESSCSP transit trips can be
accommodated by existing transit service in the vicinity, no significant transit impacts would occur, and
impacts would be less than significant.
There are no bicycle facilities located in the ESSCSP's vicinity. ESMC Chapter 15-16 sets forth requirements
for major new developments to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate the use of ridesharing,
transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle trips.
According to the ESCM Chapter 15-16-2, before approval of any development project, the Applicant must
provide for, at a minimum, all of the applicable Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and trip
reduction measures. As described in FEIR Table 5.1-1: General Plan Consistency Analysis, the ESSCSP
proposes a 6.0-foot wide Class II, on -street bicycle lane, on each side of the street, within the Nash Street
extension. Therefore, following compliance with the ESMC, impacts would be less than significant related
to bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Overall, the FEIR concluded that the ESSCSP would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related
to conflicting with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those
permitted under the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and
approximately 55 percent fewer trips when compared to the Approved Project. The ESSCSP has a trip
ceiling of 3,042 AM peak hourtrips, 3,120 total PM peak hour trips, and 26,585 total daily trips; see ESSCSP
Table III-3: Project Trip Ceiling for Trips Associated with New Development Within the ESSCSP Area. As of
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-54
Page 257 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
October 21, 2021 (i.e., inclusive of Phase I entitled development), approximately 2,954 AM peak hour
trips, approximately 2,965 PM peak hour trips, and approximately 24,756 total daily trips remain within
the ESSCSP; see Appendix A: ESSCSP Phase I Development Tracking Table. As shown in the Trip
Generation Assessment- ESSCSP—Southeast Quad (Fehr & Peers, October 28, 2021) (see Appendix C: Trip
Generation Assessment)' and in Table 4-5: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Trip Generation, the
Proposed Project would generate a 267 AM peak hour trips, 230 PM peak hour trips, and 1,808 total daily
trips. As shown in Table 4-5, the Proposed Project would result in approximately 55 percent fewer daily
vehicle trips than the Approved Project.
Table 4-5: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Trip Generation
Estimated Trip Generation'
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ITE
In I Out FTotal In Out Total
Land Use
Code
Size
Daily
ESSCSP
ESSCSP All Uses
N/A
26,585
2,634
408
3,042
631
2,489
3,120
Existing Conceptual Development Scenario'
Office
710
367,002
4,048
504
69
573
93
454
547
SF
(48)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(1)
(4)
(5)
Proposed Conceptual Development Scenario
Corporate Headquarters and
Recreation Facility
148,050
1,633
203
28
231
38
183
221
Internal capture (1% PM / 1%
710
SF
(16)
0
0
0
0
(2)
(2)
ADT)3
Special staff
-'
85 emp
170
34
0
34
0
9
9
Subtotal Lots land 8
--
--
1,787
237
28
265
38
190
228
Warehouse
150
5,865 SF
21
2
0
2
1
1
2
Total Proposed Project Trips
1,808
239
28
267
39
191
230
Proposed Project Compared to Existing
Conceptual Development Scenario (number)
-2,240
Proposed Project Compared to Existing
Conceptual Development Scenario (percent)
-55%
Proposed Project Proportion of ESSCSP
6.8%
Notes:
1. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition
2. Source: Fehr & Peers, Trip Generation Assessment - ESSCSP —Southeast Quad, October 28, 2021.
3. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or already operating within the site (Raytheon
South Campus).
4. All employees were assumed to travel in single occupancy vehicles. To be conservative, 40% of the employees were assumed to travel
during the AM peak hour and 10% in the PM peak hour.
PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent; KSF = Thousand Square Feet
Source: Fehr & Peers, Trip Generation Assessment — ESSCSP — Southeast Quad, October 28, 2021. Provided in Appendix C.
9 Kimley-Horn conducted a third -party review of the Proposed Project's Trip Generation Assessment on behalf of the City; see
Appendix C: Trip Generation Assessment. The third -party review concluded the analyses meet the applicable provisions of
CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-55
Page 258 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
With implementation of the Proposed Project, approximately 2,687 AM peak hour trips, approximately
2,735 PM peak hour trips, and approximately 22,948 total daily trips would remain within the ESSCSP.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause the ESSCSP trip ceiling, as detailed in ESSCSP Table III-3,
to be exceeded, and impacts related to the circulation system would be less than significant.
See Threshold 4.10b Analysis of Proposed Project above concerning consistency with programs, plans,
ordinances, and policies addressingthe circulation system. The Proposed Project would complywith ESMC
Chapter 15-16, which requires the Project to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate the use
of ridesharing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle commuting as alternatives to single occupant motor vehicle
trips. The Proposed Project would also include applicable TDM and trip reduction measures. As noted in
Threshold 4.10b Analysis of Proposed Project above, the Proposed Project would be required to
implement the City's Public Works Department conditions of approval related to the Nash Street
extension. Therefore, impacts related to conflicting with program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing
the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities would be less than
significant. No new or more severe impact would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.16b Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
Not applicable since this threshold was not analyzed in the FEIR.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3 codifies the change from LOS to VMT as a
metric for transportation impact analysis. Pursuant to SB 743, VMT analysis is the primary method for
determining transportation impacts under CEQA. The City is in the process of developing SB 743
implementation guidelines related to VMT analysis. Therefore, the State Office of Planning and Research
(OPR)'s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA will be utilized for the VMT
analysis. OPR acknowledges that CEQA documents released for public review before July 1, 2020 are not
required to incorporate a VMT analysis, and that CEQA analyses prepared after July 1, 2020 may rely on a
previously certified EIR that analyzes traffic impacts using the LOS metric. Lead agencies may use their
discretion to determine if a VMT analysis is not required for later -prepared documents.10 See, e.g., CREED
v. San Diego (2011) 196 Cal.AppAth 515; Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.AppAth
1301, 1320.) Therefore, a VMT analysis is not required for the Proposed Project. Notwithstanding, based
on the VMT-based analysis provided below, the Proposed Project is presumed to result in a less than
significant transportation impact concerning VMT.
The OPR Guidelines state that projects located within half mile from an existing major transit stop or
within half of a mile from an existing stop along a high -quality transit corridor can be screened out, and
10 California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, SB 743 Frequently Asked Questions, https://opr.ca.gov/cega/sb
743/fag.html#draft-docs. Accessed November 3, 2021.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-56
Page 259 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
thus presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact. As the Proposed Project would
be located less than 0.5 miles south of the Metro C (Green) Line El Segundo station, the Proposed Project
is screened out and is presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact concerning VMT.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.16c Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.2-34 — 5.2-110)
The FEIR concluded that while the proposed ESSCSP development would not result in incompatible uses,
the ESSCSP's generated trips would result in impacts at study area intersections, which could lead to
increased transportation hazards at study area intersections (e.g., a dangerous intersection). Therefore,
ESSCSP implementation would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to increased hazards
due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Significant and Unavoidable Impact: The Proposed Project would develop uses that are consistent with
those assumed in the ESSCSP land use plan and evaluated in the FEIR. The Proposed Project land uses that
would be consistent with the ESSCSP's land use plan and not result in incompatible uses. Additionally, the
Proposed Project would result in approximately 55 percent fewer daily vehicle trips than the Approved
Project. However, the Proposed Project would generate 1,808 total daily trips, which could lead to
increased transportation hazards at study area intersections (e.g., a dangerous intersection). Therefore,
the Proposed Project's uses could increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses, resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact, as
concluded in the FEIR. It is noted that although the Proposed Project would result in a significant and
unavoidable impact concerning increased transportation hazards, this significant and unavoidable impact
was previously identified in the FEIR. No new or more severe impact concerning increased transportation
hazards would occur, as a result of the Proposed Project. As described above, the Proposed Project would
result in 55 percent less total daily trips, as compared to the Approved Project. Therefore, an additional
finding concerning this significant impact is not required, since such a finding was already made in
adopting the original FEIR, and this Addendum is the proper CEQA document per State CEQA Guidelines
§§15162 and 15164 because no new significant environmental impacts have been identified.
The Proposed Project's modifications to realign the Nash Street extension would require minor utility
relocations. The Proposed Project would also realign/relocate the Coral Circle connection to the Nash
Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The proposed modified circulation pattern would continue to
provide for possible future connection from the Nash Street extension to Coral Circle (an easement
through Lots 20 and 22) and capacity for additional parking for the Coral Circle businesses (Lots 20 and
22). As noted in Response to Threshold 4.10b Analysis of Proposed Project above, the City's Public Works
Department analyzed the Nash Street extension and Coral Circle connection for compliance concerning
function, capacity, and street classification and standards with the General Plan Circulation Element, the
ESMC, and the ESSCSP, and found that the two proposed modifications would be in substantial
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-57
Page 260 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
compliance.11 The Proposed Project would implement the City's Public Works Department conditions of
approval related to the Nash Street extension, which would also require that the design and construction
of the Nash Street extension be subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works and
Director of Development Services. Complying with the conditions of approval would further ensure that
the Proposed Project would not increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses.
Impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning increasing hazards due
to a geometric design feature or incompatible use would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.16d Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.7-27 — 5.7-34)
See Threshold 4.8f Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: See Threshold 4.8f Analysis of Proposed Project
above.
FOR Mitigation Measures
See MM HAZ-8, above.
4.17 Utilities and Service Systems
4.17a Would the Project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-24 — 5.11-28, 5.11-35 — 5.11-36)
See Threshold 4.9c Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above concerning storm water drainage
improvements.
See Threshold 4.9a Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above concerning electric power and
natural gas improvements.
Water
The FEIR quantified the proposed potable water use within the ESSCSP based on the proposed land uses
to be 308,168 gallons per day (gpd) or 457.3 acre-feet per year (AFY). The ESSCSP proposed a potable
water system with three connection points to serve the proposed land uses, and approximately 6,600
linear feet of water lines within the ESSCSP boundary. Regarding fire flow, the City defers to Los Angeles
County Fire Department standards, and all final fire flows would be based on building size, construction
11 L. Carver, personal communication, October 21, 2021.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-58
Page 261 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
type, and relationship to other structures. MM USS-1 was recommended to require an additional analysis
to determine the most feasible method for reducing velocities in the City's existing water system, which
would also indicate the potential need to parallel off -site City pipelines or add service connections points
for the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP also proposed recycled water use for irrigating existing and new landscaped
areas. Therefore, the ESSCSP would require and result in the construction of new water facilities; however,
the construction would occur primarily within the road rights -of -way, and impacts would be less than
significant with mitigation incorporated.
Wastewater
The FEIR quantified the ESSCSP's projected average daily wastewater generation to be 308,168 gpd. As
identified in the FEIR, sufficient capacity exists to sewer the entire ESSCSP in the southerly trunk;
therefore, the ESSCSP would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects.
However, the FEIR also identified that the Applicant may discharge a portion of the wastewater for the
ESSCSP to the northerly trunk in El Segundo Boulevard. The ESSCSP would require additional capacity to
the northerly trunk and would upsize the critical pipe segment. In the event the City permits the Applicant
to sewer a portion of the development in the ESSCSP to the northerly trunk, the ESSCSP would be required
to implement MM USS-2 such that an adequately sized relief sewer be installed within Douglas Street that
connects with the trunk line at Coral Circle and Douglas Street and diverts sufficient sewer flow from the
northerly trunk to provide adequate capacity.
The FEIR concluded that implementation of the ESSCSP would not result in significant impacts concerning
utilities and service systems. However, the implementation of the below referenced Mitigation Measures
was recommended.
Telecommunication Facilities
The FEIR identified that telecommunications service to the ESSCSP area is proposed via the existing line
located along the ESSCFSP's eastern boundary, within the property line. There would be one connection
point to serve the ESSCSP, approximately mid -way along the eastern property line. All construction
impacts would occur primarily within the road rights -of -way. The FEIR concluded that implementation of
the ESSCSP would not result in significant impacts related to telecommunications, and no mitigation is
required.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated:
Water
The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would demand approximately 308,168 gpd or 457.3 AFY.
The ESSCSP would include three new connection points to serve the ESSCSP. The Proposed Project would
be located within the ESSCSP and would include similar uses already analyzed in the FEIR, but would
develop approximately 58 percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project. As concluded in
Threshold 4.17b Analysis of Proposed Project below, while the Proposed Project's water demand would
be less than the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would still be required to implement MM USS-1
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-59
Page 262 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
to require additional analysis of the regional system to reduce system velocities during peak system
demands. With implementation of MM USS-1, impacts would be reduced to less than significant.
Wastewater
The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would generate approximately 308,168 gpd of
wastewater. The Proposed Project would be located within the ESSCSP and would include similar uses but
would develop approximately 58 percent less gross floor area than the Approved Project. This analysis
assumes the Proposed Project would be serviced by the City's existing 21-inch trunk sewer (D-207) (i.e.,
the "southerly trunk sewer") located near the Proposed Project site's southeast corner; see FEIR Exhibit
5.11-3: Existing Sewer System. The FEIR concluded that the entire ESSCSP could be serviced by the
southerly trunk, which would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater facilities or
expansion of existing facilities. As concluded in Threshold 4.17c Analysis of Proposed Project below, the
Proposed Project's wastewater generation would be less than the Approved Project. Therefore, impacts
would be less than significant.
Telecommunication Facilities
The Proposed Project site is located in a developed and urbanized area in the City and the ESSCSP that is
already served by existing telecommunication services. The Proposed Project would install
telecommunication lines in El Segundo Boulevard and along the western boundary of the ESSCSP. Existing
telecommunication lines exist along the eastern boundary of the ESSCSP. Construction impacts associated
with the installation of new telecommunication infrastructure were already analyzed as part of the FEIR.
Installation of the infrastructure would be limited to on -site distribution and minor off -site work
associated with connections to the public systems. Therefore, it is anticipated that the Proposed Project
would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded telecommunication
facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects that have
not already been addressed in the FEIR. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Conclusion
Overall, impacts concerning water facilities would be less than significant with implementation of MM
USS-1. Impacts concerning wastewater and telecommunication facilities would be less than significant.
No new or more severe impacts concerning relocation or construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
USS-1 Before the City issues a building permit, the Applicant's Engineering Representative must
coordinate with the Director of Public Works, or designee, to increase capacity of the
City's High Pressure Zone in the vicinity of the Project site. This will include, at a minimum,
regional system analysis of the City's Water System using the City's system -wide
computer model with the goal of reducing system velocities during peak demands
adjacent to the Project site. The Director of Public Works, or designee, will determine the
system improvement options that are required.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-60
Page 263 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.17b Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-34 — 5.11-35)
The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would demand approximately 308,168 gpd or 457.3 AFY.
In accordance with SB 610 and SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was prepared for the ESSCSP to
verifythat sufficient water supply is available to the water provider during normal, single dry, and multiple
dry years within a 20-year projection that would meet the ESSCSP's projected demand, in addition to
existing and planned future uses. The FEIR concluded there would be sufficient water supplies available
to serve the ESSCSP from existing entitlement and resources, and no new or expanded entitlement would
be needed. Impacts would be less than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would develop land uses that would be similar to
those permitted under the ESSCSP, although with approximately 58 percent less gross floor area than the
Approved Project. As shown in Table 4-6: Proposed Project Potable Water Demand, the Proposed
Project's water demand is estimated to be approximately 25,420.5 gpd. The Proposed Project's natural
grass fields would utilize recycled water as proposed in the ESSCSP; therefore, the fields would not
generate additional potable water demand that was not anticipated as part of the ESSCSP and analyzed
in the FEIR.
Table 4-6: Proposed Project Potable Water Demand
Land Use'
Square Feet
Flow Factor
Average Flow (gpd)
Office
126,448
200 gpd/ksf
25,289.6
Warehouse
5,237
25 gpd/ksf
130.9
Total Proposed Project
25,420.5
Note:
1. Based on FEIR Table 5.11-6: Project Potable Water Demand.
As the Proposed Project would develop less square footage than the Approved Project, the Proposed
Project would be adequately served by the water provider and impacts would be less than significant. No
new or more severe impact concerning sufficient water supply would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.17c Would the Project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-35 — 5.11-36)
The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would generate approximately 308,168 gpd of
wastewater. The Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP) was operating at approximately 66 percent
capacity based on a design capacity of 400 million gallons per day (MGD) and the current (at time of EIR
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-61
Page 264 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
preparation) treatment totaled approximately 265.4 MGD. Therefore, approximately 134.6 MGD of
available capacity existed at the JWPCP to serve the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP's 308,168 gpd (or 0.31 MGD)
would not exceed the available capacity at the JWPCP and impacts would be less than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would develop land uses that would be similar to
those permitted under the ESSCSP and would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when
compared to the Approved Project. As shown in Table 4-7: Proposed Project Wastewater Generation,
the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate 25,420.5 gpd (0.03 MGD) of wastewater.
Table 4-7: Proposed Project Wastewater Generation
Land Use'
Square Feet
Flow Factor
Average Flow (gpd)
Office
126,448
200 gpd/ksf
25,289.6
Warehouse
5,237
25 gpd/ksf
130.9
Total Proposed Project
25,420.5
Note:
1. Based on FOR Table 5.11-8: Project Wastewater Generation.
As the Proposed Project would develop less square footage than the Approved Project, the JWPCP would
have adequate and sufficient capacity to accommodate the Proposed Project, and the JWPCP would not
be required to increase its design capacity. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than
significant impact on wastewater. No new or more severe impact concerning wastewater treatment
provider and capacity would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.17d Would the Project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-36 — 5.11-38)
The FEIR anticipated that the entire ESSCSP area would generate approximately 8,761 tons per year (tpy)
of solid waste. Consolidated Disposal Inc. would provide solid waste collection services to the ESSCSP are
and would be able to serve the ESSCSP. The ESSCSP would be served by a landfill with permitted capacity
to accommodate the ESSCSP's solid waste disposal needs. Further, as described Threshold 4.17e Summary
of Previous Environmental Analysis below, the ESSCSP would comply with the City's Source Reduction and
Recycling Element (SRRE) to divert solid waste. Some source reduction programs available to the
commercial uses proposed within the ESSCSP include Commercial On -Site Greenwaste Pick -Up; Electronic
Waste; Commercial On -site Pick -Up; and Business Waste Reduction Program. Compliance with the SRRE
would reduce the volume of solid waste ultimately disposed of at the landfill. Compliance with the SRRE
would also allow the ESSCSP to further the City's goal of exceeding Assembly Bill (AB) 939's 50 percent
diversion requirement. Therefore, the ESSCSP would not result in solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals. Impacts would be less than significant.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-62
Page 265 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would develop land uses that would be similar to
those permitted under the ESSCSP, and would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area when
compared to the Approved Project. As shown in Table 4-8: Proposed Project Solid Waste Generation, the
Proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 723.4 tpy, which would be accommodated at
the same landfills with permitted capacity to accommodate the ESSCSP's 8,761 tpy of solid waste. The
Proposed Project would be required to comply with the SRRE to divert solid waste, which would assist the
City in meeting and exceeding the AB 939's diversion requirements.
Table 4-8: Proposed Project Solid Waste Generation
Land Use'
Employees2
Generation Rate
(Ibs/day/emp)
Generation
(Ibs/day)
Generation (tpy)
Office
288
10.53
3,032.6
553.5
Warehouse
4
8.93
35.7
6.5
Special Staff
85
10.53
895.1
163.4
Total Proposed Project
3,963.4
723.4
Notes:
1. Based on FOR Table 5.11-6: Project Potable Water Demand.
2. Based on Table 4-4: Proposed Project Employment Forecast.
As the Proposed Project would develop less square footage than what was anticipated on the Proposed
Project site under the ESSCSP, the Proposed Project would be adequately served by the identified landfills
and impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning solid waste
generation would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.17e Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 5.11-36 — 5.11-38)
See Threshold 4.17d Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above.
Analysis of Proposed Project
Less Than Significant Impact: See Threshold 4.17d Analysis of Proposed Project above.
FEIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-63
Page 266 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
4.18 Wildfire
4.18a If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the Project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
4.18b If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the Project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
4.18c If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the Project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such
as roads, fuel breaks, emergency watersources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
4.18d If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the Project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR Section 10.1: Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist, p. 4.8-3)
The revised State CEQA Guidelines include a new separate discussion for Wildfire hazards. Although not
addressed as a separate threshold, the FEIR's Hazards and Hazardous Materials analysis (see Threshold
4.8g Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis above) noted that the ESSCSP area consists of, and is
surrounded by, urban/developed land. Furthermore, the ESSCSP is not located within a Very High Fire
Hazard Severity Zone. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
Analysis of Proposed Project
No Impact: The Proposed Project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no impact concerning wildfires, and no mitigation is required.
No new or more severe impact concerning wildfires would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.19 Energy
4.19a Would the Project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-64
Page 267 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 6-6 — 6-9)
The updated State CEQA Guidelines include a new separate threshold for Energy. Although not addressed
as a separate threshold in the FEIR, the FEIR analyzed energy conservation in FEIR Section 6.4.1: Project
Energy Consumption.
Regarding energy utilized during short-term construction, the ESSCSP would incorporate MM AQ-4 to
ensure that development associated with the ESSCSP would utilize diesel construction equipment that
complies with at least Tier 3-level emissions standards. The use of Tier-3 off -road engines would improve
the fuel economy of the equipment fleet. There are no unusual characteristics of the ESSCSP that would
necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy -efficient than at comparable
construction sites in the region or State. Implementation of MM AQ-4 would further minimize energy
utilized during construction. Therefore, it is expected that fuel consumption associated with ESSCSP
construction would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary than other similar development
projects of this nature. Impacts would be less than significant.
During operations, the ESSCSP would not result in any unusual characteristics that would result in
excessive long-term operational fuel consumption. The ESSCSP is located adjacent to the Metro C (Green)
Line, which would reduce the use of transportation fuel. Future development within the ESSCSP would
also be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-16, which would require developments to provide
facilities that encourage and accommodate the use of ridesharing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle
commuting. The ESSCSP would also include bicycle network improvements. Therefore, the ESSCSP would
reduce the use of transportation energy. For building energy, the ESSCSP would implement MM GHG-1
and include several energy efficiency measures, including exceeding Title 24 requirements as set forth in
the CCR, high -efficiency lighting, shade trees, and high efficiency heating and cooling systems. The ESSCSP
would adhere to all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency, including Title 24
standards, the California Building Code, Energy Code, Mechanical Code, Fire Code, and CALGreen Code.
Therefore, the ESSCSP would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy
during operation, and impacts would be less than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
The Proposed Project would require less construction on the Proposed Project site than assumed for the
Approved Project. Therefore, energy used during construction would be less than the Approved Project.
During operation, the Proposed Project's proposed land uses would be similar to those permitted under
the ESSCSP, but would involve approximately 58 percent less gross floor area and would generate
approximately 55 percent fewer trips when compared to the Approved Project. Therefore, the energy
required for the Proposed Project and the transportation fuel associated with the Proposed Project
vehicle trips would also be proportionately less than the Approved Project. The Proposed Project would
be required to comply with ESMC Chapter 15-16 to provide facilities that encourage and accommodate
multi -modal transportation. The Proposed Project would implement MM GHG-1 and several energy
efficiency measures to further minimize the energy required for the Proposed Project. The Proposed
Project would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency.
Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of
energy and impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning the
consumption of energy resources would occur as a result of the Proposed Project.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-65
Page 268 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.19b Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis (FEIR pp. 6-6 — 6-9)
The updated State CEQA Guidelines include a new separate threshold for Energy. Although not addressed
as a separate threshold in the FEIR, the FEIR analyzed energy conservation in FEIR Section 6.4.1: Project
Energy Consumption. Regarding conflicting with or obstructing a State or local plan for renewable energy
or energy efficiency, the ESSCSP would comply with all federal, State, and local requirements for energy
efficiency. ESSCSP development would not preclude or conflict with plans or policies for renewable
energy. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Analysis of Proposed Project
The Proposed Project would comply with all federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency.
Through implementation of MM GHG-1, the Proposed Project would comply with requirements of
Title 24, which would include installing high efficiency lighting, HVAC systems, water -efficient fixtures, etc.
Therefore, development of the Proposed Project would not preclude or conflict with plans or policies for
renewable energy, and impacts would be less than significant. No new or more severe impact concerning
conflicts with or obstruction of a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency would occur
as a result of the Proposed Project.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
4.20 Tribal Cultural Resources
4.20a Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or
eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical
resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
4.20b Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource
determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1.
In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-66
Page 269 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
Not applicable since tribal cultural resources were not analyzed in the FEIR.
Analysis of Proposed Project
This section briefly examines potential impacts related to tribal cultural resources that could result from
the Proposed Project. This analysis is based primarily on the FEIR's Cultural Resources analysis and as
described under Thresholds 4.5a through 4.5d above.
Public Resource Code (PRC) §21074 defines a tribal cultural resource as follows:
(a) "Tribal cultural resources" are either of the following:
(1) Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe that are either of the following:
(A) Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical
Resources.
(B) Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section
5020.1.
(2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this
paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California
Native American tribe.
(b) A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the
extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape.
(c) A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in
subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a "nonunique archaeological resource" as defined in
subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms with the
criteria of subdivision (a).
PRC §5020.1(k) states:
(k) "Local register of historical resources" means a list of properties officially designated or
recognized as historically significant by a local government pursuant to a local ordinance or
resolution.
PRC §5024.1(c) states:
(c) A resource may be listed as an historical resource in the California Register if it meets any of the
following National Register of Historic Places criteria:
(1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
California's history and cultural heritage.
(2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-67
Page 270 of 500
4. Proposed Project Environmental Impact Analysis
(3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction,
or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.
(4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
As stated in the FEIR, the ESSCSP area has already been subject to extensive disruption and may contain
artificial fill materials. Given the Proposed Project site's highly disturbed condition, the potential for
ground -disturbing activities to impact an as yet unidentified tribal cultural resource is considered remote.
The ESSCSP Notice of Preparation was filed in 2009; therefore, AB 52, which was enacted on July 1, 2015,
does not apply to this Proposed Project as the CEQA document is an Addendum to the FEIR and not subject
to the provisions of AB 52.
Based on the above, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning tribal
cultural resources; however, as discussed in Threshold 4.5d Analysis of Proposed Project, if human
remains are discovered during excavation of a site, the Proposed Project would be required to comply
with the same regulations as detailed in the FEIR as it relates to proper treatment, discovery, and
notification. Impacts related to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant.
FOR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation required.
Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project November 2021
4-68
Page 271 of 500
Appendix A
ESSCSP Phase I Development
Tracking Table
Page 272 of 500
South Campus Development Tracking Table - Square Feet and FAR
As of October 24, 2021
Land Use IMMrpmBuilding Area Building Area
(Net Square Feet) (Gross Square Feet)
South Campus Specific Plan Entitled Square Feet
Office
1,565,000 1,752,800
Warehouse/Storage
82,000
91,840
Light Industrial
150,000
168,000
Commercial
133,000
148,960
Subtotal Entitled Additional Development
1,930,000
2,161,600
Existing Campus Uses-
1,788,889
2,069,947
Total Campus Entitled Square Feet
3,718,889
4,231,547
Phase I - New Development
Office
40,600
43,000
Warehouse/Storage
-
-
Light Industrial
-
-
Commercial
22,650
22,650
Total Phase I Square Feet
1 63,250
1 65,650
Phase II - New Development
Office
Warehouse/Storage
Light Industrial
-
-
Commercial
-
-
Total Phase II Square Feet
-
-
Phase III - New Development
Office
-
-
Warehouse/Storage
-
-
Light Industrial
-
-
Commercial
-
-
Total Phase III Square Feet
-
-
Phase IV - New Development
Office
-
-
Warehouse/Storage
Light Industrial
-
-
Commercial
-
-
Total Phase IV Square Feet
-
-
Remaining South Campus Specific Plan Entitled Square Feet
Office
1,524,400
1,709,800
Warehouse/Storage
82,000
91,840
Light Industrial
150,000
168,000
Commercial
110,350
126,310
Subtotal Remaining Specific Plan Entitled Square Feet
1,866,750
2,095,950
Existing Campus Uses-
1,788,889
2,069,947
Total Campus Entitled Square Feet
3,718,889
4,231,547
South Campus Specific Plan FAR
Total Entitled FAR
0.60
Total FAR of Existing Development
0.29
Total FAR of New Development
0.01
Total FAR of Existing & New Development
0.30
Total FAR Remaining
0.30
1Pa
e 273 of 500
South Campus Development Tracking Table - Trip Generations
As of October 21, 2021
South Campus Specific Plan Development
AM Peak Hour Trips
In Out Total ,
PM Peak Hour Trips
= In Out
Total Daily Trips
Phase I New Development Trii
Counts
AM Peak Hour Trips
-
In Out
Total=
PM Peak Hour Trips
-
In Out
Total=
Total Daily Trips
Phase III New Development
AM Peak Hour Trips
In Out T�
1 1
PM Peak Ho
In
1
Total Daily Trips
Phase 11 New Development
AM Peak Hour Trips
In Out
1 1
PM Peak Hour Trips
In Out
1 1
Total Daily Trips
1
Phase IV New Development
AM Peak Hour Trips
In Out -
1
PM Peak Hour Trips
In Out
Total Daily Trips _
i �i I �
AM Peak Hour Trips A
. In Out
PM Peak Hour Trips
= In Out To�
= Total Daily Trips
Page 274 of 500
Appendix B
Inventory of Applicable
Mitigation Measures
Page 275 of 500
AQ-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and
Building Safety must approve Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications that comply with
SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust emissions must be controlled by regular watering or
other dust prevention measures, and Rule 402, which requires implementation of dust
suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off -site as specified in
the SCAQMD's Rules and Regulations. Implementation of the following measures would reduce
short-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors:
■ All active portions of the construction site must be watered every three hours during daily
construction activities and when dust is observed migrating from the Project site to prevent
excessive amounts of dust.
■ Appoint a construction relations officer to act as a community liaison concerning on -site
construction activity including resolution of issues related to particulate matter generation.
■ Pave or apply water every three hours during daily construction activities or apply non -toxic soil
stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas. More frequent watering
must occur if dust is observed migrating from the site during site disturbance.
■ Any on -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or other dusty material must be enclosed, covered, watered
twice daily, or non -toxic soil binders shall be applied.
■ All grading and excavation operations must be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles
per hour.
■ Disturbed areas must be replaced with ground cover or paved immediately after construction is
completed in the affected area.
■ Track -out devices such as gravel bed track -out aprons (3 inches deep, 25 feet long, 12 feet wide
per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes) are required to reduce mud/dirt trackout from
unpaved truck exit routes. Alternatively a wheel washer must be used at truck exit routes.
■ On -site vehicle speed must be limited to 15 miles per hour.
■ All material transported off -site must be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to
prevent excessive amounts of dust before departing the job site.
■ Reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas.
AQ-2 During construction, all trucks hauling excavated or graded material on -site must comply with
Vehicle Code § 23114 (Spilling Loads on Highways) regulating the manner for preventing material
spilling onto public streets and roads. Before the City issues Grading Permits, the Project Applicant
must demonstrate to the Director of Public Works how operations comply with Vehicle Code §
23114 during hauling activities, as applicable.
AQ-3 The following measures must be implemented by the contractor to reduce ROG emissions
resulting from application of architectural coatings:
■ Use high -pressure -low -volume (HPLV) paint applicators with a minimum transfer efficiency of at
least 50 percent;
■ Use pre -painted construction materials; and
Page 276 of 500
■ VOC content of architectural coatings cannot exceed 35 grams per liter.
AQ-4 Before the City issues a Grading Permit, the construction contractor must provide evidence to the
Public Works Director that the following measures are implemented during construction. See also
MM GHG-1.
■ Provide temporary traffic controls such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to
maintain smooth traffic flow.
■ Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on- and off -
site.
■ Improve traffic flow by signal synchronization, and ensure that all vehicles and equipment will be
properly tuned and maintained according to manufacturers' specifications.
■ Require the use of electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power
generators.
■ Require the use of 2010 and newer diesel haul trucks (e.g., material delivery trucks and soil
import/export) and if the Director determines that 2010 model year or newer diesel trucks
cannot be obtained then trucks that meet EPA 2007 model year NOx emissions requirements
may be used.
■ During Project construction, all internal combustion engines/construction, equipment operating
on the project site must meet EPA -Certified Tier 3 emissions standards, or higher according to
the following:
o Project start, to December 31, 2014: All off -road diesel -powered construction equipment
greater than 50 horsepower must meet Tier 3 off -road emissions standards. In addition, all
construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. Any
emissions control device used by the contractor must achieve emissions reductions that are
not less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a
similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations.
o Post -January 1, 2015: All off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater than 50
horsepower must meet the Tier 4 emission standards, where available. In addition, all
construction equipment must be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. Any
emissions control device used by the contractor must achieve emissions reductions that are
not less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a
similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations.
o A copy of each unit's certified tier specification, BACT documentation, and CARB or SCAQMD
operating permit must be provided at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of
equipment.
GEO-1 Before the City issues a Grading Permit or Building Permit, a lot -specific Geotechnical/Soils
Investigation must be conducted, to a satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building Safety.
The Geotechnical/Soils Investigation must:
■ Be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the California Building Code by a civil
engineer registered in this State;
Page 277 of 500
■ Comply with the recommendations specified in the Geology, Soils, Seismicity Report in Support
of Raytheon El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (D. Scott Magorien, C.E.G., March 6, 2013);
and
■ Recommend the appropriate corrective action, which is likely to prevent structural damage to
each structure proposed to be constructed in the area where geotechnical/soils problems exist.
GHG-1 The Project must incorporate the improvements listed below to ensure consistency with
applicable law. The Project Applicant must demonstrate compliance with this measure to the
satisfaction of the Building and Planning Safety Director before the City issues building permits or
certificates of occupancy.
Energy Efficiency
■ Design buildings to be energy efficient, 15 percent above Title 24 requirements (building permit).
■ Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees
(building permit).
■ Install high efficiency lighting, and energy efficient heating and cooling systems (building permit).
■ Reduce unnecessary outdoor lighting (building permit).
Water Conservation and Efficiency
■ Install water -efficient fixtures (e.g., faucets, toilets, showers) (Building Permit).
Solid Waste
■ Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil,
vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard) (Building Permit).
■ Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and adequate recycling containers
located in public areas (Occupancy Permit).
HAZ-1 Before a Grading Permit is issued, the actual location of onsite oil/gas wells must be verified with
DOGGR. All onsite wells present must be properly plugged and abandoned per current DOGGR,
DTSC, and RWQCB requirements. Further, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site
characterization experience must verify through soil sampling that no residual contamination has
resulted from historic oil/gas production activities onsite.
HAZ-2 Before a Grading Permit is issued, soil sampling must be conducted within the portions of the
Project site that have historically been utilized for agricultural purposes and may contain pesticide
residues in the soil, as determined by a qualified Phase II/site characterization specialist. The
sampling, conducted in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department, must determine if
pesticide concentrations exceed established regulatory requirements and identify further site
characterization and remedial activities, if necessary. Should further site
characterization/remedial activities be required, these activities shall be conducted per the
applicable regulatory agency requirements, as directed by the El Segundo Fire Department.
HAZ-3 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization
experience must determine, based on the Current Conditions Report (CCR), RCRA Facility
Page 278 of 500
Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan), and sampling and analysis conducted in accordance with
the RFI Work Plan, whether subsurface release of hazardous materials/waste to the
soil/groundwater associated with the existing storage facilities has occurred. If subsurface release
of hazardous materials/waste to the soil/groundwater has occurred, the environmental
consultant must determine if contaminant concentrations exceed established regulatory
requirements and identify further site characterization and remedial activities, if necessary.
Should further site characterization/remedial activities be required, these activities must be
conducted per the applicable regulatory agency requirements.
HAZ-4 Before a Grading Permit is issued, an environmental consultant with Phase II/site characterization
experience must prepare a Worker Safety Plan to ensure construction worker safety during
grading/excavation activities, based on their review the following documents:
■ Current Conditions Report (CCR);
■ RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan (RFI Work Plan);
■ Findings of the RFI Work Plan's Sampling and Analysis; and
■ Existing Hazardous Materials Conditions Assessment.
HAZ-5 An environmental professional with Phase II/site characterization experience must conduct an
inspection of existing onsite structures before building renovation/demolition activities. The
inspection must determine whether or not testing is required to confirm the presence or absence
of hazardous substances in building materials (e.g., sinks, drains, piping, flooring, walls, ceiling
tiles). Should testing be required and results determine that hazardous substances are present in
onsite building materials, the Phase II/site characterization specialist must determine appropriate
prevention/remediation measures that are required and/or the methods for proper disposal of
hazardous waste at an approved landfill facility, if required.
HAZ-6 If during construction unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered by the contractor that
are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor must comply with the
following:
■ Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and
the public from the area;
■ Notify the Director of Public Works of the City of El Segundo;
■ Secure the area as directed by the Director of Public Works; and
■ Notify the El Segundo Fire Department (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of
Public Works). The Fire Department's Environmental Safety Manager can advise the responsible
party of further actions that must be taken, if required.
HAZ-7 Before any Building Permit is issued, vapor intrusion investigations must be conducted by a
qualified Environmental Professional, in consultation with the El Segundo Fire Department.
Should the Environmental Professional determine that proposed buildings could be impacted by
vapor intrusion, the Environmental Professional, in consultation with the El Segundo Fire
Department, must recommend that specific measures be incorporated into the buildings' design
Page 279 of 500
that would reduce these indoor air quality concentrations to below regulatory thresholds, as
directed by the El Segundo Fire Department.
HAZ-8 At least three business days before any lane closure, the construction contractor must notify the
El Segundo Fire Department, El Segundo Police Department, El Segundo Public Works
Department, and the El Segundo Planning and Building Safety Department of construction
activities that would impede movement (such as road or lane closures) along roadways
immediately adjacent to the development area, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access and
maintenance of evacuation routes.
HWQ-1 Before the City issues any grading permit, the Applicant must conduct a Construction Level
Hydrology and Hydraulics Study to determine potential storm water runoff rates and peak flows
from the Project site per County of Los Angeles methodology. The 50-year storm flows for both
existing and proposed Project conditions must be included in the study. The Study must be
completed by a qualified professional, approved by the Director of Public Works, and be
consistent with standard engineering practices for the region, including the use of the Los Angeles
County Manual. The Study must demonstrate the effect of storm water discharges to any City,
County, or other agency -owned drainage or flood control facility, as mitigated and be designed
and implemented to prevent an increase in the rate or amount of storm water runoff above the
baseline condition.
The Study must also determine whether onsite detention is required. If the final hydrology
calculations determine that onsite detention is required to avoid downstream impacts, the Study
must also identifythe necessary flood control mitigation, which may include a surface stormwater
detention pond, subsurface detention structure, or subsurface detention pipes. The construction
level hydrology calculations and Construction Level Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be
prepared and reviewed by the Director of Public Works and Building Official before any Grading
Permit is issued.
HWQ-2 Before the City issues any permit for development of an individual parcel, the Construction Level
Hydrology and Hydraulics Study must be updated and submitted to the Director of Public Works
for review. The phasing must be implemented to prevent an increase in the rate or amount of
storm water runoff above the baseline condition.
N-1 Before the City issues grading permits, the Project Applicant must demonstrate, to the satisfaction
of the Director of Public Works that the Project complies with the following:
■ All construction equipment must be equipped with mufflers and sound control devices (e.g.,
intake silencers and noise shrouds) no less effective than those provided on the original
equipment and no equipment shall have an un-muffled exhaust.
■ The contractor must maintain and tune-up all construction equipment to minimize noise
emissions.
■ Stationary equipment must be placed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance to the
sensitive receptors.
■ All equipment servicing must be performed so as to maintain the greatest possible distance to
the sensitive receptors.
Page 280 of 500
■ Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for project
construction are required to be hydraulically or electronically powered wherever possible to
avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools.
However, where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler must be used; this
muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the
tools themselves must be used where feasible, and this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA.
Quieter procedures must be used, such as drills rather than impact equipment, whenever
feasible.
■ A qualified "Noise Disturbance Coordinator" will be retained amongst the construction crew to
be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a
complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the City within 24 hours of the
complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early,
malfunctioning muffler, etc.) and implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as
deemed acceptable by the Director of Planning and Building Safety.
■ Select demolition methods to minimize vibration, where possible (e.g., sawing masonry into
sections rather than demolishing it by pavement breakers).
USS-1 Before the City issues a building permit, the Applicant's Engineering Representative must
coordinate with the Director of Public Works, or designee, to increase capacity of the City's High
Pressure Zone in the vicinity of the Project site. This will include, at a minimum, regional system
analysis of the City's Water System using the City's system -wide computer model with the goal of
reducing system velocities during peak demands adjacent to the Project site. The Director of
Public Works, or designee, will determine the system improvement options that are required.
Page 281 of 500
Appendix C
Trip Generation Assessment
Page 282 of 500
Kimley»>Horn
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, City of El Segundo
From: Rita Garcia
Date: November 9, 2021
Subject: Professional Sports Headquarters and Training Facility Project, Trip
Generation Assessment Peer Review
Kimley-Horn has conducted a follow-up third -party peer review of the Project's Trip Generation
Assessment (Fehr & Peers, October 2021) on behalf of the City of El Segundo to verify that
Kimley-Horn's September 15, 2021 third -party peer review Technical Memorandum (TM)
recommendations have been incorporated. The revised October 2021 Trip Generation
Assessment addressed the third -party peer review comments and thus is in compliance with
the TM recommendations. The analysis, as revised, meets the applicable provisions of CEQA
and the State CEQA Guidelines and is adequate for inclusion in the Project Addendum.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 714.786.6116 or Rita. GarciaCa)-kim ley-horn.com with
any questions.
Page 283 of 500
FEHR�PEERS
Memorandum
Date: October 28, 2021
To: Lionel Uhry, Senior Vice President, Mar Ventures, Inc
From: Anjum Bawa, AICP
Subject: Trip Generation Assessment — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan —
Southeast Quad
PT27-0060
This memorandum summarizes a trip generation assessment conducted to evaluate
construction of a corporate headquarters and a recreation facility on El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan Parcels 7 and 8. A separate trip generation assessment is also
provided for the construction of a warehouse building (Butler Building) on Parcel 18.
Provided below is a detailed summary of the proposed changes and results of our trip
generation assessment.
Background
The October 2015 update to the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSC-SP)
provided Raytheon the flexibility to either expand its existing operations or develop a
mixed -use project that would be compatible with the existing Raytheon Campus facilities
and operations. The roughly 142.28-acre specific plan area is allowed a maximum
development intensity of 3,718,889 net square feet. Figure 1 illustrates ESSC-SP land -use
plan, which identified the various parcels and designated land -use types. Figure 2 shows
a conceptual site plan of the approved development as part of the Specific Plan. Table 1
shows a summary of land -use type and maximum development allowable for each parcel.
600 Wilshire Boulevard I Suite 1050 1 Los Angeles, CA 90017 1 (213) 261-3050 1 Fax (310) 394-7663
www.fehrandpeers.com
Page 284 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 2of18
Figure 1 —Current El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Land Use Plan
• ,�� =-Ming�.
4 (MU 2.1
--= REC/(OS
17 0/IMU
13
1 0/Ih1U`
26 ±REC 0/IMU
1106 19
25 --23
1 REMS
22
11
OPPY
�i i o 20
7
w,
0/IMU
Corrxnoraal i OMico Mixed Use
CNtice / Industrial Mmed Use
0 RecrealoNOpen Space
Source: Exhibit 5, El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, Specific Plan No. 11-01, City of El
Segundo, October 2015
Page 285 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 3 of 18
Figure 2 — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Conceptual Site Plan
v'
26
25
.1 W..-I —
18
6
T � ncmtnaK«
1
Source: Exhibit 6 — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, Specific Plan No. 11-01, City of El
Segundo, October 2075
Page 286 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 4 of 18
Table 1 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Development by Parcel
110
Parcel Use Acreage Building ding Area (GroSS)2 Assumed FAR'
Comm erciallOffice Mixed Use (CMU)
2
Office
4.87
380,040
425,644.80
1.79
3
Office
2.57
191,540
214,524.80
1.71
4
Office
5.20
191,540
214,524.80
0.84
14
Commercial
4.01
50,000
56,000
0.29
15
Commercial
3.99
46,000
51,520
0.26
16
Commercial
3.36
37,000
41,440
0.25
Subtotal
24.00
896,120
1,003,654.4
0,86
Officellndustrial Mixed Use (Oil MU)
1
Office
10.02
191,540
214,524.8
0.44
5
Existing
7.17
67,465
82,412
0.22
6
Warehouse
Light Ind.
4.53
82,000
150,000
91,840
168,000
1.18
7
Office
4.75
163,840
183,500.8
0.79
8
Office
5.81
163,840
183,500.8
0.65
9
Office
1.68
160,840
180,140.8
2.20
10
Parking
structure
1.49
--
--
--
12
Existing
7.78
53,934
82,798
0.16
13
Office
2.71
121,820
136,438.4
1.03
17
Existing
22.32
996,871
1,121,048
1.03
18
Existing
18.36
670,619
783,689
0.84
Subtotal
86.62
2,822,769
3,227,892.E
0.75
TOTAL DEV
110.62
3,718,8894
4,231,547
0.77
19-26
RoadslOS
18.07
--
--
--
11
Recreation
7.54
El Segundo Blvd. New
Dedication
Road and Bike
Path
0.83
-
El Segundo Blvd. Existing
Dedication
Road
5.22
--
TOTAL
1 142.28
1
1
1 0.60
2 Gross building area of new construction is assumed to be 1.12% of net area. Twelve (12) percent of gross area is excluded, accounting for
elevators, stairwells, and other non occupied space.
3 FAR calculation yields a net building area.
Total allowable intensity would be capped at a potential maximum of 3,718,889 net square feet.
Source: Table 111-2 - Land Use - Project Development Scenario, El Segundo South Campus Specific
Plan, Specific Plan No. 7 7-0 7, City of El Segundo, October 2075
Page 287 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 5 of 18
The Specific Plan's Development Regulation allow for transfers between land use types
and planning areas, subject to the following requirements:
• The overall FAR of the Campus cannot exceed 0.60 based on the gross acreage of the
site, resulting in a maximum development intensity of 3,718,889 net square feet of
building area (4,231, 547 square feet gross building area);
• Land uses conform to allowable uses as outlined in the Permitted Use Table in the
Development Standards section of this Specific Plan; and
• The total number of traffic trips cannot exceed the trip ceiling established for the
Project. The trip ceiling for trip generation of new development within the Project area
is:
o 631 PM peak hour inbound trips and 2,489 PM peak hour outbound trips, for
a total of 3,120 PM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism
for the Project.
0 2,634 AM peak hour inbound trips and 408 outbound AM peak hour trips, for
a total of 3,042 AM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism
for the Project.
0 26,585 daily trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project.
Table 2 summarizes the trip ceiling for the proposed development as provided in the
approved ESSC-SP.
Table 2 — Ell Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Development Trip Ceiling
Total Daily Trips
Source: Table 111-3 - Project Trip Ceiling for trips associated with new development within the
ESSCSP area. El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, Specific Plan No. 11-01, City of El Segundo,
October 2075
Page 288 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 6 of 18
The subject of this analysis is the corporate headquarters and recreation facility proposed
on El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Parcels 7 and 8 considering the Specific Plan's
permitted 367,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA) of office use. Provided below is a
summary of the proposed use. To accommodate the proposed use, the ESSC-SP will also
be updated. The Project's proposed land use plan, conceptual plan, and summary of
development are provided in Appendix A.
Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility
The roughly 13.2-acre corporate headquarters is proposed to include a 3-story building
with a partial basement, approximately 148,050 square feet GFA including in-house fitness
facilities together with 5.8 acres of open, green space and 348 stall surface parking area.
The facility will span roughly 14-acre within Parcels 7 and 8 of the ESSC-SP.
Primary vehicular access to the Project site is proposed via a primary driveway located
along the southside of proposed Nash Street Extension. A secondary driveway access to
the site is proposed along the east edge of the site, also along southside of Nash Street
extension. Both driveways will provide bicycle and pedestrian access as well.
Typical hours of operation for the facility will be from 6:30 am to 5:30 pm, with selected
periods of the year extending into the evening. Provided below is a detailed trip
generation analysis for the proposed facility.
Trip Generation
ESSC-SP was approved for 3,718,889 net square feet of building area (4,231, 547 square
feet gross building area (GFA)) and a trip ceiling within the Project area as follows:
• 631 PM peak hour inbound trips and 2,489 PM peak hour outbound trips, for a total
of 3,120 PM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project.
• 2,634 AM peak hour inbound trips and 408 outbound AM peak hour trips, for a total
of 3,042 AM peak hour trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project.
• 26,585 daily trips as outlined in the trip budget mechanism for the Project.
Provided below is a detailed trip generation summary for both Phases 1 and Phase 2 — Full
Buildout of the Specific Plan.
Page 289 of 500
TABLE 3
EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN - PHASE 1 (NASH STREET EXCHANGE)
TRIP GENERATION
ITE Land
Trip Generation Rates [a]
Estimated Trip Generation
Daily
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Trip Rate
Daily
AM Peak Hour Trips
PM Peak Hour Trips
Land Use
Size
Use Code
Rate
Rate
% In % Out
Rate
% In
% Out
Unit
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
PROPOSED PROJECT
Medical Office
720
43.000 ksf
34.80
2.78
78% 22%
3.46
28%
72%
per ksf
1,496
94
26
120
42
107
149
Internal capture [b]
15%
15%
15%
(224)
(14)
(4)
(18)
(6)
(16)
(22)
Transit credit [c]
15%
15%
15%
(191)
(12)
(3)
(15)
(5)
(14)
(19)
Pass -by (d)
10%
10%
10%
(108)
M
u
a
M
L)
0 1
Net External Medical Office
3.81
48%
52%
973
61
17
78
28
69
97
Retail (open after 10 am)
820
12.100 ksf
37.75
0.00 62% 38%
per ksf
457
0 0 0
22 24
46
Internal capture [b]
5%
0%
5%
(23)
0
0
0
(1)
(1)
(2)
Transit credit [c]
5%
5%
5%
(22)
0
0
0
(1)
(1)
(2)
Pass -by [e]
0%
0%
34%
0
0
0
0
M
M
(14)
Net External Retail
412
0
0
0
13
15
28
Retail
820
13.025 ksf
37.75
0.94
62% 38%
3.81
48%
52%
per ksf
492
7
5
12
24
26
50
Internal capture [b]
5%
5%
5%
(25)
(1)
0
(1)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Transit credit [c]
5%
5%
5%
(23)
(1)
0
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
Pass -by [e]
0%
0%
34%
0
0
0
0
M
jet
Net External Retail
1
444
5
5
10
15
15
30
A. Total Project
Trips
1,829
66
22
88
56
99
155
B. Total trips approved for Phase I Development per Raytheon South Campus Specific Plan EIR (October, 2015) 3775 89 225
Net trips available after proposed Phase I development (8-A) 1,946 1 70
Notes:
a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017, unless otherwise noted.
b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occuring between land uses proposed or already operating within the site (Raytheon South Campus).
c. Trip generation adjustment discount associated with proximity to transit service for similar sites based on recommendations published by Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LAMTA) and ITE.
d. Informed by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation pass -by trip rate, derived from surveys published in the 'Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Recommended Practice," 2003.
e. Source: Appendix A - Table 2: Summary of Trip Generation Rates and Trip Credits within the Raytheon report for retail land use.
Page 290 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 8 of 18
Table 4 — El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Phase 2 (Full Buildout) Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour Trips
PM Peak Hour Trips
Daily
Land Use
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
136.438 tsf General Office
187
26
213
34
169
203
1,505
ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT)
0
0
0
0
-2
-2
-15
ITE Transit Service & Light Rail Trip Adjustment (5%) *
-9
-1
-10
-2
-8
-10
-75
Subtotal General Office
178
25
203
32
159
191
1,415
1,615.483 tsf General Office
2,213
307
2,520
404
2,003
2,407
17,819
ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT)
0
0
0
-4
-20
-24
-178
Subtotal General Office
2,213
307
2,520
400
1,983
2,383
17,641
73.577 tsf Warehouse
18
4
22
6
18
24
262
ITE Internal Trip Capture (1% PM, 1 % ADT)
0
0
0
0
0
0
-3
Subtotal Warehouse
18
4
22
6
18
24
259
168 tsf Light Industrial
136
18
154
20
143
163
1,171
ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT)
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
-12
Subtotal Light Industrial
136
18
154
20
142
162
1,159
148.96 tsf Retail'
89
54
143
265
287
552
6,361
ITE Internal Trip Capture (1 % PM, 1 % ADT)
0
0
0
-3
-3
-6
-64
ITE Pass -by Trip Reduction (34% PM)
0
0
0
-89
-97
-186
-186
Subtotal Retail
89
54
143
173
187
360
6,111
Proposed Project Trip Generation
2,634
1 408
1 3,042
631
2,489
13,120
26,585
Note: tsf = thousand square feet; 1 = includes 92.96 tsf of retail land use associated with Phase 1 project;
* = trip generation adjustment discount associated with proximity to transit service for similar sites based on
recommendations published by LOS Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LAMTA) and ITE.
Source: Table 72, Transportation Impact Study, El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report, 2075
The trip generation analysis shown in Tables 3 was obtained from June 2019 site plan
approval of proposed Phase 1 commercial development (also known as Nash Street
Exchange). Information presented in Table 4 was obtained from the ESSC-SP
Environmental Impact Report. The analyses were conducted using trip generation rates
provided in Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook (gch
Edition). Parcels 7 and 8 were determined to be located outside a convenient walking
distance to the Green Line light rail transit (LRT), therefore, a transit trip credit of 5% was
not applied to office use proposed for these two parcels.
Table 5 shows trip rates used to calculate trip generation for the proposed project.
Page 291 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 9 of 18
Table 5 — Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
ITE Land
Use Code
Trip Generation Rates [a]
Daily
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Trip Rate
Rate
Rate % In % Out
Rate % In % Out
Unit
General Office
710
11.03
1.56 88% 12%
1.49 17% 83%
per ksf
Notes:
a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition.
Table 6 summarizes trip generation estimates for general office use for Parcels 7 and 8 in
the ESSC-SP. As shown in Table 6, Parcels 7 and 8 were expected to generate a total of
4008 daily trips, of which 573 trips (504 inbound/69 outbound) would occur in the AM
peak hour and 542 trips (92 inbound/450 outbound) would occur in the PM peak hour.
Table 6 — Ell Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Trip Generation for Parcels 7 and 8 (As Approved in 2015)
ITE
Estimated Trip Generation [a]
Land Use
Land
e
Size
Daily
AM Peak Hour Trips
PM Peak Hour Trips
Code
Trips
In Out Total
In Out Total
Parcels 7 and 8
General Office
710
367.000 ksf
4,048
504 69 573
93 454 547
Internal capture
7 % PM/ 7 % ADT[b]
(40)
0 0 0
(1) (4) (5)
Total Trips Estimated for Parcels 7 and 8
4,008
504 69 573
92 450 542
Notes:
a. Source: Consistent with the 2015 El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, rates from Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition were used.
b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or already
operating within the site (El Segundo South Campus).
Page 292 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 10 of 18
Trip Generation — Proposed Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility
The proposed corporate headquarters would include a 148,050 square GFA corporate
office, including in-house fitness facilities. Considering the general nature of the proposed
use, we used the following approach to estimate daily, morning and afternoon peak hour
trips for the facility:
1. Estimate trips for the 148,050 square feet corporate office using trip rates provided
in ITE Trip Generation Handbook 9t" Edition.
2. A special group of approximately 85 staff personnel will arrive at the project site in
the morning between 6:30 AM and 8:00 AM and departing by 3:00 PM. These staff
members are not part of corporate office functions and will travel to/from the
project to use its fitness facilities and recreation area. Therefore, trips generated by
these 85 staff members were accounted for separately from the office use.
3. Add the estimates from 1 and 2 to calculate total trips generated by the proposed
facility.
To be consistent with the 2015 ESSC-SP, we used trip generation rates for general office
provided in ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9t" Edition. All 85 early arriving/early departing
staff members were assumed to travel to/from the facility in single occupancy vehicles
(SOVs). Although majority of the early arriving/early departing staff would likely arrive at
the facility between 6:30 AM and 8:00 AM and leave by 3:00 PM; for the purpose of this
analysis, it is assumed that 40% will arrive during the morning peak commute hour' and
10% will depart the facility during the afternoon peak hour of commute.
Table 7 summarize total trips estimated to occur from the proposed corporate
headquarters and recreation facility.
' Peak hour of commute is the one hour within the morning and evening commuter peak periods when the
traffic on the adjacent street is the highest on a weekday. Morning and evening peak commuting periods
are 7:00 AM — 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM — 6:00 PM, respectively. Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook,
Appendix A — Glossary
Page 293 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 11 of 18
Table 7 — Trip Generation Estimates
Proposed Corporate Headquarters and Recreation Facility on Parcels 7 and 8
ITE
Estimated Trip Generation [a]
Daily
AM Peak Hour Trips
PM Peak Hour
Trips
Land
Land Use
e
Size
Code
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Corporate
Headquarters and
Recreation Facility
710
148.050 ksf
1,633
203
28
231
38
183
221
Internal capture
(1 % PM/ 1 %
(16)
0
0
0
0
(2)
(2)
ADT) [b]
Subtotal
7,677
203
28
237
38
181
279
Special staff [c] 85 emp
170
34
0
34
0
9
9
Total Trips from Corporate Headquarters
and Recreation Facility
1,787
237
28
265
38
190
228
Total Trips Approved for Parcels 7 and 8 in
2075 El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
4,008
504
69
573
92
450
542
Un-used Trips Available for Transfer
2,221
267
41
308
54
260
314
to Other Parcels
Notes:
a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition.
b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or already operating
within the site (Raytheon South Campus).
c. All employees were assumed to travel in single occupancy vehicles. To be conservative 40% of the employees were
assumed to travel during the AM peak hour and 10% in the PM peak hour.
Butler Building
A 5,865-sf warehouse is proposed on Parcel 18 of the ESSC-SP. Site plan for the proposed
building is provided in Appendix B.
Trip Generation — Butler Building
The proposed Butler building would involve construction of a 5,865 square GBA of
warehousing use. To be consistent with the 2015 ESSC-SP, we used trip generation rates
for a warehouse use (ITE 150) provided in ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition.
Table 8 summarize total trips estimated to occur from the proposed warehouse use.
Page 294 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021 Page 12 of 18 bpi
Table 8 — Trip Generation Estimates
Proposed Butler Building (Warehouse) on Parcel 18
ITE
Estimated Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Land
Land Use
Use
Size
Daily
Trips
Trips
Trips
In Out Total
In Out Total
Code
Parcel 18
Warehouse
150
5.865 ksf
21
2 0 2
1 1 2
7% Internal capture [b]
0
0 0 0
0 (0) (0)
Total Trips Estimated for Parcel 6
21
2 0 2
1 1 2 11
Notes:
a. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition.
Trip generation rates for warehouse land use (ITE 150):
Daily average rate= 3.56 per 1,000 sf; 50% inbound/50% outbound
AM Peak Hour average rate = 0.30 per 1,000 sf; 79% inbound/21 % outbound
PM Peak Hour average rate = 0.32 per 1,000 sf; 25% inbound/75% outbound
b. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips occurring between land uses proposed or
already operating within the site (Raytheon South Campus).
Findings and Conclusion
As shown in Table 5, the proposed corporate headquarters and recreation facility will
generate a total of 1,787 daily trips, of which 265 trips (237 inbound/28 outbound) would
occur in the AM peak hour and 228 trips (38 inbound/190 outbound) would occur in the
PM peak hour. When compared to the trips anticipated for Parcels 7 and 8 in the approved
ESSC-SP (Table 4), the proposed training facility will generate 2,221 fewer daily trips, 308
fewer AM peak hour trips, and 314 fewer PM peak hour trips. Since, the 2015 ESSC-SP
allowed for maximum flexibility within the Specific Plan area, with mechanisms in the
Specific Plan's Development Regulation to allow for transfers between land use types and
planning areas, these un-used trips can be transferred towards future development of
other parcels within the ESSC-SP.
The proposed Butler building, a warehouse use, will generate a total of 21 daily trips, of
which 2 trips (2 inbound/0 outbound) would occur in the AM peak hour and 2 trips (1
inbound/1 outbound) would occur in the PM peak hour. Table 9 provides a summary of
total trips added by the corporate headquarter/recreation facility and Butler Building
together.
Page 295 of 500
Lionel Uhry
October 28, 2021
Page 13 of 18
Table 9 — Summary of Total Net New Trip Generation
Net New Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Proposed Use
Parcel #
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Corporate
Headquarters and
Recreation Facility
Parcels 7
and 8
1,787
237
28
265
38
190
228
Butler Building
Parcel 18
21
2
0
2
1
1
2
Total Net New Trips
1,808
239
28
267
39
191
230
Page 296 of 500
Appendix
- Appendix A-1 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Land Use Plan
- Appendix A-2 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
- Appendix A-3 - El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan — Proposed Development by Parcel
- Appendix B — Butler Building Proposed Site Plan
Page 297 of 500
Appendix A-1
El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Land Use Plan
CMU
�, Nbkkl CMU
NN
O/IMU
- Commercial / Office Mixed Use
- Office / Idustrial Mixed Use
- Recreation / Open Space
Source: Mar Ventures, Inc.
REC/OS
Page 298 of 500
Appendix A-2
El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
Source: Mar Ventures, Inc.
Page 299 of 500
Appendix A-3
El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan - Proposed Development by Parcel
d�MAcreageParcel
illimb (Net) (Gross) 2 FAR 3
Commercial Office Mixed Use (CMU)
2
Office
4.85
380,040
425,645
1.80
3
Office
2.57
191,540
214,525
1.71
4
Office
5.20
191,540
214,525
0.85
14
Commercial
3.93
50,000
56,000
0.29
15
Commercial
3.99
46,000
51,520
0.26
16
Commercial
3.35
37,000
41,440
0.25
Subtotal
23.90
896,120
1,003,654
0.86
Office/Industrial Mixed Use
1
Office
10.01
191,540
214,525
0.44
5
Existing
7.17
228,305
262,553
0.73
6
Warehouse Light
Ind.
4.57
82,000
150,000
91,840
168,000
1.17
7
Office
5.71
163,840
183,500.8
0.66
8
Office
8.07
163,840
183,500.8
0.47
12
Existing
7.78
53,934
82,798
0.16
13
Office
2.71
121,820
136,438.4
1.03
17
Existing
22.32
996,871
1,121,048
1.03
18
Existing
18.41
670,619
783,689
0.84
Subtotal
86.74
2,822,769
3,227,892.6
0.75
TOTAL DEV
110.65
3,718,889
4,231,547
0.77
19-26
Roads/OS
18.24
-
-
-
9-11
Recreation
7.34
0
0
-
El Segundo Blvd.
New Dedication
Road and Bike
Path
0.83
-
-
El Segundo Blvd.
Existing
Dedication
Road
5.22
-
-
-
TOTAL
142.28
-
-
0.60
Source: Mar Ventures, Inc.
Page 300 of 500
Appendix B
Butler Building Proposed Site Plan
.®
uaornw�� a cos \ 6�9 Ial E . x Ntl1d 3LS , Q
`\�\6_/� - i = 3DVXJVd M3N3tl NVId 311E 9 I1
I �
I
I �
I
I
I �
i
I -
I
I a
O I k
� I _
w � �
w
¢ qq
� o
z �
F
rn
� z l
I� F
a
w so w m
I
U U I 6S (l
C7z
~x1< �zZ
xh
W K U I W U =
I w
I „zloz
a w O
awm
0
o ( I Z80O
I ~X o_
U W I W 0
O I a Z
LLl I
I ; I
I ;
I
C7zZ _ 0 c7
L'11 .--
Page 301 of 500
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 21-02 FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ONE-STORY STORAGE BUILDING ON
THE RAYTHEON CAMPUS AT 2000 EAST EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD
WITHIN THE EL SEGUNDO SOUTHEAST CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN
AREA (LOT 18 AND TRACT MAP 71551).
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds:
A. On October 4, 2021, Raytheon Corporation, filed an application for Site Plan
Review 21-02 construction of a new storage building (Butler building) totaling 5,865
gross square feet (5,237 net square feet) at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard
("Project").
B. The application was reviewed by the City's Development Services Department for,
in part, consistency with the General Plan, and conformity with the El Segundo
Municipal Code ("ESMC") and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
("ESSCSP").
C. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the
California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.,
"CEQA"), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations
§§15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines").
D. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the proposed Site
Plan Review No. 21-02.
E. The Planning Commission considered the information provided by City staff, public
testimony, and the applicant, and adopted its Resolution No. 2904 recommending
City Council approval of Site Plan Review No. 21-02.
SECTION 2. Factual Findings and Conclusions. The City Council finds and
concludes:
A. The subject site is located in Phase IV of the El Segundo South Campus Specific
Plan at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard.
B. Phase IV of the El Segundo Campus Specific Plan is in the Office/Industrial Mixed
Use (0/1 MU) land use designation which allows for new light industrial uses
consistent with the existing Raytheon Campus facility and specifically within lot 18
where the primary buildings are located.
C. The proposed storage building would be a one-story, 21'-2" tall, butler building
totaling 5,875 gross square feet (5,237 net square feet) and would be located in the
Page 302 of 500
southeast portion of the Raytheon Campus (Lot 18) and would be ancillary to the
primary buildings.
D. With regard to the City's General Plan and ESSCSP, considering all of its aspects,
the proposed Project will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the General
Plan and ESSCSP and not obstruct their attainment. Specifically:
1. The ESSCSP was adopted in 2015 and amended the General Plan to create
consistent land use designations and therefore was found to be consistent with
the City's General Plan.
2. The ESSCSP serves as the regulatory document to implement the General
Plan for this area of the city, by ensuring that all new developments in the area
are consistent and in compliance with the standards set forth in the Specific
Plan.
3. The Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use of the ESSCSP allows for
new light industrial and storage uses consistent with the existing Raytheon
Campus facility.
4. Objective LU5-6 of the ESSCSP seeks to encourage a mix of office and light
industrial uses in industrial areas. For this proposed storage building, a new
storage building helps to attain this goal by creating a new, clean, and
organized area of lot 18 in furtherance of the Raytheon Campus. Furthermore,
the newly proposed storage building will meet the design standards of the
ESSCSP.
E. With regard to Site Plan Review Findings Under ESMC § 15-30, The City Council
finds:
1. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies and
objectives of the El Segundo General Plan, the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan, and the Zoning Code.
a. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo General Plan as identified
above.
b. The proposed development will be located within the Office/Industrial
Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use of the ESSCSP which allows for new light
industrial and storage uses consistent with the existing Raytheon Campus
facility.
c. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Objective LU 5-6 to encourage a mix of office and light industrial uses in
industrial areas. The construction of a new 5,865 storage building would
further this Objective and would further enhance the area with development
that is compliant with the established ESSCSP design guidelines.
E
Page 303 of 500
d. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo Zoning Code in that a full
review of the project has been completed and the project has been found
to be compliant with all relevant property development standards, including
but not limited to, height, setbacks, parking, and floor area.
2. The proposed Project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is
located since it will be ancillary to the primary structures as part of the
Raytheon Campus. Specifically, the design, layout, and use of the proposed
building will be compatible with the industrial use and appearance of the
Project site that includes large, low scale buildings in a campus setting, along
with surface parking spaces, truck loading area and travel lanes, and other
ancillary structures for storage and warehousing. Furthermore, the location
and site layout of the proposed storage building will not impact or interrupt the
way existing uses on the subject site operate.
3. The proposed Project will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City
as evidenced by an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") Addendum that was
prepared and has determined that the proposed project would not have any
new or detrimental impacts than previously identified in the original EIR. There
will not be any new environmental impacts due to the construction of the
proposed storage building and, therefore, there will not be any adverse effects
on the general welfare of the city. Furthermore, and as discussed above, the
proposed project is also consistent with the El Segundo General Plan and the
El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan.
F. With regard to Site Plan Review Criteria Under Section VII.D.4 of the ESSCSP, The
City Council finds that the Project's site plan, architecture, and landscape design
are consistent with the Specific Plan because the site plan has been evaluated for
compliance with the ESSCSP and specifically for compliance with the zoning for
the site, including design guidelines and development standards. These guidelines
and standards are intended to achieve a high quality development, with criteria for
site design, architecture, orientation and massing, parking and loading,
landscaping, lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The proposed storage building
has been evaluated in the context of the standards from the ESSPSP and have
been determined to be compliant and therefore the project is consistent with these
guidelines and standards.
SECTION 3. Environmental Review. Concurrent with its review of this Resolution,
the City Council will consider adoption of an Addendum to the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report prepared to analyze the environmental effects
of the proposed Project. The factual findings and conclusions set forth in such Resolution
are incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 4. Approval. The City Council hereby approves Site Plan Review No. 21-
02 subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
SECTION 5. Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and
determination in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence,
3
Page 304 of 500
both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings
and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City
Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in
the record as a whole.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will
not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the
provisions of this Resolution are severable.
SECTION 7. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with
electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic
signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 8. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby
authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council
of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to
attest thereto.
SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately upon the
effective date of Ordinance No. _ approving an amendment to associated Project's
Development Agreement, and the Ordinance's adoption and effectiveness are conditions
precedent to this Resolution taking effect. Thereafter, this Resolution will remain effective
unless repealed or superseded.
SECTION 10. City Clerk Direction. The City Clerk will certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make
a record of this action in the meeting's minutes.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 12021.
Drew Boyles, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO 1
I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed
by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was so passed
2
Page 305 of 500
and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
/_1»00]Tki21o7_u2to] go] VJA
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
5
Page 306 of 500
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC), the
Raytheon Corporation ("Applicant" or "Owner") agrees to comply with the following provisions
as conditions for the City of El Segundo's approval of Site Plan Review No. 21-02 ("Project
Conditions"):
Zoning Conditions
1. This approval is for the project as shown on the plans approved by the Planning
Commission on November 18, 2021 and approved by City Council on and
on file with the Development Services Department.
2. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit for the project, the applicant must
submit plans, showing that the project substantially complies with the plans and
conditions of approval on file with the Development Services Department. The
Development Services Director is authorized to approve minor modifications to the
approved plans or any of the conditions if such modifications achieve substantially the
same results as would strict compliance with said plans and conditions. Any
subsequent modification must be referred to the Development Services Director for a
determination regarding the need for Planning Commission and/or City Council review
and approval of the proposed modification.
3. This approval allows for construction a storage building facility on Lot 18 (Phase IV
Specific Plan area). Specifically, the approved construction includes the following:
a) a one-story building totaling approximately 5,865 gross square feet and
5,237 square feet of net floor area
A change in use(s) or change(s) in the allocation of square footages specified above
must be referred to the Development Services Director for a determination regarding the
need for Planning Commission and/or City Council review and approval of the proposed
changes.
4. All lighting must comply with the ESSCSP Master Lighting Plan, including:
• All light fixtures and supporting poles throughout the facility shall be
architecturally compatible with the architecture of the building.
• Wall -mounted lighting, including security lighting, shall be compatible with
the architecture of the building.
5. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit a
photometric lighting plan that illustrates spill light at the project boundary shall not
exceed 8 foot-candles. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Development
Services Department. Exterior building and parking lot lights shall be provided with
decorative lighting fixtures. Exterior lighting for the project shall be designed to be
confined to within the project site. Light shields shall be used to block light and reduce
spill over light and glare as necessary. Prior to the final inspection and issuance of a
Page 307 of 500
certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall schedule an evening inspection with the
Planning Division to verify compliance with this requirement, and to ensure that lighting
is appropriately shielded to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
6. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, the proposed chain link fence
associated with the new storage building shall either be removed from the project plans
if it is determined that the fence is not required during the plan check process or a
landscape plan shall be prepared to Development Services Director's satisfaction to
screen and soften the appearance of the fencing.
7. All landscaping must be in substantial conformance to the ESSCSP Master Landscape
Plan. Tree must be of a species that provides for large canopy and shade. The use of
palm trees shall not be permitted.
8. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit or as otherwise
appropriate, a matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the City, as applicable, for
review and compliance with:
• The ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised
on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance
1589).
• All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of
Development Agreement 11-02 as amended.
9. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the project shall demonstrate compliance with all
applicable mitigation measures in the MMRP for the ESSC-SP EIR and project COA.
A final mitigation and COA monitoring matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the
City.
• the ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised
on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance
1589).
• All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of
Development Agreement 11-02 as amended.
10. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be architecturally screened in accordance with
ESMC Section 15-2-8(C). Prior to permit final, the equipment shall be adequately
screened to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
General Conditions
11. Prior to issuance of a building permit of the Raytheon storage building, the applicant
shall enter into an agreement with the City committing to effectuate either Section 9.2
7
Page 308 of 500
or Section 9.3 of Development Agreement No. 4972A regarding the recreation/open
space area.
12. The project is subject to the Public Art or In -Lieu Fee Requirement (Cultural
Development Program) established by City Council Ordinance 1594, which requires
placement of public art on -site or payment of in -lieu fees to the Cultural Development
Fund. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an application
to the Community Services Department and shall either: a) enter into an agreement
with the City of El Segundo to provide public art onsite; or, b) in -lieu of commissioning
public art onsite, pay a fee equal to 1 % of the project cost to the City's Cultural
Development Fund.
13. A positive balance shall be maintained in all project Reimbursement Accounts at all
times. If the balance of the Reimbursement Account(s) associated with the project
becomes negative at any time, all work on the project shall be suspended, including
the issuance of permits and project inspections, until such time as the sufficient funds
are deposited to return the account(s) to a positive balance.
14. A weatherproof notice/sign to report dust, noise, or other construction -related impacts
shall be posted and prominently displayed on the construction fencing clearly visible to
the public from along the abutting street(s). The notice/sign shall set forth the name of
the person(s) responsible for the construction site and a phone number(s) to be called
in the event that a construction -related impact occurs.
15. Landscaping must conform to the City's Water Conservation in Landscaping
requirements as set forth in ESMC Chapter 15.
16. All utility lines installed to serve the new construction shall be placed underground.
17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of any existing utility resulting from
the development.
18. Pedestrian walkways within the project must include admixture colored concrete and/or
design that enhance and complement the project.
19. The project site shall be fenced and screened during construction.
20. All areas within the project site shall be maintained free of trash and debris.
21. Erosion control devices shall be installed at all perimeter openings and slopes. No
sediment shall leave the job site. All newly graded surfaces not immediately involved
in construction shall have some method of erosion protection, i.e., mulching, fiber fabric,
planting, or tackifier.
22. Water spraying or other approved methods shall be used during grading operations to
control fugitive dust. Recycled water shall be used for grading operations whenever
available.
Page 309 of 500
23. The owner or contractor must conduct daily street sweeping along the streets abutting
the project site(s).
24. In the event that a Planning, Building, Public Works, Fire Department or Police
Department requirement are in conflict, the stricter standard shall apply.
Impact Fee Conditions
25. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time fire services mitigation fee. The fee
amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
26. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time police services mitigation fee. The fee
amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
27. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time park services mitigation fee. The fee
amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
28. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time traffic mitigation fee. The fee amount
must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
Building Safety Conditions
29. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the California
Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California
Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building Standards
Code in effect at the time of the plan submittal to Building and Safety Division for plan
review.
30. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the 2019 editions of
the California Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code,
California Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building
Standards Code.
31. Construction projects must comply with Best Management Practices for construction
and storm -water runoff requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System MS4 Permit. Construction activity resulting in a land disturbance of one acre or
more, or less than one acre but part of a larger common plan of development or sale
must obtain the (SWPPP) Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit.
32. A site -specific soils and geotechnical report must be submitted to Building and Safety
Division for review and approval. The report shall comply with the minimum
E
Page 310 of 500
requirements of Chapter 18 of the CBC and shall address the possible sulfate content
of the soils.
33. A stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required to certify the
location of the new construction in relation to the setbacks prior to the first foundation
inspection and stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required
to certify the height of the structures prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
34. The applicant shall obtain a building, grading, mechanical, plumbing, electrical,
demolition permit for the project.
35. Plans submitted for plan check must be stamped by a State -licensed architect or
engineer and shall include:
a) Complete structural calculations, details, notes and material specifications.
b) Complete Accessibility Plan with a statement from a California Certified Access
Specialist (CASp) indicating that a plan review has been performed and that it
complies with the requirements of Chapter 11A &11 B of the CBC.
c) A stamped and signed Boundary and Topographic survey by a California licensed
Land Surveyor.
d) A complete grading and drainage plan showing compliance with the Los Angeles
Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) Low Impact Development (LID)
requirement. The Los Angeles County LID Manual may be used as a guideline for
preparing the LID report.
e) Hydrology report along with hydraulic calculations.
f) Complete energy calculations, details, notes, and material specifications.
36. Applicant shall submit a site -wide New Address Issuance request to the Building
Division. Approved building addresses to be shown on the submitted plans.
37. Applicant shall pay all development fees, including school district developer fees, prior
to issuance of building permits.
Fire Department Conditions
38. Before the City issues a building permit, the applicant must provide Fire Life Safety
Plans to the Fire Department for review and approval, which include, without limitation,
the following:
a) Fire lanes;
b) Fire lane signage;
c) Fire lane access;
d) Fire hydrant locations;
10
Page 311 of 500
e) Minimum acceptable flow from any fire hydrant must be 2,000 gallon per minute at
20 psi;
f) Fire safety precautions during demolition and construction;
g) Emergency site access during construction;
h) Permanent fire department access;
39. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided, installed in accordance with
CFC 903 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 13.
40. A fire alarm system shall be provided, installed in accordance with CFC 907 and the
currently adopted edition of NFPA 72.
41. An on -site private hydrant shall be provided within 600 feet of the structure. Private
fire hydrants must be installed and maintained in accordance with El Segundo Fire
Department Regulation " Fire Hydrant and Private Fire Main System Installation".
42. Applicant shall submit a Hazardous Materials Management Plan prior to occupancy.
43. A knox boxes shall be provided for one of the man gates.
44. The applicant must develop and submit an Evacuation Plan and Procedures for review
and approval by the Fire Department. Before the City issues each Certificate of
Occupancy, the applicant must provide evidence to the Fire Department that the
approved Evacuation Plan and Procedures were implemented.
Police Department Conditions
45. The applicant shall comply with the requirements contained in Municipal Code Chapter
13.20, Security Code.
Landscaping
46. All landscaping shall be low profile around perimeter fencing, windows, doors and
entryways taking special care not to limit visibility or provide climbing access. Floral or
grass ground cover is recommended. Bushes shall be trimmed to 2 to 3 feet high and
away from buildings. Dense bushes shall not be clumped together; this provides a
hiding place for criminal activity. Trees shall be trimmed up to 7 feet.
47. Trees/bushes/shrubs shall not be planted next to or near any light
fixture/standard/bollard. When grown to maturity this landscaping will block the light and
reduce lighting on the ground surface.
48. Trees with high canopies are preferred when planted near light standards.
11
Page 312 of 500
Lighting
49. All parking lots shall be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1.25 footcandles of
light on the ground surface during hours of darkness.
50. All exterior pedestrian walkways, interior common corridors, and open parking lots shall
be illuminated with a minimum maintained one foot-candle of light on the walking,
parking or driving surface during the hours of operation and one hour thereafter. The
addressing, all exterior entry doors, walkways, bicycle racks and trash dumpsters shall
be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1 footcandle of light on the ground surface
during hours of darkness.
51. A site plan shall be provided, showing buildings, parking area, walkways, detailed
landscaping, fixture schedule, mounting height, lighting ratio and a point -by -point
photometric calculation of the required light levels. Foot-candles shall be measured at
grade on a horizontal plane and conform to a uniformity ratio of six to one (6:1)
average/minimum. Landscaping shall not be planted to obscure required light levels
with light fixtures exceeding eight -feet (8') in height installed at least two -feet (2') from
a tree's canopy at 70 percent maturity. A photometric study, which includes all of the
above, shall also be provided prior to issuing of a Building Permit. A site plan shall be
provided showing buildings, parking areas, walkways, and the point -by -point
photometric calculation of the required light levels. Footcandles shall be measured on
a horizontal plane and conform to a uniformity ratio of 4:1 average/minimum.
Doors/Hardware
52. Entry and Mechanical/Electrical/Fire doors shall comply with El Segundo Police
Department Approved Security Hardware list.
Security Plan
53. A security plan shall be submitted, if the Police Department deems it necessary, due
to the type of business, hours of operation, location, and propensity to crime.
Public Works Conditions
"City Engineer" = City Engineer or his/her designee throughout this document.
General
54. The applicant calculated a fair share percentage of .06% contribution towards each
traffic improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR MM TRA-1 through 9 improvements
based on the methodology provided in the First Amendment of the DA No. 11-02
Section 7.9, "...the `Fair Share' is determined by dividing the number of PM peak hour
trips produced by the individual development seeking a Certificate of Occupancy by
the total Project PM peak hour trips Ceiling as noted in City Council Ordinance No.
1516, Exhibit D `Conditions of Approval' (3,120)." The applicant shall continue to work
12
Page 313 of 500
with the City to determine the total construction value of the TRA-1 through 9
improvements that permit "fair share" contributions as opposed to actual construction,
as submitted by a State licensed Civil Engineer and accepted and approved by the City
Engineer.
55. The applicant shall submit a .06% fair share contribution towards each traffic
improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR to the City prior to issuance of Certificate
of Occupancy.
56. All work in the City's right-of-way or on City -owned and maintained facilities shall
require review and approval of the City Engineer or his/her designee. "City Engineer"
= City Engineer or his/her designee throughout this document.
57. The applicant shall ensure that encroachment permits are secured from the Public
Works Department/Engineering Division before commencing any and all work in the
City's public right-of-way (ROW), including lane closures.
58. Construction inspection shall be coordinated with the Public Works Inspector and no
construction shall deviate from the approved plans without approval of the City
Engineer. If plan deviations are necessary, the applicant shall provide a revised plan
or details of the proposed change for review and approval of the City Engineer prior to
construction.
59. Prior to issuing of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure installation
of all improvements required by the Public Works Department are inspected and
approved by the City Engineer.
60. All construction -related parking shall be accommodated on -site or on other private
property. No construction related parking shall be permitted off -site in the public right-
of-way.
61. A grading and drainage plan shall be provided and stamped by a California (CA) State -
licensed civil engineer as part of the Building Permit process.
62. A utility plan shall be provided that shows all existing and proposed utility lines and
their sizes (sewer, water, gas, storm drain, electrical, etc.), including easements, within
200 feet of the project site boundary.
63. All record drawings (PDF and CAD format) and supporting documentation shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division prior to scheduling the project's
final inspection.
64. Haul trucks are to use PCH north to Imperial Highway and PCH south to El Segundo
Boulevard. All three of these streets are currently designated as truck routes in the
City.
13
Page 314 of 500
Street Improvements & Traffic Control
65. The applicant must build the Nash Street roadway extension and associated public
improvements in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement. The
design and construction of the Nash Street roadway extension is subject to review and
approval by the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and Building Safety.
66. The applicant must construct Class II bicycle lanes in the Nash Street Extension in
accordance with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and Section 7.5 of the
Development Agreement.
67. The applicant is required to obtain any necessary approvals from the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) for any work that involves
encroachment onto Metro easement areas or right-of-ways. These approvals may
include, without limitation, pedestrian, bicycle and roadway easements and temporary
right -of -entry agreements.
68. All new sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps shall be
constructed per the latest Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC)
"Greenbook" and City standards. New sidewalk to be a minimum of 5' wide.
69. All existing sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps that are
broken or not in conformance with the latest SPPWC or City standards shall be removed
and constructed per the latest SPPWC and City standards.
70. Any obstruction located within existing curb ramps shall be relocated.
71. All unused driveways shall be removed and replaced with full -height curb, gutter and
sidewalk per SPPWC standards and City standards.
72. The applicant shall provide a minimum 4' sidewalk clearance around any obstruction in
the sidewalk i.e. posts, power poles, etc.
73. PG-64-10 tack coat and hot mix asphalt shall be used for all slot paving required next
to new concrete installations. Slot paving shall be 3 feet wide and 1 foot deep, consisting
of 6 inches of asphalt over 6 inches of base.
74. The applicant shall provide street signing and striping plans for the new development.
All striping in the public ROW shall consist of thermoplastic paint per the latest CA
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
75. The applicant shall provide traffic control plans for all work requiring a lane closure.
76. The work scheduled in the public right-of-way on major arterial streets shall be Monday
through Friday from gam to 3pm, except holidays. Work scheduled on all other street
classifications shall be Monday through Friday from 7am to 4pm. Contractor shall obtain
14
Page 315 of 500
prior approval from the City Engineer for performing weekend work, night work, or work
on a holiday.
77. During construction, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide safe
pedestrian traffic control around the site. A pedestrian protection plan shall be submitted
to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the City Engineer. This may
include but not be limited to signs, flashing lights, barricades and flag persons.
78. Once the ROW improvements are accepted by the City Engineer, they are not to be
used for staging building construction activities, including but not limited to, storage of
construction materials and equipment. The street and sidewalks shall be kept free of
construction debris, mud and other obstacles and shall remain open to traffic at all times.
The applicant shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repair to any damage to
improvements caused by its use, or its Contractors' and Subcontractors' use, of the
improvements after acceptance by the City Engineer.
79. The applicant shall submit any new traffic signal plans to the City Public Works
Department and LA County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) for review and
approval. The applicant will coordinate all inspections with the LACDPW inspector for
acceptance of the traffic signal poles and related equipment. The applicant will inform
the City of any updates during this process.
80. The applicant must comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Final
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project. All mitigation measures and
conditions of approval must be listed on the plans submitted for plan check and the
plans for which a building permit is issued.
Water
81. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing City owned water
main lines. The applicant must submit a water study to determine if there is a capacity
deficiency in the affected water main lines and if so, water main upgrades will be
required. The water study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
82. Any existing water meters, potable water service connections, fire backflow devices and
potable water backflow devices must be upgraded to current City Water Division
standards. Backflow devices shall be placed or relocated onto private property.
83. City water mains cannot be located on private property. The applicant must provide a
main meter in the public right-of-way.
84. The applicant must submit plans for water system upgrades to the City of El Segundo
Public Works Department for review and approval.
85. Any unused water laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the City main.
The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide traffic control
plans and shoring plans.
15
Page 316 of 500
Sewer
86. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing sewer main lines.
The applicant must submit a sewer study to determine if there is a capacity deficiency
in the affected sewer main lines and if so, sewer upgrades will be required. The sewer
study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
87. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, proof of payment of the sewer
connection fee to the Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) must be provided
to the City Engineer. LACSD can be reached at (310) 638-1161.
88. Any unused sanitary sewer laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the City
main. The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide traffic
control plans and shoring plans.
89. The applicant must contact the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
Industrial Waste Section and receive a determination as to the necessity of a permit for
industrial waste discharge before City approval of a Site Plan Review for any project
within the ESSCSP.
Storm Drain
90. Provide a Low Impact Development Study (LID) signed and stamped by a registered
Civil Engineer. Make sure to comply with the project design requirements to retain on
site (infiltrate or store for use) volume of runoff from 3/4 inch storm or the 85t" percentile
24-hour storm, whichever is greater (SWQDv).
91. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to size appropriate storm drain
facilities to control on -site drainage and mitigate off -site impacts. Refer to the most
recent Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual. Instructions and the manual are
available at the County website at http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wrd/Publication/index.cfm.
Calculations shall be signed by a registered civil engineer.
92. The project shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) requirements and shall provide Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
sediment control, construction material control and erosion control.
Landscaping & Irrigation
93. Irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and
approval. All irrigation meters and mechanical equipment shall meet the City Water
Division standards.
94. All public landscape improvements shall be designed to City standards and approved
by the Parks & Recreation Department.
16
Page 317 of 500
95. The property owner shall maintain all landscaping and irrigation in the public ROW
fronting the property.
96. The applicant shall coordinate any tree removals in the public right-of-way with the
Parks & Recreation Department prior to the start of construction.
97. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a landscaping and lighting
assessment district for the Nash Street Extension in accordance with Section 7.1.6 of
the Development Agreement.
98. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a landscaping and lighting
assessment district for the Continental Boulevard Extension in accordance with Section
7.2.5 of the Development Agreement if a dedication of the Continental Boulevard
roadway extension and associated improvements is accepted by the City.
Miscellaneous Conditions
99. Approval of this permit shall not be construed as a waiver of applicable and appropriate
zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County and/or City laws and regulations.
Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other requirements of the ESMC shall apply.
100. Failure to comply with and adhere to all of these conditions of approval may be cause
to revoke the approval of the project by the Planning Commission, or City Council,
pursuant to the provisions of the ESMC.
101. In the event that any of these conditions conflict with the recommendations and/or
requirements of another permitting agency or City Department, the stricter standard
shall apply.
102. The applicant and its successors in interest shall indemnify, protect, defend (with legal
counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and hold harmless, the City, and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees,
and agents from and against any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action,
proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs, and expenses of whatever
nature, including reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims")
arising out of or in any way relating this project, any discretionary approvals granted by
the City related to the development of the project, or the environmental review
conducted under California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section
21000 et seq., for the project. If the City Attorney is required to enforce any conditions
of approval, all costs, including attorney's fees, shall be paid for by the applicant. The
Applicant agrees to defend the City (at the City's request and with counsel satisfactory
to the City) and will indemnify the City for any judgment rendered against it or any sums
paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this section "the City" includes the
City of El Segundo's elected officials, appointed officials, officers, and employees.
17
Page 318 of 500
By signing this document, , on behalf of Raytheon Corporation,
certifies that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to the Project Conditions listed in
this document.
Name, Title
(Raytheon Corporation)
{If Corporation or similar entity, needs two officer signatures or evidence that one
signature binds the company)
Page 319 of 500
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING (1) A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 83507,(2) A MINOR MOIDIFCATION TO THE EL SEGUNDO SOUTH
CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN (NO. 11-01), AND (3) SITE PLAN REVIEW
NO. 21-01 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW PROFESSIONAL SPORTS
HEADQUARTERS AND TRAINING FACILITY WITHIN THE SOUTH
CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds:
A. On October 4, 2021, CDC Mar Campus I, LLC, filed an application for Second
Amendment to Development Agreement ("DA") No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 83507 ("SUB 21-03"), Minor Modifications to the El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan ("ESSCSP") No. 11-01 Revision A, and Site Plan Review
("SPR") No. 21-01, and Environmental Assessment ("EX) No. 1305 to adopt an
Addendum to the certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan Environmental
Impact Report ("EIR") for the development of a new professional sports
headquarters and training facility on a 13.7-acre site in the southeast section of the
Raytheon campus at 2000 East El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7 and 8) ("Project").
B. The ESSCSP and Environmental Impact Report (EA-905), Development
Agreement No. 11-02, and related conditions of approval, were originally approved
and adopted on January 19, 2016 (Ordinance No. 1516).
C. The City Council approved an amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02
on September 3, 2019 (Ordinance No. 1589). That amendment made changes to
the phasing of projects and reassigned certain improvements and mitigation
measures among project phases.
D. Approval of the proposed Project is a subsequent discretionary action in furtherance
of the ESSCSP.
E. The Project application was reviewed by the City's Development Services
Department for, in part, consistency with the General Plan, and conformity with the
El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC") and the ESSCSP.
F. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Project.
G. The Planning Commission considered the information all comments made at the
regularly scheduled meeting, and all other information in the administrative record,
and adopted its Resolution No. 2903, recommending City Council approval of the
Project entitlements and approvals referenced above.
Page 320 of 500
SECTION 2. General Plan and Specific Plan Findings. The City Council finds that
the proposed Project will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan
and ESSCSP and will not obstruct their attainment. Specifically:
A. The ESSCSP was adopted in 2015 and amended the General Plan to create
consistent land use designations and therefore was found to be consistent with the
City's General Plan.
B. The ESSCSP serves as the regulatory document to implement the General Plan
for this area of the city by ensuring that all new developments in the area are
consistent and in compliance with the standards set forth in the Specific Plan.
C. The proposed corporate offices for the sports facility, fields, and associated facilities
have been reviewed for compliance with the ESSCSP standards for site planning
and design and have been found to be consistent with the Specific Plan standards
as shown on the plans dated October 21, 2021.
D. The Office/Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU) land use of the ESSCSP allows for new
corporate offices and associated uses which are consistent with the permitted land
uses within this land use designation. Specifically, the development of the sports
facility office building and associated sports fields and ancillary uses are compatible
and consistent with the existing uses in the general vicinity and would help facilitate
the expansion of the existing campus.
E. The scope and goals of the ESSCSP notes that the intent of the specific plan area
is to "...serve the mission of economic development in the City, which is to create,
maintain, and implement a business climate that fosters a strong economic
community, develop a strategic plan that will result in business retention and
attraction, provide an effective level of City services to all elements of the
community, and maintain the quality of life that has characterized El Segundo for
more than nine decades." Further, the ESSCSP states that "Permitted uses within
the Campus are intended to create job opportunities and seek balance between
growth, local resources, and infrastructure capacity." The sports facility with
headquarters/office uses would create job opportunities and promote economic
growth consistent with the goals of the ESSCSP. Furthermore, Economic
Development Goal ED1 of the ESSCSP seeks a strong, healthy economic
community in which all diverse stakeholders may benefit.
SECTION 3. Findings for Approval of ESSCSP Minor Modifications. The City
Council finds:
A. The proposed Project is consistent with the Development and Design Standards,
Applicable Rules, and Project Approvals which are required pursuant to the
ESSCSP.
B. It is necessary to update the Land Use Plan and the Conceptual Site Plan (ESSCSP
Exhibits 5 and 6) to depict a revised layout of the Raytheon Recreational Facility
and to depict a modified alignment of the Nash Street extension which is needed to
2
Page 321 of 500
maintain the private recreation area and to create an appropriately sized site
necessary for the development of the organization's sports facility headquarters and
athletic fields. These changes to the ESSCSP's exhibits are not among or akin to
the list of changes that constitute "Major Modifications" pursuant to Section VII.C.1
of the ESSCSP. Consequently, the proposed changes constitute Minor
Modifications pursuant to Section VII.C.2 of the ESSCSP.
C. It is necessary to update the Vesting Tentative Map #71551 (ESSCSP Exhibit 7) to
map the new not sizes and dimensions as a result of the Nash Street extension
modified alignment. These changes to the ESSCSP's exhibits are not among or
akin to the list of changes that constitute "Major Modifications" pursuant to Section
VII.C.1 of the ESSCSP. Consequently, the proposed changes constitute Minor
Modifications pursuant to Section VII.C.2 of the ESSCSP.
D. It is necessary to update the Utilities and Infrastructure Exhibits (ESSCSP Exhibits
8-12) due to the Nash Street extension modified alignment. These changes to the
ESSCSP's exhibits are not among or akin to the list of changes that constitute
"Major Modifications" pursuant to Section VII.C.1 of the ESSCSP. Consequently,
the proposed changes constitute Minor Modifications pursuant to Section VII.C.2 of
the ESSCSP.
E. The proposed Minor Modifications are consistent with the Specific Plan in that
Section VII. (Administration) C. 2. of the ESSCSP specifically authorizes Minor
Modifications to the Land Use Plan (ESSC-SP Exhibit 5), Conceptual Site Plan
(ESSC-SP Exhibit 6), Vesting Tentative Map #71551 (ESSC-SP Exhibit 7), and
Utilities and Infrastructure (ESSC-SP Exhibits 8 through 12). Updated Exhibits 5
through 12 are contained in attached Exhibit B.
SECTION 4. Findings for Approval of Site Plan Review Per ESMC § 15-30. The
City Council finds:
A. The proposed Project is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the El
Segundo General Plan, the ESSCSP, and the El Segundo Zoning Code. The
proposed Project is in substantial compliance with the ESSCSP as originally
approved. The ESSCSP permits a mix of office, commercial, retail, research and
development, industrial and related recreational uses. The maximum overall FAR
in the ESSCSP is 0.60 based on the gross square foot size of the Specific Plan
area. The proposed Project is consistent with the following goals, policies and
objectives of the General Plan and the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan as
modified:
1. Goal LU-7 from the Land Use Element of the General Plan outlines the City's
objectives of providing the highest quality public facilities, services, and public
infrastructure possible to the community. The proposed development is
consistent with this goal. For example, the Developer will construct the Hughes
Way/Nash Street Extension concurrent with the proposed Project. The street
will be dedicated to the City for public right-of-way purposes.
3
Page 322 of 500
2. The ESSCSP sets forth the zoning for the site, which includes design guidelines
and development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to
achieve a high -quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture,
orientation and massing, architecture, parking and loading, landscaping,
lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The proposed development is
consistent with these guidelines and standards.
3. Goal ED1 from the Economic Development Element of the General Plan
outlines the City's objectives to create in El Segundo a strong, healthy economic
community in which all diverse stakeholders may benefit. The proposed project
directly advances the following economic development policies and objectives:
a. Policy ED1-1.1: Maintain economic development as one of the City's and
the business and residential communities' top priorities.
b. Policy ED1-1.2: Focus short -run economic development efforts on
business retention and focus longer -run efforts on the diversification of El
Segundo's economic base in order to meet quality of life goals.
c. Objective ED1-2: Center diversification efforts on targeted industries that
meet the City's criteria for job creation, growth potential, fiscal impact, and
fit with local resources.
B. The proposed Project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is located.
1. The City of El Segundo has distinctive land use patterns, which are divided
into four quadrants by the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and El
Segundo Boulevard. Compatibility of an individual land use is determined
mainly by its relationship to other uses within its quadrant. The ESSCSP area
is located in the southeastern quadrant of the City of El Segundo which is
east of Pacific Coast Highway and south of El Segundo Boulevard. The
design and implementation of this Specific Plan Phase II relates directly to
the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and would be functionally
compatible with other uses within the Specific Plan area.
2. The Project promotes public convenience, general welfare and good land use
practice. The ESSCSP includes a range of commercial and industrial uses
that will contribute to job creation opportunities and balance growth with local
resources and infrastructure capacity. The proposed Project incorporates
comprehensive features for site layout, building design, architecture,
landscape, lighting, walls and fences and sustainability which are consistent
with the ESSCSP. The proposed Project will enhance job creation
opportunities and provide a development that balances growth with local
resources and infrastructure capacity.
C. The proposed Project will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City.
4
Page 323 of 500
1. The Project will not adversely affect the general welfare of the City. The
proposed development will promote the orderly development of property, the
preservation of property values, and would be consistent with surrounding
development and will not adversely affect the value of neighboring properties.
The proposed ESSCSP development standards and Development
Agreement will ensure that the project will be developed in an orderly fashion.
2. Goal C2 from the General Plan Circulation Element outlines the City's
objectives to provide a circulation system that incorporates alternatives to the
single -occupant vehicle, to create a balance among travel modes based on
travel needs, costs, social values, user acceptance, and air quality
considerations. The proposed project will enhance the general welfare of the
City because the project will construct a Class 2 bicycle lane as indicated in
the ESSCSP Circulation Plan (Section D of the ESSCSP). The project will
provide for infrastructure and facilitate access for various modes of travel
including automobiles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian. One example is the
ESSCSP project to connect Hughes Way with Nash Street through the south
and eastern portions of the Campus. The Hughes Way/Nash Street Extension
will be dedicated to the City as a Secondary Arterial.
SECTION 5. Findings for Approval of Subdivision -Vesting Tentative Tract Map.
The City Council finds that grounds for denial findings cannot be made pursuant to ESMC
§ 14-1-6 for the following reasons:
A. The proposed Project map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans
as specified in Government Code § 65451. This Project generally meets the goals
and objectives of the General Plan, and it is consistent with the ESSCSP. Vesting
Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 83507 proposes to modify 13 parcels of the
existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551, while the other 13 parcels of the existing
Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. Each of the 13 modified
parcels will vary in size and will comply with the minimum lot size requirements
established in the ESSCSP.
B. The design of the proposed Project subdivision is consistent with the General Plan
and the ESSCSP since each of the 13 modified parcels will vary in size and will
comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the ESSCSP.
C. The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development in that
the proposed lots meet the size and dimension requirements to allow the
subdivision of the existing project site. Furthermore, the land use and zoning
designations of the ESSCSP allows the proposed Project.
D. The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
VTTM No. 83507 proposes to separate and change 13 parcels of the existing
Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting
Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. The proposed lots vary in size
5
Page 324 of 500
and meet the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan. The proposed maximum development density is a 0.6 Floor
Area Ratio (FAR). This density is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan. This density is also generally in conformance with the maximum FAR
allowed in the ESSCSP. Each new lot will meet or exceed the minimum size and
dimension requirements.
E. The design of the Project subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is for the
purpose of separating and altering 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map
No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551
will remain unchanged. The proposed lots would vary in size and meet the minimum
lot size requirements established in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
and this action would not have the impact of causing substantial environmental
damage or substantially and avoidably injuring fish or wildlife or their habitat
because the proposed VTTM would only serve to alter parcels of an existing VTTM
that has been previously analyzed for environmental impacts and analyzed through
an EIR Addendum. The proposed project site is currently improved with
approximately 2,089,948 gross square feet of existing Raytheon Company office,
industrial and warehouse development, an outdoor recreational area, and 6,873
parking spaces in approximately 20 surface parking lots. The project site is also
predominately surrounded by developed urban land permanently altered with
buildings, roads and hardscape. There are no fish or wildlife habitats on the site
that could be damaged by the proposed subdivision or new development.
F. The design of the Project subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map would
not cause serious public health problems in that the map is for the purpose of
creating a new subdivision map which would authorize a revision of the size and
dimensions for 13 of the existing 26 parcels in the ESSCSP area and the new lot
configurations would be compliant with the standards related to lot size and
dimensions as established in the ESSCSP.
G. The design of the Project subdivision will not conflict with easements, acquired by
the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision. The proposed subdivision is not anticipated to conflict with any known
easements located at or near the property. The proposed parcel configuration on
the site has been oriented to avoid conflicts with existing easements, such as the
existing Metro Green Line elevated rail alignment.
SECTION 6. Environmental Review. Concurrent with its review of this Resolution,
the City Council will consider adoption of an Addendum to the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to EA No. 1305, prepared to analyze
the environmental effects of the proposed Project. The factual findings and conclusions
set forth in such Resolution are incorporated herein by reference.
L
Page 325 of 500
SECTION 7. Approval. The City Council approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
83507, Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP No. 11-01 Revision A, and Site Plan Review
No. 21-01 subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto.
SECTION 8. Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and
determination in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence,
both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings
and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City
Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in
the record as a whole.
SECTION 9. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will
not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the
provisions of this Resolution are severable.
SECTION 10. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with
electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic
signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 11. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby
authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council
of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to
attest thereto.
SECTION 12. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately
upon the effective date of Ordinance No. _ approving an amendment to associated
Project's Development Agreement, and the Ordinance's adoption and effectiveness are
conditions precedent to this Resolution taking effect. Thereafter, this Resolution will remain
effective unless repealed or superseded.
SECTION 13. City Clerk Direction. The City Clerk will certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make
a record of this action in the meeting's minutes.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 12021.
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
7
Drew Boyles, Mayor
Page 326 of 500
I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed
by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was so passed
and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
Page 327 of 500
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMU) and all
provisions of the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan, CDC Mar Campus I, LLC (the
"Applicant" or "Owner") agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for
the City of El Segundo's approval of Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01, and Environmental
Assessment (EA) No. 1305 ("Project Conditions"):
Zonina Conditions
1. This approval is for the project as shown on the plans approved by the Planning
Commission on November 18, 2021 and approved by City Council on and
on file with the Development Services Department.
2. Prior to issuance of any permit for the project, the applicant must submit plans, showing
that the project substantially complies with the plans and conditions of approval on file
with the Development Services Department. The Development Services Director is
authorized to approve minor modifications to the approved plans or any of the
conditions if such modifications achieve substantially the same results as would strict
compliance with said plans and conditions. Any subsequent modification must be
referred to the Development Services Director for a determination regarding the need
for Planning Commission and/or City Council review and approval of the proposed
modification.
3. This approval allows for construction of a new professional sports headquarters and
training facility on Lots 7 and 8 (Phase II Specific Plan area). Specifically, the approved
construction includes the following:
a) a three-story plus mezzanine, 56-foot high building (from lowest grade adjacent
to building to top of parapet) totaling approximately 143,702 gross square feet
and 131,207 square feet of net floor area, accommodating offices, dining areas,
an auditorium, conference rooms, studio area, locker rooms, training rooms, a
weight room, office space, storage rooms, a service area, and mechanical and
electrical rooms;
b) two storage buildings for groundskeeping and maintenance totaling
approximately 4,800 square feet (4,368 square feet net floor area) located near
the facility's northeastern corner;
c) three natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter on the eastern side of
the facility;
d) 32-foot high poles and netting along the eastern side and northern side of the
site to screen the fields from LA Metro's above -grade commuter line that abuts
the site;
e) 347 parking spaces at two surface lots adjacent to the building, including 24
electric vehicle (EV)-capable spaces. A security booth would be located at the
corporate headquarters' southern parking lot;
f) Removal/demolition of E-20 and E-21 warehouse/storage facilities on Parcel 7
and 8.
E
Page 328 of 500
A change in uses or changes in the allocation of square footages specified above
must be referred to the Development Director for a determination regarding the need
for Planning Commission and/or City Council review and approval of the proposed
changes.
4. Final design of the 32-foot high poles and netting along the eastern side and northern
side adjacent to the fields shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission
through a Site Plan Review Amendment prior to issuance of a permit for the fields
and/or associated lighting. Final design shall include the quantity and location of poles,
type of netting, and netting that is retractable and only extended during times when the
fields are used for training and recreational activities involving balls, and lowered at the
conclusion of the recreational activity. Lastly, a hedge shall be planted along the length
of the pole and netting and shall be maintained at a minimum height of 16-feet. The
hedge shall be planted using Ficus or Podocarpus, or similar type of species approved
by the Development Services Director.
5. Any signs shown on the site and elevation plans are conceptual only. Signs proposed
for the project, including monument signs, shall be designed to conform to the sign
provisions of the and ESSC-SP Master Sign Program, ESMC, and shall require
separate application and approval by the Development Services Director or designee.
A revised Master Sign Program must be submitted and approved by the Development
Services Director or designee prior to building permit final.
6. Prior to issuance of any permit, final fencing plan shall be reviewed and approved by
the Development Services Department, including a block wall design for the proposed
Type 4 fencing and to work with Southern California Edison to achieve a block wall
design for the Type 5 fencing.
7. All lighting must comply with the ESSC-SP Master Lighting Plan, including:
a) All light fixtures and supporting poles throughout the facility shall be
architecturally compatible with the architecture of the building.
b) Wall -mounted lighting, including security lighting, shall be compatible with
the architecture of the building.
8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a photometric lighting
plan that illustrates spill light at the project boundary shall not exceed 8 foot-candles.
Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department.
Exterior building and parking lot lights shall be provided with decorative lighting fixtures.
Exterior lighting for the project shall be designed to be confined to within the project
site. Light shields shall be used to block light and reduce spill over light and glare as
necessary. Prior to the final inspection and issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the
applicant shall schedule an evening inspection with the Planning Division to verify
compliance with this requirement, and to ensure that lighting is appropriately shielded
to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
10
Page 329 of 500
9. All landscaping must be in substantial conformance to the ESSCSP Master Landscape
Plan and a Landscape Plan must be reviewed and approved by the Development
Services Department. Trees must be of a species that provides for large canopy and
shade. The use of palm trees shall not be permitted.
10. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit or as otherwise
appropriate, a matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the City, as applicable, for
review and compliance with:
• The ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised
on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance
1589).
• All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of
Development Agreement 11-02 as amended.
11. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the project shall demonstrate compliance with all
applicable mitigation measures in the MMRP for the ESSC-SP EIR and project COA.
A final mitigation and COA monitoring matrix/spreadsheet shall be submitted to the
City.
• the ESSC-SP EIR (EA-905) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(MMRP) as adopted by the City Council on January 19, 2016, and revised
on September 9, 2019, per the First Amendment to the DA 11-02 (Ordinance
1589).
• All project conditions of approval including applicable requirements of
Development Agreement 11-02 as amended.
12. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be architecturally screened in accordance with
ESMC Section 15-2-8(C). Prior to permit final, the equipment shall be adequately
screened to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director.
13. All building and drainage gutters, down spouts, vents and other protrusions shall be
concealed from view within the exterior walls. Ladders for roof access shall be mounted
on the inside of the building.
14. Mandatory solid waste disposal services shall be provided by a City approved waste
hauler to all parcels/lots or uses affected by approval of this project.
15. The Applicant shall provide receptacles (bins) for the collection of refuse and recyclable
materials, as well as a hose bib for washing collection areas. Prior to the issuance of
building permits, the applicant shall provide documentation from a City approved waste
hauler stating that the number and size of bins provided for the collection of refuse and
recyclable materials generated by the project is adequate.
11
Page 330 of 500
16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide documentation
from a City approved waste hauler stating that the dimensions of the refuse storage
enclosure are of adequate size to accommodate containers consistent with the current
methods of collection, are designed with a walk-in access component, and located and
designed to facilitate trash truck access and pickup.
17. Trash enclosures on the property shall be either fully enclosed within the building or
must be adequately screened per the ESSC-SP and ESMC. Further, the gates shall
include architectural paneling or finishing that is consistent with the paneling or finishing
of the headquarters building. Lastly, trash enclosure areas for the project shall have a
non-combustible decorative cover that matches the building's architecture.
General Conditions
18. The project is subject to the Public Art or In -Lieu Fee Requirement (Cultural
Development Program) established by City Council Ordinance 1594, which requires
placement of public art on -site or payment of in -lieu fees to the Cultural Development
Fund. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an application
to the Community Services Department and shall either: a) enter into an agreement
with the City of El Segundo to provide public art onsite; or, b) in -lieu of commissioning
public art onsite, pay a fee equal to 1 % of the project cost to the City's Cultural
Development Fund.
19. A positive balance shall be maintained in all project Reimbursement Accounts at all
times consistent with the Reimbursement Agreement. If the balance of the
Reimbursement Account(s) associated with the project becomes negative at any time,
all work on the project shall be suspended, including the issuance of permits and project
inspections, until such time as the sufficient funds are deposited to return the account(s)
to a positive balance.
20. A weatherproof notice/sign to report dust, noise, or other construction -related impacts
shall be posted and prominently displayed on the construction fencing clearly visible to
the public from along the abutting street(s). The notice/sign shall set forth the name of
the person(s) responsible for the construction site and a phone number(s) to be called
in the event that a construction -related impact occurs.
21. Reclaimed water must be utilized for all landscaped areas.
22. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, landscaping plans must be
submitted to the Development Services Department that conform to the City's Water
Conservation in Landscaping requirements as set forth in ESMC Chapter 15.
23. All utilities lines installed to serve the new construction shall be placed underground.
24. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of any existing utility necessary
as a result of the development.
12
Page 331 of 500
25. Pedestrian walkways within the project must include admixture colored concrete and/or
design that enhance and complement the project.
26. The project site shall be fenced and screened during construction.
27. All areas within the project site shall be maintained free of trash and debris.
28. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, an erosion control plan shall be
reviewed and approved by the Building Official and the Public Works Director.
29. Water spraying or other approved methods shall be used during grading operations to
control fugitive dust. Recycled water shall be used for grading operations whenever
available.
30. During the grading phase and as needed during the remainder of the construction
phase, the owner or contractor must conduct daily street sweeping along the streets
abutting the project site(s).
31. In the event that a Planning, Building, Public Works, Fire Department or Police
Department requirement are in conflict, the stricter standard shall apply.
Impact Fee Conditions
32. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time fire services mitigation fee. The fee
amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
33. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time police services mitigation fee. The fee
amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
34. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time park services mitigation fee. The fee
amount must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
35. Pursuant to ESMC §§ 15-27 A-1, et seq., prior to issuance of a building permit for new
Building C, the applicant must pay a one-time traffic mitigation fee. The fee amount
must be based upon the adopted fee at the time the building permit is issued.
Building Safety Conditions
36. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the California
Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California
Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building Standards
Code in effect at the time of the plan submittal to Building and Safety Division for plan
review.
13
Page 332 of 500
37. All projects shall comply with the El Segundo Municipal Code, and the 2019 editions of
the California Building Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code,
California Plumbing Code, California Energy Code, and the California Green Building
Standards Code.
38. Construction projects must comply with Best Management Practices for construction
and storm -water runoff requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System MS4 Permit. Construction activity resulting in a land disturbance of one acre or
more, or less than one acre but part of a larger common plan of development or sale
must obtain the (SWPPP) Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit.
39. A site -specific soils and geotechnical report must be submitted to Building and Safety
Division for review and approval. The report shall comply with the minimum
requirements of Chapter 18 of the CBC and shall address the possible sulfate content
of the soils.
40. A stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required to certify the
location of the new construction in relation to the setbacks prior to the first foundation
inspection and stamped setback certification by a Licensed Surveyor will be required
to certify the height of the structures prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
41. The applicant shall obtain a building, grading, mechanical, plumbing, electrical,
demolition permit for the project.
42. Plans submitted for plan check must be stamped by a State -licensed architect or
engineer and shall include:
a) Complete structural calculations, details, notes and material specifications.
b) Complete Accessibility Plan with a statement from a California Certified Access
Specialist (CASp) indicating that a plan review has been performed and that it
complies with the requirements of Chapter 11A &11 B of the CBC.
c) A stamped and signed Boundary and Topographic survey by a California licensed
Land Surveyor.
d) A complete grading and drainage plan showing compliance with the Los Angeles
Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) Low Impact Development (LID)
requirement. The Los Angeles County LID Manual may be used as a guideline for
preparing the LID report.
e) Hydrology report along with hydraulic calculations.
f) Complete energy calculations, details, notes, and material specifications.
43. Applicant shall submit a site -wide New Address Issuance request to the Building
Division. Approved building addresses to be shown on the submitted plans.
14
Page 333 of 500
44. Applicant shall pay all development fees, including school district developer fees, prior
to issuance of building permits.
Fire Department Conditions
45. Before the City issues a building permit, the applicant must provide Fire Life Safety
Plans to the Fire Department for review and approval, which include, without limitation,
the following:
a) Fire lanes;
b) Fire lane signage;
c) Fire lane access;
d) Fire hydrant locations;
e) Minimum acceptable flow from any fire hydrant must be 2,000 gallon per minute at
20 psi;
f) Fire safety precautions during demolition and construction;
g) Emergency site access during construction;
h) Permanent fire department access;
46. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout the Main Facility,
installed in accordance with CFC 903 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 13.
The Maintenance and Groundskeeping buildings may also require fire sprinkler system
installation based on final occupancy classification and CFC 903 requirements.
47. A fire alarm system shall be provided throughout the Main Building, installed in
accordance with CFC 907 and the currently adopted edition of NFPA 72. The
Maintenance and Groundskeeping buildings may also require fire alarm system
installation based on final occupancy classification and CFC 907 requirements.
48. The fire access road (artificial turf) on the east side of the Main Building shall be
capable of supporting a 75,000 load. The access road shall be a minimum width of 26
feet. The access road shall either be provided a turnaround or exit access to Hughes
Way.
49. A Class I standpipe system shall be provided for the Main Building, installed in
accordance with CFC 905.
50. A minimum of one EMS capable elevator shall be provided for the Main Building.
51. An Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System shall be provided for the Main
Building.
52. Public hydrants shall be provided on the street frontage for the Main Facility and the
two east buildings.
53. An on -site private hydrant shall be provided on the south side of the Main Facility at an
approved location. Private fire hydrants must be installed and maintained in accordance
15
Page 334 of 500
with El Segundo Fire Department Regulation "Fire Hydrant and Private Fire Main
System Installation".
54. A ladder truck access road is required on the west side of the Main Facility. The access
road shall be a minimum width of 26 feet. The access road shall be located a minimum
of 15 feet but no more than 30 feet away from the structure. A fire access plan shall be
submitted and indicate widths at all points and turning radii.
55. Applicant shall submit a Hazardous Materials Management Plan for the Maintenance
and Groundskeeping buildings.
56. Knox boxes and/or knox switches shall be provided for all structures, all designated
emergency access gates to the property, and for all parking control access devices.
57. The applicant must develop and submit an Evacuation Plan and Procedures for review
and approval by the Fire Department. Before the City issues each Certificate of
Occupancy, the applicant must provide evidence to the Fire Department that the
approved Evacuation Plan and Procedures were implemented.
Police Department Conditions
58. Bicycle racks shall be located in a busy, well -lit location. This will provide optimum
security for persons and property.
59. Security cameras shall be installed in all new commercial establishments if the Police
Department deems it necessary due to the type of business, hours of operation,
location and propensity to crime.
60. The Police Department shall determine the monitoring and recording location of the
security cameras, which include, but are not limited to: tenant areas such as all exterior
and interior entry doors, cash handling/counting areas, the manager's office, the safe,
parking lots and parking lot entries/exits; non -tenant areas such as common spaces
and parking lots; and any other areas deemed necessary by the Police Department.
61. Monitor and recording equipment shall be stored in a secure area.
62. The applicant shall comply with the requirements contained in Municipal Code Chapter
13.20, Security Code.
Landscaping
63. All landscaping shall be low profile around perimeter fencing, windows, doors and
entryways taking special care not to limit visibility or provide climbing access. Floral or
grass ground cover is recommended. Bushes shall be trimmed to 2 to 3 feet high and
away from buildings. Dense bushes shall not be clumped together; this provides a
hiding place for criminal activity. Trees shall be trimmed up to 7 feet.
16
Page 335 of 500
64. Trees/bushes/shrubs shall not be planted next to or near any light
fixture/standard/bollard. When grown to maturity this landscaping will block the light
and reduce lighting on the ground surface.
65. Trees with high canopies are preferred when planted near light standards
Lighting
66. All parking lots shall be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1.25 footcandles of
light on the ground surface during hours of darkness.
67. The addressing, all exterior entry doors, walkways, bicycle racks and trash dumpsters
shall be illuminated with a maintained minimum of 1 footcandle of light on the ground
surface during hours of darkness.
68. Walkways in retail applications shall use light standards with lighting mounted 12 to 14
feet for a better spread of light. Bollards cannot accomplish this.
69. A photometric study, which includes all of the above, shall also be provided prior to
issuing of a Building Permit. A site plan shall be provided showing buildings, parking
areas, walkways, and the point -by -point photometric calculation of the required light
levels. Footcandles shall be measured on a horizontal plane and conform to a
uniformity ratio of 4:1 average/minimum.
Doors/Hardware
70. Entry and Mechanical/Electrical/Fire doors shall comply with El Segundo Police
Department Approved Security Hardware list.
Security Cameras
71. Security cameras shall be installed in all new commercial/retail establishments if the
Police Department deems it necessary due to the type of business, hours of operation,
location and propensity to crime.
72. The Police Department's minimum camera requirements shall be listed after the
Camera Specifications upon a formal submittal.
73. Camera Specifications:
• All security cameras shall be in color.
• The recording equipment shall be digital and shall have a minimum of twenty
one (21) days of storage capacity.
• Cameras shall be of the highest resolution.
• There shall be a monitor connected to the recording equipment to play back
and review the video. The equipment shall be stored in a secure area.
• Security camera recordings shall be made available to law enforcement.
17
Page 336 of 500
Public Works
"City Engineer" = City Engineer or his/her designee throughout this document.
General
74. The applicant has calculated a fair share percentage of 10.06% contribution towards
each traffic improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR MM TRA-1 through 9
improvements based on the methodology provided in the First Amendment of the DA
No. 11-02 Section 7.9, "...the `Fair Share' is determined by dividing the number of PM
peak hour trips produced by the individual development seeking a Certificate of
Occupancy by the total Project PM peak hour trips Ceiling as noted in City Council
Ordinance No. 1516, Exhibit D `Conditions of Approval' (3,120)." The applicant shall
continue to work with the City to determine the total construction value (cost estimate
for design and building for improvement and right-of-way acquisition) of the TRA-1
through 9 improvements that permit "fair share" contributions as opposed to actual
construction, as submitted by a State licensed Civil Engineer and accepted and
approved by the City Engineer.
75. The applicant shall submit 10.06% fair share contribution towards each traffic
improvement identified in the ESSC-SP EIR to the City prior to issuance of Certificate
of Occupancy.
76. All work in the City's right-of-way (ROW) or on City -owned and maintained facilities
shall require review and approval of the City Engineer or his/her designee.
77. The applicant shall ensure that encroachment permits are secured from the Public
Works Department/Engineering Division before commencing any and all work in the
City's public ROW, including lane closures.
78. Construction inspection shall be coordinated with the Public Works Inspector and no
construction shall deviate from the approved plans without approval of the City
Engineer. If plan deviations are necessary, the applicant shall provide a revised plan
or details of the proposed change for review and approval of the City Engineer prior to
construction.
79. Prior to issuing of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall ensure installation
of all improvements required by the Public Works Department are inspected and
approved by the City Engineer.
80. All construction -related parking shall be accommodated on -site or on other private
property. No construction related parking shall be permitted off -site in the public ROW.
81. A grading and drainage plan shall be provided and stamped by a California (CA) State -
licensed civil engineer as part of the Building Permit process.
Page 337 of 500
82. A utility plan shall be provided that shows all existing and proposed utility lines and
their sizes (sewer, water, gas, storm drain, electrical, etc.), including easements, within
200 feet of the project site boundary.
83. All record drawings (PDF and CAD format) and supporting documentation shall be
submitted to the Public Works Engineering Division prior to scheduling the project's
final inspection.
84. Haul trucks are to use PCH north to Imperial Highway and PCH south to El Segundo
Boulevard. All three of these streets are currently designated as truck routes in the
City.
Street Improvements & Traffic Control
85. The applicant must build the Nash Street roadway extension and associated public
improvements in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement. The
design and construction of the Nash Street roadway extension is subject to review and
approval by the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning and Building Safety.
86. The applicant must construct Class II bicycle lanes in the Nash Street Extension in
accordance with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and Section 7.5 of the
Development Agreement.
87. The applicant must record a 20-year irrevocable offer of dedication of Parcels 20 and
22 of Vesting Map No. 71551, what will become Lots 3 and 12 of Vesting Map No.
83507, (Coral Circle Connection) in accordance with the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan and Section 7.7 of the Development Agreement. Before recordation, the
irrevocable offer to dedicate must be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning and Building Safety, the Director of Public Works and the City Attorney.
88. The applicant is required to obtain any necessary approvals from the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) for any work that involves
encroachment onto Metro easement areas or right-of-ways. These approvals may
include, without limitation, pedestrian, bicycle and roadway easements and temporary
right -of -entry agreements.
89. All new sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps shall be
constructed per the latest Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC)
"Greenbook" and City standards. New sidewalk to be a minimum of 5' wide.
90. All existing sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, and curb ramps that are
broken or not in conformance with the latest SPPWC or City standards shall be
removed and constructed per the latest SPPWC and City standards.
91. Any obstruction located within existing curb ramps shall be relocated.
19
Page 338 of 500
92. All unused driveways shall be removed and replaced with full -height curb, gutter and
sidewalk per SPPWC standards and City standards.
93. The applicant shall provide a minimum 4' sidewalk clearance around any obstruction
in the sidewalk i.e. posts, power poles, etc.
94. PG-64-10 tack coat and hot mix asphalt shall be used for all slot paving required next
to new concrete installations. Slot paving shall be 3 feet wide and 1 foot deep,
consisting of 6 inches of asphalt over 6 inches of base.
95. The applicant shall provide street signing and striping plans for the new development.
All striping in the public ROW shall consist of thermoplastic paint per the latest CA
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
96. The applicant shall provide traffic control plans for all work requiring a lane closure.
97. The work scheduled in the public right-of-way on major arterial streets shall be Monday
through Friday from 9am to 3pm, except holidays. Work scheduled on all other street
classifications shall be Monday through Friday from 7am to 4pm. Contractor shall
obtain prior approval from the City Engineer for performing weekend work, night work,
or work on a holiday.
98. During construction, it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide safe
pedestrian traffic control around the site. A pedestrian protection plan shall be
submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the City
Engineer. This may include but not be limited to signs, flashing lights, barricades and
flag persons.
99. Once the ROW improvements are accepted by the City Engineer, they are not to be
used for staging building construction activities, including but not limited to, storage of
construction materials and equipment. The street and sidewalks shall be kept free of
construction debris, mud and other obstacles and shall remain open to traffic at all
times. The applicant shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repair to any damage
to improvements caused by its use, or its Contractors' and Subcontractors' use, of the
improvements after acceptance by the City Engineer.
100. The applicant shall submit any new traffic signal plans to the City Public Works
Department and LA County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) for review and
approval. The applicant will coordinate all inspections with the LACDPW inspector for
acceptance of the traffic signal poles and related equipment. The applicant will inform
the City of any updates during this process.
101. The applicant must comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Final
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project. All mitigation measures and
conditions of approval must be listed on the plans submitted for plan check and the
plans for which a building permit is issued.
20
Page 339 of 500
Water
102. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing City owned water
main lines. The applicant must submit a water study to determine if there is a capacity
deficiency in the affected water main lines and if so, water main upgrades will be
required. The water study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
103. Any existing water meters, potable water service connections, fire backflow devices
and potable water backflow devices must be upgraded to current City Water Division
standards. Backflow devices shall be placed or relocated onto private property.
104. City water mains cannot be located on private property. The applicant must provide a
main meter in the public right-of-way.
105. The applicant must submit plans for water system upgrades to the City of El Segundo
Public Works Department for review and approval.
106. Any unused water laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the City main.
The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide traffic control
plans and shoring plans.
Sewer
107. The proposed improvement will impact the capacity of the existing sewer main lines.
The applicant must submit a sewer study to determine if there is a capacity deficiency
in the affected sewer main lines and if so, sewer upgrades will be required. The sewer
study shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
108. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, proof of payment of the sewer
connection fee to the Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) must be
provided to the City Engineer. LACSD can be reached at (310) 638-1161.
109. Any unused sanitary sewer laterals shall be abandoned and properly capped at the
City main. The Contractor is to obtain necessary permits and licenses, and provide
traffic control plans and shoring plans.
110. The applicant must contact the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
Industrial Waste Section and receive a determination as to the necessity of a permit
for industrial waste discharge before City approval of a Site Plan Review for any project
within the ESSCSP.
Storm Drain
111. Provide a Low Impact Development Study (LID) signed and stamped by a registered
Civil Engineer. Make sure to comply with the project design requirements to retain on
site (infiltrate or store for use) volume of runoff from 1/4 inch storm or the 85th percentile
24-hour storm, whichever is greater (SWQDv).
21
Page 340 of 500
112. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to size appropriate storm drain
facilities to control on -site drainage and mitigate off -site impacts. Refer to the most
recent Los Angeles County Hydrology Manual. Instructions and the manual are
available at the County website at http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wrd/Publication/index.cfm.
Calculations shall be signed by a registered civil engineer.
113. The project shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) requirements and shall provide Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
sediment control, construction material control and erosion control.
Landscaping & Irrigation
114. Irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and
approval. All irrigation meters and mechanical equipment shall meet the City Water
Division standards.
115. All public landscape improvements shall be designed to City standards and approved
by the Parks & Recreation Department.
116. The property owner shall maintain all landscaping and irrigation in the public ROW
fronting the property.
117. The applicant shall coordinate any tree removals in the public right-of-way with the
Parks & Recreation Department prior to the start of construction.
118. The applicant must cooperate with the City in creation of a landscaping and lighting
assessment district for the Nash Street Extension in accordance with Section 7.1.6 of
the Development Agreement.
Miscellaneous Conditions
119. Approval of this permit shall not be construed as a waiver of applicable and appropriate
zoning regulations, or any Federal, State, County and/or City laws and regulations.
Unless otherwise expressly specified, all other requirements of the ESMC shall apply.
120. Failure to comply with and adhere to all of these conditions of approval may be cause
to revoke the approval of the project by the Planning Commission, or City Council,
pursuant to the provisions of the ESMC.
121. In the event that any of these conditions conflict with the recommendations and/or
requirements of another permitting agency or City Department, the stricter standard
shall apply.
122. The applicant and its successors in interest shall indemnify, protect, defend (with legal
counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and hold harmless, the City, and any
agency or instrumentality thereof, and its elected and appointed officials, officers,
22
Page 341 of 500
employees, and agents from and against any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes
of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs, and expenses
of whatever nature, including reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements
(collectively "Claims") arising out of or in any way relating this project, any discretionary
approvals granted by the City related to the development of the project, or the
environmental review conducted under California Environmental Quality Act, Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., for the project. If the City Attorney is required
to enforce any conditions of approval, all costs, including attorney's fees, shall be paid
for by the applicant. The Applicant agrees to defend the City (at the City's request and
with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will indemnify the City for any judgment
rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of
this section "the City" includes the City of El Segundo's elected officials, appointed
officials, officers, and employees.
By signing this document,
certifies that he/she has read, understands,
this document.
Name, Title
(CDC Mar Campus I, LLC)
, on behalf of CDC Mar Campus I, LLC,
and agrees to the Project Conditions listed in
{If Corporation or similar entity, needs two officer signatures or evidence that one
signature binds the company}
23
Page 342 of 500
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
Exhibit B
MINOR MODIFICATION TO ESSCSP
24
Page 343 of 500
ire
-Commercial / Office Mixed Use
-Office / Idustrial Mixed Use
- Recreation / Open Space
EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLAN
Page 344 of 500
—ss 1Elcy EPATH
-
L EL SEGlINGO ELVO =
__ _
sr K ,
.17 .
01- IT
+. >
D
cTR i F.D
11 26 5 18 1g
F
25 23r
l
r�
EXHIBIT 6 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
Page 345 of 500
EXHIBIT 7A SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL EXHIBIT INCLUSIVE OF
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 83507
Page 346 of 500
x h\
PH Pi
U
'FIT �A FH
Fl
FH
FH i
3 � ;
FHFH
PROPOSED \ �
CWATER LINE H
�= PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 400'
LEGEND
aw PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER
— w EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER
UTILITY TO BE REMOVED
�FH FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED
VAT,RTINE
RAYTHEDN SITE
EX. WATER
\ LINE
EX. WATER
r LINE
O
w( II1
H � 1 KOPC�SEU
„ W AT�H`�-LINE r
FH
-
/� EX. WATER
LINE
EXHIBIT 8
CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN
i
Page 347 of 500
DO BLVI
JOIN EX.
E v
PROPOSEDRECLNIMED
a.
WA TF i.iNF.
� X. ILGCL I iMED
R . EX. ItEC'L U2'iEl)
N°ATRR (.T\F.
jY O ATF.R I.TNF.
' RAYTHEONSITE
X. RECLAIMED v'
i WATER LING '
H}h'
RW
PROPOSED
RECTAIMFED
WNFER LINE - �Y
1 PLAN _
j SCALE: 1" 400'
LEGEND
Rw PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER 'Rlv_,
mow- EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER
UTILITY TO 6E REMOVED
FIRE HYDRANT tti�
RAYTHEON
I■I
- o
`FX. RECLAIMED �S
l4ATEHLINE
PR(IPCAlCD s
RECLAIMED-r
- 'WATERLINE# y
FX. RFCT.ATMF.T)1
"` ` ter'✓..a �. -T
PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT 9
CONCEPTUAL RECLAIMED WATER PLAN
Page 348 of 500
EXHIBIT 10
CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN
Page 349 of 500
.JOIN EX. irk I ❑
STORM DRAIN L.X y�i RCP \\ RC
[7 JOIN EX 1n ° / � _
STORN1 DRAI STORM DRAIN lj
sd
PROPOSED sd
C
STORM DRAIN
I \ O aq e v
i.' EX RCP
STPRM DRATN �r o
i
RAYTHEONSUE °
EX. 1S`RCP
�J-STORM DRAIN
9 0
PROPOSED _q JOIN EX. -
PLAN STORM DRAIN TORM D
SCALE: 1" = 400' hod° so
I sa i'
LEGEND 5°
So PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
—so— — EXISTING STORM DRAIN
UTILITY TO BE REMOVED �P \ -:
FLOW ARROW r�`� ® PROPOSE si
,<STORM DRAI
EXHIBIT 11
CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN
RCP
�W 1
STORM DRAIN
') EX„yq'RCP -
STORM RAT
'i 1.
PROPOSED"
STORM DRAIN
_ J
RX ioz RCP -�
F STORM DRAIN
I
-. JOIN EX. .r
W STORM DRAIN
li =-
-�- EX. i8 RCP
STORM DRAIN
I
I F,X.54" R p�
—STORM DRAIN
I
EX. 10" RCP
I.�TOR1N DRAIN
j` CI
x EX. 5q" RCP
E STORM DRAIN tj
DRAIN
Page 350 of 500
EXHIBIT 12
ELECTRIC, GAS AND TELECOMMUNICATION CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Page 351 of 500
0
J
m
It
0
Ali
O
z
Z
rn
Q
U
(D
O
w
cn
o
z
J
w
Z)
(j
LL.
w
o
w
N
SITE PLAN REVIEW PACKAGE -
SEPTEMBER 27
o1'°°
�z�
PRE-ENGINEERED
MANUFACTURED BUILDING
m U
a0.s
EL SEGUNDO SOUTH
CAMPUS SPECIFIC
PLAN EL SEGUNDO CALIFORNIA
LL1 73
°z�
U L
Z o�
>Zo
U CO
a
dQ
w°0')
_
�C)
t`
N
ry
ARCh,/TFC�
f
\G��SEO
•
GREG
HONG
_
* C-35772
REN A 1 /30/2021
1..
CA0
w
Um20
f H H f H
J
U � W
H f H JH�f
Q
i
w d ¢
w
'
O
a z�
N
a
3oK
gz wa0.
ow N
x'
--
Q
z
clYa w
z
z LL
oNz
a3 m
z
z
LL!
�wwa
f
�
+�
�- �
J
a
" NOZ
woZZ ¢¢
~QOU
f
fir'
�. "�- •i �
�R
r
r
O G 6 w
7
w fh U
0 K
U li W N
'�
Y
U
0J
2K0K
7UV
w O w
N(/�
H�QW
SITE PLAN
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
PROJECT DATA
PROJECT:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PACKAGE
1. ALL PERSONS WORKING AT THE SITE SHOULD OBTAIN, READ AND UNDERSTAND THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
ADDRESS:
2000 EAST EL SEGUNDO
' r 'MA
PAMPHLET FOR THE TYPE(S) OF CONSTRUCTION BEING DONE.
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
0
Ln
>
2. STOCKPILES OF STORED OUTDOOR DEMOLITION DEBRIS, CEMENT, SAND, ETC. MUST BE COVERED WITH A WATER
ZONING
EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN
• �`:.
-, ;^ ' �' ry1 �: -3
PROOF MATERIALS TO PREVENT BEING WASHED OFF SITE.
3. FUELS, OILS, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER LIQUID MATERIALS MUST BE KEPT INDOORS OR KEPT INSIDE BERMED
DESIGNATION:
LEGAL
PARCEL MAP 4138, SHEET 32, P.A. 4138-14, TRA 9888
pqr�
AREAS. SPILLS MUST NOT BE WASHED TO THE STREET.
DESCRIPTION:
-�
ti... ♦ "" J
�" ♦ ♦
4. ANY CONSTRUCTION WASTE MUST NOT BE WASHED INTO STREET, STORM DRAIN CATCH BASINS, OR PUBLIC
APN:
4138-032-018
w
w
w
♦
RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALL DUST AND SLURRY FROM CONCRETE CUTTING MUST BE REMOVED USING A WET -DRY VACUUM OR
EQUIVALENT.
OWNER:
RAYTHEON
o
j
w
Z
`
•''�~ �'
DESIGN
THE AUSTIN COMPANY
co
co
D_
5. TRASH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION SOLID WASTES MUST BE PLACED IN A COVERED TRASH RECEPTACLE.
PROFESSIONALS:
6410 OAK CANYON, SUITE 150
Lo
U
:�.
IRVINE, CA 92618
�
0
0
6. THERE SHALL BE NO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES WASHED ON SITE. THERE SHALL BE NO ERODED SOIL OR DISTURBED
(949) 451 -9000
a
SLOPES ON THIS PROJECT.
a
Y
GOVERNING 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
SCOPE OF WORK
CODES:
2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
_
2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
m
zzz
0
0
1 U
BUILDING
CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL SUPERVISION, LABOR TOOLS, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING
2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
o
LOCATION
a�D
WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS:
2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
o0O0
0
2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
o
--BUILD NEW PRE-ENGINEERED MANUFACTURED BUILDING (PEMB)
STANDARDS
Z
-
d
PLANNED BY: CN
-CONCRETE PAD AND FOUNDATION UNDER PEMB
-REROUTE SPECIFIC ITEMS AS SHOW ON THE DRAWINGS, REROUTE HHW PIPING, LEAVE TANKS, EQUIPMENT, PUMPS, PIPING,
NUMBER OF
STORIES
1 STORY PRE-ENGINEERED MANUFACTURED BUILDING
VICINITY MAP
DESIGNED BY: CN
CHECKED BY: RL
PIPING ACCESSORIES AND CONTROLS IN PLACE AS INDICATED TO PEMB.
HEIGHT= 21'-2"±
-INSTALL CONCRETE AGGREGATE BASE. FENCE, AND GATE PER DETAILS.
-VACATE EXISTING CONTROL ROOM. BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED.
APPROVED BY: RL
LLI
-PROVIDE COLD WATER SUPPLY VALVE TRAINS AND PRESSURE REGULATOR TO PEMB.
CONSTRUCTION U CTI O N
-PROVIDE EXHAUST FANS TO VENTILATE THE STORAGE AREAS AND OTHER INDOOR SPACES.
P
TYPE:
I I - B
(D
-PROVIDE AIR-CONDITIONING TO SERVE THE CHEMICAL STORAGE ROOM FOR TEMPERATURE CONTROL.
FIRE PROTECTION:
NONE
EL SEGUNDO BLVD Co
V
Q 405
OCCUPANCY/USE:
CURRENT-F (FACTORY AND INDUSTRIAL)
DRAWING SCHEDULE
PROPOSED-S1
D
FLOOR AREA:
5,865 SF
m
w
cn
Q
W
w
0
`� SITE
0- w
cn
J
THESE DRAWINGS
AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IDEAS, DESIGNS, AND
Z
J
ARCHITECTURAL
°'
ARRANGEMENTS REPRESENTED THEREBY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE
0 Z
T001
TITLE SHEET
PROPERTY OF RAYTHEON. NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE COPIED, DISCLOSED
w Q
A100
SITE PLAN
I
o
TO OTHERS, OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY WORK OR PROJECT OTHER
2
Q
A101
LANDSCAPE PLAN
THAN THE SPECIFIC
PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND
W
Q
A110
FLOOR PLAN
DEVELOPED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF RAYTHEON. VISUAL CONTACT
cf)
A111
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
WITH THESE DRAWINGS
OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE CONCLUSIVE
ROSECRANS AVE.
A112
RENDERINGS& BUILDING MATERIALS
EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS.
A113
EXTERIOR LIGHTING CALCULATIONS
BLDG:
FLR:
PKG:
PROJECT
AL
LOCATION
PAGE:01
OF
05
SHEET#:T001
RAYTHEON PM: AMANDAANGUTANO
(310) 529-1728
Page 352 of 500
1
o ,
1
1
I
OVERED .
1
1
I
u �
'.'\HEMICA ------------------
STORAGE
CAG E
"Nommok—A
STORAGE
SHED
EXISTING
BUILDING
t�
e
SECURED
UTILITY
YARD
r.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO
REMAIN
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
DEMOLISH EDREMOVED FOR
PROPOSED BUILDING
SITE PLAN
EXISTING CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL Wl6' TALL
CHAINLINK FENCE ABOVE
r :-jp-
IL
L'
:
\\�
M
ABOVE GRO
ATER�fRANSFER
oPunAen0 -fi
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W2
ANKS
:: a
EQUIPMENT
TO REMAIN
�i
O c 0 O O O O O O
dECHANICA1
EQUPMENT
�I
x x
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING STREET ABOVE
-10 FEET ABOVE UTILITY
YARD
LIQUID
NITROGEN
PROJECT
SITE
r
.1 -----------
0
>
CO N
O rn
0 Q
Z U
w C)
(f) Z
w�
ww
C)w
0
CV
�z-L
o ''
d
��
Q•
w =3
0
Z("
U
_3
z
o
F-
} o
zo
Q�
U
Q�
W
U�
orn
_
1
1
1
1
\G�NSED ARCy,T�
GREG HONG
* C-35772
RE N .11 /30/2021
��qTF OF � �F��\�
CA
VI
0, V
w
K N
UmOZoZ
r 0.Q
U � W
O
Q
wa�
>
m
O
w
Z
� �
agV)0.a.
ow
U�¢
/Q
V
� ZYa
z
K W ti
m
7 O m
z
z
U w W aJJ
QW
O =
N w O U
(�
LL
W
.0
w
O um
z�
rL
w
}t
O
N W -d
O
Y
O U V
O K
U 1� W
N
J
W
Z
0
D)
W
ir
ww
w>
0�w
or
o�
LLz
w
W J
� U
L
o �
r �
Ln
a
Q
0
Y
2
U
} z z
CO U U
W c` cal
Q � o
o c\
00 00
Z. 00
PLANNED BY: CN
DESIGNED BY: CN
CHECKED BY: RL
APPROVED BY: RL
W
. " K
=� m
�w a
w> w
_ _ I = J
cm2 t .................
w
Fir
f
is ♦ l , .. ' 1
CURRENT SITE PHOTO BLDG: FLR:
PKG:
0 10' 20' 40' 80'
OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 N `mom PAGE:02 OF 05
1 /1-20'-011 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" SHEET#: Al
00
Page 353 of 500
PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS
M
> Lr)
J It
CO NO
O rn
M Q
z U
0 O
w o
cn z
J Z)
w (j
LLI W
O J
O W
O
N
m U
0. Q C
W 73
WW
.W �=
U w O
Zp
U � W Q
H H H H
H H H
H JH03
J
o 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 wz�5
L,
>
OQmx
OQz3�
z
3agz_
way
Q
O w N
O
z
z �
a
z3�^z
w
m
z
�3
O �
zwa
Q
wUUQ
/�
LL
Nj ZNZ�QZQ
~¢OU
w
�w�Q
Z K K
Q p (%j
N
7 Y
z
aU
w
O
U 1� W
U U
fw/1 UJ
w0 w
�K!wW
a
a ,
a
Q
0
Y ,
2
U
�zz
W cal c�
H � c
ao�
o00«
or -
PLANNED BY: CN
DESIGNED BY:
CN
CHECKED BY:
RL
APPROVED BY:
RL
rw
V
U
Q
n
m 3:
75 w
w
0- w
..�o 0�
z z
OQ
wJ
>-w
Q ~
0� Cn
z
= cn
c� z
J O
OQ
C)r- ::D
LUQ
w U
BLDG: ---- FLR:
PKG:
PAGE: 04 OF 05
SHEETM A1131
Page 354 of 500
ELEVATION DRAWINGS
C,
lq
c0 N
C)
0 rn
Q Q
� U
w o
cn z
6%
w
. w
LLJ C/)
o w
0
N
METAL ROOF PANEL,
EXTERIOR DOOR. COLOR TO
>, 00
PRB TYPE PANEL,
EXISTING SAMPLE PORT BOX
O
MATCH WALL PANELS
Z
COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL
EXTERIOR DOOR, COLOR TO
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
p„ v
MATCH WALL PANELS
FIXTURE FIXTURE
FIXTURE FIXTURE ABOVE DOOR
FIXTURE
D
uJ
O z �
a�
EXISTING -6 FOOT TALL
V
N
CHAINLINK FENCING
Z 0
GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH
WALL PANEL COLOR
CD
Q o
�
U �
EXISTING -10 FOOT TALL
QLn
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
CONCRETE WALL BEYOND
W O
FIXTURE ABOVE DOOR
o
Cl
METAL WALL PANEL,
Cj
io
PRB TYPE PANEL. COLOR: LIGHT STONE
r-
N
NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 4
1 /8"=V-0"
z
O j U
w W w
J
W w lJ w W F p -
Qtea`
0/y
LL
t�N��
O N
O � Z
Q
O W F W
C7yN� WW
z
Y
o V)
METAL ROOF PANEL.
z
a1ca
O 2
PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL
z
Q
U W a
O
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED
LIGHT WALL LOUVER TO MATCH WALL EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED LIGHT
�
0
FIXTURE
PANEL COLOR, TYPICAL FIXTURE
FIXTURE
r
FIXTURE
W�
O
N _
A
N
GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH
WALL PANEL COLOR
`ID
N
N
METAL WALL PANEL,
o
PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: LIGHT STONE
`n
z
O
Ln
w
w
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 5
1 /8"=1'-0" _
W�
w
>
w
w
o�
w
z
w
w
UU
L�
Ln
w
o
Q
�
o
c)
a
a
a
0
U
}
CO
Z
U
Z
U
W
~Q
c�
o
c�
0
N
CO
O
O
Q
Z
rHIN'Trd
PLANNED BY:
CN
DESIGNED BY:
CN
CHECKED BY:
RL
APPROVED BY:
RL
(W
V
EXISTING 6 FOOT TALL
EXISTING 6 FOOT TALL
Q
CHAINLINK FENCE
CHAINLINK FENCE
Y
U
Q
METAL ROOF PANEL,
METAL ROOF PANEL.
W
co
Z
PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL
TOP OF ROOF
EXISTING LANDSCAPING
EXISTING LANDSCAPING
TOP OF ROOF 12
PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: GALVANIZED STEEL
0
12
TO REMAIN
TO REMAIN
4
Cm W
_
a 4 `i
VN.
cV
I
G
W
Q
EXISTING CONCRETE
EXISTING CONCRETE
METAL WALL PANEL.
=
RETAINING WALL
RETAINING WALL =
METAL WALL PANEL,
W
PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: LIGHT STONE
oft f
PRB TYPE PANEL, COLOR: LIGHT STONE
Z
c i
c2 N
Z
O Q
i
t
_j
IY
= ,
EXISTING STREET GRADE
EXISTING STREET GRADE
_ a-
W
GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH
of
I
GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT TO MATCH
I—WALL
PANEL COLOR
o
-10 FEET ABOVE SECURE UTILITY
-10 FEET ABOVE SECURE UTILITY _
\
WALL PANEL COLOR
t
YARD
YARD \
W
o
x 0
\� �j
WALL LOUVER TO MATCH WALL
Of
Ll
PANEL COLOR
BLDG:
FLR:
PKG:
PAGE: 04
OF 05
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 3
1 /81.-0
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE:
1 /8.1-0
SHEET#:
Al 1 1
_
_
Page 355 of 500
STORAGE
SHED
EXISTING
BUILDING
SECURE
UTILITY
YARD
LANDSCAPE PLAN
ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO
77 REMAIN
SPECIES: BOX ELDER
<= HEIGHT: 15-20 FEET
5104
�Mffl -low
PON'""
09
OT
OAF
L91
pl,
iu
EXISTING CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL Wl6' TALL
CHAINLINK FENCE ABOVE
X
ABOV GROUND
VATER�RANSFER
P MPS0
0 "1,
0
LN2
TANKS
L
X
EXISTING - - ------------
EOUIPMENT
TO REMAIN
O O O O O O O O O O O
MECHANIC
EQUPME�
x
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING STREET ABOVE
-10 FEET ABOVE UTILITY
YARD
LIQUID
NITROGEN
STORAGE
TANKS
PROJECT
SITE
LANDSCAPING NOTES:
-NO LANDSCAPING IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK. ALL EXISTING
LANDSCAPING IS LOCATED AT STREET LEVEL
10 FEET ABOVE THE SECURE UTILITY YARD &
PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING.
-NO REMOVAL, RELOCATION OR ADDITIONAL
LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE OF
WORK
-ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION TO REMAIN. NO
REMOVAL, RELOCATION OR ADDITIONAL IRRIGATION
WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK.
C�
1 �IIII '• i , _
CURRENT SITE PHOTO
0 10' 20' 40' 80'
OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 N :mom
1 =20 -0 SCALE: 1"=20'-0"
0
>
CD
CD N
O m
0 Q
z U
(D O
w o
cn z
w O
. w
o J
o w
0
CV
'z'
°°
0
0) U
0.
U
L
OZcu
a)
U
>
— 3
O
(n
Z cc::))Qrn
U
Y
Q�
W
O0i
o
_
0,
CO
\G�NSED ARCy�T�CI
GREG HONG
* C-35772
RE N .11 /30/2021
��qTF OF � �F��\�
CA
wo
0, V
KW
N
UmOo
� C> "
Q Q Q Q
Q
U � W
O
Comm
0
O
Q
wa�
>
m
O
w
agw of 'n 0. a.
Q
ow
ZYa
z
w W ti
a;,Z
m
7 O m
z
z
U w W aJ
QW
O =
O N U
.0 ZN
O
w
O um
z�
}t
N W -d
D
Y
J U V
0 K
U 1� W
N
J
W
xKQ W
Z
0
D)
W
ir
ww
w
>
0�
W
or
o�
LLz
W
W
J
�
U
L
Ln
o
�
r
�
t�
a
Q
Y
2
U
}
z
z
CO
U
W
c`
c\
�
o
Q
o
c\
0
00
00
00
Z.
PLANNED BY:
CN
DESIGNED BY:
CN
CHECKED BY:
RL
APPROVED BY:
RL
L1J
Q
a
a-
m�
w
LJJ
Q
W
w
cn
Q
OZ
Q
Lu
J
< �
Q. v )
BLDG: ----
FLR:
PKG:
PAGE: 02
OF
05
SHEET#:
Al
01
Page 356 of 500
COLORS & MATERIALS
0
J It
m NO
O rn
0 Q
i � U
(D O
W 0
L7 z
J �
EXPOSED w w
co
FASTENING O J
O W
SYSTEMS
O
N
2
PBR
N 0
a. Q
to
i z z �:
,,^^ z O
VI Q D O
U
The PBR panel is commonly used for a wide variety of architectural, agricultural, commercial and industrial Q
applications. PBR is a structural panel and an exposed fastener panel that can be used for both roof and wall o 6
applications. The minimum roof slope for PBR is'/2:12. It 0')
ce
Features and Benefits:
• Numerous UL 580 ratings are available, as well as UL 790, Class A for external fire,
roof assembly for UL 263 for internal fire and the UL 2218 Class 4 impact rating.
• PBR carries Florida approval, Dade county ratings and FM 4471 approval standard
for Class 1 panel roofs.
Product Specifications
• Applications: Roof and Wall • Gauges: 26 (Standard); 29, 24, 22 (Optional)
• Coverage Widths: 36" • Finishes: Smooth (standard);
• Rib Spacing: 12" on center Embossed (optional)
ss° ria"
• Coatings: Galvalume Plus, Signature* 200,
•Rib Height: 1-1/4"
12"
Signature®300
• Minimum Slope: 1/2:12
• Panel Attachment: Exposed
Fastening System
Wo Z
0:
F
j j O y
U m w p
.. .. .. ..
.. .. ..
.. cb a
w w w w
Q ¢ < Q
o 0 0 0
w w w
¢ < a
0 0 0
w wFp
a WZ00:
o
J
W 0:
WE�
O
WWmm
Fi "�'`
z J
V) 0E
z
Q_
Q
o�ati
C., Xw
/ P1
V
z
G
z
w
ga 3 v' z
m
z
}}
J j
z
UWWa
w OD
Q
N )Iz
LL
~ z O U
W
COLOR CHARTS
W K _r
RENDERINGS
OF 0
YOU~
rwzm
U
U 1� W
N OJ
s
HKQW
HINJA WHITE BRIGHTWHITE POLAR WHITE IVORY LIGHTSTONE
SEA WOLF SAHARA TAN TERRA GOTTA COUNTRY RED COCOA BRO',
,ASH GRAY OLD TOWN GRAY CHARCOAL BURNISHED SLATE BURGUNDY
o
a
o_
Q
,
Y
x'
U
m
U
U
W
Q
G
cal
o
eo
c�
0
eo
HAWAIIAN BLUE TAHOE BLUE PATINA GREPNI DENALI GREEN EMERALD GREEN
O
o
O
-H
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
PLANNED BY:
CN
DESIGNED BY: CN
CHECKED BY: RL
APPROVED BY: RL
w
CD
C(=)PPER PENNY
Q
U
Q
�
m
2 w
�
z
o
J
m
0- w
Z
Z O
w Q
Q
06
cn
z
LL
0:�
0� U)
BLDG: ---- I FIR:
PKG:
L PAGE: 04 OF 05 1
SHEET#: A112
Page 357 of 500
FLOOR PLAN
> Ln
lq
CO N
O ID
rn
� Q
z
U
CD O
wbw
w
cn z z
_
D
w O
. w
o
o w
0
N
� �
O C,
0) U
jL U
L
O Z ca
a)
U
Z z
Oo
Qrn
U
YL0
QI-
w °0i
o
_ cy,
15 14
13
12 11
10 9
8
7 6 5 4 3 2
1
EXISTING 10 FOOT TALL CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL
5
111
wo
0M Z>
Um00
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -w�
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z W'
194-6 3/8"
Q
W�m�
f
O
N in33
r n r n
12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12
r n r
-11 5/8 12 -11
n r rr r n
5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8
r n
12 -11 5/8
r n
12 -11 5/8
r n J
12 -11 5/8 Q
r n r n r n r n r n r n
12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8 12 -11 5/8
a- Khd
�Naa
Z�4x
-
O
e-
z3v z
0 128'-10"
z �o
-
- ---- - --
LL
---
z a m m -
Q W00
tt
N N o ZZQ-
OZUU
ELE� ELEC fi
ELEC JAITOR ' �
Z�
a } aa
�
10 107
106 105
26 —2
W N t �I ZK�U
0(
f~/I W it 7 Y U U
��WW
W W
J � xlsi,��swzv
V'--Ne %.oe::-3kl
Le000c
STORAGE ROOM
U C-i V)
104
6 FOOT TALL
CHAIN LINK FE CING
o
IF
\'
M
I
—
STORAGE
B
2
1 1 1
STORAGE AREA
WASTEOPEN
STORAGE AREA
103
3
101
�02
111
E
SAMPLE
E
z
o
PORT
Ln
>
E,
w
A
10'WX12,H
SECTIONAL DOOR
0
BUILDING TOTAL
AREA: 5,865 S.F.
0- c
10'WX12'H
SECTIONAL DOOR
\
CONCRETE FILLED PIPE
w
w
BOLLARDS AROUND
CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDS
uj
w
DOOR OPENING
FINISH CONCRETE SURFACE
4
AROUND DOOR OPENING
o
Qf
w
FLUSH WITH ADJACENT ASPHALT
1 1 1
�
u
CHAINLINK WITH ROLLING GATE
PAVING
CHAINLINK WITH ROLLING GATE
Ln
o<
�o
0
( L
a
CHAINLINK MAN GATE
CHAINLINK MAN GATE
6 FOOT TALL CHAIN LINK FENCING
Y
U
}
CO
z
U
z
U
W
n
o
Q
0
o
00
c\
00
0
0
O
z�
PLANNED BY: CN
DESIGNED BY: CN
CHECKED BY: RL
APPROVED BY: RL
(W
V
Y
U
a-
m �
w
w >
r2 w
Z
Q
OQ
d-
Lu
_�
o
�w
o
0 4' 8'
16'
32"
Q [-
LL
N6m=
I
Q� c/)
SCALE:
8" =V-0"
BLDG: ---- FLR:
PKG:
PAGE: 04 OF 05
FLOOR
PLAN
SCALE: �
1/8 =1-0
SHEET#:
All0
_
Page 358 of 500
Page 359 of 502
PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE WATER SUPPLY &SEWER CALCULATION
0
PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY PERMIT NO: 014735
1955 Workman Mill Road / Whittier, CA
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 4998 / Whittier, California 90607-4998 Facility ID 2024182
Robert C. Ferrante, Chief Engineer and General Manager
(562) 699-7411
o1 CHECK ONE: ❑ New Sewer Connection ® Existing Sewer Connection
02 Applicant Raytheon Company
(Legal Company Name)
03 Check one and fill in appropriate information
® Corporation Name Raytheon � Company CO281489
Year Incorporated 1953 State of Incorporation MA ID# 95-1778500
❑ Partnership Name Partners
❑ Sole Proprietor Name Business Names
o4 Situs Address 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245-0902
(Street) (City) (State) (zip)
05 Mailing Address 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245-0902
(Street) (City) (State) (zip)
06 Point of Discharge Connects to local sewer line on S. Aviation Blvd.
07 Number of years applicant has been in business at present location 66
(yrs) (months)
oa Name of Property Owner Raytheon Compan
Address of Property Owner 870 Winter St., Waltham, MA 02451-1446 781.522.5000
(Street) (City) (zip) (Telephone Number)
os Assessors Map Book No. ® 1❑ 0 ® Page No. 11 ® Parcel No. 0 ® 07
10 Type of Industry Aerospace (Electronic parts/ components assemb} 3 ® t] 111 , 3❑ © ❑7
(General Description) (Federal SIC No.)
11 Number of Employees (Full Time) 3538 (Part Time)
12 Raw Materials Used Aluminum, Inorganic Acids, Paint, Oils, Non -Chlorinated Solvents, Aqueous Cleaners, Alkaline
(General Description - Add Additional Sheets as Needed)
(Daily Amount Used)
13 Products Produced Reasearch, Design and Test for Military Applications and Electronic Board Assembly
(General Description - Add Additional Sheets as Needed)
(Daily Amount Produced)
14 Wastewater Producing Operations Aqueous cleaning and defluxing, lab sinks, lab fume hood scrubbers, cooling tower bleed
laboratory DI water, ion exchange regeneration and rainwater.
(Full Description - Add Additional Sheets as Needed)
MMT®W®Th®
15 Time of Discharge 6 AM® PM❑ 10 AM[:] PM®, Shifts per day 2 Days per Week F® Sa❑ Su❑
16 Wastewater Flow Rate 79,000 Gallons per Day 409 Gallons per Minute
(Average) (Peak)
17 Constituents of Wastewater Discharge Metals, pH Neutralized Rinsewaters, Suspended Solids, BOD/COD and Sanitary
Wastewater
(General Description - Attach Chemical Analysis Results to the Application)
18 Person in company responsible for industrial wastewater discharge
Manju Mohan EHSS Engineer 310.647.1204
(Name) (Position) (Telephone Number)
I affirm that all information furnished is true a ect)anthat the applicant will comply with the conditions stated on the back of
this permit form.
2� 2 11
Date ,2019
1s Signature for Applicant I Director, EHSS
(Company Administrative Official) WameT (Position)
20 Approved/Reviewed by City or County Official Approved by Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
Date _ I 1 /Vi I Date February 18, 2021
❑ L.A. County Department of Public Works Expiration Date February 17, 2026
City of b U Robert C. Ferrante, Chief En in�_,�Jral Manager
RIFY
Name L, 'A By
Position L i T.,`tice r Position Senior Civil Engineer
-p r
Note: Please submit application first to the applicable City or County agency in which the point of discharge is located. Please contact the local
agency for the required permit -processing fee. Submit the original application (Do not endQ�i ).
D��.. � �1� � � r>,� D0C # mll1 1 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
Pre-engineered Manufactured Building Project does
not apply to LA County LID requirements. No water
treatment conducted within building. See industrial
wastewater discharge permit and separately
attached NPDES Industrial General Permit Order to
existing site wastewater treatment.
WATER SUPPLY AND SEWER CALCULATION
Job Name: Raytheon Bldg E-22
Location: El Segundo, CA
W. O. No. 20406
Date: September 29, 2021
Calculated By: MAO
Created By: MAO
Building E 22
*Fixture units based on California Plumbina Code 2019, Table 702.1 for Drainaae and Table A103.1 for Water
FIXTURE
QTY
SANITARY SEWER
DOM. COLD WATER
DOM. HOT WATER
DOMESTIC WATER
DFU/Fixt* Total DFU
FU/Fixt
Total FU
FU/Fixt
Total FU
WSFU/Fixt*
Total WSFU
Water closet, flush valve, 1.6 gpf
4.00 0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
Urinal, wall hung, 1.0 gpf
2.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
Urinal, wall hung, waterless
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Lavatory, single (water)
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
1.50
0.00
2.00
0.00
Lavatory, single (sanitary)
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Lavatory, in sets of two or three (sanitary)
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pantry Sink
2.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
Kitchen Sink
2.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
Hand Wash Sink
1 2.00
0.00
1.13
0.00
1.13
0.00
1.50
0.00
Drinking Fountain
0.50
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
Shower
3.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
Service sink, 3"
1
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
Floor drain, 2"
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Floor sink, 2"
2
2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hose bibb
1
0.00
0.00
2.50
2.50
0.00
0.00
2.50
2.50
Hose bibb, each additional AL
8
0.00
0.00
1.00
8.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
8.00
Dishwasher J A
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
1.40
0.00
Note: Quantity count includes shell & core and tenant improvement.
TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS
7.000
13.500
0.000
13.500
EQUIVALENT FLOW, GPM
Pipe Friction Loss (ft/100ft)
EQUIVALENT PIPE SIZE, in
Slope (in/ft) 1/4
29.800
#N/A
29.800
-
9.946
9.946
9.946
2"
1-1/2"
#N/A
1-1/2"
APPENDIX A
0.1
CHART A 105.1(1)
10 000
8000
6000
5000
4000
51061TI,
`610
1000
800
600
500
400
200 S
E
Q.
w
c
100 0
80 to
a1
60 0
60 J
40
30
20
10
8
6
5
4
3
2
1
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100
FRICTION LOSS IN HEAD (pounds -force per square inch) PER 100-FOOT LENGTH
For SI units: 1 inch = 25 mm, I gallon per minute = 0.06 L/s, I pound -force per square inch = 6.8947 kPa, I foot = 304.8 mm,
I foot per second = 0.3048 m/s
0
> Ln
J
CO N
O rn
0
z U
(D O
w 0
cn z
J
Lu (�
Uj W
Cn
CD J
O W
0
N
O >4 00
r
0) U
Q, U .�
us U=3)
0 z co
U >
Z O
i~!I a o
U rn
Q"t
O1+
o_ rn
I~ �
0
WW i
.W
U m Oa p
U W
H H ♦J H
H H H
H J ♦- �
o L-i
J
Q
waa
>
�amW
Oaz3�
K N
3ogz_
way
Q_
Q
O w tail
.F_��
C�Z
z
a
w
�;Nz
m
z
O �
z
Uw t1
�009
,., 00
MOOS-
~¢OU
0
�WtYJ
!
za'zoaCIC
0 c
.y
0 U
a U W
W �J
w
�KQW
z
0
1n
w
W
PLANNED BY: CN
DESIGNED BY:
CN
CHECKED BY:
RL
APPROVED BY:
RL
W
CU
Q
m W
W 5;
0- w
zz
OQ
W J
Q -
LLI
0� ()
z
O
06
J
J Z)
0-U
0- J
� Q
cn U
0� 01�
W LIJ
Q W
w
362 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
BLDG: ---- FLR:
PKG:
PAGE: 04 OF 05
SHEET#: A114
Page 360 of 500
ft
Ir
16,
'S
— r _
jr
■ 4 ' iY
J•
L ■ - - _ -
ice•" ! , �: . ' �� _.
of i - i L ~ •, '
,y titi- liph
J _
:•L• ; �-
or—
F - I ,rr
Jr
IL
+ a Y
1 +
r � } +' _ _
5
-� - PSfi I �'.
T T ~— l �� i4 y _lfY r 7 J •r• ' F f r_ - a
��z
PL NAIL
Jf #_ r1
- 7 11 � _ Jl��j #}_ _ ■ � 'i
X It
J. rII x 1'+ - Lam- -` _ ,•1 Y
OF .IdllpAr
SSS _ y + �I L, L _ , _ +Y� +�� x ,y 94. l
aor
+ - Or
Nr
% Nook
-4A t -%-.
■ (a - ff
r
9IRr
# y 3 -: _�_ +�_■ - - :*- i •� tip. - t F _
t •.� �� ,� " ,tom �� L . r � r _ '
Aor
� c •F t • Sir * * r S -• •� .�'� I�. `• L _ _ ,.
i" _ F { - •Ya _ 7 x'` as - �I �1
•r _� { ,r'n _ ,may .:I + , - - + �. �. +~r :% -'
M1 _ _ fM1 n } + ' �' • '. .'! a r J• _ ' ` . ~ '� _ _ _ it
l# �, �•1 , mx '� h �� � J ' ^+�• k a '•+i r'.' y --• ii ' F' *+ . -.
MAI
9.
Ae— : _ .1 �
.: ' r...r : fT- F r yrM i+l•A•' y `Ir # r ;' i - + • _
i ..4 .fir _ - f _ ,j�
- J' �. + T C ` terrr
• 1�i , r L'
if
1 ibr
x.+ T
r,-
1p
• '�' � I.1 • a r . # i .: � � - ' +�'�'• {l;a,•- � .,�- � � � l �: �F � '� � r f f�/{f �� .�� ,� 'y� � ' � _• �r � � � • �r�
_ ,,1l��,,{{r{r{��� 7 f rf .,�
4CA, ink
aw
�. •a, t ,.
. r r 1 _
Or
IF + r
p+�"F
dor
' ' ..pry y - p F.
go
F T
— t . _..j.
lC.
I L_
t •r •I• �. r -� F ••• -.
4.
,_ y .�T' r _ .�_�' r +` �} #�-! ••+c : - --
:
:+.• *�_ - - 1, } r�•- 5 :. _ •' _ -
-"
*r ti ' . ! `~ t r o-, err d:
r•
� M1 ,..- _ F +'_ a' '
N
L :wr . -, -:� X - , , I- I ,
-y - :J; r I+' •1� '+h
:rt R+=- r:w• rY, 4� c- �4�ii r
IF
•_i - CF + :r:S- kM1l�• " Ile : T ,� ' J _ - _ _ _ �~ 4'i7L• ' cL • - - _ , ` F : • - _ `Y k y .. �L
{'
a z. •:~ter 'F : ` 1' + •�_ _: _ r }
':t y * F . F: T*! yyrrc�J4.rL i� 1 �l r -OF9.
lli".•` F 1w'.,� .�
L . ' `{tom•" IA f'• it 'f s•_ 'k�
. �4- •�.. av •'file.•+ r}• ' �' f -` + �-X'+` .1+•F {_ �r . r -1 L •'
',.• - r 'fir ;y,� •i�J1F 'i f�2- W06c•;l��f l ' y r 'M + 1 ;1 S{ �'_ ` L f�n� lr' _- ,++h_ ..6'- r+L.
� - i1. Y• fi• } ' . ?d: r , t i }L.1` ` J +•it _' '. J- - -. - r L� - _
,.� r • _ i �_ ~L -16 _ Y.�;, t -
F ha'� i ~ ',1 s l4: wr . yn3 .+k1; R`r
u• A•' r. + aR kLr :%i' �Y I J • - .: - '•! :� r ■ .i}_ - l { M1:•}'�IF
L r . - F��L' T'+S1v - { -r••L {.: # -L F
T _ .
YKlip,
+r•:•+T(:{IV " !a '� T' ' .. L r'4 �• }T'`1
_ _ A, F 1 +}+.
,- _-t •L2'r ,vim 3• .�:• * -1• L r'. �,■+. l"s --- _ �' - _, +* ~ *A
- ��� "+�'' f y�,-.�J-- I�..,T.••�+�� f�•fir_ I' � T,. �,. F .:4 � � - ••__?� -, �
?d r
rr
Vt-.MW-C .9 W* -
ti
hm
Je
1 t3 J.-" f T{gIr, t .+ M 1 t
•
J
Ar
ti fL .I -
• , ,� + 1 y fir' : r.. w t� Owl
• :r _ ,T+kL F 'f: . L' 4y 'L .4 '.. r � • �f ' - - .:.. � L ,''f'
- A, I a
LIN
F' - �r ' _ �'4S •yy a
Y
0.
ar. t. +�•
�•� � ' . kin �A - -- _
ti •., k' : c
RA
-OW.
Rzi
':�•� +' : .'':�'_ JAI .'• ` �'
AL r y
yrt , .�
• Q ,p_
. k
kr - f ,
;.
y - �*' • 4' �•, f
-W
F6 1; r _
0 r Y
} r .
N ,
.-
. V . r —.a v .
naa \/F N-IF I Ilw
;ONTINENTA
IIEVELOPMEI
01:N:
mlar=Faw
AS AP
L04ei a L0192: [01:421:I!
1
�:
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Los Angeles Chargers Training Facility is a (3) story building with a partial mezzanine, approximately 143,250 sf, and houses the Los Angeles Chargers organization, which is comprised
of the Team (Players and Coaches), Football Operations and Business Operations staff. The site is situated in El Segundo, on a 14-acre site, bounded to the north by S. Hughes Way, to the
east by the Metro Green Line and to the west by a Sothern California Edison easement.
It will have (3) full-size natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter. There will also be approximately 345 at grade parking spaces, broken into two groupings with staff and visitors
parking in the northwest, and players and coaches parking in the south. The Southern California Edison easement will potentially be utilized for overflow parking when training camp is being
held.
A separate 4,800 sf groundskeeping and maintenance building anchors the northeastern corner of the site and provides easy access to care for and maintain the three playing fields.
Perimeter fencing with scrim will prevent visibility into the training facility and the fields and will start at the East edge of the building and surround the entirety of the playing field areas.
Pedestrian and vehicle flow in and around the site is important to understand. Players & coaches will be entering the building from the South, through a secure gated area that allows them to
remain separate and protected from other activities on site. The parking for both players and coaches will be through controlled access and incorporate both gates and security cameras.
Any visitors, media or other staff will enter the building on the west facade, through the main entry lobby. A bus loading zone lines the western edge of the building, and will be used for the
pick up and drop off of guests attending the LUX Club, as well as any team related events that require bussing.
A truck dock and loading / staging area is located in the southwest corner of the building and is equipped to receive large and small deliveries. It is adjacent to the building's main equipment
storage area.
The exterior of the building is to be an iconic design that personifies the Los Angeles Chargers brand and incorporates graphic elements, signage and bolt -like shapes to create a one -of -a -
kind training facility that is unmistakably "Chargers". Precast concrete, panels, profiled metal panels, and a mix of curtainwall and storefront glazing will be the primary materials on the
exterior. The metallic sheen of the metal panel and the matte finish of the precast concrete work together to add sophistication and complexity to the facades. Exterior glazing will be a mix of
clear vision glass and fritted glass to provide transparency and transmission of natural light, yet visual privacy and sun control when needed. A skylight stretches over the lobby atrium and
brings daylight into the center of the building.
Exterior glass rails with a recessed stainless steel shoe will line the perimeter of the outdoor terraces and extra deep roof overhangs will help with shading. The outdoor terraces will feature
pedestal pavers at the floor line with drainage below. An outdoor elevated turf area will line the southeast edge of the second floor above the locker room. It will be directly accessed from the
team meeting rooms and will be utilized for walk throughs.
Overall health and wellness is an important aspect of training facility design. In order for an organization to function at its optimal performance, health and wellness cannot only be geared
toward the players, but toward the entirety of the staff and building occupants. Some of the most important features to be incorporated in the building are:
• Air Quality — creating opportunities for an indoor / outdoor experience, increasing air flow and movement
• Interaction with Nature — visual connectivity to the fields and landscaping from the majority of occupied spaces
• Lighting — using an appropriate level of lighting for each space, taking advantage of natural light and eliminating glare
• Social Interaction and Collaboration — creating spaces that allow for departmental overlap to spark creativity
• Acoustics — separation of spaces that require a lively and loud environment from spaces that need to be quiet or restorative
• Activity — encourage the use of stairs and walking through efficient planning and functional space arrangement
• Water & Nutrition — providing water bottle filling stations and food pantries in regularized locations throughout the building
• Restorative Environment — creating zones of quiet and relaxation to decompress and unwind
• Ergonomics — provide furniture and equipment that enhance the user experience, such as adjustable task chairs and task lighting
• Autonomy & User Control — allowing users to have control over their personal thermal comfort, lighting and noise levels
PROJECT INFORMATION
THE LA CHARGERS TRAINING FACILITY & HEADQUARTERS IS CLASSIFIED AS A THREE (3) STORY ABOVE GROUND + A MEZZANINE, MIXED -USE OCCUPANCY, WITH THE
PRIMARY OCCUPANCY AS GROUP A-3.
OCCUPANCIES INCLUDED WITHIN THIS BUILDING:
A-2 (DINING AREAS)
A-3 (AUDITORIUM, CONFERENCE ROOMS, LOCKER ROOMS, TRAINING ROOM, WEIGHT ROOM, POOL)
B (OFFICE SPACE)
S-1 (STORAGE ROOMS, SERVICE AREAS)
S-2 (MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ROOMS)
PROJECT FAR: 0.25
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 54'-0" AT TOP OF PARAPET AT ELEVATOR OVERRUN
DESIGN OBJECTIVES
• TO DESIGN A STATE-OF-THE-ART TRAINING FACILITY FOR THE LOS ANGELES CHARGERS, BUILT IN THE HEART OF LA
• TO PROVIDE THE BEST OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRAINING AND CONDITIONING WITH DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PRACTICE FIELDS, ENSURING TEAM EFFICIENCY
• TO PROVIDE AN INDOOR / OUTDOOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ATMOSPHERE, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THERMAL COMFORT, DAYLIGHTING AND VIEWS
CONTACT INFORMATION
CLIENT
CONTINENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONTACT:ALEX ROSE
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE, SUITE 200
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
D: (310) 640 1520 X227
CLIENT
MAR VENTURES, INC.
CONTACT: LIONEL UHRY
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
D: (310) 7818261
CLIENT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
CONTACT:FRED MAAS
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
0: (714) 540 7100
ARCHITECT
GENSLER
CONTACT: RON TURNER
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
0: (213) 327 3600
D: (213) 327 3780
CIVIL ENGINEER
KPFF
CONTACT: DAVID MCGRAW
700 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
0: (213) 418 0201
D: (213) 266 5252
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
SWA
CONTACT: ROMAN CHILI
811 WEST 7TH STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
0: (213) 236 9090
MEP + LIGHTING ENGINEERS
HENDERSON ENGINEERS
CONTACT: BRIAN O'NEIL
510 WEST 6TH STREET, SUITE 800
LOS ANGELES, CA 90014
0: (213) 254 4750
D: (213) 254 4726
ARCHITECTURAL
E-A.1
-COVER
SHEET
E-A.2
-
PROJECT INFORMATION
E-A.3
-
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
E-AA
-
OVERALL ELEVATIONS
E-A.5
-
OVERALL ELEVATIONS
E-A.6
-
3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS
E-A.7
-
3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS
E-A.8
-
3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS
E-A.9
-
SITE FENCING DIAGRAM + SECURITY BOOTH CUT SHEETS
E-A.10
- MAIN BUILDING PLANS - B1 & L1
E-A.11
- MAIN BUILDING PLANS - L2 & L3
E-A.12
- GROUNDSKEEPING PLANS & ELEVATIONS
E-A.13
-
MATERIALS
PALETTE
CIVIL
E-C.1 - SITE PLAN
E-C.2 - VEHICLE TURNING ANALYSIS
ELECTRICAL
E-E.1
-
PARKING LOT PHOTOMETRIC
STUDY
E-E.2
-
FIELD PHOTOMETRIC STUDY
E-E.3
-
EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
APPROACH
E-EA
-
EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
APPROACH
E-E.5
-
EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
APPROACH
E-E.6
-
EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN
APPROACH
LANDSCAPE
E-L.1 - ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
E-L.2 - PLANT PALETTE
GRAPHICS
E-G.1 - SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS
E-G.2 - SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS
E-G.3 - MONUMENT SIGN
- E. EL SEGUNDO BLVD.
1
.11 f - - .
L '
!M f
Alf
•
I
4PI
j + r
-` ram;
LJ
Or
At
� ' 1
Amp
Z i
oe
49
}
... JL r• '� •4� 4�
•� 7 � � r 4
I +.
Y
' ROSECRANS AVE.4'
Z�
O
J dh
VICINITY MAP
wk
r y
� f
PIL
#� - ■
�Ilw
rL!
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
PROJECT INFORMATION
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-A.2
Page 362 of 500
CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY
MONUMENT SIGNAGE;
PROVIDE POWER FOR
ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE
�Oq,D,
\� rRljch
SOCAL EDISON UTILITY YARD
PARKING COUNTS - VEHICLE & BIKE
TYPE / CLASSIFICATION
GROSS BUILDING SF
NET BUILDING SF
PARKING PER SF
SPACES I STALLS REQUIRED
MAIN BUILDING
OFFICE
143,250
122,080
1/300 FOR 1ST 25,000 SF
84
1/350 FOR 2ND 25,000 SF
72
1/400 FOR REST - 72,080 SF
181
GROUNDSKEEPING BUILDING
MAINTENANCE & STORAGE
4,800
4,368
1 PER EA. 1,000 SF
5
TOTAL REQUIRED: 342
TOTAL PROVIDED: 348
SURPLUS / DEFICIT: +6
ADA PARKING REQUIRED: (8) ADA SPACES, (2) OF WHICH ARE VAN PARKING
ADA PARKING PROVIDED: (9) ADA SPACES, (2) OF WHICH ARE VAN PARKING
BIKE PARKING REQUIRED (NONRESIDENTIAL):
15,000
4 FOR 1ST 15,000 SF
4
111,448
5% FOR PORTION ABOVE 15,000
16
TOTAL BIKE PARKING REQUIRED: 20
OPERABLE GATE FOR FIRE
TRUCK ACCESS
PREFABRICATED SECURITY -
BOOTH WITH METAL PANEL TO
MATCH MAIN BUILDING
RED DASHED LINE INDICATES THE
LIMITS -OF -WORK (LOW) FOR THIS
PROJECT
SOLAR SHADE CANOPIES, TYP.
PARKING CONTROL ACCESS
DEVICES W-CARD READERS
I
I
I
I
PREFABRICATED METAL BUILDING
W-METAL PANEL VENEER TO
MATCH THE MAIN BUILDING
I I
I I
I I
I I
\ I I
\ \ O 1
w
0
00
Q
J_
Q
F-
J
0
w
H
Q
w
J
w
w
z
J
Z
w
w
0
Of
F-
LU
(2)14'X14'X6'TALL
CMU SAND &
FERTILIZER BINS
UTILITY EASEMENT LINE
METRO EASEMENT LINE
17 PROPERTY LINE
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
SCALE. 1 - 40 -0
CLIENTS I PROJECT I SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
Ref North A--�
Q:S)
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
E-A.3
Pagb 363 of 500
50 T
20' 0"
0' T
50 Ora
35 ;-0))
2C
0 I—oll
MATERIAL LEGEND
CONC-1
PRECAST
CONCRETE WALL
CONC-2
CAST IN PLACE
CONCRETE
L�J
ST-1
PAINTED STUCCO
WHITE
n
Lei
•
Mm
• • • • •
G LZ-1
CLEAR GLASS
SOLARBAN72
GLZ-2
LOW-E TINTED
GLASS SOLARBAN90
MT-1
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF PANEL
WHITE
MT-2
FLAT SEAM METAL
SOFFIT PANEL
WOOD VENEER
MT-3
FLAT SEAM METAL
WALL PANEL WHITE
MT-4
PERFORATED
METAL PANEL
SILVER
WEST ELEVATION
o: -. -.4
�
PT-2
ACCENT PAINT
"CHARGERS" BLUE
EAST -ELEVATION
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
OVERALL ELEVATIONS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-AA
Page 364 of 500
MATERIAL LEGEND
CONC-1
PRECAST
CONCRETE WALL
50'-0"
y� 35'-0"
Y
20'-0"
I
3
01 0fa
5C
3E
2C
0�
CONC-2
CAST IN PLACE
CONCRETE
ST-1
PAINTED STUCCO
WHITE
�IIIIIII'llllllllllllll�
ffiT1RW7 � •�0 •�iT1R�� �•�1i� SOUTH ELEVATION
:.C�� � •�1i� � •CTa� � •�Iia��� � � •�iT1R� � •�iT1R�.7 NORTH ELEVATION
G LZ-1
CLEAR GLASS
SOLARBAN72
GLZ-2
LOW-E TINTED
GLASS SOLARBAN90
MT-1
STANDING SEAM
METAL ROOF PANEL
WHITE
MT-2
FLAT SEAM METAL
SOFFIT PANEL
WOOD VENEER
MT-3
FLAT SEAM METAL
WALL PANEL WHITE
MT-4
PERFORATED METAL
PANEL SILVER
MT-5
PAINTED METAL
LOUVERS SILVER
PT-1
SILVER PAINT TO
MATCH METAL PANEL
PT-2
ACCENT PAINT
"CHARGERS" BLUE
:.rsa�
:.rsa
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ&TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
OVERALL ELEVATIONS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-A.5
Pag� 365 of 500
rw4
zi
y
1 ,� __ i � , •: � �. �F`: Sri k� �'�..
' -��� � ir, 4' �r ~" t�• ..f4��. r. � :.� �S:-. �'• r �' 1,' L'. �rt >,� `,1.
j ..� ��b� r � /. ••sue. \' -�� �r. � ' l.0 .ti�t�� k �'��' ux�r � '�� --4- +,1,. ""'•;
.4r•
• •_�;A.� r3�`t��.r',:""'� ': ��; �y" :�+ ."J �5 ^�• ~r_�,•i :` •'+ ;•' it-�� `k�4�G-.•' �r
'� � r�• f`' �"'" �� � Wit•' y _ : � -4 }; �?�• f.'`r . ' ♦.Y ,, ,.- ,.�,'�-"`" �` �
„��AV
� rxi ;�!- - � �' ` ^-.L r+� t7 �j � 4 +Il 4 _ ! - .� �f M�;a r?-'�. _ �'�' _ • 1
r' - a,c• .a' � i ` Lf � �rn r� �, �7f � '� , , i r•f + • ��'�ra.k �� }'_
% ir.'.. •ems 'fir' t l
m Ai
A mk
■I
L
11111111111111�1111l�lI�I�II"Mu�pll��Iiilil'
I�I�111iiilllll
I
•
rrr■.a■r
cif Trww■■■ ,a •i - l
wt•■■rr■rr.w ■■r _
■w■■w■■■!f*Y■■ •f
�■■■■■■w.■■... 11 .e]� IS�:'
Ji
■■■■lwwrr■wwrw 4 #��� �kk:i:���l� �- ! ir.r ��.::. �i t_..xt, r k1 `�lkllra� k.a
IL
—� S
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
3D VIEWS & RENDERINGS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-A■6
Pagb 366 of 500
r I
jr
., r. — ter, • ,� t ' ,' _ I'
'k F.._ .
yrr
x I + r
� L
4b
XF it
L05ANGELES
l-
W ',
J
11H
t ^r
milli
-Jio LOS ANCELEN CHARM"
T
r I II ,"Ilt bliily ;'wiirt �i• iilr 11 ��Ip,i '�. 1�`J:' • l:krs l' - ,,J��piq�N��l� ��i�i�'�Il�jl �dl:iv ii� s��'
�ti 2
. F..
GVNTINCNTAL ansier MAR VENTURES INC_ DEVELAPMENT CARP_ LAS ANrELES C-I� IRrER-R LOS A
ALOW aL0,92:WF:411Lat
C
milli
-Jio LOS ANCELEN CHARM"
T
r I II ,"Ilt bliily ;'wiirt �i• iilr 11 ��Ip,i '�. 1�`J:' • l:krs l' - ,,J��piq�N��l� ��i�i�'�Il�jl �dl:iv ii� s��'
�ti 2
. F..
GVNTINCNTAL ansier MAR VENTURES INC_ DEVELAPMENT CARP_ LAS ANrELES C-I� IRrER-R LOS A
ALOW aL0,92:WF:411Lat
C
AM-- -2 OWS-41
dim
11jol
$L
77 0
AJF
oil -
Ai
lop'
W
�pn
Air
n
WIN
wr -
49 _*ft
m
=.i -%. _
Inumum. I
: 0
POEMS
y W.44
MN
. . ............
++
n� . . . . ..
4.
- ---------
016,
-pull
r
L
i k
A
3nsler GUNTINENTAL
MAR UFNTt]RF-e% INC- � nFVFLnPMFNTr- nRF
n_R ANr.FLF_R r_14ARr.FR_R � LOS P
F,k] 0jej a 111 LI [el :f 0!
L04T 11] a
L:1 : [p]F4,11 I a II
I k �Jjq I I I W1 Ilk j I IVOR L49L L
two-
FENCING DIAGRAM
FENCING TYPES
I FC..FNn
-••••••••••• THIGH METAL VERTICAL PICKET SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF
THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB, TYP.
BLACK VINYL PRINTED SCRIM ON INSIDE OF FENCE
TREES & PLANTING IN 5' BUFFER BETWEEN FENCE AND SIDEWALK
m0000000000• THIGH METAL VERTICAL PICKET SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF
THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB, TYP.
BLACK VINYL PRINTED SCRIM ON INSIDE OF FENCE
•••••••••••• 45' HIGH TALL NETTING TO BLOCK VIEWS FROM ELEVATED METRO LINE
• 0000•••••• 8' HIGH BLACK VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCING
• 0000•••••• EXISTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CHAINLINK FENCE
• 0000•••••• 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL FENCE -VERTICAL PICKETS
PLANTING IN 5' BUFFER BETWEEN FENCE AND SIDEWALK
SECURITY BOOTH DESIGN.
TYPE 6
FENCE PRODUCT -VISTA SERIES, CUSTOM BOOTH DESIGN
MANUFACTURER - MFI
COLOR - WHITE
o '- ]vLTiHANO
insCu �
CALVO M $M;_ OR
AL"INUM nQK FRAME
PAINT FINISH
K+SULATE4 WALLS
CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY
PREFABRICATED SECURITY —
BOOTH WITH METAL PANEL TO
MATCH MAIN BUILDING
VISTA SERIES
1/4• TEMPERED
SATEn' GLASS
— iNSULALIED ROOF
Mardan Fabrication
HCAYv-Outr
cook ROLLYR5
R TRACK —
Tel: (800) 882-5820
Fax(855) 313-4159
www.mardonfab.com
WAIIiIRPRDOf SEALANT
3' INSUUSTED QODF
FLUOR. L*ft FIXTUNE
5"To4/DLL- SIECEPt,
SHEET
WMXT
UT:
DGK
_
LW CENTER PAxEI
swum
DOOR
FINlSNED MOOR
ELEC. ROITCH-M AREA
flECES5ILQ
G DOOR 41:AvfrLOOR FRAME RDUGH-IN LOCADON
DOOR
Standard Plans
E F7
-_ -I M
=_
Sliding Door Left Sliding Door Right Two Sliding Doors Right Rear Rear Center Left Rear
Swing Door Swing Door Swing Door
Side Swing Door Sliding & Swing Door Guard Booth w/Restroom Guard Booth w/Restroom Two Directional
E a-: -1
Forward Sliding Door Two Attendant Toll Booth r
u.ilfi—Ilca Q--tL. Custom Shapes
PBERIRSHEO wwTE
STuCOo_ZosSEO CEIUNG
,
1 /4" 7EMPEREtl
PREnNSHEO
SAFEV GLASS
INr. HALL
ALUWNUM GLAZING SASH
HK]H SECURiTy
HOOK -BOLT LOCK
W/RENWABLE CYLINDER
AIR aDkpMGNER
GALVAN12E0 SrifL OR
ALVMRLUM xAL,ts {PAINTCL]]
IN5ULATEp
TOP_mumG
WALL
INTECRAL—
Roofs and Windows
Standard Roof Profile Economy Roof Profile Flush Fascia/Butt Gloss Horizontal Sliding Window ADA Height Sliding Window
P� ® B® o 0 0 f
Peaked Roof/Step Fascia Hip Roof/Wall Moldings Single Hung Windows Ticket Windows Offset Overhang
Colonial Style Mullions Colonial Style Mullions Overhang
High Profile Fascia
PARKING CONTROL ACCESS
DEVICES W-CARD READERS
I ,
LU
o
J
TYPE 3
o
—TYPE 2 _ LU
LU
w
O �I z
J
LU
LU
o� ry
LU
- � O• I
PAIR OF 8' WIDE ACCESS
GATES FOR VEHICULAR
ACCESS TO FIELDS
UTILITY EASEMENT LINE
METRO EASEMENT LINE
PROPERTY LINE
TYPE 3
TYPE 1 & TYPE 2
FENCE PRODUCT - MONTAGE COMMERCIAL
MANUFACTURER - AMERISTAR
COLOR - BLACK
HEIGHT - 8' HIGH PANEL
SCRIM PRODUCT -VINYL WINDSCREEN - 100% BLOCKAGE - 130Z
MANUFACTURER - COLLINS COMPANY
COLOR - ROYAL BLUE WITH CHARGERS COLOR GRAPHICS
HEIGHT - 6' TALL
°I16
}
� -
1jlot,
.4
TYPE 3
FENCE PRODUCT - WOODLAND PRO CAMO NETTING - FIRE RETARDANT (BULK ROLL)
MANUFACTURER - CAMO NETS USA
COLOR - GREEN / BROWN
HEIGHT - 7'-10"W X 2551
_PIP
��� I `'•+.may �
:�. dbdh
TYPE 4
FENCE PRODUCT - VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK
MANUFACTURER - N/A
COLOR - BLACK
HEIGHT - 8' HIGH
TYPE 6
FENCE PRODUCT - MONTAGE PLUS
MANUFACTURER - AMERISTAR
COLOR - BLACK
HEIGHT - 42" HIGH
�rY
TYPE 5
FENCE PRODUCT - EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
MANUFACTURER - N/A
COLOR - GALVANIZED, SILVER
HEIGHT - 8' HIGH
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ&TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
SITE FENCING DIAGRAM + SECURITY BOOTH CUT SHEETS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-A.9
Pagel 369 of 500
A B C C.7 D D.5 E F
C9
FLOOR PLAN - MEZZANINE NET SF: 5,122 SF
3 SCALE. 1/16 - 1-0
N
7
0
N
CV
8
O
EO
co
0
bo
N
1R-E
E F
12'-4"
ELEV 1
PIT
ELEV 2
PIT
D D.5
23'-0"
STAIR 4
I
I
ELEV 4
PIT El
23'-0" 14'-8" 12'-4"
E)(F
G
29'-0"
29'-0"
4- 0" 1'
41'-0"
H H.5 T6-
J.2
34'-0" 0"L.
G) (H
I I
34'-011 6'-0"
H.5 J J.2
0
N
GV
c7
E )
co
i�
iai
i�
7
iae]
maul
D E T
G H
50'-0" 29'-0" 41'-0"
� vv�iv
G noov
12'-4"
(1-1.5 T6-
J.2
34'-0" 0"
0
0
co
STAIR 7
0
in
co
CV
N
�3)
44)
4 5 )
46)
48)
�9)
410
as
FLOOR PLAN - BASEMENT NET SF: 1,770 SF FLOOR PLAN - FIELD LEVEL NET SF: 49,357 SF
1 SCALE. 1/16 - 1-0 2 SCALE. 1/16 - 1-0
CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
CONTINENTAL
Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY MAIN BUILDING PLANS - B1 & L1 E-A.10
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET
©2021 Gensler COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PagE 370 of 500
ON
CV
7
I
T
F37'-811 2'-4'
29'-Off
G
H
'HY-O"'
5
J J.2
6'-0"
12'-4" 29'-0" 41'-0" 34'-011 [6- - Oi
D F G H H.5 J J.2
3
ED
M
TAIR 7
5
N
TAIR 6 0
N
CV
O
ED
co
O
EO
N
co
lL
7
10
12
(:6
N
7
—
I
E F
37'-8" 12'-4"
29'-0"
G
41'-0"
H
J J.2
6'-0"
FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 02 NET SF: 44,569 SF 2 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 03 NET SF: 39,784 SF
SCALE. 1/16 = 1-0 SCALE. 1/16 = 1-0
CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
CONTINENTAL
Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY MAIN BUILDING PLANS - L2 & L3 E-A.11
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
©2021 Gensler
Pagb 371 of 500
10
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING NORTH
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING SOUTH
9 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING EAST
5 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING WEST
4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
•• • • • • • • • • • • • •
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE EAST ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE SOUTH
8 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE WEST
7 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
GROUNDSKEEPING PERSPECTIVE
6 SCALE:
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - MAINTENANCE NORTH
2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - GROUNDSKEEPING PLAN NET SF: 4,800 SF
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
GROUNDSKEEPING BUILDING - PLANS & ELEVATIONS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-A.12
ge 372 of 500
:v: i • WOOL..
a� F
.i�yY. Fi'- a•
Cp
iit.•
JAN
Irl 14 m — — .
wo
GLZm2**
... ........... `..,��� ......,.,��,,,
Illllllllll
Zi-
Li—i-i HAI
Iliflllllll � �-
Illllllillll
I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�I�LI�I
MT-1 MT-2 MT-3 MT-4 MT-5
MATERIALS
CONC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE WALL
CONC-2 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE WALL
PT-1 PT-2 PT-3
GLZ-1 CLEAR GLASS SOLARBAN72
STmi
GLZ-2 LOW-E GLASS SOLARBAN90
MT-1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANEL - SILVER
MT-2 FLAT SEAM METAL SOFFIT PANEL - WOOD VENEER
MT-3 FLAT SEAM METAL WALL PANEL - WHITE
MT-4 PERFORATED METAL PANEL - 43% OPEN
MT-5 PAINTED METAL LOUVERS - WHITE
PT-1 WHITE PAINT TO MATCH METAL WALL PANEL
PT-2 ACCENT PAINT "CHARGERS" BLUE
PT-3 SILVER PAINT TO MATCH STANDING SEAM METAL PANEL
ST-1 SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO - WHITE
CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
CONTINENTAL
Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY MATERIALS PALETTE E-A.13
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET
©2021 Gensler COSTA MESA, CA 92626
Page 373 of 500
1►
0 20' 40'
SCALE: 1 "=40'
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
700 South Flower Street
Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
www.kpff.com
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
SITE PLAN
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-C.1
Pag 374 of 500
/
FIRE TRUCK ACCESS -OPTION 1
FIRE TRUCK ACCESS - OPTION 2
N
0 20' 40'
SCALE: 1 "=40'
N
0 20' 40'
SCALE: 1 "=40'
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
700 South Flower Street
Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
www.kpff.com
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ&TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
VEHICLE TURNING ANALYSIS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-C.2
Pag 375 of 500
dp
D-Series Size 1
LED Area Lumoinaoire
WEI
Huy Arne rican
Side R I ��dP
MONUMENT SIGNAGE;
PROVIDE POWER FOR
II I I IRAIAIATEM C1I(1AIA(1C
ecurity
CENTERLINE OF S HUGHES WAY
Calculation Summary
Label
CalcT pe
Unit. s
Avg
Max
Min
Avg/Min
Max/Min
Maintenance Parking
Illuminance
Fc
2.08
9.7
0.8
2.0
12.1
parking lot
Illuminance
Fc
2.02
11.9r
0.01
202.00
1195
Property Line
Illuminance
Fc
0.45
1.E
0.0
N.A.
N.A.
gate enterance
Illuminance
Fc
5.5
12.wJ
1.7
3.32
7.0
gate exit
Illuminance
Fc
1.38
1.5
1.2
1.15
1.25
Maintenance Parking
Illuminance
Fc
2.37
9.7
1.0
2.37
9.70
Roadway
Illuminance
Fc
1.60
5.F-
0.4
4.50
14.00
South parking lot
Illuminance
Fc
2.35
7.
0.6
3.92
11.67
Truest parking lot
Illuminance
Fc
2.18
4.4
0.6
2.735.50
all Pack Lu
inaire
Luminai re S ciedul-e
S col
Qty
Label
Arrang-erent
Total Lamp Lumens
LLF
Des Gripti on
20
B
SINGLE
N.A.
0.700
aS l LEI} P3 40IL 73H NVOLT
26
A
SINGLE
N . A .
0.700
aS l LEI} P3 4 OIL ELr6 NVOLT
E?mC
SINGLE
N. A.
0.700
SEA-E[>G- 3M-xx- 0 6 -E-UL- 7 0 0 -4 0 h.
RED DASHED LINE INDICATES THE
LIMITS -OF -WORK (LOW) FOR THIS
PROJECT
8' HIGH CUSTOM METAL VERTICAL SLAT
SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER
OF THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH
CONCRETE CURB, TYP.
°
SOLAR SHADE CANOPIES, TYP.
PARKING CONTROL ACCESS
DEVICES W-CARD READERS
PAIR OF 8' WIDE ACCESS
GATES FOR VEHICULAR
ACCESS TO FIELDS
0
(2) 14'X 14'X 6'TALL
CONCRETE SOIL BINS
0
UTILITY EASEMENT LINE
0
0
- METRO EASEMENT LINE
0
0
- PROPERTY LINE
0
0
a
t
1
t
1
.1
.1
.1
2
.9
5 8' HIGH CUSTOM METAL VERTICAL SLAT
5 SECURITY FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER
5 5 OF THE FIELDS; SET IN CONTINUOUS 6" HIGH
5 CONCRETE CURB, TYP.
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
PARKING LOT PHOTOMETRIC STUDY
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-E.1
142
-1 40
173
129
105
1
hl hl 1 11�
14 1 14 04
I111 1111
1141 M404
+1 65
149
1
142 1
124
11
151
.1 5Y
Fr
7
17
v
.153
�h�l ICI
1■1
1
�h�h
1111 1111
Ills
hih�
1 P 1 ��
11 1 1
1 1 14
Pi rijin
1 1 1 1
in
ti r
60
65
' 4119
1 70
11110 11111111
11
h4
1hlh
hlhl 1111
�141
1�1�
4 hd h h11 h
r
1
4 h4 h
hl h1 1 I 1 I
114 1
r4 r4
16
*152
39
141
149
742 138 134
F2
T.
;148.1
78
,1
1 1 1 1
71
1 1 1 1 62 114114
91
.163
N
*1 00
56
14 h11h
1111
114
4r111h
A hd h
hI I V
1 I 1 I 11 I P F 114
q r4 h
61
152
13��
I
1
13 139 744 _ 125 143
14
I
m M
#149
1 401
173
129
I
r r
I
F4
F 3
I I
�
I
r;
Do
3
-
-
I
F4
4
op-_�
117
17
5
J 7
t1 15 15
6
V F179
177
III 1111
�r�r 1
1 �h�h h�h� 1111
Ir1h h�h�
�h�h h�h�
11�1 1■1■
11�1 I�
t1�1
I I I
rr r
, 1, 1#
Ellin *1?2 1 17 hr hi TlYb
114 1
r rr h
1111
1, 17}I58
151
f
151
4106
157
67
172 172 170
73
172
58
A 58
151
till 1411
414P h4h4
4h11h h1111,1111
11111 1404 411111111 hlhI'll 111
114P 14P4
401111 011111
1111 111P
1g11111 411111
dIr 11r1
Jrgr 040i
40J1 I q I 1J611■
�hrh hrhr 1111
114r r4h4
4040 040r
1111 1111
11P1
-1
1
� 0 150
66
+179
177
1
20
#1
50 40
#161
1
132
1 �
4
132 A 56 .141
J
} 29
}127
�1
I I I
}� Ill1�141
.132
F7
C
G)
Z
M
Name: Football- 1
Size- 350' x 160'
Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0'
Height: 3.0' above grade
=11111111111�o�
7MAITAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES
Entire Grid
Guaranteed Average,. 1w
Scan Average,, 153,03
Maximum: 179
Mill inirnum: 124
Avg / Min: 1L24
uc (adjacent pts); 1.34
CU: 0.77
CV: Q_10
No. of Points: 72
-UMINAIRE INFORMATION
Applied Circuits: A
Color I CRI: 5700K - 75 CRI
No. of Luminaires: 89
Total Load: 117.01 kW
Guaranteed Performance: The ILLUMINATION described above
I
s guaranteed per +dour M uscD Warranty document and
includes a 0.95 dirt depreciation factor.
Field Measu renne nts: Individual field measurements may vary
from computer -calculated predictions and should be taken
in alccordalnce wIlth IESNA RP-6-15.
Electricarl System Requimmants, Refer to Amperage
Drowv Chart and/oir the "Musco control System Summary"
for electrical sizing_
Installation Requirements: Results assume ± 3%
nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structures
located within 3 feet (1 m ) of design locations.
Name: Football- 2
Sloe; 360, x 160`
Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0'
Height: 3.0' abot+e grade
�+
7MAlNED HORIZONTAtiL FOOTCANDLES
Entire Grid
Guaranteed Average; 150
Scan Average: 155.72
maximum: 179
Minimum: 124
Avg / Min: 1.26
Max/ Min. 1.45
UG (adjacent pts): 1.34
Cu: 0.78
CV: 0.11
No. of Points: 72
LUMINAIRE INFORMATION
Appliied Circuits: B
Color f CRI: 5700K - 75 CRI
No. of Luminaires: 90
Total Load: 118.44 kW
Guaranteed Performance: The ILLUMINATION described above
is guaranteed per your M usco Warranty dowment and
includes a 0.95 dirt depreciation factor_
Field lYMeasurements: I ndividuaI field measurements may vary
from computer -calculated predictions and should be taken
in accordance with IESNA RP-6-15.
Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage
Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"
for electrical sizing.
Installation Requirernerrts: Results assume ± 3%
nami nal voltage at line side of the driver and structures
located within 3 feet (1m) of design locations_
Nary: Football- 3
Size: 360' x 1.60'
Spacing: 30.0X 30.0'
Height. 3.0' above grade
kJ k1 ■11
N1�41NTAIN ED HORIZONTAL FOOTCAN DLES
Entire Grid
Guaranteed Aacra:ge. 250
Scan Average= 153.17
Maximum: 180
Minimum: 124
Av.g Kiln: 1.23
Max Min 1AS
4J C (adf a cent pts)= 1.34
CUl 0.78
cv+ 0.10
No. of PoInts: 72
LU15 INAIRE INFORMATION
Applied Circuits: C
Color •Cal: 570DK - 75 CRI
No. of Luminaires, 89
Total Load; 117.01 k
Gtiaranteed Perforwnce; The ILLUMINATION descrll�ed above
Is C uaranteed per yn u r M used Warm my docu rnent a n d
i ncl Ides a 0, 9S d i rt depreci atiarl factor_
Field rVJc asu rem a nts : Individual field m easu real-ents may vary
fro m compute r-ca Iculated pred i cti o ns a Ind s hould be take n
In a€-ordance with I ESN A RP-6-15_
Electrical System Requirements; Refler to Amperage
Draw Cha rt and/or t he "Musco Control System 5 u rn ma ry'
for electrical sizing_
Installation Requirements. Resu Its assume ± 3
nornina I voltage at I i n e Side of the d rive r a Ind struc:tu res
I ocated with i n 3 fleet (1 m) of design I ucations ,
i
I
r
INCLUDES:
- Football- 1
• Foot ba 1 I- ?_
- Football- 3
Electrical System Req u i r8 me n t s: Refer to Amperage
Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System 5 u m m a ryll
for electrical sizing.
Installation Requirements: Results ass u me ± 3
nominal voltag-e at line side of the driver and structures
located within .3 feet (1 m) of design locations.
Pole
Luminaires
QTY
LOCATION
ELEVATION
HEIGHT
70'
TYPE
TLC-LED-1500
POLE
19
4
F1-F2
? t '
-
F9- F10
15.5p
TLC-PT-57 5
3
F r FR
-
17.i)
TLC-BT-57 5
2/2
70'
TLC- LE D-1500
26
2
F4r F 7
701
-
20'
TLC- BT-5 7 5
2/2 *
? .'
70'
TLC- L E D-1500
1
1
F 5
TLC-BT-57 5
2
2j'
TLC-OT-57 5
.2
70r
TLC- LE D-1SOO
216
2or
TLC- BT-
r ..�
TLC-BT-5 7 5
2
70'
TLC-LED-1500
26
10
TOTALS
269
This st ru cture u ti I izes a back -to -%a ck m o u nt ng config u ratio n
rB
Ia�Specis
7flietio
.90 M in Poore
Ling Ampera a Per
(max d ra w�
LuMinaire
Single Ph Voltage
(WI
trkl
(WI'
I )
two
�60}
TLC LED-1500
B_5
8.1
7..1
6.4
5_ 1
4_7
3.7
TLC-ST-575
3_4
3.2
2.9
2.5
2.0
1.9
1.5,
■■11611-
G1L` IJ J
■L' ' J
Jr 0
L,' ■ r 1
�r
aaf6%.
R3
f
F1 F2
P.3
TLC for LED
Total Light Control
NaMe: spill
Spacing: 30.0'
Height,, 3_0' above grade
HORIZONTAL FOOTCAN DLE5
Entire Grid
Scan Average: 1.1989
Maximum 7.59
Minimum: 0.00
No. of Points: 72
LUMINAIRE INFORMATION
Applied Circuits: A, Be C
No. of Luminaires: 268
Tota I Load. 352.46 k1
Guaranteed Performance: The ILLUMINATION described
a Bove is gua ra nteed per Your M usco Warranty
docu men#.
Field Measurements: Ind iMidua I field measurements may vary
from -computer-calculated predictions and should be taken
in accordance with IESNA R P-G 15.
Electrical System Requ i rements: Refer to Amperage
Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System 5ulmmary"
for electrical sizing.
Installation Requirements: Results assume ± 3
no minall voltage at line side of the driver and structures
ocated wi thin 3 feet (1m) of design locations_
f �
�Jx
F-• 1-0
aF
�
o
mom
it!
111111111
11
91M
in
03
35
F3
040 0 i ' S111
�• 0
'IN
1
1
IN
1
DLENNIE
%03
06
P ' -F F7 F8 .hill;
I
54
.. .....
02 ... ..� ....
1 1111 111 11 111 1111� 11116 1111 111 111
It 05 13
.1111 '1111 1111� 111 1 1111 111 1111 1111 111 1111
1111 111 '•11 111•
OS
%r, •I
r .22
IFI LLLL,-- ----- ...... ........ ---- t -------- ----- ......
11).113
.113.05 Il1 1- .JI*F77 Y�,'� J '
ll_ ... "Jr_
1111
1111
�
••,1 11••
•••, ,••
.......
...
...
Jill
...... .... ..
.1111.
., 111.
...
... ..
.......
111
11
1111
11
1111
1
1111
..... .... ..
1111
1111 11
IIII
1 1111
_ .....
.....
I
1
,
AMP
Jr rr
-XI r
_ Ir 1
4 Ify S�EllpJ
7
■1 .1y� J
Q J --
• 1,ji.0 r J
NOT ES: An ;Bf# sol id wal I around th a fiiel ds, have
been i n cl u ded i nto the spill sea ns-
Pole location(s) +dimensionis are relativE
to 0,0 reference point(s) �
A
C=
MU
We Make It Happen:-.
Nut to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musca
Sports Lighting, LLC. 019B1. 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LL0.
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
FIELD PHOTOMETRIC STUDY
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-E.2
LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES
LINE OF BUILM
TYPE SL1 - OPTION A
15' TALL PEDESTRIAN POLE
SYMMETRIC TYPE V DISTRIBUTION
3000K
TYPE SL2
ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT
WITH ASYMMETRIC WALL WASH
15X90-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
RG B+3000 K
TYPE SL5
UPLIGHT COVE FIXTURE MOUNTED
BEHIND FACADE SCREEN
60X60 DISTRIBUTION
3000K
TYPE SL1 - OPTION B
F
TYPE SL1 - OPTION C
TYPE SL3
BUILDING MOUNT FLOODLIGHT
WITH GLARE CONTROL SNOOT
40-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
3000K
TYPE SL6
LINEAR LOW -VOLTAGE LENSED
LIGHT FIXTURE BEHIND ACRYLIC
PANEL OF FACADE SCREEN
62-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
4000K
r.
TYPE SL4
TYPE SL1 - OPTION D
FACADE GRAZE FIXTURE WITHIN
CEILING SLOT
30X30 DISTRIBUTION
3000K
TYPE WL1
WALL MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE
WITH TYPE III DISTRIBUTION
4000K
1 ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE - ILLUSTRATIVE PLAZA LIGHTING PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
CONTINENTAL
Gensler MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH E-E.3
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET
©2021 Gensler COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Pag 378 of 500
LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES
TYPE SL1 - OPTION A
15' TALL PEDESTRIAN POLE
SYMMETRIC TYPE V DISTRIBUTION
3000K
TYPE SL1 - OPTION C
Oil
TYPE SL4
FACADE GRAZE FIXTURE WITHIN
CEILING SLOT
30X30 DISTRIBUTION
3000K
TYPE SL2
ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT
WITH ASYMMETRIC WALL WASH
15X90-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
TYPE SL1 - OPTION B
TYPE SL1 - OPTION D
TYPE SL6
LINEAR LOW -VOLTAGE LIGHT
FIXTURE BEHIND ACRYLIC PANEL
OF FACADE SCREEN
62-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
4000K
RGB+3000K TYPE DL1
TYPE SL7
ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT
WITH HEX -CELL LOUVER GLARE
CONTROL
60-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
RGB+3000 K
2" RECESSED ADJUSTABLE
DOWNLIGHT
3000K
Top view
(as installed)
1
Top view
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-EA
Pag 379 of 500
LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES
TYPE SL1 - OPTION A
15' TALL PEDESTRIAN POLE
SYMMETRIC TYPE V DISTRIBUTION
3000K
TYPE SL1 - OPTION C
TYPE SL2
ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT
WITH ASYMMETRIC WALL WASH
15X90-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
RGB+3000K
TYPE SL7
ADJUSTABLE INGRADE UPLIGHT
WITH HEX -CELL LOUVER GLARE
CONTROL
60-DEGREE DISTRIBUTION
RGB+3000 K
TYPE SL1 - OPTION B
TYPE SL1 - OPTION D
TYPE DL1
2" RECESSED ADJUSTABLE
DOWNLIGHT
3000K
Top View
(as insiallad)
Top view
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
EXTERIOR LIGHTING DESIGN APPROACH
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-E.5
Pag 380 of 500
0
TYPE SL3 & SL5
TYPE SL6
1
`11111`����gp��u���1111111111111��i
,t�1,ir 111111111111111DVa .
WM�
M. lip
--- 40
Jam`
TYPE SL6
TYPE SL4
TYPE WL1
X
MOL
�N
IIIIIIII
I llljjl
��I11��1111111
{1�1111/Ijjlllllll�
r
i 1jI!
fill'
P....... ...
r
TYPE DL1
own
TYPE SL3 & SL5
-,Wo
ansler IMAR VFMTl1RFS INC_ I GUNTINhNTAL
nFVFLAPMFNT CARP- I LAS AMCFLFS CHAR
•16*1K
ALMILIaLOIR :[01:411Lot
i
:�[91L
I
IA J JLois 1i
r
r_lmn.,
M~, '
LANDSCAPE AREA
PLANTED AREAS
40,814 SQFT
HARDSCAPE AREAS
30,030 SQFT
SPORTS FIELD EDGE - ARTIFICIAL TURF
56,962 SQFT
SPORTS FIELD - NATURAL LAWN
197,652 SQFT
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREAS
325,458 SQFT
PROPERTY PERIMETER
REQUIREMENTS PER GENERAL AND SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN: (1) SHADE TREE MUST BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY (25) OF STREET
FRONTAGE.
STREET FRONTAGE: 1,046 LF = 42 TREES REQUIRED
TREES PROVIDED:47
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
pr
r
otl
Ll
OF, 00!IIIIII
00
00
/
/
00
00
`
SOCAL EDISON
LOADING DOCK , /- ,
UTILITY YARD �.� fir:,- ,//��� vo
00
00
/
00
0�
0000
SECURITY BOOTH 00
00 /�.�.
00
SOLAR PANELS (ABOVE)
BUILDING PERIMETER
REQUIREMENTS PER GENERAL AND SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN: A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DEPTH OF (5) OF LANDSCAPE SHALL BE
PROVIDED AROUND THE BUILDING.
PROVIDED: LANDSCAPE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED A MINIMUM OF (5) AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING
(REFER TO THIS SHEET FOR LANDSCAPE AREA).
VEHICULAR USE AREA (VUA)
GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS: THERE SHALL BE ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY THREE THOUSAND (3,000) SQUARE FEET OF VUA,
WITH LANDSCAPE AREAS TO COVER FIVE PERCENT (5%).
(VUA) SQUARE FEET: 194,142 LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 26,077 PERCENTAGE: 13.4%
(VUA) SQUARE FEET: 194,142 / 3,000 = 64 TREES REQUIRED
GENERAL PLAN: TREES PROVIDED: 32
32 TREES SUBSTITUTED BY OVERHEAD PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS
SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN REQUIREMENTS: LANDSCAPE AREAS TO COVER FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF THE VUA, WITH A MINIMUM OF
(5) BUFFERS AT ALL PARKING LOT EDGES. EACH PARKING SPACE MUST BE LOCATED WITH (30') OF A TREE, AND ALL
PLANTING AREAS CONTAINING TREES MUCH HAVE A MINIMUM (5) WIDTH.
SOUTH CAMPUS PLAN: 22 TREES SUBSTITUTED BY OVERHEAD PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS
l\k'0 ■
1 r-- METRO GREEN LINE
PROPERTY LINE
♦♦ 1,
♦♦ 6 _ .=
♦♦ :� o
♦
-�-� ♦=� h
1p%I r V.
*&IIIIIII� ■ ■ 1 VA
• ,1
Alk 1b II i&�,
0
I j l
r
1O VEHICULAR USE AREA
N
2O PLANTED SLOPE
3O PAVED PLAZA
4O PAVED PASEO AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS
5O POOL AREA
6O PLANTED BUFFER
7O SPORTS FIELDS
SHEET NUMBER
E-L.1
0 20'
40'
1"=40'
Page 382 of 500
TREES
SUCCULENTS
JIV
ti jty v
,1119 tr,
y
- • f +I• { �py1�•�
Ar
4/ IF
1
4
'�'` - % _ �`-1 �k �:� �•� +V ',�` '�rllI ���', Jig ��:
�+ — ��'='y --':; r' f! \' `\ fit\ v �� `� t #1�,/'� w •+\.
', # y I t �. ''x+.'v�-•i' i ,-v,,, _,'.'. _ 1 ! , f ~ it ?+..�
`
rr a. �. - ♦.• . i, tir Jr!x� _ . ♦ J ��`'iaar.�,yYlk-,-,-��+� •� - / �r.. r ' 1F,� -1' '*f0� � � `� \
y I # 'Afi ' .7T �16.:• ... e p f
r- r� r � -t + 1F' �• fir,, 1/ x: `'
SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER
�•r� `• . ;�� `�`+ :� � � . �,. -�. _- .... '� III � I -
rs'. IF
•1 1 1
•_i y '' 1S''y5x ti _ ! I 1 •I 1 �_ 11141.1 1�•
r � Ypg
,
1 �`. � /h,� � s• � .' � �' y' ,� 1 1 r � ti
l4` •'' `� i.. y r' i'' +II �'' rff ,� 'i/+ -' + • •� _ j'• 4. ' ` l _ . w4�� r �+ '_ v _'„ �!' 1'. 1 1
F` n �� .,�' s�'�`PI '�V / �' V y� f7�t' �,I•�J,f1i�l;li ��ew' _ r f . r I e. - �,7 _ � - � � r'r"" "'ti ! ' f f � i '�'
+..tipIS
'i%'�',�' �'''l, '''ri•L I' ll�i l - h. ?1j 1'{°�',r t`1r J r-• yrfi�• .�... ,3 - J� - ,r �`+ '♦'4�� + r e� • „'_ �R' yi r"•. w -,+' i<-}
+C i.\' P. - {�,4ti, 1'. 511''I'E'I�' 4ti i rl1�r'j,r' �., 1 _ J Z ♦ * ♦1 1 1 �� 1 'i �. ?-� y , ♦'r '.z' ` � ', r L , . �J 4141� Jfs_ R�.'1 r'if � � � r *.'►' � � .�" r ;"R�►e...
?
��� �� ��; � 1'�, , , 1' • r � � 'r :ice, r r + ,+� •, • rr _ I �;_.-.,��� 4 _ �It� - - - :: � ? � ,,,�"` �. � -
ri
l . 5?� \ e`,Y\5�„� �' � �;;{ I� IrAry` t`• } rJ�! `,{ - r • ,',�/ f;' ♦: .' � . -710
`�. � �+'�t•�', Yt' � ��I�`.f 1��� r' _ _ _ s.ss �-�_�.-,.-a.'- - ,i,^:;'�.. '?'r � +�� \ �,.. a� /F" r ;�T �' ✓�,. �I f
\ , \ : } .r tea- 2 ':� � 1 - �.� j 'r .t rF 7f,• } •
Vie;. ��,:\ 33� � 'ii`id� - �� � ' i °�y y '�• 1
♦ � f. � . -� i I --..-.sane ±�. frF p' '9i � i• Yf ,* _ �
��' , 1►� .F� 4' \ s � � `��al�'� '1Q y � :� i r ���'x f * _ ��y� 5 r� 1
i � _ ��T '� .i � ,{ ;® •.��!,� .:!= �-; 4 ;�, s , *f. szti .� +_' r.�.[ f "-r1 ,f'" ,,...f _ _ r_d
'I �; `� �� �.. T = kr '! K '� ;ry 'k I .' Ir. It 'i, '%Ri� r• i r
- r/ •��....���d \ ����. A -,- ,� -
- tea,a r r �oX',�-= ' '— i r �"�-- �. 1 �' p�:i1r J.r � `�1� •.��f �_ �r _ _w�L.,��-�= •+ - �` � ` � •� f '+ 1� ; V � ��j , �/'$ ' w � - , � � f . } �`T �ri - I 1 • � 1� 1 ti 1� 1
soN vim%`- _i�'•+t'iis. tlatll '.��-'.. d:•"----•''w$'�' ;'i a0.-} >..': r +fry ,1-rf'.�'i.. .a +�,.+:G.�•,�_ al �'�4. '�:iY''i',r .± s_ - �7' 1� �.� 1 .1 r .�Yi
CHONDROPETALUM ELEPHANTINUM DIETES IRIDIOIDES FICUS PUMILA JUNCUS PATENS LEYMUS CONDENSATUS
Large Cape Rush Fortnight Lily Creeping Fig California Grey Rush Sand Ryegrass
, - .: �.. .-:. r.3.- - - - r�J-)., - NI•Z - . l� �� r rwj-
:4I - My„ f- '
� - -"tf
_ >f•' r 4+4 ��[ _ . , y� •' i %i Fh- ` k R r y r \ +\ r l
- �• � .'. � �' �,.- - i1i[ __�. ..F � � I «.. 'A i 3 - C, J� L �Y^4 ,•ti"+ Lf' � � I r, ,��' �, ` �.•� • _, 'ti'.� rrf
1 r • ^rL'
:3
r
.y4.,
- dp
_ f ra -
/ 9 -
I
►� Y
•L
l
Y xa"
I
i
i •' t , dam` a e .�
; � • >I r '�' f.'s::�;'f '.fir' �`::� ' �� � �„• '.`*"R r
i+
r
4
`� ~ �: �; .i�' , ;9�' ,: 4 � q � •�'' - ;� -'tc'. � `'S;;,*` � • ;cr' alf . � ` - r.:� . r}-' �, r a �' � � ' +
+
_iA
�• y 'i� ti .-
i y
I�
ar r
,r.s.
Rey .�
r
55
f
1. l� Yl F
..
- - e
►. fi , ' _
lb
INC
- Ya r �_ •F1
5
R ? Rr
r
?i' •ram .S'j
N r
f i
i ti' � 1I�
G �{,h. 7T �f* /a 5 � �.
1
4
4
'S` r
�JR,,��-•'7 5,'.r'� - F r�� ,.Y . "I 7� �tx i .t ' '3 r -
,?+ .- -
,.rar `•or5�ri,�'. r+- - „a,'• y , s +" : ! r:' . ,/� j ..r' - _ ' _ _ � fi. f j �'. `4.� � �' � •ea„l L.� •� ♦ r �I � � , h • i �
�• _ `4gyr• `jrf,� .Er 2'sri'yi'' }r� .'t�� '[n'- �• - Y ra -!♦' +'. '`Ca`,:li' . 'ti �� � � �
•Ey :�•�# .�#lr} _ y _ � �. � y � :S*! �'i: �` c t+ �}•
}
�K
��rw;�r{a. :►� +r,,. - .�1•: \'�r��4-' ��_ -� .��+ �k ..e �:s ., Y. tia •, "1� '� 7 ; ice'' :r�,G> �`-- -+Y�� ff f -a•. r
ti< ;. l �• f ;'. �'.e1 � E�'��l. �i ``. + f,4 - ti - R� .Yr '+"�, •!`-' ,, 1f ♦ + r -}+ - ./- y f f r r� 4,
N
�-b-Ij
Pr" .♦ _ �$.\ ;-'.�ti'.�.'a- s; 4...'>k•,7�.} ?lr.. x� . '` . ` { �j
"•I �' N � -l• Y � �f(� sr L .. •� ��� �. ,�.� ����'. V �1 `�_ ',xl�:�c Y � ,{-� ! j'y6.• - 1 ''y - � 7 Y `R r
A �$.• F+?w�:b/'?+I.+q-�. . �. r [- ,� }�' \ t , V' 1.' -_ a ti r�� ' • f .-y >v yF'•�. ! � . �F
`
,.k�j`+ .-.
rf�+r �''. �r.�.yy�a :- �_ k� ��tir ii�.1� ►�r�ir "# a'�7- .'k =.5� -
!% ! f' c J/ r F a'� Y�,ny
�yf. �i'-��-•'�•��'S'+Y->.t � Vt.?i IA l� - i • �.� ` Y� �. ..i..`� . .',✓� � � '� _ _ .�~, r.r1.ti.
CAREX PRAEGRACILIS
CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS
PHORMIUM COLENS01
SALVIA CLEVELANDII
SENECIO MANDRALISCAE
California Field Sedge
Yankee Point
Mountain Flax
salvia Cleveland
Blue Chalksticks SELECTED PLANTS FROM WUCOLS LIST.
CLIENTS PROJECT SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
Gensler CONTINENTAL
MAR VENTURES INC. DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOS ANGELES CHARGERS LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY PLANT PALETTE E-L.2
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET 721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET 2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
213.327.3600 3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
Page 383 of 500
�n, 1
1
1
25' 1
1 r 5,
1 - - - - J L
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
SIGNAGE
17250 SF
1
1
SIGNAGE
240 SF
SIGNAGE
300 S w
1
1
SIGNAGE
850 SF
art
-. Z- ielr
SIGNAGE
4, 760 SF
sm
r — � — 7
18'
1
I
SIGNAGE
108 SF
pw•
*-
WEST ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE PARKING LOT
SIGNAGE
2.5' X 120'
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,732 SF
EAST ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE FIELD
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 17,814 SF
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-G.1
Pag� 384 of 500
SIGNAGE
160 SF
SIGNAGE
21250 SF
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
SIGNAGE
648 SF
SIGNAGE
13280 Si
SIGNAGE
750 SF
NORTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE STREET
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 10,618 SF
SOUTH ELEVATION - FACING TOWARD THE RAIL YARD
TOTAL FACADE AREA: 11,200 SF
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ & TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
SIGNAGE OVERLAY ON ELEVATIONS
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-G.2
Pag� 385 of 500
PUSH THROUGH INTERNALLY FABRICATED
ILLUMINATED LOGO AND � BOX WITH N
DIMENSIONAL LETTERS WITH FINE B
16 P-61P
VDALWN-:51GHALE
=Pffu1 DF FrntiFR F%-A
LLVVI T.-ED UCV.CE
EL I
P Tr)
PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION
MATERIALS ! COLORS
FINE BRUSHED
ALUMINUM PANEL
W'
CONCRETE
ENTE RLJ N E C F 3 H U C- H E 3 VJA
PANTO N E 1 2C
PANTO N E 285C
Gensler
500 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
213.327.3600
©2021 Gensler
CLIENTS
MAR VENTURES INC.
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CONTINENTAL
DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2041 ROSECRANS AVENUE
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS
TRAINING FACILITY BUSINESS OFFICE
HOAG PERFORMANCE CENTER
3333 SUSAN STREET
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
PROJECT
LOS ANGELES CHARGERS HQ &TRAINING FACILITY
SHEET NAME
MONUMENT SIGN
ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE
SHEET NUMBER
E-G.3
Pagb 386 of 500
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
COMMENTS
SITE ADDRESS . . . . . . . . 2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 83507
19 & 63 . . . . . . . . DECLARATION OF SPECIAL USE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2019-1466051, O.R.
20 & 64 . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED JANUARY 3, 2020 AS
INSTRUMENT NO 2020-0006369, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE, EXACT LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE.
21 . . . . . . . . . . LAND USE COVENANT AND AGREEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESTRICTIONS RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2020-1306546, O.R.
28 . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT OF CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BELOW SURFACE GRADE, BURIED, LATERAL
SEWER GRANTED RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1980, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 80-1197787, O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
30 . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED
APRIL 15, 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 82-390912, O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
33 . . . . . . . . . . DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20161579230, O.R. AND MODIFIED PER ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT RECORDED
MAY 3, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20170489962, O.R. AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO.
20191228494, O.R. AND MODIFIED PER DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 7, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0545516, O.R.
35 & 57 . . . . . . . . . . DECLARATION OF SPECIAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED RECORDED MAY 2, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20170489958, O.R. AND MODIFICATIONS THERETO PER
2019-1466048.
36 & 59 . . . . . . . . AGREEMENT FOR PERFORMANCE OF DESIGNATED WORK RECORDED MAY 2, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20170489961 O.R.
38 . . . . . . . . . . ANY RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR INTERESTS THAT MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY MAP DATED FEBRUARY 8, 2021 AND REVISED
MARCH 8, 2021, BY KPFF, PROJECT NO. 2000081.
39 & 65 . . . . . . . . . . . DECLARATION OF SPECIAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED APRIL 5, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2021-0545514, O.R.
DATE OF SURVEY . . . . . . MARCH 4TH, 7TH, 30TH, & 31 TH, & APRIL 1ST, 5TH, & 7TH OF 2020
OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP No: 71551 M.B. 1418 PAGE 45-55 WAS
40 . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS, UTILIZING THE TARGET AREA AND IMPROVEMENTS, UTILIZING THREE (3) EXISTING STRUCTURES AND VEHICULAR
BASIS OF BEARING
. . . . . . THE BEARING OF N 89°47'49" W ALONG THE CENTERLINE
AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS OF OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED APRIL 5, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2021-0545517, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE,
TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY
EXACT LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE.
UTILITY NOTE
. . . . . . . . . ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN/HEREON THIS MAP CONSISTING OF 13 SHEETS WERE OBTAINED FROM ACTUAL SURVEY OF UTILITY MARKINGS FROM
ELECTROMAGNETIC DETECTION, AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION FROM INDIVIDUAL PROVIDERS, CITY RECORDS, ELECTRONIC DATABASE, OR A COMBINATION THEREOF.
41 . . . . . .
. . . . ACCESS EASEMENT OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED APRIL 5, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0545518, O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE, EXACT
ALL SAID UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY, HAVING BEEN OBTAINED FROM OTHER SOURCES, NOT CONNECTED WITH THIS COMPANY OR
LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SAID INFORMATION AND ANY USER OF THIS
INFORMATION SHOULD CONTACT THE UTILITY OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY DIRECTLY IN PLANNING, CONSTRUCTION, OR ANY SUCH MATTER RELATIVE TO THE UTILITIES.
46 . . . . . . .
. . . BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES OR RIGHTS WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF RECORD OF SURVEY MAP BK 89 PGS. 25-26 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY.
APN NO. . . .
. . . . . . . . 4138-032-005, 4138-032-006, 4138-032-007, 4138-032-008, 4138-032-009, 4138-032-010, 4138-032-01 1, 4138-032-018, 4138-032-019,
4138-032-020, 4138-032-021, 4138-032-022 AND 4138-032-023.
50 51 . . . .
. . . . . EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION AND ACCESS ROAD PURPOSES AND MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF AN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED AUGUST 19, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO 80-794764, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON. ACCESS EASEMENT
BENCHMARK .
. . . . . . . . BENCHMARK J-36 SPIKE IN SE CURB AVIATION AND 120TH, 1' N OF BCR (SY4787) (BM K53)
LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE THE MISSING EXHIBIT "A" PAGE IN SAID DEED.
ELEVATION 96.72 FEET YEAR ADJUSTED: 1962
52 . . . . . .
. . . . EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF 32 & 42 DIAMETER WATERLINE AND MAINTENANCE OF BLENDING STATION STRUCTURE OF WEST
BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECORDED MAY 19, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 94-973125, O.R., PLOTTED HEREON, EASEMENT LIES OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY.
52A . . . . .
. . . EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCT, USE, MAINTAIN, ALTER, ADD TO, REPAIR, REPLACE INSPECT AND/OR REMOVE BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, POLES, TOWERS AND ETC.
TITLE REPORT
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT NO. 00158720-987-OCI-DJ4, DATED AUGUST 3, 2021, AMENDED AUGUST 27, 2021., AMENDMENT NO. B.
FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED MAY 12, 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 82-487217, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
LEGAL . . . . .
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 OF TRACT NO. 71551, IN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
60 . . . . . .
. . . MASTER COVENANT AND AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 2018 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2018-148701 , O.R.
FILED IN BOOK 1418, PAGES 45 THROUGH 55, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM, ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS, GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6903 OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
AND ALL OTHER MINERALS, WHETHER SIMILAR TO THOSE HEREIN SPECIFIED OR NOT, WITHIN OR THAT MAY BE PRODUCED FROM THE PROPERTY BELOW A DEPTH OF FIVE
61 . . . . . .
. . . EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONDUITS AND VAULTS OF RAYTHEON COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 9, 2018 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2018-231193, O.R. AND
HUNDRED (500) FEET, AS RESERVED BY DEED EXECUTED BY CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., A CORPORATION, RECORDED ON NOVEMBER 28, 1978 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 78-1317577, OF
MODIFICATIONS THERETO PER 2019-343932, NOT PLOTTED. EASEMENT LIES OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY. EXACT LOCATION IS INDETERMINATE IN NATURE.
OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH ALSO RECITES, "PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ALL RIGHTS AND INTEREST IN THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE LAND MASS OF THE PROPERTY
TO A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET ARE HEREBY CONVEYED TO GRANTEE, NO RIGHT OR INTEREST OF ANY KIND THEREIN, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BEING EXCEPTED OR
67 . . . . . .
. . . ANY EASEMENTS NOT DISCLOSED BY THOSE PUBLIC RECORDS WHICH IMPART CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AS TO MATTERS AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY AND
RESERVED TO GRANTOR EXCEPT AS HEREINAFTER EXPRESSLY SET FORTH"
WHICH ARE NOT VISIBLE AND APPARENT FROM AN INSPECTION OF THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND.
# . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . INDICATES TITLE REPORT EXCEPTION NO.
68 . . . . . .
. . . ANY MATTERS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY AN INSPECTION AND/OR BY A CORRECT ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF PROPERTY.
®. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . INDICATES TITLE REPORT EXCEPTION NO. PLOTTED HEREON
69 . . . . . .
. . . ANY RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES IN POSSESSION OF A PORTION OF, OR ALL OF, SAID LAND, WHICH RIGHTS ARE NOT DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2❑. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES, UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES AND CONDUITS OF HAGEE-LEWIS PETROLEUM CORPORATION RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 1978 AS
INSTRUMENT NO 78-1193524, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON
3 4 22 23 47 48 . . . . . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN FAVOR OF CHEVRON USA INC FOR DRILLING, AND MAINTAINING OIL WELLS AND FOR PIPELINE PURPOSES
RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 1978 AS INSTRUMENT NO 78-1317577, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY "EASEMENT PARCEL" LIES OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY WITHIN EL
SEGUNDO BLVD.
5, 24 & 49 . . . . . .
. . . . . AND EASEMENT TO DISCHARGE NOISE, LIGHT, HEAR AND GASEOUS AND PARTICULATE MATTER UPON AND OVER THE PROPERTY, NO DOCUMENT NOTED, AFFECTS
PROPERTY, NOT PLOTTABLE.
6❑ . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS PER DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 28, 1978 AS INST NO 78-1317579 O.R. AND MODIFIED MAY 21, 1979 AS
INST NO. 79-546231 O.R. AND NOVEMBER 18, 1981 AS INST NO. 81-1140869 O.R. AFFECTS ACCESS ROAD TO LOT 19. HUGHS ROAD LIES OUTSIDE THE
PROPERTY IN QUESTION.
7 25 . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 42 AND 70 FOOT WIDE EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES RECORDED JULY 25, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO
79-817589, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
8 26 . . . . . . . . . .
. . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN FAVOR OF PACIFIC TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY PURPOSES RECORDED
AUGUST 14,1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 79-895746, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
�9
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND A 18 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES RECORDED
NOVEMBER 26, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO 80-1197785, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
10
27
. . . . . . . . .
. . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, STORM DRAIN EASEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 80-1197786 O.R. AFFECTS
PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
11
29
. . . . . . . . .
. . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND A 42 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE LA CO. FLOOD CONTROL FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES RECORDED
MARCH 20, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT 81-285968, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
12 31 . . . . . . . . .
. . . INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO
06-2216963, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
13
32
53
. . . . . . .
. . . UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM EASEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO
20080316665, O.R. AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
14 & 54 . . . . . . .
. . . DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20161579230, O.R. AND MODIFIED PER ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION
AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 3, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20170489962, O.R. AND OPERATING MEMORANDUM NO. 1 EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT (RAYTHEON) RECORDED SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20191072116 AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED
NOVEMBER 13, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20191228494, O.R.
15 & 55 . . . . . . .
. . . CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20161609377, O.R.
16, 34 & 56 . . . . .
. . . COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RECORDED MAY 3, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20170489957, O.R. AND MODIFICATIONS THERETO PER 2020-0378566
AND 2020-0378567 O.R.
17 58 . . . . . . . . .
. . . EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 2, 2017 AS INSTRUMENT NO 20170489960 O.R., AFFECTS PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
18 37 62 . . . . . . .
. . . INGRESS, EGRESS SANITARY SEWER, DRAINAGE, STORM DRAIN, PUBLIC UTILITIES, EMERGENCY ACCESS, FIRE HYDRANT, WATER METER, WATER LINE, TRAFFIC SIGNAL
AND SIDEWALK PURPOSES AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON TRACT NO 71551, M.B. 1418, PGS. 45-55 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2019-1313306 O.R., AFFECTS
PROPERTY, PLOTTED HEREON.
SETBACK TABLE PER CITY OF EL SEGUNDO (PROPOSED ZONING)
BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE CAMPUS MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FIVE
FEET (25) FROM THE ADJOINING PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD, THE FUTURE
EXTENSION OF NASH STREET, AND THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD, EXCEPT FOR
LOTS WITH FRONTAGE ON THE PORTION OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD LOCATED EAST OF THE FUTURE
EXTENSION OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AND WEST OF THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF NASH STREET. FOR
LOTS WITH FRONTAGE ON THE PORTION OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD LOCATED EAST OF THE FUTURE
EXTENSION OF CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD AND WEST OF THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF NASH STREET,
BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN FEET (15') FROM THE
ADJOINING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OF EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD.
BUILDING AND STRUCTURE SETBACKS WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN MUST BE A MINIMUM
OF FIFTEEN FEET (15') FROM EACH LOT LINE. ACTUAL REQUIRED SETBACKS MAY VARY DEPENDING ON
BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS THAT RELATE TO TYPE AND HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE.
PERMITTED INTRUSIONS INTO SETBACKS ARE IDENTIFIED IN ESMC §15-2-7. THE CLASS 1 BICYCLE
PATH LOCATED ADJACENT TO EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD MAY ALSO BE LOCATED WITHIN REQUIRED
SETBACK AREAS AS LONG AS A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 5 FEET IS MAINTAINED FROM ANY BUILDING.
PROJECT NOTES
THOMAS BROS. GUIDE: 732-1G
GENERAL LAND USE: ESSCSP (EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN)
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: NONE
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA: EL SEGUNDO SOUTH CAMPUS SPECIFIC PLAN
EXISTING UTILITIES: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE OBTAINED FROM CITY EL SEGUNDO
SUBSTRUCTURE MAPS & GROUND SURVEY DATA. CERTAIN UTILITIES SUCH AS TRAFFIC SIGNAL LINES AND
ABANDONED LINES MAY NOT BE SHOWN HEREON.
PROPOSED UTILITIES: SEWAGE AND DRAINAGE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS.
THE SITE SHALL TIE INTO EXISTING SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE.
LOT CONFIGURATIONS AND SIZES ARE APPROXIMATE IN NATURE AND WILL BE FINALIZED DURING THE FINAL
MAP PHASE.
In214w/110Qz Sol yIIOV21i]:iff-11I*616MECIIIIIII 721IIIIIIII01:1121VY11ilk121b7:1'tV141mII UWTIZ&O
WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO CONSOLIDATE LOTS.
REQUEST IS MADE FOR A HAUL ROUTE.
WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO PHASE THE FINAL MAPS.
THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS MAP IS SUBJECT TO THE GOVERNING PLANNING AND ZONING REGULATIONS. PURSUANT
TO THE PROJECT APPROVALS, THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATED TO A PARTICULAR LOT MAY BE INCREASED OR
DECREASED AS LONG AS: (1) THE OVERALL AGGREGATE MAXIMUM PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT IS NOT EXCEEDED; (2)
TRANSFERS OF DENSITY OR UNITS AMONG LOTS SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A RECORDED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OWNER
OF THE LOT RELINQUISHING DENSITY AND THE OWNER OF THE LOT RECEIVING DENSITY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
APPROVALS, WITHOUT FURTHER AMENDMENT TO THIS MAP.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AUTHORITY OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, AND AS PROVIDED UNDER CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66427 (E), THE PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINED ON THE WITHIN MAP
MAY BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED BY MEANS OF CONDOMINIUM PLAN OR PLANS WITHOUT NEED OF FURTHER CITY
OR COUNTY APPROVALS PROVIDED THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CONDOMINIUM UNITS DOES NOT EXCEED
_______ , CONSISTING OF AN AGGREGATE OF _______ RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND
COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS.
SITE AREA
EXISTING LOT AREA
EXISTING LOT 5
312,543 SQ. FT. OR 7.175 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 6
195,471 SQ. FT. OR 4.487 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 7
206,967 SQ. FT. OR 4.751 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 8
252,881 SQ. FT. OR 5.805 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 9
73,235 SQ. FT. OR 1.681 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 10
65,052 SO. FT. OR 1.493 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 11
328,296 SQ. FT. OR 7.537 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 18
799,640 SQ. FT. OR 18.357 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 19
363,159 SQ. FT. OR 8.337 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 20
15,170 SQ. FT. OR 0.348 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 21
99,992 SQ. FT. OR 2.296 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 22
14,250 SQ. FT. OR 0.327 ACRES
EXISTING LOT 23
21,425 SQ. FT. OR 0.492 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT AREA
PROPOSED LOT 1
801,916 SQ. FT. OR 18.409 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 2
342,895 SQ. FT. OR 7.872 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 3
27,130 SQ. FT. OR 0.622 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 4
100,387 SQ. FT. OR 2.305 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 5
190,853 SQ. FT. OR 4.381 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 6
198,958 SQ. FT. OR 4.567 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 7
248,588 SQ. FT. OR 5.707 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 8
351,204 SQ. FT. OR 8.063 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 9
121,690 SQ. FT. OR 2.794 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 10
150,961 SQ. FT. OR 3.466 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 11
168,966 SQ. FT. OR 3.879 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 12
18,129 SQ. FT. OR 0.416 ACRES
PROPOSED LOT 13
26,385 SQ. FT. OR 0.606 ACRES
PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF:
Digitally signed by Robert S. Rogers, PLS
Robert S. Roryer$, PLS DN: C=US, E=buck.ragers@kpff.com,
y O=KPFF, CN="Robert S. Rogers, PLS"
Date: 2021.11.04 13:48:00-07'00'
ROBERT S. ROGERS, PLS 8348
buck.rogers@kpff.com
CAND SU�
* No.8348
\F OF CAOV
G
0
SI
L/
lKpff
700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
F: 213, 266.5294
www. koff. com
--NERAL NOTES:
NNERS:
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
JBDIVIDER:
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
ATTN: LIONEL UHRY
(310) 782-2525
,ND SURVEYOR:
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348
(213) 418-0201
REVISIONS
DATE ISSUED FOR
DATE 11/02/2021
PROJECT NUMBER 2000081
DRAWN BY DG/SR
CHECKED BY BR
SCALE AS SPECIFIED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL
SEGUNDO, CA 90245
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET 1 OF 6
PROPOSED RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENTS (IF ANY) ARE YET TO BE DETERMINED.
Page 387 of 500
6
0 100' 200'
SCALE: 1 "=200'
mr-� Iff"m a] _ C1la r a= WIV"-7 mraffal a]
LINE TABLE
NO.
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
N00°10'54"E
33.48'
L2
S44°47'45"E
2.49'
L3
S45'12'15"W
10.00'
L4
N45'12'15"E
12.00'
L5
S89°47'45"E
7.07'
L6
S44°47'45"E
2.00'
L7
SOO'12'15"W
7.07'
L8
S45'12'15"W
12.00'
L9
N45°12'15"E
9.00'
L10
S89°47'45"E
14.14'
(-*nK1T1n1C:n1TA 1
7►'
Jim1i70 11
1121011i0111,
ARC TABLE
NO.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
C1
00,18,00"
5689.60'
29.79'
C2
00°36'00"
2824.82
29.58'
C3
00°54'00"
1869.91'
29.37'
C4
01°12'00"
1392.47'
29.16'
C5
01°30'00"
1106.01'
28.96'
C6
58°58'20"
49.00'
50.43'
C7
90,00,00"
29.00'
45.55'
C8
90°00'00"
9.00'
14.14'
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 8350 7
EMSThG LOTS AND EMSTING SITE CONDMONS
PROPERTY LINE
LOT LINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
N NASH STREET rL
S&W LS 5810
BOULEVARD I PER TRACT 71551
M.B. 1418-45
22601 IE CAL SEGUNDO HLMDD
0007AL 2250 CAST ILL
+ SECUMBO LLC
12 31 APN 4138-014-917
(NOT A PART)
185 3 DOUGLAS 27
SOCAL pAR71NIERS II
I \\\\\141 38-01 3-026
DOUGLAS BY
?ACO Ff C BELL
4 �3��Oo 1 �3��Oo 0
=12 31 APN 4138-014-917
___ CORAL C� R ( NOT A PART)
FPCH LLCM
1 36-01 3-003
--APN 4138-014-917 (NOT A PART
LOT 23 AREA= 21,944 SQ. FT. OR 0.5 4 ACRES
8 26
3001 CORAL COIIR
0 K]AH CAp[ITAL LLC
413��013�004
0
12 31 APN 4138-014-917
(NOT A PART)
CORAL CR
X G AK CAPI]7AL LLCM
1 29
O
N �34�3 CORAL aR
OCOCLaKvPE CIARQ 37IIAH
N - CLLOO�nMSHI]p �N1C0
41 38- 1 3- 00 6
353 CORAL RAL UR
I NM ER PROP R71IIES IINIC
II I 41 �3��Oo 1 �3�Oo 0077
IIII
LOT 22 AREA= 14,458 SQ. FT. OR 0.332 ACRES
+ 365 CORAL COI]R
WIILLIIAfMI COODCLI)C KI
RTHUR H OREEN1[3ERG
41 38- 1 3-008
LOT 20 AREA= 15,941 SQ. FT.
OR 0.366 ACRES
12 31 APN 4138-014-917
(NOT A PART)
01 CORAL CO n
HCP 401 CORAL LLCM
41 �30�Oo 1 �3�OOg
+
►l
i
w
2'47 -
913.89' -
=72.52 '_ s� a a lid
DETAIL B
A=9
DETAIL A
L_ J ;PY
FTI
92.4 z
a
lqjff
700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
F: 213.266.5294
www. kpff. com
�ENERALNOTES:
JWNERS:
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
SUBDIVIDER:
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
ATTN: LIONEL UHRY
(310) 782-2525
_AND SURVEYOR:
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348
(213) 418-0201
REVISIONS
DATE
ISSUED FOR
DATE 11 /02/2021
PROJECT NUMBER 2000081
DRAWN BY DG/SR
CHECKED BY BR
SCALE AS SPECIFIED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL
SEGUNDO, CA 90245
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET 2 OF 6
Page 388 of 500
VESTING TENTATIVE TRA CTMAP No. 83507
PROPOSED LOTS
1Ut�.UU
I1 �1
ULEVARD q-
APN 4138-014-917
(NOT A PART)
APN 4138-014-917
(NOT A PART)
DETAIL A
S.
�v00
s5r. 5F o LOT 17 a o �o�� z APN 4138-014-917 ( NOT A PART)
I-�� 8 2 6
o
�`V
S?ems, LOT9ems,�� >6� O �\ 6,o 00
,�° � �_�. o
Ln
AREA= 121,690 SQ. FT. cb 9 O 's o
/i N OR 2.794 ACRES ��` �' tx p,
5 2 A o �� �`� �`��' r i t oz
CIA
o -� P r
co
��` 12 31 APN 4138-014-917 ,_x\\
(NOT A PART) ��� o)
LOT 5
O AREA= 190,853 SQ. FT. OR 4.381 ACRES h w
CD
°gyp A=11 °07'31" � 0 0 0G3T p OF �� o � oo, � \
L=60.19, �O� p5�0 O
ro _
THIS SU o IO V UMOO N � O � I�
z
13 52A LOT 1 O
i
AREA= 801 916 SQ. FT. OR 18.409 ACRES
32 53 1 1 29
w
52A roll
`\'°°�V"q' �°> C�^\I'D 00w� LOT 11 N o
AREA= 168,966 SQ. FT. IM AREA= 26,904 SQ. FT. OR 0.618 ACRES Z
rL OR 3.879 ACRES
ARC TABLE
NO.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
C1
00°18'00"
5689.60'
29.79'
C2
00°36'00"
2824.82
29.58'
C3
00°54'00"
1869.91'
29.37'
C4
01°12'00"
1 1,392. 47'11
29.16'
C5
1 01°30'00"
1 1106.01'
28.96'
N 6
0 65' 130' /
SCALE: 1 "=130' /
>4 � r
6999
0b>, ,
N
1d-
AREA= 18,233 SQ. FT. OR 0.419 ACRES
AREA= 28,004 SQ. FT. OR 0.643 ACRES
12 31 APN 4138-014-917
1 (NOT A PART)
N
o
LO
LINETYPES
i i
PROPERTY LINE
LOT LINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
w
►,
G
0
S
L
1Tff
700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
F: 213, 266.5294
www. kpff. com
ENERAL NOTES:
WNERS:
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
UBDIVIDER:
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
ATTN: LIONEL UHRY
(310) 782-2525
AND SURVEYOR:
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348
(213) 418-0201
REVISIONS
DATE
ISSUED FOR
DATE 11/02/2021
PROJECT NUMBER 2000081
DRAWN BY DG/SR
CHECKED BY BR
SCALE AS SPECIFIED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL
SEGUNDO, CA 90245
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET 3 OF 6
Page 389 of 500
VESTING TENTA TI VE TRA C T MAP No.
PROPOSED LOTS, PROPOSED DEMOLITION AND PROPOSED ROAD
7-'' rn
835077
Ef CE
VARD
q-
APN 4138-014-917
INOT A PART)
2 31
APN 4
�138-014-917
(NOT A PART)
F-917 (NOT A PART)
138-014-917
� PART)
,, ►� 12 31 ]APN 4138-014-917
P iy (NOT A PART)
I P � TION /
RE R 31 2
-014 1�
A ( OT T
A
/8
i
28
LINETYPES
PROPERTY LINE
LOT LINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
DEMOLITION AREA LIMIT
EXCEPT METRO RAIL (MTA) AND
APPURTENANT STRUCTURES
AND/OR OTHER
STRUCTURES/FACILITIES AS
RESERVED IN TITLE DOCUMENTS
G
0
S
L
1Tff
700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
F: 213.266.5294
www. kpff. com
ENERAL NOTES:
WNERS:
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
UBDIVIDER:
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
ATTN: LIONEL UHRY
(310) 782-2525
AND SURVEYOR:
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348
(213) 418-0201
REVISIONS
DATE
ISSUED FOR
DATE 11 /02/2021
PROJECT NUMBER 2000081
DRAWN BY DG/SR
CHECKED BY BR
SCALE AS SPECIFIED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL
SEGUNDO, CA 90245
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET 4 OF 6
Page 390 of 500
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 8350 7
ESTABLISHED INT PER - —
IILLECIBLE S04016'52"W• i . . �� .,I . — : •
�i7 �,_ •, EEL SEGUNDO• BLVD
i��r �� i ��L T I I IT,4L 260 EAST EL
�I1 U® �� ,• mm ��I E DO• LLC
;�► ���� I� � , ®® I 4138-013-02
mm
!� w� /r D •OU L T
a MIMIA'-
— �-- � r�i�ii�— �� �� � �' I 138-013-02: •
i
� � ���� �� n.� � Ali i I 'III • � ' • ' p
► � � � �� ��"�'" !;' � 2u1 CORAL CIR
� � � a,, �������� ��� (�I � FFPCH LLC •
/ •.� �` i,
RN
�• ,�� +` �� � ` /4t ` \ ,III ��, II ;� ®�
,� � '� �� � "�•��� ������ ♦e ,I�a�l �� . �i/. 301 CORAL CIR �
�� '� ,,,0 '. III • - . -
TR ��' �► it
M. = 141 : 45-55 : �` . ► ,, �;,
1=—� i i I• � I � it � I
� 1 � ,• ��� ��� s �� � I• � ► �� •� 343 COO FiAL IR
• E IDE CHRISTIAN '
�' ��� �� �4 �� I'�,I � FELLO• W`,�HIP INC
\/ "'�<-_ •�'� � � .• �; I 4138-013-00 I
�:� � gip; ,� �, 1 �� �I� �.1','_:�ME' P��-.•OPERTIE INC �
/�\ Ili 4138-013-007
,_� � ��•., • / � f� �' ► � � ! � � :�il u�j 365 CORAL CIR
d®M - �� � �� � •d ���I,'G� WILLIA�1 GO• •ODGLICK /
Mill RFF�IM.I
►ON �� / �ie ICI 4138 013 008
��� •� G �/ I, i �� � I� ilp�I �� 01 CORAL C I
���I.,
`tea/ ��I' ,•, , D'',,, ,,,,, '°, ��� _ ��� �/ i 1 - - ,, ��
1�o1
IN I
1002rdli
N
6
0 100' 200'
SCALE: 1 "=200'
LINETYPES
4"OIL
SC
•
PROPERTY LINE
LOT LINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
OIL UTILITY LINES
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
ELECTRICAL LINE
STORM DRAIN LINE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
WATER LINE
GAS LINE
RECLAIMED WATER
FIRE WATER
IRRIGATION WATER
PETROLEUM LINE
COMMUNICATION LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PLUGGED OIL
WELLS PER CaIGEM/DOGGR GIS DATA MAP
DETAIL B
A=9
DETAIL A
N.T.S.
.G
I I
w
lqjff
700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
F: 213.266.5294
www.kpff.com
�ENERALNOTES:
JWNERS:
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
SUBDIVIDER:
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
ATTN: LIONEL UHRY
(310) 782-2525
-AND SURVEYOR:
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348
(213) 418-0201
REVISIONS
DATE
ISSUED FOR
DATE 11 /02/2021
PROJECT NUMBER 2000081
DRAWN BY DG/SR
CHECKED BY BR
SCALE AS SPECIFIED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL
SEGUNDO, CA 90245
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET 5 OF 6
Page 391 of 500
?t,PROPOSED LOTS AND EMST�NG UTUT�ES_���r���������rl��n!
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGrTJ �%s��'�_ --_ - --.nrc_��:'— ��� 11
�I
v fAM NO MA
IIII
IIN
�J
� I, i ��■Ifh1 �• ip � T i' iti .. � c � �.��.`= \ � III
`,! +� NOO.T PAST �JF ��•�APN 4138-014-917
�, IVI. B. 1 n18 45-55 € h \,�♦�, ®�11
A .A.
_/I
--_- —���- '•• ���i„��►i�i•� ( n �....•/ �'t+, ,III
NEW,
, ,, m���
���� �.. / �'�� � �� I�I � I I"'`III I� hr' � j� � I� � �` '� '�`�'�� � • . • • •' 1 �.I. �I�1Y3i�L�' i'! ��i�'YIi)� � \�%,.. I / � R d� �� , 7 �I .!)+) I ��
��'���j �=�� '� _ ''�� +r' ;� .A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' � •_• ' ••• , • •' :�* � I � I�-��� _`:•�� '!.5 �I�-�i��� �
,1►�M�// •�/// //���/ III�IIIIII�// •// .=///i .` �1� 1r, � nAA�. �, .VA\� '. VAAVA�< ���,� ��A��%` � �• �Ir�1 �/�/
APN
''NN , , , //�i/i/ �/ �, �/ // �/ ' //�� � �i,� AA�VA A��A �,,. i R N O• 1551 '� . ��'
� v i / /% //s / /�/ /� � � / / / �,� • � w v� / IVI . � . 141� 4 � 5 5 ICI �,,� • I -
4138-014-917
IIIIII!,I 111
IIIIV IIIIIIIUI"liilll�l�
O A PART)
Il�lil�ii►►
� � . // // // // // /% / / i►/ _ /� �,� i � j / vvA�'; �� � � 'III Illllililill►VA � ,
� .I� // / / //// / / i--/i / � / � -. � v►v v � THIS UBDIVI ION ���
°'IIIV'I�li �
ICI / r
I ull
/ � � vA � VA \ VA \ VA •
_ .�� , .a0 �� � � ` . . ♦♦ fir) �, _ � vv vA� vA \ V� V� VA VA �'
�� ♦ ��� :%'- //// //��////// • ���►o` �� ,�'�� <ri ��a'� • `♦ �j�� �• � ;` • � iI ��U� vA �A `V � � A VAAAVA� VAA -
/ / , , - , = � ., �*' � ,� � 1- • •t � �, �V /► , �°I , v` w ,vim; vvw�� vvv
///i /// �/ �• �'%�/�i ��+0'`���, � . ,,, � � � �'' � o�'�;� �jll . ' VAA ��A VA VA wA VA \ -
/ WINE
� ��� ���,, f dl�,,..►� � o��i, vvvv v/vvvv �v vv vv v v;,• v
/ //
III�
..�. IIIIIII li �II\
IIIIIIII,!�
•' // /�/ �♦ �/ ` Illllllg � •�� II Illlllllu\ \ \
.
APN I i I •(NOT A PART)
•��;r � � ���!�� �. ��.. �►��, I I Elm
- � = � r .• �` ��!Ip'�,� ♦~ *� .�' �� � �� � �I` �\ �1►♦��`?r"=11 ' IIII \\ �
ll„ uuiili
� / I�ii► :- �.� .,� % �III1\III I
% , ! �. :, AAA` � , �� _� .�
<©® 1
fill
• '�
�•, IN, 101,11
600 No
I��. A \ V ��
PART)
L� Iljlllll�llllli
�;; �y� �� � , � �+�1;�;„ I � • !-It%`I HIS SUBDI�'i�IOO ��,.
j
�1� � ,���i. �.O' � III- ,•••���� \, �\ ,ti���� ��,� �>.. ���
\fir',, , `'� � / �' ; ; � /�5•��`�` ��,,,, \ ;`� \.
lul„Ip.l II
cp
�'°. / \ �� '�f ✓i %`�� Ili, � \ i
.�• '�`�, � � -�f� �`��� / ��°; , ,, � F N � . 71551 / _.� ,,,,,♦ .,, �,�i � ;, lip
`'�;.,. �� i' ���'� �� <,`� ,, ��S t►M. - 1418 45-55/ �., �, � r�
�. 1�11►11�. �
IIIIIjIU!II
" � � � � IIII �D��I„. i � �. �II - �O` ,: ` • �� �� - �1■
����' -.. � .♦ _Lire...,•.+ � � .,�., � o``O�� � � � ,�' ' �������•��''' `.♦ . ' ��
. • �� �; � _--�il...v'�t � �iiY� � �/ O` .. ,gyp ��� � � V�` '� � � � �'�
III
� � � � f � � III IIIIIIIIIIIIII// III
" IIIIIIIIII^III; � IIIIIII I III III
C
c
.� !� ,,►t �� `� � ��� . �.��� � � � � Iu�Vliiiluuululil�o° IIII � �` � IIII I
\ \M APN 4138-014-917
\\ l � `• \\, �� �' ��) \ Ilplil,�1,, IIIIIII/1/, � ''��� ,+�� ,�, ,��,o � � � � \- ,7irI II•�
L�
;, �. �,� � „�* ��;�. ••.� ��.✓ . \•r` ,. :��ice/ % �'� _♦ _�,VII� � �KmmN�'\■
(NOT A 6ART
18
' (IIIIIII;. � III Ilol
/�� �i ��i:�\�� /r �� � . ' �� •� � / ,,�,�\� \ ������ rr,_ I I► IIII III► � � mal
"Al
1�� \' ��rh � � � � jP '�� �� n n \ — � _ __� � DTI • � � � ���
. c ' .ilk • �'+,IN,,,- /• 1 ��'•-i
• , ,
II �4. � � � � ` � � � ��,� � �I.AI' '\ `'��, • , n Imo•/�%I�
,oa 9� N
C7 '
.Q
0/ _ ,�z lxl�
NOT A PART
��o 0
r /
■
LINETYPES
N
0 65' 130'
SCALE: 1 "=130'
4"UIL
OHU
E
SD
SS
w
PROPERTY LINE
LOT LI N E
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT LINE
OIL UTILITY LINES
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
ELECTRICAL LINE
STORM DRAIN LINE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
WATER LINE
GAS LINE
RECLAIMED WATER
FIRE WATER
IRRIGATION WATER
PETROLEUM LINE
COMMUNICATION LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PLUGGED OIL
WELLS PER CaIGEM/DOGGR GIS DATA MAP
G
0
S
L
ii7ff 1
AND
700 FLOWER ST., Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
O: 213.418.0201
F: 213.266.5294
www.kpff.com
ENERAL NOTES:
WNERS:
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
UBDIVIDER:
CDC MAR EAST CAMPUS 1, LLC
721 NORTH DOUGLAS STREET
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
ATTN: LIONEL UHRY
(310) 782-2525
SURVEYOR:
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
700 FLOWER ST., SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
ATTN: ROBERT ROGERS, PLS 8348
(213) 418-0201
REVISIONS
DATE
ISSUED FOR
DATE 11 /02/2021
PROJECT NUMBER 2000081
DRAWN BY DG/SR
CHECKED BY BR
SCALE AS SPECIFIED
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2000 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL
SEGUNDO, CA 90245
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET 6 OF 6
Page 392 of 500
Gil 'Y Ok
E L S E G U N D O Planning Commission Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: November 18, 2021
Agenda Heading: New Business
TITLE:
Proposed Los Angeles Chargers National Football League Headquarters and Training Facility
located at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Planning Commission:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2902, recommending the City Council adopt an Addendum to the
certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) Environmental Impact
Report (EIR);
2) Adopt Resolution No. 2903, recommending the City Council approve Second
Amendment to Development Agreement (DA) No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 83507 (SUB21-03), Minor Modifications to Specific Plan (SP) No. 11-01 Revision
A, and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01, and Environmental Assessment (EA) No.
1305 to adopt an Addendum to the certified El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
(ESSCSP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for development of a new sports facility
for the Los Angeles Chargers on a 13.7-acre site, in the southeast section of the
Raytheon campus at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels " 7" and "8"); and
3) Adopt Resolution No. 2904, recommending the City Council approve the Site Plan
Review No. 21-02 for a storage facility located in the southeast portion of lot 18 in Phase
IV.
BACKGROUND:
In 1978, a Precise Plan was approved for Hughes Aircraft (which merged with Raytheon
Company in December 1997) to build a total of 2,575,000 square feet (sf.) of improvements on
the campus for a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.42. Between 1978 and 1987, the Precise Plan
was amended several times, resulting in the development of 11 structures throughout the site
totaling approximately 1,802,513 sf. of net floor area (approximate FAR of 0.29).
In 2015, Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) EA-905 for the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2012101081) was certified by City Council. El Segundo
South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP), Development Agreement DA No. 11-02, and a
Page 393 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 2
subdivision were approved, establishing development standards for the campus site,
increasing the maximum allowable FAR to 0.60, and dividing the ESSCSP area into 26
individual lots. The Ordinance effectuating the ESSCSP and corresponding development
agreement was subsequently adopted on January 19, 2016, and the final map was recorded
on November 27, 2019 (Instrument No. 20191313306). The Development Agreement between
the City and Raytheon Company, specifying the standards and conditions that would govern
the property's development and detailing the Applicant's and City's obligations, was recorded
December 13, 2016. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement, recorded on
November 13, 2019, established four development phases for the ESSCSP area, illustrated in
Figure 1 below.
PHASE I
- PHASE H
= PHASE III
© PHASE IV
;—: A ,<,aea 1)-1,p, .Areemem zo 19 ExI ibm
LN, i �!Ai,
EL SEGUNDO BLVG
17
• 1 9
r •
X� - PHASE IV
78
12
6 \ Z 10
NOT A
ART
1a
24
13
7 P Ella
G�F�G
Figure 1: Specific Plan Development Agreement Phases
SITE DESCRIPTION:
The ESSCSP covers approximately 142 acres in the southeast quadrant of El Segundo, east
of Highway 1 (Pacific Coast Highway). The Specific Plan Area is bounded by El Segundo
Boulevard to the north, the elevated Metro C Line (Green Line) and an older industrial
subdivision on Coral Circle to the east, the Top Golf facility and golf course to the west that is
currently under construction, and Plaza El Segundo and a Union Pacific Railroad to the south.
Page 394 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 3
The applicants are requesting entitlements for the project site which consists of Lots 7, 8, for
the Chargers Facility and Lot 18 for the Raytheon storage building of the ESSCSP area, located
in the southerly and southeasterly areas of the ESSCSP site, outlined in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2: Aerial of Specific Plan area and Proiect Site
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed project involves two applicants (Raytheon and CDC -MAR). The proposed
Project includes a corporate office headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles
Chargers of the National Football League, on Lots 7 and 8 at the southeast portion of the El
Segundo South Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) area. The proposed development consists
of a three-story, 143,250 gross sf. (122,080 net sf.) building, two groundskeeping and
maintenance warehouse/storage buildings totaling 4,800 gross sf. (4,368 net sf.), three full size
sports fields, privacy netting/poles up to 32-feet in height along the sports fields' eastern and
southern boundaries, and two on -site surface parking lots with 348 total parking spaces.
Page 395 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 4
Application Summaries:
Site Plan Review SPR 21-02: Proposed construction of a storage building on Lot 18 (Phase
IV Plan area). The proposed building is a 5,865 sf. storage/warehouse replacing two existing
buildings to be removed in conjunction with the proposed headquarters and training facility on
Lots 7 and 8. The storage building will be used for Raytheon's business activities and does not
include any employee -occupiable space. The proposed storage building is one-story, at
approximately 21 feet and 2 inches high. Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way will
remain. A proposed 6-foot-high chain link fence around the building's perimeter, includes two
chain link gates and two chain link rolling gates. The proposed storage/warehouse will serve
as a storage building ancillary to the primary buildings located on the primary Raytheon
Campus site.
Site Plan Review SPR 21-01: Proposed construction of a new professional sports
headquarters and training facility for the Los Angeles Chargers (Project) on Lots 7 and 8 (Phase
II Specific Plan area). Specifically, the Project includes the following:
a) A three-story, 50-foot-high building with partial basement totaling approximately
143,250 gross sf. (122,080 net sf.), accommodating offices, dining areas, an
auditorium, conference rooms, studio area, locker rooms, training rooms, a weight
room, office space, storage rooms, a service area, and mechanical and electrical
rooms;
b) Two storage buildings for groundskeeping and maintenance totaling approximately
4,800 square feet (4,368 sf. net floor area) located near the facility's northeastern
corner;
c) Three natural grass fields with an artificial turf perimeter on the eastern side of the
facility;
d) 32-foot high poles and privacy netting along the eastern side of the site to screen the
field from LA Metro's above -grade commuter line that abuts the site;
e) 348 parking spaces at two surface lots adjacent to the building, including 24 electric
vehicle (EV)-capable spaces. A proposed security booth is located at the corporate
headquarters' southern parking lot; and,
f) Removal/demolition of E-20 and E-21 warehouse/storage facilities on Parcel 7 and
8.
Specific Plan 11-01, Revision A: Minor Modifications are necessary to update various Exhibits
of the ESSCSP due to the Nash Street Extension, Recreational Facilities, and Coral Circle
Connection. Specifically, Exhibits 5-12 of the ESSCSP need to be updated to show how the lot
configurations would change with the realignment of Nash Street Extension and with the
approval of the project.
Subdivision No. SUB 21-03: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507 that modifies Parcel Nos.
5 through 11 and 18 through 23 of the previously approved and recorded tract map No. 71551.
Modifications to these lots facilitate finalizing the new Nash Street alignment and
accommodates adjustments to parcels necessary to build the proposed Project.
Page 396 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 5
Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. DA 11-02: Amend terms and obligations
between the City of El Segundo, CDC Mar East Campus 1, LLC and Raytheon Company
(outlined below).
DISCUSSION:
Site Plan Review
A Site Plan Review is required to confirm that the proposed Project is in conformance with the
standards of the ESSCSP including uses, density, approved FAR, Design Guidelines, and trip
generation limitations.
Site Plan Review SPR 21-02— Storage Building
The proposed storage building project consists of a 5,865 gross sf., one- story, 21 feet in height,
pre-engineered manufactured building. The proposed building is placed on an existing
foundation located in the southwest corner of Parcel 18 (APN#: 4138032018) and located 15
feet from the parcel line, consistent with the setback standard of the ESSCSP. The building will
serve as a storage structure for Raytheon's business activities and does not include any
employee occupiable space.
The proposed storage building is a prefabricated metal structure with light stone colored metal
wall panels, and a galvanized steel colored metal roof panel system. The building includes
thirteen (13) LED wall pack energy efficient lighting fixtures mounted to the along each of the
building's elevations and above the doorways.
Existing landscaping along South Hughes Way will remain. A proposed 6-foot-high chain link
fence is provided around the building's perimeter, with two chain link gates and two chain link
rolling gates. This fence is required to be planted with landscaping to soften the appearance.
Submitted plans do not indicate any signage for the proposed storage building, however any
signage proposed in the future would need to comply with the ESSCSP signage standards.
Site Plan Review SPR 21-01— Sports Facility
The applicant proposes development of a new sports facility for the Los Angeles Chargers
football organization on a 13.7- acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus. The
site is bounded to the north by existing Raytheon surface parking, to the south by vacant land,
to the east by the Metro Green Line light rail, and to the west by vacant land. The project area
is currently used as a parking lot for Raytheon. Illustrated in Figures 3 and 4 below, the
proposed project will be comprised of a new three-story building, three practice fields, and
parking in surface lots to serve the sports facility.
Page 397 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 6
Figure 3: Aerial view of project site
Figure 4: Proposed Site Plan
4 AWA M ILLIYIBYYCF FAIYGYAB
-Z
The proposed Project is comprised of a headquarter office building housing Operations and
Business Operations staff near the center of the site; three natural grass fields on the eastern
side of the site that to be used for team practices and scrimmages; a total of 348 at grade
parking spaces along the southern and western portions of the site; and a pair of
Page 398 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 7
groundskeeping and maintenance buildings totaling approximately 4,800 sf. near the
northeastern corner of the site to provide easy access to care for and maintain the three playing
fields. Perimeter fencing with scrim, preventing visibility into the training sports facility and the
fields from the Metro line, and will start at the east edge of the building and surround the entirety
of the playing field areas.
The proposed headquarters building houses operations and business operations staff with
typical business hours from 6:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Approximately 270 personnel are anticipated
to travel to and from the Project site on a typical workday. Business operation staff and other
employees will enter the building from the south, through a secured gated area; while visitors,
media or other staff will enter the building from the West, through the main entry lobby.
Architecture/Design
Illustrated in Figure 5, the exterior of the building includes an iconic design and incorporates
graphic elements to create a one -of -a -kind training facility. The height of the building is 54 feet
to the top of the parapet. Exterior materials include precast concrete, fiber cement panel,
aluminum metal panel, and a mix of curtainwall and storefront glazing. The metallic sheen of
the metal panel and the matte finish of the precast concrete provide contrast for intended
sophistication and complexity to the fagade design. Exterior glazing provides transparency
and transmission of natural light, yet visual sun control when needed. A skylight extends over
the lobby atrium and brings daylight into the center of the building.
Figure 5: Exterior Renderinq Perspective
Page 399 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 8
Fencing
Six types of perimeter fencing are proposed on the corporate headquarters site to buffer views
of the proposed uses from adjacent areas, and specifically to prevent visibility into the training
sports facility and grass fields.
• Type 1 and Type 2 Fencing: 8-foot-high black metal vertical picket security fence around
the perimeter of the fields. The fencing will be located to the north of the field adjacent
to South Hughes Way and to the east and south of the fields adjacent to the
maintenance building and parking lot. Additional colored panels for banners located at
the entrance to the fields in proximity to the maintenance access drive are proposed.
Lastly, the fencing will be covered with scrim to minimize visibility from vehicles and
pedestrians along the adjacent roadway.
• Type 3 Fencing: 32-foot-high tall poles and netting along the east to block views from
the elevated abutting Metro C (Green) Line onto the Project site.
• Type 4 Fencing: 8-foot-high black chain link fencing along the Project site's southern
boundary adjacent to the southern surface parking lot.
• Type 5 Fencing: Existing 8-foot-high silver chain link fencing to the west of the Type 4
fencing along the Project site's southern boundary to the south of the western surface
parking lot.
• Type 6 Fencing: 42" high guardrail black fencing located along the western parking lot's
northern boundary.
Lighting and Signage
Various types of lighting are proposed throughout the Project site. The corporate headquarters'
southern and western parking lots include lighting fixtures above the parking spaces and along
the parking lot perimeters. Similar lighting fixtures are provided adjacent to the maintenance
building east of the grass fields (as described in the Site Plan Review subsection above). The
corporate headquarters building includes ceiling slot lighting fixed to the fagade along the
building's western frontage. Floodlights with glare control and mounted lights behind fagade
screens are provided on the headquarters building southern frontage. Pedestrian pole lights
are provided by the headquarters building lobby. While there is potential for nighttime use of
the fields, as stated in ESSCSP Chapter V, Design Guidelines, all lighting will prevent direct
glare onto adjacent properties. The three practice fields will be lighted by high performance
low -spill LED shielded fixtures mounted on ten 70'-high poles providing an average of 150 foot-
candles at the playing surface with maximum of 8 foot-candles of spill light at property line.
Layout, detailed specifications, and photometric analysis are included with the project plans
Page 400 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 9
and will be reviewed in detail for compliance during the plan check review process prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
Proposed signage is provided on all four elevations of the headquarters building. A 16'-6" wide
by 5-0" (82.5 sf.) tall concrete and aluminum monument sign with illuminated sponsor/team
graphics is located at the western corner of the Project site, at the parking lot entrance facing
South Hughes Way. Signage consists of internally illuminated wall signs, illuminated
freestanding letters and surface applied architectural wall graphics with team and/or sponsor
related branding. The proposed signage is under 20% of each fagade as identified in the
current Master Signage Plan.
Access
Regional access to the Project site is provided via 1-105 to the north, with an exit at North Nash
Street, and via 1-405 to the east, with an exit at West El Segundo Boulevard.
Local access to the proposed Project is provided via South Hughes Way, which is a six -lane
divided roadway trending in an east -west direction. Secondary access is be provided via the
proposed North Nash Street extension, which will be a four -lane undivided roadway trending
in a north -south direction. Both streets will provide bicycle and pedestrian access to the Project
site. Once on site, employees and players will enter the headquarters building from the south.
Visitors, media, or other staff will enter the building through the west via the main entry lobby.
Parking and Loading
The proposed Project proposes two parking lots providing a total of 348 at -grade parking
spaces, including 24 electric vehicle (EV) capable. Specifically, the parking lot to the west of
the building provides 158 spaces for staff and visitor parking, while the parking lot to the south
of the building provides 187 spaces for player and coach parking. Access to the southern player
and coach parking lot will be controlled via a security booth and gate. An additional three
spaces are provided east of the grass fields for the maintenance building. Lastly, bus parking
will be accommodated along the western parking lot.
In total, 20 bicycle parking stalls will be provided in various locations around the headquarters
building.
A truck dock and loading/staging area is proposed at the headquarters building southwest
corner, adjacent to the building's main equipment storage area.
Page 401 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 10
Landscaping
The Project proposes approximately 325,458 sf. of landscaped area. Planted areas (40,814
sf.) are proposed around the headquarters building perimeter and serve as buffers to the south
and east of the Project site. Proposed hardscape (approximately 30,030 sf.) includes a paved
plaza to the west of the building and a paved paseo and maintenance access to the north of
the building. The proposed sports fields are natural grass (approximately 197,652 sf.), while
the fields' edges are artificial turf (approximately 56,692 sf.). The Nash Street frontage provides
approximately 47 street trees. In the parking area, the Project provides 32 trees. A landscape
plan will be required to reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department.
Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP (Specific Plan No. 11-01)
The proposed Project results in several minor modifications to the existing Specific Plan. These
include modifications to the Land Use Plan, the Conceptual Site Plan, and various other
Exhibits to accommodate infrastructure sizing based on final designs. To implement these
proposed changes, the following Minor Modifications to the ESSCSP are proposed:
• Exhibits. Modifications to various exhibits are proposed, including the Land Use Plan
(ESSCSP Exhibit 5), Conceptual Site Plan (ESSCSP Exhibit 6), Vesting Tentative Map
#71551 (ESSCSP Exhibit 7), and Utilities and Infrastructure (ESSCSP Exhibits 8
through 12).
• Nash Street Extension. The proposed modifications include realigning the Nash Street
extension. The modifications to the Nash Street extension require minor utility
relocations, as depicted in proposed ESSCSP Exhibits 8 through 12. Nash Street
extension may require modifications to infrastructure sizing based upon final design and
engineering plans that will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
• Recreational Facilities. The proposed modifications would decrease the land available
for the ESSCSP Raytheon employee private outdoor recreational facilities (from
approximately 7.54 acres on Lot 11 to approximately 7.34 acres on Lots 10 and 11).
• Coral Circle Connection. The proposed modifications would realign/relocate the Coral
Circle connection to the Nash Street extension through Lots 20 and 22. The proposed
modified circulation pattern will continue to provide for future connection from the Nash
Street extension to Coral Circle (an easement through Lots 20 and 22) and capacity for
additional parking for the Coral Circle businesses (Lots 20 and 22).
Land Use Plan and Conceptual Site Plan Exhibits
Presented below for reference are:
• Existing and Proposed Land Use Plan (Exhibit 5) for the ESSCSP
Page 402 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 11
• Existing and Proposed Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit 6) for the ESSCSP
The Land Use Plan depicts the land uses which established the basis of the ESSCSP. There
are three major land use categories in the Specific Plan: Commercial/Office Mixed Use (CMU),
Office Industrial Mixed Use (0/1 MU), and Recreation/Open Space (REC/OS).
It is necessary to update the Land Use Plan and the Conceptual Site Plan to depict a revised
layout of the Raytheon Recreational Facility and to depict a modified alignment of the Nash
Street extension which is needed to maintain the private recreation area and to create an
appropriately sized site necessary for the development of the organization's headquarters and
facility. The following changes are proposed for the Land Use Plan (Exhibit 5) and the
Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit 6) in the ESSCSP:
• Parcels 9, 10 and 11 become 10 and 11 on the revised Exhibits 5 and 6
• Split Parcel 5 (becomes 5 and 9 on the revised Exhibits 5 and 6)
• Raytheon Recreational Facility changes from 328,296 square feet on Parcel 11 to 319,927
square feet on a combination of Parcels 10 and 11.
Page 403 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 12
i 01Mu I
CO 25
- REcips
k onmu
r ■ V
J
7 8
�M
~". OAMV
CIMWC19 Oft, M,.Sd Use
OMwce r IndvOnel Muold Use
Recrea7orvOpen Space
EXHIBIT 5 LAND USE PLAN (EXISTING)
Located on page 24 of the ESSCSP
Page 404 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 13
CMu
O/1
1
26
25
-Commercial / Office, Mixed Use
-Office / Idustrial Mixed Use
-Recreation / Open Space
CMu
CMu 24
REC/OS
17 O/IMU
1_2
EXHIBIT 5 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN
-9
'_3
'2
1LT1,
20
Page 405 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 14
i4
EXHIBIT 6 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN (EXISTING)
Located on Page 25 of the ESSCP
24
19
23
22
EXHIBIT 5 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN (PROPOSED)
*Drawing to be updated with approved project plan
Page 406 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 15
A minor modification to the Nash Street extension landscaped medians and parkway is
proposed to allow for infrastructure sizing. In certain segments of the roadway reduced or
increased width to the median and/or parkway will be necessary based on final engineering
and design plans.
Utility and Infrastructure Exhibits
The Specific Plan includes various utility and infrastructure Exhibits (pg. 32, 34, 36, 38 and 40).
The following updated Exhibits to the ESSCSP are:
Exhibit 8 —
Conceptual Water Plan
Exhibit 9 —
Conceptual Reclaimed Water Plan
Exhibit 10
— Conceptual Sewer Plan
Exhibit 11
— Conceptual Drainage Plan
Exhibit 12
— Electric, Gas, and Telecommunications Plan
NH
I
i a FI1 .rl
FH
PROP091 n
WATLR LINL H.
PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 400•LEGE1�
_''�--
ow— PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER
w EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER
fUTILITY TO BE REMOVED
j1,FH FIRE HYDRANT
EXHIBIT 8 CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN
1•ROPOSM
VAnM LINE
RAYTI1B0N SPTC
EX. WATER
I.IM1F. n
TX WATER 4
YHA
�lI�
`1H
k'H t i
WATER s.nus .
nI
II L1NF.
d�
Ik
f'-
Page 407 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 16
- - ----- �---XW-.�---=-�_=--=-=-=-�=•�--=_ice_- •-
FL 5 cuN_DO BLVD
. \ PRO ,(-TA J
YF[TaOIN
m+E ercTalac�+ --
Y ATEY LINEWAI-EKLLN]S
.
� � PROPOSI71
p I ' REC AIDEM e
WA TF L1NRIf IA- -
f WATPJE-LId`F. N WATER LTNF
:°. X-RPCLAMIFI)
+ :ATER LTNS
RN'
KW
{
PROPOSED ^
RP,C TAIMrn
PLAN WAILY LINE
SCALE: I- = 400' t C
L.G1E1�11.+
TRW— PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER '*w,
3
'--Rw--- EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER
UTILITY TO HE REMOVED
.�. FIRE HYDRANT
RAYTHEON
1'r,lEML1Hll ��
T s
I fl i1 � 1(1;(�f A1MH1�4�4
P FW. RECTA174R.P)
WATER LUN-F
7
PROPOSED RECLAIMED WATER
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT 9 CONCEPTUAL RECLAIMED WATER PLAN
-Ww aaw +wsl li;w o-
P Ro ° LINE
L
SEWER
JOIN EX,, {
BEWEIj., `.
EX. SEWER LINE I'
r
RAYTHEON SITE 1
v
�, •�'. %. SEWER LINE '
PROPOSED
PLAN SEWER LINE °
I �
LEGEND \ -
-Sl — PROPOSED SEWER O INE ss.\
=s — EXISTING SEWER,.,
...... UTILITY TO BE REMOVED
FLOW ARROW k" �� (
EXHIBIT 10 CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN
J,
6SEWER LINE 77�5—
Page 408 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 17
]DINEX_
2 d' ,a• PROPMF
STORM D1
i
S.C.oS" RCP
5 M DRAIN
r
RAYTHF.DN SITE
�. EX.18`RCI'
STORM DRAIN
PR01'OSED
PLAN S ORIM DIWIN
SCALE: T" = 400'2oy
mo s j
§ iEC3END .°
I -w- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
-sa EXISTING STORM DRAIN
UTILITY TO BE REMOVEDP�
FLOW ARROW a5 ' PRQI OSED
GX. 96. RCP •— W
57Y1RhF DRAIN
f -X 9q RCP .`
�SfORM DRAIN
ZPR—Op DRAINPOSHD _
._- \. �a7• RCP
r SiORI DRAIN
STORM DRAIN
STORM DRAIN
Li
JOIN M/ k•.n. 54' nun
STORM' RRA'i
RM
ORIfl n
�' ^
SEX. I.' RGP
t a;
ST RM RAI
s
,�" .-'-
RS.. c' 110
Ci RhF ultnl�I .Y& F91 a
EXHIBIT 11 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN
EXHIBIT 12 ELECTRIC, GAS & TELECOMMUNICATION CONCEPTUAL PLAN
Page 409 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 18
Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. 11-02
The proposed project requires modifications to the Development Agreement. The Second
Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City of El Segundo and Raytheon
Company (redlined to depict revisions) is attached for reference. The role of the Planning
Commission regarding the development agreement amendment is limited to determining
whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan. Since the
amendment does not propose any uses or raise issues inconsistent with the General Plan,
staff recommends that the Commission make the required consistency finding for the
amendment.
The following is a summary of the proposed Development Agreement amendment:
The Specific Plan area is subject to a development agreement that was approved by
the City in 2016, which was modified in 2019. Raytheon and CDC/Mar are seeking
amendments to the development agreement. There are three obligations that would be
triggered by the projects proposed by Raytheon and CDC/Mar. The first two are the
Nash Street and Continental Boulevard extensions. As described below, Raytheon is
seeking to delay the implementation of the Continental Boulevard extension, but the
Nash Street extension sill go forwards as part this project.
The third is a requirement that 7.54 acres of land within the Specific Plan area to be
used for Open Space and Recreational purposes. This is allowed to be accomplished
by either Raytheon making an irrevocable offer of dedication of 7.54 acres of land to the
City for recreational/open space area use or provide employees within the Specific Plan
area permanent access to the 7.54 acre recreational area in the Specific Plan area. As
an alternative to this requirement, the development agreement provides the City and
Developer may agree in their discretion to explore other means of addressing this
recreation/open space requirement.
CDC/Mar's proposed project trigger both the Nash Street and park requirement
discussed above. CDC/Mar is proposing that it be allowed to pay $3 million to City's
general fund to delay these requirements until the next development built in the Specific
Plan area. Staff is recommending that the $3 million community benefit contribution will
be used to support City of El Segundo capital improvement projects (such as for The
Plunge Saari Swim Stadium Pool Rehabilitation capital improvement project), as
determined by the City Council.
The $3 million is proposed to be paid as follows: $1 million when CDC/Mar closes
escrow on the property; $1 million when CDC/Mar is issued a building permit for the
project; and $1 million when a certificate of occupancy is issued for the project. There
are deadlines associated with these payments and the development agreement
amendment will become null and void if the deadlines lapse. It should be noted that the
size of the recreation area is proposed to be decreased slightly from 7.54 to 7.34 acres
due to the reconfiguration of the parcels to accommodate the proposed project.
Page 410 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 19
Raytheon's proposed project to move its approximately 5,500 square footage storage
building triggers all three of the above development requirements. Raytheon wants to
delay the Continental Boulevard extension and park requirement until the next
development. As consideration for this extension, Raytheon is proposing to execute an
agreement with the City which would give the City access to utilize the recreation
facilities/fields located on the Raytheon property between the hours of 5:00 and 9:00
p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on the weekends. The
recreation areas will not be open to the public on a "drop -in" basis but rather must be
scheduled in advance as agreed to by the City and Raytheon. The use of Raytheon
facilities will mainly be limited to practice uses but competitive team play by youth sports
on the weekends will be allowed with restrictions. Raytheon employees will be given
priority use over the facilities for scheduling purposes. The use restrictions regarding
competitive team play and joint use of the facilities by Raytheon employees and the City
at the same time arise out of security concerns by Raytheon and the need to limit the
number of people utilizing the facilities at the same time. The agreement provides for a
process whereby the City and Raytheon will cooperate in scheduling the City's use of
the facilities.
Subdivision Map SUB 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507)
For reference, presented below are depictions of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No.
71551, Exhibit 7 in the Specific Plan, and the proposed Exhibit 7, Vesting Tentative Map No.
83507.
The existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 divided the Specific Plan Area into 26 individual
lots. VTTM No. 83507 proposes to separate and change 13 parcels of the existing Vesting
Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No.
71551 will remain unchanged. With the new Map, the total number of individual lots within the
Specific Plan Area will remain unchanged, and all resulting parcels will meet minimum City lot
standards.
Page 411 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 20
EXHIBIT 7 VESTING TENTATIVE MAP #71551 (EXISTING)
Page 412 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 21
EXHIBIT 7A SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL EXHIBIT INCLUSIVE OF
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 83507 (PROPOSED)
Page 413 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 22
Exhibit Pnivel #
Tract Map 71551
Tract Map 83507
1
1
-
2
2
-
5
5
-
4
4
-
5
-
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
1Z
-
18
15
-
14
14
-
15
15
-
16
16
17
17
18
-
1
19
-
2
20
3
21
4
22
12
23
18
24
-
25
-
26
EXHIBIT 7B CONVERSION TABLE
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP NO. 83507 (PROPOSED) &
FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 71551
Page 414 of 500
EA-1305, et. al.
November 18, 2021
Page 23
FINDINGS
In considering the proposed project, the Planning Commission reviews components of
each requested application and considers the merits of the project(s) to make a
recommendation for City Council's consideration. This will include recommending that the
project is consistent with the findings associated with the General Plan, Specific Plan,
Subdivision Map, and Site Plan Review. The following are the findings in boldface,
following by staff's analysis in normal type.
Specific Plan Revision A
The proposed amendment is consistent with goals, objectives and policies of the
General Plan:
Economic Development Element
The City's Economic Development Element of the General Plan specifies the following:
Objective ED1-2: Center diversification efforts on targeted industries that meet the
City's criteria for job creation, growth potential, fiscal impact, and fit
with local resources.
Policy ED1-2.1: Seek to expand El Segundo's retail and commercial base so that the
diverse needs of the City's business and residential communities are
met.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the General Plan's Economic
Development Element and directly implements and furthers the General Plan's goals,
objectives and policies above because it promotes economic development and improves
the City's tax base through inclusion "of a full range of commercial, office, warehousing,
and light industrial land uses, allowing for new light industrial/R&D, office, and commercial
uses consistent with the existing Campus." According to the Gross Fiscal Impact and
Economic Benefit Analysis prepared by The Kosmont Companies dated August 2015, the
anticipated benefits of the existing ESSCSP included an estimated increase in the City's
annual tax revenue by $2.6 million at buildout. In addition, the analysis projected that the
buildout of the project results in 4,598 permanent jobs. The proposed project and uses
produce the amount of employees that office and recreational facilities produce, business
license tax revenues, and would fit with local resources to generate retail sales tax
generated in proximity to the Specific Plan area. As such, staff believes the proposed
project is consistent with Objective ED1-2 and Policy ED1-2.1. As such, staff believes
this finding can be made.
Page 415 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 24
Land Use Element
The City's Land Use Element of the General Plan specifies the following:
Objective LU4-4: Provide areas where development has the flexibility to mix uses, in
an effort to provide synergistic relationships which have the potential
to maximize economic benefit, reduce traffic impacts, and encourage
pedestrian environments.
Objective LU5-6: Seeks to encourage a mix of office and light industrial uses in
industrial areas.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the General Plan's Land Use Element
and directly implements and furthers the General Plan's goals, objectives and policies
above because the proposed sports facility and training center adds a new corporate
office building and athletic fields and will integrate into the corporate campus environment
and will introduce an iconic architectural style, have minimal traffic impacts, and enlivens
the campus, creating positive direct and indirect economic impacts consistent with
Objective LU4-4. Further, the project incorporates comprehensive features for site layout,
building design, architecture, landscape, signs, and lighting, consistent with the General
Plan and Specific Plan. Lastly, a new storage building helps to attain this Objective LU5-
6 by creating a new, clean, and organized area of lot 18 in furtherance of the Raytheon
Campus. As such, staff believes this finding can be made.
Circulation Element
The City's Circulation Element of the General Plan specifies the following:
Objective C1-1 Provide a roadway system that accommodates the City's existing
and projected land use and circulation needs.
Policy C1-1.4 Construct missing roadway links to complete the roadway system
designated in the Circulation Element when needed to improve traffic
operating conditions and to serve development.
The proposed Project results in the Nash Street roadway extension buildout, and
associated public improvements in accordance with Section 7.1 of the Development
Agreement. With the development of the Specific Plan, Hughes Way will be connected to
Nash Street through the south and eastern portions of the Campus (Parcel 19). The street
will be dedicated to the City for public right-of-way purposes as a Secondary Arterial with
a bicycle facility. The roadway design will be sufficient to accommodate the projected
traffic and will connect the internal roadway to provide access through the specific plan
area. As such, staff believes the proposed project is consistent with Objective C1-1 and
Policy C1-1.4 of the Circulation Element.
Page 416 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 25
Objective C2-2: Provide a bikeway system throughout the City to support and
encourage the use of the bicycle as a safe and convenient travel
mode within the City's circulation system.
Policy C2-2.6: Encourage design of new streets with the potential for Class I
or Class 11 bicycle routes that separate the automobile, bicycle, and
pedestrian to the maximum extent feasible.
Goal C2 from the General Plan Circulation Element outlines the City's objectives to
provide a circulation system that incorporates alternatives to the single- occupant
vehicle, to create a balance among travel modes based on travel needs, costs, social
values, user acceptance, and air quality considerations. The proposed project will
enhance the general welfare of the City because the proposed project includes a Class
2 or Class I bicycle facility along the new roadway Nash Street Extension. The Project
will provide for infrastructure and facilitate access for various modes of travel including
automobiles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian. As such, staff believes the proposed
project is consistent with Objective C2-2 and Policy C2-2.6 of the Circulation Element.
As such, staff believes this finding can be made.
The proposed project is in substantial compliance with the intent of the Specific
Plan.
The ESSCSP's scope and goals notes that the intent of the ESSCSP area is to "...serve
the mission of economic development in the City, which is to create, maintain, and
implement a business climate that fosters a strong economic community, develop a
strategic plan that will result in business retention and attraction, provide an effective level
of City services to all elements of the community, and maintain the quality of life that has
characterized El Segundo for more than nine decades." Further, the Specific Plan states
that "Permitted uses within the Campus are intended to create job opportunities and seek
balance between growth, local resources, and infrastructure capacity."
The sports facility with headquarters/office uses creates job opportunities and promotes
economic growth. According to the Gross Fiscal Impact and Economic Benefit Analysis
prepared by The Kosmont Companies dated August 2015, the anticipated benefits of the
existing ESSCSP included an estimated increase in the City's annual tax revenue by $2.6
million at buildout. In addition, the analysis projected that the buildout of the project would
result in 4,598 permanent jobs. The proposed project and uses will produce the amount
of employees that office and recreational facilities produce, business license tax
revenues, and would generate retail sales tax generated in proximity to the Specific Plan
area. As such, staff believes this finding can be made.
Page 417 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 26
The Specific Plan area is located adjacent to the El Segundo station of Metro's Green
Line and is a prime location for projects that would serve the mission of economic
development in the City. The addition of a sports training facility and corporate
headquarters/office use in the Specific Plan area will promote the economic potential of
the Specific Plan area. Therefore, staff believes that the proposed project and uses
comply in compliance with the intent of the approved Specific Plan.
As such, based upon the information above, staff believes that the proposed Sports
Facility is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan and the
El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan development standards and design guidelines.
Subdivision No. SUB 21-03 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map)
According to El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC) Section 14-1-6, the Planning
Commission shall deny approval of a vesting tentative map if it makes any of the following
findings consistent with section 66474 of the California Government Code. For the
proposed project findings can be made to approve the proposed vesting tentative map
and the justification in the affirmative of the findings are discussed below:
A. The proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific
plans as specified in Section 65451 of the California Government Code.
This finding cannot be met because the proposed Project meets the goals and objectives
of the General Plan, and it is consistent with the ESSCSP. Vesting Tentative Tract Map
(VTTM) No. 83507 proposes to modify 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map
No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will
remain unchanged. The proposed modifications result in lots with varying sizes that
continue to comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo
South Campus Specific Plan.
B. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent
with applicable general plan or specific plans as specified in section 65451
of the California Government Code.
This finding cannot be met because the proposed vesting tentative map would be
consistent with the ESSCSP in that it would be compliant with the standards for lot sizes
and dimensions.
C. The site is not physically suitable for the type of development.
This finding cannot be met in that the proposed lots meet the size and dimension
requirements to allow the subdivision of the existing project site. Furthermore, the land
use and zoning designations of the ESSCSP allows the proposed development.
Page 418 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 27
D. The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
VTTM No. 83507 proposes to modify 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map
No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will
remain unchanged. The proposed modifications result in lots with varying sizes that
continue to comply with the minimum lot size requirements established in the El Segundo
South Campus Specific Plan. The proposed maximum development density is a 0.6 Floor
Area Ratio (FAR). This density is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus Specific
Plan. This density is also generally in conformance with the maximum FAR allowed in the
ESSCSP. Each new lot will meet or exceed the minimum size and dimension
requirements.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The proposed Project site is currently improved with approximately 2,089,948 gross sf. of
existing Raytheon Company office, industrial and warehouse development, an outdoor
recreational area, and 6,873 parking spaces in approximately 20 surface parking lots. The
project site is also predominately surrounded by developed urban land permanently
altered with buildings, roads and hardscape. There are no fish or wildlife habitats on the
site that could be damaged by the proposed subdivision or new development. The
proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is for the purpose of separating and altering 13
parcels of the existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551. The other 13 parcels of the
existing Vesting Tentative Map No. 71551 will remain unchanged. The modifications
result in lots with varying sizes that continue to comply with the minimum lot size
requirements established in the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan and this action
will not have the impact of causing substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the proposed VTTM would only
serve to alter parcels of an existing VTTM that has been previously analyzed for
environmental impacts and analyzed through an EIR Addendum.
F. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are likely to cause
serious public health problems.
The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map would not cause serious public health
problems in that the map is for the purpose of creating a new subdivision map which
would authorize a revision of the size and dimensions for 13 of the existing 26 parcels in
the ESSCSP area and the new lot configurations would be compliant with the standards
related to lot size and dimensions as established in the ESSCSP.
G. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of
property within the proposed subdivision.
Page 419 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 28
The proposed subdivision is not anticipated to conflict with any known easements located
at or near the property. The proposed parcel configuration on the site has been oriented
to avoid conflicts with existing easements, such as the existing Metro Green Line elevated
rail alignment.
Site Plan Review 21-01 and Site Plan Review 21-02
Both the El Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC) and the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan (ESSCSP) provide criteria for reviewing and approving Site Plans. Both the
Municipal Code and Specific Plan indicate that the Planning Commission, or City Council
on appeal, have the authority to approve a site plan review application if certain findings
can be made in support of the projects. Among the criteria for consideration are site and
design considerations including, but not limited, to parcel orientation and shape,
placement of buildings, setbacks, building materials and design, distances between
buildings, circulation, parking, fences, and signage.
In consideration of these criteria, ESMC Section 15-30-4 D states that the Commission
may approve or conditionally approve a Site Plan if it makes the following findings: 1) The
proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the general
plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Zoning code; 2) The project is functionally
compatible with the area in which it is located; and 3) The proposed development will not
adversely affect the general welfare of the City.
Under Section D. 4 of the ESSCSP, the Planning Commission may approve a Site Plan
if it makes the following finding: that the site plan, architecture, and landscape design are
consistent with the Specific Plan.
Accordingly, the analysis below addresses these criteria and findings for both the
Municipal Code and ESSCSP and the site plans have been found to be consistent with
the requisite findings.
Site Plan Review 21-01 Findings pursuant to Section 15-30 of the ESMC.
A. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies, and
objectives of the El Segundo General Plan, the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan, and the El Segundo Zoning Code.
The proposed Project complies with the originally approved El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan. The ESSCSP permits a mix of office, commercial, retail, research and
development, industrial and related recreational uses and authorizes a 0.60 maximum
overall FAR in the ESSCSP, based on the gross square foot size of the Specific Plan
area. Further, The ESSCSP sets forth the zoning for the site, which includes design
guidelines and development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to
Page 420 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 29
achieve a high -quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture, orientation
and massing, parking and loading, landscaping, lighting, connectivity and sustainability.
The proposed development has been evaluated in the context of the standards from the
ESSP-SP and staff believes the project complies and is consistent with these guidelines
and standards.
General Plan Land Use Goal LU-7 outlines the City's objectives of providing the highest
quality public facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community. The
proposed development is consistent with this goal since the applicant will construct the
Hughes Way/Nash Street Extension concurrent with the proposed Project. The street will
be dedicated to the City for public right-of-way purposes. Further, General Plan Economic
Development Element Goal ED1 outlines the City's objectives to create a strong, healthy
economic community in which all diverse stakeholders may benefit. The proposed Project
is consistent with Economic Development element policies and objectives since it
maintains economic development as one of the City's and the business and residential
communities' top priorities, it diversifies the City's economic base to meet quality of life
goals, and results in job creation and growth potential. As such, staff believes this finding
can be made.
B. The proposed project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is
located.
El Segundo has distinctive land use patterns, which are divided into four quadrants by the
intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and El Segundo Boulevard. Compatibility of an
individual land use is determined mainly by its relationship to other uses within its
quadrant. The ESSCSP area is in the southeastern quadrant, which is east of Pacific
Coast Highway and south of El Segundo Boulevard. The design and implementation of
this Specific Plan Phase II relates directly to its position within this larger context by land
uses that are consistent and compatible with the area. Further, the Project conforms to
public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice. The ESSCSP includes
a range of commercial and industrial uses that will contribute to job creation opportunities
and balance growth with local resources and infrastructure capacity. The proposed
Project incorporates comprehensive features for site layout, building design, architecture,
landscape, lighting, walls and fences and sustainability, which are consistent with the
ESSCSP. The proposed Project will enhance job creation opportunities and provide a
development that balances growth with local resources and infrastructure capacity. As
such, staff believes this finding can be made.
C. The proposed development will not adversely affect the general welfare of
the City.
The proposed ESSCSP development standards and Development Agreement ensure
that the Project is developed in an orderly fashion. The Project's consistency with these
standards, its design and configuration result in a project that will not adversely affect the
Page 421 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 30
general welfare of the City. Further, the proposed project will promote the orderly
development of property, the preservation of property values, and will be consistent with
surrounding development and will not adversely affect the value of neighboring
properties.
Lastly, General Plan Circulation Element Goal C2 outlines the City's objectives to provide
a circulation system that incorporates alternatives to the single -occupant vehicle, to
create a balance among travel modes based on travel needs, costs, social values, user
acceptance, and air quality considerations. The proposed Project will enhance the
general welfare of the City by constructing a Class 2 bicycle lane as indicated in the
ESSCSP Circulation Plan (Section D of the ESSCSP). The Project will provide for
infrastructure and facilitate access for various modes of travel including automobiles,
transit, bicycles, and pedestrian. One example is the ESSC- SP project to connect
Hughes Way with Nash Street through the south and eastern portions of the Campus.
The Hughes Way/Nash Street Extension will be dedicated to the City as a Secondary
Arterial. As such, staff believes this finding can be made.
Site Plan Review 21-01 Findings pursuant to Section D. 4 of the ESSCSP.
A. The site plan, architecture, and landscape design are consistent with the
Specific Plan.
The proposed Project is consistent with the finding above because the site plan has been
evaluated for compliance with the ESSCSP and specifically for compliance with the
zoning for the site, including design guidelines and development standards. These
guidelines and standards are intended to achieve a high -quality development, with criteria
for site design, architecture, orientation and massing, parking and loading, landscaping,
lighting, connectivity and sustainability. The Project incorporates comprehensive features
for site layout, building design, architecture, landscape, signs, and lighting which are
consistent with the Specific Plan. As such, staff believes the project is consistent with
these guidelines and standards, and this finding can be made.
Site Plan Review 21-02 Findings pursuant to Section 15-30 of the ESMC.
A. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies and
objectives of the El Segundo General Plan, the El Segundo South Campus
Specific Plan, and the Zoning Code.
1. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo General Plan as identified in
Section 4 of this Resolution.
2. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan
Objective LU5-6 to encourage a mix of office and light industrial uses in industrial
areas. The construction of a new 5,865 sf. storage building would be consistent
Page 422 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 31
with this Objective and would further enhance the area with development that is
compliant with the established ESSCSP design guidelines.
3. The Project is consistent with the El Segundo Zoning Code in that a full review
of the project has been completed and the project has been found to be
compliant with all relevant property development standards, including but not
limited to, height, setbacks, parking, and floor area.
B. The proposed project is functionally compatible with the area in which it is
located.
1. The proposed storage building is ancillary to the primary structures as part of
the Raytheon Campus. Specifically, the design, layout, and use of the proposed
building will be compatible with the industrial use and appearance of the project
site that includes large, low scale buildings in a campus setting, along with
surface parking spaces, truck loading area and travel lanes, and other ancillary
structures for storage and warehousing. Furthermore, the location and site
layout of the proposed storage building will not impact or interrupt the way
existing uses on the subject site operate.
C. The proposed development will not adversely affect the general welfare of
the City.
1. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum has been prepared to
analyze the proposed project for consistency with the original ESSCSP EIR
and to determine that the proposed Project would not have any new or
detrimental impacts than previously identified in the original EIR. It was
determined that there would not be any new environmental impacts due to the
construction of the newly proposed storage building, and; therefore, it can be
determined that there would not be any adverse effects on the general welfare
of the city. Furthermore, and as indicated in Section 4 of the Resolution, the
proposed project is also consistent with the El Segundo General Plan and the
El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan.
Site Plan Review 21-02 Findings pursuant to Section D. 4 of the ESSCSP.
A. The site plan, architecture, and landscape design are consistent with the
Specific Plan.
1. The proposed Project is consistent with the finding above because the site plan
has been evaluated for compliance with the ESSCSP and specifically for
compliance with the zoning for the site, including design guidelines and
development standards. These guidelines and standards are intended to
achieve a high -quality development, with criteria for site design, architecture,
Page 423 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 32
orientation and massing, parking and loading, landscaping, lighting,
connectivity and sustainability. The proposed storage building has been
evaluated in the context of the standards from the ESSPSP and have been
determined to be compliant and therefore the project is consistent with these
guidelines and standards.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On December 15, 2015, the City adopted Resolution No. 4958, certifying the ESSCSP
FEIR (Environmental Assessment No. EA-905), State Clearinghouse (SCH) No.
2012101081, in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The certified
EIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the
ESSCSP. Since the proposed Project deviates from the approved specific plan, the City's
environmental consultant independently reviewed the modifications and determined that
no new significant environmental impacts would result, and the modifications will not
increase the severity of any effects previously identified in the EIR. As such, an
Addendum has been prepared to address the minor changes to the El Segundo South
Campus Specific Plan (ESSCSP) (Specific Plan No. 11-01), resulting from the proposed
project.
Based upon the proposed Project, a fair share percentage has been calculated towards
each traffic improvement identified in the ESSCSP EIR's traffic mitigation measures TRA-
1 through 9. The 10.6% contribution is based on the methodology provided in the First
Amendment of the DA No. 11-02 Section 7.9, which states that "...the `Fair Share' is
determined by dividing the number of PM peak hour trips produced by the individual
development seeking a Certificate of Occupancy by the total Project PM peak hour trips
Ceiling as noted in City Council Ordinance No. 1516, Exhibit D `Conditions of Approval'
(3,120)." The applicant will need to continue to work with the City to determine the total
construction value (cost estimate for design and building for improvement, and for right-
of-way acquisition) of the TRA-1 through 9 improvements to be accepted and approved
by the City Engineer. The applicant shall submit 10.06% fair share contribution towards
each traffic improvement identified in the ESSCSP EIR per DA No. 11-02 Amendment 1
Section 7.9, to the City prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
During the public comment period, staff received a comment (attached) citing a
newspaper article that indicated 5,000 fans for events. It is important to note that the
applicant has not decided whether such events will occur. Consequently, special events
and related 5,000 spectators/fans is not part of the proposed project. Further, any special
event in the future would require submittal of a temporary event permit that would be
reviewed based upon details of anticipated attendance, duration and logistics.
Page 424 of 500
EA-1305
November 18, 2021
Page 33
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project involves a new three-story Los Angeles Chargers headquarters and
training facility along with associated structures, athletic fields, and surface level parking.
Additionally, a new one-story storage building for use by Raytheon would also be
constructed. The Project complies with the development standards as set forth in the El
the El Segundo South Campus Specific Plan. Furthermore, based on the EIR Addendum
prepared for this project, the Project does not create new significant adverse impacts or
increase the severity of a significant adverse impact identified in the original EIR.
Therefore, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 2902
recommending City Council adopt an Addendum to the original ESSCSP EIR; adopt
Resolution 2903 recommending City Council approve the Second Amendment to
Development Agreement (DA) No. 11-02, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 83507
(SUB21-03), Minor Modifications to Specific Plan (SP) No. 11-01 Revision A, and Site
Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-01 for development of a new professional sports headquarters
and training facility on a 13.7-acre site in the southeast section of the Raytheon campus
at 2000 E. El Segundo Boulevard (Parcels 7" and "8"); and adopt Resolution 2904
recommending City Council approve Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 21-02 for a Storage
Facility to be located in the southeast portion of lot 18 in Phase IV.
ORIGINATED BY: Bradley J. Misner, AICP Contract Planner
REVIEWED BY: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Planning Manager
APPROVED BY: Michael Allen, AICP, Director of Development Services
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2902
Exhibit A —Addendum to ESSCSP EIR
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2903
Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval
Exhibit B — Minor Modifications to ESSCSP
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2904
Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval
4. Sports Facility Proposed Development Plans/Exhibits dated October 21, 2021
5. Butler Building Proposed Development Plans/Exhibits dated October 21, 2021
6. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 83507
7. Final Draft DA Amendment and Park Use MOU
8. Public Comment
Page 425 of 500
Give} City Council Agenda Statement
ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Staff Presentations
Item Number: D.17
TITLE:
Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution approving the City's participation in two national opioid litigation
settlements and authorizing the City Manager to execute related participation and
related implementation agreements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Based on information from the administrator for the Litigation plaintiffs' Settlement and
the Office of the State of Attorney General, the City is estimated to receive a maximum
settlement sum of $516,000 over the term of years discussed above. This estimated
total sum assumes a maximum of 100 percent participation from the total potential
eligible states, counties, and cities. The City's final settlement share will be determined
after January 2, 2022, the final day for jurisdictions to opt into the settlement. Upon this
determination, the City would elect whether to direct its funds to the county of Los
Angeles ("County") or receive the funds directly at least 60 days before the first
distribution. Funds must be used within certain time limitations for so-called "Opioid
Remediation Uses," such as expanding training for the first responders' use of FDA -
approved drugs to reverse overdoses, with at least 50 percent of the total funds being
used for "High Impact Abatement Activities," including funding intervention measures to
prevent addition in vulnerable youth. The City's direct receipt of the settlement funds
would also require the City's annual reporting of its funding and subject it to related
auditing. The City would make a determination annually whether to receive forthcoming
settlement funds directly or direct them to the County without being bound by any
previous year's funding decision.
BACKGROUND:
Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is multidistrict
litigation ("Litigation") numerous public entity plaintiffs have pursued against the
manufacturers and distributors of various opioids based on the allegation that the
Page 426 of 500
Resolution Approving Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 3
defendants' unlawful conduct caused the opioid epidemic. On or about July 1, 2021, a
proposed nationwide tentative global settlement ("Settlement") was reached between
the plaintiffs in the Litigation and several of the defendants, specifically McKesson
Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation (collectively,
"Distributors"), and Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. (collectively,
"Manufacturers") (all collectively, "Settling Defendants"). The Settlement's terms are set
forth in the Distributors Master Settlement Agreement and Manufacturers Master
Settlement Agreement (collectively "Settlement Agreements"), and copies of the
Settlement Agreements are on file with the City Clerk and available upon request. (The
Settlement Agreements' text is also available for download:
https:HnationaIopioidsettlement.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/1 1 /Final-Distributor-
Settlement-Agreement-10.22.2021-Exhibit-Updates .pdfand
https:HnationaIopioidsettlement.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/1 1 /Janssen-agreement-
20211105.pdf)
The Settlement would require the Distributors and Manufacturers to respectively pay
approximately $21 billion over 18 years and $5 billion over seven years to participating
states, counties, and cities. The state of California ("State") would receive approximately
$2.2 billion of the estimated $21 billion total, a portion of which would be distributed to
counties and cities. Local subdivisions with a population over 10,000, including the City,
that are not plaintiffs in the Litigation can participate in the Settlement and obtain certain
Settlement funds, in exchange for a release of claims against the Settling Defendants.
The total amount of Settlement funds increases in proportion to the number of states
and local subdivisions that opt in to participate in the Settlement.
DISCUSSION:
To participate in the Settlement, the City must execute two allocation agreements with
the State to facilitate the distribution of Settlement funds for the City ("Allocation
Agreements")(The Subdivision Agreements' text is also available for download:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/final-proposed-ca-state-subdivision-
agreement-distributors-settlement.pdf; https://oag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/final-
proposed-ca-state-subdivision-agreement-Janssen-settlement.pdf.). The City must also
execute two participation forms ("Participation Forms")(Included as Exhibit "K" to each
of the Settlement Agreements) to confirm its participation in the Settlement and the
terms of the Settlement Agreement, including the dismissal of the Litigation, payment of
Settlement funds, and associated release of claims against the Settlement Defendants.
Copies of the Allocation Agreements and Participation Forms are on file with the City
Clerk and available upon request.
The proposed Resolution would approve the City's participation in the Settlement and
authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary related agreements and forms as
approved by the City Attorney.
Page 427 of 500
Resolution Approving Participation in Two National Opioid Lawsuit Settlements
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 3
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 2: Support Community Safety and Preparedness
Objective: El Segundo is a safe and prepared city.
PREPARED BY:
Joaquin Vasquez, Assistant City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
Mark Hensley, City Attorney
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
Resolution - Opioid Settlements
Page 428 of 500
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN TWO
NATIONAL OPIOID LITIGATION SETTLEMENTS AND
AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER EXECUTION OF RELATED
PARTICIPATION AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS.
The City Council of the city of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds as follows:
A. Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is multidistrict
litigation ("Litigation") numerous public entity plaintiffs have pursued against the
manufacturers and distributors of various opioids based on the allegation that
the defendants' unlawful conduct caused the opioid epidemic.
B. On or about July 1, 2021, a proposed nationwide tentative global settlement
("Settlement") was reached between the plaintiffs in the Litigation and several
of the defendants, specifically McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc.,
AmerisourceBergen Corporation (collectively, "Distributors"), and Johnson &
Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. (collectively,
"Manufacturers") (all collectively, "Settling Defendants").
C. The Settlement's terms are set forth in the Distributors Master Settlement
Agreement and the Manufacturers Master Settlement Agreement (collectively
"Settlement Agreements"), and copies of the Settlement Agreements are on file
with the City Clerk and available upon request.
D. The Settlement would require the Distributors and Manufacturers to
respectively pay approximately $21 billion over 18 years and $5 billion over
seven years to participating states, counties, and cities.
E. The state of California ("State") would receive approximately $2.2 billion of the
estimated $21 billion total, a portion which would be distributed to counties and
cities.
F. Under the Settlement, local subdivisions with population over 10,000, including
the city of El Segundo (the "City"), that are not plaintiffs in the Litigation may
participate in the Settlement and obtain certain Settlement funds, in exchange
for a release of claims against the Settling Defendants.
G. The total amount of Settlement funds increases in proportion to the number of
states and local subdivisions that opt in to participate in the Settlement.
H. To participate in the Settlement, the City must execute two allocation
agreements with the State to facilitate the distribution Settlement funds for the
Page 429 of 500
Resolution No.
Page 2of3
City ("Allocation Agreements"). Copies of the Allocation Agreements are on file
with the City Clerk and available upon request.
The City must also execute two participation forms ("Participation Forms") to
confirm its participation in the Settlement and the terms of the Settlement
Agreement, including the dismissal of the Litigation, payment of Settlement
funds, and associated release of claims against the Settlement Defendants.
Copies of the Participation Forms are on file with the City Clerk and available
upon request.
SECTION 2. Approval and Authorization. The City Council approves the City's
participation in the Settlement and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Allocation
Agreements, Participation Forms, and all other necessary documents —subject to the
review and approval of the City Attorney or designee —to effectuate such participation.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity
will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this
end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.
SECTION 4. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with
electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic
signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 5. Signature Authority. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby
authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City
Council of the City of El Segundo, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is
directed to attest thereto.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution will take effect immediately upon
adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
SECTION 7. City Clerk Actions. The City Clerk will certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution, enter it in the City's book of original Resolutions, and make a
record of this action in the meeting's minutes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2021.
Drew Boyles, Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO )
Page 430 of 500
Resolution No.
Page 3of3
I, Tracy Weaver, City Clerk of the City of El Segundo, California, do hereby certify that
the whole number of members of the City Council of said City is five; that the foregoing
Resolution No. was duly passed and adopted by said City Council, approved and
signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested to by the City Clerk of said City, all at a
regular meeting of said Council held on the day of 2021, and the same was
so passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
/_1NU:;I0T/21o7_v2to] 2IfflV0751
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
Page 431 of 500
{.,rVoy City Council Agenda Statement
ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Staff Presentations
Item Number: D.18
TITLE:
Citywide Salary Schedule Update
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution to approve the Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4, 2011,
with revisions through December 7, 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The attached schedule reflects positions and salaries previously approved by City
Council and incorporated in the adopted FY 2021-2022 Citywide Budget. Sufficient
funding for State of California mandated minimum wage increase is available in the
adopted budget. No new funding is required for FY 2021-2022.
BACKGROUND:
The City of El Segundo contracts with the California Public Employees' Retirement
System (CaIPERS) for retirement benefits. CaIPERS requires that the governing bodies
of their contracting agencies approve and post publicly available salary schedules for
their employees. The City Council has previously approved the positions and salaries
reflected on the attached pay schedule through resolutions for Memorandum of
Understanding ("MOU"), salaries and conditions of employment for various
unrepresented employee groups, contract employees and elected officials, as well as
mandated minimum wage increases. The City posts these approved salary schedules,
in conjunction with the MOUs, contracts and resolutions, on the City's internet website
for public review.
Effective January 1, 2022, the State of California is mandating a minimum wage
increase from $14.00 to $15.00 per hour. To comply with the law, employees in
positions with a pay rate below $15.00 per hour will be placed in the next available
salary step to bring their pay rate to the new minimum wage.
In order to more clearly adhere to CaIPERS guidelines that were implemented in August
Page 432 of 500
Adoption of Citywide Salary Schedule and Revisions Through January 1, 2022
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 3
2011 and to confirm the City is in compliance with Government Code §20636 and
California Code of Regulations ("CCR") §570.5, the attached Citywide salary schedule
effective October 4, 2011 with revisions through December 7, 2021, is being submitted
for the City Council to approve.
DISCUSSION:
On August 10, 2011, CaIPERS implemented CCR 570.5 which requires that the City
Council regularly adopt a Citywide Public Pay Schedule listing the pay rates/ranges for
all City of El Segundo established positions, including the City Council, Elected Officials,
and City Manager. The City Council has adopted contracts, MOUs, revised
classifications, and minimum salary range adjustments, which have resulted in changes
to the wages of certain positions. CalPERS determines the amount of "compensation
earnable" as defined under Government Code Sections §20630, 20636, and 20636.1 as
a pay rate limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule that meets the following
requirements:
Has been duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in
accordance with the requirements of applicable public meetings laws;
2. Identifies the position title for every employee position;
3. Shows the payrate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for
each identified position;
4. Indicates the time base such as hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or
annually;
5. It is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available
for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on
the employer's Internet website;
6. Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions;
7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than
five years; and
8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the payrate.
To confirm compliance with CalPERS regulations, staff recommends that the City
Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the Citywide Salary Schedule
effective October 4, 2011 with revisions through December 7, 2021, and also approving
adjustments to salaries for positions below the State of California mandated minimum
wage rate of $15.00 per hour.
Page 433 of 500
Adoption of Citywide Salary Schedule and Revisions Through January 1, 2022
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 3
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 1: Enhance Customer Service, Engagement, and Communication; Embrace
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Objective 1 A: El Segundo provides unparalleled service to internal and external
customers.
Goal 3: Develop as a Choice Employer and Workforce
Objective: El Segundo is a city employer of choice and consistently hires for the future,
with a workforce that is inspired, world -class and engaged, demonstrating increasing
stability and innovation.
PREPARED BY:
Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director
REVIEWED BY:
Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Resolution - Citywide Salary Schedule
2. Citywide Salary Schedule Effective October 4, 2011 and Revisions Through
December 7, 2021
Page 434 of 500
RESOLUTION NO. Number
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 4, 2011, WITH
REVISIONS THROUGH DECEMBER 7, 2021
WHEREAS, (1) the City Council shall approve the salary pay rates and ranges for each
classified position and may update them from time -to -time as deemed
necessary pursuant to the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, (2) the State of California minimum wage law will increase from $14.00 per
hour to $15.00 per hour, effective January 1, 2022, requiring a revision to
the hourly pay schedule for part-time/hourly/non-permanent/temporary and
non -classified employees accordingly; and
WHEREAS, (3) to comply with California Code of Regulations ("CCR") 570.5, which was
adopted by CalPERS April 13, 2011, with an effective date of August 10,
2011, the City's salary schedule effective October 4, 2011 with
revisions through December 7, 2021, must be adopted by the governing
body (i.e. City Council); now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, (a) The City Council does herby approve and adopt the Citywide Salary
Schedule effective October 4, 2011, with all revisions through December
7, 2021 bringing the City into compliance with CCR 570 and the State of
California minimum wage increase, effective January 1, 2022 (Exhibit 1).
RESOLVED, (b) With the exception of having been approved and adopted by the agency's
governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public
meeting laws, all required elements necessary to meet the definition for a
publicly available pay schedule were met. This includes:
• Identifies the position title for every employee position;
• Shows the pay rate for every identified position, which may be
stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range;
• Indicates the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the
time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bimonthly, bi-
weekly, or annually;
• Is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible
an available for public review from the employer during normal
business hours or posted on the employer's internet website;
• Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions;
• Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for
not less than five years; and
• Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay
rate.
RESOLVED, (c) That the executive body appoint and direct, and it does hereby appoint
and direct, the City Clerk to file with the Board a verified copy of this
resolution, and to perform on behalf of City of El Segundo all functions
required of it under the Act; and be it further
Page 435 of 500
RESOLVED, (d) That coverage under the Act be effective on December 7, 2021.
Adopted at a regular meeting of the El Segundo City Council at El
Segundo, CA, this 7th day of December, 2021.
Signed:
Drew Boyles, Mayor
Attest:
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
Attachment: Exhibit 1- Citywide Salary Schedule effective October 4, 2011 and all Revisions
through December 7, 2021.
Page 436 of 500
Page 437 of 500
CITYWIDE PUBLIC PAY SCHEDULE - EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 4, 2011
REVISION DATE - DECEMBER 7, 2021
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
ESCEA SALARY SCHEDULE
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Accounting Technician
ESCEA
22
Hourly
26.73
4633.14
55597.68
28.07
4864.80
58377.60
29.47
5108.04
61296.48
30.94
5363.44
64361.28
32.49
5631.61
67579.32
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Accounts Specialist I
ESCEA
12
Hourly
20.88
3619.38
43432.56
21.93
3800.35
45604.20
23.02
3990.37
47884.44
24.17
4189.89
50278.68
25.38
4399.39
52792.68
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Accounts Specialist II
ESCEA
18
Hourly
24.22
4197.42
50369.04
25.43
4407.28
52887.36
26.70
4627.64
55531.68
28.03
4859.02
58308.24
29.43
5101.96
61223.52
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Administrative Specialist
ESCEA
21
Hourly
26.08
4520.14
54241.68
27.38
4746.14
56953.68
28.75
4983.45
59801.40
30.19
5232.62
62791.44
31.70
5494.26
65931.12
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Administrative Technical Specialist
ESCEA
29
Hourly
31.77
5507.35
66088.20
33.36
5782.73
69392.76
35.03
6071.86
72862.32
36.78
6375.45
76505.40
38.62
6694.23
80330.76
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Assistant Planner
ESCEA
33
Hourly
35.07
6079.08
72948.96
36.83
6383.04
76596.48
38.67
6702.19
80426.28
40.60
7037.31
84447.72
42.63
7389.17
88670.04
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Building Inspector I
ESCEA
32
Hourly
34.22
5930.81
71169.72
35.93
6227.35
74728.20
37.72
6538.72
78464.64
39.61
6865.66
82387.92
41.59
7208.95
86507.40
Page 438 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Building Inspector II
ESCEA
36
Hourly
37.77
6546.51
78558.12
39.66
6873.83
82485.96
41.64
7217.52
86610.24
43.72
7578.40
90940.80
45.91
7957.32
95487.84
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Civil Engineering Assistant
ESCEA
34
Hourly
35.95
6231.08
74772.96
37.75
6542.63
78511.56
39.63
6869.76
82437.12
41.61
7213.24
86558.88
43.70
7573.90
90886.80
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Code Compliance Inspector
ESCEA
36
Hourly
37.77
6546.51
78558.12
39.66
6873.83
82485.96
41.64
7217.52
86610.24
43.72
7578.40
90940.80
45.91
7957.32
95487.84
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Community Cable Program Specialist
ESCEA
32
Hourly
34.22
5930.81
71169.72
35.93
6227.35
74728.20
37.72
6538.72
78464.64
39.61
6865.66
82387.92
41.59
7208.95
86507.40
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Computer Graphics Designer
ESCEA
34
Hourly
35.95
6231.08
74772.96
37.75
6542.63
78511.56
39.63
6869.76
82437.12
41.61
7213.24
86558.88
43.70
7573.90
90886.80
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5232
Cultural Arts Coordinator
ESCEA
35S
Hourly
38.06
6597.49
79169.88
39.97
6927.37
83128.44
41.96
7273.73
87284.76
44.06
7637.42
91649.04
46.27
8019.29
96231.48
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Custodian
ESCEA
11
Hourly
20.37
3531.11
42373.32
21.39
3707.67
44492.04
22.46
3893.06
46716.72
23.58
4087.71
49052.52
24.76
4292.09
51505.08
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Economic Development Coordinator
ESCEA
33
Hourly
35.07
6079.08
72948.96
36.83
6383.04
76596.48
38.67
6702.19
80426.28
40.60
7037.31
84447.72
42.63
7389.17
88670.04
Page 439 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Engineering Technician
ESCEA
30
Hourly
32.57
5645.04
67740.48
34.20
5927.29
71127.48
35.91
6223.66
74683.92
37.70
6534.84
78418.08
39.59
6861.59
82339.08
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Equipment Mechanic I
ESCEA
22
Hourly
26.73
4633.14
55597.68
28.07
4864.80
58377.60
29.47
5108.04
61296.48
30.94
5363.44
64361.28
32.49
5631.61
67579.32
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Equipment Mechanic II
ESCEA
27
Hourly
30.24
5241.99
62903.88
31.75
5504.09
66049.08
33.34
5779.29
69351.48
35.01
6068.25
72819.00
36.76
6371.66
76459.92
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Facilities Systems Mechanic
ESCEA
32
Hourly
34.22
5930.81
71169.72
35.93
6227.35
74728.20
37.72
6538.72
78464.64
39.61
6865.66
82387.92
41.59
7208.95
86507.40
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Fire Equipment Mechanic
ESCEA
30
Hourly
32.57
5645.04
67740.48
34.20
5927.29
71127.48
35.91
6223.66
74683.92
37.70
6534.84
78418.08
39.59
6861.59
82339.08
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Fire Prevention Specialist
ESCEA
34
Hourly
35.95
6231.08
74772.96
37.75
6542.63
78511.56
39.63
6869.76
82437.12
41.61
7213.24
86558.88
43.70
7573.90
90886.80
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Library Assistant
ESCEA
20
Hourly
25.44
4409.90
52918.80
26.71
4630.39
55564.68
28.05
4861.91
58342.92
29.45
5105.00
61260.00
30.92
5360.25
64323.00
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Library Clerk I
ESCEA
7
Hourly
18.46
3199.00
38388.00
19.38
3358.96
40307.52
20.35
3526.90
42322.80
21.36
3703.25
44439.00
22.43
3888.42
46661.04
Page 440 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Library Clerk II
ESCEA
11
Hourly
20.37
3531.11
42373.32
21.39
3707.67
44492.04
22.46
3893.06
46716.72
23.58
4087.71
49052.52
24.76
4292.09
51505.08
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
License/Permit Specialist I
ESCEA
17
Hourly
23.63
4095.01
49140.12
24.81
4299.76
51597.12
26.05
4514.76
54177.12
27.35
4740.49
56885.88
28.72
4977.52
59730.24
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
License/Permit Specialist II
ESCEA
22
Hourly
26.73
4633.14
55597.68
28.07
4864.80
58377.60
29.47
5108.04
61296.48
30.94
5363.44
64361.28
32.49
5631.61
67579.32
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Maintenance Craftsworker
ESCEA
29
Hourly
31.77
5507.35
66088.20
33.36
5782.73
69392.76
35.03
6071.86
72862.32
36.78
6375.45
76505.40
38.62
6694.23
80330.76
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Meter Reader/Repairer
ESCEA
26
Hourly
29.50
5114.12
61369.44
30.98
5369.83
64437.96
32.53
5638.32
67659.84
34.16
5920.24
71042.88
35.86
6216.25
74595.00
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Network Assistant
ESCEA
22
Hourly
26.73
4633.14
55597.68
28.07
4864.80
58377.60
29.47
5108.04
61296.48
30.94
5363.44
64361.28
32.49
5631.61
67579.32
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Office Specialist I
ESCEA
11
Hourly
20.37
3531.11
42373.32
21.39
3707.67
44492.04
22.46
3893.06
46716.72
23.58
4087.71
49052.52
24.76
4292.09
51505.08
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Office Specialist 11
ESCEA
17
Hourly
23.63
4095.01
49140.12
24.81
4299.76
51597.12
26.05
4514.76
54177.12
27.35
4740.49
56885.88
28.72
4977.52
59730.24
Page 441 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Park Maintenance Worker I
ESCEA
15
Hourly
22.49
3897.70
46772.40
23.61
4092.58
49110.96
24.79
4297.21
51566.52
26.03
4512.07
54144.84
27.33
4737.67
56852.04
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Park Maintenance Worker II
ESCEA
19
Hourly
24.82
4302.33
51627.96
26.06
4517.45
54209.40
27.37
4743.32
56919.84
28.73
4980.49
59765.88
30.17
5229.52
62754.24
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Planning Technician
ESCEA
23
Hourly
27.40
4748.98
56987.76
28.77
4986.42
59837.04
30.21
5235.74
62828.88
31.72
5497.53
65970.36
33.30
5772.41
69268.92
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Pool Maintenance Technician
ESCEA
25
Hourly
28.78
4989.39
59872.68
30.22
5238.86
62866.32
31.74
5500.81
66009.72
33.32
5775.85
69310.20
34.99
6064.64
72775.68
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Public Works Inspector
ESCEA
22
Hourly
26.73
4633.14
55597.68
28.07
4864.80
58377.60
29.47
5108.04
61296.48
30.94
5363.44
64361.28
32.49
5631.61
67579.32
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Records Technician
ESCEA
23
Hourly
27.40
4748.98
56987.76
28.77
4986.42
59837.04
30.21
5235.74
62828.88
31.72
5497.53
65970.36
33.30
5772.41
69268.92
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Recreation Coordinator
ESCEA
25
Hourly
28.78
4989.39
59872.68
30.22
5238.86
62866.32
31.74
5500.81
66009.72
33.32
5775.85
69310.20
34.99
6064.64
72775.68
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Revenue Inspector
ESCEA
33
Hourly
35.07
6079.08
72948.96
36.83
6383.04
76596.48
38.67
6702.19
80426.28
40.60
7037.31
84447.72
42.63
7389.17
88670.04
Page 442 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Senior Administrative Specialist
ESCEA
25
Hourly
28.78
4989.39
59872.68
30.22
5238.86
62866.32
31.74
5500.81
66009.72
33.32
5775.85
69310.20
34.99
6064.64
72775.68
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Senior Library Assistant
ESCEA
27
Hourly
30.24
5241.99
62903.88
31.75
5504.09
66049.08
33.34
5779.29
69351.48
35.01
6068.25
72819.00
36.76
6371.66
76459.92
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Senior Network Assistant
ESCEA
26
Hourly
29.50
5114.12
61369.44
30.98
5369.83
64437.96
32.53
5638.32
67659.84
34.16
5920.24
71042.88
35.86
6216.25
74595.00
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Street Maintenance Leadworker
ESCEA
28
Hourly
31.00
5373.03
64476.36
32.55
5641.68
67700.16
34.18
5923.76
71085.12
35.88
6219.95
74639.40
37.68
6530.95
78371.40
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Street Maintenance Worker I
ESCEA
15
Hourly
22.49
3897.70
46772.40
23.61
4092.58
49110.96
24.79
4297.21
51566.52
26.03
4512.07
54144.84
27.33
4737.67
56852.04
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Street Maintenance Worker II
ESCEA
19
Hourly
24.82
4302.33
51627.96
26.06
4517.45
54209.40
27.37
4743.32
56919.84
28.73
4980.49
59765.88
30.17
5229.52
62754.24
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Tree Maintenance Worker
ESCEA
22
Hourly
26.73
4633.14
55597.68
28.07
4864.80
58377.60
29.47
5108.04
61296.48
30.94
5363.44
64361.28
32.49
5631.61
67579.32
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Wastewater Maintenance Leadworker
ESCEA
28
Hourly
31.00
5373.03
64476.36
32.55
5641.68
67700.16
34.18
5923.76
71085.12
35.88
6219.95
74639.40
37.68
6530.95
78371.40
Page 443 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Wastewater Maintenance Worker I
ESCEA
18
Hourly
24.22
4197.42
50369.04
25.43
4407.28
52887.36
26.70
4627.64
55531.68
28.03
4859.02
58308.24
29.43
5101.96
61223.52
3/19/2019
10/1/2021
5683
Wastewater Maintenance Worker II
ESCEA
22
Hourly
26.73
4633.14
55597.68
28.07
4864.80
58377.60
29.47
5108.04
61296.48
30.94
5363.44
64361.28
32.49
5631.61
67579.32
Page 444 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
PSSEA SALARY SCHEDULE
4/16/2019
10/1/2021
5687
Crime Scene Investigator I
PSSEA
29ps
Hourly
30.29
5250.00
63000.00
31.80
5512.50
66150.00
33.39
5788.13
69457.56
35.06
6077.53
72930.36
36.82
6381.41
76576.92
4/16/2019
10/1/2021
5687
Crime Scene Investigator II
PSSEA
21ps
Hourly
33.43
5795.01
69540.12
35.10
6084.77
73017.24
36.86
6389.00
76668.00
38.70
6708.45
80501.40
40.64
7043.88
84526.56
4/16/2019
10/1/2021
5687
Police Assistant I
PSSEA
13ps
Hourly
21.79
3776.36
45316.32
22.88
3965.18
47582.16
24.02
4163.44
49961.28
25.22
4371.61
52459.32
26.48
4590.19
55082.28
4/16/2019
10/1/2021
5687
Police Assistant 11
PSSEA
17ps
Hourly
24.05
4168.40
50020.80
25.25
4376.82
52521.84
26.51
4595.66
55147.92
27.84
4825.44
57905.28
29.23
5066.72
60800.64
4/16/2019
10/1/2021
5687
Police Service Officer I
PSSEA
22ps
Hourly
26.21
4543.07
54516.84
27.52
4770.23
57242.76
28.90
5008.74
60104.88
30.34
5259.18
63110.16
31.86
5522.14
66265.68
4/16/2019
10/1/2021
5687
Police Service Officer 11
PSSEA
26ps
Hourly
28.93
5014.71
60176.52
30.38
5265.45
63185.40
31.90
5528.72
66344.64
33.49
5805.16
69661.92
35.17
6095.41
73144.92
Page 445 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
POLICE OFFICER ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE
11/24/2018
5627
Police Officer
ESPOA
687
Hourly
41.20
7142.18
85706.16
43.27
7499.29
89991.48
45.43
7874.26
94491.12
47.70
8267.97
99215.64
50.08
8681.37
104176.44
55.09
9549.50
114594.00
11/24/2018
5627
Police Sergeant
ESPOA
700
Hourly
51.62
8947.68
107372.16
54.20
9395.06
112740.72
56.91
9864.82
118377.84
59.76
10358.06
124296.72
62.75
10875.96
130511.52
69.02
11963.56
143562.72
Page 446 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
EL SEGUNDO POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE
11/5/2019
10/1/2021
5185
Police Lieutenant
ESPMA
56P
Hourly
74.18
12857.42
154289.04
77.89
13500.29
162003.48
81.78
14175.30
170103.60
85.87
14884.07
178608.84
90.16
15628.27
187539.24
11/5/2019
10/1/2021
5185
Police Captain
ESPMA
61P
Hourly
86.69
15026.89
180322.68
91.03
15778.23
189338.76
95.58
16567.14
198805.68
100.36
17395.50
208746.00
105.38
18265.27
219183.24
Page 447 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
EL SEGUNDO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE
11/24/2018
5628
Firefighter
ESFA -IAFF
483
Hourly
37.72
6537.32
78447.84
39.53
6852.09
82225.08
41.44
7182.58
86190.96
43.44
7529.60
90355.20
45.54
7893.94
94727.28
47.75
8276.52
99318.24
11/24/2018
5628
Fire Paramedic
ESFA - IAFF
497
Hourly
45.63
7909.64
94915.68
47.84
8293.01
99516.12
50.17
8695.53
104346.36
52.60
9118.19
109418.28
55.17
9561.99
114743.88
11/24/2018
5628
Fire Engineer
ESFA - IAFF
497
Hourly
45.63
7909.64
94915.68
47.84
8293.01
99516.12
50.17
8695.53
104346.36
52.60
9118.19
109418.28
55.17
9561.99
114743.88
11/24/2018
5628
Fire Captain
ESFA - IAFF
510
Hourly
52.71
9136.40
109636.80
55.28
9581.09
114973.08
57.97
10048.04
120576.48
60.80
10538.32
126459.84
63.77
11053.11
132637.32
Page 448 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Crime Prevention Analyst I
SPEA
30S
Hourly
36.56
6336.61
76039.32
38.39
6653.44
79841.28
40.30
6986.11
83833.32
42.32
7335.42
88025.04
44.44
7702.19
92426.28
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Deputy City Treasurer I
SPEA
30S
Hourly
36.56
6336.61
76039.32
38.39
6653.44
79841.28
40.30
6986.11
83833.32
42.32
7335.42
88025.04
44.44
7702.19
92426.28
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Librarian I
SPEA
32S
Hourly
38.06
6597.49
79169.88
39.97
6927.37
83128.44
41.96
7273.73
87284.76
44.06
7637.42
91649.04
46.27
8019.29
96231.48
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Administrative Analyst
SPEA
33S
Hourly
38.84
6732.84
80794.08
40.79
7069.49
84833.88
42.82
7422.96
89075.52
44.97
7794.11
93529.32
47.21
8183.81
98205.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Property Owner Coordinator
SPEA
33S
Hourly
38.84
6732.84
80794.08
40.79
7069.49
84833.88
42.82
7422.96
89075.52
44.97
7794.11
93529.32
47.21
8183.81
98205.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Recreation Supervisor
SPEA
33S
Hourly
38.84
6732.84
80794.08
40.79
7069.49
84833.88
42.82
7422.96
89075.52
44.97
7794.11
93529.32
47.21
8183.81
98205.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Wellness Coordinator
SPEA
33S
Hourly
38.84
6732.84
80794.08
40.79
7069.49
84833.88
42.82
7422.96
89075.52
44.97
7794.11
93529.32
47.21
8183.81
98205.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Crime Prevention Analyst 11
SPEA
34S
Hourly
39.64
6871.58
82458.96
41.63
7215.16
86581.92
43.71
7575.92
90911.04
45.89
7954.72
95456.64
48.19
8352.45
100229.40
Page 449 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Equipment Maint. Supervisor
SPEA
37S
Hourly
42.17
7308.94
87707.28
44.28
7674.39
92092.68
46.49
8058.11
96697.32
48.81
8461.01
101532.12
51.25
8884.06
106608.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Park Maintenance Supervisor
SPEA
37S
Hourly
42.17
7308.94
87707.28
44.28
7674.39
92092.68
46.49
8058.11
96697.32
48.81
8461.01
101532.12
51.25
8884.06
106608.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Project Specialist/ Sr. Accountant
SPEA
37S
Hourly
42.17
7308.94
87707.28
44.28
7674.39
92092.68
46.49
8058.11
96697.32
48.81
8461.01
101532.12
51.25
8884.06
106608.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Street Maintenance Supervisor
SPEA
37S
Hourly
42.17
7308.94
87707.28
44.28
7674.39
92092.68
46.49
8058.11
96697.32
48.81
8461.01
101532.12
51.25
8884.06
106608.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Water/WastewaterSupervisor
SPEA
37S
Hourly
42.17
7308.94
87707.28
44.28
7674.39
92092.68
46.49
8058.11
96697.32
48.81
8461.01
101532.12
51.25
8884.06
106608.72
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Construction Coordinator
SPEA
38S
Hourly
43.05
7462.06
89544.72
45.20
7835.17
94022.04
47.46
8226.92
98723.04
49.84
8638.27
103659.24
52.33
9070.18
108842.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
GIS Analyst
SPEA
38S
Hourly
43.05
7462.06
89544.72
45.20
7835.17
94022.04
47.46
8226.92
98723.04
49.84
8638.27
103659.24
52.33
9070.18
108842.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Program Coordinator
SPEA
38S
Hourly
43.05
7462.06
89544.72
45.20
7835.17
94022.04
47.46
8226.92
98723.04
49.84
8638.27
103659.24
52.33
9070.18
108842.16
Page 450 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
RSI Design Coordinator
SPEA
38S
Hourly
43.05
7462.06
89544.72
45.20
7835.17
94022.04
47.46
8226.92
98723.04
49.84
8638.27
103659.24
52.33
9070.18
108842.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Information Systems Developer
SPEA
39S
Hourly
43.96
7619.04
91428.48
46.15
7999.99
95999.88
48.46
8399.99
100799.88
50.88
8819.99
105839.88
53.43
9260.99
111131.88
11/3/2020
10/1/2021
NA
Media Supervisor
SPEA
40S
Hourly
43.96
7619.04
91428.48
46.15
7999.99
95999.88
48.46
8399.99
100799.88
50.88
8819.99
105839.88
53.43
9260.99
111131.88
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Accounting Supervisor
SPEA
40S
Hourly
44.88
7779.92
93359.04
47.13
8168.91
98026.92
49.48
8577.36
102928.32
51.96
9006.23
108074.76
54.56
9456.54
113478.48
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Economic Development Analyst
SPEA
40S
Hourly
44.88
7779.92
93359.04
47.13
8168.91
98026.92
49.48
8577.36
102928.32
51.96
9006.23
108074.76
54.56
9456.54
113478.48
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Police Records Supervisor
SPEA
40S
Hourly
44.88
7779.92
93359.04
47.13
8168.91
98026.92
49.48
8577.36
102928.32
51.96
9006.23
108074.76
54.56
9456.54
113478.48
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Senior Administrative Analyst
SPEA
40S
Hourly
44.88
7779.92
93359.04
47.13
8168.91
98026.92
49.48
8577.36
102928.32
51.96
9006.23
108074.76
54.56
9456.54
113478.48
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Associate Engineer
SPEA
42S
Hourly
46.81
8113.85
97366.20
49.15
8519.54
102234.48
51.61
8945.52
107346.24
54.19
9392.80
112713.60
56.90
9862.43
118349.16
Page 451 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor
SPEA
42S
Hourly
46.81
8113.85
97366.20
49.15
8519.54
102234.48
51.61
8945.52
107346.24
54.19
9392.80
112713.60
56.90
9862.43
118349.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Plan Check Engineer
SPEA
42S
Hourly
46.81
8113.85
97366.20
49.15
8519.54
102234.48
51.61
8945.52
107346.24
54.19
9392.80
112713.60
56.90
9862.43
118349.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Purchasing Agent
SPEA
42S
Hourly
46.81
8113.85
97366.20
49.15
8519.54
102234.48
51.61
8945.52
107346.24
54.19
9392.80
112713.60
56.90
9862.43
118349.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
RSI Supervisor
SPEA
42S
Hourly
46.81
8113.85
97366.20
49.15
8519.54
102234.48
51.61
8945.52
107346.24
54.19
9392.80
112713.60
56.90
9862.43
118349.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Information System Specialist
SPEA
43S
Hourly
47.81
8287.10
99445.20
50.20
8701.46
104417.52
52.71
9136.53
109638.36
55.35
9593.36
115120.32
58.11
10073.02
120876.24
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Senior Building Inspector
SPEA
44S
Hourly
48.83
8464.69
101576.28
51.28
8887.93
106655.16
53.84
9332.32
111987.84
56.53
9798.94
117587.28
59.36
10288.88
123466.56
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Assistant Fire Marshall
SPEA
45S
Hourly
49.88
8646.73
103760.76
52.38
9079.06
108948.72
55.00
9533.02
114396.24
57.75
10009.67
120116.04
60.64
10510.15
126121.80
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Emergency Management Coordinator
SPEA
45S
Hourly
49.88
8646.73
103760.76
52.38
9079.06
108948.72
55.00
9533.02
114396.24
57.75
10009.67
120116.04
60.64
10510.15
126121.80
Page 452 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Principal Environmental Specialist
SPEA
45S
Hourly
49.88
8646.73
103760.76
52.38
9079.06
108948.72
55.00
9533.02
114396.24
57.75
10009.67
120116.04
60.64
10510.15
126121.80
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Senior Engineer Associate
SPEA
46S
Hourly
50.96
8833.30
105999.60
53.51
9274.97
111299.64
56.18
9738.71
116864.52
58.99
10225.65
122707.80
61.94
10736.93
128843.16
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Technical Services Analyst
SPEA
47S
Hourly
52.06
9024.54
108294.48
54.67
9475.77
113709.24
57.40
9949.56
119394.72
60.27
10447.04
125364.48
63.28
10969.39
131632.68
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Fire Marshall
SPEA
49S
Hourly
54.35
9421.48
113057.76
57.07
9892.56
118710.72
59.93
10387.19
124646.28
62.92
10906.54
130878.48
66.07
11451.87
137422.44
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Principal Planner
SPEA
52S
Hourly
58.01
10054.88
120658.56
60.91
10557.63
126691.56
63.95
11085.51
133026.12
67.15
11639.78
139677.36
70.51
12221.77
146661.24
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Senior Plan Check Engineer
SPEA
52S
Hourly
58.01
10054.88
120658.56
60.91
10557.63
126691.56
63.95
11085.51
133026.12
67.15
11639.78
139677.36
70.51
12221.77
146661.24
10/1/2019
10/1/2021
5759
Environmental Safety Manager
SPEA
53S
Hourly
58.76
10185.73
122228.76
61.70
10695.02
128340.24
64.79
11229.77
134757.24
68.03
11791.26
141495.12
71.43
12380.82
148569.84
Page 453 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
UNREPRESENTED: EXECUTIVE, MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
11/3/2020
5232
Deputy City Manager
EXECUTIVE
60d
Salaried
68.20
11822.00
141864.00
92.87
16098.00
193176.00
6/4/2019
5154
Chief of Police
EXECUTIVE
60f
Salaried
101.66
17620.73
211448.76
125.41
21737.72
260852.64
6/4/2019
5154
Fire Chief
EXECUTIVE
70f
Salaried
96.69
16760.14
201121.68
116.03
20112.17
241346.04
11/3/2020
5232
Chief Financial Officer
EXECUTIVE
64d
Salaried
77.39
13415.00
160980.00
92.87
16098.00
193176.00
11/3/2020
5232
Director of Human Resources
EXECUTIVE
64d
Salaried
77.39
13415.00
160980.00
92.87
16098.00
193176.00
11/3/2020
5232
Information Technology Services Director
EXECUTIVE
64d
Salaried
77.39
13415.00
160980.00
92.87
16098.00
193176.00
11/3/2020
5232
Community Services Director
EXECUTIVE
64d
Salaried
77.39
13415.00
160980.00
92.87
16098.00
193176.00
11/3/2020
5232
Development Services Director
EXECUTIVE
64d
Salaried
78.35
13581.00
162972.00
102.12
17700.00
212400.00
6/4/2019
5154
Director of Public Works
EXECUTIVE
64d
Salaried
77.39
13415.00
160980.00
92.87
16098.00
193176.00
6/4/2019
5154
Accounting Manager
MANAGEMENT
51m
Salaried
58.10
10070.98
120851.76
69.72
12085.18
145022.16
6/4/2019
5154
Assistant City Engineer
MANAGEMENT
56m
Salaried
60.70
10521.52
126258.24
72.84
12625.83
151509.96
6/4/2019
5154
Battalion Chief
MANAGEMENT
60f
Salaried
75.24
13041.06
156492.72
90.28
15649.27
187791.24
6/4/2019
5154
Building Safety Manager
MANAGEMENT
60f
Salaried
64.83
11236.58
134838.96
77.79
13483.89
161806.68
6/4/2019
5154
City Engineer (At -Will)
MANAGEMENT
60m
Salaried
68.91
11943.54
143322.48
82.69
14332.25
171987.00
6/4/2019
5154
Community Cable Program Manager
MANAGEMENT
51m
Salaried
58.10
10070.98
120851.76
69.72
12085.18
145022.16
11/3/2020
NA
Communications & Legislative Affairs
Manager
MANAGEMENT
51m
Salaried
58.10
10070.98
120851.76
69.72
12085.18
145022.16
6/4/2019
5154
Deputy City Clerk I
MANAGEMENT
27m
Salaried
35.43
6140.99
73691.88
42.27
7325.99
87911.88
6/4/2019
5154
Deputy City Clerk II
MANAGEMENT
36m
Salaried
39.57
6859.26
82311.12
47.49
8231.11
98773.32
6/4/2019
5154
Deputy City Treasurer II
MANAGEMENT
30s
Salaried
44.05
7635.47
91625.64
52.86
9162.56
109950.72
6/4/2019
5154
Finance Manager
MANAGEMENT
55m
Salaried
59.38
10292.33
123507.96
71.25
12350.80
148209.60
Page 454 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
6/4/2019
5154
General Services Manager
MANAGEMENT
53m
Salaried
59.04
10233.12
122797.44
70.84
12279.74
147356.88
6/4/2019
5154
Human Resources Manager
MANAGEMENT
51m
Salaried
58.10
10070.98
120851.76
69.72
12085.18
145022.16
6/4/2019
5154
Information Systems Manager
MANAGEMENT
54m
Salaried
62.04
10753.00
129036.00
74.44
12903.60
154843.20
6/4/2019
5154
Librarian II
MANAGEMENT
37m
Salaried
41.97
7274.57
87294.84
50.36
8729.48
104753.76
11/3/2020
1620
Library Services Manager
MANAGEMENT
50m
Salaried
56.85
9854.65
118255.80
68.22
11825.58
141906.96
6/4/2019
5154
Park Maintenance Superintendent
MANAGEMENT
48m
Salaried
54.45
9437.67
113252.04
65.34
11325.20
135902.40
6/4/2019
5154
Planning Manager
MANAGEMENT
56m
Salaried
64.83
11236.58
134838.96
77.79
13483.89
161806.68
6/4/2019
5154
Recreation Superintendent
MANAGEMENT
50m
Salaried
56.85
9854.65
118255.80
68.22
11825.58
141906.96
6/4/2019
5154
Revenue Manager
MANAGEMENT
51m
Salaried
58.10
10070.98
120851.76
69.72
12085.18
145022.16
11/3/2020
5232
Risk Manager
MANAGEMENT
52m
Salaried
58.10
10071.00
120852.00
69.72
12085.00
145020.00
6/4/2019
5154
Senior Librarian
MANAGEMENT
39m
Salaried
44.98
7796.33
93555.96
53.97
9355.60
112267.20
11/3/2020
5232
Treasury & Customer Service Manager
MANAGEMENT
141
Salaried
59.38
10292.00
123504.00
71.26
12351.00
148212.00
6/4/2019
5154
Accountant
CONFIDENTIAL
31m
Salaried
38.16
6614.09
79369.08
45.79
7936.91
95242.92
6/4/2019
5154
Executive Assistant
CONFIDENTIAL
34m
Salaried
37.98
6582.92
78995.04
45.57
7899.51
94794.12
6/4/2019
5154
Human Resources Analyst
CONFIDENTIAL
34m
Salaried
40.56
7030.31
84363.72
48.67
8436.37
101236.44
6/4/2019
NA
Human Resources Technician
CONFIDENTIAL
18m
Salaried
29.58
5127.76
61533.12
35.50
6153.32
73839.84
6/4/2019
5154
Management Analyst
CONFIDENTIAL
35m
Salaried
41.40
7176.04
86112.48
49.68
8611.25
103335.00
6/4/2019
5154
Payroll Accountant
CONFIDENTIAL
31m
Salaried
38.16
6614.09
79369.08
45.79
7936.91
95242.92
6/4/2019
5154
Principal Civil Engineer
CONFIDENTIAL
51m
Salaried
58.10
10070.98
120851.76
69.72
12085.18
145022.16
6/4/2019
5154
Senior Civil Engineer (At -Will)
CONFIDENTIAL
48m
Salaried
54.45
9437.67
113252.04
65.34
11325.20
135902.40
Page 455 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
6/4/2019
5154
Senior Executive Assistant (At -Will)
CONFIDENTIAL
35m
Salaried
41.40
7176.04
86112.48
49.68
8611.25
103335.00
6/4/2019
5154
Senior Human Resources Analyst
CONFIDENTIAL
39m
Salaried
44.98
7796.33
93555.96
53.97
9355.60
112267.20
6/4/2019
5154
Senior Management Analyst
CONFIDENTIAL
39m
Salaried
44.98
7796.33
93555.96
53.97
9355.60
112267.20
Page 456 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
CONTRACTS
6/19/2019
10/19/2021
5720
City Manager
CONTRACT
227
Salaried
124.85
21641.66
259700.00
ELECTED OFFICIALS IL
3/7/2006
Ordinance
1392
Council Member
ELECTED
290
Stipend
900.00
6/4/2019
5154
City Clerk
ELECTED
209
Stipend
2375.00
6/5/2019
5154
City Treasurer
ELECTED
236
Stipend
2375.00
Page 457 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
12/14/2020
5243
Administrative Intern PT
TEMPORARY
28pt
Hourly
15.00
2600.00
31200.00
15.75
2730.00
32760.00
16.54
2866.93
34403.20
17.36
3009.07
36108.80
18.23
3159.87
37918.40
19.14
3317.60
39811.20
12/14/2020
5243
Library Assistant PT
TEMPORARY
20h
Hourly
21.37
3704.13
44449.60
22.44
3889.60
46675.20
23.56
4083.73
49004.80
24.74
4288.27
51459.20
25.98
4503.20
54038.40
12/14/2020
5243
Library Clerk PT
TEMPORARY
7h
Hourly
15.50
2686.67
32240.00
16.28
2821.87
33862.40
17.09
2962.27
35547.20
17.95
3111.33
37336.00
18.84
3265.60
39187.20
12/14/2020
5243
Lifeguard PT
TEMPORARY
680
Hourly
15.00
2600.00
31200.00
15.75
2730.00
32760.00
16.54
2866.93
34403.20
17.36
3009.07
36108.80
18.23
3159.87
37918.40
19.14
3317.60
39811.20
11/3/2020
NA
Park Maintenance Worker I - PT
TEMPORARY
15H
Hourly
24.82
4,302.33
51,627.96
26.06
4,517.45
54,209.40
27.37
4,743.32
56,919.84
28.73
3,979.73
47,756.80
30.17
5,229.52
62,754.24
12/14/2020
5243
Police Cadet PT
TEMPORARY
05c
Hourly
16.27
2820.13
33841.60
17.08
2960.53
35526.40
17.94
3109.60
37315.20
18.83
3263.87
39166.40
19.78
3428.53
41142.40
20.77
3600.13
43201.60
2/21/2017
5025
Police Officer Trainee
TEMPORARY
NA
Hourly
29.06
5038.42
60444.80
30.52
5290.35
63481.60
32.04
5554.86
66643.20
33.64
5832.61
69971.20
35.33
6124.22
73486.40
Page 458 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
12/14/2020
11/2/2021
5243
Recreation Assistant PT
TEMPORARY
2pt
Hourly
15.44
2676.27
32115.20
16.21
2809.73
33716.80
17.02
2950.13
35401.60
17.87
3097.47
37169.60
12/14/2020
5243
Recreation Leader PT
TEMPORARY
11pt
Hourly
15.00
2600.00
31200.00
15.75
2730.00
32760.00
16.54
2866.93
34403.20
17.36
3009.07
36108.80
18.23
3159.87
37918.40
19.14
3317.60
39811.20
12/14/2020
5243
Senior Recreation Leader PT
TEMPORARY
21 pt
Hourly
16.00
2773.33
33280.00
16.80
2912.00
34944.00
17.64
3057.60
36691.20
18.52
3210.13
38521.60
19.45
3371.33
40456.00
20.42
3539.47
42473.60
12/14/2020
5243
Recreation Specialist PT
TEMPORARY
31pt
Hourly
18.29
3170.27
38043.20
19.20
3328.00
39936.00
20.16
3494.40
41932.80
21.17
3669.47
44033.60
22.23
3853.20
46238.40
23.34
4045.60
48547.20
12/14/2020
5243
Senior Lifeguard PT
TEMPORARY
681
Hourly
18.00
3120.00
37440.00
18.90
3276.00
39312.00
19.85
3440.67
41288.00
20.84
3612.27
43347.20
21.88
3792.53
45510.40
22.97
3981.47
47777.60
12/14/2020
5243
Penior Video Technician/Media Specialist
TEMPORARY
31 pt
Hourly
17.25
2990.00
35880.00
18.11
3139.07
37668.80
19.02
3296.80
39561.60
19.97
3461.47
41537.60
20.97
3634.80
43617.60
22.02
3816.80
45801.60
12/14/2020
5243
Senior Video Technician II PT
TEMPORARY
35pt
Hourly
22.25
3856.67
46280.00
23.36
4049.07
48588.80
24.53
4251.87
51022.40
25.76
4465.07
53580.80
27.05
4688.67
56264.00
28.40
4922.67
59072.00
Page 459 of 500
EFFECTIVE
DATE
SALARY
REVISION
EFFECTIVE
DATE
AGREEMENT
NUMBER
JOB CLASS TITLE
GROUP BU
GRADE
PAY TYPE
HOURLY
MONTHLY
ANNUAL
12/14/2020
11/2/2021
5243
Video Technician II/Media Assistant PT
TEMPORARY
12pt
Hourly
15.44
2676.27
32115.20
16.21
2809.73
33716.80
17.02
2950.13
35401.60
17.87
3097.47
37169.60
18.76
3251.73
39020.80
19.69
3412.93
40955.20
12/14/2020
5243
Shuttle Driver PT
TEMPORARY
38pt
Hourly
17.25
2990.00
35880.00
18.11
3139.07
37668.80
19.02
3296.80
39561.60
19.97
3461.47
41537.60
20.97
3634.80
43617.60
22.02
3816.80
45801.60
12/14/2020
5243
Swim Instructor PT
TEMPORARY
682
Hourly
16.50
2860.00
34320.00
17.33
3003.87
36046.40
18.19
3152.93
37835.20
19.10
3310.67
39728.00
20.06
3477.07
41724.80
21.06
3650.40
43804.80
6/15/2021
5270
Special Projects Administrator PT
TEMPORARY
40pt
Hourly
25.00
4333.33
52000.00
125.00
21666.67
260000
3/16/2021
5254
Police Services Officer II PT
TEMPORARY
26ps
Hourly
28.37
4917.47
59009.60
34.48
5976.53
71718.40
3/2/2021
5252
Public Safety Officer II PT
TEMPORARY
26ps
Hourly
27.81
4820.40
57844.80
33.80
5858.67
70304.00
3/2/2021
5252
Fire Marshal PT
TEMPORARY
49S
Hourly
52.24
9054.93
108659.20
63.50
11006.67
132080.00
3/2/2021
5252
Battalion Chief PT
TEMPORARY
60F
Hourly
75.24
13041.60
156499.20
90.28
15648.53
187782.40
Page 460 of 500
City of El Segundo List of Revisions to the City Wide Salary Schedule
10/04/2011 - 12/07/2021
Revision Dates
Group
% of Revision
Revision
Council Adoption Date
10/1/2021
PMA
3.00
1/16/2020
10/1/2021
CEA
2.00
3/20/2019
10/1/2021
PSSEA
2.00
10/1/2018
10/1/2021
SPEA
2.00
10/1/2018
4/20/2021
MC
-
Reclassification of HR
Assistant to HR
Technician
4/20/2021
12/15/2020
Unrepresented
Part-time salary
12/15/2020
12/14/2020
Unrepresented
-
Administrative Intern
12/14/2020
11/20/2020
MC
-
Risk Manager, Library
Services Manager,
Deputy City Manager, HR
Director, Community
Services Director,
Development Services
Director, IT Services
Director, Treasury and
Customer Service
Manager, Chief Financial
Officer
11/20/2020
11/3/2020
MC
-
Communications and
Legislative Affairs
Manager
11/3/2020
10/1/2020
PMA
3.00
1/16/2020
10/1/2020
CEA
2.00
3/20/2019
10/1/2020
FFA
2.50
10/1/2018
10/1/2020
POA
2.00
10/1/2018
10/1/2020
PSSEA
2.00
10/1/2018
10/1/2020
SPEA
2.00
10/1/2018
10/1/2019
FFA
2.50
10/1/2018
10/1/2019
POA
2.00
10/1/2018
6/4/2019
MC
-
6/4/2019
6/5/2018
Unrepresented
New PT Lifeguard and
Senior Lifeguard
6/5/2018
1/6/2018
SPEA
-
Accounting Supervisor
1/6/2018
1/6/2018
SPEA
-
Assistant Fire Marshal
1/6/2018
6/20/2017
MC
Director of Information
Systems (At -will)
6/20/2017
5/13/2017
CEA
-
Records Technician
9/20/2016
5/13/2017
CEA
-
Crime Scene Investigator
5/13/2017
4/18/2017
MC
-
Accountant
4/18/2017
4/15/2017
PSSEA
-
Police Assistant 1
4/15/2017
3/4/2017
Unrepresented
-
Police Officer Trainee
2/21/2017
3/4/2017
POA
-
Police Sergeant
3/4/2017
10/1/2016
FFA
3.00
10/1/2014
10/1/2016
FFA
-
Fire Paramedic,
Firefighter
10/1/2016
Page 1 of 2
Page 461 of 500
City of El Segundo List of Revisions to the City Wide Salary Schedule
10/04/2011 - 12/07/2021
Revision Dates
Group
% of Revision
Revision
Council Adoption Date
3/15/2016
Elected
-
City Treasurer
3/15/2016
12/26/2015
MC
-
Accounting Manager
12/26/2015
12/26/2015
MC
-
Executives
12/26/2015
12/26/2015
MC
-
Planning Manager
12/26/2015
11/28/2015
FFA
2.00
10/1/2014
9/21/2013
CEA
-
COLA
9/21/2013
10/1/2012
PMA
-
COLA
9/27/2011
10/1/2012
PSSEA
ICOLA
10/1/2011
10/1/2011
POA
I COLA
10/3/2011
Page 2 of 2
Page 462 of 500
{.,rVoy City Council Agenda Statement
ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Staff Presentations
Item Number: D.19
TITLE:
Amendment to City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolutions amending the City Contributions for CalPERS medical premiums for
the Executive Management and Mid-Management/Confidential groups covered under
the City of El Segundo Administrative Code, Title 1A Salaries and Conditions of
Employment, Chapter 1A2 Management -Confidential Series.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Fiscal impact for FY2021-22 is $36,000, assuming all eligible employees participate in
medical coverage. Sufficient funding for actions related to this recommendation is
included in the adopted Citywide Budget. No new funding is needed for this fiscal year.
7_[81:(r]:A1l1►113
The Executive Management and Mid-Management/Confidential employee groups
(Management Confidential series) are unrepresented and do not engage in the
collective bargaining process for changes to wages, benefits and other terms and
conditions of employment. Instead, their salaries and conditions of employment are
provided in the Administrative Code Title 1A, Chapter 1A-2 and are subject to change
from time to time by City Council resolution. The health allowance for employees in the
Management Confidential series includes two components, a medical contribution and
flexible benefit. The medical contribution is subject to the Public Employees' Medical
and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) and the designated allowance may only be used
towards the cost of CaIPERS medical plan premiums. The medical contribution was
last adjusted to $782 for Executive Management and to $585 for Mid-
Management/Confidential effective June 1, 2016.
Under the Administrative Code, employees are provided with a flexible benefit
allowance which may be used towards eligible benefits under the plan including medical
premiums. In May 2019, the flexible benefit allowance was adjusted to $718 for
Page 463 of 500
Amendment to the City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 3
Executive Management and to $915 for Mid-Management/Confidential. The City total
monthly health allowance (medical contribution and flexible benefit) for both groups
equals $1,500.
Q 6*9111*4Is] ►F
CalPERS requires contracting agencies participating in the Health Plan under PEMHCA
to submit a change resolution approved by the City Council to amend the employer
contribution for medical premiums. Resolutions were approved by City Council for
represented labor groups with negotiated increases to monthly medical allowances
effective January 2022. Over time, these scheduled increases to the medical plans have
brought parity to the represented groups with a monthly allowance for active employees
to $1,650. Absent the collective bargaining process, the total monthly health allowance
for the Management Confidential series has remained at $1,500 since 2019.
The following illustrates the proposed changes to Administrative Code Title 1A, Chapter
1A-2, Section 1A2.105 Flexible Benefit Plan for positions in the Executive Management
and Mid-Management/Confidential Groups as listed in the attached Resolutions:
Effective February 1, 2022, an increase to the medical contribution for Executive
Management of $150 towards the medical allowance, which will increase the
monthly contribution from $782 to $932. The total combined health contribution is
$1,650.
Medical Contribution
per Month
Flexible Benefit per Month
Total Monthly Health
Allowance
$932
$718
$1,650
2. Effective February 1, 2022, an increase to the medical contribution for
Management/Confidential of $150 towards the medical allowance, which will
increase the monthly contribution from $585 to $735. The total combined health
contribution is $1,650.
Medical Contribution
per Month
Flexible Benefit per Month
Total Monthly Health
Allowance
$735
$915
$1,650
The proposed $150 monthly medical contribution increase provides a balanced
approach to labor relations with the Management Confidential series employees. The
Page 464 of 500
Amendment to the City Contributions for CalPERS Medical Premiums
December 7, 2021
Page 3 of 3
maximum fiscal impact over a 12-month period, assuming all eligible employees
participate in medical coverage, is $86,400.
Upon approval, Human Resources will ensure that the resolutions are recorded with
CalPERS and will work with Finance to implement the amendments to the City's
contribution to medical premiums.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 3: Develop as a Choice Employer and Workforce
Objective: El Segundo is a city employer of choice and consistently hires for the future,
with a workforce that is inspired, world -class and engaged, demonstrating increasing
stability and innovation.
PREPARED BY:
Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director
REVIEWED BY:
Rebecca Redyk, Human Resources Director
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Resolution Fixing the Employer Contribution 006 El Segundo Executive
Management
2. Resolution Fixing the Employer Contribution 001 El Segundo El Segundo Mid -
Management Confidential
Page 465 of 500
RESOLUTION NO. Number
FIXING THE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION
UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT
AT AN EQUAL AMOUNT FOR EMPLOYEES AND ANNUITANTS
WITH RESPECT TO A RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION
006 EL SEGUNDO EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
WHEREAS, (1) City of El Segundo is a contracting agency under Government Code
Section 22920 and subject to the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital
Care Act (the "Act") for participation by members of El Segundo City
Employees' Association; and
WHEREAS, (2) Government Code Section 22892(a) provides that a contracting agency
subject to Act shall fix the amount of the employer contribution by
resolution; and
WHEREAS, (3) Government Code Section 22892(b) provides that the employer
contribution shall be an equal amount for both employees and annuitants,
but may not be less than the amount prescribed by Section 22892(b) of
the Act; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, (a) That the employer contribution for each employee or annuitant shall be
the amount necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including
the enrollment of family members, in a health benefits plan up to a
maximum of $1,650.00 per month, plus administrative fees and
Contingency Reserve Fund assessments; and be it further
RESOLVED, (b) City of El Segundo has fully complied with any and all applicable
provisions of Government Code Section 7507 in electing the benefits set
forth above; and be it further
RESOLVED, (c) That the participation of the employees and annuitants of City of El
Segundo shall be subject to determination of its status as an "agency or
instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State" that is
eligible to participate in a governmental plan within the meaning of
Section 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, upon publication of final
Regulations pursuant to such Section. If it is determined that City of El
Segundo would not qualify as an agency or instrumentality of the state or
political subdivision of a State under such final Regulations, CalPERS
may be obligated, and reserves the right to terminate the health coverage
of all participants of the employer; and be it further
RESOLVED, (d) That the executive body appoint and direct, and it does hereby appoint
and direct, the City Clerk to file with the Board a verified copy of this
resolution, and to perform on behalf of City of El Segundo all functions
required of it under the Act; and be it further
RESOLVED, (e) That coverage under the Act be effective on February 1, 2022.
Page 466 of 500
Adopted at a regular meeting of the El Segundo City Council at El
Segundo, CA, this 71" day of December, 2021.
Signed:
Attest:
Drew Boyles, Mayor
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
Page 467 of 500
RESOLUTION NO. Number
FIXING THE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION
UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT
AT AN EQUAL AMOUNT FOR EMPLOYEES AND ANNUITANTS
WITH RESPECT TO A RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION
001 EL SEGUNDO MID-MANAGEMENT/CONFIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, (1) City of El Segundo is a contracting agency under Government Code
Section 22920 and subject to the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital
Care Act (the "Act") for participation by members of El Segundo City
Employees' Association; and
WHEREAS, (2) Government Code Section 22892(a) provides that a contracting agency
subject to Act shall fix the amount of the employer contribution by
resolution; and
WHEREAS, (3) Government Code Section 22892(b) provides that the employer
contribution shall be an equal amount for both employees and annuitants,
but may not be less than the amount prescribed by Section 22892(b) of
the Act; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, (a) That the employer contribution for each employee or annuitant shall be
the amount necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including
the enrollment of family members, in a health benefits plan up to a
maximum of $1,650.00 per month, plus administrative fees and
Contingency Reserve Fund assessments; and be it further
RESOLVED, (b) City of El Segundo has fully complied with any and all applicable
provisions of Government Code Section 7507 in electing the benefits set
forth above; and be it further
RESOLVED, (c) That the participation of the employees and annuitants of City of El
Segundo shall be subject to determination of its status as an "agency or
instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State" that is
eligible to participate in a governmental plan within the meaning of
Section 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, upon publication of final
Regulations pursuant to such Section. If it is determined that City of El
Segundo would not qualify as an agency or instrumentality of the state or
political subdivision of a State under such final Regulations, CalPERS
may be obligated, and reserves the right to terminate the health coverage
of all participants of the employer; and be it further
RESOLVED, (d) That the executive body appoint and direct, and it does hereby appoint
and direct, the City Clerk to file with the Board a verified copy of this
resolution, and to perform on behalf of City of El Segundo all functions
required of it under the Act; and be it further
RESOLVED, (e) That coverage under the Act be effective on February 1, 2022.
Page 468 of 500
Adopted at a regular meeting of the El Segundo City Council at El
Segundo, CA, this 71" day of December, 2021.
Signed:
Attest:
Drew Boyles, Mayor
Tracy Weaver, City Clerk
Page 469 of 500
{.,rVoy City Council Agenda Statement
ELSEGUNDO Meeting Date: December 7, 2021
Agenda Heading: Reports - City Treasurer
Item Number: G.20
TITLE:
Investment Portfolio Report for September 2021
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The Treasury Department provides an Investment Portfolio Report presentation to City
Council on a quarterly basis. The report includes the status of Treasury investment
activities and related economic indicators as of September 2021.
DISCUSSION:
See attached Investment Portfolio Report.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPLIANCE:
Goal 5: Champion Economic Development and Fiscal Sustainability
Objective B: El Segundo approaches its work in a financially strategic and responsible
way.
Page 470 of 500
Presentation of Investment Portfolio Report for September 2021
December 7, 2021
Page 2 of 2
PREPARED BY:
Dino Marsocci, Revenue Manager/Deputy Treasurer
REVIEWED BY:
Matthew Robinson, City Treasurer
APPROVED BY:
Barbara Voss, Deputy City Manager
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
September 2021 Portfolio Report
Page 471 of 500
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
City of El Segundo
Investment Portfolio Report
September 2021
Certified By:
City Treasurer's Office
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
Portfolio
Portfolio Summary
As of September 2021
Portfolio Type / Security Type
Liquidity
Reserve
$50,257,100
a,
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
$16,794,365
$9,
$ 11,746,929
$7,260,825
$7,122,245823,368
$0
$84,426
$757,770
$50,257,100
$40,000,000
m
0
m0 $20,000,000
$16,307,268
$11,626,058
$6,936,878
$7,109,655
$6,991,712
M
$0
$84,426
M
$760,658
48.40%
m 40.00%
0
0
0 20.00%
16.17%
9.46 %
11.31%
6.99 %
6.86%
0.00%
0.08%
0.73%
r 3
2.85
2.11
a 2
a'
1.77
1.74
v
1
LK—
0.53
i
3 0
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00%
2.74%
v
2.54%
y
2.17%
2.14% 2.34%
> 2.00%
a
1.00%
0
0
IR
0.32%
0.21%
0.00 %
0.05%
�—w
CAMP-JPAP
Cash
LAIF
Government
Medium Term Notes
Municipal Bonds
Negotiable Certificates of Supranational Obligations
Deposit
Security Type
CAMP-JPAP
Cash
Government
LAIF
Medium Term Notes
Municipal Bonds
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
Supranational Obligations
Page 474 of 500
Investments by Security Type
As of September 2021
Supranational Obligations CAMP-JPAP
$757,770 $84,426 Cash
Negotiable C
$1
Municipal Bonds
$7,122, 245
Medium Term Notes
$11,746,929
Security Type
CAMP -JPAP
Cash
Government
LAIF
Medium Term Notes
Municipal Bonds
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
Supranational Obligations
Page 475 of 500
Reserve Portfolio Ladder by Quarter
As of September 2021
$15,000,000
$14,000,000
$13,000,000
$12,000,000
$11,000,000
$10,000,000
$9,000,000
w
$8,000,000
m
a
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
Quarter
■ Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Total
Page 476 of 500
$50,000,000
$45,000,000
$40,000,000
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
m
a
2 $25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000 $9,823,368
$5,000,000
$0
Cash
$So,257,100
LAIF
Investments by Maturity Date
As of September 2021
$10,113, 393
$8,584,400
$2,226,372
$84,426 $491,673 $740,767
� �� = M
CAMP - JPAP < 30 Days 31 to 90 Days 91 to 180 Days 181 to 365 Days 1 to 2 Years
$13,516,313
$3,108,989
2 to 3 Years
3 to 4 Years
$4,900,225
4 to 5 Years
Page 477 of 500
Portfolio
As of September 2021
PortfolioTy.. Security Type
Issuer
CUSIP
Days to Maturity
Coupon
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
UnrealizedP/L
Liquidity Cash
Bank
Custodial
Cash
Cash
1
0.45%
$6,936,878
$6,936,878
$6,936,878
$0
1 0.00% $2,886,490 $2,886,490
$0
LAIF
LAIF
LAIF
1
0.21%
$50,257,100
$50,257,100
$50,257,100
$0
CAMP-JPAP
CAMP-JPAP
CAMP-JPAP
1
0.05%
$84,426
$84,426
$84,426
$0
Reserve Government
F H L M C
FNMA
FEDERAL AGRI MTG CORP
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT B
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BKS
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTH
3137EAENS
3135GOQ89
31422BPQ7
3133EKSN7
3133EKVE3
3130A1XJ2
880591ER9
627
2.64%
$1,000,000
$1,042,940
$1,017,080
$0
7 1.37% $1,000,000 $1,000,220 $978,260
$0
783 1.58% $500,000 $513,705 $499,884
$0
634 1.73% $1,000,000 $1,026,020 $998,607
292 1.82% $1,000,000 $1,014,510 $999,900
$0
$0
988 2.70% $2,000,000 $2,129,300 $2,089,405
$0
1,081 2.69% $500,000 $534,130 $526,520
$0
Medium Term Notes
AMAZON COM INC
APPLE INC
ASTRAZENECA FINANCE L
BANK OF AMERICA CORP
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY IN
CATERPILLAR FINLSERV
CIGNACORP
CITIGROUP INC
COCA COLA CO THE
ESTEE LAUDER CO INC
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP I
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCH
JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH
MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITIO
MORGAN STANLEY
NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL
ORACLE CORP
STRYKER CORP
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT C
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP IN
WAL MARTSTORES INC
WELLS FARGO COMPANY
023135AJ5
037833AK6
04636NAA1
06051GFX2
084670BR8
14913QAA7
12SS23AGS
172967KNO
191216CL2
29736RANO
38141GXJ8
45866FAD6
478111AB3
582839AH9
61746BDZ6
64952WCSO
68389XBL8
863667AH4
89236TCQ6
911312BT2
91324PDN9
931142DU4
949746SK8
425
2.45%
$500,000
$509,910
$499,990
$0
580 2.32% $500,000 $516,190 $480,685
$0
1,701 1.20% $500,000 $500,125 $501,040
$0
1,662 3.21% $500,000 $545,965 $554,155
$0
531 2.67% $500,000 $515,585 $513,756
$0
249 2.36% $500,000 $507,640 $500,000
$0
1,507 3.71% $500,000 $555,640 $564,210
$0
1,674 3.12% $500,000 $544,310 $550,715
$0
1,072 1.69% $500,000 $518,335 $493,865
$0
1,158 1.92% $500,000 $519,985 $501,600
$0
1,279 3.26% $500,000 $537,550 $545,605
$0
1,523 3.41% $500,000 $549,480 $557,000
$0
592 2.67% $145,000 $150,264 $141,068
$0
1,507 3.70% $500,000 $556,780 $565,170
$0
1,580 3.50% $500,000 $553,500 $561,240
$0
253 2.27% $500,000 $507,235 $500,000
$0
715 2.32% $500,000 $517,305 $492,550
$0
1,493 3.12% $500,000 $541,680 $548,175
$0
286 2.75% $500,000 $509,900 $490,620
$0
1,067 2.11% $500,000 $521,955 $504,105
$0
1,537 3.35% $500,000 $552,745 $560,625
$0
441 2.30% $500,000 $510,585 $498,935
$0
481 3.04% $500,000 $504,265 $500,950
$0
Municipal Bonds
CONNECTICUTST B
CONNECTICUT ST TXBL S
GOODRICH MI AREA SCH
HOUSTON TX REF SER B
LA QUINTA CA REDEV AG
LAS VEGAS NV TAXABLE
NEW YORK NY TXBL FISC
ONTARIO CA INTERNATIO
OREGON ST DEPTADMINI
TULSA CNTY OKLA INDPT
20772JL75
20772KGN3
382406PY6
4423315T7
5042013CL4
5176968H6
64966QCA6
683042AJ4
68607VT47
899593MG9
305
2.71%
$500,000
$510,660
$508,400
$0
928 2.87% $1,000,000 $1,059,180 $1,064,850
$0
578 2.63% $300,000 $310,740 $304,584
$0
883 1.89% $1,000,000 $1,032,SSO $1,006,410
$0
336 2.85% $1,000,000 $1,024,240 $1,007,590
$0
244 3.09% $545,000 $555,230 $546,363
$0
1,036 2.04% $1,000,000 $1,041,610 $1,003,750
$0
1,323 2.72% $500,000 $533,525 $538,090
$0
914 2.67% $500,000 $527,220 $510,125
$0
975 2.47% $500,000 $527,290 $501,550
$0
Page 478 of 500
Portfolio
As of September 2021
PortfolioTy.. Security Type Issuer
CUSIP
Days to Maturity
Coupon
Reserve Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 1ST SECURITY BANK OF
ABACUS FEDERAL SAVING
ALLEGIANCE BNKTEXAS
ALLY BK MIDVALE UTAH
ALMA BK ASTORIA NEW Y
AMERICAN EXPRESS CENT
AMERICAN ST BK SIOUX
BALBOA THRIFT LN ASSN
BANK BARODA NEW YORK
BANK MIDWEST SPIRIT L
BANK OF NEW ENGLAND
BANK3
BELL BANK CORP
BELMONT SAVING BANK B
CAPITAL ONE BANK USA
CITADEL FED CR UN EXT
COMENITY CAP BK SALT
COMMERCE BKGENEVA MI
COMMERCIAL BK HARROGA
CONGRESSIONAL BK POTO
DENVER SVGS BK IOWA
DISCOVER BANK
DNB FIRST NATL ASSN
EAGLE BANK
ENCORE BK LITTLE ROCK
ENERBANK USA SALT LAK
ENTERPRISE BANK PA
FIRST BK HIGHLAND PK
FIRST FIRS BKTR CONV
FIRST NATIONAL BANKO
FIRST PREMIER BANK
FIRSTST BK BUXTON NO
GENOA BKG CO OHIO
GRAND RIV BK GRANDVIL
HORIZON BK WAVERLY NE
INDUSTRIAL COMLBKCH
KNOXTVA EMPL CREDIT
KS STATEBANK MANHATTA
LAFAYETTE FED CR UN R
LAKESIDE BK CHICAGO I
LIVE OAK BANKING COMP
LUANA SAVINGS BK IOWA
33625CCP2
00257TBF2
01748DAX4
02007GKC6
020080BLO
02587DU55
029728BA9
05765LAYB
06062QXG4
063615BP2
06426KBE7
06653LAJ9
07815ABA4
08O515CG2
14042OL24
17286TAGO
20033AXE1
200S6QRZ8
20143PDXS
20726AAZ1
249398BT4
2546726Y9
25590AAH3
27002YEJ1
29260MAM7
29278TMN7
29367RKT2
319141JC2
320165JKO
32112UDMO
33610RRF2
33648RAZ2
37234809
38644ABP3
44042TBQ6
45581EAX9
499724AD4
50116CBFS
50625LAE3
S1210SMYO
538036GU2
S49104FXO
1,034
1.92%
1,037
1.92%
364
2.11%
249
2.46%
1,077
1.69%
243
2.36%
939
2.38%
657
1.99%
54
1.85%
330
2.97%
966
2.51%
533
0.89%
172
0.90%
151
2.57%
19
1.70%
1,246
1.60%
4
2.10%
1,000
2.20%
622
2.36%
211
2.42%
629
2.18%
306
2.26%
266
1.97%
383
2.49%
683
1.94%
783
1.75%
959
2.47%
397
2.100/0
1,070
1.69%
824
1.70%
350
1.96%
705
1.61%
1,035
1.88%
1,037
1.92%
698
1.64%
638
3.14%
699
3.08%
594
2.23%
727
3.12%
83
1.94%
1,154
1.78%
26
2.30%
MAINSTREET BANK
56065GAG3I 939 2.47%
MID MO BKSPRINGFIELD 59541KBV8 I 1,021 1.83%
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Unrealized P/L
$245,000
$254,624
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$254,626
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$249,991
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$249,072
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$252,972
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$248,805
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$257,346
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$252,651
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$245,642
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$251,637
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$258,529
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$247,406
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$245,931
$245,000
$0
$245,0O0
$247,519
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$245,174
$245,O00
$0
$245,000
$252,914
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$245,054
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$256,483
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$254,011
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$248,374
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$253,249
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$249,596
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$248,452
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$251,248
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$252,632
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$252,294
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$258,144
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$250,385
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$252,960
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$252,225
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$249,469
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$251,145
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$254,283
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$254,626
$245,000
$0
$231,000
$239,140
$227,867
$0
$245,000
$257,850
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$258,607
$245,O00
$0
$200,000
$206,610
$199,700
$0
$245,000
$259,284
$245,O00
$0
$245,000
$246,031
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$254,065
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$245,390
$245,000
$0
$245,000
$257,970
$245,000
$0
$245,000 $253,894 $245,000
$0
Page 479 of 500
Portfolio
As of September 2021
PortfolioTy.. Security Type Issuer
CUSIP
Days to Maturity
Coupon
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
UnrealizedP/L
Reserve Negotiable Certificates of Deposit MORGAN STANLEY BK N A
MORGAN STANLEY PVT BK
NEIGHBORS FCU BATON R
NORTHFIELD BANK
PARK VIEW FCU HARRISO
PIONEER BKSSBAUSTIN
PLAINS ST BKTEX
POPPY BK SANTA ROSA C
PREFERRED BANK LA CAL
PRIVATE BANK AND TRUS
RAYMOND JAMES BANK NA
RELIANCE SVGS BK ALTO
RIA FED CR UN
RIVERBANK POCAHONTAS
SALLIE MAE BANK
SPRING BK BRONX NY
STONE BK MTN VIEW ARK
UBS BANK USA
ULTIMABKMINN WINGER
UPPER PENNISUA STATE
WASHINGTON FEDERAL
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
WELLS FARGO NATL BK W
61690UPF1
61760AYR4
64017AAM6
66612ABV9
70087TAA3
723605ASO
726547BK7
73319FAF6
740367HP5
74267GVX2
75472RAU5
75950XAF6
749622ALO
76857AAB7
79S4S03Q6
849430AS2
861S8RAV1
90348JCR9
90385LCR8
91630PASO
938828BJ8
9497631396
94949SAF2
1,156
1.87%
$245,000
$254,837
$245,000
0
924 2.65% $245,000 $259,053 $245,000
$0
728 3.12% $245,000 $259,308 $245,000
$0
20 1.95% $245,000 $245,252 $245,000
$0
341 1.77% $245,000 $248,891 $245,000
$0
18 2.40% $245,000 $245,282 $245,000
$0
995 2.20% $245,000 $256,451 $245,000
$0
1,265 1.09% $245,000 $248,386 $245,000
$0
1,051 1.92% $24S,000 $254,678 $24S,000
$0
217 1.98% $200,000 $202,294 $199,700
$0
1,187 1.78% $24S,000 $254,278 $24S,000
$0
145 2.48% $245,000 $247,318 $245,000
$0
817 2.39% $24S,000 $256,287 $24S,000
$0
627 2.27% $24S,000 $2S3,649 $24S,000
$0
270 2.21% $24S,000 $248,974 $24S,000
$0
343 1.96% $245,000 $249,373 $245,000
$0
550 2.97% $245,000 $255,560 $245,000
$0
607 3.01% $245,000 $256,721 $245,000
$0
363 3.01% $245,000 $252,289 $245,000
$0
1,184 1.69% $245,000 $253,450 $245,000
$0
1,058 1.97% $245,000 $255,055 $245,000
$0
967 2.51% $245,000 $258,539 $245,000
$0
1 456 1.81% $245,000 $250,135 $245,000
$0
Supranational Obligations INTERAMERICAN DEVEL
45818WCK0
193
2.34%
$750,000
$757,770
$760,658
$0
Page 480 of 500
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
Transactions
Transactions
Prior 3 Months as of September 2021
Page 482 of 500
Interest Received
As of September 2021
Transaction Date
Category
2020 2021
0 INTEREST
Category
Q4 Q1 Q2
Q3 Grand Total
FULLCALL
$1500,000
$1,310,879
MATURED
PURCHASED
$1,000,000
INTEREST
$500,000
$166,103
$80 859 $166,750 $112,406 $123,430 $120,838 $184,682
$99046
$46,785 $58,386 ,
$47,507 $104,088
$0
$2,505,209
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
FULL CALL
$1,000,000
$5O5,2O9
$10,000,000 I 1 1 1 I $9,8=
MATURED
$5,000,000
$0
$0
($2,000,000)
PURCHASED
($4,000,000)
($6,000,000)
$735,000 $1,000,000
$2,695,000
$1,745,000
$245,000 $490,000 $245,000 $245,000 $745,000 $990,000 $745,000
October November December I January February March I April May
($6,046,025) I I ($6,046,025)
June I July August September I Total
Page 483 of 500
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
Compliance
Asset Class Compliance
As of September 2021
Security Type
In Compliance?
Max Weight
Weight
Par Value
Book Value
Market Value
Cash
Y
100%
9.46%
$9,823,368
$6,936,878
$9,823,368
LAIF
Y
100%
48.40%
$50,257,100
$50,257,100
$50,257,100
CAMP-JPAP
Y
30%
0.08%
$84,426
$84,426
$84,426
Government
Y
100%
6.99%
$7,000,000
$7,109,655
$7,260,825
Medium Term Notes
Y
15%
11.31%
$11,145,000
$11,626,058
$11,746,929
Municipal Bonds
Y
10%
6.86%
$6,845,000
$6,991,712
$7,122,245
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
Y
30%
16.17%
$16,311,000
$16,307,268
$16,794,365
Supranational Obligations
Y
10%
0.73%
$750,000
$760,658
$757,770
Totals
100.00%
$102,215,894
$100,073,754
$103,847,027
Page 485 of 500
Rating Compliance
As of September 2021
Security Type
Issuer
CUSIP
S&P Rating
Moody Rating
In Compliance? I
Market Value
Medium Term Notes
AMAZON COM INC
023135AJ5
AA
Al
Y
$509,910
APPLEINC
037833AK6
AA+
AA1
Y
$516,190
ASTRAZENECA FINANCE L
04636NAAl
A-
A3
Y
$500,125
BANK OF AMERICA CORP
060S1GFX2
A-
A2
Y
$545,965
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY IN
084670BR8
AA
AA2
Y
$515,585
CATERPILLAR FINLSERV
14913QAA7
A
A2
Y
$S07,640
CIGNACORP
125523AGS
A-
BAA1
Y
$555,640
CITIGROUP INC
172967KNO
BBB+
A3
Y
$544,310
COCA COLA CO THE
191216CL2
A+
Al
Y
$518,335
ESTEE LAUDER CO INC
29736RANO
A+
Al
Y
$519,985
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP I
38141GXJ8
BBB+
A2
Y
$537,550
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCH
45866FAD6
BBB+
A3
Y
$549,480
JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH
478111AB3
AA-
AA2
Y
$150,264
MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITIO
582839AH9
A-
A3
Y
$556,780
MORGAN STANLEY
61746BDZ6
BBB+
Al
Y
$553,500
NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL
649S2WCS0
AA+
AAA
Y
$S07,23S
ORACLE CORP
68389XBLS
BBB+
BAA2
Y
$517,305
STRYKER CORP
863667AH4
A-
BAA1
Y
$541,680
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT C
89236TCQ6
A+
Al
Y
$509,900
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
911312BT2
A-
A2
Y
$521,955
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP IN
91324PDN9
A+
A3
Y
$552,745
WAL MART STORES INC
931142DU4
AA
AA2
Y
$510,585
WELLS FARGO COMPANY
949746SK8
BBB+
Al
Y
$SO4,26S
Municipal Bonds
CONNECTICUTSTB
20772JL75
A+
AA3
Y
$510,660
CONNECTICUT STTXBL S
20772KGN3
A+
AA3
Y
$1,059,180
GOODRICH MI AREA SCH
382406PY6
AA
N/A
Y
$310,740
HOUSTON TX REF SER B
4423315T7
AA
AA3
Y
$1,032,550
LA QUINTA CA REDEV AG
50420BCL4
AA-
N/A
Y
$1,024,240
LAS VEGAS NV TAXABLE
5176968H6
AA
AA2
Y
$555,230
NEW YORK NYTXBL FISC
64966QCA6
AA
AA2
Y
$1,041,610
ONTARIO CA INTERNATIO
683042AJ4
AA
N/A
Y
$533,525
OREGON ST DEPTADMINI
68607VT47
AAA
AA2
Y
$527,220
TULSA CNTY OKLA INDPT
899593MG9
N/A
AA2
Y
$527,290
SupranationalObligatio..
INTER AMERICAN DEVEL
45818WCKO
AAA
AAA
Y
$757,770
Veight
Maximum %of Portfolio
0.49%
3.00%
0.50%
3.00%
0.48%
3.00%
0.53%
3.00%
0.50%
3.00%
0.49%
3.00%
0.54%
3.00%
0.52%
3.00%
0.50%
3.00%
0.50%
3.00%
0.52%
3.00%
0.53%
3.00%
0.14%
3.00%
0.54%
3.00%
0.53%
3.00%
0.49%
3.00%
0.50%
3.00%
0.52%
3.00%
0.49%
3.00%
0.50%
3.00%
0.53%
3.00%
0.49%
3.00%
0.49%
3.00%
0.49%
5.00%
1.02%
5.00%
0.30%
5.00%
0.99%
5.00%
0.99%
5.00%
0.53%
5.00%
1.00%
5.00%
0.51%
5.00%
0.51%
5.00%
0.51%
5.00%
0.73%
3.00%
Page 486 of 500
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
LAIF
13
12
11
10
9
8
C
E 7
0
0
t
0
n
a 6
5
4
3
2
1
0
LAI F Apportionment Rates
As of September 2021
1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Date
Page 488 of 500
LAIF Diagnostics
As of September 2021
Jun 1, 19 Aug 1, 19 Oct 1, 19 Dec 1, 19 Feb 1, 20 Apr 1, 20 Jun 1, 20 Aug 1, 20 Oct 1, 20 Dec 1, 20 Feb 1, 21 Apr 1, 21 Jun 1, 21 Aug 1, 21 Oct 1, 21
Date (Daily Rates)
Measure Names
Average Maturity
Daily
Quarter to Date
Page 489 of 500
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
City Cash Flows
$14,000,000
$13,000,000
$12,000,000
$11,000,000
$10,000,000
$9,000,000
$8,000,000
$7,967,35
m
> $7,000,000
$6,000,000 $6,190,K
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
September2020
Rol I i ng 1-3-Month Cash Flow Ana lysis
As of September 2021
$13,922,249
November202O January2021 March2021 May2021 July2021
Month of Date
1,458,994
$5,160,915
September2021
Measure Names
Credits
Debits
Page 491 of 500
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$0
($2,000,000)
m
($4,000,000)
($6,000,000)
($8,000,000)
($10,000,000)
($12,000,000)
($14,000,000)
($16,000,000)
Net Change in Cash by Year
As of September 2021
$9,692,177
,938
3,477)
3,079)
($15,333,461)
October November December January February March April May June July August September
Month
Years
Last Year
This Year
Two Years Ago
Page 492 of 500
Historic Drawdowns
As of September 2021
$18,000,000
Measure Names
$16,979,291 $17,052,791 $16,948,871 Delta Cash
$16,000,000
$15,535,731
6,351,446 $15,676,236 $15,792,747 Rolling 12-Month Cumulative Drawdown
15,462,119 $14,813,086
$14,032,868
$14,000,000
14,761,324 $13,373,290
$13,414,296 $13,023,476
$12,000,000
$12 4,634 $11,6 29 $12,094,066
$11,850,289
$11,501,875
$10,000,000
$10,389,932
$10,021,393 $10 2,234
$9,444,192 $9,589,722 $8,550,295 $9,131,765 $9,692,17 $8,865,921
$8,000,000
$7,749,892 $8,007,816
$6,740,588 $6,444,394 $7,136,971
$6,000,000
$5,329,544 $6,198,611
$5,976,411 $6,1 ,113 $6,333,031 5,887,881
$5,497,816
$4,642,243
$5,067,055
$3,952,705 $3,893,993 $ '372,399 $4,504,116
$4,000,000
$3,304,431
$2,952,653
$4,143,573 $3,715,617
$3,3 ,584
$2,729,214
$2,784,224
$2,000,000
$2,012,203 $ 546,021 $2,858,340
$598,744
$17,938
$0
$ .. ..73 _
.__.. .. .
._______ _.
..... ... ..........._... ............... ($ ,071,301)..... ($754, 4).. $419,231 _... .. $442,055......... $45,591 __..
___ _.._.
($688,897) ($844,184)
($638326) ($442,630)
,
($1,493,637) ($953,953)
($2,000,000)
($2,849,212)
($2,296,277) ($2,009,831) ( 2,745,298)
$1,773,595)
($4,000,000)
($3,489,461) ($3,977,017)
($2,628,379) ($2,906,612) ($2,927,208)
($3,312,421)
($3,298,079)
($3,733,785) ($3,764,529)
($4,012,919) ($3,897,279)
($4,483,630)($4,180,579)
($6,000,000)
($8,000,000)
($7,520,128)
($10,000,000)
($9,659,128) ($9,780,664)
($12,000,000)
($14,000,000)
($16,000,000)
($15,333,461)
2013 2014
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Date
Page 493 of 500
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
Economic Environment
0.85%
0.80%
0.75%
0.70%
0.65%
0.60%
0.55%
0.50%
a 0.45%
m
o!
0.40%
0.35%
0.30%
0.25%
0.20%
0.15%
0.10%
0.05%
0.00%
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
As of September 2021
0.84%
).80%
).62%
).37%
).27%
1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 6 Month 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 Year
Month
September2020
December2020
March 2021
June 2021
September 2021
Page 495 of 500
2-60%2.62%
2.60% 2
2.
2.40% 2.
2.20%
2.00%
1.80%
1.60%
1.00%
0.80%
0.60%
0.40%
0.20%
0.00%
U.S. Treasury Maturity Through Time
As of September 2021
Dec 1,18 Marl,19 Jun 1,19 Sep 1,19 Dec 1,19 Mar 1,20
Jun 1, 20 Sep 1, 20 Dec 1, 20 Marl, 21 Jun 1, 21 Sep 1, 21
Date
Measure Names
1 Month
2 Month
3 Month
6 Month
1Year
2 Year
3 Year
5 Year
Page 496 of 500
10-Year Minus 3-Month Treasury Yield Spread
As of September 2021
S.S
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.0
2.S
Fit
1.5
1.0
0.5
................. ...............................................
0.0 % ............................................ .. . . .... ...... .... .... ...... .... ....
-0.5
-1.0
1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019
Date
Page 497 of 500
Unemployment vs Inflation
As of September 2021
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
w
m
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 ......
-1
-2
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 PC
Date
Measure Names
Realized Inflation
Unemployment Rate
Page 498 of 500
5-Year Breakeven Inflation Prediction
As of September 2021
3.0
i
t
2.s x
2.0
Si JJ�
Ls
a On `
1.0
a ..
o.s a
a
a
Y t
N
{ff
. Y
-0.5
1.0 �
1.s ,
2.0
2.5
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Date
Page 499 of 500
CITY OF
ELSEGUNDO
I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and it is in conformity with the investment policy as
approved by the City Council on 6/1/18. A copy of this policy is available in the office of the City Clerk. The investment
program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures.
Sources for the valuations are as follows:
Federal Agency Issues, Treasury Securities and Miscellaneous Securities: Union Bank, the custodial agent for the City
of El Segundo.
Detailed information on all purchase and sale transactions follows the Investment Portfolio Details section.
Matthew Robinson, City Treasurer Date
d