Loading...
2021-06-24 Planning Commission AgendaPLANNING COMMISSION LEA fP0 AGENDA r °........,° June 24, 2021 PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 ISSUED BY GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM ON MARCH 17, 2020, THE FOLLOWING MEETING WILL TAKE PLACE SOLELY BY TELECONFERENCE / VIDEOCONFERENCE. How Can Members of the Public Observe the Meeting? The meeting may be viewed via Spectrum Channel 3 and 22, AT&T U-verse Channel 99, and/or El Segundo TV at YouTube.com. How Can Members of the Public Participate in the Meeting and/or Provide Public Comments? Join via Zoom from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device, or by phone. Please use this URL https://zoom.us/m/97626185419?pwd=Vl pMcExmY1 MvaTk4aVhVbFA5dEF4dz09 If you do not wish for your name to appear on the screen, then use the drop -down menu and click on "rename" to rename yourself to be anonymous. Join by phone: 1-669-900-9128 US Enter Meeting ID: 976 2618 5419 Passcode: 117236 Your phone number is captured by the zoom software and is subject to the Public Records Act unless you first dial "*67" before dialing the number as shown above to remain anonymous. The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person. Before speaking to the Commission, please state: your name and residence or the organization you represent. Please respect the time limits. Members of the public may also provide comments electronically by sending an email to the following address prior to the start of the meeting: planningL&else gundo.org. Please include the meeting date and item number in the subject line. If you would like to request that your emailed comment be read into the record, please include that request at the top of your email, limit your comments to 150 words or less, and email your comments at least 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting. Depending on the volume of communications, the emails may be read to Commission at the appropriate time. Please note that all emailed comments are public records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. Additional Information: Unless otherwise noted in the agenda, the public can only comment on City -related business that is within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission and/or items listed on the agenda during the public communications portions of the meeting. Additionally, the public can comment on any public hearing item on the agenda during the public hearing portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person. Before speaking to the Planning Commission, please state your name and residence and the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits. DATE: Thursday, June 24, 2021 TIME: 5:30 p.m. PLACE: Tel econference/Videoconference VIDEO: El Segundo Cable Channel 3 (Live). Replayed Friday following Thursday's meeting at 1:00 pm and 7:00 pm on Channel 3. (Schedule subject to change) All files related to this agenda are available for public review by appointment in the Planning Division office, Monday through Thursday 7:00 am to 5:00 pm and on Fridays until 4:00 pm, beginning at 7:00 am on the Monday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly posted and listed agenda items. Unless otherwise noted in the agenda, the public can only comment on City -related business that is within the subject -matter jurisdiction of the Planning Commission and items listed on the Agenda during the public communications portion of the meeting. Additionally, the public can comment on any public hearing item on the Agenda during the public hearing portion of such item. The time limit for comments is generally five minutes per person. Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted to the Planning and Building Safety Director a minimum of two working days before the meeting and they do not exceed five minutes in length. Written materials distributed to the Planning Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office and on the City's website, www.elsegundo.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, (310) 524-2307. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. A. B. C. D. E. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Public Communications (Related to City Business only and for which the Planning Commission is responsible-5 minutes per person; 30 minutes total). Individuals who received value of $50 or more to communicate to the Planning Commission on another's behalf, and employees speaking on their employer's behalf, must so identify themselves before addressing the Commission. Failure to do so is a misdemeanor. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow the Commission to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Commission may respond to comments after public communications is closed. Written Communications (other than what is included in Agenda packets) F. Consent Calendar All items are to be adopted by one motion without discussion. If a request for discussion of an item is made, the items should be considered individually under the next Agenda heading. 1. Expansion of a Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility (PS) Project Address: 1 Chapman Way, Applicant: James Streetmaker (California Storage Master) Project Description: Administrative use Permit (AUP) to allow the expansion of a recreational vehicle storage facility located at 1 Chapman Way (Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 and Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05). Environmental Determination: The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15304 as a Class 4 categorical exemption (Minor Alterations to Land) and §15311 as a Class 11 categorical exemption (Accessory Structures) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and File the Director of Planning and Building Safety's approval of Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 and Administrative Use Permit No. 20-05. G. Continued Business — Public Hearing None H. New Public Hearings 2. EA-1302 Zone Text Amendment No. 21-02, adding a section to the El Segundo Municipal Code regarding parking requirements for Religious Institution Affiliated Housing. (ES) Project Address: Citywide Applicant: City Project Description: A proposed ordinance amending Chapter 15-15 (Off Street Parking and Loading Spaces) of the El Segundo Municipal Code by adding a new Section regarding parking requirements for Religious Institution Affiliated Housing (Environmental Assessment No. EA-1302 and Zone Text Amendment No. ZTA 21- 02). Environmental Determination: The proposed zone text amendment is exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 because it consists only of minor alterations in land use limitations necessary to implement a state law mandate (AB 1851) and does not portend new development. Further, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment; and is, therefore, exempt from CEQA review under 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2896, recommending that the City Council approve an Ordinance establishing parking standards for religious institution affiliated housing development projects in accordance with state law. New Business 3. Determination of Consistency of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with the City of El Segundo General Plan. (LX) Consideration and possible action regarding adoption of a resolution finding that the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City of El Segundo General Plan Applicant: City of El Segundo Project Description: Determination of Consistency of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program with the City of El Segundo General Plan. Environmental Determination: General Plan Consistency Finding is deemed not to be a "project" as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines § 15378(b)(4) since the Planning Commission is reviewing the City's Capital Improvements Program for its conformance with the City's General Plan, and a decision on individual projects in the CIP is not being made by the Planning Commission. The consistency finding is therefore exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2899, determining that the proposed FY 2021-22Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City of El Segundo General Plan. J. Report from Director of Development Services or designee K. Report from the City Attorney's office Planning Commissioners' Comments M. Adjournment —next meeting scheduled for July 08, 2021, 5:30 pm. POSTED: ve+uwWemavv Ju*ve118, 2021 (Signature) (Date and time) TITLE: Administrative Use Permit (AUP) to allow the expansion of a recreational vehicle storage facility located at 1 Chapman Way (Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 and Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05). Applicant: James Streetmaker (California Storage Masters) RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file T_[91:(r]:tell] 0113 On May 12, 2005, the Planning Commission approved EA 658 and AUP No. 04-04 for the expansion of a recreational vehicle storage facility at 1 Chapman Way/655 South Douglas Street. The facility was originally established in 2001 with 234 storage spaces. The 2005 expansion increased the number of storage spaces by 62 to 296. On September 22, 2020, EA-1290 and AUP No. 20-05 was submitted for a second expansion of the existing facility into a vacant property to the west. The expansion will increase the overall area of the facility from 5.18 to 9.58 acres and the number of storage spaces to 497. After considering the request, on May 26, 2021 the Director granted approval of the Administrative Use Permit to allow the proposed expansion. On April 1, 2021, the Development Services Director approved a lot line adjustment request for the site (Lot Line Adjustment SUB 20-03). The present AUP request is subject to a condition of approval that the lot line adjustment be recorded prior to completion of construction for the project. DISCUSSION: The site is located in the Light Industrial (M-1) zone on a vacant parcel. The uses immediately surrounding the site include railroad right-of-way, vacant industrial land, light industrial and general office uses. A recreational vehicle storage facility is a permitted use in the M-1 zone subject to approval of an Administrative Use Permit. The proposed use is compatible with other permitted uses in the M-1 zone, such as warehousing, open storage, and parking lots. No new buildings are proposed for construction; construction activities will involve grading, paving and the installation of a perimeter fence for securing and screening the property. The construction activities will comply with the City's construction noise and dust regulations. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated during construction. The existing facility operates as a self -storage facility with no staff onsite other than a security guard. The facility is open 24-hours a day and vehicle trips by visitors are distributed throughout the day seven days a week. Thus, the facility does not contribute significantly to peak hour traffic. The expansion area will operate in the same manner as the existing facility. Therefore, the operations of the expanded facility are not anticipated to have significant traffic impacts. The Director's approval includes conditions that protect the City and surrounding users from potentially negative impacts. The conditions, findings of approval, and environmental assessment are provided in the attached approval letter. Staff believes that the project is appropriate for the location and will not operate in a way that will create unwanted impacts. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the Director's approval. In the alternative, any Planning Commissioner may request that an item be discussed and a decision on the application be made by the Planning Commission instead. TYPE OF ACTION (LEGISLATIVE; QUASI-JUDICIAL; OR ADVISORY) Quasi-judicial: In the event the Planning Commission desires to review the Director's approval of the administrative use permit, the Planning Commission acts in its quasi- judicial capacity (i.e., applying established standards to applications to determine specific rights under existing law). Before an administrative use permit may be granted, the Director or the Commission must find the following findings are met as required by ESMC § 15-22-5: 1. There is compatibility of the particular use on the particular site in relationship to other existing and potential uses within the general area in which the use is proposed to be located. 2. The proposed use is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the zone in which the site is located. 3. The proposed location and use and the conditions under which the use would be operated or maintained to not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Potential impacts that could be generated by the proposed use, such as noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odors, traffic and hazards have been recognized and compensated for. As stated above, the Director found that the proposed facility satisfied these findings and thus granted the permit. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was analyzed for its environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA"), and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq., "CEQA Guidelines"). The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA EA-1290 and AUP No. 20-05 June 24, 2021 Page 3 of 4 pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations §15304 as a Class 4 categorical exemption (Minor alterations to Land) and §15311 as a Class 11 categorical exemption (Accessory Structures) because the proposed project consists primarily of grading and fill activities, paving, and installation of minor accessory structures such as perimeter fencing, parking lot signs, lighting, and a water tank for emergency purposes. PREPARED BY: Paul Samaras, Principal Planner REVIEWED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Development Services Director APPROVED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Development Services Director'�)C-/ ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Approval letter dated June 17, 2021 3. Plans ef� E N 0 (�• v S GU ,+ Development Services Department June 17, 2021 Jim Streetmaker 1921 Maple Avenue El Segundo, CA 90245 Subject: Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 and Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05 Address: 1 Chapman Way, El Segundo, CA 90245 Dear Mr. Streetmaker: Your request for an Administrative Use Permit allowing the expansion of a recreational vehicle storage facility at 1 Chapman Way is hereby tentatively approved in accordance with El Segundo Municipal Code Section 15-22-5 and subject to the conditions of approval contained in the attached Exhibit A. The associated environmental determination and findings supporting the decision are described in Exhibit B. Please note that this letter does not constitute the City's final decision in this matter. This determination is scheduled to be "received and filed" by the Planning Commission at the June 24, 2021, meeting. Any Planning Commissioner may request that this permit be discussed and a decision be made by the Commission instead of "received and filed." Should you have any questions, please contact Principal Planner Paul Samaras at (310) 524-2340, or via email at psamaras(a)elseg undo. org. Sincerely, Denis Cook, Interim Director Development Services Department cc: Kyle Smith, West Palm Group Exhibit A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC"), James Streetmaker representing California Storage Masters ("Applicant") and any successor -in -interest agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of El Segundo's approval of Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05 ("Project Conditions"): Before the City issues a building or grading permit, the applicant must submit plans, which indicate that the project substantially complies with plans and conditions approved and on file with the Development Services Department. 2. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the Development Services Director for approval or a determination regarding the need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification. 3. Lot Line Adjustment No. 20-03, approved on April 1, 2021, must be completed and recorded before completion of construction for the project. 4. Any vehicle to be stored on the site must fit within the dimensions of the vehicle stall where it is to be stored. 5. The designated fire roads must remain clear and free from obstructions at all times. 6. The applicant must paint a red, reflective stripe that is 6 inches in width on each side of the designated fire lanes in the parking areas prior to final inspection by the Fire Department. 7. The applicant must paint "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" in white in the roadway center, at intervals not to exceed 50 feet. The lettering must be a minimum of 12 inches in height with a 2-inch minimum thickness of the letter stroke. 8. Before building permits are issued the applicant must submit a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) to the Building Safety Division that outlines the best management practices that will be included in the project. 9. The applicant must provide grey vinyl slats to be used for screening in the perimeter fencing along the existing and proposed vehicle storage area before final inspection by the Building Safety Division. Any modification to the color or material of the screening must be approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services. 10. The applicant must pave the parking area with a material acceptable to the Director of Development Services. 11. Landscaping must be provided onsite as depicted on the plans and to the satisfaction of the Recreation and Parks Department and the Planning and Building Safety Department in compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-15A prior to final inspection by the Building Safety Division. 12. Light standards must be shielded and directed downward so that the light does not create glare on adjacent properties. 13. The Applicant agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, attorney fees), injuries, or liability, arising from the City's approval of Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 or Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05. Should the City be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of the City approval of Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 or Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05, the Applicant agrees to defend the City (at the City's request and with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will indemnify the City for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this section, "the City" includes the City of El Segundo's elected officials, appointed officials, officers, and employees. 14. James Streetmaker representing California Storage Masters must acknowledge receipt and acceptance of the project conditions by executing the acknowledgement below. These Conditions are binding upon James Streetmaker, and all successors and assigns to the property at 1 Chapman Way, El Segundo, CA 90245 until superseded by another approval letter or rescinded. James Streetmaker, Applicant Exhibit B Environmental Determination and Required Findings Environmental Assessment 1290: After considering the facts and findings below, the Director finds this project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations §15304 as a Class 4 categorical exemption (Minor alterations to Land) and §15311 as a Class 11 categorical exemption (Accessory Structures) because the proposed project consists primarily of grading and fill activities, paving, and installation of minor accessory structures such as perimeter fencing, parking lot signs, and a water tank for emergency purposes. Administrative Use Permit 20-05: The following are the facts in support of each finding for this decision: Finding 1: There is compatibility of the particular use on the particular site in relationship to other existing and potential uses within the general area in which the use is proposed to be located. Facts in Support of Finding 1: 1. The project is located within the M-1 (Light Industrial) zone, where storage of recreational vehicles is permitted subject to approval of an administrative use permit. The project consists of an expansion of an existing recreational vehicle storage facility on a vacant lot. The project is situated in an environment that includes light industrial uses, vacant land, and railroad right-of-way. The zoning immediately around the subject site is industrial, which ensures that the existing and potential future uses in the area will be compatible with the proposed storage facility. Finding 2: The proposed use is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the Zone in which the site is located. Facts in Support of Finding 2: 1. The property is in the M-1 (Light Industrial) zone, which is intended to provide for the location and grouping of light industrial activities, research, and technological processes, and related offices and auxiliary uses performing support services for existing and permitted establishments, companies or business firms within the zone. General storage, warehousing and mini -storage are all uses permitted in the M-1 zone and open storage of commodities is permitted as an accessory use. The subject use involves the storage of recreational vehicles, which is permitted in the zone subject to approval of an administrative use permit and is similar and compatible with these other permitted uses. Finding 3: The proposed location and use, and the conditions under which the use would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Facts in Support of Finding 3: 1. The proposed expansion is contiguous with the existing facility that is currently used for the storage of recreational vehicles. No new buildings are proposed in conjunction with the facility's expansion, except for a water tower required by the Fire Department for fire suppression purposes. The expansion will involve only minor grading activities and paving for the purpose of storing vehicles. The site is bordered by railroad tracks on two sides, vacant industrial land, and the existing vehicle storage facility. In addition, the perimeter of the site will be fenced and landscaped to screen the site for properties in the area. As a result, the location and the use will not have materially injurious impacts of the immediately adjacent properties. Finding 4: Potential impacts that could be generated by the proposed use, such as noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odors, traffic, and hazards have been recognized and mitigated. Facts in Support of Finding 4: 1. The proposed area of expansion is currently an undeveloped vacant parcel. The expansion of the existing vehicle storage facility will reduce dust as the area will be paved and landscaping will be installed. The facility is intended for the long- term storage of vehicles and there are no occupiable buildings onsite. Vehicle trips to and from the facility are distributed throughout the day. As such, it is anticipated to generate only limited traffic, noise, or other impacts. CD CD Cn CD - - - - O I 1 I 1 I T ht } 1 1 + M }I I Y < \ m I C� Z 1 (n x I# p m L -- pTI TI TI Z V rn V m D 1 r = < "' o z Dz m� Co m D go O m 1 \ rn C)N� 2 m _O C D rn _ D C) D , 1 zm O > C/) p r G) � O cn 1 D ;u n c� D � W D O -< G) � N m cn x O < m \ m z < Cl), o > Z �' z - • Cn G, z o p 1 O m 0 .. Cn C) m + m D m# o m r cn r rn rn O n 2 o �'0000 } ^^ O l) m = mz ^ Cl)x r N D r D o D° m W k m W m � — p m p O � m m z O � . � � _ G) O r CZ cn ®p000000a � \ _ C ;p .. cn rn z� _ 0000 o5ti W o= o 0 R,, I �, CDn z D �> x S. c� z O o o G) m - As w — tyro I ( m CD 0 r avow aala rn D O n - C4mO CD �s" o�_ �\ O r \ m IF avoa gala \ ^� � N D m \\ •... ® ® a C) CYJ� 36" 20'-0" \ \\ (D ® O ® ® G)rn \ _ MIN f ®I 0 0 ® o N \ \\ ® ® o C) zo�-o 0 ® ® / D — �Ex �VV •'z ® - Q ® wm O r ° l� ® p Do �a ��" \ 0 (D0 ® a � � O cn T 00 rn n Z _ 1 O T cP n O, O m < o t975 * Mq� �s� I T < I 110 I \ w D Z i i m'< CD I N 0 3 cn I � W O 1 © a O O O \ FR9 a D Cn00 z \ \ s % N C- I j j — Q Q MIN. S \ N �[ED Cl) cy° i I CD (D n G] CD m o P C-)I I o 1 0 i* I �� 0 ® '� cn 1 © 0 ® m \ \ \� cn cn m m m`� 1 0 0 /D\\ o v 9 0 1 0 I A 0 ® \ \\ I 1 O N m� (.0 CD Nk 3 rn m IIII 0 0 (D C II i avoa \ 1 0 00 0000000 0 0 �rn # lo, o000%ooyN o m _ m 1 D A - - 1 l/J Cl)VJ O ti P(o) \ /D T. N m °' 0 (D CD O N T C �1 V ( 4p o a v4 Do W m m m — 1 p,X. �� °�p O :p 4 CD rn D �� ,0 3 0 cn � z D m D 4p I- co z G) r �, z \ m D m 70z to g I I 4O \ 3 rn m �,D ,0 20-0 nm MIN. 0 m C — 0 35 0 D 0 1 o.Z4 p o� C I / W M -u \ mo $ 10 0 C)i41 O r O CD m cn � — , p D Z 2 • � V O OV - 1 za o NlO m O,oEx.tV zs LJI \ _ 1 5�X.VV m Ui _ z U) 0 A 0 \ �i � — r O _ D n 0 0 Cn (D = \ m D D = < m m m � Y O D w < m z z - m cn o $$ _0 If z /may zoo , MIN. a p D ^ z 77 77 77 77� Z N O —n m 5d za Z � ��O II MI,y O / ya �� J� T n J _ / a CD rn a� CD D - z� Cn p zTm m D ( _ rn$� CD _ O = '- O CD °° D 0 �< Z (n °°� — Cal _ s s Cf) ID T z ■ C)U) C:) O CD A o o� � 0D U) z D D m � Ull X D Z O z CA) � m r N C) D o r �rnm �G)• 0 4�,C��7 z > Z Cfl 0 o� rn� />/ c� rn 0 O 0 G) rn T V w rn V \ O1 L cD o lv (mZlw CD D co c� z = 1 ^ y m 3 q-) C7 @ D 2 (.00 v 5 Z 0 wm 3 p N N Ul � m D m m z O m 0 77 77 = N 0 D N O CD C) 0� p CD z O m U) u rO m C) p m U) C) T 0 Z l J r m z /v 2 /m m l 1 U m � z Gr Z m z uJ G) —00 z C z z G) 0 m p 0 C- m 0 N O N O 4 00 m m r r 2 2 O O D D r r x X C/) p z O C G) co m _m C) cn CD CD CD CD Cf) U) J TV J (D CD (D CD1-4 D D 0 6 90 Xv � r r I � r ' W r W n u m n0 J m 0 p ch N O Q CD I I < CD CD CD U) D lV//J�1� z CD prF NCD n �D 9° z G) G) O O � m rn> m mm X X 0 O G) G) m m Dm r m p O O m D m zz O x O m Q° � 0 _ z z GC) z GC) D m m < r < r C/) 0 z r r � — V O 1 1 VJ z � m O p � Z7 m p C z 0-) p �CD m D CD m N 0 z p cn CD Z > c Cn Tm /v 0 v CD 0 NI� =0 II m i O m r D z z m m D m x x o -n Cn m z z z G) G) m C� m z -1 m m - � -0 p m 0 m m� m r Z r r z z m m m D z _r Z TI m z m 393.03' (E) PROPERTY LINE c m z! z10 � m 0 z m� (CSM) 165' (N) PROPERTY LINE v' 0 � A J I O 28' A A A O 0 0 � MIN. W 0 _ w W Cn CD z o CD (n m �- = N w W - 0 D z r-_ o o Z z m w A N 0 0 O w W O w N 0 28' I Q m A W 0 CD Z c) MIN. m N OU A OD 0 N w O w V 0 Ow O � O O z w ? z o V N m U, � C) D I oA N D A 0 z i w w D co r A z m W m A � O m w m w z N A ?I C-) m m o A i o V w N O OW 2p A I A A w M1N m1 Z D O O o m �0 w m = O O D (AO O 4 N A r1 0 N z w D m O A -i 1 w 0 0 —� W _ w 0 � z 0 A Z w m A 0 O A A o I C m� O ` w m A w 0 D cry 0 � w w w O cn m w m D D A —I w V -n N 0 0 m 0 I 28' z o W �J w MIN. O A 0 00 0 A � w A O 0O O A O 0 0 O X G 20 W 0 oo A O MAN. O J (O w V N � w V A N m w m Jw v o� W � � I 0 m m 28' 0 `D :U J Z MIN. A X I 0 w o O D �w O O 0 O O w i T w O m(nD '770 0 r O rn w O 0 0CD w w Ib OD 0 w 0 v D c � "nJ D x 0 D A m 0 A ^ w w rn V: Z � C) A w (D w O A oQ D o� O hz � J 0 D � 2o, w m 1 ZT A O A b w W M 0 0 -n �A i O N O 1 �VV W m Z m � 0 0 W D A l � �p O A 1 N _. o O 0 `i J 0 41.00' A 0 ' A (E) PROPERTY LINE 0 0 0 O Lv3aa 3avaJ 0 m� z o m m M1IV. = mo -.1 0 N ` tiCU W omCD m o c) D I A O 1 ��� 0 I O N �,d3ae 3ava� __— O, D m N 0 u -< > _ --- 0') O D� � 00 � 1 m m C) E: p O N � X m r Qy0a 3r11� 0 0 m z r z m z C) IT am man PROPERTY LINE 346.40' -�n- a m�*X i' ♦ � m x�D m x o� 03DNr- x m 10 owc)o� -- o D 1 >;u ago (N) PROPERTY LINE m (CSM) 294' Z r z z m z m r 0 D m I I 00 N � 0 (n --I r GJ II n CA m C) al 1 m� OC2 m v D m 1 1 H Im oV V 0 (D O m m D z _r Z -nm �Qz • �� Cn z o� m o u D r r 10 m co 0 2 m X z ^D l^J l J D VJ v X D 0 z n 0 D JZ T\ N G u z r Tz m z m N N N W GJ W 4-1, Cal Ul 01 (31 d') O Ul 00 C) -Ph. 00 O (A O N E 0') O II II II II II II II II II II II II II 00 Ul 4�-- --4 N 4�-- Ul 0') — — — — N m 2 n r m 0 G) m n U) u D r r u Z r z z m m Z m CD CD D CD iv 0 0 p Ul X (n W X _ II U7 z w.I m 0 �, 0 �� U) 0 W o m X X �o U) II N -' 0 � O ZE I I � O � 0 0 p 0 p 0 ° 0 X�n 0 O N U7 C) II X O II oo (n A OD L (n I I J p p U' D 0 m0�� Cn rn < � � o m �° O D r p n rn °D m 7 o I I X O II Z D 0Cn W ^' co O X O >T1 1 II z C) 0 U)CL A p D x 0 o > � � o N m 11 m p rn -4 _ n N V' x 0 p T r � V z ° X w NOD Ui . . C)X v O � z II ) UII N N) oo N O C 0 0 -C o z o • � N W -n X (r I I Cil D W (}7 -CU) -C CA) m�n n ° N D r p 0 U) Rl X �rnmT, z II (/,�] Cp �.d I • 0 (c II 00 D • 4 C P � L � � �J � II O p A N 0 >J=Lp o C) ° 0 >< c� m Z o. x p CA) N N > `� W02 O X II 0 m -4 D p 0 C Cil o W � U) C) m ° o T II O N cn Cn rl o U) 0 0 D 0 N O + p 0 W0, - N X O p 0 Xcq O O 02 X 0 O x q pF`y X� 0 \ 0 n ✓� � cn p c� w A r c II o D X p n w r \rn < a A + Q 1� o� m I I X 0 ° 0 O D p o ) D 0 D C r- C 0 0 C D II O r X D p p p Z o O �ii .. N ap _� • o z 0 D �_ N mm ° + ® z 1 U) cn C m oON m O O� c� Z 2 >CD CY) O � r o= zD D �M> Ef 3 on�* m o D a:-Z G) C) � G) o � • �' C)m -00 O r ZC � __��� o zmomm amwnsmmmmmmmmm�w z N to cn cn cn cn �n cn cn �n �n �n �n �n Fn En D r z r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r �u D ♦ * < D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D m z < z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z D rn D> n Cl) �X D or �D O cn C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O u m D D 1 �V m \z o D �OZ����2G)�moC��D C� � C) -- + z r O z m m +A h 0 p n < m �, X �Dn < u' ~' cn Ul X W � C n < l J C) z^ 0000 j rn ti T D C D ul cn N N C) Lrj p UJ z > �+ _ "z Dz cfl Cri(DMrncn���-4rn�w D O CD z i �ti r- G) " G) co m cfl w co o� w o cn N w w m cn cn w w 0 w w cn M to (� to (� M (� cn cn z 77 � C NI- U) OD O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N _ ODII N D 0 C Cn mo m Cn n O _ OD O z titi C) o N CO � cn cn m- z r-- o D N) N z CD O O 4 6" & 1 D" Arm Drill Pattern for 12" & 16" Shoebox Fixtures TOP OF POLE QIMPORTANT: DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO SCALE! Tennis Court Davit Arm Adapter For Slipfitter Mount 5.4 04-1 0.4 03.5 I � i QIMPORTANT' DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO SCALE! Product Specifications Housing Construction, Finish & Mounting: Rugged, die-cast, soft square aluminum housing • Impact -resistant, tempered glass lens and durable silicone gasket Durable, multi -layer, polyester powder coat or industrial grade liquid paint Available in a variety of colors such as dark bronze, black, white, light gray, dark green and natural aluminum (custom colors available upon request fi" pole mount, 10" pole mount, adjustable slipfitter and trunnion yolk brackets available as standard mounting accessories Optics & Lighting Distribution: Innovative silicone optics assembly with precision light control and cutoff Standard photometric distributions include V-WIDE, 30' NARROW SPOT and 70° MEDIUM SPOT No secondary optics used for base model IFS files, photometric reports and simulations available upon request Automotive Dealership optics: • Left and right optical rotation available for applications like car dealership front fines (optics are not field -rotatable, must be done at factory) Delivers enhanced lighting and proper photometric control of auto dealership merchandise • Allows for simple 2@180 pole mount while rotating forward throw light patterns toward dealership merchandise LEGEND . fl.1 fc . 0.5 fc 2 ❑ fc ■ 5.0 fc Created & Sunuleted per IESNA LM-63-1995 .00'00• Co. ^• 2J. D. -SO'40' fic •-So•-: oa• loo•so• W W ]:' o'-a;•-d�ti6o'-so �17o• 1ra-99• io• 4o• to• o• -20 ��o •-so'-dog-1 oo• :oc•aC• fo• So' ion F!'-20'-IQ'-69'-A9'-:90' 150w Shoebox, Type V, 25' Height 160w Shoebox, Type V Square, 25' Height Electrical: Operating temp: -40 9C to +45 °C Standard AC input of 120-277v VAC, up to 480v available EMI filter: 47CFR, part 2, parr 15 • Power factor: >0.9 Total harmonic distortion: <20 ro • Surge protection: IEC/EN 61000-4-5 E M C test standard • Licensed electrician required for installation 16ow Shoebax, Type Ili, 25' Height Energy Control Options: Daylight harvesting and photo controls Motion control and dimming Surge protection • CA Title 24 compliance options available upon request 12" 16" -fly in i 1-10 in 12 {12 0 in w {180 mm} 4 5.42 in 10.43 in 4 (138 mmi- {265 mm} 12,05 in 1306 mm} 10.43 in {265 mml Light Engine Specifications (Values Listed for Type V, 5000K) 160w Shoebox, Type IV 25' Height Effective Projected Area (EPA) & Weight: 12" Housing (15 LBS) • 0.75 EPA at 0° • 1.3 EPA M 45° 16' Housing (25 LBS) 1.2 EPA at 0" • 2.0 EPA at 45" 16.50 in 1419 min)_ 14-00 in 1356 mm) o O 10.00 rn (254 mm) 116,50 in (419 mm) 12-SBHC-40-50•MV-5 40w 36w 75.175w 1 1,050 rnA 5,622 4,854 300,000+ His 12-SBHC-80-50.1v1V-S 79w 71w 125-300w 2 1,050 mA 11,119 10,007 300,000+ Hrs 12-SBHC-120-50-MV-5• 118w 106w 200-400w 3 1,050 ma. 16,490 14,841 300,000+ Hrs 16SBHC-160-50-MV.5* 157w 142w 300-525w 4 1.050 mA 21,735 19,562 300.000+airs 16-SBHC-200-50 MV-5 196w 177w 1 400-650w 5 T,050 mA 26,855 24,169 300,000+ Hrs 16-SBHC-240-50-MV-5' 235w 211w 7501000w 6 1,050 mA 31,849 28,664 300,000+ Hrs x 120w: DLC qualified mode! in 3000KS 4000K and %WDK. -160w: DLC qualified model in MV and HV voltage • 240n DLC qualified model. Amperage Load 40w0.18A E WP 0.17A 0.14A 0.12A 0.08A 79w 0-72A 0.66A 0-38A 0.36A 0-33A 0.29A 0.23A 0.16A 11Sw 1-07A 0.98A 0-57A 0.54A 0-49A 0.43A 0.34A 0.25A 157w 1.43A 7.31A 0.75A 0,71A 0.65A 0.57A 0-45A 0-33A 196w 1.78A 1-63A 0.94A 0-89A 0-S2A 031A 0.56A 0.41A 235w 2.14A 1-96A i.13A 1.07A 0-98A 0.85A 0.68A 0-49A Lumen Maintenance Factor (LMF)4 1- Considered to be a typical H1D equivalent- Specific HID wattage equivalents will depend on things like environmental and application characteristics, distribution type and desrgn criteria- 2. Cons dared initial nominal value of the LED light engine as specified by the LED chip manulacturer. Fixture eff,cacy and lumen output will depend on things like color temperature, distribution type and environmental characten$tres- 3. Considered the typical initial delivered lumens of the LED light engine Specific lumens for an application wiiI depend on things like color temperature, distribution type and environmental characteristics. 4. Lumen maintenance values a1 25'C are calculated per TM-21 based on LM-60 data and in-house luminaire testing. 5. in accordance with iESNATM-21-11, Projected Values represent imerpolated value based on time durations that are within six times (6x) the IESNA LM-80-08 total test duration (in hours) for the device under testing (DLrr) i.e. the packaged LED chip. 6. fin accordance with IESNA TM•21.11. Calculated Values represent time durations that exceed six times (6X) the IESNA L-M-SD-08 total test duration (in hours) for the device under testing (DOT) i.e. the packaged LED chip. Note? Additional wattages and configurations available upon request. Specifications are subject to change wrth0ut notice SQUARE PLASTIC TOP PUSH CAP POLE MAY BE DRILLED TO ACCEPT SIDE MOUN TE❑ FIXTURE IF REQUIRED. SQUARE POLE SHAFT CAP DETAIL (STANDARD) 2-PIECE COVER FINISHED TO MATCH POLE FULL BASE COVER (STANDARD) 0 50" NUT HOLDER FOR - 2.50" X 5.00' GROUNDING HANDHOLE RIM WITH COVER 48" THICKNESS BOLT CIRCLE I I SQUARE L � 1 SLOTTED BOLT HOLES POLE BASE AND HANDHOLE DETAIL 2.0" SCHED 80 PIPE TENON 4.00" ATE ANCE rHOLE POLE SHAFT P2 TENON DETAIL (OPTIONAL) MOUNTING HEIGHT REINFORCED HANDHOLE WITH COVER AND GROUNDING 4$" 4 -ANCHOR BOLTS WITH THREADED END GALVANIZED 12• MIN EACH BOLT FURNISHED WITH 2 HEX NUTS AND 2 FLAT WASHERS, I POLE DETAIL Advanced light engine technology in a traditional housing design. Wisconsin engineerjng and craftsmanship utilizing premium components Our LED lights, light poles and brackets are proudly engineered and manufactured in the USA. We use only the highest quality components, and our LED Shoebox fixtures deliver unmatched fight output and efficiency for any area or flood lighting project. Precision engineered for performance and energy savings, these products dramatically reduce energy consumption by up to 80% and virtually eliminate ongoing maintenance expenses for a variety of customers and applications. Product Overview Highlights: • Engineered and manufactured in Wisconsin, USA from domestic and imported components ETL Certified: Conforms to UL STD 159E & CSA STD C22.2 # 250.0 for wet locations • L70 calculated LED life over 300,000+ hours Drivers are 0-10v dimming standard Six light engine options from 5,622 - 31,849 lumens for 75-1000w HID replacements Premium high -output Chip -On -Board (COB) LEDs in 5000K, 4000K and 3000K options, custom color temps available upon request • Minimum CRI of 70, custom CRI available • DLC qualified models available. Please refer to www.designiights.org for the most current information. Common Applications: • Parking lots, ramps, walkways and roadways General area and site lighting • Car dealerships, schools, hospitals, hotels and gas stations • Retail stores and commercial buildings Sports fighting and bail fields Light Engine Warranty: • 5-year standard limited warranty on all light engine components • Accessories and adders covered by separate OEM supplier warranties Rev Description Date NOTES: PROJECT D ESCRI PTiCN : CLIENT: RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION, PHASE 111, ONE CHAPMAN WAY EL SEGUNDO, CA 99245 CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS 1921 E. MAPLE AVE. EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 (310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9931 VL d&Qte•e, C--24162 * Exp.12/31/2020 ``� re. _ aZ►tJf Product overview Pole Shaft -The pole shaft is fabricated from hot rolled welded steel tubing of one-piece construction with a minimum yield strength of 55 KSI. Pole Top -A removable top cap is provided for poles receiving drilling patterns for side -mount luminaire arm assemblies- Other pole top options include Tenon Top, Top Cap Only or Open Top which is typical when the pole top diameter matches the necessary slip -fit dimensions. • Hand Hole - A reinforced hand hole with grounding provision is provided at V-6' from the base end of the pole assembly. Each hand hole includes a cover and cover attachment hardware. All pole assemblies are provided with a 2.5" x 5" rectangular hand hole (dimensions are nominal). Base Cover - A two-piece full base cover fabricated from ABS plastic is provided with each pole assembly- Additional base cover options, including a cast aluminum and fabricated steel cover, are available upon request - Anchor Bolts - Anchor boll•; conform to ASTM F1554 Grade 55 and are provided with two {Tex nuts and two flat washers. Bolt'; have an "I_" bend on one end and are galvanized a minimum of 12" on the threaded end. Hardware - All structural fasteners are galvanized high strength carbon steel. All non-structural fasteners are galvanized or zinc-platNd carbon steel or stainless steel. Finish - Standard finishes are either Galvanized or Finish Painted. Additional finish options including Finish Paint over Galvanizing are available upon request. Design Criteria - Standard EPA (Effective Projected Area) and weight values are based on Standard Commercial Criteria (with 1.3 gust factor) for side mounted fixtures only- Consult the factory on foading criteria for pole top mounted fuminalres and/or brackets. Satisfactory performance of light poles is dependent upon the pole being properly attached to a supporting foundation of adequate design. EPA Load Information It VSSS54-104040-11-AS-FF 30.6 165 1 238 595 I8-9 i 473 VS SSSA-12-404t1-11-A3-FP 24.4 610 1 18.8 470 14.8 370 VS $SSA-144041-I I A8-FP 19.9 498 l 151 378 11.7 _ 293 223 VS S55A 15.4040-11-AB-FP 15.9 398 ms 296 8.9 VSS aA 16-4040.11-AB-FP 15-9 398 11.8 295 8.9 223 VS-SSSA-1 e-4040-1 1 -AD-FP T16 315 92 23t1 6.7 168 VS SaSA-24-404fi 71-ABfP 96 7.40 5.7 4.5 150 VS1SSSt_24-40447-AHfP 158 240 127 10 9 55SA-20.5050-11 •AB-FV _77 7 343 9.4VS VS-SSSA 25.5050.11-AB�P 9.8 245 6.3 log 157 J. 3.7 ISO VS-SSSA-25.5050.07•AB-FP 18.5 4(i3 13.3 333 9-5 238 VS-SSSA 30_404"7-A8-FP 6.7 168 4.4 110 2.6 65 .5054 VS-SW-3 11-AB-FP 4.7 150 2 50 NIA NIA Vs-SSSA-303 M50-07-AR rP 707 267 6.7 167 3.9 'loo VS SS$A 3t)6060 07,A8 FP 14 475 191 330 3 225 VS SSSA-3rr5050-07-A8 FP 59 7 50 2.5 100 NAR NIA VSS3SA-35:WW17-AB-FP 124 370 7,6 190 4.2 105 VS.SSSA40 6060-07-AR-I`P 7 lag - I _ 3 75 NiA NIA Designation & Dimensional Information WEST PALM GROUP ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING SCALE: anon Top I i Pole cap Plasi Cross Hdi]di"[iY' Fun Base cover (Standard] �I LIGHTPGLE DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS Scale: None NOTED DATE: 21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225 TORRANCE, CA 99593 DRAWN: (319) 619-1165 CHECKED: kyle.westpalm@gmail.com APPROVED: 21 JUN 20 KK5 KK5 PROJECT NO.: 2020107 A300 CD o� � 0D � z D* x D m � � X D Z O z u,m r N c) D o Lr �mrn7r' G) 0 � Z N p r c�0� o� rnU) J > N co m 0 CA)O o Ln G) m U) w mm V ) S 4k xCA 4p C � N A i rn < W --j " �G CD p CF) T0 /N_-) CD -L co D z = �m> @ Cn () (Q D = CD CD o wm 3 cn N N cn T m D � m m z O m 0 0 .. rs 77 7 N O CD 0 O 3 0 CD z O m U) l J r m Jz 1 = C mm C� m � z G)r m X n z uJ G) ;a -00 z C z z G) n D m O i 0 0 C- m z 0 IV 0 IV 0 0 4 r m :' x. X, cn m =. I cQ n n CID 3 v - - 346.40' \ Property Line. I I •---�—_ p O O O �� O O/ 1 D �F I :. D I N I I (� 1 m.'. 1 / / / /1 / / / / / / / 2 I x 3 I x / / / / / x I L / 1-- I I (D -LZ- I 0 # * 1 .. • . ..MIN..: No C � I ; \ �. m I •. Q`d02� 3?11 D D' TI m N II IO1, m 1 O 118,/ 90 C I 1 / ' / / / / // / 45,0 / I I y / r m 1 O I I D O I o/ x ^' cn C:2 m r / o N - 0`d02i 32i1� 0 0� o I m� - 1 _ Et -4 m I m� o v. � _ __ -- - 0 0 0 �� u m I zD / '� - a o o I I p p O O CD 3 " 1 c� 1 p O O Q // O w (n / O O V O (O G I , II I I U)02 E�— x / I =m _L X v D / — N f>\ -/ _. m Ll I !M4 _ I / I C]Vo8 381= m o o I I ?1 0 I I 1 I �r i �\ � m�_ I .:� O I \ \\ \\ \\ 0 1 I SA I Q I m I MIN. I ' �, / , / m O/ I I I 1 1 201 N / O \ / / / 1 1\ I 1 O O / / X T�/ ' to co CD u _ I _ , OX / 0 XI , ��Q ^ y ,p \ \` / o ' fl I >c I w � I I � � / X �J � 7 0 V / I Z NN \ ��O / � O 4 A X d� \\ `\\ � \`\ \` ' N '' m/I 'TI I ,r � On M \\ k \/ / I I 1 O y i -CO iZ / X �� \` 0D to 3 �� CD mlQO- X, S,ope p0\ ��\\ o w I to� T. (D r� \ \ \ o (D 1 ° I (1,\� \ c-i, OD o A / CID 0 1 11 � \ \ I - -4 CD o \ \ \ \ W O T-r \\I \\ � nwi I I \\ o l co O O 20'-0" 0 0 D�l m 1 MIN. / , / O \1 \\ �\ s \\ \\ / i--i m ')00 II I rrl I ' O / o/�\\\ \\\ \\ \` / / I D D / I/ •� r � -u z I O / / / ` ` \`\ / \\ \\ Y\G Do 1 / �\zrn 4 0 Ix I I , W y\/ r m O rt 1 y 0 O D `\ \` \\` cn T1 T I COD A 0 rn rn T. j O\ \ \ \ "vvLL `�C % 20 1 Q 0 \ o x' �L m I / r (D I I N I DCID \ / N (D I o /1 , 3 N / N (7 Oraiy / l / D o A\ \ �rt WZ m u T 30'-0" I 30'-0" � I I �1 N �� oo w I /'I � m _ + ♦ 1 V I. 1 T-r <m v x. CD 90 (Q --i -A cf) o 3 rt W (CD -O o Eiz v CD u, ' 73 200'-0" '�NMI CD o� � 0D U) z D* x D m � � X D Z O z u,m�c) r N o Lr m G) m 7rl 0 � Z N p r � c�0 o� rn� n /D/ co m 0 CA)O O C;l G) m U) w m V x q� \ N A i \ O1 < w --j CD o0iv CD CD CF) -L D co z = �m> @ Cn C� (0 D 2 cD 0 CD 5 Z o wm 3 Ul N N cn CD 0 O 3 0 CD Z O m U) O C— m 0 � m V 0 N O Z m Z _� mm m � z G)r z m z uJ G) N -0p Z C z z G) D n 0 Cl) T D D n � m m z m O m 0 0 .. OD O 7c 7c m N O 0 m n z O IV ■ O O IV ° Cn 0 CD U) m m r Z 200'-0" O O o U U) r cn K m v D Z rt r T. m m cQ o M. co U) CD CD m m' mLL "-. rl�\, � x o 0 0 0 ca 0 1 1 I j l w I I O10 I.- I I I I - I N C cw+, ><' A �a O in Qi X x x _ x cfl cfl 1 I Cn x x2. Ui Cn ao O ��/ 0CDCD 0 m N cQ• w �£X ,��' 1 1O o� �� w o / FTCD E _ CD >v n co O 7--r N. cu n u I � I m TrCD Ff �F r a--� ca �4 0 0 CD T—r CD El 0 , l rn C/) _ s 0 t4v I I D I ca o U) O I� �f CD T� r cQ LL � I I I � cn o O i--f � c> N O I � � m CD T-r TT �. O Z OI � m I � D z 7--r 1--r D m u u t4 T-r l9 t5' tj m G °D O �1 x � � 40' A p N 4 0 ' O -0 J �� m \' 40 o40, 0 Ta 0 D 40A0 to S/o�\ , A o 0 40, w x / , I A 0 �/ k40 O p ' N I A w I 11 k 3S, oae �C 2r -n k35 0 o m I X 35' w o m w N x23,0 p cn 0to'X23, N p v �0 CL cn k23,, 0 0 cn �o w m / w cn � 0 m m / , A r O w I I to ora n o ? <o goi I N.2j ( o m , , 0, 4 Q I CD / 1� 0 j► , OW O ► %\� C w x m fA 80'-0" G) I i m > I Z 0 I I I I jj� v CD I z o O ' I S/oae ► � t j o� to �cn (7 i 20'-0" / =3 m I � Min o 00 CD of 0 CD / d �?7 �t Min / m • /� ��y 3 y 0 O / CD CD I /� 1 I I � � I I O CD 2, 0 ;a X 3 m r-mU) rn �zz m M CM 0 CD 77 w LU W U Lug Style Butterfly Valve Ductile Iron 4" Pipe Size Class 150 0 taw (htt ps://content.too lots.net/med i alcata log/prod u ct/Cache/ l/image/fd 2c682Od 7d 512d 5e7e5a 15 d4f8 Lug Style Butterfly Valve Ductile Iron 4" Pipe Size Class 150 Product Description 1. The product is a neutral line without pin structure, which effectively reduces the probability of internal leakage of the valve. 2. The friction coefficient is small, and the operating torque is reduced by 30%-40% compared with the ordinary pinned butterfly valve. 3. Alkali resistant, salt and weak acid corrosion, inert to organic matter, wide range of applications. 4" Butterfly Valve • COLOR - may be GRAY or GREEN ■ CALL IN ADVANCE IF COLOR IS AN ISSUE • PSI - 200 • Inlet - 4 inch long handle swivel female NH 1 NST threads • Outlet - 4 inch male NH 1 NST threads ■ Height - 17 inches • Height from center of waterway - 10 inches Butterfly valve lever handle with bleeder 4 inch NH swivel female long handle x 4 inch NH male. Butterfly valve comes equipped with a 10 position lever handle with positive detents. This lever rotates or turns the center disc either parallel or perpendicular to the water flow providing you with ultimate control. Technical Details Item Lug Style Butterfly Va I ve Bushing PTFE Seat EPDM Bushing PTFE Bolt Carbon Steel Unit :MM D1 D2 D3 A B C E F N Stop Carbon Steel ?104 ?190.5 518" -11UNC 200 114 52 28 267 8 Cover Nut Carbon Steel TYPICAL 4" BUTTERFLY VALVES Nominal 232 Psi Pressure Shell 348 Psi Rev I Description I Date I NOTES: Testing Pressure PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION, PHASE III, ONE CHAPMAN WAY EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 Body Ductile Iron .9, 371_6" https:llwww. mach inerytrader.corMistingslconstruction- eq uipment/€or-sale132887285/aIlen-12000-gal?ST=california&CTRY=usa TYPICAL WATER TOWER 12,000 GAL WATER TANK SEE NOTE a 16010% Shaft ASTM A276 416 Disc Ductile Iron 1 CD C95400 `n ICF8M " ❑ " Ring EPDM „ C „Ring Spring — t 11 — ��Il— L�illl ll��ji lj f�� �11= 11 �`111 all Il 1 �IIT 111 �ll =-- 1�111= �111� 1]`-1�1j1�1�11�111=��11�=1�11-—ill- —l_Ir--- 1T=11 1111�-- 111=1` 111=1�1 ' 111-1 � !ll—IJi fir-1���1 Steel NOTE 1& RETROFIT A BUTTERFLY VALVE AND A MALE Circlips For Spring 4" NATIONAL HOSE TREADED COUPLING FOR Hales Steel EL SEGUNDO FIRE DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT. North Plate Carbon WATER TANK TO BE A MIN. OF 5' ABOVE GRADE. Steel Working -4- Temperature +248? Seal Testing 255 Psi Pressure CLIENT: CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS 9y 1921 E. MAPLE AVE. FXP.12i3;i 020 EL SEGUNDO, CA 99245 of Co4`'�4 (310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9931 WEST PALM GROUP ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING SCALE: WATER TANK DETAILS Scale: None NOTED DATE: 21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225 TORRANCE, CA 90503 DRAWN: (310) 619-1165 CHECKED: kyle.westpalm@gmail.com APPROVED: 8 MAp 20 KK5 KK5 PROJECT NO.: 20201071 A600 x x x7x x- 10 O ; x�x _ �xi`—x 1 �x� x x�X '-Zxx�x�x-x- ab, — — x—X—X— ,-081 1066 49° 4g� — O$� —_ 25 E \ I 16) 0165) 16) r 1 7 7 9. — I1109� � I - �106f _ _ 081 1pp — J � 16.10L��� 021 L�LIt�`j (101 19) L—_-------� I, 1 (10100) (106.01) 1011 1) 1p6 8) I (1p668) I (106 5 (106.13) OAS 610) L -- � _ �I10 � ill 0- 1 --� I 1 0680 p1p� I I J� 0 m �" o _ z m =x—fix x " x— p611) L I, --I I I I------- � ---— � (1 (104.4) (103.54) r6 y 1 (102.64J (102.94) o�6 4�(102.83) 61F p61y, 0 I\ 1 %I s I � `C� III 106 53) ��� 9 II ����� C�o� n �g915) I %� (106.52)ypoO G �u r�syo-< 9�� 10r.2 Ili I o O� (106.23) S L _ (1 p2 C1 p2 GP6 10313) u II II ,T � I I 0644) r--------------- ---- I I------ ---------- -- ><I J 8 ° 28 , ��9J O� C140) (98 g2) II II E�`1�3105) III � � 1 I Z _ O� 11 >� I ------, �I -—11 6 LI O� / 1 p3 103 6 1 p3 36 1 '1 I s —� ��� I r I O L_�III Ln C100.3 0) ` . 00 1 T 21) 1 I I (9 �s �—�� \ -- O� ` --- - -`I �ICI 0 g665) O� I I 0, II I I---- __-- o�y � 6 cgs II�II -------- _�__ I T-- ---- III X X X x X X x X X —x I — — d 1p3 81 � I � � X�'i (95.0 1) i I I I I I I I %I� O I c'O I 68) i I II � I ``� I I I •, I lop' I '� I I I 100 32 I C X-k_ l I I _ I 1p051 I x x x x x X L — c x x— x x x ��� S I I IA A x� -x� • „ — O x OHLIN Revj Description I Date I NOTES: LA A O O v I I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION, PHASE III, ONE CHAPMAN WAY EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 xE----------------- ONLINE — x m O O � CLIENT: CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS 1921 E. MAPLE AVE. EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 (310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031 i II I m GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY SCALE: 1 " = 30'- 0" WEST PALM GROUP SCALE: ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING DATE: 21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225 TORRANCE, CA 90503 DRAWN: (310) 619-1165 CHECKED: kyle.westpalm@gmail.com APPROVED; PROJECT NO.: NOTED 2020107 AI C-200 Rev I Description ABBREVIATIONS FL FLOWLINE TG TOP OF GRATE MH MANHOLE (E) EXISTING SD STORM DRAIN WV WATER VALVE (N) NEW TF TOP OF FOOTING WM WATER METER TW TOP OF WALL TOF TOP OF FENCE B/W BACK OF WALK INV INVERT FF FINISHED FLOOR C/L CENTER LINE FS FINISHED SURFACE N/W NORTHWEST S/W SOUTHWEST HP HIGH POINT TC TOP OF CURB PP POWER POLE FG FINISHED GRADE FL FLOW LINE LA LANDSCAPE Date I NOTES: LEGEND -- PROPERTY LINE CENTER LINE X X CHAIN LINK FENCE > > FLOWLINE (100.00) EXISTING ELEVATION 100.00 NEW ELEVATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION, PHASE III, ONE CHAPMAN WAY EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 CLIENT: CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS 1921 E. MAPLE AVE. EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 (310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 30'- 0" WEST PALM GROUP ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING 21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225 TORRANCE, CA 90503 (310) 619-1165 kyle.westpalm@gmail.com OG G SCALE: PROJECT NO.- 2020107 NOTED DATE: 06 JUI.Y 20 DRAWN: N, p C�201 CHECKED: KKS APPROVED: L 110 / pRnpncpn r_Qon� nvi v..w vnnv PR POSED GRADE 110 — — — ----- -1LL 100 — — — — — — — — — — 100 icTING Gad n� 90 90 SECTION "D" D L SCALE: 1 " = 10' L PROPOSED GRADE 110 110 7-77 100 100 SECTION "C" rC� SCALE: 1 " = 10' �-2.2 110 — — — — — — — — — — PROPOSED GRADE — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — 110 — 100 'V/5R G I-pn nc 100 SECTION "B" B SCALE: 1 " = 10' C-2.2 L —PROPOSED GRADF 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 L PROPOSED GRADE 110 r I LL FILL — 100 SECTION "A" rA SCALE: 1" = 10' C_2.2 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN SECTIONS SCALE: 1 " = 30'- 0" Rev Description Date NOTES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CLIENT: WEST PALM GROUP SCALE: NOTED PROJECT NO.: 2020107 ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION, PHASE III, ONE CHAPMAN WAY CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS 1921 E. MAPLE AVE. EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225 TORRANCE, CA 90503 (310) 619-1165 DATE: IN C�202 DRAWN: R CHECKED: EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 (310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031 kyle.westpalm@gmail.com APPROVED: VICINITY MAP (PROPOSED AREA FOR DEVELOPMENT) NTS PROJECT DATA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW LANDSCAPE AT RV AND BOAT STORAGE YARD, IN EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACT. - BLOCK: LOT. - CLIENT. CALIFORNIA STORAGE MASTERS SITE ADDRESS: ONE CHAPMAN WAY EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 SCOPE OF WORK: LANDSCAPE: YES IRRIGATION: NO CODES AND STANDARDS: • 2018 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE • 2018 CMC 2018 CPC • 2018 CEC • 2018 CGBSC 2015 CA BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS • AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT • CITY OF LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODES AND • SPECIFICATIONS JURISDICTION: City of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles State of California 2005CHAPMAN NEW LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION G0.0 COVER SHEET G1.1 GENERAL NOTES L6.0 PLANTING OVERALL L6.1 PLANTING ENLARGEMENT L6.2 PLANTING ENLARGEMENT L6.3 PLANTING SCHEDULE L6.4 PLANTING DETAILS ARCHICTECT OF RECORD CHRISTOPHER SHERWIN STATE OF CALIFORNIA REGISTRATION: 5947 STEPHEN BLEWETT STATE OF CALIFORNIA REGISTRATION:6476 CRAFT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CRAFT 3640 HARRIMAN AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90032 WWW. CRAFT -LA. COM LEGAL NOTICE THESE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, IDEAS, AND ARRANGEMENTS PRESENTED THEREBY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF CRAFT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE COPIED, DISCLOSED TO OTHERS OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROJECT OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIC PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND DEVELOPED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF CRAFT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS. SYMBOL KEY: ELEVATION NUMBER REFERENCE ELEVATION L SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE SECTION L /47 ENLARGEMENT PLAN SECTION NUMBER REFERENCE SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE ENLARGEMENT PLAN NUMBER REFERENCE SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE DETAIL DETAIL NUMBER REFERENCE SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE p SITE FURNISHING QUANTITY SITE FURNISHINGS F1 REFERENCE KEY NUMBER MATERIAL CALLOUT 1 K MATERIAL CALLOUT LETTER Z Q U) ODODaZ NQQQQ ti C/) U) 2 J o--U� c \I W �p(/5fnpW oNUUNcn 00 z C) LU YZWLII co LLI Q) LU LLJ Z zDUQ0-CO W ct N M O O _ O Z 0 O Q U J W cc Q Q c O Oj O LZLI O Q �U cc JzJ U LL =U �o� O VMS Z N co 0 L� Q Z CIO cj� Z O >- LL O LO�U LU a Q OCL z �O U Z O Q UW J N oW z r 0 L7 --., � qft O � GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IS TO INCLUDE ALL ITEMS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLEMENTARY, AND WHAT IS REQUIRED BY ONE SHALL BE AS BINDING AS IF REQUIRED BY ALL; PERFORMANCE BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO THE EXTENT CONSISTENT WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND REASONABLY INFERABLE FROM THEM AS BEING NECESSARY TO PRODUCE THE INDICATED RESULTS. 2. ORGANIZATION OF THE SPECIFICATIONS INTO DIVISIONS, SECTIONS AND ARTICLES, AND ARRANGEMENT OF DRAWINGS SHALL NOT LIMIT THE CONTRACTOR IN DIVIDING THE WORK AMONG SUBCONTRACTORS OR IN ESTABLISHING THE EXTENT OF THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY ANY TRADE. 3. THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT MANUAL ESTABLISH DETAILED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. PARTIAL SETS OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE INCOMPLETE AND SHOULD NOT BE DISTRIBUTED OR UTILIZED. 4. ALL WORK INCLUDING MATERIALS, METHODS, ASSEMBLIES, ETC. SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS AND CODES. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND PAYING FEES OF ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 6. BEFORE STARTING EACH PORTION OF THE WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY STUDY THE VARIOUS DRAWINGS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THAT PORTION OF THE WORK. REFER TO DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES THAT ARE INCLUDED IN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST IN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, CONSULT ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 7. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT AND ON THE JOB SITE. BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 8. VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH APPLICABLE UTILITY PROVIDERS. BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 9. VERIFY ALL MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. WHERE DISCREPANCIES AND CONFLICTS EXIST, CONSULT ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 10. REVIEW THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND COORDINATE WITH ALL SUB -CONTRACTORS, TRADES AND SUPPLIERS. IDENTIFY AND NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 11. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN NATURE TO THOSE DETAILED. REPETITIVE FEATURES ARE NOT DRAWN IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND SHALL BE COMPLETELY PROVIDED AS IF DRAWN IN FULL. TYPICAL DETAILS APPLY AT ALL SIMILAR CONDITIONS WHETHER CROSS REFERENCED OR NOT. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 12. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO COLUMN GRID LINES OR CENTERLINES, FACE OF CONCRETE OR CMU WALLS, FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, OR FACE OF FINAL LAYER OF SUBSTRATE OF INTERIOR PARTITION ASSEMBLY (EXCLUSIVE OF APPLIED FINISHES). 14. DOOR LOCATIONS NOT DIMENSIONED ARE: CENTER LINE OF DOOR ALIGNS WITH CENTER OF ROOM OR CORRIDOR. 15. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS REFER TO TOP OF CONCRETE SLAB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WHERE CONCRETE SLAB IS DEPRESSED TO ACCOMMODATE SETTING BEDS, RAISED ACCESS FLOOR, AND OTHER SIMILAR FLOOR ASSEMBLIES, FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE TO TOP OF FINISH FLOOR ASSEMBLY INDICATED. 16. HEIGHT DIMENSIONS AS REFERENCED ON REFLECTED CEILING PLANS RE MEASURED FROM FINISH FLOOR OF INDIVIDUAL ROOMS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 18. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AT THE JOB SITE SHALL BE NEW AND FREE FROM DEFECTS, AND SHALL BE STORED IN THE SITE IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE. ALL WORK SHALL BE OF BEST PRACTICE OF EACH TRADE. 19. VERIFY AND COORDINATE SIZES, LOCATION AND MOUNTING OF ALL EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURES. PROVIDE REQUIRED BLOCKING, BACKING, SLEEVES, ETC. 20. MAINTAIN THE PREMISES CLEAN AND FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. PROTECT PROJECT, THE SITE, AND PERSONAL PROPERTY FROM DAMAGES. 21. PROTECT WORK AREAS AND EXISTING AREAS, INCLUDING EXISTING UTILITIES, FROM DAMAGES. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PATCH ANY DAMAGE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. REPAIRED CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE BY ARCHITECT. 22. IF THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES, THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN DRAWINGS; LARGE-SCALE DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN SMALL-SCALE DRAWINGS. 23. PROVIDE REQUIRED TEMPORARY UTILITIES, BRACING, SUPPORTS, SHORING, ETC. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DESIGN ADEQUACY AND SAFETY OF ERECTION. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CURRENT UPDATED RECORD DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ON SITE AT ALL TIME. 25. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. 26. METAL FABRICATIONS AND SUPPORT ASSEMBLIES WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF MISCELLANEOUS ELEMENTS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ENGINEERED STRUCTURAL ASSEMBLIES AND CALCULATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS AND ACCOUNTING FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC LOADS INCLUDING ANY WIND OR SEISMIC LOADS, THERMAL MOVEMENT OF SUPPORTING STRUCTURE AND DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES OF THE BUILDING. 27. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, BRACING, BACK-UP PLATES AND SUPPORTING BRACKETS REQUIRED FOR THE BEST POSSIBLE INSTALLATION OF ALL TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES AND PARTITIONS AND ALL WALL MOUNTED OR SUSPENDED MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL OR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT. 28. PIPE SLEEVES IN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOMS EXTEND 2" ABOVE THE FLOOR LINE. FILL THE ANNULAR SPACES OF PIPE SLEEVES THROUGH THE FLOOR OR THROUGH RATED WALLS WITH FIRE SAFING AND SMOKE SEAL COMPOUND AS INDICATED ON THE SPECIFICATION, AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY. PROVIDE APPROVED RATED FIRE DAMPERS FOR ALL DUCTS PENETRATING FIRE RATED WALLS. FIRE DAMPER ASSEMBLIES, INCLUDING SLEEVES AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONS. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, MANUAL RESET LEVER FOR THE FIRE DAMPER MUST BE PLACED ON NON-PUBLIC OR LAY -IN CEILING SIDE OF THE RATED WALL. 29. SIZES OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PADS AND BASES SHOWN ON PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS OF ALL PADS AND BASES WITH THE APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE MOUNTINGS WITH APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS. PADS AND BASES SHALL BE INDICATED ON SUBMITTALS AND BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PRIOR TO LAY -OUT OF REINFORCING STEEL OR STEEL DECK. 30. PROVIDE ACCESS PANELS FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES. ALL ACCESS PANELS SHALL BE CONCEALED. ELECTRICAL J-BOXES, PLUMBING CLEANOUTS, FIRE DAMPERS AND OTHER SIMILAR ITEMS REQUIRING ACCESS ARE NOT TO BE LOCATED ABOVE GYPSUM BOARD OR SIMILAR CEILING. 31. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND PROVIDE ALL SLAB AND WALL OPENINGS REQUIRED BY MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LIMITS OF WORK, PROPERTY LINES AND LOT LINES BEFORE STARTING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO OFF -SITE PROPERTY. 2. LIMIT USE OF PREMISES TO WORK IN AREAS INDICATED. DO NOT DISTURB PORTIONS OF THE SITE BEYOND AREAS IN WHICH THE WORK IS INDICATED. KEEP DRIVEWAYS AND ENTRANCES SERVING PREMISES CLEAR AND AVAILABLE TO THE OWNER, PUBLIC AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES AT ALL TIMES. DO NOT USE THESE AREAS FOR PARKING OR STORAGE OF MATERIALS. SCHEDULE DELIVERIES TO MINIMIZE USE OF DRIVEWAYS AND ENTRANCES. 3. ANY EXISTING MATERIALS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 4. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS, UTILITIES, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION INDICATED AS EXISTING ARE NOT GUARANTEED. BEFORE BEGINNING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INVESTIGATE AND VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, PLANTING, HARDSCAPE AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION AFFECTING THE WORK. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION, VERIFY THE LOCATION AND POINTS OF CONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR BEARS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS WORK. ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES CAUSED BY ANY PERSON, VEHICLE, EQUIPMENT, OR TOOL RELATED TO THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT: (USA 1-800-422-4133) 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 6. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS OF WORK PERFORMED BY OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT'S. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONDUIT, SLEEVES AND EMBEDMENT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. INFORM THE OWNER OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ADJUST CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE BASED ON A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TIMETABLE. NOTIFY THE OWNER IF CHANGES TO SCHEDULE ARE REQUIRED DUE TO THE DIFFERENCES IN ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. INCLUDE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT'S AT PRE INSTALLATION MEETINGS COVERING PORTIONS OF THE WORK THAT ARE RELATED. 8. MAINTAIN A CLEAN AND SAFE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES: 9. CLEAN PROJECT SITE AND WORK AREAS DAILY, INCLUDING COMMON AREAS. COORDINATE PROGRESS CLEANING FOR JOINT -USE AREAS WHERE MORE THAN ONE INSTALLER HAS WORKED. ENFORCE REQUIREMENTS STRICTLY. DISPOSE OF MATERIALS LAWFULLY. 10. MAINTAIN THE PROJECT SITE FREE OF WASTE MATERIALS AND DEBRIS. 11. KEEP INSTALLED WORK CLEAN. 12. CLEAN INSTALLED SURFACES ACCORDING TO WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS OF MANUFACTURER OR FABRICATOR OF PRODUCT INSTALLED, USING ONLY CLEANING MATERIALS SPECIFICALLY RECOMMENDED. 13. IF SPECIFIC CLEANING MATERIALS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED, USE CLEANING MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH OR PROPERTY AND THAT WILL NOT DAMAGE EXPOSED SURFACES. 14. REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CONCEALED SPACES BEFORE ENCLOSING THE SPACE. CLEAN EXPOSED SURFACES AND PROTECT AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE FREEDOM FROM DAMAGE AND DETERIORATION AT TIME OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. 15. CLEAN AREAS AND SPACES WHERE CUTTING AND PATCHING ARE PERFORMED. COMPLETELY REMOVE PAINT, MORTAR, OILS, PUTTY, AND SIMILAR MATERIALS. BURYING OR BURNING WASTE MATERIALS ON -SITE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. WASHING WASTE MATERIALS DOWN SEWERS OR INTO WATERWAYS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 16. DURING HANDLING AND INSTALLATION, CLEAN AND PROTECT CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS AND ADJOINING MATERIALS ALREADY IN PLACE. APPLY PROTECTIVE COVERING WHERE REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROTECTION FROM DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION AT SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. 17. CLEAN AND PROVIDE MAINTENANCE ON COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION AS FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 18. ADJUST AND LUBRICATE OPERABLE COMPONENTS TO ENSURE OPERABILITY WITHOUT DAMAGING EFFECTS. SUPERVISE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO ASSURE THAT NO PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION, COMPLETED OR IN PROGRESS, IS SUBJECT TO HARMFUL, DANGEROUS, DAMAGING, OR OTHERWISE DELETERIOUS EXPOSURE. LAYOUT & MATERIALS NOTES 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. DO NOT PROCEED WITH WORK WITHOUT CONSULTING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 20. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE. 21. WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE CALLED AS "EQUAL", ALL REFERENCED ITEMS SHALL BE SPACED EQUALLY, MEASURED TO THEIR CENTER LINES. 22. ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE TO FACE OF BUILDING, WALL OR OTHER FIXED SITE IMPROVEMENT. DIMENSIONS TO CENTER LINES ARE INDICATED. 23. LOCATIONS OF FEATURES NOT SPECIFICALLY DIMENSIONED MAY BE DETERMINED BY SCALE. CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR. 24. INSTALL ALL INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90 DEGREES TO EACH OTHER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 25. CONTRACTOR'S CONSTRUCTION WORK RESPONSIBILITIES: 26. SCOPE OF WORK: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TRANSPORTATION AND SERVICES NECESSARY TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIED HEREIN. 27. CONFORMANCE: ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE LOCAL, COUNTY AND/OR STATE CODES, REGULATIONS AND RULES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS: WIND SPEED 85 MPH; EXPOSURE'C; OCCUPANCY CATEGORY II; IMPORTANCE FACTOR=1.0. 28. LICENSE: ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED CONTRACTOR. 29. PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN, COORDINATE AND PAY FOR ANY AND ALL PERMITS, FEES AND AGENCY INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED. 30. INSURANCE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CARRY ALL WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION, PUBLIC LIABILITY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE AS REQUIRED BY ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT). 31. SITE VERIFICATION: PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY, AT THE JOB SITE, A;; CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AFFECTING THE INTENDED DESIGN OF THE LANDSCAPE WORK. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER(JOB SUPERINTENDENT) IMMEDIATELY. 32. LIABLE FOR ENCROACHMENT: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ENCROACHMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY, RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS, SET -BACKS OR ANY OTHER LEGAL PROPERTY RESTRICTIONS EITHER MARKED OR UNMARKED. 33. COORDINATION OF ACTIVITIES: THE CONTRACTOR AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF THEIR ACTIVITIES WITH ALL OTHER TRADES THROUGH THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT). 34. FIELD STAKING: PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE BY STAKES, OR OTHER MEANS, ALL CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS AS DELINEATED ON THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 35. NOTIFICATION OF DISCREPANCIES: ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND/OR THE DESIGN INTENT AFFECTING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION AND COST OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. ALL WORK RELATED TO THE PROBLEM AREA SHALL CEASE UNTIL THE DISCREPANCIES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED BY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING. ANY CONTINUATION OF WORK PRIOR TO THE RESOLUTION OF DISCREPANCIES IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND EXPENSE. 36. LIABLE FOR DAMAGE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES, CONSTRUCTION, IRRIGATION AND PLANTING ELEMENTS, EXISTING OR NEW, MARKED OR UNMARKED, AND SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY DAMAGED IMPROVEMENTS IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT). 37. LIABLE FOR LOSS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS TO HIS EQUIPMENT, PARTS AND MATERIALS ON THIS PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB IN WRITING BY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT). 38. WRITTEN GUARANTEE: ALL WORK SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS TO THE MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN GUARANTEE ON HIS LETTERHEAD AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. 39. WRITTEN CERTIFICATION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS INSTALLED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY APPROVED SUBSTITUTIONS OR DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE NOTED. THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL BE ON THE CONTRACTOR'S LETTERHEAD WITH HIS SIGNATURE AND CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER. 40. STATE CIVIL CODE TITLE 7: TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS PROJECT IS GOVERNED BY TITLE 7 OF THE STATE CIVIL CODE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 7 OF THE CIVIL CODE. 41. METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION: THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES. 42. OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION WORK RESPONSIBILITIES: 43. CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES: THE OWNER WILL BE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASPECTS OF CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ALL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS. ALL FIELD MEETINGS SHALL BE INITIATED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND COORDINATED THROUGH THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE IN A SUPPORT OBSERVATION ROLE TO THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) PROVIDING INTERPRETIVE ADVICE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OBSERVATION SCHEDULE AS NOTED. 44. DETERMINING LEGAL AND PHYSICAL ELEMENTS: OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PROPERTY LINES, RIGHT-OF-WAYS, TRACT BOUNDARIES, GRADES, EASEMENTS, UTILITY LOCATIONS (ABOVE AND BELOW GRADE) ANY OTHER LEGAL OR PHYSICAL ELEMENTS, AS REQUIRED, FOR THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED WITH ANY WORK WITHOUT DETERMINATION OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION. 45. SITE DISCREPANCIES: ALL DISCREPANCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS, DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. IT IS THE OWNER'S (JOB SUPERINTENDENT'S) RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSULT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY FURTHER WORK IN THAT AREA. ANY UNREPORTED DISCREPANCY AND CONTINUED WORK WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND EXPENSE. 46. CONTRACT FULFILLMENT: ALL QUESTIONS RELATING TO INTERPRETATION OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, QUALITY OF WORK AND ACCEPTABLE FULFILLMENT OF INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DECIDED BY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CONCURRENTLY. 47. REQUIRED FIELD OBSERVATION WORK: 48. REQUIRED FIELD OBSERVATION WORK: THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE OWNER OF SAID PLANS WILL USE VALLEYCREST DESIGN GROUP TO PROVIDE'FULU CONTRACT SERVICES INCLUDING FIELD OBSERVATION SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE TO USE CRAFT AND CULTIVATE TO PROVIDE AND COMPLETE THE FIELD OBSERVATION SERVICES SET FORTH HEREIN WILL SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE RISK OF LOSS RESULTING, AMONG OTHER CAUSES, FROM MISINTERPRETATION OF THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN, UNAUTHORIZED MODIFICATIONS THERETO, AND FAILURE TO DETECT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS BEFORE THEY BECOME COSTLY MISTAKES BUILT INTO THE PROJECT. THEREFORE, IN THE EVENT THAT CRAFT AND CULTIVATE IS OTHERWISE PRECLUDED FROM COMPLETING THE FIELD OBSERVATION SERVICES SET FORTH HEREIN, THE OWNER, OR SUBSEQUENT OWNER (INDIVIDUALS OR CORPORATIONS WHO HAVE PURCHASED THESE PLANS WITH THE PROJECT), AGREES TO HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNIFY, AND DEFEND CRAFT AND CULTIVATE AND THEIR CONSULTANTS FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS. 49. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S CONSTRUCTION FIELD OBSERVATION SCHEDULE: 50. FIELD OBSERVATION COORDINATION: THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS SHALL BE INITIATED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND COORDINATED THROUGH THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NOT LESS THAN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY OBSERVATION. CONTINUED WORK WITHOUT OBSERVATION OF THESE PHASES OF WORK IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK, WITH ANY REQUIRED CHANGE OR MODIFICATIONS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) SHALL INFORM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AS TO THE PURPOSE AND TIME OF THE OBSERVATION FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE. 51. CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND LAYOUT OBSERVATION: THIS OBSERVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED AFTER ALL CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, FLOW LINES AND FINISH GRADES HAVE BEEN LOCATED IN THE FIELD, BUT PRIOR TO FORMING OR EXCAVATING. 52. ROUGH CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS OBSERVATION: THIS OBSERVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED AFTER ALL FORMING, EXCAVATION, REINFORCING STEEL AND STRUCTURAL STEEL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED, BUT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY CONCRETE. 53. PROGRESS/INSTALLATION INSPECTIONS: PERIODIC INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO INSURE CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 54. FINAL OBSERVATION/PROJECT CERTIFICATION: THIS OBSERVATION VISIT WILL BE PERFORMED TO REVIEW ALL ASPECTS OF THE CONTRACTED WORK PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PROJECT TO THE OWNER. PLANTING NOTES 55. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL UTILITY PLANS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD, AND SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF CONFLICTS WITH PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS EXISTS. 56. IF CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN SIZE OF AREAS AND PLANS, CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. FAILURE TO MAKE SUCH CONFLICTS KNOWN WILL RESULT IN CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY TO RELOCATE SUCH MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL NECESSARY BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL COVERAGE. 57. TREES SHALL BE TAGGED BY CONTRACTOR AND REVIEWED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON AWARD OF GENERAL CONTRACT. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE AVAILABLE AND MEET EXCEED REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS ON ESTIMATED DATE OF START OF PLANTING. 58. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL: PHOTOS OF ONE EXAMPLE OF EACH TREE VARIETY. PHOTOS SHOULD INCLUDE A PERSON FOR SCALE PURPOSES, TREE SPECIFICATIONS, AND QUANTITY SHALL BE NOTED. SPECIFICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE PLANTED HEIGHT, TRUNK CLEARANCE, WIDTH AND TRUNK CALIPER. NURSERY SOURCE AND CONTACT SHALL BE NOTED. 59. TREES TO BE RELOCATED ARE IDENTIFIED IN TREE REPORT. COORDINATE TREE RELOCATION AS REQUIRED WITH OWNER. 60. ANY PLANT DEEMED NOT AVAILABLE BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE NOTED. MAINTENANCE PERIOD MAY NOT BEGIN UNTIL ALL SPECIFIED MATERIALS ARE INSTALLED. 61. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIALS FREE OF PESTS OR PLANT DISEASES. PRE -SELECTED OR'TAGGED' MATERIAL MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND CERTIFIED PEST AND DISEASE FREE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATION TO WARRANTY ALL PLANT MATERIALS. 62. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED ON SITE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL. 63. ALL OVER EXCAVATION REQUIRED TO MEET PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE DONE PRIOR TO PAVING IF PAVING WILL CONFLICT WITH EXCAVATION OF PLANTING PITS. 64. ALL TREES PLANTED NEXT TO CURBS SHALL BE AT LEAST 36" CLEAR FROM CURB FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 65. SEE DETAILS FOR STAKING METHOD. 66. ALL GROUND COVERS SHALL BE APPLIED IN ALL PLANTING AREAS INDICATED ON PLAN AS WELL AS UNDER SHRUBS. GROUND COVERS AND MASS PLANTED SHRUBS SHALL BE TRIANGULARLY SPACED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 67. ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT PLANTED IN TURF AND ARE 2:1 SLOPE OR LESS SHALL BE COVERED WITH 3/4" DEEP ORGANIC MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SUBMIT 1 CU. FT. SAMPLE PRIOR TO APPLICATION. AREAS STEEPER THAN 2:1 SHALL BE COVERED WITH JUTE MESH. 68. MINIMUM 4 SOIL SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR AFTER GRADING OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED FOR SOIL FERTILITY AND AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTING AND RECOMMENDATIONS. APPROVED LABORATORY IS SOIL AND PLANT LABS 1-714-282-8777 SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SPECIFIED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITH SOILS REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. 69. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGE AS TO WHEN THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD BEGINS. 70. ALL PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PLANTED TO CONFORM TO GOVERNING AGENCY STANDARDS. 71. PLANT QUANTITIES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL PLANTS AS REQUIRED TO MEET ON -CENTER SPACING AS NOTED IN THE PLANT LEGEND. 72. ALL GRADING AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO ELIMINATE WATER STANDING OR SPRAYING ON STRUCTURES. ADJUST IRRIGATION AS REQUIRED. WATER SHALL DRAIN AWAY FROM STRUCTURES. 73. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL SHEET FLOW @ 2% MINIMUM OR DRAIN TO AREA DRAINS @ 1 % MINIMUM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION (L1 SERIES) PLANS AND LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE (AD) AND CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS CONTAINED HEREIN. 74. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES SHOWN HEREON. FINAL SHRUB PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING. 75. ALL SHRUB PLANTING AREAS TO BE MULCHED WITH A TWO (2") INCH LAYER OF MULCH. FOREST FLOOR MULCH 1/2' 1 1/2" APPEARANCE GRADE. AGUINAGUA FERTILIZER CO. PHONE: (949)786-9558. APPROVE MULCH WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PURCHASE. 76. ALL TREES THAT ARE CLOSER THAN FIVE FEET (5) TO HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH AN OWNER AND AGENCY APPROVED LINEAR ROOT BARRIER. 77. SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT 18" MIN. FROM BACK OF WALK. AREAS BETWEEN WALK AND SHRUBS TO BE MULCHED. z Q �U) co co mD Q r- (a � = J O - - U NC, Cn(no W �OCn(nO W m z oml� ° Yzww CQ U 3 _ � I- W Q c Q WQzQ�U zOUO0-C/) Lu lN M O O _ O Z O Q U QJ W co 0 O Q W O � Lu V � U U. Jz� � Q lct lJ f Z �` CA 6 4 7 6 0- S� Q Lj N N m a co Q N r 6 O ti o�sti�yd31 S 0 c 3 K N � WLo Q O � z Z >_ ILL uj O O J �U � Q Lo cb cz z W 0 �W Q Z wC/) W N oW z 0 Vmft LL 00 IVAN MOM NEW mom _ LIMIT WORK 1 D D D D D D mom D LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF W RK � I O D D D Mom°� 2 ° I D D � mom L6.1 D I D D O O O LIMIT OF WORKown G� L6.2 OO O LIMIT OF WORK — L6.1 O O Y11,00 r4 ;-?, 0 0 10 O 5 J L6.1 _ II / 6 / L6.1 z / --- O .001) D ' ClM/T ♦ �`� 1 OF WpRK♦ ♦ ♦ � � � � � �, Y D � 1� I ♦ ♦ D % ��:' it OAI/ro♦ ♦D \ , RK ♦ � ,��. III t/AuVr I ♦ O oFW R� ♦ O � O �� D � ♦ D �D O O \� L6.1 0 to I ♦ ♦ O o \ 1� I CIM,� WO� ♦ 0 �� II I ♦ � I II oA. f t I I IMIT OF ♦ ...a'...� , _ WORK ♦ ..,:. �,�' 1 LL �♦ � II � ♦ ♦ III ClA,j/TO♦ WORK 0 0� OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH 1 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 0 30so' PLAN Z Q U) ODODaZ NQQQQ ti C/) U) 2 J o--U� c \l W �pc)fnCc) W oNUUNcn 00 z om� YZWLLI CoLLjU�» Lu LLJ u z 000-co N 0 do J Q S U Z J a. 0 Z Lr) c) H N U Z Q) O I zJ a. >- o o J � w � J z<� Q) Q O CL z z oc O UW W w c/ i N oW z o PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 1 QUE AGR 24" Box QUE AG3 1 36" Box Fa m PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" G► PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" "I � 0 G► Z Q co ca z NQQQQ ti cn C/) 2 J O--U0- c\l W �p(nfnOW 00 z om� YZWUII coLLjU�» WQ2��U ZIDUQWc� uj N M O O _ O Z c O Q U J W cc Q Q Q c (� O Z Oj O Q �U JzJuft �o� O VMS Z do � �� Q W o N S --IQ Q U c Ln m o CO C.) Ln 6 O� O I y ��sN y0131 CD S II PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN Q 7 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" J PLAN PLAN PLAN a NOTES: Z SEE SHEET L6.7 FOR uj SCHEDULES AND NOTES 2 uj QUE AG2 2 —15 gal. d. Z � O Q O N Z Q - z cco BAC PIG 14 • O O O 5 gal. • Q JLli Q G2 • Q a- Z • \ ZU Q • • �O UO • O Z Z . Q Z a _( J a • 0 �a. N zJ w J Q A 2 ■ NORTH PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN LL o io, zo' SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" PLAN O ';ors �' • • I — I ► EE — o s ` • E EXISTING Tok FENCE, / pl$ s • TYP'0 /' • I • LEY CAN 84 ^ • O 1 gal. °1-44. \ \ ,rs • 4 I 00 ,L BAC PIG 57 5 gal. uE, A� �— rs�sc`14 zrs fin' • 0 • de f LL s 0 • QUE AGR 2n • 24" Box • � ors �, f� • • II • • • • 's"''� �p�°` ' >s• ` ,9";"°off,°G< ,' 44 �M1L� ,_' • ��^fs roc "oAa� • • �'s' ' • BAC PIG 69 qo 0 • o 'sr� . 'I 5 gal. ao haw QUE AG3 2 sA ' • • 1 QUE AGR °s� n • • 36" Box • • aQn 24" Box s^ • QUE AG3 1 ''ss 36" Box` 43 LEY CAN 70nsJ` • • p pogo°e ua • 1 gal.1 ',,rr ��,��cn ,� o • sr,�^4pcc • 80 LEY CANV ` • 2 ^ • • 1 gal. • I ° 30 oo. BAC PIG • �� • cnn 5 gal. ga N • '„rs • ,a°v`Onnnnc i Onnnc '�ff��lic • nngb�� � nC • • I 'gers Gnn • • QUE AGR 2 sss • • �°"�'�' EXISTING 24" Box • �ss`:�n• FENCE, s • TYP �• rdl 2 SE K IKs �pn • E • DC ss�. to �s ° 2 PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN SCALE. 1 - 10-0 PLAN SCALE. 1 - 10-0 PLAN NORTH 0 10, 20' Z Q U) ODODaZ NQQQQ ti C/) U) 2 J o--U� c \1 W �p(/5fnpW oc\1UUcNcn 00 z C) Y < LY Lu co LLj Q) Lu WQ2��U zDUQ0-CO aw o�A LLJ ct QN M O O _ O Z LL O Q U i LLI CJ W Q co O Z Oj O LU Q �U JzJ LL Cc Uft V MZ 'Q 4! U � V7 m 2 b o N 0 c a � N 0 'Y y0131 S .�'j/7 do J Q U 4. II a J a. z W 2 W Lr) O Q) U J VJ c O W O >- LL U �U a _ z Q Z O°o Q) o IL z Q� z W O �J a zJ w J N OW z a PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE QTY QUE AG2 Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak 15 gal. 7 Standard QUE AGR Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak 24" Box 6 Standard QUE AG3 Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak 36" Box 3 ,DO Standard SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING QTY • BAC PIG Baccharis pilularis Pigeon Point' / Coyote Brush 5 gal. 60" o.c. 238 LEY CAN Leymus condensatus Canyon Prince' / Native Blue Rye 1 gal. 30" o.c. 234 PLANT LEGEND TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME 0 QUE AG2 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 0aQUE AGR Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 0 QUE AG3 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME BAC PIG Baccharis pilularis Pigeon Point' 0 Coyote Brush LEY CAN Leymus condensatus Canyon Prince' Native Blue Rye PLANT IDENTIFICATION KEY PLANT ABBREVIATION CONTAINER SIZE QUANTITIY 2U) mmaz NQQQQ ti C/) cf) 2 J O--U0- NC/)fno W �pCncnOW OcNUUcNCn 00 C ) z Y < LY Lu C/) LLj Q) LU WQ2��U ZDUQ�cA � a Uj N M �ftjO O _ O Z LL O Q U LLI LLl Q Q Q � c/) O Z �L O LU Q �U LL Uft JzJ �Cr-� =U � Q) O VMS Z do � �� Q Q W o N S J Q U c m o C.) hCO 6 O� O I y ��sN A�j y0131 CD S W J o � W U Q � V ct Z >- LL O U LO�U a _ Z Q Z �p 0 O az z z O �W J a zJ N LUJ oW z a ROUND -TOPPED SOIL BERM 4" HIGH X 8" WIDE ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE SHALL BE CENTERED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE ROOT BALL FOR 240°. BERM SHALL BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY. TRUNK CALIPER SHALL MEET ANSI Z60 CURRENT EDITION FOR ROOT BALL SIZE. ROUND -TOPPED SOIL BERM 4" HIGH X 8" WIDE ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE SHALL BE CENTERED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE ROOT BALL FOR 240°. BERM SHALL BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY. 2" LAYER OF MULCH. NO MORE THAN 1" OF MULCH ON TOP OF ROOT BALL. (SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MULCH). ORIGINAL GRADE LOOSENED SOIL. DIG AND TURN THE SOIL TO REDUCE THE COMPACTION TO THE AREA AND DEPTH SHOWN. SLOPE SIDES OF LOOSENED SOIL. EXISTING SOIL BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL RESTS ON EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL. TREE ON SLOPE Detail -File TOP OF ROOT BALL (PLANT COLLAR) 1/2"-1" HIGHER THAN SURROUNDING GRADE SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL ORGANIC MULCH COVERING ROOT BALL AND ENTIRE BASIN AREA, APPROXIMATELY 1" DEEP IRRIGATION BASIN BERM IIf169GI=11eZel:L1979 2 X ROOT BALL 12" AT 1 GALLON NATIVE SHRUB PLANTING rA SHRUB ON SLOPE 3/4" = 1'-0" FX-PL-FX-SHRB-09 4" LAYER OF MULCH. NO MORE THAN 1" OF MULCH ON TOP OF ROOT BALL. (SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MULCH). ORIGINAL SLOPE SHOULD PASS THROUGH THE POINT WHERE THE TRUNK MEETS SUBSTRATE/SOIL. SHRUB ROOTBALL 4" HIGH X 8" WIDE ROUND - TOPPED SOIL BERM ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE SHALL BE CENTERED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE ROOT BALL FOR 240°. BERM SHALL BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY. MODIFIED SOIL. DEPTH VARIES PRIOR TO MULCHING, LIGHTLY TAMP SOIL AROUND THE ROOT BALL IN 6" LIFTS TO BRACE SHRUB. DO NOT OVER COMPACT. WHEN THE PLANTING HOLE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED, POUR WATER AROUND THE ROOT BALL TO SETTLE THE SOIL. EXISTING SOIL BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL RESTS ON EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL NOTES: 1- SHRUBS SHALL BE OF QUALITY AS PRESCRIBED IN THE ROOT OBSERVATIONS DETAIL AND SPECIFICATION. 2- SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THIS DETAIL. FX-PL-FX-SHRB-01 TREE STAKING TREE W/BERM 1/2" = 1'-0" I0l1r,ACTO1l1 XAMA/. SPIKE (TYP.) CONNECTOR PROTECT TREE WITH APPROVED PLANT TIE MATERIAL 2" DIAMETER LODGEPOLE PINE TREATED TREE STAKES. SET PERPENDICULAR TO PREVAILING WIND. REMOVE NURSERY STAKE BY THE END OF MAINTENANCE PERIOD. SOIL BERM TO HOLD WATER 2" MULCH BACKFILL PER PLANTING DETAIL AVOID DAMAGE TO ROOT BALL WITH SUPPORT STAKES FX-PL-FX-TREE-11 DO NOT PRUNE TREE AT PLANTING EXCEPT FOR SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL CORRECTIONS NOT STAKE OR WRAP TRUNK. \RK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE THE NURSERY AND LOCATE TO THE )RTH IN THE FIELD :T ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR :VERAL INCHES HIGHER IN POORLY ZAINED SOIL BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER MULCH (DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN )INTACT WITH TREE TRUNK) DISHED GRADE kMP SOIL SOLIDLY AROUND SSE OF ROOT BALL 3 WIDE SHALLOW HOLE WITH �PERED SIDES :EPARED SOIL FOR TREES ARCHITECT NOTE: CHECK OFF APPLICABLE SIZE & FINISH DESIRED SIZE: ❑ 1" X 2.25" ❑MF ❑BL ❑ 1.5" X 2.25" ❑MF ❑BL ® 2" X 2.25" ®MF ❑BL ❑ 2.5" X 2.25" ❑MF ❑BL ❑ 3" X 3 ❑MF ❑BL ❑ 4" X 3„ ❑MF ❑BL FINISH LEGEND: (MF) MILL FINISH -NATURAL ALUMINUM (BL) BLACK DURAFLEX-ELECTROSTATICALLY APPLIED BAKED ON PAINT, MEETS AAMA 2603 ADJACENT PLANTING AREA PERMALOC ASPHALT EDGE ALUMINUM RESTRAINT a - aa . d SINGLE COURSE ASPHALT 000000 0 000 (5 (5 (o 0 00 o FILL ALL VOIDS UNDER 0°0 00°0 0o 00°O o0°O o0°O o0°O RESTRAINT FOR PROPER 0 00 00 o 0 o 0 0 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 o SUPPORT 0000000 0o00000000 °0 °o 00 00000 COMPACT BASE COURSE 0 00 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXTENDING 6" BEYOND 0 0 00 O 00 00 O 00 0 00 0 00 O RESTRAINT %$' X 10" SPIRAL STEEL SPIKE 12" O.C. (MIN.) SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER'S "INSTALLATION GUIDELINES" 2. 8'-0" SECTIONS CONNECTED WITH 4" SLIDING CONNECTOR 3. MAINTAIN %" GAP BETWEEN SECTIONS TO ALLOW FOR PRODUCT EXPANSION IN EXTREME TEMPERATURES 4. CORNERS: NOTCH BASE ONLY AND FORM A CONTINUOUS CORNER 5. PERMALOC ASPHALTEDGE AS MANUFACTURED BY PERMALOC CORPORATION, HOLLAND MI (800) 356-9860 (616) 399-9600 6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND PURCHASING INFORMATION VISIT: WWW.PERMALOC.COM ASPHALTEDGE: SINGLE COURSE ASPHALT NTS FX-SI-PERM-EDG-01 FX-PL-FX-TREE-05 Z Q U) oocoaZ NQQQQ ti C/) U) 2 J o--U� c \1 W �oc/5fnoW oc\1UUcNcn 00 z C) YZWLLI coLLjU�» ��-WQO¢ Lu :z z u �DUC)0-co ::;.. uj N M O O _ 0) Z Z V OLL O Q U Lu Lu Q Q co co O OLa O Lu Q f�U JzJ L LL QEz =U Q) O VMS Z 0 G 0 do V z J � O N Q W co � Z uj U a V Q Z Lo Z O� C) o az z Q � Z O �W J a NzJ LuJ oW z a CD U) �_ r+ O CD Z O m 0 I j 00 m0 -u ;u o Io z 2 G c v) m D go O o m c) U) L G� = m 0 m m D - C) D m Cn % I nz O N ,I oZn %pN f Q c , ! cn O 0 CD CID \\ � \\ '' ° 0 CD \�_ �u a ----------------- O % op mI % N — //, Cn o o (� N '�lil~�i 11 N ° cn O rn 0 Z11 N z z �W C)Cfl % N p II c O r �o �m� z C r o D � z0 cn C0 m N D � N o (�}� rn m O o p io -Ph. o C) � r % O m " C/) ` I V 0 o ca w A r v S?o � Oo wp I! op D�> / jl n=m % O� I I O � y °cn COMM ° . e OM 0' tr U) Ij 0) Cb / 0 D 0 j 0 ° C) S o J ii 41 I C � .• °'.•Am � Q 10 CD C O N m D D � � X GJ m� � CD - D z r c�z� G7 O Win= z < o it O I m >m m m m ii o pii f p O z O 0 �w C CA m -0O 0 CD m 3 D C o m z cn �o °Z z 0 (7 y Zm M � n II pW I m u N x m m m m O O %' i! Q GJ m moc D - --� o m0 NO �� y 2> D C) (n D N N m w 1�T1 0o co O o 0 _ D Cn r ° D 0° 0 z w _ o N % o _ �+e3aa 3ava� II 0 C ^ zO Z p O < m D uJ �� 2� m c�� o D� / 0 Z m CD Z Z -0 i+ < m _ g.o c� � O m m m 0 z N � o m z O O 0 p �,D C) 77 m CD O ° ° 3ag3ad80 ------ ,D ESN � D =zo % p new � 1 nP � (i2� / O ,22rn n I+ - Or>D 2 O < L� 00 / C Zmn Z mm O �m2 m in �� • �p O �2� ;a22 / Z �z0 O m O _ o moor- c 0 m % 3 m cn o O C) Z G) m m w 7111 z o rn O m = = N N D i r C)z o10 0 0 SQUARE PLASTIC TOP PUSH CAP POLE MAY BE DRILLED TO ACCEPT SIDE MOUNTED FIXTURE IF REQUIRED - SQUARE POLE SHAFT CAP DETAIL (STANDARD) - � 2-PIECE COVER FIN$SHED TO MATCH POLE FULL BASE COVER (STANDARD) 0 50' 'NUT HOLDER FOR 2-50' X 5.00" GROUNDING HANDHOLE RIM WITH COVER 1' 6" j4 THICKNESS BOLT CIRCLE I 1 SQUARE f SLOTTED BOLT HOLES POLE BASE AND HANDHOLE DETAIL Iightpo-1es PLUS.C.. 308 N. Brooke St. 8W791-1453 Fond du Lac, Wl 54935 1 quotes@lightpolesplus.com LightPolesPlus.com BASE PLATE WITH STIFFENERS & ANCHOR BOLTS Rev Description I Date I NOTES: 2.0" SCHED 80 PIPE TENON SQUARE POLE PLATE WITH WIRE ENTRANCE HOLE (DEBURRED) I POLE SHAFT P2 TENON DETAIL (OPTIONAL) MOUNTING HEIGHT REINFORCED HANDHOLE " WITH COVER AND GROUNDING 1' - 6" 4 - ANCHOR BOLTS WITH THREADED END GALVANIZED 12" MIN- I ! EACH BOLT FURNISHED WITH 2 HEX NUTSAN❑ 2 FLAT WASHERS. POLE DETAIL Rev. V07312019 This epec+ficatw brothure rs xne9ded to serve as a genera! guile. Our Prom are cotnmuahy b'"at9 enONwed and t. pVoved, and speotfications are subteet w change without mute LIGHT POLE 4 -#6 x 24" MIN. VERTICAL REBAR EPA Load Information i VS-SSSA-I0.4040-11-AB-FP :r 30-6 765 i 23.8 595 r 18.9 473 VS-SSSA-12-404D-1I-AB-FP 24.4 610 18.8 470 14.8 370 VS-SSSA-I4-4040.11 AB-W 19.9 498 15.1 378 11.7 293 VS-SSSA-15.4040.11,AB-FP 15.9 398 11.8 295 8.9 223 VS-SSSA-16-4040-11 AB -FP 15.9 398 11.8 295 230 8.4 223 VS-SSSA-18A040-11AB-FP 1Z6 315 9.2 6.7 168 VS-SSSA-204040-11-ABfP 9.6 240 6.7 167 4.5 I50 VS-SSSA-20-d040.07-AB-FP 15_8 240 12.7 167 4 150 VS-SSSA-20-5050-11-AB-FP 17.7 443 12.7- 343 9.4 235 VS-SSSA-25-5050.11-AB-FP 9-8 245 6.3 157 3.7 ISO VS-SSSA-25-5050-07-AB-FP 18-5 463 13.3 393 9.5 238 VS-SSSA-30.4040.07AB-FP 6-7 168 4.4 110 2.6 65 VS-SSSA-30-5050-1I-AB-FP 4.7 150 2 So NIA NIA VS SSSA 30 5050-07-AB-FP 10 7 267 6.7 167 3.9 100 VS-SSSA-30-6060-07-AS-FP 19 475 13.2 330 9 225 VS-SSSA35-5050-07-A8FP 5.9- 150 2.5 IDO NIA NIA VS-SSSA-35-6�7-AS-FP 124 310 7.6 140 4.2 105 VS-SSSA-40-6060-07-AB+P 7.2 180 3 75 NIA I NIA Designation & Dimensional Information VSSSSA-10-4040.71-AB-FP . • . 10'-0• 4 4 11 75 :. 8.0 - 9.0 8.25 x 0.75 a• :. 0-75 x 17.00 x 300 o!"3.75 VS-SSSA-12-4040-11-AB-FP 12'-0• 4 4 11 90 8.0 - 9.0 8-25 x 0.75 0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00 3.25 - 3.75 VS-SSSA-14-4040-1 I AEA FP 14'-0- 4 4 11 100 8-0- 9.0 8.25 x 0.75 0,75 x 17.00 x 3.00 3.25 - 3.75 VS-SSSA-15-4040.11-AB-FP 1 T-0" 4 4 11 110 8.0 - 9-0 8.25 x 0.75 0.75 x 17-00 x 3.00 3.25 - 3.75 VS-SSSA-1 b-404G-1 1 -AB-FP 16'-0" 4 4 11 115 8.0 - 9-0 8.25 x 0.75 0.75 x I TDO x 3.00 3.25 - 3,75 VS- SSA-18-4040-11-AB-FP 18'-0' 4 4 11 125 8.0 - 9A 8-25 x 0.75 0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00 3.25 - 3.75 VS-SSSA 20.4040-11-A9-FP 20'-0" 4 4 11 140 8.0 - 9.0 8-25 x 0.75 0.75 x T 7.00 x 3.00 3.25 - 3.75 VS-SSSA-20.404U-07-AB-FP 20'-Ir 4 4 7 200 8.0 - 9.0 a.25 x 0,875 0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00 3,38 - 3.88 VS-SSSA-2D-5050-11-Ab-FP 201-W 5 5 11 185 10.0. 12.0 11 x I 0.75 x 17.00 x 3-DO 3.5- 4 5 VS-SSSA-25.5050.1 I -AB -FP 25'-0• 5 5 11 225 1 10.0 -12-0 11 x I 0.75 x 17-00 x 3.00 3.5 4 VS-SSSA-25-5050-07-AB-FP 25'-0• 5 5 7 360 10.0 -12,0 11 x 1 0-75 x 17,00 x 3.00 3.5 - 4 VS-SSSA-30.4040-07-AB-FP 30'-0• 4 4 7 291 8.0.9,0 8.25 x 0,875 0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00 3-38 - 3.88 VS-SSSA-30.5050-11-AB-FP 30'•0" 5 5 11 265 10.0-12.0 11 x 1 0.75 x 17.00 x 3.D0 15 -4 VS-9SSA-30-5050-07-AB-FP 30'-0" 5 5 7 380 10.0- 12.0 11 x 1 VS SSSA 30 6064-07 AB FP 30'-0` 6 6 7 520 11.0 -13.0 12.5 x 1 N77j VS-SSSA-35 5050 07-AB-FP 351-0" 5 5 7 440 i 0.0 -12.0 11 x 1 VSSSSA-35-6060-fl7-AB-FP 35.4r 6 6 7 W 11.0 -13.0 12.5 x 1 VS-SSSA-4D-6060.07AB-FP 40'-0 6 6 7 605 11 A -13.D 12.5 x 1 1.,30x 3 Engineering And Design Subject Job Humber: T2,,:, q _ date: Z i S Job: i [ n s > fe By: T `I` Section: Checked 81F. Page of • I Al s aft "f V" /1� 4 r j►�1 ff �' �� A rE 6 / ! ti - �• 2, s' + It $ }s x 2'S F 44- >'- , 2� r ate T Y Engineering And Design www.ty-eng.corn Lightpole Installation at 1 Chapman Wa , El Segundo, California 90245 Structural Calculations Date 6/15/2020 TY Job Number T2019-257 ESS TOLGA YAPRAK No. C72927 Exp. 12-31--20 CIVIC oaf' CA1-� CONDUIT, SIZE TBD CONDUIT, SIZE TBD - - (OUT) i (IN) 9 : a a PVC TUBING, SIZE TBD PVC TUBING. SIZE TBD PVC TUBING, SIZE TBD a CONDUIT, SIZE TBD CONDUIT, SIZE TBD s (IN) (OUT) 4 PVC TEE, SIZE TBD DETAIL A 4" SQ. STEEL POLE DARK BRONZE PAINTED GROUNDING LUG TERMINATE CONDUIT AT BOTTOM OF HANDHOLE WITH BUSHING CAST STEEL BASE PLATE 13"x13"x3/4" 1 1/2" T-0" ❑lA CONCRETE POST MINIMUM 2000 PSI, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 3 - #3 HORIZONTAL REBAR 12" O.C. 4 - #3 HORIZONTAL REBAR, EA. WAY 6" a PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2.50" x 5" HANDHOLE RIM WITH COVER 20 1 1/4"STEEL STIFFENER @ 4 SIDES 1414 V �1"ANON-SHRINK GROUT ,i r-611 314" CHAMFER AROUN❑ a 1 "06" ANCHOR BOLTS WITH LEVELING AND ANCHOR NUTS (TYP. 4) 31-011 d 3 51 4 RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION, PHASE III, ONE CHAPMAN WAY EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 4 GROUND LEVEL CLIENT: Product Overview Pole Shaft -The pole shaft is fabricated from clot rolled welded steel tubing of one-piece construction with a minimum yield strength of 55 KSL Pole Top - A removable top cap is provided for poles receiving drilling patterns for side -mount luminaire arm assemblies. Other pole top options include Tenon Top, Top Cap Only or Open Top which is typical when the pole top diameter matches the necessary slip-M dimensions. Hand Hole - A reinforced hand hole with grounding provision is provided at 1'-6" from the base end of the pole assembly- Each hand hole includes a cover and cover attachment hardware. All pole assemblies are provided with a 2.5" x 5" rectangular hand hole (dimensions are nominal). Base Cover - A two-piece full base cover fabricated from ABS plastic is provided with each pole assembly. Additional base cover options. including a cast aluminum and fabricated steel cover, are available upon request. Anchor Bolts - Anchor bolts conform to ASTM F1554 Grade 55 and are provided with two hex nuts and two flat washers. Bolts have an "r bend on one end and are galvanized a minimum of 12' on the threaded end. Hardware - All structural fasteners are galvanized high strength carbon steel- All non-structural fasteners are galvanized or zinc plated carbon steel or stainless steel. • Finish - Standard finishes are either Galvanized or Finish Painted- Additional finish options including Finish Paint over Galvanizing are available upon request. • Design Criterla - Standard EPA (Effective Projected Area) and weight values are based on standard Commercial Criteria (with 1.3 gust factor) for side mounted fixtures only. Consult the factory on loading criteria for pole top mounted luminaires and/or brackets. Satisfactory performance of light poles is dependent upon the pole being properly attached to a supporting foundation of adequate design. iigh! p les PLUS.tom 308 N. Brooke St- i 888-791-1463 Fond du Lac, Wf 54935 quotes@lightpolesplus.com LightPoiesPlus-corn CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS 1921 E. MAPLE AVE. EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 (310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031 C-241162 * F9.12/31/2020 ;rncx'.1r.P POk Cap P�au•r 0 Had Rev.V07312019 ThLa spei km*n hrochme is i dwded to serve as s generar guKie. Our pro&cts are cwymuah be" m9 neered and rmpmed and soec:ficat•ona are subiect to change wlliwut wine 952 Manhattan Beach Blvd. #260 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (310) 935-0060 (phone) (310) 935-0071 (fax) info@ty-eng.com Www.ty-eng,com TNY 952 Manhattan Beach Blvd., #260 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Engineering '��l;ur;r_-; (310) 935-0060 And Design fax) (310) 935-0071 www.ty-eng.com www,ty-eng.com Location E! Segundo, CA Job Number T2019-257 Date 6/15/20 Subject By MH Section Jab 1 Chapman Way Checked By TY Page/of INTRODUCTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA This submittal package includes structural calculations for the proposed 18ft lightpole installation at an existing commercial property located at 1 Chapman Way, El Segundo, California. The calculations are performed in accordance with the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2, 20181nternational Building Code (IBC 2018) and ASCE 7-16. WIND LOADING CRITERIA Per ASCE 7-16, Section 26, F = qh G Cf (psf) qh = 0.002561_ l I& V2 G = 1.0 Q= 1.0 Exposure Category = B V = 114mph K K--fId = 1 A qh = 0.00256 x 1 x 1102 = 30.98 psf WEST PALM GROUP ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING STRUCURAL CALCULATIONS Scale: None SCALE: NOTED 21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225 DATE: 2 JuN 20 TORRANCE, CA 90503 D�''"N KK5 (310) 619-1165 CHECKED: kyle .westpa l m @g ma i l . com APPROVED: KK5 PROJECT NO.: 20201071 S200 CITY by E L S E GU N D O Planning Commission Agenda Statement Meeting Date: June 24, 2021 Agenda Heading: Public Hearing DESCRIPTION: Zone Text Amendment to establish parking standards for religious institution affiliated housing development projects in accordance with state law. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2896, recommending that the City Council approve an Ordinance establishing parking standards for religious institution affiliated housing development projects in accordance with state law. BACKGROUND AB 1851, effective January 1, 2021, limits the number of parking spaces a local agency may require in connection with a "religious institution affiliated housing development project" ("RIAHD"), as defined. AB 1851 also requires a local agency to allow for the elimination of up to 50% of the existing parking spaces serving a place of worship in connection with the approval of a RIAHD and prohibits a local agency from requiring replacement of parking spaces that the developer of a RIAHD proposes to eliminate. A Zoning Ordinance amendment is required to bring the Municipal Code into conformance with state law. DISCUSSION Properties owned by religious institutions often have large, underutilized parking areas. To encourage and facilitate the development of affordable housing on these underutilized parcels, the state passed AB 1851, which does the following: • Prohibits a local agency from requiring the replacement of religious -use parking spaces that a developer of a "religious institution affiliated housing development project" proposes to eliminate as part of the housing development. • Defines "religious institution affiliated housing development project" as a housing development project that meets all of the following requirements: o The housing development project is located on one or more contiguous parcels that are each owned, entirely, whether directly or through a wholly owned company or corporation, by a religious institution. o The housing development project qualifies as being near collocated religious -use parking by being on or adjacent to a parcel with religious -use EA-1302 and ZTA 21-02 June 24, 2021 Page 2 of 3 parking or by being located within one -tenth of a mile of a parcel that contains religious -use parking. o Qualifies for a density bonus under Government Code section 65915. • Allows a project developer to eliminate up to 50 percent of the total religious -use parking spaces available at the time the developer's request is made. • Prevents a local agency from requiring a developer to cure a pre-existing deficit of the number of religious -use parking spaces as a condition of approval of a RIAHD. • Specifies that the elimination of religious -use parking spaces pursuant to a RIAHD project that has been approved by a local agency does not constitute a concession for the purposes of density bonus law. • Prohibits a local agency from denying a RIAHD solely on the basis that the project will reduce the total number of parking spaces at the place of worship as long as the reduction does not exceed 50 percent. • Requires a local agency to allow the number of remaining religious -use parking spaces to count toward the number of spaces that the local agency would otherwise require for the RIAHD. • Provides that a local agency is not required to allow the remaining religious -use parking spaces to count toward the number of parking spaces otherwise required for approval of the RIAHD to the extent that it would prohibit a local agency from requiring up to one parking space per unit unless the RIAHD is within one-half mile of public transit or there is a car share vehicle within one block of the parcel. • Prohibits the reduction in parking spaces from reducing the minimum parking standards that a local agency may require of a RIAHD below one space per unit unless (a) the RIAHD is within one-half mile of a high -quality transit corridor or a major transit stop, or (b) there is a car share vehicle within one block of the parcel. I_1011_1 W&i1.1 The proposed ordinance amends the parking regulations in Chapter 15-15 to specify that RIAHDs are subject to the provisions of AB 1851. El Segundo General Plan and Municipal Code Consistency The proposed amendment to the Zoning Code will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and will not obstruct their attainment. The amendment is relatively minor in nature and is intended to bring the Zoning Code into compliance with a new state law mandate (AB 1851). The proposed amendment is also consistent with the purpose of the Zoning Code, which is to serve the public health, safety, and general EA-1302 and ZTA 21-02 June 24, 2021 Page 3 of 3 welfare. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15305 because it consists only of minor alterations in land use limitations necessary to implement a state law mandate (AB 1851) and does not portend new development. Furthermore, the staff finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. Consequently, it is exempt from CEQA review under 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3). PREPARED BY: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Principal Plann �- REVIEWED BY: Gregg Kovacevich, Assistant City Attorney' ��� APPROVED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Director of Development Service ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2896 2. Exhibit A — Draft Ordinance 3. Text of AB 1851 RESOLUTION NO. 2896 A RESOLUTION OF THE EL SEGUNDO PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 15-15-9 (PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION AFFILIATED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS) TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE (EA-1302 AND ZTA 21-02). The Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission finds and declares that: A. On September 28, 2020, the Governor signed AB 1851 into law effective as of January 1, 2021. AB 1851 limits the number of parking spaces a local agency may require in connection with a "religious institution affiliated housing development project" ("RIAHD"), as defined. AB 1851 also requires a local agency to allow for the elimination of up to 50% of the existing parking spaces serving a place of worship in connection with the approval of a RIAHD and prohibits a local agency from requiring replacement of parking spaces that the developer of a RIAHD proposes to eliminate. AB 1851 applies to all cities, including charter cities. B. A Zoning Code amendment is required to bring the Municipal Code into conformance with AB 1851. SECTION 2: General Plan Findings. Considering all of its aspects, the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and will not obstruct their attainment. The amendments are relatively minor in nature and are intended to bring the Zoning Code into compliance with a new state law mandate (AB 1851). SECTION 3: Zone Text Amendment Findings. Based on the facts and evidence set forth herein, in the accompanying staff report, and in the record as a whole, the Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the purpose of the ESMC, which is to serve the public health, safety, and general welfare and to provide the economic and social advantages resulting from an orderly, planned use of land resources; and 2. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Code is required to ensure consistency with state law (AB 1851). SECTION 4: Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the ordinance set forth in attached "Exhibit A," which is incorporated into this resolution by reference. Page 1 of 2 SECTION 5: Environmental Review. This ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15305 because it consists only of minor alterations in land use limitations necessary to implement a state law mandate (AB 1851) and does not portend new development. Furthermore, the Planning Commission finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. Consequently, it is exempt from CEQA review under 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3). SECTION 6: Reliance on Record. Each and every finding and determination in this Resolution is based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 7: Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of /_11aI2M9 Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM MARK D. HENSLEY, City Attorney , 2021 Ryan Baldino, Chair El Segundo Planning Commission Gregg Kovacevich, Assistant City Attorney Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL ADDING SECTION 15-15-9 (PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION AFFILIATED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS) TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE (EA-1302 AND ZTA 21-02. The City Council of the City of El Segundo does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. On September 28, 2020, the Governor signed AB 1851 into law effective as of January 1, 2021. AB 1851 limits the number of parking spaces a local agency may require in connection with a "religious institution affiliated housing development project" ("RIAHD"), as defined. AB 1851 also requires a local agency to allow for the elimination of up to 50% of the existing parking spaces serving a place of worship in connection with the approval of a RIAHD and prohibits a local agency from requiring replacement of parking spaces that the developer of a RIAHD proposes to eliminate. AB 1851 applies to all cities, including charter cities. B. A Zoning Code amendment is required to bring the Municipal Code into conformance with AB 1851. C. Zone Text Amendment Findings. Based on the facts and evidence set forth herein, in the accompanying staff report, and in the record as a whole, the City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the purpose of the ESMC, which is to serve the public health, safety, and general welfare and to provide the economic and social advantages resulting from an orderly, planned use of land resources; and 2. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Code is required to ensure consistency with state law (AB 1851). D. General Plan Findings. Considering all of its aspects, the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and will not obstruct their attainment. The amendments are relatively minor in nature and are intended to bring the Zoning Code into compliance with a new state law mandate (AB 1851). SECTION 2: Environmental Review. This ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15305 because it consists only of minor alterations in land use limitations necessary to implement a state law mandate (AB 1851) and does not portend new development. Furthermore, the City Council finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. Consequently, it is exempt from CEQA review under 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3). SECTION 3: Section 15-15-9 is added to Title 15 of the ESMC to read as follows: 1115-15-9 PARKING REQUIREMENTS RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION AFFILIATED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: Notwithstanding any provisions of this Title or any adopted specific plan to the contrary, the parking requirements for a religious institution affiliated housing development project are subject to the provisions of Government Code section 65913.6, as amended. For purposes of this section, a `religious institution affiliated housing development project' is defined as set forth in Government Code section 65913.6, subd. (a)(5)." SECTION 4: Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed in order to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council's intent that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance. SECTION 5: Enforceability. Repeal of any provision of the El Segundo Municipal Code does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before this Ordinance's effective date. Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 6: Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. SECTION 7: The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be entered into the City of El Segundo's book of original ordinances, make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting, and, within fifteen days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. SECTION 8: Effective Date. This Ordinance will take effect 30 days after its final passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021 Drew Boyles, Mayor ATTEST: Tracy Sherill Weaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney Assembly Bill No. 1851 CHAPTER 196 An act to add Section 65913.6 to the Government Code, relating to land use. [Approved by Governor September 28, 2020. Filed with Secretary of State September 28, 2020.] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1851, Wicks. Religious institution affiliated housing development projects: parking requirements. Existing law provides for various incentives intended to facilitate and expedite the construction of affordable housing, including the Density Bonus Law, which requires, when an applicant proposes a housing development within the jurisdiction of a local government, that the city, county, or city and county provide the developer with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or for the donation of land within the development if the developer, among other things, agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low, low-, or moderate -income households or qualifying residents. This bill would prohibit a local agency from requiring the replacement of religious -use parking spaces that a developer of a religious institution affiliated housing development project proposes to eliminate as part of that housing development project. The bill would prohibit the number of religious -use parking spaces requested to be eliminated from exceeding 50% of the number that are available at the time the request is made. The bill would prohibit a local agency from requiring the curing of any preexisting deficit of the number of religious -use parking spaces as a condition of approval of a religious institution affiliated housing development project. The bill would require a local agency to allow the number of religious -use parking spaces that will be available after completion of a religious institution affiliated housing development project to count toward the number of parking spaces otherwise required for approval. The bill would prohibit a local agency from denying a housing development project proposed by a religious institution, or a developer working with a religious institution, solely on the basis that the project will reduce the total number of parking spaces available at the place of worship provided that the total reduction does not exceed 50% of existing parking spaces. The bill would authorize a local agency to require up to one parking space per unit for a religious institution affiliated housing development project. The bill would include findings that the changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. 94 Ch. 196 —2 By adding to the duties of local planning officials, this bill would impose a state -mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 65913.6 is added to the Government Code, to read: 65913.6. (a) For purposes of this section, all of the following definitions shall apply: (1) "Housing development project" means a housing development project as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 65589.5. (2) "Local agency" means any county, city, or city and county, including a charter city, or city and county. (3) "Place of worship" means a property owned or operated by a religious institution, that is used for the purpose of regular assembly by members of the institution. (4) "Religious institution" means an institution owned, controlled, and operated and maintained by a bona fide church, religious denomination, or religious organization composed of multidenominational members of the same well -recognized religion, lawfully operating as a nonprofit religious corporation pursuant to Part 4 (commencing with Section 9110) of Division 2 of Title 1 of the Corporations Code. (5) "Religious institution affiliated housing development project" means a housing development project that meets all of the following criteria: (A) The housing development project is located on one or more contiguous parcels that are each owned entirely, whether directly or through a wholly owned company or corporation, by a religious institution. (B) The housing development project qualifies as being near colocated religious -use parking by being any of the following: (i) Located on one or more parcels that collectively contain religious -use parking. (ii) Located adjacent to a parcel owned by the religious institution that contains religious -use parking. (iii) Located on one or more parcels separated by no more than 0.1 miles from a parcel owned by the religious institution that contains religious -use parking. (C) The housing development project qualifies for a density bonus under Section 65915. (6) "Religious -use parking spaces" means existing parking spaces that are required under the local agency's parking requirements for places of worship. 94 Ch. 196 (b) (1) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall not require the replacement of religious -use parking spaces that a developer of a religious institution affiliated housing development project proposes to eliminate as part of that housing development project pursuant to this section. (2) The number of religious -use parking spaces requested to be eliminated by a developer of a religious institution affiliated housing development project pursuant to this section shall not exceed 50 percent of the number of religious -use parking spaces that are available at the time the request is made. (3) The elimination of religious -use parking spaces pursuant to a religious institution affiliated housing development project that has been approved by a local agency does not constitute a concession pursuant to Section 65915. (c) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall not require the curing of any preexisting deficit of the number of religious -use parking spaces as a condition of approval of a religious institution affiliated housing development project. (d) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall allow the number of religious -use parking spaces that will be available after completion of a religious institution affiliated housing development project to count toward the number of parking spaces otherwise required for approval of the housing development project under any other law or ordinance. (e) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall not deny a proposed religious institution affiliated housing development project solely on the basis that the project will reduce the total number of parking spaces available at the place of worship provided that the total reduction does not exceed 50 percent of existing parking spaces. (f) (1) Notwithstanding any provision of this section, except as provided in paragraph (3), the reduction in parking spaces authorized in this section shall not reduce the minimum parking standards that a local agency may require of a religious institution affiliated housing development project below one space per unit. (2) For the purposes of this subdivision, a local agency shall not be required to allow the remaining religious -use parking spaces to count toward the number of parking spaces otherwise required for approval of the housing development project as provided in subdivision (d) to the extent that the application of subdivision (d) would prohibit a local agency from requiring up to one parking space per unit. (3) This subdivision shall not apply to a religious institution affiliated housing development project if either of the following is true: (A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit. For the purposes of this paragraph, "public transit" means either a high -quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code or a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code. (B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel. 94 Ch. 196 —4 (g) The Legislature finds and declares that the provision of adequate housing, in light of the severe shortage of housing at all income levels in this state, is a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution, and therefore this section applies to all cities, including charter cities. SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code. U 94 CITY by E L S E GU N D O Planning Commission Agenda Statement Meeting Date: June 24, 2021 Agenda Heading: New Business DESCRIPTION: Determination of Consistency of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with the City of El Segundo General Plan (Applicant: City of El Segundo). RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2899, determining that the proposed FY 2021-22Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City of El Segundo General Plan. BACKGROUND A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a document that identifies capital projects in the City which the City Council can use as a guide for the efficient and effective provision of resources for improving and maintaining public infrastructure and facilities. The City of El Segundo annually reviews its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) needs and funding resources for the purpose of identifying and prioritizing capital projects to be completed within the planning period. These projects are needed to adequately maintain current facilities, maintain existing infrastructure, provide new infrastructure where needed, implement new technologies for the health and welfare of our citizens, and prepare for major disasters. The California Government Code (Section 65103 & 65401) requires the Planning Commission to annually review the City's CIP for its consistency with the City's General Plan. The Planning Commission has reviewed previous CIPs annually and found them all to be consistent with the City's General Plan The proposed list of projects in this year's CIP was included in the proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget presented to City Council on June 15,2021. The Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP is now being presented to Planning Commission for General Plan Consistency determination. 1] 6*8111:11I:sL City staff annually reviews the City's capital improvement needs, sets goals for addressing those needs, and identifies projects necessary to achieve those goals. The Public Works Department staff prepares a CIP which includes both core projects (e.g., sewer, water, roadway infrastructure improvements) and new projects proposed by other departments and the general public. The CIP serves as a planning instrument in conjunction with the City's General Plan and City Council's Goals to identify needed capital projects and coordinate the financing and timing of improvements in a way that maximizes the return to the public. EA-1309 (General Plan Consistency Finding) June 24, 2021 Page 2 of 3 The new projects are presented to the City's 5-member Capital Improvement Program Advisory Committee (CIPAC) for consideration. Committee members are responsible for reviewing, scoring and ranking the proposed CIP projects based on established scoring criteria. Staff then makes the final funding recommendation based on CIPAC scores after also taking finances and resources into consideration. This year's complete list of projects are proposed to be funded through Prop C, Gas Tax, Water Enterprise, Sewer Enterprise, Local Grant Funds and the General Fund. CODE CONSIDERATION AND ANALYSIS Code consideration in this matter stems from the State Government Code. In part, Government Code Section 65401 states that: "...each governmental body... shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works ... such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof" As a result, the Planning Commission's role is not to add or delete projects from the CIP, but to determine if the proposed CIP conforms to the City's General Plan. In other words, the Planning Commission is being asked to determine whether the projects listed below are consistent with the goals and policies established in the City's General Plan. The proposed CIP projects are more fully described in Attachment 2. The following table lists all the proposed CIP projects for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and indicates the General Plan goals, objectives and policies with which they are consistent. Proposed CIP projects- 1 . Annual Water Main Maintenance 2. Water Division Office and Maintenance Yard Improvements 3. Wastewater Infrastructure Replacement (Annual Program) 4. Park Place Extension Transportation Project - Design 5. Roadway Rehabilitation (Annual Program) 6. El Segundo Blvd. Improvements 7. Sidewalk Maintenance Program (Annual Program) 8. Arena Street Improvements Study 9. Alondra Park (Regional project) 10. Infiltration projects - Land Use Element Goal LU6, to maintain and upgrade the existing excellent parks, recreation, and open space facilities within the City of El Segundo; and/or, - Land Use Element Goal LU7, to provide the highest quality public facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community. EA-1309 (General Plan Consistency Finding) June 24, 2021 Page 3 of 3 11. Civic Center Maintenance & Repairs 12. ADA Improvements - CDBG Funds 13. PD Women Locker Room Remodel 14. Fire Stations #1 & #2 Carpet 15. Safe Routes to School Projects 16. HVAC (Citywide) 17. Plumbing (Citywide) 18. Miscellaneous Electrical (Citywide) 19. Exterior Lighting + Miscellaneous Fagade 20. Main Facilities ADA Compliance Projects Staff has reviewed the list of capital projects identified in the proposed Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP considering the goals and objectives of the General Plan and believes that the City's CIP continues to be consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the El Segundo General Plan. Thus, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2899, determining that the proposed FY 2021- 22Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City of El Segundo General Plan. \�ll�Z�]►1►�if h� : C AVllATITIR The General Plan Consistency finding is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3), as it is an activity covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Staff finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Consistency finding may have a significant effect on the environment. PREPARED BY: Lifan Xu, City Engineer REVIEWED BY: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Principal Plann APPROVED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Director of Development Serviced ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2899 2. Detailed Projects List for Fiscal Year 2021-22 RESOLUTION NO. 2899 A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2021- 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONFORMS WITH THE EL SEGUNDO GENERAL PLAN PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65401. (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. EA-1309) The Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission finds and declares that: A. In accordance with Government Code § 65401, the Public Works Department prepared a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and submitted the CIP to the City's Planning and Building Safety Department for transmission to the Planning Commission; B. Government Code § 65103(c) requires the Planning Commission to annually review the City's CIP to determine whether the CIP is consistent with the El Segundo General Plan; C. On June 24, 2021, the Planning Commission considered the proposed CIP in light of the El Segundo General Plan; D. This Resolution and its findings are based upon the entire record including information available at the June 24, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. SECTION 2: Environmental Assessment. The Planning Commission finds that the determination of the program's consistency is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3) as it is an activity covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and this can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Consistency finding may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3: Approval. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed CIP for Fiscal Year 2021/22, attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, is consistent with the following goals of the El Segundo General Plan: Land Use Element Goal LU6: to maintain and upgrade the existing excellent parks, recreation, and open space facilities within the City of El Segundo. Land Use Element Goal LU7: to provide the highest quality public facilities, services, and public infrastructure possible to the community. SECTION 4: The Commission Secretary is directed to mail a copy of this Resolution to any person requesting a copy. - 1 - SECTION 5: This Resolution may be appealed within 10 calendar days after its adoption. All appeals must be in writing and filed with the City Clerk within this time period. Failure to file a timely written appeal will constitute a waiver of any right of appeal. SECTION 6: Except as provided in Section 5, this Resolution is the Planning Commission's final decision and will become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of June 2021. Ryan Baldino, Chairperson City of El Segundo Planning Commission ATTEST: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney David King, Assistant City Attorney -2- Baldino - Newman - Keldorf - Hoeschler - Maggay - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Annual Water Main Maintenance REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Repair or replacement of water infrastructure according to greatest need. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The water system is composed of water mains, booster pumps and reservoirs. The City Maintains approximately 57 miles of pipes, many of which date back to the 1930s and later. Potable water pipes typically have a 50-year life. The plan consists of water main replacements annually and ensure the operation and maintenance of pumps and reservoirs. Staff has laid out a plan for replacing the mains based on priority as well as maintaining and/or upgrading the facilities that su ort the waters stem infrastructure. CIPAC COMMENTS N/A ESTIMATED FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY COST ALLOCAT TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 ED TO DATE Varies, Ave. $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Annually CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT N/A FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST Water Enterprise Fund 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL Varies, Ave. $2,000,000 Annually All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Water Division Office and Maintenance Yard Improvements REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works Department DESCRIPTION Replace Built-up Roof, Replace Toilet Partitions, Replace HVAC at various locations, Install Fire Alarm System, Replace Tub/Shower Enclosure, Replace Electrical Switchboard and Exterior flood lights, Replace Interior flooring (vinyl/carpet) , Replace Ceiling Tiles, Install Fire Suppression, Replace Gate Operator, Upgrade Lighting System GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The Water Yard Building is located at 400 Lomita St. It was originally constructed in the late 1960's and did not have any major renovations since then. Heating in the building is provided by one rooftop package unit. Air distribution is provided to supply air registers by ducts concealed above the ceilings. Return air grilles are located adjacent to the furnaces. Cooling for the upper level offices is provided by 4 window mounted air conditioning units. The lower level is heated by one gas unit heater located in the staff break room/kitchenette. There are no fire sprinklers and fire protection in the building consists of fire extinguishers. The existing roof together with the heater and duct systems on it are in poor condition and in need of immediate replacement. From the previous rainfall events, the wear and tear of the existing roof is increasingly noticeable as leaks are intruding into the building. The switchboard and panels are mostly original 1966 components. Due to the age of the panel it is quite difficult to obtain replacement parts. The light fixtures throughout most of the facility utilize older, inefficient T-8 lights. The El Segundo City Water Division Storage Building was built in 1984. It was rebuilt around 8-10 years ago and replaced with a smaller storage building. It is a concrete block structure with a plywood roof. No heating, cooling or fire systems are provided at this storage building. An electric meter is location the north exterior wall of the building. Electrical equipment serving the Water Division is located inside the storage building. This electrical equipment includes control panels for chemical treatment needed by the Water Division. The exterior door, concrete blocks, interior wall finish, chemical treatment equipment, and control panels need replacement. �.� I . it It51`" .. .._ .:�: E.:?:��$re ..-. ... .. �., r''A .aka$... �• .. ., .. MTIP i•'S..5+4� v f � _ Is homi d5o F L60 . �6,w CIPAC COMMENTS Skipped, use water enterprise fund. .ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 .COST TO DATE $550,000 $110,000 $225,000 $105,000 $110,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION Water Fund 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM .COST $3,425,000 CIPAC SCORE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Wastewater Infrastructure Replacement (Annual Program) REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Repair or replacement of sewer mains according to the greatest need. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The City's wastewater system consists of approximately 50 miles of pipe and 1,050 manholes. The majority of these pipes are constructed of vitrified clay and range in size from 6-inch to 24- inch in diameter. The system was constructed over the years based on the development needs of the City and approximately 60% of the lines are now over 50 years old. The entire collection system has been CCTV inspected in 2011. Staff selects sewer line segments to be repairs based on the actual, documented condition of the pipe using the CCTV results and ratings. Pipes scoring 5 (worst) and 4 (significantly impacted) are prioritized for repair or replacement. This will also provide for the operation and maintenance of manholes, pumps, lift stations, flow meters and other components of the system. CIPAC COMMENTS ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES D ALLOCATED TO TO DATE DATE FY FY FY FY FY 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 $675,000 I $500,000 I $750,000 I $750,000 I $750,000 ScoreI L- HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION Wastewater Fund 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM 2021 — 2022 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Park Place Extension Transportation Project -Design REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION This project consists of design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of a new four -lane roadway via an underpass beneath two active railroad lines, the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), both of which serve the Chevron refinery. Other elements of the project include bridge construction, retaining structures, utilities, installation of storm drains, petroleum pipeline relocation, traffic signals, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, landscaping, and possibly realignment of the existing BNSF switching yard to accommodate continuous rail operations during construction. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The purpose of the Park Place Extension and Railroad Grade Separation Project is to provide an alternate route to the Rosecrans Corridor, a heavily congested major arterial in the South Bay region of Los Angeles and to improve access to and from the 1-105 freeway (Douglas and Nash on and off ramps, respectively). Specifically, the project will connect existing segments of Park Place between Allied Way and Nash Street to provide a continuous roadway from Douglas Street to Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). This connection will provide traffic relief to Rosecrans, as well as direct access from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) to Douglas and thereby to the 105 Freeway. � a '4 _ _ r 711 c � r r I ALTERNATIVE 1C (WI RAIL OPTION 1) CIPAC COMMENTS .ESTIMATED FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY COST ALLOCAT TO 2021122 2022/23 2023/24 2024125 2025126 ED TO DATE DATE $5,000,000 $3,200,000 $1,200,000 $600,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT N/A FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN Transportation Funds 2. CONSTRUCTION (Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 1/Measure R/Measure M) 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL I All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM 2021 — 2022 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Roadway Rehabilitation (Annual Program) REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Resurfacing Local and Arterial Streets GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU 7 JUSTIFICATION Arterial and local streets area evaluated every three years and rated using a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating system ranging from 0-100, with 100 being best. Those streets ranking below 60 require some form of rehabilitation, ranging from pavement grind/cap to full depth reclamation to bring the City's streets overall average rating up to a minimum of 74, which is considered "good". Virtually all the City's local streets are much older than 30 years and most have never been overlaid. Cracking and alligatoring are evident on most streets. Staff has identified and selected Pine Avenue from the Pavement Management Program (PMP) as the next applicable roadways to rehabilitate as part of the Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Program. The following roadway segments will receive a removal and replacement treatment of the top 2" of asphalt concrete, along with more extensive localized repairs of the most deteriorated pavement areas: • Pine Ave. between Arena St. and Hillcrest St. (PCI of 55) CIPAC COMMENTS .ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 .COST TO DATE DATE $5,850,000 $1,200,000 $1,150,000 $1,140,000 1,300,000 $1,060,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN Transportation Funds (Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 1/Measure R/Measure M) 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM 2021 — 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE El Segundo Blvd Improvements REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Improvements to El Segundo Blvd., from Isis Ave. to Pacific Coast Hwy., include but not limited to pavement rehabilitation, bikeway installation, landscaping improvements, traffic signal improvements, ADA curb ramp and pedestrian crosswalk improvements. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION El Segundo Boulevard is a major arterial east/ west six -lane divided arterial from Isis Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and a four - lane divided arterial from Pacific Coast Highway to Illinois Street. The corridor is mixed with commercial developments and aerospace campuses. The roadway has a varying width from 52-feet curb to curb on the westerly end of the project to 106-feet at the easterly end of the project limits. The existing pavement shows widespread signs of deterioration throughout the corridor with an average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) between 0-40 which constitutes a need for rehabilitation and/ or reconstruction. Existing conditions on El Segundo Boulevard are missing ADA compliant curb ramps, dedicated bicycle facilities including bicycle detection, and adequate pedestrian crossings. These deficiencies and the high volume of vehicles during peak hours create adverse conditions for cyclists and pedestrians crossing the street. Public works have applied for Measure M grant funding from Metro and anticipate being awarded funding for this project. Public Works received $241,500 in grant funds from Caltrans through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/2023 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE $7,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOTFUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN Transportation Funds 2. CONSTRUCTION (Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 3. MANAGEMEN4. CONTINGENCIES T/INSPECTION 1/Measure R/Measure M) 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CI PAC FORM 2021 — 2022 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Sidewalk Maintenance Program (Annual Program) REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Repair of City sidewalks and curbs according to the greatest need. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION Sidewalks sometimes are displaced by tree roots and other reasons which could potentially create trip hazards. Locations for sidewalks requiring repair are generated throughout the year by field surveys from the Street Maintenance Division and requests from residents. • r'7Mp��y'• - CIPAC COMMENTS .ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY -FY FY D ALLOCATED TO 2021/22 2022/23 2023124 2024/25 2025126 COST TO DATE DATE $1,000,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN Transportation Funds 2. CONSTRUCTION (Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 1/Measure R/Measure M) 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars Cl PAC FORM 2021 — 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Arena Street Improvements Study REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Street improvements which also should protect existing large trees in place GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE 1-1-17 JUSTIFICATION The parkways of the 500 and 600 block of Arena Street contain large camphor trees which not only beautify the neighborhoods but have also damaged sidewalks, curbs, and street pavement such that they are urgently in need of repair. Figures 1 through 5 below show the typical damage caused. Figure 1 — 506 Arena Street uneven sidewalk and ponding due to tree root uplift This project consists of a study to recommend how to proceed with needed repairs to the damaged sidewalks, curbs, and street improvements and keep the integrity of existing trees at the same time. Figure 2 — 536/540 Arena Street damaged asphalt, curb, and sidewalk due to tree roots. Figures 3, 4, and 5 — 613 Arena Street damaged sidewalk, curb, and asphalt due to tree trunk and roots Figures 6, 7, and 8 — raised sidewalk using Silva cells, sidewalk on private property, pervious pavement Additional extreme measures could include: • Creating a curb extension or bulbout around a tree • Narrowing the 500 block of Arena Street and replacing parking areas with sidewalk or pervious walking paths • Closing the 500 block of Arena Street to through traffic altogether and providing pervious walking paths Figures 9, 10 and 11 — curb extensions containing trees, narrow street that allows tree growth, closed street _ COST $630,221 - $2,318,337 CIPAC SCORE Funding is not currently set aside for this type of neighborhood development project. CIPAC COMMENTS CIPAC suggest doing study ($20 k to $30 k) first. Score is for study only ESTIMATE FUNDS D ALLOCATED TO DATE EXPENSES FY FY TO 2021/22 2022/23 Date 30,000 FY FY FY 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 HS SC RI JL CO Cl F TOT Score 3 5 1 0 1 6 1 16 $630,221 - $2,318,337 FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED COST Transportation Funds (Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 1/Measure R/Measure M) 1. DESIGN including potential landscape $85,000 architecture, survey, geotechnical, urban planning, and traffic engineering services 2. CONSTRUCTION $437,928 - $1,972,579 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION $50,000 4. CONTINGENCIES $57,293 - $210,758 5. OTHER (LIST) I TOTAL I $630,221 - $2,318,337 1 All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Alondra Park (Regional Project REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION The Alondra Park project was identified in the Dominguez Channel Enhanced Watershed Management Program (EWMP) as one of the regional stormwater projects to meet water quality objectives. The project will be designed to capture and treat dry -weather and stormwater runoff in an underground infiltration basin with a total capture volume of approximately 44 ac-feet. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION New Soccer Fleld - As part of the Dominguez Channel New Bioswale Plante kNew Mainten ce Acce55D iv1 Watershed, the Alondra Park Regional project is designed to capture and treat dry -weather k, and stormwater runoff from a 4,495-acre f drainage area (El Segundo is approximately 22% of this tributary area). Although the , �- project mainly consists of providing IL underground stormwater infrastructure, it also includes nature -based solutions with planting of native and drought -tolerant vegetation and r trees, bio-swales, and permeable pavement. "New 9io5wale Planting - The project will also rehabilitate the park .New Permeable Pavement Parking facilities at project completion. The County of Regional Park { Alondra Park Community Los Angeles is managing and constructing Stormw Capture Frolect Above G round Improvements the project, in partnership with several neighboring and tributary cities including the City 'Photo from the Alondra Park Regional Stormwater Capture Project website: https://d pw.lacounty.gov/wmd/stwq/Alond ra Park.aspx of El Segundo The design and construction costs are estimated to be $60 million. The project has received funding from the Regional Safe, Clean Water Program ($30 million), from Caltrans ($15 million), and from the Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP) Proposition 1 ($2.1 million), with the remaining costs being funded by municipalities tributary to the project. El Segundo's portion of the cost is estimated to be $1 million. CIPAC COMMENTS ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE $1,000,000 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT N/A .FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION $1,000,000 Stormwater Fund - 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION Measure W 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL $1,000,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Infiltration Projects REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Infiltration projects, including drywells and underground vaults, will be identified, designed, and constructed to attain regional water -quality requirements and recharge groundwater basins. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION To meet the waste discharge requirements in the LA RWQCB MS4 Permit, and as outlined in the Dominguez Channel and Santa Monica Bay J2/J3 EWMPs, the City of El Segundo is required to implement control measures to achieve wasteload µ allocations established in the Regional Board and USEPA .`s TMDLs. The City will be evaluating drywells and = �' underground vaults for use throughout the City to meet these = requirements and ultimately reduce pollutants from reaching the Santa Monica Bay and Dominguez Channel receiving waters. Sycamore Park and Recreation Park have been identified as potential project locations, but the City will be evaluating other cost-effective alternatives that minimize disturbance to public spaces. CIPAC COMMENTS .ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE $0 $1,000,000 10 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT N/A FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN Stormwater Fund - 2. CONSTRUCTION $1,000,000 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION Measure W 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL $1,000,000 All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Civic Center Maintenance & Repairs CIP Fund Carryover & Fund 708 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Interior Improvements to City Hall GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The El Segundo City Hall building was built in 1955 and renovated in 1977. The building contains the Mayor's office, Council Chamber, the Public Works Department, the Development Services Department, Human Resources, Finance and other related offices, conference rooms and support staff offices. Improvements to the interior are needed to enhance the services that the City provides. These improvements will occur in two phases. The first phase consists of improvements to the lobby area to provide a better service to the Public, upgrading the West Conference for employee meetings, relocating Human Resources to the basement to provide for a more secure and secluded location for their work, and replacing the floor in the main corridor from the lobby area to the Council Chambers to improve the aesthetics. The second phase will consist of improvements to the other offices and spaces not included in phase one. These improvements in this phase will include the layout changes to the Finances offices to provide consolidated workstations, and a more secure entry and the improvements to the City Clerk's office to provide more secure file storage. The City is currently in the design phase to finalize the project. Subsequently, this project will be advertised for construction. pi *W110"k CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT 3 3 3 0 1 6 16 FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL I All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE ADA Ramp Improvements - CDBG Funds REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION Accessibility upgrades to City Hall public restrooms GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION Each year, the City of El Segundo applies for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund (federal fund) from the Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles (CDC). This funding is available for community development projects that meet national objectives that benefit low and moderate -income areas, taking measurements to meet the ADA requirements and/or meet a particular urgent community need. The City's City Hall Restroom Upgrade Project which consists of removing accessibility barriers within the City Hall public restrooms meet this funding criteria. The public restrooms in City Hall are the men's and women's restrooms in the east City Hall lobby near the Development Services Division, as well as the men's and women's restrooms in the Council Chambers lobby. Their entrances are shown below. Figure 1 — City Hall east lobby restrooms Figure 2 — Council Chambers lobby restrooms Current accessibility requirements defined by the Building Code and ADA standards would at minimum include the following upgrades: • Ensuring that entryways to the restrooms and stalls are wide enough and doors can be opened easily • Enlarging stall capacity for standard wheelchair turning radius • Positioning all restroom fixtures and items at accessible heights • Ensuring enough turning and clear space between objects in the restrooms Construction will also take into consideration and remove any lead or asbestos that may be found in the existing restroom materials upon their demolition. CIPAC COMMENTS ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE Date Varies $122,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl F TOT N/A FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN General Fund C. C.p.B.G. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION $122,000 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL $122,000 All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE PD Women Locker Room Remodel Dev. Impact Fees & Asset Forfeiture REQUESTING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Adding 1 shower room and upgrading the women's restroom to accommodate current ADA standards. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION Women account for growing percentage of police officers (11.6% nationally, up from just 3% in the 1970s). The encouraging momentum toward creating a more balanced public safety force is encouraged in part by a growing appreciation of certain unique and valuable professional qualities that women often bring to law enforcement. Those qualities are believed to enhance the ability of law enforcement agencies to make a positive impact on the communities they serve. The City's women police force has seen growth over the years, but the aged facility still lacks sufficient shower and changing rooms. Currently, the facility only has one shower room to accommodate female officers. It is essential to upgrade the PD's women's restroom and shower room to add additional shower and upgrade the restroom facility to current ADA standards. IV Irv, '1 � 4r � CKER RM n M_GE ��yr mLOCKER RMf . i 4 f1 bL WCMFN 10I F1 ' _ a CORR—R _�y�'`-�^'�, Q EXISTING FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN ,,a=v-o .,c,.L�s �_i.a ��i r7li- CIPAC COMMENTS Use Dev. Impact Fees designated for PD (001-254-0000-1254: $105k available) plus asset forfeiture funds. .ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE $250,000 $250,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT 1 5 1 3 1 7 18 FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN Dev. Impact Fees & Asset 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION Forfeiture Funds 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Fire Station #1 & #2 Carpet (Development Fees REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Fire Department DESCRIPTION Replacement of existing carpet in Fire Station #1 and Fire Station #2 with tile type flooring to maintain a sanitary work environment and protect fire suppression personnel GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The carpets of Fire Station #1 and Fire Station #2 need removal and replacement. Since we have been in the pandemic, the replacement of the carpet for infectious control purposes has become a top priority in order to maintain the health and safety of the fire suppression personnel. The station is occupied year-round and is faced with a tremendous amount of foot traffic. In addition, the training room is an area utilized by the department for conducting training classes and serves as a meeting room for other City departments to conduct City related classes and business activities. Both fire stations are cleaned daily and the areas within each station are cleaned more thoroughly on Saturdays. In addition, the stations are fogged using a hospital -grade disinfectant/cleaner on a regular basis, however, the dirt and contaminants are deep seated into the carpet fibers. - 1 � A 1 - 1 ;�_- - - L - � II is ti r :i CIPAC COMMENTS Use Dev. Impact Fees designated for Fire (001-252-0000-1252: 276k available) ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 .COST TO DATE $85,000 $85,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT L— 3 5 1 0 3 7 19 FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Safe Routes to School Projects REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works DESCRIPTION develop solutions and mitigation techniques to improve circulation, access, and safety in the vicinity for four schools in the El Segundo Unified School District: El Segundo High School (including Eagle's Nest Preschool), Richmond Street Elementary School, Center Street Elementary School, and El Segundo Middle School. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION Safety and circulation Improvement. CIPAC COMMENTS Score is based on 80% construction cost to be funded by Safe Route to school grant. ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 .COST TO DATE $110,000 $50,000 $60,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TO 3 1 1 3 1 8 17 FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 20% general fund 1. DESIGN $50,000 Apply for 80% safe route to school grant 2. CONSTRUCTION $60,000 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL $110,000 All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE HVAC (Citywide) REQUESTING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Mechanical HVAC improvements at the City Hall, Police Station, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, Library and City Maintenance Yard GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The HVAC at all building facilities needs replacement. The refrigerant is not in compliance with current regulations, the ductwork requires cleaning, the rooftop mechanical units have reached the end of their life cycles and the performance is not what provides a comfortable controllable work environment. The HVAC improvements needed for the Police Station involve replacing more substantial portions of the HVAC system than in the other facilities. The Police Station will need all its interior air handlers replaced as they are failing and sometimes there are no repair parts readily available due to the age of the components. Additionally, the boiler, chiller, distribution pumps, rooftop exhaust fans, and rooftop packaged HVAC units are all in need of replacement. It is vital that these items are replaced as soon as possible to continue providing clean and circulated air. Due to the extensive replacement of rooftop HVAC equipment, roof patching and repair will be factored into the budget for the Police Station. The majority of HVAC work for the Police Station is scheduled for FY 2022/23 due to high priority. In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current building and safety standards and that maintenance requirements are not deferred, thereby jeopardizing the value of these assets. m I•... C i Ir z _ `, I` .t 1 J CIPAC COMMENTS CIPAC chose not to rate facility project, suggested City to handle it via reserve/equipment replacement fund. ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE $919,960 $ 60,000 $ 437,260 $ 207,640 $145,880 $ 69,180 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN General Fund DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Plumbing (Citywide) REQUESTING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Replacement of the water heater, copper piping, fixtures, and faucet at the City Hall, Police Station, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, Library and City Maintenance Yard GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION A majority of the City facilities plumbing infrastructure is original to the construction of the facilities. The plumbing components have reached the end of their life cycle period. The concern is that the fixtures, faucets, equipment, sump pumps, drinking fountains and piping have aged to the point where the piping will begin to fail, and that replacement should be planned rather than a reaction to a problem that will continue to surface throughout the building. In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current building and safety standards and that maintenance requirements should not be deferred. I i 3 CIPAC COMMENTS Skipped, Equipment Replacement Fund. ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY _FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE $228,640 $4,500 $135,000 $47,600 $22,740 $18,800 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN General Fund 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Miscellaneous Electrical (Citywide) REQUESTING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Selective replacements for panels, switchboards, transformers and other major electrical components at City Hall, Police Station, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, Library, City Maintenance Yard, and Water Division Office GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE 1-1-17 JUSTIFICATION Electrical equipment, such as panels, switchboards, and transformers, at all building facilities need replacement. The electrical equipment at the City building facilities is outdated and are all reaching the end of their life cycles. The age of the older equipment is making it difficult for the maintenance staff since some of the replacement parts are no longer readily available. The efficiency of new equipment is significant and will result in reduced energy and maintenance costs. In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current building and safety standards and that maintenance requirements should not be deferred. `I f 1-0 �� I _TT 4 CIPAC COMMENTS Skipped, Equipment Replacement Fund ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY .FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 COST TO DATE $1,303,300 $19,000 $6,300 $101,000 $130,000 $1,047,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION General Fund 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Exterior Lighting and Miscellaneous Facade Project REQUESTING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Facade improvements and the replacement of existing exterior lighting with LED and current technology lighting controls at the City Hall, Police Station, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2 and the Library. GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The existing exterior lightings at all City facilities are nearing the end of their lifecycles and are due for replacement. Replacing the existing lighting fixtures with LED lighting fixtures will result in cost savings associated with the utility bills and in maintenance labor costs. Additionally, with the changing to LED fixtures there should be the corresponding use of more current lighting control technology. When planning this replacement work, the utility company will be contacted so that they can identify rebates and 3rd party programs that can be used to offset the costs for removal & replacement with the LED products. The fagades of these City facilities need to be retouched with new paint and resealing of windows where necessary. This will ensure the City facilities remain aesthetically pleasing and not have a "run-down" look. In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current building and safety standards and that maintenance requirements should not be deferred. x nj 1 - - •i. 4 CIPAC COMMENTS Skipped, Equipment Replacement Fund. .ESTIMATED COST FUNDS ALLOCATE D TO DATE EXPENSES TO DATE FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 .FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26 $62,620 $17,000 $29,120 $16,500 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN General Fund DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep. Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 PROJECT TITLE Main Facilities ADA Compliance Projects REQUESTING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION ADA Improvements to City Hall, Police Department, Fire Station #1/#2, Library and the City Maintenance Yard GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7 JUSTIFICATION The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires state and local governments, businesses, and non-profit organizations to provide goods, services, and programs to people with disabilities on an equal basis with the rest of the public. Older facilities often require improvements to ensure accessibility to people with disabilities to provide an equal opportunity to participate. The main facilities in the City, such as City Hall, the Police Department, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, the Library, and the City Maintenance Yard, are not in compliance with the current requirements of the ADA. These needed ADA improvements at the City's facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: • Providing service counters with adequate counter heights, stairs with compliant handrails, doors with adequate wheelchair maneuvering clearances, exterior walkways with required widths and accessible slopes, signage at adequate heights with tactile characters or braille, a complaint number of accessible parking stalls and restrooms with compliant maneuvering clearances, toilet stall widths, dispenser reach ranges, mirror heights and grab bars. Being non-ADA compliant can result in fines and lawsuits. Organizations and businesses can be fined for up to $75,000 for a single ADA violation, raising that fine to $150,000 for multiple violations. It is prudent for the City to accumulate funds needed to upgrade all City owned facilities to follow the current ADA requirements. i J j l it Y" ti � CIPAC COMMENTS Yw sk ' Phase 1 for design and construction .ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES .FY FY FY _FY FY D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 .COST TO DATE $825,000 $75,000 $750,000 CIPAC SCORE Score HS SC 1 5 RI JL CO CI 1 3 3 6 TOT 19 FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 1. DESIGN 2. CONSTRUCTION 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION 4. CONTINGENCIES 5. OTHER (LIST) Survey TOTAL All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM