CONTRACT 5981 Professional Services Agreement CLOSEDAgreement No. 5981
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO AND
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
This AGREEMENT is entered into this AL day of September, 2020, by and
between the CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a general law city and municipal corporation
("CITY") and MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation
("CONSULTANT").
CONSIDERATION.
A. As partial consideration, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the work listed
in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, below;
B. As additional consideration, CONSULTANT and CITY agree to abide by the
terms and conditions contained in this Agreement;
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not
to exceed one hundred seventeen thousand nine hundred dollars
($117,900) for CONSULTANT's services. CITY may modify this amount as
set forth below, Unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this
Agreement, CITY will pay this sum as specified in the attached Exhibit A
(Proposal to Provide CEQA Environmental Studies, dated August 19,
2020), which is incorporated by reference.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES,.
A. CONSULTANT will perform services listed in the attached Exhibit A
(Proposal to Provide CEQA Environmental Studies, dated August 19, 2020)
including the optional tasks, which is incorporated by reference.
B. CONSULTANT will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor,
technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and
materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and
facilities, and all tests, testing and analyses, calculation, and all other means
whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished
by CITY, necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide
the professional services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement.
3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. While performing this Agreement,
CONSULTANT will use the appropriate generally employed professional standards of
practice existing at the time of performance utilized by persons engaged in providing
similar services in the same vicinity. CITY will continuously monitor CONSULTANT's
services. CITY will notify CONSULTANT of any deficiencies and CONSULTANT will have
15 days after such notification to cure any shortcomings to CITY's satisfaction.
Agreement No. 5981
4. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONSULTANT as specified by this Agreement,
CONSULTANT must submit a detailed invoice to CITY that lists the hours worked and
hourly rates for each personnel category and reimbursable costs (all as set forth in Exhibit
A) the tasks performed. If the CITY agrees with all of the information listed in the invoice,
CITY will then pay CONSULTANT from the Developer/Applicant account created for the
project. In the event that the Developer / Applicant account does not have sufficient funds
for payment of CONSULTANT's services, CITY will notify CONSULTANT in writing to
suspend any work under this Agreement until the account is replenished by the
Developer/Applicant. The CITY is not responsible for the cost of any of CONSULTANT's
services after the date of such written notice, unless and until the Developer/Applicant
account is replenished with sufficient funds. This Agreement will cover only those costs
incurred for which Developer / Applicant funds are available.
5. POLITICAL REFORM ACT. CONSULTANT agrees that it will be considered a
public official subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974 for purposes of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that it has no financial interests which may be
materially affected by the project(s) for which it is performing services. Such financial
interests may include, without limitation, interests in business entities, real property, or
sources of income exceeding $500 received within the past year. CONSULTANT further
warrants that, before executing this Agreement, it reviewed the Political Reform Act of
1974 and the Fair Political Practices Commission regulations, including, without limitation,
Chapter 7 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code, Section 18700, et seq., in order
to determine whether any conflict of interest would require CONSULTANT to refrain from
performing the services or in any way attempting to use its official position to influence
the governmental decisions underlying the subject project(s).
6. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK.
A. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees that it has:
Carefully investigated and considered the scope of services to be
performed;
Carefully considered how the services should be performed; and
iii. Understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending
performance of the services under this Agreement.
B, If services involve work upon any site, CONSULTANT agrees that
CONSULTANT has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully
acquainted with the conditions there existing, before commencing the
services hereunder. Should CONSULTANT discover any latent or unknown
conditions that may materially affect the performance of the services,
CONSULTANT will immediately inform CITY of such fact and will not
proceed except at CONSULTANT's own risk until written instructions are
received from CITY.
7. KEY PERSONNEL.
Agreement No. 5981
A. CONSULTANT's key personnel assigned to perform work under this
Agreement and their level of responsibility are as follows but is not limited
to:
John Bellas, Environmental Manager
Jennifer Wu, Project Manager
Greg Tonkovich, Senior Analyst/Principal
James Benya, Principal
Jason Melchor, Project Manager (Traffic)
B. The resume of each of the individuals identified in this Section are attached
to this Agreement, collectively, as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference.
C. In the event CITY objects to the continued involvement with this Agreement
by any of the persons listed in this Section, or any other person selected by
CONSULTANT to perform services under this AGREEMENT,
CONSULTANT agrees that it will replace such persons with individuals that
are agreed to by CITY.
8. TERM. The term of this Agreement will start on the Effective Date and end on
December 31, 2021. Unless otherwise determined by written amendment between the
parties, this Agreement will terminate in the following instances:
A. Completion of the work specified in Exhibit A,
B. Termination as stated in Section 15.
9. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE.
A. CONSULTANT will not perform any work under this Agreement until:
CONSULTANT furnishes proof of insurance as required under
Section 23 of this Agreement, and
CITY gives CONSULTANT a written notice to proceed.
B. Should CONSULTANT begin work
written authorization to proceed,
CONSULTANT's own risk.
on any phase in advance of receiving
any such professional services are at
10. TIME EXTENSIONS. Should CONSULTANT be delayed by causes beyond
CONSULTANT's control, CITY may grant a time extension for the completion of the
contracted services. If delay occurs, CONSULTANT must notify the Manager within 48
hours, in writing, of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes
with the Agreement's schedule. The Manager will extend the completion time, when
appropriate, for the completion of the contracted services.
3
Agreement No. 5981
11. CONSISTENCY. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the
main body of this Agreement takes precedence over the attached Exhibit; this Agreement
supersedes any conflicting provisions.
12. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of
this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract
sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be
authorized in writing, executed by CONSULTANT and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY
resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written
agreement between the parties.
13. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONSULTANT will provide CITY with
a Taxpayer Identification Number.
14. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONSULTANT, at its sole expense, will obtain and
maintain during the term of this Agreement, all necessary permits, licenses, and
certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under
this Agreement.
15. WAIVER. CITY's review or acceptance of, or payment for, work product prepared
by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will not be construed to operate as a waiver of
any rights CITY may have under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising from
CONSULTANT's performance. A waiver by CITY of any breach of any term, covenant, or
condition contained in this Agreement will not be deemed to be a waiver of any
subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained in
this Agreement, whether of the same or different character.
A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any
time with or without cause.
B. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement at any time with CITY's
mutual consent. Notice will be in writing at least thirty (30) days before the
effective termination date.
C. Upon receiving a termination notice, CONSULTANT will immediately cease
performance under this Agreement unless otherwise provided in the
termination notice. Except as otherwise provided in the termination notice,
any additional work performed by CONSULTANT after receiving a
termination notice will be performed at CONSULTANT's own cost; CITY will
not be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT for such work.
D. Should termination occur, all finished or unfinished documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by
CONSULTANT will, at CITY's option, become CITY's property, and
CONSULTANT will receive just and equitable compensation for any work
completed in accordance with the Performance Standards up to the
Agreement No. 5981
effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the total costs under
Section 1(C).
E. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may
procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated.
F. By executing this document, CONSULTANT waives any and all claims for
damages that might otherwise arise from CITY's termination under this
Section.
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps,
models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall
become CITY's property, upon CONSULTANT's receipt of full payment for services
rendered. CONSULTANT may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired
but will deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice. CITY agrees that
use of CONSULTANT's completed work product, for purposes other than identified in this
Agreement, or use of incomplete work product, is at CITY's own risk.
18. PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS. Except as necessary for performance of
service under this Agreement, no copies, sketches, or graphs of materials, including
graphic art work, prepared pursuant to this Agreement, will be released by CONSULTANT
to any other person or public CITY without CITY's prior written approval. All press
releases, including graphic display information to be published in newspapers or
magazines, will be approved and distributed solely by CITY, unless otherwise provided
by written agreement between the parties.
19. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONSULTANT agrees to the following:
Indemnification for Professional Services. CONSULTANT will save
harmless and indemnify and at CITY's request reimburse defense
costs for CITY and all its officers, volunteers, employees and
representatives from and against any and all suits, actions, or claims,
of any character whatever, brought for, or on account of, any injuries
or damages sustained by any person or property resulting or arising
from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission by
CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents,
employees, or representatives, in the performance of this
Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole
negligence or willful misconduct.
Indemnification for other Damages. For claims arising out of the
performance of non-professional services only, CONSULTANT
indemnifies and holds CITY harmless from and against any claim,
action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, attorney's fees),
injuries, or liability, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance,
5
Agreement No. 5981
except for such loss or damage arising from CITY's sole negligence
or willful misconduct. For claims arising out of the performance of
non-professional services only, should CITY be named in any such
suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise,
arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, CONSULTANT will
defend CITY (at CITY's request) and will indemnify CITY for any
judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or
otherwise.
B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials,
employees, agents, representatives, and certified volunteers.
C. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions will
survive termination of this Agreement.
D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be
-• • • as required by Section 23, and any pan•
• said insurance • CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner
limit
• • the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed •
CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to
the provisions concerning indemnification.
20. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONSULTANT's professional services.
CONSULTANT's attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without
CITY's written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.
21. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that
CONSULTANT will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and
the manner in which it is performed. CONSULTANT will be free to contract for similar
service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY.
CONSULTANT is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in
any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees.
Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct
CONSULTANT as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control
over the work means that CONSULTANT will follow the direction of the CITY as to end
results of the work only.
22. AUDIT OF RECORDS. CONSULTANT will maintain full and accurate records with
respect to all services and matters covered under this Agreement. CITY will have free
access at all reasonable times to such records, and the right to examine and audit the
same and to make transcript therefrom, and to inspect all program data, documents,
proceedings and activities. CONSULTANT will retain such financial and program service
records for at least 3 years after termination or final payment under this Agreement.
23. INSURANCE.
n.
Agreement No. 5981
A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other
times this Agreement is effective, CONSULTANT will procure and maintain
the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a
minimum, with the limits set forth below:
Iype of Insurance Limits
Commercial general liability: $2,000,000
Professional Liability $1,000,000
Business automobile liability $1,000,000
Workers compensation Statutory requirement
B. Commercial general liability insurance will meet or exceed the requirements
of the most recent ISO -CGL Form. The amount of insurance set forth above
will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage for the policy coverage. Liability policies will be
endorsed to name CITY, its officials, and employees as "additional
insureds" under said, insurance coverage and to state that such insurance
will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried
by CITY will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on
ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88, or equivalent. Such insurance will be
on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable
or subject to reduction except upon 30 days prior written notice to CITY.
C. Professional liability coverage will be on an "occurrence basis" if such
coverage is available, or on a "claims made" basis if not available. When
coverage is provided on a "claims made basis," CONSULTANT will continue
to renew the insurance for a period of 3 years after this Agreement expires
or is terminated. Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as
the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement and will cover
CONSULTANT for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or
omissions of CONSULTANT, or its officers, employees or agents during the
time this Agreement was in effect.
D. Automobile coverage will be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage Form
CA 00 01 06 92, including symbol 1 (Any Auto).
E CONSULTANT will furnish to CITY duly authenticated Certificates of
Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this
Agreement and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as
may be reasonably required by CITY from time to time. Insurance must be
placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent
to at least a Rating of "AMI."
F. Should CONSULTANT, for any reason, fail to obtain and maintain the
insurance required by this Agreement, CITY may terminate pursuant to
Section 16.
7
Agreement No. 5981
24. USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS. Unless otherwise referenced in this Agreement,
CONSULTANT must obtain CITY's prior written approval to use any sub -consultants
while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must approve of the
proposed consultant and the terms of compensation.
25. INCIDENTAL TASKS. CONSULTANT will meet with CITY regularly to provide the
status on the project, which will include a schedule update and a short narrative
description of progress for each major task, a description of the work remaining and a
description of the work to be done before the next schedule update.
26. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed
made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
If to CITY:
EI Segundo Planning & Building Safety Dept.
350 Main St.
EI Segundo, CA 90245
Attention: Gregg McClain, Planning Manager
Phone: 310-524-2393
Email: gmcclain@elsegundo.org
If to CON'SULTAN'T:
Michael Baker International, Inc.
3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 270
Long Beach, CA 90806
Attention: John Bellas, LEED AP
Phone: 562-200-7170
Email: jbellas@mbakerintl.com
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been
received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage
prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be
deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or
addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner
prescribed in this paragraph.
27. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONSULTANT will comply with all conflict of interest
laws and regulations including, without limitation, CITY's conflict of interest regulations.
28. SOLICITATION. CONSULTANT maintains and warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide employee, to
solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONSULTANT warrants that it has not paid nor
has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONSULTANT's bona fide
employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should
CONSULTANT breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without
liability.
29. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is
generally for the exclusive benefit of CONSULTANT and CITY and not for the benefit of
any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of
CONSULTANT's or CITY's obligations under this Agreement.
N.
Agreement No. 5981
30. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action
involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County.
31. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all federal,
state, and local laws applicable to this Agreement.
32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Exhibit, sets forth the entire
understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other
agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. This Agreement will bind and inure to
the benefit of the parties to this Agreement and any subsequent successors and assigns.
33. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently
review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed
simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly
for or against either Party.
34. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed
modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion
enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will
continue in full force and effect.
35. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all
necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute
this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be
modified by written amendment.
36. ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this
Agreement, agreements ancillary to this Agreement, and related documents to be entered
into in connection with this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a
party is delivered by electronic (pdf) or facsimile transmission. Such electronic or
facsimile signature will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original
signature.
37. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience
of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.
38. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of
this Agreement. However, CITY recognizes that CONSULTANT's work must be governed
by sound professional practices.
39. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be prevented due to
fire, flood, explosion, acts of terrorism, war, embargo, government action, civil or military
authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties' reasonable
control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party
to the other.
W%
Agreement No. 5981
40. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT
represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness
and capacity to perform the Agreement in accordance with the Performance Measures.
CONSULTANT represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience,
service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing
with private consultants, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that
CONSULTANT is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated
capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public CITY.
[Signatures on following page]
10
Agreement No. 5981
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day
and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
_�Or
Scott M itn ick,
City Manager
ATTEST:
Tracy Weaver,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:.
By4�v
Mark D. Hensley,
City Attorney
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
a Pennsylvania Corporation
Taxpayer ID No. 25-1228638
Albert V. Warot,
Associate Vice -President
Michael�A. Tylm
Assistant Secret'
PyWqrIn&v� rAexc e
11
9-17-20
Agreement No. 5981
EXHIBIT
Proposal to Provide CEQA Environmental Studies,
dated August 19, 2020
Agreement No. 5981
We Make a Difference
I N T E R N AT 1 0 N A L
August 19, 2020
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, AICP, Principal Planner
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
Planning Division, Planning and Building Safety
350 Main Street
EI Segundo, CA 90245
RE: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — OFFICE BUILDING
RENOVATION AND NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AT 6S0 AND 700 NORTH
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, EL SEGUNDO
Dear Mr. Schonborn;
We are pleased to submit this proposal to prepare the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed Office Building Renovation and
Construction Project (Project) at 650-700 North Pacific Coast Highway. We believe that Michael Baker
International is an ideal candidate for this assignment for the following reasons:
r We recently prepared the IS/MND for the adjacent Chick-fil-A project at 740 N. Sepulveda
Boulevard. With this experience, we have inherent knowledge of the environmental conditions
in the Project area.
• We have included key subconsultants on our team to give the City access to the best experts for
this particular Project. For example, since Kimley-Horn is currently drafting vehicle miles
traveled (VMT) analysis guidelines for the City, we have included them on our team to prepare
the Project's VMT analysis, which ensures that the Project's VMT analysis will be consistent with
the City's evolving approach for addressing Senate Bill (SB) 743 transportation analysis
requirements. We have also included a notable light and glare specialty firm, Benya Burnett
Consultancy, to conduct a quantified glare analysis of the proposed glass fa4ade for the 650
North Pacific Coast Highway building.
• Our key staff have significant CEQA experience with similar projects throughout Los Angeles
County. Examples include multi -story commercial and mixed-use projects in the cities of
Pasadena, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, and Santa Clarita. The key issues that we describe in
this proposal, along with our solutions to those issues and the corresponding scope of work, are
based on this relevant experience.
Our proposal is organized into the following sections;
A. Project Understanding
B. Issues of Concern
C. Scope of Work
MBAKERINTL COM
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 2
D. Budget Estimates
E. Schedule Estimates
F. Project Team and Qualifications
G. Closure
A. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City has received an application to redevelop an approximately 7.3 -acre site with a commercial
office building campus. The proposed Project involves the exterior and interior renovation of two
existing office buildings at 650 and 700 North Pacific Coast Highway, and construction of a new 7 -story,
122,156 -gross -square -foot office building with a 1,185 -space parking structure. The existing building at
650 North Pacific Coast Highway (Building A) is an 8 -story, 131 -foot-tall office building, and is proposed
to be remodeled with fa4ade improvements to have full -height window walls. The existing building at
700 North Pacific Coast Highway (Building B) is two stories along the portion fronting North Pacific Coast
Highway, and a single story in the rear half of the building. The new building (Building C) would be
located directly behind Building A. In addition to its integrated parking structure, Building C would be
developed with a plaza area that would replace the existing large parking lot that provides parking to
Buildings A and B.
The property comprises seven parcels that include the following features:
M Two have frontage along North Pacific Coast Highway (650 and 700 North Pacific Coast
Highway);
0 Three are landlocked parcels that are currently non -conforming lots due to their lack of having
street frontage; furthermore, one of these does not comply with the minimum lot size
requirements;
• A former railroad spur parcel that has street frontage on two public rights of way, Mariposa and
Maple Avenues, which, however, do not meet the minimum required width of street frontage;
and
w 737 Carl Jacobson Way, which has an existing office building; however, no physical changes are
proposed to this property.
The Project includes designing and beautifying the existing and new structures with contemporary
architecture, developing an outdoor landscaped plaza, enhancing the front setback areas with new
trees, and providing shade and increasing site permeability.
The applicant, L&R ZAV 650 Sepulveda, LLC, seeks the City's approval of the following entitlements for
this Project:
Zone Text Amendment, pursuant to Section 15-26 of the EI Segundo Municipal Code (ESMC),
to amend the definition of floor area ratio (ESMC Section 15-1-6) to exempt a fully integrated
parking structure within a new construction building. According to the applicant, the City is in
the process of updating the Zoning Code to reflect this change. In the event that the City
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 3
completes this change during the normal course of business during the Project entitlement
process, the applicant will retract the Zone Text Amendment request.
• Site Plan Review for a new commercial development that includes structures which have a
combined gross floor area of more than 50,000 square feet (not including parking structures),
in accordance with ESMC Section 15-3002, Site Plan Review.
• Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, in accordance with ESMC Sections 14-2 and 14-3, to
consolidate seven parcels into one ground parcel.
• Waivers of Street Dedication requirements, pursuant to ESMC Section 15-24-A-5, on North
Pacific Coast Highway, Mariposa Avenue, and Carl Jacobson Way.
The Project site is located in the northeastern quadrant of the City along Pacific Coast Highway, within
a fully urbanized setting. The site is approximately 0.4 miles south of the Imperial Highway/Glenn
Anderson Freeway (Interstate 105), 0.6 miles south of the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), and
2.25 miles east of the Pacific Ocean. The property is irregularly shaped and located entirely within the
block bounded by Pacific Coast Highway to the west, Carl Jacobson Way to the east, Maple Avenue on
the north, and Mariposa Avenue to the south. All of the Project parcels are within the City's Corporate
Office (CO) zone, are designated in the EI Segundo General Plan for Corporate Office land use, and are
currently developed with office uses and surface parking.The two buildings at 650 and 700 North Pacific
Coast Highway are currently occupied by Boeing.
In addition to Pacific Coast Highway and the other perimeter roadways, the property is surrounded by
a mix of office, retail, restaurant, and some non -conforming light industrial and manufacturing uses,
with General Commercial, Parking, and Corporate Office zoning and General Plan land use designations
(same -named). A large and continuous residential area that extends toward the ocean is adjacent to the
commercial business on the west side of Pacific Coast Highway in the Project area. Here the closest
residence is a multi -family residential unit along Palm Avenue, approximately 270 feet west of the
existing building at 650 N. Pacific Coast Highway.
Based on review of the provided Project application materials, several clarification and additional data
needs are anticipated. We will work closely with the City and the applicant to develop appropriate
assumptions for Project characteristics that are critical to the assessment of environmental impacts,
including:
• Number of construction workers, by stage
• Construction traffic, by stage, including material deliveries and hauls, and vehicle type and size
• Construction equipment verification and utilization, including use of any portable generators
• Energy consumption needs and proposed sources, including any temporary power
• Energy efficiency measures and renewable energy elements
• Proposed interior and exterior lighting
• Project design measures to avoid or reduce environmental impacts
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 4
B. ISSUES OF CONCERN
Based on our recent and current experience preparing CEQA documents for similar projects in the
region and, in particular those in close proximity to sensitive receptors, we are familiar with the types of
impacts and community concerns that often accompany such land uses. Project concerns depend on
the unique characteristics of the project, project site, and the surrounding community, as well as the
community's expectations and sensitivity to past or current land uses on or in the vicinity of the project
site.
Due to nature of the proposed Project construction and limited demolition activities, the Project would
generate construction and traffic effects that could result in adverse impacts in air quality, noise, traffic,
and hazardous materials, and possibly increased health risk to surrounding uses, including the nearby
residents.
The Project site is not located within any specific plan area, LAX Airport Influence Area, coastal zone, or
along the scenic or eligible scenic portion of Pacific Coast Highway that would require additional
compatibility analysis and potential design considerations. As mentioned, the Project involves exterior
improvements to Buildings A and B, at 650 and 700 North Pacific Coast Highway, respectively. Since
Building C is located on a landlocked parcel and would be surrounded by existing structures, including
Building A, which has a height of 131 feet, it is expected that Building C, which would be constructed to
113 feet, would be largely shielded by the existing structures, as shown on the Project design plans and
renderings. However, based on the proposed glass facade remodeling on the 131 -foot height of the
existing Building A, this building has the potential to result in glare effects to the nearby residences
toward the west and motorists along Pacific Coast Highway.
As the Project involves construction of expanded facilities which would result in increased trip
generation, operational traffic impacts will need to be analyzed to address both CEQA criteria and the
City's traffic congestion policies.
Also, the existing Buildings A and B, which were built in 1962 and 1957, respectively, and are occupied
by Boeing, are over 50 years of age and may have a potential for historic significance under the National
Register Criterion A, "Event", where the property may be significant due to its contribution to a major
pattern of American or California history. As a result, a cultural resources investigation has been
included as an optional task.
The following table identifies the several key issues to be addressed in the Project's CEQA analysis, and
our proposed solutions to those issues:
Issue Area
Solutions
Aesthetics and Clare: The Project is expected to 1) Use the architectural renderings from the
improve the aesthetic value of the Project area applicant to provide a representative view of
with the existing building renovation and the Project. No additional simulations are
landscaping, while simultaneously shielding the proposed, but could be provided as an
new building. However, the proposed design optional task if desired.
elements, i.e., use of glass fa4ade, may result in 2) Prepare a quantified Glare Study by an
glare effects experienced by motorists along PCH experienced lighting engineer. The study will
and the nearby residential area. model sunlight conditions and identify where
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 5
Issue Area
Traffic ransoortation: The Project entails
expanding office uses, which would be anticipated
to increase trip generation. The City is in the
process of developing policies to address SB 743
requirements to analyze VMT against new CEQA
thresholds, while also maintaining consistency
with the City's General Plan policies with level of
service (LOS) assessment.
Solutions
viewers would experience glare, and during
which times of day and days during the year.
1) Prepare an evaluation of the Project's VMT
characteristics. Subcontractor Kimley-Horn
was selected for this task to maintain
consistency with current efforts to develop the
traffic policy for the City.
2) Address LOS analysis in the traffic study to
maintain consistency with the City's General
Plan.
Hazardous _ Materials. Asbestos Contain nq Request any investigations conducted by the
Materials (ACMs) and Lead -Based Paint (LBPI: Applicant, such as a Phase I Environmental Site
Asbestos is a ubiquitous twentieth-century Assessment and/or asbestos and lead sampling
building material, and lead was a key component studies; otherwise, we will assume asbestos and
in paint before its use was banned in 1978. The lead are present and that construction activities
existing buildings, which were constructed in 1962 ' would need to be conducted in accordance with
and 1957, have a high likelihood of containing corresponding regulations.
ACMs and LBP that have potential to be released
during construction demolition and renovation
activities.
Construction Air Ouallty: The Project construction
activities have the potential to generate air
pollutants that could affect the nearby residential
sensitive receptors.
Npji : Nearby residential area with closest
sensitive receptors identified at approximately
270 feet from Building A has the potential to be
affected by construction and traffic noise.
Cultural/Historic Resources: Do the existing circa
1950s and 1960s structures have any eligibility for
significance in the California Register that would
be affected by the project?
Work with Applicant to identify complete
construction equipment list and corresponding
utilization rates. Evaluate potential impacts on
sensitive receptors following the South Coast Air
Quality Management District's Localized
Significance Threshold (LST) methodology.
Work with Applicant to identify construction
worker intensities, construction equipment
utilization, construction materials deliveries/hauls,
and traffic generation and distribution. Prepare a
technical noise analysis to quantify noise impacts
i on sensitive receptors.
Optional task to conduct research at regional
archaeological information center, consult with
the Los Angeles County Historical Society, and
evaluate buildings in accordance with California
Register of Historical Resources standards.
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 6
C. SCOPE OF WORK
We propose to prepare an IS/MND and associated technical studies, in accordance with the most recent
version of Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, adopted in December 2018, considering recent
legislation such as CA SB 743. The IS/MND will be prepared with a focus on the site-specific conditions
and unique Project characteristics. This will include documenting the local environmental setting,
assessing and explaining the ways the Project would change the existing environmental conditions,
determining the significance of Project impacts, and identifying measures to mitigate any potentially
significant impacts.
Our proposed scope of work would consist of the following tasks.
Task 1: Develop Project Description
We will work with City staff and the Applicant to develop a complete Project description that will
enable adequate assessment of environmental impacts that could occur during construction and
over the long-term operating life of the Project. A comprehensive narrative and illustrations of key
Project features will be provided. Based on review of the current Project Description and
architectural plan set, we would like to verify certain Project characteristics, such as square footage
calculations, occupancies, and proposed construction equipment, and request additional data, such
as construction workforce, and equipment utilization, which need to be considered in the Project
impact analysis.
Upon contract award, we will transmit a detailed Data Needs Checklist which would track and
specify Project characteristics requiring clarification and needed data. This proposal assumes that
the following information will be provided to Michael Baker to develop a sufficient project
description:
• Construction program description—phases, activities, equipment, work crew, durations
• Any updated site plan version depicting all proposed site improvements, including
dimensions and areas for all types of spaces (e.g., parking, drive aisles, landscaping, loading
areas) and building footprints
• CAD version of the site plan for glare modeling
• Building elevations
• Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans, depicting on- and off-site improvements
• Narrative description of indoor and outdoor facilities, structures and operations, employee
intensities, waste generation, storage and disposal, use/storage/generation of volatile or
hazardous substances, hours of operation
• Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I and II as may be warranted)
• Exterior lighting plans
• Energy demands and sources, including any temporary back up or renewable sources
• Water needs
�[8�Dl�Ot[�O ���1
M��w�o��n��,��wy��gy�w ~o '
RE: Proposal tmProvide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at650-700 N. PCH
Page 7
Task 2: Conduct Technical Investigations
J./ - Air Quality Assessment
Condi1ioms/Reau|aton/prannevvork. The project islocated within the South Coast Air Basin
(SCAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD). Baseline meteorological and air quality data developed through the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) will be utilized for the description of existing ambient air quality. Air quality
data from the nearest representative air quality monitoring stations will be included to help
highlight existing air quality local tmthe project area. The analysis will also describe and address the
requirements set forth bxthe SCA[)k4DCEQA Air Quality Handbook.
Constrmctimo-Related Emissions. Construction emissions will be quantified with the California
Emissions Estimator Model version 2016.3.2 (CalEEMod). A general description of the majorphases
of construction and their timing will be required. The air pollutant emissions during construction
will becompared tothe S[A{2KAOregional thresholds ofsignificance. Naturally occurring asbestos
impacts will also bediscussed qualitatively.
LpDo-Term Emissions. Operational (i.e, area, energy, and mobile source) emissions will be
quantified and compared tothe SCAQMDregional thresholds ofsignificance. Primary sources of
emissions will be related to area sources and local/regional vehicle miles traveled, which will be
derived from [a|EEK8md and the Traffic Impact Analysis. Project consistency with the 2016 Air
Quality Management Plan (AQK8P)will beevaluated.
Localized Emissions. The Project is located within the SCAQyND'sSource Receptor Area (SRA) ]
(Southwest Coastal Los Angeles County). Based on localized meteorological data for SRA 3, Michael
Baker will analyze localized impacts based upon the SCAQMD's Localized Significance Thresholds
(LST) methodology,
Air Emissions Health Impacts. Asaresult ofthe California Supreme Court decision for Sierra Club vs.
County mfFresno (FiiontRanch LP.) the resultant human health impacts from the project's short-
term construcdonand/mng-termnoperationa/airernis»ionsvviUbeconsidered.
2.2 — Energy Consumption Analysis
Michael Baker will analyze the energy implications of the Project pursuant to Public Resources Code
Section 21l0O(b)EUand AppendixGof the CEQAGuidelines. These statutes and guidelines require
a project to describe, where relevant the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of
energy caused bvaproject. |naddition, Appendix Gofthe CEQAGuidelines requires aconsistency
analysis with state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The analysis will analyze
energy consumption associated with short-term construction activities, long-term operations,
buildings, and transportation. Additionally, the assessment will include mitigation measures to
reduce inefficient and unnecessary consumption ofenergy, |fnecessary.
2.3—Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Michael Baker will review the land use data and will prepare an
inventory of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (i.e., nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide)
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 8
from both direct (i.e., area and mobile sources) and indirect sources (i.e., energy/water consumption
and wastewater/solid waste generation). In addition, total GHG emissions from construction
activities will be amortized into the GHG emissions inventory. CaIEEMod will be used to quantify
GHG emissions. Reductions from recently adopted programs and regulations will be included, such
as improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency, low carbon fuel standards, state building code energy
efficiency, renewable energy portfolio standards, and landscaping water efficiency. The analysis will
also review Project consistency with the Southern California Association of Governments 2020-2045
Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020-2045 RTP/SCS), California Air
Resources Board 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, and possibly other applicable plans for the
purpose of reducing GHG emissions. We recommend that impact significance be determined based
on the Project's consistency with the applicable GHG reduction programs. Mitigation measures will
be identified and incorporated, as necessary, to reduce potentially significant GHG impacts of the
proposed Project.
2.4 — Noise Impact Study.
Existing Conditions. The applicable noise and land use compatibility criteria for the Project area will
be reviewed and noise standards regulating noise impacts will be discussed for land uses on and
adjacent to the Project site. A site visit will be conducted and short-term noise level measurements
will be taken along the Project area. The noise monitoring survey will include three long-term (24-
hour) noise measurements taken in the immediate Project vicinity to determine existing ambient
noise conditions on the Project site and nearby residential areas. In the event that ambient noise
measurements are not possible to record due to COVID-19 restrictions, data from recent projects in
the near vicinity will be reviewed. Additionally, traffic noise may also be modeled if noise levels
cannot be reasonably ascertained.
Construction -Related Noise and Vibration. Noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed
based on the anticipated equipment to be used, length of a specific construction task, equipment
power type (gasoline or diesel engine), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The
construction noise impacts will be evaluated in terms of maximum levels (Lmax) and hourly
equivalent continuous noise levels (Leq) and the frequency of occurrence at adjacent sensitive
locations. An analysis of vibration impacts will be based on the Federal Transit Administration's
vibration analysis guidance. Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the area,
specific construction activities, and Noise Ordinance specifications.
Operational Noise Sources. The Project -generated off-site traffic noise levels will be compared to
the City's Noise Ordinance specifications and/or land use compatibility criteria for off-site uses. On-
site noise generating activities (e.g., stationary sources, truck loading/unloading, etc.) will also be
addressed and analyzed for potential impacts to the adjacent uses and will be assessed against the
Noise Ordinance specifications. Compliance with applicable noise standards will be evaluated, with
recommended mitigation measures included where appropriate. The predicted operational noise
will be modeled using either the FHWA RD -77-108 or SounclPlan, and previously obtained reference
noise measurements of office park noise sources (i.e., truck delivers, mechanical rooftop -equipment,
parking lot activities, etc.) to calculate operational onsite noise impacts to nearby residential land
uses, and compare the results to the City's stationary noise standards.
Potential vibration impacts associated with the on-going operations activities will be analyzed using
methodology from the Vibration Guidance Manual, prepared for Caltrans.
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 9 —
In the event that exceedances occur, feasible mitigation measures will be identified to reduce the
noise and vibration impacts to below significant levels.
2.5 — Glare Analysis
We propose to have Benya Burnett Consultancy (BBC), a light and glare specialty firm, prepare a
quantitative analysis of the potential glare impacts from the proposed glass fa4ade on Building A,
at 650 North Pacific Coast Highway. This analysis will consider potential glare impacts at public
viewing locations, including motorists along Pacific Coast Highway, residences to the west of the
Project, and people at the nearby commercial businesses. The glare analysis would be conducted
using three-dimensional modeling of the Project in AG132 (lighting software). By referencing
applicable International Commission on Illumination (CIE) glare assessment criteria, BBC will
evaluate the impacts of fa4ade and glazing materials affecting drivers from viewing locations where
drivers, residents, and pedestrians may be susceptible to reflected solar glare. Based on these
calculations supported by documentation of the glare criteria evaluations BBC performed, we will
recommend selection criteria for facade materials and other considerations.
2.6 Traffic lmpactAnalysis.
Kimley-Horn will prepare a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as a subconsultant to Michael Baker
International. As a result of the evolving methodologies and guidance to assess traffic impacts, the
TIA will analyze traffic impacts based on: 1) LOS, in accordance with the City General Plan Circulation
Element policies; and 2) VMT methodology that will be consistent with Kimley-Horn's current VMT
policy development for the City. The traffic study will include an evaluation of the site access points,
on-site circulation, and parking lot layout. We will identify any recommended improvements to the
site circulation to achieve efficient traffic flows to, from, and throughout the site. The tasks involved
in analyzing the Project's LOS and VMT impacts are described below.
LOS Analrils: Obtain historical morning and evening peak period traffic count data at up to 11
study intersections. The study intersections are currently envisioned to be those that were
studied in a recent TIA prepared for a nearby commercial business. The Project trip generation
estimates will be developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
Manual (10th Edition), based on likely origins and destinations of residents and current traffic
patterns in the area.
Traffic conditions will be examined for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and for daily operations
under the following scenarios:
+ Existing conditions;
• Existing Plus Project Conditions;
«� Opening Year plus Related Projects without Project Conditions (Cumulative without
Project Conditions); and
�» Opening Year plus Related Projects plus Project Conditions (Cumulative without Project
Conditions).
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 10
Mitigation measures will be identified to offset significant project impacts. These mitigation
measures may include restriping, intersection turn lanes, signalization, and segment lane
additions, as appropriate.
CEOA VMT Screening Analvsis: Since the City has not yet adopted SB 743 thresholds or guidance
regarding methodology. it is intended that the VMT analysis approach will be consistent with
December 2018 guidance provided by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR).
Kimley-Horn will run initial VMT screening based on information published by the OPR. Kimley-
Horn will coordinate with the lead agency regarding their planned approach to establishing
thresholds and methodologies for the VMT analysis. This task does not include a quantitative
VMT analysis (modeling required). If the City requires a quantitative VMT analysis, this will
constitute additional effort. An optional task for a quantitative VMT analysis is provided below.
Optional Ouantitative (Modeled) VMTAnalvsis: Kimley-Horn will code land use into the project's
representative Traffic Analysis Zone JAZ) within the SCAG travel demand model (TDM). The
resultant TDM output and interim model files will be used to determine the Home-based Work
VMT per employee for the proposed project. Note that this will require deconstructing the
model output sufficiently so that both the trip purposes and trip lengths for each contributing
part of the project's VMT from other sources can be completed. The process undertaken will be
consistent with OPR guidance as described in the most recent release of its guidance. Mitigation
measures for reducing VMT impacts determined to be potentially significant will be identified.
Kimley-Horn will prepare a draft TIA report documenting the analysis procedures, existing
conditions, traffic impacts, and recommended improvements.
2.7 Optional Historic Resources Assessment. While not previously identified, we are including an
optional task for a historic resources assessment on the existing structures at 650 and 700 North
Pacific Coast Highway. The buildings, constructed in 1962 and 1957, respectively, are over 50 years
of age and have not been evaluated for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources
(California Register).
The evaluations will include property -specific research, current photographs, and a historic context
provided on applicable Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms, the standard form
used by historic preservation professionals throughout California. The intent of the above-
mentioned cultural resources identification efforts is to determine if there are archaeological
resources and identify if the buildings are historical resources as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the
CEQA Guidelines. We will complete the South Central Coastal Information Center records search,
literature and historic map review, Los Angeles County Historical Society consultation, and field
survey and California Register of Historical Resources evaluation. This scope assumes that the
project has no direct physical impact to the building located at 737 Carl Jacobson Way. Further, we
assume an archaeological survey will not be required because project site appears fully hardscaped
with no exposed soils.
The results of the assessment will be presented in a memorandum report with attached Department
of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms that can be appended to the IS/MND.
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 11
Task 3: Prepare Draft Initial Study
3.1 — 1St Screencheck Draft Initial Study. An Initial Study will be completed, following the form
provided in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines. Concise, explanatory and annotated
responses will be provided for all checklist responses, in the 21 specific impact categories. An
electronic copy of the 1 It
Draft IS will be submitted for review and comment by City staff.
3.2-2 nd Screencheck Draft Initial Study. We will respond to City staff comments on the 1St Draft IS,
prepare appropriate revisions to the document, and submit an electronic version of the 2nd Draft IS
for City review and comment.
Task 4: Publish and Circulate Draft IVMND
This proposal assumes that the results of the Initial Study will indicate that a Negative or Mitigated
Negative Declaration is the appropriate determination, rather than an environmental impact report.
Based on this assumption, we will make final revisions to the IS as directed by City staff, compile the
official Draft IS/MND for the City's signature, complete a Notice of Intent to Adopt an MND, make
the requested number of printed and electronic copies of each, and send the NOI and Draft MND,
including appendix materials, to the distribution list to be developed in consultation with City staff.
All items would be transmitted via certified mail, except any materials sent to the State
Clearinghouse (if determined to be necessary), which would be shipped via a commercial carrier
such as Federal Express or submitted electronically. This proposal assumes that the document
production would consist of no more than the following:
0 Notice of Intent to Adopt an MND: 25 printed copies
• Draft IS/MND: 25 CD copies and 2 printed copies (includes appendix materials)
Task 5: Public Review and Adoption
The public review/comment period is estimated to be be 30 calendar days, in the event that
distribution to the State Clearinghouse is necessary. At the end of that period, we will prepare
concise written responses to any written comments submitted to the City concerning the adequacy
of the information presented in the Proposed MND. Since the number and complexity of comments
that may be submitted cannot be predicted, our proposed budget limits this effort to $5,340 of
professional fees. If any responses warrant a corresponding revision to some part of the Proposed
MND, that revision will be so noted. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will be
prepared to accompany the City's CEQA findings and action to adopt the Final MND.
Our Project Manager or Director would attend one public to respond to questions concerning the
IS/MND.
Task 6: File NOD
Within five business days following the City's action to approve the project, we would prepare and
file a Notice of Determination with the Los Angeles County Clerk. Prior to filing an NOD, we will
submit a No Effect Determination Request to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife;
Mr. Eduardo Schanborn, City of EI Segundo Agreement No. 5981
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 12
however, in our experience, it is extremely rare that they concur with such requests, even on
previously developed properties in a fully urbanized area.
Task 7: Project Management and Meetings
Throughout the entire process of preparing and adopting the (M)ND, we will be conducting regular
communications with City staff and our team, as well as other agencies and entities as needed.
Troubleshooting, budget and schedule monitoring and reporting will occur on a regular basis.
Attendance at a project start-up meeting and one additional meeting at City Hall is included. This
task also includes compilation of all background documents, to maintain that portion of the
administrative record on an ongoing basis, with regular submittals to the City. A budget limit of 30
hours is proposed for this task. Should additional effort be required or requested, we will work with
City staff to develop an appropriate budget augment at that time.
D. Budget Estimate
The following table summarizes estimated costs to complete an IS/MND, in accordance with the scope
of work described above.
Task 1 — Develop Project Description
Task 2 — Technical Studies
2.1: Air Quality Assessment
2.2: Energy Consumption Analysis
2.3 Greenhouse Gas Analysis
2.4: Noise Impact Study
2.5: Quantitative Glare Analysis
2.6: Traffic Impact Analysis
Task 3 — Prepare Draft IS/MND
Task 4 — Publish and Circulate Draft IS/MND
$3,290
$57,435
$5,460
$1,050
$1,470
$5,040
$10,500
$33,915
$23,050
$1,330
Task 5 — Public Review and Adoption $5,715
Task 6 — File NOD U $725
Task 7 — Project Management and Meetings $5,580
Labor Subtotal: I $97,125
Expenses: Printed documents, CDs, County Clerk NOD Fee*, mileage, shipping and materials, $1,345
postage. *County Clerk NOD Fee includes $75 standard fee, but excludes potential additional fee
charged by California Department of Fish and Wildlife, set at $2,406.75 for an MND.
GRAND TOTAL: 1 $98,470
' Optional Tasks:
1: Quantitative VMT Analysis: $10,000
3: Historic Resources Assessment $9,430
Agreement No. 5981
° o
Pfiw;,°�hIiNI1V
0
°
ao
u N E
� O
III
"';Vnlia III"'
l
,
v v N >
- M "VIII
0VVII
I�P"�illllll m
VIII I
ECL
8-0
4-
O
II ....... m
vi
N
+L+ v 7
L
O
N
o L
o
"O N
rN
vt Ull
fl N
o
m 3
j11
Plllllti "
v
v u
a a
O
•vLL ra
N Q
M liil
`
0.
cu
°
L 7 4J '�
IIIIIIIIII mm"'
c
4-¢ ��
!
o
4, _Q
v
CL
LM0oas
O
i0
OJ
41 LL
pp uuuu uuuum
—
•>
V
V 0
°
II
iJ
Vf
0
a
f Q
N
o
C
0 '>
G
N 4-
O
Go
f0 C N
C -p
ON N +, L
C
ro Ln ro Q
x
v
O
A N L N
:,om,
N
`o
O�
m
Ln
4-v
rn
o
c v v
h...11llm
L
tY0 c —
O
d
N
O
O V +�
4+
�,� �IIII�'•
fO
QJ
d
V
N
4J Ln D
o
C1
c ° Z
O Q
CD
N q III
Y
Y
•�
V
O
V)
O O.
W O
w v
O.
c
mu,IjI W IjMIpuuu
O Q
v+ N O
-vi
m
❑
O vi
r d
41
w
~
❑
�
4
a z
01
�
CL
u u
Q
V C
o ° —
+
UD
m❑
z «
Oro
41 :3 O
❑ o
o
� L
W
oa
o
"N'll N
w N
D r
ea
�.Y
Y O
J
V
W'E
'_ c
❑ t o
o
O
ro
41
O
N
Q
N VIn
L N
++
fa .V Ln
9�,,p ,��
w m
m T j
c
> .E o v❑
D c
c o D U E
C
O
m0.
w
2
m N 3
d> N
����,.N' fn
v 4 °' C U
p z a c� $
N N rn
` o
d c v
3 a m❑
f0
v+ N
M
0 ^
fC ai +•' >
i,„� 16
U m N =
o
N . N ❑`
Z� N
a
E
W CL d
L L O
++ i
N
Y=❑❑ 2 2 E_
m
> >
m> d m v
6
v m 2 -
7
IR 0.
W
G ° Y N
•,��;lriy
o m a o a v m o m n
d g m m v
w m m
N
N Q
9��.��1� F
a w a ¢ w (� C7 z H 0
a m a w a
a CL a a S
Q
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 14
F. Project Team and Qualifications
Key members of our team are identified below, all of which who have significant experience with
similar projects. Refer to Attachment A of this scope for the key team member resumes.
Jennifer Wu 15 Project Manager on multiple projects in Southern California for
Project Manager preparation of IS/MND, EIR, and CEQA compliance documents
Role: Project Manager for commercial, residential, and utility projects, including
power plant developments in municipalities and solar PV
projects with close sensitive receptors and glare
considerations.
.....
Greg Tonkovich
Technical Lead, SLO Council of Governments for on-call
Senior Analyst/
regional population growth forecast and regional
Principal
transportation/ sustainable communities.
John Bellas
21 Project Director, IS/MND, Chick-fil-A Project, City of EI Segundo
Department
Peer Review of multiple EIRs for office campus and mixed-use
Manager—
projects in the cities of Pasadena and Los Angeles, including
Environmental
significant Class A office projects, such as the Parsons
Role: Project Director
Corporate Headquarters and Alexandria Real Estate
Burnett Consultancy
Headquarters in Pasadena.
.....
Greg Tonkovich
..........
7 Air Quality, Health Risk Assessment, GHG, Energy, and Noise
Senior Analyst/
Technical Lead for numerous CEQA environmental review
Principal
process for multiple types of new development projects,
including residential, business, and industrial uses.
Role: Air Quality, GHG,
Energy, and Noise
James Benya, PE
47 Illuminating Engineer, Lighting Designer, Lecturer, and author,
Principal, Benya
with published articles on lighting guidelines forthe California
Burnett Consultancy
Energy Commission, lighting methodology for EPRI, and
Role: Glare Analysis
multiple journal publications.
_.....
Jason Melchor, P.E.
............ ....................
20 Traffic Engineer for: 330 Kansas St Trip Generation and VMT
Project Manager,
Study, EI Segundo; Manhattan Beach Hotel Traffic and VMT
Kimley-Horn
Study, Manhattan Beach; and multiple on-call traffic
engineering services, including with the City of Anaheim, City
Role: Traffic Analysis
of Industry, and Riverside County.
Agreement No. 5981
Mr. Eduardo Schonborn, City of EI Segundo
RE: Proposal to Provide CEQA Compliance Services for New Office Campus Project at 650-700 N. PCH
Page 15
G. Closure
The scope of work, budget and schedule estimates provided herein are based on our preliminary
understanding of the environmental setting and general nature of the proposed office campus
renovation and construction. The cost and schedule estimates assume there will be no change to the
project description after it has been submitted and reviewed by the City. Certain specifics will need to
be determined and provided as we move into the preparation of the IS and there is a potential that one
or more tasks will need to be adjusted or expanded to respond to significant new information through
more research or analysis. In those circumstances, we will work with the City to develop modifications
to our scope, budget, and schedule, as needed. Given our preliminary understanding of the scope of
the proposed project and the environmental concerns, we anticipate that the IS will support an MND.
Should any potentially significant impacts be identified that warrant more extensive analysis and/or
should any other issues arise that indicate preparation of an Environmental Impact Report would be
prudent, we would develop a corresponding scope of work, budget, and schedule for the City's
consideration.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City of EI Segundo and are ready to proceed with
the work described in this proposal upon your authorization. If you have any questions concerning this
proposal, please contact John Bellas at 562-200-7170 or Jennifer Wu at 310-436-5931.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Wu John M. Bellas
Project Manager - Environmental Department Manager — Environmental
Agreement No. 5981
E17707j=
■ M ""
INTERNATIONAL
Jennifer P. Wu
Project Manager
General Qualifications
Agreement No. 5981
We Make o Difference
Years with Michael Baker: <i
Degrees
B.A., 2000, Environmental
Chemistry, University of California,
San Diego
Ms. Wu is an accomplished project rnanager, team leader, and effective Licensesf Certi fications
team player, and has worked over 14 years in environmental consulting.
Ms. Wu has a proven track record managing and serving as technical lead Environmental Management, 2002,
on complex and oftentimes controversial projects involving substantial University of California Extension,
federal, state, and local agency and public coordination, permitting, and Irvine
environmental review processes (National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)), through
project planning/development, permitting, and construction phases. Ms. Wu's project experience is diverse, and
includes local planning, residential, commercial, industrial, and utility development.
Residential and Commercial Project Experience
Newhall Ranch Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/EIR, Valencia, CA: Prepared EIS/EIR
alternatives analysis for a large-scale master -planned community development, involving 20,000 residential
dwelling units, commercial district, water reclamation plant, public schools, fire stations and regional and community
parks.
Santa Barbara Ranch EIR, Santa Barbara, CA: EIR task leader and co-author for the controversial residential
development of 70 estate developments in the Gaviota Coast on 3,250 acres, including coastal zone development.
for the Aviation Boulevard at Artesia Boulevard Southbound to Westbound Right Turn Improvement Project. Key
issues being addressed within the IS/MND include air quality impacts, noise, hazardous materials, and circulation.
Fess Parker Waterfront Hotel and Youth Hostel, Santa Barbara, CA: Environmental compliance manager for the
project remediation activities and construction of a waterfront hotel and youth hostel. Managed and implemented
mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and prepared weekly reports to the City of Santa Barbara. Participated
in and presented at regular meetings with construction managers, project stakeholders, and agency representatives,
and interfaced with and responded to public inquiries and concerns.
Regional and Transportation Project Experience
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, Master Services Agreement, San Luis Obispo, CA: Technical lead for
population growth, for on-call MSA services to provide regional population growth forecast services and associated
Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy in support of the Sustainable Communities and Client
Protection Act of 2008 (SB 275).
San Bernardino County Transit -Oriented District: Managed land disposal and acquisition process for a planned
transit oriented district (TOD) for the City of San Bernardino. Efforts included preparation of CEQA Categorical
Exemption noticing and documentation for the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) land disposal
process.
MBAKERINTL.COM
Agreement No. 5981
We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
High Speed Rail, Kern and Fresno County: Prepared re-examination in accordance with the California High -Speed
Rail Authority Environmental Compliance Manual. Re-examination packages included engineering design proposal
and resulting environmental review of the route and design changes on the Central Valley alignment.
Energy and Transmission Project Experience
Estrella Substation and Paso Robles Area Reinforcement Project, San Luis Obispo County: Conducted and
prepared environmental due diligence, cultural and historic resources investigations, biological surveys, California
Public Utility Commission (CPUC) Proponent's Environmental Assessment (PEA), and public outreach and workshops
for the construction and operation of two substations (together comprising Estrella Substation), and new and
upgraded powerline facilities.
Greenbean Works C and D, City of Palmdale: Managed and prepared Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs) for
two solar photovoltaic (PV) and grid battery projects located in the City of Palmdale. The MNDs were prepared
simultaneously and accepted by the City for circulation within a month (total). Minimal comments were received for
each project and the client received project permits and approvals within one month after draft MND circulation.
Fort Irwin Reinforcement Project, San Bernardino County: Managed and prepared NEPA Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Plan of Development (POD) accepted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the US.
Army Fort Irwin National Training Center for a 13 -mile powerline reinforcement and rebuild project.
AV Solar Ranch One, Los Angeles County: Deputy Project Manager and Project Manager to conduct environmental
due diligence, permitting, and prepare CEQA Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and NEPA EA, for the construction
of a 230 megawatt (MW) solar PV electric generation facility located on 2,100 acres, in unincorporated Los Angeles
County.
Antelope Solar Farm Project, Los Angeles County: Managed and prepared environmental risk assessment,
permitting, baseline surveys and technical studies, and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), for a
20 MW solar PV facility on 320 acres in unincorporated Los Angeles County.
Desert Sunlight Solar Farm Project, Riverside County: Managed permitting, CEQA environmental review, and
construction of a 550 MW solar PV facility on 4,000+ acres, on BLM-administered land and Riverside County
jurisdictional lands.
Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project, multiple county area (Los Angeles, Kern, San Bernardino, Riverside,
and Angeles National Forest): Technical lead for multiple NEPA and CEQA environmental discipline areas for a PEA
for an 80+ mile regional transmission line and substation network upgrade and new facility construction.
Arroyo Grande Oil Field and Lompoc Oil Field Development, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties:
Managed state and local permitting for oil field production well development, including preparing of permit
application submittals and technical study preparation. Participated in project presentations to the public (scoping
meetings and town council meetings) addressing project controversies and public safety.
Jennifer P, Wu
Michael
Baker,
I N T E R N AT 1 0 N A L
John M. Bellas, LEER AP
Senior Associate/Department Manager
General Qualifications
With more than 20 years of experience, Mr. Bellas is a recognized expert in
the environmental planningfield in Southern California. He has managedthe
preparation of numerous CEQA and NEPA documents for a wide range of
projects, including land development/entitlement projects, land use
plans/programs, and capital improvement projects. In addition, he served as
an in-house/on-call environmental administrator/coordinator for several
prominent cities in Southern California. He has also conducted specialized
CEQA training programs for client cities, served as an instructor in AEP's
Advanced CEQA and CEQA Essentials series, and presented on CEQA
topics at AEP and APA conferences.
CEQA Advice and Strategy Experience
Agreement No. 5981
We Make a Difference
Years of Experience: 21
Degrees
BS, 1999, Environmental Resource
Management, Penn State
University
Professional Affiliations
Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP)
American Planning Association (APA)
LEED AP, U.S. Green Building
Council/Green Building Certification
Institute
Mr. Bellas has served as an in-house and/oron-call CEQAadvisortothe Cities of Los Angeles, Pasadena, Santa Clarita, Laguna
Woods, Blythe, and California City. In this role, he has reviewed numerous environmental documents for technical and legal
adequacy and provided strategic guidance on countless CEQA matters. Notable assignments include:
City of Los Angeles, EIR Peer Review Services. Mr. Bellas leads ateam of five senior/principal-level environmental planners
that provide EIR Peer Review Services to the Los Angeles Department of City Planning. In this role, he provides technical
review of initial studies, Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessments (SCEA), draft/final environmental impact
reports (EIRs), and CEQA findings/statements of overriding considerations. He also regularly advises the City on CEQA
matters. Examples include working with the City Attorney's Office to develop an approach to analyzing greenhouse gas
emissions in CEQA documents; drafting/compiling standardized regulatory framework language for the City's EIRs; and
contributingto the City's white paper on addressingthe Friant Ranch case in CEQA documents.
City of Pasadena, Environmental Coordinator/Administrator. Mr. Bellas has served as the City of Pasadena's
environmental coordinator/administrator for more than 10 years, where he is responsible for all of the City's environmental
documents. Tasks include supervising the CEQA process for all projects in the City; reviewing CEQA and NEPA documents
prepared by City staff and other consultants; providing recommendations on the appropriate procedures for complyingwith
CEQA and other environmental regulations; strategizing with the City Attorney's Office on CEQA matters; reviewing
technical studies for adequacy; drafting comment letters on behalf of the City for projects outside of the City's jurisdiction or
forwhich the City is a responsible agency; overseeingthe preparation, posting and distribution of environmental notices; and
participating in public meetings and hearings.
CEQA Document Project Management Experience
Mr. Bellas has managed the preparation of numerous CEQA documents, ranging from program EIRs for community plans,
specific plans, and other land use plans to project -level EIRs and initial study/mitigated negative declarations (IS/MND) for
land development and public works projects. He served as project managerfor the following CEQA documents for long-range
plans/land use plans, which represent a limited sample of his experience:
Agreement No. 5981
11 Q w.
1 N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L
• City of Arcadia, Arroyo Pacific Academy Specific Plan IS/MND
• City of Calimesa, JP Ranch EIR*
• City of Calimesa, Holbert Ranch EIR
• City of Fontana, Summit at Rosena Specific Plan EIR*
• City of Industry, Puente Hills Mall Expansion Project IS/MND
• City of Industry, Chestnut Street Warehouse Project EIR
• City of Laguna Woods, General Plan EIR
oil City of Laguna Woods, Golden Rain Foundation GPA/ZC IS/MND
• City of Laguna Woods, Gate 12 Community Center Improvement Project IS/MND
• City of Lomita, Cypress Street Reservoir EA/EIR*
• City of Manhattan Beach, Downtown Specific Plan IS/MND
• City of Monterey Park, DoubleTree Hotel IS/MND
• City of Morro Bay, Housing Element IS/ND
• City of Ontario, Cimarron Redevelopment Project Area Plan EIR, Project Manager*
• City of Ontario, Diamante Terrace EIR, Project Manager
• City of Ontario, Tessier Work/Live Project EIR, Project Manager*
• City of Pasadena, Villa Esperanza Master Plan IS/MND
• City of Pasadena, Housing Element IS/ND
• City of Pasadena, 39 Congress Medical Building IS/MND
• City of Pasadena, Caltech Astrophysics Building (Cahill Center) IS/MND*
• City of Pasadena, Monk Hill Treatment Facility IS/MND*
• City of Pasadena, Hahamongna Watershed Park Master Plan CEQA Document*
• City of Pasadena, Urban Wildlife Management Plan IS/MND
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Lower Hesse Park Master Plan IS/MND
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes, Grandview Park Master Plan IS/MND
• City of Rolling Hills Estates, General Plan EIR (ongoing)
• City of Rolling Hills Estates, United Methodist Church School Project IS/MND
• City of Rolling Hills Estates, The Village/Merrill Gardens Project IS/MND
• City of Rolling Hills Estates, Chandler Ranch/Rolling Hills Golf Course EIR*
• City of Rolling Hills Estates, Peninsula Center Revitalization Project IS/MND
• City of Rolling Hills Estates, Butcher Ranch IS/MND*
• City of Rolling Hills Estates, Covenant Church Project IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Jobs Creation Overlay Zone IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Canyon Country Community Center Project IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Kaiser Permanente Medical Office Building IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Valencia Suites Hotel IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Rent -A -Bin IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Sierra Highway Pedestrian Bridge and Roadway Improvement Project IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Canyon Brook Estates Project IS/MND
• City of Santa Clarita, Newhall Mixed -Use Project IS/MND and EA/FONSI
• City of South Pasadena, Dog Park IS/MND
• City of South Pasadena, Pasadena Avenue Lofts EIR*
• City of South Pasadena, Wilson Reservoir Replacement Project IS/MND*
Agreement No. 5981
I N T E R N A T I O N A L
■ City of Westlake Village, Community Park EIR*
■ City of Westlake Village„ Opus West Development EIR*
■ City of Westlake Village, Sunrise Senior Assisted Living EIR*
■ City of Westlake Village, Russell Ranch Retail Center EIR*
■ County of Santa Barbara, Energy and Climate Action Plan EIR
■ South Pasadena Unified School District, Mission Place Project EIR
■ Santa Monica -Malibu Unified School District, Santa Monica High School Campus Plan EIR
* Denotes work or projects completed priortojoining Michael Baker International.
Select Lectures and Course Instruction
Mr. Bekas regularly speaks/presents on CEQA matters. Select examples of past engagements include:
■ "Advanced CEQA" Association of Environmental Professionals (Inland Empire Section). 2011, 2018, and 2020.
■ "CEQA Essentials." Association of Environmental Professionals (Inland Empire Section). 2017, 2018, and 2019.
■ "EIR Review: A How To Guide, Parts I-V" (City of Los Angeles CEQA Training). Los Angeles, CA. 2020.
■ "CEQA Overview for the Pasadena City Council" Pasadena, CA. 2019.
■ "CEQA Update for the Pasadena Planning Commission." Pasadena, CA. 2017.
■ "CEQA Overview for the California City Planning Commission" California City, CA. 2019.
■ "The Ethics are Right." Association of Environmental Professionals. Monterey, CA. 2019.
■ "Mitigation Measures: A Rose by Any Other Name..." American Planning Association. San Diego, CA 2018.
■ "CEQA's Mid -Life Crisis." American Planning Association. Pasadena, CA. 2o16.
■ "Blazing the Trail: Pasadena's Path to Adopting VMT Transportation Metrics." American Planning Association.
Pasadena, CA. 2016.
■ "Success and Challenges for Cities in Streamlining CEQA." Association of Environmental Professionals. San Diego,
CA.2o16.
■ "City of Santa Clarita CEQA Training, Part I (CEQA Basics) and Part II (Advanced CEQA Topics)." Santa Clarita, CA.
2016.
■, "City of Santa Clarita CEQA Training, Parts I, II, and III." Santa Clarita, CA. 2013.
VISTA
ENVIRONMENTAL
HIGHLIGHTS
Education
• M.S., Electrical Engineering,
University of Southern
California
• B.S., Planning and
Development, University of
Southern California
Key Strengths
• Air quality
® Global Climate Change
Heath Risk Assessments
• Noise
Training
• Stays up to date with modeling
techniques and regulations
through continuing education
courses
Registrations/Certifications
• American Institute of Certified
Planners (AICP)
• American Planning Association
(APA)
• Institute of Noise Control
Engineering (INCE)
• State of California General "B"
Agreement No. 5981
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Mr. Tonkovich has over 15 years of air quality and noise analysis experience.
He specializes in air quality and noise impact analyses for governmental
agencies and the business community and has completed numerous complex
air and noise studies that conform to both the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requirements.
Mr. Tonkovich's air quality analysis experience includes global climate change
analyses and health risk assessments. He is proficient in utilizing CaIEEMod,
URBEMIS2007, CALINE4, ISCST3, AERMOD, EMFAC2014, and 0ffRoad2011
models, in order to quantify emissions impacts as well as to assess the efficacy
of proposed mitigation.
Mr. Tonkovich is also experienced in noise analyses and is proficient in utilizing
FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM), FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model
(RCNM), FAA Integrated Noise Model (INM), and SounclPlan. In addition he has
created and implemented a noise program based on the FHWA-RD-77-108
Standard. Through the use of the above models he is able to efficiently
determine noise impacts to nearby sensitive land uses and assess the efficacy
of proposed mitigation.
He has successfully run an environmental consulting business for over 14 years
and has been responsible in managing costs, scheduling, and accounting. Mr.
Tonkovich has a proven record of preparing air quality and noise impact
analyses to successful completion. During his 15+ year career he has prepared
more than 500 environmental documents with a 100 percent success rate.
Mr. Tonkovich is experienced in a wide range of project types, including:
residential, commercial, industrial, and recreational projects as well as public
Contractor License projects that include specific plans and general plans. He has experience in
preparing studies to specific standards and formats such as Caltrans Air Quality
and Noise Study Reports and NEPA Environmental Assessments and has completed air quality and/or noise
analyses in over 200 different local jurisdictions throughout California.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Camino Town & Country Center Revitalization Project, Oceanside, CA.
Prepared an Air Quality and Global Climate Change Analysis, a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) and Noise Impact
Analysis for the demolition of 84,305 square feet of existing building space and construction of 109,150 square
feet of shopping center building space. The air quality and GHG report analyzed the regional construction and
operational air and GHG emissions with the CalEEMod model and provided a qualitative analysis of local fugitive
dust impacts from construction. The analysis found that construction and operational activities would create
less than significant air quality impacts. The GHG analysis compared the business -as -usual GHG emissions to
the with project year 2020 GHG emissions and found that the proposed project would result in a significant
GHG emissions impact. Mitigation was provided that limited parking supply, required the installation of four
electric vehicle charging stations, improvements to pedestrian network, and implementation of a ride sharing
www.vistalb.com
Agreement No. 5981
ENVIRONMENTAL
program to the shopping center employees. With implementation of the GHG mitigation measures, the GHG
emissions were reduced to less than significant levels. The HRA utilized diesel truck running and idling emission
rates from the EMFAC2014 model, TRU emission rates from the OFFROAD2011 model and the AERMOD View
to calculate the diesel particulate matter (DPM) concentrations from operation of the proposed project at the
nearby sensitive receptors. No significant health risks were found. The noise analysis utilized the FHWA's RCNM
model to analyze the noise impacts from onsite construction activities and utilized the FHWA RD -77-108 model
to analyze the noise impacts associated with the additional vehicles on the nearby roads and utilized typical
noise propagation rates to analyze the new onsite stationary noise sources. No significant construction or
operational noise or vibration impacts were found.
Home 2 Hotel by Hilton Project, Redlands, CA. Prepared an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
Analysis and a Noise Impact Analysis that analyzed the development of a 77 -room hotel adjacent to Interstate
10 and Tennessee Street. The air quality and greenhouse gas emissions analyses utilized the CalEEMod model
to analyze the regional air and GHG emissions from construction and operational activities and the SCAQMD's
Look -Up Tables were utilized to analyze the criteria pollutants local air concentrations at the nearby sensitive
receptors. No significant air quality or GHG emissions impacts were found. The noise analysis utilized the
FHWA's RCNM model to analyze the noise impacts from onsite construction activities, utilized the FHWA RD -
77 -108 model to calculate the off-site roadway noise impacts from project -generated trips, and utilized the
SounclPlan model to calculate the freeway and nearby road noise impacts to the proposed hotel rooms and
outdoor pool and BBQ areas. Significant noise impacts were found to occur at the outdoor pool and BBQ area
and mitigation of a 10 -foot high wall was recommended to reduce the outdoor noise impacts to less than
significant levels. Significant noise impacts were also found in the hotel rooms that would face Interstate 10
and mitigation of upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of 28 STC was recommended to reduce the
hotel room noise impacts to less than significant levels.
HR Transmission Line Project, Redondo Beach, CA. Prepared air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and
noise initial study sections as a subcontractor for Chambers Group, Inc. for California Water Service company
for the development of a 1.81 mile water transmission line to connect existing wells at Station 8 and Station 22
to the existing 3.5 MG tank at Station 5. The air quality analysis utilized CalEEMod to analyze the project's
regional criteria pollutant and GHG emissions and SCAQMD's Mass Rate LST Look -up Tables to analyze the
project's local criteria pollutant impacts from construction activities. The GHG analysis also utilized CalEEMod
to analyze construction -related GHG emissions and provided a qualitative operational analysis. The noise
analysis utilized the FHWA RCNM to analyze construction noise impacts to the nearby homes and school and
provided a qualitative analysis of operational activities. No significant construction or operational impacts were
found.
Overhill Drive Improvement Project, Windsor Hills, CA. Prepared air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions,
and noise initial study sections for Los Angeles County Department of Public Works for the development of a
Class I Bicycle Path and Pedestrian Path on the east side of Overhill Drive from Stocker Street to Slauson Avenue,
construction of retaining walls, bus pads, parkway drains and catch basins, reconstruction of pavement curbs
and gutters, street lighting upgrades, and landscape improvements. The air quality analysis utilized CalEEMod
to analyze the project's regional criteria pollutant and GHG emissions and SCAQMD's Mass Rate LST Look -up
Tables to analyze the project's local criteria pollutant impacts from construction activities. The GHG analysis
also utilized CalEEMod to analyze construction -related GHG emissions and provided a qualitative operational
analysis. The noise analysis utilized the FHWA RCNM to analyze construction noise impacts to the nearby homes
and school and provided a qualitative analysis of operational activities. No significant construction or
operational impacts were found.
www.vistalb.com
Agreement No. 5981
Curriculum Vitae
JAMES ROBERT BENYAf PE, FIES, FIALD
Principal, the Benya Burnett Consultancy
Winner of the 2018 International illumination Design Award of Excellence
"At the leading edge of light" Metropolis
-one of the top lighting designers in the US", Departures by American
Express
-Top 25 Retail Lighting Designers in US", Display and Design Ideas
"Hot designer", SNAP Magazine
"Jim has been at the forefront from the start, specializing in integrated
daylighting strategies and sustainable lighting approaches long before most
designers knew what that was,' Architectural Lighting
Inaugural member of the Michigan Lighting Hall of Fame
Winner of the 2020 IES Distinguished Service Award
Jim Benya is a professional illuminating engineer, lighting designer, educator, and
consultant with 47 years of experience. Vie is a Registered Professional Electrical Engineer,
Fellow of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (FIES), and Fellow of the
International Association of Lighting Designers (IALD). Benya established and led
California's first independent lighting design firm Wrnina Souter Lighting Design as Senior
Principal and CEO before starting Benya Lighting Design in 1994 in Portland, Oregon. His
design work has been published in every major lighting, design and architectural journal,
including Architecture, Architectural Record, Architectural Lighting, Progressive
Architecture, LDA, Lighting Dimensions, Interiors, Interior Design, Designers West,
Northern California Hoi -ne and Garden, Architectural Digest, and Building Design and
Construction. He has won numerous lighting design awards, including the Edison Award,
the Edison Award of Excellence (7 times), the Edison Award for Environmental Design
(thrice), the International Illumination Design Award of Excellence (twice), and the Source
Awards First Place Award. He is the author of Lighting Design Basics (Wiley) and Lighting
Retrofits and Relighting (Wiley) and his work is featured in nine books, including the Best
of Lighting Design. In addition to design work, Benya Burnett offers codes and standards
development, forensic and expert services in lighting, environrnental impact assessments
and studies, technical research and reports, educational classes arid related rnaterials, and
product design consulting and assistance to manufacturers. Benya is currently based in
Davis, California as Principal of the Benya Burnett Consultancy with partner Deborah
Burnett.
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING um-I-ORY
Principal, the Benya Burnett Consultancy 2012 -present
Principal, Benya Lighting Design, West Linn, OR 1994-2013
Principal, Pacific Lightworks, Portland, OR 1996-1998
Principal, Lumina? Souter Lighting Design, San Francisco 1983-1994
Associate and Chief Electrical Engineer, the Smith Group, Detroit 1980-1983
Electrical Engineer and Project Manager, the Smith Group, Detroit 1973-1980
Agreement No. 5981
EDUCATIONAL HISTORY
BSE University ufMichigan, Electrical Engineering 1973
0S, University of Michigan. Computer Science 1973
Graduate work inComputer Science, University of Michigan 1973
Professional Development Work inBuilding Energy Systems, Iowa State 1978
Professional Development Work inDuy|ighhng,Harvard Graduate School 2009
ACADEMIC TEACHING HISTORY
Adjunct Professor of Architecture, Lawrence Technological University
1074-1978
Adjunct Professor nfArchitecture, Wayne State University
1979
Adjunct Professor ofDesign, University ofMichigan
1980'1983
Adjunct Professor o/Architecture, University ofCalifornia atBerkeley
1984-1985
Adjunct Professor nfArchitecture, California College, o(Art
1986'1995
Artist inResidence, University ofNebraska School ofArchitecture
1998
Adjunct Professor ofInterior Design, k4ury\hu/$University
2002
Guest Lecturer, Oregon State University interior Design Lighting Class
1999-2010
Instructor in Lighting Design, UC Davis
2008
Special studio in Day|ighhng, Duy|ectricLighdng, 8a\| State University
2007'2009
Director ofthe Advanced Lighting Design Program, UCDavis
2012-2013
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT "FEACE-11 ING/L ECTURE HISTORY
National and International Venues
LiohtFuir|n�rnadnna|(S8
1990-2020��Li�ngDesign
Conference (Ber|in,Madrid, Copenhagen, Rome, Paris)
2009,20l1,203,
2OlS,20l7and
2019
Profe�ssicna>Lighdng Design (Alings5s, Copenhagen, Wismar, Venice)
2011
Pan Pacific Lighting Conference, (Sari Francisco)
1984,19861989
\md.DayUghfing Conference (BHbao,Rotterdam, Lausanne, Copenhagen, London)
2007,20092011,
201]and 2UlG
|ALOAnnual Conference
20002002,2010
IES Annual Conference
1985,1988,1990
2000 ,2005,2017
International Dark Sky Association Annual Meeting
2002,2003,2008
AIA Annual Conference
2001,2005,2007
AS|OAnnual Conference
1985,1986,1989
1990,1994,1998
Green Build
2002,2003,2007
2008,2009
Neucon[hicago
1998,2002,2009
Strategies in Light (LED and (]LEDconferences)
2009,2011,2012,
2015,2017,2018
LED Show
2013,2015
Light5howVVest
2013'2014,2015
LED Specifier Summit
2013,2814
US DOE LED/OLED Manufacturer Summit
2014
Agreement No. 5981
Local and Regional Venues
Flagstaff Regional Dark Sky Conference 2014
Designers Saturday, New York 1992
LEDucation, New York 2011, 2015
Lighting Academy, Southern California Edison (5 classes, multiple times) 2007-2011
AIA ProfessionaI Development Classes Presented 20 programs local level) 2001-2011
ASID Professional Development. Classes presented 182 programs local level) 1983-2009
ADEM Professional Development Classes presented (local level) 1985-1995
IES Regional and Sectional Meetings -75 programs 1975-2011
Professional Development Classes for Commercial Clients 1983-2011
Commercial presentation and program clients include Acuity Brands Lighting, Cooper Lighting,
GE Lighting, Sylvania Lighting, Lutron Electronics, ELP Lighting, Efficiency Vermont, Southern
California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric, Sacramento Municipal flower and Light, LA DWP,
Southern California Gas Co, San Diego Gas & Electric, California Lighting Technology Center,
Oklahoma Gas & Electric, Edison Electric Institute, American Lighting Association, Oregon
Energy Trust, Pacific Power Company, BC Hydro, Connecticut Power arid Light, Con Edison,
Com Edison, Atlantic Electric, Georgia Power, Lucifer Lighting, NELA, NEER CHPS, ASI-IRAE,
Energy Center of Wisconsin, ACEEE, NRDC, Professional Lighting Design magazine,
Architectural Lighting magazine, Architect magazine, AMC' Trade Shows, the Atlanta Mart, the
Merchandise Mart, LA Design Center, SF Mart, the Miami Merchandise Mart, Dallas Mart, Specs
Retail Conference, the Electric Show, Electric 'West, EWEB, 11DA
College Lectures
1983-2019
Programs include University of Oregon, Oregon State University, Mt, I'lood Community
College, University of Washington, University of California Davis, University of California
Berkeley, Cal Poly Pomona, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, University of California Santa Barbara,
University of California San Diego, Cal State Chico, Cal State Sacramento, California Art
Institute, La Canada College, UCLA, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, University of Texas, UT
San Antonio, Venice School of Architecture, Hochschule Wismar, University of Montana,
University of Idaho, Arizona State University, Oklahoma State University, University of
Nebraska, Lawrence Technological Institute, University of Alabama, Memphis State University,
Rhode Island School of Design, Louisiana Tech, University of Colorado, University of Virginia,
University of I-iawaii, Fashion Institute of Design, University of Vermont, University of
Wisconsin, University of Minnesota, Parsons School of Design, University of Rochester,
Chaminade College, Bail State University
Papers Presentations
IES, IALD, ASHRAE, USCBC, ACEEE, AIA, various programs.
Internet Classes and Webinars
Federal Energy, Management Program (FEMP) Lighting Class
1997-2002
Bonneville Power ETC Program
2013
Focus on Energy Webinars (Wisconsin)
2013, 2014
IES Light Up Philadelphia Conference
2012
NECA Annual Conference, Las Vegas
2012
IES Conference Australia New Zealand, Auckland
2011
lES Conference Australia New Zealand, Queenstown, Keynote Address
2008
International Daylighting Conference, Bilbao
2007
Trade Commission of Spain, Barcelona
2005
IES Annual Conference, Keynote Address
1997
Agreement No. 5981
MEMBERSHIPS
Illuminating Engineering Society (I2S)
1975-2017
Fellow Emeritus
20161pesent
Board ofFellows (Chair 2OO7)
2003-2007
l994'1998
Airport Lighting Committee
2014
ASHRAEAED[Schools
2005'2007
Technical review committee
2007
Spectral effects committee
1998'2002
ASHRA0E690.1 representative
1992-1997
Elected Fellow
1991
Energy Management committee
1983-2008
Health Care Committee
1979-1903
Chair, annual meeting program committee
1985,
Annual conference papers
1975,1983,I010
Elected member
1975
International Association of Lighting Designers (|ALD)
1987-2017
Fellows Selection Committee
2010-2012
Elected Fellow
2005
Special presidential citation
2003
LightFairManagement Board
2002-2004
M[(}LP8uand
2002-2003
Member ofBoard, Director ofExternal Affairs
2002-2003
Member ofBoard, Director u/Education
2001
LightFairProgram Committee
1998-2001
Elected Professional Member
1987
International Dark Sky Association ({DA)
2001'2017
Chair, Model Lighting Ordinance Task Force
2001'2017
Chair, Technical Committee
2013'2015
Board nfDirectors
2001-2015
Treasurer
200-209
Technical Committee
2001-2012
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
Member, SPC 189.1
2009'2010
Member SPC 9U.1
1992'1997
AEDGSchou|s
2005'2007
High Efficiency Buildings Conference Paper presenter
2010,2012
USGreen Buildings Council (UGGBC)
2002'2012
Institute ufElectrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE)
2005'2009
National Council onQualifications for the Lighting Professions (N[LQP)
Chairman, Examination Committee
2000
Chairman, Test Committee
1907-1999
Member, organizing committee
1995'1996
Lighting Certified
1998'2010
General Electric Consumer Advisory Council (GE CAC)
2001-2012
California Energy Commission (CE[)
Advanced Lighting Professional Advisory Committee
1907'1994
Advanced Lighting Advisory Committee
1993'1998
Agreement No. 5981
PUBLICATIONS
Books (Author and Co -Author)
Lighting Design Basics Second Edition, Wiley
2012
Lighting Retrofits and Relighting, Wiley
2071
Lighting Design Basics Wiley
2004
Lighting Fundamentals, EP0
1997
Lighting Retrofit Handbook, EPR|
1997
Day|iQhtingFundamentals, EPD|
1998
Lighting Controls: Patterns for Design, EPR|
1996
Contributing Editor and Author
Advanced Lighting Guidelines, California Energy Commission 1990,1993
Advanced Lighting Guidelines, New Buildings Institute 2001,2083,2009
Lighting Controls Patterns for Design, EPR| 1997
Author and Columnist
Designing Lighting Magazine
Current
Architectural Lighting Magazine
7988'1992
Architectural Record Magazine
1992-1997
Architectural Lighting Magazine
2801-2015
0}o&,Anchi0eck/ral Lighting
2008'2009
Lighting Design and Application
Centennial Edition
Building Design and Construction
Guest Columnist
Metropolis Magazine
Guest Columnist
Articles and papers
Architectural Lighting
62articles and columns
Architectural Record
16articles and columns
Progressive Architecture
1 article
Building Operating Management
3artides
Better Bricks Website
4artideo
E[&M(McGraw Hill)
2artides
Building Design and Construction
2 articles
Published White Papers
Lighting Calculations Using LED, [reeWebsite 2011
GaN on GaN LED Terhno|ogy, S(JRAA \Nesbite 2012
REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICA"r[ONS
Professional Engineer, California 12078 1984'present
Professional Engineer, Michigan 24679 1977'1984
Class AEnergy Auditor, Iowa 1978
Certified Lighting Efficiency Professional ([LEP) 1992-1995
Lighting Certified (N[QLP) 1998-2010
Agreement No. 5981
F
2020 IES Distinguished Service Award
2019 IES San Francisco IES Mel Cohn Award
2018 International Illumination Design Award of Excellence, ASID HEADQUARTERS
2013 Edison Award for Environmental Design, REDDING SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS
2011 Edison Award for Environmental Design, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA SiXTH STREET HOUSING
2008 The Edison Award, SACRAMENTO MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM
2008 Edison Award for Environmental Design, SACRAMENTO MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM
2002 Edison Award for Environmental Design, LEWIS AND CLARK LAW LIBRARY
1996 Award of Merit, IL FORNAIO PORTLAND
1992 Award of Merit, ESPRIT DE CORP
1989 Award of Exceilence, RUSS BUILDING
1989 Award of Excellence, BANK OF THE WEST
1989 Award of Merit, BROWN AND BAIN
1984 The Edison Award, FRANCO FERINi
2008 Guth Award of Merit and Lumen Award, SiDWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL
2003 Guth Award of Merit, WEST LiNN LIBRARY
2003 Guth Award of Merit, SYMANTEC SPRINGFIELD
2003 Guth Award of Merit, LEWIS AND CLARK LAW LIBRARY
2000 Guth Award of Merit, THE HOTEL PAT -FEE
2000 Guth Award of Merit, THE STREET OF DREAMS
1997 Guth Award of Merit, HARRAH'S MARDI GRAS CASINO
1996 Guth Award of Merit, CITY OF PHOENIX STREET LIGHTING
1995 Guth Award of Merit, PALACE CASINO
1994 Guth Award of Merit, CITY OF MEMPHIS TROLLEY AND MAIN STREET
1993 Guth Award of Merit, ESPRIT DE CORP
1993 Guth Award of Merit and EPRi Efficiew,,:y Award, BEECH RESIDENCE
1992 Guth Award of Merit, STANFORD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
1991 Guth Award of Merit, WOLF RESIDENCE/MARIN DESIGNERS SHOWCASE
1991 Guth Award of Merit, THE RESORTA'G SQUAW CREEK
1991 Guth Award of Merit, THE MARIN CIVIC CENTER
1990 Guth Award of Merit, HILLSBOROUGH RESIDENCE
1989 Guth Award of Merit, EMBASSY SUITES KAANAPALi, MAUI
1988 International Illumination Design Award of Excellence, ST. MARY'S CATHEDRAL
1987 Guth Award of Merit, PAN PACIFIC LIGHTING EXPOSITION
1987 Guth Award of Merit, FRANCO FERINI
1986 Guth Award of Merit, RESIDENCE IN MARIN
1984 Guth Award of Merit, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVICES OF DETROIT
1984 Guth Award of Merit, AYLA FOR MEN
1981 Guth Award of Merit, ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2012 Beyond Green !donor Award - First Place for a New Academic Complex, REDDING SCHOOL
FOR THE ARTS
2012 Design Excellence Award, AiA Educational Facility Design Awards, REDDING SCHOOL FOR
THE ARTS
2011 Beyond Green Advanced Building Citation, PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
2011 Design Excellence Award, Community Facilities, HAVEN FOR HOPE
2009 AIA COTE Top Ten, THE CHARTWELL SCHOOL
2006 AIA COTE Top Terri, THE SIDWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL
Agreement No. 5981
2004 L4L[)Presidential Special Service Citation
2003 Better Bricks Professional SemiceyFinstRunncsUp
2003 |ALOInternational Lighting Design Awards Special Citation, SYMANTE[
1998 NA Award, Archbectore+[mergyProgram
1995 L6Department ofTransportation and Endowment for the Arts
Design for Transportation Award ofMerit
7994 |ESNAPresidential Citation
1990 {ESNASouth Pacific Coast Vice'Pre*ident'sAward
1990 Halo/ASID First Place Commercial, BANK (]FTHE WEST
1980 Michigan Governor's Award
1976 Electrical Consultant Energy Efficiency Design Award
HIGH PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENT BUILDINGS INCLUDING KEED
Double Platinum LEEDand WELL, A8D Headquarters, Washington D[
(3)Zero Net Energy Buildings (Fort HuachucaColonel Smith Middle School, Redding School for the
Arts, the Chartwell School)
(15) LEED Platinum Buildings
(1) WELL Platinum Building
(2O)LEEDGold Buildings
(lG) LEEDSilver and Qualified Buildings
PATENTS
8SU2480(2DlJ)for u complex lighting control system that choreographs theUohhngcfenvinonments
and apparel, with emphasis onLED's.
20080005044 (2008) for an electronic signaling system to reduce power demand in buildings,
CONTACT &NFORMA"rKON
James RBenya
Design Services, Inc.
Dba BENYA OURNETT[ONSULTANCY
SOl Fillmore Court
Davis, CA 95616
Cell/SMS +l (503) 519-9631
Relevant Experience
Jason has over 20 years of experience in traffic engineering and
transportation planning. He has worked with clients in Orange, Los Angeles,
Riverside, and San Diego counties to complete traffic impact studies and
perform the technical analysis for a variety of transportation planning
projects: parking studies, transit analysis, site plan reviews, and circulation
studies. His traffic engineering experience includes traffic signal design,
signing and striping, traffic control, street lighting, and signal interconnect and
ITS design plans. He has acted as in-house staff for the cities of Industry,
Irvine, Huntington Beach, and Moreno Valley to review development studies
and design plans. Jason also has experience working with a variety of traffic
engineering software programs and computer design packages. He has used
the different software applications to analyze operations at intersections,
arterial corridors, grade separations, and freeway ramp projects. He has used
the simulation toot to present at public and agency meetings then - then
1521 E. Grand Ave/330 Kansas St Trip Generation and VMT Study, El Segundo, CA - Project Manager
Manhattan Beach Hotel Traffic and VMT Study, Manhattan Beach, CA- Project Manager
Newport Village Traffic and VMT Study, Newport Beach, CA - Project Manager
City of Anaheim, On -Call Planning and Engineering, Anaheim, CA - Project Manager
City of Cypress, On -Call Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services, Cypress, CA - Project
Engineer
City of Buena Park, Traffic Flow Improvement Study of Artesia Boulevard from I -S to Beach Boulevard,
Buena Park, CA - Designer
City of Artesia, Local Roadway Safety Plan, Artesia, CA - Project Engineer
City of Temple City, TIA for Las Tunas Drive Improvement, Temple City, CA - Project Manager
City of Industry, On -Call Traffic and Civil Engineering Services, Industry, CA - Project Manager
City of Chino, On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, Chino, CA - Project Engineer
County of Riverside, On -Call Services Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Review Services,
Riverside County, CA -Project Engineer
Riverside County Transportation District, Horizontal Curve Assessment, Riverside County, CA - Project
Engineer
City of Moreno Valley, On -Call Review Services, Moreno Valley, CA - Project Engineer
City of Santa Ana, On -Call Engineering Services, Santa Ana, CA - Project Manager
County of imperial, Systemic Safety Analysis Report for Varied Roadways, El Centro, CA - Project
Engineer
City of La Quinta, Engineering Services for the Preparation of a Systemic Safety Analysis Report, La
Quinta, CA - QC/QA Reviewer
City of Santa Clarita, Citywide Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions Systemic Safety Analysis
Report Project, Santa Clarita, CA - Project Engineer
Professional Credentials
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine
Professional Engineer in California #C65218
Relevant Experience
Eirm!"11! so
Serine is a senior transportation planner and project manager with more than
33 years of experience in transportation planning, traffic impact studies,
parking evaluation studies, transportation demand management practices,
and environmental impact projects. In performing these studies, Serine has
worked effectively and successfully with community groups. She is very skilled
in presenting issues and options on complex and controversial projects to a
variety of audiences. Serine has extensive experience in analyzing traffic
impacts and developing solutions for impact mitigation. Serine has also
managed numerous large-scale traffic impact studies involving extensive data
collection and analysis of numerous intersections and roadway segments.
City of EI Segundo, On -Call Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services, EI Segundo, CA —
Project Manager
City of EI Segundo, Circulation Element Update, EI Segundo, CA— Project Planner
City of EI Segundo, Circulation Element/General Plan Update, El Segundo, CA— Project Manager
City of EI Segundo, Douglas Street Gap Closure, EI Segundo, El Segundo, CA — Project Manager
City of EI Segundo, EI Segundo Traffic Mitigation Fee Update, El Segundo, CA— Project Manager
City of Cypress, Circulation Element, General Plan Update, EIR and Traffic Mitigation Fee Update,
Cypress, CA — Project Manager
City of Cypress, On -Call Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services, Cypress, CA — Project
Manager
Residence Inn, Traffic and Parking Analysis, Cypress, CA— Project Planner
City of Cerritos, Circulation Element/General Plan Update, Cerritos, CA — Project Planner
City of Temple City, TIA for Las Tunas Drive Improvement, Temple City, CA — QC/QA Reviewer
City of Fullerton, General Plan Update and Modeling, Fullerton, CA — Project Manager
City of Placentia, Circulation Element/General Plan Update and EIR, Placentia, CA — Project Manager
City of Santa Ana, On -Call Engineering Services, Santa Ana, CA — QC/QA Reviewer
City of Huntington Beach, Parking/Traffic Consulting Services to Amend the Downtown Parking
Master Plan, Huntington Beach, CA — Project Manager
Professional Credentials
Bachelor of Science, Mass Communications, Syracuse University
American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #099177