Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2021-06-24 Planning Commission AgendaPLANNING COMMISSION
LEA fP0 AGENDA
r
°........,° June 24, 2021
PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 ISSUED BY GOVERNOR
GAVIN NEWSOM ON MARCH 17, 2020, THE FOLLOWING MEETING
WILL TAKE PLACE SOLELY BY TELECONFERENCE /
VIDEOCONFERENCE.
How Can Members of the Public Observe the Meeting?
The meeting may be viewed via Spectrum Channel 3 and 22, AT&T U-verse Channel 99, and/or
El Segundo TV at YouTube.com.
How Can Members of the Public Participate in the Meeting and/or Provide Public
Comments?
Join via Zoom from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device, or by phone.
Please use this URL
https://zoom.us/m/97626185419?pwd=Vl pMcExmY1 MvaTk4aVhVbFA5dEF4dz09
If you do not wish for your name to appear on the screen, then use the drop -down menu and
click on "rename" to rename yourself to be anonymous.
Join by phone: 1-669-900-9128 US
Enter Meeting ID: 976 2618 5419
Passcode: 117236
Your phone number is captured by the zoom software and is subject to the Public Records Act
unless you first dial "*67" before dialing the number as shown above to remain anonymous.
The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person. Before speaking to the Commission,
please state: your name and residence or the organization you represent. Please respect the time
limits.
Members of the public may also provide comments electronically by sending an email to the
following address prior to the start of the meeting: planningL&else gundo.org. Please include the
meeting date and item number in the subject line. If you would like to request that your emailed
comment be read into the record, please include that request at the top of your email, limit your
comments to 150 words or less, and email your comments at least 30 minutes prior to the start of
the meeting. Depending on the volume of communications, the emails may be read to
Commission at the appropriate time. Please note that all emailed comments are public records
subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act.
Additional Information:
Unless otherwise noted in the agenda, the public can only comment on City -related
business that is within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission and/or items listed on
the agenda during the public communications portions of the meeting. Additionally, the
public can comment on any public hearing item on the agenda during the public hearing
portion of such item. The time limit for comments is five (5) minutes per person.
Before speaking to the Planning Commission, please state your name and residence and
the organization you represent, if desired. Please respect the time limits.
DATE: Thursday, June 24, 2021
TIME: 5:30 p.m.
PLACE: Tel econference/Videoconference
VIDEO: El Segundo Cable Channel 3 (Live).
Replayed Friday following Thursday's meeting
at 1:00 pm and 7:00 pm on Channel 3.
(Schedule subject to change)
All files related to this agenda are available for public review by appointment in the Planning
Division office, Monday through Thursday 7:00 am to 5:00 pm and on Fridays until 4:00 pm,
beginning at 7:00 am on the Monday prior to the Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission, with certain statutory exceptions, can only take action upon properly
posted and listed agenda items.
Unless otherwise noted in the agenda, the public can only comment on City -related business that
is within the subject -matter jurisdiction of the Planning Commission and items listed on the
Agenda during the public communications portion of the meeting. Additionally, the public can
comment on any public hearing item on the Agenda during the public hearing portion of such item.
The time limit for comments is generally five minutes per person.
Playing of video tapes or use of visual aids may be permitted during meetings if they are submitted
to the Planning and Building Safety Director a minimum of two working days before the meeting
and they do not exceed five minutes in length. Written materials distributed to the Planning
Commission within 72 hours of the Planning Commission meeting are available for public
inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office and on the City's website,
www.elsegundo.org.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact City Clerk, (310) 524-2307. Notification 48 hours
prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure
accessibility to this meeting.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Public Communications (Related to City Business only and for which the Planning
Commission is responsible-5 minutes per person; 30 minutes total).
Individuals who received value of $50 or more to communicate to the Planning
Commission on another's behalf, and employees speaking on their employer's behalf,
must so identify themselves before addressing the Commission. Failure to do so is a
misdemeanor. While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow the
Commission to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Commission may respond
to comments after public communications is closed.
Written Communications (other than what is included in Agenda packets)
F. Consent Calendar
All items are to be adopted by one motion without discussion. If a request for discussion
of an item is made, the items should be considered individually under the next Agenda
heading.
1. Expansion of a Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility (PS)
Project Address: 1 Chapman Way,
Applicant: James Streetmaker (California Storage Master)
Project Description: Administrative use Permit (AUP) to allow the expansion of a
recreational vehicle storage facility located at 1 Chapman Way (Environmental
Assessment No. EA-1290 and Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05).
Environmental Determination: The project is categorically exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14
California Code of Regulations § 15304 as a Class 4 categorical exemption (Minor
Alterations to Land) and §15311 as a Class 11 categorical exemption (Accessory
Structures)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and File the Director of Planning and
Building Safety's approval of Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 and
Administrative Use Permit No. 20-05.
G. Continued Business — Public Hearing
None
H. New Public Hearings
2. EA-1302 Zone Text Amendment No. 21-02, adding a section to the El
Segundo Municipal Code regarding parking requirements for Religious
Institution Affiliated Housing. (ES)
Project Address: Citywide
Applicant: City
Project Description: A proposed ordinance amending Chapter 15-15 (Off Street
Parking and Loading Spaces) of the El Segundo Municipal Code by adding a new
Section regarding parking requirements for Religious Institution Affiliated Housing
(Environmental Assessment No. EA-1302 and Zone Text Amendment No. ZTA 21-
02).
Environmental Determination: The proposed zone text amendment is exempt from
environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 because it consists
only of minor alterations in land use limitations necessary to implement a state law
mandate (AB 1851) and does not portend new development. Further, it can be
seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance may have a
significant effect on the environment; and is, therefore, exempt from CEQA review
under 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2896, recommending that
the City Council approve an Ordinance establishing parking standards for
religious institution affiliated housing development projects in accordance
with state law.
New Business
3. Determination of Consistency of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) with the City of El Segundo General Plan. (LX)
Consideration and possible action regarding adoption of a resolution finding that
the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is
consistent with the City of El Segundo General Plan
Applicant: City of El Segundo
Project Description: Determination of Consistency of the Proposed Fiscal Year
2021-2022 Capital Improvement Program with the City of El Segundo General
Plan.
Environmental Determination: General Plan Consistency Finding is deemed not
to be a "project" as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines § 15378(b)(4) since the Planning Commission is reviewing the City's
Capital Improvements Program for its conformance with the City's General Plan,
and a decision on individual projects in the CIP is not being made by the Planning
Commission. The consistency finding is therefore exempt from further review
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 2899, determining that the
proposed FY 2021-22Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the
City of El Segundo General Plan.
J. Report from Director of Development Services or designee
K. Report from the City Attorney's office
Planning Commissioners' Comments
M. Adjournment —next meeting scheduled for July 08, 2021, 5:30 pm.
POSTED: ve+uwWemavv Ju*ve118, 2021
(Signature) (Date and time)
TITLE:
Administrative Use Permit (AUP) to allow the expansion of a recreational vehicle storage
facility located at 1 Chapman Way (Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 and
Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05).
Applicant: James Streetmaker (California Storage Masters)
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file
T_[91:(r]:tell] 0113
On May 12, 2005, the Planning Commission approved EA 658 and AUP No. 04-04 for
the expansion of a recreational vehicle storage facility at 1 Chapman Way/655 South
Douglas Street. The facility was originally established in 2001 with 234 storage spaces.
The 2005 expansion increased the number of storage spaces by 62 to 296.
On September 22, 2020, EA-1290 and AUP No. 20-05 was submitted for a second
expansion of the existing facility into a vacant property to the west. The expansion will
increase the overall area of the facility from 5.18 to 9.58 acres and the number of storage
spaces to 497. After considering the request, on May 26, 2021 the Director granted
approval of the Administrative Use Permit to allow the proposed expansion.
On April 1, 2021, the Development Services Director approved a lot line adjustment
request for the site (Lot Line Adjustment SUB 20-03). The present AUP request is subject
to a condition of approval that the lot line adjustment be recorded prior to completion of
construction for the project.
DISCUSSION:
The site is located in the Light Industrial (M-1) zone on a vacant parcel. The uses
immediately surrounding the site include railroad right-of-way, vacant industrial land, light
industrial and general office uses. A recreational vehicle storage facility is a permitted
use in the M-1 zone subject to approval of an Administrative Use Permit. The proposed
use is compatible with other permitted uses in the M-1 zone, such as warehousing, open
storage, and parking lots. No new buildings are proposed for construction; construction
activities will involve grading, paving and the installation of a perimeter fence for securing
and screening the property. The construction activities will comply with the City's
construction noise and dust regulations. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated
during construction. The existing facility operates as a self -storage facility with no staff
onsite other than a security guard. The facility is open 24-hours a day and vehicle trips
by visitors are distributed throughout the day seven days a week. Thus, the facility does
not contribute significantly to peak hour traffic. The expansion area will operate in the
same manner as the existing facility. Therefore, the operations of the expanded facility
are not anticipated to have significant traffic impacts.
The Director's approval includes conditions that protect the City and surrounding users
from potentially negative impacts. The conditions, findings of approval, and environmental
assessment are provided in the attached approval letter. Staff believes that the project is
appropriate for the location and will not operate in a way that will create unwanted
impacts. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file the Director's
approval. In the alternative, any Planning Commissioner may request that an item be
discussed and a decision on the application be made by the Planning Commission
instead.
TYPE OF ACTION (LEGISLATIVE; QUASI-JUDICIAL; OR ADVISORY)
Quasi-judicial: In the event the Planning Commission desires to review the Director's
approval of the administrative use permit, the Planning Commission acts in its quasi-
judicial capacity (i.e., applying established standards to applications to determine specific
rights under existing law). Before an administrative use permit may be granted, the
Director or the Commission must find the following findings are met as required by ESMC
§ 15-22-5:
1. There is compatibility of the particular use on the particular site in
relationship to other existing and potential uses within the general area
in which the use is proposed to be located.
2. The proposed use is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the
zone in which the site is located.
3. The proposed location and use and the conditions under which the use
would be operated or maintained to not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Potential impacts that could be generated by the proposed use, such as
noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibration, odors, traffic and hazards have
been recognized and compensated for.
As stated above, the Director found that the proposed facility satisfied these findings and
thus granted the permit.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project was analyzed for its environmental impacts under the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA"), and the
regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq.,
"CEQA Guidelines"). The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA
EA-1290 and AUP No. 20-05
June 24, 2021
Page 3 of 4
pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations §15304 as a Class 4 categorical exemption
(Minor alterations to Land) and §15311 as a Class 11 categorical exemption (Accessory
Structures) because the proposed project consists primarily of grading and fill activities,
paving, and installation of minor accessory structures such as perimeter fencing, parking
lot signs, lighting, and a water tank for emergency purposes.
PREPARED BY: Paul Samaras, Principal Planner
REVIEWED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Development Services Director
APPROVED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Development Services Director'�)C-/
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Approval letter dated June 17, 2021
3. Plans
ef� E N 0
(�• v
S GU ,+
Development Services Department
June 17, 2021
Jim Streetmaker
1921 Maple Avenue
El Segundo, CA 90245
Subject: Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 and Administrative Use Permit
No. AUP 20-05
Address: 1 Chapman Way, El Segundo, CA 90245
Dear Mr. Streetmaker:
Your request for an Administrative Use Permit allowing the expansion of a recreational
vehicle storage facility at 1 Chapman Way is hereby tentatively approved in accordance
with El Segundo Municipal Code Section 15-22-5 and subject to the conditions of
approval contained in the attached Exhibit A. The associated environmental
determination and findings supporting the decision are described in Exhibit B.
Please note that this letter does not constitute the City's final decision in this matter.
This determination is scheduled to be "received and filed" by the Planning Commission
at the June 24, 2021, meeting. Any Planning Commissioner may request that this permit
be discussed and a decision be made by the Commission instead of "received and filed."
Should you have any questions, please contact Principal Planner Paul Samaras at (310)
524-2340, or via email at psamaras(a)elseg undo. org.
Sincerely,
Denis Cook, Interim Director
Development Services Department
cc: Kyle Smith, West Palm Group
Exhibit A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the El Segundo Municipal Code ("ESMC"),
James Streetmaker representing California Storage Masters ("Applicant") and any
successor -in -interest agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the
City of El Segundo's approval of Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05 ("Project
Conditions"):
Before the City issues a building or grading permit, the applicant must submit
plans, which indicate that the project substantially complies with plans and
conditions approved and on file with the Development Services Department.
2. Any subsequent modification to the project as approved shall be referred to the
Development Services Director for approval or a determination regarding the
need for Planning Commission review of the proposed modification.
3. Lot Line Adjustment No. 20-03, approved on April 1, 2021, must be completed
and recorded before completion of construction for the project.
4. Any vehicle to be stored on the site must fit within the dimensions of the vehicle
stall where it is to be stored.
5. The designated fire roads must remain clear and free from obstructions at all
times.
6. The applicant must paint a red, reflective stripe that is 6 inches in width on each
side of the designated fire lanes in the parking areas prior to final inspection by
the Fire Department.
7. The applicant must paint "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" in white in the roadway
center, at intervals not to exceed 50 feet. The lettering must be a minimum of
12 inches in height with a 2-inch minimum thickness of the letter stroke.
8. Before building permits are issued the applicant must submit a Standard Urban
Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) to the Building Safety Division that
outlines the best management practices that will be included in the project.
9. The applicant must provide grey vinyl slats to be used for screening in the
perimeter fencing along the existing and proposed vehicle storage area before
final inspection by the Building Safety Division. Any modification to the color or
material of the screening must be approved to the satisfaction of the Director
of Development Services.
10. The applicant must pave the parking area with a material acceptable to the
Director of Development Services.
11. Landscaping must be provided onsite as depicted on the plans and to the
satisfaction of the Recreation and Parks Department and the Planning and
Building Safety Department in compliance with ESMC Chapter 15-15A prior to
final inspection by the Building Safety Division.
12. Light standards must be shielded and directed downward so that the light does
not create glare on adjacent properties.
13. The Applicant agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against
any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, attorney fees),
injuries, or liability, arising from the City's approval of Environmental
Assessment No. EA-1290 or Administrative Use Permit No. AUP 20-05. Should
the City be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit
or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of the City
approval of Environmental Assessment No. EA-1290 or Administrative Use
Permit No. AUP 20-05, the Applicant agrees to defend the City (at the City's
request and with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will indemnify the City for
any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or
otherwise. For purposes of this section, "the City" includes the City of El
Segundo's elected officials, appointed officials, officers, and employees.
14. James Streetmaker representing California Storage Masters must
acknowledge receipt and acceptance of the project conditions by executing the
acknowledgement below.
These Conditions are binding upon James Streetmaker, and all successors and assigns
to the property at 1 Chapman Way, El Segundo, CA 90245 until superseded by another
approval letter or rescinded.
James Streetmaker, Applicant
Exhibit B
Environmental Determination and Required Findings
Environmental Assessment 1290:
After considering the facts and findings below, the Director finds this project is
categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations §15304 as a Class 4 categorical
exemption (Minor alterations to Land) and §15311 as a Class 11 categorical exemption
(Accessory Structures) because the proposed project consists primarily of grading and fill
activities, paving, and installation of minor accessory structures such as perimeter
fencing, parking lot signs, and a water tank for emergency purposes.
Administrative Use Permit 20-05:
The following are the facts in support of each finding for this decision:
Finding 1:
There is compatibility of the particular use on the particular site in relationship to other
existing and potential uses within the general area in which the use is proposed to be
located.
Facts in Support of Finding 1:
1. The project is located within the M-1 (Light Industrial) zone, where storage of
recreational vehicles is permitted subject to approval of an administrative use
permit. The project consists of an expansion of an existing recreational vehicle
storage facility on a vacant lot. The project is situated in an environment that
includes light industrial uses, vacant land, and railroad right-of-way. The zoning
immediately around the subject site is industrial, which ensures that the existing
and potential future uses in the area will be compatible with the proposed storage
facility.
Finding 2:
The proposed use is consistent and compatible with the purpose of the Zone in which
the site is located.
Facts in Support of Finding 2:
1. The property is in the M-1 (Light Industrial) zone, which is intended to provide for
the location and grouping of light industrial activities, research, and technological
processes, and related offices and auxiliary uses performing support services for
existing and permitted establishments, companies or business firms within the
zone. General storage, warehousing and mini -storage are all uses permitted in the
M-1 zone and open storage of commodities is permitted as an accessory use. The
subject use involves the storage of recreational vehicles, which is permitted in the
zone subject to approval of an administrative use permit and is similar and
compatible with these other permitted uses.
Finding 3:
The proposed location and use, and the conditions under which the use would be
operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Facts in Support of Finding 3:
1. The proposed expansion is contiguous with the existing facility that is currently
used for the storage of recreational vehicles. No new buildings are proposed in
conjunction with the facility's expansion, except for a water tower required by the
Fire Department for fire suppression purposes. The expansion will involve only
minor grading activities and paving for the purpose of storing vehicles. The site is
bordered by railroad tracks on two sides, vacant industrial land, and the existing
vehicle storage facility. In addition, the perimeter of the site will be fenced and
landscaped to screen the site for properties in the area. As a result, the location
and the use will not have materially injurious impacts of the immediately adjacent
properties.
Finding 4:
Potential impacts that could be generated by the proposed use, such as noise, smoke,
dust, fumes, vibration, odors, traffic, and hazards have been recognized and
mitigated.
Facts in Support of Finding 4:
1. The proposed area of expansion is currently an undeveloped vacant parcel. The
expansion of the existing vehicle storage facility will reduce dust as the area will
be paved and landscaping will be installed. The facility is intended for the long-
term storage of vehicles and there are no occupiable buildings onsite. Vehicle trips
to and from the facility are distributed throughout the day. As such, it is anticipated
to generate only limited traffic, noise, or other impacts.
CD
CD
Cn
CD
- - - -
O I 1
I 1
I
T ht
} 1 1
+ M
}I
I Y
< \
m I
C� Z 1
(n
x I#
p m
L --
pTI TI TI Z
V rn V m D 1
r = < "' o
z Dz m�
Co m D go O m
1 \
rn C)N�
2 m
_O
C D rn _ D C) D ,
1
zm
O > C/) p r
G)
� O cn 1
D ;u n
c� D � W
D
O -< G) �
N m
cn x O < m \
m z < Cl),
o >
Z �' z - •
Cn G, z
o p 1
O m
0
.. Cn C) m +
m D m# o
m r
cn r rn rn O
n 2 o �'0000
}
^^ O
l) m = mz
^ Cl)x
r N D r D o D° m W k
m W m
� — p m p O
� m m z O �
. � � _
G) O r CZ cn ®p000000a � \ _
C ;p .. cn rn z� _ 0000 o5ti
W o= o 0 R,, I �, CDn z D �> x S.
c� z O o o G) m - As w — tyro I ( m
CD 0 r
avow aala
rn D
O n -
C4mO CD
�s" o�_
�\ O r \ m IF avoa gala
\ ^�
� N D m \\ •... ® ® a
C) CYJ� 36" 20'-0" \ \\ (D ® O ® ® G)rn \ _ MIN f
®I 0 0 ® o
N \ \\ ® ® o
C) zo�-o 0
® ® /
D — �Ex �VV •'z ® - Q ® wm O r ° l� ® p
Do �a ��" \ 0 (D0 ® a
� � O
cn T
00
rn n Z _ 1 O
T cP n
O, O
m
< o
t975
*
Mq� �s� I T < I 110 I \ w
D Z i i m'< CD I N
0 3 cn I � W O 1 ©
a O O O \ FR9
a D Cn00 z \ \ s
% N C- I j j — Q Q MIN. S \
N �[ED
Cl) cy° i I CD (D n
G] CD
m o P C-)I I o 1 0 i* I �� 0 ® '�
cn 1 © 0 ® m \ \
\�
cn cn m
m
m`� 1 0 0
/D\\ o v 9 0 1 0 I A 0 ® \ \\
I 1 O
N m�
(.0 CD Nk
3
rn m IIII 0 0
(D C II
i avoa \
1 0 00 0000000 0 0
�rn # lo, o000%ooyN o m _
m 1 D
A - - 1 l/J
Cl)VJ
O ti P(o) \ /D
T. N m °' 0 (D
CD O N T C �1 V ( 4p o a
v4 Do
W m m m — 1 p,X. �� °�p O
:p 4
CD rn D �� ,0 3 0
cn � z D m D 4p
I- co z G) r �, z \
m D m 70z to g I I 4O \
3 rn m �,D ,0 20-0
nm MIN. 0
m C — 0 35
0 D 0 1 o.Z4 p o�
C I /
W M -u \ mo $ 10 0 C)i41
O r O CD m cn � — , p
D
Z 2
• � V
O OV - 1 za o
NlO m O,oEx.tV zs
LJI \
_ 1 5�X.VV m
Ui _ z U) 0 A 0 \
�i � —
r O _
D n 0 0 Cn (D = \
m D D = < m
m
m � Y
O D w
< m z z -
m cn o $$ _0 If
z /may zoo
, MIN. a
p D ^
z
77
77 77 77� Z
N O —n
m 5d za
Z � ��O II MI,y
O / ya
�� J�
T
n
J _
/ a CD
rn a� CD D
- z� Cn
p zTm
m
D ( _
rn$� CD
_ O = '-
O CD °° D
0 �< Z (n °°� — Cal
_ s
s
Cf) ID T
z
■ C)U)
C:)
O
CD
A
o
o�
�
0D
U)
z
D
D
m
�
Ull
X
D
Z
O
z
CA)
�
m
r
N
C)
D
o
r
�rnm
�G)•
0
4�,C��7
z
>
Z
Cfl
0
o�
rn�
/>/
c�
rn
0
O
0
G)
rn
T
V
w
rn
V
\ O1
L
cD o lv
(mZlw
CD D co
c� z =
1 ^
y m
3 q-) C7
@ D 2
(.00
v 5 Z
0 wm
3
p
N
N
Ul
�
m
D
m
m
z
O
m
0
77 77 =
N
0
D
N
O
CD
C)
0�
p
CD
z
O
m
U)
u
rO
m
C)
p
m
U)
C)
T
0
Z
l J
r
m
z
/v
2
/m m
l 1 U
m �
z
Gr
Z
m
z uJ
G)
—00
z C
z
z
G)
0
m
p
0
C-
m
0
N
O
N
O
4
00
m m
r r
2 2
O O
D D
r r
x X
C/) p
z O C
G) co
m
_m
C)
cn
CD CD
CD CD
Cf) U)
J TV J
(D CD
(D CD1-4
D D
0 6
90 Xv
� r
r
I �
r '
W r
W
n
u
m
n0
J
m
0
p
ch
N
O
Q
CD
I I
<
CD CD
CD
U) D
lV//J�1�
z
CD prF
NCD
n
�D
9° z
G) G)
O
O �
m
rn>
m
mm
X
X
0
O
G)
G)
m
m
Dm
r
m
p
O
O
m
D
m
zz
O
x
O
m
Q°
�
0
_
z
z
GC)
z
GC)
D
m
m
<
r
<
r
C/)
0
z
r
r
�
—
V
O
1
1
VJ
z
�
m
O
p
�
Z7
m
p
C
z
0-)
p
�CD
m
D
CD
m
N
0
z
p
cn
CD
Z
>
c
Cn
Tm
/v
0
v
CD 0
NI�
=0
II
m
i
O
m
r
D
z
z
m
m
D
m
x
x
o
-n
Cn
m
z
z
z
G)
G)
m
C�
m
z
-1
m
m
-
�
-0
p
m
0
m
m�
m
r
Z
r
r
z
z
m
m
m
D
z
_r
Z
TI
m
z
m 393.03'
(E) PROPERTY LINE
c
m z!
z10
�
m
0
z
m�
(CSM) 165'
(N) PROPERTY LINE
v'
0
� A
J
I
O
28'
A
A
A
O
0
0 � MIN.
W
0
_
w
W
Cn
CD
z
o
CD
(n
m
�-
=
N
w
W
-
0
D
z
r-_
o
o
Z
z
m
w
A
N
0
0
O
w
W
O
w
N
0
28'
I Q
m
A
W
0
CD
Z
c)
MIN.
m
N
OU A
OD
0 N
w
O
w
V
0
Ow
O
�
O
O z
w
? z o
V
N
m U, �
C)
D I oA N D
A 0
z i w
w D co
r A
z m W
m A � O
m w m
w
z N A ?I
C-) m
m o
A i o
V w
N
O OW
2p A
I A A
w
M1N
m1 Z
D O
O o m �0 w
m = O O
D (AO
O 4
N A
r1 0
N
z w
D m O
A
-i 1 w 0
0 —� W
_ w
0 � z 0
A
Z w m
A 0 O A A
o I C m� O
` w
m A w 0
D
cry
0
� w w
w
O
cn m w m
D D A
—I w
V
-n N 0 0
m 0
I 28' z o W
�J w
MIN. O
A
0 00 0 A
� w
A O 0O
O A
O 0
0 O
X
G 20
W 0
oo A
O MAN. O J
(O w V
N
� w
V A N
m w m Jw
v o� W �
� I 0 m m 28' 0
`D :U J
Z
MIN.
A
X I 0 w
o O
D
�w O
O 0 O O w i T
w O
m(nD '770 0
r O rn w O
0 0CD
w w Ib
OD
0 w 0
v D c � "nJ
D x
0 D A m 0
A
^ w w rn
V:
Z
�
C) A w
(D w O A oQ
D o� O
hz � J 0 D
� 2o, w m 1
ZT A O A
b w W
M 0
0 -n �A i O N O 1
�VV W
m
Z
m � 0
0 W D A
l � �p O
A 1
N
_. o O 0
`i J
0
41.00'
A
0 '
A
(E) PROPERTY LINE
0 0 0
O Lv3aa 3avaJ 0
m� z o
m m M1IV.
= mo -.1
0 N ` tiCU W
omCD
m o c) D I A O 1
��� 0 I
O N �,d3ae 3ava� __— O, D m
N
0 u -< > _ --- 0') O D� �
00 � 1 m m
C) E: p O N � X
m r Qy0a 3r11�
0 0
m
z
r
z
m
z
C)
IT
am
man
PROPERTY LINE
346.40'
-�n-
a
m�*X
i' ♦
�
m
x�D
m
x
o� 03DNr-
x m
10
owc)o�
-- o D
1
>;u
ago
(N) PROPERTY LINE
m (CSM) 294'
Z
r
z
z
m
z
m
r
0
D
m
I I
00
N �
0
(n --I
r
GJ II
n CA
m
C) al
1
m�
OC2
m
v
D
m
1
1
H
Im
oV
V
0 (D
O
m
m
D
z
_r
Z
-nm
�Qz
•
��
Cn
z
o�
m
o
u
D
r
r
10
m
co
0
2
m
X
z
^D
l^J
l J
D
VJ
v
X
D
0
z
n
0
D
JZ
T\
N
G
u
z
r
Tz
m
z
m
N N N W GJ W 4-1, Cal Ul 01 (31 d')
O Ul 00 C) -Ph. 00 O (A O N E 0') O
II II II II II II II II II II II II II
00 Ul 4�-- --4 N 4�-- Ul 0') — — — — N
m
2
n
r
m
0
G)
m
n
U)
u
D
r
r
u
Z
r
z
z
m
m
Z
m
CD
CD
D
CD
iv 0 0 p
Ul X
(n W X
_ II U7
z w.I m 0
�,
0 ��
U) 0
W o
m X X
�o
U) II
N
-' 0
� O
ZE
I I �
O � 0
0 p
0 p
0 °
0
X�n 0 O
N U7
C) II X O
II oo (n
A
OD L
(n I I
J
p p
U' D
0
m0��
Cn rn < � � o
m �° O D r p
n rn °D m 7 o
I I X
O II
Z D 0Cn W
^' co O
X
O >T1 1 II
z
C) 0 U)CL
A
p
D x 0
o
> � � o
N m 11
m p
rn -4 _
n N
V' x 0 p
T r �
V z ° X
w
NOD
Ui
. . C)X v O
� z II
) UII
N N)
oo N O C 0
0 -C o
z o
• � N
W
-n X
(r
I I
Cil
D
W (}7
-CU)
-C
CA) m�n n °
N D r p
0 U) Rl X
�rnmT, z II
(/,�] Cp
�.d I • 0 (c II 00 D • 4
C P
� L � � �J � II O p
A
N 0 >J=Lp
o C) ° 0
><
c� m Z
o. x p
CA)
N
N > `�
W02
O
X
II 0
m -4 D p
0
C
Cil
o
W
� U)
C) m ° o
T II O
N cn
Cn rl o
U)
0 0 D 0
N O
+ p 0
W0, -
N X O
p
0
Xcq
O O
02
X 0 O
x q
pF`y X� 0
\
0
n ✓� � cn p
c� w A r c II
o D
X p n
w
r \rn < a A + Q 1�
o� m
I I X 0 ° 0 O D
p o ) D
0 D C r- C
0 0 C D
II O r X D
p p p Z o O
�ii ..
N ap
_� • o z 0 D �_ N
mm ° + ® z 1
U) cn
C
m oON
m O O�
c� Z 2 >CD CY)
O �
r o= zD D
�M> Ef
3 on�* m o
D a:-Z G)
C) � G) o � •
�' C)m -00
O r
ZC �
__���
o zmomm amwnsmmmmmmmmm�w
z
N to cn cn cn cn �n cn cn �n �n �n �n �n Fn En D r
z r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r �u D
♦ * < D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D m z
< z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z D
rn D> n Cl) �X D or �D O cn
C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
u m D D 1 �V m \z o D �OZ����2G)�moC��D C�
� C) -- + z r
O z m m +A h 0 p n
< m �, X �Dn < u' ~' cn
Ul X W � C n < l J C) z^
0000 j rn ti T D C D ul cn N N C) Lrj p UJ
z > �+ _ "z Dz cfl Cri(DMrncn���-4rn�w D
O CD z i �ti r- G) " G) co m cfl w co o� w o cn N w w m cn
cn w w 0 w w cn M to (� to (� M (� cn cn z
77 � C NI- U) OD
O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
N _ ODII N D 0 C Cn
mo m Cn
n O
_ OD
O z titi C) o
N
CO �
cn cn
m-
z r--
o D
N) N z
CD
O
O
4
6" & 1 D" Arm Drill Pattern for 12" & 16" Shoebox Fixtures
TOP OF POLE
QIMPORTANT: DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO SCALE!
Tennis Court Davit Arm Adapter For Slipfitter Mount
5.4
04-1
0.4
03.5
I
�
i
QIMPORTANT' DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO SCALE!
Product Specifications
Housing Construction, Finish & Mounting:
Rugged, die-cast, soft square aluminum housing
• Impact -resistant, tempered glass lens and durable silicone gasket
Durable, multi -layer, polyester powder coat or industrial grade liquid paint
Available in a variety of colors such as dark bronze, black, white, light gray, dark green and natural aluminum (custom colors available upon request
fi" pole mount, 10" pole mount, adjustable slipfitter and trunnion yolk brackets available as standard mounting accessories
Optics & Lighting Distribution:
Innovative silicone optics assembly with precision light control and cutoff
Standard photometric distributions include V-WIDE, 30' NARROW SPOT and 70° MEDIUM SPOT
No secondary optics used for base model
IFS files, photometric reports and simulations available upon request
Automotive Dealership optics:
• Left and right optical rotation available for applications like car dealership front fines (optics are not field -rotatable, must be done at factory)
Delivers enhanced lighting and proper photometric control of auto dealership merchandise
• Allows for simple 2@180 pole mount while rotating forward throw light patterns toward dealership merchandise
LEGEND
. fl.1 fc . 0.5 fc 2 ❑ fc ■ 5.0 fc Created & Sunuleted per IESNA LM-63-1995
.00'00• Co. ^• 2J. D. -SO'40' fic •-So•-: oa• loo•so• W W ]:' o'-a;•-d�ti6o'-so �17o• 1ra-99• io• 4o• to• o• -20 ��o •-so'-dog-1 oo• :oc•aC• fo• So' ion F!'-20'-IQ'-69'-A9'-:90'
150w Shoebox, Type V, 25' Height 160w Shoebox, Type V Square, 25' Height
Electrical:
Operating temp: -40 9C to +45 °C
Standard AC input of 120-277v VAC, up to
480v available
EMI filter: 47CFR, part 2, parr 15
• Power factor: >0.9
Total harmonic distortion: <20 ro
• Surge protection: IEC/EN 61000-4-5 E M C test
standard
• Licensed electrician required for installation
16ow Shoebax, Type Ili, 25' Height
Energy Control Options:
Daylight harvesting and photo controls
Motion control and dimming
Surge protection
• CA Title 24 compliance options available
upon request
12" 16"
-fly in i 1-10 in
12
{12 0 in w {180 mm} 4
5.42 in 10.43 in 4
(138 mmi- {265 mm}
12,05 in
1306 mm}
10.43 in
{265 mml
Light Engine Specifications (Values Listed for Type V, 5000K)
160w Shoebox, Type IV 25' Height
Effective Projected Area (EPA) & Weight:
12" Housing (15 LBS)
• 0.75 EPA at 0°
• 1.3 EPA M 45°
16' Housing (25 LBS)
1.2 EPA at 0"
• 2.0 EPA at 45"
16.50 in
1419 min)_
14-00 in
1356 mm)
o O
10.00 rn
(254 mm)
116,50 in
(419 mm)
12-SBHC-40-50•MV-5
40w
36w
75.175w
1
1,050 rnA
5,622
4,854
300,000+ His
12-SBHC-80-50.1v1V-S
79w
71w
125-300w
2
1,050 mA
11,119
10,007
300,000+ Hrs
12-SBHC-120-50-MV-5•
118w
106w
200-400w
3
1,050 ma.
16,490
14,841
300,000+ Hrs
16SBHC-160-50-MV.5*
157w
142w
300-525w
4
1.050 mA
21,735
19,562
300.000+airs
16-SBHC-200-50 MV-5
196w
177w 1
400-650w
5
T,050 mA
26,855
24,169
300,000+ Hrs
16-SBHC-240-50-MV-5'
235w
211w
7501000w
6
1,050 mA
31,849
28,664
300,000+ Hrs
x 120w: DLC qualified mode! in 3000KS 4000K and %WDK. -160w: DLC qualified model in MV and HV voltage • 240n DLC qualified model.
Amperage Load
40w0.18A
E
WP 0.17A 0.14A 0.12A 0.08A
79w
0-72A 0.66A
0-38A 0.36A
0-33A 0.29A 0.23A 0.16A
11Sw
1-07A 0.98A
0-57A 0.54A
0-49A 0.43A 0.34A 0.25A
157w
1.43A 7.31A
0.75A 0,71A
0.65A 0.57A 0-45A 0-33A
196w
1.78A 1-63A
0.94A 0-89A
0-S2A 031A 0.56A 0.41A
235w
2.14A 1-96A
i.13A 1.07A
0-98A 0.85A 0.68A 0-49A
Lumen Maintenance Factor (LMF)4
1- Considered to be a typical H1D equivalent- Specific HID wattage equivalents will depend on things like environmental and application characteristics, distribution type and desrgn criteria-
2. Cons dared initial nominal value of the LED light engine as specified by the LED chip manulacturer. Fixture eff,cacy and lumen output will depend on things like color temperature, distribution type and
environmental characten$tres-
3. Considered the typical initial delivered lumens of the LED light engine Specific lumens for an application wiiI depend on things like color temperature, distribution type and environmental
characteristics.
4. Lumen maintenance values a1 25'C are calculated per TM-21 based on LM-60 data and in-house luminaire testing.
5. in accordance with iESNATM-21-11, Projected Values represent imerpolated value based on time durations that are within six times (6x) the IESNA LM-80-08 total test duration (in hours) for the
device under testing (DLrr) i.e. the packaged LED chip.
6. fin accordance with IESNA TM•21.11. Calculated Values represent time durations that exceed six times (6X) the IESNA L-M-SD-08 total test duration (in hours) for the device under testing (DOT) i.e. the
packaged LED chip.
Note? Additional wattages and configurations available upon request. Specifications are subject to change wrth0ut notice
SQUARE PLASTIC
TOP PUSH CAP
POLE MAY BE
DRILLED TO
ACCEPT SIDE
MOUN TE❑
FIXTURE IF
REQUIRED.
SQUARE POLE
SHAFT
CAP DETAIL (STANDARD)
2-PIECE COVER
FINISHED TO
MATCH POLE
FULL BASE COVER (STANDARD)
0 50" NUT
HOLDER FOR
- 2.50" X 5.00'
GROUNDING
HANDHOLE RIM
WITH COVER
48"
THICKNESS
BOLT CIRCLE
I
I SQUARE
L
�
1
SLOTTED BOLT HOLES
POLE BASE AND HANDHOLE DETAIL
2.0" SCHED 80
PIPE TENON
4.00"
ATE
ANCE
rHOLE
POLE SHAFT
P2 TENON DETAIL (OPTIONAL)
MOUNTING
HEIGHT
REINFORCED HANDHOLE
WITH COVER AND
GROUNDING
4$" 4 -ANCHOR BOLTS
WITH THREADED END
GALVANIZED 12• MIN
EACH BOLT FURNISHED
WITH 2 HEX NUTS AND
2 FLAT WASHERS,
I POLE DETAIL
Advanced light engine technology in a traditional housing design.
Wisconsin engineerjng and craftsmanship utilizing premium components
Our LED lights, light poles and brackets are proudly engineered and manufactured in the USA. We use only the highest quality components, and our LED
Shoebox fixtures deliver unmatched fight output and efficiency for any area or flood lighting project. Precision engineered for performance and energy
savings, these products dramatically reduce energy consumption by up to 80% and virtually eliminate ongoing maintenance expenses for a variety of
customers and applications.
Product Overview
Highlights:
• Engineered and manufactured in Wisconsin, USA from domestic and imported components
ETL Certified: Conforms to UL STD 159E & CSA STD C22.2 # 250.0 for wet locations
• L70 calculated LED life over 300,000+ hours
Drivers are 0-10v dimming standard
Six light engine options from 5,622 - 31,849 lumens for 75-1000w HID replacements
Premium high -output Chip -On -Board (COB) LEDs in 5000K, 4000K and 3000K options,
custom color temps available upon request
• Minimum CRI of 70, custom CRI available
• DLC qualified models available. Please refer to www.designiights.org for the most current
information.
Common Applications:
• Parking lots, ramps, walkways and roadways
General area and site lighting
• Car dealerships, schools, hospitals, hotels and gas stations
• Retail stores and commercial buildings
Sports fighting and bail fields
Light Engine Warranty:
• 5-year standard limited warranty on all light engine components
• Accessories and adders covered by separate OEM supplier warranties
Rev
Description
Date
NOTES:
PROJECT D ESCRI PTiCN :
CLIENT:
RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION,
PHASE 111,
ONE CHAPMAN WAY
EL SEGUNDO, CA 99245
CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS
1921 E. MAPLE AVE.
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
(310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9931
VL d&Qte•e,
C--24162
* Exp.12/31/2020
``� re. _ aZ►tJf
Product overview
Pole Shaft -The pole shaft is fabricated from hot rolled welded steel tubing of one-piece construction
with a minimum yield strength of 55 KSI.
Pole Top -A removable top cap is provided for poles receiving drilling patterns for side -mount luminaire
arm assemblies- Other pole top options include Tenon Top, Top Cap Only or Open Top which is typical
when the pole top diameter matches the necessary slip -fit dimensions.
• Hand Hole - A reinforced hand hole with grounding provision is provided at V-6' from the base end of the
pole assembly. Each hand hole includes a cover and cover attachment hardware. All pole assemblies
are provided with a 2.5" x 5" rectangular hand hole (dimensions are nominal).
Base Cover - A two-piece full base cover fabricated from ABS plastic is provided with each pole
assembly- Additional base cover options, including a cast aluminum and fabricated steel cover, are
available upon request -
Anchor Bolts - Anchor boll•; conform to ASTM F1554 Grade 55 and are provided with two {Tex nuts
and two flat washers. Bolt'; have an "I_" bend on one end and are galvanized a minimum of 12" on the
threaded end.
Hardware - All structural fasteners are galvanized high strength carbon steel. All non-structural fasteners
are galvanized or zinc-platNd carbon steel or stainless steel.
Finish - Standard finishes are either Galvanized or Finish Painted. Additional finish options including
Finish Paint over Galvanizing are available upon request.
Design Criteria - Standard EPA (Effective Projected Area) and weight values are based on Standard
Commercial Criteria (with 1.3 gust factor) for side mounted fixtures only- Consult the factory on foading
criteria for pole top mounted fuminalres and/or brackets. Satisfactory performance of light poles is
dependent upon the pole being properly attached to a supporting foundation of adequate design.
EPA Load Information
It
VSSS54-104040-11-AS-FF
30.6
165 1 238
595
I8-9 i
473
VS SSSA-12-404t1-11-A3-FP
24.4
610 1
18.8
470
14.8
370
VS $SSA-144041-I I A8-FP
19.9
498 l
151
378
11.7
_ 293
223
VS S55A 15.4040-11-AB-FP
15.9
398
ms
296
8.9
VSS aA 16-4040.11-AB-FP
15-9
398
11.8
295
8.9
223
VS-SSSA-1 e-4040-1 1 -AD-FP
T16
315
92
23t1
6.7
168
VS SaSA-24-404fi 71-ABfP
96
7.40
5.7
4.5
150
VS1SSSt_24-40447-AHfP
158
240
127
10
9
55SA-20.5050-11 •AB-FV
_77
7
343
9.4VS
VS-SSSA 25.5050.11-AB�P
9.8
245
6.3
log
157
J.
3.7
ISO
VS-SSSA-25.5050.07•AB-FP
18.5
4(i3
13.3
333
9-5
238
VS-SSSA 30_404"7-A8-FP
6.7
168
4.4
110
2.6
65
.5054 VS-SW-3 11-AB-FP
4.7
150
2
50
NIA
NIA
Vs-SSSA-303 M50-07-AR rP
707
267
6.7
167
3.9
'loo
VS SS$A 3t)6060 07,A8 FP
14
475
191
330
3
225
VS SSSA-3rr5050-07-A8 FP
59
7 50
2.5
100
NAR
NIA
VSS3SA-35:WW17-AB-FP
124
370
7,6
190
4.2
105
VS.SSSA40 6060-07-AR-I`P
7
lag -
I _ 3
75
NiA
NIA
Designation & Dimensional Information
WEST PALM GROUP
ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING
SCALE:
anon Top
I
i
Pole cap Plasi
Cross
Hdi]di"[iY'
Fun Base cover
(Standard]
�I
LIGHTPGLE
DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS
Scale: None
NOTED
DATE:
21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225
TORRANCE, CA 99593 DRAWN:
(319) 619-1165 CHECKED:
kyle.westpalm@gmail.com
APPROVED:
21 JUN 20
KK5
KK5
PROJECT NO.: 2020107
A300
CD
o�
�
0D
�
z
D*
x
D
m
�
�
X
D
Z
O
z
u,m
r
N
c)
D
o
Lr
�mrn7r'
G)
0
�
Z
N
p
r
c�0�
o�
rnU)
J
>
N
co
m
0
CA)O
o
Ln
G)
m
U)
w
mm
V )
S
4k
xCA
4p C
�
N
A
i
rn
<
W
--j "
�G
CD
p
CF)
T0 /N_-)
CD
-L
co
D
z =
�m>
@
Cn
()
(Q
D =
CD
CD
o
wm
3
cn
N
N
cn
T
m
D
�
m
m
z
O
m
0
0
..
rs
77 7
N
O
CD
0
O
3
0
CD
z
O
m
U)
l J
r
m
Jz
1
= C
mm
C�
m �
z
G)r
m
X n
z uJ
G) ;a
-00
z C
z
z
G)
n
D
m
O
i
0
0
C-
m
z
0
IV
0
IV
0
0
4
r m
:' x.
X, cn
m
=.
I cQ
n n
CID 3
v
- - 346.40' \
Property Line.
I I •---�—_ p O O O �� O O/ 1
D �F I :. D I N I
I
(� 1 m.'. 1 / / / /1 / / / / / / /
2 I x 3 I x / / / / / x I
L / 1-- I I (D
-LZ- I
0 # * 1 .. • . ..MIN..: No C �
I ; \ �.
m I •. Q`d02� 3?11
D
D' TI
m N II
IO1,
m 1 O 118,/
90 C I 1 / ' / / / / // / 45,0 /
I I y /
r m 1 O I I D O I o/
x ^' cn C:2
m r / o N -
0`d02i 32i1�
0 0� o I
m� - 1 _ Et -4 m I m� o v. � _ __ -- - 0 0 0
�� u m I zD / '� - a o o
I I p p O O CD 3 " 1 c� 1 p O O Q // O
w
(n / O O V O (O
G I
,
II I I U)02
E�— x
/ I
=m _L
X v D / — N f>\ -/
_. m Ll
I
!M4 _ I / I
C]Vo8 381= m o
o
I I ?1 0 I
I 1 I
�r i �\ �
m�_
I
.:� O I
\ \\ \\ \\ 0 1 I SA I Q I
m I MIN. I ' �, / , / m
O/ I I I 1 1
201
N / O
\ / / / 1 1\ I 1 O O / / X T�/
' to
co
CD
u _ I _ ,
OX
/ 0 XI , ��Q ^ y ,p \ \` / o ' fl I >c I w � I I � � / X �J �
7 0
V / I Z
NN
\
��O / � O 4 A X d� \\ `\\ � \`\ \` ' N '' m/I 'TI I ,r � On M
\\ k \/ / I I 1 O y
i -CO iZ /
X �� \`
0D to
3 �� CD
mlQO-
X, S,ope p0\ ��\\
o w I to� T. (D r� \ \ \ o
(D 1 ° I (1,\� \ c-i,
OD
o
A / CID 0
1 11 � \ \ I - -4
CD
o \ \ \ \ W O
T-r \\I \\ �
nwi I I \\ o l
co O O 20'-0"
0 0
D�l m 1 MIN. / , / O \1 \\ �\ s \\ \\ / i--i m
')00
II I rrl I ' O / o/�\\\ \\\ \\ \` / / I D
D / I/ •� r
�
-u z I O / / / ` ` \`\ / \\ \\ Y\G
Do 1 / �\zrn
4 0 Ix I I , W y\/ r
m
O rt 1 y 0 O D `\ \` \\`
cn T1 T I COD
A 0 rn rn
T.
j O\ \ \ \
"vvLL `�C %
20
1 Q 0 \
o x' �L
m I / r
(D I I N I DCID
\ / N
(D I o /1 ,
3 N /
N (7 Oraiy / l / D
o A\ \ �rt WZ
m
u
T
30'-0" I 30'-0" �
I I �1 N �� oo w
I /'I � m
_ + ♦ 1 V I. 1
T-r
<m
v x.
CD
90 (Q --i
-A cf) o
3 rt W
(CD
-O
o Eiz
v CD
u, '
73
200'-0"
'�NMI
CD
o�
�
0D
U)
z
D*
x
D
m
�
�
X
D
Z
O
z
u,m�c)
r
N
o
Lr
m
G)
m
7rl
0
�
Z
N
p
r
�
c�0
o�
rn�
n
/D/
co
m
0
CA)O
O
C;l
G)
m
U)
w
m
V
x
q�
\ N
A
i
\ O1
<
w --j
CD o0iv
CD CD CF)
-L D
co z =
�m>
@ Cn C�
(0 D 2
cD 0
CD
5 Z
o wm
3
Ul
N
N
cn
CD
0
O
3
0
CD
Z
O
m
U)
O
C—
m
0
�
m
V
0
N
O
Z
m
Z
_�
mm
m �
z
G)r
z
m
z uJ
G) N
-0p
Z C
z
z
G)
D
n
0
Cl)
T
D
D
n
�
m
m
z
m
O
m
0
0
..
OD
O
7c
7c
m
N
O
0
m
n
z
O
IV
■
O
O
IV
°
Cn
0
CD
U)
m
m
r
Z
200'-0"
O O
o U U) r
cn
K m v D
Z rt
r T. m m cQ
o
M.
co U)
CD CD
m m'
mLL "-. rl�\, � x o 0 0 0
ca
0
1
1 I j l w I I
O10 I.- I
I I
I - I
N
C cw+, ><'
A
�a
O
in
Qi X
x x _ x
cfl cfl 1 I Cn
x x2.
Ui Cn
ao
O ��/
0CDCD 0
m
N
cQ•
w �£X ,��' 1
1O
o�
��
w
o
/
FTCD
E
_
CD
>v
n
co
O
7--r N.
cu
n
u
I �
I m
TrCD
Ff
�F r
a--� ca
�4 0
0
CD
T—r
CD
El
0 ,
l rn
C/) _
s
0
t4v
I I D
I ca
o
U)
O
I� �f CD
T�
r
cQ
LL �
I I
I �
cn
o
O
i--f
�
c>
N
O
I � �
m
CD
T-r
TT �.
O
Z
OI
�
m
I �
D
z
7--r
1--r
D
m
u
u
t4
T-r
l9
t5'
tj
m
G
°D O
�1 x
� � 40' A p N
4 0 ' O -0 J ��
m \' 40
o40,
0 Ta
0
D
40A0
to S/o�\ , A o
0
40, w
x / , I A 0 �/
k40 O p
' N
I A
w I 11 k 3S, oae �C
2r
-n k35 0 o
m I X 35' w
o
m
w
N
x23,0 p cn
0to'X23, N p v
�0 CL
cn
k23,, 0 0
cn �o
w m /
w
cn
� 0 m
m
/ ,
A r O w
I I
to ora n o ? <o
goi I N.2j ( o
m , , 0, 4
Q I CD
/
1� 0
j► ,
OW O ► %\� C
w x m fA
80'-0" G) I i m
> I Z
0 I I I
I jj�
v
CD I z o
O '
I S/oae ► � t j o�
to
�cn
(7 i 20'-0" / =3
m
I � Min
o
00
CD
of
0
CD
/ d
�?7
�t Min / m • /� ��y
3
y
0
O
/
CD
CD I /�
1
I I �
� I I
O
CD
2,
0 ;a
X 3 m
r-mU)
rn
�zz
m
M
CM 0
CD
77
w
LU
W
U
Lug Style Butterfly Valve Ductile Iron 4" Pipe Size Class 150
0
taw
(htt ps://content.too lots.net/med i alcata log/prod u ct/Cache/ l/image/fd 2c682Od 7d 512d 5e7e5a 15 d4f8
Lug Style Butterfly Valve Ductile Iron 4" Pipe Size Class 150
Product Description
1. The product is a neutral line without pin structure, which effectively reduces the probability of
internal leakage of the valve.
2. The friction coefficient is small, and the operating torque is reduced by 30%-40% compared
with the ordinary pinned butterfly valve.
3. Alkali resistant, salt and weak acid corrosion, inert to organic matter, wide range of
applications.
4" Butterfly Valve
• COLOR - may be GRAY or GREEN
■ CALL IN ADVANCE IF COLOR IS
AN ISSUE
• PSI - 200
• Inlet - 4 inch long handle swivel
female NH 1 NST threads
• Outlet - 4 inch male NH 1 NST
threads
■ Height - 17 inches
• Height from center of waterway - 10
inches
Butterfly valve lever handle with bleeder 4 inch NH swivel female long handle x 4 inch
NH male. Butterfly valve comes equipped with a 10 position lever handle with positive
detents. This lever rotates or turns the center disc either parallel or perpendicular to the
water flow providing you with ultimate control.
Technical Details
Item Lug
Style Butterfly
Va I ve
Bushing PTFE
Seat EPDM
Bushing
PTFE
Bolt
Carbon Steel
Unit :MM
D1 D2 D3 A B
C E F N
Stop
Carbon Steel
?104 ?190.5 518" -11UNC 200 114
52 28 267 8
Cover
Nut
Carbon Steel
TYPICAL 4" BUTTERFLY
VALVES
Nominal
232 Psi
Pressure
Shell
348 Psi
Rev I Description I Date I NOTES:
Testing
Pressure
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION,
PHASE III,
ONE CHAPMAN WAY
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
Body Ductile
Iron
.9,
371_6"
https:llwww. mach inerytrader.corMistingslconstruction- eq uipment/€or-sale132887285/aIlen-12000-gal?ST=california&CTRY=usa
TYPICAL WATER TOWER
12,000 GAL
WATER TANK
SEE NOTE a
16010%
Shaft
ASTM
A276
416
Disc
Ductile
Iron 1
CD
C95400
`n
ICF8M
" ❑ " Ring
EPDM
„ C „Ring
Spring
— t 11 — ��Il— L�illl
ll��ji lj f�� �11= 11 �`111
all Il 1 �IIT
111 �ll =-- 1�111= �111� 1]`-1�1j1�1�11�111=��11�=1�11-—ill-
—l_Ir--- 1T=11 1111�-- 111=1` 111=1�1 ' 111-1 � !ll—IJi fir-1���1
Steel
NOTE 1& RETROFIT A BUTTERFLY VALVE AND A MALE
Circlips For
Spring
4" NATIONAL HOSE TREADED COUPLING FOR
Hales
Steel
EL SEGUNDO FIRE DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT.
North Plate
Carbon
WATER TANK TO BE A MIN. OF 5' ABOVE GRADE.
Steel
Working -4-
Temperature +248?
Seal Testing 255 Psi
Pressure
CLIENT:
CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS 9y
1921 E. MAPLE AVE. FXP.12i3;i 020
EL SEGUNDO, CA 99245 of Co4`'�4
(310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9931
WEST PALM GROUP
ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING
SCALE:
WATER TANK DETAILS
Scale: None
NOTED
DATE:
21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225
TORRANCE, CA 90503 DRAWN:
(310) 619-1165 CHECKED:
kyle.westpalm@gmail.com
APPROVED:
8 MAp 20
KK5
KK5
PROJECT NO.: 20201071
A600
x x x7x x-
10
O ;
x�x _ �xi`—x
1 �x�
x x�X
'-Zxx�x�x-x-
ab, — — x—X—X—
,-081 1066 49° 4g�
— O$� —_ 25 E
\ I 16) 0165) 16) r 1 7 7 9.
— I1109� � I - �106f _ _ 081 1pp —
J � 16.10L���
021 L�LIt�`j
(101 19)
L—_-------� I, 1 (10100)
(106.01)
1011
1)
1p6 8) I (1p668) I (106 5
(106.13) OAS
610)
L --
� _ �I10 � ill 0-
1
--� I 1 0680 p1p�
I I J�
0
m �"
o _
z m
=x—fix x " x—
p611) L
I, --I I I I------- � ---—
� (1 (104.4) (103.54) r6
y
1 (102.64J (102.94) o�6 4�(102.83) 61F
p61y, 0
I\
1 %I
s I � `C� III
106 53) ��� 9 II ����� C�o� n �g915) I %�
(106.52)ypoO G �u r�syo-< 9�� 10r.2
Ili
I o
O�
(106.23) S L _ (1 p2 C1 p2 GP6 10313) u II II
,T � I I
0644) r--------------- ---- I I------
---------- --
><I
J 8 ° 28 , ��9J O� C140) (98 g2) II II
E�`1�3105) III
� � 1
I Z
_ O� 11 >� I
------, �I -—11 6
LI O� / 1 p3 103 6 1 p3 36 1 '1
I s —� ��� I r I O
L_�III Ln
C100.3 0) ` .
00 1 T
21) 1 I
I
(9
�s �—�� \ -- O� ` --- - -`I �ICI 0
g665)
O� I I 0,
II I I---- __-- o�y � 6 cgs II�II
-------- _�__ I T-- ---- III
X X X x
X X x X X —x
I — — d 1p3 81 � I � � X�'i (95.0 1)
i
I I I I I I I %I�
O I c'O I 68) i I II � I ``�
I I I •, I lop' I '� I
I I 100 32 I C
X-k_ l I I _ I 1p051 I
x x x x x X
L — c x x— x x x ���
S I
I IA A
x� -x� • „
— O x OHLIN
Revj Description I Date I NOTES:
LA A
O O v
I I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION,
PHASE III,
ONE CHAPMAN WAY
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
xE-----------------
ONLINE —
x
m O
O �
CLIENT:
CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS
1921 E. MAPLE AVE.
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
(310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031
i
II
I
m
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY
SCALE: 1 " = 30'- 0"
WEST PALM GROUP SCALE:
ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING
DATE:
21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225
TORRANCE, CA 90503 DRAWN:
(310) 619-1165 CHECKED:
kyle.westpalm@gmail.com
APPROVED;
PROJECT NO.: NOTED 2020107
AI
C-200
Rev I Description
ABBREVIATIONS
FL
FLOWLINE
TG
TOP OF GRATE
MH
MANHOLE
(E)
EXISTING
SD
STORM DRAIN
WV
WATER VALVE
(N)
NEW
TF
TOP OF FOOTING
WM
WATER METER
TW
TOP OF WALL
TOF
TOP OF FENCE
B/W
BACK OF WALK
INV
INVERT
FF
FINISHED FLOOR
C/L
CENTER LINE
FS
FINISHED SURFACE
N/W
NORTHWEST
S/W
SOUTHWEST
HP
HIGH POINT
TC
TOP OF CURB
PP
POWER POLE
FG
FINISHED GRADE
FL
FLOW LINE
LA
LANDSCAPE
Date I NOTES:
LEGEND
-- PROPERTY LINE
CENTER LINE
X X CHAIN LINK FENCE
> > FLOWLINE
(100.00) EXISTING ELEVATION
100.00 NEW ELEVATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION,
PHASE III,
ONE CHAPMAN WAY
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
CLIENT:
CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS
1921 E. MAPLE AVE.
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
(310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 30'- 0"
WEST PALM GROUP
ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING
21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225
TORRANCE, CA 90503
(310) 619-1165
kyle.westpalm@gmail.com
OG
G
SCALE: PROJECT NO.- 2020107
NOTED
DATE: 06 JUI.Y 20
DRAWN: N, p C�201
CHECKED: KKS
APPROVED:
L
110
/
pRnpncpn r_Qon�
nvi v..w vnnv
PR POSED
GRADE
110
— — —
-----
-1LL
100
— — — — — —
—
— — —
100
icTING Gad n�
90
90
SECTION "D"
D
L
SCALE: 1 " = 10'
L
PROPOSED GRADE
110
110
7-77
100
100
SECTION "C"
rC�
SCALE: 1 " = 10'
�-2.2
110
— — — — — — — — — —
PROPOSED GRADE
— — — — — — ——
— — — — — —
— —
110
—
100
'V/5R
G I-pn nc
100
SECTION "B"
B
SCALE: 1 " = 10'
C-2.2
L
—PROPOSED GRADF
110
- - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
-
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - -
100
L
PROPOSED GRADE
110
r I LL
FILL
—
100
SECTION "A"
rA
SCALE: 1" = 10'
C_2.2
GRADING & DRAINAGE
PLAN
SECTIONS
SCALE: 1 " =
30'- 0"
Rev
Description
Date
NOTES:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
CLIENT:
WEST PALM GROUP
SCALE:
NOTED
PROJECT NO.: 2020107
ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING
RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION,
PHASE III,
ONE CHAPMAN WAY
CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS
1921 E. MAPLE AVE.
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225
TORRANCE, CA 90503
(310) 619-1165
DATE:
IN
C�202
DRAWN:
R
CHECKED:
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
(310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031
kyle.westpalm@gmail.com
APPROVED:
VICINITY MAP
(PROPOSED AREA FOR
DEVELOPMENT)
NTS
PROJECT DATA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
NEW LANDSCAPE AT RV AND BOAT STORAGE YARD,
IN EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
TRACT. -
BLOCK:
LOT. -
CLIENT.
CALIFORNIA STORAGE MASTERS
SITE ADDRESS:
ONE CHAPMAN WAY
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
SCOPE OF WORK:
LANDSCAPE: YES
IRRIGATION: NO
CODES AND STANDARDS:
• 2018 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
• 2018 CMC
2018 CPC
• 2018 CEC
• 2018 CGBSC
2015 CA BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
STANDARDS
• AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
• CITY OF LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODES AND
• SPECIFICATIONS
JURISDICTION:
City of Los Angeles
County of Los Angeles
State of California
2005CHAPMAN
NEW LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET DESCRIPTION
G0.0
COVER SHEET
G1.1
GENERAL NOTES
L6.0
PLANTING OVERALL
L6.1
PLANTING ENLARGEMENT
L6.2
PLANTING ENLARGEMENT
L6.3
PLANTING SCHEDULE
L6.4
PLANTING DETAILS
ARCHICTECT OF RECORD
CHRISTOPHER SHERWIN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA REGISTRATION: 5947
STEPHEN BLEWETT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA REGISTRATION:6476
CRAFT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
CRAFT
3640 HARRIMAN AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90032
WWW. CRAFT -LA. COM
LEGAL NOTICE
THESE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, IDEAS, AND ARRANGEMENTS PRESENTED
THEREBY ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF CRAFT LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE. NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE COPIED, DISCLOSED TO OTHERS
OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PROJECT OTHER THAN THE SPECIFIC
PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND DEVELOPED WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF CRAFT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. VISUAL
CONTACT WITH THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSTITUTE
CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTIONS.
SYMBOL KEY:
ELEVATION NUMBER REFERENCE
ELEVATION L SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE
SECTION L /47
ENLARGEMENT PLAN
SECTION NUMBER REFERENCE
SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE
ENLARGEMENT PLAN NUMBER REFERENCE
SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE
DETAIL DETAIL NUMBER REFERENCE
SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE
p SITE FURNISHING QUANTITY
SITE FURNISHINGS F1
REFERENCE KEY NUMBER
MATERIAL CALLOUT 1 K MATERIAL CALLOUT LETTER
Z
Q
U)
ODODaZ
NQQQQ
ti C/) U) 2 J
o--U�
c \I W
�p(/5fnpW
oNUUNcn
00
z C)
LU YZWLII
co LLI Q)
LU
LLJ Z
zDUQ0-CO
W
ct
N
M
O
O
_ O
Z
0 O
Q U
J
W cc
Q
Q c
O
Oj O
LZLI O
Q �U
cc
JzJ
U
LL
=U
�o� O
VMS Z
N
co
0
L�
Q
Z
CIO
cj�
Z
O
>- LL
O
LO�U
LU
a
Q
OCL
z
�O
U
Z
O
Q
UW
J
N
oW
z
r 0
L7 --., �
qft
O �
GENERAL NOTES:
1. THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IS TO INCLUDE ALL ITEMS
NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK BY THE
CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLEMENTARY, AND WHAT IS
REQUIRED BY ONE SHALL BE AS BINDING AS IF REQUIRED BY ALL; PERFORMANCE BY
THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO THE EXTENT CONSISTENT
WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND REASONABLY INFERABLE
FROM THEM AS BEING NECESSARY TO PRODUCE THE INDICATED
RESULTS.
2. ORGANIZATION OF THE SPECIFICATIONS INTO DIVISIONS, SECTIONS AND ARTICLES,
AND ARRANGEMENT OF DRAWINGS SHALL NOT LIMIT THE CONTRACTOR IN DIVIDING
THE WORK AMONG SUBCONTRACTORS OR IN ESTABLISHING THE EXTENT OF THE
WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY ANY TRADE.
3. THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT MANUAL ESTABLISH DETAILED MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. PARTIAL
SETS OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE
INCOMPLETE AND SHOULD NOT BE DISTRIBUTED OR UTILIZED.
4. ALL WORK INCLUDING MATERIALS, METHODS, ASSEMBLIES, ETC.
SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF ALL GOVERNING
REGULATIONS AND CODES.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND PAYING FEES OF ALL
PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
6. BEFORE STARTING EACH PORTION OF THE WORK, CONTRACTOR
SHALL CAREFULLY STUDY THE VARIOUS DRAWINGS AND OTHER
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO THAT PORTION OF THE WORK.
REFER TO DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES THAT ARE INCLUDED IN
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. WHERE
DISCREPANCIES EXIST IN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, CONSULT
ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
7. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT AND ON THE JOB SITE.
BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.
8. VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH APPLICABLE UTILITY PROVIDERS.
BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS TO THE ATTENTION OF
THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.
9. VERIFY ALL MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL INFORMATION AND
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. WHERE DISCREPANCIES AND
CONFLICTS EXIST, CONSULT ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
10. REVIEW THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND COORDINATE WITH ALL
SUB -CONTRACTORS, TRADES AND SUPPLIERS. IDENTIFY AND NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT
OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.
11. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN NATURE TO THOSE DETAILED. REPETITIVE
FEATURES ARE NOT DRAWN IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND SHALL BE COMPLETELY
PROVIDED AS IF DRAWN IN FULL. TYPICAL DETAILS APPLY AT ALL SIMILAR
CONDITIONS WHETHER CROSS REFERENCED OR NOT. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS,
DETAILS, OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
12. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
13. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO COLUMN GRID LINES OR
CENTERLINES, FACE OF CONCRETE OR CMU WALLS, FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, OR
FACE OF FINAL LAYER OF SUBSTRATE OF INTERIOR PARTITION ASSEMBLY
(EXCLUSIVE OF APPLIED FINISHES).
14. DOOR LOCATIONS NOT DIMENSIONED ARE:
CENTER LINE OF DOOR ALIGNS WITH CENTER OF ROOM OR
CORRIDOR.
15. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS REFER TO TOP OF CONCRETE SLAB
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WHERE CONCRETE SLAB IS DEPRESSED TO
ACCOMMODATE SETTING BEDS, RAISED ACCESS FLOOR, AND OTHER SIMILAR FLOOR
ASSEMBLIES, FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE TO TOP OF FINISH FLOOR ASSEMBLY
INDICATED.
16. HEIGHT DIMENSIONS AS REFERENCED ON REFLECTED CEILING PLANS RE
MEASURED FROM FINISH FLOOR OF INDIVIDUAL ROOMS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
18. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AT THE JOB SITE SHALL BE NEW AND FREE FROM
DEFECTS, AND SHALL BE STORED IN THE SITE IN SUCH A
MANNER AS TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE. ALL WORK SHALL BE
OF BEST PRACTICE OF EACH TRADE.
19. VERIFY AND COORDINATE SIZES, LOCATION AND MOUNTING OF ALL EQUIPMENT
AND FIXTURES. PROVIDE REQUIRED BLOCKING, BACKING, SLEEVES, ETC.
20. MAINTAIN THE PREMISES CLEAN AND FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. PROTECT
PROJECT, THE SITE, AND PERSONAL PROPERTY FROM DAMAGES.
21. PROTECT WORK AREAS AND EXISTING AREAS, INCLUDING EXISTING UTILITIES,
FROM DAMAGES. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PATCH ANY DAMAGE DUE TO
CONSTRUCTION. REPAIRED CONSTRUCTION IS
SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE BY ARCHITECT.
22. IF THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES, THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN DRAWINGS;
LARGE-SCALE DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN SMALL-SCALE DRAWINGS.
23. PROVIDE REQUIRED TEMPORARY UTILITIES, BRACING, SUPPORTS, SHORING, ETC.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DESIGN ADEQUACY AND SAFETY OF
ERECTION.
24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CURRENT UPDATED RECORD
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ON SITE AT ALL TIME.
25. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS OF
CONSTRUCTION.
26. METAL FABRICATIONS AND SUPPORT ASSEMBLIES WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT
SHOWN SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF MISCELLANEOUS
ELEMENTS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ENGINEERED
STRUCTURAL
ASSEMBLIES AND CALCULATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH CODE
REQUIREMENTS AND ACCOUNTING FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC LOADS INCLUDING
ANY WIND OR SEISMIC LOADS, THERMAL MOVEMENT OF SUPPORTING STRUCTURE
AND DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES OF THE BUILDING.
27. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, BRACING,
BACK-UP PLATES AND SUPPORTING BRACKETS REQUIRED FOR THE BEST POSSIBLE
INSTALLATION OF ALL TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES AND PARTITIONS AND ALL WALL
MOUNTED OR SUSPENDED MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL OR MISCELLANEOUS
EQUIPMENT.
28. PIPE SLEEVES IN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ROOMS EXTEND 2" ABOVE THE FLOOR
LINE. FILL THE ANNULAR SPACES OF PIPE SLEEVES THROUGH THE FLOOR OR
THROUGH RATED WALLS WITH FIRE SAFING AND SMOKE SEAL COMPOUND AS
INDICATED ON THE SPECIFICATION, AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY. PROVIDE
APPROVED RATED FIRE DAMPERS FOR ALL DUCTS PENETRATING FIRE RATED WALLS.
FIRE DAMPER ASSEMBLIES, INCLUDING SLEEVES AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES
MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONS.
WHEREVER POSSIBLE, MANUAL RESET LEVER FOR THE FIRE DAMPER MUST BE
PLACED ON NON-PUBLIC OR LAY -IN CEILING SIDE OF THE RATED WALL.
29. SIZES OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PADS AND BASES SHOWN ON PLAN ARE
APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS OF ALL PADS AND BASES
WITH THE APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE MOUNTINGS
WITH APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS. PADS AND BASES SHALL BE
INDICATED ON SUBMITTALS AND BROUGHT TO THE
ATTENTION OF THE CITY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PRIOR TO LAY -OUT OF REINFORCING
STEEL OR STEEL DECK.
30. PROVIDE ACCESS PANELS FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AS
REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES. ALL ACCESS PANELS SHALL BE CONCEALED.
ELECTRICAL J-BOXES, PLUMBING CLEANOUTS, FIRE DAMPERS AND OTHER SIMILAR
ITEMS REQUIRING ACCESS ARE NOT TO BE LOCATED ABOVE GYPSUM BOARD OR
SIMILAR CEILING.
31. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND PROVIDE ALL SLAB AND WALL
OPENINGS REQUIRED BY MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LIMITS OF WORK, PROPERTY LINES AND LOT
LINES BEFORE STARTING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY
DAMAGE TO OFF -SITE PROPERTY.
2. LIMIT USE OF PREMISES TO WORK IN AREAS INDICATED. DO NOT DISTURB
PORTIONS OF THE SITE BEYOND AREAS IN WHICH THE WORK IS INDICATED.
KEEP DRIVEWAYS AND ENTRANCES SERVING PREMISES CLEAR AND AVAILABLE
TO THE OWNER, PUBLIC AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES AT ALL TIMES. DO NOT USE
THESE AREAS FOR PARKING OR STORAGE OF MATERIALS. SCHEDULE
DELIVERIES TO MINIMIZE USE OF DRIVEWAYS AND ENTRANCES.
3. ANY EXISTING MATERIALS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE
REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
4. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS, UTILITIES, AND OTHER
CONSTRUCTION INDICATED AS EXISTING ARE NOT GUARANTEED. BEFORE
BEGINNING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INVESTIGATE AND VERIFY THE
EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, PLANTING,
HARDSCAPE AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION AFFECTING THE WORK. BEFORE
CONSTRUCTION, VERIFY THE LOCATION AND POINTS OF CONNECTION OF UTILITY
SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR BEARS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS WORK.
ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES CAUSED BY ANY PERSON, VEHICLE, EQUIPMENT, OR
TOOL RELATED TO THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE REPAIRED
IMMEDIATELY AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT: (USA
1-800-422-4133) 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.
6. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS OF WORK PERFORMED BY
OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT'S. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
CONDUIT, SLEEVES AND EMBEDMENT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
7. INFORM THE OWNER OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION
SCHEDULE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ADJUST CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
BASED ON A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TIMETABLE. NOTIFY THE OWNER IF
CHANGES TO SCHEDULE ARE REQUIRED DUE TO THE DIFFERENCES IN ACTUAL
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS. INCLUDE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT'S
AT PRE INSTALLATION MEETINGS COVERING PORTIONS OF THE WORK THAT ARE
RELATED.
8. MAINTAIN A CLEAN AND SAFE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES:
9. CLEAN PROJECT SITE AND WORK AREAS DAILY, INCLUDING COMMON AREAS.
COORDINATE PROGRESS CLEANING FOR JOINT -USE AREAS WHERE MORE THAN
ONE INSTALLER HAS WORKED. ENFORCE REQUIREMENTS STRICTLY. DISPOSE
OF MATERIALS LAWFULLY.
10. MAINTAIN THE PROJECT SITE FREE OF WASTE MATERIALS AND DEBRIS.
11. KEEP INSTALLED WORK CLEAN.
12. CLEAN INSTALLED SURFACES ACCORDING TO WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS OF
MANUFACTURER OR FABRICATOR OF PRODUCT INSTALLED, USING ONLY
CLEANING MATERIALS SPECIFICALLY RECOMMENDED.
13. IF SPECIFIC CLEANING MATERIALS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED, USE CLEANING
MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH OR PROPERTY AND THAT
WILL NOT DAMAGE EXPOSED SURFACES.
14. REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CONCEALED SPACES BEFORE ENCLOSING THE SPACE.
CLEAN EXPOSED SURFACES AND PROTECT AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE
FREEDOM FROM DAMAGE AND DETERIORATION AT TIME OF SUBSTANTIAL
COMPLETION.
15. CLEAN AREAS AND SPACES WHERE CUTTING AND PATCHING ARE PERFORMED.
COMPLETELY REMOVE PAINT, MORTAR, OILS, PUTTY, AND SIMILAR MATERIALS.
BURYING OR BURNING WASTE MATERIALS ON -SITE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED.
WASHING WASTE MATERIALS DOWN SEWERS OR INTO WATERWAYS WILL NOT
BE PERMITTED.
16. DURING HANDLING AND INSTALLATION, CLEAN AND PROTECT CONSTRUCTION IN
PROGRESS AND ADJOINING MATERIALS ALREADY IN PLACE. APPLY PROTECTIVE
COVERING WHERE REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROTECTION FROM DAMAGE OR
DETERIORATION AT SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION.
17. CLEAN AND PROVIDE MAINTENANCE ON COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION AS
FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF THE
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
18. ADJUST AND LUBRICATE OPERABLE COMPONENTS TO ENSURE OPERABILITY
WITHOUT DAMAGING EFFECTS. SUPERVISE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO
ASSURE THAT NO PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION, COMPLETED OR IN PROGRESS,
IS SUBJECT TO HARMFUL, DANGEROUS, DAMAGING, OR OTHERWISE
DELETERIOUS EXPOSURE.
LAYOUT & MATERIALS NOTES
19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION
OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. DO NOT PROCEED WITH WORK
WITHOUT CONSULTING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
20. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE.
21. WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE CALLED AS "EQUAL", ALL REFERENCED ITEMS SHALL
BE SPACED EQUALLY, MEASURED TO THEIR CENTER LINES.
22. ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE TO FACE OF BUILDING, WALL OR OTHER FIXED SITE
IMPROVEMENT. DIMENSIONS TO CENTER LINES ARE INDICATED.
23. LOCATIONS OF FEATURES NOT SPECIFICALLY DIMENSIONED MAY BE
DETERMINED BY SCALE. CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WHERE
CONFLICTS OCCUR.
24. INSTALL ALL INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90 DEGREES TO EACH OTHER UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
25. CONTRACTOR'S CONSTRUCTION WORK RESPONSIBILITIES:
26. SCOPE OF WORK: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS,
TRANSPORTATION AND SERVICES NECESSARY TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL
CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIED
HEREIN.
27. CONFORMANCE: ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE
LOCAL, COUNTY AND/OR STATE CODES, REGULATIONS AND RULES, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. STRUCTURAL
DESIGN BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS: WIND SPEED 85 MPH;
EXPOSURE'C; OCCUPANCY CATEGORY II; IMPORTANCE FACTOR=1.0.
28. LICENSE: ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED
CONTRACTOR.
29. PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN, COORDINATE
AND PAY FOR ANY AND ALL PERMITS, FEES AND AGENCY INSPECTIONS AS
REQUIRED.
30. INSURANCE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CARRY ALL WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION,
PUBLIC LIABILITY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE AS REQUIRED BY ALL APPLICABLE
CODES, REGULATIONS AND THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT).
31. SITE VERIFICATION: PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL VERIFY, AT THE JOB SITE, A;; CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON
THE PLANS AFFECTING THE INTENDED DESIGN OF THE LANDSCAPE WORK. ANY
DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER(JOB SUPERINTENDENT)
IMMEDIATELY.
32. LIABLE FOR ENCROACHMENT: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ANY ENCROACHMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY, RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS,
SET -BACKS OR ANY OTHER LEGAL PROPERTY RESTRICTIONS EITHER MARKED
OR UNMARKED.
33. COORDINATION OF ACTIVITIES: THE CONTRACTOR AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF THEIR ACTIVITIES WITH ALL
OTHER TRADES THROUGH THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT).
34. FIELD STAKING: PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE BY
STAKES, OR OTHER MEANS, ALL CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS AS DELINEATED ON
THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
35. NOTIFICATION OF DISCREPANCIES: ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE FIELD
CONDITIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND/OR THE DESIGN INTENT
AFFECTING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION AND COST OF THE PROJECT SHALL
BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. ALL WORK RELATED TO THE PROBLEM AREA SHALL
CEASE UNTIL THE DISCREPANCIES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED BY THE OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT) OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING. ANY CONTINUATION
OF WORK PRIOR TO THE RESOLUTION OF DISCREPANCIES IS AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND EXPENSE.
36. LIABLE FOR DAMAGE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGE TO ALL
UTILITIES, CONSTRUCTION, IRRIGATION AND PLANTING ELEMENTS, EXISTING OR
NEW, MARKED OR UNMARKED, AND SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY DAMAGED
IMPROVEMENTS IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT).
37. LIABLE FOR LOSS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR
ANY LOSS TO HIS EQUIPMENT, PARTS AND MATERIALS ON THIS PROJECT UNTIL
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB IN WRITING BY THE OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT).
38. WRITTEN GUARANTEE: ALL WORK SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AS TO THE MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR
FOLLOWING THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN GUARANTEE ON HIS LETTERHEAD AT THE TIME OF
THE FINAL INSPECTION.
39. WRITTEN CERTIFICATION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN
CERTIFICATION THAT THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS INSTALLED IN FULL
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY APPROVED
SUBSTITUTIONS OR DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE
NOTED. THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL BE ON THE CONTRACTOR'S LETTERHEAD
WITH HIS SIGNATURE AND CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER.
40. STATE CIVIL CODE TITLE 7: TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS PROJECT IS GOVERNED
BY TITLE 7 OF THE STATE CIVIL CODE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM WITH
THE FUNCTIONALITY REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 7 OF THE CIVIL CODE.
41. METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION: THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, THEY DO
NOT INDICATE THE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR
ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND
PROCEDURES.
42. OWNER'S CONSTRUCTION WORK RESPONSIBILITIES:
43. CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES: THE OWNER WILL BE DIRECTLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASPECTS OF CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ALL
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS. ALL FIELD MEETINGS SHALL BE INITIATED BY THE
CONTRACTOR AND COORDINATED THROUGH THE OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT) TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT SHALL BE IN A SUPPORT OBSERVATION ROLE TO THE OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT) PROVIDING INTERPRETIVE ADVICE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE OBSERVATION SCHEDULE AS NOTED.
44. DETERMINING LEGAL AND PHYSICAL ELEMENTS: OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT) SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING PROPERTY
LINES, RIGHT-OF-WAYS, TRACT BOUNDARIES, GRADES, EASEMENTS, UTILITY
LOCATIONS (ABOVE AND BELOW GRADE) ANY OTHER LEGAL OR PHYSICAL
ELEMENTS, AS REQUIRED, FOR THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE WORK.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED WITH ANY WORK
WITHOUT DETERMINATION OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION.
45. SITE DISCREPANCIES: ALL DISCREPANCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS, DRAWINGS OR
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. IT IS THE
OWNER'S (JOB SUPERINTENDENT'S) RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSULT THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY FURTHER WORK IN THAT AREA. ANY
UNREPORTED DISCREPANCY AND CONTINUED WORK WITHOUT WRITTEN
AUTHORIZATION FROM THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND EXPENSE.
46. CONTRACT FULFILLMENT: ALL QUESTIONS RELATING TO INTERPRETATION OF
THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, QUALITY OF WORK AND ACCEPTABLE
FULFILLMENT OF INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DECIDED BY
THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
CONCURRENTLY.
47. REQUIRED FIELD OBSERVATION WORK:
48. REQUIRED FIELD OBSERVATION WORK: THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED
WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE OWNER OF SAID PLANS WILL USE
VALLEYCREST DESIGN GROUP TO PROVIDE'FULU CONTRACT SERVICES
INCLUDING FIELD OBSERVATION SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE
TO USE CRAFT AND CULTIVATE TO PROVIDE AND COMPLETE THE FIELD
OBSERVATION SERVICES SET FORTH HEREIN WILL SIGNIFICANTLY
INCREASE THE RISK OF LOSS RESULTING, AMONG OTHER CAUSES, FROM
MISINTERPRETATION OF THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN, UNAUTHORIZED
MODIFICATIONS THERETO, AND FAILURE TO DETECT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN
THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS BEFORE THEY BECOME COSTLY MISTAKES
BUILT INTO THE PROJECT. THEREFORE, IN THE EVENT THAT CRAFT AND
CULTIVATE IS OTHERWISE PRECLUDED FROM COMPLETING THE FIELD
OBSERVATION SERVICES SET FORTH HEREIN, THE OWNER, OR SUBSEQUENT
OWNER (INDIVIDUALS OR CORPORATIONS WHO HAVE PURCHASED THESE PLANS
WITH THE PROJECT), AGREES TO HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNIFY, AND DEFEND
CRAFT AND CULTIVATE AND THEIR CONSULTANTS FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND
ALL CLAIMS.
49. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S CONSTRUCTION FIELD OBSERVATION SCHEDULE:
50. FIELD OBSERVATION COORDINATION: THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS SHALL
BE INITIATED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND COORDINATED THROUGH THE OWNER
(JOB SUPERINTENDENT). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER (JOB
SUPERINTENDENT) AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NOT LESS THAN FORTY-EIGHT
(48) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY OBSERVATION. CONTINUED WORK WITHOUT
OBSERVATION OF THESE PHASES OF WORK IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK,
WITH ANY REQUIRED CHANGE OR MODIFICATIONS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S
EXPENSE. THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) SHALL INFORM THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT AS TO THE PURPOSE AND TIME OF THE OBSERVATION FORTY-EIGHT
(48) HOURS IN ADVANCE.
51. CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND LAYOUT OBSERVATION: THIS OBSERVATION
SHALL BE PERFORMED AFTER ALL CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, FLOW LINES AND
FINISH GRADES HAVE BEEN LOCATED IN THE FIELD, BUT PRIOR TO FORMING OR
EXCAVATING.
52. ROUGH CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS OBSERVATION: THIS OBSERVATION SHALL
BE PERFORMED AFTER ALL FORMING, EXCAVATION, REINFORCING STEEL AND
STRUCTURAL STEEL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED, BUT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT
OF ANY CONCRETE.
53. PROGRESS/INSTALLATION INSPECTIONS: PERIODIC INSPECTIONS SHALL BE
PERFORMED BY THE OWNER (JOB SUPERINTENDENT) DURING CONSTRUCTION
OPERATIONS TO INSURE CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
54. FINAL OBSERVATION/PROJECT CERTIFICATION: THIS OBSERVATION VISIT
WILL BE PERFORMED TO REVIEW ALL ASPECTS OF THE CONTRACTED WORK
PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PROJECT TO THE OWNER.
PLANTING NOTES
55. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL UTILITY PLANS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS IN THE
FIELD, AND SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF CONFLICTS WITH PLANT
MATERIAL LOCATIONS EXISTS.
56. IF CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN SIZE OF AREAS AND PLANS, CONTRACTOR TO
CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. FAILURE TO MAKE SUCH
CONFLICTS KNOWN WILL RESULT IN CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY TO RELOCATE
SUCH MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT QUANTITIES OF PLANT
MATERIAL NECESSARY BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EXISTING PLANT
MATERIAL COVERAGE.
57. TREES SHALL BE TAGGED BY CONTRACTOR AND REVIEWED BY OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON AWARD OF GENERAL
CONTRACT. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE AVAILABLE AND
MEET EXCEED REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS ON ESTIMATED DATE OF START OF
PLANTING.
58. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL: PHOTOS OF ONE EXAMPLE OF
EACH TREE VARIETY. PHOTOS SHOULD INCLUDE A PERSON FOR SCALE
PURPOSES, TREE SPECIFICATIONS, AND QUANTITY SHALL BE NOTED.
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE PLANTED HEIGHT, TRUNK CLEARANCE, WIDTH
AND TRUNK CALIPER. NURSERY SOURCE AND CONTACT SHALL BE NOTED.
59. TREES TO BE RELOCATED ARE IDENTIFIED IN TREE REPORT. COORDINATE TREE
RELOCATION AS REQUIRED WITH OWNER.
60. ANY PLANT DEEMED NOT AVAILABLE BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE NOTED.
MAINTENANCE PERIOD MAY NOT BEGIN UNTIL ALL SPECIFIED MATERIALS ARE
INSTALLED.
61. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIALS FREE
OF PESTS OR PLANT DISEASES. PRE -SELECTED OR'TAGGED' MATERIAL MUST BE
INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND CERTIFIED PEST AND DISEASE FREE. IT IS
THE CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATION TO WARRANTY ALL PLANT MATERIALS.
62. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED ON SITE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
FINAL LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL.
63. ALL OVER EXCAVATION REQUIRED TO MEET PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL
BE DONE PRIOR TO PAVING IF PAVING WILL CONFLICT WITH EXCAVATION OF
PLANTING PITS.
64. ALL TREES PLANTED NEXT TO CURBS SHALL BE AT LEAST 36" CLEAR FROM CURB
FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
65. SEE DETAILS FOR STAKING METHOD.
66. ALL GROUND COVERS SHALL BE APPLIED IN ALL PLANTING AREAS INDICATED ON
PLAN AS WELL AS UNDER SHRUBS. GROUND COVERS AND MASS PLANTED
SHRUBS SHALL BE TRIANGULARLY SPACED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
67. ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT PLANTED IN TURF AND ARE 2:1 SLOPE OR LESS SHALL
BE COVERED WITH 3/4" DEEP ORGANIC MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SUBMIT 1 CU. FT. SAMPLE PRIOR TO APPLICATION. AREAS STEEPER THAN 2:1
SHALL BE COVERED WITH JUTE MESH.
68. MINIMUM 4 SOIL SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR AFTER GRADING
OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED FOR SOIL FERTILITY AND AGRICULTURAL
SUITABILITY TESTING AND RECOMMENDATIONS. APPROVED LABORATORY IS
SOIL AND PLANT LABS 1-714-282-8777 SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL
AMENDMENTS SPECIFIED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT WITH SOILS REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS.
69. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGE AS TO WHEN THE
MAINTENANCE PERIOD BEGINS.
70. ALL PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PLANTED TO
CONFORM TO GOVERNING AGENCY STANDARDS.
71. PLANT QUANTITIES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF
THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING
ALL PLANTS AS REQUIRED TO MEET ON -CENTER SPACING AS NOTED IN THE
PLANT LEGEND.
72. ALL GRADING AND IRRIGATION SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO ELIMINATE WATER
STANDING OR SPRAYING ON STRUCTURES. ADJUST IRRIGATION AS REQUIRED.
WATER SHALL DRAIN AWAY FROM STRUCTURES.
73. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL SHEET FLOW @ 2% MINIMUM OR DRAIN TO AREA
DRAINS @ 1 % MINIMUM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION
(L1 SERIES) PLANS AND LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE (AD) AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
PLANS CONTAINED HEREIN.
74. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION
FEATURES SHOWN HEREON. FINAL SHRUB PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY
OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING.
75. ALL SHRUB PLANTING AREAS TO BE MULCHED WITH A TWO (2") INCH LAYER OF
MULCH. FOREST FLOOR MULCH 1/2' 1 1/2" APPEARANCE GRADE. AGUINAGUA
FERTILIZER CO. PHONE: (949)786-9558. APPROVE MULCH WITH OWNER PRIOR TO
PURCHASE.
76. ALL TREES THAT ARE CLOSER THAN FIVE FEET (5) TO HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS
SHALL BE PLANTED WITH AN OWNER AND AGENCY APPROVED LINEAR ROOT
BARRIER.
77. SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED AT 18" MIN. FROM BACK OF WALK. AREAS BETWEEN
WALK AND SHRUBS TO BE MULCHED.
z
Q
�U)
co co mD
Q
r- (a � = J
O - - U
NC, Cn(no W
�OCn(nO W
m
z oml�
° Yzww
CQ U 3
_
� I- W Q c Q
WQzQ�U
zOUO0-C/)
Lu
lN
M
O
O
_ O
Z
O
Q U
QJ
W
co 0
O
Q W O
� Lu V
� U
U.
Jz� �
Q
lct
lJ
f Z
�`
CA
6 4 7 6
0-
S�
Q Lj N
N m a co
Q N r
6 O
ti
o�sti�yd31 S
0
c
3
K
N � WLo
Q O
� z Z
>_ ILL
uj
O O J
�U � Q
Lo
cb cz z W
0 �W Q Z
wC/) W
N oW z 0
Vmft
LL
00
IVAN MOM NEW mom
_ LIMIT WORK 1
D D D D D D mom
D LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF W
RK
� I O D D D Mom°� 2
° I D D � mom L6.1
D I D D O O O LIMIT OF WORKown G� L6.2
OO O LIMIT OF WORK
— L6.1
O O
Y11,00 r4 ;-?,
0 0
10
O 5
J
L6.1 _ II
/ 6 /
L6.1
z /
---
O
.001)
D '
ClM/T ♦ �`� 1
OF WpRK♦ ♦ ♦ � � � � � �, Y
D � 1�
I ♦ ♦ D % ��:' it
OAI/ro♦ ♦D \ ,
RK ♦ � ,��. III
t/AuVr
I ♦ O
oFW R� ♦ O � O �� D �
♦ D �D O O \� L6.1 0
to
I
♦ ♦ O o \ 1�
I
CIM,� WO� ♦ 0 �� II
I ♦ � I
II
oA.
f t
I
I
IMIT OF ♦ ...a'...� , _
WORK ♦ ..,:. �,�' 1
LL
�♦ � II
� ♦ ♦ III
ClA,j/TO♦
WORK
0 0�
OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH
1 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 0 30so'
PLAN
Z
Q
U)
ODODaZ
NQQQQ
ti C/) U) 2 J
o--U�
c \l W
�pc)fnCc) W
oNUUNcn
00
z om�
YZWLLI
CoLLjU�»
Lu
LLJ u
z 000-co
N
0
do
J
Q
S U
Z
J
a.
0
Z
Lr) c)
H
N U Z
Q)
O I
zJ
a.
>- o o J
�
w � J
z<�
Q) Q
O CL z z oc
O UW W
w c/ i
N oW z o
PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
1 QUE AGR
24" Box
QUE AG3 1
36" Box
Fa m
PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
G►
PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
"I � 0
G►
Z
Q
co ca z
NQQQQ
ti cn C/) 2 J
O--U0-
c\l W
�p(nfnOW
00
z om�
YZWUII
coLLjU�»
WQ2��U
ZIDUQWc�
uj
N
M
O
O
_ O
Z
c O
Q U
J
W cc
Q Q
Q c
(� O Z
Oj O
Q �U
JzJuft
�o� O
VMS Z
do
� ��
Q
W
o
N S
--IQ
Q
U c
Ln m
o
CO
C.)
Ln
6
O�
O
I y
��sN
y0131
CD
S
II
PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN Q
7 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" J
PLAN PLAN PLAN a
NOTES: Z
SEE SHEET L6.7 FOR uj
SCHEDULES AND NOTES 2
uj
QUE AG2 2
—15 gal. d. Z � O Q
O N Z
Q - z
cco
BAC PIG 14
• O O O
5 gal. • Q JLli
Q G2 • Q a- Z
• \ ZU Q
• • �O UO
• O Z Z . Q Z a
_( J a
• 0 �a.
N zJ w J
Q A 2
■
NORTH
PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN LL
o io, zo'
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" PLAN O
';ors �' • • I —
I
► EE —
o s ` • E EXISTING
Tok FENCE, /
pl$ s • TYP'0
/' •
I •
LEY CAN 84 ^ • O
1 gal. °1-44. \ \
,rs • 4 I
00 ,L
BAC PIG 57
5 gal. uE, A� �—
rs�sc`14
zrs fin' • 0 • de
f LL
s 0 •
QUE AGR 2n •
24" Box • �
ors �, f� • • II •
• •
• 's"''� �p�°` ' >s• ` ,9";"°off,°G<
,' 44 �M1L� ,_' • ��^fs roc "oAa� •
• �'s' ' • BAC PIG 69 qo
0
• o 'sr� . 'I 5 gal.
ao haw QUE AG3 2 sA ' • •
1 QUE AGR °s� n
• • 36" Box • •
aQn 24" Box s^ •
QUE AG3 1 ''ss
36" Box` 43 LEY CAN 70nsJ` • •
p pogo°e ua • 1 gal.1 ',,rr
��,��cn ,� o • sr,�^4pcc •
80 LEY CANV ` • 2 ^ • •
1 gal. • I °
30
oo. BAC PIG • �� •
cnn 5 gal. ga N • '„rs •
,a°v`Onnnnc
i
Onnnc '�ff��lic •
nngb�� � nC • • I 'gers Gnn • •
QUE AGR 2 sss •
• �°"�'�' EXISTING
24" Box •
�ss`:�n• FENCE,
s • TYP
�• rdl 2
SE K
IKs
�pn • E •
DC ss�.
to �s °
2 PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN
SCALE. 1 - 10-0 PLAN SCALE. 1 - 10-0 PLAN NORTH
0 10, 20'
Z
Q
U)
ODODaZ
NQQQQ
ti C/) U) 2 J
o--U�
c \1 W
�p(/5fnpW
oc\1UUcNcn
00
z C)
Y < LY Lu
co LLj Q)
Lu
WQ2��U
zDUQ0-CO
aw
o�A
LLJ
ct
QN
M
O
O
_ O
Z
LL O
Q U
i LLI
CJ
W
Q
co
O Z
Oj O
LU
Q �U
JzJ
LL
Cc Uft
V MZ
'Q 4!
U �
V7 m
2 b
o N
0
c
a �
N 0
'Y
y0131 S
.�'j/7
do
J
Q
U
4.
II
a
J
a.
z
W
2
W
Lr) O
Q) U J
VJ
c
O W
O
>- LL U
�U a _
z Q Z
O°o Q)
o IL z
Q� z
W
O �J a
zJ
w J
N OW z a
PLANT SCHEDULE
TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE QTY
QUE AG2 Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak 15 gal. 7
Standard
QUE AGR Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak 24" Box 6
Standard
QUE AG3 Quercus agrifolia / Coast Live Oak 36" Box 3
,DO Standard
SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING QTY
• BAC PIG Baccharis pilularis Pigeon Point' / Coyote Brush 5 gal. 60" o.c. 238
LEY CAN Leymus condensatus Canyon Prince' / Native Blue Rye 1 gal. 30" o.c. 234
PLANT LEGEND
TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME
0 QUE AG2 Quercus agrifolia
Coast Live Oak
0aQUE AGR Quercus agrifolia
Coast Live Oak
0 QUE AG3 Quercus agrifolia
Coast Live Oak
SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME
BAC PIG Baccharis pilularis Pigeon Point'
0
Coyote Brush
LEY CAN Leymus condensatus Canyon Prince'
Native Blue Rye
PLANT IDENTIFICATION KEY
PLANT ABBREVIATION
CONTAINER SIZE
QUANTITIY
2U)
mmaz
NQQQQ
ti C/) cf) 2 J
O--U0-
NC/)fno W
�pCncnOW
OcNUUcNCn
00
C ) z
Y < LY Lu
C/) LLj Q)
LU
WQ2��U
ZDUQ�cA
� a
Uj
N
M
�ftjO
O
_ O
Z
LL O
Q U
LLI
LLl
Q Q
Q �
c/) O Z
�L O
LU
Q �U
LL
Uft
JzJ
�Cr-�
=U
� Q) O
VMS Z
do
� ��
Q
Q W
o
N S
J
Q
U c
m
o
C.)
hCO
6
O�
O
I y
��sN
A�j
y0131
CD
S
W
J
o �
W
U
Q � V
ct Z
>- LL O U
LO�U a _
Z Q Z
�p 0
O az z
z
O �W J a
zJ N LUJ oW z a
ROUND -TOPPED SOIL BERM 4" HIGH X 8"
WIDE ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE SHALL
BE CENTERED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF
THE ROOT BALL FOR 240°. BERM SHALL
BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY.
TRUNK CALIPER SHALL MEET ANSI Z60
CURRENT EDITION FOR ROOT BALL
SIZE.
ROUND -TOPPED SOIL BERM 4" HIGH X 8" WIDE
ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE SHALL BE
CENTERED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE
ROOT BALL FOR 240°. BERM SHALL BEGIN AT
ROOT BALL PERIPHERY.
2" LAYER OF MULCH. NO MORE THAN 1" OF
MULCH ON TOP OF ROOT BALL. (SEE
SPECIFICATIONS FOR MULCH).
ORIGINAL GRADE
LOOSENED SOIL. DIG AND TURN THE SOIL
TO REDUCE THE COMPACTION TO THE
AREA AND DEPTH SHOWN.
SLOPE SIDES OF LOOSENED SOIL.
EXISTING SOIL
BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL RESTS ON
EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL.
TREE ON SLOPE
Detail -File
TOP OF ROOT BALL (PLANT
COLLAR) 1/2"-1" HIGHER THAN
SURROUNDING GRADE
SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AT
BACKFILL AWAY FROM
ROOTBALL
ORGANIC MULCH COVERING
ROOT BALL AND ENTIRE
BASIN AREA,
APPROXIMATELY 1" DEEP
IRRIGATION BASIN BERM
IIf169GI=11eZel:L1979
2 X ROOT BALL
12" AT 1 GALLON
NATIVE SHRUB PLANTING
rA SHRUB ON SLOPE
3/4" = 1'-0"
FX-PL-FX-SHRB-09
4" LAYER OF MULCH. NO MORE THAN
1" OF MULCH ON TOP OF ROOT BALL.
(SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MULCH).
ORIGINAL SLOPE SHOULD PASS
THROUGH THE POINT WHERE THE
TRUNK MEETS SUBSTRATE/SOIL.
SHRUB
ROOTBALL
4" HIGH X 8" WIDE ROUND - TOPPED SOIL
BERM ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE SHALL
BE CENTERED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF
THE ROOT BALL FOR 240°. BERM SHALL
BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY.
MODIFIED SOIL. DEPTH VARIES
PRIOR TO MULCHING, LIGHTLY TAMP
SOIL AROUND THE ROOT BALL IN 6"
LIFTS TO BRACE SHRUB. DO NOT OVER
COMPACT. WHEN THE PLANTING HOLE
HAS BEEN BACKFILLED, POUR WATER
AROUND THE ROOT BALL TO SETTLE
THE SOIL.
EXISTING SOIL
BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL RESTS ON
EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL
NOTES:
1- SHRUBS SHALL BE OF QUALITY AS
PRESCRIBED IN THE ROOT OBSERVATIONS
DETAIL AND SPECIFICATION.
2- SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER
REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THIS DETAIL.
FX-PL-FX-SHRB-01
TREE STAKING
TREE W/BERM
1/2" = 1'-0"
I0l1r,ACTO1l1 XAMA/.
SPIKE (TYP.)
CONNECTOR
PROTECT TREE WITH APPROVED
PLANT TIE MATERIAL
2" DIAMETER LODGEPOLE PINE
TREATED TREE STAKES. SET
PERPENDICULAR
TO PREVAILING WIND.
REMOVE NURSERY STAKE
BY THE END OF MAINTENANCE
PERIOD.
SOIL BERM TO HOLD
WATER
2" MULCH
BACKFILL PER PLANTING DETAIL
AVOID DAMAGE TO ROOT BALL
WITH SUPPORT STAKES
FX-PL-FX-TREE-11
DO NOT PRUNE TREE AT PLANTING
EXCEPT FOR SPECIFIC
STRUCTURAL CORRECTIONS
NOT STAKE OR WRAP TRUNK.
\RK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE
THE NURSERY AND LOCATE TO THE
)RTH IN THE FIELD
:T ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR
:VERAL INCHES HIGHER IN POORLY
ZAINED SOIL
BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER
MULCH (DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN
)INTACT WITH TREE TRUNK)
DISHED GRADE
kMP SOIL SOLIDLY AROUND
SSE OF ROOT BALL
3 WIDE SHALLOW HOLE WITH
�PERED SIDES
:EPARED SOIL FOR TREES
ARCHITECT NOTE: CHECK OFF APPLICABLE
SIZE & FINISH DESIRED
SIZE:
❑
1"
X 2.25"
❑MF
❑BL
❑
1.5"
X 2.25"
❑MF
❑BL
®
2"
X 2.25"
®MF
❑BL
❑
2.5"
X 2.25"
❑MF
❑BL
❑
3"
X 3
❑MF
❑BL
❑
4"
X 3„
❑MF
❑BL
FINISH LEGEND:
(MF) MILL FINISH -NATURAL ALUMINUM
(BL) BLACK DURAFLEX-ELECTROSTATICALLY
APPLIED BAKED ON PAINT, MEETS AAMA 2603
ADJACENT PLANTING AREA
PERMALOC ASPHALT EDGE
ALUMINUM RESTRAINT
a -
aa . d SINGLE COURSE ASPHALT
000000 0
000 (5 (5 (o
0 00 o
FILL ALL VOIDS UNDER
0°0 00°0 0o
00°O o0°O o0°O o0°O
RESTRAINT FOR PROPER
0 00 00
o 0 o 0
0 00 00 00
00 0 0 0 0 0 o
SUPPORT
0000000
0o00000000
°0 °o
00 00000
COMPACT BASE COURSE
0 00 0
000000 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EXTENDING 6" BEYOND
0 0 00 O 00
00 O 00 0 00 0 00 O
RESTRAINT
%$' X 10" SPIRAL STEEL
SPIKE 12" O.C. (MIN.)
SUBGRADE
NOTES:
1. INSTALLATION PER
MANUFACTURER'S
"INSTALLATION GUIDELINES"
2. 8'-0" SECTIONS CONNECTED WITH
4" SLIDING CONNECTOR
3. MAINTAIN %" GAP BETWEEN
SECTIONS TO ALLOW FOR
PRODUCT EXPANSION IN
EXTREME TEMPERATURES
4. CORNERS: NOTCH BASE ONLY
AND FORM A CONTINUOUS
CORNER
5. PERMALOC ASPHALTEDGE AS
MANUFACTURED BY PERMALOC
CORPORATION, HOLLAND MI
(800) 356-9860
(616) 399-9600
6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE:
FOR PRODUCT AND PURCHASING
INFORMATION
VISIT: WWW.PERMALOC.COM
ASPHALTEDGE: SINGLE COURSE ASPHALT
NTS
FX-SI-PERM-EDG-01
FX-PL-FX-TREE-05
Z
Q
U)
oocoaZ
NQQQQ
ti C/) U) 2 J
o--U�
c \1 W
�oc/5fnoW
oc\1UUcNcn
00
z C)
YZWLLI
coLLjU�»
��-WQO¢
Lu :z z u
�DUC)0-co
::;..
uj
N
M
O
O
_ 0)
Z Z
V OLL
O
Q U
Lu
Lu
Q Q
co co
O
OLa O
Lu
Q f�U
JzJ
L
LL QEz
=U
Q) O
VMS Z
0
G
0
do
V
z J
� O
N
Q W
co
� Z
uj
U a V
Q Z
Lo Z
O� C) o
az z
Q � Z
O �W J a
NzJ LuJ
oW z a
CD
U)
�_
r+
O
CD
Z
O
m
0
I j
00
m0 -u ;u o Io
z 2 G c
v) m D go O o
m c) U) L
G� = m 0 m m
D - C)
D m Cn % I
nz O N
,I
oZn %pN f Q
c , !
cn O 0
CD CID
\\ �
\\ '' °
0 CD
\�_ �u a -----------------
O % op
mI %
N — //, Cn o
o (� N '�lil~�i 11 N °
cn
O rn 0 Z11 N
z z �W C)Cfl %
N p II c
O r �o
�m� z C r
o D � z0 cn
C0 m
N D � N
o (�}� rn m O o p io
-Ph. o C)
� r %
O m
"
C/) `
I V
0
o
ca w A r v S?o � Oo wp I! op
D�> / jl
n=m % O� I
I
O � y
°cn COMM
° . e OM
0' tr U) Ij
0)
Cb
/ 0
D 0
j 0
°
C) S o J ii
41
I
C � .• °'.•Am � Q 10
CD C O N m D D
� � X
GJ m� �
CD -
D z r
c�z� G7 O
Win= z < o it O I
m >m m m m ii o pii f p
O z O
0 �w C CA
m -0O
0 CD m
3 D C o m
z cn
�o °Z
z 0 (7 y Zm
M � n II pW I
m u
N x m m
m m O O %' i! Q GJ
m moc D - --� o
m0 NO �� y 2>
D C) (n D N N m w 1�T1 0o co O o 0
_ D Cn r ° D 0° 0 z w _ o N % o _ �+e3aa 3ava� II 0
C ^ zO Z p
O < m D uJ �� 2� m c�� o D� / 0
Z m CD Z Z -0 i+
< m _ g.o c� � O
m m m
0 z N � o m
z O
O 0 p �,D C)
77 m CD O ° ° 3ag3ad80 ------ ,D
ESN � D
=zo %
p
new � 1 nP � (i2� /
O ,22rn n I+ -
Or>D 2 O < L� 00 /
C Zmn Z mm
O �m2 m in �� • �p
O �2� ;a22 /
Z �z0 O m
O _ o moor- c 0 m % 3
m cn o
O
C) Z G) m
m w
7111
z o rn
O m = = N
N D i
r
C)z
o10
0
0
SQUARE PLASTIC
TOP PUSH CAP
POLE MAY BE
DRILLED TO
ACCEPT SIDE
MOUNTED
FIXTURE IF
REQUIRED -
SQUARE POLE
SHAFT
CAP DETAIL (STANDARD) - �
2-PIECE COVER
FIN$SHED TO
MATCH POLE
FULL BASE COVER (STANDARD)
0 50' 'NUT
HOLDER FOR
2-50' X 5.00"
GROUNDING
HANDHOLE RIM
WITH COVER
1' 6"
j4
THICKNESS
BOLT CIRCLE
I
1 SQUARE
f
SLOTTED BOLT HOLES
POLE BASE AND HANDHOLE DETAIL
Iightpo-1es PLUS.C..
308 N. Brooke St. 8W791-1453
Fond du Lac, Wl 54935 1
quotes@lightpolesplus.com
LightPolesPlus.com
BASE PLATE
WITH STIFFENERS
& ANCHOR BOLTS
Rev Description I Date I NOTES:
2.0" SCHED 80
PIPE TENON
SQUARE POLE PLATE
WITH WIRE ENTRANCE
HOLE (DEBURRED)
I POLE SHAFT
P2 TENON DETAIL (OPTIONAL)
MOUNTING
HEIGHT
REINFORCED HANDHOLE
"
WITH COVER AND
GROUNDING
1' - 6"
4 - ANCHOR BOLTS
WITH THREADED END
GALVANIZED 12" MIN-
I !
EACH BOLT FURNISHED
WITH 2 HEX NUTSAN❑
2 FLAT WASHERS.
POLE DETAIL
Rev. V07312019
This epec+ficatw brothure rs xne9ded to serve as a genera! guile. Our Prom are cotnmuahy
b'"at9 enONwed and t. pVoved, and speotfications are subteet w change without mute
LIGHT POLE
4 -#6 x 24" MIN. VERTICAL
REBAR
EPA Load Information
i
VS-SSSA-I0.4040-11-AB-FP
:r
30-6
765
i
23.8 595
r
18.9
473
VS-SSSA-12-404D-1I-AB-FP
24.4
610
18.8
470
14.8
370
VS-SSSA-I4-4040.11 AB-W
19.9
498
15.1
378
11.7
293
VS-SSSA-15.4040.11,AB-FP
15.9
398
11.8
295
8.9
223
VS-SSSA-16-4040-11 AB -FP
15.9
398
11.8
295
230
8.4
223
VS-SSSA-18A040-11AB-FP
1Z6
315
9.2
6.7
168
VS-SSSA-204040-11-ABfP
9.6
240
6.7
167
4.5
I50
VS-SSSA-20-d040.07-AB-FP
15_8
240
12.7
167
4
150
VS-SSSA-20-5050-11-AB-FP
17.7
443
12.7-
343
9.4
235
VS-SSSA-25-5050.11-AB-FP
9-8
245
6.3
157
3.7
ISO
VS-SSSA-25-5050-07-AB-FP
18-5
463
13.3
393
9.5
238
VS-SSSA-30.4040.07AB-FP
6-7
168
4.4
110
2.6
65
VS-SSSA-30-5050-1I-AB-FP
4.7
150
2
So
NIA
NIA
VS SSSA 30 5050-07-AB-FP
10 7
267
6.7
167
3.9
100
VS-SSSA-30-6060-07-AS-FP
19
475
13.2
330
9
225
VS-SSSA35-5050-07-A8FP
5.9-
150
2.5
IDO
NIA
NIA
VS-SSSA-35-6�7-AS-FP
124
310
7.6
140
4.2
105
VS-SSSA-40-6060-07-AB+P
7.2
180
3
75
NIA
I NIA
Designation & Dimensional Information
VSSSSA-10-4040.71-AB-FP
. • .
10'-0• 4
4
11
75
:.
8.0 - 9.0
8.25 x 0.75
a• :.
0-75 x 17.00 x 300
o!"3.75
VS-SSSA-12-4040-11-AB-FP
12'-0• 4
4
11
90
8.0 - 9.0
8-25 x 0.75
0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00
3.25 - 3.75
VS-SSSA-14-4040-1 I AEA FP
14'-0- 4
4
11
100
8-0- 9.0
8.25 x 0.75
0,75 x 17.00 x 3.00
3.25 - 3.75
VS-SSSA-15-4040.11-AB-FP
1 T-0" 4
4
11
110
8.0 - 9-0
8.25 x 0.75
0.75 x 17-00 x 3.00
3.25 - 3.75
VS-SSSA-1 b-404G-1 1 -AB-FP
16'-0" 4
4
11
115
8.0 - 9-0
8.25 x 0.75
0.75 x I TDO x 3.00
3.25 - 3,75
VS- SSA-18-4040-11-AB-FP
18'-0' 4
4
11
125
8.0 - 9A
8-25 x 0.75
0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00
3.25 - 3.75
VS-SSSA 20.4040-11-A9-FP
20'-0" 4
4
11
140
8.0 - 9.0
8-25 x 0.75
0.75 x T 7.00 x 3.00
3.25 - 3.75
VS-SSSA-20.404U-07-AB-FP
20'-Ir
4
4
7
200
8.0 - 9.0
a.25 x 0,875
0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00
3,38 - 3.88
VS-SSSA-2D-5050-11-Ab-FP
201-W
5
5
11
185
10.0. 12.0
11 x I
0.75 x 17.00 x 3-DO
3.5- 4
5
VS-SSSA-25.5050.1 I -AB -FP
25'-0•
5
5
11
225
1 10.0 -12-0
11 x I
0.75 x 17-00 x 3.00
3.5 4
VS-SSSA-25-5050-07-AB-FP
25'-0•
5
5
7
360
10.0 -12,0
11 x 1
0-75 x 17,00 x 3.00
3.5 - 4
VS-SSSA-30.4040-07-AB-FP
30'-0•
4
4
7
291
8.0.9,0
8.25 x 0,875
0.75 x 17.00 x 3.00
3-38 - 3.88
VS-SSSA-30.5050-11-AB-FP
30'•0"
5
5
11
265
10.0-12.0
11 x 1
0.75 x 17.00 x 3.D0
15 -4
VS-9SSA-30-5050-07-AB-FP
30'-0"
5
5
7
380
10.0- 12.0
11 x 1
VS SSSA 30 6064-07 AB FP
30'-0`
6
6
7
520
11.0 -13.0
12.5 x 1
N77j
VS-SSSA-35 5050 07-AB-FP
351-0"
5
5
7
440
i 0.0 -12.0
11 x 1
VSSSSA-35-6060-fl7-AB-FP
35.4r
6
6
7
W
11.0 -13.0
12.5 x 1
VS-SSSA-4D-6060.07AB-FP
40'-0
6
6
7
605
11 A -13.D
12.5 x 1
1.,30x 3
Engineering
And Design
Subject Job Humber: T2,,:, q _ date: Z i S
Job: i [ n s > fe By: T `I` Section:
Checked 81F. Page of
• I
Al
s aft "f
V" /1� 4
r
j►�1 ff
�' ��
A rE 6
/ ! ti - �•
2, s' + It $ }s x 2'S
F 44- >'- , 2� r ate
T Y
Engineering
And Design
www.ty-eng.corn
Lightpole Installation at
1 Chapman Wa , El Segundo, California 90245
Structural Calculations
Date 6/15/2020
TY Job Number T2019-257
ESS
TOLGA YAPRAK
No. C72927
Exp. 12-31--20
CIVIC
oaf' CA1-�
CONDUIT, SIZE TBD CONDUIT, SIZE TBD - -
(OUT) i (IN)
9 : a a PVC TUBING, SIZE TBD
PVC TUBING. SIZE TBD PVC TUBING, SIZE TBD
a CONDUIT, SIZE TBD
CONDUIT, SIZE TBD s (IN)
(OUT)
4
PVC TEE, SIZE TBD
DETAIL A
4" SQ. STEEL POLE
DARK BRONZE PAINTED
GROUNDING LUG
TERMINATE CONDUIT AT BOTTOM
OF HANDHOLE WITH BUSHING
CAST STEEL BASE PLATE
13"x13"x3/4"
1 1/2"
T-0" ❑lA CONCRETE POST MINIMUM
2000 PSI, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
3 - #3 HORIZONTAL
REBAR 12" O.C.
4 - #3 HORIZONTAL
REBAR, EA. WAY
6" a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
2.50" x 5"
HANDHOLE RIM
WITH COVER 20
1
1/4"STEEL STIFFENER
@ 4 SIDES
1414 V
�1"ANON-SHRINK GROUT ,i r-611
314" CHAMFER AROUN❑
a 1 "06" ANCHOR BOLTS
WITH LEVELING AND
ANCHOR NUTS (TYP. 4) 31-011
d 3
51
4
RV & BOAT STORAGE EXPANSION,
PHASE III,
ONE CHAPMAN WAY
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
4
GROUND LEVEL
CLIENT:
Product Overview
Pole Shaft -The pole shaft is fabricated from clot rolled welded steel tubing of one-piece construction
with a minimum yield strength of 55 KSL
Pole Top - A removable top cap is provided for poles receiving drilling patterns for side -mount luminaire
arm assemblies. Other pole top options include Tenon Top, Top Cap Only or Open Top which is typical
when the pole top diameter matches the necessary slip-M dimensions.
Hand Hole - A reinforced hand hole with grounding provision is provided at 1'-6" from the base end of the
pole assembly- Each hand hole includes a cover and cover attachment hardware. All pole assemblies
are provided with a 2.5" x 5" rectangular hand hole (dimensions are nominal).
Base Cover - A two-piece full base cover fabricated from ABS plastic is provided with each pole
assembly. Additional base cover options. including a cast aluminum and fabricated steel cover, are
available upon request.
Anchor Bolts - Anchor bolts conform to ASTM F1554 Grade 55 and are provided with two hex nuts
and two flat washers. Bolts have an "r bend on one end and are galvanized a minimum of 12' on the
threaded end.
Hardware - All structural fasteners are galvanized high strength carbon steel- All non-structural fasteners
are galvanized or zinc plated carbon steel or stainless steel.
• Finish - Standard finishes are either Galvanized or Finish Painted- Additional finish options including
Finish Paint over Galvanizing are available upon request.
• Design Criterla - Standard EPA (Effective Projected Area) and weight values are based on standard
Commercial Criteria (with 1.3 gust factor) for side mounted fixtures only. Consult the factory on loading
criteria for pole top mounted luminaires and/or brackets. Satisfactory performance of light poles is
dependent upon the pole being properly attached to a supporting foundation of adequate design.
iigh! p les PLUS.tom
308 N. Brooke St- i 888-791-1463
Fond du Lac, Wf 54935 quotes@lightpolesplus.com
LightPoiesPlus-corn
CALIFORNIA STRORAGEMASTERS
1921 E. MAPLE AVE.
EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
(310) 414-9294 off (310) 414-9031
C-241162
* F9.12/31/2020
;rncx'.1r.P
POk Cap P�au•r
0
Had
Rev.V07312019
ThLa spei km*n hrochme is i dwded to serve as s generar guKie. Our pro&cts are cwymuah
be" m9 neered and rmpmed and soec:ficat•ona are subiect to change wlliwut wine
952 Manhattan Beach Blvd. #260
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
(310) 935-0060 (phone)
(310) 935-0071 (fax)
info@ty-eng.com
Www.ty-eng,com
TNY 952 Manhattan Beach Blvd., #260
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Engineering '��l;ur;r_-; (310) 935-0060
And Design fax) (310) 935-0071
www.ty-eng.com www,ty-eng.com
Location E! Segundo, CA Job Number T2019-257 Date 6/15/20
Subject By MH Section
Jab 1 Chapman Way Checked By TY Page/of
INTRODUCTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
This submittal package includes structural calculations for the proposed 18ft lightpole installation at
an existing commercial property located at 1 Chapman Way, El Segundo, California.
The calculations are performed in accordance with the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), Title
24, Part 2, Volume 2, 20181nternational Building Code (IBC 2018) and ASCE 7-16.
WIND LOADING CRITERIA
Per ASCE 7-16, Section 26,
F = qh G Cf (psf)
qh = 0.002561_ l I& V2
G = 1.0
Q= 1.0
Exposure Category = B
V = 114mph
K K--fId = 1 A
qh = 0.00256 x 1 x 1102 = 30.98 psf
WEST PALM GROUP
ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, PLANNING
STRUCURAL CALCULATIONS
Scale: None
SCALE:
NOTED
21213 B HAWTHORNE BLVD. #5225 DATE: 2 JuN 20
TORRANCE, CA 90503 D�''"N KK5
(310) 619-1165 CHECKED:
kyle .westpa l m @g ma i l . com
APPROVED:
KK5
PROJECT NO.: 20201071
S200
CITY by
E L S E GU N D O Planning Commission Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: June 24, 2021
Agenda Heading: Public Hearing
DESCRIPTION:
Zone Text Amendment to establish parking standards for religious institution affiliated
housing development projects in accordance with state law.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 2896, recommending that the City Council approve an Ordinance
establishing parking standards for religious institution affiliated housing development
projects in accordance with state law.
BACKGROUND
AB 1851, effective January 1, 2021, limits the number of parking spaces a local agency
may require in connection with a "religious institution affiliated housing development
project" ("RIAHD"), as defined. AB 1851 also requires a local agency to allow for the
elimination of up to 50% of the existing parking spaces serving a place of worship in
connection with the approval of a RIAHD and prohibits a local agency from requiring
replacement of parking spaces that the developer of a RIAHD proposes to eliminate. A
Zoning Ordinance amendment is required to bring the Municipal Code into conformance
with state law.
DISCUSSION
Properties owned by religious institutions often have large, underutilized parking areas.
To encourage and facilitate the development of affordable housing on these underutilized
parcels, the state passed AB 1851, which does the following:
• Prohibits a local agency from requiring the replacement of religious -use parking
spaces that a developer of a "religious institution affiliated housing development
project" proposes to eliminate as part of the housing development.
• Defines "religious institution affiliated housing development project" as a housing
development project that meets all of the following requirements:
o The housing development project is located on one or more contiguous
parcels that are each owned, entirely, whether directly or through a wholly
owned company or corporation, by a religious institution.
o The housing development project qualifies as being near collocated
religious -use parking by being on or adjacent to a parcel with religious -use
EA-1302 and ZTA 21-02
June 24, 2021
Page 2 of 3
parking or by being located within one -tenth of a mile of a parcel that
contains religious -use parking.
o Qualifies for a density bonus under Government Code section 65915.
• Allows a project developer to eliminate up to 50 percent of the total religious -use
parking spaces available at the time the developer's request is made.
• Prevents a local agency from requiring a developer to cure a pre-existing deficit of
the number of religious -use parking spaces as a condition of approval of a RIAHD.
• Specifies that the elimination of religious -use parking spaces pursuant to a RIAHD
project that has been approved by a local agency does not constitute a concession
for the purposes of density bonus law.
• Prohibits a local agency from denying a RIAHD solely on the basis that the project
will reduce the total number of parking spaces at the place of worship as long as
the reduction does not exceed 50 percent.
• Requires a local agency to allow the number of remaining religious -use parking
spaces to count toward the number of spaces that the local agency would
otherwise require for the RIAHD.
• Provides that a local agency is not required to allow the remaining religious -use
parking spaces to count toward the number of parking spaces otherwise required
for approval of the RIAHD to the extent that it would prohibit a local agency from
requiring up to one parking space per unit unless the RIAHD is within one-half mile
of public transit or there is a car share vehicle within one block of the parcel.
• Prohibits the reduction in parking spaces from reducing the minimum parking
standards that a local agency may require of a RIAHD below one space per unit
unless (a) the RIAHD is within one-half mile of a high -quality transit corridor or a
major transit stop, or (b) there is a car share vehicle within one block of the parcel.
I_1011_1 W&i1.1
The proposed ordinance amends the parking regulations in Chapter 15-15 to specify that
RIAHDs are subject to the provisions of AB 1851.
El Segundo General Plan and Municipal Code Consistency
The proposed amendment to the Zoning Code will further the goals, objectives, and
policies of the General Plan and will not obstruct their attainment. The amendment is
relatively minor in nature and is intended to bring the Zoning Code into compliance with
a new state law mandate (AB 1851). The proposed amendment is also consistent with
the purpose of the Zoning Code, which is to serve the public health, safety, and general
EA-1302 and ZTA 21-02
June 24, 2021
Page 3 of 3
welfare.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal.
Code Regs. § 15305 because it consists only of minor alterations in land use limitations
necessary to implement a state law mandate (AB 1851) and does not portend new
development. Furthermore, the staff finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is
no possibility that the ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.
Consequently, it is exempt from CEQA review under 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3).
PREPARED BY: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Principal Plann �-
REVIEWED BY: Gregg Kovacevich, Assistant City Attorney' ���
APPROVED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Director of Development Service
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2896
2. Exhibit A — Draft Ordinance
3. Text of AB 1851
RESOLUTION NO. 2896
A RESOLUTION OF THE EL SEGUNDO PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 15-15-9 (PARKING
REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION AFFILIATED
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS) TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
(EA-1302 AND ZTA 21-02).
The Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission finds and declares that:
A. On September 28, 2020, the Governor signed AB 1851 into law effective as
of January 1, 2021. AB 1851 limits the number of parking spaces a local agency may
require in connection with a "religious institution affiliated housing development project"
("RIAHD"), as defined. AB 1851 also requires a local agency to allow for the elimination
of up to 50% of the existing parking spaces serving a place of worship in connection with
the approval of a RIAHD and prohibits a local agency from requiring replacement of
parking spaces that the developer of a RIAHD proposes to eliminate. AB 1851 applies to
all cities, including charter cities.
B. A Zoning Code amendment is required to bring the Municipal Code into
conformance with AB 1851.
SECTION 2: General Plan Findings. Considering all of its aspects, the proposed
amendments to the Zoning Code will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the
General Plan and will not obstruct their attainment. The amendments are relatively minor
in nature and are intended to bring the Zoning Code into compliance with a new state law
mandate (AB 1851).
SECTION 3: Zone Text Amendment Findings. Based on the facts and evidence set forth
herein, in the accompanying staff report, and in the record as a whole, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
1. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the purpose of the ESMC, which is
to serve the public health, safety, and general welfare and to provide the economic and
social advantages resulting from an orderly, planned use of land resources; and
2. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Code is required to ensure consistency
with state law (AB 1851).
SECTION 4: Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council adopt the ordinance set forth in attached "Exhibit A," which is incorporated into
this resolution by reference.
Page 1 of 2
SECTION 5: Environmental Review. This ordinance is exempt from environmental
review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code
§§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15305 because it consists only of
minor alterations in land use limitations necessary to implement a state law mandate (AB
1851) and does not portend new development. Furthermore, the Planning Commission
finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance may
have a significant effect on the environment. Consequently, it is exempt from CEQA
review under 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3).
SECTION 6: Reliance on Record. Each and every finding and determination in this
Resolution is based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written,
contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations
constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission in all
respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as
a whole.
SECTION 7: Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon
adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of
/_11aI2M9
Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM
MARK D. HENSLEY, City Attorney
, 2021
Ryan Baldino, Chair
El Segundo Planning Commission
Gregg Kovacevich, Assistant City Attorney
Page 2 of 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE EL SEGUNDO CITY COUNCIL ADDING
SECTION 15-15-9 (PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS
INSTITUTION AFFILIATED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS) TO
THE MUNICIPAL CODE (EA-1302 AND ZTA 21-02.
The City Council of the City of El Segundo does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. On September 28, 2020, the Governor signed AB 1851 into law effective as
of January 1, 2021. AB 1851 limits the number of parking spaces a local agency may
require in connection with a "religious institution affiliated housing development project"
("RIAHD"), as defined. AB 1851 also requires a local agency to allow for the elimination
of up to 50% of the existing parking spaces serving a place of worship in connection with
the approval of a RIAHD and prohibits a local agency from requiring replacement of
parking spaces that the developer of a RIAHD proposes to eliminate. AB 1851 applies to
all cities, including charter cities.
B. A Zoning Code amendment is required to bring the Municipal Code into
conformance with AB 1851.
C. Zone Text Amendment Findings. Based on the facts and evidence set forth
herein, in the accompanying staff report, and in the record as a whole, the City Council
finds as follows:
1. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the purpose of the ESMC,
which is to serve the public health, safety, and general welfare and to provide the
economic and social advantages resulting from an orderly, planned use of land resources;
and
2. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Code is required to ensure
consistency with state law (AB 1851).
D. General Plan Findings. Considering all of its aspects, the proposed
amendments to the Zoning Code will further the goals, objectives, and policies of the
General Plan and will not obstruct their attainment. The amendments are relatively minor
in nature and are intended to bring the Zoning Code into compliance with a new state law
mandate (AB 1851).
SECTION 2: Environmental Review. This ordinance is exempt from environmental
review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code
§§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15305 because it consists only of
minor alterations in land use limitations necessary to implement a state law mandate (AB
1851) and does not portend new development. Furthermore, the City Council finds that
it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance may have a
significant effect on the environment. Consequently, it is exempt from CEQA review under
14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3).
SECTION 3: Section 15-15-9 is added to Title 15 of the ESMC to read as follows:
1115-15-9 PARKING REQUIREMENTS RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION
AFFILIATED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS:
Notwithstanding any provisions of this Title or any adopted specific plan to the
contrary, the parking requirements for a religious institution affiliated housing
development project are subject to the provisions of Government Code section
65913.6, as amended. For purposes of this section, a `religious institution
affiliated housing development project' is defined as set forth in Government
Code section 65913.6, subd. (a)(5)."
SECTION 4: Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed in order to achieve
the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council's intent that the provisions of
this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that
facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.
SECTION 5: Enforceability. Repeal of any provision of the El Segundo Municipal Code
does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution
and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before this Ordinance's effective
date. Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or
prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Ordinance.
SECTION 6: Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid
by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not
affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 7: The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this
Ordinance, cause it to be entered into the City of El Segundo's book of original
ordinances, make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting, and,
within fifteen days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be
published or posted in accordance with California law.
SECTION 8: Effective Date. This Ordinance will take effect 30 days after its final passage
and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021
Drew Boyles, Mayor
ATTEST:
Tracy Sherill Weaver, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
Assembly Bill No. 1851
CHAPTER 196
An act to add Section 65913.6 to the Government Code, relating to land
use.
[Approved by Governor September 28, 2020. Filed with
Secretary of State September 28, 2020.]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1851, Wicks. Religious institution affiliated housing development
projects: parking requirements.
Existing law provides for various incentives intended to facilitate and
expedite the construction of affordable housing, including the Density Bonus
Law, which requires, when an applicant proposes a housing development
within the jurisdiction of a local government, that the city, county, or city
and county provide the developer with a density bonus and other incentives
or concessions for the production of lower income housing units or for the
donation of land within the development if the developer, among other
things, agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low, low-,
or moderate -income households or qualifying residents.
This bill would prohibit a local agency from requiring the replacement
of religious -use parking spaces that a developer of a religious institution
affiliated housing development project proposes to eliminate as part of that
housing development project. The bill would prohibit the number of
religious -use parking spaces requested to be eliminated from exceeding
50% of the number that are available at the time the request is made. The
bill would prohibit a local agency from requiring the curing of any
preexisting deficit of the number of religious -use parking spaces as a
condition of approval of a religious institution affiliated housing development
project. The bill would require a local agency to allow the number of
religious -use parking spaces that will be available after completion of a
religious institution affiliated housing development project to count toward
the number of parking spaces otherwise required for approval. The bill
would prohibit a local agency from denying a housing development project
proposed by a religious institution, or a developer working with a religious
institution, solely on the basis that the project will reduce the total number
of parking spaces available at the place of worship provided that the total
reduction does not exceed 50% of existing parking spaces. The bill would
authorize a local agency to require up to one parking space per unit for a
religious institution affiliated housing development project. The bill would
include findings that the changes proposed by this bill address a matter of
statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all
cities, including charter cities.
94
Ch. 196 —2
By adding to the duties of local planning officials, this bill would impose
a state -mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies
and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory
provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for
a specified reason.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 65913.6 is added to the Government Code, to read:
65913.6. (a) For purposes of this section, all of the following definitions
shall apply:
(1) "Housing development project" means a housing development project
as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 65589.5.
(2) "Local agency" means any county, city, or city and county, including
a charter city, or city and county.
(3) "Place of worship" means a property owned or operated by a religious
institution, that is used for the purpose of regular assembly by members of
the institution.
(4) "Religious institution" means an institution owned, controlled, and
operated and maintained by a bona fide church, religious denomination, or
religious organization composed of multidenominational members of the
same well -recognized religion, lawfully operating as a nonprofit religious
corporation pursuant to Part 4 (commencing with Section 9110) of Division
2 of Title 1 of the Corporations Code.
(5) "Religious institution affiliated housing development project" means
a housing development project that meets all of the following criteria:
(A) The housing development project is located on one or more
contiguous parcels that are each owned entirely, whether directly or through
a wholly owned company or corporation, by a religious institution.
(B) The housing development project qualifies as being near colocated
religious -use parking by being any of the following:
(i) Located on one or more parcels that collectively contain religious -use
parking.
(ii) Located adjacent to a parcel owned by the religious institution that
contains religious -use parking.
(iii) Located on one or more parcels separated by no more than 0.1 miles
from a parcel owned by the religious institution that contains religious -use
parking.
(C) The housing development project qualifies for a density bonus under
Section 65915.
(6) "Religious -use parking spaces" means existing parking spaces that
are required under the local agency's parking requirements for places of
worship.
94
Ch. 196
(b) (1) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall
not require the replacement of religious -use parking spaces that a developer
of a religious institution affiliated housing development project proposes
to eliminate as part of that housing development project pursuant to this
section.
(2) The number of religious -use parking spaces requested to be eliminated
by a developer of a religious institution affiliated housing development
project pursuant to this section shall not exceed 50 percent of the number
of religious -use parking spaces that are available at the time the request is
made.
(3) The elimination of religious -use parking spaces pursuant to a religious
institution affiliated housing development project that has been approved
by a local agency does not constitute a concession pursuant to Section 65915.
(c) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall not
require the curing of any preexisting deficit of the number of religious -use
parking spaces as a condition of approval of a religious institution affiliated
housing development project.
(d) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall
allow the number of religious -use parking spaces that will be available after
completion of a religious institution affiliated housing development project
to count toward the number of parking spaces otherwise required for approval
of the housing development project under any other law or ordinance.
(e) Notwithstanding any other law or ordinance, a local agency shall not
deny a proposed religious institution affiliated housing development project
solely on the basis that the project will reduce the total number of parking
spaces available at the place of worship provided that the total reduction
does not exceed 50 percent of existing parking spaces.
(f) (1) Notwithstanding any provision of this section, except as provided
in paragraph (3), the reduction in parking spaces authorized in this section
shall not reduce the minimum parking standards that a local agency may
require of a religious institution affiliated housing development project
below one space per unit.
(2) For the purposes of this subdivision, a local agency shall not be
required to allow the remaining religious -use parking spaces to count toward
the number of parking spaces otherwise required for approval of the housing
development project as provided in subdivision (d) to the extent that the
application of subdivision (d) would prohibit a local agency from requiring
up to one parking space per unit.
(3) This subdivision shall not apply to a religious institution affiliated
housing development project if either of the following is true:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of public
transit. For the purposes of this paragraph, "public transit" means either a
high -quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155
of the Public Resources Code or a major transit stop as defined in Section
21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel.
94
Ch. 196 —4
(g) The Legislature finds and declares that the provision of adequate
housing, in light of the severe shortage of housing at all income levels in
this state, is a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as
that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution,
and therefore this section applies to all cities, including charter cities.
SEC. 2. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6
of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or
school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments
sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act,
within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
U
94
CITY by
E L S E GU N D O Planning Commission Agenda Statement
Meeting Date: June 24, 2021
Agenda Heading: New Business
DESCRIPTION:
Determination of Consistency of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) with the City of El Segundo General Plan (Applicant: City of El Segundo).
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 2899, determining that the proposed FY 2021-22Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City of El Segundo General Plan.
BACKGROUND
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a document that identifies capital projects in the
City which the City Council can use as a guide for the efficient and effective provision
of resources for improving and maintaining public infrastructure and facilities. The City
of El Segundo annually reviews its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) needs and
funding resources for the purpose of identifying and prioritizing capital projects to be
completed within the planning period. These projects are needed to adequately maintain
current facilities, maintain existing infrastructure, provide new infrastructure where
needed, implement new technologies for the health and welfare of our citizens, and
prepare for major disasters.
The California Government Code (Section 65103 & 65401) requires the Planning
Commission to annually review the City's CIP for its consistency with the City's
General Plan. The Planning Commission has reviewed previous CIPs annually and
found them all to be consistent with the City's General Plan The proposed list of
projects in this year's CIP was included in the proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget
presented to City Council on June 15,2021. The Fiscal Year 2021-22 CIP is now being
presented to Planning Commission for General Plan Consistency determination.
1] 6*8111:11I:sL
City staff annually reviews the City's capital improvement needs, sets goals for
addressing those needs, and identifies projects necessary to achieve those goals. The
Public Works Department staff prepares a CIP which includes both core projects (e.g.,
sewer, water, roadway infrastructure improvements) and new projects proposed by other
departments and the general public. The CIP serves as a planning instrument in
conjunction with the City's General Plan and City Council's Goals to identify needed
capital projects and coordinate the financing and timing of improvements in a way
that maximizes the return to the public.
EA-1309 (General Plan Consistency Finding)
June 24, 2021
Page 2 of 3
The new projects are presented to the City's 5-member Capital Improvement Program
Advisory Committee (CIPAC) for consideration. Committee members are responsible for
reviewing, scoring and ranking the proposed CIP projects based on established scoring
criteria. Staff then makes the final funding recommendation based on CIPAC scores after
also taking finances and resources into consideration. This year's complete list of
projects are proposed to be funded through Prop C, Gas Tax, Water Enterprise, Sewer
Enterprise, Local Grant Funds and the General Fund.
CODE CONSIDERATION AND ANALYSIS
Code consideration in this matter stems from the State Government Code. In part,
Government Code Section 65401 states that:
"...each governmental body... shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed
public works ... such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city
planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with
the adopted general plan or part thereof"
As a result, the Planning Commission's role is not to add or delete projects from the
CIP, but to determine if the proposed CIP conforms to the City's General Plan. In
other words, the Planning Commission is being asked to determine whether the
projects listed below are consistent with the goals and policies established in the
City's General Plan.
The proposed CIP projects are more fully described in Attachment 2. The following table
lists all the proposed CIP projects for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and indicates the General Plan
goals, objectives and policies with which they are consistent.
Proposed CIP projects-
1 . Annual Water Main Maintenance
2. Water Division Office and Maintenance Yard
Improvements
3. Wastewater Infrastructure Replacement (Annual
Program)
4. Park Place Extension Transportation Project -
Design
5. Roadway Rehabilitation (Annual Program)
6. El Segundo Blvd. Improvements
7. Sidewalk Maintenance Program (Annual
Program)
8. Arena Street Improvements Study
9. Alondra Park (Regional project)
10. Infiltration projects
- Land Use Element Goal LU6,
to maintain and upgrade the
existing excellent parks,
recreation, and open space
facilities within the City of El
Segundo; and/or,
- Land Use Element Goal LU7,
to provide the highest quality
public facilities, services, and
public infrastructure possible to
the community.
EA-1309 (General Plan Consistency Finding)
June 24, 2021
Page 3 of 3
11. Civic Center Maintenance & Repairs
12. ADA Improvements - CDBG Funds
13. PD Women Locker Room Remodel
14. Fire Stations #1 & #2 Carpet
15. Safe Routes to School Projects
16. HVAC (Citywide)
17. Plumbing (Citywide)
18. Miscellaneous Electrical (Citywide)
19. Exterior Lighting + Miscellaneous Fagade
20. Main Facilities ADA Compliance Projects
Staff has reviewed the list of capital projects identified in the proposed Fiscal Year
2021-22 CIP considering the goals and objectives of the General Plan and believes
that the City's CIP continues to be consistent with the applicable goals and policies
of the El Segundo General Plan. Thus, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission adopt Resolution No. 2899, determining that the proposed FY 2021-
22Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City of El Segundo General
Plan.
\�ll�Z�]►1►�if h� : C AVllATITIR
The General Plan Consistency finding is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and 14 Cal.
Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3), as it is an activity covered by the common sense exemption
that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant
effect on the environment. Staff finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the Consistency finding may have a significant effect on the environment.
PREPARED BY: Lifan Xu, City Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Principal Plann
APPROVED BY: Denis Cook, Interim Director of Development Serviced
ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2899
2. Detailed Projects List for Fiscal Year 2021-22
RESOLUTION NO. 2899
A RESOLUTION FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2021-
2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONFORMS WITH THE EL
SEGUNDO GENERAL PLAN PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65401. (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. EA-1309)
The Planning Commission of the City of El Segundo does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Planning Commission finds and declares that:
A. In accordance with Government Code § 65401, the Public Works
Department prepared a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and submitted
the CIP to the City's Planning and Building Safety Department for
transmission to the Planning Commission;
B. Government Code § 65103(c) requires the Planning Commission to
annually review the City's CIP to determine whether the CIP is consistent
with the El Segundo General Plan;
C. On June 24, 2021, the Planning Commission considered the proposed CIP
in light of the El Segundo General Plan;
D. This Resolution and its findings are based upon the entire record including
information available at the June 24, 2021 Planning Commission meeting.
SECTION 2: Environmental Assessment. The Planning Commission finds that the
determination of the program's consistency is exempt from California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3) as it is an activity
covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects, which have
the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and this can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the Consistency finding may have a significant
effect on the environment.
SECTION 3: Approval. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed CIP for Fiscal
Year 2021/22, attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, is consistent with
the following goals of the El Segundo General Plan:
Land Use Element Goal LU6: to maintain and upgrade the existing excellent parks,
recreation, and open space facilities within the City of El Segundo.
Land Use Element Goal LU7: to provide the highest quality public facilities, services,
and public infrastructure possible to the community.
SECTION 4: The Commission Secretary is directed to mail a copy of this Resolution to
any person requesting a copy.
- 1 -
SECTION 5: This Resolution may be appealed within 10 calendar days after its adoption.
All appeals must be in writing and filed with the City Clerk within this time period. Failure
to file a timely written appeal will constitute a waiver of any right of appeal.
SECTION 6: Except as provided in Section 5, this Resolution is the Planning
Commission's final decision and will become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of June 2021.
Ryan Baldino, Chairperson
City of El Segundo Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney
David King, Assistant City Attorney
-2-
Baldino -
Newman -
Keldorf -
Hoeschler -
Maggay -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Annual Water Main Maintenance
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
DESCRIPTION
Repair or replacement of water infrastructure according to greatest need.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The water system is composed of water mains, booster pumps and reservoirs. The City Maintains approximately 57
miles of pipes, many of which date back to the 1930s and later. Potable water pipes typically have a 50-year life. The
plan consists of water main replacements annually and ensure the operation and maintenance of pumps and reservoirs.
Staff has laid out a plan for replacing the mains based on priority as well as maintaining and/or upgrading the facilities
that su ort the waters stem infrastructure.
CIPAC COMMENTS
N/A
ESTIMATED FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
COST ALLOCAT TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
ED TO
DATE
Varies, Ave. $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
$2,000,000
Annually
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
Water Enterprise Fund
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
Varies, Ave. $2,000,000 Annually
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Water Division Office and Maintenance Yard Improvements
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Public Works Department
DESCRIPTION
Replace Built-up Roof, Replace Toilet Partitions, Replace HVAC at various
locations, Install Fire Alarm System, Replace Tub/Shower Enclosure, Replace
Electrical Switchboard and Exterior flood lights, Replace Interior flooring
(vinyl/carpet) , Replace Ceiling Tiles, Install Fire Suppression, Replace Gate
Operator, Upgrade Lighting System
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The Water Yard Building is located at 400 Lomita St. It was originally constructed in the late 1960's and did not have any
major renovations since then. Heating in the building is provided by one rooftop package unit. Air distribution is provided
to supply air registers by ducts concealed above the ceilings. Return air grilles are located adjacent to the furnaces.
Cooling for the upper level offices is provided by 4 window mounted air conditioning units. The lower level is heated by
one gas unit heater located in the staff break room/kitchenette. There are no fire sprinklers and fire protection in the
building consists of fire extinguishers. The existing roof together with the heater and duct systems on it are in poor
condition and in need of immediate replacement. From the previous rainfall events, the wear and tear of the existing roof
is increasingly noticeable as leaks are intruding into the building. The switchboard and panels are mostly original 1966
components. Due to the age of the panel it is quite difficult to obtain replacement parts. The light fixtures throughout most
of the facility utilize older, inefficient T-8 lights.
The El Segundo City Water Division Storage Building was built in 1984. It was rebuilt around 8-10 years ago and
replaced with a smaller storage building. It is a concrete block structure with a plywood roof. No heating, cooling or fire
systems are provided at this storage building. An electric meter is location the north exterior wall of the building.
Electrical equipment serving the Water Division is located inside the storage building. This electrical equipment includes
control panels for chemical treatment needed by the Water Division. The exterior door, concrete blocks, interior wall
finish, chemical treatment equipment, and control panels need replacement.
�.�
I .
it
It51`"
.. .._ .:�: E.:?:��$re ..-. ... .. �., r''A .aka$... �• .. ., ..
MTIP i•'S..5+4�
v
f � _
Is
homi
d5o
F
L60
. �6,w
CIPAC COMMENTS
Skipped, use water enterprise fund.
.ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
.COST TO DATE
$550,000 $110,000 $225,000 $105,000 $110,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
Water Fund 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
.COST
$3,425,000
CIPAC SCORE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE Wastewater Infrastructure Replacement (Annual Program)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works
DESCRIPTION Repair or replacement of sewer mains according to the greatest need.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The City's wastewater system consists of approximately 50 miles
of pipe and 1,050 manholes. The majority of these pipes are
constructed of vitrified clay and range in size from 6-inch to 24-
inch in diameter. The system was constructed over the years
based on the development needs of the City and approximately
60% of the lines are now over 50 years old.
The entire collection system has been CCTV inspected in 2011.
Staff selects sewer line segments to be repairs based on the
actual, documented condition of the pipe using the CCTV results
and ratings. Pipes scoring 5 (worst) and 4 (significantly
impacted) are prioritized for repair or replacement. This will
also provide for the operation and maintenance of manholes,
pumps, lift stations, flow meters and other components of the
system.
CIPAC COMMENTS
ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES
D ALLOCATED TO
TO DATE DATE
FY FY FY FY FY
2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
$675,000 I $500,000 I $750,000 I $750,000 I $750,000
ScoreI L-
HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
Wastewater Fund 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM 2021 — 2022 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Park Place Extension Transportation Project -Design
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
DESCRIPTION
This project consists of design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of a new
four -lane roadway via an underpass beneath two active railroad lines, the Union
Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), both of which
serve the Chevron refinery. Other elements of the project include bridge
construction, retaining structures, utilities, installation of storm drains, petroleum
pipeline relocation, traffic signals, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, landscaping, and
possibly realignment of the existing BNSF switching yard to accommodate
continuous rail operations during construction.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION The purpose of the Park Place Extension and Railroad Grade Separation Project is to provide an
alternate route to the Rosecrans Corridor, a heavily congested major arterial in the South Bay region of Los Angeles
and to improve access to and from the 1-105 freeway (Douglas and Nash on and off ramps, respectively). Specifically,
the project will connect existing segments of Park Place between Allied Way and Nash Street to provide a continuous
roadway from Douglas Street to Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). This connection will provide traffic relief to Rosecrans,
as well as direct access from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) to Douglas and thereby to the 105 Freeway.
� a
'4
_ _ r
711
c � r
r I
ALTERNATIVE 1C
(WI RAIL OPTION 1)
CIPAC COMMENTS
.ESTIMATED
FUNDS
EXPENSES
FY
FY
FY
FY
FY
COST
ALLOCAT
TO
2021122
2022/23
2023/24
2024125
2025126
ED TO
DATE
DATE
$5,000,000
$3,200,000
$1,200,000
$600,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
Transportation Funds 2. CONSTRUCTION
(Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
1/Measure R/Measure M) 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
I All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM 2021 — 2022 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Roadway Rehabilitation (Annual Program)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
DESCRIPTION
Resurfacing Local and Arterial Streets
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU 7
JUSTIFICATION
Arterial and local streets area evaluated every three years and rated using a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating
system ranging from 0-100, with 100 being best. Those streets ranking below 60 require some form of rehabilitation,
ranging from pavement grind/cap to full depth reclamation to bring the City's streets overall average rating up to a
minimum of 74, which is considered "good". Virtually all the City's local streets are much older than 30 years and most
have never been overlaid. Cracking and alligatoring are evident on most streets.
Staff has identified and selected Pine Avenue from the Pavement Management Program (PMP) as the next applicable
roadways to rehabilitate as part of the Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Program. The following roadway segments will
receive a removal and replacement treatment of the top 2" of asphalt concrete, along with more extensive localized
repairs of the most deteriorated pavement areas:
• Pine Ave. between Arena St. and Hillcrest St. (PCI of 55)
CIPAC COMMENTS
.ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
.COST TO DATE DATE
$5,850,000
$1,200,000
$1,150,000
$1,140,000
1,300,000
$1,060,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
Transportation Funds
(Gas Tax/Prop C/SB
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
1/Measure R/Measure M)
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM 2021 — 2022
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE El Segundo Blvd Improvements
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works
DESCRIPTION Improvements to El Segundo Blvd., from Isis Ave. to Pacific Coast Hwy., include but not
limited to pavement rehabilitation, bikeway installation, landscaping improvements, traffic
signal improvements, ADA curb ramp and pedestrian crosswalk improvements.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7
JUSTIFICATION
El Segundo Boulevard is a major arterial east/ west six -lane divided arterial from Isis Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and a four -
lane divided arterial from Pacific Coast Highway to Illinois Street. The corridor is mixed with commercial developments and
aerospace campuses. The roadway has a varying width from 52-feet curb to curb on the westerly end of the project to 106-feet at
the easterly end of the project limits. The existing pavement shows widespread signs of deterioration throughout the corridor with an
average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) between 0-40 which constitutes a need for rehabilitation and/ or reconstruction. Existing
conditions on El Segundo Boulevard are missing ADA compliant curb ramps, dedicated bicycle facilities including bicycle detection,
and adequate pedestrian crossings. These deficiencies and the high volume of vehicles during peak hours create adverse
conditions for cyclists and pedestrians crossing the street.
Public works have applied for Measure M grant funding from Metro and anticipate being awarded funding for this project. Public
Works received $241,500 in grant funds from Caltrans through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).
ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/2023 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
COST TO DATE
$7,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOTFUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
Transportation Funds 2. CONSTRUCTION
(Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 3. MANAGEMEN4. CONTINGENCIES
T/INSPECTION
1/Measure R/Measure M) 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CI PAC FORM 2021 — 2022
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE Sidewalk Maintenance Program (Annual Program)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works
DESCRIPTION Repair of City sidewalks and curbs according to the greatest need.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7
JUSTIFICATION
Sidewalks sometimes are displaced by tree roots and other reasons which could potentially create trip hazards.
Locations for sidewalks requiring repair are generated throughout the year by field surveys from the Street Maintenance
Division and requests from residents.
• r'7Mp��y'• -
CIPAC COMMENTS
.ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY -FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO 2021/22 2022/23 2023124 2024/25 2025126
COST TO DATE DATE
$1,000,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score
HS
SC
RI
JL
CO
Cl
TOT
FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
Transportation Funds 2. CONSTRUCTION
(Gas Tax/Prop C/SB 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
1/Measure R/Measure M) 5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars Cl PAC FORM 2021 — 2022
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE Arena Street Improvements Study
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works
DESCRIPTION Street improvements which also should protect existing large trees in place
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE 1-1-17
JUSTIFICATION
The parkways of the 500 and 600 block of Arena Street contain large camphor trees which not only beautify the
neighborhoods but have also damaged sidewalks, curbs, and street pavement such that they are urgently in need of
repair. Figures 1 through 5 below show the typical damage caused.
Figure 1 — 506 Arena Street uneven sidewalk and ponding due to tree root uplift
This project consists of a study to recommend how to proceed with needed
repairs to the damaged sidewalks, curbs, and street improvements and keep
the integrity of existing trees at the same time.
Figure 2 — 536/540 Arena Street damaged asphalt, curb, and sidewalk due to
tree roots.
Figures 3, 4, and 5 — 613 Arena Street damaged sidewalk, curb, and asphalt due to tree trunk and roots
Figures 6, 7, and 8 — raised sidewalk using Silva cells, sidewalk on private property, pervious pavement
Additional extreme measures could include:
• Creating a curb extension or bulbout around a tree
• Narrowing the 500 block of Arena Street and replacing parking areas with sidewalk or pervious walking paths
• Closing the 500 block of Arena Street to through traffic altogether and providing pervious walking paths
Figures 9, 10 and 11 — curb extensions containing trees, narrow street that allows tree growth, closed street
_ COST
$630,221 -
$2,318,337
CIPAC SCORE
Funding is not currently set aside for this type of neighborhood development project.
CIPAC COMMENTS
CIPAC suggest doing study ($20 k to $30 k) first. Score is for study only
ESTIMATE FUNDS
D ALLOCATED
TO DATE
EXPENSES FY FY
TO 2021/22 2022/23
Date
30,000
FY FY FY
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
HS
SC
RI
JL
CO
Cl
F TOT
Score
3
5
1
0
1
6
1 16
$630,221 -
$2,318,337
FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION I ESTIMATED COST
Transportation Funds
(Gas Tax/Prop C/SB
1/Measure R/Measure M)
1. DESIGN including potential landscape $85,000
architecture, survey, geotechnical, urban
planning, and traffic engineering services
2. CONSTRUCTION $437,928 - $1,972,579
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION $50,000
4. CONTINGENCIES $57,293 - $210,758
5. OTHER (LIST)
I TOTAL I $630,221 - $2,318,337
1 All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Alondra Park (Regional Project
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
DESCRIPTION
The Alondra Park project was identified in the Dominguez Channel Enhanced
Watershed Management Program (EWMP) as one of the regional stormwater
projects to meet water quality objectives. The project will be designed to capture
and treat dry -weather and stormwater runoff in an underground infiltration basin
with a total capture volume of approximately 44 ac-feet.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
New Soccer Fleld -
As part of the Dominguez Channel New Bioswale Plante kNew Mainten ce Acce55D iv1
Watershed, the Alondra Park Regional project
is designed to capture and treat dry -weather k,
and stormwater runoff from a 4,495-acre f
drainage area (El Segundo is approximately
22% of this tributary area). Although the , �-
project mainly consists of providing IL
underground stormwater infrastructure, it also
includes nature -based solutions with planting
of native and drought -tolerant vegetation and r
trees, bio-swales, and permeable pavement. "New 9io5wale Planting
-
The project will also rehabilitate the park .New Permeable Pavement Parking
facilities at project completion. The County of Regional Park {
Alondra Park Community
Los Angeles is managing and constructing
Stormw Capture Frolect Above G round Improvements
the project, in partnership with several
neighboring and tributary cities including the City 'Photo from the Alondra Park Regional Stormwater Capture Project website:
https://d pw.lacounty.gov/wmd/stwq/Alond ra Park.aspx
of El Segundo
The design and construction costs are estimated to be $60 million. The project has received funding from the Regional
Safe, Clean Water Program ($30 million), from Caltrans ($15 million), and from the Storm Water Grant Program
(SWGP) Proposition 1 ($2.1 million), with the remaining costs being funded by municipalities tributary to the project. El
Segundo's portion of the cost is estimated to be $1 million.
CIPAC COMMENTS
ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
COST TO DATE
$1,000,000 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
N/A
.FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
$1,000,000
Stormwater Fund -
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
Measure W
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
$1,000,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Infiltration Projects
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
DESCRIPTION
Infiltration projects, including drywells and underground vaults, will be identified,
designed, and constructed to attain regional water -quality requirements and
recharge groundwater basins.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
To meet the waste discharge requirements in the LA RWQCB
MS4 Permit, and as outlined in the Dominguez Channel and
Santa Monica Bay J2/J3 EWMPs, the City of El Segundo is
required to implement control measures to achieve wasteload µ
allocations established in the Regional Board and USEPA .`s
TMDLs. The City will be evaluating drywells and = �'
underground vaults for use throughout the City to meet these =
requirements and ultimately reduce pollutants from reaching
the Santa Monica Bay and Dominguez Channel receiving
waters.
Sycamore Park and Recreation Park have been identified as potential project locations, but the City will be evaluating
other cost-effective alternatives that minimize disturbance to public spaces.
CIPAC COMMENTS
.ESTIMATE
FUNDS
EXPENSES
FY
FY
FY
FY
FY
D
ALLOCATED
TO DATE
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
COST
TO DATE
$0
$1,000,000
10
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
Stormwater Fund -
2. CONSTRUCTION
$1,000,000
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
Measure W
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
$1,000,000
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Civic Center Maintenance & Repairs CIP Fund Carryover & Fund 708
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
Interior Improvements to City Hall
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The El Segundo City Hall building was built in 1955 and renovated in 1977. The building contains the Mayor's office,
Council Chamber, the Public Works Department, the Development Services Department, Human Resources, Finance
and other related offices, conference rooms and support staff offices.
Improvements to the interior are needed to enhance the services that the City provides. These improvements will occur
in two phases. The first phase consists of improvements to the lobby area to provide a better service to the Public,
upgrading the West Conference for employee meetings, relocating Human Resources to the basement to provide for a
more secure and secluded location for their work, and replacing the floor in the main corridor from the lobby area to the
Council Chambers to improve the aesthetics.
The second phase will consist of improvements to the other offices and spaces not included in phase one. These
improvements in this phase will include the layout changes to the Finances offices to provide consolidated workstations,
and a more secure entry and the improvements to the City Clerk's office to provide more secure file storage.
The City is currently in the design phase to finalize the project. Subsequently, this project will be advertised for
construction.
pi *W110"k
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
3 3 3 0 1 6 16
FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
I All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE ADA Ramp Improvements - CDBG Funds
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works
DESCRIPTION Accessibility upgrades to City Hall public restrooms
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE LU7
JUSTIFICATION
Each year, the City of El Segundo applies for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund (federal fund) from the
Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles (CDC). This funding is available for community
development projects that meet national objectives that benefit low and moderate -income areas, taking measurements
to meet the ADA requirements and/or meet a particular urgent community need. The City's City Hall Restroom Upgrade
Project which consists of removing accessibility barriers within the City Hall public restrooms meet this funding criteria.
The public restrooms in City Hall are the men's and women's restrooms in the east City Hall lobby near the Development
Services Division, as well as the men's and women's restrooms in the Council Chambers lobby. Their entrances are
shown below.
Figure 1 —
City Hall east
lobby restrooms
Figure 2 —
Council Chambers
lobby restrooms
Current accessibility requirements defined by the Building Code and ADA standards would at minimum include the
following upgrades:
• Ensuring that entryways to the restrooms and stalls are wide enough and doors can be opened easily
• Enlarging stall capacity for standard wheelchair turning radius
• Positioning all restroom fixtures and items at accessible heights
• Ensuring enough turning and clear space between objects in the restrooms
Construction will also take into consideration and remove any lead or asbestos that may be found in the existing
restroom materials upon their demolition.
CIPAC COMMENTS
ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
COST TO DATE Date
Varies $122,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score
HS
SC
RI
JL
CO
Cl
F TOT
N/A
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
General Fund
C. C.p.B.G.
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
$122,000
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
$122,000
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
PD Women Locker Room Remodel Dev. Impact Fees & Asset Forfeiture
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
Adding 1 shower room and upgrading the women's restroom to accommodate
current ADA standards.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
Women account for growing percentage of police officers (11.6% nationally, up from just 3% in the 1970s). The
encouraging momentum toward creating a more balanced public safety force is encouraged in part by a growing
appreciation of certain unique and valuable professional qualities that women often bring to law enforcement. Those
qualities are believed to enhance the ability of law enforcement agencies to make a positive impact on the communities
they serve.
The City's women police force has seen growth over the years, but the aged facility still lacks sufficient shower and
changing rooms. Currently, the facility only has one shower room to accommodate female officers. It is essential to
upgrade the PD's women's restroom and shower room to add additional shower and upgrade the restroom facility to
current ADA standards.
IV
Irv, '1 �
4r
� CKER RM n
M_GE
��yr mLOCKER RMf . i 4 f1
bL WCMFN 10I F1
'
_ a CORR—R
_�y�'`-�^'�, Q EXISTING FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
,,a=v-o .,c,.L�s �_i.a
��i
r7li-
CIPAC COMMENTS
Use Dev. Impact Fees designated for PD (001-254-0000-1254: $105k available) plus asset forfeiture funds.
.ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
COST TO DATE
$250,000 $250,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
1 5 1 3 1 7 18
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
Dev. Impact Fees & Asset
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
Forfeiture Funds
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Fire Station #1 & #2 Carpet (Development Fees
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Fire Department
DESCRIPTION
Replacement of existing carpet in Fire Station #1 and Fire Station #2 with tile type
flooring to maintain a sanitary work environment and protect fire suppression
personnel
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The carpets of Fire Station #1 and Fire Station #2 need removal and replacement. Since we have been in the pandemic,
the replacement of the carpet for infectious control purposes has become a top priority in order to maintain the health and
safety of the fire suppression personnel. The station is occupied year-round and is faced with a tremendous amount of
foot traffic. In addition, the training room is an area utilized by the department for conducting training classes and serves
as a meeting room for other City departments to conduct City related classes and business activities. Both fire stations
are cleaned daily and the areas within each station are cleaned more thoroughly on Saturdays. In addition, the stations
are fogged using a hospital -grade disinfectant/cleaner on a regular basis, however, the dirt and contaminants are deep
seated into the carpet fibers.
- 1
� A
1 -
1
;�_- -
-
L
-
� II
is
ti
r
:i
CIPAC COMMENTS
Use Dev. Impact Fees designated for Fire (001-252-0000-1252: 276k available)
ESTIMATE
FUNDS
EXPENSES
FY
FY
FY
FY
FY
D
ALLOCATED
TO DATE
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
.COST
TO DATE
$85,000
$85,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
L—
3 5 1 0 3 7 19
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST)
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Safe Routes to School Projects
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
Public Works
DESCRIPTION
develop solutions and mitigation techniques to improve circulation, access, and
safety in the vicinity for four schools in the El Segundo Unified School District: El
Segundo High School (including Eagle's Nest Preschool), Richmond Street
Elementary School, Center Street Elementary School, and El Segundo Middle
School.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
Safety and circulation Improvement.
CIPAC COMMENTS
Score is based on 80% construction
cost to be funded by Safe Route to school grant.
ESTIMATE
FUNDS
EXPENSES
FY
FY
FY
FY
FY
D
ALLOCATED
TO DATE
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
.COST
TO DATE
$110,000
$50,000
$60,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TO
3 1 1 3 1 8 17
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
20% general fund
1. DESIGN
$50,000
Apply for 80% safe route to school
grant
2. CONSTRUCTION
$60,000
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
$110,000
All costs shown in current dollars
CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
HVAC (Citywide)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
Mechanical HVAC improvements at the City Hall, Police Station, Fire Station #1,
Fire Station #2, Library and City Maintenance Yard
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The HVAC at all building facilities needs replacement. The refrigerant is not in compliance with current regulations, the
ductwork requires cleaning, the rooftop mechanical units have reached the end of their life cycles and the performance
is not what provides a comfortable controllable work environment.
The HVAC improvements needed for the Police Station involve replacing more substantial portions of the HVAC system
than in the other facilities. The Police Station will need all its interior air handlers replaced as they are failing and
sometimes there are no repair parts readily available due to the age of the components. Additionally, the boiler, chiller,
distribution pumps, rooftop exhaust fans, and rooftop packaged HVAC units are all in need of replacement. It is vital
that these items are replaced as soon as possible to continue providing clean and circulated air. Due to the extensive
replacement of rooftop HVAC equipment, roof patching and repair will be factored into the budget for the Police Station.
The majority of HVAC work for the Police Station is scheduled for FY 2022/23 due to high priority.
In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate
maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current building
and safety standards and that maintenance requirements are not deferred, thereby jeopardizing the value of these assets.
m I•...
C i Ir
z
_ `,
I`
.t
1
J
CIPAC COMMENTS
CIPAC chose not to rate facility project, suggested City to handle it via reserve/equipment replacement
fund.
ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
COST TO DATE
$919,960
$ 60,000
$ 437,260
$ 207,640
$145,880
$ 69,180
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC
RI JL CO Cl TOT
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
General Fund
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars
CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Plumbing (Citywide)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
Replacement of the water heater, copper piping, fixtures, and faucet at the City
Hall, Police Station, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, Library and City Maintenance
Yard
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
A majority of the City facilities plumbing infrastructure is original to the construction of the facilities. The plumbing
components have reached the end of their life cycle period. The concern is that the fixtures, faucets, equipment, sump
pumps, drinking fountains and piping have aged to the point where the piping will begin to fail, and that replacement
should be planned rather than a reaction to a problem that will continue to surface throughout the building.
In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate
maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current building
and safety standards and that maintenance requirements should not be deferred.
I
i
3
CIPAC COMMENTS
Skipped, Equipment Replacement Fund.
ESTIMATE
FUNDS
EXPENSES
FY
FY
FY
_FY
FY
D
ALLOCATED
TO DATE
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
COST
TO DATE
$228,640
$4,500
$135,000
$47,600
$22,740
$18,800
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
General Fund
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Miscellaneous Electrical (Citywide)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
Selective replacements for panels, switchboards, transformers and other major
electrical components at City Hall, Police Station, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2,
Library, City Maintenance Yard, and Water Division Office
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
1-1-17
JUSTIFICATION
Electrical equipment, such as panels, switchboards, and transformers, at all building facilities need replacement. The
electrical equipment at the City building facilities is outdated and are all reaching the end of their life cycles. The age of
the older equipment is making it difficult for the maintenance staff since some of the replacement parts are no longer
readily available. The efficiency of new equipment is significant and will result in reduced energy and maintenance
costs.
In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate
maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current
building and safety standards and that maintenance requirements should not be deferred.
`I
f
1-0 ��
I
_TT
4
CIPAC COMMENTS
Skipped, Equipment Replacement Fund
ESTIMATE FUNDS EXPENSES FY FY FY .FY FY
D ALLOCATED TO DATE 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
COST TO DATE
$1,303,300
$19,000
$6,300
$101,000
$130,000
$1,047,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC RI JL CO Cl TOT
FUNDING SOURCES COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
General Fund 3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Exterior Lighting and Miscellaneous Facade Project
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
Facade improvements and the replacement of existing exterior lighting with LED
and current technology lighting controls at the City Hall, Police Station, Fire
Station #1, Fire Station #2 and the Library.
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The existing exterior lightings at all City facilities are nearing the end of their lifecycles and are due for replacement.
Replacing the existing lighting fixtures with LED lighting fixtures will result in cost savings associated with the utility bills
and in maintenance labor costs. Additionally, with the changing to LED fixtures there should be the corresponding use
of more current lighting control technology. When planning this replacement work, the utility company will be contacted
so that they can identify rebates and 3rd party programs that can be used to offset the costs for removal & replacement
with the LED products.
The fagades of these City facilities need to be retouched with new paint and resealing of windows where necessary.
This will ensure the City facilities remain aesthetically pleasing and not have a "run-down" look.
In 2018, a consultant (EMG) was hired to conduct a comprehensive building assessment to identify immediate
maintenance and capital needs. In that report, it was recommended to address the above issues to meet current building
and safety standards and that maintenance requirements should not be deferred.
x nj 1
- -
•i.
4
CIPAC COMMENTS
Skipped, Equipment Replacement Fund.
.ESTIMATED
COST
FUNDS
ALLOCATE
D TO DATE
EXPENSES
TO DATE
FY
2021/22
FY
2022/23
FY
2023/24
.FY
2024/25
FY
2025/26
$62,620
$17,000
$29,120
$16,500
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS
SC
RI JL CO Cl TOT
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
General Fund
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1. DESIGN
2. CONSTRUCTION
3. MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4. CONTINGENCIES
5. OTHER (LIST) Soils Engineer Rep.
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars
CIPAC FORM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
PROJECT TITLE
Main Facilities ADA Compliance Projects
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT
DESCRIPTION
ADA Improvements to City Hall, Police Department, Fire Station #1/#2, Library
and the City Maintenance Yard
GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE
LU7
JUSTIFICATION
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires state and local governments, businesses, and non-profit
organizations to provide goods, services, and programs to people with disabilities on an equal basis with the rest of the
public. Older facilities often require improvements to ensure accessibility to people with disabilities to provide an equal
opportunity to participate.
The main facilities in the City, such as City Hall, the Police Department, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, the Library, and
the City Maintenance Yard, are not in compliance with the current requirements of the ADA. These needed ADA
improvements at the City's facilities include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Providing service counters with adequate counter heights, stairs with compliant handrails, doors with adequate
wheelchair maneuvering clearances, exterior walkways with required widths and accessible slopes, signage at
adequate heights with tactile characters or braille, a complaint number of accessible parking stalls and
restrooms with compliant maneuvering clearances, toilet stall widths, dispenser reach ranges, mirror heights
and grab bars.
Being non-ADA compliant can result in fines and lawsuits. Organizations and businesses can be fined for up to $75,000
for a single ADA violation, raising that fine to $150,000 for multiple violations. It is prudent for the City to accumulate
funds needed to upgrade all City owned facilities to follow the current ADA requirements.
i
J j l
it
Y"
ti
�
CIPAC COMMENTS
Yw
sk '
Phase 1 for design and construction
.ESTIMATE
FUNDS
EXPENSES
.FY
FY
FY
_FY
FY
D
ALLOCATED
TO DATE
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25
2025/26
.COST
TO DATE
$825,000
$75,000
$750,000
CIPAC SCORE
Score HS SC
1 5
RI JL CO CI
1 3 3 6
TOT
19
FUNDING SOURCES
COST - BREAKDOWN
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED COST
1.
DESIGN
2.
CONSTRUCTION
3.
MANAGEMENT/INSPECTION
4.
CONTINGENCIES
5.
OTHER (LIST)
Survey
TOTAL
All costs shown in current dollars
CIPAC FORM
